Skip to main content

Full text of "Investigation of un-American propaganda activities in the United States. Hearings before a Special Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Seventy-fifth Congress, third session-Seventy-eighth Congress, second session, on H. Res. 282, to investigate (l) the extent, character, and objects of un-American propaganda activities in the United States, (2) the diffusion within the United States of subversive and un-American propaganda that is instigated from foreign countries or of a domestic origin and attacks the principle of the form of government as guaranteed by our Constitution, and (3) all other questions in relation thereto that would aid Congress in any necessary remedial legislation"

See other formats


r^ 


t 


jitStAt.  Hall  Ust  Only 


FROM    THE 

FRANK  CLEMENT  FUND 


dn 


^ 


FN    978  :   4.23.40:   300 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN 

PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE 

UNITED  STATES 

HEARINGS 

BEFOEB  A 

SPECIAL 

COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 
HOUSE  OE  REPRESENTATIVES 

SEVENTY-SEVENTH  CONGEESS 

FIRST  SESSION 

ON 


H.  Res.  282 


"*/ 


TO  INVESTIGATE  (1)  THE  EXTENT,  CHARACTER,  AND  OBJECTS 
OF  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED 
STATES,  (2)  THE  DIFFUSION  WITHIN  THE  UNITED  STATES  OF 
SUBVERSIVE  AND  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  THAT  IS  INSTI- 
GATED FROM  FOREIGN  COUNTRIES  OR  OF  A  DOMESTIC  ORIGIN 
AND  ATTACKS  THE  PRINCIPLE  OF  THE  FORM  OF  GOVERN- 
MENT AS  GUARANTEED  BY  OUR  CONSTITUTION,  AND  (3)  ALL 
OTHER  QUESTIONS  IN  RELATION  THERETO  THAT  WOULD  AID 
CONGRESS  IN  ANY  NECESSARY  REMEDIAL 
LEGISLATION 

J 


VOLUME  14 

AUGUST  29,  OCTOBER  1,  2,  4,  1940 ;  MAY  21,  22,  26,  27,  29 
JUNE  10,  12,  AUGUST  11,  1941 


Printed  for  the  use  of  the  Special  Committee  on  Uii-Amorioan  Activities 


I 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN 

PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE 

UNITED  STATES 

HEARINGS 

BEFORE  A 

SrECIAL 

COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 

HOUSE  OF  EEPRESENTATIYES 

SEVENTY-SEVENTH  CONGRESS 

FIRST  SESSION 
ON 

H.  Res.  282 

TO  INVESTIGATE  (1)  THE  EXTENT,  CHARACTER,  AND  OBJECTS 
OF  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED 
STATES,  (2)  THE  DIFFUSION  A\"ITHIN  THE  UNITED  STATES  OF 
SUBVERSIVE  AND  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  THAT  IS  INSTI- 
GATED FROIM  FOREIGN  COUNTRIES  OR  OF  A  DOMESTIC  ORIGIN 
AND  ATTACKS  THE  PRINCIPLE  OF  THE  FORM  OF  GOVERN- 
MENT AS  GUARANTEED  BY  OUR  CONSTITUTION,  AND  (3 1  ALL 
OTHER  QLT:STI0NS  IN  RELATION  THERETO  THAT  WOULD  AID 
CONGRESS  IN  ANY  NECESSARY  REMEDIAL 
LEGISLATION 


VOLUME  14 

AUGUST  29,  OCTOBER  1,  2,  4,  1940;  MAY  21,  22,  26.  27,  29 
JUNE  10,  12,  AUGUST  11,  1941 


Printed  for  the  use  of  the  Special  Committee  on  LTn-American  Activities 


UNITED    STATES 
GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 
62626  WASHINGTON   :    3  941 


fj 


'  r 


H^'^  o-r-         <^ 


MAR  2.7  1944 


U- 


SPECIAL  COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES- 

Washington,  D.  C. 

MARTIN  DIES,  Texas,  Chairman 

JOE  STARNES,  Alabama  HARRY  P.  BEAM,  Illinois 

JERRY  VOORHIS,  California  NOAH  M.  MASON,  lllicois 

JOSEPH  E.  CASEY,  Massachusetts  J.  PARNELL  THOMAS,  New  Jersey 

Robert  E.  Stripling,  Chief  Investigator 
J.  B.  Matthews,  Director  of  Research 
II 


4   *      a   « 

1 •     •••   • 


CONTENTS 


Pas* 

Apergis,  Vera 8616 

Api  leby.  Walter  M 8232 

Ba.l  y,    Fred    E 8569 

Balint,  Alex 85j7,  8614 

Baluiiek,    Ardrew 8619 

Barker,  Robert  B 8640 

Bell,  Artliiir   H 8307 

Birmiiighim,  Srephen  W 8617,8812 

BolUng.  Jav  Edward 8586 

Bvoir,   Lt.  Carl 8210 

Cowau,  C.  B , 8623 

Crczier,  Oscar  C 8575 

Franklin,  Richard  K 8558 

Freitag,  Elmer 8594 

H  ilMier.   Otto 8318 

Huff.nan.    Hazel 8391,  8417,  8421,  8  57 

Inzer,   Hugh    B^n 8532 

Klapprott,    August 8285 

K.'ebs,  Richard 8479,  8509 

Kunze,  Gerhard  Wilhelm , 8251 

Lamb,    Edward 8612 

Michener,  Lew 8595 

Mosberger.  John  M 8639 

Batman,    Wright 8164,  8198,  8226 

R^es,  Herman  A 8323 

Schmidt,    Godfrey 8826 

Spargo,   Mary 8404,  8436,  8443 

S^ewprt,  Joseph   W 8251 

S  ripling.   R-ibert   E 8645 

Werner,   Richard  W 8331 

Young,  Rev.  A.  M S31S 

rn 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMEEICAN  PROPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


THURSDAY,   AUGUST   29,    1940 

House  of  Representatives, 
Special  Committee  to  Investigate 

Un-American  Activities, 

Washington,  D.  0. 

The  committee  met  at  10  o'clock  a.  m.,  the  Honorable  Martin  Dies 
(chairman),  presiding. 

Present:  Hon.  Joseph  E.  Casey  of  Massachusetts,  Hon.  Noah  M. 
Mason  of  Illinois. 

Also  present:  J.  B.  Matthews,  director  of  research  for  the  com- 
mittee; Brien  McMahon,  Esq.,  counsel  representing  Lt.  Carl  Byoir. 

The  Chairman.  The  committee  will  come  to  order,  please. 

Because  of  the  absence  of  a  quorum  the  Chair  will  designate  him- 
self and  the  gentleman  from  Massachusetts,  Mr.  Casey,  and  the 
gentleman  from  Illinois,  Mr.  Mason,  as  a  subcommittee  for  the  pur- 
pose of  hearing  Congressman  Wright  Patman,  and  also  for  the  purpose 
of  hearing  Mr.  Carl  Byoir. 

As  is  known,  several  months  ago  the  Chair  appointed  a  subcom- 
mittee, composed  of  Mr.  Dempsey  of  New  Mexico,  Mr.  Mason  of 
Illinois,  and  Mr.  Casey  of  Massachusetts,  to  hear  and  investigate 
certain  charges  made  by  Mr.  Patman  with  reference  to  Mr.  Carl 
Byoir. 

The  com.m.ittee  had  one  of  its  investgators  go  into  the  matter,  and 
a  report  was  filed  by  this  investigator. 

This  report,  together  with  a  report  of  the  F.  B.  I.,  was  considered, 
as  I  understand,  by  the  subcom.mittee. 

Since  the  Chair  was  not  present,  he  will  call  on  one  of  the  gentlemen 
here  on  the  subcom.m.ittee  to  make  a  more  com.plete  statement  with 
reference  to  the  m.atter 

Mr.  Mason,  I  will  call  on  you. 

Mr.  Mason.  Mr.  Chairm.an,  in  suro.m.arizing  the  situation  to  date 
in  this  m.atter,  I  would  say  that  cer*;ain  charges  were  made  on  the 
floor  of  the  House  by  Congressm.an  Patm.an  against  Air.  Carl  Byoir 
that  would  tend  to  give  the  im.pression  that  Air.  Byoir  was  un-Ameri- 
can and  that  certain  activities  in  the  past,  and  perhaps  the  present, 
would  indicate  so. 

Mr.  Byoir  first  requested  of  the  Dies  com.m.ittee  that  the  com.mittee 
go  into  the  m.atter  as  to  charges  m.ade  against  hun,  in  full,  check  on  liis 
past,  go  over  all  of  his  accounts,  and 

The  Chairman  (interposing).  That  part  is  true.  But  it  should  be 
stated  also  that  Mr.  Patm.an  first  m.ade  the  request  that  the  matter 
be  investigated.     Mr.  Byoir  made  the  request  also  later. 

8163 


8164  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Mason.  All  right. 

Our  investigator,  Mr.  Stedman,  made  an  investigation,  quite  an 
elaborate  investigation,  a  thorough  one,  and  brought  a  report  to  our 
committee — that  is,  the  full  com.m.ittee — and  the  F.  B.  I.  had  also 
made  an  investigation  of  Mr.  Carl  Byoir,  and  also  had  in  its  files  a 
report  on  the  matter. 

So  that  when  your  subcommittee  was  appointed,  consisting  of  Mr. 
Dempsey,  as  chairman,  Mr.  Casey,  and  myself,  to  take  this  matter 
up  we  had  available  the  files  of  our  investigator,  Mr.  Stedman,  and 
the  files  of  the  F.  B.  I.  Your  subcommittee  went  over  the  files  with 
the  investigator  quite  thoroughly  and  conscientiously,  and  also, 
through  the  Department  of  Justice,  the  files  of  the  F.  B.  I.,  and  as 
a  result  of  that  careful  investigation  your  subcommittee  made  the 
following  report  in  this  matter: 

The  subcommittee  you  appointed  to  investigate  the  un-American  activity 
charges  made  against  Mr.  Carl  Byoir,  after  carefully  going  over  the  report  of  our 
special  investigator,  Mr.  Stedman,  and  also  after  consulting  the  files  of  the 
F.  B.  I.  in  the  case,  find  nothing  to  justify  the  charges  made,  nor  any  evidence  that 
could  possibly  form  a  basis  for  such  charges. 

We,  therefore,  find  satisfaction  in  clearing  Mr.  Carl  Byoir  of  the  charges  made 
against  him,  and  recommend  that  a  resolution  covering  a  complete  exoneration  of 
Mr.  Byoir  be  voted  by  the  full  committee  as  soon  as  possible,  such  resolution 
to  be  based  upon  this  subcommittee  report. 

We  also  believe,  in  fairness  to  Mr.  Bj'oir,  immediate  publicity  should  be  given 
to  the  subcomznittee's  findings. 

Signed  by  John  C.  Dempsey,  chairman;  Joseph  Casey,  and  N.  M» 
Mason . 

The  Chairman.  The  Chair  wishes  to  make  the  statement  that 
Mr.  Patman  was  assured  by  the  Chair  that  he  would  have  an  oppor- 
tunity to  be  heard,  and  present  any  facts  or  any  information  which 
he  had,  and  that  this  was  in  accordance  with  the  practice  that  we 
have  heretofore  engaged  in,  and  that  the  committee  intended  to  go 
into  this  matter  fully  and  hear  all  evidence  that  we  could  obtain  on 
the  subject  matter. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  do  not  think  the  subcommittee  was  aware  of  that 
assurance  given  by  the  Chair,  Mr.  Chairman. 

The  Chairman.  I  do  not  recall  about  that  fact, 

Mr.  Mason.  But  I  think  it  is  perfectly  proper  that  such  assurance 
should  be  given,  and  that  before  action  of  the  full  com.mittee  on  this 
report  of  the  subcommittee  be  taken  that  should  be  done. 

The  Chairman.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Casey.  Then  we  can  go  ahead? 

The  Chairman.  That  is  right.  Does  that  clarify  the  situation  for 
the  sake  of  the  record? 

(No  reponse.) 

The  Chairman.  All  right,  Mr.  Patman,  will  you  please  come 
around?     Will  you  raise  your  right  hand  and  be  sworn,  please? 

HON.  WRIGHT  PATMAN,  A  REPRESENTATIVE  IN  CONGRESS  FROM 

THE  STATE  OF  TEXAS 

(The  witness  was  duly  sworn  by  the  chairman.) 

The  Chairman.  All  right,  Mr.  Patman. 

Mr,  Patman.  Mr.  Chairman,  knowing  the  fairness  of  the  Members 
of  the  House,  and  the  reputation  for  fairness  of  Mr.  Mason  and  Mr. 
Casey  in  particular,  I  feel  like  that  they  will  lay  aside  any  convictions 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8165 

thoy  have  had  in  this  matter  in  the  past,  and  start  anew  m  its  considera- 
tion. I  presume  that  is  true.  If  it  is  not  true  I  do  not  feel  hke  going 
ahead. 

On  a  committee  of  three,  two  of  them,  Mr.  Mason  and  Mr.  Casey, 
have  gone  on  record  as  being  opposed  to  what  I  am  going  to  say,  and 
exonerated  this  man. 

The  Chairman.  Mr.  Patman,  the  answer  can  be  made  to  that  by 
these  gentlemen  by  saying  that  they  were  basing  their  decision  on  the 
evidence  that  tliej'  had  before  them  at  the  time. 

Mr.  Patman.  At  that  time? 

The  Chairman.  They  had  the  report  of  the  investigator,  Mr. 
Stedman,  and  the  report  of  the  F.  B.  I. 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes. 

The  Chairman.  Now,  if  there  is  evidence  in  addition  to  that  of 
course  these  gentlemen  will  be  governed  by  the  new  evidence.  I  do 
not  have  any  authority  to  speak  for  them. 

Mr.  Casey.  Tiiere  is  no  question  about  that  in  my  mind. 

Mr.  Mason.  However,  Mr.  Chairman,  having  gone  over  all  the 
evidence  available,  and  having  found  on  that  evidence  a  judgment 
conclusion,  it  will  be  necessary  before  I  change  my  mind  that  additional 
evidence  shall  be  adduced  which  would  at  least  change  the  situation 
insofar  as  the  evidence  that  we  have  gone  over  is  concerned. 

The  Chairman.  That  is  what  Mr.  Patman  proposes  to  do. 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes.  Of  course,  that  places  quite  a  burden  on  me, 
and  ordinarily  one  occupying  Mr.  Mason's  position  would  not  be 
qualified  for  jury  service,  but  I  am  perfectly  willing  to  trust  the 
gentleman. 

The  Chairman.  I  think  Mr.  Patman  should  have  the  opportunity, 
first  as  a  Member  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  and  then  his 
responsibility  as  a  citizen,  as  well  as  a  Member  of  the  House  of  Repre- 
sentatives, to  be  heard,  as  he  is  making  certain  statements  and  charges 
here,  and  I  am  sure  the  committee  has  every  disposition  and  desire  to 
hear  what  you  have  to  say,  because  it  is  our  duty  to  receive  informa- 
tion, and  we  are  glad  to  give  you  the  opportunity  to  proceed. 

Mr.  Patman.  All  right,  Mr.  Chairman;  I  appreciate  the  opportunity 
you  have  given  me  for  a  hearing. 

Regarding  Mr.  Mason's  statement  that  he  was  probably  influenced 
in  some  way  by  the  F.  B.  I.  report,  the  F.  B.  I.  could  only  investigate 
one  thing,  and  that  was  whether  or  not  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  had 
registered  according  to  the  law  as  representing  a  foreign  principal. 
And  of  course  they  failed  to  find  that  since  1938,  when  that  law  was 
passed,  that  he  had  violated  the  law.  So  any  exoneration  of  the 
F.  B.  I.  is  necessarily  restricted  to  that  one  point  only. 

The  charges  that  I  made  on  the  floor  of  the  House,  and  the  charges 
which  I  feel  confident  that  I  can  sustain  before  this  committee,  were 
that  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  was  guilty  of  un-American  activities. 

I  realize,  gentlemen,  that  is  quite  a  serious  charge,  and  I  do  not 
make  charges  unless  I  have  what  I  consider  to  be  adequate  and 
sufficient  proof  to  sustain  those  charges. 

It  will  be  remembered — of  coiu-se,  gentlemen,  I  hope  you  bear  with 
me,  and  are  patient  with  me,  and  will  indulge  me  for  the  reason  that  I 
have  a  greater  burden  now  than  I  would  ordinarily  have  by  reason  of 
the  fact  that  this  subcommittee,  which  I  mentioned,  passed  on  it, 
although  I  was  not  heard,  and  so  there  has  been  a  prejudgment  of  the 
subcommittee,  and  that  will  necessitate  my  going  into  the  matter  lq 


8166  UN-AMERiaysr  propaganda  activities 

greater  detail  and  possibly  at  greater  length  than  would  ordinarily  be 
necessary,  and  I  hope  you  will  be  very  patient  with  me  regardmg  this 
matter. 

I  have  no  feeling  in  tliis  matter.  I  am  an  American  citizen,  a 
Member  of  Congress,  and  I  have  information  which  comes  to  me,  and 
I  feel  like  it  is  my  duty  to  present  it  to  the  right  people  if  anyone  is 
guilty  of  conduct  that  an  American  citizen  should  not  be  guilty  of  and 
he  occupies  a  position  in  our  armed  forces  that  will  possibly  permit 
him  to  have  a  great  deal  to  do  with  the  enforcement  of  the  conscription 
law  when  it  is  passed,  and  if  it  does  pass,  or  the  voluntary  system  in 
the  event  the  conscription  law  does  not  pass,  and  I  think  it  is  a  matter 
of  serious  and  great  importance.  And  I  suggest  to  you  that  if  this 
man,  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir,  had  been  guilty  of  the  same  thing,  as  I 
believe  he  was  guilty  of  in  time  of  peace,  if  he  had  been  guilty  of  it  in 
time  of  war  I  believe  he  would  have  been  guilty  of  treason.  Of 
course,  that  is  a  pretty  serious  charge  to  make.  And  I  believe  before 
I  am  finished  you  will  see  I  am  100  percent  correct,  and  there  is  no 
doubt  about  it. 

Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  was  hired  to  disseminate  Nazi  propaganda, 
including  anti-Semitic  and  church  and  State  propaganda. 

January  30,  1933,  Hitler  became  Chancellor  of  Germany. 

Before  I  go  further.  Lieutenant  Byoir  as  a  lieutenant  colonel  was 
not  promoted  from  the  ranks,  but  he  was  just  picked  out  and  made  a 
lieutenant  colonel. 

In  1931  it  shows  that  he  went  into  the  specialist  reserves,  and  he  is 
carried  in  the  specialist  reserves  of  the  United  States  Army  Reserves 
right  now. 

In  less  than  18  months  from  the  time  he  was  appointed  lieutenant 
colonel  Hitler  became  Chancellor  of  Germany  on  January  30,  1933, 
and  very  soon  thereafter  there  was  an  immediate  new  life  taken  on  by 
German  organizations  in  America  to  sell  new  Germany  to  American 
people  and  make  them  crave  a  dictatorship  under  Hitler  instead  of  a 
democracy,  the  kind  we  had. 

Mr.  Byoir  was  a  propagandist,  in  addition  to  being  a  lieutenant 
colonel  in  the  Army  Reserves,  with  offices  in  New  York,  and  he  was 
employed  by  the  German  consul,  Kiep,  in  New  York  at  that  time,  and 
within  60  days  after  Hitler  became  chancellor  was  paid  $4,000  in  cash, 
in  bills  to  represent  the  German  consul  in  distributing  certain  litera- 
ture, which  was  anti-Semitic  literature. 

The  Chairman.  You  say  he  was  paid  $4,000  cash,  in  bills? 

Mr.  Patman.  In  cash,  in  bills. 

The  Chairman.  Was  any  explanation  given  as  to  why  the  payment 
was  made  in  cash? 

Mr.  Patman.  No;  I  do  not  know  of  any  explanation.  I  know  that 
Mr.  McCormack,  the  chairman  of  a  committee,  at  one  time  looked 
into  this,  and  partially  made  some  statement  about  it,  and  here  is 
what  he  said.  Mr.  Raymond  Moley  was  on  the  witness  stand,  and  the 
chairman,  Mr.  John  W.  McCormack,  asked  Mr.  Moley  this  question: 

The  Chairman.  There  was  authentic  evidence  produced  at  the  Washington 
hearings,  both  testimony  and  documents,  in  the  case  of  the  former  German  consul, 
Kiep,  paying  $4,000  for  propaganda  directed  against  people  in  this  country, 
whether  citizens  or  not,  because  of  tlieir  race.  Have  you  any  opinion  that  you 
desire  to  express  as  to  the  propriety  of  such  actions? 


UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8167 

To  which  Mr.  Moley  replied: 

Mr.  Moley.  I  think  it  is  thoroughly  improper  to  do  any  such  subsidizing  of 
any  movement  in  the  United  States  of  that  character  by  anyone  who  is  a  German 
citizen,  and  particularly  so  when  he  occupies  an  official  position. 

Now,  at  that  time  Mr.  McConnack  did  not  know  that  this  man, 
Mr.  Carl  Byoir,  was  a  lieutenant  colonel  in  the  Army,  and  had  he 
known  that  he  would  have  known  there  were  two  people  who  were 
doing  something  that  the  American  people  would  frown  on.  First, 
one  from  a  foreign  country  coming  in  and  trying  to  dictate  our  affairs, 
and  another  was  to  employ  one  who  occupies  an  important  position 
in  our  armed  forces. 

Mr.  Casey.  Mr.  Patman,  you  said  Mr.  McCormack  did  not  know 
that  Mr.  Byoir  was  a  lieutenant  colonel? 

Mr.  Patman.  No;  he  did  not  know  it. 

Mr.  Casey.  And  he  did  not  say  that  Mr.  Byoir  received  $4,000, 
did  he? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  know;  but  I  now  refer  to  that  testimony  in  Wash- 
ington which  shows  that  Mr.  Byoir  did  get  the  money. 

Mr.  Casey.  \Miat  testimony  is  that,  Mr.  Patman? 

Mr.  Patman.  The  testimony  before  the  committee  here  in  Wash- 
ington. Before  I  finish,  Mr.  Casey,  I  believe  you  will  be  thoroughly 
convinced  on  that  point,  if  that  is  the  only  thing  that  is  bothering  you. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  wanted  that  cleared  up. 

Mr.  Patman.  In  the  spring  of  1933  Byoir  was  employed  by  the 
German  Tourist  Information  Office,  and  received  $2,000  and  $3,000  a 
month  for  distributing  literature,  which  I  consider,  and  I  believe  the 
members  of  the  McCormack  committee  considered,  to  be  prejudicial 
to  our  form  of  government. 

George  Sylvester  Vierick,  a  noted  propagandist  for  Kaiser  Wilhelm 
in  the  World  War,  and  who  said  that  he  was  ashamed  of  America, 
went  to  German}'  in  August  1933  to  obtain  a  contract  for  Carl  Byoir 
to  represent  Hitler  in  Ainerica. 

Mr.  Carl  Dickey,  one  of  the  two  partners  of  Byoir's,  was  also  in 
Germany  at  that  time. 

Now,  while  Vierick  was  there  in  Germany  he  discussed  the  matter 
with  Hitler  himself,  and  obtained  the  promise  of  a  contract  for  Carl 
Byoir,  which  was  later  approved  by  the  German  Minister  of  Propa- 
ganda, for  Byoir  to  receive  $6,000  a  month  for  a  period  of  18  months. 

I  am  giving  you  a  summary  of  this,  gentlemen,  for  the  purpose  of 
backing  it  up  with  proof.  I  thought  that  you  gentlemen  would  appre- 
ciate summarizing  the  case  in  advance,  so  that  you  would  know  what 
to  expect,  and  also  to  allow  me  an  opportunity  to  present  to  you  what 
you  require  me  to  present. 

The  Chairman.  May  I  make  a  notation  at  this  time  that  there  is 
now  a  quorum  present,  and  we  are  sitting  as  a  full  committee.  There 
are  present,  Mr.  Casey,  of  Massachusetts;  Mr.  Mason,  of  IlHnois; 
and  Mr.  Voorhis.  of  California,  who  has  just  entered. 

Mr.  Mason.  May  I  ask  a  question,  Mr.  Chairman? 

The  Chairman.  Yes,  Mr.  Mason. 

Mr.  Mason.  Mr.  Patman,  all  of  this  summary  that  you  are  giving 
is  a  summary  of  what  the  McCormack  committee  went  into  and 
found,  and  upon  which  the}'  made  a  finding,  which  we  had  available 
when  we  went  over  this  matter. 


8168  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

It  adds  notliing  new.  And  unless  you  have  got  new  evidence, 
which  was  not  mchided  in  the  McConnack  committee  testimony,  it 
seems  to  me  this  is  water  over  the  dam,  and  is  past. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  do  not  agree  with  you,  Mr.  Mason. 

Mr.  Mason.  The  McCormack  committee  did  not  find  this  man 
guilty  of  un-American  activities. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  beg  your  pardon.  The}^  did.  And  if  you  will  let 
me  go  ahead  I  will  convince  you  they  did.  So  there  is  a  difference  of 
opinion  there.  And  I  do  not  think  you  have  read  the  committee 
report  very  carefully. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  was  my  impression,  and  I  went  over  it. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  I  will  give  you  a  different  impression  of  it. 

Now,  wliile  Vierick  was  in  Germany  to  get  this  contract  for  Byoir 
he  discussed  with  Hitler  this  matter,  himself,  and  later  there  was  a 
contract  of  18  months,  which  was  to  extend  from  October  1933  but 
wliich  was  changed  November  23,  1933,  providing  that  Byoir  would 
be  paid  $6,000  a  month,  or  $108,000  in  all,  and  certain  expenses,  when 
he  incurred  certain  expenses,  in  connection  with  tliis  work  that  he  was 
engaged  to  do,  and  also  trips  to  Germany  and  back  in  the  event  it 
was  necessary  to  send  people  there. 

Therefore,  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  became  the  highest  paid 
German  representative  of  the  German  Government  in  America. 

In  Hitler's  book.  My  Battle,  he  said  this:  That  the  masses  must  be 
misled  in  order  to  be  led.  That  fits  in  with  his  then  Minister  of 
Propaganda,  Goebbels,  who  said:  "Propaganda  knows  neither  right 
nor  wrong,  neither  truth  nor  falsehood,  but  only  what  it  wants." 

Col.  Edwin  Emerson,  of  New  York,  was  named  the  Nazi  Party's 
representative  in  America  about  the  same  time  that  Byoir  was  given 
a  contract,  both  by  the  German  Consul  in  New  York  and  by  the 
German  Tourist  Information  Office,  which  was  nothing  more  than  a 
bund  for  the  purpose  of  disseminating  Nazi  propaganda  in  America. 

The  Nazis  commenced  in  dead  earnest  with  such  leaders  as  Lt.  Col. 
Carl  Byoir,  Colonel  Emerson,  Spanknoble,  Schmitz,  and  others,  to 
make  the  American  people  like  Hitler  and  dislike  their  own  form  of 
Government,  the  American  democracy. 

Many  different  organizations  were  formed  and  old  ones  taken  over. 

This  commenced  immediately  after  the  employment  of  Lt.  Col. 
Carl  Byoir. 

"Teutonia"  was  organized.  The  name  did  not  sound  so  good. 
So  they  changed  it  to  the  "Friends  of  New  Germany."  The  people  of 
German  descent  did  not  seem  to  like  that  so  much,  so  they  changed  it 
to  the  "Friends  of  Germany."  And  the  purpose  of  organizing  these 
different  groups  throughout  the  country  was  to  induce  the  German 
people  to  join  and  thereby  assist  Hitler  in  what  he  was  trying  to  do. 
There  was  the  National  Socialistic  German  Party,  the  Steel  Helmets, 
the  Order  of  '76,  Sons  of  '76,  the  bunds  of  the  Friends  of  New  Germany 
and  they  organized  all  of  these  and  many  more  different  kinds  of 
organizations. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  understand  that  Mr.  Patm.an  is  going  to  tie  Mr. 
Byoir  up  with  these  organizations;  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  say  this:  He  was  head  of  publicity  of  all  of  this, 
and  it  was  done  for  the  purpose  of  creating  good  will  for  Germany 
under  the  leadership  of  Feulii-er  Hitler. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8169 

Mr.  Casey.  I  mean  you  are  going  to  show  he  has  some  connection 
with  this? 

Mr.  Patman.  You  woukl  not  expect  that.  He  has  that  proof. 
You  woukl  expect  this  as  a  part  of  the  general  program.  In  other 
words,  if  he  was  a  player  on  Hitler's  team  he  would  have  to  show 
about  this. 

Mr.  Casey.  That  follows  very  well;  I  mean  you  can  get  a  great 
(k'al  of  color  with  3'^ou,  but  I  do  not  see  the  relevancy  if  you  do  not  tie 
hini.  up  with  this. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  I  can  tie  liim  up.  I  think  that  testimony 
would  be  good  in  a  court. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  want  you  to  tie  it  up. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  want  to  do  it  in  m.y  way. 

Mr.  ]Mason.  Of  course,  Mr.  Chairman,  at  that  particular  tim.e  in 
our  State  Dcpartm.cnt  the  whole  set-up  was  engaged  in  relations  to 
m.ake  friendsliip  long  before  this  happened,  long  before  Hitler  began  to 
show  himself,  and  so  the  State  Department  and  other  Departn^ents  of 
the  Government  were  cultivating  friendship  with  the  new  Germany 
at  that  time. 

Mr.  Patman.  Do  you  niean  in  that  anti-Sem.itic  drive? 

Mr.  !Mason.  I  am  not  meaning  any  anti-Sem.itic  drive.  I  am,  m,ean- 
ing  that  our  State  Departm.ent  was  at  that  particular  tim.e  cultivating 
econom.ic,  friendly  relationships  with  the  new  Germany. 

Mr.  Patman.  This  was  not  economic  relations  entirely,  my  dear 
sir. 

The  Chairman.  All  right;  let  us  proceed. 

Mr.  Patman.  Hitler  Youths  was  another  organization,  and  the 
literature  distributed  to  these  children  included  this  statement:  "If 
the  world  at  large  bares  its  teeth  at  Germany,  we  will  smash  it." 

And  it  was  always  carried  on  a  placard. 

Clearl}^  the  main  objective  of  this  group  is  to  breed  soldiers  for  a 
war  in  w^hich  Nazidom  will  conquer  the  world. 

All  got  literature  from  Nazi  Germany,  that  is,  these  different 
organizations,  which  was  distributed.  It  came  over  here  on  the 
steamship  lines,  represented  by  the  very  group  which  employed 
Lieutenant  Colonel  B3'oir.  They  brought  in  literature  at  will  and 
carried  literature  back  at  \vill. 

Party  leaders  in  the  United  States  had  to  have  the  approval  of  party 
leaders  in  Germany. 

All  of  the  steamsliip  employees  in  America  must  belong  to  the 
German  union. 

German  citizens  came  in  and  elected  leaders.  Some  of  them  had 
uniforms  in  some  organization  the  same  as  the  storm  troop  uniforms 
in  Germany. 

One  of  these  organizations  taught  Germans  how  to  fly  at  an 
aviation  field  in  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Casey.  Before  you  leave  Hitler's  Youth  distribution  of 
literature,  have  you  any  evidence  that  Mr.  Byoir  had  any  part  in 
the  distribution  of  that  literature? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  you  will  be  convinced  that  he  was  a  part  of 
the  program,  the  whole  program,  and  in  fact  he  was  the  highest  paid 
representative  of  Hitler  in  America.  And  how  can  he  avoid  respon- 
sibility entirely  for  what  was  done  by  the  groups  who  were  working 
in  the  direction  of  the  same  end  toward  which  he  was  going? 


8170  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Casey.  By  virtue  of  that  you  could  tie  a  man  up  with  any- 
thing. I  mean  if  you  are  going  to  make  a  particular  issue  about 
Hitler  out  of  this,  and  just  say  that  Mr.  Byoir  was  in  general  a  part  of 
the  program,  I  do  not  see  that  is  relevant. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  you  gentlemen  will  be  able  to  cast  aside  that 
part  which  you  consider  material,  and  that  part  which  you  consider 
immaterial. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  think  we  will  be  able  to  do  that  too,  Mr.  Patman. 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  was  just  wondering  if  you  had  anything  more  specific 
than  that  to  tie  up. 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  my  belief. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  was  just  seeking  something. 

The  Chairman.  Let  us  proceed. 

Mr.  Patman.  T  think  I  will  be  able  to  prove  that  Lieutenant 
Colonel  Byoir  had  been  guilty  of  un-American  activities. 

The  Chairman.  Let  us  proceed. 

Mr.  Patman.  In  all  of  these  organizations  members  were  taught 
that  Hitler  was  a  leader  of  German  people  all  over  the  world.  Bales 
of  propaganda  came  in  on  every  ship  from  the  German  propaganda 
office. 

And,  speaking  of  Hitler,  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  prepared  a 
booklet,  Speaking  of  Hitler,  in  his  office,  and  it  was  distributed  over 
the  Nation  to  boost  Hitler  and  the  Nazi  form  of  Government,  and 
most  certainly  it  was  not  anything  to  harm  Hitler.  It  was  some- 
thing which  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  would  not  have  sent  out  or 
the  Nazis  would  not  have  had  sent  out  if  that  had  been  the  case. 

Mr.  Casey.  What  was  that  name  again? 

Mr.  Patman.  Speaking  of  Hitler. 

Mr,  Casey.  Hnve  you  a  copy  of  it? 

Mr.  Patman.  No;  I  wired  for  it,  and  it  was  not  available  at  any 
place.  But  I  have  seen  soro.e  references  to  it  in  the  different  news- 
papers and  ro.agazincs  only,  which,  of  course,  I  am.  not  using  here. 

No  propaganda  was  confiscated  before  Byoir  became  the  highest 
paid  Hitler  representative  in  Am.erica,  but  im.m.cdiately  after  his 
employm.ent  the  am.ount  of  propaganda  becam.e  noticeable. 

Germ.an  citizens  were  allowed  to  go  and  com.e  at  will  on  German 
steam.ship  lines  represented  by  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir. 

Germ,an  citizens  swore  that  they  were  Am.crican  citizens  in  order 
to  become  members  of  the  National  Guard  in  this  country.  It  seems 
they  were  trying  to  get  them  just  as  high  in  the  Army  as  they  could, 
ancl  trying  to  get  some  in  the  ranks,  too.  The  evidence  cannot  be 
refuted  that  while  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  was  representing  them 
that  they  also  were  trying  to  influence  aliens  in  order  to  get  them 
to  becom.e  National  Guards  in  America  in  a  number  of  cities. 

The  Chairman.  Mr.  Patm.an,  your  point  is  that  Mr.  Byoir  was  an 
agent  of  the  Gerro.an  Government? 

Mr.  Patman.  Absolutely.  And  also  that  the  Germ.an  Tourist 
Inform.ation  Office  was  nothing  more  than  a  front  for  the  German 
Governm.ent. 

The  Chairman.  What  was  his  agency  so  that  he  would  have  to 
take  that  responsibility,  what  other  acts  for  the  German  Government 
other  than  what  he  was? 


UN-AMERTCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8171 

Air.  Patman.  In  the  boginniiig:  of  this  campaign- 


The  Chairman  (iiitreposing).  What  I  am  trying  to  find  out  is  was 
his  rcprosentation  as  a  pubhcity  man,  or  propaganda  m.an,  or  what- 
ever you  want  to  call  it,  such  as  to  imply  the  whole  range  of  Nazi 
propaganda,  which  now  and  then  has  included  a  nmnber  of  different 
subjects,  and  is  there  anything  to  show  just  what  the  scope  of  this 
agency  was? 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  they  picked  out  a  tourist  office  because  there 
is  no  linut  to  what  they  could  do  or  say.  They  are  doing  that  in 
South  An\erica  now.  They  are  doing  that  in  other  countries  of  the 
world.  Of  course,  they  do  it  under  the  guise  of  "Build  up  Hitler," 
and  if  they  build  up  Hitler  3^011  know  what  that  will  mean.  They  say 
also  that  "We  are  trying  to  build  up  a  good  relation,"  and  they  have 
selected  a  subject  that  covers  every  water  front  that  permits  the  dis- 
semination of  any  kind  of  propaganda,  and  their  answer  is  that  it  is 
to  build  up  trade,  and  "We  want  you  people  to  feel  kindly  to  Germany 
so  you  will  go  over  there  and  travel."  So  the  tourist  office  1  as  been 
selected  by  the  officials  of  the  propaganda  German  office  for  them  to 
go  into  those  fields  and  whatever  they  do  or  say  it  is  to  encourage 
trade  and  travel. 

I  shall  go  into  that  further,  Mr.  Chairman,  in  my  testimony. 

The  Chairman.  The  theory  is,  and  seems  to  be  beyond  a  doubt  con- 
clusive, that  Mr.  Byoir  was  employed  by  the  German  Government,  or 
by  some  official  of  the  German  Government,  and  he  was  employed  for 
certain  purposes.  It  is  not  clear  in  the  mind  of  the  chairman  just  how 
those  purposes  were  expressed,  whether  limited  so  as  to  comprise  a 
particular  field,  and  whether  that  field  was  legitimate,  and  the  reason 
I  have  inquired  into  it  is  that  all  governments  employ  government 
agents.  And  1  am  informed  that  the  two  Communists  are  employed 
by  a  certain  government,  and  while  in  the  employment  of  that  govern- 
ment at  the  same  time  they  were  writing  columns,  and  I  think  it  is 
material  to  determine  if  this  contract,  general  in  nature,  covered  all 
propaganda,  or  whether  Mr.  Byoir  had  a  contract  wliich  was  speci- 
fically limited  as  to  the  character  of  publicity  that  he  was  to  direct. 

Mr.  Patman.  The  chairman  has  a  copy  of  that  contract  in  his  pos- 
session, and  I  suggest  he  read  paragraph  number  2. 

The  Chairman.  That  is  what  I  would  like  to  do.  Wliere  is  that? 
Have  you  a  copy  of  that?     I  must  confess  I  have  not  read  it. 

Mr.  Patman.  Anyway,  it  says  "To  build  up  good  will  between  the 
two  countries,"  which  covers  anything.  Of  course,  he  is  not  to  do 
anything  which  is  of  a  political  nature,  or  against  the  American  Gov- 
ernment. But  1  do  not  consider  that  just  because  a  contract  is  worded 
a  certain  way  that  you  are  bound  by  the  wording  of  the  contract,  and 
oftentimes  when  people  have  in  mind  doing  something  they  put  in  the 
contract  that  it  will  not  be  done. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  have  read  the  contract  very  carefully.  I  found  that 
it  is  le2:itimate  in  every  respect.  And  at  that  particular  period  in  our 
histor}^,  wliir-h  is  different  than  now,  anyone  would  have  signed  that 
contract  and  entered  into  that  contractual  relation. 

Mr.  Patman.  The  gentleman  can  examine  the  lease  contracts  on 
every  house  that  is  conducted  for  unlawful  purposes  in  Wasliington, 
and  the}'  will  look  good,  too,  because  nobody  ever  leased  a  house  for 
gambling  purposes,  or  at  least  did  not  put  in  that  contract  that  they 
had  leased  the  house  for  gambling  purposes. 


8172  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

The  Chairman.  The  point  you  raise  is  the  fact  that  if  it  did  not  con- 
tain specific  language  it  would  not  be  conclusive  itself,  because  the 
German  Bund  and  many  organizations  have  had  high-sounding  titles 
and  high-sounding  purposes  and  still  not  followed  them,  is  that  a  fact? 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  a  fact. 

Mr.  Mason.  It  is  being  used  as  a  contract. 

Mr.  Casey.  But,  as  I  understand,  this  contract  sets  forth  certain 
things,  and  not  such  as  the  witness  suggests,  and  on  which  I  under- 
stand from  the  witness  he  has  positive  evidence  in  regard  to. 

Mr.  Patman.  No,  no;  I  did  not  say  I  had  positive  evidence  as  to 
that.  Do  not  put  words  in  my  mouth.  I  did  not  say  I  had  positive 
evidence  as  to  that. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  did  not  quite  get  your  position  on  that. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  said  if  you  were  going  to  lease  a  house  for  gambling 
purposes  you  had  never  seen  one  in  your  life  that  did  not  contain  a 
prohibition  against  gambling.  I  say  that  not  as  positive  evidence  that 
the  reverse  is  true,  but  as  evidence  it  does  not  always  mean  anything. 

The  Chairman.  All  right.     Let  us  proceed. 

Mr.  Casey.  You  say  the  duration  of  this  contract  was  for  18 
months? 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes;  but  do  not  overlook  the  fact  that  the  German 
consul  employed  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  and  paid  him  quite  a  lot 
of  money  when  there  was  no  contract  there  that  I  know  of.  We  do 
know  that  he  disseminated  anti-Semitic  literature,  evidently  under 
that  contract,  and  that  alone  should  be  an  un-American  activity. 

There  is  propaganda  on  every  ship  as  to  Byoir's  employment. 
There  were  armed  Nazis  aboard  every  vesssel  after  Hitler  came  in 
and  Byoir  was  employed. 

Uniforms  were  taken  by  German  citizens  from  ships  and  smuggled 
into  this  country  for  drilling  purposes,  tickets,  passports,  or  anything 
else.  And  we  do  not  know  how  many  of  them  are  left  over  here  in 
our  "fifth  column"  today,  because  they  came  over  and  left  at  will  and 
came  over  and  stayed  at  will. 

Rifles  were  used  by  German  organizations  to  drill  a  certain  time 
each  week,  and  they  recognized  a  duel  citizenship  because  they  went 
to  the  trouble  of  following  up  these  instructions  at  a  certain  time  each 
week. 

These  German-American  organizations  were  formed  to  preach  racial 
and  religious  hatred;  to  oppose  preparedness;  to  oppose  all  expendi- 
tures to  protect  our  country;  and  to  obtain  names  and  addresses  of 
all  sympathizers  of  nazi-ism. 

Since  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir  accepted  employment  from  the  German 
consul  in  New  York,  and  German  interests  spread  Nazi  propaganda 
m  this  country  which  was  inimical  to  our  form  of  government,  he 
should  certainly  not  be  permitted  to  remain  a  lieutenant  colonel  in 
the  Army.  This  is  no  time  to  trust  aliens  in  a  national  defense 
program  nor  to  trust  representatives  of  aliens. 

I  hope  you  gentlemen  will  notice  this,  because  I  am  serious  about 
it,  and  because  I  think  it  requires  an  investigation  by  your  committee. 

There  is  sufficient  evidence  to  warrant  an  investigation  into  the 
unholy  alliance  and  close  connection  between  Nazi  propaganda  in 
this  country  and  big  business,  or  certain  parts  of  big  business. 


UN-AJMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8173 

Recently,  a  representative  of  the  German  Government  was  here  to 
cement  Nazi  propaganda  and  big  business  together,  and  was  even 
bold  enough  to  take  interest  in  our  internal  political  affairs. 

In  this  particular  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir  said  in  October  1938,  at  Rye, 
N.  Y.,  in  a  booklet  that  was  distributed  by  one  of  his  organizations, 
and  which  was  evidently  approved  by  him,  that  he  represented 
American  industiy  in  this  country,  with  assets  of  $14,500,000,000. 
That  is  a  lot  of  money.  If  he  represents  American  industry  with 
assets  of  $14,500,000,000,  like  he  said,  he  represents  about  90  per- 
cent of  the  advertisers  in  this  country,  and  he  has  tremendous  power 
and  influence.  And  1  think  this  committee  should  call  upon  him  to 
give  the  names  of  those  concerns,  in  order  that  this  committee  might 
look  into  til  em  and  see  if  they  have  any  connection  with  this  unholy 
alliance  between  Nazi  propaganda  and  this  certain  part  of  big 
business. 

Now,  I  saw  the  statement  which  he  gave  to  this  committee,  about 
the  connections  he  had  in  1938  and  in  1939,  and  they  only  aggregated 
just  a  very  small  peT'centage  of  $14,500,000,000. 

The  Chairman.  My  information  is — and  I  know  it  is  correct,  that 
our  investigator  went  to  the  offices  of  Air.  Byoir.  Mr.  Byoir  gave 
him  access  to  all  of  his  books  and  records  and  to  his  clientele;  his 
clientele  was  in  the  interview,  that  his  books  were  produced;  and  I 
merely  make  that  statement  to  keep  the  record  straight. 

Do  not  the  investigator's  records  show  that? 

Mr.  Mason.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Batman.  Yes;  after  the  report  had  been  made. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  saw  a  record  of  the  hiterviews  that  had  been  had  by 
these  people  in  that  report. 

The  Chairman.  Let  me  get  the  record  straight. 

The  first  thing  you  did  was  to  mak(^  a  request  for  an  investigation. 
Mr.  Stedman  was  placed  on  it.  Mr.  Stedman  went  to  New  York. 
He  saw  everybody,  followed  every  lead  he  could  get,  and  he  made  a 
report,  which  was  before  the  subcommittee. 

Mr.  Mason.  Yes,  sir;  and  he  was  appointed  to  do  that. 

Mr.  Batman.  Now,  Mr.  Chairman,  would  you  mind  letting  me  have 
a  copy  of  that  report? 

The  Chairman.  As  I  understand  it,  you  came  to  the  office  and  read 
the  report? 

Mr.  Batman.  Surely. 

The  Chairman.  Do  you  want  a  copy  of  it? 

Mr.  Batman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  just  want  to  clear  up  this  point  about  big  business.  I 
am  somewhat  confused  about  it.  As  I  understand  the  reasoning  of  the 
gentleman  is  that  he  says  there  was  an  unholy  alliance  between  the 
Nazi  propaganda  and  big  business. 

Mr.  Batman.  Certain  parts  of  big  business. 

Mr.  Casey.  And  Mr.  Byoir  represents  $14,500,000,000  of  big 
business? 

Mr.  Batman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Casey.  Therefore,  Mr.  Byoir  is  un-American? 

Mr.  Batman.  No  ;  that  is  not  the  point  at  all. 

Mr.  Casey.  Wliat  is  it? 

Mr.  Batman.  You  failed  to  catch  it.  I  want  this  committee  to 
investigate  and  determine  what  cooperation  there  is  between  certain 


3174  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

parts  of  big  business  and  the  spread  of  nazi-ism  in  this  country.  I 
think  they  are  doing  it  for  the  purpose  of  causing  appeasement.  I 
think  they  are  working  together  for  that  purpose. 

I  think  I  will  have  something  more  on  that. 

The  Chairman.  I  merely  wish  to  say,  since  you  brought  up  that 
point,  that  charges  were  made  that  there  was  some  collaboration 
between  certain  representatives  of  big  business  and  certain  representa- 
tives of  the  German  Government,  that  the  chairman  directed  a  full  and 
complete  investigation  of  that  matter,  and  there  have  been  investi- 
gators in  New  York  on  it,  and  in  the  course  of  the  inves'i^ation  we 
have  received  no  evidence  sustaining  those  charges.  And  we  have 
three  men  there  now  invest iTating  it,  going  into  those  affairs  and  the 
records,  so  I  wish  to  say  that  that  suggestion  has  been  acted  upon. 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  fine.  I  have  some  information  I  will  be 
glad  to  give  the  committee  on  it. 

Now,  then,  summarizing  this  matter,  which  I  shall  back  up  with 
proof: 

1.  Travel  offices  generally  used  by  Nazis  as  a  front  to  dissem.inate 
their  propaganda. 

2.  Byoir  employed  when  he  was  lieutenant  colonel  by  German 
consul  a'ld  by  Hitler  reoresentatives. 

3.  Byoir  caused  to  be  distributed  literature  relating  to  Germany 
and  her  debts,  church  and  state,  and  anti-Semitism. 

4.  Bvoir's  crime  is  as  great  in  time  of  peace  as  treason  would  be  in 
time  of  war.  In  fact,  his  conduct  would  have  been  treason  in  time  of 
war.  Time  element  makes  no  difference.  Each  one  is  a  serious 
offense,  although  there  is  evidence  in  the  files  of  tliis  committee  that  he 
represented  the  German  Government  as  late  as  1938.  I  am  making 
no  claim  about  that  at  all,  so  it  is  not  necessary  to  a'o  into  it  even,  and 
it  is  not  necessary  to  follow  it  up,  but  the  point  is:  Did  he  ever  represent 
the  Hitler  goverrm.ent?  Was  he  ever  engaged  as  a  lieutenant  colonel 
to  distribute  Nazi  literature  in  this  country?  It  n^akes  no  difference 
whe^i  it  was.     That  alone  to  my  mind  would  be  sufficient. 

The  only  question  is:  Are  the  allegatiors  I  make  relative  to  his 
employ  me^^t  and  activities  true?  If  so,  he  should  not  be  a  lieutenant 
colonel  in  the  United  States  Army  at  sundown  this  evening. 

I  resneC'fully  submit  that  every  alleo-ation  has  been  proven. 

I  urp-e  that  this  committee  investigate  big  business'  connection 
with  Nazi  propaganda  in  this  country.  These  thoughts  should  not 
be  overlooked:  That  Vierick  was  a  partner  of  Byoir,  if  not  now;  that 
Dr.  Hinnrich  Albert  was  a  partner  of  Bvoir  when  he  was  German 
commercial  attache  here.  Dr.  Albert  is  now  the  partner  of  Gerhardt 
Westrick,  now  German  commercial  attache  here  as  Hitler's  secret 
emissary  to  influ(Mice  Wall  Street  leaders. 

I  just  make  that  sugoestion  in  connection  with  the  big  business 
part  that  was  mentioned  a  while  ago. 

Now,  I  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  sworn  testimony  cannot  be 
improved  upon,  and  Mr.  Mason  suggested  that  the  McCormack  com- 
mittee's testimony  should  not  be  used.  I  respectfully  disagree  with 
him  for  the  reason  that  when  that  testimony  was  taken  it  was  not 
known  that  Byoir  was  a  lieutenant  colonel  in  the  Army.  Ofttimes  in 
the  trial  of  lawsuits  a  stranger  can  take  a  transcript  of  the  testimony 
and  possibly  not  see  the  points  at  all,  but  someone  who  is  familiar 
with  it,  or  who  has  given  it  study  and  thought,  can  take  it,  piece  it 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8175 

together,  make  a  case  out  of  it,  and  a  good  case.  So,  in  reference  to 
the  McCormack  committee's  testimony  I  am  bringing  that  out  only 
for  the  purpose  of  bringing  this  matter  up  to  date  to  sliow  you  that 
it  is  ahsohitely  material  now,  and  that  the  charges  that  I  made  are  true. 

And  1  do  not  think  any  member  of  tliis  committee  will  say  that  if 
Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir,  or  any  other  colonel  or  officer  of  the  United 
States  Army,  ever  represented  Hitler  that  they  should  remain  a 
lieutenant  colonel,  or  any  other  rank,  in  tlie  United  States  Army, 

Air.  VooKiiis.  Can  I  ask  you  a  question  at  that  point? 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  As  I  understand  it,  your  point  in  that  particular 
respect  is  made  on  account  of  the  fact  that  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir 
was  in  the  Arnij^,  and  it  is  not  made  because  he  represented  some 
other  foreign  agency;  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  he  is  guilty,  both  as  an  American  citizen,  and 
particularly  because  he  was  an  otticer  in  the  Army.  I  think  he  was 
guilt}''  of  conduct  unbecoming  an  American  citizen,  as  w^ell  as  conduct 
certainly  unbecoming  a  United  States  Army  officer. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  what  I  mean  is  that  we  have  many  people  in 
this  country,  and  have  had  over  a  period  of  years,  of  course,  who  have 
had  connections  with  foreign  countries  in  various  ways.  We  might 
not  like  it  very  much.  But  what  I  am  trying  to  get  at  is  whether 
that  is  the  main  point,  or  whether  the  main  point  you  are  making  is 
the  fact  as  an  officer  in  the  Army  tiiat  he  did  that. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  meant  both.  As  an  American  citizen  it  is  unbecom- 
ing of  him.  It  is  an  un-American  activity,  and  I  think  you  will  find 
that  anything  that  he  has  done  toward  supporting  nazi-ism  in  this 
country  in  recent  years  has  been  because  of  the  big-business  element, 
not  because  of  anything  else,  and  I  think  Hitler  ordered  his  discharge 
for  a  reason  which  I  would  consider,  and  consider  logically,  a  good  and 
sufhcient  one,  so  the  point  is  lie  did  represent  the  Nazi  government 
while  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir  was  in  the  Army,  and  that  is  the  proof  I 
want  to  submit  to  you  gentlemen. 

Mr.  Mason.  There  is  no  need  for  that  proof,  because  that  was  one 
of  the  findings  of  the  McCormack  committee.  It  has  been  definitely 
established  that  he  was  employed  by  the  German  Government  at  that 
time  under  this  contract,  and  it  has  been  definitely  established  that 
he  was  employed  by  the  German  consul,  and  did  receive  a  certain 
remuneration  for  it,  all  of  which  has  been  defiintely  established.  So 
there  is  no  need  to  bring  up  evidence  or  proof  of  that  now. 

Air.  Patman.  Now,  can  I  answer  that? 

Mr.  Mason.  Sure. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  there  is  need,  because  the  gentleman  showed 
he  had  gone  over  that  testimony  too  lightly,  or  not  carefully  enough, 
because  he  did  not  get  the  point. 

Mr.  Mason.  They  did  not  find  against  him  as  to  un-American 
activities,  and   that  is  the  questior,. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  say  that  they  did.  That  shows  one  of  us  is  bound 
to  be  wrong. 

The  Chairman.  Read  the  finding. 

Mr.  Patman.  If  Byoir  is  exonerated  he  will  occupy  a  key  position 
in  our  national-defense  program.  It  will  be  one  of  his  duties  to  have 
charge  of  recruiting,  enlisting,  and  drafting  of  the  pcrsoimel  for  the 
armed  forces. 

62.;2« — 41— vol.  14 2 


8176  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir's  associates  consist  of  Carl  C.  Dickey  and  Vin- 
cent Lancaster.  I  presume  everyone  knows  that  the  firm  was  really 
Carl  Byoir.     I  did  not  think  anyone  considered  it  as  anyone  else. 

Mr.  Casey.  If  they  were  associates  then  he  was  considered  as  the 
principal  man. 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  should  say  that  he  was  the  principal  man  even  though 
he  had  associates? 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes ;  that  is  right. 

Now,  Carl  C.  Dicke}^  testified  before  the  McCormack  committee 
June  5,  1934,  and  said  that  his  address  is  No.  10  East  Forty-second 
Street,  New  York;  that  his  business  was  publicity  ard  business  pro- 
moter. That  his  firm  name  was  Carl  B3^oir  &  Asscciites;  that  the 
partnership  was  composed  of  Mr.  Byoir,  himself,  end  Mr.  Vincent 
Lancaster;  that  the  organization  had  been  in  business  about  3  years; 
that  his  firm  represented  the  German  Tourist  Informaticn  Office,  665 
Fifth  Avenue;  that  the  purnose  of  the  or2"anization  was  to  promote 
trave'  to  Germany  on  the  railroads  and  other  means  of  transit,  includ- 
ing steamship  lines  and  hotels. 

Dickey  admitted  that  the  Government  would  have  some  control 
over  the  German  railroads.  That  formerly  his  concern  was  the  ad- 
viser of  an  organization  known  as  the  National  Committee  of  Jews 
and  Christians,  which  was  called  National  Conference  of  Jews  and 
Christians,  an  organization  to  combat  intolerance — religious  intoler- 
ance of  all  kinds.  Dickey  testified  that  about  March  or  April  1933 
he  was  consulted  as  a  representative  of  Carl  Byoir  &  Associates  by 
German  interests  in  New  York  resrarding  the  effect  upon  their  business 
of  anti-Semitism  in  Germany;  that  he  does  not  remember  the  exact 
time,  but  it  was  in  the  spring  of  1933,  after  Chancellor  Hitler  came 
into  power  in  Germany.  That  he  had  a  contract  with  the  Germ.an 
Tourist  Information  Office  for  Carl  Byoir,  commencing  October  1, 
1933,  which  obligated  the  tourist  office  to  pay  them  $6,000  a  month 
for  18  months,  Mdiich  represented  $108,000.  That  about  all  they  did 
for  the  $6,000  a  month  was  to  give  to  them  advice  and  counsel  and 
cooperate  with  them  in  getting  up  material  for  travel  promotion;  that 
they  also  got  out  a  little  bulletin  called  the  German-American  Eco- 
nomic Bulletin.  That  is  about  all  that  he  could  recall  that  they  did 
for  their  money. 

That  he  sent  out  some  material  for  the  consul  general  in  New  York, 
page  35,  that  the  German  consul's  name  was  Dr.  Kiep,  and  he  also 
had  conferences  with  Dr.  Schwarz  and  Dr.  Borchers,  when  they  were 
consuls  there. 

Dickey  said  he  was  in  Berlin  in  August  1933.  That  he  knew 
George  Sylvester  Vierick  and  had  known  him  for  10  years.  That  he 
knew  of  Vierick's  activities  during  the  World  War;  that  Vierick  re- 
ceived $1,750  a  month  out  of  the  $6,000  paid  to  Carl  Byoir;  that  he 
could  not  think  of  anything  that  Vierick  had  done  to  assist  Carl 
Byoir  &  Associates,  although  they  furnished  him  an  oflSce  and  stenog- 
rapher; paid  all  the  electric  bills  and  other  incidental  bills  around  his 
office,  besides  the  $1,750;  that  Vierick's  office  rent  was  w^orth  about 
$1,000  a  year,  which  they  paid. 

Byoir  also  had  a  Berlin  office. 

Mr.  Casey.  $1,000  a  year? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8177 

Mr.  Patman.  That  was  the  office  rent  only.  He  got  $1,750  a 
month. 

Mr.  Casey.  That  is  just  for  that  German  Travel  Office? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  do  not  know  what  it  was.  He  was  up  there  in 
B^^oir's  office.  He  had  an  office  with  them.  I  do  not  know  what  he 
had  him  doing. 

Dickey  testified,  page  38,  that  Carl  Byoir  kept  a  representative  of 
his  o^^Tl  in  Germany;  that  his  name  was  Fred  Hamlin,  and  that  his 
office  was  in  Berlin.  And  that  was  during  the  time  that  this  was  go- 
ing on,  and  they  had  an  office  in  Berlin  and  also  one  in  New  York. 

Dickey  said  that  his  firm  got  out  an  economic  bulletin.  Seventeen 
of  these  bulletins  were  gotten  out.  They  were  assisted  in  getting  out 
the  bulletins  by  their  representative  in  Germany,  also  by  a  committee 
composed  of  Sclimidt — incidentally,  Schmidt  is  the  president  of  that 
German  Tourist  Information  Office  that  your  representatives  went 
into  the  other  dav. 

Mr.  Casey.  This  is  in  1933? 

Mr.  Patman.  It  was  in  1934  that  this  testimony  was  given. 

Mr.  Casey.  You  are  talking  about  1933? 

Mr.  Patman.  This  is  with  reference  to  the  1933  contract. 

They  were  assisted  in  getting  out  the  bulletins  by  their  representa- 
tive in  Germany,  also  by  a  committee  composed  of  Schmidt  of  the 
German  Tourist  Information  Office  and  Schroeder  of  the  North 
German  Lloj^d  Steamship  Line,  Mr.  Beck  of  the  North  German 
Lloyd,  or  rather  the  Hamburg-American  Line,  Dr.  Degener,  of  the 
German-American  Board  of  Trade  and  Mr.  Johnson,  Leipzig  Trade 
Fair.  Dickey  said  perhaps  they  were  members  of  it  too  and  there 
were  also  one  or  two  others  who  were  members  that  he  did  not  name, 
he  said.  About  5,000  copies  of  the  bulletin  were  printed  each  time 
and  sent  out  principally  to  newspapers  and  different  publications; 
that  the  material  for  it  came  from  Mr.  Hamlin  of  the  Berlin  office. 
In  other  words,  Byoir  had  an  office  in  Berlin,  with  a  man  there  who 
would  furnish  him  information  over  here,  and  he  would  take  that 
information  and  disseminate  that  information  from  the  New  York 
office. 

Mr.  Casey.  "Wliat  kind  of  information  was  it? 

Mr,  Patman.  I  do  not  know  what  kind.  I  know  what  some  of  it 
was.     I  do  not  know  what  all  of  it  was. 

Some  few  things  were  prepared  by  Vierick  from  his  own  organization 
and  some  items  from  the  members  of  the  committee. 

Dickey  said  in  tlie  issue  of  January  29,  1934,  there  was  an  article 
on  German}^  and  her  debts  in  the  bulletin.  That  the  reason  it  was 
carried  was  because  the  question  of  debts  had  some  bearing  on  trade 
and  travel. 

That  answers  the  chairman's  question  as  to  the  discussion  on 
any  of  these  bulletins  you  can  always  say  that  refers  to  trade  and 
travel  in  Germany, 

Mr,  Casey.  By  the  same  token,  if  it  was  trade  and  travel,  you 
would  have  to  say  it  was  trade  and  travel, 

Mr.  Patman,  Dickey  said  when  he  made  the  contract  with  the 
German  Tom'ist  Information  Office  that  no  such  bulletin  as  the 
economic  bulletin  was  contemplated  or  thought  of;  that  he  did  not 
have  it  in  mmd  at  all.     There  is  further  corroboration  that  it  was 


gl78  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

not  necessarily  the  contract.  The  contract  had  nothmg  to  do  with 
this  economic  bulletin.  The  only  thing  they  even  claimed  to  have 
done  was  to  get  out  this  economic  bulletin,  and  he  swears  it  was  not 
contemplated  or  thought  of  when  the  contract  was  made.  So  what 
they  did  for  $6,000  a  month  was  not  even  contemplated  nor  thought 
of  when  the  contract  was  signed.  They  did  not  have  it  in  mind  at 
all,  he  said. 

Dickey  testified,  page  43,  that  he  got  up  a  report  on  the  sentiment 
in  America  toward  Germany.  You  see,  they  did  not  do  anything, 
except  they  were  using  the  Travel  and  Tourist  Office  as  a  front  to 
get  up  sentiment.  This  report  indicates  the  amount  of  publicity 
that  Byoir  was  getting  for  Hitler  in  this  country  that  was  favorable. 
Page  45,  Dickey  admitted  that  these  reports  were  submitted  in 
German  because  some  of  the  people  who  would  read  them  could  not 
read  English;  that  some  of  the  reports  went  to  their  man  in  Berlin, 
Mr.  Hamlin. 

In  other  words,  they  tested  the  sentiment  of  this  country,  got  up 
reports,  put  them  in  the  German  language,  and  sent  them  to  their 
man  in  the  Berlin  office. 

Dickey  admitted,  page  46,  that  he  collected  for  Carl  Byoir  &  Asso- 
ciates $4,000  from  Dr.  Kiep,  the  consul  general  in  New  York,  in 
currency. 

Nothing  was  said  about  whether  it  was  in  cash  or  bills.  Dickey 
himself  admitted  it  was  ui  currency.  He  said  it  was  an  unusual 
amount  to  be  paid  in  currency,  but  it  was  paid  in  bills. 

That  Vierick  took  him  to  see  Dr.  Kiep  and  Dr.  Kiep  asked  him  to 
get  out  some  releases  for  the  consulate,  which  he  did,  and  for  getting 
out  these  releases,  including  the  postage,  they  were  paid  the  $4,000. 

Dickey  stated,  page  48,  that  on  his  trip  to  Germany,  his  employers 
paid  about  two-thirds  of  his  expenses,  and  he  paid  the  other  third. 

Page  50,  Dickey  admits  that  he  had  meetings  with  the  German 
consul  and  at  these  meetings  the  policy  of  the  German  Government 
toward  certain  rnces  of  people  in  this  country  were  discussed.  He 
further  admitted  it  was  one  of  his  duties  to  minimize  the  effect  of  the 
anti-Semitism  policv  of  Gernuuiy  in  this  country;  in  other  words,  to 
combat  the  effect  of  that  policy  in  this  country;  that  in  order  to  get 
the  sentiment  of  the  people  they  had  read  about  60  newspapers  a  day 
from  all  sections  of  the  country.  When  the  reports  were  compiled, 
some  of  them  were  sent  to  Hamhn  in  Berlin  and  some  to  Mr.  Schmidt 
of  the  Railroad  Bureau  and  Vierick  always  looked  at  them,  said 
Dickey. 

Mr.  Casey.  That  was  Bvoir's  representative? 

Mr.  Patman.  That  was  Byoir's  representative. 

The  reports  were  gotten  out  about  once  a  week;  sometimes  every 
10  days  or  twice  a  month. 

Dickey  testified,  page  53,  that  Byoir  had  been  receiving  two  or  three 
thousand  dollars  a  month  to  represent  this  same  concern  before  the 
wiitten  contract  was  entered  into. 

The  committee  will  notice  that  the  written  contract  was  entered 
into  on  November  23,  1933,  I  believe,  but  within  a  very  short  time 
less  than  60  days  after  Hitler  went  in  as  chancellor  on  January  30, 
1933,  the  German  consul  and  the  German  Toiu-ist  Information  Office 
also  employed  Bvoir.  And  that  the  Germ^an  consul  paid  him  $4,000 
and  the  German  Tourist  Office  paid  him  $2,000  or  $3,000  a  month. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8179 

Dickey  testified  that  the  German  consul  paid  him  $4,000  to  obtain 
piibhcity  in  this  country  on  tlie  question  of  anti-Semitism. 

The  $4,000  was  paid  by  the  German  consul  to  Byoir  in  May  of  1933, 
see  page  56. 

Dickey  admits,  page  58,  that  they  never  represented  the  railways 
or  the  German  Government  until  after  Hitler  came  into  power. 
Dickey  admits,  page  58,  that  the  railroads  were  under  control  of  the 
German  Government. 

Mr.  Casey.  Let  me  see  if  I  got  that  right.  You  say  that  Byoir 
was  paid  two  or  tlu-ee  thousand  dollars  a  month  prior  to  the  contract? 

Mr.  Patxman.  Yes;  he  was. 

Mr.  Casey.  Was  it  prior  to  Hitler  becoming  chancellor? 

Mr.  Patman.  No;  it  was  after  Hitler  became  chancellor.  Byoir 
did  not  get  any  contract,  nor  receive  any  money,  until  after  Hitler 
went  in. 

Mr.  Mason.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  is  going  over  all  of  the  testimony 
that  was  taken  by  the  McCormack  committee,  and  it  is  a  rehash  of 
the  same,  and  what  we  are  interested  in  now  is  the  findings  of  the 
McCormack  committee  rather  than  the  testimony,  wliich  is  all  old 
stuff. 

Mr.  Patman.  If  the  gentleman  will  bear  with  me  about  2  minutes 
I  will  get  to  that. 

Page  60,  Dickey  testified  that  he  sent  out,  at  the  request  of  Colonel 
Emerson,  a  pamplilet  dealing  with  church  and  state  in  Germany. 
I  am  sure  the  members  of  this  committee  loiow  something  about  the 
background  of  Colonel  Emerson.  He  was  one  of  the  first  to  come 
here  representing  the  Nazi  form  of  Government  in  America.  He  had 
-charge  of  Nazi  activities  in  1933  and  in  subsequent  years. 

Dickey  has  testified  that  he  sent  this  pamplilet  out  at  the  request 
■of  Colonel  Emerson,  and  it  was  printed  by  the  Friends  of  New  Ger- 
many, 17  New  Battery  Place,  New  York  City;  incidentally,  this  is 
the  same  place  where  the  Facts  in  Review  publication  is  printed  and 
Vierick  is  one  of  the  editors.  It  is  where  the  German  Consulate  is 
located. 

On  page  61  Dickey  praised  Colonel  Emerson's  work  by  saying  that 
he  was  doing  a  fairly  good  job.  Dickey  sent  the  church  and  state 
pamplilets  to  the  same  list  that  he  sent  the  economic  bulletins. 

The  testimony  of  Vincent  Lancaster,  page  67,  was  that  he  was  a 
member  of  the  firm  of  Byoir  &  Associates;  that  he  was  treasurer 
and  business  manager;  that  he  merely  takes  care  of  the  books  and  just 
business  matters;  and  that  there  was  a  journal  entry  of  $4,000  every 
month  which  was  collected  from  the  German  Consul,  and  that  he 
gave  Mr.  B3'oir  $2,000  of  it  and  gave  Mr.  Dickey  $2,000  of  it. 

Now,  in  regard  to  Vierick  I  hope  that  the  committee  will  give  me 
an  opportunity  to  go  into  that  a  little  bit  more  fully,  because  I  believe 
it  is  important  in  view  of  what  this  committee  is  now  investigating, 
as  well  as  this  particular  investigation. 

The  gentleman  from  Illinois  asked  me  to  get  to  the  findings  of 
this  committee.  This  committee  was  composed  of  the  Honorable 
Jolm  W.  McCormack,  chairman,  Samuel  Dickstein,  vice  chairman, 
Charles  Kramer,  Carl  Weideman,  Thomas  Jenkins,  J.  Will  Taylor, 
and  U.  S.  Guyer.  And  the  resolution  giving  the  committee  its  power 
•was  passed  on  March  20,  1934,  by  the  House,  House  Resolution  198. 


8180  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

The  committee  derived  its  authority  from  House  Resohition  198, 
adopted  by  the  House  on  March  20,  1934.  Byoir  left  immediately 
for  Europe. 

The  committee  was  charged  with  the  duty  of  conducting  an  investi- 
gation to  find  out  the  extent,  character,  and  object  of  Nazi  propaganda 
activities  in  the  United  States,  the  diffusion  within  the  United  States 
of  subversive  propaganda  that  is  instigated  from  foreign  countries 
and  attacks  the  principle  of  the  form  of  government  as  guaranteed  by 
our  Constitution,  and  all  other  questions  in  relation  thereto  that 
would  aid  Congress  in  any  necessary  remedial  legislation. 

The  first  public  hearing  was  conducted  by  the  committee  on  June 
5,  1934,  in  Washington,  D.  C,  and  is  covered  in  Report  No.  153, 
Seventy-fourth  Congress,  first  session  of  the  McCormack  committee. 

The  committee  report  covers  two  periods.  The  first  one,  the  time 
prior  to  the  designation  of  Adolph  Hitler  as  Chancellor  of  Germany, 
and  the  second  one  covering  the  period  after  Adolf  Hitler  became 
chancellor  and  to  the  present  time.  That  is,  the  time  of  the  report 
which  was  made  February  15,  1935. 

Let  me  quote  the  committee's  report.     I  am  quoting  it  now: 

During  the  first  period,  as  we  have  characterized  it,  efforts  were  inaugurated 
by  individuals  and  groups,  who  beheve  in  the  pohcies  of  the  National  Socialist 
German  Labor  Party,  to  establish  them  here.  This  committee  has  evidence  of 
such  efforts  particularly  in  the  cities  of  New  York  and  vicinity,  Chicago,  and 
Los  Angeles.  They  sought  diligently  to  bind  together  in  this  country  people  of 
German  birth  and  German  descent  into  a  political  group  that  was  and  was  to  be 
directed  from  abroad,  in  distinct  violation  of  every  known  American  principle. 

Another  quotation: 

These  individuals  organized  a  group  which  became  known  as  Teutonia,  and 
which,  through  various  stages,  finally  becam.e  known,  after  the  advent  of  Adolf 
Hitler,  as  chancellor,  as  the  Friends  of  New  Germany,  which  brings  us  to  the 
second  period  of  activity. 

That  was  a  quote. 

After  Hitler  became  chancellor  of  Germany,  what  was  done 
throu2:h  the  Friends  of  New  Germany  in  the  United  States  to  dissemi- 
nate Nazi  propaganda? 

And  I  quote: 

Early  in  the  history  of  the  Friends  of  New  Germany  the  leadership  was  usurped 
by  one  Heinz  Spanknoebel,  an  alien,  who  entered  this  country  claiming  to  be  a 
clergyman. 

Mr.  Casey.  Wliat  was  that  name  again? 

Mr.  Patman.  What  was  that? 

Mr.  Casey.  I  said — what  was  that  nam.e  again? 

Mr.  Patman.  Spanknoebel.  Maybe  I  did  not  pronounce  it  cor- 
rectly. I  do  not  know  whether  I  have  been  pronouncing  these  namea 
correctly  or  not. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  did  not  know;  but  was  it  Spanknoebel? 

Mr.  Patman.  What  is  that? 

Air.  Casey.  T  said- — was  it  Spanknoebel? 

Mr.  Patman  (spelling):  S-p-a-n-k-n-o-e-b-e-1. 

The  Chairman.  That  is  right ;  Spanknoebel. 

Mr.  Patman.  And  I  am.  still  quoting: 

One  of  his  first  activities  was  to  take  over,  by  intimidation  and  without  com- 
pensation, a  small  newspaper  in  New  York  published  by  the  German  Legion,  which 
paper  he  largely  financed  by  subsidies  under  the  guise  of  advertisements  granted 
him  by  the  German  steamship  lines  as  well  as  the  German  railways. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8181 

In  other  words,  gentlen\en,  the  same  people  that  were  behind 
Spanlviioebel  were  behind  Byoir,  and  I  make  that  comm.ent  because 
the  money  was  coming  from  the  same  source,  and  that  is  the  reason  I 
am  bringhig  this  in. 

And  1  quote  again: 

Documentary  evidence  before  the  committee  obtained  from  the  companies 
shows  that  this  subsidy  was  ordered  from  Germany  and  amounted,  in  the  case  of 
the  steamship  hnes,  to  §600  per  month  and  in  the  case  of  the  railways  to  $200  per 
month  without  regard  to  the  amount  of  space  used.  The  evidence  estabhshed 
that  S])anknooijel  ordered  another  American-German  paper  in  New  York  City  to 
discontinue  its  publication,  which  order,  while  resented,  was  complied  with. 
The  evidence  also  shows  that  he  undertook  to  determine  and  supervise  the  news 
and  editorial  pohcy  of  certain  other  American  newspapers,  and  that  in  at  least  one 
case  his  orders  were  refused  and  his  efforts  resisted. 

Spanknoebel  was  working  for  the  same  people  who  were  usmg  the 
same  "front"  that  Carl  Byoir  was  working  for.  Spanknoebel  was 
working  at  the  same  time  that  Carl  Byoir  was  workmg.  In  other 
words,  the  two  of  them  belonged  to  the  same  group  that  was  attempt- 
ing to  sell  nazi-ism  to  the  American  people. 

Mr.  Mason.  Wait  one  moment. 

Mr.  Patman.  Just  a  moment,  please. 

Each,  however,  had  his  own  distmct  duties  to  perform  in  that 
connection.  Spanknoebel,  a  clergyman;  Byoir,  a  publicity  man;  but 
both  workmg  for  Adolf  Hitler. 

Air.  Mason.  The  fact  that  Mr.  Byoir  was  working  for  the  German 
Government,  and  that  Spanloioebel  was  working  for  the  German 
Government,  and  that  Spanlvnoebel  perhaps  was  doing  certain  tilings 
and  Byoir  doing  certain  other  things,  and  then  you  say  Byoir  is  to 
be  blamed  for  any  un-American  activities  which  Spanknoebel  did? 

Mr.  Patman.  Not  personally  did,  but  carrying  out  this  program, 
both  of  them  playing  on  Hitler's  team — Byoir  one  part  and  Spank- 
noebel the  other. 

Mr.  Mason.  Hitler's  team  at  that  time  had  not  shown  his  mailed 
fist. 

Mr.  Patman.  Oh,  I  think  so. 

Mr.  Casey.  It  was  after  that  that  Colonel  Lindbergh  and  Henry 
Ford  got  medals  from  the  German  Government,  and  at  a  time  when 
there  was  not  such  a  dispute  as  there  is  today. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Is  this  what  you  are  reading  now?  The  testimony 
from  the  committee? 

Mr.  Patman.  Those  are  the  conclusions  of  the  committee,  the 
unanimous  conclusions,  except  I  do  not  know  why  Mr.  Weideman 
did  not  sign  it,  but  these  are  the  conclusions  of  the  McCormack 
committee. 

What  influence  did  Spanknoebel  exert  over  German  organizations? 

The  members  of  the  German  organizations  consisted  in  the  main 
of  aliens. 

Spanknoebel,  indicted  by  a  grand  jury  in  New  York  in  the  fall  of 
1933,  when  both  he  and  Byoir  were  working  for  the  German  Govern- 
ment.    He  is  now  a  fugitive  from  justice. 

Spanknoebel's  organizations  in  this  country  took  orders  from  the 
members  of  the  Cabinet  of  Germany. 

And  I  am  now  quoting  again: 

He  also  became  very  active  in,  and  obtained  control  of,  the  Stahlhelm,  a  Ger- 
man veterans'  organization,  causing  those  members  who  were  opposed  to  his 
policies  to  v.'ithdraw,  and  utilized  the  remainder  of  the  membership  and  this 
organization  in  the  Nazi  movement. 


8182  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Further  quoting: 

Through  devious  methods  he  gained  control  of  the  United  German  Societies  of 
New  York — a  body  in  that  city  composed  of  delegates  from  many  American- 
German  organizations — causing  a  breach  among  the  members  which  has  not  yet 
been  healed.  As  a  result  of  such  efforts  Spanknoebel  exerted  tremendous  influ- 
ence on  the  various  organizations,  most  of  which  had  been  in  existence  for  decades 
in  the  United  States. 

Successful  efforts  were  made  to  establish  locals  or  units  of  the  Friends  of  Nev^ 
Germany  in  many  other  American  cities,  the  membership  consisting  in  the  main 
of  aliens,  and  the  evidence  clearly  shows  that  the  movement  received  the  direct 
and  indirect  aid  of  certain  accredited  German  representatives  to  this  country. 

In  the  fall  of  1933  a  Federal  grand  jury  in  New  York  City  indicted  Spanknoebel 
for  failing  to  register  as  the  agent  of  a  foreign  country,  and  he  is  now  a  fugitive 
from  justice. 

His  successor,  Fritz  Gissibl — 

I  presume  that  is  right — 

one  of  the  original  founders  of  the  Teutonia,  also  an  alien,  then  became  the  leader 
of  the  Nazi  group  in  this  country  and  carried  on  the  same  general  activities. 

Later  Gissibl  was  succeeded  by  one  Reinhold  Walter,  who  is  a  citizen  of  this 
country.  This  was  done  in  an  eff'ort  to  give  the  organization  the  appearance  of 
being  American  in  character,  although  Walter  admitted  to  the  committee  that 
Gissibl  remained  the  real  head  of  the  movement  and  continued  to  dominate  its 
policies,  altliough  he,  Walter,  desired  to  divorce  the  organization  from  its  German 
connections.  Mr.  Walter  was  succeeded,  in  July  1934,  by  Hurbert  Schmuch,  a 
naturalized  citizen  and  college  graduate,  who  was  chosen  for  the  position  by 
Gissibl  and  continued  Gissibl's  policies.      He  is  the  present  party  lead  r. 

Although  started  7  or  8  years  ago,  its  self-appointed  leaders  did  not  seek  to 
charter  their  organization  until  the  fall  of  1934.  Recently  Justice  Edward  J. 
McGoldrick,  of  the  supreme  court,  New  York  County,  N.  Y.,  refused  to  grant 
them  a  charter. 

However,  lack  of  a  charter,  lack  of  a  constitution  or  bylaws  or  any  of  the  steps 
usually  taken  by  American  organizations,  did  not  hinder  these  leaders  from 
functioning. 

The  evidence  plainly  shows  that  they  took  orders  not  only  from  the  National 
Socialist  German  Labor  Party  but  from  some  members  of  the  Cabinet  of  that 
country. 

That  is  the  end  of  the  quotation. 

Now,  then,  did  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir  engage  in  un-American  propa- 
ganda activities  while  he  was  working  for  the  German  consul  or  for 
his  German  principals  in  1933  and  1934? 

This  can  be  answered  by  an  excerpt  from  the  committee  report. 

Now  I  am  quoting  from  that  committee  report: 

This  committee  foimd  indisputable  evidence  to  show  that  certain  German 
consuls  in  this  country,  with  all  the  appurtenances  of  diplomatic  immunity, 
violated  the  pledge  and  proprieties  cf  diplomatic  status  and  engaged  in  vicious 
and  un-American  propaganda  activities,  paying  for  it  in  cash,  in  the  hope  that 
it  could  not  be  traced. 

The  references  in  that  committee  report  to  support  this  statement 
are  to  the  testimony  that  Byoir  received  $4,000  from  the  German 
consul.  So  there  is  a  statement  from  the  committee  itself  that  he  was 
engaged  in  un-American  activities. 

Mr.  Mason.  Oh,  no.  That  is  that  the  German  consul  at  that 
time  was  engaged  in  putting  this  across. 

Mr.  Patman.  Would  the  gentleman  say  that  the  fellow  on  the 
other  end  of  the  line  was  not  just  as  guilty? 

Mr.  Mason.  I  would  not  say  it. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  would. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  might  be  hired  by  someone  with  reference  to  Ger- 
man activities,  but  that  would  not  mean  that  I  was  hired  for  un- 
American  activities. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8183 

Mr.  Patman.  Let  me  finish. 

Did  Carl  Byoir  engao:e  in  vicious  and  un-American-propaganda 
activities  in  1933  and  1934?  The  answer  is  "yes."  The  McCormack 
investigating  committee  said  that  he  did. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  have  not  found  it. 

Mr.  Patman.  How  can  the  German  consul  engage  in  un-American 
activities  and  pay  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  in  the  United  States  of 
America  here  to  help  him  without  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  being 
engaged  in  un-American  activities  at  the  same  time,  when  he  was  paid 
to  engage  in  it?  That  is  what  I  cannot  understand.  If  the  gentleman 
takes  that  position 

Mr.  ALISON  (interposing).  The  German  consul  can  hire  this  man 
to  do  a  certain  thing,  and  that  man  to  do  a  certain  thing,  and  that 
other  man  to  do  a  certam  thing,  and  because  one  was  engaged  in 
German  activities  does  not  prove  that  this  one  over  here  is. 

Mr.  Casey.  May  I  point  out  this  situation:  A  gentleman  was 
engaged  in  certain  activities  before  McKesson  &  Robbins,  and  nobody 
would  say  that  he  was  engaged  in  un-American  activities. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  have  not  done  anything  wrong  with  McKesson  & 
Robbins;  and  if  you  say  I  did  anythmg  wrong  then  put  it  down  in 
writing  and  say  it. 

Mr.  Casey,  I  have  not  said  whether  you  did  it  or  not,  nor  accused 
you. 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  unfair.  You  do  not  say  I  did  anything 
wrong. 

Mr.  Casey.  No;  I  did  not. 

Mr,  Patman.  Then  why  bring  it  up? 

Mr.  Casey.  I  am  making  a  point  analogous  to  your  point  that  this 
man  w^as  engaged  in  un-American  activities. 

Mr.  Patman.  No;  it  is  not  analogous  at  all,  and  it  does  not  touch 
either  side,  edge,  or  bottom. 

The  Chairman.  Let  us  proceed. 

Mr.  Patman.  All  right. 

Did  Carl  Byoir  engage  in  vicious  and  un-American  propaganda 
activities  in  1933  and  1934? 

I  just  read  that. 

When  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir  w^as  working  for  the  German  consul  and 
for  the  German  Tourists'  Information  Office,  the  front  organizations 
for  Adolf  Hitler,  did  he  engage  in  propaganda  activities? 

This  can  be  answered  by  another  excerpt  from  the  committee. 
Remember,  this  is  John  W.  McCormack,  and  five  other  members,  who 
signed  this  report,  wliich  says: 

Several  American  firms  and  American  citizens  as  individuals  sold  their  services 
for  express  propaganda  purposes,  making  their  contracts  with  and  accepting 
compensation  from  foreign  business  firms.  The  firms  in  question  were  Carl 
Byoir  &  Associates  and  Ivy  Lee — T.  J.  Ross. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  is  right;  yes. 

Mr.  Patman.  Therefore,  the  McCormack  committee  said  that  Carl 
Byoir  sold  his  services  for  express  propaganda  purposes. 

And  there  is  a  finding  of  the  committee  that  he  was  engaged  by 
German  interests  for  the  purpose  of  disseminating  propaganda. 

Mr.  Mason.  And  that  was  legitimate,  and  is  legitimate,  even  today. 

Mr.  Patman.  Let  us  see  about  that. 

Mr,  Mason.  And  it  has  been  recognized,  even  by  the  Registration 
Act. 


8184  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Casey.  That  is  right.  In  1938  Congress  passed  a  law  with 
reference  to  that. 

Mr.  Mason.  And  recognized  it. 

Mr.  Casey.  Making  it  necessary  for  representatives  of  foreign 
governments  to  register  as  to  their  activity. 

Mr.  Patman.  So  that  was  the  finding  as  to  propaganda  of  the  Mc- 
Cormack  committee. 

Mr.  Mason.  Yes;  German  propaganda. 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  right.  But  they  said  they  sold  their  names 
for  express  propaganda  purposes. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  does  not  mean  that  propaganda  was  un- 
American. 

Mr.  Patman.  The  gentleman  can  place  any  interpretation  on  it  he 
desires,  but  I  am  merely  stating  what  the  report  of  the  committee 
says. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  have  read  that  committee  finding,  and  have  read 
it  very  thoroughly. 

Mr.  Patman.  The  McCormack  committee  made  another  finding 
that  Carl  Byoir  was  propagandizing  the  country  for  Nazi  Germany. 

The  committee  report  is  the  best  evidence.  An  excerpt  is  quoted 
herewith: 

Carl  Dickey,  junior  partner  of  Carl  Byoir  &  Associates,  testified  that  his  firm 
handled  the  contract  with  the  German  Tourist  Bureau  with  the  fee  for  service 
set  at  $6,000  a  month.  He  testified  that  the  contract  was  secured  with  the  help 
of  George  Sylvester  Viereck,  who  received  $1,750  per  month  with  free  office  space 
and  secretary  as  his  share  of  the  $0,000.  The  committee  finds  that  the  services 
rendered  by  Carl  Byoir  Associates  were  largely  of  a  propaganda  nature. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  is  right.  That  is  the  finding  of  the  McCormack 
committee. 

Mr.  Patman.  Wliat  kind  of  propaganda  was  the  McCormack  com- 
mittee investigating? 

Mr.  Mason.  Nazi  propaganda. 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  right,  Nazi  propaganda.  And  they  found  that 
this  firm  and  its  services  were  largely  for  propaganda  purposes.  Is 
not  there  a  difference  between  distributing  propaganda  and  travel? 

Mr.  Mason.  No. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  thought  there  was. 

Mr.  Mason.  It  is  very  far-reached,  it  seems  to  me,  when  the 
McCormack  committee  found,  on  the  basis  of  the  evidence  of  Carl 
Byoir  &  Associates,  that  they  were  hired  by  an  agency  of  the  German 
Government  for  certain  work,  mainly  propaganda,  if  you  want  to 
call  it  that,  that  that  is  un-American  activities.  There  is  a  difference 
there. 

The  Chairman.  Let  us  see  if  we  can  get  at  what  the  situation  is. 
It  seems  that  Mr.  Patman  is  making  the  charges,  as  expressed  in  the 
McCormack  hearings,  which  is  that  Mr.  Byoir  was  engaged  in  un- 
Amorican  activities  by  reason  of  the  fact  that  he  was  employed  by 
the  German  Govern.ment. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  has  been  established.  Those  are  not  the 
charges,  but  they  are  established  facts. 

The  Chairman.  And  in  addition  to  those  charges,  which  accord- 
ing to  the  record  here  terminated  in  what  year — what  year  did  his 
connection  terminate? 

Mr.  Mason.  1934. 

Mr.  Patman.  In  1935. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8185 

The  Chairman.  In  1935.  Now,  from  the  period  of  1935  up  to 
the  present  date  is  there  any  difference,  or  do  you  make  any  cliarge 
that  he  either  continued  tlie  relationship,  or  that  he  has  been  engaged 
in  it  since? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  have  made  no  effort,  because  what  better  proof  do 
you  need?  If  a  man  is  guilty  of  treason  50  years  ago  would  you 
trust  him  in  the  Army  now?  And  if  he  was  guilty  of  conduct  equal 
to  treason  5  years  ago  would  you  trust  him  in  the  United  States 
Army  now? 

Mr.  Mason.  Of  course,  that  is  a  matter  of  opinion,  as  to  whether 
it  is  equal  to  treason. 

Mr.  Patman.  You  have  a  letter  in  your  files  from  a  man  in  Miami, 
Fla.,  stating  that  he  was  representing  the  German  Government  in 
1938.  I  do  not  need  it  here.  The  mere  fact  that  you  can,  or  I  can, 
prove  it  at  any  time  is  sufficient. 

The  Chairman.  I  am  trying  to  get  your  charges  straight.  And 
you  say  up  to  1935  he  was  a  representative  of  the  German  Govern- 
ment or,  rather,  an  employee  for  propaganda  purposes,  and  based 
upon  that  and  upon  the  record  of  the  McCormack  committee,  it  is 
your  contention  having  once  been  found  guilty  as  a  representative 
that  he  is  now  guilty  of  un-x\merican  activities? 

Mr.  Patman.  And  that  he  is  not  a  fit  person  to  be  a  lieutenant 
colonel  in  the  United  States  Army,  and  that  he  is  guilty  of  un-American 
activities  for  doing  that,  not  only  as  a  citizen,  but  as  an  officer  in  the 
Army. 

The  Chairman.  You  mean  he  is  guilty  of  un-American  activities 
up  until  1935? 

Mr.  Patman.  We  laiow  he  was  then. 

The  Chairman.  You  have  no  evidence  since  then? 

Mr.  Patman.  We  need  no  further  evidence.  What  more  do  we 
need,  or  do  you  need?  If  you  have  a  colonel  in  the  Army  who  has  done 
something  that  has  been  equal  to  treason  in  time  of  war,  what  woidd 
you  do  with  him? 

The  Chairman.  I  am  not  confusing  his  position  as  a  colonel  in  the 
Army  with  liis  position  as  being  guilty  of  un-American  activities. 
Your  position  was  that  because  up  until  1935  he  was  employed  by  the 
German  Government  that  he  was  guilty  of  un-American  activities? 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  right. 

The  Chairman.  xA.nd  there  is  no  record  that  while  he  ceased  his 
activities  in  1935,  though  nevertheless  you  thmk  he  should  be  dis- 
charged from  the  United  States  Army? 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  right. 

The  Chairman.  And  your  second  position  is  having  once  been 
guilty  of  un-American  activities  that  he  is  still  guilty? 

Mr.  Patman.  No;  that  he  was  guilty  of  un-American  activities. 

The  Chairman.  Of  course,  he  had  a  hearing  before  the  Committee. 

Mr.  Patman.  How  is  that? 
The  Chairman.  In  the  McCormack  hearings. 

Mr.  Patman.  No;  he  was  gone  to  Europe.  The  very  minute  the 
resolution  was  passed  he  left  for  Europe  and  did  not  come  back  until 
the  committee  adjourned. 

Mr.  Mason.  Mr.  Chairman,  may  I  make  this  observation:  I  want 
to  say  that  so  far  as  Mr.  Bvoir's  qualifications  to  act  as  n  lieutenant 
colonel  in  the  Army  are  concerned,  it  seems  to  me  that  they  should 
be  based  and  referred  to  the  Army  ofiicdals,  and  not  to  this  committee. 


8186  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

As  to  his  un-American  activities,  if  those  un-American  activities 
were  after  the  time  of  the  McCormack  committee,  which  gave  him 
a  clean  bill  of  health,  then  it  is  up  to  our  committee  to  investigate. 

Mr.  Patman.  Here  is  the  clean  bill  of  health  that  the  McCormack 
committee  gave  him: 

Several  American  firms  and  American  citizens  as  individuals  sold  their  services 
for  express  propaganda  purposes,  making  their  contracts  with  and  accepting 
compensation  from  foreign  business  firms.  The  firms  in  question  were  Carl 
Byoir  &  Associates  and  Ivy  Lee-T.  J.  Ross. 

The  German  Tourist  Office  referred  to  in  this  report  is  the  Gcrm.an 
Tourist  Information  Office  that  is  now  under  investigation  by  the 
Dies  committee,  and  was  the  front  organization  for  Germany  that 
employed  Carl  Byoir. 

Therefore,  this  committee  of  seven  members,  unanimously  declared 
that  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir's  work  was  largely  of  a  propaganda  nature. 
Wliat  better  evidence  is  needed? 

In  order  for  this  committee  to  say  that  Carl  Byoir  was  not  engaged 
in  un-American  activities,  it  must  say  that  the  McCormack  committee 
was  wrong. 

At  the  hearings  in  New  York  City  before  the  McCormack  com- 
mittee, when  George  Sylvester  Viereck  was  on  the  witness  stand, 
Vierick  testified  that  he  went  to  Germany  in  August  1933,  to  secure  a 
contract  for  Carl  Byoir  to  offset  the  wave  of  Nazi  propaganda  in  this 
country.  \Vlien  asked  the  direct  question  if  he  obtained  the  contract, 
page  103,  he  replied  that  he  was  helpful  in  securing  it.  Wlien  pressed 
for  an  answer,  he  said  he  was  one  of  the  instrumentalities  through 
which  the  contract  was  obtained  and  that  the  other  instrumentality 
was  the  German  Railroad  Information  Bureau. 

In  other  words,  two  of  them  getting  this  for  Byoir,  one  the  German 
Tourist  Office  and  the  other  was  Viereck,  and  they  are  interceding  with 
officials  in  Germany  to  get  Byoir  the  contract.  I  think  the  question 
and  answer  is  self-exnlanatory. 

The  Chairman.  The  point  that  I  have  in  mind  is  that  there  was  a 
McCormack  committee  to  investigate  un-American  activities,  which 
they  did,  and  that  brought  it  up  to  what  year? 

Mr.  Patman.   1935. 

The  Chairman.  And  all  you  have  given  the  committee 

Mr.  Mason  (interposing).  So  far. 

The  Chairman  (continuing).  Is  the  same  testimony  and  the  same 
evidence  that  appeared  before  the  McCormack  committee,  and  that 
brings  it  up  to  1935,  and  that  is  a  matter  of  record.  I  mean  whether 
it  goes  in  this  committee  or  not  it  is  still  a  part  of  the  files  of  Congress. 
And  from  1935  to  the  present,  begmning  with  our  jurisdiction  in  1937 
or  1938,  the  question  so  far  as  we  are  concerned  is  to  bring  the  matter 
from  1935  up  to  the  present  time.  And  this  committee  takes  cog- 
nizance of  what  took  place  before  the  McCormack  committee,  as  we 
have  a  right  to  do,  but  you  should  bring  it  up  to  date,  from  1935  to 
1940,  and  the  material  question,  insofar  as  our  finding  is  concerned, 
would  be  determined  by  what  evidence  we  have  from  1935  to  1940. 

Mr.  Patman.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  do  not  think  that  all  of  this  extra- 
neous matter  should  be  brought  into  this  testimony  until  I  have  an 
opportunity  to  present  my  case. 

The  Chairman.  All  right. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  other  extraneous  matter  should  come  at  the 
proper  time.     Of  course,  I  am  not  criticizing  the  chairman. 


UN-AJNIERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8187 

The  Chairman.  No;  but  I  was  trying  to  get  this  point  over:  I 
understand  all  these  matters  are  matters  of  record,  the  iMcCormack 
committee  heard  them,  made  a  finding. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  will  bring  it  up  to  date. 

The  Chairman.  I  am  thinking  about  the  time  we  are  concerned 
about,  of  course. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  I  am  doing  that. 

The  Chairman.  Proceed. 

Mr.  Patman.  Therefore  it  appears  that  the  contract  was  obtained 
from  the  German  Government  through  two  instrumentalities,  Viereck 
and  the  concern  that  Byoir  was  supposed  to  have  represented.  The 
following  question  and  answer  relative  to  this  contract  is  self-explana- 
tory : 

The  Chairman.  As  to  this  particular  contract,  did  you  take  it  up  with  anybody 
who  was  an  official  of  the  German  Railroad? 

Mr.  Viereck.  I  advised  all  my  German  friends  that  it  was  necessary  to  do 
something  to  counteract  this  wave  of  propaganda. 

In  other  words,  when  Viereck  was  in  Germany  in  1933,  he  was 
convincing  everyone  he  came  in  contact  with  that  it  was  necessary 
for  Germany  to  be  properly  represented  in  the  United  States  to  counter- 
act the  wave  of  propaganda  against  Germany,  which  was  in  effect 
saying,  to  build  up  nazi-ism  in  the  United  States. 

You  see,  there  is  a  representative  of  Byoir  talking  to  the  representa- 
tives of  Germany  in  German  about  a  wave  of  propaganda.  They  are 
not  talking  about  tourist  travel.  They  want  to  build  up  Hitler,  and 
build  up  nazi-ism  in  the  United  States. 

Now,  about  the  contract  for  Carl  Byoir.  I  will  quote  you  some 
testimony.  This  is  from  Mr.  Hardwick,  and  he  was  counsel  for  the 
committee — but  the  first  is  the  charge  true  that  Viereck  went  to  see 
Hitler  himself  about  the  contract  for  Carl  Byoir? 

Mr.  Hardwick.  How  long  have  you  known  Mr.  Hitler — Chancellor  Hitler? 

Mr.  Viereck.  I  met  him  for  the  first  time,  I  believe,  some  8  years  ago  in 
Munich,  when  I  interviewed  him. 

Mr.  Hardwick.  Have  you  seen  him  since  then? 

Mr.  Viereck.  I  have  seen  him,  jes.  I  met  him  for  the  last  time  late  in  August 
or  in  September. 

That  was  in  1933,  while  Byoir  was  representing  the  German  inter- 
ests at  two  or  three  thousand  dollars  a  month,  as  well  as  the  German 
consul  in  New  York. 

Mr.  Hardwick.  In  these  last  interviews  that  you  had  with  Mr.  Hitler,  did 
you  discuss  German-American  relations  with  him? 

Mr.  Viereck.  Yes.  Before  meeting  him,  I  conveyed  to  him  certain  ideas 
suggested  to  me  by  the  American  Ambassador  at  Berhn. 

The  testimony  discloses  that  Viereck  had  quite  a  conversation  with 
Hitler  about  building  up  good  will  for  Nazi  Germany  in  America. 

It  will  be  noticed  that  Viereck  said  that  he  conveyed  to  Hitler  the 
ideas  suggested  by  the  American  Ambassador  in  Berlin.  It  will  be 
recalled  that  Byoir  was  then  employed  by  the  German  Ambassador 
in  New  York  City  and  very  likely  there  was  a  close  relationship 
existing  between  them. 

The  time  that  Viereck  refers  to  as  having  conferred  with  Hitler  was 
in  August  or  September  of  1933,  when  Byoir  was  then  working  for 
the  German  consul  in  New  York  and  when  Viereck  was  in  Germany 
suggesting  a  long-time  contract  for  Byoir. 


8188  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Viereck  said  he  discussed  better  relations  with  America  in  all  of  his 
conversations  with  the  prominent  people  in  Germany  when  he  was 
there  in  August  or  September  1933  to  get  a  contract  for  Byoir.  Among 
those  with  whom  he  evidently  discussed  this  matter  was  Von  Papen. 
His  name  is  very  much  in  the  print  now — Von  Papen. 

He  said  he  saw  him  on  that  trip  to  Germany  and  that  he  was  an  old 
friend  of  his. 

The  next  is:  Were  Viereck  and  Lieutenant  Colonel  Bj^oir  partners? 

I  will  ask  the  chairman  to  listen  to  tliis  testimony. 

The  testimony  before  the  McCormack  committee  at  the  hearings 
in  New  York,  commencing  at  page  92,  disclose  that  Viereck  received — - 
out  of  the  $6,000  per  month  that  Byoir  was  receiving  from  the  German 
interests — Viereck  received  $1,000  a  month  and  a  commission  of  $750' 
a  month,  or  $1,750  a  month  out  of  $6,000  a  month  that  Byoir  collected 
from  the  German  interests.  In  addition,  he  had  an  office  with  Carl 
Byoir  and  he  was  furnished  a  secretary  by  Carl  Byoir. 

Therefore,  Viereck  and  Byoir  were  partners. 

The  testimony  further  discloses  that  at  the  same  time  that  Viereck 
was  working  for  the  German  consul  in  New  York,  Dr.  Kiep,  before 
the  long  contract  was  entered  into  in  November  1933,  that  Byoir  was 
also  working  for  the  Gennan  consul  in  New  York,  Dr.  Kiep.  Viereck 
received  $500  a  month.  It  is  not  known  what  Byoir  received  at  all, 
but  it  is  known  that  he  received  at  one  time  $4,000  in  cash  from  the 
German  consul  in  New  York. 

What  did  Viereck  and  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  do  under  this 
contract  with  the  German  Tourist  Information  Office? 

Viereck  says,  page  97,  that  he  did  no*i  write  any  bulletins,  that  he 
may  have  helped  to  edit  them.  When  pressed  for  further  explanation, 
he  admitted  that  bulletins  were  issued,  and  the  first  one  of  the  bulle- 
tins issued  "were  a  sheet  of  press  excerpts  called  Speaking  of  Hitler.'^ 
[Reading:] 

Mr.  Hardwick.  That  was  the  first? 

Mr.  Viereck.  That,  I  think,  was  the  first. 

Mr.  Hardwick.  And  the  second 

Mr.  Viereck.  The  second  was  an  economic  bulletin;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Hardwick.   You  did  edit  or  help  to  prepare  these  two  bulletins,  did  you  not?' 

Mr.  Viereck.   Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Hardwick.     And  he  sent  them  out  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Viereck.   Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Hardwick.  How  many  of  them  went  out;  do  you  know? 

Mr.  Viereck.  I  believe  between  three  and  five  thousand. 

Mr.  Hardwick.  Of  each  one? 

Mr.  Viereck.  I  believe  so;  I  did  not  count  them. 

Regardhig  different  people  that  Viereck  talked  to  while  he  was  in 
Germany  in  August  1933,  the  following  testimony,  at  page  97,  is  self- 
explanatory: 

Mr.  Hardwick.  While  you  were  in  Germany  last  year,  did  you  get  in  touch 
with  a  man  over  there  named  Feltmann? 

Mr.  Viereck.   Yes. 

Mr.  Hardwick.   What  kind  of  an  office  does  he  hold,  if  you  know? 

Mr.  Viereck.  As  I  recall  it,  I  believe  he  is  with  the  propaganda  ministry, 
and  I  presume  he  was  a  liaison  official  between  that  bureau  and  some  industrial 
interests. 

Regarding  the  different  people  Viereck  met  and  talked  to  when  he 
was  in  Germany  in  August  1933,  the  following  testimony,  at  page  98 
of  the  New  York  hearings  of  the  McCormack  committee,  is  self- 
explanatory: 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8189 

Mr.  Hardwick.  Were  you,  on  these  several  trips  to  Germany,  in  close  and 
constant  contact  with  the  foreign  offices,  the  foreign  ministry,  in  Berlin? 

Mr.  ViERECK.  I  would  hardly  say  that.  I  have  many  friends  in  the  foreign 
office,  and  I  visited  them. 

The  Chairman.   Please  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  ViERECK.  The  question  is,  whether  I  was  in  constant  touch  with  them. 
That  means  that  I  communicated  with  them  daily,  and  so  forth.  I  did  not.  I 
have  friends  there  whom  I  visited  and  with  whom  I  discussed  various  matters  of 
interest  to  me. 

Mr.  Hardwick.  That  was  in  connection  with  this  matter  of  German-American 
relations? 

Mr.  ViERECK.  Not  only  that,  but  it  was  in  relation  to  material  that  I  sought  for 
interviews  and  articles,  materials  for  books,  historical  and  otherwise,  on  wliich  I 
was  working.     But  naturally  they  sought  my  advice. 

Mr.  Hardwick.  You  did  discuss,  with  these  German  officials,  German- 
American  relations  and  policies? 

]\Ir.  ViERECK.  Undoubtedly.     The  topic  could  not  be  escaped. 

The  kind  of  literature  put  out  by  Viereck  and  Byoir  and  where  it 
was  prepared  is  interesting. 

The  following  testimony,  page  98  of  the  New  York  hearing,  is 
self-explanatory : 

Mr.  Hardwick.  That  book  or  pamphlet.  Speaking  About  Hitler,  who  prepared 
that? 

Mr.  ViERECK.  It  was  prepared  in  the  offices  of  Carl  Byoir. 

Mr.  Hardwick.  Did  you  give  it  the  final  finishing  touch? 

Mr.  ViERECK.  I  was  consulted  on  each  issue  before  it  was  published.  I 
occasionally  gave  them  contributions,  excerpts,  which  had  come  to  my  attention 
and  which  I  thought  should  be  distributed. 

I  think,  gentlemen,  that  is  very  interesting.  There  is  Viereck,  a 
lifelong  propagandist  for  Germany,  a  man  who  said  he  was  ashamed 
of  America,  who  is  now  engaged  in  propaganda  purposes  for  the 
German  Government,  and  was  a  partner  working  with  Carl  Byoir, 
editing  all  the  information  that  went  out  from  his  office  to  the  different 
people  throughout  this  Nation.  I  think  that  is  a  point  worthy  of 
consideration. 

People  with  whom  Viereck  discussed  Byoir  contracts  in  Germany 
in  August  1933. 

Commencing  on  page  104  of  the  hearings  of  the  McCorm.ack  com- 
mittee in  Viercck's  testimony,  Viereck  testified  that  when  he  was  in 
Germany  he  discussed  the  Byoir  contract  with  Mr.  Winters,  of  the 
German  Railroads,  and  Mr.  Feltmann;  that  he  took  it  up  with  them 
personally  when  he  was  in  Germany  and  insisted  that  the  sensible 
point  was  to  take  some  defensive  measures;  that  he  discussed  the 
necessity  of  employing  somebody  in  the  United  States;  that  before 
the  contract  was  made,  he  not  only  discussed  it  with  at  least  two  of  the 
officials  of  the  German  Railroads,  but  "with  innumerable  people  in 
Germany.'' 

It  then  developed  in  Viereck's  testimony  that  Mr.  Feltmann  is  not 
with  the  Gennan  Railroads  at  all,  but  that  "he  is  propaganda  min- 
ister," and  that  the  contract  was  made  afterward. 

In  the  McCormack  report,  after  a  discussion  of  the  contract  of  Carl 
Bvoir  and  Viereck,  the  report  said: 

The  National  Socialist  German  Labor  Party,  through  its  various  agencies,  fur- 
nished tons  of  propaganda  literature,  w^hich  in  most  cases  was  smuggled  into  this 
country.  Some  of  it,  however,  came  through  our  customs,  because  there  is  no 
laiw  against  it.     This  is  the  committee's  report: 

"With  the  advent  of  Adolf  Hitler  as  Chancelor,  efforts  to  obtain  supporters 
for  the  Nazi  movement  were  redoubled  in  the  United  States.  Campaigns  were 
conducted,  gieantic  mass  meetings  held,  literature  of  the  vilest  kind  was  dis- 
seminated, and  the  short-wave  radio  was  added  to  the  effort." 


8190  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANt)A  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Mason.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  is  nothing  but  a  reiteration  of  the 
McCormack  report  and  the  findings  of  the  McCormack  committee. 
Those  are  matters  of  record,  and  this  committee  has  no  right  to  go 
behind  the  McCormack  report.  All  we  should  do  is  to  take  into 
account  the  McCormack  report  as  a  starting  place,  and  form  our  own 
from  there  on,  and  there  has  been  not  one  scintilla  of  new  evidence 
which  has  been  adduced  here  with  this  whole  morning's  testimony. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  do  not  think  the  gentleman  is  justified  in  saying 
that,  but  if  it  will  satisfy  him  I  will  add  three  or  four  more  matters 
before  I  get  through. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  am  looking  for  new  evidence. 

Mr.  Patman.  This  all  connects  up. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  am  not  looking  for  what  I  have  looked  over  with  a 
fine-tooth  comb  already. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  I  should  have  a  right  to  present  my  case  in 
my  own  way.  I  think  all  of  this  is  material.  It  is  certainly  material 
to  show  that  soon  after  Hitler  went  in  office  that  this  man  was  being 
paid  the  highest  salary  in  America  as  the  representative  of  the  German 
Government,  which  is  the  man  we  are  talking  about. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  is  all  shown  in  the  McCormack  report  and  the 
McCormack  testimony.  If  the  gentleman  has  anything  further  to 
show  than  that  we  would  like  to  hear  it. 

Mr.  Patman.  It  is  material  now,  because  you  have  attempted  to 
exonerate  him  of  un-American  activities,  and  how  can  you  do  that 
when  the  proof  shows  that  at  the  time  he  was  spreading  Nazi  propa- 
ganda, both  as  to  the  church  and  the  state?  I  am  under  a  handicap 
here.  That  is  what  I  have  to  overcome.  And  that  is  what  I  wish  to 
go  into. 

Mr.  Patman.  It  must  be  remembered  that  all  this  was  taking  place 
while  Carl  Byoir  was  representing  Hitler  under  the  terms  of  the 
contract. 

While  Byoir  was  representing  Germany  under  this  contract  the 
McCormack  committee  says  that  the  following  occurred: 

German  steamship  lines  not  only  brought  over  propaganda  but  transported 
back  and  forth  certain  American  citizens  without  cost,  for  the  purpose  of  having 
them  write  and  speak  favorably  of  the  German  Nation.  A  German  steamship 
company's  records  show  that  some  of  these  persons  received  free  transportation 
at  the  request  of  the  German  Ambassador  "in  the  interest  of  the  state."  Mem- 
bers of  the  crews  of  these  ships  carried messages  between  party  officials  in  Germany 
and  leaders  of  the  Nazi  groups  here. 

It  was  quite  a  common  occurrence  for  steamship  companies  to  invite  residents 
in  this  country  to  attend  social  i:)arties  on  board  ships  while  they  were  in  port, 
and  persons  attending  these  parties  were  addressed  by  representatives  from  Nazi 
organizations  abroad  on  the  subject  of  nazi-ism  and  the  philosophies  of  the  National 
Socialist  German  Labor  Party. 

All  this  taking  place  while  Carl  Byoir,  lieutenant  colonel,  was 
representing  German  interests. 

While  Byoir  was  representing  Germany  under  this  contract  the 
following  occurred,  according  to  the  McCormack  committee: 

The  membership  lists  of  The  Friends  of  New  Germany  showed  a  large  number 
of  aliens,  who,  although  they  have  resided  in  this  country  for  a  number  of  years, 
had  never  made  an  effort  to  obtain  their  first  papers  to  laecome  citizens.  Yet, 
these  self-same  aliens  sought  to  dictate  to  American  citizens  and  to  find  fault  with 
the  American  philosophy  of  government. 

Wliile  all  of  this  was  occurring  Byoir  was  one  of  the  players  on 
Hitler's  team. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8191 

While  Byoir  was  representing  Germany  under  the  contract,  the 
following  occurred  [reading]: 

Naturalized  German  citizens  believed  that  this  conferred  upon  them  a  dual 
citizenship. 

The  Friends  of  New  Germany  conducted  so-called  youth  summer  camps  at 
different  localities,  at  which  camps  nothing  of  American  history  or  of  American 
principles  of  government  were  taught,  even  to  the  children  of  American  citizens 
of  German  extraction. 

On  the  contrary,  the  children  were  taught  to  recognize  Chancellor  Hitler  as 
their  leader,  to  salute  him  on  all  occasions,  and  to  believe  that  the  principles  of 
government  taught  by  him  were  superior  to  the  principles  of  our  Government. 

At  these  camps  the  official  language  was  German,  the  swastika  flag  was  promi- 
nently displayed  at  the  headquarters  tent,  and  at  the  morning  and  evening  exer- 
cises the  flag  was  saluted  in  Nazi  style,  and  the  director  of  the  camp,  in  charge 
of  these  children,  was  an  alien  who  displayed  unusual  ignorance  of  many  of  the 
principles  of  the  United  States  Government,  and  whose  personal  allegiance  was 
solely  to  the  German  Government  and  its  present  ruler. 

The  investigation  conducted  by  the  McCormack  committee 
extended  over  the  period  of  time  when  Carl  Byoir  was  Iviiown  to  be 
representing  German  interests.  Keeping  that  point  in  mind,  let  us 
see  what  the  committee  said  about  what  took  place  during  the  time  of 
Carl  Byoir 's  activities.  Its  report  is  self-explanatory,  and  a  part  of 
it  is  as  follows: 

From  the  evidence  taken  by  this  committee  in  its  investigation  of  nazi-ism  in 
the  United  States  it  develops  that  all  kinds  of  efforts  and  influence,  short  of  vio- 
lence and  force,  were  used  to  obtain  its  desired  objective,  which  was  to  consolidate 
persons  of  German  birth  or  descent,  if  possible,  into  one  group,  subject  to  dictation 
from  abroad. 

When  this  committee  was  appointed,  the  Nazi  movement  had  made  considerable 
headway,  greater  in  its  influence  than  its  actual  membership  would  indicate.  Its 
efforts  and  activity,  particularly  with  reference  to  its  intolerance  features,  were 
disturbing. 

The  disclosures  made  by  the  committee  not  only  have  stopped  their  progress 
and  caused  the  activities  of  certain  German  accredited  representatives  to  this 
country  to  cease,  but  a  disintegration  of  the  movement  has  and  is  taking  place. 
Efforts  are  still  being  made  by  the  leaders  of  the  movement  but  without  the  success 
that  they  heretofore  enjoj'ed. 

This  committee  condemns  the  establishment  and  the  propaganda  of  the  Nazi 
principles  in  this  country. 

There  is  another  committee  finding  which  contains  the  activities 
of  Byoir,  because  it  condemns  the  propaganda  of  Nazi  principles  in 
this  country,  which  he  was  disseminating,  which  is  a  condemnation 
by  the  McCormack  committee. 

Now,  then,  in  bringing  it  further  up  to  date,  I  desire  to  mention  a 
few  things  in  connection  with  travel  bureaus,  but  before  I  do  that 
I  would  like  to  offer  in  evidence  a  letter  from  the  Secretary  of  State 
that  Byoir  is  now  representing  German  interests. 

The  Chairman.  We  have  that  already  in  the  record. 

Mr.  Patman.  You  do? 

The  Chairman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Patman.  And  a  copy  of  the  contract  with  the  German  interests? 

The  Chairman.  We  have  that. 

Mr.  Patman.  And  where  he  obligates  himself  to  cover  the  news? 

Mr.  Mason.  That  is  not  Byoir,  but  Viereck. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  know;  but  there  is  nothing  in  the  record  to  presume 
they  were  not  partners.  We  know  at  one  time  they  were  partners 
disseminating  propaganda,  and  we  know  nothing  further  than  that. 

The  Chairman.  You  can    offer  that. 

62626 — tl— vol.  14 3 


8192  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Patman.  You  take  the  White  Book,  which  goes  to  every 
Member  of  Congress,  and  probably  goes  to  a  number  of  people  over 
the  Nation,  and  there  is  postage  of  21  cents  paid  on  it,  and  also  here 
is  Facts  in  Review,  sent  out  every  week. 

The  Chairman.  We  have  all  of  that. 

Mr.  Patman.  This  is  from  an  organization  in  New^  York  State,  as 
well  as  other  propaganda. 

Here  is  the  man  who  is  still  disseminatmg  Nazi  propaganda  in 
America,  who  obtained  the  contract,  and  was  a  partner  of  Lieutenant 
Colonel  Byoir,  and  yet  you  say  he  is  not  guilty  of  un-American 
activities. 

The  Chairman.  If  Mr.  Byoir  is  no  longer  engaged  in  those  activi- 
ties  

Mr.  Patman  (interposing).  But  when  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir 
was  engaged  m  that  activity. 

The  Chairman.  If  Mr.  Byoir  is  no  longer  connected  with  Mr. 
Viereck  how  can  you  connect  him  with  it? 

Mr.  Patman.  So  far  as  I  know  there  is  nothing  to  indicate  he  is  not. 

The  Chairman.  We  are  going  to  hear  from  Mr.  Byoir  later  this 
afternoon  as  to  what  he  has  to  say  about  this  matter. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  have  here  in  words,  better  than  I  can  express 
it  in  any  words,  and  it  is  an  article  in  PM  about  Viereck  and  about 
this  propaganda  in  America,  and  I  want  to  ask  the  indulgence  of  the 
committee  to  read  it.  It  is  right  along  this  point,  and  it  is  in  corrobora- 
tion of  what  I  have  said. 

Mr,  Mason.  You  have  got  to  connect  Viereck  and  his  present 
activities  with  Mr.  Byoir,  and  that  is  a  pretty  difficult  thing  to  do,  it 
seems  to  me. 

Mr.  Patman.  Byoir  represents  some  of  the  biggest  interests  in  the 
country,  and  I  believe  there  is  a  close  working  arrangement  and  coali- 
tion between  them  in  disseminating  propaganda;  I  believe  that 
sincerely. 

This  is  the  issue  of  August  13,  1940: 

George  Viereck  (Benedict  Arnold)  Is  Germany's  Paid  Press  Agent. 

The  Chairman.  Wait  a  minute,  Mr.  Patman.  That  is  from  some 
newspaper,  is  it  not? 

Mr.  Patman.  It  is  information  better  than  I  can  express  it. 

The  Chairman.  What  newspaper  is  that? 

Mr.  Patman.  It  is  PM.  I  think  it  bears  right  on  this  point  as  to 
these  parts  of  big  business,  and  I  presume  that  the  committee  will  want 
to  hear  that. 

The  Chairman.  We  have  practically  all  of  that. 

Mr.  Patman.  This  hooks  up  with  what  I  have  said. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  we  have  voluminous  evidence  to 
show  how  many  Communists  are  on  the  staff  of  this  paper  from  which 
you  propose  to  quote. 

Mr.  Patman.  ^Vliat  is  that? 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  say  we  have  voluminous  evidence  to  show  how 
many  Communists  are  on  the  staff  of  this  PM  paper  from  which 
you  propose  to  quote. 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes.     But  what  does  that  have  to  do  with  this? 

Mr.  Casey.  I  understand  they  get  out  a  pretty  good  newspaper. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  know;  but  I  think  this  is  something  that  corrob- 
orates wiiat  I  have  to  present.  I  have  some  further  testimony  to 
present,  of  course. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIP^S  8193 

The  Chairman.  We  want  to  give  you  a  full  opportunity  to  be  heard 
and  want  to  give  Mr.  Byoir  a  full  opportunity. 

Mr.  Patman.  This  reads:  "Figure  in  World  War  Propaganda  Is 
Still  at  Work  in  Present  War,"  and  it  is  by  Henry  Paynter. 

Hitler's  \o.   I    Benedict  Arnold  is  George  Sylvester  Viereck 

Sonic  other  proiuiiuMit  Ainoricans  parrot  Hitler's  Nazi  propaganda  for  America, 
over  the  radio  anci  in  leading  publications,  and  receive  no  pay  for  it. 

But  Viereck  is  well  paid. 

Viereck  has  been  playing  Germany's  game  against  the  U.  S.  A. — for  dough — 
since  long  before  Hitler. 

lie  \vas  naturalized  in  1901,  but  he  still  comes  close  to  Hitler's  definition  of  all 
8,000,0U0  German-.\nierican.s — "part  of  the  German  nation." 

He  has  as  interesting  a  Nazi  record  as  anj-  U.  S.  citizen. 

He  received  scores  of  thousands  of  dollars  in  World  War  I  for  activities  which 
ended  with  the  exposure  of  the  notorious  Dr.  Heinrich  Albert,  then  German 
commercial  attache  here.  Dr.  Albert  is  the  partner  of  Gerhard  Westrick,  now 
German  commercial  attache  here,  and  Hitler's  secret  emissary  to  influence  Wall 
Street  leaders. 

It  was  Viereck  who  wrote  to  the  notorious  Capt.  Franz  von  Papen,  German 
military  attache  ousted  for  spying: 

"I  am  thoroughly  ashamed  of  my  country." 

"  lusitania"  charge 

It  was  Viereck  who,  Albert  Ij.  Becker,  New  York  deputy  attoriiej-  general 
charged,  received  $100,000  from  German  Government  agents,  after  the  U.  S. 
entered  the  irar. 

It  was  Viereck,  according  to  sworn  testimony  of  a  newspaperman,  who  said  in 
advance  that  the  Lusitania  would  be  torpedoed.  He  later  denied  he'd  said  it, 
although  he  thought  it  "justifiable." 

It  was  Viereck  who  testified  in  1934  that  he  had  got  $1,750  a  month  from  Carl 
Byoir  and  Associates  for  swinging  a  German  Government  "publicity"  contract 
to  that  firm. 

It  was  Viereck  who  said  in  1934:  "I  am  a  friend  of  Adolf  Hitler's  Germany." 

In  addition  to  special  fees,  Viereck  now  expects  to  earn  $15,000  this  year  for 
his  talents  in  fitting  Hitler's  propaganda  to  current  U.  S.  needs. 

In  the  last  World  War,  German  propaganda  here  was  clumsy.  Viereck  was  a 
good  deal  less  experienced.  It  was  i^robably  at  least  equally  as  effective  as 
British  propaganda  in  getting  us  into  war  against  Germany. 

Hitler  didn't  want  to  make  that  mistake,  so  Viereck  shades  Hitler's  Nazi 
propaganda  in  getting  us  into  war  to  fit  nuances  in  U.  S.  feeling. 

Viereck  is  paid  $500  a  month  bj'  a  Munich  newspaper — 

I  will  Tiot  call  the  name,  I  cannot  pronounce  it — 

Miinchner  Neueste  Nachrichten,  Sendlingerstrasse  80,  Munich;  another  $500  a 
month  by  the  German  Library  of  Information,  Hitler's  official  Nazi  propaganda 
agency  in  this  country,  17  Battery  Place.  He  lives  at  305  Riverside  Drive  in  a 
ten-room,  •*3,500-a-year  apartment. 

special  fee 

During  the  critical  period  this  spring  when  Hitler  jjlanned  his  United  States 
peace-intervention  barrage,  helped  by  Lindbergh,  etc.,  \'iereck  got  a  special  fee 
of  $1,200  for  special  consultatioTi  from  the  German  Library  of  Information.  He 
expects  to  get  more. 

Hitler  zealously  tries  to  get  his  me.ssage  to  every  .\mcrican.  On  lowest  levels,  the 
proi)aganda  comes  here,  now  by  way  of  Russia,  from  the  Fichte  Bund,  Hamburg. 
For  middle  levels  it  comes  from  Welt-Dienst,  Work!  Service,  in  eight  languages. 

Similar  material  is  broadcast  by  P'ather  Coughlin,  the  Reverend  Gerald  Winrod, 
the  Dishon.  .loe  McWilliams,  and  others. 

For  the  highest  leveb^,  there  is  personal  contact,  such  as  Westrick,  who  uses 
the  Tnited  States  name  of  A.  Webster.  Westrick  worked  on  .James  D.  Mooney 
and  many  other  prominent  United  States  industrialists. 

.  It   is    V^iereck's    Benedict    Arnold   job   to   corrupt   the   thinking   of   backbone 
Americans.     His   contract   with   the   Germanv   Librarv   of   Information   has   his 


8194  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

signed  promise  to  prepare  news  for  Facts  in  Review,  official  Hitler  upper  level 
propaganda  organ  published  under  the  supervision  of  Nazi  Consul  General  Dr. 
Hans  Borcliers,  to  hold  himself  at  all  times  for  consultation  on  Nazi  propaganda 
problems  in  the  United  States  of  America  and  to  interpret  the  news  to  favor  Germany. 

VIERECK'S    JOB 

3t  is  Viereck's  job 

Mr.  Mason.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  protest  that  Mr.  Viereck  is  not 
before  us,  and  I  can  testify  in  connection  with  the  indictment  of  Mr. 
Viereck,  all  of  which  is  probably  true,  and  I  believe  it  probably  is, 
that  he  had  nothing  to  do  with  the  situation  we  are  facing  and  the 
question  we  have  to  settle. 

The  Chairman.  It  is  now  nearly  12,  and  Mr.  Voorhis  and  some  of 
the  Members  want  to  be  on  the  floor,  and  we  want  to  resume  at  1 
o'clock.     How  long  will  it  take  you  to  conclude,  Mr.  Patman? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  do  not  know,  Mr.  Chairman.     Probably  30  minutes. 

The  Chairman.  No  longer  than  30  minutes? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  am  not  quite  sure,  but  that  is  my  feeling. 

The  Chairman.  Do  you  want  to  go  on,  gentlemen? 

Mr.  Mason.  I  would  rather  stay  and  finish. 

Mr.  Patman.  The  chairman  told  me  that  we  would  have  just  the 
morning  session,  but  it  makes  no  difference,  and  we  can  continue  on. 
Of  course,  we  have  the  tax  bill  coming  up,  and  I  do  not  think  it  will 
help  by  our  being  there,  because  it  is  under  the  gag  rule,  naturally. 

The  Chairman.  Go  right  ahead. 

Mr.  Patman.  If  you  are  having  an  afternoon  session  I  would  like 
to  wait  until  this  afternoon,  because  having  gone  2  hours,  naturally 
I  am  just  a  little  bit  tired. 

The  Chairman.  Wliat  is  the  pleasure  of  the  members  of  the 
committee? 

Mr.  Mason.  I  would  rather  finish  this  part  of  it,  and  then  take 
the  other  part  of  it  up  after  lunch. 

The  Chairman.  All  right.     Let  us  proceed. 

Mr.  Patman.  This  is  entitled,  "Viereck's  Job." 

It  is  Viereck's  job  to  "interpret"  or  "color"  information,  whether  it  is  to  appear 
in  the  Free  American,  Hitler's  No.  1  United  States  propaganda  sheet,  or  elsewhere, 
so  that  it  will  further  Hitler's  strategy  in  his  war  against  America. 

It  is  obvious,  then,  that  no  Benedict  Arnold  is  doing  so  much  for  Hitler  in  this 
crucial  period  as  Viereck. 

He  is  assisted  by  Herr  Heinz  Beller,  actual  manager  of  the  library. 

The  chief  function  is  to  supply  information  for  non-Nazi  publications  here,  and 
for  intelligent  Americans.  Germany's  view  of  the  progress  of  the  war  is  told  ably, 
with  subtle  implication  always  of  Gerro.any's  confidence  in  victory. 

Germany's  post-European  war  economic  plans  for  America  are  subtly  de- 
veloped. 

By  som.e  strange  m.agic,  if  you  write  to  17  Battery  Place,  you  get  other  Nazi 
publications;  if  you  write  to  Father  Coughlin  or  other  Hitlerite  publicists,  you  are 
likely  to  get  Facts  in  Review. 

The  German  Library  of  Information  is  in  the  same  building  as  the  German  Con- 
sulate General,  where  a  bomb  went  off  not  long  ago. 

MAILING   EQUIPMENT 

Its  modern  mailing  equipment  takes  care  of  a  mailing  list  of  100,000  individual 
names,  including  the  Young  Men's  Christian  Association,  the  Young  Women's 
Christian  Association,  clergymen,  university  faculty  inembers.  Members  of 
Congress,  university  publications  editors,  school  teachers,  and  radio  commen- 
tators. 

The  library  also  puts  out  and  mails  propaganda  tracts,  such  as  one  to  prove 
that  Polish  atrocities  against  Germans  caused  the  war. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8195 

They  have  been  successful  in  getting  their  statements,  including  those  in  spe- 
cial books,  reprinted  in  the  Congressio7ial  Record,  and  distributed  at  public  expense. 

Among  these  were  writings  criticizing  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation  for  ex- 
posing "fifth  column"  activities. 

Viereck's  work  in  tliis  field,  important  as  it  is  to  Hitler,  is  secondary  to  Viereck's 
work  in  toning  down  Nazi  propaganda  to  fit  the  palate  of  the  leaders  of  United 
States  opinion,  to  whom  it  is  fed  l)y  word  of  mouth  through  such  persons  as 
Westrick,  and  by  slick  paper  monotonies  mailed  to  selected  lists. 

Thanks  to  Viereck,  this  vital  Hitler  propaganda  seems  superficially  harmless, 
legal,  even  praiseworthy,  to  millions  of  Americans. 

So  it  is  not  surprising  such  persons  as  Charles  A.  Lindbergh  and  James  D. 
Mooney  publich-  parrot  the  same  propaganda  message  as  Hitler's  short-wave 
radio. 

Moreover,  everything  they  have  done  has  been  perfectly  legal.  Hitler  boasts 
that  he  can  spread  his  power  everywhere  because  the  democracies  are  too  dumb 
to  prevent  his  propagandists  from  conquering  before  a  shot  is  fired. 

Everything  Lindbergh  said  and  Mooney  said  along  the  same  lines  as  Hitler's 
propaganda  for  this  country  has  been  perfectly  legal.  It  is  clear  they  have  not 
violated  the  Federal  statute  against  treason.  But  the  two  men  have  done  more 
for  Hitler  than  all  his  bunds  and  spies  here. 

LINDBERGH,    MOONEY 

Lindl)ergh  is  an  American  idol.  Despite  his  half  dozen  outbursts  favorable  to 
Hitler,  he  may  have  been  until  recently  the  most  popular  man  in  the  United  States 
next  to  President  Roosevelt.  His  prestige,  then,  was  tremendous.  He  holds  a 
commission  as  a  flying  colonel  in  the  United  States  Army  Reserve. 

PM  has  shown  how,  sentence  by  sentence,  Lindbergh's  recent  radio  talk 
paralleled  official  German  Government  propaganda  broadcasts. 

Of  all  Americans,  only  Roosevelt  could  have  done  Hitler  a  greater  propaganda 
favor. 

Mooney,  relatively  unknown  to  the  public,  has  distributed  similar  ideas. 
^  Mooney  is  also  a  Reserve  officer,  a  lieutenant  commander  in  the  United  States 
Navy,  and  occupies  a  key  position  in  United  States  defense,  as  liaison  and  defense 
production  man  for  General  Motors. 

SOCIAL   JUSTICE 

More  than  100  Hitlerite  propaganda  publications  here  were  hammering  away 
at  the  same  thing — one  of  the  loudest  and  most  persistent.  Father  Coughlin's 
Social  Justice,  in  which  official  Nazi  propaganda  is  continually  parroted. 

In  the  June  10  issue  of  Social  Justice,  Father  Coughlin  gave  the  entire  back  page 
to  adulation  of  Senator  Johnson  of  Colorado.  In  the  same  issue  Coughlin's 
page  one  headline  was  "American  Nations  Need  to  Begin  Peace  Plans." 

On  June  10  Senator  Johnson  introduced  into  the  Congressional  Record  the  fuU 
text  of  Mooney's  speech. 

Then  the  Congressional  Record  publication  was  reprinted  at  private  cost,  but 
distributed  at  taxpaj^ers'  cost. 

Thus,  at  a  time  when  every  possible  means  was  being  used  to  get  President 
Roosevelt  to  intervene  to  bring  peace — which  would  be  a  Hitler  peace — the 
Congressional  Record  was  distributing  similar  sentiments. 

Asked  by  PM,  Senator  Johnson  said  he  did  not  remember  who  paid  for  the 
reprinting,  and  that  the  speech  had  originally  been  sent  to  him  by  somebody  in 
Chicago.  He  said  he  would  look  into  it.  He  is  for  peace,  and  thought  the  speech 
was  all  right  because  it  was  for  peace,  he  said. 

Mooney  also  paid  to  have  the  talk  reprinted  in  pamphlet  form,  and  widely 
distributed. 

But  that  apparently  was  not  enough. 

The  Saturday  Evening  Post  claims  the  largest  audience  of  any  United  States 
periodical.  One  of  the  Post's  largest  single  sources  of  income  is  from  General 
Motors.  In  the  Post  of  August  3,  Mooney's  talk,  considerably  bolder  in  amplifi- 
cation, was  republished  under  the  heading: 

"Though  the  Post  disagrees  with  much  that  he  says  here,  we  thought  his  recent 
speech  *  *  *  so  hnportant  and  .so  little  quoted  in  the  press  that  we  asked 
him  to  amplify  that  address  for  publication  here." 

In  the  Post  article,  called  "War  or  Peace  in  America,"  Moonev  again  described 
the  horrors  of  war,  and  said: 

"Germany  felt  that  England  and  France  exercised  too  great  control  over  the 
food  for  her  people     *     *     *. 


8196  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

"On  the  day  war  is  declared  we  can  kiss  democracy  goodby  and  she  won't 
be  back  during  your  Hfetime  or  mine,  or  during  the  Hfetime  of  our  sons  and 
daughters     .*     *     * 

"We  have  already  done  too  much  monkeying  around  in  the  European  situation 
during  the  past  2  or  3  years,  joarticularly  in  the  direction  of  encouraging  England 
and  France  to  take  Germany  on  for  a  fight. 

HELPING    ENGLAND 

"Most  military  authorities  agree  that  the  chances  of  our  helping  England  are 
very  slight.  The  present  course  of  sending  over  military  equipment  is  not  promis- 
ing, because  the  quantities  of  such  war  materials  that  we  can  ship  in  a  hurry  are 
relatively  small.  Besides,  much  of  the  equipment  is  out  of  date.  It  is  not  the 
kind  of  equipment  that  can  stand  up  against  a  blitzkrieg     *     *     * 

"There  is  a  lot  of  loose,  theatrical  talk  going  on  in  the  way  of  encouraging  the 
British  to  make  a  last  stand     *     *     * 

"It  is  high  time  to  stop  this  fight  and  save  England  from  further  misery.  It 
is  high  time  for  us  Americans  to  save  our  friends,  the  English,  from  a  further 
beating     *     *     * 

"If  we  are  to  save  our  friends,  the  English,  at  all,  we  must  save  them  right 
now  by  using  our  strength  in  the  situation  to  compel  a  peace. 

"We  have  got  to  state  bluntly  and  frankly  to  the  rulers  of  Germany  and  England 
that  we  insist  upon  an  end  to  the  holocaust     *     *     *. 

LOOKING  AHEAD 

"The  German  military  victories  in  this  war  have  been  im])ressive,  but  farsighted 
leaders   in    that   countrv    must   look    ahead    to    the    world    structure   after   the 


war 


*     *     ^. 


"England  can  now,  on  the  strong  intervention  of  a  mediator,  stop  fighting 
without  acknowledging  shameful  defeat  and  without  loss  of  honor.  Even  now, 
through  a  mediated  peace,  there  is  still  prestige,  glory,  and  honor  for  all     *     *     *. 

"In  other  words,  what  we  have  to  say  to  the  political  group  in  England  is, 
'If  you  won't  talk  peace  now,  but  insist  on  continuing  with  the  struggle,  we  will 
not  enter  the  war  in  a  military  way  to  help  you.'  " 

This  is  almost  precisely  what  the  German  short-wave  radio  has  been  saying 
to  Americans  for  2  months,  except  that  England's  plight  is  depicted  somewhat 
more  delicately  by  Mooney.     And  Hitler  does  not  call  the  English  "Our  friends." 

It  is  almost  precisely  what  Westrick  told  Mooney  2  or  3  months  ago. 

/  know,  because  I  heard  Westrick  say  it,  then.  At  the  time,  I  was  a  financial 
writer  on  the  staff  of  the  Associated  Press. 

Now,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  am  just  a  little  bit  fatigued,  and  if  you  are 
going  to  have  a  recess  for  a  while  I  would  like  to  have  a  rest. 

Mr.  Casey.  I  would  just  like  to  ask  you  some  questions  on  that  PM. 
I  do  not  remember  the  language,  but  it  shows  Air.  Viereck  was  doing 
the  work  of  Hitler  in  this  country,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Casey.  And  it  also  accuses  Lindbergh  of  doing  work  for 
Hitler. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  will  read  what  he  says  about  Viereck,  which  is  in 
a  little  box  at  the  top  of  the  page,  which  is  as  follows: 

The  man  on  the  front  page  is  George  Sylvester  Viereck,  naturalized  citizen  of 
the  United  States  of  America,  who  had  difficulties  during  World  War  I  because 
of  his  German  activities — for  hire.  Then,  he  wrote  lie  was  "thoroughly  ashamed" 
of  his  country.  Now  he  has  a  contract  with  the  German  Library  of  Information, 
chief  source  of  Hitler  propaganda  here,  and  is  well  paid  for  it.  The  contract 
calls  for  him  to  interpret  the  news  in  Germany's  favor. 

Mr.  Casey.  What  does  it  say  about  Lindbergh? 
Mr.  Patman.  About  what? 
Mr.  Casey.  About  Lindbergh. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  really  did  not  pay  any  attention  to  that  part  of  it, 
because  I  was  not  concerned  about  it. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8197 

Mr.  Casey.  But  you  agree  with  the  article  with  reference  to 
Viereck. 

Mr.  Patman.  It  corroborates  what  I  have  said. 

Air.  Casey.  Do  you  agree  with  what  it  says  about  Lindbergh? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  am  not  making  any  statement  as  to  that. 

Mr.  Casey.  You  put  it  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  put  it  in  evidence;  yes. 

Mr.  Casey.  Do  you  agree  with  what  it  says  about  General  Motors? 

Mr.  Patman.  They  are  not  concerned  in  this  investigation.  It  was 
not  material. 

Mr.  Casey.  Do  you  agree  with  what  it  says  about  the  Saturday 
Evening  Post? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  am  not  answ^ering  as  to  that. 

Mr.  Casey.  If  we  follow  that  course  of  procedure  we  will  finish 
very  shortly. 

The  Chairman.  What  is  the  pleasure  of  you  gentlemen?  I  wonder 
if  we  possibly  can  conclude. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  30  minutes  would  possibly  conclude  what  I 
have  to  say,  but  you  must  realize  that  I  have  been  talking  over  2 
hours  already. 

The  Chairman.  Suppose  we  come  back  at  1  o'clock? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  would  not  like  to  be  bound  by  exactly  half  an  hour, 
but  I  feel  reasonably  certain  that  I  can  be  here.     It  is  now^  12:10. 

The  Chairman.  You  see,  we  are  very  anxious  to  conclude  this  as 
soon  as  we  can. 

Mr.  Patman.  These  charges  were  made  May  27,  Mr.  Chairman, 
and  I  do  not  see  why  they  should  be  rushed  and  hurried  through  in 
1  day.  Of  course,  that  is  for  the  committee.  I  am  more  or  less  a 
guest  of  the  committee,  and  I  realize  that. 

The  Chairman.  Of  course,  I  think  you  have  been  very  much  in- 
dulged here,  and  permitted  as  much  latitude  as  we  possibly  have,  and 
we  want  to  conclude  this  if  we  can  today.  And  there  is  the  finishing 
of  your  testimony  and  the  hearing  of  Mr.  Byoir,  who  wants  to  be 
heard. 

Mr.  Patman.  The  committees  usually  recess  until  2  o'clock.  If 
that  is  all  right  with  the  committee  it  would  suit  me  very  well. 

The  Chairman.  We  have  often  recessed  until  1  o'clock.  It  just 
depends  upon  whether  you  insist  on  it  or  not. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  am  not  going  to  insist  on  anj^thing.     Whatever 
the  committee  wishes  to  do  will  have  to  be  all  right  with  me. 
The  Chairman.  Let  us  say  at  1 :30. 

Mr.  Patman.  You  know  when  a  fellow  has  talked  2  hours  and 
sometimes  you  do  not  get  much  rest  in  a  half  an  hour,  and  you  have 
to  take  a  meal  during  that  time. 

The  Chairman.  Suppose  w^e  say  we  reconvene  at  1 :15. 

(Whereupon,  at  12:15  p.  m.,  a  recess  was  taken  until  1:15  p.  m. 
of  the  same  day.) 

after  recess 

(The  committee  reconvened  at  1:15  p.  m.,  pursuant  to  the  taking 
of  the  recess.) 

The  Chairman.  We  will  proceed. 


8198  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

TESTIMONY  OF  HON.  WRIGHT  PATMAN^Resumed 

The  Chairman.  Go  ahead,  Congressman  Patman. 

Mr.  Patman.  Mr.  Chairman,  if  it  is  agreeable  with  the  committee, 
I  can  insert  some  of  this  material  in  connection  with  my  remarks,  and 
it  need  not  be  read  at  all. 

Do  I  have  the  privilege  of  revising  and  extending  my  remarks,  and 
inserting  such  things  as  I  consider  material? 

The  Chairman.  You  can  just  go  along,  and  we  will  see  what  it  is. 

Mr.  Patman.  You  say,  for  instance,  although  the  committee  has 
this  registration  statement,  it  is  not  in  any  record  that  I  know  of, 
and  I  want  to  insert  it  in  the  record. 

The  Chairman.   We  will  receive  that. 

(The  registration  statement  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

Department  of  State, 
Washington,  June  27,  1940. 
In  reply  refer  to  Co  800.01B11  Registration— 
Byoir  &  Associates,  Inc.,  Carl: 

My  Dear  Mr.  Stripling:  I  acknowledge  the  receipt  of  your  letter  of  .lune 
18,  1940,  and,  in  reply,  have  to  inform  you  that  neither  Business  Organizations, 
Incorporated,  10  East  Fortieth  Street,  New  York  City,  nor  National  Consumers 
Tax  Commission,  310  South  Michigan  Avenue,  Chicago,  Illinois,  is  registered  in 
conformity  with  the  provisions  of  the  Act  of  June  8,  1938,  as  amended,  requiring 
the  registration  of  agents  of  foreign  principals. 

Carl  Byoir,  10  East  Fortieth  Street,  New  York  City,  also  is  not  registered  in 
conformity  with  the  provisions  of  the  law  mentioned  above,  but  Carl  Byoir  and 
Associates,  Inc.,  10  East  Fortieth  Street,  New  York  City,  registered  as  agents  of 
the  Transpacific  News  Service,  Inc.,  on  October  7,  1938.  By  letter  dated  October 
16,  1939,  however,  a  sworn  affidavit  was  submitted  stating  that  the  agency  re- 
lationship described  in  their  Registration  Statement  had  been  terminated  and, 
accordingly,  their  Registration  Statement  was  withdrawn  from  the  public  files  of 
the  Department  pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  section  4  of  the  Act.  I  may  add 
that  although  this  Registration  Statement  and  its  accompanying  documents  are 
no  longer  available  for  public  inspection,  this  material  will,  of  course,  be  open  to 
inspection  by  your  Committee  upon  request. 
Sincerely  yours. 

For  the  Secretary  of  State: 

(Signed)      A.  A.  Berle,  .Ir.,  Assistant  Secretary. 
Mr.  Robert  E.  Stripling, 

Secretary,  Special  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 

House  of  Representatives,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Mr.  Patman.  And  I  would  like  to  introduce  the  letter  from  the 
Secretary  of  State  also. 

The  Chairman.  We  will  receive  that  in  connection  with  your 
statement. 

(The  letter  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

June  20,  1940. 

My  Dear  Mr.  Patman:  I  acknowledge  the  receipt  of  your  letter  of  June  17, 
1940,  and,  in  reply,  have  to  inform  you  that  George  Sylvester  Viereck  is  registered 
with  the  Secretary  of  State  in  conformity  with  the  provisions  of  the  act  of  June  8, 
1938,  as  amended,  requiring  the  registration  of  agents  of  foreign  principals.  A 
copy  of  the  registration  statement  submitted  by  Mr.  Viereck,  together  with  copies 
of  the  supplements  thereto,  is  enclosed  for  your  information. 

In  addition  to  his  contractual  relationship  with  the  German  newspaper, 
Mlinchner  Neueste  Nachrichten,  Sendlingerstrasse  80,  Munich,  Germany,  Mr. 
Viereck  also  performs  services  in  connection  with  the  preparation  of  the  publica- 
tion. Facts  in  Review,  which  is  published  by  the  German  Library  of  Information, 
17  Battery  Place,  New  York,  N.  Y.  The  German  Library  of  Information  is 
registered  in  conformity  with  the  provisions  of  the  law  mentioned  above  in  the 
name  of  its  director,  Mr.  Heinz  Beller,  under  the  number  364  and  date  September 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8199 

8,  1939.  According  to  its  registration  statement,  the  "German  Library  of  Infor- 
mation is  a  library  of  public  information  on  the  social,  cultural,  political,  and 
economic  development  of  Germany.  It  comprises  several  thousand  books, 
pamphlets,  periodicals,  newspapers,  official  documents,  and  standard  works  on 
law,  economics,  history,  philosophy,  art,  sport,  etc.  Its  services  are  available 
upon  request." 

Sincerely  yours, 

Sumner  Welles,  Acting  Secretary. 

Mr.  Patman.  Are  we  ready  to  proceed? 

The  Chairman.  Yes,   sir. 

Mr.  Patman.  The  German  railroads  have  always  used  the  travel 
bureaus  and  tourist  offices  for  propaganda  purposes. 

Mr.  Russell  B.  Porter,  of  the  New  York  Times,  made  a  trip  to  South 
American  countries  within  the  last  60  days,  and  his  articles  have 
appeared  in  the  New  York  Times  daily,  and  disclose  a  great  amount  of 
German  propaganda  that  is  being  disseminated,  and  also  discloses  the 
tremendous  sums  spent  in  this  country  for  that  purpose.  In  this 
article,  which  appeared  in  the  New  York  Times,  it  was  stated — I  will 
not  read  all  of  the  article — but  it  says,  "Travel  Official  Implicated." 
It  reads,  in  part: 

Herr  Voigt,  who  used  his  railways  office  as  a  propaganda  center,  was  shadowed 
and  discovered  ordering  the  printing  of  thousands  of  anti-Semitic  pamphlets.  He 
was  also  charged  with  organizing  Nazi  parades  and  demonstrations.  Herr  Voigt 
was  arrested  and  expelled  from  Chile  about  a  year  ago.  His  case  was  handled  so 
quickly  that  the  German  Embassy  and  his  powerful  friends  had  no  time  to 
intervene. 

And  if  it  is  agreeable  with  the  committee,  I  will  insert  the  balance  of 
it  in  the  record.  That  is  all  that  they  do,  use  those  offices  for  propa- 
ganda piH'poses. 

(The  editorial  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

EX-DICTATOR    HEADS    GROUP 

Another  is  the  Chilean  nationalist  movement,  whose  former  leaders.  Gen. 
Carlos  Ibanez,  former  dictator  of  Chile,  and  Gen.  Ariosto  Herrera,  were 
expelled  from  Chile  after  loyal  regiments  discovered  and  exposed  a  plot  to  estab- 
lish a  regime  on  the  Italian  model. 

Another  organization  that  has  been  investigated  is  the  Association  of  Friends 
of  Germany,  consisting  of  many  prominent  Chileans,  including  retired  generals, 
university  professors,  writers,  and  intellectuals  who  were  educated  in  or  have 
visited  Germany  and  admire  German  "kultur"  or  feel  grateful  for  favors  shown 
them  in  Germany. 

This  group  meets  regularly  to  talk  about  Germany.  Its  members  make  pro- 
German  statements  in  press  and  lectures  and  on  the  radio,  especially  coming  to 
Germany's  defense  when  she's  attacked. 

The  heading  of  this  article  was: 

Nazis  in  Chile  closelj^  watched  for  evidence  of  subversive  acts — Travel  agent 
deported  upon  discovery  that  he  financed  an  anti-Semetic  paper — Enormous  sums 
spent  for  ])ropaganda. 

This  is  especially  interesting,  in  view  of  the  fact  that  Lt.  Col. 
Carl  Byoir  claimed  to  be  only  a  travel  agent  representing  the  German 
Tourists'  Information  Service  in  the  United  States  while  he  was 
employed  by  the  German  Consul  in  New  York  and  other  German 
interests  after  Hitler  came  in  power. 

There  was  the  head  of  the  Russian  Tourist  Information  Service 
convicted  for  buying  Navy  secrets.  That  is  a  case  which  is  on  all 
fours,  so  far  as  using  fronting  is  concerned,  with  this  one. 


8200  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

The  Honorable  J.  Edgar  Hoover,  Director  of  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investiga- 
tion, was  the  author  of  an  article  on  how  spies  operate,  in  the  magazine  section 
of  the  daily  newspaper  for  July  28,  1940,  issue  of  This  Week.  In  this  article  he 
discussed  what  I  presume  to  be  the  only  case  in  which  the  Department  of  Justice 
has  obtained  a  conviction  of  an  agent  of  a  foreign  government  under  the  espionage 
statute.     In  this  article,  Mr.  Hoover  stated: 

"SALICH-GORIN    CASE 

"A  case  handled  by  Naval  Intelligence  and  the  F.  B.  I.  about  a  year  ago  throws 
further  light  on  the  manner  in  which  spies  operate.  Hafis  Salich  was  born  in 
Moscow,  Russia,  in  1905.  In  1920  he  emigrated  to  the  United  States.  He  had 
attended  St.  Joseph's  College  in  Yokohama,  Japan,  and  spoke  Japanese  fluently. 
After  he  arrived  here  he  completed  a  course  at  a  business  college  in  Seattle,  Wash. 
He  worked  for  steamship  companies  oflf  and  on  until  1926,  when  he  became  a 
member  of  the  Berkeley,  Calif.,  police  department.  He  worked  there  imtil 
1936,  when  he  was  given  a  leave  of  absence  to  work  on  a  special  assignment  for 
the  Navy  Department.  In  the  meantime,  he  became  acquainted  with  Mikhail 
Nicholas  Gorin,  who  arrived  in  the  United  States  on  January  10,  1936,  to  take 
over  the  management  of  the  Pacific  coast  division  of  Intourist,  Inc.,  a  travel 
bureau  designed  to  promote  travel  in  Soviet  Russia. 

"It  is  alleged  that  Gorin  absent-mindedly  left  a  document  in  a  coat  pocket 
that  was  sent  to  the  cleaner's.  A  patriotic  citizen  found  it.  It  immediately 
reached  the  hands  of  our  eflicient  Naval  Intelligence.  An  alert  officer  recognized 
the  document  as  having  come  from  Navy  files.  The  F.  B.  I.  was  notified.  A 
joint  investigation  disclosed  that  Salich  apparently  had  received  $1,700  from 
Gorin  for  reports  that  Salich  was  accused  of  having  secured  from  Navy  Depart- 
ment files.  Salich  and  Gorin  were  sentenced  to  serve  prison  terms  for  violation 
of  the  Espionage  Statute.  As  this  is  being  written  the  case  is  pending  appeal  in 
the  United  Sta,tes  Supreme  Court. 

"Espionage  agents  have  but  one  code:  'The  end  justifies  the  means.'  The 
meaTis  can  be  murder,  robbery,  burglary,  barter  of  loyalty,  or  blackmail. 

"Identifying  spies  is  one  thing — proving  their  mission  is  much  more  difficult. 
Of  even  greater  importance  to  the  protection  of  our  internal  defense  is  keeping 
a  check  upon  their  plans.  These  plans,  as  a  rule,  are  carried  out  by  the  under- 
lings of  spydom.  The  directors  of  esjjionage  invariably  remain  behind  the  scene, 
well  protected  by  many  imposing 'fronts.'  " 

I  invite  your  attention  especially  to  the  fact  that  Gorin,  who  was  the  repre- 
sentative of  a  travel  bureau  designed  to  promote  travel  in  Soviet  Russia,  induced 
an  employee  of  our  Navy  Department  to  sell  him  valuable  secrets,  which  were 
secured  from  Navy  Department  files.  Gorin  occupied  a  similar  position  with  the 
Russian  tourist  agency  that  Lieutenant  Colonel  B>  oir  occupied  with  the  Gennan 
Tourist  Information  Service  when  he  first  commenced  spreading  Nazi  propaganda 
in  America. 

Now,  another  travel  agency  used  as  a  front.  In  the  Washington 
Times-Herakl,  of  August  13,  1940,  the  following  article  appeared 
relative  to  17  Battery  Place  in  New  York,  which  is  headquarters  for 
German  propaganda,  and  this  shows  the  agency  bombed  over  there  a 
short  time  ago  was  a  tourist  information  office,  just  like  that  used  in  all 
other  fronts  as  a  disseminating  propaganda  office. 

(The  editorial  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

Another  Travel  Agency  Used  as  a  Front 

The  Times  Herald,  Washington,  D.  C,  August  13,  1940,  carried  the  following 
article  relative  to  17  Batterj'  Place,  in  New  York,  which  is  headcjuarters  for 
German  propaganda: 

F.  B.  I.  Bares  Gestapo  Ring  in  New  York — Evidence  Given  United  States 

By  Former  German  Consul 

By  John  Cross  and  Guy  Richards 

New  York,  August  12. — F.  B.  I.  agents,  armed  with  the  reluctant  testimony 
of  German  Americans,  including  the  Reich's  former  consul  here,  will  soon  submit 
evidence  to  the   Federal  grand  jury  that  the  firm  of   Deutcher  Handels  und 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8201 

VVirthschaftsdionst,  at  17  liatlery  Place  hero,  is  the  New  York,  if  not  the  United 
States,  he?dc|uartcrs  for  Hitler's  Gestapo,  object  of  heretofore  fruitless  search 
since  the  New  York  German  spy  trials  of   1938. 

This  is  the  firm,  licensed  as  a  travel  and  foreign  exchange  agency,  whose  offices 
were  damaged  on  June  20  last  by  a  bomb  blast  injuring  nine  persons.      *     *     * 

THREE-YEAR    FEUD 

They  called  Dr.  Paid  Schwarz,  for  4  years  German  consul  here,  and  from  him 
gained  confirmation  of  their  suspicions  that  the  June  bombing  culminated  a 
bitter  3-year  feud  l)etween  Dr.  Borchers,  a  scholarly  career  man  in  the  German 
foreign  service,  and  the  Gestapo  staff  that  used  the  travel  agency  as  a  front. 

Colonel  Donovan's  report  on  the  "fifth  columns"  in  the  United 
States  is  very  interesting.  This  appeared  on  August  22,  and  had  a 
heatliine,  as  follows:  "Strong  'Fifth  Column'  In  United  States  Could 
Be  Oiu"  Undoing — Hitler  Conspiring  for  World  Dominion — Immense 
Sums  Spent  for  Propaganda.  There  have  been  as  many  as  $200,000,- 
000  annually  spent  on  organization  and  propaganda  abroad.  The 
immensity  of  this  sum  is  a  secret.  Nazi  Germany  is  not  a  govern- 
ment— not  even  a  'folkdom'  of  the  sort  Nazi  orators  talk  about. 
Nazi  Germany  is  a  conspiracy.  Its  scope  is  universal  and  its  aim 
world  domination. 

"Its  primary  agents  are  as  many  of  the  millions  of  the  Germans  in 
Germany,  and  abroad,  as  can  be  induced  or  compelled  to  serve  the 
German  fatherland,"  over  here  and  elsewhere. 

And  I  ask  that  the  full  article  be  inserted. 

(The  newspaper  article  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

COLONEL   DONOVAN    REPORTS    STRONG  'FIFTH    COLUMN'    IN    UNITED    STATES    'COULD 

BE  OUR  UNDOING' HITLER  CONSPIRING  FOR  WORLD  DOMINATION IMMENSE  SUMS 

SPENT  FOR   PROPAGANDA. 

(By  Col.  William  J.  Donovan  and  Edgar  Mowrer) 

Since  we  must  ascribe  a  huge  share  in  Adolf  Hitler's  incomparable  military 
successes  to  his  use  of  Germans  and  'fifth  columnists'  in  victim  countries,  the 
questions  arise:  How  was  such  a  success  possible? 

How  are  Germans  abroad  brought  to  such  self-sacrificing  enthusiasm  for  the 
Nazi  regime?  How  above  all  can  foreigners  living  under  relatively  mild  and 
civilized  governments  be  induced  voluntarily  to  betray  their  own  countries  for 
Hitler's  Germany?     It  seems  mysterious. 

The  answer  is  $200,000,000  spent  annually  on  organization  and  propaganda 
abroad.  The  immensity  of  this  sum  is  the  secret.  Nazi  Germany  is  not  a  gov- 
ernment— not  even  a  "folkdom"  of  the  sort  Nazi  orators  talk  about.  Nazi 
Germany  is  a  conspiracy.     Its  scope  is  universal  and  its  aim  world  domination. 

Its  primary  agents  are  as  many  of  the  millions  of  the  Germans  in  Germany, 
and  abroad,  as  can  be  induced  or  compelled  to  serve  the  German  fatherland. 

ARMED  INSURRECTIONS 

Its  activities  begin  with  attempted  proselyting  of  Germans  abroad,  go  on  to 
the  murder  and  kidnaping  of  real  or  fancied  enemies,  and  end  in  armed  insurrec- 
tion against  the  foreign  country  Hitler  wishes  to  conc}uer  or  absorb. 

Such  insurrections  of  Germans  actually  occurred  in  Czechoslovakia,  Austria, 
and  Holland.  But  for  the  firm  attitude  of  the  United  States  such  an  insurrection 
would,  many  students  believe,  have  occurred  in  Brazil. 

That  the  Germans  abroad  are  usually  naturalized  into  something  else  is  no 
hindrance.  Pre-war  imperial  Germany  sanctioned  tlie  double  nationality  status — 
Germans  could,  that  is,  become  French  or  American  or  Portuguese  without  losing 
their  German  nationality.  The  Weimar  republic  did  not  alter  this  strange  con- 
ception and  Nazi  Germany  has  made  it  the  center  of  its  Trojan  horse  tactics  of 
placing  Germans  within  the  enemy  walls. 


g202  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

GERMAN    AIMS    IN    AMERICA 

It  is  safe  to  say  that  a  very  fair  proportion  of  the  nonrefugee  Germans  who 
have  become  Americans  since  Hitler  came  to  power  did  so  with  the  secret  intention 
of  turning  free  and  democratic  America  into  their — that  is,  Hitler's,  America. 

Children  of  Germans  naturalized  half  a  century  ago  are  still  counted  German 
by  Berlin  and  every  effort  is  made  to  convince  them  of  the  fact. 

Naturally  the  Nazis  accept  traitors  as  allies  wherever  they  can  find  them  and 
welcome  the  assistance  of  non-Nordics.  But  peoples  racially  akin  to  Germans — 
Scandinavians,  Dutch,  Flemings,  German-speaking  Swiss,  even  Anglo-Saxons — 
are  made  the  object  to  special  proselyting  as  belonging  to  the  "same  blood."  These 
form  the  material  with  which  the  Nazi  world  conspiracy  chiefly  attempts  to  work. 

The  center  is  the  Nazi  Party.  The  tool  is  the  Auslands  organization  (or 
"organization  abroad")  of  this  party.  Today  this  organization  of  Germans 
abroad  has  nearly  4,000,000  members,  all  of  whom  are  conscious  agents.  Over 
600  local  groups  or  "supporting  points"  are  organized  in  45  or  more  "landes- 
gruppen" — one  in  each  country. 

DIRECTED  BY  ERNST  BOHLE 

The  headquarters  is  in  Stuttgart,  but  all  the  groups  are  directed  by  a  single 
man  in  Berlin,  Gauleiter  Ern.st  Wilhelm  Bohle,  with  some  800  assistants.  Tech- 
nically Bohle  is  a  "state  secretary"  in  the  German  foreign  office.  Where  the  local 
branches  dare  not  appear  under  their  true  colors  they  take  on  fancy  names — -in 
Rumania,  the  Iron  Guards;  in  Switzerland,  True  Confederates;  in  the  United 
States,  Amerikadeutscher  Volksbund. 

But  everywhere,  whether  the  members  are  Germans,  naturalized  Germans,  or 
non-Germanr,  the  aim  is  the  same — to  achieve  Hitler's  end  by  trickery  or  terror; 
the  organizing  principle  is  the  same,  with  SA  and  Hitler  Youth  and  Hitler  Sport, 
marching,  emblems,  ruthless  discipline,  ceremonies  in  honor  of  Nazi  heroes  or 
Hitler's  birthday  parties;  and  in  case  of  war  they  would  all  be  on  Germany's 
side.  In  time  of  peace  they  make  lists  of  Hitler's  enemies,  who  are  marked  down 
for  murder  or  kidnapping  to  Germany  and  torture  when  the  great  day  comes. 

SELLING  Germany's  cause 

Organized  Germans  abroad  are  publicly  told  to  'obey  the  laws  of  their  guest 
country'  but  at  the  same  time  urged  to  'convince  every  outsider  of  the  necessity 
of  Germany's  victory.'  The  Nazi  party  Auslands-Organization  is  by  no  means 
the  only  entity  that  works  for  Hitler  outside  Germany. 

Particularly  important,  notably  in  countries  like  the  Third  French  Republic, 
is  the  work  of  the  press  attaches  in  the  German  embassies  and  consulates.  Not 
only  do  they  see  that  the  1,700  German  language  newspapers  outside  Germany 
(total  circulation  3,000,000)  are  supplied  with  interesting  material  of  all  sorts  at 
the  price  no  other  source  can  meet,  but  they  also  watch  over  German  radio 
programs. 

Special  attention  is  given  to  winning  over  possible  Nazi  friends  on  the  local 
press  and  combating  or  bringing  into  disrepute  newspapers  and  periodicals  that 
oppose  Hitler. 

GESTAPO    EVER    ON    WATCH 

The  German  Gestapo  of  Heinrich  Himmler,  whose  ruthless  efficiency  surpasses 
even  the  Russian  Ogpu,  employs  only  about  5,000  agents  abroad.  One  of  its 
special  tasks  is  watching  over  German  refugee  emigrants,  but  it  does  not  scorn  to 
cast  an  eye  even  on  Nazis  in  good  standing,  some  of  whom  have  been  known  to 
speak  slightingly  of  the  Fuehrer  or  to  express  a  passing  wish  for  greater  personal 
freedom. 

Therefore  one  or  more  agents  can  be  foimd  in  every  German  consulate  or 
embassy  abroad.  A  good  angler  can  manage  to  locate  others  in  the  larger  German 
commercial  enterprises  such  as  shipping  or  oil  companies. 

In  addition  to  the  agencies  already  mentioned,  there  exists  a  colonial  political 
department  headed  by  Gen.  Franz  Ritter  Von  Epp,  Hitler's  special  friend,  which 
carries  on  a  livel,y  pro-Nazi  propaganda  in  the  former  German  colonies  and  among 
Germans  in  colonies  of  other  countries. 

Although  there  is  some  doubt,  presumably  it  is  the  Gestapo  that  picks  out 
special  agents  for  particular  jobs  in  countries  that  happen  at  a  particular  moment 
to  interest  the  Nazis  most.  Rumor  speaks  of  a  high-class  German  technician 
who  managed  to  find  a  relatively  insignificant  job  in  an  American  broadcasting 
company. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8203 

Broadcasting  plays  a  great  role  in  German  spy  life.  Not  only  the  agents 
possess  tiny  senders  with  which  they  transmit  information  unfit  for  the  public, 
but  they  receive  instructions  carefully  concealed  in  ])ublic  broadcasts  from  the 
fatlierland.  One  such  typical  broadcast  was  that  called  Kamaradschaftsdienst, 
supposedly  intended  for  the  soldiers  at  the  front. 

USE    OF    GERMAN    SERVANT    GIRLS 

Tliere  is  no  claim  that  this  description  of  the  German  propaganda  service  is 
complete.  Conceivably  there  exist  other  even  more  interesting  services.  But 
this  much  should  make  it  clear  why  Adolf  Hitler  has  been  so  successful  in  utilizing 
Germans  abroad  and  creating  "fifth  columns"  among  his  enemies. 

Thanks  to  the  pains  taken  and  the  money  spent,  Hitler  has  in  nearly  every 
country  been  able  to  do  considerable  in  breaking  down  the  national  morale  and 
enlisting  traitors.  One  particularly  good  dodge  is  in  most  places  the  creation  of 
two  Nazi  organizations,  one  of  which  acts  in  a  strictly  legal  way. 

Another  (until  it  was  found  out)  was  the  use  of  German  servant  girls.  DutclV 
employers  of  a  particularly  "dumb"  German  cook  were  surj)rised  to  hear  her 
conversing  in  the  kitchen  with  a  perfect  stranger  in  fluent  Oxford  English.  She 
was  dismissed,  and  took  with  her  the  more  important  famil\'  papers. 

TOURISTS    COLLECT    INFORMATION 

German  exchange  students,  carefully  schooled  in  espionage  and  propaganda, 
collected  no  end  of  information  in  Switzerland.  Strength-through-joy  tourists 
carefully  majiped  Poland  for  the  Reichswehr.  It  must  alwa^'s  be  remembered 
that  no  German  receives  police  permission  to  leave  the  Reich,  regardless  of  the 
motives,  until  he  or  she  promises  to  report  everything  seen  and  heard  abroad. 

Each  must  declare  his  address  to  the  nearest  Nazi  ofhcial  and  keep  in  touch 
with  him  so  far  as  circumstances  permit. 

Hi  the  United  States  an  organization  of  Nazis  is  being  trained  in  arms.  As 
matters  now  stand  it  is  conceivable  that  the  United  States  possesses  the  finest 
Nazi-schooled  "fifth  column"  in  the  world,  on  which,  in  case  of  war  with  Ger- 
many, could  be  our  undoing. 

WOULD    BAN    GERMAN    PRESS 

Could,  but  need  not  be.  The  Nazis  are  strong  only  where  unopposed.  Where 
they  are  resisted,  where  the  initiative  is  taken  from  them,  they  tend  to  collapse. 
The  revelations  in  the  American  press  of  the  fortunes  amassed  and  held  abroad 
by  leading  Nazis  kept  Goebbels  busy  denying  it  for  2  weeks. 

It  is  hard  to  see  why  under  present  circumstances,  in  view  of  "fifth  column" 
activity  observed  abroad,  countries  that  do  not  intend  to  submit  to  the  Third 
Reich  permit  any  Germany-language  publications  or  why  they  do  not  adopt 
legislation  allowing  naturalizations  obtained  under  false  pretenses  to  be  annulled 
by  executive  act,  or  do  not  insist  on  knowing  just  what  domestic  industries  and 
commercial  houses  have  tie-ups  of  any  sort  with  the  Nazis. 

Failure  to  do  this,  failure  to  study  and  combat  the  entire  Nazi  Auslands  organi- 
ization,  may  have  tragic  consequences.  Unearthed  in  time,  the  Nazi  conspiracy 
is  relatively  harmless. 

Air.  Mason.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  really  do  not  see  the  relevancy  of 
these  articles  to  the  question  before  the  committee. 

The  Chairman.  Wliat  Mr.  Patman  wants  to  do  is  to  establish  the 
fact  that  these  tourist  concerns  are  used  by  Germany  as  fronts. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  fact  has  been  established  time  and  time  again 
before  this  committee. 

The  Chairman.  All  right. 

Mr.  Mason.  And  it  was  established  before  the  McCormack  com- 
mittee. 

The  Chairman.  All  right. 

Mr.  Mason.  And  why  should  we  take  up  all  of  this  time  to  establish 
the  fact  it  has  been  accepted? 

The  Chairman.  All  rig-ht. 


8204  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Patman.  If  it  is  accepted  that  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir  was  being 
used  as  a  front  to  disseminate  propaganda  I  would  not  care  to  intro- 
duce any  further  testimony. 

The  Chairman.  You  may  proceed. 

Mr.  Patman.  And  if  that  is  conceded  I  have  one  more  item  here  I 
would  like  to  introduce. 

The  Chairman.  Go  ahead. 

Mr.  Patman.  The  following  article  appeared  in  the  New  York 
World-Telegram,  November  2,  1939: 

Germany  Lost  no  Time  in  Launching  Offensive  on  Propaganda  Front 

(By  George  Britt) 

The  Goebbels  propaganda  assault  began  operations  long  before  there  was 
anything  Vjut  quiet  on  the  western  front.  Former  Germans,  to  the  third  and  fourth 
generations  in  America,  were  approached  and  wherever  possible  were  organized 
according  to  their  social  class.  Vast  mailing  lists  were  collected — of  persons  to 
receive  propaganda  or  to  be  called  on  for  money  or  services  or  to  bombard  Con- 
gress with  letters. 

As  I  stated,  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir  was  the  first  highly  paid  Hitler 
agent  in  this  country;  and  one  of  the  main  things,  as  I  understand, 
that  he  was  doing  was  to  furnish  names  of  people,  secret  mailing  lists, 
and  things  like  that,  and  I  think  this  committee,  if  they  have  not  done 
it  already,  should  certainly  get  a  list  of  the  names  furnished  these 
people  who  were  engaged  in  Nazi  propaganda,  without  a  doubt,  and 
possibly  they  are  still  being  used. 

Every  possible  ally,  however  temporary,  was  enlisted.  Every  means  was 
utilized — lecturers,  news  dispatches,  publicity  hand-outs,  papers,  magazines, 
radio  l^roadcasts — for  putting  Nazi  Gerinany's  message  across. 

I  will  ask  that  you  put  this  whole  thing  in. 
(The  editorial  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

Germany  Lost  No  Time  in   Launching   Offensive  on   Propaganda  Front 

(By  George  Britt) 

The  Goeljbels'  propaganda  assault  began  operations  long  before  there  was  any- 
thing but  quiet  on  the  western  front.  Former  Germans,  to  the  third  and  fourth 
generations  in  America,  were  approached  and  wherever  possible  were  organized 
according  to  tlieir  social  class.  Vast  mailing  lists  were  collected — of  persons  to 
receive  i)ropaganda  or  to  be  called  on  for  money  or  services  or  to  bombard  Congress 
with  letters. 

Every  possible  ally,  however  temporary,  was  enlisted.  Every  means  was 
utilized — lecturers,  news  dispatches,  publicity  hand-outs,  papers,  magazines,  radio 
broadcasts — for  i^utting  Nazi  Germany's  message  across. 

MR.  viereck 

And  as  if  for  old-times'  sake,  there  also  was  George  Sylvester  Viereck,  now 
registered  with  the  State  Department  as  a  German  agent. 

Mr.  Viereck,  who  called  himself  "the  Kaiser's  spokesman  in  America"  and 
piililished  his  Fatherland  weekly  during  the  last  war,  was  returned  to  the  head- 
lines in  1934  by  the  McCormack  investigating  committee.  It  was  shown  that 
he  had  got  $1,750  a  month  for  publicity  for  Nazi  Germany  and  an  additional 
$500  a  month  for  advice  concerning  propaganda  to  the  consul  general. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  have  a  prepared  statement  here  as  to  nazi-ism,  and 
it  is  not  very  long,  and  I  would  like  to  ask  permission  to  insert  it 
instead  of  reading  it,  if  it  is  all  right.  I  assure  you  that  it  is  along  the 
lines  of  tilings  which  is  not  entirely  cumulative,  and  some  of  it  is  in  a 
very  different  way  than  what  I  have  gone  into. 

The  Chairman.  What  is  the  purpose  of  it? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8205 

Mr.  Patman.  The  purpose  of  it  is  to  show  what  other  people  think 
about  spreading  Nazi  propaganda  in  this  country,  and  how  it  spreads, 
and  the  resuhs  of  how  it  spreads. 

The  Chairman.  Su])pose  we  receive  that  as  an  exhibit. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  would  rather  have  it  in  as  part  of  my  remarks. 
I  assure  you  it  is  proper  and  material. 

The  Chairman.  Just  place  it  in  the  record,  and  we  will  go  over  it. 
Wlio  is  it  by? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  forget  the  man's  name,  but  it  is  a  chapter  in  a  book 
on  nazi-ism  and  I  am  advised  that  this  chapter  is  by  Albert  Brandt. 
I  imagine  you  have  it  in  your  office,  because  I  think  every  Member  of 
Congress  got  one.  It  was  published  in  1934.  It  is  a  well-recognized 
book,  received  all  over  the  country. 

The  Chairman.  If  you  wish  to  introduce  it  we  will  receive  it  as  an 
exhibit. 

Mr.  Patman.  Then  it  is  not  copied  in  the  testimony,  as  I  under- 
stand it.  If  I  am  mistaken  about  it  it  will  be  already  a  part  of  the 
record,  but  I  would  rather  have  it  in  my  testimony.  It  is  not  long, 
and  merely  a  double-spaced  typewritten  sheet. 

The  Chairman.  It  explains  the  operation  of  Nazi  propaganda? 

Mr.  Patman.  That  is  it  entirely. 

The  Chairman.  Put  it  in. 

Mr.  Patman.  All  right. 

(The  statement  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

A  well-knit  active  organization  with  iron  discipline  replaced  the  rather  slip- 
shod body  which  had  preceded  Hitler's  rise  to  dictatorship.  The  work  of  this 
group  did  not  pass  unnoticed  in  the  liberal  press,  however.  There  were  protests 
against  this  dissemination  of  ideas  inimical  to  American  institutions  and  tradition. 

April  30,  1933,  the  German  leaders  ostensibly  dissolved  their  American  branch 
and  recalled  Manger. 

May  1,  1933,  the  Xazis  established  in  America  the  "Friends  of  Xew  Germany." 

Soon  after  May  1,  another  organization,  "The  Friends  of  Germany,"  was 
organized  for  the  purpose  of  spreading  Nazi  ideas  to  Americans  of  non-German 
origin.  The  omission  of  the  word  "new"  in  this  second  title  is  a  typical  example 
of  what  the  Xazis  no  doubt  felt  to  be  a  master  stroke  of  intrigue.  They  doubtless 
thought  it  would  be  easier  to  enlist  Americans  as  friends  merely  of  Germany  than 
as  friends  of  the  "new"  Germany. 

Dr.  Xieland's  decree,  previously  referred  to,  was  reproduced  in  the  January 
1933,  number  of  the  Nazi  organ,  America's  Deutsche  Post:  "In  order  to  consoli- 
date all  local  German  groups  in  America,"  the  decree  reads,  "and  to  pave  the 
way  for  the  establishment  of  units  to  comprise  an  American  section  of  the  Xa- 
tional  Socialist  Party,  I  hereby  appoint  Comrade  Heinz  Spanknoebel,  of  Detroit, 
national  confidential  agent  for  the  United  States  of  Xorth  America.  *  *  * 
The  confidential  agent  shall  be  responsible  only  to  the  chief  of  the  foreign  divi- 
sion (Xieland) .  It  shall  be  his  task  to  build  up  the  national  movement  *  *  *." 
The  Voelkiseher  Beobachter  on  August  o,  1933,  hailed  the  organization  of  Xazi 
cells  in  America  and  referred  to  Heinz  Spanknoebel  as  their  leader.  The  paper 
stated  that  one  of  the  objects  of  the  American  group  was  to  raise  a  fund  of 
$5,000,000  to  spread  Xazi  ideas. 

October  29,  1933,  a  big  German  Day  celebration  was  staged  for  the  New  York 
Armory,  but  it  was  not  held  because  Mayor  O'Brien  prohibited  the  celebration 
on  the  ground  that  it  would  be  dangerous  to  the  peace  of  the  city. 

December  10,  1933,  the  meeting  was  held  under  the  auspices  of  the  Steuben 
Society.     It  turned  out  to  be  a  X'azi  ma.ss  meeting. 

Members  of  the  "Friends  of  Xew  Germany"  have  organized  an  extensive 
espionage  system.  Every  German  refugee  is  carefully  watched.  If  he  is  a 
Xazi  follower,  he  will  be  assisted  in  every  way  possible;  if  he  is  not  a  follower  of 
Hitler,  he  is  watched  very  carefully  and  reports  made  to  immigration  authorities. 

The  Xorth  German  and  Hamburg-American  Lines'  offices  in  Xew  York  are 
hotbeds  of  Xazi  propaganda  in  America.  The  Xorth  German  Lloyd  director, 
H.  Mensing,  is  the  official  representative  of  the  Xazi  Labor  Front  in  America, 


8206  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

working  under  the  direction  of  Dr.  Robert  Ley,  his  direct  superior  in  Germany. 
Employees  of  these  lines,  in  accordance  with  the  German  laws,  have  been  forced 
to  join  the  Nazi  shop  organizations.  Mensing  has  forced  thousands  of  German 
employees  of  American  firms  to  join  the  labor  front  on  the  threat  that  if  they 
should  ever  return  to  Germany  they  would  be  refused  jobs  and  persecuted.  The 
steamship  lines  have  brought  tons  of  propaganda  to  this  country.  As  recently 
as  on  February  7,  1934,  the  New  York  Times  informed  its  readers  that  United 
States  officials  had  discovered  six  burlap  sacks  containing  300  pounds  of  Nazi 
propaganda  on  the  German  freighter  Este.  All  thip  material  was  addressed  to  the 
chief  propagandists  in  New  York  and  other  cities.  A  share  was  consigned  to 
The  Friends  of  the  New  Germany.  Naturally  this  propaganda  dealt  with 
the  Jewish  question,  though  the  anti-pacifistic  and  cultural  phases  of  Nazi  ideology 
were  duly  stressed.  Spanknoebel  is  reported  to  have  fled  to  Germany  on  the 
S.  S.  Deutschland  without  registering  as  a  passenger.  According  to  the  New 
York  World-Telegram,  Colonel  Emerson  did  the  same  thing  on  the  S.  S.  Europa 
late  in  January  1934.  Propagandists  are  smuggled  into  this  country  after  coming 
across  ostensibly  as  members  of  the  crew.  Nazi  conspirators  have  complete 
privacy  for  their  conferences  aboard  these  ships  in  port.  Employees  of  the  lines 
have  taken  part  in  Nazi  meetings  in  New  York. 

American  children  have  not  been  overlooked  by  the  Nazi  propagandists.  In 
New  York  a  group  called  the  Hitler  Youth  has  been  formed,  on  the  surface  a 
kind  of  boy-scout  movement,  but  actually  a  recruiting  movement  for  the  Storm 
Troops.  The  literature  distributed  to  the  children  included  such  statements  as 
"If  the  world  at  large  bares  its  teeth  at  Germany  we  will  smash  it."  Clearly 
the  main  objective  of  this  group  is  to  breed  soldiers  for  a  war  in  which  nazidom 
will  conquer  the  world. 

Colonel  Emerson  maintained  a  "translation  and  advisory  bureau"  in  the 
Whitehall  Building,  17  Battery  Place,  New  York,  which  is  also  the  address  of 
the  German  consul  general.  This  happens  to  be  the  same  place  where  the 
publication  Facts  in  Review  was  issued  and  a  May  20,  1940,  issue  sent  to  each 
Member  of  Congress  by  special  delivery. 

T.  St.  John  Gaffney  helped  Emerson. 

Frederick  Franklin  Schrader  also  helped  Emerson. 

Ferdinand  Hansen,  Joseph  J.  O'Donohue,  Rev.  Francis  Gross,  Arthur  Fleming 
Waring,  and  others,  helped  him. 

But  these  are  the  more  obvious  propagandists.  Far  more  dangerous  are  those 
who  pose  as  unbiased.  They  include  professional  lecturers,  college  professors, 
"good  will"  lecturers  and  exchange  students.  Their  name  is  literally  legion,  but 
there  is  space  here  to  mention  but  a  few. 

Douglas  Brinkley,  former  National  Broadcasting  Company  announcer  and  news 
commentator,  was  one  of  the  numerous  American  publicists  who  were  invited  to 
Germany  ostensibly  to  study  conditions  there.  None  of  this  group,  which  included 
such  men  as  George  Sylvester  Viereck,  paid  his  own  expenses.  These  visits  have 
already  begun  to  show  results  in  a  wave  of  propaganda.  Brinkley,  for  instance, 
had  no  sooner  returned  to  this  country  than  he  told  a  New  York  Nazi  audience  at 
the  Central  Opera  House  that  Hitlerland  is  a  vertiable  paradise,  that  the  concen- 
tration camps  are  models  of  humane  comfort,  and  that  stories  of  atrocities  are  all 
untrue.  Brinkley  was  the  only  man  who  addressed  this  meeting  in  English.  He 
informed  the  audience  that  he  intended  to  travel  throughout  the  United  States  to 
carry  this  message.  Mr.  Brinkley,  as  far  back  as  July,  1933,  knew  what  he  wanted. 
On  July  11,  he  declared  from  a  German  short-wave  radio  station:  "I  came  to 
Germany  to  become  acquainted  with  actual  conditions — to  establish  the  naked 
facts,  and  to  enlighten  the  American  people  about  the  new  Germany.  Nowhere 
have  I  been  able  to  find  even  the  slightest  sign  of  unrest  or  mistreatment.  I  am  a 
witness  that  all  disquieting  reports  about  Germany  are  mere  fabrication." 

Brinkley  is  regarded  today  as  the  most  important  Nazi  propagandist  in  America. 
The  Nazis  hope  he  will  eventually  secure  time  on  the  national  radio  networks 
here.  In  the  meantime  he  is  preparing  to  syndicate  a  series  of  articles.  The 
Deutsche  Zeitung  on  January  20  said  of  him:  "We  know  Germany  has  a  very 
good  friend  in  Douglas  Brinkley,  and  we  hope,  in  the  interest  of  our  fatherland  and 
of  the  whole  world,  that  his  important  voice  will  be  heard  so  that  the  world  will 
know  better  the  blessings  of  National  Socialist  Germany." 

But  it  is  Viereck  who  is  the  real  "brain  trust"  of  Nazi  propaganda  in  America. 
It  is  Viereck  who  sends  an  indignant  letter  of  protest  to  the  editor  whenever  an 
American  publication  exposes  the  machinations  of  the  nazidom  here.  It  is 
Viereck  who  censors  all  the  Nazi  publicity  material  in  this  country.  Viereck's 
trip  to  Germany  was  made  with  Carl  D.  Dickey  of  the  firm  of  Carl  Byoir  and 
Associates  of  New  York,  the  publicity  outfit  which  formerly  represented  the 


UN-AMElilCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8207 

infamous  Machado.  Apparent!}'  the  theory  of  the  Nazis  was  that  if  tliis  firm 
could  sell  Machado  to  the  American  public  it  could  sell  even  Hitler  and  Goering. 
The,  no  doubt,  tlisintcrested  opinions  of  Messrs.  Viereck  and  Dickey  on  Germany 
will  soon  be  fed  to  Americans  through  a  series  of  syndicated  articles.  One  may 
expect  that  these  gentlemen  will  be  more  circumspect  than  the  crude,  outspoken 
George  Schmitt. 

German  exchange  students  arc  seeking  in  this  country  to  dujjlicate  the  success 
of  the  Nazis  in  Germany  in  winning  the  support  in  universities.  If  anti-Semitism 
appeals  so  readily  to  European  students,  the  Nazis  reason,  why  not  to  American 
students?  Before  the  exchange  students  leave  Germany  they  must  sign  a  pledge 
to  speak  only  good  of  the  Hitler  regime. 

A  dcmanci  that  the  activities  of  German  exchange  students  at  American  uni- 
versities be  investigated  to  disclose  whether  they  are  exchanged  in  Nazi  propa- 
ganda work  was  made  in  October  1933,  by  Dr.  Franz  Boas,  professor  of  anthro- 
pology at  Columbia  University.  In  a  letter  to  Representative  Samuel  Dickstein, 
chairman  of  the  House  Immigration  Committee,  Boas  cited  the  official  order  of 
the  German  Government  recjuiring  all  exchange  students  in  foreign  countries  to 
spread  Nazi  propaganda. 

The  Nazi  press  in  America  is  urging  its  readers  to  buy  good  receivers  for  short- 
wave radio  broadcasts  from  Germany.  "German  stations  on  the  air  every  night 
for  North  and  South  America,"  headlines  the  German  Outlook,  English  edition 
of  the  Deutsche  Zcitung.  There  are  three  broadcasts  on  short-wave  stations 
every  daj',  spreading  propaganda  from  Germany  to  the  United  States. 

The  German  consul  general's  office  in  New  York  had  been  the  center  of  most 
of  the  propaganda  in  this  country.  Here  much  of  the  funds  were  distributed. 
Bills  for  propaganda  activities  were  frequently  paid  by  Herr  Loeper,  treasurer 
of  the  German  general  consulate,  and  the  receipts  sent  to  Berlin  along  with  diplo- 
matic correspondence.  Ambassador  Luther,  formerly  of  the  moderate  and 
republican  People's  Party,  with  the  accession  of  Hitler  became  an  ardent  Nazi 
supporter.  Propaganda  bills  have  also  been  paid  by  Dr.  Degener  of  the  German 
American  Commercial  League,  which,  with  the  German-American  Board  of 
Trade  and  the  German  Legion,  has  carried  on  active  anti-Semitic  and  pro-Hitler 
propaganda. 

The  drain  on  the  German  Government's  funds  was  such  that  in  June  1933 
Dr.  Luther  and  Dr.  Kiep,  acting  on  orders  from  Berlin,  summoned  German  big 
businessmen  in  this  country  to  a  meeting  at  the  consulate  and  told  them  it  was 
their  duty  to  finance  Nazi  propaganda  in  America.  Adolph  Scheurer,  director 
of  the  American  office  of  the  Hamburg- American  Line;  Willi  von  Meister,  Ameri- 
can representative  of  the  Dornier  Motor  Works,  Friedrichschaven;  Gen.  A.  Metz 
and  Von  Rath  of  the  I.  G.  Chemical  Corporation,  were  given  leading  roles  in 
organizing  big  business  as  a  factor  in  Nazi  propaganda. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  respectfully  submit  that  I  have  shown  positively, 
conclusively,  and  by  sworn  testimony  the  following: 

One,  that  Lt.  Col.  Carl  Byoir  accepted  enormous  sums  of  money 
from  the  German  consul  in  New  York  and  from  a  "front"  organiza- 
tion for  Nazi  propaganda  in  America,  known  as  the  German  Tourist 
Information  Office,  to  distribute  Nazi  literature  in  America 

Mr.  Mason  (interposing).  May  I  just  interrupt  there  to  say,  have 
you  said  you  have  shown  that  conclusivelv?  Is  that  the  way  you 
put  it? 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes;  I  have. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  was  all  established  by  the  McCormack  com- 
mittee in  its  findings,  and  in  its  evidence  that  has  been  printed. 

Mr,  Patman.  You  admit  it,  that  it  does? 

Mr.  Mason.  Yes;  I  admit  that  part;  yes. 

Mr.  Patman.  Of  course.     1  am  glad  you  do,  Mr.  Mason. 

As  I  was  saying,  including  literature  concerning  church  and  state, 
anti-Semitism,  and  in  behalf  of  Hitler's  form  of  government. 

Too,  it  has  been  shown  that  this  occurred  while  he  was  a  lieutenant 
colonel  in  the  United  States  Army  Reserves. 

Therefore,  no  other  proof  is  needed.  The  fact  that  he  ever,  at  any 
time,  was  guilty  of  such  un-American  activity  should  be  sufficient  to 

62626 — 41— vol.  14 4 


8208  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

cause  this  committee  to  recommend  his  immediate  dismissal  and  to 
make  a  finding  that  he  has  been  guilty  of  un-American  activity. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  cannot  follow  your  logic  there,  sir. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  appreciate  the  fact  that  honest  men  differ  about 
things,  Mr.  Mason,  and,  of  couree,  this  matter  is  a  matter  about  which 
we  are  all  concerned.  It  is  not  a  matter  of  any  personal  feeling  on  the 
part  of  anyone,  but  it  is  a  matter  which  we  consider  to  be  a  public  duty. 
That  is  my  opinion. 

Mr.  Mason.  Then  there  is  no  personal  feeling  on  my  part,  and  there 
has  never  been.  The  first  time  I  ever  heard  of  Byoir  was  when  I  was 
asked  to  sit  on  a  committee  and  go  into  this  matter. 

Mr.  Patman.  Further,  in  regard  to  a  part  of  big  business  being 
connected  with  Nazi  propaganda  representatives,  I  ask  the  committee 
to  investigate  the  connection  of  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  and  George 
Sylvester  Viereck  and  George  Sylvester  Viereck,  Lieutenant  Colonel 
Byoir  and  Dr.  Westrick. 

It  is  my  belief  that  Viereck  was  here  to  try  to  encourage  the  big 
industrial  and  financial  leaders  in  this  Nation  to  adopt  an  appeasement 
policy  toward  Hitler  and  Germany,  the  same  kind  of  policy  that 
France  adopted;  this  belief  is  justified  by  newspaper  and  magazine 
accounts  of  his  activities  and  the  fact  that  he  was  bold  enough  to  even 
attend  one  of  our  national  political  conventions,  at  which  a  candidate 
for  President  was  nominated.  Certainly  there  is  sufficient  to  justify 
an  investigation. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  did  not  get  that,  Mr.  Patman.  The  fact  that  who 
was  bold  enough  to  even  attend  a  convention? 

Mr.  Patman.  Viereck. 

Mr.  Mason.  Of  course,  Viereck  has  not  anything  to  do  with  the 
question  before  this  committee. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  laiow;  but  I  am  asking  you  to  bring  that  in  to  show 
his  connection  with  Byoir. 

The  Chairman.  We  are  investigating  Mr.  Byoir. 

Mr.  Mason.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  am  connected,  we  will  say,  with  big 
business.  Casey  is  connected  with  big  business  in  a  different  position. 
Because  I  am  connected  with  big  business  and  I  have  done  things  wrong 
or  illegal,  therefore,  because  Casey  is  connected  with  big  business  he 
must  be  just  as  criminal  as  I  am. 

The  Chairman.  All  right. 

Mr.  Patman.  There  is  a  big  difference  there. 

Mr.  Mason.  There  is  no  logic  in  that. 

Mr.  Patman.  You  have  not  followed  through,  Mr.  Mason.  Your 
premise  is  not  entirely  correct. 

Do  you  want  me  to  read  that  over? 

Mr.  Mason.  Yes;  I  would  like  to  hear  it. 

Mr.  Patman.  It  is  my  belief  that  Westrick  was  here  to  try  to 
encourage  the  big  industrial  and  financial  leaders  in  this  Nation  to 
adopt  an  appeasement  policy  toward  Hitler  and  Germany,  the  same 
kind  of  policy  that  France  adopted;  this  belief  is  justified  by  news- 
paper and  magazine  accounts  of  his  activities  and  the  fact  that  he 
was  bold  enough  to  even  attend  one  of  our  national  political  conven- 
tions, at  which  a  candidate  for  President  was  nominated.  Certainly 
that  is  sufficient  to  justify  an  investigation. 

I  realize  that  I  have  been  seriously  handicapped  at  this  hearing; 
that  a  subcommittee  of  this  committee  had  heretofore  exonerated 
Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  without  giving  me  an  opportunity  to  be 


UN-AMEUICAX  PROPAGAXDA  ACTIVITIES  8209 

hoard,  nii<l  without  any  nttompt  to  criticize  tlic  coinTiiittcc.  it  is  nat- 
ural to  prcsunu'  lluit  all  thiii(;s  being  (Kjual,  you  will  have  a  j^resuinp- 
tion  in  favor  of  this  subcommittee's  action. 

However,  I  appreciate^  [he  opportunity  of  presc^iting  this  evidence, 
Avhich  T  consider  is  sudicient  and  to  make  recommendations  as  to 
further  in(|uiry  by  this  committee  relative  to  a  certain  part  of  big 
business'  connection  with  Nazi  propaganda. 

And  I  shall  close  with  this  closing  remark,  that  if  Lieutenant 
Colonel  Byoir  ever  represented  Hitler  in  this  country  ho  is  guilty  of 
un-American  activity. 

Mr.  Casey.  Mr.  Patman,  just  one  word.  When  you  said  there 
was  a  subcommittee  here  at  which  you  were  not  heard  they  also  did 
not  hear  Mr.  Byoir  either. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  do  not  consider  that  analogous.  Do  you  want  to 
justify  your  position? 

Mr.  Casey.  I  want  this  tor  the  record.  Mr.  Byoir  was  not  heard, 
you  were  not  heard,  but  your  charges  were  heard.  We  have  no  feeling 
in  thf  matter.  We  made  a  finding.  And  we  do  not  want  any  infer- 
ence from  any  statements  which  you  make  that  there  was  a  hearing 
at  which  only  one  side  was  heard. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  did  not  make  that  statement  so  that  it  would  convey 
the  impression  that  only  one  side  was  heard,  and  I  do  not  w^ant  it  to 
appear  for  one  minute  that  I  did  intend  to  imply  that.  I  certainly  did 
not  mean  to  make  that  impression. 

But  2  weeks  before,  or  1  week  before  this  announcement  came  out 
from  the  Dies  committee  that  he  was  exonerated 

The  Chairman.  Did  the  announcement  come  out  that  they  exon- 
erated him? 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes,  clearly;  100  percent,  without  any  doubt. 

The  Chairman.  As  I  understand  the  position  of  these  gentlemen 
it  is  from  1935  up  to  the  present  time,  and  they  w^ere  dealing  with 
that  period,  and  not  undertaking  to  contradict  the  findmgs  of  the 
McCormack  committee. 

Mr.  Patman.  Wliy  should  you  not  deal  with  that,  when  it  was  not 
known  that  he  was  a  lieutenant  colonel  at  that  time?  In  other 
words,  subsequent  information  connected  with  that  should  be  con- 
sidered to  my  mind. 

The  Chairman.  I  am  not  going  into  that  question.  The  point  I 
am  making  is  that  if  a  committee  of  this  Congress,  having  jurisdiction 
of  certain  subject  matter,  hears  evidence  and  renders  a  finding,  and 
another  committee,  shortly  thereafter,  comes  along,  certainly  that 
committee  could  not  take  the  same  testimony  heard  before  and  from 
a  committee  standpoint  reverse  its  opinion,  without  new  evidence. 

Mr.  Patman.  There  is  new  evidence  in  this.  But  certainly  in 
view  of  the  fact  that  knowledge  about  Lieutenant  Colonel  Byoir  at 
that  time  would  produce  an  entirely  dift'eront  light  on  this  2  weeks 
before  this  came  out  about  the  exoneration  should  amount  to  some- 
thing, and  I  went  to  Mr.  Dempsey  on  the  floor,  and  I  told  him — 
I  will  quote  it  as  near  as  I  can;  I  do  not  like  to  quote  people,  because 
sometimes  there  is  a  difference  of  opinion,  but  I  will  do  it  in  this 
case,  because  I  feel  it  is  justified  and  absolutely  necessary. 

I  said,  "Mr.  Dempsey,  I  am  going  to  Texas  tonight  because  my 
primary  is  in  2  weeks.     Will  you  need  me  during  that  time?     If  you 


8210  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

do,  of  course  I  will  make  arrangements  to  stay  over.  If  you  do  not 
I  am  going  to  Texas  for  2  weeks." 

He  said,  "Why,  certainlv;  nothing  will  be  done  during  that  time 
at  all." 

I  went  on  to  Texas.  I  was  there  a  week.  And  in  the  meantime 
headlines  came  out  in  the  papers  leaving  the  impression  that  I  had 
filed  charges  which  were  wholly  unfounded  against  Lt.  Col.  Carl 
Byoir,  and  he  was  by  the  Dies  committee  exonerated  completely  of 
any  blame  whatever. 

I  came  back  and  asked  Mr.  Dempsey  about  it,  and  I  said  I  wanted 
to  be  heard.  He  said,  "Pat,  this  is  too  big  for  politics."  I  said, 
"Of  course;  politics  are  not  hooked  up  in  this  either.  It  is  just  a  fair 
trial  for  a  colleague,"  because  I  wanted  an  opportunity  to  refute  the 
dispute.  And  I  am  not  questioning  the  sincerity  of  any  member  of 
this  committee,  as  I  presume  you  are  all  honest,  but  I  realize  when  you 
make  a  finding  you  want  to  support  your  finding — and  I  do  not  blame 
you  for  it,  as  I  would  be  in  the  same  position  were  I  in  your  place, 
but  at  the  same  time  I  am  under  a  handicap  in  this  matter,  as  you  see. 

Mr.  Mason.  May  I  say  this;  that  I  have  listened  to  all  of  the  testi- 
mony today,  and  I  have  not  received  one  scintilla  of  new  evidence 
which  we  did  not  go  over  in  carefully  going  over  the  Congressional 
Record  as  to  the  charges  made  on  the  floor,  and  in  carefully  going  over 
the  report  of  our  investigator,  and  in  carefully  going  over  the  report  of 
the  McCormack  committee,  as  well  as  the  investigation  of  the  F.  B.  I., 
and  I  have  not  received  one  iota  of  any  evidence  to  substantiate  the 
charges  made. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  the  gentleman  will  admit  that  there  is  a 
difference  in  talkmg  to  someone  who  has  not  prejudged  a  case  and  one 
who  has.     Naturally  you  would  lean  that  way.     I  am  sure  I  would. 

I  think  there  has  been  additional  evidence,  and  I  think  it  is  very 
clear  and  positive  and  to  the  point. 

Are  there  any  other  questions? 

The  Chairman.  I  do  not  hear  any. 

Mr.  Patman.  Thank  you  very  much  for  the  hearing. 

The  Chairman.  In  accordance  with  the  custom  of  the  committee, 
Mr.  Byoir  has  a  right  to  confer  with  counsel  m  the  course  of  his 
testimony. 

Mr.  McMahon.  Thank  you. 

The  Chairman.  I  will  therefore  ask  both  of  you  gentlemen  to  be 
seated  at  the  witness  desk. 

Counsel  has  no  right  to  ask  questions  of  the  witness,  but  he  can 
confer  with  the  witness,  and  the  witness  has  a  right  to  make  any 
necessary  explanation  in  connection  with  his  statements. 

TESTIMONY   OF  LT.  COI.   CARL   BYOIR,    UNITED   STATES   ARMY 

RESERVE 

(The  witness  was  accompanied  by  his  attorney,  Brien  McMahon.) 

(The  witness  was  sworn  by  the  chairman.) 

The  Chairman.  What  is  your  name? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Carl  Byoir. 

The  Chairman.  Where  do  you  live? 

Colonel  Byoir.  New  York  City. 

The  Chairman.  How  long  have  you  lived  m  New  York  City? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Thirty  years. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8211 

The  Chairman.  Where  were  you  born? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Des  Moines,  Iowa. 

The  Chairman.  Wliat  profession  or  occupation  are  you  engaged  in? 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  am  a  public  relations  counsel. 

The  Chairman.  How  long  have  you  been  in  that  business? 

Colonel  Byoir.  About  10  years. 

The  Chairman.  What  was  your  occupation  prior  to  that  time? 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  was  a  manufacturer. 

The  Chairman.  Where? 

Colonel  Byoir.  In  New  York. 

The  Chairman.  A'Nliat  did  you  manufacture? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Toilet  preparations. 

The  Chairman.  How  long  have  you  been  engaged  in  that  occupa- 
tion? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Oh,  for  about  9  years. 

The  Chairman,  ^^^lat  was  your  business  prior  to  that? 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  w^as  in  the  magazine  and  newspaper  business. 

The  Chairman.  In  the  magazine  and  newspaper  business? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  How  long  were  you  in  that  business? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Back  to  the  time  I  was  12  years  old. 

The  Chairman.  Mr.  Byoir;  are  you  a  member  of,  or  have  you  ever 
been  a  member  of  the  German- American  Bund? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No. 

The  Chairman.  Are  you  a  member  of,  or  have  you  ever  been  a 
member  of  the  German- American  Alliance? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Are  you  a  member  of,  or  have  you  ever  been  a 
member  of  the  Teutonic  Society? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Have  you  ever  been,  or  are  3^ou  a  member  of  any 
organization  which  advocates,  believes  in,  or  preaches  nazi-ism  or 
fascism? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Are  you,  or  have  you  ever  been  connected  with  the 
Communist  Party? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Or  of  any  organization  under  the  control  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Do  you  believe  in  the  principles  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Do  you  believe  in  the  principles  of  fascism? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Do  you  believe  in  the  principles  of  communism? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Do  you  believe  in  the  principles  of  nazi-ism? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  You  have  heard  the  charges  and  statements  which 
have  been  made  by  the  previous  witness,  have  you  not? 

Colonel  Byoir.   Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  You  have  been  in  attendance  all  of  the  time  he 
testified? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Yes,  sir. 


8212  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

The  Chairman.  It  has  been  the  custom  of  the  committee  to  ask 
ciuestions  of  the  witnesses,  and  that  has  been  a  custom  that  we  have 
seklom  deviated  from.  In  view  of  the  fact  that  the  previous  witness 
was  permitted  to  make  a  statement  without  questions  by  the  com- 
mittee, I  think,  in  fairness  to  you,  you  may  do  so,  but  you  should 
confine  yourself  to  the  charges  made;  that  is,  your  answers  should  be 
a  denial  or  affirmance  of  any  statement  made  by  the  previous  witness. 

Colonel  Bygir.  I  should  like  to  address  myself,  Mr.  Chairman, 
first  of  all 

The  Chairman  (interposing).  Speak  as  distinctly  as  you  can,  and 
as  loud  as  you  can. 

Colonel  Bygir.  Yes.  I  would  like  to  address  myself  first  of  all  to 
the  last  statement  made  by  Mr.  Fatman,  to  the  eft'ect  that  he  had  been 
handicapped  and  had  had  no  opportunity  to  be  heard.  It  seems  to  me 
the  statement  is  a  little  defensive.  Mr.  Patman  has  said  here  that  he 
is  not  actuated  by  any  malice,  that  he  has  no  personal  feeling  in  this 
matter,  but  that  just  as  a  patriotic  citizen  he  thinks  that  Lieutenant 
Colonel  Byoir  ought  to  be  exposed. 

I  do  not  think  that  that  statement  sincerely  gives  this  committee  the 
exact  ground  upon  which  these  charges  grew^  out.  In  the  first  place, 
Mr.  Patman  said  that  he  never  made  statements  that  he  could  not 
prove.  Mr.  Patman  started  oft'  b}^  saying  that  he  was  going  to  prove 
that  Carl  Byoir  was  a  propagandist  and  had  been  in  the  employ  of  the 
German  Government. 

Now,  gentlemen,  I  M'ould  like  to  call  your  attention  to  the  fact  that 
that  is  in  itself  an  admission  b}'^  Mr.  Patman  that  he  makes  statements 
that  he  would  not  even  try  to  prove.  When  Mr.  Patman  first  made 
his  charge  on  the  floor  of  the  House,  he  did  not  say  that  5  or  6  years  ago 
Carl  Byoir  was  a  propagandist  employed  by  the  German  railroads,  or 
the  German  consul  or  the  German  Government.  He  said,  and  I  quote 
him  from  memory  because  it  is  burnt  into  my  memory,  "I  have  no 
doubt  that  Carl  Byoir  was  bought  to  try  to  set  up  the  greatest  spy 
system  in  the  world  and  w^as  engaged  in  the  effort  to  infiltrate  spies  in 
this  country's  big  business." 

There  is  quite  a  dift'erence  between  a  publicity  agent  and  a  spy,  and 
Mr.  Patman  has  made  a  good  deal  of  complaint  after  the  hasty  action 
of  this  committee. 

I  want  to  tell  you  that  in  the  present  state  of  the  public  opinion 
in  the  United  States  and  the  background  of  the  present  scene,  when 
you  say  a  man  is  a  spy  or  the  head  of  the  greatest  spy  system  in  the 
history  of  the  world,  that  man  does  not  live  in  comfort  during  40  or  50 
days  that  Mr.  Patman  regards  as  too  hasty  for  an  investigation  by  a 
committee  of  Congress. 

It  may  be  surprising  to  Mr.  Patman  that  there  are  those  who  love 
me;  those  are  those  who  are  associated  with  me  in  business,  who 
believe  in  me.  How  does  Mr.  Patman  think  that  those  people  think 
and  feel?  How  does  he  thuik  they  feel  when  he  is  too  busy  in  a 
political  campaign  to  present  his  evidence  to  this  committee?  How 
does  he  think  that  the  200  or  300  people  associated  with  me  today 
feel  when  thej  get  letters  from  home  saying,  "Are  you  associated  with 
the  great  mass  spy?  Is  that  the  business  in  which  you  are  engaged?" 
How  does  he  think  that  the  family  of  the  accused  feels?  And  I  do 
not  want  to  draw  any  tears,  gentlemen,  but  I  do  not  believe  there 
were  2  days  that  went  by  that  the  telephone  did  not  ring  and  questions 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8213 

were  asked  that  caused  the  tears  of  tlie  gh'l  sitting  tliere  answering 
that  telephone.  I  want  to  show  that  there  was  not  a  day  went  by 
that  we  did  not  get  letters  saying,  "We  are  going  to  blow  you  up."  I 
won't  say  anybody  was  frightened,  but  it  was  not  very  nice,  in  days 
when  we  were  threatened  with  being  blown  up. 

Mr.  Patman  has  thought  it  was  too  hasty.  Mr.  Patman  has  had 
now  more  than  90  days  and  he  has  not  said  a  word  now  today  that 
was  not  available  to  these  people  when  he  concluded  his  speech  on  the 
lloor  of  the  House  on  the  27th  day  of  May. 

Let  us  look  at  his  patriotic  motives  and  his  bona  fides.  He  said  on 
May  27  that  he  had  discovered  the  greatest  spy  system  in  the  history 
of  the  world.  What  does  a  patriotic  citizen  do  under  these  conditions, 
whether  he  is  a  private  citizen  or  a  Member  of  Congress?  He  goes 
to  the  Department  of  Justice  or  to  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation 
and  says  "Tliere  is  some  information  for  you;  here  is  some  evidence  for 
you."  He  does  not  get  up  on  the  floor  of  the  House  in  the  character 
of  a  Congressman,  if  he  is  only  motivated  by  patriotic  feelings  and 
nothing  personal.  He  only  last  week  complained  on  the  floor  of  the 
House  that  you  had  not  given  him  an  opportunity  to  be  heard  during 
those  50  days.  Why  didn't  Mr.  Patman  tell  the  Members  of  the 
House;  why  didn't  he  admit  that  he  had  had  opportunity  to  be  heard; 
that  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation  investigators  had  called  on 
him;  that  he  had  every  opportunity  to  give  them  all  of  the  evidence 
that  he  had  and  that  the  file  of  that  evidence  was  available  to  this 
committee? 

Then,  I  am  sorry  to  say  that  I  cannot  believe  the  Representative 
when  he  says  that  he  has  no  personal  feelmg  in  this  matter.  The 
fact  is  that  there  is  a  rather  long  history  of  personal  conflicts  between 
Wright  Patman  and  Carl  Byoir. 

Up  until  Ma}'  27,  when  Mr.  Patman  made  these  charges,  I  can 
assure  you  that  on  my  part  there  was  nothing  personal  in  that  con- 
flict. Air.  Patman  was  a  Representative  in  the  Congress  of  the  United 
States,  advocating  certain  legislation,  and  for  several  years  has  been 
engaged  in  serving  the  people  for  cash  payments  through  making 
speeches  to  them 

(At  tliis  pomt  the  chairman  sounded  liis  gavel.) 

Mr.  Mason.  That  refers  to  the  charges  that  have  been  made  and 
to  the  assertions  that  have  been  made  here,  and  we  do  want  to  get 
both  sides. 

The  Chairman.  That  is  true.  His  testimony,  as  I  said  before, 
ought  to  be  in  opposition  to  what  Mr.  Patman  testified. 

Mr.  Mason.  But  you  gave  tliis  witness  permission  to  give  evidence 
as  a  foundation  for  the  evideiice  that  he  had.  Tliis  is  a  general  state- 
ment. 

The  Chairman.  Very  well. 

Ml-.  Casey.  I  got  this  feeling.  I  was  very  much  impressed  with 
Mr.  Batman's  statement  that  he  was  acting  as  an  American  citizen 
and  a  Member  of  Congress,  and  that  he  had  no  feeling.  I  think  that 
if  this  gentl(>man  can  show  a  motive  for  this,  he  should  be  given  the 
opportunity  to  do  it. 

The  Chairman.  Then  go  ahead. 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  repeat  then,  that  Mr.  Patman  either  felt  that 
Carl  B}oir  was  standing  in  the  way  of  his  making  $10,000  or  $15,000 
a  year  outside  of  his  salaiy  as  a  Congressman,  or  he  was  terrorized  by 
Carl  Byoir  for  fear  that  he  might  reveal  sometliing  that  he  knew  Mr. 


3214  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Byoir  knew  which  might  reflect  upon  the  conduct  of  Congressman 
Patman. 

I  can  say  now,  gentlemen,  that  if  Mr.  Patman  was  terrorized,  it  was 
needless,  because  when  the  contest  over  his  legislation — the  record  is 
there  before  the  committee  of  this  same  House — that  at  no  time  did 
I  ever  hit  Mr.  Patman  below  the  belt.  We  introduced  more  than  180 
witnesses,  and  all  confined  themselves  to  the  merits  or  demerits  of  the 
legislation  which  he  sponsored. 

The  Chairman.  Regardless  of  the  merits  or  demerits  of  the  legisla- 
tion, the  Chairman  does  not  think  Mr.  Patman  would  make  those 
charges  through  dishonorable  or  corrupt  motives  or  through  strong 
personal  reasons  or  beliefs.  I  still  believe  that  you  should  confine 
yourself  to  statements  of  fact. 

Colonel  Byoir.  Don't  you  think  the  malice  of  the  accuser  is 
pertinent  here? 

The  Chairman.  Neither  you  nor  Mr.  Patman  can  establish  facts 
by  opinions.  What  we  are  primarily  concerned  with,  is  Mr.  Byoir 
engaged  in  dishonorable  practice? 

Mr.  Mason.  Let  me  interject  this.  You  are  a  lawyer  and  I  am 
not,  but  I  understand  that  in  all  trials,  in  criminal  trials  particularly, 
a  motive  behind  the  case  is  always  pertinent,  and  I  think  from  what 
I  gather  that  it  is  the  motive  that  the  witness  is  trying  to  develop  in 
this  matter,  and  I  consider  that  pertinent. 

The  Chairman.  Just  a  moment.  I  want  to  confer  with  my 
associates. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  make  the  motion,  if  it  is  necessary,  that  we  listen 
to  the  development  of  facts  which  would  show  a  notive  for  the  attacks 
upon  Carl  Byoir. 

The  Chairman.  All  in  favor  say  "aye." 

Mr.  Casey.  Aye. 

The  Chairman.  The  chairman  does  not  agree  with  that.  The 
Chair  has  the  opinion  that  if  you  permit  a  witness  to  undertake  to 
explore  the  field  of  motives,  that  you  are  going  far  afield  in  that 
connection. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  want  him  to  present  facts  which,  upon  the  basis 
of  those  facts,  might  show  a  motive. 

The  Chairman.  There  is  a  vast  difference  between  a  statement 
of  fact  and  the  deducing  of  a  wrong  from  those  facts. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  is  true. 

The  Chairman.  I  admit  that  while  we  did  accord  Mr.  Patman 
wide  latitude,  we  have  other  Members  of  Congress  who  appear  before 
the  committee.  Nevertheless,  I  think  that  when  he  attacks  a  Member 
of  Congress  on  liis  record,  it  is  going  far  afield.  It  is  his  opinion,  but 
he  may  proceed. 

Mr.  Mason.  We  should  listen  to  this  witness  to  state  facts  upon 
which  interpretations  can  be  made  by  the  committee. 

The  Chairman.  All  right.     Let  us  proceed,  gentlemen. 

Colonel  Byoir.  Mr.  Chairman,  it  is  admitted  that  I  am  in  the 
publicity  business.  It  is  admitted  that  in  1934  and  1933  we  had  a 
contract  with  the  German  Federal  Railway.  It  is  a  little  bit  different 
for  somebody  to  try  to  get  the  American  people  to  interpret  the 
motives  and  happenings  in  that  scene  in  the  light  of  what  goes  on  today. 

It  is  a  first  principle  in  any  legal  matter,  I  think,  that  when  you 
have  the  best  record  you  do  not  take  the  second  best  record.  The 
best  record  of  what  was  done  under  that  contract  is  the  record  of 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8215 

the  McCormack  coininittee.  The  McCorniack  committee  heard  all 
the  witnesses.  They  could  decide  whether  a  man's  testimony  was 
credible  or  not.  They  saw  all  of  the  material,  and  they  arrived  at 
the  conclusion. 

The  thing-  that  I  dislike  most  about  this  unpleasant  business  is 
that  when  Air.  Patman  made  his  charges  on  the  floor  of  the  House, 
he  then  knew  that  they  were  false,  because  within  a  few  days  before 
he  had  gone  to  the  subcommittee  of  the  McCormack  committee, 
and  the  subcommittee  had  asked  liim,  "Is  there  anything  in  this 
record  discreditable  to  Mr.  Byoir?"  And  the  chairman  of  the  sub- 
committee, who  certaiidy  could  not  be  accused  of  nazi-ism  leanings, 
said  to  Imn: 

After  we  saw  all  the  material  and  heard  all  the  evidence,  I  made  a  rejiort  on 
the  floor  of  the  House  in  which  I  commended  Mr.  Byoir  for  his  American  attitude, 
his  patriotism,  and  the  way  he  had  handled  the  whole  matter. 

Mr.  Patman  knew  that.  He  knew  it  was  a  publicity  contract  with 
the  German  Federal  Railroads,  and  he  also  knew  then  and  knows 
now  that  there  was  no  scintilla  of  evidence  to  warrant  any  of  the 
espionage  charges  that  he  had  made. 

Mr.  Patman  went  further.  He  went  to  the  War  Department  and 
he  made  inquiries.  He  said  "Didn't  some  plans  disappear  from  here 
once  or  twice  that  have  been  reported  reached  Germany?"  And 
they  said  "Yes,  that  is  the  report,"  and  he  said,  "Colonel  Byoir  is  in 
the  Reserves."  There  are  only  120,000  of  us,  the  balance  have 
disappeared.     "Mr.  Byoir  must  be  the  thief." 

I  think  that  is  just  as  able  a  non  sequitur  as  it  would  be  possible 
to  find.  I  might  just  as  well  say  that  there  was  a  murder  committed 
in  Texas  last  year  and  Mr.  Patman  was  in  Texas  at  the  time  of  the 
murder,  therefore  he  must  be  the  murderer,  or  at  least  there  should 
be  an  investigation. 

Gentlem.en,  I  think  m.y  record  as  an  American  citizen  is  a  very 
good  record.  I  served  this  country  during  the  war,  and  no  call  has 
ever  been  m.ade  upon  m.e  by  the  Governm.ent  of  the  United  States  of 
Am.crica  to  which  I  have  not  fully  responded. 

Mr.  Mason.  In  what  capacity  did  you  serve  during  the  World 
War? 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  was  associate  chairm.an  of  the  United  States 
Governm.ent  Committee  on  Public  Inform.ation  all  through  the 
World  War.  I  was  the  diplom.atic  representative  sent  by  President 
Wilson  personally  to  the  new  countries  created  out  of  the  Treaty  of 
Versailles,  after  the  war,  and  I  have  been  for  m.ore  than  9  years  a 
lieutenant  colonel  in  the  United  States  Ai'm.y  Reserve. 

I  am  a  little  sensitive  on  that  last,  Mr.  Mason,  because  Mr.  Patman 
sat  here  and  said  Mr.  Byoir  did  not  work  up  to  that.  He  was  just 
kind  of  appohited  to  it. 

A  m.an  docs  take  a  good  deal  of  pride  in  being  a  lieutenant  colonel 
in  the  United  States  Arm.y,  and  he  wants  som.ebody  to  think  that  he 
earned  it.  As  a  matter  of  fac*^,  in  the  first  registration  of  selective 
service  we  were  3,000,000  m.en  short  of  the  number  of  men  who  should 
have  registered,  and  the  provost  m.arshal  called  on  the  public  com- 
m.ittee  for  help  in  the  second  selective-service  draft,  and  we  were  able 
to  evolve  plans  which  assisted  the  Governm.ent  to  get  the  full  num- 
ber. We  picked  up  the  3,000,000  m.en  and  got  an  almost  complete 
registration  in  the  second  draft. 


8216  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Therefore,  the  Army  might  have  had  reason  to  believe  that  Carl 
Byoir,  having  been  through  that  experience,  had  some  special  quali- 
fications to  be  a  lieutenant  colonel  in  the  United  States  Army  Reserve, 
and  it  is  a  position  for  wliich  j^ou  are  not  paid,  it  is  a  position  to  which 
you  devote  a  good  deal  of  time  in  working  out  these  plans  or  assisting 
in  working  them  out  for  no  other  than  patriotic  reasons. 

Since  the  committee  permits  me,  I  want  to  return  to  the  question  of 
why  Mr.  Patman  made  these  charges  against  me. 

There  has  been  going  on  in  this  country,  gentlemen,  for  the  last  4 
years  a  conspiracy  against  the  American  people  that  has  taken  literally 
millions  of  dollars  a  day  out  of  the  wage  envelopes  of  40,000,000 
workers,  and  20,000,000  farmers. 

About  1926 — I  will  go  further  back  a  little  since  you  are  giving  me 
this  latitude — and  say  to  you  that  about  1919,  if  my  memory  serves  me 
correctly,  a  young  man  by  the  name  of  Philip  Musica  persuaded  his 
father  to  go  into  the  cheese  importing  business.  Mr.  Musica's  cheese 
importing  business  prospered  amazingly,  and  very  shortly  thereafter 
the  United  States  Government  stepped  in  and  sent  Mr.  Philip  Musica 
to  the  penitentiary  for  defrauding  the  United  States  customhouse  by 
underweighing  the  cheese  so  that  it  would  bear  less  tariff  duty. 

In  that — the  next  was  when  he  persuaded  his  father  to  go  into  the 
natural-hair  business,  his  father  being  an  ex-barber.  Natural  hair 
was  selling  for  about  $80  a  pound,  because  there  was  a  great  demand 
for  it  in  those  days.  That  business  prospered,  and  Mr.  Musica  had 
built  up  a  bank  credit  of  over  half  a  million  dollars,  but  one  of  the 
banks  became  suspicious  and  examined  the  cases  on  the  dock,  and 
found  them  to  be  full  of  worthless  trash.  So  Mr.  Musica  was  again 
criminally  indicted  and  convicted. 

Some  years  later,  about  1923,  Philip  Musica,  swindler  and  convict, 
turned  up  in  Westchester  County,  N.  Y.,  under  the  name  of 
Daniel  F.  Coster,  a  reputable  businessman  engaged  in  the  hair-tonic 
business.  Hair  tonic  was  made  very  largely  from  alcohol,  and  this 
was  in  the  prohibition  days,  and  Mr.  Coster's  hair-tonic  business 
prospered  amazingly,  so  that  by  1926  Mr.  Coster  had  made  enough 
money  in  Girard  &  Co.,  who  were  engaged  in  the  hair-tonic  business, 
so  that  he  was  able  to  interest  Wall  Street  financiers  to  purchase 
that  for  a  million  dollars  cash,  the  McKesson  &  Robbins,  a  100-year-old 
reputable  manufacturing  concern.  McKesson  &  Robbins  made 
proprietary  medicines  and  toothpaste  and  handled  drugs,  and  these 
had  to  be  sold  through  wholesale  dealers  to  retailers.  Mr.  Coster, 
who  was  a  genius,  decided  that  if  he  could  get  control  of  wholesale 
houses  that  they  could  push  the  sale  of  his  goods,  and  he  accordingly 
purchased,  for  common  stock  in  the  company  which  he  organized,  59 
of  the  largest  drug  houses  of  the  United  States,  and  I  am  going  to  tie 
this  up  any  minute,  gentlemen. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  is  what  I  was  wondering,  what  this  has  to  do 
with  it. 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  will  tell  you  what  it  has  to  do  with  it,  Mr.  Mason. 
Mr.  Coster  bought  these  61  drug  houses,  which  was  a  chain  whose 
business  amounted  to  more  than  50  percent  of  all  of  the  drug  business 
in  the  United  States,  and  he  found  that  he  could  not  make  any 
money,  because  of  the  competition  of  department  stores,  chain  stores, 
who  were  operating  upon  a  basis  of  3-  or  4-percent  profit,  so  that 
these  companies  were  making  very  little  money,  and  that  their 
business  was  being  taken  away  from  them  by  the  chain  stores. 


rX-AMKRirAX  I'ROT'ArxAXDA  ACTIVITIES  8217 

Mr.  Coster  then  decided  that  if  he  could  get  some  legislation  that 
he  could  cover  up  what  he  was  doing.  Mr.  Coster  was  faking  the 
inventories  of  this  company  to  the  extent  of  $20,000,000.  Mr.  Coster, 
in  a  single  year,  stole  $1,300,000  from  this  company,  but  he  knew  that 
if  he  could  get  legislation  first  to  fix  prices,  and  second,  to  make  his 
competitors  ofTer  these  goods  at  the  raised  prices,  and  thirdly,  to  put 
his  competitor  out  of  business,  that  he  could  make  money  and  cover 
up  all  ol  this  fraud  and  speculation. 

I  am  not  going  to  adopt  Mr.  Patman's  tactics.  Therefore,  any- 
body, if  he  did  anything  that  Mr.  Byoir  ever  heard  of,  Mr.  Byoir  is 
equallj-  guilty.  Mr.  Patman  took  $4,800  from  Coster-Musica  making 
speeches  for  the  stuff  that  Coster  wanted  to  popularize.  The  checks 
were  made  out  to  cash  and 

Mr.  Mason  (interposing).  Of  course,  that  does  not  make  Mr. 
Patman  to  be  wrong? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No.  I  am  only  saying  that  if  I  applied  to  Mr. 
Patnxan  the  principle  that  he  applied  to  me,  I  would  say  why  were 
the  checks  to  Mr.  Patman  not  made  out  to  him  but  made  out  to  cash? 
Why  was  an  intermediary  used?  Mr.  Patman  must  be  particeps 
criminus  in  all  of  these  crimes.  Oh,  no.  I  have  not  made  that 
charge.  I  have  not  said  that  Mr.  Patman  ought  to  be  like  his  clients — 
either  a  suicide  or  in  the  penitentiary.  That  is  not  so.  But  what  is 
so?  That  Mr.  Patman,  as  a  Member  of  the  Congress,  did  accept  em- 
plo3"ment  from  these  people  and  go  about  the  country  making  speeches 
in  behalf  of  legislation  which  they  had  helped  to  put  on  the  statute 
books. 

Mr.  Ma.son.  You  are  trying  to  draw  a  conclusion  that  that  case  is 
a  parallel  case  to  your  own.     Is  that  the  idea? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No.  I  am  only  trying  to  show  you,  and  I  can 
appreciate  the  committee's  patience,  I  am  only  trying  to  show  you 
why  Mr.  Patman  did  have  malice  in  making  these  charges  against  me, 

Mr.  Mason.  Then  come  to  the  point.  Where,  in  that  malice,  might 
it  be  considered  on  a  foundation  of  facts? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Mr.  Mason,  I  was  employed  by  the  Great  Atlantic 
&  Pacific  Tea  Co.  to  oppose  a  piece  of  legislation  introduced  by  the 
Honorable  Wright  Patman,  the  Patman  chain-store  tax  bill. 
Previous  to  that  Mr.  Patman  had  sponsored  in  the  House  the  Robin- 
son-Pa tman  bill.  Both  of  these  pieces  of  legislation  were  supported 
by  the  United  States  Wholesale  Grocers  Association,  McKesson  & 
Robbins,  the  National  Wholesale  Drug  Association,  and  they  we're 
parties  in  interest  to  those  bills,  and  they  were  paying  Mr.  Patman 
what  he  would  characterize  as  very  large  sums  of  money  to  go  and 
talk  to  them  about  the  legislation  for  which  they  were  parties  in 
interest. 

The  Chairman.  You  are  charging  him 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  am  not  criticizing  it,  Mr.  Chairman.  If  Mr. 
Patman  thought  it  was  proper  for  a  Member  of  Congress  to  introduce 
a  bill  to  put  somebody's  competitors  out  of  business  and  then  take 
money  to  go  and  make  a  speech  to  them,  that  is  all  right.  That  is  a 
matter  of  public  record,  and,  if  you  like,  I  will  introduce  letters  from 
the  Wholesale  Grocers  Association  explaining  the  terms  on  which 
Mr.  Patman 

The  Chairman  (interposing).  You  mean,  while  that  bi'l  was  pend- 
ing, he  was  making  the  speeches  to  them  and  receiving  money? 


8218  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Colonel  Byoir.  Yes,  sir;  and  I  will  go  further  and  say  that  Mr. 
Patman  admitted  it  on  the  floor  of  the  House,  and  I  will  go  further 
and  say  that  one  organization,  the  Wholesale  Hardware  people — 
unfortunately  they  had  been  left  out,  their  competitors  had  been 
left  out,  they  were  not  going  to  put  the  gasoline  people  in  it — but 
Mr.  Patman  made  a  speech  to  them  and  he  promised  them  that  he 
would  go  and  take  them  out  of  the  bill. 

And  after  he  got  back  here  a  Ways  and  Means  Committee  brought 
up  his  bill,  and  then  Mr.  Patman  walked  into  that  subcoinmittee  and 
said,  "I  propose  to  amend  my  bill  by  taking  out  the  gasoline  stations." 

Mr.  Patman  gave  them  every  opportunity  to  use  the  facilities  of 
his  office.  He  gave  them  the  free  use  of  the  Government  frank  and 
sent  out  letters  which  said,  "When  a  man  gets  along  as  Carl  Byoir 
did  and  makes  it  difficult  to  keep  on  taking  those  fees,"  and  Mr.  Pat- 
man, after  the  suicide  of  Mr.  Musica — Mr.  Coster — felt  that  it  was 
no  longer  profitable,  maybe,  if  he  w^as  a  greedy  and  felt  the  need  of 
money,  he  some  malice  against  the  man  who  brought  it  about. 

Mr.  Patman  expressed  a  good  deal  of  admiration  here  for  Mr. 
J.  Edgar  Hoover  and  c^uoted  some  of  the  things  which  he  had  written 
in  relation  to  propaganda.  Mr.  Patman  did  not  say  that  Mr.  J. 
Edgar  Hoover,  as  head  of  the  Bureau  of  Investigation,  conducted  a 
very  thorough  investigation  in  which  we  made  all  of  our  books,  rec- 
ords, and  papers  available  to  the  Department  of  Justice,  and  all  of 
our  employees,  and  that  when  that  was  over,  they  issued  a  statement 
which  said  that  the  investigation  disclosed  no  evidence  whatsoever 
that  Carl  Byoir  had  engaged  in  any  un-American  activities. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  is  the  report  of  the  Bureau  of  Investigation? 

Colonel  Byoir.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Mason.  After  the  investigation  w^as  made? 

Colonel  Byoir.  That  is  right.  And  just  the  other  day,  when  Air. 
Patman  was  on  the  floor  of  the  House  on  this  same  subject,  some  sev- 
eral Members  queried  him  about  the  course  of  action  he  proposed  to 
take.  And  he  said  that  he  had  given  his  material  to  the  Department 
of  Justice,  but  he  concealed  from  the  Members  of  the  House  that  the 
Department  of  Justice,  after  the  receipt  of  his  evidence,  has  had 
made  a  complete  investigation.  I  think  that  all  of  those  things  showed 
a  good  deal  of  Ivnowledge. 

I  want  to  point  out,  too,  that  "propaganda"  is  a  very  large  word. 
If  you  believe  any  religion  and  you  try  to  persuade  others,  whether 
by  word  of  mouth,  writings,  or  speeches,  to  recognize  that  it  is  a  good 
religion,  that  is  propaganda;  and  if  you  do  not  believe  in  it  and  you 
try  to  persuade  people  that  it  is  not  a  good  religion,  that  is  propaganda. 
If  you  try  to  persuade  people  that  Quebec  is  a  lovely  place  to  go  to 
to  spend  a  vacation,  that  is  propaganda;  and  if  you  represent  another 
competitive  place  for  a  vacation  and  try  to  persuade  them  that 
Quebec  is  not  a  good  place  to  go  to,  but  that  your  place  is  the  better 
of  the  two,  that  is  propaganda. 

Mr.  Patman  is  trying  to  make  out  that  we  are  engaged  in  subversive 
propaganda,  and  I  repeat  to  the  committee  that  here  it  has  all  of  the 
material  and  again  that  this  committee  came  to  us,  and  when  they 
came  we  furnished  them  v:ith  all  the  material,  and  that  at  the  end  they 
not  only  said  that  my  conduct  was  not  un-American  but  affirmatively 
said  that  it  was  American,  and  when  Mr.  Patman  made  his  first  charge 
on  the  floor  of  the  House,  he  knew  that  that  was  so. 


UN-AMEIIICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8219 

I  think  I  havo  touched  on  the  fact  that  there  is  something  almost 
fiendish  in  trying  to  interpret,  in  the  atmosphere  and  excitement  of 
the  day,  actions  taken  long  since.  Air.  Mason  has  pointed  out,  and  I 
know  it  is  accurate,  that  6  or  7  years  ago  all  responsible  departments 
of  this  Government  were  trying  to  encourage  trade  and  travel  with  the 
German  Government. 

Mr.  Pat  man  thinks  that  I  ought  to  have  been  the  greatest  prophet 
in  the  liistory  of  the  world.  In  those  days  the  British  Government 
was  trying  to  do  ever^^thing  they  could  to  assist  the  German  Govern- 
ment in  thinking  that  their  country  was  the  greatest  country  in  the 
world,  and  they  did  it  with  the  idea  that  it  might  avert  the  war  which 
has  now  come  upon  us.  They  were  wrong,  and  everybody  was  wrong 
except  Carl  Bj^oir,  who  should  have  expected  the  World  War  in  1940. 

Mr.  Patman  says  that  he  does  not  know  whether  tliis  relationship 
exists  today.     I  only  need  say  here 

Mr.  Mason  (interposing).  ^Miat relation? 

Colonel  Byoir.  AA'ith  the  German  Government.  In  other  words,  he 
goes  on  to  talk  about  Mr.  Vierick  and  others  who  are  doing  certain 
things,  all  with  the  implication  that  Carl  Byoir  never  stopped  repre- 
senting the  German  Government,  but  all  the  bureaus  have  it  that  that 
contract  was  canceled  in  1934,  in  November — or  1935;  so  that  others 
might  be  a  little  confused  by  the  careless  use  of  tenses,  as  if  something 
done  long  ago  were  being  done  now. 

Mr.  Patman  has  made  the  statement  that  I  have  great  influence 
with  the  American  press  because  I  represent  over  90  percent  of  the 
country's  national  advertisers.  I  think  the  true  fact  is  that  we 
probably  represent  about  one-twentieth  or  one-fiftieth  of  1  percent  of 
the  Nation's  national  advertisers,  and  probably  one-half  of  1  percent 
of  the  leading  advertisers  of  the  Nation.  You  move  a  period  over  or 
j^ou  add  a  zero,  and  of  course  that  zero  is  nothing,  the  adding  of  a 
zero  is  nothing,  1,400,000,000  becomes  14,000,000,000. 

But  I  do  not  think  that  is  especially  germane.  I  want  to  say  that 
everything  that  Mr.  Carl  Byoir  and  his  associates  have  ever  done  has 
been  as  much  under  my  personal  direction  as  a  personal-service  busi- 
ness is.  There  is  no  thought  on  my  part  to  evade  any  responsibility 
for  an3'thing  that  has  ever  been  made.  Everything  that  was  done  in 
coimection  with  the  contract  of  1933-34  was  disclosed  fully  to  both 
the  McCormack  committee  and  to  your  investigators. 

On  the  day  before  3^our  investigators  came  into  our  office  in  New 
York,  I  called  a  meeting  of  all  of  the  staff  of  Carl  Byoir  &  Associates, 
and  incidentally  on  that  staff  there  is  not  a  single  alien,  everyone 
being  an  American  citizen,  and  with  the  single  exception  of  a  ghl  who 
came  here  from  Ireland  at  the  age  of  11,  everyone  is  a  native-born 
American  citizen. 

At  that  meeting  I  said  to  them  that  I  appreciated  that  they  must  be 
under  a  great  strain.  I  said  to  them  that  they  had  one  advantage, 
that  we  would  give  these  investigators  the  files,  books,  and  all  that, 
and  all  that  anyone  in  that  room  had  to  do  in  response  to  any  questions 
was  not  to  think  what  he  ought  to  say  or  not  to  try  to  think  would  be 
the  proper  answer,  would  be  to  make  the  best  effect,  but  just  to  tell 
the  truth.  And  that  is  the  way  I  feel  about  the  personnel  and  the 
business  of  Carl  Byoir  &  Associates. 

Mr.  Patman  accused  me  of  being  the  head  of  the  greatest  spy  system 
in  the  history  of  the  world.     I  want  to  make  a  flat  denial  of  that 


8220  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

allegation  and  say  that  in  all  my  life  for  no  government  have  I  ever 
engaged  in  any  espionage  activities. 

Mr.  Patman  made  the  accusation  that  while  I  was  a  lieutenant 
colonel  working  on  the  plans  of  the  War  Department,  certain  plans 
had  disappeared,  and  he  had  reason  to  believe  had  reached  Germany. 
Of  course  I  want  to  make  the  flat  statement  that  no  secret  of  the  War 
Department  or  anything  connected  with  my  work  with  the  War 
Department  has  ever  been  communicated  to  anyone  w^ho  was  not 
entitled  to  have  that  information. 

Mr.  Patman  made  the  statement  that  Byoir  had  great  opportunity 
to  infiltrate  spies  into  all  these  great  American  businesses.  I  not  only 
want  to  deny  that  statement  but  to  state  that  the  investigator  of  this 
committee  communicated  with  my  clients  and  ever}^  client  and  every 
past  client  of  Carl  Byoir  &  Associates,  and  ascertained  that  there  had 
been  no  such  infiltration  of  spies,  but  in  all  cases  we  had  never  recom- 
mended the  employment  of  anyone  to  our  clients,  as  that  is  not  a  part 
of  our  business. 

Mr.  Casey.  May  I  address  your  attention  specifically  to  Mr. 
Patman 's  statement  that  you  had  distributed  propaganda  literature? 

Colonel  Byoir.  That  is  absolutely  untrue. 

Mr.  Casey.  What  was  your  connection  with  Hitler  Youth? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No  connection  wdiatsoever. 

The  Chairman.  Mr.  Byoir,  what  w\as  your  purpose  in  seeking 
information  and  employment  from  the  Nazi  government? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Wliy,  Mr.  Chairman,  we  were  in  the  publicity 
business,  and  we  had  especially  the  reputation  of  being  very  able,  I 
think,  in  the  tourist-trade-promotion  field,  particularly  in  the  tourist 
field,  and  there  was  at  that  time  nothing  in  the  situation  as  to  the 
German  Government  that  would  make  it  unpatriotic  or  un-American 
to  represent  the  German  Federal  Railroads. 

The  Chairman.  Had  you  represented  any  other  companies  from 
any  other  countries  prior  to  or  at  that  same  time? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Yes,  sir;  we  had  represented  the  Cuban  Tourists 
Association  in  similar  work,  and  the  city  of  Miami  in  similar  work, 
and  we  had  represented  the  Province  of  Quebec.  I  think  they  came 
later,  but  the  two  previous  ones  had  been  very  successful,  and  we  had 
quite  a  reputation  in  the  promotion  of  tourist  trade. 

The  Chairman.  Did  you  represent  any  foreign  governments  beside 
the  German  Government? 

Colonel  Byoir.  The  Government  of  Cuba  and  the  Government  of 
Quebec,  and  later  on  the  Chinese  Government. 

The  Chairman.  You  knew  at  that  time  that  the  German  Govern- 
ment was  engaged  in  an  anti-Communist  program? 

Colonel  Byoir.  At  that  time,  Mr.  Dies,  that  was  not  so  patent. 
In  other  words,  a  great  many  very  sincere  people  in  this  country  and 
everywhere  else  thought  that  the  new  German  Government  was  the 
bloc  that  would  keep  communism  from  spreading  over  the  rest  of  the 
world.  They  now  recognize  that  they  were  in  error  and  they  now 
tell  you  so,  and  our  Government  was  issuing  statements  that  we  ought 
to  do  everything  we  could  to  promote  trade  with  Germany. 

The  Chairman.  What  was  it  that  they  wanted  you  to  do  specifi- 
cally when  they  employed  you? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Well,  the  German  Federal  Railroads  were  owned 
by  the  German  Government.  They  had  been  owned  by  the  German 
Government,  I  think,  under  the  Kaiser,  they  had  been  owned  by  the 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8221 

German  Government  under  the  Republic,  and  they  were  owned  by 
the  German  Government  when  Hitler  came  into  power. 

German  Railroads  could  not  do  a  passenger  business  based  on 
tourist  traffic  unless  you  could  get  the  people  to  go  to  Germany,  and 
of  course  the  German  steamship  lines  were  interested  in  getting  busi- 
ness across  the  Atlantic  in  order  for  the  people  to  ride  on  the  German 
railroads  and,  Mr.  Chairman,  it  is  not  a  matter  of  opinion.  You 
cannot  do  publicity  in  the  dark.  The  people  who  get  the  information 
know  who  sends  it  to  them,  and  the  record  is  all  in  the  files  of  the 
committee.  What  was  this  awful  propaganda?  Your  investigator, 
Mr.  Stedman,  has  seen  it.  Mr.  Birmingham  has  seen  it.  Wliy,  it 
was  a  story  that  the  Oberammergau  Passion  Play  would  be  as  good 
as  it  was  in  the  past;  stories  about  the  scenery  about  Heidelberg, 
where  the  great  university  is  located,  and  places  for  trading  and 
places  for  beautiful  scenery. 

The  Chairman.  Did  you  have  anything  for  political  propaganda? 

Colonel  Bygir.  No,  sir.  The  contract  provided  that  we  would  not, 
and  it  was  carried  out  in  good  faith. 

The  Chairman.  Were  you  ever  called  on  to  send  out  anything  of  a 
political  character? 

Colonel  Bygir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Did  you  confine  yourselves  to  matters  with  regard 
to  the  railroads? 

Colonel  Bygir.  To  those  matters  which  would  interest  Americans 
to  go  and  visit  Germany. 

The  Chairman.  What  matters  were  they? 

Colonel  Bygir.  I  could  refresh  my  memory  very  easil3^  The 
committee  has  18  monthly  bulletins  which  set  forth  all  of  this  material. 

The  Chairman.  I  want  to  ask  you  this.  I  do  not  want  to  ask  you 
in  detail,  but  generally  speaking,  you  know  what  was  in  the  bulletins 
or  pamphlets? 

Colonel  Bygir.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  What  did  they  deal  with? 

Colonel  Bygir.  They  dealt  with  sports  events  and  the  theater  and 
art  and  scenery  and  natural  beauties  in  Germany.  They  dealt  with 
the  modernization  of  the  German  railroads  and  with  the  effectiveness 
of  the  German  steamship  lines  for  passenger  service.  They  dealt 
with  good  hotels;  they  dealt  with  improvements  which  were  being 
made  in  trade,  scientific  improvements  with  the  type  of  goods  that 
were  distributed  at  the  Leipzig  Fair,  editorials  from  the  American 
papers  praising  the  progress  that  was  being  made  in  Germany. 

The  Chairman.  Is  there  anything  in  any  of  the  publicity  or 
propaganda  which  you  distributed  under  contract  or  under  any 
employment  with  the  German  Government  which  related,  directly  or 
indirectly,  to  the  Nazi  government  as  to  what  it  was  doing,  or  any- 
thing of  that  sort? 

Colonel  Bygir.  There  has  been  something  about  what  they  were 
doing  to  the  people  of  Germany  in  the  way  of  improvement,  because 
those  were  the  things  that  would  affect — attract  people  to  go  there. 

The  Chairman.  I  mean  of  a  political  nature. 

Colonel  Bygir.  Of  a  political  nature?  Absolutely  no.  There  was 
no  effort  to  build  up  a  great  picture  of  Nazi  govenunent  or  anythmg — 
any  picture  of  Nazi  government. 

The  Chairman.  Did  you  come  into  contact  with  the  agents  of 
Germanv  in  the  United  States? 


3222  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Colonel  Byoir.  The  only  people  I  came  in  contact  with,  Mr. 
Chairman,  were  representatives  of  the  German  steamship  lines,  of 
the  German  Federal  Railroads,  and  the  German  consul  general  in 
New  York;  and  it  may  be  unpopular  at  the  moment,  but  the  fact  is 
that  they  behaved  themselves  like  other  men  that  you  know  or  do 
business  with.  They  were  interested  in  what  was  happening  to  their 
business  and  why  the  poeple  should  not  go  and  ride  on  the  railroads 
in  Germany. 

The  Chairman.  Was  there  any  discussion  with  regard  to  nazi-ism? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Never. 

The  Chairman.  Was  there  any  conference,  at  any  of  those  which 
you  had,  with  reference  to  political  Germany? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Was  your  relationship  with  them  solely  on  business? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Absolutely. 

The  Chairman.  Wliat  was  your  relationship  with  Mr.  Viereck? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Mr.  Vierick  brought  the  business  to  Carl  Byoir  & 
Associates,  and  was  paid  a  commission  for  getting  the  business,  and 
was  later  paid  a  salary  for  working  on  the  material.  In  other  words, 
it  was  felt  that  he  was  an  expert,  that  he  was  familiar  with  all  of  these 
matters,  and  could  devise  material  and  editing  knowledge  in  going 
over  the  material. 

The  Chairman.  At  the  same  time,  do  you  know  of  any  political- 
propaganda  activities  that  Mr.  Vierick  was  engaged  in? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Then,  no,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Did  you  consult  with  them  with  regard  to  them? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  How  long  was  he  in  your  employ? 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  think — my  recollection  now  is  that  it  was  a  little 
less  than  a  year. 

Mr.  Mason.  And  that  was  during  this  time? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Had  you  ever  terminated  or  indicated  any  inten- 
tion of  terminating  this  contract  prior  to  the  investigation  of  the 
McCormack  committee? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Mr.  Chairman,  the  contract  was  practically  a  new 
contract  when  the  McCormack  investigation  into  these  matters 
began. 

The  Chairman.  Not  when  it  began,  but  I  mean,  so  far  as  you  are 
concerned? 

Colonel  Byoir.  At  that  time,  Mr.  Chairman,  that— there  was 
nothing  that  anyone,  any  patriotic  American,  would  have  considered 
improper  in  the  work  that  we  were  doing.  Later  on,  it  became  evi- 
dent gradually  what  the  German  Government  was  and  what  their 
intentions  were,  and  what  their  plans  were.  Of  course,  nobody  would 
have  any  pride  in  having  an  association  with  that  Government  at  any 
time,  but  at  that  time  there  was  nothing  that  anyone  would  consider 
improper  in  such  an  association. 

The  Chairman.  Did  you  terminate  your  relations  with  the  Nazi 
government  at  the  time  of  the  McCormack  investigation? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No;  it  was  after  that. 

The  Chairman.  How  long  afterward,  would  you  say? 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  think  probably  4  or  5  months,  Mr.  Chairman. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8223 

The  Chairman.  You  continued  under  the  contract  for  a  period  of 
about  5  months  after  the  hearing  with  respect  to  your  relationship 
to  the  German  Government? 

Colonel  Bygir.  That  is  riglit. 

The  Chairman.  Have  you,  since  the  termination  of  that  contract, 
had  any  relationship,  directly  or  indirectly,  express  or  implied,  with 
the  German  Government,  or  with  any  agency  of  the  German  Govern- 
ment, or  with  any  representatives  of  the  German  Government,  of  any 
nature  or  description? 

Colonel  Bygir.  Absolutely  not,  Mr.  Chairman,  direct  or  indirect, 
or  of  any  description. 

The  Chairman.  Have  you  represented,  or  have  you  been  connected 
with,  the  German-American  Bund  or  any  organization  which  believes 
in  nazi-ism? 

Colonel  Bygir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  In  any  capacity? 

Colonel  By'gir.  In  no  capacity. 

The  Chairman.  Wliat  was  your  reason  for  terminating  it?  Was  it 
because  of  the  situation  which  arose? 

Colonel  Bygir.  I  think  it  was  the  realization  that  the  continuing 
unfolding  of  the  plans  of  the  German  Government  would  be  something 
that  we  would  not  want  to  be  associated  with,  and,  cjuite  frankly, 
I  think  I  postponed  the  cancellation  a  little  further  than  I  think  I 
ought  to  have  canceled  it,  but  I  think  it  was  reasonably  prompt,  and 
I  think  that  during  all  of  the  time  that  we  did  the  work  there  was 
nothing  done  that  any  patriotic  American  citizen  would  have  raised 
any  objection  to. 

The  Chairman.  Did  you  ever  learn,  or  have  any  reason  to  think, 
that  any  representative  of  the  German  railroads,  or  the  German 
Tourist  Co.,  or  other  agencies  of  the  German  Government,  used  them 
for  political  propaganda  purposes  or  for  espionage  or  sabotage? 

Colonel  By'gir.  There  was  not  the  slightest  evidence  of  anything  of 
that  sort,  and,  frankly,  I  should  be  surprised  if  they  were. 

The  Chairman.  Did  any  information  come  to  you  of  any  nature 
that  at  any  time  it  would  cause  you  to  suspect  the  true  purposes  and 
nature  of  these  organizations  used  by  Germany  in  the  United  States? 

Colonel  Bygir.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  believed  then  and  I  believe  now 
that  the  purpose  for  which  we  were  employed  was  honestly  stated  by 
them  in  the  contract  itself;  that  as  far  as  this  group  was  concerned, 
and  as  far  as  we  were  concerned,  there  was  nothing  intended  but  the 
improvement  of  trade  and  travel  between  the  United  States  and  Ger- 
many. I  said  to  you,  and  I  repeat — it  may  not  be  a  favorable  thing 
to  say  under  the  present  atmosphere — that  these  men  acted  just  like 
other  men  that  I  had  met  before,  that  people  in  the  German  Railroad 
office  were  interested  in  getting  people  to  travel  on  their  railroads,  and 
that  is  as  far  as  they  were  interested  in,  so  far  as  any  conversation 
they  held  with  me  was  concerned. 

The  Chair.man.  Was  another  government,  or  any  other  govern- 
ment, engaged  in  the  same  or  similar  work  as  that  for  \vhich  you  were 
engaged  for  the  German  Government? 

Colonel  Bygir.  I  cannot  tell  you  exactly  at  that  moment,  but  it  has 
been  increasingly  the  policy  of  resorts,  municipal.  State,  and  National, 
to  employ  both  advertising  agents  aufl  pul)licity  agents,  to  promote 
those  resorts.  There  is  notliing  unusual  about  that.  There  was  not 
anything  unusual  about  it  then.     I  think  you  will  find  that  long  before 

62626— 41— vol.  14 5 


8224  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

this  period  many  govornments  had  employed  both  advertising  agents 
and  pubhcists  to  pubhcize  and  advertise  the  tom'ist  advantages  of  their 
coimtries — Switzerhmd,  Egypt,  Ireland,  Czechoslovakia,  Cuba,  and 
Canada — and  m  this  country  it  has  grown  up  in  the  last  few  years  so 
that  many  States  are  doing  it. 

The  Chairman.  Did  you  receive  any  part  of  your  compensation^ 
either  directly  or  indirectly,  in  the  form  of  cash? 

Colonel  Bygir.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  What  is  your  explanation  or  reason  for  receivmg 
cash  in  payment  from  the  German  Government? 

Colonel  Bygir.  The  explanation  at  that  time  was,  and  perhaps  I 
should  have  regarded  it  with  some  doubt,  but  I  tell  you  that  I  did 
not 

The  Chairman  (interposing) .  What  was  the  information  they  gave 

Colonel  Bygir.  Yes;  that  is  the  information,  that  the  bureau  did 
not  have  funds  for  that  purpose;  that  the  consul  general  did,  and  he 
was  making  them  available.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  not  being  in  a 
suspicious  atmosphere,  but  what  was  in  a  normal  business  transaction 
for  us,  we  did  not  regard  the  German  consul  general,  who,  in  the  case 
of  all  governments,  is  expected  to  handle  commercial  matters,  as 
being  engaged  in  anything  else  than  in  the  promotion  of  commercial 
business. 

The  Chairman.  You  think  that  the  payment  in  cash  is  a  normal 
busmess  transaction,  especially  in  dealings  with  foreign  governments? 

Colonel  Bygir.  I  only  say  to  you  that  I  did  not  think  it  was 
abnormal  at  that  time,  when  the  bureau  did  not  have  cash  available. 

The  Chairman.  That  is  the  information  they  gave  you?  Was  a 
receipt  given  you  for  the  cash  paid  you? 

Colonel  Bygir.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Were  all  the  subsequent  payments  in  cash? 

Colonel  Bygir.  I  think  the  subsequent  payments  were  paid  by 
check.     I  thmk  the  first  month  or  two  they  may  have  been  by  cash. 

The  Chairman.  You  have  followed,  have  you  not,  to  some  extent 
at  least,  the  career  of  Adolf  Hitler? 

Colonel  Bygir.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  You  knew,  at  least  to  some  extent,  what  his  Nazi 
Party  stood  for,  did  you? 

Colonel  Bygir.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  And  you  are  familiar  with  the  entire  anti-Semitic 
nature? 

Colonel  Bygir.  At  that  time  they  denied  it  and  took  the  position 
that  these  outbreaks  were  sporadic  and  popular  and  they  made  re- 
peated declarations,  and  I  think  in  some  cases  to  other  governments, 
and  they  made  an  effort  to  put  a  stop  to  it.  Of  course,  we  know  now 
that  the  tongue  was  in  the  cheek,  and  I  say  to  you  now  that  I  would 
not  have  hesitated  at  any  point,  and  it  would  have  been  smart  business 
for  them  if  any  anti-Semitic  program  was  in  hopes  of  building  the 
American  tourist  trade,  because  it  was  a  barrier  which  they  could  not 
overcome. 

Mr.  Casey.  You  mean  the  German  trade,  the  German  tourist 
trade,  was  something  that  they  should  have  taken  into  consideration? 

Colonel  Bygir.  I  think  in  the  beginning  it  did,  but  as  soon  as  the 
anti-Semitic  feeling  became  apparent — Mr.  McMahon  says  it  did 
not  break  out  until  1935.     I  do  not  know  whether  it  was  that  late. 


UN-AMEIIICAX  PHOl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8225 

but  I  Iviiow  during  that  piM'iod  the  Govei'iinicut  was  disavowing  anti- 
Si'initic  actions. 

Tho  Chairman.  Have  you  ever  read  Mein  Kampt? 

Colonel  BvoiK.   Xo,  sir;  I  have  not. 

The  Chairman.  You  arc  not  familiar  with  the  statements,  especially 
with  reference  to  propaganda? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Very  recently  we  are  all  very  acutely  aware  of  it.. 

The  Chairman.  At  that  time  were  you? 

Colonel  Byoir.   No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Is  it  or  is  it  not  a  fact  that  Mr.  Hitler  officially 
ordered  your  discharge  because  he  found  out  that  you  liad  Jewish 
blood  in  your  veins? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Of  course,  it  is  not  a  fact. 

The  Chairman.  It  is  not  true? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir.  Mr.  Hitler  nor  anyone  else  ever  ordered 
my  discharge. 

The  Chairman.  You  have  points  there  to  which  you  wish  to  reply?" 

Colonel  Byoir.  One  other  point  was  made.  It  is  incidental,  but 
it  is  along  the  line  of  many  of  these  charges,  that  while  I  had  this 
contract  propaganda  was  being  shipped  in  by  bales,  and  some  of  it 
w^as  seized  in  the  port  of  New  York,  and  it  was  nothing  but  trash. 
That  may  be  true,  but  it  had  no  remote  connection;  that  is.  nothing- 
that  we  had  was  ever  seized  anywhere. 

Mr.  Casey.  Were  any  of  these  charges  as  to  receiving  this  propa- 
ganda litei'ature  made  directly  to  you? 

Colonel  Byoir.  One  of  our  men  was  there.  He  collected  the  ma- 
terial. He  wrote  most  of  it  himself,  and  he  sent  it  to  us.  He  did 
not  send  it  in  printed  form.  He  simply  signed  stories  that  a  feature 
wTiter  would  wTite.  He  went  to  Heidelberg,  and  he  wrote  a  very 
long  story  about  Heidelberg  University,  and  he  went  to  Oberam- 
mergau  and  WTote  a  long  story  about  the  Oberammergau  Passion 
Play,  but  none  of  that  came  over  in  printed  form.  It  was  simply 
sent  over  to  be  used  or  not  used  as  we  thought  fit. 

Air.  Patman,  very  early  in  his  remarks  today,  referring  to  the 
Department  of  Justice,  said  that  the  only  thing  that  they  were  looking 
for  was  whether  there  had  been  any  resignation.  Of  course,  Mr. 
Patman  knows  that  that  was  untrue,  that  the  Department  of  Justice 
and  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation  were  investigating  the  whole 
matter,  and  that  the}'  must  have  received  from  him  anything  he  had 
to  give  them  or  any  evidence  that  he  had  to  offer,  and  that  they  were 
not  solely  concerned  with  the  matter  of  whether  a  fpreign  agent  had 
registered,  because,  if  Mr.  Patman's  charge  was  tnu\  I  was  a  spy  and 
my  organization  was  a  nest  of  spies,  which  would  be  illegal,  whether 
you  were  registered  or  not. 

The  Chairman.  Hov\'  did  j'our  business  with  the  German  Gov^ern- 
ment  com])are  with  your  other  business  in  the  United  States? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Mr.  Patman  has  along  that  line  referi-ed  to  these- 
tremendous  sums  paid  in  advertising  and  i)ublicity:  $6,000  a  month 
is  not  regarded  as  a  tremendous  sum.  In  publicity  accounts  T  think 
it  is  not  a  large  account,  and  there  is  absolutely  nothing  unusual  in. 
relation  to  that  amount  of  money. 

Mr.  Mason.  The  ciuiestion  the  chairman  wanted  to  get  at  is:  What 
portion  would  you  sav  that  is  of  vour  total  business? 


8226  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Colonel  Byoir.  If  you  take  the  nature  of  it,  it  was — it  would 
probably  would  have  been  a  fifth  or  sixth  or  a  seventh  of  our  business. 

The  Chairman.  During  that  period? 

Colonel  Byoir.  During  that  period;  yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  In  other  words,  your  compensation  from  Germany 
would  not  exceed  7  percent  of  the  net  income  or  receipts  of  your  total 
revenue  from  all  sources? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No.     I  said  a  sixth  or  seventh  of  the  total  business. 

The  Chairman.  A  sixth  or  seventh  of  the  total  business? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Yes,  sir.  The  average  account,  Mr.  Chairman, 
whether  you  take  it  on  a  fee  basis  and  bill  the  individual  expenses  to 
the  client,  or  whether  it  is  a  lump  sum  out  of  which  you  pay  expenses, 
will  run  $5,000  or  $6,000  or  $7,000  a  month. 

The  Chairman.  You  stated  that  you  are  a  lieutenant  colonel  m  the 
Reserve? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Has  there  been  any  investigation  by  the  War 
Department  of  you  that  you  know  of? 

Colonel  Byoir.  I  know  of  none.  I  assume  that  they  would  get 
the  report  of  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation. 

The  Chairman.  Have  you  ever  talked  with  the  Department  or  any 
official  of  the  War  Department  with  respect  to  this  matter? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  What  is  your  statement  with  reference  to  nazi-ism? 
Have  you  any  sympathy  for  nazi-ism? 

Colonel  Byoir.  No,  sir;  nor  for  communism,  and  I  want  to  state, 
in  conclusion,  that  anything  in  any  allegation  that  Mr.  Batman  has 
made  that  would  reflect  upon  my  belief  on  the  American  system  or  my 
patriotism  or  my  loyalty  to  this  Government  is  absolutely  untrue,  and 
there  is  not  a  scintilla  of  evidence  to  support  it,  because  there  cannot  be. 

The  Chairman.  Were  you  in  this  country  during  the  war  between 
the  United  States  and  Germany? 

Colonel  Byoir.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  That  is  all. 

(Witness  excused.) 

The  Chairman.  Have  you  anything  else  to  say? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  want  to  answer  what  Mr.  Byoir  said  about  me 
personally. 

The  Chairman.   Have  you  any  questions  to  ask? 

Mr.  Patman.  If  I  were  permitted,  there  occurs  to  me  perhaps  a 
hundred  questions  which  I  might  ask  Of  course,  if  I  were  privileged 
to  ask  ciuestions  I  know  of  a  lot  of  them  that  I  would  like  to  ask  him. 

Colonel  Byoir.  He  said  I  was  a  spy,  that  it  was  possible  that  I  had 
stolen  the  plans  out  of  the  War  Department,  and  I  would  like  to  ask 
him  if  the  committee  has  a  scintilla  of  evidence  as  to  those  charges. 

TESTIMONY  OF  HON.  WRIGHT  PATMAN— Resumed 

Mr.  Patman.  The  statement  I  made  appears  of  record,  that  he  did 
accept  money  from  the  German  consul  in  New  York  and  from  the 
Hitler  government  in  Germany,  and  that  his  own  partner  testified 
that  it  was  used  to  send  out  propaganda.  He  has  further  testified 
that  the  first  book  that  he  got  out  was  Speaking  of  Hitler. 

In  regard  to  my  personal  conduct,  I  do  resent  the  charge  that  I 
would  introduce  a  bill  in  Congress  and  go  out  and  make  speeches  about 
it.     Tiiat  necessitates  a  brief  resume  of  mv  service. 


UN-AMKRICAX  I'UOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8227 

The  inference  that  1  had  maUce  m  my  heart  toward  Carl  Byoir 
because  he  apposed  a  bill  of  mine  is  too  far-fetched  for  serious  con- 
sideration. Our  side  could  have  possibly  had  his  services  if  we  had 
luul  the  money  to  have  paid  him.  1  did  not  regard  his  opposition 
any  more  than  I  woidd  regard  the  opposition  of  a  lawyer  in  the  trial 
of  a  lawsuit.  He  was  only  one  in  a  large  number  of  people  who  op- 
posed the  bill.  In  fact,  only  one  more  than  120,000 — the  number  of 
Reserve  officers. 

Colonel  Byoir's  statement  that  a  member  of  the  McCormack  com- 
mittee told  me  before  I  brought  the  charges  that  he,  Colonel  Byoir, 
had  been  exonerated  by  the  McCormack  committee  is  not  true. 
The  fact  is,  I  talked  to  both  Mr.  McCormack,  the  chairman,  and  Mr. 
Dickstein,  the  vice  chairman,  and  each  one  told  me  that  the  record 
spoke  for  itself;  that  the  testimony  had  been  very  carefully  taken  and 
could  be  relied  upon;  and  that  their  conclusions  were  seriously  con- 
sidered and  carefully  drawn  and  represented  their  views.  It  will  be 
noticed  that  Colonel  Byoir  made  no  effort  to  introduce  any  proof  on 
this  point  other  than  his  owai  bare  statement  which  was  not  true. 

Colonel  Byoir  has  left  the  impression,  in  fact  stated,  that  I  intro- 
duced bills  in  Congress,  then  went  out  over  the  country  making 
speeches  for  them  and  received  enormous  sums  of  money  therefor. 
The  truth  is,  from  the  time  I  was  elected  to  Congress  in  1928  untU 
1936  all  during  the  time  I  was  crusading  for  the  payment  of  the 
adjusted-service  certificates  for  veterans,  I  received  no  fees  what- 
soever for  making  addresses.  On  the  other  hand,  I  spent  considerable 
money  of  my  own  and  went  very  much  in  debt. 

In  1936,  after  the  passage  of  the  Robinson-Patman  Act,  and  during 
1937,  I  was  represented  by  a  speaker's  bureau  and  made  speeches 
under  customary  terms  and  conditions. 

In  Febriuiry  1938  I  introduced  the  bill  to  curb  the  greed  of  about 
20  large  interstate  chain-store  companies  out  of  7,000  chain-store  com- 
panies in  the  United  States,  known  as  the  anti-chain-store  bill,  and 
irom  that  date  to  this,  I  have  not  accepted  one  penny  profit  directly 
or  indirectly  from  anyone  for  making  addresses  on  this  subject  or 
any  other  subject. 

There  was  only  one  short  period  of  time  in  my  12  years'  service 
that  I  was  represented  by  a  speaker's  bureau  and  that  was  during  the 
time  that  I  was  not  engaged  in  any  crusade  in  1936  and  1937. 

If  I  had  been  making  money  out  of  making  addresses,  it  would 
have  been  in  my  interest  to  have  had  effective  opponents  to  keep  the 
bills  from  passing  so  that  I  could  have  continued  to  make  mone3^ 
Instead  of  Colonel  Bj^oir  showing  a  motive,  his  illogical  argument 
would  show  the  reverse  to  be  true. 

Ninety  percent  of  the  prominent  Members  of  the  House,  Senate, 
and  high  public  officials  today  are  represented  by  the  same  speaker's 
bureau  that  represented  me.  Such  prominent  men  as  William 
Jennings  Bryan,  William  Howard  Taft,  and  Calvin  Coolidge  were 
represented  by  this  same  speaker's  bureau. 

The  Chairman.  And  many  cabinet  officers? 

Mr.  Patman.  And  many  cabinet  officers;  and  that  is  true,  and  so 
there  was  nothnig  wrong  with  me  making  speeches  in  1936  and  1937 
about  a  law  that  was  already  passed. 

The  Chairman.  Which  had  already  been  passed. 

Mr.  Patman.  Yes;  and  approved  by  the  President,  and  every 
speech  I  made  is  now  available  and  is  ready  for  any  man  to  read.    At 


8228  UN-AMERICAN  PROI'AOANDA  ACTIVITIES 

the  conclusion  of  each  speech  I  yiekled  to  questions  and  I  answered 
those  questions  and  every  one  of  them  are  available.  Later  on  they 
were  put  into  a  book  under  the  name  of  the  Robinson-Pa tman  Act. 
It  was  just  guesswork,  1  am  sure,  but  the  Supreme  Court  and  the 
Federal  Trade  Commission  have  never  overruled  one  of  those  answers 
today  that  I  put  in  that  book. 

So  I  made  those  speeches  over  a  period  of  2  years  when  I  was  not  in 
a  crusade. 

In  his  desperation  to  try  to  connect  me  with  Coster-Musica  is  a 
sample  of  the  unfairness  of  his  testimony.  I  never,  at  any  time, 
advocated  price-fixuig  legislation.  You  will  notice  that  he  offered  no 
proof  that  I  did — only  his  bare  statement,  which  is  untrue. 

Further,  his  statement  that  I  accepted  $4,800  from  Coster  to  make 
speeches  is  absolutely  untrue.  I  never,  at  any  time,  accepted  one 
penny  from  Coster  or  the  firm  he  represented  for  any  purpose,  or 
under  any  circumstance  or  condition  whatsoever,  either  directly  or 
indirectly.  You  will  notice  he  submitted  no  proof — just  his  bare 
statement,  which  is  untrue. 

Another  sample  of  the  weakness  of  his  defense  and  the  unfairness  of 
his  testimony  is  his  statement  that  I  did  not  have  gasoline  stations  in 
the  anti-chain-store  bill  until  I  made  a  speech  to  the  hardware  men. 
He  left  the  inference  that  I  must  have  received  a  large  fee  for  making 
this  speech  and  that  induced  me  to  change  my  mind.  The  truth  is, 
I  made  no  speech  to  the  hardware  men  and  the  gasoline  stations  have 
always  been  in  the  bill  shice  it  was  first  introduced.  This  statement 
by  Colonel  Byoir  was  absolutely  untrue.  He  offered  no  proof — only 
his  bare  statement,  which  was  imtrue. 

In  1938  I  got  some  very  unfavorable  publicity  and  I  wondered  how 
it  came  about.  The  newspapers  said,  "There  is  a  southern  Congress- 
man mvolved  in  this  scandal,"  and  next  they  would  say  "He  lives  in 
Texas,"  and  next  they  came  along  and  said  "It  must  be  Wright 
Patman,  because  he  made  some  speeches  one  time  and  this  concern 
locally  sponsored  some  of  those  speeches,  so  it  must  be  him." 

So  it  went  on  and  I  came  up  to  Washington  and  I  laiew  I  had  not  been 
-connected  in  any  way  w^th  what  was  wrong  in  making  those  speeches 
and  I  went  to  see  Mr.  Brien  McMahon,  Assistant  Attorney  General 
in  charge  of  criminal  prosecutions,  now  representmg  Colonel  Byoir, 
also  had  charge  of  the  F.  B.  I.  I  guess  he  has  friends  there  now.  I 
do  not  imply  any  improper  motives.  But  I  went  to  see  him  and  I  said 
"Why  is  it  that  they  give  this  information  as  possibly  coming  from 
the  Department  of  Justice?"  I  said  to  him  "I  know  that  your 
Department  is  the  one  that  has  been  handling  it,  and  I  know  there  is 
nothing  which  can  involve  me  in  any  way  in  the  world,"  and  he  told 
mie  about  it.  One  man,  representing  a  newspaper,  would  come  in  and 
say  to  him,  "Do  you  know  that  Patman  has  a  $4,000  automobile  that 
McKesson  gave  him?"  "No;  I  had  not  heard  it,"  he  would  say. 
Then  another  woidd  come  in  and  ask  him  the  same  question.  And 
•when  he  would  say  "Yes,  but"  and  attempt  to  explain  it  was  hearsay, 
the  newsman  would  say  "that  is  all  I  want  to  know,"  and  would  print 
it.  In  the  same  way  much  damaging  news  was  obtained  and  printed. 
I  really  thought  he  was  trying  to  do  the  right  thing  about  it,  but  the 
newspapers  had  unfairly  put  me  in  an  unfavorable  position,  and  they 
published  it  in  that  way. 

I  wrote  to  Frank  Murphy,  the  Attorney  General  of  the  United 
States,  and  said  "I  know  I  have  never  done  anything  wrong  in  the 


UN-AMEKirvX  TROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8229 

matter  of  receiving  aiitomo})ilos  or  making  speeches,  but  the  charges 
have  been  madv  by  the  Cliicago  Tribune  that  I  was  carried  on  the 
McKesson  pay  roll  and  that  I  received  $18,000,  and  that  1  also  got  a 
$4,000  autoniobik\  and  I  wish,  Mr.  Murphy,  you  would  write  me 
what  the  facts  are,  what  the  records  show,  regardless  of  what  the 
facts  are." 

I  now  wish  to  read  just  what  Mr.  Murphy  wrote  me: 

Hon.  Wright  Patman, 

House  of  Representatives, 

Washington,  D.  C. 

My  Dear  Mr.  Congressman:  Upon  my  return  to  the  city  after  an  extended 
trip,  I  received  your  letter  of  May  24,  1939,  advising  of  the  charges  made  against 
you  by  political  enemies  concerning  j-our  alleged  affiliations  with  the  McKesson 
&  Robbins  Co. 

The  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation  of  this  Department  is  conducting  an 
investigation  into  the  affairs  of  the  McKesson  &  Robbins  Co.  at  the  present  time. 
Although  this  investigation  is  not  yet  complete,  I  can  assure  you  that  absolutely 
no  information  has  been  developed  indicating  that  you  were  ever  carried  on  the 
McKesson  &  Robbins  pay  roll;  that  you  received  the  sum  of  $18,000  or  any  other 
sum,  or  a  $4,000  automobile  or  any  other  kind  of  automobile. 
I  trust  that  this  information  will  be  of  some  assistance  to  you. 
Sincerely  yours, 

Frank  Murphy, 

Attorney  General. 

And  then  I  asked  the  Honorable  Robert  Jackson — Mr.  Murphy 
said  the  investigation  was  not  completed — and  when  I  found  out  it  had 
been  completed,  I  wrote  Mr.  Jackson,  Attorney  General  of  the  United 
States  who  succeeded  Mr.  Murphy,  and  said  to  him,  "I  want  you  to 
give  me  the  information.  Is  there  anything  in  connection  with  the 
McKesson  &  Robbins  that  I  did  that  was  wrong?"  and  told  him  the 
accusations. 

So  he  replied  that: 

July  23,  1940. 
Hon.  Wright  Patman, 

Room  1133,  Neiv  House  Office  Building,  Washington,  D.  C. 

My  Dear  Mr.  Congressman:  In  reply  to  your  inquiry,  I  take  pleasure  in 
informing  you  that  the  investigation  made  by  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation 
as  to  the  affairs  of  McKesson  &  Robbins  disclosed  no  evidence  whatever  to 
substantiate  accusations  that  you  had  been  in  the  employ  or  on  the  pay  roll  of  that 
corporation,  nor  was  any  evidence  found  which  would  indicate  that  you  had  any 
connection  whatever  with  the  activities  of  that  corporation,  which  were  the  subject 
of  the  investigation. 

Sincerely  yours,  Robert  H.  Jackson,  Attorney  General. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  in  itself  gives  you  a  clean  bill  of  health  so  far  as 
the  Bureau  of  Investigation  is  concerned  and  their  investigation, 
doesn't  it? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  think  so. 

Mr.  Mason.  There  is  no  question  about  it? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  do  not  think  so. 

Mr.  Mason.  Then  the  report  of  the  Bureau  on  this  man  Byoir 
ought  to  be  just  as  acceptable? 

Mr.  Patman.  They  had  gone  into  this  matter  concerning  me  with 
a  fine-tooth  comb. 

Mr.  Mason.  And  they  had  gone  into  the  other  with  a  fine-tooth 
comb? 

Mr.  Patman.  You  just  looked  over  the  papers  and  then  without 
giving  me  a  hearing  at  all,  exonerated  him. 

Another  thing  I  did  not  like,  Mr.  Byoir  said — there  were  two  things. 
It  was  not  very  long  after  the  unfavorable  publicity  until  Mr.  Mc- 
Mahon  became  the  lawyer  of  Mr,  Byoir,  and  not  only  that,  but  some 


8230  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

other  important  people  went  out  of  the  Department  of  Justice  over 
to  this  law  firm.  That  is  very  good,  and  they  might  be  able  to  per- 
suade those  still  in  the  Department  to  do  what  they  considered  was 
the  right  thing  to  do. 

Mr.  Mason.  And  they  might  be  willing  to  have  them  do  the  wrong, 
thing. 

Mr.  Patman.  First  of  all,  you  can  search  these  records  from  begin- 
ning to  end,  and  you  can  never  find  that  I  made  a  speech  on  the  floor 
of  the  House  or  anywhere  else  with  respect  to  advocating  price  fixing. 

Number  two,  the  Patman-Robinson  law  is  generally  observed. 
Both  sides  are  observing  it  now.  And  so  far  as  the  general  appeal  is 
concerned,  Mr.  Byoir  happened  to  be  one  of  a  million  that  is  opposed 
to  the  law,  and  of  course  he  is  assuming  that  he  is  the  one  that  has 
the  burden  of  our  opposition,  but  I  do  not  agree  with  that  that  he  is 
the  onh^  one. 

Furthermore,  if  the  contract  was  so  good  with  Germany  and  there 
was  nothing  wrong  about  it,  why  was  it  terminated  at  all?  Why 
didn't  he  keep  on?  $6,000  a  month  or  $108,000  for  18  months,  but 
I  am  willing  to  rest  on  the  record.  If  this  committee  believes  that  it 
is  wrong  for  a  lieutenant  colonel  in  the  United  States  Army  to  accept 
money  from  the  German  consul  in  New  York,  at  that  time  all  kinds 
of  bad  things  were  happening  in  Germany  against  certain  people  over 
there,  which  I  greatly  deplore  and  regret,  and  which  everyone  does; 
but  they  were  going  on.  He  accepted  the  money  from  the  German 
consul  in  New  York  and  from  the  German  Government  itself  during 
a  period  of  months,  and  propaganda  and  other  information  against  the 
interest  of  this  Government  was  sent  out — if  you  believe  that  is  all 
right,  of  course  that  is  your  opinion. 

But  the  fact  is  not  denied.  It  is  not  disputed  that  wliile  he  was 
lieutenant  colonel  in  the  United  States  Army  he  did  accept  money 
from  the  German  Government,  and  upon  that  a  finding  was  later  on 
made  that  he  had  been  guilty  of  German  activities. 

Mr.  Casey.  You  do  not  believe  that  the  termination  in  1935  of 
the  contract  has  anything  to  do  with  the  German  Government? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  do  not  know.  I  do  not  think  the  German  Govern- 
ment would  permit  him  to  since  that  time,  but  I  tliink  I  have  reason 
to  believe 

Mr.  Casey.  Prior  to  1935? 

Mr.  Patman.  Except  that  you  have  a  letter  in  youi'  file  that  he 
represented  the  German  Government  in  1938. 

Mr.  Casey.  You  do  not  believe  that? 

Mr.  Patman.  I  do  not  know.  There  was  not  an  investigator  sent 
to  Miami? 

Mr.  Casey.  Yes. 

Mr.  Patman.  I  am  not  making  any  point  on  it.  In  other  words, 
if  a  man  were  guilty  of  treason  50  years  ago,  I  would  not  want  him 
in  our  Army  today,  and  if  the  man  was  guilty  as  a  lieutenant  colonel 
of  doing  something  in  time  of  peace  which  would  be  treason  in  time 
of  war,  I  would  not  be  willing  to  trust  him  at  all. 

The  Chairman.  Anytliing  else? 

Mr.  Patman.  Nothing  else,  Mr.  Chairman. 

(Witness  excused.) 

The  Chairman.  The  committee  stands  adjourned. 

(Whereupon,  at  3:15  p.  m.,  the  committee  adjourned,  to  meet  at  the 
call  of  the  chairman.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPOGANDA  ACTIV- 
ITIES IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


OCTOBER    1,    1940 

House  of  Representatives, 
Subcommittee  of  the  Special  Committee  to  Investigate, 

Un-American  Activities, 

Newark,  N.  J. 

The  subcommittee  met  at  10  a.  m.,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (acting  chair- 
man), presiding. 

Present:  Messrs.  Starnes  (acting  chairman),  Thomas,  and  Voorhis. 

Also  present:  Dr.  J.  B.  Matthews,  Director  of  Research,  Robert  E. 
Stripling,  chief  investigator  and  Robert  B.  Barker,  investigator. 

Mr^  Starnes.  The  chairman  of  the  subcommittee,  composed  of 
Mr.  Voorhis,  Mr.  Thomas,  and  the  chairman,  wishes  to  announce  at 
this  time  for  the  benefit  of  the  press  and  others  that  the  subcommittee 
appointed  by  the  chairman  of  the  committee  to  conduct  the  hearing 
in  this  area  has  been  in  executive  session  since  10  o'clock  this  morning. 

We  shall  continue  in  executive  session  until  1  o'clock  this  afternoon. 
At  that  time  we  plan  to  hold  public  hearings. 

There  is  no  further  announcement  to  make  at  this  time. 

(Thereupon  the  committee  went  into  executive  session.) 

after  executive  session 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  committee  will  come  to  order. 

The  committee  is  holding  this  public  hearing  upon  the  instructions 
of  the  chairman  of  the  full  committee  to  investigate  alleged  un-Ameri- 
can and  subversive  activities  in  this  area. 

I  think  all  of  us  appreciate  these  are  imusual  times  if  not  perilous 
times.  It  is  time  for  sound  and  sane  thinking.  It  is  no  time  for 
hysteria;  no  time  for  the  arousing  of  emotions  and  passions. 

We  hope  to  conduct  these  hearings  in  a  calm,  dispassionate  manner. 
The  committee  is  seeking  facts  and  facts  only  concerning  un-American 
and  subversive  activities. 

It  may  be  necessary  in  the  course  of  these  hearings  for  the  com- 
mittee to  go  into  executive  session  again  because  the  committee  is 
going  to  make  every  possible  effort  to  safeguard  the  character  and  the 
reputation  of  all  American  citizens  and  all  other  people  whose  names 
may  be  involved  in  the  conduct  of  this  investigation. 

It  may  be  necessary  for  the  time  being  to  withhold  the  publication 
of  certain  exhibits,  petitions  and  names  for  the  purpose  of  protecting 
the  character  and  the  welfare  of  the  parties  interested.  If  this  is 
necessary  the  chairman  will  not  hesitate  to  close  the  open  hearings 
and  go  into  executive  session  at  any  stage  of  the  proceedings. 

8231 


8232  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

That  is  for  the  benefit  of  the  public  and  the  gentlemen  of  the  press 
so  you  will  understand  our  proceedings. 
Mr.  Barker,  who  will  be  your  first  witness? 
Mr.  Barker.  Mr.  Appleby. 

TESTIMONY    OF   WALTER    M.  APPLEBY,    SECRETARY,  SUN   SHIP-^ 
YARD  EMPLOYEES  ASSOCIATION 

(The  witness  was  duly  sworn  by  Mr.  Starnes.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Be  seated  and  give  us  your  full  name, 

Mr.  Appleby,  Walter  M.  Appleby. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  give  us  your  address. 

Mr.  Appleby.  Media,  Pa. 

Mr.  Starnes.    Will  you  state  your  profession  or  avocation? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,   sir;   marine   chemist. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  have  you  been  engaged  in  that  vocation? 

Mr.  Appleby.  About  3  years. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  is  your  educational  background? 

Mr.  Appleby.  High  school,  2  years  of  college,  and  home  courses — 
home  study. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  have  been  engaged  in  that  business  or 
profession? 

Mr.  Appleby.  In  this  particular  profession? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes;  and  prior  to  that. 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  have  been  connected  with  the  shipbuilding 
industry  for  6  years.     Prior  to  that  I  was  a  transport  pilot,  since  1921. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  Dr.  Matthews,  will  you  take  over  the 
witness? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Appleby,  where  are  you  employed  at  the  pres- 
ent time? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Sun  Shipbuilding  &  Dry  Dock  Co.,  Chester,  Pa. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  have  you  been  employed  at  the  Sun 
Shipbuilding  &  Dry  Dock  Co.? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Six  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  capacity  are  you  employed  there? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Marine  chemist. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  any  special  relationship  to  the  em- 
ployees of  that  plant? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  I  am  secretary  of  the  Sun  Shipbuilding 
Employees  Association. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  union  which  has  bargaining  rights 
for  the  employees  of  the  Sun  Shipbuilding  &  Dry  Dock  Co.? 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  an  independent  union. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  union  which  has  bargaining  rights 
with  the  company? 

Mr.  Appleby.  It  is  an  independent  union  which  has  had  the  bar- 
gaining rights  for  all  of  the  employees  for  the  last  4  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  many  members  are  there  in  that  union? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Five  thousand  tliree  hundred  paid  up  out  of  approx- 
imately six  thousand. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  your  position  as  an  official  of  this  union,  have 
you  had  occasion  to  learn  of  the  activities  of  Communists  or  of  Nazis, 
or  of  Communist-minded  or  Nazi-minded  employees  in  the  plant? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  have. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  823S 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  yoii  please  describe  biiefly  liow  yon  have 
come  into  possession  of  such  information? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes.  I  don't  know  just  where  to  start.  Suppose  I 
<:(^  back  about  2  years  when  it  came  to  my  knowledg-e  that  there  were 
conuuunistic  activities  not  only  in  the  shipyard  itself  but  in  the  ini- 
metliate  vicinity  of  the  shipyard. 

The  locality  of  the  shipyard  is  such  that  there  are  mnnerous  dwell- 
ings within  one  or  two  squares  of  it. 

1  found  out  through  vaiious  members  and  information  that  came 
to  me 

Mr.  Matthews.  Through  various  members  of  what? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Of  the  Sun  Shipbuilding  Employees  Association,  the 
independent  union,  that  there  were  numerous  boarding  houses  within 
a  few  squares  of  the  shipyard  and  that  those  boarding  houses  were  run 
by  Communists ;  that  they  took  in  shipyard  workers  particularly,  both 
for  room  and  board  and  that  one  house  in  particular  was  the  home  of 
a  Mrs.  Soifer — I  believe  the  first  name  is  Anna. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  do  you  spell  that  name? 

Mr.  Appleby.  S-o-i-f-e-r.  Although  it  had  no  particidar  bearing 
on  our  organization  I  decided  that  it  was  my  business  to  look  into 
it  and  a  few  of  the  bo5''s  who  were  willing  to  give  their  time,  spend 
their  money  to  go  out  nights  and  investigate  matters. 

"\Mien  we  got  into  the  affair  we  foimd  out  that  Mrs.  Scifer  not  only 
ran  a  boarding  house  but  she  was  the  head  of  the  Communist  Party 
of  Delaware  County;  however,  she  is  not  the  front.  A  man  by  the 
name  of  John  Weaver  was  the  front  for  Mrs.  Soifer.  He  lived  in  her 
home;  kept  his  Communist  propaganda  in  the  home,  and  that  pi'opa- 
ganda  was  given  or  sold  to  shipyard  workers  and  to  pupils  of  John 
Weaver,  who  was  a  W.  P.  A.  teacher. 

K  they  had  the  money  they  bought  it ;  if  they  di(hi"t  have  the  money 
it  was  given  to  them. 

Further  investigation  disclosed  that  Mrs.  Soifer  had  two  sons  work- 
ing in  the  shipyard.  As  we  got  into  it  it  became  more  interesting  and 
more  involved. 

1  might  sa}"  at  the  time  1  did  not  know  whether  this  connnittee  was 
functioning  or  not  but  it  seemed  as  though  there  was  no  one  we  could 
turn  to  to  take  this  over  and  investigate  it,  so  we  continued  in  our 
own  way. 

In  the  course  of  events  1  found  that  one  of  the  boys,  who  at  one 
time  had  been  a  friend  of  mine  many  years  ago,  was  in  the  shipyard, 
and  although  he  happened  to  be  a  member  of  an  opposing  union,  a 
C.  L  O.  union,  he  got  into  these  Communist  activities  himself  through, 
the  union. 

He  found  out  in  that  organization  was  Mrs.  Soifer's  son  and  many 
other  names  of  which  we  have  here  and  which  we  will  place  in  the 
record  as  evidence. 

I  convinced  him  that  for  the  good  of  the  coinitry  and  everyone  in 
general  it  would  be  a  good  idea  if  he  entered  the  Communist  Party  of 
Delaware  County,  dig  in,  become  a  worker  and  we  would  gather  this 
data  and  present  it  to  the  proper  authorities  when  we  saw  fit. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  said  a  moment  ago  he  got  into  Communist 
activities  through  his  union  work.  You  mean  that  he  came  in  tou(b 
Avith  Conmiunist  activities  and  iciirned  about  them? 


8234  UX-AMERICAX  I'R0PAr4ANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Appleby.  Through  the  Industrial  Union  of  Marine  Shipbuild- 
ing Workers  of  America,  Local  No.  2,  C.  I.  O.  affiliated  in  Chester,  Pa. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  advised  him  to  get  into  the  circle  of  com- 
munism? 

Mr.  Appleby.  It  was  my  thought  that  if  he  became  friendly  with 
Mrs.  Soifer,  whom  we  found  out  was  the  head  but  not  the  fiont,  that 
we  could  learn  more  of  their  activities  and  find  out  just  how  many 
Communists  there  were  working  in  the  shipyard. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Tes. 

Mr.  Appleby.  We  ^\  ere  fairly  successful  in  that  endeavor. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  year  was  that? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  would  say  that  was — wel),  I  really  got  into  this  in 
about  1938,  the  early  part  of  1938.  Prior  to  that  I  had  heard  certain 
rumors  and  different  things  told,  but  mv  interest  was  really  not  in  it 
until  1938. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  right,  proceed. 

Mr.  Appleby.  So  with  the  thought  in  mind  that  the  best  way  to 
attack  this  situation  was  to  have  one  good  and  trusted  man  in  their 
organization  for  that  purpose.  The  man  I  speak  of,  who  was  an  old 
friend  and  I  found  out  he  was  working  in  the  shipyard  and  had 
worked  there  before  I  worked  there  but  had  been  at  sea  during  which 
time  he  made  contact  with  the  N.  M.  U.  and  the  various  sailors 
aboard  ship.  He  knew  their  language  and  he  decided  that  he  would 
do  that  for  me  without  remuneration. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  his  name? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Joseph  Nilon.  He  is  present  here  now  and  will  be  a 
witness. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  say  that  he  had  been  active  in  the  N.  M.  U. — 
the  National  Maritime  Union? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  was  aboard  ships  that  the  N.  M.  U.  at  that  time 
were  trying  to  organize.  He,  however,  was  not  a  member  of  the 
N.  M.  U. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Don't  you  mean  or  do  you  mean  the  predecessor 
union  to  the  National  Maritime  Union? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes;  I  mean  the  organization  that  they  called 
the 

Mr.  Matthews.  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Union? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes;  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Committee,  or 
something  like  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Union? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Tes,  sir;  that  was,  incidentally,  the  successor  of  the 
I.  S.  U.,  which  was  sabotaged  by  Curran  on  the  Pacific  Coast — the 
Communists  on  the  Pacific  coast.  After  they  sabotaged  the  I.  S.  U. 
it  became  this  N.  M.  U.  eventually.  That  is  the  organization  I  am 
speaking  of. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  what  did  Mr.  Nilon  get  in  the  way  of  infor- 
mation after  you  advised  him  to  get  closer  to  the  activities  of  the 
Communist  Party  for  the  purpose  of  securing  information? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  found  by  attending  the  pi-ivate  meetings  in  Mrs. 
Soifer's  home  that  the  majority  of  the  men  who  attended  those 
meetings  were  workers  in  the  shipyard.  Those  meetings  were  gen- 
erally held  at  night  during  the  week.  There  weie  more  or  less  open 
meetings,  however,  held  every  Sunday  morning  about  10  o'clock  in 
the  office  of  the  Liberal  Press  run  by  Milne.  He  is  the  editor  and 
publisher  of  that  paper. 


V.N-AMEHICAX  PKOrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8235 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  Milne's  first  name? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  have  it  riglit  here. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  it  Stanley? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Stanley  Milne,  that  is  right.  Throu^i^h  those 
contacts  naturally  lie  found  that  there  were  a  lot  of  hoys  that  attended 
those  meetings  that  were  members,  or  rather  workers  in  the  shipyard. 

He  also  became  on  very  close  terms  with  John  Weaver,  who  was  the 
W.  P.  A.  teacher  and  the  front  for  the  party. 

John  Weaver  allegedly  wrote  their  propaganda  and  handed  it  out 
on  the  streets  hi  the  vichiit}'  of  the  shipyard  along  with  other  followers 
of  their  organization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  personally  seen  Weaver  distribute 
Communist  literature  on  the  streets? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  many  times.  And  I  have  presented  to  Mr. 
Barker,  your  in\estigator,  about  three  pieces  of  that  material,  signed 
b}'  the  Communist  Party  of  Delaware  County  with  the  post-office  box 
in  Chester,  which  was  distributed  by  John  ^Veaver  and  others  of  the 
party. 

\It.  Starnes.  Let  the  witness  identify  those  if  you  have  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  mimeographed  sheet  entitled:  "Atten- 
tion! Sun  Ship  Workers."  At  the  bottom  of  that  sheet  appears: 
"Communist  Party,  Delaware  County,  Pennsylvania,  Box  712, 
Chester,  Penn.sylvania.''  Can  you  identify  this  as  one  of  the  pieces 
of  literature  which  you  turned  over  to  Mr.  Barker? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  this  was  handed  to  me  by  one  ol  their  work- 
ers on  the  street,  the  street  right  in  front  of  the  shipyard.  It  is  the 
only  entrance  to  the  shipyard. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  in  turn  gave  this  to  Mr.  Barker? 

Mr.  x\ppleby.  I  placed  that  in  my  file  and  wdien  Mr.  Barker  was 
interested  I  gave  it  to  liim  a  few  months  ago. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  another  mimeographed  sheet  with  the 
caption:  "Attention!  Sun  Ship  Workers,"  and  signed  by  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  Delaware  County,  Box  712,  Chester,  Pa.  Can  you 
identify  that  as  one  of  the  papers  distributed  by  the  Communist 
Party? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes;  as  a  matter  of  fact  this  date  1  have  up  there, 
4-14-39,  is  my  handwriting.  That  is  the  day  it  was  given  out,  on  the 
morning  of  4-14-39. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  was  given  out  in  the  vicinity  of  the  Sun 
Shipyard,  was  it? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Within  a  half  square  of  the  gate. 

Mr.  Matthews.  By  wiiom? 

Mr.  Appleby.  By  John  Weaver.  He  was  also  present  but  the  ones 
who  handed  them  out  were  usually  different  parties — whomever  he 
could  get  at  tlie  time,  but  he  himself  was  always  there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  the  fiist  one  of  these  mimeo- 
graphed sheets  be  marked  "Exliibit  1"  to  Mr.  Api)ieby's  testimony. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  so  nuirked  and  made  a  i)art  of  the  record. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Appleby  Exhibit  Xo.  1.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  ]  ask  that  the  second  mimeographed  paper 
identified  by  Mr.  Appleby  be  marked  as  Exliibit  No.  2. 

Mr.  Starxes.  It  may  be  so  marked. 

(The  docinnent  referred  to  was  marked  "Appleby  Hxhibit  No.  2.") 


8236  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIP^S 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  third  mimeographed  sheet  with  the 
caption:  "This  isn't  our  war,  remember  1917."  At  the  bottom  of  the 
page  appears  the  words:  "Read  tlie  Daily  Worker,"  and  "Communist 
Party  of  DeLaware  County,  Chester,  Post  Office  Box  741."  Can  you 
identify  that  as  one  of  these  pieces  of  Communist  Hterature  distributed 
in  the  vicinity  of  the  Sun  Shipyard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  that  was  handed  out  within  the  hist  6  months 
or  8  months. 

Mr.  Matthews.   Is  that  your  handwriting  at  the  top  of  the  page? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "Distributed  at  the  Sun  Shipyard  in  May  1940." 

Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  that  be  marked  "Exhibit  8"  and  received  in 
^evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  may  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Appleby  Exhibit  No.  3.") 

Mr.  M.atthews.  You  testified  that  Mr.  Weaver  is  the  person  who 
participated  in  the  distribution  of  this  literature? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  he  distributes  all  this  literature,  he  makes 
soap-box  speeches  in  the  vicinity  of  the  yard  and  runs  the  Sunday 
meetings. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  still  employed  on  W.  P.  A.? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  understand  that  he  was  dropped  a  few  months  ago 
under  pressure,  although  he  had  been  on  for  something  like  4  or  5  years 
prior  to  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  he  was  one  of  the  persons,  according  to  your 
information,  who  frequented  the  home  of  Mrs.  Soifer? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  was  a  boarder  in  Mrs.  Soifer's  home. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  boarded  at  Mrs.  Soifer's  home? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  does  now  and  did  then. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  attend  the  meetings  which  you  described 
as  Communist  nu'ctings  held  in  the  evenings  in  Mrs.  Soifer's  home? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  else  about  the  commu- 
nistic activities  of  Mr.  Weaver  that  you  have  not  stated? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Weaver  himself  boasts  that  he  pulled  the  first  strike 
in  the  history  of  the  country  as  far  as  the  W.  P.  A.  was  concerned, 
which  was  back  in  the  early  days  of  the  W.  P.  A.  At  that  time  he  was 
a  timekeeper.  This  was  Weaver's  own  story.  I  am  quoting  not 
what  he  said  to  me  but  what  he  said  to  Nilon. 

Later  he  was  arrested  at  the  Philco  strike,  which  was  some  years 
ago — I  guess  4  years  ago.  It  was  quite  a  big  strike  and  although  he 
was  not  an  employee  of  the  Philco  plant,  he  was  arrested  for  his  violent 
activities  with  the  strikers. 

The  next  time  he  showed  up  in  the  papers  was  the  Ford  strike  in 
Chester.  He  was  still  working  for  the  W.  P.  A.  and  not  an  employee 
of  the  Ford  Co.  He  was  arrested  again  and  his  picture  appears  in  the 
paper. 

I  should  go  back  a  little  bit.  During  the  strike  of  December  11, 
1936,  at  the  Sun  Shipl)uilding  &  Dry  Dock  Co.,  that  day  is  known  as 
"bloody  Friday,"  because  two  men  went  to  the  hospital.  During 
that  violence  John  Weaver  served  at  the  soup  kitchen  for  the  strikers 
although  he  was  not  an  employee  of  the  Sun  Shipbuilding  Co.  nor  was 
he  a  member  of  the  C.  I.  O.,  and  with  the  soup  they  served  they  served 
the  kind  of  propaganda  you  have  in  your  hand. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIF^S  8237 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  moiitioncd  Mrs.  Soifer  and  Mr.  Weaver 
as  niombeis  of  the  Coiiiniuuist  Party  wlio  were  working  in  the  vicinity 
of  the  Sun  Shipyard.  Did  you  learn  the  identity  of  any  other  Com- 
munist Party  h^ichn's  who  were  domg  simihir  work  in  the  vicinity  of 
the  shipyanl? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Not  leaders  in  the  vicinity  of  the  shipyard;  no. 
Some  of  the  Soifer  family  are  leaders  in  the  party  and  with  the  excep- 
tion of  Mrs.  Soifer's  nej)hew 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  a  Dr.  Herman  Gold? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  don't  know  the  man  personally  but  I  laiow  of  him. 
Dr.  Herman  Gold  is  an  open  Communist — I  mean  an  admitted  Com- 
munist. The  last  advices  I  had  on  him  he  was  in  charge  of  the  Rus- 
sian or  Communist  Insurance  Co.  which  operates  in  America. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Mrs.  Sonya  Gillman? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  I  don't  know  the  lady  personally  but  the 
Gillmans  are  related  to  the  Soifers.     They  are  blood  relatives. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  Mrs.  Gillman  was  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Communist  Party  or  not? 

Mr.  Appleby'.  I  could  not  say  that  she  was  a  dues-paying  member 
of  the  Communist  Party;  I  don't  know,  but  her  activities  were 
communistic. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  to  say  she  participated  m  the  activities 
along  with  John  Weaver  and  Mrs.  Soifer? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Gillman  was  in  the  Soifer  home  on  several  occasions 
when  the  usual  closed  meetings  were  being  held. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  a  brother  of  Mrs.  Sonya  Gillman 
by  the  name  of  Israel  Gillman? 

Mr.  Appleby".  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  active  in  these  Communist  Party  affairs 
in  Chester? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  had  any  connec- 
tion with  the  W.  P.  A.  Theater  Project? 

Mr.  Appleby'.  Yes,  sir;  he  was  a  part  of  the  W.  P.  A.  Theater 
Project  and  took  a  leading  part. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  mentioned  the  children  of  Mrs.  Soifer. 
What  were  their  names? 

Mr.  Appleby'.  I  don't  remember  them  all.  There  is  an  Abe  and  a 
few  others.     As  a  matter  of  fact  I  haven't  gone  over  that  data. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  there  a  Harry  Soifer? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  active  in  the  Communist  Party  affairs? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Every  one. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  Chester? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Every  one  of  the  Soifer  boys  were  active  in  Com- 
munist affairs  in  Chester. 

Mr.  MxVTTHEWs.  Including  Abe  also? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Including  the  son  that  happens  to  be  in  Mexico  at 
the  present  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  address  of  the  Soifers  was  416  East  Fourth 
Street,  Chester,  Pa. ;  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  is  where  the  meetings  were  held  that 
Mr.  Nilon  attended? 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  right. 


8238  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  a  Steve  Lewicki? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Steve  Lewicki;  yes,  sir.  He  works  in  the  shipyard. 
He  is  a  welder.  He  has  been  there  4  or  5  years.  He  is  still  there  at 
the  present  time.  He  is  one  of  the  trustees  of  the  C  I.  O.  Local  No. 
2  in  Chester. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  learn  that  he  also  attended  the  meetings, 
of  the  Communists  m  the  home  of  Mrs.  Soifer? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Lie  was  a  regular  attendant  at  the  Sunday  meetings 
and  the  Milne  office  and  he  has  been  a  close  friend  of  the  Soifer  boys 
for  years  and  has  been  in  and  out  of  their  house  like  one  of  the  children. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  it  is  your  information  that  he  is  still  employed 
at  the  Sun  Shipyard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  is,  sir.     I  do  know  that  definitely. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  seen  the  Communist  Party's  nominating 
petitions  circulated  in  the  State  of  Pennsylvania  and  particularly  in 
Delaware  County  for  the  placing  of  Communist  candidates  on  the' 
ballot  in  Pennsylvania? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  had  made  available  to  me  the  petitions  relating  to 
those  in  the  Chester  district  for  a  district  job. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  make  a  check  of  the  names  that  appeared 
on  the  Communist  Party's  nominating  petitions  against  employees 
in  the  Sun  Shipyard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  find  that  persons  employed  in  the  Sun 
Shipyard  appeared  on  the  Communists  Party's  nominating  petitions?' 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  many  such  persons  did  you  find  employed  at 
the  Sun  Shipyard  whose  names  appeared  on  the  Communist  Party's 
nominating  petitions? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  have  a  list  here  of  37.  It  is  rather  rough  but  I  will 
be  glad  to  put  it  in  the  record  if  you  care  to  have  it — 37  from  the  list 
of  those  on  the  petitions  who  were  employed  at  that  date  in  the  yards, 
some  of  whom  now  have  left  the  service. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  what  is  your  pleasure? 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  think  we  should  have  the  date  of  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  the  date  that  you  made  the  check? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  made  the  check  within  a  few  days  after  I  received 
the  copy  of  the  petition.  I  don't  have  the  petition  here  and  I  can't 
very  well  give  you  the  date. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  this  year? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Oh,  yes;  it  was  within  the  last  3  months.  I  would 
say  it  was  just  about  3  months  ago  and  no  longer. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  what  is  your  pleasure  with  refer- 
ence to  this  particular  list  of  names? 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  suggest  those  names  be  marked  as  an  exhibit  and 
made  a  part  of  the  record. 

Mr.  Thomas.  As  I  understand  this  contains  37  names  of  persons 
employed  in  the  Sun  Shipyard  whose  names  appeared  on  the  Com- 
munist Party  petitions? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  and  that  particular  petition  was  John 
Weaver's  own  petition.  He  was  running  for  a  job  as  county  engineer 
or  some  such  job,  which  appeared  on  the  petition.  The  majority  of 
the  names  were  gotten  by  himself  and  the  balance  were  gotten  by  some 
lady^ — I  have  forgotten  her  name. 


UN-AMKRICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8239 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Was  his  name  indicated  as  a  Communist  Party 
candidate? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  was  a  candidate  on  the  Communist  Party  ticket 
for  county  engineer  or  some  such  job. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  his  name  also  appear  at  the  bottom  of  the 
petition  as  the  circuhitor  of  the  petition? 

Mr.  Appleby.  His  name  appeared  at  the  section  where  the  name  is 
signed  to  the  effect  he  obtained  the  signatures  and  the  lady  who  con- 
tinued on  with  the  petition,  her  name  appeared  after  that. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  These  names  are  found  on  2  sheets  of  typewriter 
paper,  37  in  number,  and  I  offer  them  in  evidence. 

Air.  Starnes.  They  may  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Appleby  Exhibit  No.  4.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Appleby,  I  show  you  again  one  of  these 
mimeographed  sheets  which  has  been  introduced  as  an  exhibit,  which 
starts  out  with  this  question: 

Why  did  Aggie  Campbell  spread  Nazi  propaganda  in  the  shipyard  and  why 
did  he  stop  all  of  a  sudden  ? 

Do  you  know  Aggie  Campbell,  mentioned  in  this  sheet? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  I  know  him  very  well. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Aggie  Campbell  at  one  time  engage  in  the 
dissemination  of  Nazi  propaganda  in  the  shipyard,  according  to  your 
information  ?    • 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  his  first  name  Agnew? 

]Mr.  Appleby.  His  full  name  is  Louis  Agnew  Campbell. 

Mr.  Matthews.  L-o-u-i-s? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  believe  it  is  spelled  that  way. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A-g-n-e-w? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  do  you  know  that  he  has  disseminated  Nazi 
propaganda  at  the  shipyard? 

Air.  Appleby.  I  saw  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  he  was  associated  at  that 
time  with  any  organization? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  was  a  member  of  the  Anti-Communist  Society 
that  held  their  meetings  in  the  vicinity  of  Walnut  Street  in  Philadel- 
phia. 

Air.  AIatthews.  Was  that  known  as  the  Anti-Communist 

Air.  Appleby.  Anti-Commimist  Society  of  America  I  believe  was 
its  full  name. 

Air.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  propaganda  of 
that  organization? 

Air.  Appleby.  To  a  certain  extent. 

Air.  AIatthews.  The  nature  of  it? 

Air.  Appleby.  To  a  certain  degree;  yes.  I  attended  about  three 
meetings  believing  it  was  an  anti-Communist  society  and  the  first 
speakers  that  we  heard  sounded  as  though  they  were  out  for  the  pur- 
pose which  we  thought  they  were. 

However,  they  worked  in  other  speakers  and  they  became  very 
much  pro-Nazi  in  their  discussions  and  as  you  left  the  hall  they  had 
on  tables  piled  up,  stacks  of  anti-Semitic  propaganda — the  usual  stuff" 
with  the  pictures  of  the  Jews  and  movie  actresses  all  done  more  or 

62626— 41— vol.  14 6 


8240  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

less  to  make  them  look  bizarre;  and  it  was  such  data  as  that  that 
Campbell  brought  into  the  yard  and  disseminated. 

After  that  that  material  was  sent  directly  to  him  by  express  from 
I  believe,  Washington,  and  was  received  by  him  in  the  shipyard. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  satisfy  yourself  by  your  attendance  at 
these  meetings  of  the  Anti-Communist  Society  in  Philadelphia  that 
the  organization  was  a  pro-Nazi  organization? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Definitely. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  the  earmarks  of  the  propaganda  seemed  to 
indicate  it  was  that? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  have  no  doubt  that  Louis  Agnew  Camp- 
bell was  at  the  time  you  speak  of,  engaged  in  the  dissemination  of 
Nazi  propaganda  on  behalf  of  this  organization? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  became  a  very  active  member  for  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  do  you  know  about  Mr.  Campbell's  affilia- 
tions or  associations  at  the  present  time? 

Mr,  Appleby.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  Before  you  answer  that  question  which  I  just 
asked  you,  Mr.  Appleby,  I  show  you  a  mimeographed  sheet  of  paper 
entitled:  "Attention  Workers,  Philadelphia  Police  Exposes  Anti- 
Communist  League  as  Blind  for  the  Nazi  Bund." 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  this  is  signed  by  tlie  Communist  Party  of 
Delaware  County? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  seen  that  sheet? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes;  and  this  is  my  writing.  It  was  distributed  as 
given  here  at  7:45  a.  m.,  March  30,  1939. 

Mr.  Matthews.  March  30,  1939? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  at  times  I  marked  those  just  as  a  matter 
of  record. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  at  that  time  the  Communist 
Party  definitely  charged  that  the  Anti-Communist  League  was  a 
blind  for  the  Nazi  Bund? 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes;  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  the  allegation  here  is  that  the  Philadelphia 
police  had  exposed  the  Anti-Communist  League  as  such  an  organi- 
zation.    That  is  the  purport  of  this  document,  is  it  not? 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  right.  I  don't  know  the  extent  of  their 
exposition  but  they  did  intervene  in  several  cases,  I  believe,  where 
there  was  some  disturbance — a  little  violence  or  something  that 
occurred. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  that  be  marked  "Exhibit  5," 
and  made  a  part  of  the  I'ecord. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  may  be  marked  "Exhibit  5"  and  received  in 
evidence. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Appleby  Exhibit  No.  5.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Mr.  Appleby,  returning  to  the  question  I 
asked  you:  Do  you  know  anything  about  Mr.  Campbell's  present 
affiliations  or  activities? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  about  December  1939  Campbell  and  those 
who  were  supporting  him  in  his,  should  we  say  Nazi  activities  and  the 


UN-AMKUTCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §241 

distributiiiii  ol"  litorature  throuijhoiit  tlio  yard  and  out  on  tlio  stroot — 
pro-Nazi  {)ropagan(la,  joined  hands  with  the  Coniinunist  Party  in  the 
Dehaware  County  district. 

Air.  Matthews.  You  mean  that  tlie  niembers  of  the  Anti-Com- 
munist Leaiiue  joined  with  the  C^ommunists  in  some  kind  of  a  joint 
program? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  mean  that  John  Weaver,  Steve  Lewicki,  the  Soifer 
boys  and  the  others  joined  hands  with  Campbell  and  his  group  in 
about  De(  embei'  of  1939  and  as  a  residt  of  that  union  of  the  two  fac- 
tions and  ('oml)iiuitions,  they  reopened  local  No.  2,  which  had  died  a 
natui'al  (hnitli,  and  that  group  is  now  running  local  No.  2  of  the 
1.  U.  M.  S.  W.  A.,  a  C.  I.  O.  affiliate. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Just  one  question.  What  do  you  mean  when  you 
say  Weaver  and  these  other  people  joined  Campbell's  group?  Wliat 
do  you  mean  exactly  by  that? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  mean  that  they  sit  in  at  the  same  meetings,  are  of 
one  thought.  The  only  propaganda  that  is  on  the  streets  now  in  this 
locality  is  the  Liberal  Press  and  that  sheet  carries  the  activities  of  the 
group  which  were  out  for  one  purpose. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  do  you  mean  by  ''Campbell's  group"?  What 
was  "Campbell's  group"  exactly  that  they  joined? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Campbell  naturally  had  a  following  in  the  yard  and 
T  have  here  a  list  of  that  following. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  mean  that  they  joined  the  group  in  the  yard  of 
which  Campbell  was  the  leader,  is  that  it? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Would  you  repeat  that,  please? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  mean  they  joined  a  group  of  people  in  the  ship- 
yard of  which  Campbell  was  the  leader,  is  that  what  you  mean? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Tiiat  is  true.  I  mean  that  those  who  had  previously 
been  the  enemies  became  friends. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  I  understand  the  record,  Mr.  Voorhis,  Camp- 
bell had  a  following  working  with  him  when  he  was  disseminating 
Nazi  propaganda,  a  following  employed  in  the  shipyard. 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  on  the  other  hand.  Weaver  and  Soifer  had  a 
Communist  following,  employed  in  the  shipyard  and  that  on  or  about 
December  1939  these  two  groups,  the  Nazi  group  under  the  leadership 
of  Campbell  and  the  Communist  group  under  the  leadership  of 
Weaver,  joined  forces? 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  are  at  present  working  in  concert  rather  than 
in  opposition  to  each  other.  Is  that  the  correct  testimony,  Mr. 
Appleby? 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  What  I  was  trying  to  get  at,  is  Campbell  still  the 
leader  of  the  group  as  a  whole? 

Mr.  Appleby.  You  bring  up  the  point  so  I  think  it  is  relevant. 
There  was  an  election  last  Saturday  in  that  group.  Campbell  was 
elected  secretary  of  that  organization,  Steve  Lewicki,  who  had  been 
the  nearest  or  the  closest  friend  to  the  Communist  John  Weaver,  is 
a  trustee.  He  was  elected  trustee  of  that  organization.  That 
happened   last  Saturday  afternoon. 

Xlr.  Thomas.  In  other  words  the  Connnunists  and  the  Nazis  are 
represented  among  the  officers  of  the  organization? 


8242  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  have  you,  Mr.  Appleby,  in  your  investiga- 
tion of  communism  in  your  district,  in  your  observation  of  the  Com- 
munists and  Nazis,  noted  that  at  least  on  the  question  of  their 
attitude  toward  the  foreign  relations  of  this  country  are  in  substantial 
agreement  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Appleby.  They  are  in  agreement. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  observed  from  their  literature  and  their 
speeches  that  that  is  the  fact? 

Mr.  Appleby.  The  Liberal  Press  published  by  Stanley  Milne  is  not 
an  organ  for  any  particular  organization.  It  is  simply  a  liberal 
paper,  so-called — very  liberal. 

Air.  Matthews.  "So-called"? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  and  Milne  had  always  condemned  the 
Campbell  faction  and  had  always  given,  you  might  say,  the  Com- 
munist faction  the  break  until  this  change  took  place  in  December, 
roughly  December  1939.  The  I.  U.  M.  S.  W.  A.  have  their  own 
organ,  the  official  organ  called  the  Shipyard  Worker. 

It  carried  its  own  articles.  Tiie  two  papers  are  now  distributed 
one  inserted  in  the  other  and  are  handed  out  by  this  group  that  has 
merged  which  we  have  been  talking  about — the  two  papers,  the  Ship- 
yard Worker,  the  official  organ  for  the  I.  U.  M.  S.  W.  A.  and  the 
Liberal  Press  published  by  Stanley  jVIilne  of  Chester. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  menn  whoever  distributes  them  distributes 
them  together? 

Mr.  Appleby.  They  are  put  together  and  distributed  together.  In 
addition  to  that,  notices  such  as  sheets  like  this,  notice  or  notices  of 
meetings  are  also  inserted.  In  other  words,  you  receive  three  pieces 
of  literature — the  Shipyard  Worker  and  the  Liberal  Press  and  often 
notices  on  paper  this  size  [indicating],  inserted  in  with  the  papers  and 
they  are  given  out  as  a  unit  by  the  combined  groups. 

The  distributors  change,  naturally,  from  week  to  week,  depending 
on  whoever  is  available  to  hand  them  out. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  referred  to  a  list  which  I  hold  in  my 
hand,  as  a  list  of  the  followers  of  Mr.  Campbell — persons  who  were 
employed  in  the  Sun  Shipyard.  This  is  entitled:  "List  No.  2."  It 
appears  to  contain  about  21  names. 

Mr.  Chairman,  would  you  like  to  receive  this  list  in  evidence? 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  the  significance  of  that  list?  I  want  to 
know  that  first. 

Mr.  Appleby.  No  particular  significance  except  that  this  group 
as  a  whole  presented  the  pro-Nazi  group.  This  group  now  as  a 
whole,  with  perhaps  a  few  exceptions,  has  joined  hands  with  the 
Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Are  the  names  of  those  people  on  that  list? 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  the  group  listed  there  was  originally  a  pro-Nazi 
group? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  they  employees  of  the  Sun  Shipbuilding  Co., 
many  of  them? 

Mr.  Appleby.  May  I  glance  at  that  a  moment.  I  believe  they  are. 
I  would  just  like  to  check  it  first.  Yes,  sir;  as  a  matter  of  fact,  their 
occupations  are  given  on  the  side — abbreviated.  There  is  the  word 
"weld"  which  means  they  are  all  welders,  which  is  the  key  department 
in  the  Sun  Shipbuilding  Co, 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8243 

Mr.  Starnes.  There  is  no  objection  to  that  being  received  in 
evidence  and  it  will  be  made  a  part  of  the  record. 

(The  list  referred  to  was  marked  "Appleby  Exhibit  No.  6.") 

Air.  Matthews.  For  the  record,  Mr.  Appleby,  can  you  outline 
bri(>flv  the  txpo  of  manufactiu-ing  that  takes  place  in  the  Sun  Ship- 
yard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  at  the  present  time  60  percent  of  our  con- 
struction is  for  the  United  States  Maritime  Commission. 

I  overlooked  one  point.  I  stated  earlier  today  that  we  had  done 
some  Nav3'  work  but  very  little  of  it.  That  w^as  on  a  ship  within  the 
last  montii  that  we  had  built  and  the  Navy  Department  bought 
from  the  Maritime  Commission.  We  finished  certain  additional 
construction  for  the  Navy  Department  before  they  took  it  from  the 
yard.  However,  I  overlooked  one  larger  job.  I  believe  that  naval 
work  has  special  significance  at  this  time. 

We  built  and  delivered  the  first  twin-screw  high-speed  tanker,  a 
practically  all-welded  ship  called  the  Cimmeron,  to  the  Navy  Depart- 
ment. That  was  delivered  about  a  year  ago  and  that  is  on  the 
Pacific  coast  now.  It  is  the  pride  of  the  fleet.  It  is  the  first  high- 
speed tanker  built  in  this  country. 

And  when  I  speak  of  "high  speed,"  I  mean  a  tanker  with  6,000,000 
gallons  of  fuel  that  can  do  maybe  21  or  22  knots.  So  we  have  been 
engaged  in  naval  work  for  sometime  although  the  majority  of  our 
Avork  at  this  time  is  for  the  Maritime  Commission. 

The  balance  is  made  up  of  tankers  for  private  owners.  We  also 
do  repair  work.  We  do  Navy  repair  work  in  dredges  and  Army 
engineer's  vessels — on  their  dredges  and  also  private  work. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  cases  of  sabotage  come  to  your  attention, 
sabotage  in  the  Sun  Shipyard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  the  first  case  of  sabotage  that  came  to  my 
personal  attention  was  about,  I  would  say,  4  months  ago.  It  was  the 
case  of  a  large  reel  of  2-inch  diameter  8-conductor  conduit — that  is 
armored  cable.  It  has  a  woven  basket  weave  of  metal  on  the  outside. 
It  Avas  on  board  the  deck  of  one  of  the  ships  under  construction. 

The  cable  was  being  unreeled  for  the  purpose  of  wiring  the  ship. 
They  use  this  cable  and  draw  it  through,  hundreds  and  hundreds  of 
feet  of  the  cable  is  drawn  through  the  ship.  After  it  is  in  place  it  is 
so  covered  up  and  protected  that  it  is  difficult  to  get  to  it. 

In  other  words,  if  there  is  a  short  circuit  or  anything  else  happened 
to  it.  it  would  be  verj"  difficult  to  locate  the  trouble.  This  was  a  new 
reel  that  they  were  unreeling.  After  they  had  about  12  or  15  feet 
unraveled  one  of  the  workmen  caught  his  finger  on  a  sharp  object  and 
thev  examined  it  closelv  and  it  turned  out  to  be  a  nail  driven  straight 
through  the  cable  with  the  head  flush  with  the  basket  weave  which 
made  it  difficult  to  see,  but  it  just  happened  that  it  was  just  about  a 
sixteenth  of  an  inch  too  long  and  it  caught  his  finger. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  that  cause  a  short  circuit? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Within  that  conduit  are  eight  conductors  and  in 
driving  a  nail  through  it  it  would  be  impossible  to  go  through  without 
hitting  three  or  four  which  would  short  circuit  those  wires. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  that  create  a  hazard  of  fire? 

Mr.  Appleby.  It  would  definitely  create  a  hazard,  either  a  fire  or 
burn  up  the  vital  pieces  of  machinery  that  would  be  connected  to  that 
cable,  inasmuch  as  most  of  the  ships  today,  their  auxiliaries,  are  elec- 
tricallv  driven  and  not  steam. 


8244  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Or  at  least  necessitate  a  great  deal  of  work  in 
finding  the  short  circuit? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  would  be  the  least  that  could  be  expected 
as  a  result  of  driving  a  nail  through  that  cable? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  there  any  doubt  about  that  being  a  piece  of 
sabotage?     I  mean  to  say,  could  that  have  been  an  accident? 

Mr.  Appleby.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  a  question  there.  Did  the  company  itself  con- 
sider it  a  piece  of  sabotage? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  this  occurrence  was 
reported  to  the  F.  B.  I.? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  it  happened  in  this  way:  One  of  our  men— 
and  when  I  saA"  "one  of  our  men"  I  mean  one  of  our  members,  who 
reported  to  me — he  did  not  laiow  what  else  to  do.  I  immediately 
reported  to  an  official  of  the  company  and  they  turned  it  over  to  the 
F.  B.  I.     Wliat  they  have  done,  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  Thomas.  May  I  ask  how  long  ago  that  was? 

Mr.  Appleby.  About  4  months  ago,  sir. 

Now,  the  next  act  of  sabotage 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  want  to  ask  you  one  more  question.  Is  that 
cable  a  very  expensive  material? 

Mr.  Appleby.  It  runs  about  $8  a  foot. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  is,  in  other  words,  relatively  expensive  material? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  it  is  very  fine  cable. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  would  the  necessity  of  taking  it  out  to  find 
a  short  circuit  damage  the  cable? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Oh,  yes;  yes,  indeed. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  right,  will  you  please  give  any  other  instances, 
if  any  such  have  come  to  your  attention,  of  sabotage  in  the  Sun 
Shipyard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  About  2  months  ago  one  of  the  Atlantic  Eefining 
Co.  tankers,  one  of  the  large  new,  all-welded  jobs — in  fact  the  largest 
in  the  United  States — was  in  our  yard  for  repairs.  There  were  no 
particular  repairs  on  the  engine.  vShe  was  in  for  the  customary  paint 
job  which  they  get  about  every  6  months.  After  being  in  a  few  days 
when  they  started  the  engine  to  leave  the  yard  they  could  not  get 
oil  pressure  and  the  engine  heated  up.     And  it  had  to  be  stopped. 

Investigation  disclosed  after  2  days  of  pulling  the  oil  lines  apart 
that  there  were  numerous  pieces,  I  would  say,  8  10.  or  12  pieces  of 
sweater  all  cut  about  the  same  size  but  rough,  in  the  lubricating  oil 
system.  The  lubricating  oil  system  on  a  ship  that  size  carries  a 
tank,  reserve  tank  of  several  himdred  drums  of  lubricating  oil.  This 
was  an  enclosed  system  and  the  only  way  you  could  possibly  enter 
any  foreign  matter  into  the  system  would  be  by  removing  a  steel 
plate  about  this  large,  with  eight  bolts  holding  it  down.  That 
material  was  deposited  in  that  tank  between  the  time  the  ship  came 
into  our  yard  until  it  was  ready  to  leave. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  say  "pieces  of  sweater"  is  that  a 
technical  term? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  mean  a  piece  of  clothing. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  an  ordinary  sweater,  a  piece  of  clothing? 


UN-AMEHICAN  I'KOrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8245 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yos,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  they  were  cut  in  squares  and  deposited,  this 
forei<2:n  material,  in  these  drums? 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  right,  in  the  tank  and  into  the  oil  which 
went  through  all  the  oil  lines  to  the  engine  and  naturally  stopped  all 
circulation  of  the  lubricating  oil  to  the  moving  parts  of  the  engine. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  You  testify  that  it  is  impossible  for  the  material 
to  have  come  in  through  any  of  the  pipelines? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  because  it  is  a  closed  system.  It  is  not 
like  the  case  of  a  Diesel  engine  where  you  have  a  large  crankcase. 
This  is  a  turbine  job  where  there  is  no  opening  whatsoever. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Was  this  case  which  you  concluded  to  be  a  case 
of  sabotage,  also  presented  to  the  proper  authorities  and  if  so  to  whom? 

Mr.  Appleby.  The  authorities  were  well  familiar  with  the  case 
because  as  soon  as  the  pressure  was  not  present,  natm'ally  our  engi- 
neering department  was  called  in.  AVe  built  the  ship  and  naturally 
we  are  familiar  with  the  system  and  where  to  look  for  trouble. 

The  company  is  quite  familiar  with  the  case. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  it  was  turned  over 
to  the  Federal  authorities  for  investigation? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  presume  so  but  I  could  not  say. 

Mr.  ^Iattheavs.  You  do  say  positively  that  this  act  of  sabotage 
occurred  after  tliis  tanker  had  come  into  the  Sun  Shipyard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  she  could  not  possibly  have  run  into  the 
yard  in  that  condition.  She  had  just  come  from  her  regular  trip, 
which  is  usually  Texas,  with  a  load  of  crude  oil  for  tlie  refinery. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  has  any  other  case  of  sabotage  come  to 
your  attention? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  2  weeks  ago  or  within  a  period  of  2  weeks  I 
would  say,  of  five  working  days,  we  had  63  hoses  cut.  The  hoses  that 
I  speak  of  are  about  a  half  uich  outside  diameter  and  they  run  thou- 
sands and  thousands  of  feet  of  this  hose  all  over  the  plant,  all  through 
the  new  ships,  repair  work,  drydocks  and  so  forth. 

These  hoses  cany  oxygen,  protane,  and  acetylene  gas,  a  combina- 
tion of  which,  of  course,  is  ver}'  explosive  and  very  inflammable. 
Those  hoses  were  cut  at  quite  an  angle — I  would  say  maybe  a  20° 
angle,  with  what  appeared  to  be  a  safety  razor  blade  or  some  kind  of  a 
very  sharp  instrument.  It  cut  into  the  last  segment  or  fiber,  not  com- 
pletely severed  in  two  but  just  at  the  breaking  point.  The  manner 
in  which  it  was  cut  with  a  sharp  instrument  at  a  sharp  angle  relative 
to  the  piece  of  hose  itself,  made  it  almost  impossible  to  see  it  unless  you 
picked  the  hose  up  and  bent  it  at  which  time  the  piece  would  fly  up. 
As  I  sa}"  63  of  those  were  found  m  1  week.     That  was  just  2  weeks  ago. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Sixty-three  gashes? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Sixty-three  gashes.  Naturally  when  they  found  a 
few  they  put  inspectors  on  and  they  went  over  everv  foot  of  hose, 
bending  it  to  fmd  the  cut  places  and  cut  those  sections  out. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  these  gashes  found  throughout  the  plant? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Throughout  the  plant,  from  one  end  of  the  shipway 
to  the  other.  We  have  a  man  here  present  today  who  was  one  of 
the  inspectors  who  was  sent  out  to  look  for  and  found  some  of  these 
pieces  of  hose  that  were  slashed. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  it  your  information  that  this  could  not  have 
come  about  accidently? 


8246  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Appleby.  Absolutely  impossible.  There  is  no  instrument 
around  the  shipways;  there  is  no  necessity  of  an  instrument  sharp 
enough  to  make  such  a  cut  and  I  am  sure  you  could  not  duplicate  it 
without  a  razor  blade  because  it  is  tough  hose,  very  tough  vulcanized 
hose  with  a  fabric  running  through  it.  It  was  a  particularly  bad 
case  of  sabotage  to  this  extent,  although  nothing  happened  because 
it  was  found,  fortunately,  before  it  did  happen,  but  such  a  hose  cut 
so  close  to  the  inside  core  that  carries  the  gas  could  fill  up  a  ship,  a 
compartment  or  any  of  the  tanks  in  these  ships,  or  the  holes  and  a 
spark  would  blow  the  ship  to  pieces. 

We  have  had  cases  of  explosion  with  acetylene  mixed  with  oxygen 
or  profane.  It  is  higlily  explosive.  It  is  an  exceptionally  bad  piece 
of  sabotage,  and  it  would  be  disastrous  to  a  ship  where  a  tank  was 
full  of  that  gas  and  exploded.  We  are  familiar  with  such  explosions. 
We  have  had  such  a  thing  happen  but  not  to  that  extent  nor  because 
of  sabotage. 

It  is  particularly  dangerous  to  life — the  fire  hazard — when  oxygen, 
for  instance,  without  the  acetylene  comes  out  of  a  hose  and  gets  into 
your  clothing.  If  a  spark  strikes  your  clothing  your  clothing  imme- 
diately goes  up  in  flame,  although  oxygen  itself  is  not  inflammable, 
but  in  combination  with  some  material  that  is  inflammable  it  goes  off 
like  a  mixture  of  profane  or  anything  else.  It  is  a  very  bad  form  of 
sabotage. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  say  that  was  discovered  in  the  past  few  days? 

Mr.  Appleby.  About  2  weeks  ago,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  of  any  other  instances  of  sabotage? 

Mr.  Appleby.  There  have  been  three  fires  in  the  last  month  on 
ships  under  construction.  There  was  one  fire  in  the  tanks.  We  don't 
know  whether  it  was  sabotage  or  not  but  we  cannot  account  for  the 
fire  because  the  nearest  thing  to  anything  that  will  burn  are  3-inch 
planks  and  these  fires  have  started  and  we  don't  laiow  just  how. 

Air.  Thomas.  Wliat  precautions  is  the  management  of  your  com- 
pany taking  to  counteract  the  sabotage  and  to  eliminate  the  Nazi  and 
Communist  influence? 

Mr.  Appleby.  As  to  eliminating  the  Nazi  and  Communist  influence, 
I  could  not  say,  except  to  this  degree,  that  within  the  last  2  months 
every  one  of  the  7,000  employees  in  the  yard — and  that  includes  the 
office  workers — the  7,000  have  been  fingerprinted  and  copies  of  the 
fingerprints  have  been  sent  to  the  F.  B.  I.  for  their  file  in  Washington. 
In  addition  to  that  their  guard  force  has  been  increased  by  perhaps 
25  percent,  and  I  am  informed  also,  although  I  don't  know 

Mr.  Thomas.  Yet  sabotage  goes  on  just  the  same? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes;  I  am  informed  by  I  can't  state  definitely  that 
there  are  F.  B.  I.  and  Naval  Intelligence  men  in  the  yard. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not,  Mr.  Appleby,  any 
of  these  employees  whose  names  appeared  on  the  Communist  Party 
nominating  petitions  have  left  the  employ  of  the  Sun  Shipyard  just 
prior  to  the  fingerprinting  of  all  the  employees? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes;  there  were  perhaps  a  half  a  dozen  who  left  prior 
to  the  fingerprinting.  However,  I  woukl  not  assume  too  much  there 
because  this  has  become  a  day  when  men  are  shifting  more  than  they 
used  to  shift.  They  are  giving  up  jobs  to  go  to  other  places  because 
there  are  jobs  open.     It  could  be  a  coincidence. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes;  but  you  know  some  have  left? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8247 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  do  you  know  from  information  which  cir- 
ciihitos  among-  empk)yces  that  some  of  those  persons  whoso  names 
appear  on  the  Communist  Party  nominating  petitions,  have  already 
obtained  employment  in  other  plants? 

Air.  Applehy.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  plants  that  manufacture  products  vital 
to  national  defense? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  j^ou  know  whether  or  not  the  present  line  of 
the  Communist  Party 

Mr.  Thomas.  Before  you  ask  that  question  I  think  you  ought  to 
ask  another  question  in  regard  to  where  these  employes  have  gone. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  would  be  purely  hearsay  unless  he  knows  of 
his  own  knowledge. 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  do  know  of  my  own  knowledge,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  do  know? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  shall  only  quote  the  ones  that  I  do  know. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  am  not  here  with  the  names  of  those  but  I  can  tell 
you  this  definitely,  to  my  knowledge,  two  of  them  are  at  the  Westing- 
house  plant  which  is  about  5  miles  up  the  river  from  us,  where  they  are 
manufacturing  turbines  for  the  United  States  Navy.  There  are  prob- 
ably a  half  dozen  in  the  last  few  months  who  left  prior  to  the  finger- 
printing, but  we  would  not  say  the  fingerprinting  had  anything  to 
do  with  it. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Was  it  after  the  fingerprinting  was  announced? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  don't  think  it  was  announced.  It  was  probably 
in  the  talking  stage  but  not  announced. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Let  us  get  that  clear. 

Mr.  Appleby.  Some  went  to  Pusey  &  Jones  in  Wilmington  where 
they  are  building  United  States  maritime  boats.  There  were  two  that 
I  know  of  that  went  to  the  New  York  Ship  &  Dry  Dock  at  Camden, 
N.  J.,  where  they  are  building  nothing  but  Navy  boats,  battleships, 
cruisers,  and  so  forth.  And  the  others  are  just  here  and  there.  I 
could  not  say  where.     I  know  there  are  a  few  in  the  New  York  district. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  know  that  any  went  to  the  Philadelphia 
Navy  Yard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir;  one  or  two  went  to  the  Philadelphia  Navy 
Yard. 

Air.  AIatthews.  Air.  Appleby,  you  said  there  were  37  employees 
of  the  Sun  Shipyard  whose  names  appeared  on  these  Communist 
Party  nominating  petitions.  Do  you  know  how  many  of  the  37  are 
still  employed  at  the  Sun  Shipyard? 

Air.  Appleby.  Without  a  check  I  could  not  say  definitely  but  I 
doubt  if  there  are  more  than  25  left  or  20. 

Air.  AIatthews.  Between  20  and  25? 

Air.  Appleby.  On  the  original  list  that  I  have  turned  in  here. 

Air.  AIatthews.  But  there  are  still  a  score  or  so? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes;  there  are  at  least  20  or  25. 

Air.  AIatthews.  Employed? 

Mr.  Appleby.  That  is  right. 

Air.  AIatthews.  And  you  haven't  made  an  absolute  check  as  of 
today? 

Air.  Appleby.  That  is  right;  I  had  no  particular  reason  to  do  so. 

Air.  Starnes.  Can  you  obtain  that  check  for  us? 


8248  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  could,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  If  you  will  do  that  and  insert  it  in  the  record  with 
your  testimony  we  will  be  glad  to  have  it. 

(The  following  letter  was  submitted  by  Mr.  Appleby  relative  to 
the  above:) 

February  22,  1941. 
Dies  Committee, 

House  Office  Building,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Gentlemen:  Relative  to  the  information  you  desire  concerning  tlie  writer's 
testimony  at  Newark,  Oct.  1,  1940. 

Records  available  indicate  that  there  are  eighteen  (18)  employees  now  at  Sun 
Ship   Co.,   Cliester,   who   were  signers  of  the   Communist  petition   in    behalf  of 
John  Weaver,  Communist,  Delaware  County,  Pa. 
Trusting  this  is  the  information  you  desire,  I  am 
Yours  very  truly, 

[Signed]     Walter  M.   AppLEBr, 

Plymouth  Hall,  Media,  Pa. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Mr.  Appleby,  I  want  to  ask  you  this 
final  question  as  far  as  I  am  concerned:  Are  you  sufficiently  familiar 
with  the  present  line  of  the  Communist  Party  to  know  whether  or  not 
it  is  agitating  in  an  extraordinary  degree  against  all  measures  of 
national  defense? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  am  afraid  I  will  have  to  give  that  some  thought. 
I  couldn't  say  definitely  on  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  the  German- 
American  Bund  and  Nazi-minded  organizations  are  agitating  against 
measures  for  national  defense? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Not  to  my  personal  knowledge.  I  mean  in  a 
practical  way.     I  know  of  no  such  activities. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Appleby,  did  you  know  a  Mr.  Adolf  Locker, 
who  worked  at  the  Sun  Shipyard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Adolf  Locker  was 
pro-Nazi  in  his  utterances  and  sympathies? 

Mr.  Appleby.  In  conversations  with  him  he  was  not  pro-Nazi, 
only  to  this  extent:  He  was  sympathetic  for  Germany  because,  due  to 
the  fact  that  he  had  fought  in  the  German  Army  in  the  first  World 
War  and  at  the  present  time  he  has  four  brothers  fighting  in  Germany 
in  this  war  whom  he  had  not  heard  from  for  about  6  months  and  about 
whom  he  was  quite  concerned,  naturally.  He  was  sympathetic 
toward  the  cause — he  made  no  un-American  activities,  however,  to  me. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  was  an  alien  or  is 
an  alien? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Otto  told  me  that  he  was  a  citizen  of  this  country 
that  he  was  naturalized.     I  could  not  prove  that  but  he  told  me  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  work  in  the  Sun  Shipyard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  did  not  work  directly  for  the  yard ;  he  worked  for 
the  Slater  System  that  has  the  concession  in  the  yard  and  runs  the 
restaurant  for  the  entire  yard  within  the  yard  itself. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  have  general  supervision  of  the  foods, 
in  other  words,  in  the  yard? 

Mr.  Appleby.  He  had  general  supervision  of  all  the  foods  eaten 
throughout  the  yard  and  at  the  time  of  the  trial  trips  where  the  com- 
pany supplies  their  own  crew  and  food  and  so  forth,  Otto  went  along 
on  those  trips  and  was  in  complete  charge  of  the  food. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  am  afraid  I  made  a  mistake  in  the  name; 
is  it  Otto  Locker? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8249 

Mr.  Afplebv.  Otto  and  not  Adolf — no,  no;  I  am  wron^:.  Otto  is 
another  Gorman  in  the  kitoiien. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  Adolf  and  when  you  said  "Otto"  you  mean 
Adolf,  is  that  right. 

Mr.  Appleby.  Adolf,  that  is  right. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Now,  you  were  speaking  what  he  did  when  the 
ships  went  on  trial  runs.     Did  you  conclude  that? 

Air.  Appleby.  I  think  suspicions  were  first  aroused  on  the  trial 
runs  when  they  found  that  Adolf  was  down  in  the  engine  room  where 
he  had  no  business  to  be.  His  business  was  up,  on  the  particular  type 
of  ship  that  he  would  usually  go  on,  which  was  more  or  less  freighters 
or  tankers — the  galley  is  right  there  on  the  sheltered  deck  and  there  is 
no  reason  why  lie  would  be  in  the  engine  room  unless  he  was  just  look- 
ing around.  He  had  no  business  there.  He  was  seen  in  the  engine 
room  quite  frequently  and  there  suspicions  were  aroused.  Further 
than  that  I  can  say  that  he  was  discharged  last  week  and  although  it 
isn't  exactly  reliable  information,  and  I  got  it  from  a  fairly  good  source, 
they  found  that  he  was  an  official  of  some  German  bund  in  the  vicinity 
of  Chester. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  that  was  the  German- 
American  Bund  in  the  vicinity  of  Chester? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  don't  know  that.  Information  could  probably 
come  from  the  company. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  Thank  you. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Can  you  furnish  us  sections  of  this  cable  that  you 
said  was  cut  with  some  sharp  instrument? 

Mr.  Appleby.  If  they  haven't  done  something  with  it  by  this  time 
I  could.  They  did  keep  it  for  a  long  time  for  examination,  I  guess  for 
various  agencies. 

Mr.  Starnes.  If  it  is  available. 

Mr.  Appleby.  If  it  is  available,  I  could  either  get  the  section  or 
perhaps  a  photograph  of  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  if  you  will  do  that  for  us. 

Mr.  Appleby'.  I  can  also  get  you  sections  of  the  hose  which  I  spoke 
of  which  apparently  was  cut  with  a  sharp  instrument. 

Mr.  Starxes.  We  will  be  glad  to  have  those  and  when  the}'  are 
received  we  will  then  use  the  inspector  who  was  inspecting  the  job 
and  can  identify  it.     Any  questions  by  members  of  the  committee? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  want  to  ask  one  or  two  questions. 

Mr.  Appleby,  you  said,  I  believe,  at  the  beginning  of  your  testimony 
that  your  union  was  the  recognized  bargaining  agent  for  the  workers 
in  that  plant;  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Appleby".  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  How  long  has  it  been  so? 

Mr.  Appleby.  We  established  the  right  to  bargain  for  all  the  hourly 
workers  in  the  Sun  Shipyard  on  March  17,  1937,  through  a  National 
Labor  Relations  Board  elections  between  ourselves  and  the  I.  U.  M. 
S.  W.  A. 

We  have  maintained  that  position  since. 

Mr.  VooRHife.  One  other  question  that  is  in  an  entirely  different 
direction.  Do  you  happen  to  know  whether  this  so-called  Anti- 
Communist  Society  that  you  have  mentioned  as  being  in  Philadelphia, 
do  3^ou  know  whether  that  organization  was  a  local  organization  in 
that  region  or  whether  it  has  other  branches  in  other  parts  of  the 


8250  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

country?  I  mean  the  organization  that  Mr.  Campbell  was  connected 
with? 

Mr.  Appleby.  The  organization  itself  appeared  to  be  local  people 
but  those  who  were  in  back  of  it  seemed  to  travel  around  an  awful 
lot  and  brought  others  hi  from  other  sections.  There  was  always  a 
new  speaker  from  some  other  section. 

It  was  difficult  to  know  who  was  running  the  organization. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Appleby,  as  I  understand  it  these  ships  are  being 
made  for  the  Maritime  Commission? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Some  of  our  ships. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  the  ships  that  are  being  made  for  the  Maritime 
Commission  aren't  they  being  made  in  such  a  way  that  they  could  be 
converted  into  Nav}^  auxiliary  vessels? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir.  The  fore  peak  deck  and  usually  somewhere 
aft  about  the  stern,  they  are  reinforced  for  gun  mounts  but  the  gun 
mounts  are  not  in  place. 

Mr.  Thomas.  One  more  question:  What  steps  have  the  manage- 
ment taken  to  determine  what  employees  are  citizens  or  rather,  which 
employees  are  citizens  and  which  employees  are  aliens? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Well,  the  employees  that  have  come  in  there  and 
registered  or  you  might  say  registered — yes,  registered  with  the 
employment  agent  in  years  gone  by  as  citizens — just  how  they  work 
that  I  don't  know  unless  they  speak  in  a  foreign  tongue  or  something. 
I  don't  laiow  whether  they  check  them  or  not  but  all  new  employees 
coming  m  and  for  at  least  the  last  year  must  produce  a  birth  certificate. 
Without  a  birth  certificate  they  cannot  be  employed. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Of  the  6,000  employees,  what  is  your  estimate  of  the 
number  of  aliens? 

Mr.  Appleby.  I  would  say  there  are  only  perhaps  15  in  the  yard 
who  are  not  citizens  or  taking  out  papers  or  there  is  one  reason  or 
another  for  them  not  taking  out  citizenship  papers. 

We  have  a  couple  from  foreign  countries  who  are  okayed  by  the 
State  Department  and  there  are  a  few  of  foreign  birth  where  it  is 
impossible  for  them  to  get  their  birth  certificates  due  to  the  fact  there 
is  no  country  where  they  come  from  and  their  records  are  not  available. 

If  they  are  old  employees  the  company  is  going  to  go  along  with 
them  until  some  means  is  found  to  establish  their  citizenship. 

Mr.  Thomas.  So  practically  every  employee  is  either  a  citizen  or  an 
alien  who  has  taken  out  his  first  papers  or  is  about  to  take  them  out? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  in  addition  to  all  those  groups  there  are 
about  15  who  are  aliens? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Fifteen  who  are  aliens  and  have  not  taken  out  papers 
for  one  reason  or  another,  which  is  satisfactory  to  the  company. 

Mr.  Thomas.  So  any  sabotage  that  is  taking  place  is  being  done 
probably  by  persons  who  have  already  become  citizens  of  this  country? 

Mr.  Appleby.  Undoubtedly. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  stand  aside,  Mr.  Appleby. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Call  your  next  witness. 

Mr.  Barker.  Joseph  Stewart. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8251 

TESTIMONY  OF  JOSEPH  W.  STEWART,  WELDING  INSPECTOR,   SUN 
SHIPBUILDING  &  DRYDOCK  CO. 

(The  witness  was  duly  sworn  by  Mr.  Starnes.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  your  name,  please? 

Mr.  Stewart.  Joseph  W.  Stewart. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  your  address? 

Mr.  Stewart.  423  South  Fifty-fifth  Street,  Pliiladelphia,  Pa. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  yoiu"  occupation? 

Mr.  Stewart.  I  am  a  welding  instructor. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Welding  inspector? 

Mr.  Stewart.  Welding  instructor  and  inspector. 

Mr.  Starnes.  By  whom  are  you  employed? 

Mr,  Stewart.  Sun  Shipbuilding  &  Dry  Dock  Co.,  Chester,  Pa, 

IMr.  Starnes.  All  right,  Air.  Barker. 

Mr.  Barker.  Mr.  Stewart,  as  part  of  your  inspection  duties  did 
you  examine  this  cable  which  had  been  cut  that  you  heard  Mr. 
Appleby  testify  about? 

Mr.  Stewart.  I  did.  I  can  testify  that  I  will  corroborate  every 
statement  Mr.  Appleby  made.  In  fact  two  sections  of  the  hose  I 
found  myself,  going  into  the  double  bottoms,  and  the  cable  itself  I 
seen  that  the  nail  was  driven  in  there.     1  inspected  that  myself. 

Mr.  Starnes.  By  "the  double  bottom"  you  mean  the  inner  layer? 

Mr.  Stewart.  That  is  right;  the  double  bottom  of  the  sliip. 

Mr.  Barker.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  stand  aside. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Who  is  your  next  witness? 

Mr.  Barker.  Gerhard  Wilhelm  Kunze. 

TESTIMONY  OF  GERHARD  WILHELM  KUNZE,  NATIONAL  LEADER 
OF  THE  GERMAN-AMERICAN  BUND 

(Mr.  Kunze  was  attended  by  his  attorney,  Wilbur  V.  Keegan.) 

(The  witness  was  duly  sworn  by  Mr.  Starnes.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  This  gentleman  who  is  sitting  on  your  right  is  your 
counsel? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  give  us  your  name  for  the  record  [addressing 
comisel]? 

Mr.  Keegan.  I  will  be  glad  to  do  that,  Congressman.  My  name 
is  Wilbur  V.  Keegan,  general  counsel  for  the  German-American  Bund, 
address,  178  East  Eighty-fifth  Street,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Starnes.  [Addressing  the  witness.]  Have  a  seat  and  give  us 
your  full  name,  please. 

Mr.  Kunze.  Gerhard  Wilhelm  Kunze. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  your  address? 

Mr.  Kunze.  New  York  City,  178  East  Eighty-fifth  Street,  room  5. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Where  were  you  born,  Mr.  Kunze? 

Mr.  Kunze.  In  Camden,  N.  J. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When? 

Mr.  Kunze.  January  10,  1906. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  are  a  citizen,  therefore,  of  the  United  ^States? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  your  occupation  or  profession? 


8252  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  am  the  national  leader  of  the  German-American 
Bund. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  other  profession  or  any  other 
means  of  support — any  other  occupation  other  than  being  the  national 
leader  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  your  sole  means  of  support? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  have  you  been  the  national  leader  of  the 
German- American  Bund? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Since  December  5,  1939,  as  acting  national  leader,  and 
since  September  1  of  this  year  as  national  leader  without  the  term 
"acting"  before  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  were,  in  other  words,  the  acting  leader  from 
December  5,  1939,  to  September  1940? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  since  September  1940  you  were  elected  and  have 
been  the  national  leader? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  overlooked  asking  you  a  moment  ago  in  the  pre- 
liminary questions  to  give  us  your  educational  training  and  back- 
ground. We  usually  ask  for  that  and  will  you  give  us  that  information 
now? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Public  school,  high  school,  and  various  night  schools 
in  electrical  and  mechanical  training. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  was  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  In  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  lived  then  in  Pennsylvania  or  New 
Jersey  practically  all  your  life? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When  did  you  join  the  German- American  Bund? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Upon  its  creation  in  1936. 

Mr.  Starnes.  At  Buffalo,  N.  Y.? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  vou  among  those  who  organized  the  bund 
there  in  1936? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Friends  of  New  Germany 
prior  to  that  time? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  was;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Prior  to  the  time  you  became  a  member  of  the  Friends 
of  New  Germany  were  you  a  member  of  the  forerunner  to  it,  the 
Teutonic  Society? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  was  not  a  member  of  any  forerunner  of  the  Friends 
of  New  Germany. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  was  the  first  organization  you  joined? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wlien  did  you  join  that  organization? 

Mr.  Kunze.  In  September  1933. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  was  your  occupation  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Chauffeur-mechanic. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  had  been  your  occupation  until  you  became 
the  acting  national  leader  of  the  bund  in  December  1939? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Public  luitional  relations  director. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Give  us  your  business  background. 


UN-AMERICAN   PKOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8253 

Mr.  KuNZE.  ClnuidVur-nKM'haiiir  nnd  eloclrician. 

Mr.  St.\rnes.  By  what  companios  wore  you  employed? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Caroni  Dredging  Contractors  at  Trinidad,  British 
West  Indies,  in  1922  and  1923;  at  the  Trinidad  Leaseholds,  an  oil 
field,  in  1923  and  1924.  At  the  Philadelphia  Electric  Co.  in  1924 
and  1925.  At  the  Quaker  Auto  Supply  Co.  1925  and  1920,  Phila- 
delphia. The  Southern  Pacific  Railroad  in  El  Paso,  Tex.,  in  1927. 
Pickwick  Stages  in  El  Paso,  Tex.,  in  1927.  The  Southland  Stages 
in  San  Diego,  Calif.,  in  1928,  or  1927  and  the  begiiniing  of  1928. 
The  Textile  Electric  Machinery  Co.  of  Philadelphia  from  1928,  in 
February,  I  believe,  until  the  end  of  1930. 

Mr.  Starnes.  From  1930  where  were  you  employed? 

Mr.  Ki  NZE.  Thomas  M.  Royal  Manufacturers  at  Bryn  Mawr,  Pa., 
in  1931,  and  as  chaufl'eur-mechanic  for  several  families  from  1932 
until  1936,  I  beheve. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  from  1936? 

Mr.  KrxzE.  Thereafter  in  the  employ  of  the  German-American 
Bund,  first  in  Philadelphia,  until  August  1937,  and  employed  volun- 
tarily in  New  York  from  November  1937  to  April  1939  and  on  salary 
in  New  York  from  April  1939  to  this  time. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Can  you  give  us  the  names  of  some  of  your  employers 
between  1932  and  1936?  You  gave  the  names  of  all  your  employers 
up  to  that  time. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Employers? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes;  some  of  vour  employers. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  E.  L.  Rothchild— at  that  time  2121  North  Park  Avenue 
in  Philadelpliia;  a  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Paris  at  Elkins  Park,  Pa.,  and  the 
2  years  from  1934  to  1936  for  Mrs.  E.  L.— no;  Mrs.  Robert  E.  Daffron, 
Jr.,  Newton  Square. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right.  Now,  why  did  you  join  the  German- 
American  Bund? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Because  I  am  a  German-American  and  wanted  to 
find  an  organization  or  help  build  one  wliich  would  pay  more  militant 
attention  to  protecting  the  good  name,  the  rights  and  privileges  of  the 
German-Americans  than  I  had  been  able  to  find  before, 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  any  other  reason? 

Mr.  Kunze.  That  was  the  only  reason. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  only  reason? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  were  smcere  in  your  belief  or  opinion  that 
American  citizens  of  German  descent  were  not  receiving  proper  treat- 
ment or  accorded  fair  representation  in  all  the  liberties  and  the  rights 
that  other  American  citizens  were  enjoying? 

Mr.  Kunze.  That  is  my  belief. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  your  belief? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Upon  what  was  that  belief  based,  Mr.  Kunze? 

Mr.  Kunze.  The  war  hysteria  of  the  last  war  and  the  inability, 
apparently,  of  the  German  element  to  properly  fight  back  against 
mifairness  which  developed  because  of  that  hysteria. 

I  went  through  the  public  schools  during  the  last  war  and  had  very 
many  experiences  which  I  shall  never  forget  just  because  of  the  simple 
fact  that  I  refused  to  consider  everytliing  that  was  German  in  my 
make-up  or  in  others,  to  be  bad  and  condemnable.  I  received  enough 
beatings  to  remind  me  of  that  for  the  rest  of  my  life. 


8254  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  appreciate  the  fact,  of  course,  that  many  of  the 
outstanding  citizens  of  this  country — citizens  in  business,  finance, 
industry,  the  various  professions  and  in  the  agricultural  field;  the 
agricultural  field  and  all  the  other  lines  of  endeavor  in  American  life,  in 
all  of  these  fields  American  citizens  of  German  descent  have  risen  to 
preeminence,  isn't  that  true? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  was  generally  true  up  to  the  last  war.  After  the 
fact  that  they  had  not  at  the  same  time  learned  to  protect  themselves 
by  organizing  to  assure  their  political  and  economic  representation, 
made  itself  felt  and  since  that  war  the  German-Americans,  so  far  as 
our  experiences  show,  are  more  or  less  of  a  goat  whenever  a  goat  is 
required. 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  did  not  hear  that  last  statement. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  The  Germans,  I  say,  are  more  or  less  of  a  goat  when- 
ever a  goat  is  recjuired. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  can  understand,  of  course,  that  that  statement 
has  grave  implications  and  presents  an  indictment  of  a  nature  against 
the  American  people  and  the  American  public.  Can  you  be  more 
specific  in  that  statement  as  to  what  those  instances  are?  I  will  state 
the  question  this  way:  Give  us  examples  of  people  or  specific  groups 
of  people  that  you  feel  have  infringed  upon  the  political  rights  and  eco- 
nomic rights  of  American  citizens  of  German  descent. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Our  experience  has  been  that  such  organizations  as 
the  Non-Sectarian  League  and  Anti-Nazi  League  have  ver}^  assidu- 
ously throughout  these  last  years  preached  that  all  those  who,  for 
instance,  are  at  all  interested  in  maintaining  any  German  cultural 
traditions  or  are  interested  in  building  up  more  efficient  economic  and 
political  organizations  of  the  German  element  are  to  be  considered 
as  essentially  alien  and  inclined  to  treason,  and  consequently  not  to 
be  trusted  in  important  factories  and  undertakings. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  asked  for  specific  instances.  Your  statement  is 
very  generic.  Won't  you  give  us  specific  instances?  You  have  only 
named  one  organization — what  was  that,  the  Anti-Nazi  League? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right.  Now,  that  is  the  only  one  that  you  have 
mentioned  and  it  evidently  is  a  very  small  organization  because  in 
the  whole  broad  expanse  of  this  country  there  is  not  a  single  member 
of  that  league  that  I  know  of. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  And  the  daily  press. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  mean  the  daily  press  generally? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Quite  generally. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  And  some  such  organization  as  the  Joint  Boycott 
Council  which  afl^ects  not  only  foreign  countries  and  their  interests 
but  the  business  interests  of  perfectly  loyal  German-American — - 
German  and  American  export  and  import  firms. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  is  there  a  specific  reason  for  your  attitude? 
Do  you  think  that  is  sufficient  reason,  because  this  Anti-Nazi  Non- 
Sectarian  League  has  been  engaged  in  activities  which  you  find  ob- 
jectionable to  American  citizens  of  German  descent?  Do  you  think 
that  is  sufficient  reason  for  the  organization  of  the  German-American 
Bund  in  order  to  protect  the  political  and  economic  rights  of  American 
citizens  of  German  descent? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  It  attempted  to  get  legislation  passed  that  was  di- 
rected particularly  against  the  members,  for  instance,  of  the  German- 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8255 

Anun-ican  Bund,  as  such,  altiiough  that  oroanization  has  iievpr  been 

shown  to  bo  in  any  way  trcasonabk^  or  unpatriotic.     In  othci-  words • 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  either  misunderstood  my  question  or  you  are 
evadinp;  my  question.  I  asked  you  if  you  felt  that  it  was  necessary 
to  set  up  an  organization  hke  the  German-American  Bund  simply  to 
ofi'set  the  activities  of  this  Anti-Nazi  Non-Sectarian  League  that  you 
mentioned  a  moment  ago,  and  that  is  the  only  organization  you 
mentioned. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  mentioned  the  daily  press. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  the  daily  press.  Now,  what  steps  do  you 
think  are  necessary  to  protect  the  people  of  German  descent  in  this 
country  against  the  Anti-Nazi  Non-Sectarian  League? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  To  unify  them  sufficiently  so  that  they  can  economi- 
cally and  politically  exercise  at  least  that  much  influence  in  the 
Nation  that  they  will  receive  exactly  the  same  treatment  that  any 
other  part  of  the  citizenship  gets. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  specific.  Wliat  would  your  organization 
propose  to  remedy  the  situation  as  to  the  press,  which  you  stated  had 
been  unfair?  You  made  your  statement  applicable  to  the  press  in 
general.  What  is  yoiu-  method  of  approach  or  angle  of  approach 
toward  remedying  that  situation? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  know  that  if  the  German  element  throughout  the 
Nation  becomes  more  circumspect  in  how  it  votes  and  how  it  supports 
its  own  kind  and  those  who  are  friendly  to  it,  then  in  time  the  powers 
that  control  the  public  policy  of  the  press  and  the  radio  will  also  become 
more  just  to  this  particular  element  which  is  being  attacked  so  much 
today. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  aren't  you  advocating  there  a  method  which 
you  are  condemning  others  for  the  use  of? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  We  are  only  counteracting  that  which  is  already  being 
used  against  us  from  many  sides. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  do  you  propose  to  treat  with  the  press  specifi- 
cally? Do  you  propose  that  the  press  shall  be  controlled  or  that  the 
press  shall  become  an  agent  or  a  tool  of  your  organization  to  dissemi- 
nate its  viewpoint  alone  in  order  to  bring  about  the  restitution  you 
say  is  necessary  for  the  people  of  German  descent  in  this  country? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  propose  nothing  of  the  kind.  Any  element  of  this 
Nation's  citizenry  which  takes  proper  care  of  its  political  and  economic 
representation  will  be  respected  by  the  daily  press. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Would  you  use  the  same  methods  that  have  been 
placed  in  vogue  elsewhere  in  other  countries  in  order  to  control  the 
press  of  this  country? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  is  no  need  for  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  know  that,  but  is  that  one  of  the  methods  that  you 
would  advocate? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  would  not  advocate  such  a  method. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  would  not  advocate  such  a  method? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  No. 

Mr^  Starnes.  During  the  past  year — I  believe  it  was  in  August — 
Mr.  Kuhn  told  us  that  this  country  had  some  68 — or  there  were  in  this 
•country  some  68  posts  of  the  bund  with  approximately  20,000  dues- 
paying  members.     That  is  a  matter  of  public  record. 

How  does  that  number  compare  today  in  the  number  of  posts  and 
in  the  number  of  dues-paying  members? 

How  many  posts  do  you  have? 

62626— 41— vol.  14 7 


8256  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  am  soriy,  I  really  do  not  know. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  an  approximation  of  the  number? 
You  had  68  last  year  in  August — August  1939.  Can't  you  give  us 
some  approximation?  You  are  the  leader  of  the  organization  and 
have  been  for  almost  a  year? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  It  is  impossible  to  give  any  definite  figure  on  that 
score. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  am  asking  for  an  approximation — an  approxima- 
tion that  would  be  approximately  correct. 

Mr.  Kunze.  There  will  be  approximately  40,  I  presume. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Forty  local  units? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Would  you  give  us  now  an  approximation,  and  I 
understand  of  course  it  would  have  to  be  an  approximation,  of  the 
membership  at  the  present  time — dues  paying  members. 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  couldn't  give  any  approximation  which  would  be 
worth  anything  under  the  circumstances,  because 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  you  have  shown  there  are  approximately  40 
posts  at  the  present  time  as  compared  to  68  last  year.  Would  it 
follow  that  there  has  been  a  possible  proportionate  reduction  in  the 
number  of  dues-paying  members? 

Air.  Kunze.  The  reorganization  in  many  respects,  which  has  been 
going  on  and  is  going  on  all  this  later  time,  has  caused  the  income  from 
dues  and  contributions  to  fluctuate  to  such  a  degree  I  could  not  give 
you  any  fair  idea  whatever. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Kunze,  what  is  the  purpose  of  the  reorganiza- 
tion which  has  been  going  on  since  you  have  been  there? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Well,  I  suppose,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  whenever  any 
change  in  leadership  is  made  in  any  organization  there  will  be  changes 
in  many  details,  depending  upon  the  nature  of  the  new  leader. 

There  is  no  need  for  any  basic  changes  and  none  are  contemplated. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Yet  you  say  reorganization  is  going  on.  W^ell,  now, 
that  is  not  just  a  minor  change.  You  must  have  some  reason  for  it 
or  purpose. 

Mr.  Kunze.  No  ;  except  help  improve  whatever  needs  improving  so 
that  the  organization  may  operate  more  efficiently. 

Mr.  Thomas.  How  do  you  mean  "more  efficiently"? 

Mr.  Kunze.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  would  just  like  to  know  the  reason  for  bringing 
about  this  reorganization  and  what  the  reorganization  amounts  to. 

Mr.  Kunze.  There  was  a  reorganization,  for  instance,  in  1936,. 
based  upon  experiences  m  former  organizations.  There  have  been 
reorganizations  in  part  here  and  there  since  then — whenever  more 
improved  methods  of  operating  were  found  or  whenever  certain 
elements  had  found  their  way  into  the  organization  which  we  believed 
did  not  belong  in  it  and  had  to  be  removed. 

I  believe  again  through  the  experiences  of  these  past  years  that 
there  was  quite  a  bit  which  could  be  improved  upon  in  every  respect 
and  that  is  what  we  are  undertaking  now  and  what  I  call  "reorganiza- 
tion." 

Mr.  Thomas.  In  this  reorganization  which  you  are  bringing  about 
you  are  trying  to  remove  certain  elements  which  you  do  not  believe^ 
or  rather,  which  you  believe  should  not  be  in  the  organization? 

Mr.  Kunze.  That  is  quite  true. 


rX-AMKUKAX  rUOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIKS  8257 

Mr.  Thomas.  What  do  you  mean — it  is  not  clear  to  me  why  these 
ehMnents  shouhl  not  be  in  the  organization.  What  kind  of  elements 
do  you  mean  and  what  are  they  doing? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Well,  there  is,  for  example,  a  man  named  Healey  in 
Chicago,  who  was  never  a  member  of  this  organization  but  who  claimed 
to  have  similar  beliefs  and  wanted  its  support  and  its  recommenda- 
tions among  (lerman-Americans  and  things  of  that  kind.  Making 
sure  that  he  and  other  such  have  nothing  whatever  to  do  with  us  and 
are  not  furtheretl  by  us  and  don't  by  any  chance  get  into  our  ranks  to 
find  ways  and  means  to  make  sure  we  find  these  people  and  keep  them 
from  using  the  name  of  the  organization  in  order  to  give  the  public  or 
the  authorities  a  twisted  conception  of  what  we  are  actually  fighting 
for. 

That  is  also  a  part  of  the  reorganization. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  not  very  clear  to  me;  but  have  you  brought 
about  any  reorganization  here  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Not  to  any  noticeable  extent.  For  instance,  makmg 
sure  that  the  units  and  the  other  officers  of  the  organization  throughout 
the  country 

Mr.  Thomas.  But  1  am  referring  now  to  New  Jersey.  I  have  left 
the  rest  of  the  country. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  All  right,  sir.  Referring  to  New  Jersey — seeing  to 
it  that  the  officers  responsible  keep  the  authorities  informed  con- 
cerning what  they  are  douig,  nudve  sure  that  these  authorities  have 
every  chance  to  see  what  is  going  on  and  to  investigate  it  to  make 
sure  that  such  speakers  who  have  a  way  of  speaking,  which  is  not 
compatible  with  the  laws  of  the  State  or  the  laws  of  the  land  or  the 
principles  of  the  organization  are  kept  aw^ay  from  our  speaker's  stand. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  haven't  made  any  changes  in  New  Jersey  since 
you  have  been  in  office?  Has  there  been  or  hasn't  there  been  a  re- 
organization in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  The  things  I  just  mentioned  also  apply  to  the  State  of 
New  Jersey. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Then  when  Mr.  Klapprott  goes  on  the  stand  he  can 
tell  what  the  changes  are  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  He  would  know  them  more  than  I  would. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  the  purposes  of  the  bund,  as  set  forth  in  their 
constitution  of  1936,  been  changed  since  you  took  over  the  organiza- 
tion? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  The  purposes  of  the  organization  as  an  organization 
of  American  citizens  have  not  been  changed.  The  purposes  and  aims 
outlining  what  this  organization  stands  for  have  been  revised  on  more 
than  one  occasion  to  attract  more  attention  to  various  subjects  which 
have  been  mentioned  too  little  before. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Last  year  Mr.  Kubn  gladly  furnished  us  with  a  copy 
of  the  constitution,  which  set  forth  the  aims  and  pvn'poses  of  the 
organization  and  he  briefly  summarized  the  purposes  as  follows: 

First,  to  form  a  political  unit  or  a  political  party  to  see  that  a  minor- 
ity, as  he  termed  it,  a  persecuted  minority,  and  that  is  in  substance 
what  you  said  a  moment  ago,  were  given  political  representation  in 
our  aftairs  of  government — in  the  affairs  of  om-  Govennnent. 

Is  that  still  one  of  the  professed  aims  of  tlie  bund? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  If  it  was  understood  by  this  committee  that  it  could 
be  the  object  of  the  German-American  Bund  to  alter  the  system  under 
which  our  United  States  were  built  up  in  order  to  in  the  future  to  have 


8258  UN-A:\rERiCAN  propaganda  activities 

direct  political  representation  for  so-called  national  minorities,  then 
that  is  not  the  case  and  never  has  been  in  the  German-American  Bund. 

We  have  never  had  the  objective  of  having  representatives  in 
Congress. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  don't  want  to  be  discourteous  to  you  but  your 
answers  are  too  involved  and  they  are  not  responsive,  sufficiently 
responsive. 

Mr.  Kulm  testified  that  they  had  a  threefold  purpose  in  organizing 
the  bund  in  1936.  One  was  to  establish  a  political  party  in  America 
which  would  give  representation  in  the  political  life  of  America  to  a 
minority  which  was  now  being  denied  those  full  rights.  Secondly,  it 
was  established  for  the  purpose  of  combating  the  inroads  of  com- 
munism and,  third,  that  it  was  anti-Semitic.  He  made  those  state- 
ments before  this  same  committee  in  August  of  last  year,  August  or 
September,  under  oath. 

Now,  I  am  asking  you  if  the  general  purposes  of  the  bund  as  stated 
by  Mr.  Kuhn,  the  founder  and  the  leader  of  the  bund  until  December 
of  the  past  year,  has  there  been  any  fundamental  change  in  the  pur- 
poses and  objectives  of  the  organization. 

That  is  what  1  am  asking  you. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  If  that  is  the  sense  conveyed  by  what  Mr.  Kuhn 
said,  then  so  far  as  I  am  concerned  it  never  has  been  the  basic  principle 
of  the  German-American  Bund  but  is  his  personal  idea  about  it. 
I  believe 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  formed  the  bund,  did  he  not? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  He  became  the  first  national  leader. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  he  was  its  national  leader  until  December  of 
the  past  year? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  So  far  as  1  know  Mr.  Kulm  I  don't  believe  he  intended 
to  convey  the  impression  which  you  just  have  given  me,  Mr.  Starnes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  his  language  was  veiy  clear  and  very  specific 
and  it  was  not  capable  of  being  misunderstood. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  know  that  since  I  have  been  responsible  the  purposes 
and  aims  have  been  rephrased  so  there  should  be  removed  any  room 
for  doubt. 

Mr,  Starnes.  That  is  what  I  am  asking  you.  You  said  a  moment 
ago  that  the  reason  you  joined  the  bund  yourself  was  for  the  purpose 
of  seeing  that  a  minority  group  of  American  citizens  should  be  given, 
or  would  be  given,  the  political  rights  and  economic  rights  to  which 
they  were  entitled  but  which  you  were  now  being  denied.  That  cer- 
tainly is  in  line  with  what  Mr.  Kuhn  said  a  year  ago.  Now,  in  what 
other  respe  ts  or  what  respect,  if  any,  is  there  a  change  in  the  purpose 
of  the  bund?  You  say  that  is  the  sole  reason  you  joined  the  bund; 
Mr.  Kulm  says  that  is  one  of  the  three  reasons  that  he  set  up  the 
organization.  Now,  in  what  other  respect  does  the  present  organiza- 
tion differ  from  Mr.  Kuhn's  statement  and  conception  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  KuNZE.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  wStarnes.  Does  your  organization,  in  other  words,  I  will  be 
specific — I  will  help  you — does  your  organization  still  combat  com- 
munism in  this  country  and  elsewhere,  those  who  sympathize  with 
your  viewpoint,  as  they  did  in  the  years  gone  by? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  It  combats  communism  and  any  other  political  inter- 
nationalism in  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  does  combat  communism? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  As  an  international  political  power  in  the  United  States. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8259 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Does  it  oonibat  nazi-isni  in  the  same  way? 

Mr.  KuNZf:.  Any  foreign-controlled,  political,  or  economic  power  in 
these  United  States. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  mean  you  are  opposed  to  any  spread  of  the 
influence  of  Hitler  in  the  United  States;  is  that  right? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  We  are  opposed  to  the  spread  of  the  influence 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  think  3-ou  should  answer  tlie  question. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  To  the  influence  of  Hitler  as  a  political  or  economic 
conception  in  these  United  States,  or  any  other  foreign  political  power 
or  international  political  or  economic  power. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  do  you  do  to  try  to  stop  the  spread  of  the 
influence  of  Hitler  in  the  United  States,  specifically? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  We  are  interested  in  developing  the  respect  of  the 
German  element  in  the  United  States  back  to  the  stage  at  w^liich  it 
belongs,  not  with  a  political  party  of  the  German  elem.ent  but  within 
the  entire  citizenry,  by  helping  to  reconstitute  or  maintain  the  political 
and  economic  set-up  in  the  United  States  something  similar  to  that 
upon  which  the  country  was  founded. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  you  said  aw^hile  ago  that  you  were  opposed  to 
the  spread  of  international  political  influence  in  the  United  States,  if 
1  understood  you  correctl}'? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  And  you  said  you  were  opposed  to  the  spread  of 
communism  in  the  United  States  and  you  were  opposed  to  the  spread 
of  nazi-ism  in  the  United  States  and  I  asked  you  what  your  organiza- 
tion is  doing  to  combat  the  spread  of  nazi-ism  in  the  United  States. 
What  is  it  doing? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  believe  I  expressed  myself  clearly  in  the  first  place 
when  I  wanted  it  understood  that  we  are  just  as  much  against  the 
importation  of  foreign  political  or  economic  systems  from  Germany 
as  we  are  from  any  other  country-,  but  if  we  can  learn  from  the  expe- 
riences of  other  countries  in  the  economic  or  any  other  field  upon  the 
basis  of  the  American  republican  system,  we  are  certainh'  not  opposed 
to  learning. 

Mr.  VoORHis.  Everybody  will  agree  to  that.  Why  is  it  that  through 
the  l)und  there  is  all  kinds  of  literature  brouglit  in  here  from  Germany? 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  have,  of  course,  in  the  files  of  the  committee 
numerous  publications  which  were  furnished  us  either  by  our  investi- 
gators or  given  to  us  by  Mr.  Kuhn  himself  or  his  agents,  some  of 
which,  of  course,  undeniably  and  undoubted!}'  had  their  inspiration 
and  their  source  from  Germany. 

For  instance,  Mein  Kampf.  There  is  undeniable  testimony  under 
oath  that  that  was  used  widely  in  your  camps  and  read  by  your 
members. 

Then  we  have,  of  course,  any  number  of  exhibits  that  came  through 
the  Ausland  in  Stuttgart,  which,  of  course,  is  financed  by  the  German 
Government,  according  to  the  testimony. 

We  are  now  asking  you  whereui  the  aims  and  purposes  difl'er  from 
heretofore  and  the  method  of  operation  dift'ers  from  heretofore,  because 
Mr.  Kuhn  and  othei-s  who  were  members  of  the  bund  heretofore 
gladly  testified,  apparently,  because  some  came  in  voluntarily  and 
gave  us  this  information. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Insofar  as  your  third,  shall  I  say  conception,  concerning- 
the  meaning  of  Mr.  Kuhn's  utterances  last  vear  is  conceiiied,  I  must 


8260  UN-AMERICAN  PKDI'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

also  protest  and  say  that  the  German-American  Bund  is  not  an 
~anti-any  race. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words  the  German -American  Bund  is  not 
anti-Semitic? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  It  is  not  except  insofar  as  it  has  to  be  in  self-defense  on 
some  occasions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  are  entirely  friendly  and  your  relations  with 
people  of  Jewish  descent  in  this  country  are  entirely  cordial  and  you 
work  together  in  harmony  to  promote  the  welfare  of  the  country; 
is  that  right? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  may  or  may  not  be  the  case,  depending  on  the 
individual.  If  I  may  say  that  what  has  been  considered  the  anti- 
Semitism  of  the  bund  will  have  been  its  reaction  to  activities  by  people 
Avho  happen  to  be  Jews. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Voorhis  wishes  to  ask  a  question. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  If  the  Anti-Nazi  League  was  formed  in  1937  how 
could  the  bund  have  been  formed  to  counteract  it? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  can  assure  you,  Mr.  Voorhis,  that  the  Friends  of 
New  Germany  were  formed  as  a  reaction  to  the  boycott  activities 
which  came  before. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Can  you  give  us  a  single,  solitary  instance  in  the 
United  States  of  discrimination  against  a  person  because  he  was  a 
German?  I  do  not  know  of  anyone  who  does  not  have  the  greatest 
respect  for  people  of  German  descent.  I  would  like  to  have  you  give 
me  one  single  instance  where  somebody  was  discriminated  against 
in  the  United  States  because  he  was  a  German. 

Mr.  Ki^NZE.  There  was  an  occasion  when  a  list  of  unit  leaders  of 
the  German-American  Bund  was  submitted  to  this  committee.  As  I 
understand  it  that  list  was  submitted  on  the  condition  that  it  would 
not  be  published.  That  list  appeared  in  the  daily  press  a  day  or  two 
later  and  at  least  two  of  those  leaders  immediately  lost  their  jobs. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  That  is  begging  the  question  on  that  particular 
point.  I  did  not  ask  you  about  members  of  the  German -American 
Bund.  I  asked  you  where  there  was  discrimination  because  a  person 
was  of  German  descent.  It  is  a  very  different  matter  when  a  racial 
group  organizes  in  militant  fashion,  as  the  bund  has  done. 

I  would  really  like  to  ask  you  whether  you  think  you  can  accomplish 
anything  for  the  welfare  of  the  average  German,  the  average  American 
citizen  of  German  descent,  by  setting  him  apart  from  his  fellow  Ameri- 
cans in  an  organization  of  that  kind?  I  believe  that  if  you  consider 
that  discrimination  it  is  due  to  the  very  basic  blunder  that  has  been 
made  in  the  formation  of  the  organization  in  the  first  place. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  He  is  being  set  apart  from  the  rest  of  the  citizenry 
not  by  us  but  by  those  who  make  it  a  point  to  do  so  if  he  has  the  slight- 
est decency  left  him  so  far  as  honoring  his  own  name  is  concerned. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Will  you  please  give  me  an  instance  where  that  has 
happened? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  It  is  difficult  for  me  to  do  so  without  bringing  proof 
because  the  people  who  have  suffered  themselves  have  not  the  courage 
to  get  on  the  witness  stand  and  swear  to  it. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  You  don't  have  to  prove  a  thing,  Mr.  Kunze;  I  will 
take  your  word  for  it. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  But  I  know  a  number  of  instances  where  it  happened. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  I  want  you  to  tell  me  one  case  where  a  man  was 
discriminated  aaainst  because  he  was  a  German  in  the  United  States. 


UN-ami: UK  AN  I-KOrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8261 

Mr.  KuNZE.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  VooKHis.  Now,  there  must  be  thousands  of  such  cases  if  that 
is  the  basis  of  an  organization  of  this  kind. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  are. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Well,  name  one  of  them. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  is  legislation  before  the  Congress  of  the  United 
States;  there  are  regulations  applying  to  the  P.  W.  A. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  those  things  are  all  the  result  of  the  bund 
movement  and  its  allied  activities? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  They  represented  a  discrimination  against  a  group  of 
citizens  which  has  not  been  proven  to  be  in  any  way  disloyal. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  want  you  to  give  me  an  example  of  discrimination 
against  a  person  because  he  is  a  German. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  are  employment  agencies  in  various  cities  with 
signs  on  their  windows  w^hich  say:  "Germans  need  not  apply," 
because  of  the  artificial  public  opinion  which  has  been  created. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Let  me  say  this  to  you :  There  is  no  legislation  which 
discriminates  against  any  American  citizen  who  subscribes  to  or 
follows  the  American  principles  of  government. 

In  the  administration  of  relief  we  have  spent  billions  of  dollars  in 
the  last  7  or  8  years  helping  to  take  care  of  the  distressed  condition 
and  the  needs  and  the  misery  of  fellow  human  beings  who  are  not 
even  American  citizens  and  who  don't  even  subscribe  to  our  form  of 
government. 

Now,  give  us  some  specific  examples  if  you  can. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  can't  give  you  any  names. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  can't  give  us  a  specific  name? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  wouldn't  give  any  names. 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  will  recess  for  5  minutes. 

(Whereupon,  a  short  recess  was  taken.) 

Air.  Starnes.  The  committee  wiU  resume  the  session. 

How  many  posts  of  the  bund  do  you  have  in  the  State  of  New 
Jersey  Sit  the  present  time,  Mr.  Kunze? 

Air.  Kunze.  We  have  no  posts,  Mr.  Starnes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  do  you  call  them  now?  Units?  You  know 
what  I  am  talking  about,  branches,  posts,  local  units.  I  just  want  to 
find  the  correct  terminology.  How  many  local  miits  do  you  have  in 
the  State  of  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  am  sorry,  but  I  couldn't  say. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  in  the  State  of  New  York? 

Mr.  Thomas.  He  is  not  answering  the  question.  He  says  he  is 
sorry  he  couldn't  say  in  New  Jersey.  He  must  know  what  he  has  in 
New  Jersey. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  in  the  State  of  New  York? 

Mr.  Kunze.  It  would  be  somewhere  from  a  half  dozen  on  up. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  manv  in  the  New  England  area? 

Mr.  Kunze.  There  are  several  there. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Would  you  say  as  many  as  six? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  don't  believe  there  are  that  many. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  nuiny  in  the  Midwest  area  around  Chicago?  I 
believe  that  was  the  original  division.  What  is  in  the  Midwest  dis- 
trict or  Midwest  area,  if  I  am  not  usmg  the  correct  terminology  you 
will  understand  what  I  mean.  There  would  be  a  dozen  in  the 
Middle  West? 

Mr.  Kunze.   (No  answer.) 


8262  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  along  the  Pacific  Coast  or  the  far  West  areaT 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  are  several  there. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Would  you  say  as  many  as  seven? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  don't  believe  there  are  quite  that  many. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  in  the  South? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Two  or  three,  depending  on  how  these  geographical 
areas  are.  I  don't  know  just  exactly  ofi'hand  just  where  they  are 
located  or  what  their  names  are. 

Mr.  Starnes.  With  only  40  local  units  you  are  unable  to  tell  the 
committee  the  exact  locations  or  to  divide  them  into  their  geograph- 
ical districts  and  give  us  approximately  how  many  in  each? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  are  more  cities  and  towns  in  which  members 
are  resident  than  there  are  functioning  units  and  that  is  the  only 
difficulty  in  determining  exactly  where  units  are  located  or  where 
there  are  simply  several  members  who  correspond  directly  with 
headquarters. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Has  there  been  any  effort  since  you  became  the  act- 
ing head  and  the  head  of  the  organization,  to  cooperate  with  groups 
of  citizens  who  have  the  same  ideals  and  aspirations? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  have  been  no  specific  conversations  or  corre- 
spondence with  such  organizations  in  that  time. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words,  since  1939  then  you  have  ceased  as 
an  organization,  and  when  I  say  ''you,"  I  mean  your  organization, 
you  have  ceased  any  efforts  to  unite  with  other  groups  who  have 
the  same  ideals  and  aspirations  that  you  have  or  follow  approximately 
the  same  party  line  or  the  same  political  line? 

Mr.  Kunze.  In  eft'ect,  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  effect  that  is  true? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  you  did  have  a  meeting  here  in  the  State  of 
New  Jersey  quite  recently,  didn't  you,  with  another  group? 

I  will  renew  my  question.  Has  your  organization  had  any  joint 
meetings  with  other  groups  during  the  past  12  months,  seeking  to 
reach  an  agreement  with  the  view  of  working  toward  a  common  end, 
or  have  you  had  meetings  with  other  groups  whose  aims  and  aspira- 
tions may  follow  the  same  political  line  as  yours  to  a  certain  extent? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  None  whatsoever? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  haven't  had  any  meetings  with  the  Silver  Shirt 
group? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Not  anybody? 

Mr.  Kunze.  If  that  had  taken  place  anywhere  throughout  the 
country  in  some  small  unit  as  a  local  affair  I  would  not  know  about 
it,  but  the  German-American  Bmid  as  such  has  done  notliing  of  the 
kind. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  do  not  deny,  however,  that  local  units  of  the 
Bund  may  have  met  and  consorted  with  other  groups  such  as  the 
Silver  Shirt  gi'oup,  or  the  Kjiights  of  the  Ku  Klux  Klan,  or  the  Knights 
of  the  \yhite  Camellia? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  gave  out  a  specific  order  shortly  after 
taking  charge  that  there  is  to  be  no  connection  of  any  kind  with  any 
other  organization  in  the  country. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8263 

Air.  Starnes.  That  is  one  of  the  changes  of  poHcy  in  the  Bund  in 
the  past  12  months? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Insofar  as  that  may  not  have  been  clear  before. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  the  testimony  is  undeniably  clear  before  that 
there  had  been  numbers  of  meetings  between  individuals  who  headed 
various  organizations  in  this  country  in  an  effort  to  present  a  united 
front  along  those  lines. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  In  that  event  then  it  is  a  change  of  policy. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  say  it  is  a  definite  change? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir;  may  I  complete  the  sentence? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  there  any  specific  reason  for  inviting  the  Klan  to 
attend  a  joint  meeting  with  the  Bund  here  in  the  State  of  New  Jersey? 
Was  there  any  specific  reason  for  that?  Let  me  ask  you  this  ques- 
tion: Is  Camp  Nordland  the  property  of  the  German- American  Bund? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  It  is  not,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  it  the  propert}^  of  an  affiliate  of  the  German- 
American  Bund  or  a  local  unit  of  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Thomas.  Does  the  German-American  Bund  meet  there? 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  has  met  there  regularly  for  a  number  of  years, 
hasn't  it? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Not  regularly. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  has  met  there  over  a  period  of  years? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  of  any  other  organization  that  meets 
there  other  than  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  couldn't — I  don't  know  that  definitely  because  I  am 
not  directly  connected. 

Air.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  of  any  other  organization  ever  meeting 
there  at  any  time  for  any  purpose  other  than  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Air.  Kunze.  Air.  Chairman,  I  understand  that  the  Ku  Klux  Klan 
of  New  Jersey  had  an  afi'air  there  this  summer — that  is,  they  they 
were  permitted  by  the  owners  of  that  property  to  use  that  property 
for  an  affair  of  their  own.     It  was  not  a  joint  affair  with  anyone  else. 

Air.  Starnes.  Were  the  members  of  the  German-American  Bund 
present  on  that  occasion? 

Mr.  Kunze.  If  they  were  there  they  were  there  as  individuals  and 
guests. 

Air.  Starnes.  Were  you  there  on  that  occasion? 

Air.  Kunze.  I  was  not,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  were  not? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Air.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  of  any  other  officials  of  the  German- 
American  Bund  who  were  present  on  that  occasion? 

Air.  Kunze.  I  could  not  swear  to  that  because  I  don't  definitely 
know. 

Air.  Thomas.  Was  Klapprott  there? 

Mr.  Kunze.  He  may  have  been  there.     I  could  not  say. 

Air.  Thomas.  You  also  know  that  the  Smythe  organization — I  just 
€an't  recall  the  name  of  the  organization  at  the  present  time,  was 
present  at  that  same  affair? 

Air.  Kunze.  I  don't  know.  I  don't  know  whether  they  were  there 
on  that  day. 

Air.  Thomas.  You  read  about  the  meeting? 


8264  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  KuNZE.  So  far  as  I  know  it  was  only  the  Klan  that  was  there. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  read  about  it  in  the  newspapers?  You  read  the 
Klan  was  there  and  the  Smythe  organization  and  Mr.  Klapprott  was 
there  and  various  other  bund  officials  were  there.  You  read  all  about 
that? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  you  one  of  the  trustees  of  the  German-American 
Bund  Auxiliary,  a  domestic  corporation  in  the  State  of  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  am  one  of  the  directors;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  the  group  that  owns  Camp  Nordland? 

Mr.  Kunze.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Who  are  the  other  trustees? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  don't  know  their  names.  I  am  afraid  Mr.  Klapprott 
or  whoever  loiows  that  will  have  to  testify. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  trustees  in  the  group  that  owns  Camp 
Nordland? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  believe  seven. 

Air.  Starnes.  Seven;  and  you  are  the  only  person  that  you  know 
of  that  is  a  member  of  the  board? 

Mr.  Kunze.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  don't  know  the  other  six  members? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  know  Mr.  Klapprott  is  president. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  do  you  know  who  the  other  five  members  are? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  do  not,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  who  the  secretary  or  treasurer  of  the 
organization  is? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  am  afraid  I  could  not  swear  to  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Don't  you  meet  with  the  other  trustees? 

Mr.  Kunze.  They  meet  but  I  haven't  been  there  regularly. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  ever  there? 

Mr.  Kunze.  At  these  meetings? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  ever  attended  any  meetings  there  of  any 
kind  or  character? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  don't  believe  I  have  this  year. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  in  previous  years? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  was  not  a  director  before. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  know,  but  you  have  met  with  any  group  or  attended 
any  meetings  at  Camp  Nordland  at  any  time  during  the  past  5  or  6 
years? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  am  instructed  by  counsel  because  I  am  a  prospective 
defendant  perhaps  in  a  suit  in  New  Jersey  concerning  speeches  made 
at  Camp  Nordland,  that  I  should  not  testify  against  mj^^self.  In  that 
eventuality • 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  the  ground,  that  it  might  incriminate  you? 
Mr.  Counsel,  is  that  the  objection? 

Mr.  Keegan.  That  is  right.  I  will  help  you  to  get  an  answer  to 
that  question  if  it  is  possible,  Mr.  Chau-man,  but  not  in  that  form. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  Mr.  Mathias  Kohler? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  know  Mr.  Koliler;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  he  one  of  the  trustees  of  this  organization? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  believe  he  is;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  We  haven't  gotten  an  answer  to  the  other  question. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  a  moment  and  we  will  get  it.  Do  vou  know 
Mr.  John  C.  Fitting? 


rX-A.MKllICAX    rUiM'AGANDA  A(T1\  1  TIKS 


8265 


Ml'.  KuNZE.  I  know  him:  yos,  sir. 

Mr.  Staknes.  Is  he  a  m('iiil)or  or  is  hv  n  trustee  of  the  German- 
American  Bund  AuxiHarv  \vhicli  owtis  or  operates  the  Nordhmd 
Camp?  ^ 

Mr.  KuNZE.   1  beUeve  he  is. 

Mr.  StaRxNes.  Isn't  he  the  secretary? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  believe  he  is. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  Mr.  Klapprott  is  the  president,  isn't  he? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  know  tliat. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  do  you  know  Mr.  Eiehard — I  can't  pronounce 
his  hist  name:  S-c-h-i-e-1-e? 

Mr.  Kunze.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  Mr.  Schiele? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  beheye  I  know  the  gentleman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Isn't  he  one  of  the  members  of  the  hmwd  of  trustees 
of  this  organization? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  don't  laiow. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  don't  know? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  Imow  Mr.  Paul  Sehaarschmidt? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  know  him  slightly;  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  he  a  member  of  the  board  of  trustees  of  this 
organization? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  don't  know.  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  don't  know  that? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  Imow  Mi-.  George — I  can't  make  this  out— 
Neupert — Mr.  George  Neupert? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  know  Mr.  George  Neupert. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  he  one  of  the  trustees  of  this  organization? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  don't  know  that.  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  3^ou  know  Mr.  Carl  Sehipphorst? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  know  Mr.  Carl  Sehipphorst. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  he  one  of  the  trustees? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  don't  know  concerning  him. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When  have  you  attended  a  meeting  of  the  board  of 
trustees  of  this  organization? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  don't  believe  I  ever  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  don't  happen  to  belong  to  the  Know  Nothing 
Party?  I  am  afraid  you  are  being  evasive  in  vour  answers,  whether 
purposely  or  not,  I  don't  laiow\ 

Mr.  Ki'NZE.  Mr.  Chairman,  there  would  be  no  point  in  my  evading 
the  answers  concerning  that  board  of  directors  because  that  can  be- 
come kno\\ni  to  you  as  soon  as  you  want  it.  I  only  stated  the  fact^ 
that  I  know  definitely  that  Mr.  Klapprott  is  the  president;  that  I  was 
made  a  director  but  that  I  have  not  been  in  a  position  to  take  part  in 
any  of  its  meetings  so  far.  That  is  why  I  don't  know  definitely  con- 
cerning those  other  names  you  have  mentioned. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  thing  that  puzzles  the  Chair  about  this  things 
Mr.  Kunze,  is  that  you  belong  to  an  organization  that  has  the  control 
and  direction  and  the  ownership  of  Camp  Nordland  and  yet  you  don't 
know  who  the  members  are — who  the  seven  members  of  the  board  of 
trustees  are  when  you  are  the  directing  genius  and  the  head  of  it — of  a 
national  organization  known  as  the  German-American  Bund.      You 


8266  rx-AMP:RicAN  propaCxANda  activities 

are  also  very  indefinite  as  to  the  number  of  local  units  or  the  member- 
ship that  you  have.  You  are  very  indefuiite  in  your  recollection  or 
memory  as  to  the  location  of  these  various  local  units  and  yet  you  state 
that  this  organization  is  one  which  is  national  in  scope  and  has  a 
very  definite  and  decided  program — affirmative  program  looking  to 
the  benefit  of  its  membership  and  too,  so  you  profess,  the  public  weal 
of  this  Nation. 

The  Chair  is  at  a  loss  to  understand  that  position. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  are  national  officers  and  each  one  has  his  parti- 
cular work  to  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  national  officers  do  you  have  for  your 
German-American  Bund  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  is  a  national  secretary  and  a  national  treasurer. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  Icnow  who  the  national  secretary  is? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  know  those  officers;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  kindly  give  us  the  names  for  the  record? 

Mr,  KuNZE.  The  national  secretary  is  Wilhelm  Luedtke. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Who  is  your  national  treasurer? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Gustav  Elmer. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  do  you  have  any  other  national  officers? 

Mr.  Kunze.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  vice  presidents,  national  vice  presi- 
dents?    If  so,  how  many  and  who  are  they? 

Mr.  Kunze.  The  midwestern  department  leader  is  deputy  national 
leader. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Who  is  he,  the  midwestern  department  leader? 

Mr.  Kunze.  George  Froboese. 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  was  the  leader  under  Mr.  Kulm? 

Mr.  Kunze.  He  was  midwestern  department  leader. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  who  are  your  New  England  or  eastern  depart- 
ment leaders? 

Mr.  Kunze.  The  eastern  department  leader  is  Mr.  Klapprott. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Who  is  your  Pacific  coast  or  Far  Western  leader? 

Mr.  Kunze.  The  western  department  leader  is  Mr.  Hermann 
Schwinn. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  other  departments? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  the  three? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  don't  have  any  departments  in  the  South  or 
Southwest? 

Mr.  Kunze.  The  departments  run  through  from  North  to  South. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  believe  that  is  all  the  questions  I  have.  Mr. 
Voorhis,  do  you  have  any  questions? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  wanted  to  ask  a  couple  of  ciuestions,  if  I  may.  Mr. 
Kimze,  what  is  the  approximate  amount  of  dues  that  come  in  per 
month  to  the  organization  now,  do  you  know? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  can't  make  definite  statements  without  the 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  don't  want  to  know  exactly — just  approximately. 

Mr.  Kunze.  Somewhere  from  $1,000  to  $2,000. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Per  month? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  is  the  organization  supported  entirely  by  the 
dues  that  it  collects  or  does  it  have  other  sources  of  revenue? 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8267 

Mr.  KrNZE.  Tliero  arc  donations  nmdc  occasionally  hy  individuals. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  By  an^^  oruanizations? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Not  that  1  know,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Has  one  of  the  purjioscs  of  the  oipinization  l)een  tlio 
interpretation  of  the  present  regime  in  Germany  to  the  people  of 
America? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  is  not  tlic  case. 

^[r.  VooRHis.  That  is  not  true? 

Mr.  Ki'NZE.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  And  as  you  stated  before,  as  I  understood  3^ou,  you 
would  he  o])posed  to  the  spread  of  the  influence  of  the  present  regime 
in  Ciermany,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  We  are  opposed  to  the  importation  of  the  German 
political  system  or  any  otlier  foreign  system  in  the  United  States, 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Is  that  a  new  tack  on  the  part  of  the  organization?. 
Is  that  a  part  of  your  reorganization? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  am  sure  that  it  is  not. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  was  the  reason  then  for  the  organization 
wearing  the  miiform  of  the  Nazi  storm  troopers  and  giving  the  Nazi 
salute  and  so  on  and  so  forth  in  the  past? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  has  never  been  done,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  want  the  record  to  show  that  that  never  was 
done;  that  you  never  wore  a  uniform  similar  to  if  not  exactly  ahke 
the  ones  worn  in  Germany?  And  you  want  to  go  on  record  saying^ 
that  it  was  never  the  practice  of  the  members  of  the  German-American 
Binid  to  give  the  Nazi  salute  or  wear  the  swastika  or  display  it  in  the 
meetings? 

Mr.  KiTNZE.  We  do  use  the  swastika  but  I  believe  that  is  used  in  a 
number  of  countries  throughout  the  world  and  has  been,  for  all  kinds 
of  purposes. 

^Ir.  VooRHis.  And  j^ou  never  used  the  Nazi  salute  in  meetings? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  So  far  as  we  are  concerned  it  is  not  a  Nazi  salute.  I 
have  never  seen  a  defuiition  of  that  word. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Well,  how  do  you  give  that  salute  then?  Has  it  ever 
been  given  [demonstrating]? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  W^e  have  used  a  salute  with  the  raised  right  hand;: 
yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  O.  K. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  is  the  one. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Is  it  used  now? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  It  is  used  w^herever  the  law  allows  it;  yes.  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Wlierever  the  law  allows  it? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  you  feel  in  doing  that  and  the  other  things  that 
I  have  mentioned,  is  not  in  any  way  carrying  over  into  the  Ignited 
States  the  influences  of  modern  Germany? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Not  as  such;  no,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  don't  think  so? 

Mr.  KixzE.    (No  answer.) 

Mr.  VooRHis.  In  the  yearbook  that  we  had  before  our  committee 
in  its  hearing  a  few  months  ago,  the  picture  of  Mr.  Hitler  was  the  first 
picture  in  the  book  and  then  tliere  was  a  picture  of  the  President  of  the- 
United  States.  Does  that  indicate  any  j)ref(>rence  oii  the  j^ai't  of  your 
organization? 


8268  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  am  sure  if  I  had  had  anything  to  say  about  that  it 
never  would  have  happened. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  thought  that  was  a  mistake? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir;  certainly. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Let  me  ask  you  this,  Mr.  Kunze:  Certain  changes  have 
been  made;  some  of  these  things  that  used  to  be  done  by  the  bund  are 
not  done  now.  Why  did  you  drop  those  things?  Why  do  you  say 
you  think  including  that  picture  was  a  mistake?  Wlij^  is  it  that  uni- 
forms of  any  sort  are  no  longer  worn  and  so  on?  What  was  your 
reason  for  making  those  changes? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Wherever  we  have  had 'any  customs  which  can  be 
misunderstood  in  their  import — where  they  become  a  weapon  to  be 
used  in  attacking  us  without  any  benefits  thereby  coming  out  for  our 
work,  we  have,  of  course  tried  to  improve  the  situation.     That  is  clear. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Well,  is  it  possible  that  some  of  those  things  that  you 
yourself  now  say  were  mistakes,  may  explain  in  part  for  the  bitterness 
against  the  organization  by  other  people  in  America? 

Mr.  Kunze.  In  many  cases;  yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  And  what  would  happen  to  American  society  as  a 
whole,  America  being  composed  as  she  is  of  people  of  many  different 
races  and  kinds,  if  eveiy  one  of  those  races  were  to  organize  itself  into 
a  tight  little  racial  group  to  say  that  "we  propose  to  advance  the 
cause  of  this  particular  group  to  the  exclusion  of  others"?  What 
kind  of  a  comitry  would  you  have? 

Mr.  Kunze.  1  believe  in  effect  that  is  the  case  throughout  the 
country  now  except  so  far  as  the  German-Americans  are  concerned. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  mean  every  one  else  is  in  one  organization  and 
the  German- Americans  in  another? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  mean  other  elements  are  politically  and  economically 
much  better  organized  for  their  own  defense  than  the  German- Amer- 
icans are  and  that  is  why  they  are  not  being  made  goats. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Well,  I  don't  know  of  any  racial  group  that  is  organ- 
ized in  that  manner.  Is  there  an  organization  of  Anglo-Saxons  in 
America  that  you  know  of? 

Mr.  Kunze.  There  are  quite  a  number  of  them,  I  believe,  and  there 
is  the  Polish  National  Alliance. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  are  exclusive  and  do  not  permit  anybody  else 
to  belong? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  could  not  swear  to  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Have  there  ever  been  instances,  speaking  about 
discrimination,  have  there  ever  been  instances  of  discrimination  or 
intimidation  against  German-Americans  by  your  organization  because 
those  German- Americans  did  not  play  ball  with  you? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No  indeed. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  might  say  I  disagree  with  you  but  that  is  your 
testimony.     I  think  that  is  all,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Thomas. 

Mr.  Thomas.  As  I  understand  it  you  were  born  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  was,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Would  you  call  yourself  an  American? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  do,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Then  why  do  you  refer  to  yourself  all  the  time  as  a 
Crerman- American? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8269 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Because  the  German- American  is  a  political  one — 
we  arc  all  Americans,  but  the  blood  in  our  veins  is  different. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Oh,  the  blood  in  your  veins  is  different  from  the 
blood  in  the  veins  ol"  any  of  the  other  people  of  the  country? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  mean  to  say  that  the  entire  white  population  of  the 
United  States  is  descended  from  Europeans.  We  have  the  En^- 
hsh ^ 

Mr.  Thomas.  What  I  want  to  know  is  what  you  are — are  you  an 
American  or  a  German-American? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  am  racially  a  German  and  politically  an  American. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Were  your  parents  born  in  Germany? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  are  racially  a  Gennan,  but  you  are  pohtically  an 
American? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  is  true. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  that  is  true  of  people  whose  parents  who  were 
born  in  Ireland? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  They  would  be  racially  Irish  and  politically  American. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  how  do  you  become  an  American  both  racially 
and  politically? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  believe  it  woidd  take  a  few  thousand  years  to  bring 
that  about. 

Mr.  Thomas.  So  that  the  only  w^ay  you  can  become  an  American 
racially  and  politically  is  to,  as  you  say,  have  a  thousand  years 
go  by? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  is  a  round  figure,  but  I  believe  you  understand 
what  I  mean. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Now,  in  regard  to  these  trustees  or  rather  these 
names  that  you  were  asked  about  by  the  chairman.  You  said  you 
believed  that  all  of  them  but  one  were  trustees  of  Camp  Nordland? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  believe  there  were  two  or  three  concerning  whom  I 
don't  know  definitely. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  you  did  say  that  Carl  Shipphorst 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  don't  know  about  him. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  don't  know  Carl  Shipphorst? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  don't  know  whether  he  is  a  trustee  or  not. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  attended  any  meetings  when  Carl  Shipp- 
horst was  present? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  don't  recall  having  attended  any  meetings  of  that 
board  of  directors.  I  would  like  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  I 
have  only  been  a  dii'ector  since  their  annual  meeting  of  this  year. 

Mr.  Thomas.  What  month  w^as  that? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  1  don't  recall  exactly. 

Mr.  Mason.  Did  you  attend  that  meeting? 

Mr.  KuxzE.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Tho.mas.  Have  you  attended  any  meeting  at  Camp  Nordland 
since  you  became  the  leader  of  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  believe  that  })rings  us  brings  us  back  to  that  case  that 
is  pending. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  know  you  have  attended  meetings  out  there  since 
December  1939.     You  will  admit  that,  won't  you? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  am  sorry  that  I  cannot  answer  questions  concerning 
that  because  of  that  case  over  there — not  because  there  would  be  any 
other  reason  for  not  answ^ering. 


8270  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Thomas.  Yes;  but  you  are  just  evading  the  question.  You 
are  evading  the  question.  You  know  that  you  were  out  at  Camp 
Nordland  since  December  1939? 

Mr.  KuNZE.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  don't  see  any  reason  for  not  answering  that  simple 
question. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  understand  that  I  may  be  speaking  against  myself 
and  incriminating  myself  in  an  indictment  which  may  come  out  of 
Newton. 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  insist  that  he  be  compelled  to  answer  the  question 
whether  he  was  in  Camp  Nordland  since  December  1939. 

Mr.  Chairman,  I  don't  think  the  witness  should  go  into  a  long  con- 
sultation with  his  attorney.     He  should  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Mr.  Thomas,  don't  you  believe  in  all  fairness  that  that 
trial  over  there  should  be  over,  if  there  is  to  be  one,  before  the  Die& 
committee  demands  an  answer  to  that  question? 

Mr.  Thomas.  The  Dies  committee  hasn't  anything  to  do  with  any 
trial. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  It  may  have. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Witness,  the  question  as  I  understand  it  is  not 
directed  toward  any  specific  meeting  or  any  specific  event.  It  is 
just  simply  a  question  as  to  whether  or  not  you  have  been  at  Camp 
Nordland  at  any  Lime  since  December  1939.  That  does  not  involve 
any  meeting,  does  not  involve  any  commission  of  any  crime.  You 
certainly  know  whether  you  have  been  out  on  that  piece  of  property 
or  on  a  piece  of  property  of  which  you  are  a  trustee  and  one  of  the 
joint  owners  and  over  which  you  have  control  or  have  had  control 
during  that  period  of  time. 

The  Chair  directs  you  to  answer  that  question  because  it  is  pertinent 
to  this  inquiry. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  have  been  out  there;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Now,  will  you  please  tell  the  committee  when  you 
were  out  there? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  was  there  on  the  4th  of  July  when  I  was  arrested. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  have  you  been  out  there  since  the  4th  of  July? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  have  been  out  there  since  the  4th  of  July. 

Mr.  Thomas.  When? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Oh,  on  a  number  of  occasions.  I  could  not  say  at  the 
moment  exactly  when. 

Mr.  Thomas.  It  is  also  true  that  you  have  really  made  your  home 
out  there? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  have  not  done  that,  sir;  no,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Where  is  your  home? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  In  New  York. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  Chair  agreed  he  did  not  need  to  testify  to  that. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  referred  a  little  while  ago  to  "other  elements. "^ 
What  did  you  mean  by  that? 

Mr.  Kunze.  All  the  various  racial  elements  that  make  up  the 
citizenry  of  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  spoke  a  moment  ago  about  "difl"erent  blood  in 
your  veins"  and  the  veins  of  bund  members.  Just  what  did  you 
mean  by  that? 


UN-AMKRICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8271 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Simply  what  is  o;enorally  called  nationality.  We 
have  Italian-Americans,  English-Americans,  Russian-Americans,  and 
German-Americans. 

Mr.  Staknes.  You  did  not  use  it  with  the  significance  that  the 
blood  in  the  veins  of  the  German-American  Bund  members  was 
superior  to  that  which  flows  through  the  veins  of  other  American 
citizens? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  meant  nothing  of  the  kind. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  teach  the  members  of  the  bund  the  doctrine 
that  people  of  German  descent  are  a  superior  race  of  people? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  We  do  not. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  reaffirm  your  belief  and  the  necessity  of  an 
organization  such  as  yours  in  order  that  American  citizens  of  German 
descent  may  have  political  representation  in  this  country? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  May  have  equality  with  all  other  elements  in  every 
respect,  that  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  let  me  put  it  this  way:  You  feel  that  they 
do  not  have  that  equalit}^? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  They  do  not  at  this  time;  no,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  recite  specifically  and  clearly  in  what  w^ay 
they  are  denied  their  political  and  economic  rights?  I  don't  want  a 
speech  but  simply  a  clear  statement  as  to  how  they  are  denied  pohtical 
and  economic  equality  in  this  country? 

Air.  KuNZE.  They  are  sufi'ering  under  boycotts. 

Mr.  Starnes.  No.  1,  they  are  suffering  under  boycotts. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  They  are  being  refused  jobs  in  many  places  simply 
because  they  have  a  German  name  or  look  German. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  that  is  No.  2. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  They  are  even  being  politically  hounded  as  possible 
or  probable  aliens  or  rather,  traitors  simply  because  they  belong  to  a 
German  element  and  don't  deny  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  else? 

Mr.  KuNZE.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  they  denied  a  place  on  the  ballot? 

Mr.  KuNZE.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  American  citizens  to  your  knowledge,  of  German 
descent,  denied  a  place  on  the  American  ballot? 

Mr.  KiJNZE.  They  are  not  but  their  chances  of  being  elected  are 
very,  very  slim  unless  they  condemn  everything  German. 

Air.  Starnes.  Ai-e  they  denied  employment  in  this  country? 

Air.  KuNZE.  In  many  places. 

Air.  Starnes.  And  do  you  still  maintain  that  they  are  not  given 
adequate  political  representation? 

Air.  KuNZE.  In  most  cases;  yes. 

Air.  Voorhis.  What  chance  would  a  group  organized  along  the 
lines  of  your  organization  have  of  getting  people  elected  to  office  in 
Germany  today? 

Air.  KuNZE.  I  couldn't  say. 

Air.  Thomas.  I  would  like  to  ask  a  question.  Supposing  (he 
United  States  and  Germany  should  go  to  war.  Would  you  be  willing 
to  fight  for  the  United  States  against  Germany? 

Air.  KuNZE.  Aly  duties  as  a  citizen  would  not  allow  me  any  choice 
in  the  matter  except  to  do  so. 

62626 — 41 — vol.  14 8 


g272  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  am  asking  the  question — never  mind  your  duties  as 
a  citizen  either  m  this  country  or  in  Germany.  Would  you  fight  for 
America  against  Germany? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  answered  that  question. 

Mr.  Thomas.  No;  you  didn't.     I  would  like  to  know  yes  or  no. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  1  understand  the  question  is  if  the  United  States  were 
to  be  at  war  with  Germany  whether  I  would  serve  in  the  armed  forces 
of  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Against  Germany  either  here  or  in  Germany. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  would  like  to  ask  other  Americans  of  other  extrac- 
tions how  they  would  like  to  go  to  war  against  their  countries.  I 
would  like  to  ask  an  American  of  English  descent  how  much  he  would 
like  to  go  to  war  against  Great  Britain. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  would  say  that  no  man  would  get  any  pleasure  out 
of  fighting  anybody. 

Mr.  Thomas.  The  reason  I  asked  that  question  was  when  Earl 
Browder  was  before  us,  the  Communist  leader,  approximately  the 
same  question  was  asked  of  him,  and  Earl  Browder  dodged  it  and 
finally  said  that  he  would  just  about  do  the  same  as  he  did  in  1917, 
which  was  to  be  a  conscientious  objector. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  to  ask  you  this  and  then  I  am  through.  You 
say  you  and  your  organization  are  opposed  to  the  importation  of  any 
political  system  from  foreign  sources  to  American  soil? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Correct,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  are  opposed  to  the  doctrine  of  communism  and 
its  importation  to  America? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Does  your  organization  still  fight  communism  m  this 
country  as  it  originally  did  in  1936,  1937,  1938,  and  1939? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  We  do;  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Has  there  been  any,  and  answer  me  truthfully,  has 
there  been  any  collaboration  on  the  part  of  yourself  and  your  organiza- 
tion with  the  Communist  Party  leadership  and  organization  on  a 
political  line  in  this  country  since  1939?     That  is  September  1939? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  has  not;  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Has  there  been  any  consultation  or  agreement  on  a 
plan  of  action  by  the  two  organizations? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  There  has  not;  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Has  there  been  any  consultation  or  agreement  on  a 
plan  of  action  by  the  two  organizations? 

Mr,  KuNZE.  There  has  not;  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Has  there  been  the  same  degree  of  activity  on  the 
part  of  yourself  and  your  organization  in  fighting  the  Communist 
Party  and  the  Communist  Party  line  in  America  since  September  1939 
as  it  was  prior  thereto? 

Mr.  Kunze.  That  would  require  a  qualified  answer. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Isn't  it  a  fact  that  you  do  find  yourselves  in  agree- 
ment, speaking  of  the  German-American  Bund  and  the  Communist 
Party,  along  certain  political  lines  in  America  today  as  they  affect  our 
national  relations? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  do  not.     I  would  like  to  answer  your  first  question. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  a  moment.  Are  you  opposed  to  the  importation 
of  the  doctrine  of  national  socialism  as  exemplified  in  Germany  under 
the  leadership  of  Herr  Hitler,  to  the  United  States  of  America? 


IN  A.MKKICAN   I'UOl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8273 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starxes.  You  would  oppose  its  spread  or  growth  in  this 
country  as  being  inimical  to  the  welfare  of  this  country? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  woidd? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  would  oppose  the  importation  of  fascism  and  its 
growth  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Of  that  or  any  other  form  of  political  system, 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Kunze,  have  you  ever  distributed  stickers 
bearing  the  slogan:  "The  Yanks  Are  Not  Commg"? 

Mr.  Kunze.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  have  you  or  have  you  not? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Not  personally;  no. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  had  in  your  possession  stickers 
bearing  the  slogan:  "The  Yanks  Are  Not  Coming"? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  have;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "\Miat  were  you  doing  with  them? 

I  would  like  to  explain  the  purpose  of  my  question.  It  is  a  well 
known  fact  and  has  been  established  beyond  any  doubt  that  these 
stickers  are  a  Communist  Party  slogan,  originated  by  the  Communist 
Party,  propagated  by  the  Communist  Party  and  that  the  German- 
Amei'ican  Bund  has  taken  it  up  from  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Kunze  has  stated  that  he  has  had  them  in  his  possession  and  I 
^\'ould  like  to  know  what  he  did  with  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  distribute  them? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No;  they  were  given  to  me.  I  have  seen  them.  I 
have  seen  them  in  various  parts  of  the  country.  They  deal  with  the 
question  of  whether  the  United  States 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  did  you  do  with  them,  that  is  the  question, 
Mr.  Kunze. 

Mr.  Kunze.  Those  that  I  received  I  had  until  I  threw  them  away. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  threw  all  that  you  had  away  or  do  you  still 
have  some? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  am  speaking  of  myself  personally. 

Mr.  Mattthews.  Yes;  I  am  speaking  of  you  personally. 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  may  have  one  or  two. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Otherwise  you  have  tlu'own  them  away;  you 
never  passed  them  out. 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  have  never  personally — never  personally  never  had 
more  than  a  half  a  dozen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  gave  them  to  you? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  could  not    say  at  the  moment. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  they  given  to  you? 

Mr.  Kunze.  In  New  York. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  By  whom? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  could  not  say  at  the  moment. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  some  member  of  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Mr.  Kunze.  As  I  recall  it;  ves. 


8274  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  wouldn't  you  know  who  gave  you  such 
stickers? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  would  have  to  determine  who  it  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  were  they  given  to  you? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  At  the  beginning — somewhere  around  the  beginning 
of  this  year. 

Mr.  Matthews.  January  1940? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  think  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  was  about  the  time — had  you  seen  them 
before  that? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  may  have  seen  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  you  traveled  around  the  United  States  prior 
to  1940  had  you  seen  these  stickers? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Not  prior  to  that  time,  no,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  that  that  was  approximately  the 
time  that  the  Communist  Party  brought  these  stickers  out? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  don't  know  that. 

Mr.  Keegan.  I  object  to  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  a  pertinent  inquiry  as  to  whether  or  not 
there  is  collaboration  as  described  by  Dr.  Matthews.  The  objection 
is  overruled. 

Mr.  Kunze.  There  has  been  absolutely  no  collaboration.  I  saw 
those  things  and  I  have  seen  them  elsewhere.  I  have  no  objection 
to  them  but  I  didn't  know  where  they  came  from  or  did  not  ask  any 
one  for  the  ri2;ht  to  use  them  or  anything  of  that  kind. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  understand  that  you  have  never  received  more 
than  a  half  a  dozen — six,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  personally. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  personally  have  received  six;  you  have  two 
of  them  still  in  your  possession  and  you  destroyed  four  or  threw  four 
away,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Kunze.  That  may  be  true. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  your  testimony,  is  it  not? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  could  not  swear  to  the  definite  figures.  I  have  seen 
a  few  samples  of  them  and  had  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  testified  that  you  have  two  or  three 
still  in  your  possession,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  believe  I  have,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  you  never  had  more  than  a  half  dozen  and 
that  you  did  throw  some  away? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  say  I  may  have  lost  them  or  thrown  them  away. 

Mr.  Matthews.  No;  you  said  you  did  throw  them  away,  isn't 
that  correct — isn't  that  your  testimony. 

Mr.  Kunze.   I  don't  definitely  r(nneniber  throwing  any  away. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  did  you  do  with  them  then,  the  ones  you 
don't  have  now? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  never  paid  any  particular  attention  to  them  except 
they  looked  interesting  when  I  read  the  text  on  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  you  remember  that  you  had  a  half  dozen  and 
now  you  have  only  two  or  three? 

Mr.  Kunze.  What  is  the  point  in  that? 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  want  to  know  how  you  can  remember  almost 
a  year  these  numbers  to  which  you  previously  testified  but  yet  you 
can't  remember  who  gave  you  these  stickers. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8275 

Mr.  KuxzE.  I  will  correct  that  then  to  say  that  I  recall  having 
so(Mi  thcin,  having  had  one  in  my  hand  aiul  that  1  may  still  have  it  and 
it  may  have  been  more  than  one,  but  not  more  than  a' half  dozen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  been  to  Germany? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  have,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  \\Tien  were  you  in  Germany  last? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  In  1938. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  month  were  you  in  Germany  in  1938? 

Mr.  KuNZE.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  month  did  you  go  to  Germanj^  in  1938? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  left  here  in  May  or  June  and  returned  in  the  middle 
of  August. 

Mr.  ^Iatthews.  When  were  you  in  Germany  prior  to  that  visit? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  In  1937,  leaving  here  I  beheve  in  the  beginning  of 
August  and  returning  in  the  beginning  of  November. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  when  were  vou  in  Germanv  prior  to  that  visit 
in  1937? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  In  1930,  leaving  here  in  May  and  returning  in  July. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  make  any  other  trips  to  Germany 
than  those  three? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  In  1929,  leaving  here  in  August  and  returning  in  No- 
vember.    I  am  pretty  sure  of  those  dates. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  make  any  other  trips  to  Germany 
than  those  four? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  am  told  that  I  was  taken  along  on  a  visit  to  Germany 
in  1911  but  I  don't  remember  anything  about  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  were  in  Germany  in  1938  and  also  in 
1937,  were  you  an  official  of  the  German-American  Bund  in  this 
country? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  were  national  organizational  director,  is  that 
correct? 

Mr.  Kunze.  National  public  relations  director. 

Mr.  Matthews.  National  public  relations  director? 

Mr.  KuxzE.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  IVIatthews.  Both  in  1937  and  1938  when  you  were  in  Ger- 
many? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Not  in  1937.  That  was  an  interim  period  after  leaving 
Philadelphia. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  occupy  any  official  position  or  have  any 
connection  with  the  German-American  Bund  in  an  official  way  in 
1937  during  your  visit  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  had  given  up  my  Philadelphia  unit  and  was  simply  a 
member  until  I  returned. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  1938  wdien  you  were  in  Germany  from  May  to 
August,  approximately,  4  or  5  months  did  you  meet 

^Ir.  Kunze.  Four  or  five  months?     It  wasn't  tliat  long. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  June,  July,  August— you  went  in  May.  That 
was  4  months. 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  was  only  there  about  4  weeks  that  time.  I  believe 
it  was  June  when  I  left  here. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  You  said  from  May  to  August.  That  is  what  I 
was  going  by.  At  any  rate  when  you  were  in  Germany  in  1938  w^hat 
Nazi  officials  did  you  personally  meet? 


8276  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  KuNZE.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  the  higher  ranks? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  did  not  meet  any. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  meet  Rudolf  Hess? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  did  not,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  did  not  meet  Mr.  Hitler? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  did  not,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Goering? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  didn't  meet  any 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  did  not  meet  any  of  the  higher  ranking 
officials? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  cities  did  vou  visit  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Kunze.  In  1938? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  did  you  spend  most  of  your  time,  if  I  may 
rephrase  the  question,  during  those  8  weeks? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Near  the  southern  border,  at  the  home  of  my  parents- 
in-law. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  go  to  Erfurt? 

Mr.  Kt'Nze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Did  you  go  to  the  Brown  House  in  Munich? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  did  not,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  visit  anv  of  the  Nazi  propaganda  head- 
quarters in  Germany? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  did  not,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  vou  visit  Stuttgart? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Not  in  1938. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  there  in  1937? 

Mr.  Kunze.  In  Stuttgart;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  go  to  Erfurt  in  1937? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  visit  the  Ausland  in  Stuttgart  in  1937? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  visited  the  museum  in  that  building  while  I  was  in 
that  city  but  in  no  official  capacity  whatever. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Has  the  German-American  Bund  sent  persons  to 
Germany  for  study  of  any  kind? 

Mr,  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  groups  or  delegations  been  organized  under 
the  auspices  of  the  German-American  Bund  for  trips  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir.  In  1936  there  was  a  trip  to  the  Olympic 
Games  but  I  could  not  say  anything  about  it  because  I  wasn't  in 
New  York  and  had  nothing  to  do  with  the  arranging  of  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Kunze  you  testified  that  the  swastika  is 
used  by  the  German -American  Bund,  is  that  correct? 

Mr,  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  in  connection  with  that  testimony  you 
elaborated  your  statement  and  said  that  the  swastika  was  used  by 
many  countries  throughout  the  world.  Do  you  mean  to  imply  that 
the  use  of  the  swastika  by  the  German-American  Bimd  was  not  in 
anyway  whatsoever  connected  with  the  fact  that  the  swastika  is  the 
emblem  of  the  National  Socialist  Party  of  Germany? 

Mr.  Kunze.  We  use  that  symbol  as  a  sign  of  Christian  nationalism 
and  more  definitely  as  a  sign  of  that  part  of  the  white  people  to  wliich 
we  are  most  closely  related  in  contradistinction  to  atheistic  inter- 


UN-AMEHTCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8277 

nationalism,  b\it  not  as  representing  any  particular  political  system 
whatever. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  repeat  the  question,  Mr.  Chairman.  I  would 
like  to  know  if  Mr.  Kunze  means  to  say  by  his  testimony  that  the 
use  of  the  swastika  by  the  Cierman-American  Bund  in  the  United 
States  has  absolutely  no  coiniection  wdth  the  fact  that  the  swastika 
is  the  official  emblem  of  the  Nazi  Party  m  Germany.  Now,  I  think 
you  can  answer  yes  or  no  to  that  question. 

Mr.  Kunze.  Will  you  read  the  question? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Read  the  question,  Mr.  Reporter. 

[Question  read.] 

Air.  Kunze.  No. 

Mr.  Staunes.  What  is  your  answer? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  answer  is,  there  is  a  connection? 

Mr.  Kunze.  There  is  no  connection  whatever. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  entirelv  accidental,  in  other  words,  as  far  as 
these  two  facts  are  related,  the  fact  that  the  German-American  Bund 
uses  the  swastika  and  that  Hitler  uses  the  swastika  in  Germany — that 
is  purely  an  accidental  thing? 

Mr.  Kunze.  May  I  enlarge  on  that  answer? 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  I  would  like  to  know  if  we  are  to  understand 
that  it  is  purely  an  accidental  matter  that  the  German-American 
Bund  in  the  United  States  is  using  the  swastika  and  that  the  Nazi 
Party  in  Germany  uses  it  as  its  official  emblem? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Dr.  Matthew^s,  I  believe  I  answered  that  more  cor- 
rectly than  with  the  word  "accidental"  in  my  previous  reply.  W^e 
recognize  that  sj^mbol  over  there  and  elsewhere  in  the  world  as  a 
symbol  of  Clu-istian  nationalism  in  contradistinction  to  atheistic 
internationalism,  and  we  use  it  because  it  happens  to  be  that  form 
most  generally  used  by  races  of  the  world  closely  related  to  us,  but  it 
has  no  connection  whatsoever  with  the  political  philosophy  of  national 
socialism. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  I  understand  you  to  say,  and  correct  me  if 
I  am  ^^■Tong,  that  you  recognize  that  the  National  Socialist  Party  of 
Germany  uses  the  swastika  because  it  is  a  symbol  of  Christian  na- 
tionalism.    Is  that  what  you  stated  in  your  testimony? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  am  sure  over  there  it  means  more.  It  means  the 
entire  political  system  also  and  it  does  not  mean  that  so  far  as  we 
are  concerned  here. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  do  you  draw  a  distinction  between  what  it 
means  there  and  what  it  means  here  if  it  is  a  part  of  a  Christian 
internationalism? 

Mr.  Kunze.  If  we  adopt  the  symbol  we  also  know  why  we  adopt  it 
and  know  what  it  is  to  mean  to  us. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  adopt  it  with  reservations.  You  adopt  a  sym- 
bol here  in  America  but  you  do  so  with  reservations  so  far  as  politicn.! 
lines  of  action  are  concerned,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Mr.  Starnes,  there  are  other  political  movements  in 
other  countries  also,  in  no  way  interested  in  importing  Germany's 
political  S3^stem  who  are  also  using,  or  at  least  up  to  recently,  are  using- 
that  same  symbol,  simply  as  a  Christian  nationalist  symbol. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  AYliat  are  those  other  groups? 


8278  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Some  in  Canada,  I  believe,  and  even  one  of  those 
similar  movements  in  Great  Britain  until  it  changed.  It  once  used 
that  symbol  also. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  Sir  Moseley's  organization? 

Mr.  KiTNZE.  I  believe  Moseiey  had  it  in  the  beginning.  T  have 
seen  an  Arab  movement  that  uses  that  symbol.  I  have  seen  Russian 
nationalists  that  use  it. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  all  the  movements,  at  any  rate,  receive  from 
time  to  time  from  Germany  certain  literature  and  help  in  the  way  of 
materials  to  be  used  to  spread  the  gospel,  don't  they? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  don't  know  anything  about  that.  It  is  not  an  anti- 
Semitic  symbol  so  far  as  we  are  concerned.  It  stands  in  the  United 
States  as  we  see  it  because  the  vast  majority  of  the  population  is 
considered  gentile-Christians,  as  a  means  to  help  unify  them  in  the 
preservation  of  American  nationalism  and  the  American  political 
system,  which  happens  to  be  a  Republic. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  mean  you  want  to  unify  them  around  the 
swastika? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Not  as  a  political  symbol.  The  political  symbol  is 
the  flag  of  the  United  States.  There  is  no  idea  whatever  of  changing 
that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Kunze,  if  you  discovered  that  an  organization 
used  the  hammer  and  sickle  as  its  emblem — — 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  would  conclude  would  you  not,  that  there 
was  some  connection  between  them  with  the  Communist  movement 
or  at  least  some  very  distinct  sympathy  for  the  Communist  move- 
ment— wouldn't  that  be  a  conclusion  that  you  would  draw? 

Mr.  Kunze.  It  would  be  a  reasonable  conclusion  to  draw  because 
the  hammer  and  sickle  does  not  represent  a  simple  geometrical  figure 
which  has  been  used  throughout  history  for  all  kmds  of  purposes; 
whereas  the  swastika  has  through  thousands  of  years  always  repre- 
sented something,  as  we  understand  history,  having  to  do  with  races 
of  people  related  to  us. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Didn't  the  swastika  originate  among  the  Indian 
tribes  in  South  America? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  know  they  use  it  there  and  in  North  America. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Is  that  where  it  came  from? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Perhaps. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  they  Christian  internationalists?  Haven't 
you  read,  Air.  Kunze,  that  the  Indians  in  Arizona  recently  repudiated 
their  century-old  use  of  the  swastika  because  of  their  fear  there  would 
be  confusion  in  their  use  of  the  symbol  and  the  movement  of  Hitler? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  wonder  just  what  they  were  afraid  of. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  wondered  if  you  had  noticed  that. 

Mr.  Kunze.  They  want  to  sell  their  carpets  and  rugs. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Kunze,  did  you  ever  make  an  organization 
trip  to  Texas  on  behalf  of  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  did,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  towns  or  cities  in  particular  did  you  visit 
in  the  State  of  Texas  for  the  purpose  of  organizing  the  German- 
American  Bund. 

Air.  Kunze.  I  do  not  care  to  expose  any  individuals  in  Texas  or 
anywhere  else  to  any  persecution,  because  their  names  may  become 
known  as  a  consequence  of  this  hearing. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8279 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  have  asked  you  lor  the  names  of  the  towns  and 
cities. 

Mr.  KuNZE.  The  authorities  know  if  there  are  any  bund  members 
in  Texas — any  units  operating,  where  they  are  and  who  those  people 
are. 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  is  not  asking  you,  Mr.  Kunze,  for  the  names  of 
any  individuals  nor  about  any  visit  to  any  individual.  He  is  asking 
you  merely  what  towns  or  cities  you  visited  in  Texas  when  you  were 
down  there. 

Mr.  ^Iatthews.  Did  jou  visit  Taylor  for  the  purpose  of  organiz- 
ing the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  visit  Taylor? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  visited  Taylor  but  not  for  the  purpose  of  organizing 
anything. 

^Ir.  Matthews.  Did  you  discuss  the  organization  of  the  bund  in 
Texas  with  anyone  in  Taylor? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Only  academically.  I  visited  the  publisher  of  a  small 
newspaper. 

Mr.  ^IATTHEWS.  Wliat  do  you  mean  b}-^  "discussing  it  with  him 
academically"? 

Mr.  Kunze.  There  was  no  intention  of  creating  any  part  of  the 
organization  there  or  getting  members  there.  I  was  interested  in  his 
paper. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  just  set  up  the  hypothesis  that  in  case  there 
were  an  organization  there  you  would  do  so  and  so,  is  that  what  you 
mean  by  "academically  discussing  it"? 

Mr.  Kunze.  We  may  have  spoken  of  the  bund  as  such.  I  visited 
that  town  to  meet  the  publisher  of  that  newspaper  because  I  liked 
some  of  the  things  in  it. 

.Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  Hans  Ackermann  of  Taylor,  Tex.? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  editor  of  the  Texas  Herold? 

Mr.  Kunze.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  visit  New  Braimfels? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  have  been  through  New  Braunfels;  I  never  visited 
anyone  there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  discuss  the  organization  of  the  bund  in 
Texas  with  a  Mr.  Leonhard? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  am  acquainted  with  him;  he  is  not  connected  with 
the  organization.  I  have  discussed  with  him  that  I  am  connected 
with  the  bund  and  that  I  am  interested  in  finding  people  who  sympa- 
thize with  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  discuss  the  subject  of  organizing  the 
bund  in  Texas  or  in  any  part  of  Texas  with  a  Mr.  Koetter? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes;  in  the  same  manner  as  with  Mr.  Leonhard. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Mr.  Kunze,  you  have  read  of  the  recently 
concluded  pact  between  Berlin,  Rome,  and  Tokyo.  Does  the  German- 
American  Bund  support  the  principles  embodied  in  that  pact? 

Mr.  Kunze.  The  German-American  Bund  has  nothing  to  do  with 
the  politics  of  other  countries. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  vour  publication — your  official  publica- 
tion? 

Mr.  Kunze.  The  F'ree  American  and  Deutscher  Weckruf  und 
Beobachter. 


3280  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  mean  to  say  that  the  Deutscher  Weckruf 
und  Beobachter  has  never  discussed  the  poHtics  of  other  countries? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  As  a  newspaper  I  would  suppose  it  would. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Has  it  ever  discussed  them  editorially? 

Mr.  KuNZE.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  read  the  papers,  of  course,  don't  you? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Quite  frequently  from  an  American  point  of  view. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  now,  how  do  you  square  that  with  your 
testimony  that  you  don't  discuss  the  politics  of  other  countries? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  The  German- American  Bund  doesn't  take  any  stand 
on  the  politics  of  other  coimtries  except  insofar  as  they  directly  affect 
the  United  States. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  do  you  think  the  recently  concluded  pact 
affects  the  United  States? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  have  no  opinion  on  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  will  change  the  question:  Has  the  Deutscher 
Weckruf  und  Beobachter  in  any  way  taken  a  position  on  this  recently 
concluded  pact  between  these  three  powers? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  The  Deutscher  Weckruf  und  Beobachter  may  discuss 
the  pros  and  cons  as  any  other  newspaper  would. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Has  it  done  so? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  believe  that  is  too  recent.  I  don't  believe  that  has 
been  done. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  often  does  the  publication  appear? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Every  week. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Edward  James  Smythe? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Slightly. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  connection  have  you  met  him?  Has  he 
been  actively  connected  with  the  work  of  the  bund? 

Air.  KuNZE.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Never  had  any  connection  with  the  bund? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  So  far  as  I  know  he  has  never  been  a  member  or  in 
any  way  connected  with  the  bund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  has  never  worked  to  support  bund  projects  or 
meetings  or  rallies? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  He  may  in  past  years  have  been  a  speaker  at  some 
meeting — I  couldn't  say. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  was  one  of  the  speakers  at  Camp  Nordland 
that  you  referred  to  as  having  held  a  rally  under  the  auspices  of  the 
Ku  Klux  Klan,  was  he  not? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  That  may  be. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Kunze,  can  you  identify  that  as  the  letterhead 
■of  the  German-American  Bund  and  the  signature  of  J.  Wlieeler  Hill? 

Mr.  Kunze.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  AIatthews.  You  are  not  reading  the  letterhead ;  you  are  read- 
ing the  contents  of  the  letter,  are  you  not? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  believe  that  letterhead  was  used  at  that  time  but  I 
could  not  swear  to  the  signature. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  have  seen  Mr  James  Wheeler  Hill's 
signature,  have  you  not? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  have  seen  it;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  to  introduce  this  in 
■evidence.     It  is  on  the  letterhead  of  the  German-American  Bund,  a 


genuine : 


rX-AMKI?ICAN  PUorACAXHA   ACTIVITIES  8281 

letter  dated  Fe])ruarv  3,  1939.  and  addressed  to  Mr.  Edward  James 
Smytlie,  and  signed  by  James  Wheeler  Hill. 
The  letter  reads : 

Dear  Mr.  Smythe:  If  you  liave  not  as  yet  sold  the  tickets  to  the  Madison 
Square 

Air.  Starxes.  Are  you  familiar  with  the  signature  of  James  Wheeler 
Hill? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Fairly;  yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Starxes.  You  have  seen  it  a  number  of  times? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  have. 

Mr.  Starxes.  You  have  had  correspondence  with  him  and  you 
have  seen  his  signature  on  letters  and  documents  that  you  knew  were 
? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  have,  sir. 

Mr.  Starxes.  All  right.  Now,  does  that  look  like  his  hand- 
writing— does  that  look  like  his  signature — does  that  resemble  it? 

Mr.  KuxzE.  It  resembles  it  but  I  could  not  swear  to  its  accuracy. 

Mr.  Starxes.  He  says  he  knows  his  signature  and  he  has  seen  it  a 
number  of  times  and  he  says  it  looks  like  his  handwriting. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  letter  reads: 

Dear  Mr.  Smythe:  If  you  have  not  as  yet  sold  the  tickets  for  the  Madison 
Square  Garden  rally  I  ask  you  to  return  them  to  me  at  once  because  we  are 
completely  sold  out  of  reserve  tickets — 

And  so  forth,  and  it  is  signed  "yours  truly,  J.  Wheeler  HUl." 

Mr.  Starxes.  "\^^lat  is  the  purpose  of  that? 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  witness  has  testified  that  Mr.  Edward  James 
Smj^the  has  never  in  any  way  worked  with  the  German-American 
Bund.    This  letter  establishes  the  fact  that  he  has  done  so. 

Mr.  KrxzE.  So  far  as  I  know,  Dr.  Matthews 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  Mr.  Edward  James  Smythe  was  the  principal 
speaker  for  the  newspaper  at  Camp  Nordland  and  announced  as  one  of 
the  leaders  of  the  Ku  Klux  Klan  for  the  State  of  New  Jersey. 

Mr.  Starxes.  All  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  are  several  other  letters  of  the  same  tenor, 
Mr.  Chairman,  which  establishes  the  connection  between  Edward 
James  Smythe  and  the  German- American  Bund. 

I  ask  your  pleasure  with  reference  to  them.  Shall  1  ask  the  witness 
to  identify  them  also? 

Mr.  Starnes.  If  he  can  identify  them — if  they  are  similar  to  the 
others. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  pencil  signature  of  Mr.  J.  Wheeler  Hill. 
Do  you  recognize  that,  Mr.  Kunze? 

Air.  KuxzE.  It  may  have  been.  I  could  not  swear  to  someone 
else's  signature. 

Air.  AIatthews.  If  you  received  a  letter  with  that  signature  on  it 
you  would  not  have  any  doubt  about  its  authenticity,  would  you? 

Air.  KuxzE.  It  would  not  help  me  in  a  court  of  law. 

Air.  AIatthews.  You  are  not  in  a  court  of  law  now.  Do  you 
recognize  that  signature  as  that  of  James  Wheeler  Hill? 

This  letter  is  dated  March  9,  1939,  and  addressed  to  Mr.  Smythe  and 
signed  "James  \\lieeler  Hill."  This  one  is  dated  February  14,  1939, 
addressed  to  Air.  Smythe  and  signed  by  James  Wheeler  Hill.  Do  you 
pick  out  any  one  of  these  signatures  as  more  nearh^  resembling  Mr. 
James  ^Yheeler  Hiil's  signature  than  the  other  two. 


't5^ 


8282  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  KuNZE.  I  don't  know  his  signature  well  enough  to  say  which  of 
the  three  would  resemble  it  most.  I  did  say  that  I  can't  identify  any 
one  of  the  three  as  definitely  being  his  signature. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  you  have  seen  the  signature  frequently, 
haven't  you? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  Once  in  a  while.  There  is  a  certain  similarit}^  between 
all  three.     They  may  be  his  and  they  may  not  be  his.     I  do  not  know. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  is  despite  counsel's  statement  ''they  are 
totally  different." 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  first  letter  is  received  in  evidence  because  he 
stated  it  did  resemble  his  signature  and  in  his  best  judgment  it  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  letter  of  February  3. 

(The  letter  referred  to  was  marked  "Kunze  Exhibit  No.  1.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  have  no  more  questions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  An}^  further  questions,  Mr.  Voorhis? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  One  question.  Mr.  Kunze,  are  you  acquainted  with 
Herr  von  Speigel,  the  German  consul  in  New  Orleans? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  You  are  not? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Have  you  ever  met  with  any  of  the  German  consuls 
in  America? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  have  met  several  of  them  at  affairs  at  which  they 
have  been  guests. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  where  you  have  also  been  present? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  What  were  those  occasions — what  sort  of  occasions? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  have  seen  the  German  consul  general  at  affairs  in 
New  York  City — some  German  day  celebration  or  something  of  that 
kind  or  at  the  Christmas  market.  I  have  been  introduced  to  him 
when  the  occasion  happened  to  require  it.  I  have  seen  the  consul 
general  on  the  west  coast  on  one  occasion  at  some  aft'air  of  the  bund 
out  there,  but  in  each  case  it  was  a  matter  of  being  introduced  and 
that  was  all. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Have  you  ever  visited  in  any  of  the  embassies? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  You  have  never  been  to  an  embassy? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Yes;  I  have  been  there  once.  I  have  been  down- 
town at  the  consulate  general's  office  with  Mr.  Keegan  on  one  occasion 
but  we  didn't  speak  to  the  consul. 

Mr.  Matthews.  \Vliy  did  you  go  there — why  did  you  visit  the 
embassv? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  My  question  was  mth  reference  to  the  German 
Embassv  in  Washington. 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  have  had  no  dealings  at  the  German  Embassy. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  You  never  have  been  there? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  have  been  at  that  building  on  one  occasion  several 
years  aeio,  I  believe. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Do  you  recall  what  year  it  was? 

Mr.  Kunze.  I  believe  it  was  in  1938  while  I  was  visiting  Wash- 
ington, D.  C,  in  the  early  part  of  the  year. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  What  was  your  business  there? 

Mr.  Kunze.  None  whatever.  They  were  simply  showing  it  to 
me,  that  was  all — people  I  knew  in  Washington  were  showing  me 
the  German  Embassy. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8283 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  did  not  talk  to  nnyhody  while  you  wore  in  there? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  To  some  subordinate  in  the  olliee,  just  to  say  "how  do 
jou  do." 

Mr.  Voouiiis.  Did  you  visit  other  embassies? 

Mr.  KuNZE.  No,  sir;  we  drove  by  others. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Kunze,  what  bank  or  banks  in  New  York  City 
does  the  German-Ameriean  Bund  do  business  with? 

Mr.  Kunze.  The  German-American  Bund  uses  the  Manufacturers 
Trust  Co. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Any  other  bank  in  New  York? 

Mr.  Kunze.  Perhaps  the  local  unit  does.  I  don't  know  about  that. 
The  national  organization  does  not. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Did  you  meet  a  man  by  the  name  of  Gerrard  Wescott 
w^hen  he  was  visiting  here? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir;  I  don't  know  the  gentleman. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  don't  know  him? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Never  met  him? 

Mr.  Kunze.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  all. 

Air.  Starnes.  That  is  all.  We  see  no  reason  for  holding  this  witness 
any  further  so  you  are  excused  from  the  process  of  the  committee. 

The  other  witnesses  who  are  present  in  the  committee  room  at  this 
time  please  return  tomorrow  morning  at  9  o'clock. 

It  is  the  intention  of  the  committee  to  resume  its  public  hearings  at 
9  o'clock  tomorrow  morning. 

(Whereupon,  at  4:35  p.  m.,  the  public  hearing  was  adjourned  until 
9  a.  m.,  Wednesdav,  October  2,  1940.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMEEICAN  PEOPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


OCTOBER  2,   1940 

House  of  Representatives, 
Subcommittee  of  the  Special  Committee 

TO  Investigate  Un-American  Activities, 

Newark,  N.  J. 
The  subcommittee  met  at  10  a.  m.,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (chairmaB> 
presiding. 

Present:  Messrs.  Starnes  (chairman),  Voorhis,  and  Thomas.  Also- 
present:  R.  E.  Striphng,  chief  investigator;  Robert  B.  Barker, 
investigator. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  hearing  wih  come  to  order. 
Mr.  Khipprott,  will  you  take  the  stand. 

TESTIMONY    OF    AUGUST    KLAPPROTT,    EASTERN    DEPARTMENT 
LEADER,  GERMAN-AMERICAN  BUND 

(The  witness  was^aecompanied  by  his  attorney,  Wilbur  V.  Keogan.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand. 
Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are  going  to  give  will 
be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you 
God? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Let  the  record  show  Mr.  Klapprott  is  represented  by 
his  counsel,  Mr.  Keegan. 

Give  us  your  full  name  if  you  please? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  August  Klapprott. 

Mr.  Starnes.  ^Vliat  is  your  address? 

Mr.  Klapprott.^  My  address  is  Nordland,  R.  F.  D.  No.  1,  Newton. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  your  business  or  profession? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  now  work  for  the  German-American  Bund. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  work  for  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  have  you  worked  for  the  German-American 
Bund  as  a  business  or  for  a  living? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  J'rom  January  15  of  this  year. 

Mr.  Starnes.  \Miat  was  your  occupation  prior  to  that  time? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  ran  a  business  in  Nordland. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  kind  of  a  business? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Restaurant  business. 

Air.  Starnes.  How  many  years  did  you  operate  that  business? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  From  May  1937  to  the  first  of  January  1940. 

8285 


5286  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Where  were  you  born? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Where? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes;  where? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  In  Germany. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Septem])er  4,  1906. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When  did  you  come  to  the  United  States  first? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  September  1927. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  you  a  naturalized  citizen? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wlien  did  j^ou  become  natui-aHzed? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  In  the  spring-  of  1934. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliere? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  In  Hackensack  Courthouse. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  been  back  to  Germany  since  1927? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  profession  did  you  follow — what  work  did  you 
follow  when  you  first  came  to  America  in  1927? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Bricklayer — mason. 

Mr.  Starnes.  For  how  long? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Up  to  the  time  when  I  started  the  business  in 
Nordland . 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  follow  that  trade  from  1927  to  1937 — 10 
years? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  lived  in  New  Jersey  all  the  while? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  All  the  while;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  been  back  to  Germany  at  all  since  1927? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When  did  you  join  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  When  it  was  founded  in  1936. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Friends  of  New  Germany? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes;  for  2  years. 

Mr.  Starnes.  '34  and  '35? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  belong  to  the  Teutonic  Society  or  any  other 
German  society  prior  to  the  time  you  joined  the  Friends  of  New 
Germany? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Why  did  you  join  the  bund? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  To  fight  the  boycott  of  German  goods  and  German 
people  in  America. 

Mr.  Starnes.  To  fight  the  boycott  of  German  goods  and  people  in 
America? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  there  any  other  reason  for  your  joining  the  bund? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  was  my  reason  for  joining  the  bund. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  what  I  want  to  get.  What  was  your  reason 
— that  was  your  reason — was  that  one  of  the  purposes  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  It  was  already  from  the  Friends  of  New  Ger- 
many— the  purpose  of  the  Friends  of  New  Germany. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  was  one  of  the  purposes?  Well,  did  the  Bund 
assume  that  obligation  or  aim  or  purpose  as  a  part  of  its  program? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8287 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  what  was  the  other  part  of  the  program  of  the 
build?  In  other  words,  what  were  its  aims  and  purposes?  It  has 
something  else  to  do  other  than  light  agahist  a  boycott,  against 
German  citizens  and  German  goods? 

Air.  Klapprott.  To  organize  politically  to  combat  such  movements. 

Air.  Starnes.  In  other  words,  it  was  a  political  organization? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Oh,  yes. 

Air.  Starnes.  That  was  its  concept? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Air.  Starnes.  Was  the  purpose  of  the  bund  to  establish  a  separate 
political  party  to  provide  political  representation  for  the  German 
citizens  of  German  birth  or  was  the  purpose  of  the  bund  to  support 
the  Republican  Party  or  Democratic  Party,  the  Communist  Party  or 
some  other  political  party  in  this  country? 

Air.  Klapprott.  As  I  understand  the  bund  always — we  never  tried 
to  be  a  separate  party  but  we  also  never  were  Republicans  or  Demo- 
crats. We  always  voted  and  let  the  people  know  for  whom  we  thought 
would  be  the  right  man  to  vote  for.  You  see  we  were  never  a  party — 
true  to  any  party. 

Air.  Starnes.  The  reason  I  asked  that  question  is  that  I  have  the 
impression  and  the  committee  has  the  impression  from  testimony  of 
Air.  Kuhn  and  other  leaders  of  the  bund,  that  it  was  for  the  purpose 
of  establishing  a  political  party  to  give  representation  to  what  they 
alleged  to  be  a  persecuted  minority  m  this  country  who  are  not  given 
proper  political  recognition  or  equal  rights,  politically,  in  this  country. 

\\Tiat  is  your  concept  of  it?     Was  that  your  conception  of  the  bund? 

Air.  Klapprott.  It  was  not  my  conception  at  all  to  form  a  political 
party — never  was. 

Air.  Starnes.  What  is  your  position  in  the  bmid? 

Air.  Klapprott.  I  am  the  eastern  department  leader. 

Air.  Starnes.  You  are  the  eastern  department  leader  of  the 
German-American  Bund? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir. 

Air.  Starnes.  How  many  States  does  that  cover? 

Air.  Klapprott.  The  eastern  seaboard  States. 

Air.  Starnes.  The  eastern  seaboard  States  from  Alaine  to  Florida? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Right. 

Air.  Starnes.  How  far  inland  does  it  extend? 

Air.  Kl.\pprott.  Up  to  West  Virginia. 

Air.  Starnes.  Let  us  see  if  we  can  get  the  geographical  limits 
clearly  fixed.     You  take  in  all  of  the  New  England  States? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Right. 

Air.  Starnes.  New  York? 

Air.  Klapprott.    (No  answer.) 

Air.  Starnes.  Pennsylvania? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Pennsylvania,  New  Jersey,  Delaware,  West  Vu"- 
ginia,  North  Carolina. 

Air.  Starnes.  Virginia? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Air.  Starnes.  Alaryland? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Alaryland  and  South  Carolina. 

Air.  Starnes.  Georgia? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Georgia  and  Florida. 

62626—41 — vol.  14 9 


8288  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Staenes.  How  many  local  units — I  am  not  asking  you  about 
the  members,  but  how  many  local  units  do  you  have  in  your  area? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  About  20. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  of  them  are  located  in  the  New  England 
area? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  There  are  none  at  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  None  at  all  in  the  New  England  area.  How  many 
in  New  York  State  and  the  city,  of  course? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  City  and  State,  you  say? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  About  10. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Fom-. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  in  Pennsylvania? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Only  one  just  now. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  in  Delaware? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  None. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  Maiyland? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  None. 

Mr.  Starnes.  West  Virginia? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  None. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  Virginia — the  State  of  Virginia? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  None. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  Washington,  D.  C? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  None. 

Mr.  Starnes.  North  Carolina? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  None. 

Mr.  Starnes.  South  Carolina? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  None. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Georgia? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  None. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Florida? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  None. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words,  you  have  given  us — you  say  there 
are  approximately  20  posts  but  you  have  only  located  here  for  us  15 
in  your  area.     Have  we  overlooked  any  States? 

Mr,  Klapprott.   (No  answer). 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  mean  to  say  you  do  not  have  any  bund 
units,  local  units,  in  Massachusetts  any  more? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No;  you  see  they  are  only  small  groups  which  are 
not  units.     They  are  called  branches. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  would  you  say  the  approximate  membership 
is  in  your  area?  You  have  15  local  units  that  you  have  established 
for  us,  10  in  New  York  City  and  State  and  4  in  New  Jersey  and  1  in 
Pennsylvania.     That  is  15. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  I  couldn't  tell  you  exactly. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  you  can  give  us  an  approximation;  I  am  not 
asking  you  the  exact  number.  I  am  not  saying  999  and  1,001  or 
anything  like  that,  but  approximately  how  many?  Would  you  say 
there  are  as  many  as  500? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  There  are  more  than  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  there  1,000  in  these  15  units? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  About  500  in  New  Jersey,  I  know. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8289 

Mr.  Starnes.  About  500  in  New  Jersey.  Now,  that  is  getting 
somewhere.     How  many  would  you  say  in  Pennsylvania? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  know  exacth',  150  or  something. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Then  what  would  you  say  for  the  10  units  in  New 
York  State  and  eity? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Maybe  they  comprise  about  5,000. 

Mr.  Starnes.  There  are  probably  more  in  New  York  City  and 
State  than  any  other  section  of  the  country,  of  course,  because  of  the 
population  and  because  it  is  along  the  eastern  seaboard. 

^Ir.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  are  the  dues  that  the  members  are  required  to 
pay? 

^Ir.  Klapprott.  One  dollar  a  month. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  is  that  distributed?  How  is  that  allocated? 
Is  it  so  much  for  the  national  organization  and  so  much  for  the  local 
organization?     That  is  what  I  mean.     How  do  3^ou  distribute  that? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Sixty  cents  goes  to  the  national  headquarters. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  State  headquarters? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  what  you  call  district  headquarters. 
How  much  is  allocated  of  that  dollar  to  the  district  headquarters? 

Mr.  Kl.apprott.  None  at  all. 

Air.  Starnes.  How  much  to  the  local  unit?  In  other  words,  60 
cents  goes  to  the  national  headquarters,  to  Mr.  Kunze  or  the  national 
treasurer  or  secretary.  Who  are  those  dues  paid  over  to?  To  the 
secretary  or  to  the  treasurer? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  To  the  treasurer. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  the  other  40  cents  is  retained  by  the  local  unit? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes;  by  the  local  unit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  is  that  money  expended — for  what  general 
purposes? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  For  the  expense  of  the  national  office. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  does  that  consist  of?  Traveling  expenses, 
telephone  and  postage? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Rent. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Rent  for  the  office  of  the  organization? 

Mr.  Klapprott.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  witness  nodded  his  head. 

What  else  is  the  money  used  for?  To  carry  on  the  political  program 
of  the  bimd? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Fees  for  counsel  and  those  who  have  to  work  in 
the  office,  you  know,  w^eekly  wages. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  How  much  do  you  spend  for  counsel  fees? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  We  spent  a  fortune  already. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  do  you  make  any  contributions  to  any 
political  parties  or  do  you  carry  on  or  finance  your  political  activities 
and  carry  it  along  the  lines  you  suggested  a  moment  ago? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  remember  that  we  ever  financed  any- 
thing else  but  our  own. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  your  own? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  right. 


8290  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  ever  sent  any  of  that  money  out  of  this 
country? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Not  that  I  know. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  how  the  money  was  raised  that  Mr. 
Kuhn  testifii^d  that  he  carried  to  Germany  with  him? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  I  only  know  I  gave  a  dollar  to  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  gave  a  dollar  to  that,  too? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  an  organization  that  calls  foi-  frequent  contri- 
butions of  dollars  and  other  amounts,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  how  else  could  we  exist? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  solicit  funds  from  indivichmls  who  might 
be  sympathetic  to  your  program  in  addition  to  the  dues  that  you 
assess  your  members? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Occasionally;  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  receive  considerable  amounts  or  money  in  that 
respect? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  that  is  not  a  question  I  could  answer  properly. 
You  should  ask  the  treasurer. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  all  right,  have  you  ever  solicited  any  one  out- 
side of  the  bund  for  money? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  years  ago. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  been  successful  in  obtaining  money  out- 
side of  the  membership  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Oh,  I  remember  I  had  $10  on  the  list  once,  or 
something  like  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  the  largest  contribution  you  received? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  all  outside  of  the  bund. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  attend  a  joint  meeting  of  the  bund  and  the 
Ku  Klux  Klan  and  the  Protestant  War  Veterans  of  America  at  Nord- 
land  on  August  18th? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  was  at  the  meeting  but  I  don't  consider  it  a  joint 
meeting. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  let  us  see  who  were  there.  There  were  bund 
members  there? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  this  was  on  bund  property? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  It  was  the  German-American  Bund  Auxiliary 
property. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  the  trustet^s  of  that  auxiliary  are  all  bund 
members? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  were  present  on  that  occasion? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  presided  at  the  meeting? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  you  made  some  remarks  on  that  occasion? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  s])oke  in  the  morning,  didn't  you,  and  then 
•didn't  you  speak  again  in  the  evening?  You  spoke  twice  on  that 
date  there  in  Camp  Nordland? 


UX-AMERICAN  PHOrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §291 

Mr.  Klai'pi{Ott.  Yes;  in  the  aftonioon  I  welcoinod  the  ^niests  there 
jiiul  tlie  ineiiibers  and  friends  of  the  KUui  and  that  is  all  I  (\'u\. 

Mr.  Staknes.  You  welcomed  your  guests? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  riijlit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  There  were  hund  members  present  there  that  day, 
of  course? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  suppose  there  were. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Quite  a  number? 

Mr.  Klapprott.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  there  were  klansmen  present? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  By  invitation? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  the  day  was  advertised  all  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  was  what? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Advertised. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  was  advertised,  yes,  but  the\-  came  there  as  an 
organization  and  the  Klan  officials  spoke. there  that  (hiy  on  invitation^ 
isn't  that  right? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No ;  that  day  they  entered  the  grounds 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  the  night.  When  I  speak  of  "that  day"  or 
"date"  I  mean  the  day  and  night  of  August  18th.  I  am  trying  to 
determine  what  occurred  there  on  that  day.  Klan  officials  were 
present  and  spoke  there  on  that  occasion,  isn't  that  correct?  On  that 
date  Klan  officials  came  there  and  spoke  on  that  date? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes;  but  they  had  the  grounds  rented  from  the 
German-American  Bund  Auxiliary  for  that  day.  In  the  afternoon 
before  they  started. 

Mr.  Starnes.  There  was  a  speaker  there  for  the  Protestant  War 
Veterans  of  America  also,  wasn't  there? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes;  you  refer  to  Mr.  Smythe. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes.  Did  they  have  the  ground  rented  for  that 
occasion  also? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  the  Klan  rented  the  gromid? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Just  the  Klan;  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  With  whom  did  the  Klan  make  that  arrangement? 
With  the  board  of  trustees  or  with  you? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  AVith  me  personally. 

Mr.  Starnes.  With  you  personally? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  invite  them  or  did  you  initiate  it? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  program? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  led  to  the  events  of  that  day? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Or  did  they  initiate  tlu^  program? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  first  got  a  telephone  call  from  Dr.  Young. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  he  was  the 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  he  called  himself  Kleagle  of  the  Klan. 

Mr.  Starnes.  National  kleagle  or  State  kleagle  or  what? 


8292  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Klapprott.  State  kleagle. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Go  ahead.     Did  Dr.  Young  speak  that  day? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sh\ 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Chah-man,  let  him  develop  how  the  arrange- 
ments were  made  for  the  renting  of  the  gromids. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes;  go  ahead  and  tell  us  how  that  was  done. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Dr.  Young  called  me  up  and  said:  "I  heard  so 
much  of  your  place  and  we  were  looking  for  a  place  to  hold  a  meeting. 
"Wliile  it  is  hard  for  us  to  get  a  place  we  thought  we  would  call  you 
because  we  want  to  try  you  out  and  see  whether  you  are  Americans 
or  not." 

He  told  me  that,  and  he  said:  "Couldn't  we  arrange  some  day  so 
you  would  give  us  the  place  for  a  day  to  have  a  meetmg  for  the  Klan 
at  your  place?" 

I  said  over  the  phone,  I  said:  "For  that  special  purpose  we  would 
have  to  come  together  once  and  talk  this  thing  over." 

"Of  course,"  they  said,  "we  will  get  a  couple  of  thousand  people  to 
go  for  the  meeting." 

After  all  1  figured  Camp  Nordland  was  hit  hard  by  all  this  propa- 
ganda against  the  place  and  the  boys  from  the  newspapers  did  their 
best  to  chase  the  people  away  and,  of  course,  I  welcomed  the  idea. 
Then  we  made  arrangements — we  made  a  contract  signed  by  the  Klan 
and  signed  by  me  as  a  representative  of  the  German-American  Bund 
Auxiliary,  for  this  August  18  to  have  an  Americanization  rally  there. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  a  copy  of  that  contract  with  you? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  haven't  got  one  with  me;  no. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  have  a  copy  of  it? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  know.  1  could  look  for  it.  I  think  I  have 
it  in  my  files. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Will  you  submit  a  copy  to  the  committee? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Now,  I  would  also  like  to  know  how  much  rent  was 
paid  to  the  bund  auxiliary  for  the  use  of  the  camp  that  day? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  There  was  no  rent  paid  at  all. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Go  ahead  or  have  you  finished  with  your  statement 
as  to  what  occurred  and  how  the  trade  was  made? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  think  I  did  explain  everything. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  I  understand  you  to  say  a  moment  ago  that  Dr. 
Young,  in  the  course  of  that  conversation,  said  the  pm'poses  or  aims 
of  your  organizations  were  the  same,  or  that  you  were  working  toward 
the  same  goal? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  When? 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  arranging  your  meeting  and  the  use  of  the 
grounds. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No;  Dr.  Young  said  to  me:  "We  want  to  try  out 
whether  you  are  Americans  and  for  that  reason  we  will  come  up  to 
Camp  Nordland." 

I  told  him:   "I  am  a  good  American  and  you  can  come  any  time." 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  what  I  wanted  to  clear  up.  I  did  not  under- 
stand what  vou  said  about  that. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAG.VNDA  ACTIVITIES  8293 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  also  told  Dr.  Young:  and  others  from  the  Klan, 
that  any  other  oro;anization  could  rent  the  place  too  for  a  day. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  you  say  they  didn't  pay  any  rent? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  They  rented  it  but  they  paid  no  rent,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  right.  They  don't  have  to  pay  rent  if 
the  people  come  there  and  eat  in  the  place.     That  keeps  the  place  up. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  to  know  wliat  was  in 
that  contnict. 

Mr.  Keegan.  I  am  going  to  deliver  a  copy  for  the  committee, 
Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  all  right;  but  maybe  the  witness  would  like 
to  tell  us  now  some  of  the  things  that  are  in  the  contract.  You  say, 
Mr.  Ivlapprott,  you  had  a  contract? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Right. 

Air.  Thomas.  Now,  what  was  in  this  contract?  There  is  nothing 
in  there  about  rent,  so  what  was  it? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  only  said  that  they  would  have  the  site  where 
the  open  air  platform  is;  that  they  would  hold  their  meetings  there 
and  that  we  couldn't  interfere  with  that  part,  but  that  we  could  have 
our  restaurant  as  usual  running  for  the  occasion  and  that  we  would 
take  the  25  cent  parking  fee  and  that  they  were  allowed  to  make  a 
collection  for  their  Klan's  treasury.     That  was  in  the  contract. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  I  want  to  ask  you  some  further  questions 
about  the  meeting.     Was  the  press  present  on  that  occasion? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  The  press? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  they  permitted  free  range  and  freedom  hi 
action  in  going  where  they  pleased  and  taking  pictures  as  they  pleased 
and  questioning  people  as  they  pleased? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  think  so. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  were  they  treated  on  that  occasion  and  how 
were  they  cared  for  on  that  occasion? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  as  much  as  I  noticed  they  were  taken  into 
place  and  let  out  of  the  place. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  were  taken  in  and  let  out? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  they  kept  under  close  surveillance  or  guard 
during  the  time  they  were  in  there? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  They  were. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  they  told  where  they  could  go  and  where  they 
couldn't  go? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  I  didn't  tell  them  anything  but  I  guess  that 
is  about  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  about  correct? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  did  not  tell  them  what  they  could  write  and 
couldn't  write? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  they  do  that  any  way — they  write  what 
they  please. 


8294  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  On  that  occasion  did  any  of  the  speakers did 

you  hear  the  speakers  on  that  occasion? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Not  all  of  them, 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  hear  Dr.  Young? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  In  the  evening;  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  hear  Mr.  Smythe? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  any  of  the  speakers  on  that  occasion  make 
reference  to  the  fact  that  there  was  a  minority  in  this  country  who 
controlled  it? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  didn't  say  so. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  know,  but  didn't  somebody  else  say  that  on  that 
occasion? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  I  couldn't  remember  exactly  what  every- 
body said. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wasn't  something  said  like  that  by  the  speakers 
present,  which  includes,  of  course,  Dr.  Young  and  others.  Wasn't 
that  said  a  time  or  two?  Probably  you  might  have  said  something 
about  it,  not  all  of  this,  but  you  and  other  speakers  in  substance  said 
that  you  could  discuss  in  this  country  and  talk  any  way  you  wanted 
to  about  all  nationalities  and  groups  of  different  nationalities  and 
racial  groups  save  one,  but  there  was  one  minority  group  in  this 
country  that  you  could  not  talk  about  without  fear  of  prosecution  or 
persecution?  Mr.  Klapprott,  was  something  said  like  that  on  that 
occasion? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  if  it  was  said  then  why  don't  you  ask  the 
fellow  who  said  it? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  I  am  asking  you.  I  am  asking  you  if  in  the 
course  of  your  remarks  you  didn't  make  some  reference  to  a  certain 
racial  minority  in  this  coimtry — you  did  not  call  any  names,  but  you 
spoke  of  a  certain  racial  minority  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Klapprott.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Isn't  it  a  fact  you  made  some  reference,  without 
calling  names,  that  there  was  a  certain  racial  minority  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  I  said:  ''If  you  are  fellow  Americans  and 
staying  out  of  this  w^ar  and  you  are  like  Lindbergh,  in  fact  neutral, 
then  you  will  be  called  a  fifth  columnist"  by  a  certain  minority  in 
America.     That  is  what  I  said. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  now,  did  you  say  anything  about  a  certain 
minority  in  this  country  controlling  the  press? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  And  it  is  still  my  belief  to  a  certain  extent. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  believe  there  is  a  certain  minority  in  this 
country  that  controls  the  press? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  a  certain  minority  in  this  country  that  controls 
the  moving-picture  industry? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Oh,  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  your  belief? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Oh,  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  it  is  your  belief  that  there  is  a  certain  minority 
in  this  country  that  controls  the  Government  of  the  United  States? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8295 

Mr.  Klappkott.  To  a  certain  extent. 

Mr.  Staknes.  Now,  that  was  the  theme  song  generally  of  yourself 
and  of  the  speakers  on  that  occasion,  was  it  not? 

Mr.  Klapi'rott.  That  is  and  should  be  the  theme  song  for  every 
American  today. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  may  be  your  opinion.  You  are  not  responsive 
to  the  ciuestion.  1  asked  you  if  that  wasn't  the  theme  song  on  that 
occasion  among  those  who  called  themselves  Americans — wasn't 
that  youi'  theme  song? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  I  suppose  it  was. 

Mr.  Starnes.  There  is  a  dance  hall  out  there  and  a  large  restaurant 
at  Camp  Nordland;  is  that  right? 

Mr,  Klapprott.  Yes;  but  on  the  other  side  of  the  hill.  It  is  in  the 
front  right  where  you  come  in. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  at  Camp  Nordland? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  on  that  date  isn't  it  a  fact  there  was  a  large 
picture  of  Herr  Hitler  suspended  there  in  that  restaurant  or  dance 
hall? 

]Mr.  Klapprott.  You  say  whether  that  picture  is  still  there? 

Mr.  Starnes.  No,  if  it  wasn't  there  on  that  date. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  It  wasn't  there  on  that  date. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  wasn't  there? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  has  hung  there? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  But  it  wasn't  taken  down  just  because  of  that 
date. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Isn't  it  a  fact  there  was  a  picture  of  Herr  Hitler 
suspended  there  on  that  date,  either  from  the  roof  or  on  the  walls  of 
that  building? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  there  was  a  slogan,  a  printed  slogan  of  some 
tvpe  or  character  which  said,  "One  Spirit,  One  Bund,  and  One 
Leader"? 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  better  refresh  your  memor}". 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  was  last  year. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  it  was  out  there? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  It  was  last  year  out  of  there;  yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  When  was  the  last  time  the  picture  of  Hitler  was 
up  there?  Wlien  was  the  last  day,  according  to  your  best  recollection, 
that  the  picture  of  Hitler  was  there? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  About  the  4th  of  July  of  this  year. 

Mr.  Tho.mas.  Was  it  up  there  on  the  4th  of  July? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  think  it  was. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Was  it  up  there  on  August  18  of  this  year? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  ThOiMas.  Why  did  you  say  then  it  was  last  year  when  it  was  up 
there  and  not  this  year?     It  was  actually  up  there  this  year,  wasn't  it? 

Wasn't  the  slogan  up  there  on  July  4  of  this  year? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  are  positive  of  that? 


8296  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir;  I  am  positive  of  that. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  say  you  are  positive  on  that? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes;  I  think  I  am  positive  on  that. 

Mr.  Thomas.  But  the  picture  of  Herr  Hitler  was  up  there  on 
July  4  of  this  year? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  think  so. 

Mr.  Thomas.  On  the  other  side  of  the  hall  was  a  small  picture  of 
George  Washington? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Right. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Was  there  a  picture  of  the  President  up  there? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes;  on  the  other  side  of  the  hall  near  the  bar 
was  a  picture  of  the  President. 

Mr.  Thomas.  A  picture  of  President  Roosevelt  near  the  bar? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  are  positive  on  July  4  there  was  a  picture  of 
President  Roosevelt  there? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  am  not  certain  of  that, 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  to  get  this  literally,  the  slogan  translated  is 
"One  Racial  Ancestry,  One  Society,  One  Leader,"  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Right,  for  America. 

Mr.  Starnes.  For  America? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  In  America.    That  hasn't  anything  to  do  with 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  haven't  got  there — you  haven't  got  that  on 
there  though:   "Ein  Folkstom,  Ein  Bund,  Ein  Fuehi-er"? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  means  one  people. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  miderstand  that,  but  who  would  the  one  leader  be 
if  it  was  for  America? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  One  leadership  of  German-Americans  because  we 
have  thousands  of  Germans  and  thousands  of  different  groups  and 
everyone  wants  to  be  the  biggest  one,  so  we  say  "you  are  one  people, 
why  haven't  we  got  one  organization  under  one  leadership  and  you 
get  some  places." 

Mr.TnoMAS.  What  leadership  would  that  be? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  would  be  ourselves. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  said  you  would  get  some  place.  I  wonder 
where  that  would  be? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  You  would  get  political  recognition  and  you 
would  not  be  thrown  out  of  your  jobs  and  you  wouldn't  be  a  second- 
class  citizen  in  this  country. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  anything  said  on  that  occasion  about  certain 
racial  minorities  in  this  country  being  human  insects? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  didn't  hear  anythmg  like  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Mr.  Klapprott,  the  purpose  of  the  bund  is  to  try  to 
get  all  the  Americans  of  German  descent  into  one  organization,  if 
possible,  isn't  that  right? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Right. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  About  how  many  Americans  of  German  descent  are 
there  in  the  United  States  today?  Do  you  estimate  15,000,000  or 
maybe  more? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Of  German  descent? 


UN-AMEKIOAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8297 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Yes;  how  many  people  do  you  consider  would  be 
eligible  to  membership  in  the  bund  under  those  terms  and  under  that 
slogan? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Twenty  million. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  How  many  members  have  you  now? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Mr.  Kunze  stated  yesterday 

Mr.  VooRHis.  And  you  agree  with  his  figures,  which  I  believe  were 
10,000?^ 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Suppose  you  got  all  the  20,000,000  into  one  organi- 
zation would  you  expect  to  dominate  the  other  people  of  the  United 
States  by  that  means? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  We  never  want  to  dominate  anything. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  you  easily  could,  coiddn't  you? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  We  could  if  we  would  have  it  today — we  could 
keep  this  country  out  of  war. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  isn't  what  I  am  asking  about.  I  was  asking 
you  about  the  domination  of  the  United  States,  whether  you  could 
not  dominate  the  United  States  if  you  had  all  the  20,000,000  German- 
Americans  in  one  organization  and  under  one  leadership. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well;  how  could  we  when  there  are  130,000,000 
or  110,000,000  people  in  the  country? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  They  are  not  organized  like  that,  none  of  them? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  The}'^  are. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  And  that  is  the  most  important  point  about  this 
whole  inquiry.  Now,  you  spoke  about  a  boj^cott.  Can  you  give  me 
one  instance  of  a  boycott  against  people  because  they  were  Germans — 
not  because  they  are  members  of  the  bund  or  some  organization,  but 
because  they  are  Germans,  which  occurred  prior  to  tlie  time  of  the 
organization  of  the  Friends  of  New  Germany  in  1934? 

Mr.  Klapprott.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Or  before  1936,  for  that  matter,  of  a  boycott. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  When  the  Anti-Nazi  League 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  was  organized  in  1937? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Or  the  boycott  committee  of  Mr.  Unternieyer 
brought  out  the  first  pamphlets.  The}^  printed  all  the  firms'  names 
who  imported  German  goods. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  When  was  that  done? 

Mr.  Kl.\pprott.  That  was  in  1933  ah-eady,  and  today  they  still 
give  those  pamphlets  out  where  those  firms  are  named  and  they  still 
say  as  m  1933,  that  the  boycott  is  the  moral  substitute  of  war.  In 
other  words,  these  pamphlets  are  in  war  with  Germany  since  1933. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Was  that  movement  organized  in  1933,  Mr.  Klapp- 
rott? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir;  it  was  organized  in  1933. 

Mr.  VooRHLS.  Has  your  organization  ever  conducted  any  boycott 
against  anybody? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Are  you  sure? 

Mr.  Klapprott.   Well,  we  are  self-protecting. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Are  vou  sure  it  never  has? 


8298  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Klappkott.  We  never  advocated  anv  bovcott  ao-ainst  anvoiie 
se. 

Mr  VooRHis.  Not  against  any  German  citizens  who  did  not  co- 
operate with  the  bund?  I  don't  mean  German  citizens,  I  mean 
German-Americans  that  did  not  cooperate  witli  the  bund?  You  never 
bo^vcotted  one  of  tliose? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Nor  you  never  advocated  a  boycott  against  any 
•other  group  of  people? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  are  sure  of  that? 

Air  Klapprott.  But  we  wanted  to  protect  ourselves. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Is  the  membership  of  the  bund,  Mr.  Klapprott, 
composed  of  American  citizens? 

Mr  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Entirely? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Yes.  sir. 

Air.  Voorhis.  Is  that  a  rule  of  the  buud? 

Air.  Klapprott.  It  is  a  rule. 

Air.  Voorhis.  And  yet  yesterday  Air.  Kunze  testified  that  the 
leader  on  the  west  coast  is  not  a  citizen. 

Now,  as  I  understand  Air.  Klapprott's  testunony,  every  single 
member  of  the  German-American  Bund  is  a  citizen  of  the  United 
States,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  right. 

Air.  Starnes.  Alay  I  interpose  here  for  a  moment? 

Air.  Voorhis.  Yes. 

Air.  Starnes.  When  did  that  rule  go  into  force  and  effect? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  When  the  bund  was  formed  from  the  Friends  of 
New  Gennany,  in  the  national  convention  in  1936  in  Buffalo,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  since  1936  you  have  had  no  ahens  in  the  bund? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Since  that  date  you  have  not  accepted  anybody  for 
membership  who  is  not  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  right. 

Air.  Starnes.  Is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Air.  Klapprott,  what  is  the  relationship  between  your 
organization  and  the  Deutscher  Konsum  Verband?  Is  there  any  con- 
nection between  the  two? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Insofar  as  the  German-American  Bund  is  buying 
from  those  people  and  supports  them. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Is  this  an  affiliate  of  the  German-American  Bund  or  a 
subsidiary  of  the  German -American  Bund? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  would  not  want  to  say  whether  it  is  an  affiliate 
or  subsidiary.  I  don't  know.  It  is  strictly  a  business  matter;  but  it 
is  supported  by  the  German- American  Bund. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  In  other  words  if  a  store  or  somebody  like  that  did 
not  cooperate  with  the  work  of  the  bund  they  probably  wouldn't  have 
their  name  in  there,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  would  not  say  that,  no. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8299 

Mr.  \c)c)Riiis.  Isn't  that  llie  case? 

Mr.  Klai'I'Kott.  If  a  businessman  cares  to  have  the  l)usiness  and 
support  from  members  and  sympathizers  of  th(>  Germ  an -Am  eric  an 
Bund  then  he  puts  his  name  in  tliere. 

Mr.  \'ooKnis.  Just  one  or  tAvo  more  (luesLit)ns.  Have  you  in  tlie 
bund  withni  the  last  year  we  will  say,  have  you  hatl  any  organization 
within  the  bund  which  carried  on  various  types  of  military  (h-ills  and 
disciplinary  activities  at  one  time  or  another  within  the  last  12 
months? 

Air.  Klappeott.  \^'ell,  -we  have  the  order  division  but  tliey  ar(^  not 
on  militarv  duty,  as  you  call  it. 

Mr.  \  ooimis.  Aren't  they  under  military  type  of  discipline?  Don't 
they  have  duties  that  are  very  similai-,  to  say  the  least,  to  military 
duties? 

Mr.  IvLAPPROTr.  No. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  might  be  a  matter  of  opinion,  might  it  not? 

Mr.  Klapprott.   1  don't  want  to  quarrel  with  your  ideas. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  all  right,  we  will  let  it  go  at  that. 

Would  you  rent  Camp  Nordland  to  any  group  of  loyal  American 
citizens  that  asked  for  it  on  the  same  basis  you  rented  it  to  the  Klan? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  think  I  would. 

Mr.  Yoorhis.  You  would? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Air.  Thomas.  Alay  I  ask  a  question  there? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Yes. 

Air.  Thomas.  I  would  like  to  know  Air.  Klapprott,  whether  yoir 
would  rent  Camp  Nordland  to  Jewish  war  veterans? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Yes;  and  when  I  say  "yes"  I  mean  it. 

Air.  VooRHis.  Air.  Klapprott,  have  there  been  any  changes  in  the 
tactics  pursued  by  the  bund  with  regard  to  the  Communist  Party 
since  August  of  1939? 

Air.  Klapprott.  I  don't  thiid<  so. 

Air.  VooRHis.  You  would  know,  wouldn't  you? 

Air.  Klapprott.  Any  changes?  The  changes  may  have  been  that 
the  Communists  don't  attack  us  so  much  any  more  as  they  did,  and  as 
we  are  always  on  the  defensive  we  only  hit  back  those  who  attack  us. 

Air.  VooRHLs.  Well,  I  wasn't  asking  you  what  somebody  else  did. 
I  asked  what  your  tactics  were  about  the  matter.  Have  your  tactics 
changed  any? 

Air.  Klapprott.  The  tactics  again-st  or  about  what? 

Air.  Yoorhls.  The  Communist  Party  or  Communist  groups  wher- 
ever you  find  them. 

Air.  Klapprott.  We  fought  communism  already  from  childhood  up 
and  I  don  t  think  I  changed  my  idea  about  communism. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  did  not  ask  you  whether  you  changed  your  attitude. 
1  asked  you  whether  the  tactics  of  the  German-Annu'ican  Bund  with 
regard  to  the  Comnnunsts  aiul  Comnuniist  groups  have  cliangedi 
since  August   1939.      Now.  have  they  or  have  they  not? 

Air.  Klapprott.   1   don't    think  so — i   don't   see  any  change. 

Air.  Yoorhis.  But  you  would  know  whether  they  had  or  not. 


8300  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Still  fight  the  same  Communist  enemies  as  we 
did  from  the  beginning. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  in  this  country  you  don't  have  the  actual  physical 
combat  between  groups  of  bundsmen  and  its  sympathizers,  with  the 
Communists  that  you  once  had? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  We  never  tried  to  physically  combat  communism. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  never  had  any  physical  contact  at  all  with 
Communists  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Oh,  yes;  but  not  that  we  went  to  the  Communists; 
the  Communists  came  to  us. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Then  that  tactic  has  changed? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  they  don't  come  any  more,  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  say,  they  don't  come  any  more? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  right.  They  don't  attack  us  any  more 
bodily. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  therefore  you  don't  defend  yourselves  any  more 
by  hitting  them  back? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  How  could  we?  How  could  we  if  we  go  to  their 
meetings?  That  would  be  un-American.  If  we  go  to  somebody 
else's  meeting  we  are  un-American  and  that  is  no  good. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  mean  to  say  the  members  of  the  bund  never 
went  to  other  people's  meetings? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Never  did, 

Mr.  VooRHis.  They  did  not? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  They  never  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Let  me  ask  you  this  as  one  of  the  leaders  of  the 
bund:  Have  you  sought  during  the  past  12  months,  or  since  you  have 
been  giving  your  time  solely  and  wholly  to  the  bund,  have  you  sought 
the  cooperation  of  other  groups  of  American  citizens — I  will  say 
other  racial  stocks  or  groups  who  do  not  feature  race  as  a  part  of 
their  program?  In  other  words,  have  you  sought  any  agreement 
with  the  Klan  or  the  Protestant  War  Veterans  of  America  and  groups 
of  that  type  and  character? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  sought  to  find  a  leader  in  common  with 
other  groups  in  this  country?  Have  you  been  seeking  for  a  leader 
during  the  past  12  months?  That  was  testified  to  by  bund  leaders 
last  year.  They  testified  having  talked  to  certain  American  citizens 
and  meeting  with  certain  groups  of  American  citizens  and  approaching 
distinguished  Army  officers  and-  other  men  with  a  view  to  obtaining 
someone  for  that  leadership? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  never  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  am  not  asking  you  if  you  did.  I  am  askmg  you  is 
it  the  policy  of  the  bund  any  longer  to  do  that? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  I  don't  know  anything  about  that,  no. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  did  not  attend  any  of  the  meetings  that  Mr. 
Kuhn  and  others  testified  about  last  year,  that  were  held  here  in 
Newark  and  New  York  area  and  along  the  Pacific  coast,  m  which 
they  were  seeking  a  union  of  forces  in  this  country  who  had  the 
same  ideals? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  know  anything  about  those. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8301 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  don't  know  anything  about  that? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  Mr.  Thomas. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Klapprott,  who  are  the  trustees  of  Camn 
Nordland?  ^ 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Those  trustees  are  all  filed  with  the  State  clerk 
in  Trenton. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  may  be  so  but  I  am  asking  you  now  who  the 
trustees  are. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  I  wish  to  state  that  in  confidence  to  you; 
otherwise  these  people  are  smeared  through  the  press  again. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  if  it  is  filed  in  Trenton  it  is  public  anyway, 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  let  them  look  them  up. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Nevertheless  they  are  smeared  or  not  smeared 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  a  pertinent  inquiry  and  you  will  have  to 
answer  the  question.  Those  articles  are  on  file  and  are  a  part  of  the 
public  record.  Any  citizen  of  America  can  go  into  the  repository 
where  these  papers  are  kept  and  ascertain  who  they  are.  That  same 
privilege  is  open  to  the  press  if  they  wanted  that  information. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  My  impression  is  that  the  names  are  in  the  record 
as  of  yesterday. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  are. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Not  exactly. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  but  two  were  identified  yesterday.  I  read  the 
list  to  Mr.  Kunze  yesterday  and  he  identified  either  four  or  five. 
You  can  ask  him  about  the  list  if  you  have  the  list  there  and  you  may 
question  him  about  it. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Is  Walter  Kohler  a  trustee? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Mathias  Kohler, 

Mr.  Thomas.  Is  Richard  Schiele  a  trustee? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Is  Carl  Schipphorst  a  trustee? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Klapprott,  now  who  are  the  owners  of  the  cot- 
tages at  Camp  Nordland? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  decline  from  telling  here  in  this  court  the  names 
just  so  they  can  be  published  in  the  newspapers  again,  who  the  owners 
of  those  cottages  are. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Will  you  submit  a  list  to  the  committee  of  the  owners 
of  the  cottages? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  If  you  promise  to  keep  them  secret. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Never  mind  any  promises.  I  want  to  know  whether 
you  will  submit  a  list  or  not. 

Mr,  Keegan.  I  think  if  the  chairman  will  guarantee  against  unfair 
publication  of  the  list. 

Mr.  Starnes.  If  you  will  submit  a  list  of  those  for  the  committee's 
files  that  will  be  sufficient. 

Mr.  Keegan.  Thank  you. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Klapprott,  what  was  the  revenue  of  Camp  Nord- 
land in  1938? 


8302  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Klapprott.  You  mean  the  gross  income? 

Mr.  Thomas.  Receipts,  gross  income;  yes. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  For  tlie  camp  or  for  the  business,  you  mean? 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  I  mean — I  don't  know  the  exact  difference 
between  the  business  and  the  camp,  but  I  mean  the  revenue  taken 
in  at  Camp  Nordland — receipts  from  the  sale  of  beverages  and  all 
that  sort  of  thmg. 

Mr.  IvLAPPROTT.  About  $40,000  plus. 

Mr.  Thomas.  \Vliat  do  you  estimate  to  be  the  revenue  of  Camp 
Nordland  in  1940? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Must  have  been  for  the  camp,  four  or  five  thou- 
sand, that  is  about  all. 

Mr.  Thomas.  So  in  1938  it  was  approximately  $40,000  and  now  it 
is  approximately  $4,000  or  $5,000? 

Mr.  Klapprott.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  ever  been  to  the  German-American  camp 
at  Midvale — I  have  just  forgotten  the  name  of  it. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  attended  meetings  at  any  other  German- 
American  camps  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  said  before  you  had  four  units  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  tell  the  committee  where  the  locations  of 
those  four  units  are? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  In  Newark,  Hudson  County. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Wliat  is  the  address  m  Newark? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  They  have  no  meetings  any  more. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  have  you  a  unit  in  Newark? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Only  loose  members — they  can't  get  any  hold. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  do  they  meet  any  place  in  Newark? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No;  can't  meet  any  place. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Don't  meet  in  anyone's  home  or  anything  like  that? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  So  then  actually  there  is  no  unit  m  Newark,  is  that 
right? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Only  those  loose  members  who  come  up  to  Camp 
Nordland,  but  that  is  all  they  can  do. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Now,  you  say  you  have  a  unit  in  Hudson  County. 
Wliere  is  that  located? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  The  same  condition.  It  used  to  be  in  the  City 
Hall  Tavern  in  Union  City.     It  is  not  active  now. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  no  meeting  place  now? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Where  is  the  other? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Bergen  County. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Where  is  the  meeting  place? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Same  condition. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Where  was  it  before? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  They  met  in  Mrs.  Kuhn's  place. 


UN-AMERICAN  PUOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8303^ 

Mr.  Thomas.  Caroline  Meade's  lately? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  seen  Caroline  Meade  lately? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  When  was  the  last  time  you  saw  her? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  The  end  of  December  last  year. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  was  out  at  Camp  Nordland? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No;  in  New  York. 

Mr.  Thomas.  How  did  you  happen  to  select  Andover  Township 
as  the  site  for  your  camp? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  somebodj^  heard  that  there  was  a  place 
for  sale.  We  were  looking  for  a  summer  recreation  place.  Then 
we  got  in  touch  with  the  owner  and  we  bought  the  place. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  was  in  1934  or  1936? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  was  in  the  fall  of  1936  when  we  first  started 
to  look  for  a  place. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  will  3'ou  give  the  committee  the  location  of  it 
in  Andover  Township — where  it  is  located? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Sussex  County. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  it  is  located  about  how  many  miles  from  Dover? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  About  12  miles. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  about  how  many  miles  from  Pompton  Lakes? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  know  exactly.     I  never  go  that  way. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  would  you  say  maybe  15  miles  or  20  miles? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  It  is  about  that. 

Mr.  Thomas.  About  20  miles? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  How  many  miles  from  Winocki? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  ^^Tlere  is  that? 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  halfway  between  Camp  Nordland  and  Pomp- 
ton  Lakes. 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  know  the  town. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Camp  Nordland  is  how  far  from  Lake  Patna? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  About  7  or  8  miles. 

Mr.  Thomas.  How  many  miles  from  Warton? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  know  the  town. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  said  before  that  the  German-American  Bund 
was  a  political  organization,  that  is  correct,  isn't  it? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Not  entirely  political — cultural  and  educational. 

Mr.  Thomas.  It  is  m  part  a  political  organization? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Part  political  and  part  educational. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  made  a  declaration  of  receipts  and  ex- 
penditures to  the  Secretary  of  State? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Are  you  talking  about  the  German-American 
Bund  Auxiliary? 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  am  talking  about  the  thing  that  you  said  was  a 
political  organization.  You  said  the  German-American  Bund  was  in 
part  a  pohtical  organization,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  The  bund ;  yes. 


62626— 41— vol.  14 10 


8304  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  made  any  declaration  to  the  Secretary 
of  State  of  receipts  or  expenditures? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  know  anything  about  that.  That  would 
be  the  national  headquarters  to  do  that. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  checked  up  with  yoiu*  attorney  at  any 
time  as  to  whether  you  should,  under  the  law,  make  any  declaration? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  up  to  the  legal  department,  I  guess. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  a  membership  list? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  haven't  a  membership  list? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  When  members  pay  their  dues  what  do  you  do? 
Give  them  a  receipt? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  laiow  how  they  do  it. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  don't  know  how  it  is  done? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  never  collected  any  dues.  I  never  did  collect 
a  penny  of  dues. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  you  are  the  head  of  the  eastern  department  of 
the  German-American  Bund,  aren't  you? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  correct. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  you  are  familiar  with  the  organization? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  know  whether  the  treasurer  gives  a  receipt 
or  not  when  he  accepts  dues? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  think  so.  He  gives  them  stamps  which 
go  in  the  book. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  has  he  a  membersliip  list? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  think  he  has. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Does  any  officer  of  the  German-American  Bund  have 
a  membership  list? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No  ;  as  much  as  I  know  nobody  is  allowed  to  carry 
any  list. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  was  a  result  of  an  order  handed  down  by  Fritz 
Kuhn  a  few  years  ago? 

Mr.  Klapprott.    Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  have  a  mailing  list? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  haven't  got  any. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Did  you  have  a  mailing  list? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  We  did  in  the  first  years  I  know,  but  no  one  has 
now — I  don't  think  we  have. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  say  there  are  about  500  members  of  the  bund  in 
New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  my  estimation. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Would  you  know  all  of  them  by  sight? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  that  is  impossible. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  would  not  know  them  by  sight? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  you  would  not  know  them  by  name  either? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No,  couldn't  know  them  by  name. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  know  where  they  are  all  employed? 


IN-AMEUICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8305 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  what  I  don't  know  at  all. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  that  is  what  you  don't  want  to  know? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  your  conclusion. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Is  one  of  the  purposes  of  the  German-American 
Bund  to  keep  this  country  out  of  war? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  One  of  the  main  purposes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  One  of  your  main  purposes  is  to  keep  this  country 
out  of  war? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Before  in  response  to  some  questions  put  to  you  by 
Mr.  Voorhis  in  relation  to  communism,  and  I  think  in  connection  with 
some  other  testimony  given  to  this  committee,  I  got  the  idea  that  at 
one  time  the  Germ  an- American  Bund  was  active  in  combating  com- 
munism, is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  And  still  today. 

Mr.  Thomas.  It  is  still  active  today? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  what  active  steps  are  you  taking  today  to 
combat  communism? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  wherever  we  have  a  chance  to  have  a  meet- 
ing yet  we  talk  about  the  danger  of  Communist  philosophy  and  give  a 
certain  educational  program  to  combat  communism  as  a  philosophy 
of  life.  As  I  stated  before,  in  the  first  years  communism  triecl  to 
attack  our  meetings  all  the  time,  and  then  out  of  that  also  the  order 
division  got  in  existence  so  we  could  identify  our  men  from  others. 
That  was  the  original  creation  of  the  order  division  in  the  bund. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Are  you  as  active  in  combating  communism  today  as 
you  were  in  1938? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  We  are.  We  still  are  against  the  philosophy  of 
communism  as  we  were  before. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  combat  communism  today  as  you  did  in  1938? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  We  do. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Is  your  press  still  combating  it  in  the  same  way? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  We  do  as  much  as 

Mr.  Thomas.  Your  newspapers,  yes,  but  are  your  newspapers  com- 
bating it  the  same  way  as  they  did  in  1938? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  say  they  do? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  said  they  do;  yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  know  Adolf  Bauer? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No;  I  don't  know  him. 

Mr.  Thomas.  He  is  active  out  there  at  Camp  Nordland,  isn't  he? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  might  know  him. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Adolf  Bauer.  I  don't  know  exactly  how  to  spell  the 
name,  whether  it  is  B-o-w-e-r  or  B-a-u-e-r.  Do  you  know  any  per- 
son by  that  name? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  know  him.  I  might  know  him  when  I 
see  him. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  know  Otto  Bauer? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 


8306  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Thomas.  As  I  imderstand  you  have  no  liquor  license  out  there 
now  at  all? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Is  beer  sold  on  the  premises  now? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Is  beer  given  away  on  the  premises? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  there  are  some  who  want  to  buy  one  for 
himself.     He  buys  one  and  then  drinks  it. 

Air.  Thomas.  You  mean  someone  can  buy  beer  there  now? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  care  whether  someone  buys  beer  or  not. 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  may  ask — I  know  you  may  not  care  but  what  I  am 
trying  to  find  out  is,  can  a  person  go  there  and  buy  beer? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Can't  buy  beer? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Beer  is  distributed  there,  isn't  it? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  know  anything  about  that  either. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  know  that  someone  goes  into  Camp  Nordland 
they  can  buy  a  ticket  for  a  dollar? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  We  will  consider  the  meeting  of  July  4  or  the  meet- 
ing of  August  18;  weren't  tickets  distributed  to  people  who  attended 
Camp  Nordland,  who  paid  a  dollar  for  those  tickets? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Not  that  I  know  of. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  don't  know  of  any  tickets  sold  or  distributed 
for  the  price  of  a  dollar  on  either  one  of  those  days? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  For  any  purpose  wliatsoever? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  No. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  If  a  person  were  present  at  that  camp  on  either  July 
4  or  August  18  and  contributed  a  dollar  upon  solicitation,  to  the 
defense  fund  of  Fritz  Kulin,  would  he  be  given  the  right  to  drink  beer 
there  on  the  grounds? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Not  that  I  know  of. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Would  he  be  given  some  receipt  or  ticket  that  would 
entitle  him  to  drink  beer  on  the  grounds  and  be  served  beer  on  the 
grounds? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  This  is  very  new  to  me. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Very  new  to  you?  All  right,  your  organization  as  an 
organization  and  as  part  of  the  national  policy,  opposed  the  passage 
of  the  Selective  Service  Act,  did  it  not? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  think  we  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  didn't?  Did  you  oppose  as  a  policy  of  your 
organization,  and  I  want  you  to  be  very  careful  about  this,  the  pas- 
sage of  the  act  giving  the  President  of  the  United  States  the  authority 
to  order  the  National  Guard  into  service  for  one  year's  peacetime 
training? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  was  a  bill  in  Congress. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes;  I  am  talking  about  congressional  bills.  First, 
did  the  bund  as  an  organization  and  as  a  part  of  its  policy  oppose  the 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8307 

passao:o  of  tho  bill  by  Congress  which  authorized  Ibo  Prosidcnt  of  the 
United  States  to  order  the  National  Guard  of  the  United  States  into 
sers^ice  for  1  year's  peacetime  training? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  We,  as  much  as  1  know,  we  always  against  the 
President  ordering  things.  We  were  always  for  Congress  should 
decide  on  questions  like  that. 

Mr.  Staknes.  In  other  words,  you  oppose  giving  the  President  any 
authority  to  order  out  the  guard? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  you  would  not  insist,  would  you,  that  the 
Reichstag  in  Germany  should  have  the  authority  to  veto  the  acts  of 
the  fuehrer? 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  will  ask  you  if  it  was  tlie  policy  of  the  bund  as  a 
national  organization,  to  oppose  the  passage  of  the  Selective  Service 
Act  by  the  Congress  during  the  past  month? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  I  would  have  to  look  into  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  you  might  have  called  it  "the  conscription 
bill."     Did  you  oppose  the  passage  of  the  conscription  bill? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  think  we  did;  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Isn't  it  a  fact  that  you  did  do  so  editorially  in  your 
publication  and  that  the  organization  was  active  in  its  figlit  against 
the  passage  of  that  bill? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  Well,  only  with  the  newspaper,  I  guess. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Hasn't  the  bund  as  a  part  of  its  policy  opposed  the 
defense  preparations  of  this  country  during  the  i)ast   12  months? 

Mr.  Klapprott.  I  don't  think  so. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  all  I  have  to  ask. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  all;  you  may  be  excused. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Barker,  who  will  be  vour  next  witness? 

Mr.  Barker.  Mr.  Arthur  H.  Bell. 

TESTIMONY    OF    ARTHUR    H.    BELL,    ORGANIZER    FOR    THE    KU 

KLUX  KLAN 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand. 
Do  you  solemnl}^  swear  to  tell  the  truth,  the  whole  truth  and  nothing 
but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Bell.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Give  us  your  full  name  and  vour  address,  please? 

Mr.  Bell.  Arthur  H.  Bell,  Bloomfield,  N.  J. 

Mr.  Starnes.  WTiat  is  your  profession  or  vocation? 

Mr.  Bell.  At  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Bell.  I  am  an  organizer  for  the  Klan, 

Mr.  Starnes.  At  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Bell.  Yes,  until  3  weeks  ago. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  positions  have  you  held  in  the  Klan  other  than 
^n  organizer? 


8308  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Bell.  I  was  grand  dragon  for  the  State  of  New  Jersey,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  the  chief  office? 

Mr.  Bell.  That  is  so. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  the  chief  presiding  officer  of  the  Klan  in 
this  State? 

Mr.  Bell.  Yes,  su*. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  were  such  on  the  18th  of  August  of  this 
year? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  beg  your  pardon? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  the  truth? 

Mr.  Bell.  That  is  the  truth. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  were  you  grand  dragon? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  was  grand  dragon  from  1933  to  1934. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  position  did  you  hold  in  the  Klau  from  1934 
to  this  time? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  held  no  position  in  the  Klan  until  2  years  ago. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  position  did  you  hold  then? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  went  in  business  for  myself. 

Mr.  Starnes,  In  other  words,  prior  to  that  time,  prior  to  the  t'me 
you  went  in  business  for  yourself  you  were  working  for  the  Klan? 

Mr.  Bell.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  An  employee  of  the  Klan? 

Mr.  Bell.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  received  your  remuneration  from   them? 

Mr.  Bell.  Correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  have  you  been  a  member  of  the  Klan? 

Mr.  Bell.  Since  1920.  ^ 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  members,  approximately,  in  the  lOan,  do 
you  have  at  the  present  time  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Bell.  At  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Bell.  I  could  not  give  you  an  idea.  When  I  was  grand  dragon 
I  could  have  told  you. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wlio  is  the  grand  dragon  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Bell.  Samuel  G.  Stout  III,  of  Philadelphia. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  idea  how  many  posts  or  local  units 
or  branches  of  the  Klan  there  is? 

Mr.  Bell.  As  an  offhand  guess  I  would  say  about  35. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  the  State? 

Mr.  Bell.  That  is  a  guess,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  understand.  We  are  just  merely  getting  an  approxi- 
mation and  there  is  no  criticism  of  you. 

Mr.  Bell.  Not  being  the  grand  dragon  I  have  no  knowledge  of  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  was  the  membership  of  the  Klan — can  you 
give  us  some  approximation  of  the  size  of  the  units  so  we  can  get  some 
sort  of  approximation  of  the  membership? 

Mr.  Bell.  You  mean  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PKOl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8309 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir;  not  being  in  charge  of  the  meetings  I  don't  know- 
any  thing  about  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  At  the  time  you  were  grand  dragon  what  was  its 
membership  in  the  State? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  would  say  about  300,000. 

Mr.  Starnes.  About  300,000  in  the  State? 

Mr.  Bell.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  was  the  peak  membership? 

Mr,  Bell.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  present  at  the  meeting  that  was  held  on 
August  18th  at  Camp  Nordland? 

\h\  Bell.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  speak  on  that  occasion? 

Mr.  Bell.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  one  of  the  officers  of  the  Klan  who  made 
arrangements  with  Mr.  Klapprott  for  the  use  of  Camp  Nordland  on 
that  occasion? 

Mr.  Bell.  (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words,  did  you  take  any  part  in  the  negotia- 
tions or  conversations  leading  up  to  the  use  of  Camp  Nordland  by  the 
Klan? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  meant  Mr.  Klapprott — I  mean  I  met  Mr.  Klapprott 
once  prior  to  that  date,  at  wdiicli  time  the  thought  was  brought  and 
it  was  more  or  less  agreed  upon,  that  we  meet  there. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  led  to  that  meeting? 

Mr.  Bell.  The  thought  was  brought  to  me  by  another  member 
of  our  organization  that  it  would  be  a  good  idea  to  go  to  a  place 
where  there  was  supposed  to  be  no  Americans  and  speak  on  Ameri- 
canism to  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  did  vou  expect  to  find  such  a  place  at  Camp 
Nordland? 

Mr.  Bell.  Well,  that  was  the  understandmg,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  there  wouldn't  be  any  Americans  there? 

Mr.  Bell.  They  were  hyphenated  Americans. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  were  going  to  put  on  Americanization 
program,  is  that  the  idea? 

Mr.  Bell.  That  is  the  idea,  yes,  that  I  understood,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  there  anything  said  at  all  in  the  negotiations 
about  the  aims  and  purposes  of  the  two  organizations  being  one? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  anything  of  a  movement  that  has  been 
under  way  during  the  past  year  or  18  months  or  any  time  during  that 
period,  by  leaders  of  certain  groups  to  unite  these  groups  into  one 
organization  or  to  place  them  behind  one  program  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  have  never  heard  anything  about  it.  I  know  nothing 
about  any  other  organization  excepting  the  Klan  and,  of  course,  w^hat 
I  met  with 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  never  had  any  dealings  with  the  officials  of 
the  Knights  of  the  White  Camellia? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Or  the  Silver  Shirts? 


8310  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Pelley's  organization? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  heard  of  them  through  the  press  but  know  nothing 
about  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  never  participated  in  any  form,  shape  or  man- 
ner in  an  effort  to  bring  about  leadership  behind  one  group  in  this 
country  or  behind  one  program? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  are  the  professed  purposes  of  the  Klan  now, 
briefly  stated  and  no  speech? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir.  I  would  like — do  you  want  me  to  put  that  in, 
sir,  or  do  you  want  me  to  just  speak  about  it? 

Mr.  Starnes.  If  it  is  brief. 

Mr.  Bell.  This  is  why  I  joined  the  Klan.  I  was  handed  one  of 
these  and  it  appealed  to  me:  Believing  in  the  tenets  of  the  Christian 
religion,  white  supremacy,  protection  of  womanhood,  just  laws,  the 
pursuit  of  happiness,  closer  relationship  of  purer  Americanism ;  the 
upholding  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  the  sovereignty 
of  our  State  rights,  separation  of  church  and  State,  freedom  of  speech 
and  press ;  the  relationship  between  capital  and  labor,  or  the  preserva- 
tion of  the  cause  of  mob  violence  and  lynchings,  preventing  of 
unwarranted  strikes  by  foreign  labor  agitators;  prevention  of  fires 
and  destruction  of  property  by  lawless  elements;  the  limitation  of 
foreign  immigration;  much  needed  local  reforms  and  laws  and  order. 
That  appealed  to  me,  sir,  and  that  is  what  the  Klan  stands  for. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  said  that  the  peak  membership  of  the  Klan 
when  you  were  grand  dragon  in  this  State,  was  probably  300,000,  is 
that  correct? 

Mr.  Bell.  That  is  my  estimation.  Of  course,  that  is  a  long  time 
ago.     I  could  not  give  you  the  actual  figures. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Would  you  say  that  many  at  the  present  time,  judg- 
ing from  your  experience  and  your  contact  with  the  Klan  and  your 
work  as  an  organizer  of  the  Klan,  going  about  over  the  State,  woidd 
you  say  your  membership  is  that  strong  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Would  you  say  it  was  half  that  number? 

Mr.  Bell.  Well,  you  are  asking  me  something  that  I  cannot  answer. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  understand  that. 

Mr.  Bell,  I  will  tell  you  the  reason  I  can't  answer  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  at  the  same  time  I  would  like  to  have  some 
approximation. 

Mr.  Bell.  The  reason  I  can't  answer  it  is  I  know  nothing  about 
the  southern  end  of  the  State. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  about  the  strength  of  the  northern  end  of  the 
State  as  compared  to  former  years? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  would  say  it  is  about  one-fom'th.  That  is  roughly 
guessing. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliere  was  your  membership,  most  of  it,  formerly 
located  when  you  were  grand  dragon  and  you  were  familiar  with  the 
approximate  strength  of  the  Klan? 

Mr.  Bell.  Where  was  it  located,  sir? 


UN-AMEIilCAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8311 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Bell.  All  over  the  State. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  idea  what  the  membership  of  the 
Klan  was  at  its  height  throuiihout  the  country? 

Mr.  Bell.  The  national  Klan? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  su\ 

Mr.  Starnes.  At  this  meeting  out  here  on  August  18,  was  that  the 
only  time  that  the  Klan  had  met  at  Camp  Nordland?  Was  that  the 
fij-st  and  onh'  tmie  it  ever  met  at  Camp  Nordland? 

Mr.  Bell.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you,  in  the  course  of  your  remarks,  make  any 
reference  to  the  fact  that  it  was  possible  to  criticize  or  talk  as  you 
pleased,  as  an  American  citizen,  about  any  particular  group,  racial 
or  religious  or  otherwise,  in  this  country  save  one,  but  there  was  one 
minority  in  this  country  you  would  be  violently  criticized  for  if  you 
said  anything  critical  of? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  heard  you  put  the  question  and  I  was  trying  to  remem- 
ber whether  I  said  anything  like  that  or  not.  I  might  have  mentioned 
something  casually  that  way. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  recall  saying  something  to  the  effect  there 
w^as  a  minority  in  this  country  which  apparently  had  control  of  the 
press? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  the  moving-picture  industry? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  financial  affairs  of  the  nation? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  did  not  make  that  statement? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  you  might  have  said  something  to  the  effect 
that  you  could  discuss  and  criticize  any  other  racial  group  and  any 
other  organization  in  this  country  save  one  racial  minority? 

Mr.  Bell.  It  is  true  I  might  have  said  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  see  the  picture  of  Adolf  Hitler  being  dis- 
played anywhere  within  the  confines  of  that  camp  at  the  time  you 
were  there? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir;  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  that  the  only  visit  you  ever  made  out  there? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  have  never  been  there  except  that  day. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  go  through  this  so-called  dance  hall? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  was  in  there  and  had  something  to  eat. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  there  a  dance  hall  there? 

Mr.  Bell.  There  is  a  floor  space  about,  I  would  say,  about  as  large 
as  this  auditorium  here,  with  tables  and  seats  around  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  WTiat  was  the  date  of  that  meeting? 

Mr.  Bell.  August  18. 

^Ir.  Starnes.  ^Yliat  have  been  the  activities  of  the  Klan  in  this 
State? 

Mr.  Bell.  In  which  way,  sir?     Will  you  put  the  question  again? 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  said,  what  have  been  the  programs  of  the  Elian  in 
this  State? 


8312  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Bell.  To  unite  the  people  of  the  Protestant  faith  in  the  or- 
ganization of  Americanism;  to  teach  Americanism  where  we  could 
to  try  to  discourage  hyphenated  Americanism  and  to  build  up  a  closer 
relationship  of  Christian  men  and  women. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  engaged  in  any  drills  or  formations  as  an 
organization,  of  any  type  or  character? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  partook  of  the  nature  of  military  drills? 

Mr.  Bell.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  worn  masks  or  robes  which  would  disguise 
your  identity? 

Mr.  Bell.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  done  that? 

Mr.  Bell.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Why  do  you  feel  it  is  necessary  to  do  a  thing  like 
that? 

Mr.  Bell.  Sir,  that  was  a  part  of  the  ritualistic  regalia  when  I 
went  into  the  organization.  It  is  simply  a  symbol — a  symbol  of 
secrecy,  the  same  as  any  other  organization,  without  mentioning  any 
names.  They  have  their  secrets  and  symbols  of  secrecy.  However, 
that  has  been  changed.  They  do  not  wear  the  visor  any  longer. 
That  is  not  allowed  by  the  order  of  the  imperial  wizard.  The  visor 
is  not  allowed  on  the  order  of  the  imperial  wizard. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  since  the  visor  is  not  allowed? 

Mr.  Bell.  In  other  words,  the  members  of  the  klan  still  wear 
their  robes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Their  robes  and  helmet? 

Mr.  Bell.  The  robes  and  helmets  but  the  visors  have  been  removed. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Mr.  Bell,  did  you  tell  the  leaders  of  the  German- 
American  Bund  that  you  were  going  out  there  because  you  thought 
there  were  not  any  Americans  there  and  you  wanted  to  Americanize 
them? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  did  not  say  that  to  anybody.  I  think  that  thought 
was  given  by  the  men  who  made  the  original  arrangements. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  thought  that  was  your  testimony  in  answer  to 
Mr.  Starnes'  question. 

Mr.  Bell.  He  asked  me  why  I  agreed  to  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Well,  do  you  think  it  was  wise  to  hold  the  meeting 
there? 

Mr.  Bell.  I  did  then;  I  don't  now. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Are  there  any  groups  of  people  or  individuals  who 
are  excluded  from  membership  in  the  Klan? 

Mr.  Bell.  Excluded? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Yes. 

Mr.  Bell.  Not  by  the  Klan  itself.  It  is  a  Christian  organization, 
«ir,  so  therefore  Hebrews  do  not  join  it.  It  is  a  Protestant  organiza- 
tion, so  therefore  Catholics  do  not  join  it. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  They  can't  join  it? 

Mr.  Bell.  If  the  church  allows  them  I  understand  they  can.  But 
it  is  also  my  understanding  that  the  Catholic  Church  does  not  permit 
its  members  to  join  anything  not  controlled  by  the  church.     I  am 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8313 

not  a  Catholic  and  I  know  I  can't  join  the  CathoHc  Church.  This 
hoins:  a  white  or<2;anization  the  NeQ:roes  are  naturally  excluded. 

I  think  they  have  org-anizations  that  I  can't  join. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  it  is  your  judgment  that  it  is  helpful  to  the 
country  to  have  different  groups  organized  in  little  tight  organizations? 

Mr.  Bell.  No. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  And  sometimes  secret. 

Mr.  Bell.  Yes.  Secret  societies — they  have  been  in  existence 
since  the  time  of  King  Solomon. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  asked  you  if  you  think  it  is  good  for  the  country. 

Mr.  Bell.  I  think  so  in  this  way.  I  have  made  statements — I 
have  spoken  in  Negro  churches  and  before  Negro  congregations  and 
before  all  types  of  people  that  don't  belong  to  the  Klan,  and  I  made 
the  statement  we  can  work  with  all  organizations  and  fight  for  Ameri- 
canism as  groups,  working  united  together. 

I  mean  by  that  the  Catholics,  the  Jewish  people  and  the  Negro 
people. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Do  you  attempt  to  cooperate  with  them? 

Mr.  Bell.  Perfectly  willing  to  if  they  are  fighting  for  America. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Any  further  questions,  Mr.  Voorhis? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Thomas,  No  questions. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  CfJl  your  next  witness. 

Mr.  Barker.  Reverend  Young. 

TESTIMONY  OF  REV.  A.  M.  YOUNG,  FORMER  GRAND  KALIFF  OF 
THE  KU  KLUX   KLAN  IN   NEW  JERSEY 

Mr,  Starnes.  Please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand.  Do  you 
solemnly  swear  to  tell  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  3^ou  God? 

Mr.  Young.  I  do, 

Mr.  Starnes.  Give  us  your  full  name  and  address,  please. 

Mr.  Young.  Alton  Monroe  Young,  D.  D.,  Hudson  County,  New 
Jersey. 

Mr,  Starnes.  You  are  a  doctor  of  divinity? 

Mr.  Young.  I  am. 

Mr,  Starnes.  With  an  honorary  degree? 

Mr.  Young.  All  doctors  of  divinity  have  honorary  degrees, 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  other  degrees  honorary  or  other- 
wise? 

Mr.  Young.  None  whatsoever. 

Mr,  Starnes.  Are  you  the  pastor  of  any  church? 

Mr.  Young.  I  haven't  been  for  about  7  years. 

Mr.  Starnes,  How  long  have  you  been  in  the  ministry? 

Mr,  Young,  Forty  years. 

Mr,  Starnes.  Where  were  you  born? 

Mr,  Young,  Texas. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  have  you  been  a  member  of  the  Klan? 

Mr.  Young.  Well,  since,  almost,  the  first  day  it  started  23  years 
ago. 


8314  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  have  you  lived  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr,  Young.  Forty  years. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  joined  the  Klan  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Young.  I  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  your  present  position? 

Mr.  Young.  Klansman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  no  title  of  any  type  or  character? 

Mr.  Young.  I  am  former  grand  kaliff  of  the  State,  which  is  vice 
grand  dragon. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  just  plain,  everj^day  language  that  means  the 
same  as  vice  president  of  a  corporation? 

Mr.  Young.  Vice  president. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  were  you  in  that  position? 

Mr.  Young.  Well,  now,  I  can't  give  you  that  date.  I  was  made 
grand  kaliff  the  day  Mr.  Bell  was  made  grand  dragon  and  I  don't 
quite  remember  the  j^ear.  I  will  have  to  ask  him  to  tell  you  that,  sir. 
I  could  not  tell  you. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  you  in  a  position  or  do  you  loiow  about  what  the 
approximate  membership  of  the  Klan  is  in  the  State  at  the  present 
time? 

Mr.  Young.  There  isn't  any  one,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Don't  you  keep  a  roll  or  record  of  some  sort? 

Mr.  Young.  At  Atlanta,  Ga. 

Mr.  Starnes.  At  Atlanta,  Ga.? 

Mr.  Young.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  would  have  it? 

Mr.  Young.  Atlanta,  Ga.,  has  the  complete  roster  of  the  Ku 
Klux  Klan. 

Mr.  Starnes.  For  the  entire  Nation? 

Mr.  Young.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  don't  have  a  State  organization  or  anything  like 
that  that  keeps  a  record  of  its  own  members? 

Mr.  Young.  Well,  the  Klan  is  not  as  it  w^as  years  ago  and  I  am  not 
really  prepared  to  tell  you  that  for  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  don't  know  anything  about  its  finances  or 
anything  of  that  sort? 

Mr.  Young.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  much  do  vou  pav  annual  dues  to  the  Klan? 

Mr.  Young.  $6. 

Mr.  Starnes.  $6  per  year? 

Mr.  Young.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  is  the  initiation  fee? 

Mr.  Young.  $10. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  heard  the  testimony,  of  course,  of  Mr.  Bell 
with  reference  to  the  wearing  of  robes  and  concealment,  and  so  forth, 
and  so  on? 

Mr.  Young.  I  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  His  statement  was  a  correct  statement  of  the  present 
situation?     The}^  do  wear  the  robes  but  they 

Mr.  Young.  They  have  no  visor. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  visor  is  pulled  back  so  the  face 


Mr.  Young.  It  is  cut  off.     We  are  not  allowed  to  have  it  there^ 
It  was  cut  off  by  the  order  of  the  imperial  wizard ;  and  may  I  add  this, 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8315 

that  if  any  ono  were  oaug-ht  with  somi'thiiis  attached,  permanently 
attached.  th(>y  wouhl  be  banished  from  the  Khm. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  attend  a  meeting  out  here  at  Camp 
Nordhvnd  on  August  IS? 

Air.  Young.  I  did;  I  arranged  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  arranged  the  meeting? 

Mr.  Young.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  ^Vlly  did  you  arrange  that  meeting? 

Mr.  Young.  Well,  I  will  answer  you  for  the  same  reason  why  I 
have  been  in  the  Ku  Klux  Klan  for  23  years. 

Afr.  Starnes.  Just  a  moment,  for  your  information  and  to  be 
])erfectly  fair  with  you  the  committee  has  an  unbroken  rule  we  don't 
permit  the  reading  of  statements. 

Mr.  Young.  I  am  not  reading  tlie  statement.  This  is  something 
I  thought  you  asked  for  about  an  hour  ago  and  I  have  it  here  for  you. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  give  us  briefly  and  in  your  own  words  and 
without  any  attempt  at  making  a  speech,  the  answer  to  my  question — 
be  as  factual  as  you  can. 

Mr.  Young.  It  is  pretty  hard  for  an  old  fool;  why  did  we? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes;  wh}^  did  you  arrange  the  meeting  with  the 
bund? 

Mr.  Young.  I  \W11  tell  you,  Mr.  Chairman,  and  gentlemen  of  the 
committee,  for  the  last  year  and  a  half  we  have  been  bombarding, 
and  I  think  your  Congressman  from  that  district  can  vouch  for  that, 
that  we  have  been  out  all'  hours  of  the  night  and  all  hours  of  the  day 
preaching  against  the  German- American  Bund  and  the  Fascists  and 
all  un-American  or  hyphenated  American  organizations. 

On  the  Fourth  of  Jul}^  I  happened  to  be  one  of  the  speakers  at 
New^foundland  at  a  Klan  rally,  and  then  went  to  a  church  rally — 
the  Methodist  Church.  I  read  the  next  day  of  a  man  by  the  name 
of  Klapprott,  who  I  never  saw  in  my  life  at  that  time,  and  some 
other  men — I  can't  tell  you  their  names,  I  don't  know.  I  know^  I 
met  two  bundsmen — Kunze  and  Klapprott  and  the  thought  came  to 
me,  you  know  I  probably  made  an  awful  fool  of  myself — I  don't 
object  to  that  going  on  the  record.  I  am  an  old  man.  I  am  an  Ameri- 
can and  an\'thing  that  I  have  ever  done  in  my  23  years  with  the  Klan 
has  onlv  been  done  with  one  objective. 

The  thought  came  to  me  if  we  could  only  go  up  there  to  Camp 
Nordland,  invite  all  Klans  people  of  the  State  and  around  the  terri- 
tory and  have  a  great  national  day.  I  went  to  my  superior  officer 
and  I  told  him  of  my  desire.     He  said  it  could  not  be  done. 

He  said:  "You  don't  expect  an  un-American  group  like  that  to 
let  the  Klan  have  its  meeting  ground  when  you  know  we  call  our- 
selves the  No.  1  patriotic  order  of  America,  and  I  still  insist  we  are — 
they  wouhhi't  have  us  there.'' 

"Well,"  I  said:  "Who  do  vou  get  in  touch  with,''  and  he  said: 
"I  don't  know." 

I  learned  through  inquiring  about  where  I  might  get  a  man  who 
was  supposed  to  live  in  Hoboken.  and  that  was  Mr.  Klapprott.  But 
I  learned  he  did  not  live  hi  Hoboken.  I  got  in  touch  with  him  through 
a  paper — I  never  heard  of  it  hi  my  life  before.  I  think  they  call  it 
the  Free  America — the  Free  American.  I  think  that  is  the  name  of  it. 


8316  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

I  called  up  and  asked  for  the  man  who  had  charge  of  New  Jersey  and 
the  lady  wanted  to  know  who  I  was  and  what  I  wanted  and  so  forth. 

I  said  that  I  happened  to  represent  the  Ku  Klux  Klan  and  I  wanted 
to  talk  about  the  property  for  a  meeting.  Very  shortly  a  gentlemen 
got  on  the  phone  and  said  his  name  was  Mr.  Klapprott  and  I  told 
him — I  told  him  what  we  wanted  and  he  said:  "Well,  I  can't  make 
any  decision  as  to  that." 

As  a  matter  of  fact  I  rather  felt  he  was  doubtful  that  it  could  be 
held  there.  He  said  he  would  have  to  take  that  up  with  the  board, 
and  he  said:  "You  will  have  to  come  to  me  and  you  will  have  to  tell 
us  why  you  want  this  meeting  and  we  would  want  to  know  whether 
you  were  going  to  openly  attack  us  or  not." 

I  said:  "Well,  we  are  gomg  to  attack,  I  can  tell  you  now,  any 
group  or  any  mdividual  whom  we  consider  is  out  of  harmony  with  the 
United  States  of  America." 

So  we  met — to  tell  you  the  house  I  don't  know,  it  was  somewhere 
in  Union  City.  I  could  take  you  there  but  I  don't  know  the  number. 
I  met  Mr.  Klapprott  and  Mr.  Kunze.  I  think  that  is  the  head  of  it. 
He  was  here  yesterday.  They  asked  me  why  we  wanted  to  visit 
their  camp. 

"Well,"  I  said:  "It  isn't  a  matter  of  visiting  your  camp;  it  is  a 
matter  of  putting  on  an  Americanization  program." 

I  told  Mr.  Klapprott,  and  I  am  sure  he  will  bear  me  out  in  this, 
I  said:  "If  you  can  take  the  dishing  out  of  our  Americanism  that  we 
will  give  you  well  then  I  don't  think  you"  are  such  bad  Americans, 
but  I  don't  know  whether  you  can  nor  can't." 

There  was  only  one  thing  that  he  asked  me  and  that  was  that  we 
don't  attack  what  you  call  the  bund. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Wliat  was  that?    I  did  not  hear  you. 

Mr.  Young.  The  bund,  and  I  said:  "If  it  is  un-American  it  should 
be  attacked;  if  it  is  American  you  won't  object  to  being  questioned 
anyway." 

And  to  make  a  long  story  short  of  the  negotiations,  w^e  entered 
into  a  contract  of  which  I  have  here  a  copy  of  the  contract.  If  you 
would  care  to  have  me  read  it  or  how  would  you  like  it  presented? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Read  it  for  us. 

Mr.  Young  (reading) : 

Camp  Nordland,  R.  F.  D.  No.  1,  Newton,  N  J,  July  1940.  .     . 

It  doesn't  give  the  date  and  I  can't  tell  you  the  date.  But  I  thmk 
it  does  further  down. 

Agreement:  Be  it  agreed  between  the  authorized  representatives  of  the  Ger- 
man-American Bund  AuxiliarA',  Inc.,  a  New  Jersey  corporation  and  owner  of 
Camp  Nordland,  August  Klapprott  on  one  part  and  the  authorized  representa- 
tives of  the  Knights  and  Women  of  the  Ku  Klux  Klan  of  the  Realm  of  New 
Jersey,  Arthur  H.  Bell  and  A.M.  Young  on  the  other  part,  that  the  Knights  and 
Women  of  the  Ku  Klux  Klan  of  the  Realm  of  New  Jersey,  be  permitted  to  hold 
Americanization  exercises,  to  take  up  a  collection,  on  the  general  assembly 
grounds — 

and  may  I  say  here,  gentlemen,  the  general  assembly  grounds  is  a 
natural  bowl  and  it  isn't  on  the  part  of  the  property  where  the 
German-American  Bund  have  their  buildings. 

There  is  only  a  platform  there. 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  would  like  to  ask  a  question  there:  Isn't  that 
bowl  within  the  200  acres  owned  by  the  bund? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8317 

Mr.  Young.  I  could  not  tell  you  that,  Mr.  Thomas.     I  don't  know. 
I  presume  it  is  because  they  give  us  a  contract. 
Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  proceed. 
Mr.  Young  (reading) : 

Take  up  a  collection  on  the  general  assembly  grounds — 

that  was  the  place  where  we  were  meetmg — 

at  Camp  Xordland  on  the  afternoon  and  evening  of  August  18,  1940,  subject  to 
the  following  conditions: 

The  Knights  and  Women  of  the  Ku  Klux  Klan  of  the  Realm  of  New  Jersey 
agree  to  abide  by  the  general  rules  and  regulations  of  the  Camp  Nordland  manage- 
ment; no  admission  fee  shall  be  charged  for  entry  to  the  grounds  but  a  contribu- 
tion of  25  cents  shall  be  collected  from  the  operator  of  every  automobile  or  other 
vehicle  entering  the  property — 


It  doesn't  say  here  but  that  was 

Mr.  Starxes.  That  was  your  contract? 

Mr.  Young.  That  was  their  mone}^  and  not  ours.  We  did  not 
get  any  of  that  money.     [Reading:] 

The  restaurant  and  other  food,  beverage  concessions  on  the  ground  shall  be 
operated  by  the  Camp  Nordland  management.  Other  current  activities  on  the 
grounds  or  in  the  buildings  of  Camp  Xordland  shall  not  be  limited  or  affected  by 
this  meeting. 

That  is  we  had  no  rights  there  excepting  on  that  field. 

Now,  I  might  say,  sir,  that  there  is  a  portion  here  where  it  is 
penciled  or  inked  out  and  okayed  by  Mr,  Klapprott's  signatme.  He 
inked  it  out.  He  put  a  stipulation  there  that  they  held  the  right  to 
refuse  any  one  the  privilege  to  come  on  that  field  that  they  felt  should 
not  be  on  the  field,  and  as  we  were  having  a  meeting  where  everybody, 
black  and  white,  Jew  and  Catholic  and  Protestant,  were  invited,  we 
would  not  stand  for  it — that  is  the  grand  dragon  would  not  stand  for 
it  in  Philadelphia.  He  had  the  contract.  He  asked  to  see  the  con- 
tract.    They  then  removed  that  objectionable  part  about  the  camp. 

That  is  about  all,  gentlemen,  regarding  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  May  I  ask  you  a  question  with  reference  to  this 
meeting 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  would  like  to  ask  a  question  regarding  the  contract. 

Dr.  Young,  was  any  fee  paid  for  the  use  of  the  premises? 

i        Mr.  Young.  Well,  Mr.  Thomas,  you  w^ould  say  yes  and  you  would 

say  no.     We  considered  the  fee  of  getting  the  money  on  the  gate  was 

ample  fee  for  the  use  of  the  grounds;  otherwise  there  was  no  money 

(    paid. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  was  for  the  parking  privilege? 
i        Mr.  Young.  Ye&— well,  I  don't  know  w^hether  you  call  it  parking, 
i    sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  understand,  it  was  for  automobiles. 

Mr.  Young.  Yes;  to  get  into  the  groimds. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Din-ing  the  course  of  the  day  or  evening  or  both,. 
H    did  you  make  a  talk — a  public  addiess? 

^ir.  Young.  Well,  sir,  I  talked  about  3  minutes,  perhaps — I  had  a 
wedding 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  in  the  course  of  your  remarks  make  any 
reference  to  the  fact  that  there  was  afforded  every  American  an 
opportunity  to  criticize  any  minority  or  racial  group  in  this  country 
save  one,  but  there  was  one  minority  group  you  would  dare  not 
attack  without  reprisals? 


8318  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Young.  I  could  not  say  that  because- 


Mr.  Starnes.  On  this  occasion  you  did  attack  one  racial  group, 
did  you? 

Mr.  Young.  Now,  Mr.  Chairman 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Young.  Well,  I  have  got  to  clarify  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  to  know  first  if  on  this  occasion  during  the 
brief  time  you  talked,  if  you  attacked  a  racial  mmority? 

Mr.  Young.  I  would  not  call  it  "attack."  I  disagree  with  the 
theological  standpoint  of  the  Jew  and  I  have  been  told  all  around 
there  that  there  was  a  law  in  New  Jersey  that  if  a  man  said  something 
about  a  Jew  he  would  be  arrested;  if  he  carried  three  pamphlets  in 
his  pocket  that  were  anti-Jewish  he  would  be  arrested ;  if  he  was  in  his 
home  and  had  five  people  there  and  talked  about  the  Jew  he  would  be 
arrested.  I  say  it  and  I  say  it  again  that  this  is  a  free  country  and  it 
gives  me  the  right  to  attack,  not  an  individual — there  are  criminal 
libels  for  that — but  any  group  of  people  or  any  race  and  I  still  hold 
that  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  any  of  the  other  speakers  there  make  any 
reference  to  the  fact  that  in  this  country  the  press,  the  moving- 
picture  industry,  its  financial  set-up  for  the  Government  was  con- 
trolled by  a  racial  minority? 

Mr.  Young.  I  think  there  was. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  recall  who  made  those  remarks? 

Mr.  Young.  A  man  who  is  supposed  to  have  an  organization  by 
the  name  of 

Mr.  Starnes.  Smythe? 

Mr.  Young.  Yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  is  supposed  to  be  with  the  Protestant  War  Veter- 
ans of  America? 

Mr.  Young.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  made  the  statement? 

Mr.  Young.  He  made  the  statement  and  I  was  very  much  opposed 
to  his  having  been  permitted  to  speak  at  all  on  the  platform. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Who  invited  hun  to  speak? 

Mr.  Young.  Mr.  Bell. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Thomas.  No  questions. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Call  the  next  witness. 

TESTIMONY  OF  OTTO   HOHNER,  IRVINGTON,  N.  J. 

(Mr.  Hohner  was  attended  b}^  Mr.  Keegan,  his  attorney.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand. 
Do  you  solemnly  swear  to  tell  the  truth,  the  whole  truth  and  nothing 
but  the  truth  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Let  the  record  show  this  witness  is  represented  by 
Mr.  Keegan. 

Will  you  give  j^our  full  name  and  address,  please? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Otto  Hohner,  1022  Grove  Street,  Irvington. 

Mr.  Starnes.  By  whom  are  you  employed? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Roselle  Tool  &  Die  Co. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


8319 


Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 


Mr. 
Mr. 


Mr.  Starnes.  How  long;  have  you  been  employed  by  them? 
Mr.  IIoHNER.  About  6  years. 

You  live  here  in  Newark? 

Irvington. 

Where  were  you  born? 

Germany. 

\\Tien? 

June  23,  1909. 

When  did  you  come  to  America? 

1929. 

Was  that  the  first  time  you  came  here? 

Yes. 

Have  vou  been  back  to  Germany? 

Yes. 

WTien? 

1936. 

\^Tiat  month  did  you  go  back? 

End  of  May,  I  think. 

How  long  did  you  remain  there? 

Until  the  end  of  September,  including  the  trip. 

Ai"e  you  a  natm-alized  citizen? 

I  have  my  fu'st  papers. 

Your  first  papers? 

Yes. 

When  did  you  take  out  yom-  first  papers? 

The  fu"st  time  I  took  it  out  m  1930. 

Took  out  your  first  papers  in  1930? 

Yes. 

And  you  did  not  complete  yoiu-  citizenship  papers 
so  you  took  out  your  second  first  papers  when? 
Mr.  HoHNER.  I  applied  for  them  in  1939. 

What  month,  do  you  recall? 

June  or  July. 
Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  frequently  visit  Camp  Nordland? 
Mr.  Hohner.  Yes,  sir. 
Mr.   Starnes.  WTien   did  you  first  begin  your  visits   to   Camp 
Nordland? 

Mr.  Hohner.  My  first  visit? 
Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Hohner.  I  think  in  1938  I  was  up  there  a  few  times. 
Mr.  Starnes.  A  few  times  in  1938? 
Mr.  Hohner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  you  continued  to  visit  Camp  Nordland 
tlu-oughout  1939? 

Mr.  Hohner.  That  is  right. 
Mr.  Starnes.  You  went  up  there  quite  often? 
Mr.  Hohner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Would  you  say  once  a  week  or  once  every  2  or  3 
weeks  throughout  the  year,  and  sometimes  more  than  once  a  week, 
is  that  correct? 

Air.  Hohner.  I  should  sav  about  once  every  2  weeks  during  1939. 
Mr.  Starnes.  Then  you  have  been  gomg  up  there  through  1940? 
Mr.  Hohner.  I  have  been— during  1940  I  have  been  up  once  a 
week. 


Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 

Starnes. 

Hohner. 

Starnes. 

Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 

Starnes. 

Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 


Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Hohner. 


62626 — il— vol.  14- 


-11 


8320  UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  there  the  day  the  Kii  Klux  Klan  was 
having  its  meetmg  on  August  18? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  you  a  member  of  the  German- American  Bund? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  Friends  of  New  Germany? 

Mr.  Hohner.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  own  an  automobile,  don't  you? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  the  hcense  number  is  ES-29-C? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  was  the  automobile  m  wliich  you  visited  the 
camp  on  August  18? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Yes,  sir. 

Air.  Starnes.  ^Vliy  were  you  going  to  Camp  Nordland  so  often  if 
you  are  not  a  member  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Because  I  was  helping  out  a  friend  Avho  is. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Because  what? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Because  I  was  helping  out  a  friend. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  were  helping  out  a  friend? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Who  is  an  officer  at  the  camp  and  he  is  under  the 
doctor's  care  and  I  was  doing 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  seen  members  of  the  Bund  drilling  at 
Camp  Nordland? 

Mr.  Hohner.  I  wish  you  would  define  that  a  little  more- — "drill- 
iiig."  As  I  heard  that  this  morning  already  you  mean  military 
drilling.     If  it  is  military  drilling  I  haven't  seen  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  asked  you  if  you  saw  any  drilling. 

Mr.  Hohner.  I  have  seen  formations. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Prior  to  the  time  that  you  came  here  from  Germany 
did  you  have  any  military  experience? 

Mr.  Hohner.  I  had  not. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Had  none? 

Mr.  Hohner.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  were  these  formations  that  you  saw  out  there, 
these  drill  formations,  what  were  they — describe  them  to  the  com- 
mittee. 

Mr.  Hohner.  Well,  they  were  the  same  like  thej^  would  hold  up 
to  the  grounds  where  the  speakers  w^ere. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  seen  them  in  uniform  out  there? 

Mr.  Hohner.  I  have  in  1938. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  1938  j^ou  saw  them  in  uniform? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  seen  the  swastika  displaj^ed  out  there 
along  with  the  American  flag? 

Mr.  Hohner.  I  have. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  seen  the  members  of  the  Bund  give  a  salute 
like  this  (demonstrating)  with  the  right  hand? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Early  in  1938  I  have. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8321 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  1938  you  saw  them  give  the  so-called  Nazi  salute 
with  the  right  hand? 

Mr.  HoHNER.   (No  answer). 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  correct? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  did  not  see  that  in  1939  or  1940? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  seen  in  the  dance  hall  and  in  the  res- 
taurant a  photograph  of  Herr  Hitler  displayed  or  shown  either  in 
1938, 1939  or  1940? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  I  have  seen  it  in  1939. 

Mr.  Starnes.  \Mien  was  it? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  During  the  summer  season. 

Mr.  Thomas.  May  I  ask  a  c^uestion  there? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Hohner,  have  you  been  out  to  the  bar  there  at 
Camp  Nordland  where  they  serve  beverages? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Did  3  ou  see  the  pictures  of  Hitler  at  the  bar? 

Mr.  Hohner.  At  the  bar? 

Mr.  Thomas.  Yes. 

Mr.  Hohner.  No;  I  don't  recollect  seeing  it  there. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Did  you  see  any  pictures  at  the  bar? 

Mr.  Hohner.  I  don't  recollect  any  pictures  at  the  bar. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Did  you  see  a  picture  of  Hindenburg  and  Bismarck 
at  the  bar — in  back  of  the  bar? 

Mr.  Hohner.  I  don't  recollect. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  now  since  1938  did  j^ou  see  any  pictures  there 
at  the  bar  at  all? 

Mr.  Hohner.  No,  not  that  I  can  recall — not  that  I  have  noticed, 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  any  one  make  any  attempt  to  get  you  to  join 
the  bmid — any  one  ask  you  to  join? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Well,  I  have  been  asked  why  I  am  not  joining. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  were  asked  why  you  did  not  join? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  this  friend  of  yours  ask  you  to  join? 

Mr.  Hohner.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  had  other  friends  though  who  did  ask  you? 

Mr.  Hohner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Asked  why  you  did  not  join? 

Mr.  Hohner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  ^Aliat  do  vou  understand  the  purposes  of  the  bund 
to  be? 

Mr.  Hohner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  asking  you  to  join  they  certainly  told  you  the 
aims  and  purposes  of  the  bund;  what  did  you  understand  the  purposes^ 
of  the  bund  to  be? 

Mr.  Hohner.  To  gather  the  German-Americans  into  one  group. 

Mr.  Starnes.  For  what  purpose? 

Mr.  Hohner.  To  have  more  political  influence  and  to  unify  all  the 
Germans — all  the  German  cultures  in  one  organization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  else? 

Mr.  Hohner.  That  is  all  I  know  of. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  they  also  tell  you  it  was  to  fight  against  any 
boycott  of  German  people  or  German-American  people  and  of  German 


8322  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

goods?  Did  they  tell  you  that  was  one  of  the  reasons  they  formed  the 
bund? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  Not  to  me. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  did  not  tell  you  that? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  are  you  in  sympathy  with  the  aims  of  the 
bund  as  you  understand  them? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  As  I  understand  them;  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  As  you  understand  them  you  are? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  a  Social  Security  card? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  Yes. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Have  you  the  card  with  you? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  I  have  not;  I  am  sorry. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  recall  the  number  on  that  card? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  No;  I  can't  give  it  to  you. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Barker,  have  you  got  the  number  of  the  card? 

Mr.  Barker.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  A  little  later  on  will  you  give  the  number  to  this 
committee. 

Do  you  know  whether  the  Roselle  Tool  &  Die  Co.  has  any  national- 
defense  contracts? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  I  don't  laiow. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  know  whether  that  company  has  any 
national-defense  contracts,  Mr.  Barker? 

Mr.  Barker.  They  do. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  is  one  of  a  great  many  cases 
that  Mr.  Barker  and  other  mvestigators  have  unearthed  in  New 
Jersey  where  members  go  to  the  bund  camp  and  are  employees  of 
firms  in  this  State  that  have  national-defense  contracts. 

I  just  wanted  to  point  that  out. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  Chair  will  make  a  reference  concerning  the  execu- 
tive hearings  that  have  been  held  before  we  adjom-n  today. 

You  are  talking  more  freely  and  giving  us  more  information  in  a 
public  hearing  than  you  did  in  executive  hearing,  aren't  you? 

Mr.  Hohner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Isn't  that  right?  I  will  ask  you,  you  did  refuse  to 
give  us  answers  to  certain  questions  in  an  executive  hearing  that  you 
have  answered  today,  isn't  that  true? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  any  questions,  Mr.  Voorhis? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Thomas? 

Mr.  Thomas.  No  further  questions. 

Mr.  Barker.  I  would  like  to  ask  a  question.  Mr.  Hohner,  are  you 
a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Hohner.  No. 

Mr.  Barker.  You  are  an  alien? 

Mr.  Hohner.  I  have  my  first  papers. 

Mr.  Barker.  You  have  yom-  first  papers? 

Mr.  Hohner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Barker.  That  is  your  second  set  of  first  papers;  isn't  it,  Mr. 
Hohner? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8323 

Afr.  HoHXER.  Yes. 

Mr.  Bahker.  When  did  vou  lake  your  first  set  of  papers  out? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  1930. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  you  went  back  to  Germany  after  that? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  Yes. 

Mr.  Barker.  You  did  not  apply  for  your  second  papers  after  that? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  No. 

Mr.  Barker.  When  did  you  take  out  your  second  first  papers? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  I  applied  for  it  in  June  or  July  1939  and  1  received 
them  early  tliis  year. 

Mr.  Barker.  Have  you  registered  as  an  alien  under  the  act  recently 
passed? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  Not  yet. 

Mr.  Barker.  You  have  not? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  No. 

Mr.  Barker.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  all.     You  are  excused. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  other  witnesses  are  excused.  We  will  not  use 
them  at  this  time.     They  are  all  at  liberty  to  go. 

Mr.  Keegan.  Thank  you  very  much. 

Mr.  Barker.  Mr.  Holmer,  when  you  made  this  trip  to  Germany 
whom  did  you  go  with? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  Nobody. 

Mr.  Barker.  You  did  not  go  with  anyone? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  No. 

Mr.  Barker.  You  did  not  go  with  Geiter? 

Mr.  HoHNER.  No. 

Mr.  Barker.  But  you  do  know  Geiter? 

Mr.  HoHXER.  No. 

Mr.  Barker.  You  said  last  night  j^ou  knew  Geiter. 

Mr.  HoHNER.  I  explained  to  you  last  night  I  thought  you  were 
saying  Geeto. 

Mr.  Barker.  You  called  him  Geiter. 

Mr.  HoHNER.  That  is  not  the  same  man  we  are  talking  about,  I  am 
sure. 

Mr.  Barker.  That  is  all. 

(Witness  excused.) 

Mr.  Barker.  Mr.  Ries. 

TESTIMONY  OF  HERMAN  A.  RIES,  OF  THE  PENNSYLVANIA  MOTOR 

POLICE 

Mr.  Starxes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand. 
Do  you  solemnly  swear  to  tell  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  notliing 
but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Ries.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Barker,  I  will  ask  the  prehminary  questions. 
Will  you  give  us  your  full  name? 

Mr.  Ries.  Herman  A.  Ries. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  is  your  address? 

Mr.  Ries.  Avondale,  Pa. 


8324  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  is  your  profession  or  vocation? 

Mr.  RiES.  Pennsylvania  Motor  Police. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  are  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  were  born  in  America? 

Mr.  RiEs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Educated  in  America? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  live  here? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  can  speak  the  German  language? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  Mr.  Barker,  you  may  take  the  witness. 

Mr.  Barker.  Mr.  Ries,  you  spell  your  name  R-i-e-s? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  Were  you  called  to  the  office  of  the  commissioner  of 
the  Pennsylvania  State  police  and  advised  to  go  to  Washington  and 
report  to  the  Dies  committee? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  down  in  Washington  you  met  Congressman  Dies 
and  Congressman  Thomas  and  Congressman  Voorhis? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  you  had  another  trooper  from  the  Pennsylvania 
State  police  with  you  who  is  also  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  Born  here? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  Of  German  descent? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  Who  can  speak  German  also? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  Now,  you  and  the  other  Pennsylvania  trooper  and 
myself  then  proceeded  by  automobile  to  northern  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  To  make  an  investigation  of  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  In  accordance  with  instructions  from  the  chairman? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  You  were  employed  during  that  period  as  an  investi- 
gator for  the  Dies  Committee? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  your  pay  as  a  Pennsylvania  State  trooper  was 
temporarily  suspended? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  then  we  went  to  Newton,  N.  J.? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  established  contact  with  the  Jersey  State 
police? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  they  provided  us  with  a  couple  of  sets  of  dead 
tags  for  our  automobiles? 

Mr.  Ries.  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AAIEUICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8325 

Mr.  Barker.  And  you  changed  your  appearance  and  went  in 
hiking  clothes? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  so  did  the  otlier  man? 

Mr.  RiEs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  I  was  a  fanner  down  the  road  shovehng  sand? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  And  we  proceeded  out  to  the  bund  camp? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Barker.  All  right,  now  take  it  up  when  you  went  in  at  the 
gate — I  left  you  there. 

Mr.  RiES.  On  this  date  that  Robert  Barker  is  speaking  of,  Mr. 
Strickler,  the  other  member  of  the  Pennsylvania  State  police,  and  I 
went  to  the  gate  of  Camp  Nordland,  situated  at  the  gate  in  a  small 
building  where  were  stationed  a  group  of  young  German  youths. 
We  approached  these  young  men  and  introduced  ourselves  as  the — 
as  vacationists  from  Pennsylvania. 

We  conversed  with  them  in  German  and  the  one  youth  by  the  name 
of  Geiter  disclosed  to  us  that  he  was  sort  of  suspicious  of  us  on  our  first 
appearance  at  the  gate;  that  w^e  resembled  Newton  spies.  He  then 
stated  to  me  that  since  he  saw  me  closer  he  saw  the  map  of  Germany 
on  my  face. 

We  were  then  accepted  into  the  camp  as  honest  Germans  and  were 
taken  to  the  restaurant.  In  German  it  is  called  "the  Essenplatz." 
On  our  way  to  the  restaurant  we  were  then  stopped  and  introduced  to 
Adolf  Bauer. 

We  conversed  in  German  and  after  conversing  some  time  he  asked 
us  if  we  were  willing  to  contribute  a  dollar  for  the  welfare  of  Camp 
Nordland.  We  contributed  each  a  dollar  and  in  turn  we  received  a 
small  pink  paper  which  was  fastened  in  our  shirt. 

Mr.  Thomas.  At  that  point,  have  you  one  of  those  with  you? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Will  you  give  that  to  the  committee? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  was  to  indicate  you  paid  a  dollar,  was  it? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  every  one  who  paid  a  dollar  got  one  of  these 
little  pink  slips  and  they  put  the  slip  in  the  button  hole  of  the  lapel? 

Mr.  RiES.  Of  the  shirt,  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Did  you  see  many  of  those  slips  around  indicating  that 
many  people  paid  a  dollar? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir;  and  Mr.  Bauer  then  informed  us  that  we  had 
the  privilege  of  coming  back  into  the  w^oods  where  were  congregated 
some  other  Gorman  people,  and  where  we  would  be  allowed  to  have  a 
few  glasses  of  beer  since  we  contributed  to  the  welfare  of  the  camp. 

Mr.  Thomas.  May  I  ask  another  question:  Was  it  possible  to  get 
any  beer  without  paying  that  dollar? 

Mr.  RiEs.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  had  to  pay  the  dollar  in  order  to  get  beer? 

Mr.  RiES.  It  was  explained  to  us  that  we  were  contributing  to  the 
welfare  of  Camp  Nordland. 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  right,  but  you  could  not  get  the  beer  until  you 
paid  the  dollar? 


8326  UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  RiES.  That  is  right.  We  entered  the  restaurant — the  Essen- 
platz,  where  were  congregated  a  group  of  German  people  all  conversing 
in  German.  The  songs  on  the  victrola  were  German.  One  in  par- 
ticular I  recall  was  Deutschland  Uber  Allies.  In  other  words  it  is 
translated  literally  as  "Germany  over  all." 

There  were  people  dancing  folk  dances  and  some  were  dressed  in 
folk  costumes. 

We  then  ordered  our  supper  or  dinner  at  that  time  in  the  German 
language.  Now,  this  dance  hall  or  the  Essenplatz  is  a  large,  one  story 
frame  building.  It  iias  a  large  dance  floor  surrounded  by  tables  and 
chairs  on  the  outside  rim  of  the  dance  floor.  On  one  side  of  the  dance 
floor  is  a  large  bar  from  which  beverages,  soft  drinks  and  things  were 
sold.     At  one  end  was  a  kitchen. 

Now,  in  this  dance  floor  surrounding  the  inner  circle  of  the  dance 
floor,  was  a  large  picture  of  Adolf  Hitler,  decorated  with  the — I  think 
they  caU  it  the — it  is  the  red,  white,  and  black  colors  of  the  German 
Nation — I  think  it  is.  At  the  other  end  of  the  dance  floor  was  a  small 
picture  of  George  Washington.  In  the  center  of  the  dance  floor 
hanging  from  the  ceiling  was  an  American  flag. 

There  was  also  displayed  a  smaU  card  with  the  swastika  emblem 
on  it. 

We  were  in  there  a  short  time  and  proceeded  out  to  the  grounds 
where  were  parked,  I  estimated,  about  300  automobiles,  from  Penn- 
sylvania, New  York,  and  New  Jersey  mostly.  That  is  from  our  ob- 
servation those  three  States  the  cars  were  from. 

We  walked  around  the  camp  and  saw  that  there  were  cottages  up  in 
the  woods  and  over  near  the  speaker's  stand  in  the  forest  was  being 
erected  a  large,  long  building — frame  building,  which  was  claimed  to 
be  the  boys  and  girls  scout  camp.  Some  of  the  boys  were  playing 
soccer.     A  lot  of  people  were  in  their  bathing  suits. 

We  then  confronted  Mr.  Bauer  again  and  asked  him  when  we  were 
going  back  to  this  forest  where  they  had  the  beer.  He  informed  me 
not  to  speak  so  loud  because  Deputy  Sheriff  Dehart  from  Newton  was 
on  the  premises,  and  that  there  were  some  newspaper  men  and  some 
under-cover  men  trying  to  get  in  the  entrance.  He  said  he  had  to  go 
to  help  try  to  keep  them  from  getting  in.  Mr.  Strickler  asked  him  if 
he  needed  any  help  we  would  help  him. 

We  then  went  back  into  the  woods. 

Mr.  Thomas.  May  I  interrupt?  In  that  dance  hall  were  there  any 
slogans  of  any  kind? 

Mr.  RiEs.  Yes,  sir;  I  forgot  about  that.  A  large  sign  was  on  the 
inner  circle  of  the  dance  floor.  It  was  a  white  sign  and  I  imagine  it 
was  at  least  40  or  50  feet  long  and  about  4  or  5  feet  wide,  and  on  it  was 
the  German  words  "Ein  Folkstom,  Ein  Bund,  Ein  Fuelirer."  Liter- 
ally translated  it  means  "One  Society,  One  People,  and  One  Leader." 
That  was  a  large  sign  that  was  in  the  dance  hall. 

As  we  were  going  back  into  the  woods  with  Mr.  Bauer  we  were 
taken  to  a  long  wooden  table  with  a  canopy  over  the  top,  and  at  one 
end  of  the  table  was  situated  a  quarter  barrel  of  beer. 

Now,  this  beer  was  distributed  among  the  German  men  and  women 
seated  at  this  table.  In  fact  there  were  two  tables.  One  was  out  in 
the  open.  Mr.  Strickler  and  I  seated  ourselves  among  the  people. 
They  acted  suspicious  at  first,  due  to  our  strangeness,  but  after  con- 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8327 

versing  some  time  with  the  people  their  suspicions  lessened  and  they 
talked  to  us  freely. 

Their  general  conversation  was  the  war  that  was  taking  place  in 
Europe  and  the  situation  in  the  United  States.  Most  of  the  people, 
the  majority  of  them,  were  pro-Nazi  and  talked  quite  considerably  of 
the  great  things  that  had  been  taking  place  in  Europe  being  done  by 
Hitler. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Did  they  make  any  comments  about  the  possibility 
of  Hitler  coming  over  to  the  Western  Hemisphere  or  any  influence 
that  he  might  have  here? 

Mr.  RiES.  There  were  no  direct  words  to  that  eft'ect  except  the 
German  Government  or  Hitler  would  conquer  Europe  and  the  German 
people  woidd  be  dominating  the  world. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Did  you  also  hear  comparisons  between  the  German 
form  of  government  and  our  form  of  government  here? 

Mr.  RiES.  They  were  very  much  opposed  to  Roosevelt,  and  they 
were  in  favor  of  Lindbergh  and  Hoover. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Did  you  also  hear  that  they  preferred  the  German 
form  of  government  to  our  form  of  government? 

Mr.  RiES.  Their  favoritism  was  leaning  to  Hitler — his  way  of 
doing. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  was  there  a  man  by  the  name  of  Geiter  among 
those  people? 

Mr.  RiES.  This  gentleman  by  the  name  of  Geiter  took  us,  prior  to 
going  back  to  the  woods,  into^he  restaurant.  He  was  a  very  pas- 
sionate-minded pro-Hitler  man.  He  stated  to  us  that  he  was  a  sheet- 
metal  worker  and  a  gymnastic  instructor  on  the  side  and  expressed 
to  us  that  physical  training  was  the  main  thing  in  wiiming  wars.  He 
stated  that  he  was  in  Germany  m  1936  for  3  months,  as  I  recall,  and 
during  the  Olympics. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Did  he  say  where  he  is  employed  now  as  a  sheet- 
metal  worker? 

Mr.  RiES.  No;  we  did  not  ask  him  that  because  we  were  just  in  the 
camp  a  short  time  and  did  not  want  to  arouse  their  suspicions  through 
questioning. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  would  like  to  ask  you  this:  You  said  a  while  ago 
that  you  thought  that  most  of  the  people  were  pro-Nazi.  Now,  I 
think  you  should  explain  why  you  think  that  and  on  what  you  base 
that  statement.     I  mean  we  should  not  leave  that  hanging  up  there. 

Mr.  RiES.  If  I  may  use  my  notes,  I  can  refresh  my  memory. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Go  ahead.  There  is  no  reason  you  can't  do  that. 
I  think  we  should  be  specific  about  what  you  mean  when  you  say 
that. 

Mr.  RiES.  It  has  been  some  time,  and  I  have  to  look  at  my  notes 
on  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Could  you  give  us  again  the  date  when  this  took 
place? 

Mr.  RiES.  June  16,  1940. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Everybody  understands  that  all  people  naturally 
have  a  lovalty  to  their  own  ancestry  and  to  their  own  people  and  to 
the  place^^from  which  tliev  came,  but  this  business  about  bemg  pro- 
Nazi  is  a  different  matter  because  by  that  we  understand  an  alle- 
giance to  a  particular  political  movement  and  form  of  government. 
That  is  the  point  I  am  trying  to  get  straightened  out. 


8328  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  RiES.  From  one  statement  by  a  gentleman  at  the  table,  he 
stated  Hitler  was  not  trying  to  conquer  the  world  or  to  oppress  the 
people,  but  to  free  them,  and  most  of  the  men  at  the  table  welcomed 
world  domination  by  Hitler. 

Mr.  VoooRHis.  Did  they  say  that? 

Mr.  RiES.  That  was  their  general  discussion.  There  were  no  direct 
words  to  that  effect.     There  was  a  man  at  the  table 

Mr.  Thomas.  But  it  was  evident  from  the  conversation  that  cer- 
tain of  them  were  friendly  to  Hitler  and  his  Government — it  was 
evident  they  were  more  friendlj'-  to  Hitler  and  his  Government  than 
to  our  Government? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Is  that  right? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sii*.  There  was  a  man  seated  next  to  Strickler  by 
the  name  of  H.  Wunderle,  who  lives  in  Hoboken,  N.  J.,  who  had  the 
floor  most  of  the  time.  We  obtained  his  name  from  a  subscription  of 
a  ticket  or  chance  he  bought  for  the  ladies'  auxiliary.  They  were 
chancing  off  a  blanket  or  something  lilve  that  and  Mr.  Strickler  took 
the  next  chance  and  that  is  how  we  obtained  his  name.  He  stated 
he  was  a  sailor  on  a  steamship  traveling  between  New  York  and  Pana- 
ma. He  emphatically  stated  that  the  Jews  were  insects  of  mankind. 
He  stated  he  was  well  acquainted  with  the  internal  sentiment  of 
Panama,  Mexico,  and  Brazil;  that  these  countries  were  anti- American 
and  all  for  Hitler.  He  stated  that  the  German  people  at  the  present 
time  in  the  United  States  were  much  stronger  than  they  were  prior 
to  the  World  War.     "They  are  congregated  in  a  more  unified  body." 

He  stated  also  that  he  had  an  employer  who  was  a  Jew.  In  other 
words,  in  plain  words,  if  he  was  fired  because  he  was  a  German,  he 
could  make  a  lot  of  trouble. 

The  conversation  was  that  Members  of  Congress  of  the  United 
States  and  the  President  were  all  pro-Jews  and  were  looking  out 
for  the  welfare  of  the  rich. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Just  one  question  with  reference  to  what  this  man 
said  about  Brazil  and  Panama,  and  so  on;  did  he  express  himself  as 
being  gratified  with  the  situation  that  he  found  to  exist  there? 

Mr.  RiES.  He  expressed  the  feeling  that  the  German  people  are 
getting  more  thickly  populated  and  their  feelings  for  Hitler  and  his 
doings  are  increasing — that  their  sentiments  toward  his  actions  are 
very  strong. 

Mr.  Wunderle  stated  also  that  the  time  will  come  when  the  final 
haven  for  Jews  will  be  in  the  United  States. 

As  I  said  before,  the  men  around  the  table  had  high  regard  for 
Lindbergh  and  Hoover. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  How  do  you  mean  that? 

Mr.  RiES.  They  were  talking  m  regard  to  the  speeches  that  Lind- 
bergh had  made,  I  think  a  few  nights  prior  to  June  16,  and  also  the 
work  that  Hoover  had  done  dming  the  World  War. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  mean  relief  work  and  things  lilte  that? 

Mr.  RiES.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  They  approved  of  that,  you  mean? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir;  and  talked  to  some  of  the  German  people  who 
felt  that  they  would  not  bother  anybody  as  long  as  nobody  bothered 
them;  that  they  wanted  to  live  in  the  United  States  and  be  citizens. 
That  was  mostly  the  conversation  of  the  more  elderly  class. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8329 

From  one  person  we  understood  he  has  been  living  in  the  United 
States  for  40  years. 

Air.  Thomas.  The  younger  ones  were  more  mihtant  in  their  speech 
and  con(hict? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  would  you  say  about  the  younger  people  in 
alliMidance  and  their  attitude? 

Mr.  KiES.  Their  .attitude  was  very  passionate^overs  of  Hitlerism. 
They  thought  he  was  doing  a  wonderful  thing. 

We  stayed  there  for  some  time.  The  general  conversation  was 
back  and  forth  on  that  subject.  We  left  and  were  given  an  invitation 
to  come  back  the  following  day.  As  we  left  the  table  tiie  men  gave 
us  a  salute  and  the  words  "Auf  Wiedersehen" — "until  we  see  each 
other  again,"  and  the  salute  was  by  raising  the  hand. 

Mr.  Striclder  and  I  were  in  the  camp  and  Mr.  Barker  was  dressed 
as  a  farmer  and  digging  a  ditch.  He  was  on  the  outside.  In  that 
mamier  we  were  able  to  obtain  the  license  nmnbers  of  the  cars  that 
entered  the  camp. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  also  visited  other  camps,  did  you  not? 

Mr.  RiES.  We  can  back  to  Camp  Nordland  the  following  Sunday, 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  mean  you  went  to  other  camps  in  the  State? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir;  we  went  to  the  camp  on  Federal  Hill. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  got  in  there  with  the  same  ease  and  about  in  the 
same  manner? 

Mr.  RiES.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  And  Mr.  Barker,  as  I  understand,  visited  still  more 
places  in  the  State? 

Mr.  RiEs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Anv  further  questions? 

Mr.  Thomas.  That  is  all. 

(Witness  excused.) 

The  Chairman.  This  concludes  this  phase  of  the  liearmg.  The 
Chair  wishes  to  make  the  following  statement:  That  on  yesterday 
afternoon  and  last  evenmg  we  held  extended  executive  hearings  of  the 
committee,  lasting  until  midnight.  More  than  a  score  of  witnesses 
were  heard  by  the  committee  in  this  executive  session. 

It  is  noteworth}^  that  these  witnesses,  with  one  exception,  were 
aliens  or  naturalized  citizens  of  German  extraction.  They  were  wit- 
nesses who  were  selected  as  a  cross  section  of  hundreds  of  available 
witnesses  who  had  attended  the  meetings  of  the  German-American 
Bund  at  Camp  Nordland.  They  were  owaiers  of  motor  vehicles  which 
had  been  discovered  at  these  camps  by  the  investigator  and  his 
assistants,  with  the  assistance  of  the  State  officials  of  the  States  of 
New  Jersey  and  of  New  York  and  of  Pennsylvania,  by  which  they  were 
able  to  trace  the  o\\aiership  of  these  automobiles. 

With  one  exception  every  witness  readily  admitted  to  attendance 
upon  the  meetings  of  various  character  at  Camp  Nordland.  Some 
were  bund  meetings  and  some  were  open  meetings. 

Approximatelv  a  third  of  these  witnesses  were  members  of  the 
bund  or  had  been  members  of  the  bund.  Others  were  sympathizers. 
Quite  a  few  went  to  the  camp  out  of  idle  curosity  and  were  certaiidy 
innocent  of  any  intentional  wrongdoing  and  professed  to  have  no 
sympathy  with  the  bund  or  its  program. 


8330  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Without  exception  every  witness  who  was  heard  in  these  executive 
sessions  was  employed  in  shipyards,  munition  plants,  or  industrial 
plants  with  governmental  contracts  involved  in  our  present  national 
defense  program. 

The  committee  heard  some  evidence  of  sabotage  in  other  plants 
but  not  of  the  nature  described  in  the  public  hearings  yesterday. 

The  committee  has  been  impressed  by  the  testimony  of  the  witnesses 
heard  in  the  executive  sessions  and  has  noted  with  interest  the 
demeanor  and  the  statements  made  by  witnesses  in  the  open  hearing. 

The  committee  readily  understands  that  any  national  group  in  this 
country  who  are  now  citizens  of  this  country  but  who  were  born 
elsewhere  cling  to  family  ties,  to  the  heritage  of  their  race  or  to  the 
traditions  and  background  of  their  former  country.  That  is  natural, 
and  it  is  not  to  be  criticized. 

No  one  can  by  merely  transporting  themselves  from  one  land  or 
one  clime  to  another  forget  the  land  of  his  fathers  or  his  family  or 
the  traditions  of  his  native  land. 

Many  organizations  in  this  country  have  been  set  up  by  national 
or  racial  groups  who  have  members  that  have  contributed  much  to 
the  public  welfare  in  this  country  and  have  made  good  citizens,  but 
their  energies  and  their  talents  have  been  devoted  to  cultivating 
better  and  more  peaceful  relations  with  the  other  national  and  racial 
strains  in  this  country  of  ours. 

I  would  like  to  suggest  to  some  of  these  sincere  but  evidently 
misguided  and  misled  new  citizens  of  ours,  that  this  comniittee  has 
judicially  determined  that  the  German-American  Bund  is  not  an 
American  organization  in  its  concept  nor  in  its  practices.  By  the 
overwhelming  weight  of  the  evidence  this  committee  has  received, 
the  bund  has  been  shown  to  be  an  agent  of  a  foreign  government, 
sympathetic  with  the  political  philosophy  of  a  foreign  government. 
There  is  no  pla  e  in  American  life  for  such  an  organization,  and  we 
trust  that  these  hearings  will  prove  of  some  benefit  to  those  who 
have  been  misled  and  have  been  misguided. 

We  have  not  closed  our  hearings  with  reference  to  discoveries  made 
in  this  huge  metropolitan  area  of  Newark  and  New  York  City  and 
in  this  thickly  populated  section  of  our  country.  It  may  be  that  we 
will  hold  hearings  here  or  in  New  York  or  in  Washington  on  certain 
phases  of  matters  already  brought  before  the  committee. 

We  hope  there  will  be  no  hysteria  engendered  by  any  group  in  this 
country  at  this  time  and  that  no  cult  nor  class  nor  prejudice  will  be 
engendered.  There  is  no  time  for  that  now.  This  is  the  time  for 
unity  and  regardless  of  what  the  organization  is  if  it  is  a  legal  organ- 
ization, a  lawful  organization,  and  if  you  feel  you  have  a  right  to  join 
it,  and  if  you  do  join  it,  I  hope  you  will  direct  all  your  energies 
toward  a  better  understanding  of  American  ideals  and  American 
principles  of  government  and  that  you  will  give  unswerving  loyalty, 
whether  you  are  a  native  or  naturalized,  to  the  constitutional,  repre- 
sentative democracy  that  we  enjoy. 

We  will  stand  adjourned. 

(Whereupon,  at  1  o'clock  the  hearing  was  adjourned.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMEEICAN  PROPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


OCTOBER  4,    1940 

House  of  Representatives, 
Subcommittee  of  the  Special  Committee 

TO  Investigate  Un-American  Activities, 

Washington,  D.  C. 

The  subconiinittee  met  at  10  a.  m.,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (chairman), 
presiding. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  subcommittee  appointed  by  the  chairman  to 
investigate  im-American  and  subversive  activities  and  to  hold  hearings 
in  the  Newark-New  York  area,  having  held  sessions  in  Newark  earlier 
in  the  week  and  having  adjourned  the  hearing  to  this  date  here  in 
Washington  is  now  called  to  order  for  the  purpose  of  taking  additional 
testimony. 

Let  the  record  show  the  subcommittee  is  composed  of  Mr.  Voorhis, 
Mr.  Mason,  and  the  chairman. 

Dr.  Matthews,  will  you  call  your  first  witness. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner. 

TESTIMONY  OF  RICHARD  W.  WERNER,  FORMER  MEMBER  OF  THE 
0.  D.  OF  THE  GERMAN-AMERICAN  BUND 

Mr.  Starnes.  Hold  up  your  right  hand.  Do  you  solemnly  swear 
that  the  testimony  you  wJJl  give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth, 
and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  After  I  put  the  preliminary  questions.  Dr.  Matthews, 
1  shall  ask  you  to  take  charge  of  the  examination. 

State  your  full  name. 

Mr.  Werner    Aly  full  name  is  Richard  W.  Werner. 

Mr.  Starnes.  \Miat  is  your  address? 

Mr.  AVerner.  302  East  Ninety-fifth  Street,  New  York. 

Mr.  Starnes.  AATiat  has  been  yom-  profession  or  occupation? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  this  country  I  worked  as  a  chef. 

Mr.  Starnes.  As  a  chef? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  WTiat  did  you  do  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  was  an  office  clerk. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Where  were  you  born? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  Germany. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When  were  vou  born? 

Mr.  Werner.  December  26,  1903. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When  did  you  first  come  to  the  United  States? 

8331 


8332 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


Mr.  Wernek.  In  the  year  of  1926. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  been  back  to  Germany  since  you  came  to 
the  United  States  the  first  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  worked  as  a  crew  member  on  the  North 
German  Lloyd  boat  Berlin. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  did  you  stay  in  Germany  when  you  went 
back? 

In  1926  I  worked  on  a  boat  and  we  traveled  back 
I  had  my  visa  and  then  I  stayed  here  in  February 


Mr.  Werner. 
and  forth  until 
1927  for  good. 
Mr.  Starnes. 

Werner. 

Starnes. 

Werner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Werner. 
.Mr.  Starnes. 

Werner. 

Starnes. 

Werner. 
military  school. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Werner. 

Starnes. 

Werner. 

Starnes. 

Werner. 

Starnes, 


Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 


Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 


You  entered  the  country  legally  and  lawfidly? 

Yes;  I  did. 

Have  you  ever  become  naturalized? 

No. 

You  are  still  an  alien? 

That  is  right. 

Did  vou  go  to  school  in  Germany? 

Yes."^ 

What  was  the  extent  of  your  education? 

I   went  4   years  in  public  school   and  4   years 


m 


Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 


been  a  member  of  the 


Did  you  serve  any  in  the  German  Army? 
I  served  in  the  Free  Corps. 
The  so-called  Free  Corps? 
That  is  right;  after  the  war. 
How  long? 
For  14  months. 
Ai-e  you  now  or  have  you 
German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  was  a  member  of  the  German-American  Bund. 
Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  been  a  member  of  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Mr.  Werner. 
Starnes. 
Werner. 
Starnes. 
Werner. 
Mr.  Starnes. 
Mr.  Werner. 
Starnes 


Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 


M] 


Yes,  sir. 

When  did  you  join? 

In  June  1938. 

How  long  were  you  a  member  of  the  bund? 

Up  to  February  this  year. 
February  of  1940? 

That  is  right. 

Dr.  Matthews,  will  you  take  charge  of  the  witness 
and  conduct  the  examination  from  this  point? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner,  did  you  attend  a  military  academy 
before  you  came  to  the  United  States? 
Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliat  was  the  name  of  that  school? 
Mr.  Werner.  Imperial  German  Military  Academy  in  Hanover. 
Mr.  Matthews.  Hanover,  Germany? 
Mr.  Werner.  Hanover,  Germany;  yes. 
Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  were  you  a  student  there? 
Mr.  Werner.  Four  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  you  leave  the  school? 
Mr.  Werner.  November  9,  1918. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  was  2  days  before  the  Armistice  was  signed; 
is  that  correct? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8333 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  the  school  closed  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  the  school  was  closed. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Was  the  school  closed  as  a  result  of  the  general 
confusion  and  revolutionary  movement  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  did  you  go  immediately  after  the  closing 
of  the  school? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  started  to  work  for  a  newspaper  in  my  home  town. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  took  up  newspaper  work? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr,  Matthews.  How  long  did  you  engage  in  newspaper  work  in 
Germany  altogether? 

Mr.  Werner.  Three  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  were  also  a  member  of  the  Free  Corps? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  other  occupations  did  you  engage  in 
while  you  were  still  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  worked  as  a  bookkeeper  and  correspondent  in  a 
cigar  and  cigarette  factory  in  Frankfurt-am-Main.  After  that  I 
worked  in  the  office  of  the  North  German  Lloyd  and  from  there  I 
started  to  work  on  the  boat  as  a  waiter. 

]Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  work  in  the  offices  of  the  North  German 
Lloyd  in  Bremerhaven? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  Bremerhaven,  yes. 

Mr.  ^L\TTHEWS.  Was  Bremerhaven  your  home? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  came  to  the  United  States  in  1927? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ^L\TTHEWS.  To  reside  here  permanently;  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  have  resided  in  the  United  States  ever 
since  that  date? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  \\Tien  you  arrived  in  the  United  States  in  Feb- 
ruary 1927 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr,  Matthews,  Did  you  obtain  employment  at  once? 

Mr,  Werner.  Yes,  the  following  day. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Within  24  hours  of  your  arrival  in  the  United 
States  you  received  employment? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  the  principal  motive  in  your  desiring 
to  reside  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  times  over  in  Germany  were  so  hard  and  the 
living  conditions  were  so  bad  over  there  there  was  hardly  any  other 
choice  but  to  leave  Germany  and  look  for  another  country  where 
living  conditions  and  working  conditions  were  better. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  vou  know  whether  or  not  thousands  of  Ger- 
mans were  migrating  to  the  United  States  or  attempting  to  migrate 
to  the  United  States  at  that  time,  due  to  the  adverse  economic  con- 
ditions in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  many,  many  thousands. 

Mr.  ^L\TTHEWS.  And  you  were  one  who  came? 


8334  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  One  of  them. 
Mr.  Matthews.  Who  came  with  that  motive? 
Air.  Werner.     That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  anticipating  other  questions,  let  me  ask 
you  this:  From  the  time  of  your  arrival  in  the  United  States  when 
you  received  employment  within  24  hours  of  your  landing  here,  were 
you  continuously  employed  up  until  this  year? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Air.  Matthews.  Were  you  ever  without  employment  for  a  period 
of  more  than  5  days  during  those  12  years? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  never. 

Mr.  Matthews.  For  a  period  of  12  years  then,  you  foimd  that 
you  were  able  to  get  a  job  and  if  you  for  any  reason  left  a  position 
you  had  no  serious  diihcidty  in  getting  another  one? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right.     I  never  had  any  difficulty. 

Air.  Voorhis.  May  I  interject?  Even  during  the  depression  that 
was  still  true? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right;  I  worked  right  through  it. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  During  1930  and  1931? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  always  worked. 

Air.  AIatthews.  And  your  employment  was  that  of  a  chef? 

Air.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Air.  AIatthews.  In  restaurants  and  dining  cars? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Air.  AIatthews.  Did  you  know  of  an  instance  wherem  a  German 
ship  arrived  at  the  port  of  Houston,  Tex.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  In  which  a  large  number  of  the  crew  jumped  ship 
in  order  to  remain  in  the  United  vStates? 

Air.  Werner.  Yes;  that  happened  in  1923. 

Air.  Matthews.  How  many  members  were  there  of  the  crew  of 
that  particular  ship? 

Mr.  Werner.  Fifty- two. 

Air.  AIatthews.  Do  you  remember  the  name  of  the  ship? 

Air.  Werner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  AIatthews.  Was  it  the  Minclen? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  Minden;  that  is  right. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  Of  the  52  members  of  the  crew  how  many  jumped 
ship  at  Houston,  Tex.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Forty-eight. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  that  include  the  captain  of  the  ship? 

Air.  Werner.  The  captain  and  the  chief  engineer. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  The  captain  and  the  chief  engineer  were  among 
those  who  jumped  ship  in  the  United  States? 

Air.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  did  you  know  of  that  incident? 

Air.  Werner.  From  certain  information  in  my  home  to^vn.  My 
job  was  to  prepare  wage  lists  for  the  crew  members  in  the  office  in 
my  home  town.  As  soon  as  a  boat  leaves  a  foreign  harbor  we  have 
to  make  an  exact  list  who  is  on  the  boat  and  who  jumps  the  boat. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  in  your  capacity  as  an  employee  in  the 
offices  of  the  North  German  Lloyd  you  personally  dealt  with  this 
question  of 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AMERICAN  TROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8335 

Mr.  Matthews.  FortA^-eight  mcinbors  of  this  crew  jumping  the 
ship  in  Houston,  Tex.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  AVhcn  was  that? 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  1923.  The  point,  Congressman  Voorhis,  is 
that  Mr.  Werner  was  one  of  the  thousands  who  were  getting  out  of 
Germany  because  of  adverse  economic  conditions  and  going  to  the 
United  States  because  they  believed  it  was  a  land  of  opportunity;  is 
that  correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Your  first  employment  then  was  that  of  a  chef 
when  jT^ou  landed  ui  the  United  States,  was  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  as  a  bus  boy. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  how  long  did  you  engage  in  that  work? 

Mr.  Werner.  About  4  weeks. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  was  your  next  job? 

Mr.  Werner.  Kitchen  man. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  your  next  job? 

Mr.  Werner.  Waiter. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  after  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  Chef. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Chef? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words  you  were  promoted  from  kitchen 
boy  to  chef? 

Nir.  Werner.  Yes;  I  promoted  myself. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  engage  m  any  other  kmd  of  work 
in  this  country,  remunerative  employment,  other  than  that  of  working 
in  restaurants  and  dming  cars? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  j^ou  ever  a  member  of  the  Friends  of  New 
Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  \Mien  did  you  jom  the  Friends  of  New  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.   1933  or  1934;  I  am  not  quite  sure. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  how  long  did  you  remain  a  member  of  the 
Friends  of  New  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  For  about  8  months. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  state  briefly  why  you  joined  the  Friends 
of  New  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  can. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  do  so? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes.  There  was  a  meeting  in  New  York  in  the  Turn- 
verein  Hall  on  Eighty-fifth  Street  and  they  gave  out  cjuite  a  few  leaf- 
lets and  propaganda  and  so  I  decided  I  wanted  to  go  over  there.  I 
took  my  wife  and  we  both  went  over  there.  One  of  the  storm  troopers 
I  know^  slightly.  He  met  me  and  talked  to  me  and  asked  if  I  don't 
like  to  join  and  so  on.  There  were  fellows  in  uniform.  At  that  time 
they  wore  white  shirts  and  boots,  riding  boots.  I  was  raised  in  a 
military  school  and  I  guess  it  came  over  me  again  and  I  joined  the 
Friends  of  New  Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  was  the  leader  of  the  Friends  of  New  Ger- 
many at  that  time? 

62626— 11— vol.  14 12 


8336  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  There  was  a  Fritz  Gissibl  and  right  after  that  was 
Walter. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Walter? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  Spanknoebel? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  one  of  the  leaders  of  the  Friends  of  New 
Germany  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  that  is  rig-ht. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  join  the  storm  troopers  in  the  Friends  of 
New  Germany  or  were  you  just  a  member  of  the  organization? 

Mr.  Werner.  Just  a  member  of  the  organization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  did  not  join  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  No  ;  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  the  storm  troopers  in  the  Friends  of  New 
Germany  known  as  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  the  initials  "O.  D."  the  abbreviation  for  the 
words  Ordnungs  Dienst? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  spoke  of  going  to  a  meeting  of  the  Friends  of 
New  Germany  in  the  Turnverein  Hall.     Is  that  a  German  center? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  New  York  City? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  Eighty-fifth  Street  and  Lexington  Avenue. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  Turnverein  mean  gymnastic  society? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  drop  out  of  the  Fiiends  of  New  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  your  own  volition? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  state  briefly  why  you  dropped  out  of  the 
Friends  of  New  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes.  I  had  a  chance  to  buy  a  house  in  New  Jersey 
and  I  liked  the  country  life.  I  like  a  little  farming,  so  I  bought  the 
house  and  I  moved  out  to  Jersey  and  forgot  all  about  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  you  had  earned  enough  money  as  a 
kitchen  employee,  a  waiter,  and  a  chef  from  the  time  of  your  arrival 
in  this  country  to  buy  a  house? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Over  what  period  of  years  was  that,  from  the 
time  of  your  arrival  here,  until  you  were  able  to  buy  your  own  home? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  will  say  about  7  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  in  the  course  of  7  years  you  had  saved 
enough  money  from  your  wages  to  buy  a  house  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  in  New  Jersey  did  you  buy  that  home? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  Spottswood. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Spottswood,  N.  J.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  did  you  live  in  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Werner.  About  14  or  15  months. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  then  did  you  go  back  to  New  York  to  live? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  to  work? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8337 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  you  join  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  June  1938. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  membership  book  of  the  German- 
American  Bund,  No.  18344,  and  ask  you  if  j^ou  can  identify  that  as 
your  own  membership  book  in  tlie  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  this  is  my  card. 

Mr.  Matthews.  By  whom  was  this  card  issued? 

Mr.  Werner.  B}'  James  Wheeler  Hill. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  his  name  signed  at  the  bottom  of  tlie  card? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  is  the  date  of  the  issuance  of  this  card? 

Mr.  Werner.  11th  of  July  1938. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  the  name  of  Fritz  Kulm  affixed  to  this  card  as 
the  bundesleitung 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Or  on  behalf  of  the  bundesleitung? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right.     He  was  the  leader  of  the  bund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  Fritz  Kuhn  personally? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  veiy  good. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  3^ou  know  him  well  enough  to  address  him 
by  the  name  of  "Fritz"? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  this  book  show  that  your  membership  dues 
were  paid  up? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right;  paid  up  to  December  1939. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  stamps  are  affixed  to  your  book  which  indi- 
cate that  you  had  paid  your  dues,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  also  join  the  O.  D.  division  of  the  Ger- 
man-American Bund  or  the  storm  troopers? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  join  the  storm  troopers  at  the  same  time 
you  joined  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  the  same  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  remain  a  member  of  the  O.  D.  or  the 
storm  troopers  from  that  time  until  you  left  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  an  arm  band  with  the  letters  "O.  D." 
on  it  and  the  insignia  of  the  German-American  Bund  and  ask  you  if 
you  can  identifj^  that  as  your  own  arm  band? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  this  is  my  own  arm  band. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  the  insignia  of  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  swastika  superimposed  on  the  rising  sun? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Above  the  letters  A.  V.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  these  the  trousers  and  the  belt  which  you 
used  as  a  member  of  the  storm  troopers  of  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  this  is  my  trousers  and  my  belt. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A  pair  of  black  trousers  and  a  Sam  Brown  belt.'' 


8338  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  this  the  shirt  which  you  used  as  a  member  of 
the  storm  troopers  of  the  German- American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  it  is  my  shirt. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  this  the  black  tie  which  you  used  as  a  part  of 
your  uniform? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  this  is  my  tie. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  identify  this  as  the  cap  which  you  used 
as  a  part  of  your  uniform  in  the  storm  troopers? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  this  is  my  cap. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  this  flag,  Mr.  Werner? 

Mr.  Werner.  This  is  the  bund  flag. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  your  own  flag? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  this  is  my  own  flag.  I  bought  it  in  Camp 
Siegfried. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  bought  this  flag  in  Camp  Siegfried? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  Long  Island? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  What  did  you  use  that  for? 

Mr.  Werner.  Put  it  up  in  my  home — in  my  apartment. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wliat  does  the  "A.  V."  stand  for? 

Mr.  Werner.  Amerikadeutscher  Volksbund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  another  strap,  Mr.  Werner,  and  ask 
you  if  you  can  identify  that  as  a  part  of  your  uniform  as  a  Storm 
trooper  in  the  German- American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes ;  this  is  my  strap  for  my  belt. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  that  go  over  your  shoulder? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  fasten  at  the  ends  of  the  belt? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  receive  any  special  instructions  at  any 
time  in  the  use  of  this  belt? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  what  they  were? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  case  of  fighting  we  took  this  belt  off  from  our 
shoulders  and  slung  it  around  our  arm  and  used  it  as  a  powerful 
weapon  (demonstrating) . 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  a  specific  instruction  which  members  of 
the  O.  D.  received? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  use  of  this  strap? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  For  purposes  of  fighting? 

Air.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  For  fighting  where? 

Mr.  Werner.  On  streets  and  in  meeting  halls. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  some  of  the  members 
of  the  storm  troopers  had  metal  brads  put  into  this  strap? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  To  make  a  more  effective  weapon? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  see  any  of  these  straps  used  in 
combat? 


I'X-A.MKIUCAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8339 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  the  streets? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  New  York? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  on  the  strei^ts  and  in  halls. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  particular  occasions  were  there  when  these 
straps  w^ere  used  for  fighting? 

Mr.  Werner.  There  was  one  in  a  hall  where  w^e  had  a  meeting  on 
Eighty-sixth  Street  and  some  Jewish  war  veterans  came  up  and  tried 
to  break  up  the  meeting  or  tried  to  make  some  noise  anyhow,  and 
some  of  my  former  friends  took  off  their  straps  and  hit  them  with  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  receive  any  other  instructions  in  how  to 
fight  other  than  those  which  had  to  do  with  the  use  of  this  strap? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  w^as  trained  in  jiu  jitsu. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  all  of  the  members  of  the  storm  troopers 
trained  in  jiu  jitsu? 

Mr.  Werner.  Ninety  percent. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  regular  training  in  jiu  jitsu? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  had. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  there  a  special  night  of  the  week  set  apart 
for  such  training? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  what  night  of  the  week  that  was? 

Mr.  Werner.  Wednesday  night. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Every  Wednesday  night  through  the  year? 

Mr.  Werner.  During  the  wintertime. 

Mr.  Matthews.  During  the  wintertime  only? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

]Mr.  Matthews.  Every  Wednesday  night? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Members  of  the  storm  troopers  w^ere  instructed  in 
the  use  of  jiu  jitsu? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  For  what  purpose  was  that  instruction  to  be  used? 

Mr.  Werner.  To  learn  and  to  use  as  many  tricks  as  possible  in  case 
of  fighting. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  there  any  other  weapons  or  objects  used  as 
w^eapons  in  which  you  received  instructions  for  purposes  of  fighting? 

^Ir.  Werner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  a  flaslilight  as  a  part  of  your  equip- 
ment? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  had.     We  used  that  as  a  weapon  too. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  trained  to  use  the  flashlight  as  a  weapon 
or  were  you  just  told 

Mr.  Werner.  We  w^ere  just  told.  I  don't  think  we  had  any  need 
for  training  for  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  this  a  large  flashlight? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  large? 

]Mr.  Werner.  Fourteen  inches. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Fourteen  inches  long? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  the  fla.shlights  actually  used  in  fights  that 
took  place  during  your  membership  in  the  storm  troopers? 


8340  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  it  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  receive  any  other  instructions  that 
had  to  do  with  physical  violence? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  summertime  in  Camp  Siegfried  we  were 
trained  in  shooting  rifles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  had  rifle  practice? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  supplied  the  rifles  for  that  practice? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  O.  D. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  personally  have  your  rifle  or  were  they 
stored  somewhere  in  the  custody  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  W^ERNER.  They  were  stored  in  the  custody  of  the  bund — in 
the  custody  of  the  O.  D. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  They  were  brought  to  Camp  Siegfried  in  the 
summertime  and  you  were  trained  in  the  use  of  them? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  a  skilled  marksman? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  was  pretty  good. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  receive  training  in  Germany  in  marks- 
jnanship? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  training  in  other  ways  with  a  view 
toward  eventually  fighting? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  we  were  sent  out  nights  for  some  kind  of  war 
games  out  in  Flushing  MeadoAvs  near  the  Worlds  Fair  and  had  mili- 
tary drills  on  every  Monday  night  when  we  had  our  so-called  appell 
night. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  an  appell  night? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  army  language  it  means  some  kind  of — you 
have  to  be  there  on  the  place  on  a  certain  time  and  you  have  to  do 
whatever  you  are  told  to  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words  it  was  a  compulsorj^  meeting  of 
the  Storm  Troopers,  was  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  don't  want  to  say  exactly  compulsory  but  it  was 
almost  compulsory. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  did  you  ever  know  of  any  occasion  when 
some  member  of  the  bund  had  failed,  or  some  member  of  the  Storm 
Troopers  had  failed  to  attend  one  of  these  meetings  and  as  a  result 
got  into  trouble  over  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  what  that  incident  was? 

Mr.  Werner.  There  was  one  certain  O.  D.  man — he  did  not  show 
up  for  two  or  three  nights  and  his  group  leader  asked  him  why  he 
didn't  come  and  he  had  the  excuse  that  coidd  not  stand  up.  He 
said  he  was  working  but  he  was  not  working.  Somebody  else  saw 
liim,  I  guess,  and  he  had  to  stand  in  front  of  the  line  and  the  O.  D. 
leader  was  hollering  at  him  and  told  him  "we  are  soldiers  over  here 
and  we  have  to  do  our  duty;  that  is  why  3^ou  became  a  member  of 
the  O.  D.  It  is  supposed  to  be  an  honor  and  if  you  can't  do  that  it 
is  better  that  you  drop  out  altogether;  it  is  much  better  to  have  ten 
good  and  faithful  men  than  one  hundred  unfaithful  men." 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8341 

Mr.  Starnes.  May  1  ask  a  question  at  that  point,  Doctor.  You 
said  a  moment  ago  you  had  mihtary  drills  in  Flushing  Meadows? 

Mr.  Wekner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  kind  of  drill  was  that?  Was  that  extended 
order  drill,  battle  formations  and  patrols  and  that  type  of  drill  or  just 
mass  military  drill  for  disciplinary  purposes? 

Mr.  AVerner.  We  had  about  300  O.  D.  men  that  certain  night  and 
we  were  split  in  two  groups,  150  men  each  and  each  group  split  up  and 
some  were  in  patrols  of  from  5  to  10.  The  first  unit  marched  out 
about  an  hour  ahead  of  us  and  there  was  about  a  two  and  a  half  mile 
square  that  they  had  to  hide  themselves  in  and  we  were  sent  after 
them  to  find  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words  they  were  divided  into  two  groups,  one 
group  going  out  in  advance  to  take  up  certain  positions? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  military  formation? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  then  the  second  group  proceeded  out  in  military 
formation  to  gain  contact  with  tliis  group? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Regular  military  drills  or  maneuvers? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner,  was  this  rifle  practice  engaged  in, 
according  to  anything  that  you  ever  heard,  simply  for  the  purpose  of 
knowing  how  to  use  firearms  for  hunting? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  not  for  hunthig. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliat  did  you  understand  the  purpose  of  this 
rifle  practice  to  be? 

Mr.  Werner.  At  the  end  of  each  summer  there  was  some  kind  of  a 
tournament  and  in  this  tournament  there  was  rifle  practice  and  the 
best  shots  of  each  unit,  about  twelve  men,  were  specially  trained  to 
try  to  win  a  prize  for  their  unit. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Why  were  j^ou  trained  in  rifle  practice?  Was 
there  ever  anything  said  about  the  coming  of  a  tune  when  there  would 
be  violent  uprisings  that  would  call  for  the  use  of  firearms? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  that  occasion  known  as  when  this  up- 
rising would  take  place? 

Mr.  Werner.  This  was  in  Turnverein  Hall  in  Astoria.  We  had  a 
Bezirk  meeting — that  means  three  units  like  Manhattan,  Astoria 
and  Bronx. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  B-e-z-i-r-k,  is  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  B-e-z-i-r-k,  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  the  rifle  practice  that  you  had  play  a  part  in 
the  military  drills — was  that  coordinated? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  it  w^as. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  they  tell  you  why  it  was  necessary  to  have  these 
night  maneuvers  of  a  military  nature?  Were  they  in  preparation  for 
any  particular  event? 

Mr.  Werner.  Our  leaders  told  us  many,  many  times  that  we  have 
to  be  prepared — we  have  to  be  prepared  or  we  have  to  be  fit  for  a 
certain  day;  when  that  certain  day  is  coming  that  w^e  know  how  to 
behave  ourselves  and  so  we  know  what  to  do  on  that  day. 


8342  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  spoke  of  "That  Day"  or  "The  Day"  that  was 
coming? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  "The  Day." 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  what  did  you  understand  from  their  instruc- 
tions and  from  the  training  that  was  given  you,  what  did  you  under- 
stand that  "that  day"  would  mean? 

Mr.  Werner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes,  Or  what  did  it  mean? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  overthrow  of  this  Government  and  the  estab- 
hshing  of  a  government  hke  they  have  in  Germany. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  was  "the  day"  for  which  they  told  you  and 
other  O.  D.  men  were  preparing? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  that  you  should  train  yourselves  for  it  and  fit 
yourselves  for  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  For  "the  day"  when  National  Socialism  would  super- 
cede this  from  of  Government? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  go  ahead.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner,  you  were  not  a  citizen  of  the  United 
States  during  that  entire  time,  were  you? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Before  you  start  on  that  I  want  to  ask  one  question. 
I  want  to  ask  Mr.  Werner  if  he  knows  where  the  rifles  were  obtained 
that  were  used  by  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  These  rifles  we  used  in  Camp  Siegfried  were  in  the 
possession  of  the  O.  D.  men  for  many  years. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Where  did  they  get  them,  do  you  know? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  any  particular  individual  O.  D. 
member  who  had  the  custody  of  these  guns? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  his  name? 

Mr.  Werner.  Josef  Resell. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  spelled  R-e-s-c-h? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  stiU  a  member  of  the  O.  D.? 

Mr,  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  know  of  your  own  personal  knowledge  that 
he  was  a  member  of  the  O.  D.  up  to  last  February,  at  least,  is  that 
correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  have  reason  to  believe  he  is  still  a 
member? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  still  a  member. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  during  the  entire  time  that  you  were  a 
member  of  the  storm  troopers  receiving  training  looking  toward 
eventual  violent  uprisings,  and  before  that  to  the  use  of  violence  on 
the  streets  and  in  the  halls,  you  were  not  a  citizen  of  the  United  States, 
is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  was  not  a  citizen,  no. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8343 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  any  other  members  of  the  ().  D. 
who  wore  not  eitizens  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner,  Fritz  Kuhn  testified  before  this 
committee  that  tlie  German-American  Bund  at  a  certain  time  was 
ordered  to  remove  from  its  rolls  all  persons  who  were  not  citizens  of 
the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  I  remember  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  testimony  true? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  the  testimony  was  not  true. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  read  about  it  in  the  papers  at  the  time 
Mr.  Kuhn  testified  here? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  it  your  statement  that  the  German- American 
Bmid  did  not  do  anything  to  remove  from  its  membership  rolls  those 
who  were  not  citizens  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  bund  never  did  any  such  thing. 

Mr.  IMatthews.  Was  there  any  discussion  of  this  subject  in  Bund 
circles  or  m  the  O.  D.  at  the  time  that  Fritz  Kuhn  testified  before  this 
committee? 

Air.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  there  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  said  about  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  "Just  forget  about  it." 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words  did  the  members  of  the  Bund  and 
the  O.  D.  understand  that  Mr.  Kuhn  was  testifying  falsely  on  this 
question  before  this  committee? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  everybody  knew  about  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  were  you  ever  told  in  anyway  whatsoever  it 
woidd  be  advisable  for  you  to  get  out  of  the  Bund  because  you  were 
not  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Nobody  ever  said  any  such  thing  to  me  or  anybody 
else  who  was  not  a  citizen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  of  a  single  instance  in  which  anyone 
resigned  from  the  Bund  or  from  the  O.  D.  because  he  was  not  a 
citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Air.  Werner.  No. 

Air.  AIatthews.  You  never  heard  of  such  an  incident? 

Air.  Werner.  I  never  heard  of  it. 

Air.  AIatthews.  And  you  can  state  that  the  officials  of  the  Bund 
never  took  any  steps  whatsoever  to  remove  from  their  rolls  those  who 
were  not  citizens  of  the  United  States? 

Air.  Werner.  That  is  right.     Nobody  ever  took  any  steps. 

Air.  Starnes.  Dr.  AIatthews,  that  is  rather  important  testimony. 
You  say  you  know  of  a  number  of  other  O.  D.  who  are  not  citizens? 

Mr,  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Air.  Starnes.  Approximately  how  many  would  you  say  there  are 
who  are  members  of  the  bund  and  O.  D.  who  are  not  citizens  of  the 
United  States?  What  is  your  estimate  of  the  percentage  of  the  O.  D. 
men  that  you  personally  knew  who  were  not  citizens? 

Air.  Werner.  I  will  say  about  twenty-five  percent  of  the  O.  D. 
men  are  not  citizens. 

Air.  Starnes.  You  know  that  of  your  own  personal  kiiowledge 
after  having  been  in  personal  contact  with  them? 

Air.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 


8344  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  despite  the  testimony  of  Mr.  Kuhn  last  year? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  Mr.  Kunze  and  Mr.  Klapprott  of  this  week? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  which  they  stated  no  ahens  were  members  of  the 
German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Or  of  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  proceed,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  any  knowledge  with  respect  to  the 
membership  of  the  bund  itself  on  this  question?  You  have  testified 
that  about  25  percent  of  the  members  of  the  O.  D. 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  — were  not  citizens? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  that  same  general  percentage  prevail  through 
the  membership  of  the  bund  itself? 

Mr.  Werner.  To  my  knowledge,  yes;  it  might  even  be  higher. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Approximately  how  many  members  of  the  bund 
were  there  in  the  New  York  area  where  you  held  your  membership? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  Manhattan  area? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

Mr.  Werner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  am  speaking  of  the  bund  now  and  not  the  O.  D. 

Mr.  Werner.  Up  to  February  1940  there  were  in  Manhattan;  288 
members  left. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  membership  of 
the  bund  in  the  districts  that  surround  New  York,  including  New 
York?  I  mean  by  that  the  Bronx,  Astoria,  New  Jersey,  and  the 
eastern  seaboard  district? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  could  not  say  exactly  the  number  of  them  but  the 
way  they  were  talking  I  would  say  between  eight  and  ten  thousand. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  see  any  membership  records  of  the 
bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  form  were  those  records? 

Mr.  Werner.  They  asked  for  volunteers  who  would  like  to  work 
in  the  office  in  the  bund — the  bund  office  and  who  knew  how  to  use 
a  typewriter.  I  volunteered  and  that  was  the  occasion  I  saw  some 
records  of  the  membership  records  of  the  bund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  those  membership  records  cards? 

Mr.  Werner.  They  were  cards;  yes. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Four  by  six  cards,  approximately,  would  you  say? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  something  like  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  typed  names  from  those  cards  onto 
sheets  of  paper? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  So  you  did  see  membership  cards  of  the  German- 
American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  From  that  first-hand  contact  with  the  member- 
ship records  did  you  obtain  any  idea  as  to  the  number  of  members 
in  the  New  York  area  or  in  the  bund  at  large? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8345 

Mr.  Werner.  All  I  saw  was  membership  cards  from  the  New  York 
area. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  it  is  your  testimony  that  twenty-five  percent 
or  more 

Mr.  Werner.  Or  more;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  — of  tlie  members  of  the  German-American  Bund 
as  distinguished  from  the  O.  D.  section  of  it,  were  not  citizens  of  the 
I'Tiilod  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  Heintz 
Tissen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  know  him  very  well. 

Mr.  Matthews.  His  last  name  is  spelled  Tissen? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  a  member  of  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  also  a  member  of  the  storm  troopers? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  was  a  citizen 
of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  not  a  citizen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  positive  that  he  is  not  a  citizen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Very  positive,  yes. 

IMr.  Matthews.  Is  he  still  a  member  of  the  0.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  his  wife  was  a  mem- 
ber of  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  His  wife  is  a  member  of  the  German-American 
Bund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  she  also  an  alien? 

Mr.  W^ERNER.  She  is  an  alien. 

Mr.  Matthews.  W^ere  they  both  born  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Heintz  Tissen  was 
ever  a  member  of  the  National  Guard  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  was  a  member  of  the  National  Guard. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where?     In  New  York? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  New  York,  yes.  As  much  as  I  know  it  was  the 
seventy-first  regiment. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Your  recollection  is  that  he  was  a  member  of  the 
seventy-first  regiment  of  the  National  Guard  of  New  York? 

jMr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  he  was  not  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  was  not  a  citizen  and  he  is  not  a  citizen  today. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  not  a  citizen  today  and  he  is  still  a  member 
of  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Ernst  Sotzek? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  one  of  the  leaders;  the  second  highest  in 
command.  . 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  the  second  highest  in  command  of  the  O.  D. . 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  His  name  is  spelled  S-o-t-z-e-k? 


3346  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  a  Max  Rapp? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  do  know  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  citizen  of  the 
United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  To  my  knowledge  he  is  an  ahen ;  he  is  not  a  citizen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Henry  Fluegge? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  I  know  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  citizen  of  the 
United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  not  a  citizen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  entered  the 
United  States  illegally? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  entered  the  United  States  illegally,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  year  did  he  enter  the  United  States 
illegally? 

Mr.  Werner.  To  my  knowledge  1923  or  1924. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  he  is  today  a  member  of  the  German-Ameri- 
can Bund  and  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right.  He  used  to  be  a  former  leader  of  the 
O.  D.  in  the  Friends  of  New  Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  a  Mr.  George  Frank? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  do  know  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  citizen  of  the 
United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  am  not  quite  sure  about  George  Frank  but  to  my 
knowledge  he  is  an  alien. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  your  best  belief  that  George  Frank  is  an 
alien? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  a  member  of  the  O.  D.  of  the  German- 
American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  he  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Werner  Ullrich? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  do  know  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  citizen  of  the 
United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  an  alien. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  also  a  member  of  the  O.  D.  of  the  German- 
American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  he  is  a  group  leader. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A  group  leader? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  unit? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  unit  of  Manhattan. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  many  members  are  there  in  a  group  in  the 
O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Eight  members  in  a  group  and  one  group  leader. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  there  are  three  groups  in  a  unit;  is  that 
correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  Three  groups  in  a  unit,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  Werner  Ullrich  was  a  group  leader  of  the 
O.  D.  in  Manhattan? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  g347 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  laiow  Willielm  Schelegel? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  1  know  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  vou  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  citizen  of 
the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  he  is  an  ahen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  also  an  alien? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Is  he  also  a  member  of  the  German-American 
Bund  and  of  its  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Ado  Bolilken? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  know  liim. 

Jvlr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  citizen  of 
the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  an  alien. 

^Ir.  Matthews.  Is  he  also  a  member  of  the  O.  D.  of  the  German- 
American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Mrs.  Hans  Zimmerman? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  laiow  her. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  she  was  an  alien? 

Mr.  Werner.  She  was  an  alien. 

Mr.  Matthews.  She  was  a  member  of  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  she  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  your  testimony  then,  Mr.  Werner,  that  you 
personally  know  members  of  the  O.  D.  who  are  still  members  of  the 
O.  D.  and  who  are  not  citizens  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  these  persons  are  receiving  training  and  have 
been  receiving  training  for  the  use  of  violence  at  the  present  time, 
when  there  are  not  conflicts  between  members  of  the  German- American 
Bund  and  citizens  of  the  United  States,  and  also  anticipating  the 
coming  of  "The  Day"? 

Mr.  W^ERNER.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  hear  any  member  of  the  German- 
American  Bund,  in  particular,  speak  of  the  time  when  "blood  will 
flow  in  the  streets  of  the  United  States"? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wfll  your  please  tell  who  that  was? 

Mr.  Werner.  It  was  the  O.  D.  leader  for  the  eastern  district, 
Herman  vSchwartzmann. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  was  it  he  made  the  statement  "blood  will 
flow  in  the  streets  of  the  United  States"? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  was  in  1989  in  Astoria  in  the  Turn  Hall  to 
one  of  our  big  meetings,  a  meeting  just  for  the  O.  D.'s. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  made  that  statement  at  a  big  meeting  of  the 
O.  D.'s? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  standing  in  front  of  all  of  us.  There  were 
about  300  O.  D.  men  and  he  made  that  statement. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  they  his  exact  words? 

Mr.  Werner.  Exactly  his  words. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "Blood  will  flow  in  the  streets  of  the  United 
States"? 


§348  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  did  you  understand  by  that? 

Mr.  Werner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  what  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  Just  for  "That  Day,"  for  'The  Day." 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  coming  of  'The  Day"? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  there  wouhl  be  a  revolutionary  overthrow 
of  the  existing  form  of  government  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right;  when  they  marched  through  the 
streets  and  go  down  to  Wall  Street  and  to  some  other  places. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Why  were  you  going  to  Wall  Street?  Was  there 
anything  said  about  going  to  Wall  Street  in  particular  on  the  occasion 
of  this  revolution? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  to  get  some  big  bankers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  to  be  done  with  the  big  bankers? 

Mr.  Werner.  Hang  them  up  on  the  next  tree  or  the  next  post  on 
the  street. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Statements  were  made  to  that  effect? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Or  in  that  language? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  meetings  of  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  when  "The  Day"  came  or  when  "The  Day" 
arrived  the  O.  D.  would  have  the  responsibility  of  going  down  to 
Wall  Street  among  other  places? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  hanging  big  bankers? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  At  that  point,  Doctor,  we  speak  here  of  "The  Day." 
Who  was  to  bring  about  that  day?  In  other  words  who  was  going  to 
bring  about  the  revolution?    Who  was  going  to  cause  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  When  that  word  came  from  the  highest  leader, 
I  imagine. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When  the  word  came  from  the  highest  leader? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  bund  or  from  the  National  Socialist  Party. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  who  is  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  highest  leader  from  the  bund  or  National 
Socialist  Party  is  Adolf  Hitler. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  when  "The  Day"  would  come? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When  he  gave  the  word? 

Mr.  Werner.  Wlien  he  gave  the  word,  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words  this  was  to  be  a  revolutionary  move- 
ment that  would  be  dictated  by  the  highest  leader? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  "WHiio  did  not  live  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  the  bund  itself  would  be  a  part  of  the  revolu- 
tionary movement? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  the  storm  troopers  would  play  a  vital  part  in 
that  because  of  their  training? 


UX-AMEliK  AN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  ^349 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  their  fitness? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  riglit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Physical  and  mental? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  iVnd  as  a  result  of  those  things  "blood  would  How 
in  the  streets  of  the  United  States"? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  riglit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  tliis  attack  on  Wall  Street  was  to  be  an  attack 
on  capitalism? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.    Starnes.  To    destroy    capitalism    and    substitute    therefor 
national  socialism? 

Air.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  what  you  were  told  would  come  about? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  proceed,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  connection,  Mr.  Werner,  did  the  names  of 
specific  individual  bankers  come  up? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wlio  were  they? 

Mr.  Werner.  There  was  Morgan,  Schiff,  and  Kulm  &  Loeb. 

Mr.  Matthews.  These  men  were  named  as  bankers  who  would  be 
the  objects  of  the  violence  of  the  O.  D.  when  "The  Day"  came? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right,  because  they  were  against  us — working 
against  us  and  so  forth. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner,  I  show  you  a  photograph  and  ask 
you  to  describe  that  photograph  briefly? 

(Handing  photograph  to  the  witness.) 

What  is  that  a  picture  of? 

Mr.  Werner.  This  is  a  picture  of  O.  D.  members  from  Bezirk,  New 
York. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did   that  include   Manhattan,    the   Bronx,   and 
Astoria? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  picture  of  the  members  of  the  O.  D.  from 
Manhattan,  the  Bronx,  and  Astoria? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you   know  most   of  the  individuals   whose 
faces  appear  in  that  photograph? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  know  most  of  them;  about  half  of  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  find  yourself  in  that  photograph? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  right  here,  carrying  the  flag  [indicating]. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  are  at  the  end  of  the  right  hand  top  row;  is 
that  right? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Or  at  the  end  of  the  top  row;  the  right-hand  end? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  I  ask  you  if  you  can  identify  on  that  picture 
Heintz  Tissen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  here  he  is  [indicating]. 

Mr.  Matthews,  Heintz  Tissen  is  in  the  second  row  and  the  eighth 
man  from  the  right-hand  end  of  the  row? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  Is  that  correct? 


8350  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  identify  Max  Rapp  on  that  photograph? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  here  [indicating]. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Max  Rapp  is  in  the  first  row  of  those  seated? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Or  the  second  row  of  the  picture  and  the  sixth  man 
from  the  left-hand  end  of  the  row;  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  can  you  fuid  Henry  Fhiegge  on  that  photo- 
graph? 

Mr.  Werner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  also  would  like  for  you  to  find  the  others,  the 
ones  you  have  named  as  aliens :  Werner  Ullrich,  Wilhelm  Schelegel 
and  Ado  Bohlken,  whichever  one  you  find  first  will  you  please  point 
out? 

Mr.  Werner.  Henry  Fluegge  was  not  present  on  that  occasion,  I 
don't  think. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  not  found  him? 

Mr.  Werner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews,  I  want  to  ask  one  more  question.  I 
asked  you  a  series  of  questions  awhile  ago  about  "The  Day"  and  the 
preparations  you  were  making  for  "The  Day." 

Mr,  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  military  training  and  night  drills  that  you  had? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  the  instructions  that  vou  had  as  to  what  you 
would  do  on  "That  Day"? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  when  "That  Day"  arrived  "blood  would  flow 
in  the  streets,"  and  so  forth.  Now,  that  occurred  in  the  New  York 
area,  did  it  not? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  These  drills  occurred  in  the  New  York  area  and 
these  meetings  were  held  in  that  area? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  these  conversations,  or  speeches,  or  statements 
were  made  to  members  of  the  O.  D.  of  the  bund  in  the  New  York 
area  and  it  was  all  while  you  were  a  member  of  the  bund,  a  paid-up 
member  of  the  bund  and  also  a  member  of  the  O.  D.  yourself? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  are  speaking  of  actual,  personal  knowledge 
and  contacts  there? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now  are  you  able  to  identify  Ullrich  or  Schelegel 
or  Bohlken  on  that  photograph? 

Mr.  Werner.  This  is  Schelegel  here  [indicating]. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  identify  as  Wilhelm  Schelegel  a  man  in  the 
third  row  from  the  top  of  the  picture,  the  eighth  man  from  the  right 
end? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  the  row? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  have  you  found  Ullrich  or  Bohlken? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8Sd1 

Mr.  Werner,  niricli  and  Bohlkon  are  not  in  the  picture. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Ullrich  and  Bolilken  are  not  in  this  picture? 

Mr.  Werner.  No.  These  are  not  all  the  members.  There  were 
some  missing — there  were  many  more. 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  were  members  absent  on  this  particular 
occasion? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  ask  this  be  marked  for  identification  as  exhibit 
No.  1. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  marked  exhibit  1  and  made  a  part  of  the 
record. 

(The  photograph  referred  to  was  marked  "Werner  Exhibit  1") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner,  did  you  know  a  member  of  the  Ger- 
man-American Bund  by  the  name  of  Schellenberger? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  what  Schellenberger's  first  name  is? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  I'  don't  recall  liis  right  first  name.  To  my 
best  of  knowledge  it  is  Bruno  but  I  am  not  quite  sure. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  You  knew  him  as  Schellenberger? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  as  Schellenberger. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  have  a  vague  recollection  his  first  name 
is  Bruno? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  was  a  member  of  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  a  member  of  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  a  member  of  the  O.  D.,  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  now  in  the 
United  States  Army? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  he  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  loiow  where  he  is  at  the  present  time  in 
the  United  States  Army? 

Mr.  Werner.  Fort  Dix. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  at  Fort  Dix? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  in  New  York  State? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  Fort  Dix? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  Fort  DLx. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  him  personally? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  photographs  of  him  or  any  other 
method  of  identification? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  not  from  Schellenberger.     He  belongs  to  the 

Bronx  unit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Reporter,  let  the  record  show  now  and  for 
practically  the  entire  hearing  a  quorum  of  the  full  committee  is 
present  in  addition  to  the  subcommittee.  That  quorum  is  composed 
of  Mr.  Voorhis,  Mr.  Mason.  Mr.  Dempsey  and  the  chairman. 


62626 — 41— vol.  14 13 


g352  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner,  I  show  you  a  photograph  and  ask 
you  if  this  is  a  photograph  of  yourself  in  this  [indicating  uniform] 
O.  D.  uniform  that  you  have  identified? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right;  that  is  me. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  was  that  taken,  approximately? 

Mr.  Werner.  On  Christmas. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Around  Christmas  of  this  last  year? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right,  last  Christmas. 

Mr.  Matthews.  December  1939? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  ask  that  that  be  marked  as  exhibit  No.  2. 
Mr.  Starnes.  The  photograph  will  be  marked  as  exhibit  No.  2. 
(The  photograph  referred  to  was  marked  "Werner  Exhibit  No.  2") 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  photograph,  Mr.  Werner,  and  ask 
you  if  that  was  taken  at  Madison  Square  Garden  during  a  rally  of  the 
German-American  Bund  on  February  28,  1939? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  February  1939. 

Mr.  Matthews.  February  28,  1939? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  IVIatthews.  And  is  this  a  picture  taken  on  the  platform  of 
Madison  Square  Garden? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  it  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  are  these  men  in  the  picture  members  of 
the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  the  individual  in  the  foreground  of  this  picture 
yourself? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right;  that  is  me. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  appear  to  be  on  the  right-hand  end  of  the 
line  on  the  platform  of  Madison  Square  Garden  that  night  in  your 
O.  D.  uniform? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  ask  that  this  be  marked  as  exhibit  No.  3. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  may  be  marked  "Exhibit  3"  and  made  a  part  of 
the  record. 
(The  photograph  referred  to  was  marked  "Werner  Exhibit  No.  3") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner,  do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of 
Hans  Meyer? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  know  him  very  well. 

Mr.  Matthews.  M-e-y-e-r? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  he  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliere  is  he  now,  do  you  know? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  in  Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  a  member  of  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  a  member  of  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  was  a  leader  of  the  O.  D. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  when  he  went  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  summer  of  1939. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Could  you  help  me  find  liis  photograph  in  this 
pile  of  pictures? 

Mr.  Werner.  This  is  him. 


rX-AMEKK'AN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8353 

Mr.  Matthews.  Ho  is  in  the  first  row  of  the  photograph,  the  fifth 
from  the  end,  is  tiuit  correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  Hans  Meyer? 

Mr.  AVerner.  Hans  Meyer. 

Mr.  Dempsey.  Why  did  he  go  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  why  he  went  to  Germany, 
Mr.  Werner? 

Mr.  Werner.  Well,  his  vocation  is  a  mechanic.  He  was  called 
back  by  the  German  Government  with  everything  paid,  his  trip  for 
himself,  for  his  wife  and  child  and  a  job  over  in  Germany — a  small 
liouse  and  garden. 

Mr.  Dempsey.  What  kind  of  a  job  did  he  receive  over  there? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  worked  in  an  airplane  factory — in  a  Hermann 
Goering  airplane  factory. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  Magdeberg,  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  say  he  was  called  back.  You  stated  he  was 
an  American  citizen,  didn't  you? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  he  was  called  to  Germany  by  the  German 
Government? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  through  the  German  consul  in  New  York. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  see  him  at  the  time  of  his  departure  from 
the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  talk  with  him  about  his  going  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  MaTTHEWs.  Did  you  understand  from  him  that  he  had  received 
both  instructions  and  passage  from  the  German  consulate  in  New 
York? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  To  go  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  the  individual  in  the  German  consulate  in 
New  York,  the  Consul  Hans  Borchers? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  consul  general. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Consul  B-o-r-c-h-e-r-s  delivered  instructions  to 
Hans  Meyer? 

Mr.  Werner.  B-o-r-c-h-e-r-t. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  there  a  "t"  in  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  think  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  think  not  but  we  can  verify  that.  Hans  Meyer 
received  instructions  and  passage  for  himself  and  family? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Despite  the  fact  that  he  was  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  From  the  consul  general  in  New  York  to  go  to 
Germany  and  work  in  the  Hermann  Goering  airplane  factory? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Last  summer,  a  year  ago? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Just  prior  to  the  outbreak  of  war? 

Mr.  Werner.  About  in  June. 


8354  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  understood  in  the  O.  D.  and  German- 
American  Bund  that  American  citizens  who  were  members  of  these 
organizations  were  also  subject  to  orders  from  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  was  understood. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  was  the  understanding? 

Mr.  Werner.  It  was  understood. 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  is  no  doubt  in  your  mind  about  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  No  doubt  in  my  mind  about  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  About  the  fact  that  anyone  who  was  a  member  of 
the  O.  D.  and  the  German- American  Bund  were  subject  to  orders  from 
Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right.  He  isn't  the  only  one  who  went  back. 
There  was  another  citizen  from  this  country. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  name  someone  else  who  was  a 
citizen  of  the  United  States  and  was  called  back  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  There  was  Hans  Asch;  he  was  a  mechanic  too. 

Mr.  Dempsey,  When  you  say  "called  back,"  you  mean  ordered 
back? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  guess  that  is  almost  the  same. 

Mr.  Dempsey.  It  was  not  clear  in  my  own  mind. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Did  they  receive  instructions  to  go  back? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  will  say  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  of  any  instance  in  which  a  member 
of  the  O.  D.  or  the  German- American  Bund  received  instructions  to 
go  to  Germany  and  did  not  comply? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  not  comply  with  those  instructions? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  I  don't  know  about  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  don't  know  of  such  instances? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  you  do  know  of  your  first-hand  conversation 
with  Asch  and  Meyer? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  Asch  went  overnight.  He  didn't  have  time  to 
say  goodby  to  anyone. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  he  received  instructions  and  went 
immediately? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Without  even  an  opportunity  to  say  goodbye? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  did  you  know  that  he  went  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  wrote  a  letter  to  some  of  his  friends  over  here. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Which  indicated  that  he  was  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  was  in  Germany  and  working  in  the  factory  in 
the  southern  part  of  Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Rudolf  Markmann 
is  now  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  is  in  Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  receive  instructions  to  go  to  Germany  or 
did  he  escape  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  I  would  say  he  ran  away  from  here.  That  was 
in  the  beguining  of  the  investigation  of  Fritz  Kulm. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  a  little  more  than  a  year  ago? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 


UX-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8355 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  at  that  time  Markmann  decided  to  get  out  of 
the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right,  disappear. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  go  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Werner.  To  my  knowledge  he  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  far  as  you  Imow  he  was  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  loiow  any  peculiar  circumstances  sur- 
rounding his  desire  to  get  out  of  the  United  States  and  go  to  Germany? 

Mr,  Werner.  Yes;  he  sneaked  out  of  this  coimtry.  He  wanted 
nobody  to  know  about  it.  Even  his  plans  were  to  hide  himself  in 
a  box  and  some  of  us  should  carry  him  up  on  the  boat  in  the  box  and 
leave  the  box  and  then  he  would  get  out,  but  we  did  not  do  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  he  wanted  to  be  carried  aboard  ship  in  a 
box? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  one  of  my  friends  brought  him  on  the  boat  just 
5  mmutes  before  sailing  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  was  that,  Josef  Kesch? 

Mr.  Werner.  Josef  Resch,  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  your  roommate? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes ;  I  lived  with  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  lived  with  Josef  Resell? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  Josef  Resch  took  Markmann  aboard  ship? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  knew  about  Hans  Meyer  going  to  Ger- 
many because  he  received  mstructions  from  the  German  consul  gen- 
eral in  New  York.  Did  members  of  the  O.  D.  go  down  to  the  boat 
to  see  Hans  Meyer  off? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  all  the  members. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  the  members? 

Mr.  Werner.  All  the  members,  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliat  boat  did  he  sail  on,  do  you  recall? 

Mr.  Werner.  It  was  the  Hamburg-American  Line,  the  New  York 
or  the  Hamburg. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Either  the  New  York  or  Hamburg? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  the  Hamburg-American  Line? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  vou  go  down  to  the  ship  personallv  to  see 
him  off? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  To  see  who  off? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Hans  Meyer.  And  you  say  many  other  members 
of  the  O.  D.  went  down  to  the  boat  to  see  him  off? 

Mr.  Werner.  There  were  about  50  or  60  members  of  the  O.  D. 

Mr.  ]\L\TTHEws.  Were  you  received  aboard  ship  in  any  special 
manner  by  ship  officials? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  we  were  led  to  a  special  dining  room. 
It  was  just  reserved  for  him  so  he  could  have  some  kind  of  farewell 
party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  all  in  O.  D.  uniforms? 


3356  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  Not  in  fiill  uniform.  We  had  our  black  trousers, 
grey  shirt,  and  black  tie.  We  were  not  allowed  to  go  on  a  German  boat 
in  the  full  uniform. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  That  is  you  did  not  have  the  cap  on? 

Mr.  Werner.  Did  not  have  the  cap  on  or  we  didn't  have  the  belt 
on.     We  had  this  arm  band  on. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  had  the  arm  band  on? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  but  not  the  full  time.  We  sung  a  couple  of 
songs,  one  special  song,  and  then  we  put  on  this  arm  band. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  you  had  the  trousers  and  the  grey  shirt  and 
black  tie? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  part  of  the  time  you  had  the  arm  band  on? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  were  given  a  special  dining  room  by  the 
officials  of  the  boat? 

Mr.  Werner.  We  were  given  a  special  dining  room,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  by  the  captain,  or  do  you  know? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  am  not  quite  sure,  but  I  guess  they  would  have  to 
have  the  captain's  permission. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Did  these  people  want  to  go  back  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  guess  they  wanted  to  go  back.  They  pictured 
everything  so  nice  and  quiet  and  peaceful  and  plenty  of  work  and 
good  living  conditions  over  in  Germany,  so  I  guess  everybody  was 
wilhng  to  go. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  do  you  know  of  any  instance  that  might 
be  called  an  exception  to  that,  where  any  one  of  these  persons  actually 
wept  because  he  had  to  leave  the  United  vStates  under  orders? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  was  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  Hans  Meyer,  and  one  fellow  by  the  name  of  Hans 
Zimmerman. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  they  say  they  preferred  so  much  to  stay  in 
America  that  they  actually  wept  when  they  had  to  leave  the  United 
States  to  go  to  Germany — did  they  explain  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  Leaving  so  many  friends  l)ehind  and  there  were 
some  good  fellows — I  guess  that  touched  their  heart. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Ernst  Sotzek  was  in 
Germany  recently? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Ernst  Sotzek  is  now  what  in  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  O.  D.  leader  for  the  unit  of  Manhattan. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  the  leader  for  the  Manhattan  unit  of  the 
O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wlien  was  he  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  To  my  best  knowledge  the  last  time  was  1936  or 
1937.     I  am  not  quite  sure. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  hear  him  say  anything  about 
whether  or  not  he  had  wanted  to  remain  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  did  he  say  about  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  One  of  his  brothers  is  a  very  high  official  in  the  Nazi 
Party  in  East  Prussia  and  he  went  back  over  there  for  a  visit.     He 


rX-AMKKICAX   I'UdPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8357 

made  a  remark  that  he  would  like  to  stay  over  there  and  his  brother 
and  some  other  officials  told  him  to  go  back  to  the  United  States, 
become  a  citizen — he  could  do  much  more  good  for  German}^  and  for 
the  ideals  they  have  over  here  than  over  there;  they  have  plenty  of 
men  over  there,  but  they  need  some  good  men  out  in  the  United 
States. 

Mr.  Matthews.  So  he  was  advised  to  return  to  the  United  States 
despite  his  desii-e  to  remain  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Because  bund  leaders  and  Nazi  leaders  were 
leaders  in  the  United  States? 

.Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  more  than  he  was  needed  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  he  came  back  to  the  United  States  and  is 
now  the  O.  D.  leader  for  the  unit  of  Manhattan? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Dempsey.  Was  he  a  citizen  of  the  United  States  at  the  time 
this  happened  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  he  was  not. 

Mr.  Dempsey.  Is  he  a  citizen  now? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Dempsey.  He  became  a  citizen  at  the  direction  of  the  officials, 
of  the  Nazi  Party? 

Mr.  Werner.  According  to  his  word,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  this  point,  Mr.  W^erner,  I  would  like  to  ask 
j^ou  if  you  have  recently  registered  as  an  alien  in  compliance  with 
the  recently  enacted  statute  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes.  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  when  you  registered  as  an  alien? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  was  the  third  or  fourth  day  after  it  became  the 
law. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  about  the  middle  of  September? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  would  say  so.  I  don't  loiow  exactly  the 
date,  but  I  am  sure  it  was  the  third  or  fourth  day  after  we  had  to 
register. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  registered  did  you  give  the  information 
that  you  had  been  a  member  of  the  German- American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  marked  down  I  was  a  member  of  the 
German- American  Bund  up  to  December  1939  because  I  only  paid 
dues  up  to  there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  you  continued  your  active  association  up  to 
the  end  of  February;  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  you  were  a  dues-paying  member  up  to  the 
end  of  December? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  Sotzek's  brother  in  East  Prussia  occupy  the 
position  of  Gauleiter  as  far  as  you  loiow? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  his  position  in  East  Prussia? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Arid  it  was  his  brother  who  advised  him  to  return 
to  the  United  States  to  take  up  a  position  of  leadership  in  the  bund? 


8358  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  G.  Wilhelm  Kunze  personally? 

Mr,  Werner.  Yes;  I  know  him  very  good. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  laiown  him  for  a  number  of  years? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  since  I  was  in  the  bund  I  know  him  and  for  the 
last  half  a  year  in  the  bund  I  had  a  chance  to  laiow  him  veiy  well. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  any  contact  with  him  after  he 
became  the  fuehrer 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  the  German-American  Bund  as  a  successor  to 
Fritz  Kuhn? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Kunze  ever  expressed 
any  deshe  to  remain  in  Germany  and  not  to  return  to  the  United 
States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  did  you  learn  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  One  of  the  officers  from  the  bund,  one  of  the  higher 
officers  from  the  bund,  told  me  and  some  other  fellows  that  Kunze 
would  like  to  stay  on  one  of  his  visits — wanted  to  stay  in  Germany 
and  even  begged  them  and  they  told  him  "no,"  that  he  has  to  go  back 
to  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  high  official  who  told  vou  that  Gustav 
Elmer? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  And  Gustav  Elmer  now  is  the  treasurer  of  the 
German -American  B  und  ? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  whether  or  not  Kunze  was  in  Ger- 
many in  1938? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  am  not  quite  sure. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Kunze  testified  before  this  committee  a  few 
days  ago  that  he  was  in  Germany  in  1938  and  also  in  1937.  \Mien  he 
returned  from  Germany  did  he  address  meetings  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes ;  he  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  OroftheO.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  describe  what  he  had  seen  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  described  everything  was  wonderful  and  he 
praised  the  conditions  over  in  Germany  sky  high. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  in  the  course  of  his  addressing  the  meetings 
of  the  bund  after  his  return  from  Germany  on  either  one  of  these  occa- 
sions, did  he  say  anything  about  having  met  high  officials  of  the  Nazi 
Party  or  of  the  German  Government  while  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  he  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  did? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Whom  did  he  say  he  had  met? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  met  former  bund  members,  high  officials  now  in 
Germany — talked  to  them,  and  to  our  knowledge  he  even  met  Hitler. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliat  do  you  mean  by  "to  your  knowledge  he 
even  met  Hitler"? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8359 

Mr.  Werner.  I  don't  know  if  he  was  the  one  who  said  that  he 
met  him  but  everyono  from  tlio  O.  D.  who  talked  about  it  said  Fritz 
Kuhn  met  Hitler  and  other  members 

Mr.  Matthews.  TMiether  or  not  Mr.  Kunze  did  meet  Hitler  is 
the  question.  Was  it  the  opinion  of  the  O.  D.  that  Kunze  met  Hitler 
in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes ;  that  he  talked  with  him. 

Mr.  M.\tthews.  That  he  as  well  as  Kuhn  had  met  Hitler? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  During  his  visit  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  TMiat  occupation  was  Kunze  alleged  to  have  been 
engaged  in  prior  to  his  assumption  of  positions  in  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  To  my  knowledge  and  to  the  other  fellows'  knowledge 
he  was  a  teacher  and  I  was  surprised  a  couple  of  days  ago  wdien  I  was 
reading  the  paper  that  he  was  a  chauffeur  and  mechanic  and  so  forth. 

Mr.  Matthews.  During  the  year  that  you  laiew  him  in  the 
leadership  of  the  bund  did  you  ever  hear  him  or  anyone  else  in  the 
bund  refer  to  him  as  a  chauffeur? 

Mr.  Werner.  Never. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  had  no  idea  that  he  had  been  a  chauffeur? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  never. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Most  of  his  adult  life? 

Mr.  Werner.  Never. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  he  testified  before  this  committee? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  was  the  belief  in  the  bund  that  he  had  been  a 
teacher? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Kunze  did  not  testify  that  he  had  ever  been 
a  teacher;  he  testified  that  he  had  been  a  chaufl'eur-mechanic. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  believe  he  testified  he  had  been  a  chauffeur- 
mechanic  since  1933  and  prior  to  that  time  he  was  in  Trinidad  and 
other  islands  of  the  West  Indies  where  he  held  several  positions. 
But  since  1933,  if  I  recall  his  testimony  correctly,  he  has  been  a  chauf- 
feur-mechanic. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  said  anything 
about  meeting  Walter  Kappe? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right.  He  said  he  met  Walter  Kappe  at 
Stuttgart. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  Stuttgart  in  the  Ausland  Institute? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  ho  met  Fritz  Gissibl? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  also  in  Stuttgart  in  the  Ausland  In- 
stitute? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

The  Chairman.  Now,  you  know  that  from  his  having  said  so? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  told  O.  D.  members  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  told  O.  D.  members  and  members  from  the 
German-American  Bund — at  a  membership  meeting. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  say  he  had  met  Josef  Schuster? 


3360  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr,  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  make  particular  reference  to  Kappe  and 
Gissibl  and  Schuster  because  they  had  all  been  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  they  were  former  members  and  leaders 
from  the  Friends  of  New  Germany  and  he  talked  to  them.  He  was 
wined  and  dined. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  what  position  Josef  Schuster  now 
occupies  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  second  district  leader  or  Gauleiter  from 
Bavaria. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  Nazi  Party  in  Bavaria? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  least  that  is  the  report  you  got  in  this  country 
as  to  his  activities? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  Kappe  and  Gissibl  and  Schuster  American 
citizens  or  do  you  laiow? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  could  not  say  for  sure.  Kappe  was  not  a  citizen, 
I  know  that,  and  Schuster 

Mr.  Starnes.  Gissibl's  testimony  was  that  he  was  not  an  American 
citizen.  That  was  the  testimony  we  received  in  1938.  He  testified 
that  he  was  an  alien  and  that  he  returned  to  Germany.  As  I  recall 
one  of  his  brothers  was  a  citizen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  meet  Gissibl? 

Mr.  Werner.  Fritz  Gissibl,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  one  who  is  now  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner,  Yes,  sir;  as  a  member  of  the  Friends  of  New  Ger- 
many. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  Walter  Kappe? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  saw  him  when  he  was  talking  at  meetings 
and  so  forth. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  Josef  Schuster? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  there  any  particular  significance  attached  to  these 
men?  They  have  been  in  this  country  and  were  connected  with  the 
Friends  of  New  Germany  and  the  German-American  Bund.  They 
are  now  in  the  Ausland  Institute  in  Stuttgart? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  sir;  and  Kunze  stated  he  met  no  officials  of 
the  party  while  he  was  in  Germany.  He  said  he  went  down  to  see  his 
parents-in-law  in  Germany. 

Now,  do  you  know  whether  Rudolf  Markmann  occupies  any  position 
in  Germany  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  does. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  an  official  of  the  party  or  of  the  Government 
in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  As  much  as — I  will  say  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge 
yes — he  has — he  is  working  for  the  party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  did  Hans  Zimmermann  happen  to  leave  the 
United  States?  You  have  identified  him  already  as  a  member  of  the 
German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  and  a  former  member  of  the  Friends  of  New 
Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  also  an  O.  D.  member? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §361 

Mr.  ^^ATTHEAvs.  Do  vou  knoAV  how  he  happened  to  leave  the 
United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  had  to  leave  this  country — he  had  his 
deportation  papers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  was  deported? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sii". 

Mr.  Matthews.  Because  he  was  in  the  country  illegally? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  deported  in  June  1939  or  thereabouts? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  express  any  great  regret  at  having  to 
leave  the  United  States  and  go  back  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  no;  he  was  not  sorry. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  Albert 
Born? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  know  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  he  a  bund  member? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  is  a  bund  member. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  where  he  is  employed  at  the  present 
time? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  works  in  the  airplane  factory  in  Long  Island. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  an  airplane  factory  on  Long  Island,  N.  Y.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  the  name  of  the  factory? 

Air.  Werner.  No,  I  don't  know  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  after  you  had  your  drills — I  believe  they  were 
were  on  Monday  night,  were  they  not? 

Mr.  Werner.  Every  Monday  night,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  Bund,  was  there  anything  in  the  nature 
of  a  pledge  taken  by  the  members  at  the  conclusion  of  the  meeting? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliat  was  that?     Will  you  please  describe  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  After  the  meeting  was  over — that  was  at  11  o'clock, 
we  had  to  stand  up  and  we  would  sing  the  second  verse  of  the  bund 
song  and  then  the  O.  D.  leader  would  shout  "attention."  He  would 
say  it  in  German. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "Achtung"? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right.  And  then  his  words  were:  "For  our 
spiritual  leader,  for  our  bund,  for  our  O.  D.,  and  for  what  it  stands" 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  who  is  referred  to  in  the  expression:  "To 
our  spiritual  leader"? 

Mr.  Werner.  Adolf  Hitler. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  the  way  in  which  Hitler  is  designated  in  the 
bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  First  this  salute  or  pledge  was  "for  our  spiritual 
leader"  and  that  is  for  Adolf  Hitler? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  AL\TTHEWS.  And  then,  "for  our  fuehrer  in  this  country"? 

Mr.  Wbiiner.  That  is  right,  yes— no,  no, — yes,  "for  our  political 
leader,"  for  our  bund  leader. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  would  be  Kunze  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  then  for  the  O.  D.? 


§362  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  the  German  "sieg  heil,  sieg  heil,  sieg  heil" — 
"hail  victory,  hail  victory,  hail  victory"? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Kimze  testified  a  few  days  ago  there  wasn't 
any  connection  between  the  German-American  Bund  and  the  Nazi 
Party  or  the  Nazi  Government  in  Germany. 

If  I  recall  correctly,  Mr.  Chairman,  he  went  so  far  as  to  say  he  was 
opposed  to  the  spread  of  nazi-ism  in  the  United  States. 
■  Mr.  VooRHis.  That  was  his  testimony.     He  said  that  three  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  Congressman  Voorhis  said,  he  said  that  three 
times.  Have  you  any  statement  to  make  about  whether  or  not  the 
German-American  Bund  is  opposed  to  the  spread  of  nazi-ism  in  the 
United  States. 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  it  is  not  opposed  to  it.     They  are  for  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  there  any  doubt  whatever  in  your  mind,  Mr. 
Werner,  that  the  German-American  Bund  is  an  agency  which  is 
under  the  control  of  a  foreign  principal  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  it  is  my  firm  belief  and  my  firm  conviction 
that  the  German-American  Bund  is  some  kind  of  an  agency  of  the 
National  Socialist  Party  in  Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  are  not  trying  to  give  the  exact  legalistic 
description  of  the  connection,  but  you  are  quite  positive  that  there 
is  a  connection? 

Mr.  Werner.  ^Yliatever  we  said  or  whatever  we  did  it  was  in  favor 
of  the  National  Socialist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  do  you  laiow  August  Klapprott? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  do  know  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  him  very  well? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  hear  Klapprott  say  anything  about 
"Der  Tag," ''The  Day"? 

Mr,  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  his  comment  about  "The  Day"? 

Mr.  Werner.  Well,  one  of  his  comments  was  that  "The  Day 
isn't  so  far  away."  He  said:  "We  will  have  it  our  way — the  way 
we  are  working  for."     I  could  not  say  exactly  his  words. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  did  you  hear  him  make  such  a  statement 
as  that — a  statement  referring  to  "The  Day"? 

Mr.  Werner.  This  was  in  Brooklyn  in  one  of  the  big  O.  D.  meet- 
ings. There  was  about — between  four  and  five  hundred  O.  D.  men 
there. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  public  hearings  are  now  recessed  until  1  o'clock 
p.  m.,  this  date. 

(Whereupon,  at  12:30  o'clock  p.  m.,  the  hearing  was  recessed  until 
1  o'clock  p.  m.,  the  same  day.) 

after  recess 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  proceed.  Dr.  Matthews.  » 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Werner,  when  Fritz  Kuhn  testified  before 
the  committee  he  stated  the  records  of  the  German-American  Bund 
had  been  destroyed.  This  morning  you  testified  that  you  vohmteered 
yom-  services  to  copy  names  from  bund  membership  cards  onto  sheets 
of  paper. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8363 

Do  you  know  whother  thoro  was  any  connection  })ctwccn  this 
work  which  you  chd  and  the  anticipated  destruction  of  the  records? 

Mr.  Werner.  To  my  best  knowledge  the  cards  were  destroyed 
and  the  Hsts  were  kept. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  was  your  understandinii;  the  cards  were  to  be 
destroyed  and  the  hsts,  which  wouhl  be  much  smaller  in  bulk  than  the 
cards 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  be  preserved  as  membership  records? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  was  the  understanding  you  had  whea 
you  did  this  work? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anyone  who,  for  a  time  at  least, 
possessed  the  membership  records  in  the  form  of  the  sheets  which 
you  had  helped  to  cop}^? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  was  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  O.  D.'s  man  Hans  Kramer. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  Hans  Kramer's  occupation? 

Mr,  Werner,  He  owns  a  barber  shop  on  Seventy-fourth  Street 
near  Second  Avenue. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  photograph  which  appears  to  have 
been  made  at  Camp  Nordland ■ 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right, 

Mr,  Matthews.  Since  the  words  "Camp  Nordland"  are  on  the 
building  in  the  background  of  the  picture? 

Mr,  Werner,  That  is  right, 

Mr,  Matthews,  And  I  will  ask  you  if  you  can  identify  any  one  of 
the  persons  in  that  photograph  as  Hans  Kramer? 

Mr.  Werner,  This  man  here  [indicating]. 

Mr,  Matthews,  The  one  man  in  the  group  whose  full  face  view  is 
toward  the  camera? 

Mr.  Werner,  That  is  right, 

Mr,  Matthews,  Is  that  correct? 

Mr,  Werner,  That  is  correct, 

Mr,  Matthews,  Just  for  the  purpose  of  other  identification,  who 
is  that  [indicating]? 

Mr,  Werner.  August  Klapprott, 

Mr,  Matthews,  Do  you  know  who  this  is  [indicating]? 

Mr,  Werner,  William  Kunze, 

Mr,  Matthews,  And  the  other  man? 

Mr.  Werner,  Mr,  Keegan, 

Mr,  Matthews,  General  counsel  for  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr,  Werner,  That  is  right, 

Mr,  Matthews,  I  ask  that  that  be  marked  in  evidence, 

Mr,  Starnes,  The  photograpli  referred  to  will  be  marked  exhibit 
No,  4  and  made  a  part  of  the  record, 
(The  photograph  referred  to  was  marked  "Werner  Exhibit  No.  4.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  was  it  your  understanding  that  Kramer 
kept  these  membership  records  in  the  form  of  typewritten  sheets  in 
his  barber  shop? 


J^364  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  In  his  apartment  behind  the  barber  shop. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  his  apartment  behind  the  barber  shop? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  see  them  there  or  how  did  you  know 
they  were  there? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  told  me  that  himself  and  I  saw  James  Wheeler 
Hill,  the  former  secretary,  gomg  in  the  back — going  in  the  apartment 
and  looking  over  some  books  and  some  lists. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  were  present  when  that  took  place? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  was  present  when  that  happened,  yes, 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  attended  the  Madison  Square  rally  of  the 
bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  February  20,  1939.  You  have  testified  to 
that  already? 

Air.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  laiow  how  much  money  was  collected  at 
that  meeting? 

Mr.  Werner.  James  Wlieeler  Hill  said  downstairs  in  one  of  the 
lobbies  when  we  were  off  duty  for  a  half  hour,  he  said  there  were 
eight  thousand  two  hundred-and-some-odd  dollars  collected. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Hill  was  at  that  time  treasurer  of  the  Bund,  was 
he  not? 

Mr.  Werner.  Secretary  of  the  bund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Secretary? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  was  the  right-hand  man  to  Kuhn. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Told  you  at  the  meeting  that  night 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  and  some  other  O.  D.  members,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  eight  thousand  two  hundred-and-some-odd 
dollars  had  been  collected? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  the  Garden  that  night? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  do  you  know  how  much  money  was  reported 
later  to  the  membership  of  the  bund  as  having  been  collected  at  that 
Madison  Square  Garden  rally? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  $825;  something  like  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  $82,5  was  reported  as  having  been  collected? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  yet  Hill  told  you  that  $8,000  had  been 
collected  ? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  any  idea  how  many  people  were 
present  at  the  Garden  that  night? 

Mr.  Werner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  the  Garden  filled? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  filled  up  to  the  last  seat.  I  don't  know 
how  much  it  holds. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  this  a  photograph  of  the  meeting  at  the  Garden 
that  night? 

Mr.  Werner.  Between  twenty  and  twenty-two  thousand,  and 
many  more  cards  sold  on  the  outside. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  tickets  were  sold? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right,  to  people  who  couldn't  get  in. 


I'X-AMKKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8365 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  another  photograph  of  the  Garden  meeting 
that  night? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Docs  it  appear  that  a  very  hirge  nnmher  of 
people  in  tiie  aiulience  are  giving  the  Nazi  salute  m  this  photograph? 

Mr.  Werner.  Almost  every  one. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  it  be  your  own  nndcrstandnig  that  with 
twenty-two  or  twenty-three  thousand  persons  present  there  must 
have  been  more  than  $800  taken  in  in  collections? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sure.  Some  of  the  collection  boxes  had  checks 
for  more  than  $100  and  there  were  $50  and  $20  bills  in  the  collection 
box.  I  would  say  about  100  O.  D.  men  went  around  with  the  col- 
lection boxes  antl  almost  everyone  reported  that  they  were  filled  up 
to  the  top — you  could  not  put  a  dime  in  any  more  in  these  boxes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  were  on  duty  that  night  in  the  O.  D.? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  was  carrying  the  flag. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  to  mark  these  photo- 
graphs as  exhibits. 

]\[r.  Starnes.  The  photographs  will  be  marked  "Exhibits"  and 
received  in  evidence. 

(The  photographs  referred  to  were  marked  "Werner  Exhibits  Nos. 

5  and  6.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  the  names  of  any  of  the  larger  con- 
tributors to  the  German-American  Bund;  I  mean  financial  contrib- 
utors, of  course? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  one  bund  member,  one  Dr.  Klein. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  where  he  lives — in  what  city? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  think  Eighty-seventh  Street  in  Manhattan,  near 
Second  Avenue. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  Dr.  O.  H.  Klein? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  yourself  solicited  contributions 
from  him  for  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is,  you  have  been  assigned  the  work  of  going 
around  to  get  money  from  Dr.  Klein? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  they  didn't  tell  me  to  go  to  Dr.  Klein,  but  I 
went  there  because  I  knew  he  was  one  of  the  best  spenders  for  the 
Bund.  He  never  refused.  As  soon  as  I  was  handed  the  list  that  was 
my  first  thing,  to  approach  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  any  of  the  other  larger  contributors 
to  the  financial  treasury  of  the  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  a  baking  firm— concern — Krueger. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  spell  the  name? 

Mr.  Werner.  K-r-u-e-g-e-r. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Krueger? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  Krueger  baking  concern? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir.     He  owns  quite  a  number  of  trucks. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  Mr.  Krueger  himself  who  was  one  of  the 
larger  contributors  to  the  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right,  yes. 


8366  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  happen  to  know  whether  he  is  a  man  of 
considerable  wealth  or  not? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  Icnow  any  of  the  large  contributors? 

Mr.  Werner.  One  woman  in  Jersey.  I  just  don't  recollect  her 
name. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  see  her  name  in  any  of  the  records 
of  the  Bund  as  a  contributor? 

Mr.  Werner.  Her  name  was  mentioned  in  one  of  the  meetings. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  she  live  in  Short  Hills,  New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right.  She  loaned  the  Bund  $1,000  for 
Fritz  Kuhn's  bail  and  she  did  not  ask  for  it — she  did  not  ask  for  the 
$1,000  back.     She  left  $500  in  the  bund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  you  be  able  to  identify  her  name  if  I 
have  it  to  you? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  would. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  Mary  Fertsch? 

Mr.  Werner.  Mrs.  Fertsch,  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mary  Fertsch  of  Short  Hills,  N.  J.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  go  around  to  merchants,  German 
merchants  in  New  York  to  solicit  contributions  for  the  German- 
American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  these  merchants,  these  German  merchants 
all  members  of  the  bund  or  sympathizers  with  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  not  sympathizers.  In  one  way,  yes;  but  not 
all  members. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Some  of  them  were  members  and  some  were  not? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  make  it  a  point  not  to  go  to  German 
merchants  who  were  not  sympathizers  with  the  bund,  or  did  you  go 
to  all  German  merchants  you  knew  about?     What  was  your  practice? 

Mr.  Werner.  For  collecting  money  I  went  to  all  the  merchants  I 
know  and  I  was  dealing  with  and  asked  for  contributions. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  do  you  know  anything  about  a  practice  of 
imposing  something  like  a  boycott  on  German  merchants  who  refused 
to  contribute  to  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  myself  threatened  some  of  them — I  don't 
want  to  say  "threatened,"  but  I  told  them  I  would  not  buy  there 
anymore  and  I  would  tell  my  friends  not  to  come  in  there  anymore. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  that  was  the  general 
practice? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  it  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  For  solicitors  from  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  To  give  at  least  implied  threats  of  a  boycott  to 
merchants  who  refused  to  contribute? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right;  everybody  was  doing  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  the  bund  has  active 
sympathizers  in  the  police  department  of  New  York  City? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  any  idea  about  how  many  such 
sympathizers  there  are? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES'  8367 

Mr.  Werner.  Oh,  I  would  say  a  few  hundrcHl  in  the  New  York 
Fohce  Dopartniont. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  met  them  personally — any  of 
them? 

Mr.  Werner.  One  of  them  1  met  quite  often — almost  at  every 
meeting  we  luul. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  do  you  know  that  he  was  a  sympathizer  with 
the  German-American  Bund?  In  what  way  did  he  express  his 
sympathy? 

'  Mr.  Werner.  He  attended  all  meetings;  he  bought  all  papers  and 
he  thought  we  were  right — whatever  we  were  doing  was  correct  and  he 
was  with  us — not  only  he,  but  quite  a  few  members  of  the  police 
department  are  with  us.  He  used  to  have  a  swastika  ring  at  every 
meeting  he  attended. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  wore  a  swastika  ring? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  his  name? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  I  don't.  I  will  say  that  Heintz  Tissen  is  workmg 
for  his  w'lic  in  a  beauty  parlor. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Heintz  Tissen  who  was  mentioned  this  morning  in 
your  testimony? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Working  for  the  wife  of  this ■ 

Mr.  W^ERNER.  Policeman. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Policeman? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  a  beauty  parlor  in  New  York? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  only  way  you  can  identify  the 
policeman? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  been  out  to  Camp  Siegfried? 

Mr.  Werner.  Very  often. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  been  there  often? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  boys  from  California 
who  were  spending  their  vacation  at  Camp  Siegfried  were  sent  to 
Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  there  were  four  boys  from  a  military  acad- 
emy from  California  that  came  up  to  Camp  Siegfried.  They  wore  the 
uniform  and  they  left  Camp  Siegfried.  They  were  in  Camp  Siegfried 
for  1  week  and  they  were  going  to  Germany.  They  told  us  that  the 
trip  was  paid  for  by  the  German  Government  and  they  were  spending 
some  months  in  Germany  as  guests  of  the  German  Government. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  the  bund  ever  directly  or 
indirectlv  sent  other  young  people  to  Germany  for  propaganda  pur- 
poses; and  by  "  indirectly ""l  mean  the  bund  was  active  in  getting  up 
such  delegations? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  tourists  to  go  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  order  that  they  might  come  in  contact  with  the 
National  Socialist  system  there? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

62626 — 41 — vol.  14 14 


8368  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Aiid  come  back  to  the  United  States  and  prop- 
agandize on  behalf  of  the  Nazi  movement? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  who  receives  the  propaganda  Hter- 
atiire  from  Germany  to  distribute  on  behalf  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  one  O.  D.  man,  Ernst  Schwenck. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  literature  come  directly  to  Schwenck  from 
Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  It  comes  to  him  directly  from  Germany  as  far  as  I 
know;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  how  do  you  connect  him  with  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  Every  week  we  were  getting  the  German  papers, 
what  they  call  the  Black  Corps  and  the  Sturmer.  They  were  printed 
just  1  week  before  I  received  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  they  were  printed  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  if  today  is  the  4th  or  5th  of  October  they  were 
printed  maybe  the  27th  or  28th  of  September  in  Germany.  I  get 
them  just  1  week  or  8  days  later.  He  was  the  one  who  sold  us  these 
papers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  least  you  know  that  much,  that  he  sold  you  the 
literature  that  came  from  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  was  that  his  special  responsibility  in  the 
bund — in  the  work  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  it  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  under  any  kind  of  compulsion,  moral 
compulsion  or  otherwise,  to  buy  this  literature? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  moral  compulsion  1  will  say.  If  he  did  not  sell 
his  papers  he  stood  up  and  made  a  speech  that  he  ordered  them  and  he 
is  getting  these  papers  and  he  expects  that  everyone  at  least  gets  one 
or  two  of  these  papers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Before  the  outbreak  of  the  war  when  German 
boats  and  crews  were  still  coming  into  New  York  harbor,  did  the  crew 
members  go  to  the  Germ  an -Am  eric  an  Bund  camp  as  the  guests  of  the 
camp? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  sometimes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  that  happen  often  or  infrequently? 

Mr.  Werner.  About  four  or  five  times  I  would  say  for  sure. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  you  personally  knew  of  four  or  five 
instances? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  which  the  crew  members  of  German  ships  were 
the  guests  of  the  camp? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  camp  was  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  Camp  Siegfried. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  each  German  boat 
that  came  into  New  York  Harbor  had  its  own  propaganda  feuhrer 
or  leader? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  it  had. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  did  these  propaganda  leaders  from  the 
German  boats  visit  the  camps  of  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  sometimes, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  they  make  speeches? 


rX-AMEIUCAN  PUOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8369 

Mr.  Werner.  Not  in  the  camp  ])ut  in  meetings. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  meetings  of  the  bnnd? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  meetings  of  the  bund;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  a  member  of  the  O.  D.  of  the  German-American 
Bimd  did  yon  (^ver  do  guard  duty  at  the  meetings  of  Joe  McWilhams 
of  the  Christian  Mobihzers? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  the  common  practice  for  the  O.  D.  to 
be  assigned  to  do  guard  duty  at  the  meetings  of  Joe  McWilhams? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  Do  you  recall  any  occasion  on  which  George 
Deatherage  of  the  organization  known  as  the  Knights  of  the  Wliite 
Camellia  addressed  meetings  of  the  German-American  Bimd? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  was  a  meeting  of  the  German-American  Bund 
and  the  Christian  Mobilizers  together  in  the  Bronx  in  front  of  Ford 
Park  or  something  like  that — a  big  park. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Was  that  Innisfail  Park? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Innisfail  Park  in  the  Bronx? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  Bronx,  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  was  a  joint  meeting  of  the  German-American 
Bund  and  the  Christian  Mobilizers? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Addressed  by  Joe  McWillaims? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  by  George  Deatherage? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  and  by  Fritz  Kuhn. 

Mr.  IVIatthews.  Did  you  ever  hear  of  an  organization  known  as 
the  Kyffhauserbund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  K-y-f-f-h-a-u-s-e-r? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  organization  formerly  known  as  the 
Steel  Helmets  or  in  German,  Stahlhelm? 

Mr.  Werner.  Steel  Helmets — Stahlhelm. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  do  you  know  about  the  nature  of  the 
Kyffhauserbund  ? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  woidd  say  it  is  an  organization  of  former  German 
war  veterans  and  pro-Nazis.  In  the  meetings  they  don't  have  any 
American  flags — only  the  swastika  there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  been  to  a  meeting  of  the  Kyff- 
hauserbund? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  where  they  meet? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  KJreutzer  Hall. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  know  the  Kyft'hauserbund  did  meet  at  the 
Kreutzer  Hall? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  do  you  know  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  was  working  in  the  Kreutzer  Hall  as  a  chef  and  I 
happened  to  go  up  to  one  of  these  halls  and  they  were  decorating  the 
haU. 

Mr.  Matthews.  They  were  decorating  the  hall  for  a  meeting  of  the 
Kyffhauserbund? 


3370  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  were  working  in  the  hall? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  did  not  attend  the  meeting  but  you  saw  them 
decorating  the  hall? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wlien  you  say  "German  war  veterans"  you  mean 
Germans  who  fought  in  the  German  Army? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  some  war  or  other? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  right,  in  the  last  war. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  relationship  of 
the  German  consul's  office  to  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  On  a  couple  of  occasions  I  saw  one  of  the  secretaries — 
I  guess  he  is  a  secretary — in  the  German  consulate.  He  was  inside 
in  the  office  of  the  German- American  Bund,  and  one  of  the  leaders  was 
saying,  "There  is  still  a  higher  leader  than  Kuhn."  At  that  time  Kuhn 
was  the  leader. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  said:  "There  is  still  a  higher  leader  in  the 
German-American  Bund"? 

Mr.  Werner.  Kunze  made  the  remark. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  there  was  someone  in  the  consulate 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  not  in  the  consulate,  but  between  us,  we  know 
who  it  was.     He  was  one  of  the  secretaries  in  the  German  consulate. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  Kunze  made  a  statement  that 
there  was  someone  in  this  comitry 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wlio  was  higher  in  the  leadership  of  the  bund  than 
Fritz  Kuhn? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Or  himself? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  who  gave  orders  to  the  bund. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Who  gave  orders  to  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  say  that  you  understood  that  that  man 
was  one  of  the  secretaries  in  the  German  consulate? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  New  York? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  who  the  man  was? 

Mr.  Werner.   (No  answer.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  his  name? 

Mr.  Werner.  It  was  something  like  Ohnen  or  Ohner.  I  am  not 
quite  sure  of  the  name. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  would  you  spell  it,  approximately? 

Mr,  Werner.  I  would  spell  it  O-h-n-e-r  or  O-h-n-e-n. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  which  it  was? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  when  you  heard  the  name,  that  is  the  im- 
pression it  made  upon  you,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Ohner  or  Ohnen? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §371 

Mr.  Matthews.  A  secretaiy  in  the  German  ronsiilate  who  had 
higher  authority  in  the  German-American  Bimd  thnn  either  Kulin 
or  Kunze? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  a  Nazi  school  in 
Yorkville? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  Manhattan? 

Mr.  Werner.  There  are  different  schools.  There  is  one  school  run 
by  the  German  Bund  and  there  is  one  school  run  by  the  German 
consulate — under  the  supervision  of  the  German  consulate. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  is  this  school  in  Yorkville  that  is  under 
the  supervision  of  the  German  consulate? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  Turnverein  Hall,  on  Eighty-fifth  Street  and 
Lexington  Avenue. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Lexington  Avenue  and  Eighty-fifth  Street? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  New  York? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  it  behind  Jaeger's  Restaurant? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  same  building, 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  rear  of  the  building? 

Mr.  W^erner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  this  school  run  by  the  National  Socialist  Party? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  National  Socialist  Party  in  the 
Ignited  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Matthews.  By  whom  is  it  financed? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  German  consulate. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  financed  by  the  German  consulate? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  W^ith  funds  that  come  from  Germany,  as  far  as 
you  know? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  don't  know  where  the  funds  are  coming  from. 
I  guess  they  would  have  no  other  means  of  making  any  money. 

Air.  Matthews.  Now,  how  many  pupils  attend  this  school? 

Mr.  Werner.  Between  two  and  three  hundred. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  are  the  approximate  ages  of  the  pupils  in 
attendance  at  the  school? 

Mr.  Werner.  Between  8  and  16. 

\It.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  any  of  the  pupils  or  have  you  known 
any  of  the  pupils  who  attended  the  school,  yourself? 

Nir.  Werner.  Yes;  I  know  two  children. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  old  were  the  children  that  you  personally 
knew? 

Mr.  Werner.  Eleven  and  twelve. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Boys  or  girls? 

Mr.  Werner.  One  boy  and  one  girl. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  did  you  happen  to  know  these  two  children 
who  attended  this  Nazi  school? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  mother  of  the  two  children  was  my  laundress- 
took  care  of  my  laundry. 

Mr.  Matthews.  She  washed  vour  clothing? 


3372  UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


Air.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  help  these  two  children  with  their 
home  worlv  which  they  brought  home  from  the  Nazi  school? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  many  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  instruction  in  that  school  in  the  German 
language? 

Mr.  Werner.  Only  in  German. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  see  the  books  which  they  were  studying^ 
from? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  they  books  published  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  German  language? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right.  They  were  printed  in  Erfurt  and 
Leipzig. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  these  two  children  who  were  the  children  of 
your  laundress,  where  were  they  born? 

Mr.  Werner.  They  were  born  over  here  in  this  country. 

Mr.  Matthews.  They  were  American  citizens? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  their  father  was 
living? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  father  is  dead. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  the  children  on  relief? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  they  were  getting  money  from  the  city  of 
New  York. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  the  mother  tell  you  that. 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  the  attitude  of  these  cliildren,  let  us 
say  the  boy  in  particular,  toward  the  United  States  and  his  attitude 
toward  Hitler's  Third  Reich? 

Mr.  Werner.  All  his  talk  and  all  his  thoughts  were  pro-German. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  they  pro-Nazi? 

Mr.  Werner.  Pro-Nazi;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliat  was  his  attitude  toward  the  United  States? 
Did  he  express  himself? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  did.  He  did  not  like  it  over  here.  He 
wanted  to  live  in  Germany.     That  was  his  sole  ambition. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  him  last  year? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  was  11  years  old  then,  was  he? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  he  thought  it  would  be  much  nicer  to  live 
in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Than  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  ever  plan  to  go  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  the  plans  were  made  in  the  German  consulate. 
He  was  waiting  for  his  ticket  and  his  passport  from  Germany  so  he 
could  go  to  Germany,  through  the  German  consulate. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Plans  were  made  at  the  German  consulate  to 
send  him  to  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 


IN-AMERICAN   I'liorAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8373 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  to  pay  his  expenses? 

]\Ir.  Wekner.  Yes;  to  pay  the  ship's  ticket  and  his  upkeep  over 
in  Germany  for  0  or  7  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  when  was  he  planning  to  make  that  trip? 

Mr.  Werner.  Just  before  the  war  started  and  his 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  talk  to  him  after  he  discovered  that  it 
would  be  impossible  for  him  to  go  to  Germany  because  the  war  had 
broken  out? 

Mr.  Werner    Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVhat  was  his  attitude  toward  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  was  heartbroken  that  he  could  not  go, 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  do  you  mean  to  say  that  here  was 
a  boy  born  in  the  United  States,  an  American  citizen,  who  was  being 
taught  in  this  Nazi  school,  supported  by  the  German  Government 
through  the  German  consulate 

Mr.  Werner.  Right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Promised  a  trip  to  Germany  with  his  expenses 
paid  by  the  German  Government? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wlio  thought  that  Germany  was  a  much  better 
country  than  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "\Mien  the  plans  fell  through  and  he  was  unable  to 
go  to  Germany  he  expressed  himself  in  the  manner  which  your  de- 
scribe as  "heartbroken"? 

Mr.  Werner.  Heartbroken;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  the  witness  is  able  to  give  the 
name  of  the  woman  and  the  children  if  you  desire  it. 

]Mr.  Starnes.  I  suggest  that  be  done  in  executive  session.  I  prefer 
it  be  given  to  the  committee  in  executive  session,  but  be  certain  the 
committee  is  provided  with  that  information. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  said  that  this  Nazi  school  where  two  to  three 
hundred  chikh-en  are  enrolled  is  under  the  direction  of  the  National 
Socialist  Party? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  is  the  National  Socialist  Party  an  organiza- 
tion in  this  country  different  from  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  it  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  is  in  the  United  States  a  National  Socialist 
Party,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  W^erner.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  who  any  of  the  leaders  of  the  Na- 
tional Socialist  Party  of  the  United  States  are? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  know  two  of  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  are  the  ones  that  you  know? 

Mr.  Werner.  One  man  by  the  name  of  Otto  Johannsen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Anfl  who  is  the  other? 

Mr.  Werner.  Gerhard  Haack. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  know  that  these  two  are  among  the 
leaders  of  the  National  Socialist  Party  in  the  Ignited  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  any  bund  members 
have  dropped  out  of  the  German-American  Bund  and  entered  the 
National  Socialist  Party? 


8374  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  quite  a  few. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wlien  you  say  "quite  a  few,"  what  do  you  mean — 
a  score,  or  do  you  mean  more  than  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  I  will  say  about  40  or  50  bund  members  are 
now  members  in  this  party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  you  Imow  of? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  that  I  know  of. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Mr.  Kunze  testified  before  this  committee 
a  few  days  ago  that  the  membership  of  the  bund  had  dropped  from 
somewhere  around  20,000  to  somewhere  around  10,000. 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  hear  anything  about  an  attempt  to 
create  the  impression  that  the  German-American  Bund  was  in  a  state 
of  decline,  for  propaganda  purposes? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  it  was  a  couple  of  times  said  we  should  join 
some  other  organization — try  to  go  inside  and  try  to  wdn  the  upper 
hand  and  bring  them  to  our  side. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  Communists  call  that  "boring  from  within." 
Did  you  understand  the  same  thing  to  be  true  in  this  connection? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  bund  members  were  told  that 
they  should  go  into  other  organizations  and  bore  from  within? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  in  addition  to  that,  they  also  left  the  bund  and 
joined  the  National  Socialist  Party,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  So  that  when  Mr.  Kunze  says  that  10,000  mem- 
bers of  the  bund  have  dropped  away  from  membership  it  would  be 
your  understanding  that  at  least  some  of  those  have  gone  into  the 
National  Socialist  Party? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  and  to  some  other  organizations. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  also  into  other  organizations? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Into  what  particular  type  of  organizations 
would  these  ex-bund  members  go  for  the  purpose  of  "boring  from 
within"? 

Mr.  Werner.  Well,  all  pro-Nazi  organizations.  Now,  some  of 
these  former  bund  members  made  them  pro-Nazi. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  there  were  organizations  already  set 
up  that  were  not  pro-Nazi  but  bund  members  went  into  them? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Under  instructions  from  the  bund,  and  made 
them  pro-Nazi  by  these  boring-from-within  tactics? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  name  some  of  these  organizations  into 
which  the  bimd  members  have  gone  for  the  purpose  of  influencing 
their  policies? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  do  so? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  Steuben  Bund  in  New  York. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  is  spelled  S-t-e-u-b-e-n? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right;  and  the  Kyffhauserbund — the  sport 
club,  soccer  ball  club,  rather — Eintragt. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Soccer  football  club? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8375 

Mr.  Wekner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  By  tlie  way,  where  is  that  located? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  sport  club? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Werner.  In  Astoria. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  they  never  play  any  games  of  soccer  football  at 
a  place  called  Federal  Hill?  Do  you  know  where  Federal  Hill  is  in 
New  Jersey? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  New  Jersey?     I  don't  know  that. 

Mr.  jSIatthews.  Do  you  think  now  of  any  other  organizations  into 
which  the  members  of  the  bund  have  gone  to  bore  from  within? 

Mr.  Werner,  The  Kyffhauscrbund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mentioned  that  one  and  the  sporting  organiza- 
tion, the  Steuben  Bund. 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes.  And  there  are  quite  a  few  small  clubs,  like 
somebody  come  from  one  city  like  Hanover  or  Bremen — they  have 
their  own  clubs.  A  couple  of  members  join  that  club  and  other 
members  join  the  other  club. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  ISIay  I  ask  a  question  in  connection  with  this  Steuben 
Society 

Air.  Werner.  Not  the  Steuben  Society;  this  is  different. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  It  is  a  different  organization  from  the  Steuben 
Society? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  altogether. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  what  I  wanted  to  know.  The  Steuben 
Society  is  very  old  and  of  long  standing. 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  this  is  different. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  Gerhard  Haack,  whom  you  mentioned  as  one  of 
the  leaders  of  the  National  Socialist  Party,  the  manager  of  Kreutzer 
HaU? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  Kreutzer  Hall  is  where  in  New  York? 

Mr.  Werner.  228  East  Eighty-sLxth  Street. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  where  the  O.  D.  sometimes  had  its  drills? 

Mr.  Werner.  We  always  had  drills  for  the  last  year — for  the  last 
year  we  had  our  drills  over  there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  always  had  your  drills  in  Kreutzer  Hall? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  and  our  meetings. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  have  any  personal  contact  with 
Gerhard  Haack? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  every  day  I  was  working  in  that  place  and  talked 
to  him  every  day. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  go  to  any  camps  with  him? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where? 

Mr.  Werner.  Near  Nyack. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  he  personally  escorted  you  to  a  camp 
near  Nyack,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  \Miat  did  you  do  there? 

Mr.  Werner.  Went  shortly  before  Christmas  and  chopped  down 
some  Christmas  trees  and  some  green  for  the  Christmas  trees. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  a  German-American  Bund  camp? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  it  was  not. 


8376  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  kind  of  a  camp  was  that  at  Nyack? 

Mr.  Werner.  This  was  a  camp  of  the  National  Sociahst  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A  camp  of  the  National  Socialist  Party? 

Mr,  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  the  German-American  Bund  have  a  unit  up 
near  Nyack? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliat  kind  of  a  unit  was  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  Rockland. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Rockland  County,  N.  Y.? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right,  Rockland  County. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Nyack  is  in  Rockland  County? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Do  you  Icnow  anything  about  the  composition  of 
that  unit — what  type  of  persons  belonged  to  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  Mostly  lawyers,  doctors,  and  merchants. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words  so  far  as  you  know  they  were 
professional  people? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  professional  people. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  seemed  to  be  a  special  unit  for  profes- 
sional people  that  was  organized  in  Rocldand  County? 

Mr.  Wekner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  Nyack? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  this  morning  you  named  quite  a  number  of 
your  former  associates  in  the  O.  D.  and  you  offered  photographs  of 
b.  D.  members.  Are  you  in  general  familiar  with  the  occupations 
which  these  O.  D.  men  held? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Could  you  give  a  general  characterization  that 
would  applv  to  these  men  so  far  as  their  occupations  go?  Were  they 
professional  people? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  would  you  describe  them? 

Mr.  Werner.  They  were  mechanics,  bakers,  restaurant  people; 
a  couple  worked  in  a  hospital  as  porters,  and  carpenters  and  painters. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  would  you  say  in  other  words  that  the  rank 
and  file  of  the  membership  of  the  O,  D.  was  made  up  of  hard  working 
people? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  not  people  of  means? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  no. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Not  professional  people? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Generally  speaking? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  hard  working  people? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wlio  draw  wages  in  the  lower  brackets 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  income? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  was  there  any  hardship  imposed  upon  such 
people  in  the  amount  demanded  of  them  in  order  to  belong  to  the 
bund? 


rX-AMKRICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8377 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  to  belong;  to  the  bund  and  to  belong  to  the 
O.  D.  it  cost  (luite  a  little  bit  of  money  every  week. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  hear  any  expressions  or  feel  any 
pinch  yourself? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did.  There  were  quite  a  few  fellow^s  only 
made  $18  and  $20  a  week,  who  were  married  and  some  with  a  child 
or  two  and  it  was  pretty  hard  for  them  to  meet  their  membership 
dues  and  other  things.  They  had  to  pay  carfare  and  the  papers  w^e 
had  to  buy.     It  Avas  very  hard  for  them  to  meet  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  know  whether  Otto  Williimeit  from 
Chicago  came  to  address  bund  meetings  in  New  York? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  see  him  personally? 

jMr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  Colin  Ross  ever  addressed 
an}^  meetings  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  did. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  TMio  is  Colin  Ross? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  only  know  him  as  a  speaker — a  speaker  who  goes 
around.  He  addressed  a  meeting  here  in  New  York.  He  was  ad- 
dressing meetings  of  the  German-American  Bund — German-American 
Bimd  meetings  in  Chicago  and  California. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mentioned  this  morning  an  occasion  when  a 
member  of  the  O.  D.  had  failed  to  attend  two  or  three  meetings  and 
vras  called  on  the  carpet  by  the  O.  D.  leader  for  having  failed  to  attend. 
I  don't  think  you  told  what  happened  to  him? 

Mr.  Werner.  Some  of  them  out  of  the  ranks  shouted  that  he  was 
a  traitor  and  a  spy  and  two  O.  D.  men  jumped  up  to  him  and  hit  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  you  say  they  hit  him? 

Mr.  Werner.  They  threw  him  out  of  the  meeting  hall. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  severely  beaten,  woidd  you  say? 

Mr.  Werner.  His  nose  was  bleeding  and  he  had  a  puffed-up  eye. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  was  the  man  in  charge  of  that  occasion? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  O.  D.  leader,  Ernst  Sotzek. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know^  a  Martin  Heinrich  who  was  an 
O.  D.  member? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Martin  Heinrich  have  any  part  in  the  beating 
of  this  storm  trooper? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  he  is  one  of  the  fellows  who  beat  him. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  How  did  that  affect  you? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  was  disgusted. 

Mr.  Matthews.  WTiy? 

Mr.  Werner.   (No  answa^r.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  think  the  man  had  had  an  opportunity 
to  answer  the  charges  or  not? 

Mr.  Werner.  He  gave  the  excuse — he  said  he  was  working,  but  he 
was  not  working.  He  was  out  dancing  on  tw^o  nights  and  some  of 
them  reported  that  he  was  not  working. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  so  they  set  upon  him  without  giving  him  a 
chance? 

Mr.  Werner.  Did  not  give  him  any  chance. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  receive  any  letters  from  Hans  Meyer 
after  he  arrived  in  Germany? 


8378  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  express  himself  as  enjoying  it  or  otherwise? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  he  wrote  me  that  he  was  disappointed;  he 
expected  much  more  and  he  was  disappointed. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  was  the  American  citizen  who  went  to  Germany 
after  he  received  passage  and  instructions  from  the  German  Consulate 
to  go  there? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  Did  you  have  any  difficulties  as  a  residt  of  showing 
Hans  Meyer's  letter  or  telling  its  contents  to  other  O.  D.  members? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  had  quite  a  few  members — rather  I  will  say 
my  closest  friends  in  the  O.  D. — I  showed  them  this  letter  from  Hans 
Meyer  and  they  told  me  I  shoidd  not  do  that  and  I  should  not  talk 
about  the  letter,  and  after  that  they  gave  me  the  cold  shoulder. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  your  attitude  toward  boycotting  Ger- 
man businessmen  who  would  not  contribute  to  the  German-American 
Bund? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Would  those  be  German  businessmen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  did  that  affect  you?  Did  you  have  any 
special  attitude  toward  that  practice  of  boycotting  German  business- 
men who  would  not  contribute?  Did  you  have  any  attitude  toward 
that  practice? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  I  did  not  like  that  and  on  a  couple  of  occasions 
I  did  it  myself.  I  told  them  if  they  didn't  give  me  any  money  for  this 
I  would  not  come  back  and  buy  and  would  tell  mv  friends  not  to  come 
there  in  their  store. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  did  you  have  any  suspicions  of  an  idea  that 
this  might  be  a  sort  of  improper  way  of  getting  funds,  to  threaten 
Germans  with  boycott? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  in  those  days  I  did  not  but  later  on  I  did. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  When  were  "those  days"?     Do  you  mean  in  1938? 

Mr.  Werner.  Later  on  in  1940  after  I  got  out. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  make  any  protest  at  any  bund 
meetings  about  any  of  the  practices  that  had  to  do  with  raising  money 
or  spending  money? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  1  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  what  that  protest  was? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  made  a  couple  of  statements  m  O.  D.  meetings 
between  O.  D.  members  that  the  bund  keeps  such  a  big  office  and  such 
a  big  force  and  we  are  suckers  enough  to  pay  for  them ;  if  the  office  gets 
closed  and  them  fellows  have  to  go  out  and  work  like  we  have  they 
would  feel  a  little  different. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words  did  you  think  that  out  of  your  very 
meager  income  you  were  supporting  a  top-heavy  bureaucracy  in  the 
German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  publicly  protested  against  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  did;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  a  bund  meeting,  and  how  was  3^our  protest 
received? 

Mr.  Werner.  Oh,  verj^  cold.  They  did  not  like  the  idea  and  I 
guess  that  it  was  the  finish  for  me  in  the  bund. 


UN-AMERICAN  rilOPAGANDA  ACTIVITlEvS  8379 

Mr.  Matthews.  After  that  did  you  feel  that  you  were  distinctly 
set  apart? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  some  one  to  avoid? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  hardly  any  one  talked  to  me  anymore  and 
would  not  hardly  say ''hello"  on  the  streets  anymore. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  when  did  that  happen? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  February  of  this  year. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  was  in  February  of  this  year? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  did  you  decide  to  do  then  about  the 
whole  bund  after  you  found  that  you  had  been  isolated  from  the 
membership  of  the  bund  as  a  result  of  your  protest? 

Mr.  Werner.  At  first  I  didn't  want  to  do  nothing  the  first  week  or 
two  because  there  was  quite  a  number  of  real  nice,  good  fellows  inside 
in  the  O.  D.  and  in  the  bund.  Then  I  had  ample  time  to  think  things 
over  and  I  missed  some  of  these  fellows  and  I  thought  it  over,  what 
we  were  doing  over  there,  them  fellows  and  me.  Most  of  us,  we  had 
a  pretty  good  job  and  made  a  pretty  nice  living;  we  could  afford  many 
things  and  then  it  came  to  me  we  are  only  suckers. 

Mr.  Matthew's.  You  mean  after  you  had  stopped  going  to  the 
bund  meetings  in  February  and  after  some  weeks  of  thinking  this 
thing  over 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  looking  back  on  it  you  decided  that  you  just 
had  been  made  a  sucker  of? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  did  you  do  eventually  about  the  matter  of 
your  German  citizenship? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  July  I  applied  for  my  first  papers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  To  take  out  citizenship  papers? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Matthews.  By  the  way,  do  you  have  a  German  passport? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes.    [Handing  booklet  to  Mr,  Matthews.] 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  presume  the  witness  will  have 
to  keep  possession  of  this  passport  for  the  time  being,  but  here  is  his 
current  passport  which  is  good  until  1944. 

Is  that  correct? 

Mr,  Werner,  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  other  members  may  look  at  the  passport  and  of 
course  it  should  be  returned  to  the  witness. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  in  July  of  this  year  you  made  an  appUcation 
for  your  first  papers  to  become  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews,  Did  your  decision,  after  having  been  in  the  United 
States  13  years 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews  (continuing).  To  take  out  citizenship  papers  have 
anything  to  do  \\dth  the  fact  that  you  had  become  disillusioned  with 
the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Would  you  say  that  again,  please? 


g3§0  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  given  some  concrete  things  that  led  to 
your  questioning  the  practices  of  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  decided  you  had  been  made  a  sucker  of 
in  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  some  of  your  friends  had  been  made  suck- 
ers of? 

Mr.  Werner.  All  of  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  of  them? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  of  them  had  been  made  suckers  of  in  this 
bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  And  that  you  had  come  to  America,  you  had  had 
opportunities  with  fairly  good  income  and  you  had  been  able  to  buy 
your  home? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  those  wore  things  that  you  think  ma}'-  not 
have  happened  to  you  if  you  had  stayed  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Werner.  No  ;  we  never  could  have  had  that  in  Germany. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  Now,  I  want  to  know  if  this  all  led  up  to  your 
decision  to  become  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Or  to  try  and  become  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  that  is  the  reason. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  disillusionment  with  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  that  is  right,  with  the  bund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  ever  persecuted? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  never. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  copy  of  the  Deutscher  Weckruf 
und  Beobachter.     You  have  seen  that  paper  frequently,  have  you  not? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  identify  that  as  an  issue  of  the  Deutscher 
Weckruf  und  Beobachter? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  it  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  the  Deutscher  Weckruf  und  Beobachter 
for  October  3d,  1940.  That  is  yesterday's  paper.  G.  Wilhelm  Kunze 
is  the  editor  of  this  publication? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  so  listed  on  the  masthead:  "G.  Wilhelm 
Kunze,  president,  G.  Wilhelm  Kunze,  editor,  G.  Wilhelm  Kunze, 
managing  editor."     He  holds  three  positions? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  a  sworn  statement  of  this  particular  issue  of  the 
publication. 

Now,  when  Mr.  Kunze  was  on  the  stand  a  few  days  ago  he  was 
asked  if  the  Weckruf  had  taken  any  position  on  the  Tripartite  Pact — 
the  Rome,  Berlin,  Tokyo  Pact,  which  has  just  been  concluded.  I 
think  he  answered  that  there  had  not  been  time  for  the  Weckruf  to 
discuss  it  and  he  further  stated  that  he  would  not  have  any  position 
on  it  because  the  bund  did  not  mix  in  foreign  politics. 


rX-AIMEKK'A.N   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §3§1 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  is  quite  a  lengthy  editorial  oii  the  pact, 
approving  it  quite  highly  and  sayhig  the  United  States  should  fall  in 
line  with  the  pact  and  keep  its  hands  off  of  the  affairs  of  foreign 
countries. 

That  editorial  appears  on  page  2,  but  I  was  gomg  to  ask  the  witness 
about  a  statement  in  an  editorial,  presumably  from  Mr.  Kiuizc,  to  the 
effect  that  30,000,000  people  living  in  the  United  States,  whom  he 
identifies  as  the  German-American  population,  are  about  to  have 
their-  rights  and  lives  exterminated  by  violence,  conducted  with 
Government  sanction. 

I  want  to  have  the  witness  testify  whether  or  not  he  ever  had  any 
experience  in  this  country  which  by  any  stretch  of  the  imagination 
would  justify  that  kind  of  an  assertion? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  I  never  have. 

Air.  Starnes.  To  what  does  that  article  have  reference?  Is  it  the 
Selective  Service  Act  or  ordering  the  National  Guard  into  service  or 
what? 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  appears  to  be  a  general  article,  Mr.  Chairman. 
It  reads: 

There  are  about  30,000,000  people  living  in  the  United  States  who  know  that 
they  live  under  a  political  condition  which  is  only  prolonging  their  civil  and 
political  death. 

and  it  doesn't  get  any  more  specific  than  that. 

There  are  also  articles  against  conscription. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  believe  the  leaders  of  the  bund  in  their  testimony 
said  as  an  organization  they  did  oppose  the  selective  service  bill,  the 
passage  of  it,  and  also  the  National  Guard  training  bill. 

Mr.  Mason.  Would  you  say,  Dr.  Matthews,  that  the  editorial  was 
nothing  but  glittering  generalities,  vague  and  so  forth? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  sir.  It  is  a  very  long  editorial  and  that  is 
the  trend  of  the  article.  It  covers  a  great  deal  of  territory.  It  goes 
back  to  King  George  the  III,  and  brings  it  right  down  to  elate. 

Now,  Mr.  Werner,  after  you  took  out  your  first  citizenship  papers 
you  had  not  yet  discussed  with  any  outside  persons  the  fact  of  your 
break  with  the  German-American  Bund,  had  you? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  had  not  discussed  it  with  anyone? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  had  kept  the  matter  entirely  to  yourself  but 
when  you  came  to  register  as  an  alien  in  the  middle  of  September,  you 
did  make  a  notation  that  you  had  formerly  been  a  member  of  the 
German- American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  I  did, 

Mr.  IMatthews.  Now,  after  you  applied  for  your  first  papers  to 
become  an  American  citizen,  did  you  associate  this  step  which  you 
had  taken  with  the  importance  of  trying  to  bring  out  the  facts  about 
the  German- American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  did  not  get  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  you  decided  to  become  an  American  citizen 
if  you  could  be  admitted? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  had  not  talked  about  the  bund  yet? 


8382  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  wondered  if  there  was  any  connection  between 
the  fact  that  you  decided  to  become  an  American  citizen  and  your 
wiUingness  to  appear  before  this  committee? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Or  to  go  to  any  other  person  and  tell  what  you 
knew  about  the  real  facts  pertaining  to  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  My  sole  reason  and  my  sole  ambition  is  that  all  my 
former  friends  get  wise  to  the  German-American  Bund  and  think  it 
over.  They  know  they  are  making  a  living  over  here  and  making  a 
better  living  than  they  would  in  Germany;  and  to  forget  about  the 
bund  and  the  things  the  bund  is  standing  for  and  just  be  real  Amer- 
icans. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  the  bund  stand,  among  other  things,  for 
the  dissemination  of  hatred? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  the  bund  stands  for  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Stands  for  racial  hatreds? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Ajid  also  stands  for  class  hatreds.  If  you  are 
going  to  hang  the  bankers  that  is  class  hatred,  isn't  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  one  who  aspires  to  becoming  an  American 
citizen  do  you  think  that  hatred  has  any  place  in  the  American  way 
of  life? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  would  like  for  your  former  comrades  in 
the  German-American  Bund  to  get  wise  to  themselves,  as  you  put  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  right.  That  is  my  sole  ambition. 
I  don't  have  any  hatred  or  hard  feelings  against  anybody  because 
most  of  them — they  are  a  nice  bunch  of  fellows.  They  are  working 
hard  and  most,  almost  all  of  them  own  a  nice  home,  are  married, 
have  children  and  they  are  over  here  in  this  country  and  they  have 
all  the  opportunity  in  the  world,  and  let  them  be  real  Americans. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Not  long  ago — in  fact,  I  think  it  may  have  been 
the  last  job  you  had,  weren't  you  working  in  a  diner  where  a  number 
of  nationalities  were  working  all  together  in  the  same  place? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  the  last  job  you  had  where  this  took 
place? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  last  steady  job,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  last  steady  job  you  had? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  were  there  as  a  German;  was  there  another 
German  working  there? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  a  German  fellow,  a  Russian,  an  English  fellow, 
a  Frenchman,  a  Canadian  and  a  Polish  fellow — two  Polish  fellows 
and  a  Russian. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  all  worked  in  one  diner? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  that  impress  you  as  constituting  a  Uttle 
league  of  nations? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  get  along  together? 

Mr.  Werner.  Wonderful. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8383 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  did  that  come  to  impress  itself  upon  your 
mind  as  being  sometliing  of  a  picture  of  America  in  miniature? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  if  we  work  in  a  small  place  like  that  so  nice 
together  we  ought  to  be  able  to  work  in  a  large  place  togethei-. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Werner,  you  spoke  a  moment  ago  of  the  fact 
that  the  bund  had  ordered  its  members  to  join  other  organizations? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  to  work  within  the  framework  of  those  organi- 
zations to  create  sympathy  for  the  National  Socialist  Party  or  the 
Nazi  government? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  gave  us  a  number  of  names  of  some  groups. 
Were  you  given  any  instructions  other  than  to  go  into  the  Christian 
Mobilizers? 

Mr.  AVerner.  A  few  former  members  of  the  bund  joined  the  Chris- 
tian Mobilizers. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  j^ou  don't  know  whether  it  was  under  instruc- 
tions or  not? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  we  didn't  have  any  instructions  for  that.  We 
attended  some  meetings  and  so  forth  or  rallies. 

Mr.  J>tlATTHEWs.  In  a  sense  there  was  open  collaboration,  was  there 
not,  between  the  Chi'istian  Mobilizers  and  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  aim  of  Fritz  Kulm  was  to  be  the  head  man  of  all 
these  organizations.  He  tried  to  unite  them  and  he  wanted  the 
German-American  Bund  to  be  the  head  of  all  these  organizations. 

Air.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  any  of  the  former  bund 
members  joined  the  Knights  of  the  White  Camellia? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  not  what  I  know. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  an}^  of  them  joined  Pelley's 
Silver  Shirt  Legion? 

Mr.  Werner.  Not  that  I  laiow  of. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  Icnow  whether  or  not  they  have  worked 
closely  with  the  Black  Shirt  Legion  or  the  Fascist  groups  in  New 
York? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  Italian  Black  Shirts? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  they  tied  hi  with  that  group? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  they  are  tied  in  with  that  group. 

Air.  Starnes.  Have  they  held  joint  meetings  to  your  knowledge, 
the  members  of  the  bund  and  the  Black  Shirt  group,  have  they  held 
joint  meetings  in  New  York  City? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Were  they  working  along  the  same  line  and  follow- 
ing the  same  program  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Air.  Starnes.  Since  the  Hitler-Stalin  pact  of  the  past  year,  August 
of  1939,  has  there  been  a  change  in  the  attitude  of  the  bund  men 
and  of  the  Storm  Troopers  toward  the  Communists  in  this  country? 

Air.  Werner.  Yes. 

Air.  Starnes.  \Miat  was  the  attituae  originally?  Was  it  rather 
hostile?     Didn't  they  attack  the  Communists? 

Air.  Werner.  Yes. 

Air.  Starnes.  Rather  severely? 

Air.  Werner.  "\Mierever  we  met  a  Communist  or  some  Communists 
we  would  pick  a  fight  and  they  picked  a  fight  with  us  and  there  was 
a  good  free-for-all  with  pleasure. 

62626 — 41 — vol.  14 15 


8384  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  happened  quite  often,  didn't  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  it  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  since  the  pact  have  there  been  any  further 
fights  between  the  Communist  groups  and  the  bund  groups  in  the 
New  York  City  area? 

Mr.  Werner.  Never  since  the  pact  was  signed. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  prior  to  the  time  of  the  pact  the  Germans 
were  constantly  attacking  the  Communist  Party  through  the  cohimns 
and  editorial  pages  of  their  papers? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  those  attacks  ceased  since  that  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  stopped  almost  altogether. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  ever  read  the  Daily  Worker  either  through 
curiosity  or  otherwise? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  guess  I  had  it  twice  or  three  times. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Prior  to  that  the  Daily  Worker  was  very  severe  in 
its  attacks  on  nazi-ism  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  since  signing  the  pact  have  those  attacks  in  the 
Daily  Worker  against  the  Nazi  and  Fascist  movements  ceased? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words  there  has  been  an  accord  in  this 
country,  to  your  personal  Iviiowledge,  between  the  Communists, 
Fascists,  and  Nazi  groups  since  the  signing  of  the  Stalin-Hitler  pact 
of  the  past  year? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  here  are  two  issues  of  the  Weclcruf 
which  establishes  the  fact  that  at  least  in  these  issues  there  are  no 
anticommunist  articles. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  will  be  received  as  exhibits. 

(The  Deutscher  Weckruf  und  Beobachter  referred  to  were  marked 
"Exhibit  No.  7.") 

Mr.  VooRHis.  And  prior  to  the  signing  of  the  pact  I  doubt  if  theie 
was  a  single  issue  of  the  Weckruf  that  did  not  feature  an  attack  upon 
the  Communists,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  At  the  time  you  joined  the  Friends  of  New  Germany 
and  the  German-American  Bund,  you  were  still  a  German  citizen? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Your  sympathies  naturally  were  toward  things 
German,  German  culture,  German  heritage,  and  German  traditions 
and  so  forth? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  now  you  have,  as  a  result  of  your  experiences  in 
the  Friends  of  New  Germany  and  in  the  German- American  Bund,  plus 
the  experiences  that  you  have  obtained  or  lived  through  in  this  coun- 
try, have  convinced  you  that  the  way  you  trod  and  the  way  the  mem- 
bers of  the  Friends  of  New  Germany  and  the  members  of  the  German- 
American  Bund  have  trod,  was  the  wrong  wav? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  are  now  applying  for  citizenship  papers  in 
this  country? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  i.=i  right. 


1'X-A:\1KK1CAN  rUorAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8385 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  joined  the  German-American  Bund,  of 
course,  as  a  German  citizen  in  order  to  promote  the  Friends  of  New 
German}'  and  the  German- American  Bund  and  al  that  time  you  were 
sincere  in  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  was. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  were  sincere  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  I  was. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  now  vow  equal  sincerity  in  renouncing  that 
program  and  that  faith  in  accepting  a  new  faith  and  a  new  program 
and  a  new  citizenship? 

Islr.  Werner.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Has  the  German-American  Bund  blackhsted  you  or 
attempted  to  bhicklist  you  with  reference  to  the  question  of  employ- 
ment since  you  h,ave  broken  with  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  It  is  my  impression;  I  can't  prove  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  can't  prove  it  but  that  is  your  impression? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  my  impression. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  find  it  difficult  if  not  almost  impossible  to  ob- 
tain employment  since  that  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Air.  Starnes.  Although  within  24  hours  after  you  landed  on  these 
shores  13  years  ago  3'ou  obtained  employment? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  held  it  steadily  and  continuously  through  the 
years  mitil  after  you  broke  with  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  W^ERNER.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  was  the  apparent  reason  why  you  could  not 
get  a  job  after  you  broke  with  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Emplo3mient  offices  would  send  me  to  a  restaurant 
or  to  a  diner  and  the  boss  would  tell  me  to  start  work  the  next  morning 
at  4  o'clock.  I  came  down  with  my  working  clothes  and  one  of  the 
night  men  would  tell  me:  "I  am  sorry,  the  old  chef  is  coming  back." 
And  on  other  occasions  the  boss  told  me  to  bring  my  tools  and  work- 
ing clothes  the  following  day  and  I  shall  start  to  work.  I  came  down 
with  my  tools  and  working  clothes  and  he  told  me:  "I  have  some  bad 
news  for  you.     I  am  going  to  keep  the  old  chef." 

I  was  working  in  a  place  about  a  week  and  the  boss  came  to  me  and 
said  'T  am  sorry,  I  have  to  let  you  go.     The  old  chef  is  coming  back." 

And  I  was  working  for  one  place  for  4  years  and  the  other  place  for 
5  years  and  I  know  I  always  did  my  \\-ork  well — as  good  as  I  could  and 
never  an}^  comphiints  and  now  all  of  a  sudden 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  were  never  discharged  before  from  any  of  your 
positions? 

Mr.  Werner.  No.  never.     I  always  quit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  the  13  years? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  never  was  discharged. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  never  left  any  place  of  employment  save 
with  a  good  record  and  good  conduct? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  I  believe  you  stated  this  morning  you  were 
never  out  of  employment  during  tlie  13  years  for  over  a  week  at  a  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  tlie  longest  was  o  days. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  was  tlie  longest  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  was  the  longest  time;  yes. 


8386  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  will  say  for  you  that  is  an  unusual  record. 

Mr.  Voorliis,  Do  you  liave  anything  further? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  want  to  ask  a  further  question. 

You  mentioned  something  about  the  National  Socialist  Party  of 
the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Not  much  has  been  known  about  that  organization. 
There  has  not  been  much  in  the  press  or  any  place  else  about  it. 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  How  long  has  it  been  in  existence  in  the  United 
States,  do  you  know? 

Mr.  Werner.  In  the  United  States?     I  could  not  say. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  You  don't  know? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Voorhis.     WT^ien  was  the  first  time  you  heard  of  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  It  was  in  the  fall  of  last  year. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  The  fall  of  1939? 

Mr.  Werner.  1939,  yes. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  what  did  you  hear  about  it  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  it  is  a  branch  from  Germany  of  the  National 
Socialist  Party  and  it  was  to  open  up  an  office  on  Eighty-sixth  Street. 
Quite  a  few  Germans  I  know  belong  to  that.  When  we  talk  about 
it  we  say:  "The  Party." 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Do  you  know  whether  there  was  ever  an  attempt  to 
keep  this  organization  extremely  secret  and  at  the  same  time  to  make 
the  bund  as  a  sort  of  front  for  the  activities  of  the  National  Socialist 
Party  so  as  to  divert  attention  from  it? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  I  would  not  say  they  want  to  keep  it  a  secret. 
If  they  w^ant  to  keep  it  a  secret  they  would  not  make  an  office  in  the 
middle  of  Manhattan. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Which  do  you  think  is  the  more  important  from  the 
standpoint  of  the  Nazi  movement,  the  German-American  Bund  or 
the  National  Socialist  Party? 

Mr.  Werner.  The  National  Socialist  Party  is  more  important 
than  the  bund.  The  bund  is  a  hell  raiser  I  would  say;  they  make 
a  lot  of  noise.  The  National  Socialist  Party,  they  are  working 
quietly  and  my  impression  is  that  the  quiet  work  does  more  harm 
than  the  hell  raising. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Do  you  know  who  is  the  head  of  the  National 
Socialist  Party  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  No;  not  of  the  United  States  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  You  don't  know  that? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  You  never  heard  that  discussed? 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  named  two  men  he  knows  who  are  leaders 
but  not  the  leader. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Among  the  leaders. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  But  there  never  would  be  any  doubt  about  who  the 
leader  of  the  bund  was,  would  there? 

Mr.  Werner.  No.  They  are  very  closely  associated  with  the 
German  consulate.  Every  meeting  they  have  one  of  the  consul  staff 
at  the  meeting. 


UN-AIMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES'  8387 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Did  the  bund  support  the  candidacy  for  Joe  McWil- 
liams  to  Congress,  do  you  know? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Did  they  support  him  vigorously? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes;  helped  iiini  to  distribute  some  pamphlets  and 
attended  his  street  meetings  in  Yorkville  and  stood  guard  in  the 
street  meetings  in  case  there  should  be  some  fighting. 

Mr.  VcoRHis.  Was  Mr.  Pelley's  literature  ever  distributed  by  the 
bund  ill  bui  d  meetings? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir;  this  Schwenck  sold  Pelley's  papers,  the 
Silver  Shii't,  I  guess  the  name  was.  At  quite  a  few  big  meetings  we 
had  some  fellows  who  were  allowed  to  sell  Pelley's  papers. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Now,  along  a  little  bit  different  line.  Do  you 
believe  the  German-American  Bund  represents  the  real  point  of  view 
of  the  average  German-American  who  has  come  here  from  Germany, 
or  whose  parents  came  here  from  German}^? 

Mr.  Werner.  No.  The  feeling  of  the  German  people  over  here — 
will  you  say  the  question  again? 

Mr.  YooRHis.  That  is  right.  I  asked  you  whether  you  thought 
the  bund  represented  the  feeling  of  the  people  of  German  ancestry 
who  are  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  No,  not  in  general.     No,  not  in  general. 

Mr.  YooRHis.  I  wouldn't  thinlv  so  either. 

Mr.  Werner.  No. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Do  you  feel  any  less  affection  or  loyalty  to  your  owti 
ancestry  and  your  own  people  today  than  you  did  when  you  were  an 
active  member  in  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  Do  I  feel^ — - 

Mr.  YooRHis.  Do  you  feel  any  less  loyalty  to  your  own  German 
people  and  your  German  ancestry  and  their  traditions  and  so  on 
today  than  you  did  when  you  were  active  in  the  bund? 

Mr.  Werner.  No.  I  feel  more  for  my  people  in  Germany  than  at 
that  time. 

Mr.  Mason.  In  other  words  your  loyalty  to  the  German  ancestry 
and  the  German  people  and  the  German  culture  is  one  thing? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes. 

Mr.  Mason.  And  your  loyalty  to  Hitler  and  his  regime  and  the 
National  Socialist  Party  is  a  different  thing  entirely? 

Mr.  Werner.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  YooRHis.  That  is  the  point  I  was  trying  to  bring  out.  Do 
you  believe  that  the  activities  of  the  bund  are  doing  a  good  thing  or 
a  bad  thing  for  the  German  people  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Werner.  I  think  they  are  doing  a  lot  of  harm  to  the  German 
people  over  here. 

Mr.  YooRHis.  Putting  them  in  a  false  light? 

Mr.  Werner.  That  is  riglii. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  think  that  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Dempsey. 

Mr.  Dempsey.  No  questions. 

!Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Mason. 

Mr.  Mason.  No  further  questions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  all  and  w^e  thank  you  very  much  lor  your 
testimony. 

We  hope  that  you  will  become  a  good  American  citizen. 


3388  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Werner.  I  will  try  my  best.  I  will  try  to  make  up  for  what  I 
was  doing  that  was  wrong. 

Mr,  VooRHis.  I  think  the  committee  should,  as  you  have  already 
done,  express  its  very  great  appreciation  for  this  man  coming  here. 
He  has  done  a  courageous  thing. 

Mr.  Starnes.  His  testimony  has  slied  further  light  on  the  true 
intent  and  purposes  of  the  German-American  Bund  and  the  National 
Socialist  Party.  It  has  served  to  center  the  attention  of  all  of  us 
upon  the  necessity  of  being  constantly  on  guard  against  any  of  these 
movements,  like  the  bund,  which  foster  class  hatred  and  racial  hatred 
and  prejudices  m  this  country.  A  love  of  our  family  life  and  our 
background,  the  traditions  of  our  race,  or  of  our  mother  country  is 
one  thing,  but  a  loyalty,  political  loyalty  and  allegiance  to  our 
adopted  country  is  another.  They  need  not  be  in  contradistinction 
or  against  each  other.  But  with  your  background  and  with  this 
new  land  of  ouis  you  should  become  a  better  citizen  than  many  of 
us  who  don't  loiow  what  occurs  over  there. 

Mr.  Werner.  I  shall  try  my  best. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  there  anything  further,  Mr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Nothing  further,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Then  the  hearing  will  adjourn. 

(Whereupon,  at  2:30  o'clock  p.  m.,  the  hearing  was  concluded.) 


I 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  PEOPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 

WEDNESDAY,   MAY  21,    1941 

House  of  Representatr-es, 
Subcommittee  of  the  Special  Committee  to 

In\'estigate  Un-American  Acti\tties, 

Washington,  D.  G. 

The  subcommittee  met  at  10  a.  m.  in  the  caucus  room,  House  Office 
Building,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee) 
presiding. 

Present:  Messrs.  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee),  Voorhis, 
and  JNIason. 

Also  present:  Mr.  Robert  E.  Stripling,  chief  investigator,  and  Dr. 
J.  B.  Matthews,  director  of  research. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  committee  will  be  in  order. 

Chairman  Dies  has  appointed  a  subcommittee  consisting  of  Mr. 
Voorhis  of  California,  Mr.  Mason  of  Illinois,  and  myself  to  investi- 
gate the  American  Peace  Mobilization  and  other  groups  against  whom 
charges  have  been  made  of  seeking  to  disturb  our  national  unity  and 
through  their  affiliations  to  disrupt  production  for  national  security. 

I  think  all  of  us  appreciate  the  fact  that  this  is  a  ]nost  critical  period 
in  the  history  of  our  Nation ;  that  the  great  need  of  the  hour  is  national 
unity  and  our  security  can  be  maintained  only  by  unprecedented  pro- 
duction for  defense. 

Certainly  any  individual  or  group  of  individuals  who,  by  one 
method  or  another,  would  disrupt,  willfully  disrupt,  this  production 
program  or  willfully  disturb  or  attempt  to  destroy  national  unity  or 
the  confidence  of  our  people  in  their  ability  or  their  capacity  to  govern 
themselves,  is  a  dangerous  group. 

This  subcommittee  is  meeting  for  the  purpose  of  investigating  the 
truth  of  assertions  made  by  certain  of  these  organizations  and  allega- 
tions made  concerning  the  nature  of  the  work  of  the  organizations  and 
whether  or  not  they  are  really  and  truly  subversive  in  their  character. 

I  think  it  only  fair  to  state  that  this  committee  issued  three  sub- 
penas  directed  to  the  officers  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization,  re- 
questing them  to  bring  their  records  to  the  committee  and  to  go  over 
tnose  records  with  the  committee  and  discuss  the  matter.  The  first 
two  subpenas  were  not  even  acknowledged.  The  only  acknowledg- 
ment we  have  received  to  the  third  subpena,  which  was  issued  late  in 
February  of  this  year,  returnable  March  4,  was  given  by  Mrs.  Mont- 
gomery, who  appeared  at  the  committee's  office,  accompanied  by  Mr. 
Joseph  Cadden,  of  the  American  Youth  Congress,  and  Mr.  Morris  AVat- 
kins.  of  the  Newspaper  Guild,  and  Mr.  Lamb,  and  the  only  informa- 
tion they  brought  or  gave  to  the  committee  was  one  small  pamphlet 

which  disclosed  nothing. 

8389 


8390  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Before  proceeding  with  the  hearing  of  the  witnesses  whom  we  have 
scheduled  to  be  heard  today,  I  would  like  to  ascertain  whether  or  not 
the  following  parties  are  in  the  committee  room  with  the  material 
which  they  were  requested  to  bring  by  proper  subpena:  Mr.  Arthur 
B.  Hersey,  treasurer  of  the  Washington  Committee  for  Aid  to  China. 

Mr.  Hersey.  Here. 

Mr.  fcTARNES.  And  Mrs.  Muriel  Koenigsberg,  secretary  of  the 
Washington  Committee  for  Aid  to  China. 

Mr.  Kersey.  Yes ;  she  is  present,  your  honor. 

]\Ir.  Starnes.  Mr.  Hersey,  you  were  requested  by  the  subpena  to 
bring  with  you  all  of  the  financial  records  of  the  Washington  Commit- 
tee for  Aid  to  China,  including  all  receipts,  disbursements,  and  contri- 
butions in  connection  with  the  Chinese  Christmas  Bazaar,  sponsored 
by  the  Washington  Committee  for  Aid  to  China,  also  all  receipts, 
disbursements,  contributions  in  connection  with  the  Paul  Robeson 
concert  sponsored  by  the  Washington  Committee  for  Aid  to  China,  also 
a  complete  financial  statement  of  funds  received,  expended,  and  dis- 
bursed by  the  Washington  Committee  for  Aid  to  China.  Do  you  have 
those  records  with  you,  Mr.  Hersey? 

Mr.  Hersey.  I  have  them  with  the  exception  of  the  financial  state- 
ment of  the  committee  which  I  haven't  been  able  to  complete  within 
the  rather  short  notice  that  was  given  to  me. 

Mr.  Starves.  All  right;  just  stand  aside,  then;  and,  Mr.  Stripling, 
will  you  wait  on  Mr.  Hersey  about  that  matter? 

Mr.  Taub.  May  I  address  myself  to  you  now,  please  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  No;  you  can't  now.  I  haven't  completed  my  state- 
ment yet.     Mrs.  Koenigsberg. 

]Mrs.  Koenigsberg.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starves.  You  were  subpenaed  to  bring  with  you  the  member- 
ship list  of  the  Washington  Committee  for  Aid  to  China,  also  copies 
of  minutes  of  executive  council  meetings,  also  copies  of  a  resolution 
adopted  by  said  organization,  and  also  all  official  correspondence  of 
said  organization.     Do  you  have  those  with  you,  Mrs.  Koenigsberg? 

Mrs.  KoENmsBERG.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Thank  you  very  much.  Now,  if  you  will  just  stand 
aside,  later  in  the  day,  Mr.  Stripling,  the  secretary  of  the  committee, 
will  be  glad  to  wait  on  you  and  receive  those  papers  and  whatever 
statements  you  wish  to  make.     Thank  you  very  much  for  appearing. 

Mr.  Taub.  May  I  address  myself  now  to  you?  I  will  appreciate 
an  opportunity. 

]\Ir,  Starnes.  We  are  not  ready  to  listen  to  any  statements  now. 

Mr.  Taub.  I  am  counsel  here  for  these  people. 

Mr.  Starnes.  May  I  say  to  you  that  the  committee  is  merely  ascer- 
taining whether  or  not  these  people  are  present  with  the  records. 
That  is  all  we  want  to  know  and  we  are  now  ready  to  proceed  with 
the  hearing  and  we  are  not  ready  to  hear  any  statement. 

Mr.  Taub.  I  just  want  to  make  a  statement.  I  was  called  in  yes- 
terday by  the  committee — I  am  the  counsel — I  haven't  had  a  chance 
to  consult  with  them.  I  respectfully  ask  you  to  listen  for  the 
record.     My  name  is  Allen  Taub,  175 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  are  not  ready  to  hear  from  you  now. 

Who  is  the  first  witness  we  will  have  today,  Mr.  Stripling? 

Mr.  Stripling.  Miss  Hazel  Huffman. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8391 

I\Ir.  Stahxes.  ]\Iiss  Huffman,  will  you  j^lease  stand  and  raise  your 
ri<rht  hand.  Do  you  solenuily  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  oive  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth  so  help  you  God  ^ 

TESTIMONY  OF  HAZEL  HUFFMAN,  BROOKLYN,  N.  Y. 

]\Iiss  Huffman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  proceed.  Dr.  ]Mattliews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "Will  you  please  give  j'Our  full  name  for  the 
record  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Hazel  Huffman. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "Where  are  you  from,  Miss  Huffman? 

Miss  Huffman.  From  New  York  City. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  "What  is  your  address? 

Miss  Huffman.  55  Pierpont  Street.  Brooklyn. 

Mr.  ISIatthews.  Are  you  an  American  citizen  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  am. 

ISIr.  Matthews.  "Where  were  you  born? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  was  born  in  Niagara  Falls,  N.  Y. 

]\Ir.  Matthews.  "Will  you  please  state  briefly  what  your  educational 
training  has  been? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  am  a  New  York  State  registered  nurse  and 
graduate  of  the  "University  of  Buffalo. 

]\Ir.  Matthews.  And  what  occupations  have  you  followed  other 
than  nursing,  if  any? 

Miss  Huffman.  "\Vell,  I  have  been  a  telephone  operator;  I  have 
clerked  in  a  store:  I  have  been  a  trained  nurse,  ancl  in  my  nursing 
field  I  have  done  industrial  nursing,  private  duty  nursing.  I  was  a 
night  sujjerintendent  of  a  hospital  in  Brooklyn. 

i\lr.  Mattheavs.  That  is  sufficient.  You  are  a  registered  nurse  in 
the  State  of  New  York? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  am. 

Mr.  IMatthews.  Have  you  engaged  in  research  or  investigations 
on  the  subject  of  un-American  and  subversive  activities? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  For  approximately  how  long  a  period? 

Miss  Huffman.  Just  a  little  short  of  10  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  appear  once  before  this  committee  as 
a  witness? 

Miss  Huffman.  Twice  before.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Twice  in  1938? 

Miss  Huffman.  Twice  in  1938.  I  believe  August  and  November 
or  December.    Anyway,  it  is  volumes  1  and  4. 

Mr.  Matthews."  And  the  subject  of  your  testimony  at  that  time 
was 

Miss  Huffman.  Pertaining  to  the  Federal  Theater  Project. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Your  testimony  was  in  connection  with  the  Fed- 
eral Theater  ]:)roject  ? 

]\Iiss  Huffman.  Yes. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  "Were  you  engaged  by  this  committee  to  make  an 
investigation  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 


8392  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  made  such  an  investigation  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  During  the  past  year  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  your  investigations  cover  the  entire  history 
of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews,  What  did  you  find  with  respect  to  the  origin  of 
the  American  Peace  Mobilization  and  its  relationship  to  the  Ameri- 
can League  for  Peace  and  Democracy? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  American  League  for  Peace  and  Democracy 
had  become  rather  dormant.  The  organization  was  not  operating 
actively  except  for  a  few  groups  that  were  struggling  to  still  main- 
tain a  peace,  so-called  peace  program.  Then  around  the  first  week 
in  June  1940  Israel  Amter  and  Charles 

Mr.  Matthews.  Just  a  minute.  The  American  League  for  Peace 
and  Democracy  was  formally  disbanded  in  February  of  1940,  was 
it  not? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  it  was  formally  disbanded  but  some  of 
the  smaller  groups,  possibly  because  of  their  social  aspects,  still  were 
holding  on.  They  had  some  rather  unimportant  meetings  during  that 
period  of  time.  They  hadn't  completely  disbanded.  For  instance, 
the  Niagara  Peace  Council  was  still  having  meetings  under  the  name 
of  the  Niagara  Peace  Council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  were  about  to  say  that  something  hap- 
pened in  June  of  1940 ;  what  was  that  ?  • 

IVIiss  Huffman.  From  around  January  1  up  to  June  certain  groups 
in  labor  had  come  out  with  a  program,  certain  youth  groups  had 
come  out  with  a  peace  program.  I  believe  that  was  following  a 
special  peace  program  that  had  been  issued  from  the  Soviet  Union, 
but  they  were  not  connected  groups.  Then  in  June  of  1940,  for  New 
York  State  this  would  be,  Israel  Amter  and  Charles  Krumbein — 
that  is.,  the  New  York  State  chairman  and  secretary  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  the  United  States 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  Israel  A-m-t-e-r? 

Miss  Huffman.  A-m-t-e-r;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  chairman  of  the  New  York  State  Committee 
of  the  Communist  Party? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  believe  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  Charles  Krumbein? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  State  secretary  of  the  Communist  Partv  of  New 
York? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir.  They  issued  orders  to  all  section  organ- 
izers throughout  New  York  State  to  organize  peace  groups  in  their 
various  sections,  branches,  and  units.  It  is  natural  to  conclude  that 
this  same  order  went  out  from  other  State  secretaries  in  the  various 
States.  At  least  our  findings  show  that  similar  action  was  taken 
in  all  the  States  as  was  taken  in  New  York  State. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  you  only  know  the  express  order  as  coming 
from  Krumbein  and  x\mter? 

Miss  Huffman.  From  Krumbein  and  Amter;  yes,  sir. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8393 

Mr.  IMatthews.  But  the  same  effects  that  followed  in  New  York 
were  also  noticed  throughout  the  ITnited  States? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  Just  a  minute — who  are  Amter  and  Krumbein?  I 
mean  what  oi-oanization  did  they  issue  these  orders  to?  To  what 
section  organizers? 

Miss  Huffman.  It  was  the  orders  issued  to  all  sections  for  New 
York  State,  all  sections  and  branches  and  units. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Of  Avhat? 

Miss  Huff^ian.  Of  the  Communist  Party. 

ISIr.  VooRHis.  How  do  you  know  they  did  that? 

Miss  Huffman.  This  information  came  from  a  most  reliable 
source — a  man  who  was  a  member  of  one  of  the  units. 

]\Ir.  VooRHis.  Did  he  tell  you  about  this? 

Miss  Huffman.  He  testified  to  that — he  gave  us  that  information 
under  oath,  ves. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  mean  do  you  have  documents  there  with  reference 
to  that  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  May  I,  perhaps,  help  in  clearing  this  up?  In  the 
course  of  your  investigation  you  relied  to  some  extent  upon  the  work 
of  informers  inside  of  the  Communist  Party,  is  that  correct? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews  And  this  particular  informaton  about  the  orders 
was  obtained  through  such  informers? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  correct? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  is  it  your  finding  that  the  order,  at  least,  is 
in  entire  agreement  with  the  developments  which  took  place  later  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Completely.  These  orders  were  to  the  effect  that 
the  groups  were  to  be  conducted  under  nonpartisan  affiliations  and 
they  stressed  the  importance  of  keeping  the  Communist  Party  in  the 
background  and  under  no  circumstances  was  the  party  to  sponsor 
any  of  the  original  peace  organizations  or  any  of  the  demonstrations 
by  these  peace  organizations. 

The  order  stressed  that  the  original  organizers  of  the  peace  groups 
should  be  comprised  of  the  individuals  from  the  following  groups 
and  organizations:  Section  and  branch  chairman  of  each  assembly 
district  of  the  Communist  Party.  Executives  from  the  shop  and  in- 
dustrial branches  of  the  Communist  Party.  Leading  Connnunists 
from  Conmumist-front  organizations,  and  fellow-travelers  from  the 
various  trade-unions,  fraternal  and  religious  groups  and  so  forth. 
Communist  executives  and  fronts  frf)m  the  Workers  Alliance,  Na- 
tional Maritime  Union,  American  Labor  Party,  left-wing,  Abraham 
Lincoln  Brigade,  Tenants  League,  Jewish  People's  Connnittee, 
Friends  of  the  Soviet  Union,  American  Council  on  Soviet  Relations, 
and  various  other  similar  groups. 

Under  the  orders  each  peace  committee  or  organization  was  to 
adopt  a  different  title,  for  instance,  there  would  be  the  West  Side 
Peace  Council,  the  New  York  Peace  Committee,  the  New  York  Peace 
Conference,  the  Coordinating  Committee  for  Peace;  the  West  Side 


8394  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

group,  the  Harlem  group,  all  of  them  appearing  to  be  spontaneous 
and  individual  organizations,  having  no  link  or  connection  with  the 
others. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Miss  Huffman,  did  you  name  the  New  York 
Peace  Association  in  that  list? 

IMiss  Huffman.  I  believe  I  named  the  New  York  Peace  Committee. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  You  gave  them  as  examples  of  the  titles? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now  did  you  find  that  an  organization  was  set  up 
known  as  the  New  York  Peace  Association? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir.  I  was  not  listing  all  of  the  organizations 
that  were  set  up.  I  was  merely  giving  examples  of  the  type  of  names 
that  were  to  be  used.    That  is  the  way  the  order  was  issued,  you  see. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  photostatic  copy  of  a  throwaway; 
have  you  seen  that  ? 

(Handing  document  to  the  witness.) 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir.  This  was  obtained  at  one  of  the  meet- 
ings and  this  confirms  the  list  that  I  gave  previously,  of  the  groups 
that  were  to  be  set  up — Mothers  Club,  United  American  xVrtists, 
United  Action  Against  Fascism  and  Anti-Semitism,  International 
Workers  Order,  Jewish  People's  Committee,  American  Fiiends  of 
the  Chinese  People,  and  the  Coordinating  Connnittee  Against 
Profiteering. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  the  entire  meeting  was  under  the  auspices  of 
the  New  York  Peace  Association? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  that  this  be  incorporated  in 
the  record  at  this  point, 

Mr.  Starxes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibit  No.  1.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  may  proceed. 

INIiss  Huffman.  The  orders  as  issued  by  Mr.  Amter  and  Mr. 
Krumbein  went  on  further  to  state  that  all  sti-eet  meetings  were  to 
be  under  the  auspices  of  some  union  or  organization  and  they  were 
all  to  follow  strictly  the  party  line.  The  speakers  were  to  discourse 
strictly  along  Communist  Party  lines  and  the  speakers  at  street  meet- 
ings, and  I  quote  this : 

Will  only  be  allowed  to  speak  after  they  have  showu  credentials  which  will 
be  furnished  each  contemplated  speaker  by  the  Cominmiist  Party  section 
chairman. 

Mv.  VooRHis.  You  say  you  quote  that  ?     What  do  you  quote  it  from  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  That  was  given  to  us  by  the  man  who  was  in  this 
group ;  it  is  a  direct  quote  regarding  the  street  meetings. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  you  haven't  it  from  any  official  document  or  any- 
thing like  that  ? 

Miss  HuFFiMAN.  It  came  from  an  official  source,  Congressman 
Voorhis. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  source  was  that,  that  is  what  I  am  trying  to 
get  at. 

Miss  Huffman.  I  was  asked  not  to  divulge  that  source  in  open 
hearing.  I  shoidd  be  very  glad  to  give  the  source  of  that  information 
in  executive  hearing  because  it  would  interfere  with  the  further  ac- 
tivities of  this  particular  party  for  this  particiUar  agency. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8395 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  can  <iive  that  information  to  Mr.  Voorhis  in  an 
executive  session. 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

INIr.  ^Iattiieavs.  ]\Iiss  Huffman,  do  you  know  vluit  the  New  York 
address  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  national  headquarters  is? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  address  of  the  national  headquarters  is  1133 
Broadway,  New  York  City — that  is  Broadway  just  above  Twenty- 
sixth  Street.  I  believe  it  is  on  the  fourth  floor.  I  would  not  be  too 
sure  of  the  lloor. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now  I  show  you  a  copy  of  a  publication  called  The 
Peace  Reporter,  issued  by  the  New  York  Peace  Association,  the  organ- 
ization which  you  have  identified  as  being  one  of  the  local  groups 
set  up. 

Mii^s  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  compliance  with  this  alleged  order  of  Krum- 
bein  and  Amter.  The  address  of  the  New  York  Peace  Association  was 
1133  Broadway,  which  is  now  the  address  of  the  national  headquarters 
of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  the  national  headquarters.  The 
New  York  office  is  at  381  Fourth  Avenue. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  spoke  of  the  line  which  was  to  be  accept- 
able in  these  programs  as  being  the  line  of  the  Communist  Party,  did 
you  not  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  mentioned  the  fact  that  the  speakers  were  to 
follow  strictly  the  so-called  party  line. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  Conmiunist  Party  line? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  Connnunist  Party  line;  yes.  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  jVIr.  Chairman,  at  this  point  I  ask  to  have  introduced 
into  the  record  tlie  editorial  from  the  June  1940  issue  of  the  Peace 
Reporter,  published  by  the  New  York  Peace  Association,  which  sets 
forth  the  line  of  the  New  York  Peace  Association. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  in  corroboration  of  ]Miss  Huffman's  testimony  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes;  it  is  in  corroboration  of  the  facts  that  Miss 
Huffman  gave  with  reference  to  the  New  York  Peace  Association  line 
being  the  line  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibit 
No.  2.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Miss  Huffman,  will  you  j^roceed? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  State  committee  especially  urged,  that  is, 
the  New  York  State  committee  of  the  Connnunist  Party,  especially 
urged  that  attention  be  given  to  the  Italian  sections,  and  this  was 
given  to  me  as  before.  Congressman  Voorhis,  as  a  direct  quote  of 
the  order  given  out  by  Mr.  Amter  and  Mr.  Krumbein : 

Since  Italy  entered  the  war,  a  wonderful  field  is  open  for  uniting  the 
Italian  people  to  support  the  Communist  Party  peace  program  because  the 
Italian  i>ei)ple  will  be  the  center  of  attack  by  the  warmongers  and  advocates 
of  the  war  hysteria  which  will  brand  them  as  fifth  columnists. 

^Ir.  ]MATTnEws.  Do  you  kn(jw  whether  or  not  the  Communist 
Party  lias  carried  out  that  instruction  and  engaged  in  special  activi- 
ties among  Italians  in  New  York? 

Miss  Hutfman.  Yes,  sir;  Dr.  Matthews,  because  I  am  going  into 
the  organization  of  the  lower  East  Side  of  New  York,  which  was 


8396  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

carried  on  by  the  Communist  Party  members  of  the  Italian  division 
of  the  Communist  Party — the  Italian  bureau  of  the  Communist 
Party,  to  be  exact. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  right. 

Miss  HuFFMAx.  This  list  were  the  leaders  for  the  Communist 
Party  of  the  lower  East  Side  and  they  were  delegated  to  organize 
the  lower  East  Side.     They  included  Louis  Hanover. 

]SIr,  Matthews.  Will  you  please  spell  these  names  for  the  reporter, 
Miss  Huffman? 

Miss  Huffman.  L-o-u-i-s  H-a-n-o-v-e-r.  His  real  name  is  Louis 
Yanover — Y-a-n-o-v-e-r.  He  is  section  chairman  of  the  Tom  Paine 
branch  of  the  Communist  Party,  located  at  289  Bleeker  Street. 
Tony  Morano.  He  was  chairman  of  the  Gaiibaldi  branch  of  the 
Communist  Party,  located  at  107  MacDougal  Street.  That  is  in 
Manhattan. 

Gino  Bardi,  editor  of  L'Unita  del  Popolo,  which  is  termed  the 
Communist-Italian  paper.     That  is  located  at  80  East  Eleventh  Street. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  80  East  Eleventh  Street 
is  headquarters  for  a  large  number  of  Communist  Party  organi- 
zations ? 

Miss  Huffman.  It  is;  and  Doctor,  right  there  I  might  mention 
that — and  I  am  talking  now  about  June  1940,  but  this  editor,  Gino 
Bardi,  is  one  of  the  most  active  speakers  at  the  present  time.  Within 
the  past  2  weeks  he  has  made  speeches  at  three  and  four  meetings 
a  day. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Meetings  of  what? 

Miss  Huffman.  Covered  three  or  four  meetings  a  day  for  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization,  whei-e  he  has  been  the  speaker  and 
the  organizer,  always  stressing  the  Italian  aspect. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  80  East  Eleventh  Street  the  same  address  as 
799  Broadway  ?     Do  you  happen  to  know  what  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  would  have  to  figure  that  out.  I  prefer  not  to 
answer  that  now.  Then  for  the  same  ])aper  we  have  the  associate 
editor,  Mary  Ratti.  Her  party  name,  Maria  Testa,  is  given  to  us 
in  tliis  report  which  is  also  the  name  under  which  she  has  been 
speaking  for  the  American  Peace  Mobilization.  She  is  the  wife  of 
Carl  Petrino  and  is  also  a  member  of  the  Italian  bureau  of  the 
Communist  Party. 

Carl  Petrino  is  chairman  of  section  31  of  the  Communist  Party 
and  was  a  candidate  for  Congress  from  the  second  assembly  district 
on  the  Communist  Party  ticket. 

Mr.  IMatthews.  That  would  be  the  Second  Congressional  Dis- 
trict rather  than  the  second  assembly  district  if  he  was  running  for 
Congress  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  This  was  given  as  assembly;  it  should  be  Con- 
gressional District;  yes. 

Alex  Schwartzman  of  the  Abraham  Lincoln  Brigade,  and  Ralph 
Simola  of  the  Italian  Bureau  of  the  Comnuniist  Party;  Teito  Nuzio 
of  the  Italian  Bureau  of  the  Communist  Party;  Bob  Lesser,  chair- 
man of  local  No.  10  of  the  Workers'  Alliance,  located  at  No.  9  Jones 
Street;  Robert  Meiron  of  the  National  Maritime  Union;  Martin 
Ludwig  of  the  ^Vbraham  Lincoln  Brigade  and  executive  branch  No. 
2  of  the  Communist  Party  for  the  East  Side. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8397 

Mr.  VooRHis,  Who  are  these  people? 

Mr.  Matthews.  These  people  are  the  people  who  were  delegated 
to  organize  the  lower  East  Side  of  New  York  for  the  peace  move- 
ment. They  were  ordered  by  the  Comnumist  Parly  executives  at 
the  time  this  official  order  was  given  out  to  the  sections  and  units. 

Mr.  VooKHis.  You  are  going  to  leave  the  Italians  for  the  time 
being? 

Miss  HurriMAN,  I  just  have  one  more  name.  Congressman  Voorhis: 
Beatrice  JMcCullem,  a  Comnuuiist  Party  member  and  executive  of  the 
Tenants'  League. 

Now,  that  is  just  a  group  that  was  ordered  to  organize  the  East 
Side.  Similar  groups  were  ordered  to  organize  the  West  Side,  the 
Harlem  area,  and  the  Bronx,  and  various  other  sections  of  the 
country. 

]Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  the  Congressman  asked  yon  if  yon  were 
going  to  leave  the  Italians? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  thought  there  was  one  question  that  might  go  in 
here.  I  wanted  to  ask  whether  you  secured  any  substantial  evidence 
that  any  work  had  been  done  with  the  Italian  groups  that  were  not 
Connnunists? 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words,  did  you  secure  any  evidence  about 
Fascist  groups  being  used  in  these  peace  drives? 

]Mr.  Voorhis.  What  I  want  to  know  is,  you  said  that  there  was 
great  emphasis  to  be  placed  on  the  Italians.  Of  course,  everybody 
knows  there  has  been  a  very  bitter  and  sharp  division  between  the 
Italian  people  for  a  long  time;  and  the  Italians  that  were  Com- 
munists themselves,  there  wouldn't  be  any  difficulty  about  working 
with  them.  I  want  to  know  whether  the  significance  of  that  state- 
ment had  to  do  with  an  attempt  to  bring  in  other  Italian  people 
into  this  supposed  peace  mobilization  and  whether  there  had  been 
any  success  in  attempting  to  do  that? 

iiliss  HuFFMAx.  I  don't  believe  I  understand  your  question. 

Mr.  Mat^thews.  I  wonder  if  I  can  help  clear  that  up.  You  have 
read  the  Daily  Worker  rather  regularly  during  the  past  year? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  spoke  a  moment  ago  about  this  order  being 
directed  to  work  among  the  Italians  because  they  would  be  the  vic- 
tims of  the  warmongers;  isn't  that  correct? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ]SrATTHEW\s.  Now,  have  you  read  editorials  in  the  Daily 
Worker  which  deal  with  that  question? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  May  I  ask  you  if  those  editorials  do  not  reflect 
this  viewpoint,  that  the  Comnumist  Party  tells  the  entire  Italian 
po})ulation,  as  it  were,  that  because  the  United  States  may  become 
involved  in  a  conflict  with  Italy,  the  entire  Italian  population  will 
be  subjected  to  suspicion  on  the  i^art  of  their  non-Italian  neighbors^ 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  therefore  the  Communist  Party  hopes  to 
exploit  that  fact  to  win  members  of  the  Italian  population  generallv 
to  its  program? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  what  you  meant? 


8398  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  and  that  is  a  point  that  is  stressed  by 
Gino  Bardi  and  Maria  Testa  in  the  speeches  they  made.  They  are 
constantly  dwelling  on  that  phase  of  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Miss  Huffman,  you  were  going  to  take  up 
some  of  the  other  groups  around  New  York  City.  Did  you  conclude 
that  part  of  your  statement  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Similar  groups  were  set  up  in  the  various  areas 
and  sections.  Each  designated  area,  such  as  the  East  Side,  West  Side, 
Harlem,  the  Bronx,  Brooklyn,  had  their  own  particular  group  of  dele- 
gates who  did  the  organizing.  That  was  specifically  set  up  by  the 
Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  right.     WiJl  you  proceed? 

Miss  Huffjvuan.  The  first  large  public  activity  was  on  Memorial 
Day  of  1940,  at  which  time  an  attempt  was  made  by  some  of  these 
peace  groups  to  circulate  war  circulars  at  the  ceremonies  of  the  Rhine- 
lander  Post  of  the  American  Legion. 

There  had  been  several  street  fights.  Several  of  them  had  been 
beaten  and  assaulted  and  as  a  result  of  that  having  happened,  Eugene 
P.  Connolly,  chairman  of  the  New  York  County  American  Labor 
Party,  left  wing,  telegraphed  protests  to  Mayor  LaGuardia  and 
Police  Commissioner  Valentine  charging  the  police  with  failing  to 
provide  adequate  protection.  Along  about  that  time  Mr.  Connolly 
issued  the  statement  defending  Representative  Vito  Marcantonio's 
sole  vote  against  the  President's  defense  program,  stating  that  one 
vote  had  the  full  support  of  the  rank  and  file  of  the  American  Labor 
Party. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Now  have  you  found  that  Eugene  P.  Connolly 
is  active  in  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

ISIr.  Matthews.  Will  you  give  some  of  the  facts  on  that  point? 
In  what  way  has  he  been  active  other  than  telegraphing  this  protest 
to  Mayor  LaGuardia  and  Police  Commissioner  Valentine  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  As  head  of  the  organization  of  the  left  wing  of 
the  American  Labor  Party.  They  have  been  very  active  in  the 
group 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  this  so-called  left  wing  of  the  American  Labor 
Party  officially  known  as  the  Progressive  Committee  to  Rebuild  the 
American  Labor  Party? 

jNIiss  Huffman.  I  had  always  felt  that  was  one  of  the  slogans  they 
used  rather  than  it  beino-  the  official  title.  It  mioht  be  the  official 
title. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  Well,  it  is  the  Progressive  Committee  to  Rebuild 
the  American  Labor  Party  ? 

ISIiss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

]Mr.  VooRHis.  I  think  it  is  rather  important  to  distinguish  that 
from  the  American  Labor  Party  as  such.  I  think  it  is  rather  im- 
portant to  distinguish  that  from  the  American  Labor  Party. 

Mr.  Mait^iiews.  That  is  what  I  wanted  to  bring  out. 

Miss  Huffman.  In  all  references  I  make  to  the  American  Labor 
Party,  left  wing,  I  am  referring  to  the  group  that  is  headed  by  Morris 
Watson,  Eugene  P.  Connolly,  Herman 

Mr.  VocRHis.  I  understand  that  perfectly  well.  Miss  Huffman,  but 
a  lot  of  people  might  not  understand  it,  and  I  think  it  is  important 


UN-AMERICAN  I'llUl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8399 

that  it  be  made  clear  tliat  is  not  the  American  Labor  Partj'  as  such — 
it  is  simply  a  dissident  gronj)  within. 

Miss  IIuFFMAN.  Yes,  sir. 

JNIr.  ISIatthews.  Did  you  have  some  more  on  Eugene  P.  Connolly's 
participation  in  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  HuFFMAX.  Well,  he  is  a  sponsor  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization. 

Mr.  ISIatthews.  You  mean  he  is  a  national  sponsor? 

i\liss  Huffman.  He  is  a  national  sponsor  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization. 

ISIr.  Matthews.  And  so  listed  officially  on  their  literature? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir ;  then  another  one  of  the  large  groups  that 
was  set  up  at  that  time  and  was  particularly  active  on  this  Memorial 
Day  in  1940,  was  the  group  known  as  the  AVest  Side  ^lothers'  Peace 
Committee.  They  had  presented  a  petition,  an  antiwar  petition,  to 
Congressman  Bloom  and  Congressman  Barton  in  which  there  were 
10,000  mothers'  signatures.  That  group  is  still  very  active  as  of  the 
present  day. 

Under  their  new  title,  which  is  "The  AVomen's  Division  of  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization,''  and  that  group  is  headed  by  Dr.  An- 
nette T.  Rubenstein,  who  is  princijial  of  the  Robert  Louis  Stevenson 
School  at  804  West  Eighty-eighth  Street  in  New  York  City,  and  Dr. 
Rubenstein  headed  the  delegation  at  that  time. 

Mr.  ]\L^TTHEWs.  Delegation  to  what? 

Miss  HuFFiviAN.  Delegation  that  presented  that  petition  of  the 
10,000  mothers'  signatures.  At  that  time  Dr.  Rubenstein  denied  she 
had  any  Communist  affiliations.  From  that  time  on  Dr.  Rubenstein 
has  been  very  active  with  the  grou]:>  and 

JNIr.  Matthews.  Do  you  mean  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  American  Peace  jMobilization.  And  the  Com- 
munists in  the  American  Peace  Mobilization — I  hope  I  can  make  this 
clear  because  it  is  more  than  just  a  term  of  endearment — Dr.  Ruben- 
stein is  constantly  being  described  to  me  by  people  who  are  Coni- 
munists  and  people  who  are  members  of  the  American  Peace  Mobili- 
zation as  "the  darling  of  the  peace  movement."  At  a  meeting  she 
spoke  at  2  weeks  ago,  I  have  the  exact  date  here,  she  mentioned  that 
she  had  spoken  at  four  meetings  that  day  and  her  mother  had  spoken 
at  three  and  for  the  past  week  she  had  been  speaking  at  from  three 
to  four  meetings.  She  is  head  of  the  women's  division  of  the  Amer- 
ican Peace  ^Mobilization. 

]Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  these  various  local  groups  were  set  u]>  in 
New  York,  and  also  such  specialized  committees  as  the  mothers'  peace 
group  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  Mothers'  West  Side  Peace  Connnittee,  which 
Dr.  Rubenstein  at  this  time  admitlod  was  affiliated  with  the  New  York 
Peace  Association. 

Mr.  ]Matthews.  Now,  what  was  the  next  step  in  bringing  all  of 
these  gi'oups  together? 

Miss  Huffman.  On  August  4,  a  People's  Rally  for  Peace  was  held  at 
Randalls  Island 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  is  Randalls  Island? 

Miss  Huffman.  Randalls  Island  is  in  New  York  City,  in  Manhat- 
tan.   At  this  rally  the  speakers  were  John  P.  Davis,  of  the  National 

62626 — 41— vol.  14 10 


8400  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Negro  Congress ;  Miss  Jean  Horie,  of  the  New  York  Youth  Congress ; 
Rabbi  Moses  Miller,  of  the  Jewish  People's  Committee;  Harry  Van 
Ardsdale,  president  of  Local  No.  3  of  the  International  Brotherhood 
of  Electrical  Workers ;  and  Congressman  Vito  Marcantonio. 

There  were  about  10,000  peoople  who  attended  this  rally.  I  be- 
lieve the  police  department  estimated  10,000 — it  wasn't  the  organiza- 
tion's estimate.  And  prominent  among  them  were  members  of  the 
Workers'  Alliance,  the  American  Student  Union,  the  National  Negro 
Congress,  the  American  Youth  Congress,  National  Maritime  Union, 
and  some  branches  of  the  Communist  Party. 

A  telegram  was  read  at  that  meeting  from  Joseph  Curran,  express- 
ing his  regrets  at  not  being  able  to  attend. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  Joseph  Curran  actively  associated  with  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Is  he  a  sponsor  or  official  of  the  organization? 

Miss  Huffman.  He  is  a  sponsor  and  also  a  member  of  the  Na- 
tional Council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  he  is  also  head  of  the  National  Maritime 
Union;  is  that  correct? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir ;  he  is  president  of  the  National  Maritime 
Union  and  a  member  of  the  International  Labor  Defense. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  the  name  of  this  rally  held  on  August  4, 
1940?    Did  they  have  a  special  name  for  it? 

Miss  HuTTMAN.  The  People's  Rally  for  Peace  of  the  Emergency 
Peace  Conference. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Could  you  say  that  this  rally  received  a  very  ex- 
traordinary backing  and  pushing  by  the  Daily  Worker? 

Miss  Huffman.  Oh,  it  was  both  advertised — it  was  distinctly  a 
Daily  Worker-publicized  affair. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Could  you  say  it  was  the  chief  feature  in  the  Daily 
Worker  for  a  number  of  days? 

Miss  Huffman.  Oh,  yes;  both  before  and  after.  The  next  large 
activity  was  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  which  was  held  in 
Chicago  stadium  on  August  31. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  Emergency  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  the  Emergency  Peace  Mobilization  on 
August  31.  This  call  went  out  to  all  the  prominent  fronts  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  to  come  to  the  aid  of  the  party  in  putting  this  gigantic 
rally  across.  That  information  came  from  the  same  man  that  was 
a  member  of  these  branches  and  these  units.  The  order  had  gone  out 
to  all  of  them  to  give  both  financial  and  personal  support  to  putting 
over  this  rally. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Before  you  go  ahead  with  that,  I  show  you  a  photo- 
static copy  of  a  letter  dated  August  10,  1940.  This  letterhead  bears 
the  name  of  the  Committee  to  Defend  America  By  Keeping  Out  of 
War. 

Miss  Hitffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  And  the  letter  has  to  do  witli  the  holding  of  an 
Emergency  Peace  Mobilization  in  Chicago  over  the  Labor  Day  week- 
end :  is  that  correct  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AxMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §401 

Mr.  IVIatthews.  And  the  letterhead  on  front  and  back  side  has  a 
list  of  the  S])onsors  of  this  Connnittee  to  Defend  America  By  Keep- 
ing Out  of  War? 

]\Iiss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  Have  you  seen  this  letter  before? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  identify  this  as  one  of  the  pieces  of  litera- 
ture in  the  early  stages  of  the  organization  of  the  American  Peace 
]Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  name  "Committee  to  Defend  America  By 
Keeping  Out  of  War"  was  dropped,  was  it  not,  in  favor  of  the 
Emergency  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  Emergency  Peace  Mobilization ;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  IMatihews.  And  at  the  Chicago  conference  the  name  then 
became  the  "American  Peace  Mobilization,"  is  that  correct? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  that  this  be  introduced  in 
the  record  at  this  point,  but  I  would  like  to  ask  Miss  Huffman  if  it 
is  not  true  that  some  of  the  persons  who  appeared  as  sponsors  of 
the  organization  at  that  time  have  withdrawn  after  having  learned 
that  the  organization  was  under  the  control  of  the  Communist  Party. 
Have  you  learned  such? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  made  a  check  of  this  personnel  against 
the  subsequent  personnel,  have  you  not? 

Miss  HuFFiNiAN.  Yes,  sir;  but  the  point  on  that  is  not  only  that 
they  withdrew — some  of  them  did  not  withdraw  because  of  the 
Communist  domination.  At  least  there  was  some  newspaper  pub- 
licity given  to  the  fact  that  some  of  them  claimed  that  their  names 
had  been  used  without  their  consent  or  their  approval,  I  mention 
that  because  two  of  the  girls  working  in  the  national  office  in  New 
York  City  explained  to  me  that  the  sponsors  on  the  call  and  the 
sponsors  on  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  folder  that  was  dis- 
tributed at  tlie  Mecca  Temple  rally — that  is  a  blue  folder  that  has  a 
list  of  names — that  they  had  in  writing  in  their  office,  the  acceptance 
of  the  sponsorship.  The  fact  that  they  had  written  accepting  the 
sponsorship  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  so  that  this  sort  of 
thing  wouldn't  happen  again  to  discredit  them,  so  the  people  could 
say  their  names  were  used  without  consent. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  I  want  to  have  in  the  record,  Mr.  Chairman, 
is  this :  That  the  names  which  appear  on  this  list  and  do  not  appear 
on  subsequent  lists  as  sponsors  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization, 
should  not  be  considered  as  now  active  in  the  organization. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  think  those  names  should  be  very  clearly  pointed 
out. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  will  be  a  matter  of  checking,  say  99  names 
against  89,  or  something  like  that,  to  be  sure  they  do  not  appear 
subsequently. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  will  be  incorporated  in  tlie  record  and  then 
T  would  like  for  you  to  make  a  statement  later  or  insert  a  statement 
rather,  sliowing  those  wlio  have  subsequently  withdrawn  and  that 
will  keep  the  record  straight. 


8402  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  We  don't  happen  to  know  in  every  instance  why  th& 
name  does  not  appear  in  subsequent  lists. 

Miss  Huffman.  I  believe  in  going  through  the  file  we  can  make 
up  such  a  list. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Of  course  you  don't  know  why  but  you  can  insert  it. 
Mr.  Matthews.  I  would  like  to  ask  that  tliis  be  made  a  part  of 
the  record. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibit 
No.  3.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  have  one  more  question  on  this  letter:  In  this 
conmiunication,  the  statement  is  made  that  the  prominent  speakers 
at  the  Chicago  conference  would  include  Senators  Nye  and  Clark? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Senators  Nye  and 
Clark  both  refused  to  attend  this  meeting  when  they  learned  that 
it  had  connections  or  affiliations  with  the  Communist  Party? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  believe  they  did.  At  least  they  were  not  speakers 
there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  They  publicly  withdrew? 

Miss  Huffman.  They  publicly  withdrew;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  atteaid  this  Randall's  Island  meeting 
about  which  you  spoke  a  moment  ago,  the  one  held  on  August  4,  1940  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir,  Dr.  Matthews;  may  I  go  into  the  meeting 
that  was  held  at  Steinway  Hall  where  the  report  from  the  Chicago 
conference  rally  was  given? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes.  I  wanted  to  bring  out  if  it  was  a  fact  that 
5^ou  yourself  were  attending  these  meetings  almost  from  the  beginning 
of  this  organization  or  from  the  very  beginning  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  personally  attended  them? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  So  you  know  what  went  on  at  these  meetings  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  after  the  Chicago  conference,  what  was  the 
first  meeting  held  in  New  York? 

Miss  Huffman.  Well,  divisional  meetings  were  held  around  the 
various  places.  The  meetings  that  I  attended  at  that  time  were 
principally  the  midtown  group.  That  was  the  Mid-Manhattan  Peace 
Council  that  held  the  meeting  at  Steinway  Hall  and  I  also  attended 
some  of  the  meetings  that  were  held  by  the  upper  Manhattan  group. 
That  was  the  Washington  Heights  group. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  say  there  was  a  meeting  at  Steinway 
Hall? 

Miss  PIupfman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  the  date  of  that  meeting? 

Miss  Huffman.  That  was  September  15,  1940,  immediately  after 
the  Chicago  meeting. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  attend  that  meeting? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  will  you  please  state  briefly  what  transpired 
at  .that  meeting? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  open  discussion  before  the  meeting,  which 
was  led  off  by  Ira  Klein,  discussing  the  transfer  of  the  50  destroyers 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIA^TIES  8403 

to  the  British  and  lie  brou<iht  out  a  lot  of  the  aspects  of  the  transfer 
and  hud  so  worked  up  the  audience  that  I  wondered  whether  they 
•would  ever  come  to  order.    This  was  a  prenieeting  discussion. 

I  am  only  bringincj  that  in  because  it  seemed  to  me  that  it  was  a 
piece  of  ajiitation  work  to  get  the  ivst  of  the  meetino-  into  the  sj)irit  of 
the  meeting.  It  was  a  little  unusual.  Perhaps  I  am  not  making 
mj'self  clear. 

Mr.  Maitheavs.  Who  was  the  man  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Iia  Klein. 

Mr.  ISlAn-HFAVs.  By  the  way,  do  you  know  who  was  in  charge  of 
the  housing  and  arrangements  for  the  Chicago  meeting  of  the  Emer- 
gency Peace  Mobilization. 

IVIiss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  Abbott  Simon,  the  committee  secretary, 
•Chicago  committee  secretary. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVill  you  spell  that,  please? 

Miss  Huffman.  S-i-m-o-n. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Abbott  Simon  was 
also  in  charge  of  housing  arrangements  for  the  gathering  of  the 
American  Youth  Congress  in  the  city  of  Washington  in  February  of 
1940? 

^Nliss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir.  Mr.  Simon  was  in  charge  in  Chicago, 
<and  Walter  Xeff  took  charge  of  all  the  New  York  arrangements. 
They  were  the  two  heads  of  the  committee.  If  I  may,  there  is  one 
thing  I  didn't  go  into  at  the  time  they  were  setting  up  these  various 
organizations  in  New  York.    I  am  going  back  a  little  now. 

Along  with  this  West  Side  Mothers'  Club  that  was  set  up,  there  is 
another  women's  organization  that  is  still  very  powerful  as  of  the 
present  day,  that  is  the  Trade  Union  Women's  Committee.  It  was 
first  set  u})  and  is  now  a  division  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization, 
and  that  group  was  formed  by  B:dla  V.  Dodd,  of  the  Teachers'  Union, 
and  Mrs.  Miriam  Murphy,  of  the  Transport  Auxiliary. 

The  original  committee  for  the  Trade  Union  Women's  Committee 
Avas  Miss  Mary  Lucille  INIcGorky,  president  of  the  New  York  district. 
State,  County,  and  Municipal  Workers'  Union;  ]\Iiss  Norma  Aronson, 
manager  of  Local  16  of  the  United  Office  and  Professional  Workers 
of  America,  C.  I.  O. ;  Miss  Esther  Letts,  vice  president  of  Local  65  of 
the  United  AVh.olesale  and  Warehouse  Emploj-ees'  Union  of  tlie 
C  I,  (). ;  Mrs.  Frieda  Jordan,  secretary  of  the  Bakers'  Union  Auxil- 
iary of  the  American  Federation  of  Labor;  Miss  Dora  Jones,  organ- 
izer of  the  Domestic  Workers'  Union,  of  the  American  Federation  of 
Labor;  Mrs.  Ona  Luebke,  president  of  the  Architects  and  Engineers 
and  Technicians  Union  Auxiliary,  C.  I.  O. ;  Mrs.  Winifred  Crost,  sec- 
retary of  the  Photo  Engravers'  Union  Auxiliary,  American  Feder- 
ation of  Lal)or;  Mrs.  Mabel  Pollock,  ])resident  of  the  New  Yoi'k 
Newspaper  Guikl  Auxiliary;  Miss  Ann  Wliarton,  oiganizer  of  the 
United  Federal  Workers,  and  ]\Iiss  Jane  Filley,  educational  director 
of  Local  1250  of  the  Department  Store  Workers'  Union  of  the  C.  I.  O. 

I  mention  that.  Dr.  Matthews,  because  of  their  pronounced  activi- 
ties at  the  present  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  were  reading  from  a  page  of  the  Daily  Worker 
for  June  27,  1940  ? 

Miss  Huff:man.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Page  5,  were  you  not  ? 


8404  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Miss  Huffman.  I  was;  and  I  also  attended  two  of  their  meetings, 
and  that  has  all  been  rechecked,  so  I  am  not  just  reading  a  newspaper 
clipping  because  all  of  those  names  and  their  activities  were  rechecked, 
and  the  fact  that  they  had  participated  in  the  subsequent  meetings. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  these  women  were  members  of  the  women's 
organization — the  Trade  Union  Women's  Committee  for  Peace? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Headed  by  Bella  V.  Dodd,  of  the  Teachers'  Union ; 
is  that  correct? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Miss  Huffman,  we  would  like  for  you  to  stand 
aside,  if  you  don't  mind,  for  the  next  witness. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Who  is  your  next  witness? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Miss  Mary  Spargo. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MARY  SPAEGO,  INVESTIGATOR  EOR  THE  SPECIAL 
COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Miss  Spargo,  will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your 
right  hand  ?  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  that  j^ou  shall 
give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so 
help  you  God? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  will  you  please  give  your  name  for  the  record  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Mary  Spargo  Wardell. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  born.  Miss  Spargo? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yonkers,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Matthew\s.  Will  you  please  state  briefly  your  educational  train- 
ing? 

Miss  Spargo.  Riverhook  School  for  Girls,  the  Bennington,  Vt.,  High 
School,  and  the  University  of  Vermont. 

INIr.  Matthews.  What  is  your  profession? 

Miss  Spargo.  A  newspaper  woman — I  mean  it  was. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  What  newspaper  experience  have  you  had  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  worked  on  a  number  of  papers.  My  last  experience 
was  on  the  Washington  Daily  News. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  you  work  on  the  Washington  Daily  News  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Up  until  March  27  from  last  September. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  now  an  investigator  for  the  committee — 
for  this  committee  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  your  s]:)ecial  assignment  after  you  became 
an  investigator  for  this  committee? 

Miss  Spargo.  My  assignment  was  to  investigate  particularly  the 
Washington  angle  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  and  the  part 
that  Government  workers  played  in  it. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Will  you  please  outline  in  chronological  order,  as 
far  as  possible,  just  how  you  went  about  investigating  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization  here  in  Washington,  and  subsequently  elsewhere. 

Miss  Spargo.  I  attended  a  meeting  of  the  Washington  Newspaper 
Guild  outside — that  was,  I  believe,  on  March  26. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  a  member  of  the  Newspaper  Guild  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  am.  Outside  the  door  of  the  District  Building  was  a 
man  who  later  identified  himself  to  me  as  Louis  Kolb.    He  had  a  letter 


UN-AMERICAX  TKOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8405 

from  Mrs.  Moiitaoniery.  Mrs.  Surah  V.  Montixompry.  idoiitifyiii<r  liiiu 
as  a  distributor  of  literature  for  the  American  I'oace  ^Mobilization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  identify  INIrs.  Montoomery  at  this  point, 
with  respect  to  her  connections  with  the  American  Peace  Mobi- 
lizations? 

^Nliss  Spargo.  She  is  secretary-treasurer  of  the  Washington  branch. 
1  believe  she  is  so  listed,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mv.  Matthkws.  And  she  had  signed  the  credentials  for  Louis 
Kolb? 

iNIiss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

]Mr.  JNIatthews.  All  riaht.  "WHiat  did  you  do  after  vou  met  Louis 
Kolb? 

Miss  Spargo.  He  had  these  handbills  so  I  asked  him  if  I  might 
have  one  and  I  looked  them  over  and  told  him  that  I  was  very  much 
interested  in  the  Peace  Mobilization.  He  asked  me  if  it  would  be 
possible  for  me  to  persuade  the  Washington  Newspaper  Guild  to 
let  him  speak  to  them.  He  said:  "You  are  interested.''  I  said:  "I 
am  very  much  interested,  but  it  would  be  impossible  for  me  to  per- 
suade the  Washington  Newspaper  Guild  to  have  a  representative  of 
the  Peace  Mobilization  speak  to  them  because  the  Washington  News- 
paper Guild  is  very  strongly  opposed  to  this  movement."  I  said : 
"However,  there  is  no  reason  why  I  can't  take  a  personal  interest 
in  it.'' 

]Mr.  Matthews.  Now  what  did  you  do  next  in  the  way  of  learn- 
ing about  the  American  Peace  Mobilization'^ 

ISIiss  Spargo.  I  went  next  into  the  local  headquarters  at  1116  Ver- 
mont Avenue,  at  that  time,  and  saw  Mrs.  Montgomery,  taking  with 
me  the  literature  which  INIr.  Kolb  had  been  distributing.  I  told  Mrs. 
]Montgomery  that  I  was  very  much  interested  in  the  Peace 
Mobilization. 

JNIr.  Matthews.  Did  you  join  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Spargo.  In  a  sort  of  fashion.  I  was  ver}-  active  in  it.  I 
never  got  a  membership  card. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVell,  what  did  you  do  in  the  way  of  joining? 

iVIiss  Spargo.  I  went  to  the  meetings  with  them  and  did  some 
little  work  at  their  headquarters  and  that  kind  of  thing. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  see  anything  like  an  application 
blank  or  anything  tliat  you  fill  out  to  become  connected  with  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Spargo.  No;  Dr.  Matthews,  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  never  saw  any  such  thing? 

Miss  Spargo.  No:  I  did  not.  I  do  know  that  they  had  member- 
ship lists,  but  I  did  not  see  any  application  blanks. 

Mr.  IVLvtthews.  Did  you  offer  your  services  in  any  way  whatsoever 
to  Mrs.  Montgomery  at  the  headquarters  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  did  you  do  any  work  in  the  office? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  I  did. 

]\Ir.  Matihews.  AVill  you  ])lease  describe  briefly  what  that  was? 

Miss  Spargo.  Oh,  I  folded  throw-outs  and  handbills  and  that  kind 
of  thing. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  how  long  did  you  do  that? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  would  have  to  have  mv  notes  for  the  exact  dates. 


§406  UN-AMERICAN  PliOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Never  mind  the  exact  dates. 

Miss  Spargo.  Approximately  a  month. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  you  were  in  the  headquarters  quite  regu- 
larly for  approximately  a  month? 

Miss  Spargo.  In  and  out. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  express  any  desire  to  attend 

Miss  Spargo.  Oh,  I  am  sorry;  I  worked  on  the  Graphic  Arts 
Committee.  That  was  a  committee  making  posters  and  lay-outs  and 
that  kind  of  thing. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  express  any  desire  to  attend  the  meeting 
■of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  held  in  New  York 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Early  in  April? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes ;  I  did.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  And  will  you  please  describe  how  you  went  about 
that? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  just  went  in  and  asked  Mrs.  Montgomery  about  it 
and  said  that  I  would  like  to  go  and  learned  about  the  arrangements 
for  buying  tickets. 

She  said  that  they  were  not  selling  tickets  until  the  next  day  and 
that  the  people  who  handled  the  tickets  would  be  in  the  next  day. 
I  went  down  the  next  day  and  saw  Samuel  Schmerler  and  Helen 
Schmerler,  who  were  in  charge  of  tickets.  Morton  Friedman  was 
another  who  was  in  charge  of  transpoi-t  ation. 

Mr.  Mati'hews.  Where  did  yoa  see  them? 

Miss  Spargo.  At  the  headquarters  on  Vermont  Avenue. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  did  you  obtain  transportation  to  go  to  the 
New  York  meeting  from  Schmerler,  or  how  did  you  get  your  trans- 
portation? 

jNIiss  Spargo.  I  am  not  ci[uite  sure  from  which  person  I  obtained 
the  transportation.  Dr.  Matthews.  I  believe  that  I  bought  my  ticket 
from  Mrs.  Helen  Schmerler. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  Did  you  pay  for  it? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  a  cut  rate  on  a  special  train  or  special  car? 

Miss  Spargo.  It  was  on  a  special  trahi  to  take  the  Washington  dele- 
gation down. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  you  are  sure  that  you  made  arrangements  to 
go  to  New  York  with  this  committee;  is  that  right? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  you  don't  happen  to  remember  which  one 
actually  took  the  cash  out  of  your  hand;  is  that  what  you  mean? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVho  was  in  charge — any  one  of  these  individuals 
in  particular? 

Miss  Spargo.  Morton  Friedman  was  named  as  being  in  charge  of 
transportation  but  Samuel  Schmerler  and  Helen  Schmerler  were 
equally  active.  It  depended — I  mean  it  depended  on  which  hour  of 
the  day  you  went  in  there.  There  were  diiferent  people  in  charge 
as  you  can  imagine — they  are  working  people  and  cannot  spend  all 
their  time  there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  identify  Sam  Schmerler  as  to  his  occupa- 
tion? 

Miss  Spargo.  He  works  in  the  Federal  Security  Agency. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PUOPAOANDA  ACTIVITIES  8407 

Mr.  Matthews.  Federal  Security  Administration  or  Agency? 

IMiss  Sparoo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  eniploj'ed  there  now? 

Miss  Spaego.  I  believe  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  made  a  check  on  whether  or  not  he  is 
employed  there? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  I  checked  with  civil  service,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  according-  to  that  check  he  is  employed  at 
the  Federal  Security  Administration? 

]\Iiss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  Mrs.  Schmerler  employed  anywhere  in  the  Gov- 
ernment ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  Dr.  Matthews.    I  will  have  to  have  my  papers. 

Mr.  JSIatthews.  AVhere  is  Mrs.  Schmerler  employed  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  don't  seem  to  have  that  there.  My  recollection  is 
that  she  is  with  the  Railroad  Retirement  Board. 

ISIr.  Matthews.  Have  you  made  a  check  on  her  employment? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  Dr.  Matthews,  but  I  am  not  well  prepared  on 
these  names. 

]\Ir.  ]Matthews.  Is  that  because  you  happen  to  have  several 
hundred  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir.  I  don't  know  that  we  have  several  hundred 
but  we  have  a  great  many  and  I  have  not  had  time  to  prepare  the 
definite  listing  of  those  names. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  Do  you  know  where  Morton  Friedman  is  em- 
ployed ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  do  not,  Dr.  ]\Iatthews.  I  do  not  believe  Morton 
Friedman  is  a  Government  employee  but  that  also  I  have  not  yet 
checked. 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  do  not  want  any  testimony  concerning  Govern- 
ment employees  or  any  list  until  you  have  finished  checking  except 
those  you  have  personal  information  about. 

Miss  Spargo.  I  understand  that. 

IMr.  Matthew's.  You  said  you  didn't  know  whether  there  were  sev- 
eral hundred  or  not.  Don't  you  have  lists  that  you  have  checked 
that  have  at  least  2,000  names  on  them? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  at  least  1  list  that  has  2,000  names  you 
checked  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  Dr.  Matthews;  but  that  is  not  the  American 
Peace  ^lobilization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes ;  I  understand,  but  I  am  talking  about  Govern- 
ment employees. 

Miss  Spargo.  Interlocking  organizations. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  asked  you  about  Government  employees  and  not 
about  the  American  Peace 'Mobilization.  What  was  the  date  of  the 
meeting  in  New  York? 

Miss  Spargo.  April  5  and  6. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  you  go  up  to  New  York? 

Miss  Spargo.  We  went  up  April  4,  Friday. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  many  persons  went  with  you  on  the  trip,  on 
the  train  to  New  York,  approximately? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  think  on  the  train  there  were  approximately  150 
people. 


8408  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  sj^ecial  cars  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  we  did,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  many? 

Miss  Spargo.  Two. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  had  two  cars  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  yon  meet  a  large  number  of  these  delegates  on 
the  way  up  to  New  York? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir ;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  come  to  know  some  of  them  personally? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  quite  well? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  I  did;  very  well. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  other  delegates  went  from 
Washington  to  the  New  York  meeting  of  the  American  Peace  Mobili- 
zation by  otlier  methods  of  transportation? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  a  great  many  went  by  special  bus  and  a  great 
many  went  by  private  car. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  any  one  of  the  officers  in  the  headquarters  of 
the  American  Peace  Mobilization  here  in  Washington  tell  you  wdiat 
the  size  of  the  Washington  delegation  would  be? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  Sam  Schmerler  told  me  that  they  would  have 
about  500  delegates  from  Washington,  150  of  whom  were  to  be  dele- 
gates from  the  Government — all  of  those  that  they  called  Government 
delegates  and  all  those  delegates  whom  I  met  were  members  of  the 
U.  F.  W.  A. 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  Just  a  minute  You  don't  mean  they  were  delegates 
from  the  Government? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  what  they  were  called. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  You  mean  they  were  delegates  from  the  United  States 
Government  to  the  meeting  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization,  so 
designated  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  am  referring  to  them  only  as  they  were  referred  to 
me,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  think  it  is  rather  important  that  we  get  this  matter 
plain.  You  mean  that  the  President  appointed  these  people  to  repre- 
sent the  United  States  Government  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Oh,  certainly  not. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Of  course,  you  don't.  What  you  mean  is  they  were 
people  who  came  from  Washington,  who  belonged  to  a  union,  perhaps, 
that  was  composed  of  Government  employees ;  isn't  that  right  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct.  They  called  themselves,  how^ever, 
Government  delegates. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  What  were  they  delegates  to  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Delegates  to  the  American  People's  Meeting. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  People's  meeting? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct;  which  was  a  meeting  of  the  national 
meeting  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  These  people  who  w^ere  referred  to  as  Government  del- 
egates were  purported  to  be  Government  employees  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct.  They  were  in  fact  Government  em- 
ployees. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Government  employees? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8409 

Mr,  Starnes.  And  the  Washinoton  council  or  the  Washington  chap- 
ter for  tliat  reason,  presumably,  referred  to  them  as  Government 
delegates? 

jNIiss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

jMr.  Starxes.  In  contradistinction  to  those  who  were  not  em- 
ployes of  the  Federal  Government? 

Miss  SpAi;(;o.  Tliat  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right, 

Mr.  INIatthews.  Do  you  happen  to  know  whether  or  not  there  were 
as  many  as  500  delegates  from  Washington  to  the  American  Peoples 
Meeting  ? 

jNIiss  Spargo.  Yes ;  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  There  were  approximately  500  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes ;  there  were  approximately  500. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  From  Washington  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes.  I  believe  some  of  the  literature  of  the  American 
Peace  Mobilizati(m  and  the  Washington  Peace  Mobilization  said  that 
there  were  600  delegates  from  Washington.  I  am  merely  giving  my 
own  estimate. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Which  would  be  nearer — 500 ;  is  that  correct  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  MattheW'S.  Now,  you  say  the  official  title  of  this  meeting  was 
the  "American  People's  Meeting"  but  it  was  held  under  the  auspices  of 
the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

IMr.  ^Matthews.  Do  you  happen  to  have  a  call  that  was  issued  for 
that  gathering? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

IVIr.  Matthews.  Is  that  it? 

(Handing  pa])er  to  the  witness.) 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  it;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  MATTHEw^s.  Xow,  will  you  please  describe  that  briefly? 

]\Iiss  Spargo.  "Call.  American  People's  Meeting."  A.  P.  M.  Those 
are  the  capital  letters  which  form  A,  P.  M,  reading  downward — Ameri- 
can Peace  Mobilization,    It  calls  upon  all  friends  of  peace  and  liberty, 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  it  is  signed  by  a  large  number  of  names,  isn't 
it? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthew^'^.  Approximately  how  many  names  appear  as  signers 
of  this  call  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  don't  know,  sir — maybe  225. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  that  this  call  which  has  been 
identified  by  the  witness,  be  made  a  part  of  the  record. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  is  marked  "Spargo  Exhibit  No.  1.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Xow,  on  the  back  of  tlie  call,  I  direct  your  at- 
tention. Mr.  Chairman,  to  the  fact  that  the  sponsoring  organizations 
or  participating  organizations  in  the  American  Peace  Mobilization, 
are  also  listed  in  part:  The  American  Youth  Congress;  the  Farmer- 
Labor  Partv  of  Minnesota;  the  International  Fur  and  Leather  AVoi'k- 
ers'  Union:  the  International  Workers  Order;  the  Jewish  Peoples' 
Committee:  the  National  Maritime  Union;  the  Southein  Negro  Con- 
gress; the  United  Electrical,  Radio,  and  Machine  Workers  of  America, 


8410  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Local  1225;  the  Washington  Commonweahh  Federation  and  other 
organizations  of  that  general  character. 

Mr.  VooKHis.  Is  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  on  that  call  ? 

Mr.  Matitiews.  At  the  bottom  of  the  page  we  find  the  following  r 

Please  mail  immediately  to  the  national  office  of  the  American  Peace  Mobiliza- 
tion, 1133  Broadway,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  all  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  think  that  is  the  only  place  where  the  name 
appeal's. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  it  does  appear  on  there  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  sir. 

You  attended  this  gathering,  did  you  not? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  did,  Dr.  JMatthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  your  way  up  to  New  York  on  the  train  did  you 
do  any  work  in  preparation  for  the  gathering  in  New  York? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes.  The  group  led  by  Sam  Schmerler  made  up  a 
song  on  the  train.  I  liad  my  typewriter  with  me,  so  I  made  several — 
made  a  good  many  copies  of  that  song  for  them  for  distribution. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  referred  a  number  of  times  to  Sam 
Schmerler.     Was  he  one  of  the  leaders  of  the  delegation  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes ;  very  decidedly.     He  was  one  of  the  ablest  leaders. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  he  have  any  official  title  in  the  Washington 
Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Spargo.  It  does  not  appear  on  the  letterhead,  but  he  is  chair- 
man of  the  Trade  Union  Council  of  the  Washington  Peace  Mobiliza- 
tion. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  any  other  pertinent  details 
about  your  trip  to  New  York  City.  You  helped  them  type  some  songs. 
What  else  transpired  on  the  train?  Were  there  discussions  of  the 
organization  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes ;  and  the  chief  business  on  the  train  was  rehearsing 
songs  and  things  of  that  sort,  such  as  The  Yanks  Are  Not  Coming,  No, 
Sir,  and  also  the  business  of  where  people  were  to  stay  was  straight- 
ened out,  and  that  kind  of  thing. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Avhat  did  you  do  after  you  reached  New  York  ? 
Will  you  describe  what  happened? 

Miss  Spargo.  We  went  to  Mecca  Temple  to  register  and  arrange  for 
housing  the  Washington  delegation.  The  Washmgton  delegation  was 
largely  housed  at  the  Hotel  Lincoln. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  then  will  you  go  ahead  with  the  story  of  the 
gathering  itself?  Describe  the  gathering  which  took  place  in  New 
York  step  by  step. 

Miss  Spargo.  Dr.  Matthews,  do  you  want  to  have  the  first  meeting? 
The  first  meeting  of  the  Washington  delegation — would  you  prefer  to 
have  that  first  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

Miss  Spargo.  The  Washington  delegation  met  in  the  Crystal  Room 
at  the  Great  Northern  Hotel.  An  executive  committee  was  formed. 
Mrs.  Montgomery,  Mrs.  Sarah  V.  Montgomery,  Morris  Tepping,  alias 
Tepletsky. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Tepletsky  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  do  you  happen  to  know  that  is  an  alias  for 
Morris  Tepping? 


UN-AMKUICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8411 

]\Iiss  Spargo.  It  is  so  given  in  the  records  of  the  Metropolitan 
Police  Dejiartnu'iil. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  right.     Will  you  name — are  you  naming  the 
executive  connnittee  that  was  chosen? 
Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Ma'ithews.  Was  Sarah  V.  ^Nfontiiomery  chairman  of  the  execu- 
tive committee — is  that  the  reason  you  named  her  first? 

Miss  Spargo.  Her  name  came  first  on  the  list. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Proceed  with  the  names  of  the  executive  com- 
mittee. 

Miss  Spargo.  Sam  Zihet,  alias  Samuel  Goodman;  Jack  Z'lcker; 
Sam  Schmerler;  Morton  Friedman;  Mary  Eichardson;  and  Henry 
Thomas.  Henry  Thomas  is  the  Negro  leader  of  the  southwest  Com- 
munist Party  here. 

A  national  presiding  committee  Avas  also  formed.     Jack  Mink — — 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  national  presiding  committee  formed  in 
the  Washington  delegation  meeting? 

]SIiss  Spargo.  That  is  correct.  That  is  the  committee  which  was 
to  be  the  contact  with  the  national  committee  and  sit  on  the  plat- 
form and  that  kind  of  thing. 

Jack  Mink,  ISIary  Richardson,  and  Henry  Thomas,  Morris  Tep- 
ping.  Jack  Zucker,  and  Miss  Mildred  Bricker  were  also  mentioned, 
but  they  withdrew\  A  lobby  committee  was  set  up.  This  was  to 
show  the  White  House  and  Congress  how  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization  felt  about  this  "imperialist  war."  Tliis  lobby  com- 
mittee is  the  same  committee  which  was  aiding  with  this  present 
picketing  of  the  White  House. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  describe  the  war  as  an  "imperialist 
Avar.-'  what  are  you  quoting? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  am  quoting  what  was  said  at  the  meeting,  Dr. 
Matthews. 

Mr.  ]Matthew^s.  Is  that  the  common  parlance  of  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization,  as  you  learned  to  know  about  it  in  describing 
the  war? 

Miss  Spargo.  It  is,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  the  word  "imperialist"  invariably  prefixed? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  happen  to  know  whether  or  not  that  is 
also  the  Communist  Party  line? 

Miss  Spargo.  It  is.  Dr.  JNIatthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  the  question  of  the  war? 

I\Iiss  Spargo.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  right ;  you  were  naming  some  committee. 

Miss  Spargo.  A  lobby  connnittee  was  set  up.  Jack  Zucker  and 
Sally  Montgomery — "Sally  Montgomery"  is  Mrs.  Sarah  V.  Mont- 
gomery. She  was  generally  called  "Sally"  by  the  people  there.  A 
resolutions  committee  Avas"^set  up.  Sam  Schmerler;  I^ee  Whiting; 
Tod  Ozmun,  identified  by  the  Metropolitan  Police  as  a  Communist 
Party  leader  and  organizer  here  for  many  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  spell  the  name? 

Miss  Spargo.  0-z-m-u-n.     Alexander  Betz. 

]Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  what  Ted  Ozmun  does  for  a  liv- 
ing— what  his  occupation  is? 


^412  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Miss  Spargo,  I  do  not,  Dr.  Matthews.  He  has  been  repeatedly- 
employed  upon  W.  P.  A.  and  W.  P.  A.  projects.  He  has  translated 
for  that  department  and  other  departments,  according  to  information 
he  gave  me.     At  the  present  time  I  don't  know  what  he  is  doing. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Had  you  concluded  the  reading  of  the  names  of 
the  committees? 

Miss  Spargo.  No,  sir.  Benjamin  Kanerak.  He  is  a  bituminous-coal 
employee. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  an  employee  of  the  Bituminous  Coal 
Commission  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  not  a  miner  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  No,  sir.  Hugh  B.  Miller,  an  attorney  of  the  Bitu- 
minous Coal  Commission;  Mrs.  Eleanor  Fowler;  Mrs.  Dorothy 
Strange;  Reginald  Audrey;  Herman  Dolgan. 

Mr.  Matthews.  D-o-l-g-a-n  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct,  I  believe.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Starnes.  As  you  read  those  names  you  are  identifying  people 
that  you  know  personally  to  be  employed  by  the  Federal  Government 
in  various  capacities  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  was  so  informed. 

Mr,  Voorhis.  Well,  so  I  may  understand  this,  is  that  a  list  of  an 
executive  committee  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  are  committees  appointed  by  the  organization 
in  New  York.  She  said  this  particular  person  was  an  employee  of  the 
Bituminous  Coal  Commission. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  I  asked  if  she  had  personal  knowledge  that  these 
people  were  em]:)loyed  by  the  Government. 

]\Ir.  JMason.  Of  those  you  listed  as  employees? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  know  from  them  or  from  checking  with  Government 
departments  that  they  are  employed — by  checking  in  the  departments 
where  they  are  employed. 

Agnes  Spencei-;  Ali^heus  Hunt  on,  a  professor  at  Howard  University. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  committee  is  that  you  just  read? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  the  resolutions  committee. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  there  any  other  committee  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Hudson  Wells,  who  was  president  of  the  Washington 
Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  IMatthews.  Was  he  on  the  resolutions  committee? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  he  was  appointed  to  draw  up  a  separate  resolu- 
tion on  housing.  Then  there  was  the  march  from  One  Hundred  and 
Twenty-fifth  Street 

Mr.  JNIatthews.  Are  you  through  with  the  committees? 

Miss  Spargo.  No,  Dr.  Matthews.  They  scheduled  a  march  from  One 
Hundred  and  Twenty-fifth  Street  to  Randall's  Island  and  appointed  a 
connnittee  to  handle  that.  Jack  Zucker,  Charles  Adamson,  Fay  Gold- 
stein, Ted  Ozmun,  and  five  or  six  people  of  whom  I  have  only  the  last 
names — do  you  wish  those  included  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Only  the  last  names?  I  don't  know  that  that  is 
material. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  that  conclude  the  list  of  committees? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Now,  this  was  all  business  which  transpired  at  the 
meeting  of  the  Washington  delegation  ? 


UN-AM KKICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8413 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  IMattuews.  To  the  American  Peoples  Meeting? 

Miss  Spakgo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  JNlATrHEWS.  Did  any  other  business  transpire  there  that  is  perti- 
nent to  this  investigation  ?  Did  the  meeting  consist  entirely  of  naming 
these  committees? 

jNliss  Spakgo.  No. 

]Mr.  Mati'hews.  "Who  presided  at  the  meeting  of  the  AVashington 
delegation  ? 

MTss  Spargo.  IMrs.  Montgomery, 

]\rr.  jMati'hews.  AVas  there  a  secretary  of  the  delegation? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  Mary  Richardson  acted  as  secretary. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  what  her  employment  is? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  do  not. 

Ml'.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  who  made  speeches,  if  any  formal 
speeches  were  made,  at  this  meeting  of  the  Washington  delegation? 

Miss  Spargo.  Sam  Schmerler  spoke  and  Jack  Zucker  spoke  mostly 
upon  the  kind  of  resolutions  which  they  wanted  to  have  included  in 
the  national  platform. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Sam  Schmerler  in  his  speech  make  any  refer- 
ence to  the  Washington  Bookshop? 

Miss  Spakgo.  Yes,  Dr.  Matthews.  He  said  that  members  of  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization  would  get  a  special  discount  at  the 
Bookshop  and  that  the  Bookshop  on  Seventeenth  Street  carried  liter- 
ature which  no  other  bookshop  would  carry  in  Washington. 

Mv.  ISIatthews.  Did  he  state  witli  what  authority  he  could  offer 
special  discounts  from  the  Bookshop  to  the  members  of  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Spargo.  Xo.  I  believe  not.  Dr.  IVIatthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  just  stated  that  as  a  fact? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  After  the  Washington  delegation  had  its  meeting, 
was  there  a  main  session  of  the  entire  American  Peoples  Meeting? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliere  was  that  held  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  It  was  held  in  Mecca  Temple.  It  was  originally 
scheduled  to  have  been  held  at  Randall's  Island,  but  because  of  raiii 
it  was  called  off. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  start  to  Randall's  Island? 

Miss  Spargo.  We  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  it  began  to  rain  on  the  way  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  It  did. 

Mr.  ]\lAn^HEws.  And  the  march  turned  around  and  came  back  to 
Mecca  Tem])le;  is  that  right? 

Miss  Spaigo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AYas  the  meeting  at  Mecca  Temple  an  open  or 
public  meeting? 

Miss  Spargo.  Xo.  sir ;  it  was  for  delegates  only. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AA^as  the  meeting  at  Randall's  Island  to  be  a  public 
meeting? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

IMr.  ]MAiTnEWs.  How  far  had  you  marched  before  you  turned 
around  and  went  back  to  Mecca  Temple? 


3414  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Miss  Spargo.  We  marched  from  One  Hundred  and  Twenty-fifth 
Street  part  way  across  the  Triborough  Bridge. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  got  back  to  Mecca  Temple,  what  did 
you  have  to  do?  Show  your  delegate's  card  or  badge  in  order  to 
gain  admission  to  the  meeting? 

Miss  Spargo.  In  every  section  at  Mecca  Temple  you  had  to  show 
your  delegate's  card.     May  I  explain? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

Miss  Spargo.  I  was  given  a  delegate's  card,  although  I  could  present 
no  credentials.  I  mean  they  were  asking  for  credentials  and  I  said 
that  I  had  none,  but  I  was  very  interested  and  that  is  how  I  happened 
to  have  a  delegate's  card. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Where  did  you  get  the  delegate's  card?  Here  in 
Washington  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  No  ;  at  Mecca  Temple  when  I  first  went  down  there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  the  meeting  of  the  Washington  delegation  did 
you  have  any  particular  friend  with  whom  you  were  sitting  and  with 
whom  you  discussed  what  was  going  on,  or  did  that  occur  on  the 
march  or  subsequently?  Did  you  discuss  this  matter  with  any  par- 
ticular individual  in  the  Washington  delegation  ? 

]Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  ])articularly  with  a  Miss  Julia  Marcus. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  J-u-1-i-a? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  M-a-r-c-u-s? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  that  during  the  gathering  you  got  par- 
ticularly acquainted  with  her? 

Miss  Spargo.  On  the  way  down  on  the  train.  She  is  a  Govern- 
ment employee. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  where  she  is  employed  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  have  it  in  my  notes.  Dr.  Matthews.  I  don't  recall 
offhand. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  get  to  know  any  other  individual  par- 
ticularly well  from  the  standpoint  of  discussing  the  nature  and  pur- 
poses of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  I  got  to  know  Mr.  Ozmun  quite  well. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  sit  with  him  in  some  of  the  sessions? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  I  sat  with  him  at  the  sessions  of  the  Wash- 
ington delegation  in  the  Crystal  Room  of  the  Great  Northern  Hotel 
and  on  subsequent  occasions. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Did  Mr.  Ozmun  take  it  upon  himself  to  exj^lain 
to  you  carefully  the  nature  and  purposes  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization? 

Miss  Spargo.  He  did.     He  asked  me  to  join  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  did  he  ask  you  to  join  the  Communist 
Party  ?     Going  up  on  the  train  or  coming  back  or  where  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  No;  it  was  at  a  session  in  Mecca  Temple,  a  branch 
meeting  of  Press,  Office,  Government  and 

Mr.  Matthews.  Had  he  led  up  to  his  asking  you  to  join  the  Com- 
munist Party  with  any  discussion  of  the  relationship  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  to  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Oh.  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  just  didn't  ask  you  out  of  the  blue  to  join  the 
Communist  Party,  did  he? 


UX-AMEUICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8415 


Miss  8pakgo.  No,  indeed.  He  had  the  evening  that  I  arrived  in 
New  York — 1  wonder  if  I  niioht  refer  to  my  notes  ^ 

Mr.  Matthews.  Certainly.  AVill  you  detail  your  conversations 
Avith  Ozniun  ^ 

Mr.  Staunks.  We  aie  going  to  declare  a  short  recess  for  the  purpose 
of  letting  the  witness  check  her  notes. 

(Whereupon,  a  short  recess  was  taken.) 

Ml".  Staknes.  The  connnittee  will  be  in  order. 

As  I  understand  it  you  are  to  show  by  this  line  of  questions  what 
relations  there  were  between  the  Communist  Party  and  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes.  I  would  like  Miss  Spargo  to  remember  as 
exactly  as  po.ssible  the  language  of  her  conversations  with  Mr.  Oz- 
nuni  that  had  to  do  with  the  relationship  of  the  Communist  Party 
to  the  American  Peace  Mobilization.  Will  you  describe  the  con- 
versations? 

Miss  Spakgo.  Part  of  this  conversation  was  at  a  party  given  April 
4,  given  at  the  home  of  Miss  Muriel  Draper,  144  Lexington  Avenue, 
New  York  City. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  Miss  Muriel  Draper,  the  famous  dancer? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  believe  so.  The  party  was  for  out-of-town  delegates 
to  the  American  Peo])le"'s  Meeting. 

I  had  to  go  to  the  party  with  Miss  Julia  Marcus  and  it  was  there 
That  I  met  Mr.  Oznum.  We  had  a  A^ery  lengthy  conversation.  He 
l)egan  to  quote  the  things  William  Z.  Foster  had  said  about  the  rights 
of  workers.  He  then  asked  me  how  far  I  had  progressed.  He  said 
that  by  this  time  :  "You  have  discovered  that  the  old  two-party  system, 
the  dear  old  American  Avay,  is  just  so  much  bunkum  for  the  Avorkers." 

Later  Mr.  Ozmun  said  he  believed  that  I  Avas  about  "ripe  to  join 
the  C.  P." 

I  asked  him:  "You  mean  the  Connuunist  Party?'* 

He  said :  ''Of  course,  don't  tell  me  you  don't  like  the  party." 

I  again  saAV  Mr.  Ozmun  and  sat  with  him  at  the  Washington  dele- 
gation meeting  the  next  morning.  That  Avas  xVpril  5.  Then,  later 
again  that  same  day  on  April  5,  I  saAV  him  at  the  CA^ening  conference 
at  Mecca  Temple.  ]\Ir.  Oznmn  wanted  me  to  leave  the  conference 
early  to  attend  a  party  at  the  Youth  Workshop,  at  4  West  Eighteenth 
Street,  Avhich  was  being  giA-en  in — I  mean  for  delegates  to  the  Amer- 
ican People's  Meeting.  I  suggested  that  since  they  had  given  me  a 
card  as  a  delegate  I  should  stay  at  the  sessions  and  attend  the  ses- 
sions. He  thereupon  said  in  a  meeting  AAdiere  there  Avere  people 
around.  I  mean  a  great  many  people,  the  whole  audience,  he  said  "You 
can't  do  any  good  by  sitting  at  these  sessions.  All  the  positions  are 
held  by  members  of  the  C.  P.  Nobody  Avho  is  not  a  member  of  the 
C.  P.  can  get  anvAvhere  in  the  A.  P.  M." 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Did  Ozmun  tell  you  that? 

Miss   Spargo.    That    is   correct,   Mr.   Voorhis,   he  did.     He   said: 

AVe  have  a  fow  A.  P.  M.  iiieinbers  who  arc  not  C.  P.  people  but  they  haven't 
a  tiling  to  do  AVith  running  this  organization. 

He  said : 

When  yon  join  the  C.  P.  it  will  he  worth  while  for  you  to  stick  around;  you 
iniglit  be  elected  to  office  or  ])Ut  in  a  group  leadership  position,  but  don't  forget 
the  ('.  P.  has  this  whole  matter  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  in  the  bag 
and  is  running  it  just  the  Avay  it  Avants  to. 
62626— 41— vol.  14 17 


8416  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  was  that  conversation  to  dissuade  you  from 

staying  at  the  meeting  on  the  ground  that  if  you  stayed  you  could  not 
do  anything  because  you  were  not  yet  a  Communist  Party  member? 
Is  that  the  way  you  understood  the  conversation  % 

Miss  SPARGO.'lt  was  partly  for  that  purpose  and  jjartly  as  an  or- 
ganizational effort.  He  is  organizer  and  he  was  trying  to  show  me 
how  important  it  was  to  join  the  Communist  Party.  He  had  brought 
that  up  several  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  wanted  you  to  go  to  another  meeting — is  that 
correct — or  party  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  He  wanted  me  to  go  to  a  party  at  the  Youth  Work 
Shop. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  go  to  the  party  at  the  Youth  Work  Shop  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Go  ahead  with  your  conversations  with  Mr.  Ozmun, 
if  there  was  some  more  on  that  particular  point. 

Miss  Spargo.  At  the  Youth  Work  Shop  Mr.  Ozmun  informed  me 
he  had  started  the  Workers  Alliance  here  in  Washington  with  10  mem- 
bers and  it  had  grown  to  2,500.  He  said  he  had  joined  the  Commu- 
nist Party  5  years  ago.  He  said  he  had  worked  in  various  capacities 
on  W.  P.  A.  Historical  Records  Survey,  translating  for  the  Justice 
Department,  Interior  Department,  and  Agriculture.  He  said  that  be- 
cause the  Communist  Party  had  many  members  in  key  defense  posi- 
tions in  the  Government,  and  was  trying  to  get  as  many  more  as  it 
could,  that  he  had  tried  himself  to  get  in  with  the  Defense  Commission, 
but  he  said  that  he  had  been  turned  down  because  he  belieA^ed  that  the 
police  knew  he  was  a  Communist.    He  said  : 

I  was  one  of  those  who  picketed  the  German  Embassy  and  I  served  30  days 
in  jail  for  it,  all  because  they  knew  we  were  Communists.  I  was  with  the  Sea- 
men's Union  at  that  time. 

He  also  told  me  that  Representative  Cox,  of  Georgia,  had  slapped 
his  face  on  one  occasion  and  he  said  he  had  made  the  headlines  with  it. 

I  suggested  to  Mr.  Ozmun  that  if  I  should  join  the  Communist 
Party  I  wouldn't  care  to  have  it  generally  known.  Mr.  Ozmun  in- 
formed me  that  that  was  very  easy,  he  would  pro*pose  me,  the  Com- 
munists in  the  Newspaper  Guild  will  inquire  into  my  reputation  and 
only  he,  they,  and  the  local  party  secretary  would  know  my  real  name. 
He  said : 

We  all  use  different  names  in  any  Communist  connection  except  for  such  people 
as  Corliss  Lamont. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  use  the  name  Corliss  Lamont? 

Miss  Spargo.  He  did,  sir.  He  also  suggested  that  joining  the  Com- 
munist Party  woidd  be  a  wonderful  form  of  insurance  for  the  future, 
because  the  Comnumists  were  going  to  be  able  to  take  over  this  country 
in  about  5  years,  he  thought,  and  he  said  that  naturally  party  members 
would  fare  better  than  others  when  the  revolution  came. 

I  believe,  Dr.  Matthews,  that  that  is  about  all  on  that  particular 
point. 

Mr.  Starnes.  May  I  ask  you  a  little  bit  further  about  this  tie-up 
of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  ?  He  told  you  the  only  way  you 
could  hope  to  achieve  a  position  of  responsibility  or  leadership  in 
the  movement  was  to  become  a  party'  member? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  3417 

Miss  Spargo.  What  lie  told  me  was  that  I  couldn't  hold  an  office  or 
be  on  a  comniilloe  or  have  anythin<x  whatever  to  do  with  runninfj  it 
if  I  were  not  a  Connuuuist  Parly  member. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words,  he  told  you  definitely  that  the  Com- 
munist Party  controlled  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Sparho.  He  did,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  VooRHiK.  Now,  with  that  as  No.  1  point,  would  it  not  be  true 
that  every  effort  would  be  made  to  try  to  get  people  who  were  not 
Communists  to  be  interested  in  it  or  affiliated  with  it  in  one  way  or 
another,  providing  they  didn't  have  any  position? 

Miss  Spargo.  Providing  they  held  no  position  of  leadership,  oh,  ab- 
solutely. 

Mr.  \\K^Rnis.  And  wouldn't  the  effort  be  made  to  get  people  as  far 
away  as  possible  if  you  coukl,  to  come  along  with  the  thing  and  attend 
meetings  and  be  members  and  so  on  and  so  forth  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Oh,  j-es;  I  definitely  know  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  what  a  front  is  for,  isn't  it  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  only  this  is  a  personal  opinion,  Mr.  Voorhis,  but 
it  seemed  to  me  this  is  less  of  a  front  than  most  of  these  other  organ- 
izations— it  is  more  open. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  mean  the  control  is  tighter  and  it  is  more  defi- 
nitely communistic? 

Miss  Spargo.  It  is  more  definitely  communistic;  yes.  In  other 
words  we  have  so  much  testimony 

Mr.  Voorhis.  The  point  I  am  trying  to  make  is,  it  would  not  do 
the  Comnninist  Party  any  good  to  have  an  organization  that  was 
just  limited  to  control  by  them  and  membership  of  their  own  people, 
so,  therefore,  the  attempt  is  to  utilize  this  cause  of  peace  in  which  so 
many  people  are  sincerely  interested,  and  deeply  concerned  and  from, 
to  my  mind,  the  very  best  of  motives,  to  utilize  that  as  a  means  of 
getting  a  lot  of  perfectly  good  people  as  tails  to  what  is  definitely  a 
Communist  kite,  isn't  that  right? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  exactly  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  JMr.  Chairman,  if  Miss  Spargo  will  stand 
aside  for  a  few  minutes.  Miss  Huffman  has  testimonj^  concerning  the 
same  meeting  and  the  same  point,  and  if  you  will  hear  that  now  we 
Avill  have  Miss  Spargo  come  back  in  a  moment. 

]Mr.  Starnes.  Very  well.  Miss  Spargo,  you  may  stand  aside. 

TESTIMONY  OF  HAZEL  HUFFMAN— Resumed 

Mr.  ^Iatthkwr.  Miss  Huffman,  did  you  attend  the  first  large  meet- 
ing of  tlie  American  Peoples  Meeting  held  at  Mecca  Temple  after  the 
affair  was  adjourned  from  Randall's  Island  to  the  temple? 

Miss  Huffman.  Both.  Befoie  Randall's  Island  meeting  there  was 
some  activities  at  Mecca  Temple  previous  to  the  Randall  Island 
meet  in"'. 

Mr.  aIatthewr.  You  attended  all  the  meetings,  did  you? 

IMiss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  will  you  please  give  what  information  you 
have  on  what  transpired  at  that  meeting  at  Mecca  Temple,  particularly 


3418  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

as  it  relates  to  the  question  of  the  part  that  the  Communist  Party  was 
playing  in  he  American  Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes ;  both  that  and  a  meeting  that  I  attended  later 
that  evening  that  was  not  an  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  right. 

Miss  Huffman.  At  the  American  Peace  INIobilization  one  thing  I 
was  particularly  interested  in  was  observing  how  many  of  the  so-called 
leaders  of  the  Communist  Party  were  in  attendance  at  that  meeting. 

Among  those  in  attendance  at  the  meeting  on  the  floor  with  the 
delegates  were  Ben  Gold,  Rockwell  Kent,  Isobel  Walker  Soule,  Eliza- 
beth Gurley  Flynn,  Norman  Tallentire,  of  the  International  Workers' 
Alliance;  Joseph  Brodsky,  William  F.  Dunne,  Robert  Dunn,  Mike 
Gold,  Si  Gerson,  a  former  representative;  Jerry  O'Comiell,  the 
Michigan  State  senator.  Stanley  Novak  was  both  a  speaker  and  for 
a  period  of  time  was  on  the  floor  with  the  delegates. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  meeting  is  this? 

Miss  Huffman.  This  is  the  meeting  at  the  Mecca  Temple. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Of  the  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  American  Peace  Mobilization  convention.  It 
was  called  the  American  People's  Meeting. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  understand,  and  that  is  this  meeting? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  and  they  were  on  the  main  floor  with 
the  delegates.  There  was  the  main  auditorium  and  two  balconies 
and  these  people  were  all  seen  on  the  main  floor  with  the  delegates. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  mean  over  a  period  of  years  as  you  have 
studied  this  question  that  you  are  able  to  identify  or  recognize  these 
persons  yourself  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Not  only  from  that  point,  Doctor,  but  from  the 
point  of  attending  meetings  that  were  purely  Communist  meetings 
at  which  they  were  the  people  in  charge  of  the  meetings.  There  is 
no  question  of  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  are  speaking  of  first-hand  knowledge  when 
you  say  the  people  there  are  Communists? 

Miss"  Huffman.  I  know  the  people  individually,  personally — I  saw 
these  people  in  the  audience.  In  fact,  I  spoke  to  some  of  them  at 
the  meeting  as  they  came  off  the  floor  with  the  delegates.  I  am  only 
mentioning  those  people  that  I  know  first-hand  and  am  able  to  idea- 
tify.  Lloyd  Gough,  who  is  in  charge  of  the  cultural  division  of  the 
A.  P.  M.,  and  who  was  one  of  the  ringleadei's  with  the  theater  arts 
committee  and  Francis  Bass  and  Morris  Watson. 

I  have  given  that  just  as  a  partial  list  of  the  people  that  I  iden- 
tified. 

May  I  be  permitted  to  go  to  the  evening  meeting?  After  we  at- 
tended the  A.  P.  M.  meeting  and  that  was  a  celebration  for  Norman 
Tallentire — that  was  a  jubilee  celebration  for  his  fifty-fifth  birtliday. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  any  rate  it  was  a  birthday  celebration? 

Miss  Huffman.  At  any  rate  he  was  born  on  April  6,  1896  and  it 
was  the  celebration  of  his  birthday  and  his  40  years  in  the  labor 
movement. 

The  sponsors  of  that  meeting  are  all  of  the  people  who  are  quoted 
in  the  Daily  Worker,  who  are  leaders  in  the  Communist  Party  and 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8419 

known  to  ho  the  leaders  in  the  Conniuinist  Party.     I  thoupjht  I  \v,v\ 
that  exhibit  here  but  I  haven't. 

At  that  nieetino;  Rockwell  Kent,  William  F.  Dunne,  Robert  Dunn, 
Elizabeth  (jurley  Flynn,  Joseph  R.  Brodsky,  Isobel  AValker  Soule — 
William  Z.  Foster  was  scheduled  to  attend  but  sent  his  regrets — and 
William  Dunne  covered  the  part  of  the  program  which  Mr.  Foster 
was  to  cover. 

William  E.  Browder,  the  brother  of  Earl  Browder,  was  one  of  the 
speakers  at  that  meeting.  Each  speaker  referred  to  the  fact  that  he 
had  been  at  the  American  Peoples  Meeting;  each  one  of  them  spoke 
of  the  necessity  for  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  and  what  it  could 
do.  ' 

Along  with  that  they  were  describing  how  the  exact  place  where  each 
had  fitted  in  on  what  might  be  termed  the  Communist  "cause  celebre" 
movement  such  as  the  Sacco-Vanzetti  case^  the  Tom  Mooney  case. 
They  called  themselves  the  agitators  who  had  carried  on  all  this  agita- 
tion and  activity  on  behalf  of  Tom  Mooney  and  the  Sacco-Vanzetti 
cases,  the  Butte  {Mont.)  case,  the  Montana  Anaconda  strike,  the 
marble  strike  in  Vermont,  the  activity  for  the  recognition  of  the  Soviet 
Union. 

As  a  matter  of  fact  one  comment  that  was  made  there  by  Mr.  Tallen- 
tire  was  that  they  were  largely  responsible  for  the  fact  that  the  Soviet 
Union  liad  recognized  the  United  States  and  went  on  to  explain  that 
was  the  way  it  really  happened. 

Mr.  William  Dunne  in  telling  of  his  activities  during  the  1923  and 
1924  period  with  the  unemployed  and  in  strike  areas  constantly  re- 
ferred to  the  United  States  as  "this  Wall  Street  government."  Rock- 
well Kent  told  of  his  activities  in  association  with  Norman  Tallentire 
over  this  long  period,  and  Rockwell  Kent  spoke  of  the  activities  of  the 
United  American  Artists  in  the  American  Peace  ^Mobilization. 

William  E.  Browder  also  told  of  his  activities.  I  bring  that  out 
because  there  was  no  question  in  the  subjects  that  they  were  covering 
and  in  tlieir  activities  about  the  fact  that  they  had  carried  on  this 
movement  for  the  Communist  Party.  They  so  stated.  And  they 
closely  associated  the  fact  of  the  activity  of  the  American  Peace  Mobi- 
lization Avith  the  Communist  Party  at  that  particular  meeting. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  have  a  throw-away  on  the  Norman  Tallentire  jubi- 
lee celebration. 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  this  distributed  at  the  meeting  of  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Htjffmax.  I  received  this  particular  one,  I  know  from  the  sig- 
nature in  the  right-hand  corner,  at  the  upper  Manhattan  American 
Peace  Mobilization  meeting.  I  have  the  exact  date  here  that  was  on — 
March  26,  1941 — at  whicli  this  Norman  Tallentire  was  one  of  the  prin- 
cipal speakers  along  with  Rabbi  Plotkin,  of  New  Jersey. 

At  that  time  Norman  Tallentire,  speaking  at  an  American  Peace 
Mobilization  meeting,  spoke  of  his  40  years  in  the  progressive 
labor  movement.  He  referred  to  himself  as  "a  party  member.''  He 
stated  he  was  a  delegate  to  the  Chicago  Mobilization  for  Peace  in  Sep- 
tember from  the  International  Workers'  Order,  and  that  he  was  a 
delegate  for  the  April  6  convention. 


3420  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

You  see  this  meeting  was  before  the  Mecca  Temple  meeting,  so  he 
was  telling  that  he  was  a  delegate  to  the  Mecca  Temple  meeting. 

He  stated  that  the  International  Workers'  Order  had  a  membership 
of  1,700,000  people  and  "is  a  proud  affiliate  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization." 

He  credited  efforts  of  the  A.  P.  M.  march  on  Washington  for  chang- 
ing the  congressional  vote  on  the  conscription  bill  from,  I  quote : 

One  vote  on  the  first  ballot  to  163  votes  on  the  final  ballot. 

He  stated  and  I  quote : 

Efforts  have  been  untiring  since  the  Amsterdam  Congress  Against  War  to 
defeat  efforts  of  Ford,  Du  Pont  of  Bethlehem  Steel,  and  the  rest  of  the  warmongers 
to  lead  the  people  into  imperialist  wars. 

This  speech  that  he  made  at  the  American  Peace  Mobilization 
was  entirely  pro-Soviet  and  along  Communist  Party  lines,  dealing 
with  sharecroppers,  housing,  unemployment,  conscription.  He 
clahned  that  Great  Britain  through  Halifax  built  up  Hitler  in  an 
effort  to  cause  a  war  to  fight — and  I  quote : 

the  only  nation  of  the  workers,  the  most  glorious  place  in  the  world,  a  socialist 
nation  that  occupies  one-sixth  of  the  world. 

This  praise  of  Soviet  Russia  and  advantages  of  the  Soviet  Gov- 
ernment for  the  workers  lasted  15  minutes.     He  stated : 

The  purpose  of  peace  mobilization  is  to  cause  all  of  us  in  every  nation,  after 
Germany  and  Britain  are  exhausted,  to  rise  up  and  throw  off  the  Fascist  yoke 
in  every  nation — Italy,  Germany,  Britain,  Africa,  India,  and  these  United  States, 
and  build  a  world  republic  of  tlie  workers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  mean  to  say  that  there  is  no  secret  what- 
ever about  Norman  Tallentire  being  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

Miss  Huffman.  He  doesn't  make  it  any  sex?ret  because  he  tells 
when  he  joined  it  and  when  he  went  into  the  labor  movement.  He 
went  into  the  Socialist  Party  in  Canada  first  and  then  came  to  this 
country.  He  admits  being  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party — he 
states  he  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  was  one  of  the  defendants  in  the  famous 
Bridgeman  Michigan  criminal  syndicalist  trial  some  years  ago,  was 
he  not? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Along  with  Foster  and  other  Communist  leaders? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews,  Ancl  the  other  persons  you  have  named  who  were 
on  the  program  at  the  Norman  Tallentire  celebration  were  openly 
and  avowed  members  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir.  Kockwell  Kent  introduced  them  at  the 
meeting  as  being  Communists. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  Rockwell  Kent  the  master  of  ceremonies  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Rockwell  Kent  was  master  of  ceremonies  at  that 
meeting;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  were  going  to  go  back  to  the  meeting 
at  Mecca  Temple.  Have  you  concluded  with  the  Norman  Tallentire 
celebration  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir.  At  the  meeting  at  Mecca  Temple  the 
first  plans  were  to  have  nothing  carried  on  at  Mecca  Temple,  I  be- 


UX-AMEUICAN   I'liOl'AtJANDA  ACTIVITIES  8421 

lieve,  except  some  of  the  conferences  such  as  have  been  previoiiKly 
mentioned,  whicli  Avere  held,  some  at  Mecca  Temph'  and  some  in 
the  various  hotels.  There  was  a  great  deal  of  confusion  due  to 
the  fact  that  it  was  raining  and  no  one  could  ascertain  as  to  whether 
or  not  there  wa;^  to  be  a  Randall's  Island  meeting  or  not.  Conse- 
quently we  had  time  to  circidate  in  the  lobby  and  on  the  second 
floor  where  they  were  selling  literature.  The  literature  was  for  sale 
and  also  being  distributed,  and  where  the  "free  Browder"  petition 
was  being  distributed  there  was  a  petition  on  the  poll  tax  and 
subscriptions  for  various  publications. 

It  was  finally  announced  that  the  meeing  would  be  held  at  Ran- 
dall's Island,  so  we  Avent  up  to  Randall's  Island. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Dr.  Matthews,  before  you  go  into  the  Randall's 
Island  meeting — I  understand  that  is  a  rather  important  episode — 
can  you  tell  me  about  what  time  you  will  take  on  this  phase  of  the 
testimony? 

Mr.  Mattiifavs.  You  were  going  to  describe  what  transpired  at 
the  Mecca  Tem])1e  meeting  with  respect  to  Communist  relationships 
to  the  organization,  were  you  not? 

Miss  HirFF:MAN.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  And  how  long  will  it  take  you  to  do  that  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  think  I  can  cover  that  in  about  3  minutes.  I  may 
be  underestimating  myself. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Then  we  will  be  ready  to  adjourn. 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  v^ill  finish  the  Mecca  Temple  meeting  and  then 
we  will  recess  for  lunch. 

IMr.  Matthews.  Off  the  record. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Off  the  record. 

(Discussion  off  the  record.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  will  take  a  recess  at  this  time  until  1 :  30  p.  m. 

(WHiereupon,  at  12  noon,  a  recess  was  taken  until  1:30  p.  m.  the 
same  day.) 

afternoon  session 

(Whereupon,  at  1:30  p.  m.,  the  hearing  was  resumed,  pursuant 
to  the  taking  of  a  recess.) 

jVIr.  Starnes.  The  committee  will  please  be  in  order. 
Who  is  your  first  witness,  Dr.  Matthews  ? 
Mr.  Matfhew^s.  Miss  Huffman. 

TESTIMONY  OF  HAZEL  HUFFMAN— Resumed 

Mr.  Matthews,  ]\Ir.  Chairman,  we  will  ask  Miss  Huffman  to  con- 
tinue with  her  account  of  the  meetings  of  the  American  Peace  Mobili- 
zation held  at  Randall's  Island  and  Mecca  Temple  on  April  5  and  6 
of  this  year.    Will  you  proceed.  Miss  Huffman? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Before  you  begin,  Dr.  Matthews,  do  you  have  pre- 
pared a  chart  or  diagram  of  any  kind  or  character  showing  the  initia- 
tion of  this  American  Peace  Mobilization,  its  affiliation  with  the  Com- 
munist Party  in  any  way,  and  also  any  interlocking  of  interests  or 
community  of  interests  or  community  of  control  and  so  forth  and 
so  on  with  any  of  the  other  organizations  which  may  be  checked 
upon  later? 


3422  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  Mr.  Chairman,,  we  have  an  ehiborate  chart 
of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization.  It  lists  the  officers  and  spon- 
sors not  only  of  the  organization  but  also  their  various  connections 
with  the  Communist  Party  and  front  organizations  of  the  Com- 
munist Party. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  would  think  that  is  of  i)aramount  interest  to  the 
committee  and  at  the  proper  time  and  place,  without  interfering 
with  your  schedule  of  the  hearing,  let  me  suggest  you  introduce 
that  and  make  it  a  part  of  the  record  because  I  think  it  is  not  only 
pertinent  and  very  important  that  we  have  something  like  that 
for  the  record  but  the  connnittee  must  have  something  of  that  nature. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr,  Starnes.  You  may  proceed. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now  will  you  proceed  with  your  description  of  the 
meeting  at  Randalls  Island  and  Mecca  Templet 

Miss  HuTTMAN.  Yes,  sir.  At  Mecca  Temple  on  the  second  floor, 
which  was  used  for  the  displays  and  the  distribution  of  literature,  the 
one  side  of  the  balcony  had  a  huge  display  of  the  International  Work- 
ers' Order  and  its  plan  of  plenty — the  publication  The  Plan  of 
Plenty  of  the  International  Workers'  Order.  That  was  sold  at  the 
meeting. 

In  fact,  a  number  of  the  people  who  represented  themselves  as 
being  strikebreakers  from  the  Harvester  strike  as  well  as  the  Interna- 
tional Workers'  Order  people  were  distributing  or  selling  this  par- 
ticular booklet. 

The  foreword  in  this  booklet,  which  might  be  of  interest  to  the  com- 
mittee, is  written  by  Herbert  Benjamin,  the  national  executive  secre- 
tary of  the  I.  W.  O. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Herbert  Benjamin  was  at  one  time  the  secretary- 
treasurer  of  the  Workers  Alliance;  is  that  correct? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  also  a  member  of  the  National  Committee  of 
the  Communist  Party? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  and  this  book — and  the  point  that  was 
brought  out  and  was  mentioned  to  me  by  a  number  of  people  who  were 
selling  the  book  and  later  at  this  Tallentire  meeting  by  people  who 
admitted  being  Communists  was  that  it  was  to  be  the  basis  of  a  bill  to 
be  presented  in  Congress  and  in  the  Sunday  Worker  of  May  11,  1940 — 
I  am  including  this  clipping  which  states  one  of  the  bills,  H.  R.  4688, 
embodies  the  principle  of  the  plan  for  plenty  originated  and  spon- 
sored by  the  International  Workers'  Order,  the  International  Workers' 
Order  having  been  set  up  in  1930  by  the  Central  Committee  of  the 
Communist  Party. 

I  am  particularly  mentioning  that  because  at  both  the  Mecca  Temple 
meeting  and  the  subsequent  meetings  the  International  Workers' 
Order — being  set  up  by  the  Communist  Party,  shows  a  definite  Com- 
munist connection — because  of  their  membership,  practically  every 
committee  had  a  person  who  can  be  identified  as  a  member  of  the 
International  Workers'  Order. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  The  International  Workers'  Order  is  officially  one 
of  the  affiliated  bodies  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  read  that  in  this  morning's  testimony,  that  Nor- 
man Tallentire  said — I  gave  the  exact  quote  of  Norman  Tallentire  of 


UN-AMKIIICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8423 

their  full  support  of  the  Aniorican  Poace  Mobilization,  thoir  affilia- 
tion Avitli  tlie  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  MArrnEws.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  this  clipping  be  introduced  in 
tlie  record  at  this  point. 

Mr.  Starxes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  clipping  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibit  No.  4.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  may  proceed. 

Miss  Huffman.  The  other  piece  of  literature  that  was  perhaps  out- 
stand  ino-  was  the  book  Soviet  Power,  written  by  the  Dean  of  Canter- 
bury. There  was  a  huge  display  sign  on  the  second  floor  of  Mecca 
Temple,  and  special  prices  were  being  offered  by  the  American  Coun- 
cil on  Soviet  Relations.  A  number  of  the  people  who  claimed  to  be 
strikers  and  who  were  also  selling  the  Harvester  literature  to  raise 
funds  for  the  strikers  were  also  engaged  in  selling  this  book,  Soviet 
Power,  which  was  offered  at  this  special  price. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  keep  speaking  of  "strikers,"  Miss  Huffman. 
Was  that  at  the  International  Harvester  plants? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Men  from  those  plants? 

Miss  Huffman.  Y^es,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  see  or  converse  with  any  people  or  persons 
at  either  the  Mecca  Temple  meeting  or  the  Randall's  Island  meeting 
who  claimed  to  be  strikers  in  the  AUis-Chalmers  i^lant  at  Milwaukee? 

Miss  Huffman.  Y^es.  In  fact  this  is  literature  that  was  sold  in 
order  to  raise  funds  for  the  men  who  were  on  strike.  This  one  piece 
of  literature  was  the  publication  from  the  Allis-Chalmers. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  will  you  have  this  introduced  in 
the  record  at  this  point? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Miss  Huffman.  There  are  two  pieces  of  literature  on  the  Allis- 
Chalmers. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Both  will  be  received. 

(The  literature  referred  to  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibit 
No.  5.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Harold  Christoffel 
was  formerly  connected  with  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  Y^'es,  sir ;  and  he  is  included  on  our  chart. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  do  you  know  whether  or  not  Harold  Chris- 
toffel ndflressed  a  meeting,  a  mass  meeting  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization,  here  in  "Washington  about  2  weeks  ago? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  saAv  an  account  of  it.  I  did  not  cover  the 
meeting. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  Harold  Christoffel  is  the  leader  of  the  Allis- 
Chalmers  local  of  the  United  Automobile  Workers? 

Miss  Huffman.  Y^'es,  sir. 

Other  literature  that  was  being  sold  or  distributed  was  that  of  the 
American  Student  Union  and  an  announcement  of  the  Cornell  and 
Xew  Y^ork  University  dance  for  the  delegates. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Before  you  leave  the  International  Harvester  strik- 
ers, you  say  they  attended  the  meeting  in  New  York? 

Miss  Huffman.  Now,  just  a  moment.  Doctor;  I  have  the  point 
here  where  they  were  introduced  on  the  platform.  Mr.  Felhaber, 
vice  president  of  the  Ohio  C.  I.  O.,  introduced 


8424  UN-AMERIOAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  His  first  name  is  Elmer,  is  it  not  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  think  so.  Elmer  Felhaber  introduced  "Brother 
Enoch  Rollback,"  and  he  was  introduced  as  one  of  the  leaders  of 
the  Allis-Chahners  strike. 

Mr.  Rollback  told  of  the  women  and  children  sitting  on  the  lawn  in 
the  park  and  how  the  police  threw  tear-gas  bombs  into  their  midst. 
He  told  how  one  deputy  sheriff  resigned  in  disgust  after  this  hap- 
pened. He  told  of  the  tear-gas  battle  and  stated:  "It  was  not  with- 
out casualties,  42  deputy  sheriffs,"  and  the  audience  at  the  A.  P.  M. 
immediately  gave  considerable  applause  to  the  fact  that  42  deputy 
sheriffs  had  been  injured. 

Mr.  Rollback  went  on  to  say: 

"We,  too,  bear  scars,  honor  scars,"  which  brought  applause.  Then 
he  appealed  to  the  audience  for  funds  to  help  the  strikers,  stating 
that  the  strike  had  been  going  on  for  a  long  time  and  that  most  of 
the  strikers  were  living  on  the  county.  He  stated  that  they  had 
raised  $1,000  bail  for  one  fellow  the  F.  B.  I.  got  and  "$10,000  bail 
had  to  be  raised  in  one  day." 

Then  the  strike  delegates  from  the  Allis-Chalmers  went  through 
the  audience  and  distributed  these  circulars  that  have  previously  been 
entered  in  the  record,  distributed  them  in  exchange  for  contributions 
to  continue  the  strike. 

Then  Mr.  Felhaber  introduced  Senator  Novak,  the  State  senator 
from  Michigan. 

Mr.  Matthews,  That  is  N-o-v-a-k? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes;  Stanley  Novak,  and  he  was  introduced  as 
an  outstanding  organizer  in  the  labor  movement  from  the  Ford 
organization  camp. 

He  constantly  referred  to  the  Ford  police  and  the  Gestapo,  and 
Mr.  Novak  claimed  that  TO  percent  of  the  Ford  workers  live  in  his 
district  and  he  claimed  he  had  been  elected  to  the  State  senate  by 
the  C.  I,  O,  organization,  that  he  had  been  in  the  Ford  organizing 
staff  for  a  number  of  months.  He  said  that  the  Ford  workers  were 
really  organized  and  "there  is  no  greater  danger  to  American  democ- 
racy than  the  Ford  Motor  Co." 

He  also  stated  that  while  on  the  floor  of  the  senate,  that  is,  the 
State  senate,  on  Tuesday,  "the  news  reached  me  the  Ford  plant  was 
down — shut  down,"  and  the  audience  went  into  perhaps  the  loudest 
burst  of  applause  up  to  that  time  of  the  meeting.  It  was  greeted 
with  a  great  deal  of  cheering. 

Mr.  Staknes,  This  was  a  meeting  of  the  American  Peace  Mobili- 
zation ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes;  a  meeting  of  the  American  Peace  Mobiliza- 
tion. And  he  said  that  that  was  cei-tainly  good  news,  that  the  plant 
was  shut  down.  He  stated  that  he  had  participated  in  practically 
every  auto  strike  since  1030 — General  IVIotors,  Chrysler,  Plymouth, 
and  Ford.  He  said  that  Ford  is  the  most  comj^lete  success  and 
"the  plant  is  closed," 

Every  reference  that  was  made  to  Harry  Bennett  was  greeted  by 
boos  from  the  audience.  Senator  Novak  also  mentioned  that  he 
is  head  of  the  Stanley  Novak  Federation,  of  Detroit,  Mich,,  and  this 
organization  is  one  of  the  organizational  sponsors  of  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization. 


UN-AMERICAN  PKOPAGANDA  ACTIA^TIES  §425 

Mr.  Novak  introduced  one  of  the  men  from  the  picket  line  at  the 
Ford  plant,  ''lirother  Goor<ie  Davis."  The  audience  when  Mr. 
Davis — wheii  (ieorge  Davis  came  on  the  platform,  he  was  the  first 
colored  man  who  had  been  introduced  at  that  day's  meeting,  the 
audience  meeting — tlie  audience  immediately  burst  into  singing 
Solidarity  Forever. 

Mr.  Netf  then  introduced  several  strikers  from  the  International 
Harvester  strike  in  Chicago. 

Mr.  :MA'rTHEWS.  That  is  Walter  Scott  Neff  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  his  relationship  to  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  Dr.  Walter  Scott  Neff  is  in  charge  of  the  New 
York  Council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  one  of  the  professors  from  the  City  College 
that  was  ousted  as  a  result  of  the  investigation  of  the  Coudert  com- 
mittee ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Bob  Travis,  of  Cleveland,  was  the  first  striker  that 
Dr.  Neff  had  introduced. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  he  was  from  the  International  Harvester 
strike? 

Miss  Hufftvian.  He  w^as  from  the  International  Harvester  strike. 
He  paid  tribute  to  John  L.  Lewis  and  the  United  Mine  Workers, 
which  brought  forth  applause  from  the  audience,  and  stated :  "We 
have  told  the  bosses,  'Get  on  tlie  line  or  we  are  out  too.'  " 

He  also  stated  that  the  "Harvesters  are  fighting  American  fascism 
in  the  form  of  the  Chicago  Police  Department."  Every  reference 
at  this  American  Peace  Mobilization  meeting  that  was  made  to  the 
Chicago  Police  Department  or  the  Kelly-Nash  machine,  as  it  was 
called,  met  with  boos  from  the  audience.  Mr.  Travis  claimed  that 
there  were  65,000  new  C.  I.  O.  members  in  Illinois  due  to  the  Harvester 
strike,  and  he  quoted  John  Lewis  as  saying :  "Forty-five  million  people 
will  not  become  indentured  slaves  of  this  country." 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  vou  know  whether  or  not  this  is  the  same  Bob 
Travis  who  led  the  sit-down  strikes  at  Flint,  Mich.? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  1936? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir ;  it  is,  and  that  was  brought  out  by — I  was 
sitting  with  the  Kentucky  delegation  and  the  woman  who  was  sitting 
next  to  me  knew  IMr.  Travis  from  the  Flint,  Mich.,  strike  and  had 
mentioned  the  Flint,  Mich.,  strike. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  who  else  was  there  from  the  International 
Harvester  strikers? 

Miss  HuFi^MAN.  Those  are  the  only  names  that  I  have  on  this 
report,  Doctor. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Grant  Oakes  is  the  head  of  the  union  which 
was  on  strike? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  the  International  Harvester? 

Miss  puFFMAN.  Yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  Farm  Equipment  Workers  Organizing  Com- 
mittee? 

Miss  HuFFaiAN.  Yes,  sir. 


8426  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  any  record  of  Grant  Oakes'  connec- 
tion with  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir ;  Grant  Oakes  is  listed  on  the  chart. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  one  of  the  officers  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization,  is  he  not? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir ;  he  is  a  member  of  the  national  executive 
council.  The  address  of  the  national  office  is  1133  Broadway.  That 
is  just  above  Twenty-sixth  Street  in  Manhattan. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  give  us  a  list  of  the  officers? 

Miss  Huffman.  Do  you  want  a  list  of  the  national  officers  at  this 
time  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  don't  want  to  interrupt  you  now — we  will  lake  that 
up  later. 

Miss  Huffman.  Noav,  other  than  the  strikers  I  would  like  to  go 
back  to  Randall's  Island.  The  Randall's  Island  rally  was  called  off. 
We  did  go  to  Randall's  Island  and  we  took  in  our  car  three  people 
who  Avere  in  attendance  at  the  meeting.  One  of  them  was  a  man 
named  Jack  Marshall,  a  delegate  from  the  C.  I.  O.  United  Electrical, 
Radio  and  Machine  Workers  of  America ;  Shrover,  the  Ohio  delegate 
from  Cleveland:  and  Jack  Wallace,  formerly  of  the  Art  Project  of 
the  W.  P.  A.,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Marshall  stated  that  he  had  with  him  the  credentials  of  Mr. 
Fahy,  vice  president  of  the  United  Electrical,  Radio,  and  Machine 
Workers  of  America. 

Mr.  Marshall,  in  talking  to  us  on  the  way  to  the  meeting,  was  very 
frank  about  the  fact  that  he  belonged  to  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Shrover  was  frank  about  the  fact  that  he  was  connected  with 
the  Abraham  Lincoln  Brigade.  When  we  reached  Randall's  Island 
the  rain  had  already  started.  The  group  was  small  but  there  was, 
I  would  say,  approximately  50  people  of  the  Abraham  Lincoln  Bri- 
gade there  with  a  large  pennant. 

The  outstanding  event  at  the  rally  was  the  songs  that  they  sang. 
In  between  every  other  song  they  sang  Solidarity  Forever.  The 
Abraham  Lincoln  Brigade  sang  the  Internationale  and  sang  the  Abra- 
ham Lincoln  Brigade  Marching  Song.  There  was  frequent  singing  of 
We  Will  Hang  Henry  Ford  From  A  Sour  Aj^ple  Tree,  and  Why  Do 
You  Stand  There  In^  the  Rain,  the  Ballad  of  October  16,  and  Billy 
Boy. 

I  am  mentioning  those  songs  because  those  are  exactly  the  same 
songs  that  are  sung  at  all  of  the  other  meetings  that  are  conducted  by 
the  Communists.  They  are  the  songs  that  appear  in  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization  book  of  songs  that  is  distributed  at  their  meetings. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  have  a  book  of  songs,  do  they  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  Congressman  Starnes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  May  we  have  this  introduced  in  the  record  at  this 
point  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  American  Songs  for  American  Peoples 
Meeting,  April  5  and  6,  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received  in  evidence. 

(The  booklet  referred  to  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibit  No.  6.") 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Now,  while  we  are  on  the  subject  of  songs.  Miss 
Huffman,  have  you  seen  the  album  of  records  which  is  published  as 
a  special  edition  for  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §427 

Miss  HuFFArAN,  Yes.  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  this  is  one  of  those  al- 
bums of  records  that  I  am  luuuling  you? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Staknes.  Do  you  desire  to  have  those  attached  as  exhibits? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes;  I  think  they  slioukl  be  attached  as  exhibits. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  make  proper  reference  to  them  in  the  record. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  phonograph  records  referred  to  were  marked  "Huflman 
Exhibits  Nos.  7,  7-A,  7-B,  7-C,  and  7-D.") 

Mr.  Matthj:ws.  Now  here  is  a  throw-away  put  out  by  the  dis- 
pensers of  these  records  in  which  there  is  advertised  this  special 
A.  P.  M.  edition  of  this  album. 

I  would  like  for  Miss  Huffman  to  read  the  words  of  two  or  three 
of  these  songs.  Will  you  first  read  the  words  of  a  song  entitled, 
"C  for  Conscription/'  wliich  appears  on  one  of  the  records. 

Miss  Huffman.  Dr.  Matthews,  on  the  point  of  the  records,  on 
this  balcony  floor  where  the  books  were  being  sold,  they  had  a  vic- 
trola  there  with  a  man  in  attendance,  that  constantly  played  these 
recortls  and  a  special  price  was  olfered  with  a  huge  sign  announcing 
the  special  price  for  the  recordings. 

C  for  ConscriptioD  and  C  for  Capitol  Hill ; 

C  for  Conscription  and  C  for  Capitol  Hill ; 

It's  C  for  the  Congress  that  passed  that  godamned  bill. 

This  here  New  York  City  water  tastes  like  cherry  wine ; 

This  here  New  York  City  water  tastes  like  cherry  wine; 

They  tell  me  army  water  tastes  like  turpentine. 

I'd  rather  be  here  at  home,  even  living  in  a  hollow  log ; 

I'd  rather  be  here  at  home,  even  living  in  a  hollow  log ; 

Than  go  to  the  Army,  be  treated  like  a  dirty  dog. 

WASHINGTON    BREAK-DOWN 

Franklin  D.,  listen  to  me,  yon  ain't  a-gonua  send  me  'cross  the  sea  ;  you  ain't 
a-gonna  send  me  'cross  tlie  sea  : 

You  may  say  it's  for  defense,  it's  that  kinda  talk  that  I'm  against;  I'm 
against,  I'm  against,  that  kinda  talk  ain't  got  uo  sense. 

Lafayette,  we  are  here,  we're  gonna  stay  right  over  here;  we're  gonna  stay 
right  over  here. 

.Marcantonio  is  the  best.  l)Ut  I  wouldn't  give  a  nickel  for  all  the  rest;  I 
wouldn't  give  a  nickel  for  all  the  rest. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  the  end  of  that  song? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes;  the  next  song  is  Washington  Break-down 
which  I  have  read. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  think  Ave  might  omit  the  next  stanza,  Mr.  Chair- 
man. 

Miss  Huffman.  I  think  it  is  a  good  example  of  their  filthy  minds. 

;Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  a  rather  personal  reference  to  Mr.  J.  P. 
^lorgan. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Go  ahead. 

Miss  Huffman. 

"Wendell  Willkie  and  Franklin  D.,  seems  to  me  they  both  agree;  they  both 
agree  on  killin'  me. 

Mr.  Mattheavs'.  Xow  there  is  a  chorus  of  the  Ballad  of  October  16. 

Miss  Huffman.  This  Ballad  of  October  16— after  the  meetings  are 

over,  that  is  the  upper  Manhattan  meeting,  the  Harlem  meetmg,  the 


8428  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

midtown  meeting,  they  get  into  Childs  Restaurant  or  any  place  else, 
and  while  they  are  eating  they  just  seem  to  burst  spontaneously  into 
this  and  Solidarity  Forever,  and  I  am  just  going  to  read  the  first 
verse  and  the  chorus. 

It  was  on  a  Saturday  night  and  the  moon  was  shining  bright ; 

They  passed  the  conscription  bill  and  the  people  they  did  say  for  many  miles 
away, 

'Twas  the  President  and  his  boys  on  Capitol  Hill. 

Oh,  Franklin  Roosevelt  told  the  people  how  he  felt ; 

We  damned  near  believed  what  he  said. 

He  said  "I  hate  war,  and  so  does  Eleanor,  but  we  won't  be  safe  'till  every- 
body's dead." 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Mr.  Chairman,  we  would  like  to  have  the  entire 
collection  of  songs  introduced  at  this  point  in  the  record. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes;  they  will  be  introduced  in  the  record  and  I 
presume  the  records  have  been  identified  and  will  be  kept  as  exhibits? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes;  I  would  like  to  introduce  the  pamphlet 
"Songs  for  John  Doe"  and  one  other  has  already  been  received. 

(The  song  pamphlet  referred  to  was  marked  "Huffman  Ex- 
hibit No.  8.") 

Miss  Huffman.  At  the  Mecca  Temple  meeting  one  of  the  speakers 
was  Esther  Cooper,  secretary  of  the  Southern  Negro  Youth  Congress, 
who  brought  greetings  from  the  Southern  Congress.  Miss  Cooper 
was  followed  by  Mr.  Hunter  of  the  W.  P.  A.  Committee  for  the  Con- 
tinuation of  W.  P.  A.  Then  Adolph  Heller,  of  the  Philadelphia 
Civil  Liberties  Union  and  former  director  of  the  Workers'  School  in 
Philadelphia — that  is  the  Communist  Party  Workers'  School  in  Phila- 
delphia, spoke  regarding 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  a  moment.  Is  that  the  Heller  to  whom  refer- 
ence has  been  made  in  previous  hearings? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  Mr.  A.  A.  Heller,  the  head  of  the  Inter- 
national Publishers. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Miss  Huffman.  And  Mr.  Bernard  Rush,  who  spoke  regarding  the 
trial  of  himself  and  stated  that  incidentally — he  stated  incidentally 
that  the  bomb  that  had  been  planted  at  the  Workers  School  had  been 
planted  by  the  New  York  Police  Department. 

IVir.  Matthews.  Now,  Miss  Huffman,  Adolf  Heller  and  Rush  were 
recently  tried  in  Philadelphia? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  For  planting  a  bomb,  or  having  in  their  posses- 
sion a  bomb,  in  the  Workers'  School  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  Philadelphia? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir ;  but  his  statement  from  that  platform  at 
that  meeting 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  the  New  York  police  had  planted  the 
bomb  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir,  that  the  bomb  had  been  planted  by  the 
New  York  police  department  and  it  was  the  same  kind  of  a  ruse 
that  had  been  used  against  Tom  Mooney,  and  he  requested  the 
A.  P.  M.  delegates  to  take  a  stand  against  that,  because  he  said  that, 
the  only  way  they  could  possibly  succeed  was  if  they  had  the  support 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8429 

of  the  A,  P.  i\r.,  and  tliat  was  crrectod  with  apphiuse  and  apparent, 
approval  by  the  people  in  that  audience. 

Reference  to  Dr.  J,  B.  JMatthews,  brought  lusty  hisses  from  the 
audience. 

C'lancy  ]\Iiller  of  the  International  Workers  Order,  and  Roxie 
Jones  were  brief  speakers  at  the  meeting.  Mr.  Abraham  Eisserman 
gave  a  sumuiary  of  the  meeting  and  the  meeting  closed  with  Chester 
Watson,  of  Minnesota,  singing  another  one  of  their  songs,  not  pre- 
viously mentioned :  Not  you,  Mr.  War, 

An  announcement  was  made  that  the  Workers'  Alliance  would  hold 
a  special  meeting  in  the  registration  room.  Dr.  Annette  Ruben- 
stein,  who  was  previously  mentioned,  was  one  of  the  speakers.  Mrs. 
Eileen  Davis  Hays,  wife  of  John  Garfield  Hays,  was  a  speaker  and. 
stated  that  the  Women's  Auxiliary  of  the  National  Maritime  Union 
was  sending  a  telegram  to  Mrs.  Roosevelt.  Mrs.  Katherine  Beecher 
spoke  in  place  of  Miss  Trice,  of  the  Federal  Communications  Com- 
mission. 

She  spoke  on  the  need  to  educate  women  to  positions  of  union 
leadership  after  the  men  were  drafted.  Frederick  Field  then  spoke 
on  establishing  opposition  to  war  and  continuing  the  struggle  for 
peace. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  is  Frederick  Field? 

Miss  Huffman.  Frederick  Field  is  the  national  executive  secretary 
of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Miss  Huffman,  this  seems  to  be  the  first  time  we 
have  found  any  speaker  or  any  participant  in  all  these  meetings  who 
has  ever  gotten  down  to  the  subject  of  peace. 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes.  Congressman  Starnes;  that  is  why  I  men- 
tioned it.  He  was  practically  the  only  speaker  who  dwelt  even 
lightly  on  the  matter  of  peace.  The  entire  meeting,  just  giving  a 
summary  of  the  2  days,  the  entire  meeting  was  a  strike  campaign. 
All  of  the  speakers  merely  emphasized  the  fact  that  should  we  be- 
come any  closer  to  war,  labor  is  not  going  to  participate,  labor  was 
going  to  strike;  that  further  strikes  were  needed — that  people  were 
to  contribute  to  the  strikes  and  give  assistance  to  the  strikers.  The 
entire  meeting  was  a  strike  meeting. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Did  they  say  this  was  necessary  in  order  to  sabotage 
the  defense  program  or  to  disrupt  production  for  security  in  order 
to  keep  this  country  out  of  an  imperialist  war,  or  on  what  theme  did 
they  base  the  necessity  of  continued  strikes?  Was  that  the  theme 
of  it,  that  they  were  continuing  these  strikes  so  as  to  disrupt  pro- 
duction and  keep  this  country  out  of  war  or  place  this  country  in  a 
position  where  it  couldn't  engage  in  an  imperialist  war?  Is  that  the 
idea? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  and  the  fact  that  labor  is  cari-ying  on 
these  strikes  would  make  it  impossible  for  us  to  participate  in  the 
war  and  tliat  the  thing  that  must  be  em])hasized  was  conditions  at 
home  and  the  need  for  solidarity  and  the  fact  that  the  workers  were 
to  get  everything  that  they  wanted. 

I  have  a  list  here  of  the  various  organizations  that  contributed  and 
individuals,  where  the  contributions  were  announced  from  the  floor. 
Shall  I  bring  that  in,  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  want  that  list,  Mr.  Chairman? 


8430  "    UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  may  be  a  little  lengthy  to  read,  but  does  it  show 
the  contribution  from  Communist  sources  or  subversive  sources? 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  just  a  single  page. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Let  me  get  this  straight — there  was  an  announce- 
ment fi'om  the  floor  of  those  who  had  made  contributions  to  the 
support  of  the  meeting? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  girls  passed  through  the  meeting  taking  up 
these  contributions  and  as  they  were  taken  to  the  platform  the  money 
was  held  up  and  an  announcement  was  made  that  that  contribution 
had  been  made.     A  majority  of  them  are  Communist  organizations. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Suppose  you  read  that  then,  and  we  will  insert  it 
in  the  record. 

(The  list  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

Washington  A.  P.  M.  delegates — $100.00 

New  York 250.  00 

American  Youth  Congress 100.  UO 

Farmers   Union   of   Alabama 100.  00 

Jonnie  Bernard,  Minnesota 25.  00 

Jewish   People  of  America 50.  00 

Massachusetts  Peace  Council 50.00 

Veterans  of  Abraham  Lincoln  Brigade 25.  00 

National  staff,  A.  P.  M 25.00 

Maryland 2.5.  00 

Local  No.  65,  Warehouse  Employees 12.  0<) 

Kansas ^. 5.00 

Philadelphia  Peace  Mobilization ^0.  00 

Joint  Board  of  Furriers  Union. 225.  00 

Albany 5.00 

I.  W.  O.,  branch  32 — 3.00 

Rockaway  Council 5.  00 

Bronx  Study  Club 5.00 

U.  A.   W.    (United  Automobile  Workers) 2.5.00 

Steel  Workers  Council  of  Youngstown 25.00 

Ford  Strikers,  Negro  and  white 27.35 

Washington  Youth  Coiuicil — 5.  00 

St.  Louis  and  Kansas  City 10.  00 

Miimesota 30.  00 

Florida—^ 25100 

North  Carolina 5.  00 

Rhode  Island 2.5.  00 

California 100.00 

North  Jersey 60.  40 

C.  I.  O.  Philadelphia  Committee  for  Peace 23.  00 

Doctors  of  Crown  Heights  Hospital 2.  .50 

Mr.  VooEHis.  Nobody  thinks  the  Farmers'  Union  is  a  Communist 
organization ;  do  they  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  the  list  simply  includes  the  name  of  Farmers 
Union  of  Alabama. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  understand,  but  it  was  introduced  with  that  im- 
proper observation. 

Miss  Huffman.  That  a  majority  were.  Congressman  Voorhis. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  don't  know  whetlier  we  have  the  same  organiza- 
tion in  mind. 

Mr.  Starnes.  There  is  one  that  is  definitely  so. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  The  Farmers'  Union  of  the  United  States  is  one 
of  the  three  major  farm  organizations  of  the  country. 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  is  a  Farmers'  Union,  about  which  there 
is  a  good  deal  of  testimony  that  has  been  presented  to  this  committee 
for  a  period  of  years,  to  which  I  think  this  refers. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  right. 


UX-AMEIUCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §431 

Miss  HuFFMAX.  There  are  ii  few  adilitionsil  names  of  contribu- 
tors— may  we  include  these — Two  Photographers  from  Friday,  $18; 
Peace  Council  of  Connecticut,  $100;  and  Striking  Mine  Workers,  $5. 

They  had  taken  up  a  collection  for  the  striking  mine  workers  and 
then  the  striking;  mine  workers  gave  a  contribution  to  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  VoORHis.  You  don't  happen  to  know  what  happened  to  the 
contribution  for  the  miners;  do  you? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  have  never  heard  of  them  making  an  accounting, 
Congressman  Voorhis,  of  what  they  do  with  the  contributions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  I  understand  you  to  say  that  they  did  take  up 
a  contribution  there  for  the  striking  mine  workers  and  then  that  the 
strikin<r  mine  workers  made  a  contribution  to  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Mason.  Which  is  an  excellent  example  of  cooperation. 

Miss  Huffman.  The  two  committees  in  which  I  was  particularly 
interested,  that  is  the  two  conference  committees  in  which  I  was  par- 
ticularly interested,  were  also  carried  on  at  Mecca  Temple,  was  the 
commission  on  draft  and  military  camps;  and  Joseph  Cadden,  presi- 
dent of  the  American  Youth  Congress 

Mr.  Matthews.  Not  president  but  I  think  executive  secretary. 

Miss  Huffman.  Executive  secretary  of  the  American  Youth  Con- 
gress, was  the  keynoter  for  that  meeting. 

I  had  managed  to  obtain  admission  to  one  of  the  labor  committee 
meetings.  I  did  not  have  credentials.  I  talked  my  way  in,  and  I  was 
in  the  one;  but  two  people  there  recognized  me  so  when  I  tried  to 
gain  entrance  to  the  draft  and  military  camp  committee  I  was  un- 
successful, but  I  did  see  two  boys  in  uniform,  one  a  sergeant  and  one 
a  private,  go  into  that  meeting. 

There  is  an  article  regarding  the  talk  was  given  by  these  two  boys 
from  Fort  Dix  at  this  conference  and  it  is  in  the  literature  that  was 
put  out  by  the  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  give  us  that  speech  or  those  talks? 

Miss  Huffman.  It  was  in  reference  to  the  condition  at  camp  and 
the  fact  that  they  needed  help.  We  have  it  right  here.  Dr.  Matthews 
[reading]  : 

Soldier  Asks  A.  P.  M.  to  Protect  Draftees'  Rights 

A  proposal  to  set  up  national  and  local  A.  P.  M.  committees  to  protect  the  wel- 
fare of  draftees  and  their  families  was  unanimously  accepted  by  the  commis- 
sion on  draft  and  military  camps  after  a  spirited  discussion  which  was  high- 
lighted by  the  presence  of  a  yoimg  man  in  uniform  from  Camp  Dix. 

Louis  ^IcCabe,  a  Philadelpiiia  attorney  and  vice  president  of  the  National 
Lawyers  (iuild,  chairman  of  the  discussion,  led  off  with  proposals  for  amend- 
ments to  the  Burke-Wadsworth  hill  that  would  guarantee  free  siieech  and  civil 
liberties  in  the  camp,  and  to  put  teeth  in  the  health  guaranties  for  conscripts, 
protect  the  right  to  vote  and  do  away  with  Negro  discrimination  in  the  draft. 

For  almost  an  hour  the  draftee  from  Fort  Dix  answered  questions  about  con- 
ditions in  the  camps.  He  descril)e(l  how  draftees  at  Fort  Dix,  watching  a  recent 
IMarch  of  Time  movie  had  brolveu  out  into  hearty  applause  when  Congressman 
IMarcantimio  appearefl  on  the  screen  and  denounced  the  war. 

The  biggest  fear  among  conscripts  is  that  they  are  not  in  the  Army  just  for 
a  year,  but  as  the  officers  say  "for  the  duration." 

The  young  man  reported  that  cases  of  meningitis  and  scarlet  fever  had  proved 
fatal  at  the  camp  and  that  cases  of  insanity  were  frequent. 

62626— 41— vol.  14 18 


3432  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Emerson  Daggett,  representative  of  the  San  Francisco  Industrial  Union  Coun- 
cil, told  of  plans  to  start  a  recreation  center  for  the  boys  in  the  California  camps. 
He  proposed  that  local  A.  P.  M.  groups,  together  with  the  trade  unions  and 
youth  groups,  establish  such  centers  where  conscripts  can  find  educational  and 
recreational  activities  which  are  sorely  lacking  in  the  camps.  Mr.  Daggett 
emphasized  the  necessity  of  miions  and  other  groups  maintaining  contact  with 
their  members  who  were  drafted. 

Support  for  the  Murray  bill  which  would  defer  all  medical  students  and  in- 
ternes and  place  draft  doctors  only  in  the  Medical  Corps  was  expressed  by 
the  members  of  the  commission. 

The  commission  endorsed  the  Marcantonio  bill  to  repeal  the  Draft  Act  and 
recommended  that  the  A.  P.  M.  work  for  the  passage  of  this  bill  at  the  same 
time  that  it  carried  on  campaigns  to  improve  the  welfare  of  draftees. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  concluded  with  this  meeting  at  Mecca 
Temple? 

Miss  Huffman.  No.  Then  the  United  States  Foreign  Policy  Com- 
mission, the  chairman  for  that  meeting  was  Max  Yergan  of  the  Ameri- 
can Negro  or  National  Negro  Congress — I  am  bringing  that  out  be- 
cause on  both  of  these  there  is  evidence  proving  tliat  they  are 
Communists  who  headed  these  various  committees — these  various 
groups  which  were  in  charge  of  the  meeting. 

Then  under  labor  they  had  one  general  conference,  the  chairman 
of  which  was  Donald  Henderson,  and  Morris  Watson  was  the 
secretary. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Before  we  leave  that  point,  Mr.  Chairman,  per- 
haps it  should  be  observed  here  if  the  witness  knows  the  fact,  that 
Donald  Henderson  was  the  first  executive  secretary  of  the  American 
League  Against  War  and  Fascism,  and  then  later  the  American 
League  for  Peace  and  Democracy;  that  he  is  publicly  an  avowed 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  and  he  is  also  head  or  president  of 
one  of  the  C.  I.  O.  unions. 

Mr.  Staknes.  He  was  present  at  this  meeting? 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  presided. 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  presided  at  the  labor  conference  that  was  held 
there  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  the  general  conference,  the  big  general 
conference  at  which  their  new  group  was  set  up. 

The  others  who  appeared  on  that — there  are  10  in  all,  half  of 
them  appear  on  the  list  in  the  congressional  record  of  the  Communists 
in  C.  I.  O.  organizations.  They  were  C.  J.  Edelen — I  am  reading 
all  10 — Bob  Travis,  Daniel  Allen,  and  Courtney  Ward.  They  were 
the  chairmen.  The  keynoters  were  Red  Robinson,  Al  Stonkus,  Elmer 
Felhaber,  Morris  Watson,  and  Louis  Merrill. 

Those  were  the  10  and  5  of  those  apj)ear  on  that  other  list. 

Mr.  VooEHis.  Which  other  list? 

Miss  HuFi^MAN.  On  the  list  that  appears  in  the  congressional 
record  of  the  C.  I.  O. — Communists  in  C.  I.  O.  organizations. 

At  this  general  conference  there  was  set  up  a  National  Labor  Com- 
mittee Against  War  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization,  of  which 
Morris  Watson  was  made  provisional  secretary. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Morris  Watson  is  the  vice  president  of  the  Amer- 
ican Newspaper  Guild,  is  he  not? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  have  the  history  of  Morris  Watson.  Shall  I 
go  into  it? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §433 

Mr.  Matthews,  Mr.  Chairman,  do  you  want  an  account  of  Morris 
Watson  in  the  record  at  this  point? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  he  jiresent  at  this  meeting,  taking  an  active 
part  in  the  meeting? 

Mr.  MvrTHEws.  He  was  the  keynoter. 

Miss  HuFFMAX.  And  made  provisional  secretary  of  the  big  group 
they  set  up  since 

jS'lr.  Matthews.  He  is  secretary  of  the  National  Labor  Committee 
of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  his  record  there  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ]MASt)N.  Let  us  have  his  record. 

Mr.  Staknes.  All  right. 

Miss  Huffman.  Morris  Watson,  chairman  of  the  National — pro- 
visional secretary  of  the  National  Labor  Committee  Against  War  of 
the  American  Peace  Mobilization.  He  is  a  vice  president  of  the 
American  Newspaper  Guild.  He  was  a  signer  of  the  "Free  Browder" 
petitions  that  were  signed  at  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  meet- 
ing, and  a  list  of  the  names  appear  in  the  Daily  Worker  for  May  2. 
He  is  active  head  of  the  left-wing  division  of  the  American  Labor 
Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  Progressive  Committee  to  Kebuild  the 
American  Labor  Party? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes.  Dr.  Matthews.  He  is  a  member  of  the  execu- 
tive committee  of  the  National  Federation  for  Constitutional  Liber- 
ties. Literature  of  that  organization  was  also  distributed  at  the 
A.  P.  M.  meeting,  one  of  them  being  "Witch  Hunt,  1941,  Hits  Gov- 
ernment Workers."  and  another  one  "Investigating  Committees  and 
Civil  Rights."  JNIorris  Watson's  name  appears  on  their  call  for 
action  not  on  this  original. 

INIr.  Starnes.  Those  can  be  attached  to  the  record  as  exhibits. 

(The  pamphlets  referred  to  were  marked  "Huffman  Exhibits 
Nos.  9  and  10.") 

Miss  HuFT'MAN.  Tliese  are  both  attacks  on  investigating  com- 
mittees and  tell  how  not  to  accept  a  subpena,  to  a  large  extent. 
Then  the  "Call  for  National  Action  Conference  for  Civil  Eights" 
that  Avas  held  in  the  Hotel  Hamilton  in  Washington,  D.  C.  This 
was  distributed — these  were  sold  and  this  was  distributed  at  that 
meeting  and  a  list  of  the  officers  and  sponsors  that  appear  on  the 
back  page,  41  of  them  are  either  officers,  national  officers,  not  local, 
or  sponsors  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  that  list? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  Including  Morris  Watson? 

Miss  Huffman.  Including  Morris  Watson;  yes. 

]\Ir.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  the  rest  of  Morris  Watson's  record 
there  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  I  have  Morris  Watson.  He  is  editor  of 
Release,  a  new  publication  published  by  the  Jewish  People's  Com- 
mittee, for  which  circulars  were  distributed  at  that  meeting.  And 
he  was  a  national  member  of  the  executive  board  of  the  American 
League  for  Peace  and  Democracy.  That  appears  on  their  letterhead 
for  March  24,  1939.    Morris  Watson  was  also  a  speaker  at  a  meeting 


8434  TJN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

in  April  of  1940,  at  which  Elizabeth  Giiiley  Flynn,  a  member  of 
the  national  committee  of  the  Communist  Party  was  a  speaker,  and 
Dr.  Ned  Dearborn,  of  the  American  Committee  for  Democracy  and 
Intellectual  Freedom.  Their  literature  was  distributed  at  the  meet- 
ing. Morris  Watson  was  a  former — the  unit  manager  of  the  Living 
Newspaper  Unit  of  the  Federal  Theater  Project,  W.  P.  A. 

I  have  here  three  articles  that  were  written  by  Morris  Watson 
for  the  New  Theater  Magazine.  The  first  article  is  a  description 
of  the  Living  Newspaper  Unit  of  the  Federal  Theater  Project,  in 
which  it  states : 

As  long  as  it  is  part  of  the  W.  P.  A.  it  will  be  subject  to  petty  and  unfair 
attacks  from  those  revolutionary  forces  which  see  red  in  every  letter  of  relief. 

The  second  article  has  to  do  with  a  mass  meeting,  held  in  New 
York  City  for  W.  P.  A.  employees  and  supervisors.  The  third 
article  which  appears  in  the  April  1937  issue  of  the  New  Theater 
Magazine,  called  Sit-down  Strikes,  is  about  a  play  directefl  by 
Mr.  Watson  for  the  General  Motors  strikers.  The  play  was  a 
play  using  General  Motors  strikers  to  be  presented  before  the 
strikers  at  the  Union  Hall  in  Flint,  Mich.  Mention  is  also  made  of 
the  speech  by  Mr.  Watson  in  Lansing,  Mich.,  that  he  was  to  make 
2  days  after  this  play  was  given,  for  the  League  for  Industrial 
Democracy.  Incidentally,  at  that  time,  and  I  verified  that  a  few 
years  back,  Mr.  Watson  was  a  Federal  Theater  Project  administra- 
tive employee,  supervisor  at  the  time  that  he  staged  this  play — this 
sit-down  strike  play  in  Flint,  Mich.,  where  Mr.  Watson,  of  course, 
will  be  recalled  as  a  former  vice  president  of  the  Associated  Press. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Did  you  say  he  gave  a  play  for  the  League  for  Indus- 
trial Democracy? 

Miss  HuFFJUAN.  He  made  a  speech  for  them. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Are  you  sure  about  that  name  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  will  read  what  the  magazine  says : 

When  I  arrived  in  Flint  to  lecture  before  the  League  for  Industrial  Democracy 
on  the  Monday  before  the  General  Motors  strike  settlement  I  found  Mary  Henton 
and  Joseph  Hernie  industriously  preparing  a  living  newspaper  script  on  the 
strike. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  all — did  you  say  he  was  vice  president  of  the 
Associated  Press ? 

Miss  Huffman.  No,  Congressman  Voorhis ;  I  started  to  read  some- 
thing. He  was  vice  president  of  the  News])aper  Guild  and  a  member 
of  the — a  speaker  for  the  International  Workers'  Order.  He  was 
conference  chairman  at  the  national  conference  of  the  Workers' 
Alliance  of  America,  speaker  at  the  conference  of  the  Washington 
Committee  for  Democratic  Action,  and  a  signer  of  an  open  letter  for 
closer  cooperation  with  the  Soviet  Union,  and  a  sponsor  of  the  Con- 
sumers' National  Federation,  a  speaker  for  the  American  Student 
Union,  a  speaker  for  the  Committee  for  Peoples'  Rights,  a  member  of 
the  Advisory  Board  of  Frontier  Films,  on  the  council  of  the  United 
States  Veterans,  Inc.,  a  member  of  the  advisory  board — and  his  name 
appears  on  their  letterhead — a  speaker  at  the  Greenwich  Village  mass 
meeting  for  peace  of  the  New  York  Peace  Association.  And  Morris 
Watson  is  head  of  this  gi'oup  that  has  been  set  up — amiouncement  has 
been  made  at  the  Building  Trades  Peace  Council,  wliich  is  a  branch  of 


un-a:^ierican  propaganda  activities  8435 

this  National  Labor  Committee  Against  War.  This  jrroup  has  been 
set  up  to  form  peace  <>r()iii)s  from  16  different  trades. 

The  executive  board  of  that  Buiklin<2;  Trades  Peace  Council  has 
Tim  Murphy  as  president  of  the  executive  board.  He  is  a  member 
of  the  CompVesstMl  Air  and  Tunnel  Workers'  Local  147;  Joe  Maroolin, 
secretary  of  the  Electrical  Workers  Union  Local  No.  3;  and  then  there 
are  15  meml)ers  on  the  executive  board. 

At  the  Buildina"  Workers  Peace  Council  meeting  among  the  speakers 
^vere  Gino  Rardi,  the  editor  of  L'Unita  del  Popolo,  that  was  mentioned 
this  morning;  Oscar  Schellner,  administrative  secretary;  Frank  Wed- 
dell,  president  of  Local  840  of  the  Painters'  Union.  They  took  action 
supi)orting  the  transport  workers  House  Resolution  3994,  which  is 
called  the  Marcantonio  bill,  the  struggle  of  Ireland,  support  of  the 
Teachers'  Union,  the  Tobey  resolution  to  prohibit  an  increase  in  the 
Federal  appropriation  for  the  unemployed,  a  larger  housing  program, 
and  union  rights. 

I  ]nit  those  in.  Congressman  Starnes,  because  that  is  the  active  rather 
than  the  peace  activities  that  are  carried  on  by  all  of  the  so-called 
peace  organizations. 

Mr.  Staenes.  In  other  words,  you  put  in  here  their  so-called  legis- 
lative program  or  the  conference  agenda  that  they  had  at  the  meeting 
at  Mecca  Temple,  plus  the  local  meeting  that  they  had? 

]Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  To  show  that  the  true  character  of  it  is  not  a  peace 
group,  but  merely  a  political  grouj)  whose  antecedents  are  now  sub- 
ject to  ciuestion.  and  whose  relation  to  the  Communist  Party  and  con- 
trolled by  the  Communist  Party,  you  have  given  testimony  here  today  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes;  and  the  principal  activities  appear  to  be  to 
organize  a  gigantic  strike  movement. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Now,  just  a  minute.  I  think  you  misspoke  yourself 
a  moment  ago.  You  said  that  these  were  the  activities  of  all  peace 
movements.     You  don't  mean  to  say  that,  do  you? 

Miss  Huffman.  Of  the  American  branches  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  right.  And  in  the  second  place  I  would  like 
to  ask  you  this:  You  don't  mean,  do  you,  to  imply  that  an  interest 
in  unemployment,  for  instance,  or  some  of  the  otlier  things  that  you 
mentioned  in  that  list  is  an  indication  that  anyone  who  is  interested 
in  those  things  is  pursuing  a  Communist  course,  do  you? 

Miss  Huffman.  No,  Congressman  Yoorhis. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  don't  mean  to  put  words  in  your  mouth. 

Miss  Huffman.  No. 

Mr.  Yoorhis.  But  rather  to  show  that  this  organization  setting  it- 
self up  as  being  an  American  Peace  Mobilization  has  as  a  matter  of 
fact  undertaken  a  great  wide  range  of  activities,  covering  many 
different  things  and  presumably  with  the  idea — under  Communist 
leaderslii]! — of  ):»enetrating  into  a  lot  of  different  movements,  using 
this  as  a  focal  point,  is  that  right? 

Miss  Huffman.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Yoorhis.  Although  many  of  those  enterprises  and  aims  may 
be  fundamentally  sound  and  just  and  right? 

Miss  Huffman,  Yes. 


8436  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  VooRHis.  1  think  it  is  important  to  make  that  point. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  would  like  if  we  can  have  the  official  reporter  state 
exactly  wliat  the  lady  said.     I  didn't  get  it  as  yon  inteipreted  it. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  am  not  criticising  her  at  all. 

Mr.  Mason.  You  stated  she  made  a  certain  remarlc  which  I  am 
quite  sure  she  didn't  make  in  the  way  you  said  it  and  on  that  basis 
you  are  questioning  the  testimony.  I  am  sure  that  the  stenographer 
can  give  us  the  exact  statement. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  read  the  statement,  Mr.  Reporter? 

(Statement  read.) 

Miss  Huffman.  The  latest  activity  of  this  National  Labor  Com- 
mittee Against  War  has  been  the  signing  of  a  call  by  25  union  lead- 
ers, for  a  conference  to  be  held  on  May  26,  of  which  Morris  Watson 
will  be  the  head,  and  notices  have  been  sent,  according  to  their  an- 
nouncement, to  all  labor  unions  in  New  York  City. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  When  you  say  "25  union  leaders,"  I  am  inclined  to 
think  you  ought  to  explain  what  you  mean  by  that. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Have  you  the  list  of  the  signers  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Not  of  that  list,  but  on  the  union  leaders  I 
thought  I  had  the  file  here  on  the  labor  unions. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Congressman  Voorhis,  the  announcement  of  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization  simply  states  "signed  by  25  of  the  city's 
outstanding  trade-union  leaders." 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Let  us  make  it  plain  that  when  that  aimouncement 
says  that  that  the  probabilities  are  there  are  not  25  outstanding  trade- 
union  leaders  as  ordinarily  understood  in  the  labor  movement  in  the 
United  States. 

Mr.  Maithews.  Mr.  Chairman,  at  this  point  we  would  like  to  re- 
call Miss  Spargo. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  want  to  insert  in  the  record  at  this  point  that 
call  with  reference  to  the  25  prominent  trade-union  leaders? 

M.  Matthews.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibit 
No.  IL") 

TESTIMONY  OF  MARY  SPARGO— Resumed 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Will  you  give  an  account  of  what  you  found  to  be 
the  situation  in  the  Bituminous  Coal  Commission,  as  it  bears  upon  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  On  March  18  of  this  year,  this  throw-away  or  flyer 
advertising  a  meeting  of  the  American  Peace — or  the  Washington 
Peace  Mobilization  rally  at  Turner's  Arena,  Avas  found  on  eveiy 
desk  on  the  eleventh  and  twelfth  floors  of  the  Bituminous  Coal  Com- 
mission. The  speakers  at  this  Turner's  Arena  rally  were  to  be 
Anna  Louise  Strong;  Eugene  P.  Connolly,  chairman  of  the  Progres- 
sive Committee  to  Rebuild  the  American  Labor  Party;  George  U. 
Murphy,  administrative  secretary  of  the  National  Negro  Conference 
or  Congress;  and  Sarah  V.  Montgomery,  secretarj^-treasurer  of  the 
Washington  Peace  Mobilization, 

I  have  certain  information  concerning  how  these  came  to  be  dis- 
tributed. I  am  very  glad  to  give  you  the  names  of  my  informants 
in  executive  session  and  some  of  the  people  are  willing  to  appear  be- 


UN-AJIERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8437 

fore  the  committee  in  executive  session,  but  I  will  omit  at  this  time  the 
names. 

]Mr.  ]\Iattheavs.  "Will  you  state  the  reasons  you  are  not  naming  the 
individuals  when  you  give  an  account  of  this  incident? 

Miss  Spahgo.  Yes.  sir;  these  individuals  have  told  me  that  they  are 
afraid  to  testifv^  concerning  the  activities  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization,  for  fear  of  losing  their  jobs.  Some  of  them  have  said 
that  they  are  afraid  of  physical  violence  from  the  Communists. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Who  told  you  that,  Miss  Spargo,  your  informants? 

Miss  Spakgo.  That  is  correct,  sir. 

ISIr.  Starnes.  Are  you  willing  to  give  the  committee  the  names  of 
the  informants  in  executive  session? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ]VL\TTHEAvs.  Are  they  employees  of  the  Bituminous  Coal  Com- 
mission ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  they  are  employees  of  the  Bituminous  Coal 
Commission. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  know  that  of  your  own  personal  knowledge  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Oh,  yes ;  I  talked  to  them.  I  will  read  you  this  report, 
leaving  the  names  out. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Miss  Spargo.  I  had  information  that  these  notices  had  been  found 
on  the  desks.  I  went  to  an  administrative  officer  of  the  Bituminous 
Coal  Commission.  "\Ylien  I  presented  my  credentials  he  said :  "I  am 
glad  indeed,  to  see  a  Dies  investigator  here;  this  place  is  loaded  from 
top  to  bottom  with  Communists;  I  have  thought  several  times  of 
going  to  see  Mr.  Starnes  and  tell  him  what  the  situation  is,  but  this 
Comnumist  influence  is  so  heavy  and  comes  from  the  very  top  I  felt 
it  would  be  unwise  for  me  to  be  seen  at  Mr.  Starnes'  office,  because  I 
might  lose  my  job." 

The  official  said  that  he  knew  about  the  distribution  of  the  Peace 
Mobilization  literature  at  the  Bituminous  Coal.  In  fact  this  came 
from  him. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  that  made  a  part  of  the  record,  the  call  or 
throw-away  you  have  there. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Spargo  Exhibit  No.  2.") 

Miss  Spargo.  He  said  that  an  investigator  from  the  Interior  De- 
partment had  spent  very  considerable  time  trying  to  learn  who  had 
distributed  the  literature.  I  had  been  informed  that  the  night  before 
the  papers  appeared  on  every  desk,  that  they  were  in  the  desk  of 
Harry  Rand. 

Mr.  Matthews.  R-a-n-d? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  an  attorney  in  the  Bituminous  Coal  Divi- 
sion. I  then  questioned — after  conferring  with  this  official — I  then 
questioned  a  girl  employee. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  question  her  at  the  office  of  the  Bitumi- 
nous Coal  Commission? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  did.  I  went  into  Mr.  Rand's  office.  I  went  mto 
the  Legal  Division  and  I  spoke  to  this  girl  in  the  hall  privately.  I 
took  out  the  pink  paper  and  handed  it  to  her  and  I  said:  "Were 
these  the  papers — was  this  paper  in  Harry  Rand's  desk  the  night 
before  they  were  found  on  every  desk  in  your  Division,'"'  and  she 


3438  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

replied,  "Yes,  those  were  the  papers — they  were  the  ones  Mr.  Kand 
had  in  his  desk." 

I  thereupon  said :  "We  are  very  anxions  to  get  at  the  bottom  of 
this  Communist  influence  in  this  Division.  I  wonder  if  you  Avould  be 
wdlHng  to  appear  before  an  executive  session  of  the  Dies  committee 
and  tell  what  you  know  of  these  papers — we  would  not  ask  you  to 
appear  at  a  public  hearing,  we  would  ask  you  to  speak  only  to  the 
Congressmen  on  the  committee  T'  She  looked  straight  at  me  and 
she  said :  "But  I  know  nothing  about  those  papers,"  after  being 
asked  to  testify.  She  said:  "I  didn't  see  them  in  Mr.  Rand's  desk; 
I  know  nothing  about  Mr.  Rand ;  there  is  nothing  that  I  can  tell  the 
committee." 

Now,  I  may  insert  here  that  I  have  another  witness  who  is  em- 
ployed in  the  Bituminous  Coal  Division  who  had  precisely  the  same 
experience  before  the  Interior  Department  sent  its  investigator  over 
there.  This  same  girl  had  informed  my  witness  that  she  had  seen 
these  in  Mr.  Rand's  desk,  but  there  hacl  then  been  no  investigation 
started.  After  the  investigation  started  she  came  upstairs  and  denied 
flatly  to  this  same  witness  that  she  had  ever  seen  the  papers. 

My  witness  will  also  say  that  everybody  is  terrified  about  testify- 
ing concerning  these  communistic  activities  in  that  Department. 
After  she  said,  "There  is  nothing  that  I  can  tell  the  committee,"  I 
said,  "Didn't  you  just  tell  me  that  those  were  the  papers  in  Mr. 
Rand's  desk?"' 

She  said :  "No ;  I  did  not." 

I  said :  "Do  you  mean  to  say  that  you  never  at  any  time  told  a 
girl  in  your  department  that  you  had  seen  those  papers  in  Mr.  Rand's 
desk?'*' 

She  said :  "I  could  not  have  said  that,  because  I  never  saw  them — 
the  papers — in  his  desk." 

I  said:  "I  can't  understand  the  conflict  in  your  statements." 

She  said :  "There  is  no  conflict  in  my  statements,  I  didn't  tell  you 
or  anybody  else  that  I  saw  the  papers," 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  go  back  and  discuss  this  matter  with  the 
official  in  tlie  Bituminous  Coal  Commission,  to  whom  you  made  refer- 
ence in  your  statement? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  had  previously  discussed  it  and  he  had  previously 
told  me,  "You  will  not  pin  her  or  anyone  else  down  in  this  division — 
I  would  not  appear  myself." 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  tell  you  why  he  would  not  appear  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  think  I  have  covered  that.  He  said:  "The  Com- 
munist influence  is  so  lieavy  and  comes  fi'om  the  very  top  I  feel  it 
would  be  unwise  for  me  to  be  seen  at  Mr.  Starnes'  oflice." 

Mr.  VoORHis.  What  did  he  mean  by  "the  very  top''  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  didn't  ask  him,  sir.  I  am  merely  giving  as  nearly 
as  I  can — I  mean,  immediatel}^  upon  coming  back  I  wrote  out  my 
notes.  Now,  what  he  meant  by  the  "very  top,"  I  assumed  he  meant 
the  very  top  of  the  Coal  Division,  but  that  I  do  not  know. 

Mr.  Starxes.  That  is  an  assumption  merely  on  your  part  following 
his  statement  to  you? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  was  merely  liis  statement  to  me.  I  didn't  ask 
liim  anything  further. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8439 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  he  said  he  was  fearful  to  come  to  talk  to  Meui- 
bers  of  Congress  or  u  congressional  conunittee  even  in  executive 
session  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct.  I  may  say  also  that  it  was  some 
time  previous  to  that  that  I  first  began  hearing  these  stories  that 
these  (iovernment  people  were  terrified  about  testifying  against  the 
ComnuHiists  in  the  Government.  I  had  heard  it  repeatedly  from 
many  ditFerent  people  employed  in  the  Government. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  you  heard  that  in  the  course  of  your 
investigations? 

Miss  Si'ARGo.  In  the  course  of  my  investigations  I  heard  it  many 
times. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Where  had  you  heard  tliat? 

Miss  Spargo.  From  various  Government  employees,  Mr.  Voorhis. 

Mr.  Voorhis,  I  think  it  is  most  important — I  mean  if  we  are  going 
to  have  testimony  like  this  where  we  just  kind  of  blanket  in  whole 
divisions,  then  it  seems  to  me  it  is  absolutely  incumbent  on  the  com- 
mittee thereafter  to  be  very  specific  because  otherwise  you  have  im- 
plicated a  whole  organization  and  I  would  like  to  say,  Mr.  Chairman, 
if  we  cannot  be  specific  about  these  matters  I  think  that  this  type  of 
testimony  is  extremely  unfair.  I  have  every  desire  to  try  to  get  rid 
of  this  influence  wherever  it  exists,  but  it  isn't  any  good  to  put  out 
a  public  statement  to  the  effect  that  this  thing  comes  ''from  the  veiy 
top"  or  something  like  that,  without  saying  who  is  who  and  who 
isn't  who. 

ISIr.  Starnes.  You  are  willing,  of  course,  and  will  gladly  give  to  the 
conunittee  in  executive  session  the  name  of  your  informant? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starxes.  And  any  departments  involved  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Certainly,  sir. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  It  isn't  tlie  informants  I  am  worried  about. 

^Ir.  Starxes.  And  you  will  give  to  us  the  division  in  which  this 
occurred — I  mean  in  which  these  people  were  employed? 

jNIiss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir.  You  understand,  Mr.  Voorhis,  I  am  merely 
repeating  a  conversation. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  understand. 

Miss  Spargo.  I  am  not  personally  bringing  any  charge. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  understand  perfectly  well  what  you  are  doing.  Miss 
Spargo.  The  thing  that  I  am  concerned  about  is  that  right  at  this 
moment  the  United  States  is  in  an  extremely  difficult  and  critical 
period,  and  it  seems  to  me  important  that  no  committee  and  no  agency 
anywhere  should,  without  the  greatest  care  and  specification,  make 
charges  whicli  are  likely  to  lead  to  a  lack  of  confidence  on  the  part  of 
the  people  in  their  Government.  Xow,  if  we  are  going  to  say  things 
like  that,  then  we  have  got  to  pin  them  down,  and  we  can't  let  it  go 
that  just  all  over  the  Government  people  said  they  Avere  afraid  of 
ph3'sical  violence  if  they  testified. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Let  us  get  this  specific  witliout  giving  any  names 
except  in  executive  session  in  order  to  protect  these  people,  but  you 
can  give  us  the  names  of  the  departments  for  the  record  specifically. 
If  you  talked  to  anyone  in  any  particular  department,  you  can  give 
us  that  information. 


8440  UN-AMERICAN  PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Miss  Spargo.  I  talked  to  people  in  the  Bituminous  Coal  Commis- 
sion and  in  the  Civil  Service  Commission.  I  am  afraid  to  give  you 
any  more  than  that,  because  my  notes  with,  reference  to  it  are  not  here. 

Mr.  Starnes,  Do  you  have  the  notes  with  vou — are  thev  available 
here? 

Miss  Spargo.  They  are  not  here ;  no,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  will  produce  those  for  us  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Now,  you  say  that  you  were  told  this  at  the  Bitu- 
minous Coal  Commission  and  also  in  the  Civil  Service  Commission? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  these  responsible  executives  in  administra- 
tive positions  who  told  you  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Well,  this  one  statement  which  I  here  introduced  was 
a  responsible  executive. 

Mr.  Matihews.  In  an  administrative  position? 

Miss  Spargo.  Certainly.  Now,  I  may  say  also  and  again  I  would 
prefer  to  give  you  this  in  executive  session,  that  I  was  very  much 
shocked,  and  I  did  not  believe  that  in  this  Government  were  people 
who  were  afraid  to  testify  against  the  Communists  when  I  first  heard 
it.  So  I  thought  that  the  logical  thing  to  do  was  to  take  it  to  investi- 
gators in  Government  departments  whom  I  had  run  into  in  the  course 
of  my  work.  I  did  so,  and  I  was  told  by  them  that  their  fear  is  justi- 
fied; that  it  has  been  known — "we  know  that  people  who  have  in- 
formed against  the  Communists  have  lost  their  jobs  in  the  Govern- 
ment." 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  came  from  an  investigator  in  another  govern- 
mental agency  with  whom  you  were  working  in  cooperation? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct,  and  I  will  be  glad  to  give  you  the 
name  of  the  investigator  who  said  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  ]\Ir.  Chairman,  it  seems  to  me  the  orderly  procedure 
in  a  matter  of  this  kind  is,  where  there  are  things  which  Miss  Spargo 
or  any  of  the  rest  of  us  feel  should  be  taken  up  in  executive  session 
that  the  entire  story  should  be  taken  up  in  executive  session  until 
such  time  as  the  committee  is  ready  to  make  a  release  on  it.  We 
shouldn't  have  half  of  the  story  here  which  makes  a  kind  of  general 
accusation  and  then  say  we  are  going  to  have  the  other  part  of  it, 
which  becomes  specific,  in  executive  session.  I  think  it  ought  to  be 
all  one  way  or  the  other. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Suppose  you  proceed  with  your  testimony  and  be 
as  specific  as  you  can  in  the  instances  where  you  can  be  specific.  Miss 
Spargo.  You  may  proceed  and  we  will  take  this  other  testimony  in 
executive  session. 

Miss  Spargo.  I  know  of  nothing  further  to  go  into  on  that,  Mr. 
Starnes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  can  see  the  justice,  of  course,  in  the  position  stated 
by  Mr.  Voorhis,  that  we  should  proceed  with  precaution;  that  there 
shouldn't  be  a  blanket  indictment  and  there  is  no  blanket  indictment. 
I  want  to  say  for  the  record,  that  neither  this  committee  nor  any 
other  committee  that  I  know  of  is  making  any  charges.  We  are 
simply  hearing  testimony.  We  haven't  even  filed  a  charge.  We 
are  merely  hearing  testimony  and  as  to  what  our  verdict  will  be, 
only  time  and  time  alone  can  tell. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §441 

I  want  the  record  straight  so  there  will  be  no  quotation  that  the 
connnittee  is  charoino-  anything.  We  are  merely  hearino-  testimony 
under  oath  of  a  competent  witness  with  reference  to  certain  matters 
of  public  importance,  that  the  public  ought  to  know  about  if  it  is 
true  and  exists.  I  don't  know  of  anythino-  that  is  of  more  vital 
importance  to  the  Nation  in  this  critical  hour  than  that  we  should 
know  who  in  responsible  positions,  either  administrative  or  executive, 
whose  loyalty  to  the  American  democracy  is  in  doubt.  That  is  of 
prime  importance  and  I  don't  know  of  anything  that  transcends  it 
in  importance — whether  or  not  the  people  who  are  Avorking  for  this 
Government  are  loyal  to  America  and  its  institutions. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  would  like  to  say  it  is  my  personal  opinion  that 
the  overwhelming  majority  of  such  people  are  loyal.  I  think  the 
job  of  the  committee  is  to  get  very  accurate  information  about  things 
of  that  kind.  I  think  it  is  more  important  for  the  people  to  get  accu- 
rate information,  that  is  the  point  I  make. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  quite  agree  with  the  gentleman. 

Mr.  jMatthews.  Now,  Miss  Spargo,  did  you  make  an  investigation 
of  the  activities  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  in  the  Wash- 
ington Navy  Yard? 

]\riss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  make  such  an  investigation  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  did,  JDr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  a  report  on  that  investigation  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  a  minute,  Dr.  Matthews.  The  chair  will  make 
the  following  statement : 

At  the  beginning  of  the  session  this  morning  the  chair  called  the 
names  of  Mr.  Hersey  and  INIiss  Koenigsberg  for  the  express  purpose 
of  determining  whether  or  not  they  were  in  the  committee  room  in 
answer  to  subpenas  directing  them  to  be  present  today  and  to  bring 
their  records. 

It  was  not  the  thought  of  the  committee  to  investigate  or  to  receive 
evidence  concerning  these  parties  and  the  organizations  or  individuals 
whom  they  might  represent,  but  merely  to  determine  whether  they 
had  responded  to  the  call  of  the  subpenas  and  were  present  with  their 
records. 

The  committee  is  glad  to  state  they  are  present  and  have  brought 
the  records  called  for,  and  have  agreed  to  cooperate  fully  with  us 
and  the  committee  appreciates  that  fact. 

Whether  or  not  these  parties  testify  in  the  future  depends,  of 
course,  upon  the  result  of  our  conferences  with  those  two  witnesses 
who  were  subpenaed,  and  an  examination  of  their  records.  If  so,  clue 
notice  will  be  given  them  and  if  they  want  counsel,  should  a  hearing 
be  held,  they  are  entitled  to  it. 

At  the  time  they  appeared  this  morning  it  seems  that  counsel  from 
the  national  headquarters  of  the  organization  to  which  they  belong 
was  present  in  the  room  and  attemjited  to  make  a  statement.  He  ap- 
parently was  under  a  misapprehension  because  he  had  just  arrived, 
so  he  states,  in  the  city  and  knew  nothing  of  the  facts  and  was  merely 
pleading  for  time  to  have  an  opportunity  to  examine  the  record. 

The  Chair  is  glad  to  make  this  announcement  and  to  say  that  so  far 
as  we  are  concerned  the  incident  is  closed  and  hope  no  unpleasant 


8442  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

inferences  may  be  drawn  from  what  occurred  at  the  time.  It  was 
merely  a  misunderstanding  on  the  part  of  this  attorney  as  to  why 
this  hidy  and  this  gentleman  were  called. 

The  committee  had  no  intention  of  examining  tliem  today  nor 
examining  into  the  records,  but  just  merely  to  ascertain,  as  a  matter 
of  record,  whether  or  not  they  had  appeared  and  had  brought  their 
records  with  them;  and  with  that  the  incident  is  closed. 

Now  the  Chair  wishes  to  call  the  committee  into  executive  session. 
There  will  be  no  further  public  hearings  today.  Our  hearings  will 
be  resumed  tomorrow  morning  at  10  o'clock. 

(Whereupon,  at  3  p.  m.,  the  committee  adjourned  until  10  a.  m., 
Thursday,  May  22,  1941.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  PEOPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


THURSDAY,   MAY   22,    1941 

House  of  Representatives, 
Subcommittee  of  the  Special  Committee  to 

Investigate  Un-American   Activities, 

Washington^  D.  C. 

The  subcommittee  met  at  10  a.  m.,  in  the  caucus  room,  House 
Office  Building,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee) 
presiding. 

Present:  Messrs.  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee),  Voor- 
liis,  and  Mason. 

Also  present:  Mr.  Robert  E.  Stripling,  chief  investigator,  and  Dr. 
J.  B.  Matthews,  reseai'cli  director. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  committee  will  resume  its  session. 

"Wlio  is  your  first  witness,  Dr.  Matthews  ? 

Mr.  Matthews,  Miss  Spargo. 

TESTIMONY  OF  MARY  SPARGO— Eecalled 

Mr.  Matthews.  Miss  Spargo,  you  met  Julia  Marcus  in  your 
investigation  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization,  did  you  not? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Julia  Marcus  is  one  of  the  very  active  participants 
in  the  work  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  in  Washington? 

Miss  Spargo.  She  is. 

Mr,  Maithews.  Is  she  a  Government  employee? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  she  is.  She  is  employed  in  Employment  Se- 
curity. 

Mr,  Matthews,  In  the  Employment  Security? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes, 

Mr.  Matthews,  Did  Miss  Marcus  ever  talk  with  you  about  the  prog- 
ress of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  in  the  navy  yard  in  AVash- 
ington? 

Miss  Spargo,  She  did.  She  said  they  were  making  considerable 
progress  in  organizing  in  the  navy  yard, 

Mr,  Matthews.  Did  you  in  your  investigation  find  that  one 
Charles  T.  Gift  was  active  in  the  iVmerican  Peace  Mobilization  in 
Washington? 

Miss  Spahc;().  I  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  the  same  Charles  T,  Gift  that  the  com- 
mittee heard  in  executive  session  with  reference  to  his  activities 
in  the  American  League  for  Peace  and  Democracy? 

8443 


8444  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews,  That  is  correct,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  is  the  same  man  who  gave  ns  testimony  with 
reference  to  Communist  activities  in  the  navy  yard  in  an  executive 
session?     That  is  the  same  Charles  T.  Gift? 

Mr.  Matthews  That  is  correct. 

And  the  information  which  you  obtained  in  your  investigations  is 
to  the  eifect  that  Charles  T.  Gift  is  still  employed  at  the  navy  yard, 
is  that  correct? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Miss  Spargo,  did  you  attend  a  meeting  of  the 
Washington  delegation  to  the  American  People's  Meeting  which 
Avas  held  at  the  Roumanian  Inn,  or  was  that  here  in  Washington? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  think  the  meeting  to  which  you  are  referring  is 
a  meeting  of  the  Washington  delegation  in  New  York  City  on 
Sunday,  April  6. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  was  that  held  at  the  Roumanian  Inn? 

Miss  Spargo.  No;  the  Roumaniaji  Inn  is  here  in  Washington. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  did  attend  a  meeting  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization  in  Washington  at  the  Roumanian  Inn,  did  you  not? 

Miss  Spargo.  No,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  did  not  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  meeting  which  you  attended  of  the  Washing- 
ton delegation  in  New  York  was  held  where  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  It  was  held  in  Mecca  Temple. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Helen  Miller 

Miss  Spargo.  The  one — this  particular  one  to  which  I  have  refer- 
ence was  held  in  Mecca  Temple. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Helen  Miller  participate  in  that  meeting? 

Miss  Spargo.  She  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  she  make  a  speech  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  She  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  tell  us  what  Helen  Miller  had  to  say  at 
that  meeting  of  the  Washington  delegation  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes.  I  am  referring  to  Helen  Schnatzler  Miller, 
the  wife  of  Hugh  B.  Miller,  chairman  of  the  grievance  committee  of 
Local  12,  Labor  Department  U.  F.  W.  A.  Her  husband  has  been 
active  in  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  and  is  secretary  of  the 
Washington  Committee  for  Democratic  Action.  He  is  an  attorney 
in  the  Bituminous  Coal. 

Miss  Miller  at  the  Washington  delegation  in  New  York  City,  was 
speaking  of  the  necessity  of  pay  raises  for  Government  employees. 
In  the  course  of  that  speech  she  called  this  a  Fascist  Government. 
She  said  that  America  was  "an  imperialist  nation  which  wanted  to 
engage  upon  an  imperialist  war  for  world  conquest."  She  said  that 
in  the  meantime  this  Government  underpaid,  overworked,  and  poorly 
housed  its  workers. 

She  also  of  course,  scored  the  investigations  of  Government  workers. 
I  may  say  in  regard  to  this  term  ' 'Fascist"  it  is  in  very  general  use 
among  members  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  refer  to  America  as  a  "Fascist  State"  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AMEiaCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8445 

'Mr.  Starnes.  AikI  she  particularly  on  this  occasion  scored  this 
Government  as  beino;  a  ''Fascist  Government"? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Bent  upon  engaging  in  an  imperialist  war  for  world 
conquest  ? 

jNIi.ss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  criticized  it  for  overworking,  underpaying,  and 
giving  poor  housing  or  affording  poor  housing  for  its  own  employees? 

Miss  Spargo.  She  described  the  treatment  by  this  Government  of 
its  workers  as  shameful. 

Mr.  Starnes.  She  is  a  Government  employee  herself? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  described  her  as  such  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  have  given  us  the  agency  with  which  she  works  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  did  I  understand  you  to  say  that  this  was  a 
somewhat  geneial  indictment  or  a  general  charge  that  was  being 
made  by  members  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization,  to  the  effect 
that  America  was  a  "Fascist  State"  and  about  to  "engage  upon  an 
impejialist  war"  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  ^Many  of  the  members  of  the  group  particularly  men- 
tioned the  President  and  ]Mrs.  Roosevelt  and  Mr.  Dies  as  being  the 
three  chief  Fascists  in  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  hear  any  of  these  Government  employees 
making  statements  to  that  effect? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  did? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Can  you  name  those? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  some  of  them.  I  wonder  if  you  want  me  to 
name  just  one  or  two.  I  mean  when  there  are  so  many  who  said 
that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  would  rather  you  would  give  us  a  complete  list — 
if  you  will  furnish  the  committee  with  a  complete  list  of  those  en- 
gaging in  activities  such  as  those  or  making  statements  such  as  those. 

Miss  Spargo.  It  was  such  a  widespread  thing,  Mr.  Starnes.  There 
was  so  much  said.  It  would  be  difficult  to  give  you  a  complete  list. 
I  mean  it  was  so  general.  It  was  the  general  tenor  of  the  conversa- 
tions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  If  you  will  furnish  us  as  complete  a  list  as  you  are 
able  to. 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  For  the  record.     You  may  proceed. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  looking  over  issues  of  the  Daily  Worker  and 
other  Communist  publications  during  your  investigation,  have  you 
found  that  that  is  also  the  Communist  Party  line  with  respect  to 
the  United  States  Government? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes :  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  at  any  time  in  talking  with  the 
people  who  are  at  work  in  the  American  Peace  Mobilization,  detect 


3446  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

any  deviation  from  the  Communist  Party  line  on  the  part  of  those 
individuals  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  you  say  that  the  Communist  Party  line 
as  you  are  acquainted  with  it,  completely  coincides  with  the  line  of 
the  American  Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  It  does  completely  coincide  with  the  line  of  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  photograph,  Miss  Spargo,  and  ask  you 
if  you  can  identify  Helen  Miller,  about  whom  you  have  spoken,  as 
one  of  the  persons  in  that  photograph?  [Handing  photograph  to 
the  witness.] 

Miss  Spargo.  Reading  from  left  to  right  is  Nellie  Schafer,  Matilda 
Katz,  and  Helen  Miller. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Helen  Miller  is  at  the  right  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  describe  what  that  is  a  picture  of  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  a  picture  of  part  of  the  Washington  delega- 
tion leaving  for  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  at  the  Chicago 
Stadium  on  August  31.  It  is  a  picture  of  the  three  young  ladies 
standing  on  the  jilatform  of  the  car — I  mean  on  the  rear  of  the  train. 

Mr.  IVIatthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  aak  that  that  photograph  be 
received  as  an  exhibit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  photograph  was  marked  as  "Spargo  Exhibit  No.  1,  May 
22,  1941.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  complete  your  account  of  Miss  Miller's 
speech  at  the  meeting  of  the  Washington  delegation? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes.  At  the  meeting  of  the  Washington  delega- 
tion  

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  attend  any  meetings  of  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization  where  the  subject  of  the  Glenn  Martin  airplane 
plant  was  discussed  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  the  committee  an  account  of 
what  was  said  at  that  meeting  or  those  meetings? 

Miss  Spargo.  The  subject  of  the  7,000  jobs  for  Negroes  at  Glenn  L. 
Martin  was  discussed  at  every  meeting  which  I  attended.  I  believe. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the'Glenn  Martin  airplane  plant  at  Balti- 
more, is  it  not? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct;  and  buttons  like  this  were  sold  at  some 
of  the  meetings. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Buttons  like  this  were  sold  at  the  meetings  of  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  that  particular  button  was  sold  at  a  meeting 
of  the  AVashington  Peace  Mobilization  at  1633  U  Street  NW.— 
Majestic  Studio,  April  18. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Will  you  please  read  what  the  button  says? 

Miss  Spargo  (reading).  "7,000  jobs  for  Negroes  at  Glenn  L.  Martin, 
National  Negro  Congress." 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  ask  that  that  be  received  as  an  exhibit,  Mr. 
Chairman. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8447 

ISTr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordei-ed. 

(The  button  referred  to  was  marked  "Spargo  Exhibit  No.  2, 
May  22,  1941.") 

Mr.  Staijnes.  This  particular  item  was  the  subject  matter  of  dis- 
cussion at  a  meetintr  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Si'AKGo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  employment  of  7,000  Negros  in  the  Glenn  Martin 
plant? 

Miss  Sparoo.  Yes,  sir. 

ISIr.  Starnes.  And  was  it  a  subject  matter  of  discussion  before  the 
Washiuiiton  chai)ter  here  or  the  Washington  group? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr,  Starnes.  Of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  in  fact  it  is — in  fact  the  Washington  Peace 
Mobilization  group  made  posters  for  the  rally  that  was  to  have  been 
held  or  was  held  in  Baltimore. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  describe  what  the  discussion  amounted  to? 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  that  ? 

Mr,  Matthews.  I  am  asking  about  the  nature  of  the  discussion 
about  the  employment  of  the  7,000  Negroes  in  the  Glenn  Martin  plant. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Finish  that  and  then  I  have  some  questions  I  want  to 
ask  about  another  item. 

Miss  Spargo.  Reading  from  a  report  of  a  meeting  at  the  Majestic 
Studio  at  1633  U  Street  NW.,  on  April  16 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  this  your  own  report? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Your  own  notes  on  what  was  said  at  that  meeting? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct,  Mrs.  Dorothy  Strange  urged  attend- 
ance at  the  rally  in  Baltimore  on  April  27  to  get  jobs  for  7,000  Negroes 
at  the  Glenn  L,  Martin  plant.  She  and  others  sold  these  buttons. 
Jack  Zucker,  vice  pi^esident  of  the  Washington  American  Peace  Mobil- 
ization and  a  representative  of  the  Shoe  Workers'  Union,  added  to  her 
report  which  concerned  the  necessity  of  these  7,000  jobs.  He  urged 
that  every  A.  P.  M.  member  support  this  drive  on  Glenn  L.  Martin 
and  said: 

You  must  rpalize  that  it  is  not  only  a  question  of  getting  justice  for  Negro 
brothers,  but  if  we  achieve  this  victory  and  actually  get  jobs  for  7,000  Negroes 
down  there  we  have  got  7,000  new  members  of  our  union.  Think  what  that 
will  mean  to  us, 

Henry  Thomas,  a  Negro  leader  of  the  southwest  branch  of  the  Com- 
munist Party — that  is  how  lie  is  listed  in  the  police  records — reporting 
on  the  view  of  the  Negro — Mr.  Thomas  was  asked  what  success  he  had 
had  in  encouraging  the  Negroes  to  apply  for  those  jobs,  and  he  said : 
"Well,  in  view,-'  he  said,  "Negroes  in  general  are  too  lukewarm  to  our 
peace  movement."  He  said :  "They  hope  that  the  war  will  bring  them 
jobs  that  they  have  not  been  able  to  get  before." 

He  also  said  that  the  trouble  was,  the  difficulty  was  in  organizing 
among  the  Negroes  that  they  couldn't  understand  why  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization  should  be  interested  in  getting  them  itito  Glenn  L, 
Martin  to  manufacture  war  goods. 

He  said  that  many  Negroes  suggested  that  a  peace  movement 
shoud  take  just  the  opposite  stand.     He  said  that  many  Negroes 

62626 — 41 — vol.  14 19 


8448  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

with  whom  he  had  talked  said  that  in  their  view  if  this  was  a  peacft 
movement  they  should  be  urging  people  to  take  no  part  whatever  iu 
any  defense  industry. 

This  comment  met  with  a  general  laugh.  You  understand  that 
Mr.  Thomas  was  reporting  on  the  attitude  of  Negroes  whom  he 
had  tried  to  organize — that  was  not  his  point  of  view. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Their  simple  logic  was  they  couldn't  understand 
why  a  peace  movement,  if  it  was  a  peace  movement,  was  interested 
in  obtaining  jobs  for  Negroes  in  a  war  industry? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  couldn't  follow  that  logic? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  say  that  was  met  with  general  laughter? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  cominent  was  met  with  very  general  laughter. 
One  man  whom  I  would  recognize  but  whose  name  I  do  not  have, 
said:  "Well,  certainly,  in  some  cases  it  could  be  explained  to  the 
Negroes  or  to  certain  of  our  brothers,  what  they  could  do  if  they 
could  get  a  job  in  a  defense  industry." 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  implication  being,  of  course,  they  would  be  in 
a  position  to  sabotage  the  defense  program? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  so  took  it. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  May  I  ask  a  couple  of  questions,  Mr.  Chairman? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Did  you  get  the  impression  that  the  Peace  Mobili- 
zation organization  was  interested  in  getting  jobs  for  Negi'oes  as  such 
and  because  they  were  Negroes,  or  was  it  just  because  they  were  Ne- 
groes that  they  wanted  to  see  them  get  good  jobs  and  be  able  to  make 
a  living?     Was  that  why  they  were  interested  in  it? 

Miss  Spargo.  No.     Of  course  it  is  a  very  complicated  picture. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  don't  think  it  is  complicated  at  all.  Let  me  ask 
you  another  question :  Weren't  they  interested  in  getting  a  particular 
group  of  persons  who  were  sympathetic  to  their  point  of  view,  who 
might  be  willing  to  cooperate  with  the  Comnumist  leadership  of  this 
organization  no  matter  who  they  were,  but  that  they  believed  that 
by  raising  this  issue  it  might  be  possible  for  Mr.  Thomas  and  otheis 
to  see  that  the  particulaiiy  right  ones  would  get  in?  Isn't  that 
actually  the  case? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  correct.  And  also  they  made  it  very 
plain  they  didn't  want  them  all  to  go  at  once.  They  had  a  plan 
that  every  day  from  30  to  100  Negroes  would  apply  at  Glenn  L. 
Martin.  That  was  discussed  on  several  occasions.  They  planned 
to  send  out  press  releases  each  day  when  they  said  those  applicants 
would  be  turned  down.  They  said  when  the  applicants  would  be 
turned  down:  "We  will  send  to  every  newspaper  a  statement  that 
'today  30  Negroes  were  refused  jobs  at  this  Jim  Crow  plant,'  "  but 
they  said :  "We  must  see  to  it  that  those  Negroes  who  apply  are 
Negroes  with  whom  we  have  come  in  contact." 

Iix  other  words,  they  did  not  Avant  just  any  Negro — they  wanted 
Negroes  who  had  been  influenced  to  their  point  of  view. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  It  seems  to  me  that  is  important. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  think  that  is  highly  important  and  very  sig- 
nificant. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  just  like  to  make  this  obser- 
vation  with  regard  to  tliese  hearings:    Speaking   for  myself   and 


UN-AMERICAN  PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  g449 

I  believe  the  committee  would  agree,  I  know  that  there  are  a  great 
many  i)e()i)le  in  the  I'nited  States  that  sincerely  are  working  for 
peace;  that  what  these  hearings  have  to  do  is  to  show  the  degree 
to  which  one  organization  that  is  controlled  by  a  foreign  govern- 
ment is  att^mipting  to  utilize  this  sincere  desire  to  serv'e  its  own 
ends,  and  to  show  that  although  an  organization  may  be  called  a 
"peace  organization*'  that  in  fact  it  may  not  be  that  at  all;  that 
ihese  liearings  are  not  intended  in  any  slightest  degree  to  cast  any 
discredit  on  any  sincere  peace  movement  in  the  United  States  which 
is  an  expression  of  sincere  conviction  on  the  part  of  the  American 
people  with  regard  to  our  foreign  policy. 

That  isn't  a  matter,  of  course,  that  the  committee  would,  obviously, 
go  into. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yon  may  resume  your  questioning. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Miss  Spargo,  following  up  the  statement 
by  Mr.  Voorhis,  was  it  not  also  your  distinct  impression  that  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization  was  out  to  exploit  the  question  of 
racial  justice)  for  ends  which  did  not  have  particularly  to  do  with 
the  bettering  of  conditions  of  Negro  people? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  absolutely  correct.  I  felt  very  strongly  that 
they  really  didn't  care  one  particle  what  actually  haj^pened  to  the 
Negroes  as  a  Avhole,  or  to  any  individual  Negro,  provided  he  could 
serve  the  ends  of  Soviet  Russia. 

Mv.  Starnes.  In  all  of  the  meetings  that  you  attended  of  the  Amer- 
ican Peace  Mobilization,  either  here  or  elsewhere,  when  you  con- 
sidered the  program  or  the  agenda  which  was  under  discussion  and 
the  general  tenor  and  tj'pe  of  meetings,  did  it  give  you  an  impres- 
sion that  here  was  a  group  of  people  genuinely  interested  in  peace 
who  were  disciples  of  peace,  or  did  you  obtain  an  impression  that 
hei-e  was  a  group  who  were  following  the  political  line  which  is 
being  forced  on  this  country  by  a  foreign  government? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  certainly  was  convinced  that  they  were  following 
the  political  line  of  a  foreign  government.  They  talked  about  strikes 
continuously.  Strikers  came  to  the  rally  in  New  York  who  were 
right  off  the  picket  lines,  and  people  were  wearing  these  buttons. 
Ford  buttons  and  Chief  Steward,  United  Automobile  Workers,  and 
the  International  Harvester  strikers. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  see  anyone  there  who  purported  to  be  from 
the  Allis-Chalmers  plant? 

Miss  Spargo.  Oh,  yes;  Allis-Chalmers  plant,  and  they  contributed 
money  to  this  American  Peace  Mobilization,  all  of  them,  and  they 
were  wildh'  cheered  when  they  did  so. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  the  question  of  strikes  in  national-defense  in- 
dustries constantly  under  discussion  and  consideration  at  these  vari- 
ous meetings? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  they  were. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  was  the  purport  of  the  discussions?  Was  it 
to  support  strikes  of  that  type  and  nature  in  order  to  hinder  and  ham- 
string the  United  States  of  America? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  it. 

Mr.  Starne.s.  In  its  effort  to  speed  up  its  security  program  and 
provide  a  defense  for  this  country? 


3450  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct.  They  said  they  were  out  to  get 
General  Motors  and  talked  about  Big  Steel  and  Little  Steel — I  mean 
the  whole  tenor  of  the  thing  was  definitely  fomenting  strikes  in  order 
to  hamper  tlie  national  defense. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Isn't  that  a  part  of  the  Communist  Party  line  in 
this  country,  to  impede  the  efforts  of  the  United  States  to  defend 
itself  if  it  is  about  to  engage  in  an  "imperialist  war"? 
Miss  Spargo.  Tliat  is  so. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  think,  of  course,  the  members  of  the  committee 
have  laiowledge  of  the  fact  that  the  one-time  leader  of  the  Com- 
munist Party,  who  has  been  offered  for  the  Presidency  on  more  than 
one  occasion,  stated  before  this  committee,  if  I  remember  correctly, 
in  1939,  that  that  was  a  part  of  their  program  and  it  would  be  carried 
forward  to  such  an  extent  that  they  would  not  only  promote  strikes 
in  national-defense  industries  and  strife,  but  they  would  attempt  to 
bring  about  civil  war  in  this  country  if  necessary. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Mr.  Browder  said  he  would  attempt  to  precipitate 
civil  war. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right.  Dr.  Matthews,  you  may  proceed. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  that  conclude  your  statement  of  the  account 
of  the  discussion  of  the  Glenn  Martin  plant  and  the  question  of  the 
employment  of  Negroes  at  that  plant? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  I  think  I  did  say  that  the  members  worked  on 
posters  and  all  that  sort  of  thing.  I  mean  there  was  a  very  great 
deal  of  work  done  by  the  A.  P.  M.  in  connection  with  the  Glenn  L. 
Martin  rally, 

Mr.  Starnes,  I  would  like  to  get  a  matter  straight  in  my  mind. 
Dr.  Matthews,  about  some  previous  testimony  given  by  the  witness. 

This  Helen  Miller  you  spoke  of  a  moment  ago,  you  stated  was  the 
wife  of  Hugh  Miller? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  Hugh  Miller  is  an  attorney  for  this  Washington 
Committee  on  Democratic  Action — is  that  the  name  of  the  commit- 
tee? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  have  him  listed  as  a  secretary,  but  I  may  be  in 
error  on  that. 

Mr.  Mason.  He  is  counsel  for  the  Bituminous  Coal  Division. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  stated  she  is  a  Government  employee? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  so.  She  was  representing  her  local  as  a 
delegate. 

Mr.  Starnes,  Where  is  she  employed? 

Miss  Spargo,  I  believe  in  the  Labor  Department. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Where  was  this  speech  made  that  she  made  that  you 
refer  to? 

Miss  Spargo.  At  the  American  People's  Meeting  in  New  York 
City. 

Mr,  Starnes.  Do  you  recall  whether  or  not  in  her  own  speech  she 
referred  to  these  "three  leading  Fascists  in  this  Government"? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  don't  recall  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  others  present  who  spoke  did  refer  to  the  Pres- 
ident, his  wife,  and  Mr.  Dies  as  "being  three  of  the  leading  Fascists 
in  the  country"? 

Miss  Spargo,  Yes,  sir. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8451 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  Helen  Miller  repeatedly  made  the  statement 
that 

Miss  Spakgo.  "Tliis  is  a  Fascist  Government" — that  "America  is  a 
Fascist  Government." 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  it  was  about  to  engage  in  an  imperialist  war 
for  world  conquests 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  obtain  the  general  impression  at  these  meet- 
ings, or  were  you  instructed  yourself,  as  a  member  of  this  organization, 
that  you  should  constantly  exploit  the  racial  question? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  so. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  that  among  the  instructions  that  you  received, 
that  you  should  in  every  manner  possible  exploit  racial  discrimination 
and  racial  justice  and  hatred? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  Dr.  Matthews, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you,  in  your  investigation,  encounter  a  man 
luimed  Greenberg? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  Greenberg's  full  name  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Robert  N.  Greenberg. 

Mr.  Matthews.  G-r-e-e-n-b-e-r-g  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  jou  know  whether  or  not  Robert  N.  Greenberg  is 
a  Government  employee? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes ;  he  is.  He  works,  I  believe  it  is,  with  the  Labor 
Department.  I  don't  happen  to  have  that  particular  list  here,  Dr. 
Matthews,  but  I  am  quite  sure  that  that  is  the  fact.  In  any  event,  he  is 
a  Government  employee. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  find  that  Greenberg  had  any  police  record 
in  the  District  of  Columbia  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes.  He  was  arrested  June  9,  1938,  for  distributing 
literature  at  the  navy  yard  without  a  permit. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  anyone  else  arrested  with  him  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Matilda  Katz,  one  of  those  in  that  picture. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Arrested  with  him  on  that  occasion? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  ]VIatthews.  Which  one  is  Matilda  Katz  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  She  is  in  the  middle. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  person  in  the  middle  of  this  exhibit  1? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes.  She  was  another  member  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization.  She  was  arrested  with  Mr.  Greenberg  on  the  same 
occa^sion. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  are  they  both  active  in  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Tliey  are. 

Mr.  Matthews.  They  were  arrested  by  the  Washington  Police  De- 
partment? 

Miss  Spargo.  According  to  the  records;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  For  illegal  distribution  of  literature  at  the  navy- 
yard  gates? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Miss  Spargo,  was  there  any  discussion  at 
these  meetings  or  elsewhere  amon":  the  members  of  the  American 


8452  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Peace  Mobilization  about  what  the  American  Peace  Mobilization 
should  attempt  to  do  among  draftees  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  the  committee  a  full  account 
of  the  discussion  that  took  place  about  what  the  xlmerican  Peace 
Mobilization  should  do  with  reference  to  draftees? 

Miss  Spargo.  In  the  firet  place  there  was  at  their  headquarters  a 
good-sized  bookcase  full  of  literature.  It  concerned  the  Washington 
Committee  for  Democratic  Action,  it  concerned  the  Aid  to  China, 
it  concerned  Spanish  Loyalists  and  all  that  sort  of  literature.  There 
was  a  separate  section  of  that  same  bookcase  set  aside  for  literature 
on  the  draft. 

Here  in  one  piece  issued  by  the  Washington  Youth  Council,  907 
Fifteenth  Street,  NW. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Washington  Youth  Council? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct.     That  was  on  the  shelf. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  the  general  tenor  of  that?  It  deals  with 
the  draft,  does  it  ?     I  will  read  it : 

Young  people  of  Washington,  democracy  works,  save  it  by  using  it.  Take 
your  pick.  Tlie  numbers  are  up.  Has  yours  been  called?  Your  brothers,  your 
friends,  your  sons,  your  boy  friends,  your  liusbands. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  read  this  line  which  is  the  slogan  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  "Democracy  or  conscription." 

Mr.  Starnes.  "Democracy  or  conscription?" 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  so. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  the  general  tenor  of  that  literature?  Is  it 
an  attack  upon  the  draft?  Is  that  the  general  tenor  of  this  liter- 
ature, Dr.  Matthews  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  literature  as  I  have  read  it — the  witness  may 
speak  for  herself,  does  not  come  out  overtly  and  attack  the  draft 
act  but  calls  for  very  wide  and  drastic  amendments  to  the  act. 

Will  you  have  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

(The  pamphlet  referred  to  was  marked  as  "Spargo  Exhibit  No. 
3,  May  22,  1941.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  May  I  ask  you  if  the  Washington  Youth  Council 
is  an  affiliate  of  the  American  Youth  Congress  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  wish  to  modify  in  any  way  the  statement 
which  I  made  about  the  attitude  of  this  literature  toward  the  draft? 

Miss  Spargo.  No  ;  you  stated  it  correctly. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  identify  this  piece  of  literature? 

Miss  Spargo.  This  is  a  piece  of  literature  published  by — which  was 
also  on  the  slielf,  published  in  the  Washington  American  Peace 
Mobilization  headquarters,  published  by  the  National  Federation  for 
Constitutional  Liberties. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  is  the  title  of  this  piece  of  literature? 

Miss  Spargo.  The  Draft  Act  and  Your  Rights,  Your  Right  to 
Criticize,  Advocate  Change  or  Repeal. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  is  the  tenor  of  the  discussion  throughout 
this  piece  of  literature,  is  it? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  the  tenor  of  the  discussion;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  receive  this  in  evidence  as  an  exliibit? 


UN- A  Mi:  I  tic  AN   I'liOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8453 

Ml".  Stahnes.  It  is  so  onloi'od. 

(The  paper  referred  to  was  marked  "Spargo  Exhibit  No.  4,  May 
22,  1941.") 

Miss  ISrAR«o.  Ami  tliis  piece  of  literature  is  a  piece  of  literature  put 
out  by  the  Auiericau  Peace  Mobilization,  1116  Veruiont  Avenue.  NW., 
Reconunendat  ions  for  Mai^iiiii-  the  Bul•ke-^^'a(ls\vortll  Act  and  its  Ad- 
ministration as  Truly  Democratic  as  Possible. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  receive  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman? 

^Ir.  Starxes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Spargo  Exhibit  No.  5, 
May  22,  1941.") 

Mr.  Starxes.  AVas  all  of  this  literature  that  you  have  here  on  dis- 
play, beino-  distributed  there  at  this  meetin«»-  in  New  York  City? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes.  This  was  certaiidy  distributed,  this  National 
Federation  for  Constitutional  Liberties  and  much  of  the  other  ma- 
terial of  the  same  kind.  I  do  not  recall  this  American  Peace  Mobiliza- 
tion  

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  literature  of  that  type 
or  character  could  be  obtained  from  the  Washington  Bookshop? 

Miss  SPARGt).  Yes.  sir. 

^Ir.  Starxes.  It  could  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  MArrHEws.  Now  did  you  find  in  their  discussions  at  meetings 
and  elsewhere  that  tliey  made  much  more  explicit  their  purposes  with 
reference  to  draftees  than  they  did  in  this  printed  literature? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  jM atphews.  Now  will  you  please  outline  what  it  is  they  had  to 
say  in  their  conversaticms  or  speeches  about  work  among  draftees? 

Miss  Spargo.  For  part  of  the  slant  I  go  back  to  the  part  of  the 
speech  of  Annette  Eul)instein  at  the  American  People's  Meeting  in 
New  York  City.  To  the  best  of  my  recollection  she  said  that  since  a 
draft  of  labor  is  not  only  ])ossible  but  probable,  that  women  would 
have  to  take  a  more  militant  point  of  view  in  the  trade-union  work; 
that  women  were  going  to  have  to  be  more  militant  and  it  was  re- 
peatedly said  by  other  s})eakers 

Ml'.  MATfHEws.  Who  Mas  that  speaker? 

Miss  Spar(;(».  Annette  Kiibiustein.  You  recall  we  have  consider- 
able material  on  that.  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

Miss  SpAKGo.  ''Em])loyers'' — I  am  quoting  her  from  this  six-page 
mimeogia[)hed  folder: 

Statistics  on  local  draft  boards  already  show  that  they  are  composed  over- 
whelniinjrly  of  business  ;ind  professional  men  and  that  the  representation  of 
labor  tlicreon  is  almost  negligible. 

Since  there  are  no  group  deferments  and  only  individuals  can  be  deferred, 
a  draft  of  labor  is  possilile  and  probable.  Employers  hostile  to  labor  miions 
will  certify  that  imnunion  oiiiployes  are  necessary  and  union  members  not 
necessary. 

Local  draft  boards  without  labor  representation  may  with  impunity  co- 
oi^erate  in  such  discriminatory  practices  unless  the  act  is  amended  to  safeguard 
labor's  rights. 

Then  another  slant,  of  course,  which  is  taken  is  the  reiteration  of 

elimination  of  Jim  Crowism  from  the  Arm},  which  also  follows 

Mr.   Starn'^es.  In   other   words,  they   were   advocating  the   Draft 


8454  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Act  be  so  amended  that  some  representatives  of  organized  labor 
would  have  to  serve  on  all  local  draft  boards — is  that  the  general 
tenor  of  their  discussion? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  would  say  so;  yes,  sir.  Those  are  exact  quotes 
I  was  reading  you. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  go  ahead  now  with  your  Jim  Crowism  state- 
ment. 

Miss  Spargo.  On  the  Negro  shelf  is  a  four-page  mimeographed 
sheet  under  the  heading :  "Did  the  Last  World  War  Bring  Democracy 
to  the  Negro  People?  Let  Us  Look  at  a  Few  of  the  Facts";  and 
it  refers  to  a  special,  secret  order  sent  out  by  the  high  command  of 
the  American  Expeditionary  Forces  in  France,  stating  that  Negro 
soldiers  were  not  to  be  given  any  treatment  that  might  be  interpreted 
as  social  equality. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  attend  meetings  where  the  matter  of 
draftees  was  discussed? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  remember  any  of  the  conversations  that 
took  place  at  those  meetings  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVill  you  please  outline  what  they  were? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  who  made  the  remarks. 

Miss  Spargo.  On  the  bulletin  boards  at  the  headquarters  are  posted 
all  articles  which  might  possibly  tend  in  any  way  to  criticize  the 
draft,  with  particular  things  underlined. 

There  was  one  article,  for  example,  said  that  letters  from  home 
complaining  of  home  conditions  made  boys  homesick.  That  was 
underscored,  and  it  said :  "It  undermines  their  morale."  That  was 
heavily  underscored.  Then  at  a  meeting  of  the  northwest  peace  group 
on  April  22,  at  the  home  of  Bob  Austin  and  Lou  Bibberman,  2023 
O  Street  Northwest 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  spell  that  name  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Bob  A-u-s-t-i-n  and  Lou  B-i-b-b-e-r-m-a-n. 

The  chairman  said : 

We  have  a  big  job  cut  out  for  us.  The  A.  P.  M.  has  asked  each  branch  to  set 
up  its  own  draft  committee.  We  find  that  very  few  people  know  the  draft 
regulations  and  we  must  study  them  to  find  out  just  what  exemptions  are 
allowed. 

iMany  conscripts  are  being  drafted  who  could  be  deferred  if  they  knew  the 
law.  It  is  up  to  us  to  help  them.  We  must  figlit  any  extension  of  that  year 
of  service  and  see  to  it  that  the  Government  keeps  its  pi'omise  to  let  the  boys 
out  at  the  end  of  a  year. 

Then  again  right  here  in  Washington  we  are  surrounded  by  camps.  It  is  up 
to  us,  it  is  up  to  each  one  of  you  as  an  individual,  to  meet  the  boys  when  they 
come  in  for  weekends,  and  we  must  give  them  a  good  time.  We  must  let  them 
see  that  the  A.  P.  M.  is  working  for  true  American  democracy.  We  must  let 
them  see  that  we  have  something  to  offer  in  the  way  of  protection  of  their  rights 
to  work  and  live  free  lives  away  from  the  Fascist  domination  of  this  Government. 

Attention  was  called  to  the  fact  that  the  Government  was  discour- 
aging— the  charge  was  made  that  the  Government  was  discouraging 
letters  from  home  to  the  boys  because  letters  undermine  their  morale. 

The  chairman  said : 

That  brings  up  another  point.  It  is  up  to  us  to  see  that  the  boys  get  plenty 
of  those  homesick  letters.     We  must  fight  the  Fascists  on  all  fronts. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8455 

Mr.  Starxes.  In  other  words,  it  would  be  a  part  of  the  program  of 
the  American  Peace  Mobilization  to  undermine  the  morale  of  the 
soldiei's  of  the  United  States  Army? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starxes.  And  that  was  to  be  accomjilished  by  having  homesick 
letters  written  to  them  and  b}^  other  devious  methods? 

Miss  SrARGO.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  jSIattitews.  In  your  investigation  you  found  out  about  this 
meeting  at  the  Roumanian  Inn? 

Miss  Si'ARGO.  Yes ;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  describe  what  took  place  there  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  On  April  26 

Mr.  Starxes.  This  is  a  meeting  on  April  26  at  tho  Roumanian  Inn? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes ;  of  the  Washington  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr,  Starxes.  All  right — this  year  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes.     Susan  B.  Anthony  declared  at  this  meeting : 

We  must  go  I'ight  into  the  camps  and  see  what  is  going  on ;  we  must  be  sure 
we  do  get  iuto  tlie  camps. 

Miss  Anthony  read  a  letter  purported  to  be  from  a  soldier  at  Camp 
Dix  stating  that  in  a  recent  forest  fire  five  boys  had  been  killed,  but 
she  said : 

The  kept  capitalistic  press  has  suppressed  that  news  at  the  request  of  this 
capitalistic  Government. 

She  said  that  her  informant  had  told  her  that  the  food  at  Camp 
Dix  was  veiy  poor  indeed.  I  believe  that  the  informant  also  said 
that  on  certain  days  the  draftees  had  nothing  to  eat  but  bologna 
sandwiches. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  there  anything  else  that  took  place  at  the 
Roumanian  Inn? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes;  Mrs.  Montgomery 

Mr.  Starxes.  '\Mio  is  this  Susan  B.  Anthony  you  are  referring  to? 

Miss  Spargo.  She  is  a  young  Government  employee. 

Mr.  Starxes.  A  young  Government  employee  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starxes.  That  is  not  the  gi'eat  suffragist  leader  that  you  are 
referring  to  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  No;  I  believe  she  is  a  descendent.  I  haven't  fully 
checked  on  that. 

Mr.  Starxes.  I  just  want  to  make  it  clear  that  you  are  not  testify- 
ing with  regard  to  her. 

Now  the  letters  you  referred  to  awhile  ago,  Miss  Spargo,  about 
homesickness,  those  letters  were  a  type  of  letters  that  they  wanted 
written  to  the  boys  which  would  tend  to  develop  homesickness  on  the 
part  of  the  young  fellows  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starxes.  ^Make  them  discontented  with  camp  life  and  so  forth  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Now  do  you  know  what  Government  agency  tins 
Susan  B.  Anthony,  this  young  Susan  B.  Anthony  works  in? 

Miss  Spargo.  I  don't  know  unless  Dr.  Matthews  has  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  record  in  our  file  shows  she  is  with  the  Na- 
tional Youth  Administration. 


8456  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Do  you  have  some  more  material  on  this  question  of  the  draft  ? 

Miss  Spakgo.  Yes.  In  New  York  at  the  Youth  Workshop  there 
was  a  play  presented  which  was  as  powerful  a  piece  of  antiwar 
propaganda  as  I  think  I  have  ever  seen.  It  was  Johnny  Got  His 
Gun.  It  shows  a  soldier  of  the  last  World  AVar  ending  up  as  a  blind, 
deaf,  immobile  hunk  of  flesh.  All  these  people  at  the  Youth  Work- 
shop, it  was  freely  admitted,  were  Comnumists. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  play  Johnny  Got  His  Gun  was  written  by 
Dalton  Trumbo  ^ 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  the  story  that  was  run  serially  in  the 
Daily  Worker? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  any  discussions  at  that  Youth  Work- 
shop in  New  York  about  this  play  with  any  of  the  people  who  were 
there  ? 

Mi_ss  Spargo.  Yes ;  we  discussed  it  at  great  length  as  a  very  effective 
piece  of  antiwar  propaganda — very  effective. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  go  to  that  Youth  Workshop  in  company 
among  others,  with  Ted  Ozmun? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  was  it  at  that  Youth  Workshop  that  Ted 
Ozmun  told  you  about  how  close  the  Communist  Party  was  to  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization — how  completely  it  controlled  it? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes.  It  was  there  and  in  other  subsequent  conver- 
sations. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  the  difference,  if  any,  between  the  Ameri- 
can People's  Meeting  and  this  Youth  Workshop  ?  Is  there  any  tie-up 
or  connection  or  correlation  or  cooperation  between  the  two  groups? 

Miss  Spargo.  The  Youth  Workshop  gave  a  party  for  the  delegates 
to  the  American  People's  Meeting — for  some  of  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  there  any  expression  of  sympathy  with  the 
aims  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  or  did  there  seem  to  be  an 
identity  of  program? 

Miss  Spargo.  There  was  a  complete  identity  of  program. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Complete  identity  of  program  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  concerted  action  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  it. 

Mr,  Starnes.  All  right. 

Miss  Spargo.  I  would  also  like  to  refer  to  the  attitude  toward  men 
ill  uniform,  which  was  displayed  (m  all  sorts  of  occasions. 

At  fii'st  at  the  American  People's  IVfeeting  when  there  was  a  con- 
script, or  a  man  in  uniform,  a  soldier,  who  was  attending  the  meet- 
ing— there  were  several  soldiers  in  attendance  at  that  American 
People's  Meeting,  and  the  delegates  sitting  around  had  a  tendencv 
to  whisper  about  "here  is  a  man  in  uniform"  and  someone  else  would 
make  the  reply — some  other  member  would  say:  "We  have  got  a 
conscript  army  now.  Don't  you  realize  that  these  are  conscripts — 
these  aren't  professional  soldiers — these  aren't  slaves  of  the  capital- 
ists. These  men  don't  necessarily  want  to  be  in  the  Army.  You 
must  make  friends  with  the  soldiers  and  not  make  fun  of  them"; 
and  I  repeatedly  observed  that  program  put  into  action.     That  i<? 


UN-A3IKRICAN  PROl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §457 

they  AV(Mil(l  o-o  up  to  a  man  in  uniform  and  approach  him  in  a 
friendly  manner. 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  Avill  take  a  short  recess  at  this  time. 

("Whereupon,  a  short  recess  was  taken.) 

Mr.  Starxes.  You  may  proceed.  Dr.  ^lattheAvs. 

INIr.  jMatihews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  to  call  Miss  Huffman 
again. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Very  well. 

TESTIMONY  OF  HAZEL  HUFFMAN— Recalled 

Mr.  Matthews.  ISIiss  Huffman,  I  show  you  a  copy  of  a  telegi-am 
and  ask  you  if  you  have  seen  a  copy  of  that? 

(Handing  telegram  to  the  w^itness.) 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  describe  the  telegram  and  read  it? 

Ilkliss  Huffman.  The  telegram  is  from  Marian  Briggs  of  the  Ameri- 
can Peace  Mobilization.  It  is  a  day  letter  and  sent  to  a  series  of 
addresses.     The  telegi-am  reads  as  follows : 

Peace  vigil  at  Wliite  House  approaching  340th  hour.  Still  going  strong. 
Urgently  need  money  to  keep  line  going.  Vigil  costs  $100  per  day.  Please  air 
mail  special  any  funds  you  can. 

The  telegram  is  addressed  to  eight  people:  George  Marshall,  38 
East  Fifty-seventh  Street,  New  York  City;  Mrs.  Guggenheimer,  An- 
sonia  Hotel,  New  York  City — that  is  Mrs.  J.  C.  Guggenheimer  be- 
cause of  the  address;  Anna  Rochester,  85  Bedford  Street,  New  York 
City;  Mrs.  Ellen  Brandstetter,  637  Arlington  Place,  Chicago,  111.; 
Harvey  O'Connor,  Hull  House.  Chicago,  111.;  Alfred  K.  Stern,  30 
Rockefeller  Plaza.  New  York  City;  Lionel  Stander,  care  of  Native 
Son.  St.  James  Theater,  West  Forty-fourth  Street,  New  York  City, 
and  Herbert  Biberman,  603  Delta  Building,  426  South  Spring  Street, 
Los  Angeles,  Calif. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  a  copy  of  a  telegram  or  the  original  telegram 
that  was  obtained  from  the  Postal  Telegraph  Co.  by  proper  subpena 
from  this  committee,  and  is  this  the  information  which  was  furnished 
the  committee  in  response  to  the  subpena,  by  the  Postal  Tele- 
graph Co.  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  correct. 

Miss  Huffman.  The  markings  would  so  indicate. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  will  be  a  part  of  the  record. 

(The  telegram  referred  to  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibit  No.  1, 
May  22,  1941.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Miss  Huffman,  have  you  investigated  the 
records  of  the  iiidividuals  to  whom  that  telegram  was  sent,  with 
respect  to  their  affiliations  with  front  organizations  of  the  Commu- 
nist Party? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  have.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  these  cards  indicate  the  original 
material  which  is  in  the  files  of  the  committee,  showing  the  connec- 
tions of  the  individuals  to  whom  this  telegram  was  addressed,  and  I 
suggest  that  instead  of  taking  the  hours  that  would  be  necessary  to 
go  over  all  of  this  material,  that  the  tabulation  be  made  at  this  point 
a  j)art  of  the  record,  or  do  3'ou  have  some  other  procedure  in  mind? 


3458  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  that  show  the  record  of  organizations,  some  of 
which  undoubtedly  are  Communist-front  organizations  and  so  found 
by  this  committee,  to  which  these  people  belong?  That  is  the  im- 
portant part  of  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  correct,  Mr,  Chairman. 

Mr.  StarneiS.  You  might  read  the  record  of  one  or  two  of  the 
parties  so  the  committee  will  have  an  idea  of  the  general  tenor  of  the 
organizations  they  belong  to  and  their  connections,  and  the  others 
can  then  be  inserted  in  the  record  along  with  the  names  of  the  people 
to  whom  the  telegrams  were  sent. 

Mr.  Matthews.  George  Marshall  was  a  member  of  the  executive 
board  of  the  American  League  for  Peace  and  Democracy.  He  is  a 
member  of  the  executive  committee  of  the  National  Federation  for 
Constitutional  Liberties,  whose  literature  has  just  been  introduced 
into  evidence.  He  is  a  member  of  the  National  Council  of  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization.  He  was  a  sponsor  of  a  meeting  of 
the  Friends  of  the  Soviet  Union  at  Mecca  Temple  on  March  22, 
3938.  He  is  a  sponsor  of  the  Conference  on  Pan-American  De- 
mocracy. He  is  a  writer  for  the  magazine  Soviet  Russia  Today, 
the  magazine  of  the  Friends  of  the  Soviet  Union.  He  is  on  the 
editorial  council  of  the  magazine  Soviet  Russia  Today.  He  is  a 
member  of  the  National  Committee  for  People's  Rights;  a  sponsor 
of  the  North  American  Committee  to  Aid  Spanish  Democracy;  a 
signer  of  an  open  letter  in  the  New  Masses — in  the  Soviet  Russia 
Today  magazine,  calling  for  closer  cooperation  between  the  United 
States  and  the  Soviet  LTnion. 

He  is  the  signer  of  a  letter  in  Soviet  Russia  Today,  defending  the 
Moscow  purge  trials.  He  is  a  member  of  the  executive  committee 
of  the  Progressive  Committee  to  Rebuild  the  American  Labor  Party, 
the  organization  of  which  Morris  Watson  is  head,  as  was  testified 
by  one  of  the  witnesses  yesterday. 

He  is  a  sponsor  of  the  United  American  Spanish  Aid  Committee; 
a  member  of  the  American  Committee  for  Democracy  and  Intel- 
lectual Freedom;  the  signer  of  a  telegram  to  the  President  of  the 
United  States  on  March  5,  1941,  defending  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  he  is  one  of  the  great  peace  advocates  who  are 
responsible  for  the  program  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization,  and 
this  is  an  appeal  to  him  for  funds  to  maintain  the  vigil  around 
the  Wliite  House  now  being  kept  by  the  American  Peace  Mobiliza- 
tion; is  that  right? 

Miss  Huffman.  No  ;  Congressman  Starnes.  That  is  correct  in  es- 
sence but  at  any  of  the  meetings  that  I  have  attended  that  Morris 
Watkins  has  spoken  at,  I  have  not  heard  Morris  Watson  advocate 
peace. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  am  not  talking  about  Morris  Watson,  I  am  talking 
about  George  Marshall. 

Miss  Huffman.  Oh,  yes;  that  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matfhews.  Here  is  Anna  Rochester,  another  of  the  persons 
to  whom  the  telegi'am  was  addressed.  She  is  a  contributing  editor 
of  the  New  Masses;  a  frequent  writer  for  the  New  Masses. 

She  is  a  member  of  the  League  of  American  Writers  and  a  sponsor 
of  the  Mother  Bloor  Banquet;  publisher  of  numerous  volumes  pub- 
lished by  the  International  Publishers.  She  is  author  of  numerous 
pamphlets  published  by  the  Workers'  Library,  both  of  which  pub- 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8459 

lisliing  concerns  have  been  identified  as  Communist  Party  auxiliaries. 

She  is  a  Avriter  for  the  Communist  International;  a  member  of 
the  Comnumist  Party  and  so  designated  in  the  Daily  Worker  of 
May  17,  1940. 

She  is  a  writer  for  the  Daily  Worker,  a  writer  for  the  official 
publication  of  the  Communist  Party,  the  monthly  magazine,  The 
Comnumist;  a  signer  of  the  statement  defending  the  purge  trials  in 
Moscow. 

She  is  a  member  of  the  League  of  American  Writers  and  a  mem- 
ber of  the  campaign  committee  for  election  of  Browder  and  Ford. 

Mr.  St.vrnes,  Now,  I  renew  my  question:  This  lady  and  George 
Marshall  are  two  of  the  parties  to  whom  the  peace  vigil  maintained 
around  the  White  House,  at  the  present  time  so-called  by  the  Ameri- 
can Peace  Mobilization,  addressed  a  telegram  appealing  for  funds 
to  maintain  the  vigil? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes;  Congressman  Starnes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Those  are  two  of  the  eight. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  other  telegrams  witli  reference  to  an 
appeal  for  aid  for  funds  or  other  support,  Dr.  Matthews,  for  the 
peace  vigil? 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  the  same  date  Marian  Briggs  sent  the  follow- 
ing telegram  to  Herman  Shumlin  at  229  West  Forty-second  Street, 
New  York.     The  telegram  reads: 

Peace  vigQ  still  going,  approaching  three  hundred  and  sixty-eighth  hour, 
still  going  strong.  Urgent  need  for  money  to  keep  vigil  going.  Costs  $100  a 
day.     Please  send  air-mail  special  any  funds  available,  care  A.  P.  M. 

And  that  telegram  is  signed,  "Marian  Briggs." 

Mr.  Starnes.  Who  is  Herman  Shumlin? 

Mr,  ^Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  a  resume  of  what  you  know 
about  Herman  Shumlin? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir.  I  have  known  Herman  Shumlin  per- 
.sonally  since  late  in  1929.  Herman  Shumlin  was  the  Broadwa}'  pro- 
ducer of  the  play  Grand  Hotel.  That  was  his  outstanding  success — 
one  of  his  first  outstanding  successes,  and  then  a  series  of  Broadway 
productions.  He  has  been  the  producer  of  a  major  number  of  the 
plays  put  out  by  Lillian  Hellman. 

Herman  Shumlin  is  an  endorser  of  the  drive  to  bring  veterans 
back  to  America — the  Friends  of  the  Abraham  Lincoln  Brigade  vet- 
erans. He  is  chairman  of  the  United  American  Spanish  Aid  Com- 
mittee; a  sponsor  of  the  send-off  dinner  for  the  ambulance  corps  of 
the  American  Artists  and  Writers  Committee;  their  division  was 
the  Medical  Bureau,  American  Friends  of  the  Spanish  Democracy 
(jf  I  he  American  Artists  and  Writers  Committee. 

Herman  Shumlin  is  a  signer  of  an  open  letter  for  closer  coo})er.i- 
tion  with  the  Soviet  Union  which  appeared  in  Soviet  Russia  Today 
in  September  1939. 

He  is  a  membei-  of  the  theater  arts  committee,  medical  bureau  of 
the  North  American  Committee  to  Aid  Spanish  Democracy;  and  in- 
cidentally was  particularly  active  Avith  the  theater  arts  connnittee. 

He  was  a  signer  of  the  statement  to  the  President  defending  the 
Communist  Party.  It  appeared  in  the  Dailv  Worker  of  March  5, 
1941. 

He  is  a  signer  of  an  appeal  on  behalf  of  Communist  Darcy  for  the 
National  Federation  of  Constitutional  Liberties. 


8460  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  Sam  Darcy,  of  California  ? 
Miss  Huffman.  Yes.     Executive  committee  member  of  the  China 
Aid   Council.     His  name   appears   in   a   pamphlet   Relighting  the 
Lamps  of  China;  chairman  of  the  North  American  Spanish  Aid 
Committee. 

He  is  a  sponsor  for  the  conference  on  constitutional  liberties  in 
America;  a  member  of  the  executive  committee  of  the  Progressive 
Committee  to  Rebuild  the  American  Labor  Party. 

He  is  a  member  of  the  executive  board  of  the  theater  arts  committee ; 
a  member  of  the  executive  board  of  the  American  League  for  Peace 
and  Democracy,  of  the  national  office ;  a  signer  of  the  petition  to  dis- 
continue the  Dies  committee,  American  Committee  for  Democracy  and 
Intellectual  Freedom. 

He  is  a  sponsor  of  the  refugee  scholarship  and  peace  campaign. 
That  is  not  a  complete  list. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  would  like  to  ask  you  this  question,  and  it  is  ad- 
dressed to  either  Miss  Huffman  or  Dr.  Matthews : 

In  checking  the  case  records  of  the  parties  to  whom  this  telegram 
appealing  for  funds  was  directed,  did  you  find  that  each  and  every 
one  of  those  parties  are  known  members  of  the  Communist  Party  or 
have  been  affiliated  at  some  time  or  another  with,  Communist  organi- 
zations ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  is  only  one  exception,  Congressman  Starnes, 
to  an  affirmative  answer  to  your  question,  and  that  exception  is  Mrs. 
Ellen  Brandstetter,  of  Chicago,  about  whom — at  least  the  committee 
at  this  time  does  not  have  information  wliich  would  indicate  that  she 
has  been  a  fellow  traveler. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  we  do  have  documentary  evidence  implemented 
by  sworn  testimony  before  this  committee  to  the  effect  that  each  and 
every  one  of  the  others  have  been  members  of  the  Communist  Party 
or  have  been  members  of  Communist-front  oi-ganizations? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  Congressman  Starnes ;  each  one  of  these  cards 
refers  to  an  original  document  in  the  files  of  the  committee. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  with  that  sole  exception,  the  appeal  for  funds 
to  maintain  the  peace  vigil  around  the  White  House  was  addressed  to 
these  Communists  or  to  Communist-front  members? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir.  Congressman  Starnes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now  that  was  addressed  on  l)ehalf  of  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization,  of  course? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes;  at  this  point  may  I  have  a  photograph  in- 
troduced into  the  record?  It  is  one  of  the  many  photographs  in  the 
possession  of  the  committee  of  the  peace  vigil  in  front  of  the  White 
House. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  photograph  of  the  peace  vigil  in 
front  of  the  white  House.  Miss  Huffman,  and  ask  you  if  you  can 
identify  a  gentleman  in  the  middle  of  the  front  line  of  marchers? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  the  gentleman  in  the  middle  is  Morris 
Watson,  and  on  his  right  is  Sarah  V.  Montgomery  and  on  his  left  is 
Joseph  Cadden,  of  the  American  Youth  Congress. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received  in  evidence. 

(The  photograph  referred  to  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibit  No. 
2,  May  22, 1941.") 


UN-AMKKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8461' 

Mr.  Matthkws.  Mr.  Chairman,  IVIiss  Huffman  has  testimony  that 
has  to  do  with  the  same  question  about  which  Miss  Spargo  has  testi- 
fied; namely,  the  work  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  among 
the  draftees  or  with  respect  to  the  draftees. 

JNIr.  Starnes.  The  chair  is  of  the  opinion  that  testimony  of  that 
type  and  nature  is  of  such  vital  importance  to  the  welfai-e  of  the 
country  at  the  present  time,  uidess  there  is  objection  from  the  other 
members  of  the  committee,  we  should  hear  what  Miss  Huffman  has 
to  say  about  that  matter. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  proceed  with  your  statement,  Miss  Huff- 
man ? 

]VIiss  Huffman.  As  a  result  of  an  investigation  I  found  that  the 
aims  of  these  groups  can  be  divided  into  four  particular  parts.  One 
of  them  is  to  recruit  converts  to  left-wing  programs  in  radical  organi- 
zations; second,  to  engender  hatred  or  at  least  definite  distrust  of 
the  United  States  and  its  officials,  both  military  and  nonmilitary; 
third,  to  instill  fear;  and,  fourth,  to  cause  unrest  and  chaos. 

I  found  in  checking  that  all  of  the  front  organizations  of  the  Amer- 
ican Peace  Mobilization  that  are  listed  by  the  American  Peace  Mobili- 
zation as  their  sponsors,  are  also  engaging  in  this  program  wdiich  is 
being  advanced  by  the  American  Peace  Mobilization.  They  have  a 
set  plan  of  campaign  which  I  will  go  into  later. 

Of  these  groups  I  found  that  the  most  active,  other  than  the  Ameri- 
can Peace  Mobilization  as  a  central  organization,  is  the  American 
Youth  Congress,  the  American  Negro  Congress,  and  the  International 
Workers"  Order.  Possibly  I  should  have  mentioned  the  International 
Workers'  Order  first  but  it  was  very  difficult  to  tell  just  which  group 
Avas  the  most  active.  It  would  depend  upon  the  size  of  its  member- 
ship to  tell  wliich  was  carrying  on  the  most  active  campaign. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  the  National  Negro  Congress? 

Miss  Huffman.  The  National  Negro  Congress;  yes,  sir. 

The  locals  of  the  C.  I.  O.  and  A.  F.  of  L.,  that  participated  in  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization  are  also,  we  find,  carrying  out  this  same 
program. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Now,  just  a  minute.  Do  you  mean  that  locals  partic- 
ipated or  do  you  mean  that  persons  came  to  the  meeting  and  said 
they  were  members  of  such  and  such  a  local,  but  came  on  their  own 
hook  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Congressman  Voorhis,  in  talking  to  men  from  the 
United  Electrical.  Radio  and  Machine  Workers  of  America,  in  talk- 
ing to  some  of  the  delegates  from  that  local,  I  found  that  their 
local  had  voted  them  in  as  delegates.  I  am  referring  to  as  far  as  the 
program  is  concerned. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Which  local  is  that?  Can  you  give  us  the  name  of 
the  local? 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  in  the  record. 

Miss  Huffman.  The  numbers  of  the  eight  locals  that  are  in  the 
record  from  the  testimony  yesterday,  that  voted  delegates  to  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  it  wasn't  a  case  of  where  a  single  individual 
stated  he  represented  a  local? 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  can  give  you  the  numbers  if  you  want  them. 


8462  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  I  don't  care  so  much  about  that.  I  want  to  be  sure 
the  record  is  specific  about  whether  or  not  the  locals  were  claimed 
to  be  represented  by  a  single  member  or  whether  it  was  action  taken 
by  the  local  itself. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  the  official  program  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization,  signed  by  the  Electrical — United  Electrical,  Radio  and 
Machine  Workers  Union  of  America,  Local  36,  and  also  Local  1225, 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Wliat  Miss  Huffman  was  talking  about  was  the  locals 
that  are  listed  there? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  As  having  been  on  that  list? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  And  presumably  if  there  is  any  mistake  about  it  we 
will  hear  about  that.  But  I  mean  their  official  statement  is  to  the 
effect  that  these  locals  by  their  own  action  went  on  record  about  this 
matter,  is  that  right? 

Miss  Huffman.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  think  it  is  important  to  be  sure  that  some  indi- 
viduals don't  attempt  to  commit  organizations  against  the  will  of 
the  organization.     That  is  what  I  have  in  mind. 

Miss  Huffman.  No;  Congressman  Voorhis.  In  this  particular  in- 
vestigation concerning  the  activities  of  un-American  groups  and  how 
they  affect  the  United  States  Army,  I  took  that  into  special  con- 
sideration, that  some  individual  was  not  representing  himself  as 
representing  the  group.  In  fact,  I  spent  several  weeks  trying  to 
get  a  line  of  demarcation  between  who  the  people  were  who  were 
individual  members  or  even  officers  of  an  organization,  but  without 
the  authorized  authority  to  represent  that  organization. 

When  I  mention  the  "locals"  I  am  talking  of  locals  who  designated 
official  delegates  and  where  that  local  itself  affiliated  itself  with  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Are  you  in  a  position  to  answer  as  to  whether  in  the 
case  of  this  electrical  workers  union  that  you  mentioned,  you  do  not 
mean  the  InteiTiational  Brotherhood  of  Electrical  Workers? 

Miss  Huffman.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  But  the  C.  I.  O.  affiliate.  Can  you  answer  wdiether 
in  the  case  of  one  or  two  of  those  locals,  at  least,  whether  the  locals 
merely  voted  power  to  their  executive  board  to  decide  the  question 
and  then  the  executive  board  voted  to  affiliate  with  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization — do  you  know  whether  that  was  the  case? 

Miss  Huffman.  Jack  Marshall,  of  Local  1225,  I  believe,  told  me 
that  it  was  a  membei'ship — a  local  membership  meeting  that  had  voted 
him  as  a  delegate  and  had  voted  Mr.  Fahy,  and  that  they  were  cover- 
ing the  expenses  of  the  30  delegates  and  that  they  had  to  go  back 
and  make  a  report  to  the  local  because  the  local  itself  was  going 
to  follow  out  the  program. 

As  a  matter  of  fact,  he  asked  me  to  cover  part  of  the  labor  con- 
ference for  him  and  part  of  the  meeting  on  the  floor  because  he  would 
be  unable  to  be  present  so  he  could  take  a  report  back  to  his  local. 
It  was  one  means  I  used  of  obtaining  entrance  on  the  delegates  floor. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Proceed  with  your  statement. 

Miss  Huffman.  We  also  find  among  these  groups  officers  of  the 
Y.  M.  C.  A.,  Y.  M.  H.  A.,  Y.  W.  C.  A.,  and  Y.  W.  H.  A.  I  will 
mention  those  names  later  as  I  come  to  them  in  the  group. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8463 

School  leadei-s  and  repi'esentatives  of  church  groups  or  individuals 
from  church  groups. 

Their  method  of  contact  is  to  divide  their  approach  into  a  direct 
and  indirect  approach.  The  direct  method  of  contact  comes  through 
the  fact  that  there  are  members  of  these  organizations  being  inducted 
into  the  Army  under  the  conscription  act. 

According  to  reports,  Woodie  Guthrie,  known  as  "Woodie,"  is  a 
conscriptee  and  is  now  at  Camp  Dix. 

Now,  Woodie  Guthrie,  a  Communist,  is  a  guitar-playing,  ballad- 
singing  entertainer,  brought  to!  New  York  by  Will  Greer,  also  a 
Conununist,  and  incidentally  the  grandson-in-law  of  Ella  May  Bloor, 
known  as  "Mother  Bloor,"  Pennsylvania  State  secretary  of  the  Com- 
munist Party. 

Woodie  Guthrie  was  brought  by  Will  Greer  from  Oklahoma  and 
advertised  as  one  of  the  "Joads,'-  or  migratory  workers. 

During  the  past  3  or  4  years  Woodie  Guthrie  has  become  one  of 
the  outstanding  entertainers  in  the  Communist  Party.  Communist 
Party  fronts,  and  other  left-wing  organization  meetings. 

Now,  at  a  recent  American  Peace  Mobilization  meeting,  in  fact 
I  might  say  that  at  the  upper  Manhattan  meeting,  the  midtown 
meeting,  one  of  the  large  Harlem  meetings,  a  meeting  in  Queens, 
and  a  meeting  in  Brooklyn,  people  in  the  audience,  before  the  meet- 
ing had  started,  did  a  great  deal  of  rejoicing  over  the  amount  of 
good  that  Woodie  Guthrie  could  do  now  that  he  was  in  the  camp. 

He  is  an  entertainer  of  the  droll,  homespun  variety  that  tells  tales 
and  plays  his  guitar.  And  I  have  heard  him  on  numerous  occasions 
and  it  is  always  with  this  definite  Communist  Party  tinge,  and  in  his 
singing  and  in  his  talk  he  has  never  tried  to  attempt  to  conceal  the 
fact  that  he  was  the  columnist  for  the  Daily  Worker  or  that  he  was 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  and  represented  it  as  such. 

Besides  mentioning  that  one  particularly,  for  the  boys  who  are  at- 
tending the  Peace — who  are  attending  these  American  Peace  meet- 
ings and  have  their  registration  cards  or  have  just  been  called  for 
their  examination,  there  is  always  a  great  deal  of,  I  would  say,  al- 
most joy  over  the  fact  that  they  are  going  to  get  in — not  that  the 
boys  particularly  want  to  go  but  they  are  going  to  get  "work  done 
there  in  the  camp." 

The  second  method  of  contact  is  through  the  families  of  the  boys. 
Now,  in  the  American  Peace  Volunteer  publication  for  May  17,  1941, 
on  page  2 — may  I  correct  that,  please,  on  page  4  we  find  an  item 
that :  "Staten  Island  visits  families  of  conscriptees  last  week.  The 
members  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  Council  on  Staten 
Island  visited  the  families  of  30  draftees.  During  the  course  of  these 
visits  more  than  20  bought  A.  P.  M.  literature  and  promised  to  come 
to  council  meetings." 

Now,  the  fact  is  that  contacting  the  families  of  the  conscriptees 
has  been  discussed  not  so  frequently  from  the  platform  at  public 
American  Peace  Mobilization  meetings  as  it  has  been  discussed  by 
the  ])eople  who  were  later  the  speakers  and  discussed  before  the 
meetings  started. 

The  next  form  of  contact  is  through  club  and  recreational  facilities 
set  up  by  these  groups  in  areas  surrounding  the  camps. 

62626 — 41— vol.  14 20 


3464  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

We  have  again  a  copy  of  the  A.  P.  M.  memo  which  covered  the 
draft  in  military  camp  conferences,  in  which  Emerson  Daggett, 
the  representative  of  the  San  Francisco  Industrial  Union  Council, 
told  of  plans  to  start  a  recreation  center  for  the  boys  in  the  Cali- 
fornia camps.  He  proposed  that  local  A.  P.  M.  groups,  together 
with  the  trade-union  and  youth  groups,  establish  such  centers  where 
conscripts  can  find  educational  and  recreational  activities  "which  are 
sorely  lacking  in  the  camps." 

Also  at  this  conference  one  woman  from  South  Carolina  and  an- 
other womain  from  North  Carolina,  a  woman  who  stated  that  she  had 
lived  within  a  few  miles  of  Camp  Meade,  told  of  the  action  that  had 
already  gone  forward — that  it  was  set  up,  that  it  wasn't  something 
that  was  just  proposed,  and  inasmuch  as  the  individual  from  near 
Camp  Meade,  inasmuch  as  thev  had  not  raised  enough  funds  to 
hire  a  hall  or  a  big  meeting  place  where  they  could  hold  dances, 
three  different  people,  and  she  designated  at  the  time  they  were  all 
from  the  International  Workers'  Order,  were  using  their  homes  to 
entertain  the  boys  and  put  literature  there  for  the  boys  to  read  in 
their  homes. 

The  next  method  of  contact  is  through  the  so-called  conscription 
committees  or  People's  Rights  Committees. 

I  wish  I  could  leave  that  there  and  then  go  back  to  those  committees 
because  their  entire  progiam  is  an  important  phase,  one  of  which  is 
corresponding  with  the  boys  in  camps  and  visiting  the  boys  in  camps. 

The  next  method  of  contact  is  through  literature  sent  directly  to 
the  boys  or  sent  by  the  families  of  the  boys.  And  then  the  next  item, 
activities  in  areas  surrounding  the  camps. 

Now,  at  the  cultural  division  meeting  that  was  held  at  the  fraternal 
clubhouse — that  is  the  cultural  division  of  the  A.  P.  M.,  which  Lloyd 
Gough  was  the  chairman  of,  they  played  a  series  of  records,  some  of 
which  wei'e  introduced  in  testimony  yesterday,  and  another  record 
that  tells  of  the  colored  soldier  boy  from  the  World  War  that  came 
back  and  was  finally  hanged  down  South  in  his  uniform,  and  it  is  a 
particidarly  gruesome  song,  a  very  disheartening  one,  I  would  say, 
at  least  as  far  as  the  boys  were  concerned;  and  they  had  stacked  that 
day  on  the  platform  what  they  said  were  2,000  of  those  recordings 
that  were  being  put  in  the  restaurants  and  recreational  points  in  the 
areas  surrounding  the  camps,  and  they  were  all  addressed.  I  went 
up  to  look  at  them  before  I  was  stopped  by  someone  who  knew  me 
from  the  Federal  Theater  Project,  and  found  that  the  top  group 
were  being  sent  to  restaurants  in  and  around  Trenton,  N.  J.,  which 
is  not  far  from  Camp  Dix. 

Then,  of  course,  the  indirect  method  of  contact  is  through  the  gen- 
eral entertainment.  I  am  not  going  into  the  entertainment  method 
of  contact;  but  on  these  committees  that  are  set  u]3  the  various  names 
are  being  used.  To  date  there  are  the  Conscript's  Welfare  Com- 
mittee, People's  Rights  Committee,  Conscriptee  Committees,  Draft 
Aid  Committees. 

At  one  A.  P.  M.  meeting  that  I  attended  Miss  Kneiper  and  Dr. 
Annette  Rubinstein  brought  out  the  fact  that  the  branches  of  these 
committees  should  be  given  comnumity  or  folksy  sounding  names  like 
"Committee  for  Aid  to  Our  Sons  In  Camp,"  or  "Washington  Heights 
Committee  To  Assist  The  Boys  In  Camps." 


UN-AMERICAN  PUorAClANDA  ACTIVITIES  §4(35 

Mr.  Staknes.  Ill  other  woi-ds,  jjet  it[)  iiiiines,  caiiiouflagiiig-  names; 
is  that  tlie  idea  i 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes.  The  program  of  the  committee — of  these 
committees,  which  is  currently  called  "the  eight-point  program  of 
the  American  Peace  JSIobilization,  the  seven-jpoint  program,  the 
three-point,"  was  adopted  at  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  meet- 
ing. Shall  I  read  the  eight  points  of  that  program?  I  believe  it 
is  pertinent,  Congressman  Starnes. 

Mr.  Staknes.  All  right. 

Miss  Huffman,  (reading)  : 

Guard  ag;aisnt  discriminatory  conscription  aimed  at  labor,  peace,  and  pro- 
gressive  organizations. 

Fight  increases  in  prices  and  rent,  and  general  wartime  profiteering. 

Protect  rights  of  conscripts  to  vote,  campaign  on  political  issues,  participate 
in  trade  unions,  receive  luicensored  mail. 

Fight  Jim  Crowism  in  conscripted  and  liegular  armed  forces,  protest  segre- 
gation of  Negroes  in  separate  regiments,  discriminatory  assignments  to  menial 
tasks,  and  st»  forth. 

See  that  conscripts  have  adequate  housing,  health  protection  and  furlough 
rights  1  week  every  .3  months. 

Prevent  evictions,  foreclosures  on  installment  buying,  and  so  forth. 

Work  to  guarantee  unconditional  reemployment  of  conscripts,  not  dependent, 
as  now,  on  prevailing  conditions. 

Campaign  for  increase  in  conscript  pay  to  $40  a  month,  continuation  of 
social-security  rights,  adequate  compensation  for  disability,  injury,  or  death. 

The  seven-point  program  varies  only  slightly  from  the  eight-point 
program.  In  fact,  the  one  point  that  is  missing  being  actually  incor- 
porated in  the  seven-point  program  though  a  slight  difference  in 
wording. 

The  three-point  program  AYliich  incidentally  appeared  in  the  Daily 
Worker,  is  really  a  method  of  operation,  I  w^ould  call  it,  although 
they  refer  to  it  as  "the  three-point  action  program." 

Draftees  will  be  given  advice  in  answering  questionnaires  from  draft  boards 
and  will  get  legal  service  in  preparing  appeals  from  board  decisions 

Draftees  will  be  helped  to  save  their  property  from  loan  sharks  while  in  the 
Army.     Families  of  draftees  will  be  given  help  and  eviction  cases  will  be  fought. 

Tlie  committee  will  maintain  contact  with  the  draftees  and  will  maintain 
their  union  consciousness  by  correspondence  and  union  literature. 

Now  the  organization  of  these  committees  which  have  already  been 
set  up  and  have  been  approved  by  the  National  Negro  Congress  and 
the  National  Negro  Youth  Congress,  and  have  these  points  in  their 
pi-ogram : 

Organized  correspondence  with  draftees  from  their  respective  organizations. 

Organize  large  delegations  of  parents,  trade-union  brothers,  church  members 
and  so  forth  to  visit  the  nearl)y  camps  to  investigate  conditions. 

Organize  delegations  to  make  demands  upon  the  camp  commanders  and  the 
State  defense  boards  for  immediate  redesss  of  all  grievances  uncovered. 

Give  wide  publicity  to  all  action  taken  to  further  the  welfare  of  the  con- 
.scripts  through  ihe  press  and  mass  meetings. 

In  talking  with  the  various  people  and  in  checking  the  literature 
we  find  that  these  groups  wnll  not  act  as  representatives  of  these 
committees  or  the  connnittees  that  we  have  given  you  a  feW'  of 
the  names,  but  that  the  plan  is  to  a[)pear  as  spontaneous  individual 
complaints  made  by  relatives  or  friends  in  the  interests  of  their 
loved  ones. 


8466  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words,  an  organized  campaign  to  make 
it  appear  that  protests  are  spontaneous  affairs;  as  if  the  complaints 
were  based  on  facts  rather  than  just  a  campaign  of  propaganda. 

Miss  Huffman.  It  is  exactly  similar  to  the  situation  in  the  Fed- 
eral theater  project.  It  is  the  same  type  and  pattern — turmoil, 
creating  distrust,  agitation — nobody  knows  who  is  who  by  the  time 
they  get  through. 

We  find  that  line  of  attack  is  as  follows :  The  help  the  boys — the 
unsanitary  camp  conditions — vermin-infested  quarters — quarters  are 
too  hot — they  are  too  cold — too  wet  and  they  are  too  dry.  There  is 
bad  food.  There  is  insufficient  food.  There  is  improper  housing. 
There  is  lack  of  sanitary  facilities.  There  is  poor  medical  attention. 
Fascist-minded  officers. 

In  fact,  in  literature  already  put  out  along  this  line  General 
Marshall  has  been  referred  to  a  number  of  times — I  have  some  of 
it  here — as  "a  Fascist-minded  individual  in  charge  of  the  Army." 
Abuse  of  men  by  officers,  particularly  Negroes;  I  think  we  have  four 
cases  on  that. 

Mr.  Stabnes.  You  will  insert  those  at  their  proper  place  in  your 
testimony  and  they  will  be  either  incorporated  in  the  record  or 
attached  as  exhibits. 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes.  I  have  one  item  that  appears  in  the  publi- 
cation called  Cavalcade  of  the  National  Negro  Congress.  In  it 
is  stated:  "Brutal  treatment  of  Negro  conscripts  in  the  camps  at 
the  hands  of  prejudiced  white  officers;"  and  Jim  Crowism  in  the 
camps.  I  feel  that  that  should  have  been  possibly  a  little  higher 
on  the  list  because  it  is  one  of  the  things  that  they  are  using  which 
causes  a  great  deal  of  turmoil. 

The  inadequate  pay,  longer  furloughs,  the  distance  the  boys  are 
from  home ;  the  conditions  at  home  and  the  condition  of  the  family ; 
the  fear  stories  of  the  horrors  of  war;  the  fact  that  this  is  a  cap- 
italist war.  In  fact,  the  slogan  I  quote:  "Refuse  to  Die  for  Wall 
Street"  has  already  been  adopted  by  some  of  these  groups  that 
have  been  set  up. 

The  one  group  that  has  been  set  up  in  upper  Manhattan  have 
adopted  that  as  their  slogan:  "Refuse  to  Die  for  Wall  Street."  An- 
other point  they  are  using  in  their  campaign  is  censorship  of  mail — 
the  treatment  of  the  draftees,  and  their  treatment  after  the  war — 
the  fact  that  the  soldiers  had  no  jobs,  and  so  forth,  and  so  forth,  and 
so  forth;  the  possible  extension  of  the  1-year  limit. 

Another  point  that  they  are  using  is  the  fact  that  this  Govern- 
ment wants  war  and  the  Soviet  wants  peace.  And  then  the  possibility 
of  death  on  a  foreign  shore. 

The  entire  line  of  attack  is  being  directed  toward  installing  a 
self-pity  that  can  be  turned  to  militant  action,  hatred,  and  fear. 

Besides  the  amount  of  material  that  we  found  in  the  publications 
that  were  put  out  by  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  or  groups 
whose  material  was  distributed  at  the  American  Peace  Mobilization, 
one  of  which  is  this  regarding  the  censorship  of  mail,  which  has  at 
the  top  of  it  a  drawing  of  a  letter  starting :  "Dear  Mom."  And  you 
can't  see  the  rest  of  the  letter  for  the  censor  stamp  across  it,  and  then 
underneath  it  is  a  memorandum  signed  by  Lt.  Col.  John  H.  Ahrens, 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8467 

Adjutant  General,  Fortv-fourth  Division,  Fort  Dix,  which  appeared 
in  the  World  Tele<2:ram,  November  4,  1940,  and  reads  as  follows: 

It  is  the  desire  of  the  commanding  general  that  enlisted  men  be  encouraged 
to  write  home  and  that,  so  far  as  is  reasonable,  they  be  influenced  to  present 
a  favorable  imiu-essiou  of  conditions  in  their  \inits. 

Followino-  that  are  the  words  "Is  this  peacetime  censorship  a  fore- 
runner of  wartime  gag  rule?" 
Then  it  says: 

Questions  on  the  conscription  law  will  be  discussed  at  the  community  forum. 

Now,  that  meeting  was  sponsored  by  the  Upper  Manhattan  Peace 
Council  of  the  American  People's  Mobilization. 

Besides  that  literature  we  checked  a  number  of  the  publications 
that  are  put  out  by  the  camps,  and  found  that  there  are  items  which 
appear,  items  that — possibly  the  same  and  in  some  instances  the  same 
items  appear  in  more  than  one  issue  which  would  follow  that  par- 
ticular line  of  campaign. 

Now,  we  took  great  care  and  caution  in  analyzing  that,  A  boy 
Avho  is  writing  home  because  he  is  homesick  may  really  be  genuinely 
homesick,  so  we  tried  not  to  split  hairs  but  only  take  those  instances 
of  material  there  would  appear  to  be  a  definite  question  of  why  that 
material  would  appear  in  a  camp  paper. 

For  instance,  following  the  line  of  attack  there  were  other  items 
as  they  would  affect  the  camps  that  appeared  in  the  papers  that  would 
have  nothing  to  do  with  the  activities  of  that  campaign.  For  in- 
stance, this  appears  in  the  Fort  Dix  Gazette  of  May  7,  1941.  Under 
one  of  the  columns  it  states : 

J.  Philips  Waring,  E's  Gazette  correspondent,  is  a  1940  A.  B.  from  the  West 
Virginia  State  College.  He  was  successful  in  achieving  wonderful  success  in 
the  organization  work  with  the  youth  section  of  the  N.  A.  A.  C.  P.,  and  the  Southern 
Youth  Congress.     He  was  elected  to  the  Who's  Who  in  Negro  American  colleges. 

Phil's  experience  of  several  years  in  recreation  and  community  leader  has 
met  the  same  results  under  his  hand  since  coming  into  the  Army.  He  has 
successfully  organized  the  B.  O.  Davis  Service  Forum. 

I  mention  that  because  in  the  publications  of  the  Southern  Negro 
Congress  and  the  Southern  Youtli  Congi^ess  we  find  this  seven-point 
plan,  this  eight-point  plan,  and  this  three-point  plan  mentioned,  and 
here  we  have  one  of  their  organizers  setting  up  what  is  known  as  a 
B.  O.  Davis  Service  Forum  at  Fort  Dix. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  identify  "B.  O.  Davis" — you  know 
who  he  is  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  do  not.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Can  you  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Editor  of  the  Daily  Worker. 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  is  editor  of  the  Daily  Worker? 

Mr.  Matthews.  One  of  the  editors  of  the  Daily  Worker. 

Miss  Huffman.  Another  point  that  they  are  stressing  in  their  fear 
campaign  is  the  number  of  noncitizens  that  are  in  the  American  Army, 
and  we  find  in  these  publications  of  the  camps  several  references — in 
fact,  in  this  particular  edition  there  is  reference  to  one  boy  who  is  not 
a  citizen,  who  was  a  member  of  the  Hitler  youth  movement. 

In  this  publication,  which  is  also  from  Fort  Dix,  we  have  three  items 
on  conditions  in  the  camp  pertaining  to  health. 


8468  UN-AMERICAN  PROl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  say  this  man  is  a  nieiiiber  of  the  Hitler  youth 
movement  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  This  one  boy  is  referred  to  as  having  been  a  member 
of  the  Hitler  youth  movement. 

Then  ill  1934  was  inducted  into  the  Hitler  youth  movement.  It  was 
compulsory  to  join  at  that  time.  If  you  did  not  join,  you  were  looked 
upon  as  a  slacker  and  shunned  by  your  friends. 

Saturday  was  designated  as  the  meeting  day — supposed  to  be  a 
fresh-air  movement,  hikes — and  it  goes  on  about  the  military  aspects 
of  the  Hitler  youth  movement. 

This  publication,  as  I  said,  carried  an  item  regardhig  the  sanitary 
conditions  of  the  camp — the  fact  tliat  the  camp  was  too  hot  and  the 
health  and  food  were  all  dwelt  on  in  this  publication. 

This  publication,  also  from  Fort  Dix,  has  a  repeat  on  a  letter  which 
appears  in  another  publication  regarding  the  conditions  at  home,  bear- 
ing out  that  point.  That  had  appeared  in  two  of  those.  And  in  this 
publication  there  was  a  poem  that  I  had  first  seen  at  an  American 
Peace  Mobilization  meeting.  There  were  two  poems,  one  bringing 
out  the  point  of  a  capitalist  war  and  the  letter,  incidentally,  regarding 
1-ome  conditions  is  reproduced  in  this  magazine  from  the  Boston  area. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  checking  the  testimony.  Dr.  Matthews,  you  wnll 
have  to  have  the  witness  identiTy  the  various  documents  to  which  she 
has  referred,  because  they  have  not  been  properly  identified  in  the 
record.  She  refers  to  "this  publication"  or  that  publication.  Let 
them  be  properly  identified  and  munbered  and  attached  as  exhibits  to 
her  testimony. 

Miss  Huffman,  in  the  course  of  your  investigations  of  the  efforts 
of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  and  other  organizations  to  create 
a  feeling  of  unrest  and  disaffection  among  the  armed  forces  of  the 
United  States,  did  you  find  them  attempting  to  use  theaters — 1  mean 
using  places  or  services  or  organizations  of  tliat  type  and  character? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  find  that  to  be  true  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  We  found  that  the  entertainment  in  the  camps 
was  being  carried  on  in  a  variety  of  ways,  both  by  individual  enter- 
tainers from  outside  the  camp,  entertainers  from  the  personnel  of  the 
camp  with  civilian  directors — civilian  directors  coming  in  to  direct 
the  boys  in  their  plays,  and  we  had  one  instance  of  a  man  who  had — 
I  have  the  material  here  regarding  this  man — in  fact,  this  entire 
package  is  with  reference  to  him,  from  a  group  that  has  been  left 
wing  over  a  long  period  of  time.  He  is  director  in  the  Trenton  area 
of  the  Theater  League.  He  has  gone  into  Camp  Dix  directing  a 
number  of  the  plays  there.  That  is  Max  Glandvard.  An  article 
which  appeared  in  the  Theater  magazine  by  him,  also  appeared  in 
the  Daily  Worker  and  is  entitled  "The  Progressive  Theater  in  War- 
time." It  pertained  to  the  civilian  activities  in  the  camp. 
,, Mr.  Starnes.  Then  you  have  found  in  the  course  of  your  investi- 
gations a  definite  attempt  on  the  part  of  the  American  Peace  Mobili- 
zation and  of  the  Communist  Party  to  attempt  to  influence  the  type 
of  entertainment  being  given  by  civilian  agencies  in  the  camps? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  would  say  very  definitely,  Congressman  Starnes. 
We  have  one  instance  here  at  Fort  Bragg  where  a  play  was  written 
by  one  of  the  privates  at  the  camp  and  directed  by  him  and  put  on 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8469 

in  the  oainp.  That  script — I  don't  see  it  here  in  this  p:ickno;e  but  I 
liave  that  script  and  that  script  is  defiuitely  left-winj^  propaganda. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  evidence  at  all  to  the  effect  that 
there  has  been  any  attempt  to  bring  pressure  upon  or  to  get  into  the 
organizations  that  are  headed  by  Mr.  Chai'les  Taft  ? 

Miss  Hi'FFMAx.  The  Joint  Army  and  Navy  Committee  on  Recrea- 
tion and  Welfare  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes.  Numerous  attempts  have  been  made  and 
prior  to  the  setting  up  of  that  committee  Paul  (Ireen,  Barrett  H. 
Clark,  and  Charles  Leacham  made  a  number  of  trips  to  Washington 
here  to  obtain  the  contracts.  Paul  Green  has  been  a  left-wing  writer 
and  is  now  head  of  the  National  Theater  Conference,  a  group  of 
community  theaters,  but  we  have  a  complete  history  on  him  and  his 
left-wing  activities  in  the  organizations  he  belongs  to. 

Mr.  Vcx)RHis.  I  would  like  to  ask  a  question:  Do  you  think  left 
wing  is  synonymous  with  communism? 

]\Iiss  Huffman.  Yes;  I  do. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  do? 

Miss  Huffman.  Oh,  yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  would  like  to  say  that  I  don't. 

Miss  Huffman.  I  am  using  it  as  synonymous  with  communism 
merely  because  I  was  keeping  away  from  Communist  Party  mem- 
bership, but  when  I  say  "left  wing"  I  mean  individuals  who  couldn't 
possibly  be  so  stupid  that  they  wouldn't  know  they  were  following 
the  Communist  Party  line. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  a  different  matter. 

Miss  Huffman.  I  am  not  talking  about  genuinely  sincere  liberals. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Who  are  too  stupid  to  know  they  are  being  used  by 
the  Connnunists. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  would  like  to  ask  one  more  question. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  The  important  thing  would  be  whether  any  of  these 
people  had  been  successful  in  getting  into  Mr.  Taft's  organization. 
Of  course,  they  are  going  to  try  to  influence  it,  but  have  they  been 
successful  in  doing  so? 

Miss  Huffman.  Well,  Robert  Sherwood  was  the  president  of  the 
Playwrights  Co.  in  New  York  City.  I  don't  feel  that  the  Playrights 
Co.  could  be  designated,  which  was  a  producing  organization,  as  a 
left-wing  organization,  using  my  definition  of  left  wing,  but  at  the 
same  time  very  prominent  in  the  Playwrights  Co.  in  New  Yorii, 
along  with  Robert  Sherwood,  was  Elmer  Rice,  about  whose  radical- 
ism there  can  be  little  question,  and  Maxwell  Anderson.  A  history 
of  Maxwell  Anderson  is  here. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  does  that  have  to  do  with  Mr.  Taft's  com- 
mittee? 

Miss  Huffman.  Robert  Sherwood  is  the  chairman  of  the  subcom- 
mittee on  entertainment  of  Mr.  Taft's  committee,  and  I  feel,  I  really 
feel,  that  a  great  deal  more ■ 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  ]\Iatthews,  is  there  any  case  record  of  any  of 
these  parties  here  that  Miss  Huffman  is  referring  to  in  her  testimony, 
which  indicates  that  they  are  members  of  an}'  Comnnmist  organi- 
zations? 


g4!70  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  If  she  meant  to  say  before  she  finished  her  sen- 
tence that  Maxwell  Anderson  was  included  in  that  group — did  you 
mean  to  say  that? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  said  Maxwell  Anderson  was  associated  with 
Eobert  Sherwood  in  the  new  Playwrights  Theater. 

Mr,  Matthews.  There  is  a  case  record  on  Elmer  Rice. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  have  that  inserted  in  the  record  in  con- 
nection with  Miss  Huffman's  testimony,  the  case  record  showing 
the  groups  with  whom  Robert  Sherwood  has  been  identified  or  affil- 
iated with  as  a  member? 

Miss  Huffman.  And  he  was  also  a  speaker  on  various  occasions 
with  Representative  Vito  Marcantonio  before  groups — this  is  some 
years  back,  classified  as  left-wing  organizations.  I  haven't  the  his- 
tory of  those  organizations  here. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Do  you  mean  groups  that  have  been  classified  as 
left-wing  organizations?  You  mean  they  are  progressive  organi- 
zations ? 

Mr.  Mason.  Or  Communist  organizations. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Communist  orgaiiizations. 

Miss  Huffman.  I  will  avoid  the  use  of  the  words  "left  wing." 
I  meant  Communist-front  organizations,  organizations  we  have  listed 
as  being  affiliated  with  and  active  with  the  American  Peace  Mobili- 
zation. 

I  will  carefully  avoid  the  use  of  the  words  "left  wing." 

Mr.  Starnes.  Be  very  careful  about  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  don't  mind  that.  All  I  want  to  do  is  make  my 
own  position  plain. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Be  very  careful,  because  in  the  use  of  the  words 
"left  wing,"  it  has  such  a  wide  variety  of  meanings,  and  it  affects 
so  many  different  people  and  in  so  many  different  ways.  If  you 
can  find  a  better  phrase,  I  prefer  you  use  it. 

Miss  Huffman.  Then,  a  subcommittee  has  been  set  up,  the  Citizens' 
Committee  for  the  Army  and  Navy — that  is  a  committee  of  the  sub- 
committee of  the  joint  committee. 

Thomas  J.  Watson  is  chairman  of  that  committee.  The  com- 
mittee consists  of  Edward  Arnold,  John  Benson,  Irving  Berlin,  Gene 
Buck,  George  M.  Cohan,  Bette  Davis,  Y.  Frank  Freedman,  Helen 
Hayes,  Emily  Holt — while  Helen  Hayes  is  one  of  our  leading 
actresses,  she  was  head  of  the  milk  fund  for  the  North  American- 
Spanish  Committee,  and  was  very  active  with  the  Theater  Arts 
Committee. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Miss  Huffman,  does  that  cover  the  story? 

Miss  Huffman.  Well,  the  activities  on  the  camps,  and  then,  too, 
we  have  some  information  to  the  effect  that  three  different  groups — 
we  have  specific  evidence,  testimony — I  haven't  gone  beyond  that — 
they  are  having  classes  in  writing  particular  skits  and  scripts  for 
the  camps,  to  be  put  on,  and  these  particular  groups  are  groups 
that  are  connected  with  front  organizations. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews,  if  you  will  produce  these  documents 
and  identify  some  of  them  for  the  record  we  will  appreciate  it. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  don't  know  just  where  we  left  Mr.  Taft  on  this 
proposition. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8471 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  nuM-ely  nsked  Miss  Huffman  if  sho  found  any  evi- 
dence of  the  fact  that  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  or  the  Coni- 
nnmist  Pai-ty  had  made  an  attempt  to  obtain  a  position  in  that 
orfranizationi  or  if  they  had  attempted  to  get  the  type  of  phxys  suit- 
able for  propaganda "  purposes  used  by  that  group.  Nobody  is 
attacking  Mr.  Taft  and  nobody  is  attacking  anything.  It  was  a 
question  of  Avhether  or  not  they  found  sucli  attempt  had  been  made 
and  she  said  there  had  been  such  an  attempt. 

Miss  HuFFiMAN.  There  have  been  a  series  of  attempts.  As  a  matter 
of  fact,  Paul  Green  did  put  on  some  plays  down  in  some  of  these 
southern  camps  and  there  have  been  a  series  of  attempts  by  a  number 
of  people  with  material  being  provided  the  committee,  some  of  which 
was  successful,  some  of  which  was  not  successful  in  putting  enter- 
tainers into  the  camps. 

The  committee  set  up  with  Mr.  Taft  in  charge  of  it  to  correlate 
this  activity  should  be  one  means  of  correcting  it  instead  of  putting 
the  responsibility  on  busy  camp  commanders  to  have  to  figure  out  the 
subtleties  and  the  fitness  of  some  of  these  plays  that  are  going  in, 
and  someone  who  really  is  informed  on  it  should  be  in  charge  of  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  have  not  heard  anybody  say  that  Mr.  Taft  was 
a  Communist  or  a  bad  man  or  anything  like  that  at  all? 

Miss  Huffman.  No;  I  have  not. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Nobody  said  that  at  all,  nobody  intimated  that  to 
you  at  any  time,  have  they  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  No;  they  have  not.  But  that  is  as  far  as  we 
have  gone  into  the  program  concerning  the  camp  activities — to 
agitate  them  through  their  families  by  direct  contact  and  the  usual 
"boy  meets  girl"  technique,  and  the  activities  surrounding  the  camps. 

I  find  that  with  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  at  the  present 
time  they  are  concerning  themselves — in  talks  I  have  had  with 
various  people  who  belong  to  the  International  Workers  Order  and 
other  groups,  that  they  are  very  much  concerning  themselves  with 
the  possibilities  of  carrying  on  the  activities  in  the  areas,  such  as 
Trenton  and  various  others  closely  surrounding  the  camps,  because 
of  the  lack  of  entertainment  facilities  and  their  difficulty  in  getting 
it  in  the  camps.  They  are  still  preparing  their  material  to  go  into 
the  camps  under  this  other  committee.  There  is  never  a  day  they  are 
not  trying  to  get  in. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  this  testimony  for  the  record  because  I  hap- 
pen to  know  the  Army  is  very  much  interested  in  studying  and  check- 
ing upon  the  same  subject  matter. 

Now  Dr.  Matthews,  I  would  like  to  have  introduced  in  the  record 
at  this  point  the  names  of  the  national  officers  and  the  executive 
council  or  by  whatever  name  their  governing  body  or  advisory  body 
is  called,  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization.  And  while  it  may 
be  too  length}'  to  give  verbal  testimony  concerning  it,  I  wish  you 
would  attach  or  insert  after  the  names  of  each  one  in  the  record, 
whether  or  not  there  is  any  Communist  Party  affiliation  or  any  mem- 
bership in  any  Communist  front  organization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  have  several  lists  that  I  would  like  to  have 
placed  in  the  record  in  compliance  with  your  request. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  would  like  to  have  the  parent  one  first,  if  I  may. 
I  think  you  mentioned  a  sort  of  chart  or  graph  yesterday. 


8472  UN-AMERICAN  PRO! '.UGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  list  of  the  officers  of  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization  from  the  Daily  Worker  of  September  3,  1940. 
These  are  the  permanent  officers  elected  to  date  to  lead  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  that  was  obtained  from  the  Daily  Worker? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  sir;  this  was  the  first  published  list  after 
the  Chicago  conference.  There  have  been  subsequent  lists  with  ad- 
ditions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not,  Doctor,  that  is  the 
first  list  that  was  published  in  any  newspaper? 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  could  not  say,  Congressman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  it  was  the  first  list  that  has  been  brought  to 
your  attention — the  first  you  have  any  record  of? 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  first  we  were  able  to  obtain ;  yes. 

Miss  Huffman,  you  are  familiar  with  this  docmnent? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  describe  it  for  the  record? 

Miss  Huffman.  This  is  a  document  of  the  American  Peace  Mobili- 
zation that  was  sold  at  the  time  of  the  American  People's  Meeting 
at  the  Mecca  Temple,  entitled  "The  Story  of  A.  P.  M."  The  pic- 
tures and  a  thumbnail  sketch  of  the  historj^  of  these  officers — Rev. 
Jolm  B.  Thompson 

Mr.  Starnes.  Bv  the  way,  who  is  this  John  B.  Thompson,  Dr. 
Matthews  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  He  is  dean  of  the  Presbyterian  Foundation  of 
the  University  of  Oklahoma  and  pastor  of  the  First  Presbyterian 
Church  in  Noi-man,  near  Oklahoma  City. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  also  chairman  of  the  Southern  Conference 
for  Human  Welfare,  according  to  the  original  documents  in  the  com- 
mittee's files. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

IMiss  Huffman.  Reid  Robinson,  who  is  a  vice  cliairman;  Dr.  Max 
Yergan,  a  vice  chairman;  Hon.  Vito  Marcantonio,  a  vice  cliairman; 
Captain  Terrell,  a  vice  chairman ;  Theodore  Dreiser,  a  vice  chairman ; 
Jack McMichael,  a  vice  cliairman;  Frederick  V.  Field,  executive  secre- 
tary; Morris  Watson,  laboi-  representative,  and  he  has  since  been  made 
the  provisional  secretaiy  of  the  National  Labor  Committee  Against 
War;  Marian  Briggs,  administrative  secretary. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  the  same  Marian  Briggs,  I  assume,  who  sent 
this  telegram? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes. 

Mr,  Matthews.  This  program  also  contains  a  list  of  the  sponsors 
of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization ;  does  it  not  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  It  contains  a  list  that  is  designated  as  sponsors. 
It  is  a  partial  list  of  the  committee  list  of  sponsors  and  the  program 
of  the  meetings.  Then  it  includes  for  the  New  York  Citv  Council : 
Aline  Davis  Hays,  C.  H.  Van  Tyne,  Walter  Scott  Neff,  and  Oscar 
Schneller,  and  a  description  of  the  activities.  Then  the  songs  of  the 
American  Peace  Mobilizati(m:  "Billv  Boy,"  and  "Franklin,  Oh 
Franklin,"  and  "The  Farmer  is  the  Man  That  Feeds  Them  All."  and 
"Jim  Crow,"  and  "Get  Out  and  Stav  Out  of  War,"  and  "Ballad  of 
October  16,"  "The  Strange  Death  of"  John  Doe,"  and  "Plow  Under." 
That  is  the  one  that  ends  "Plow  Under  Every  Fourth  American  Bov." 


UN-AMFJIICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8473 

Mr.  Starnes.  Tliat  particular  publication  contains  the  purported 
list  of  national  officials  and  sponsors  of  the  American  Peace  Mobili- 
zation at  that  time? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes.  Con<rressman  Starnes,  and  in  addition  a  list 
of  the  sponsoring-  organizations.  The  list  is  headed  by  the  American 
Student  Union  and  American  Youth  Congress,  Armour  Local  Pack- 
ing House  Workers,  C.  I.  O.,  Blount  County,  Ala.,  Farmers  Union. 

Mr.  ]N[.v'rTiii:ws.  Now  I  show  you  a  letterhead  of  the  Washington 
Peace  Mobilization  which  contains  the  names  of  the  Washington 
officers  and  committee  members. 

Miss  Huffman.  The  president  is  Hudson  Wells,  the  vice  president 
is  Myrtle  Powell,  Rev.  A.  Joseph  Edwards,  Lucy  Hancock,  James 
Harris 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  say  Lucy  Hancock  ? 

Miss  Hutffman.  Yes:  James  Harris,  Louis  Stedman,  Costas 
Alexiou,  Dr.  Alpheus  Hunton,  and  Jack  Zucker.  The  secretary- 
treasurer  is  Sarah  V.  Montgomery,  and  the  organizer  is  Mary  Ricli- 
ardson, 

Mr.  Starnes.  Each  of  tliose  documents  will  be  incorporated  in  the 
record. 

Mr.  Matphews,  We  have  a  suj)plementary  list  from  the  Daily 
AYorker  for  January  14.  1941.  contained  in  an  article  entitled  "Six- 
teen Top  Union  Leaders  Back  Peace  Parley."  This  is  a  meeting  of 
the  American  Peace  Mobilization  to  be  held  in  Washington  January 
25  to  27,  and  the  individuals  named  among  the  16  are  Reid  Robinson, 
president  of  the  Mine,  Mill  and  Smelter  Workers  of  America;  Michael 
J.  Quill,  president  of  the  Transport  Workers  Union;  George  C. 
Peacock,  president  of  the  National  Association  of  Die  Casters;  Louis 
Allen  Berne,  president  of  the  Federation  of  Architects,  Engineers, 
Chemists,  and  Technicians;  E.  F.  Burke,  secretary.  National  Marine 
Crooks  and  Stewards  Association;  Abram  Flaxer,  jjresident  of  the 
State,  County,  and  Municipal  AVorkers  of  America;  Ben  Gold,  presi- 
dent. International  Fur  and  Leather  Workers  Union;  Donald  Hender- 
son, president.  United  Cannery,  Agricultural,  Packing,  and  Allied 
Workers  of  America  ;  J.  F.  Jurich.  president.  International  Union  of 
Fishermen  and  Allied  AVorkers  of  America;  Mat  Meehan.  secretary. 
International  Longshcn-emen's  a'nd  Warehousemen's  Union;  Lewis 
Merrill,  president.  United  Office  and  Professional  Workers  of  Ameri- 
ca;  Frederick  N.  IVIyers.  general  organizer.  National  Maritime  Union; 
Grant  AA".  Oakes.  chairman  Farm  E(juipment  Organizing  Committee; 
O.  M.  Orton,  president.  International  AA^ood  Workers  of  America; 
Joseph  Selly,  president  of  the  American  Communications  Association ; 
and  Louis  Weinstock.  secretai'V.  District  9  of  the  American  Federa- 
tion of  Labor,  Affiliated  Brothei-hood  of  Painters,  Decorators,  and 
Paperhangers  of  America. 

I  may  point  out  that  in  the  list  of  16  only  1  of  the  union  leaders 
named  is  in  the  American  Federation  of  Labor.  The  Daily  AA^orker 
seems  to  have  taken  special  jiains  to  i)oint  that  out.  The  other  15  are 
heads  of  C.  I.  O.  unions,  even  if  those  unions  are  not  so  designated 
here. 

AA'^e  have  a  list  of  ])ersons  who  were  present  or  }>articipated  in  some 
manner  in  the  American  Peo^^le's  Meeting  in  New  York. 


8474  un-amp:rican  propaganda  activities 

Miss  Huffman,  I  will  ask  you  if  a  petition  to  free  Earl  Browder 
was  circulated  and  signed  at  the  American  People's  Meeting  in  New 
York? 

Miss  Huffman.  It  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  this  issue  of  the  Daily  Worker  for  May  2, 1941, 
has  an  article  entitled  "Signers  of  Petition  to  Free  Browder."  The 
following  is  the  list  of  688  persons  who  signed  the  petition  demanding 
the  freedom  of  Earl  Browder,  while  attending  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization  meeting,  held  here  last  April  6. 

I  ask  that  that  be  received  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  article  referred  to  was  marked  "Matthews'  Exhibit  1.") 

Miss  Huffman.  Incidentally,  Dr.  Matthews,  this  list  is  the  list 
that  was  signed  at  the  A.  P.  M.  meeting.  There  was  also  a  petition  to 
free  Browder  that  was  being  signed  at  the  Tallentire  June  Celebration. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Congressman,  would  you  like  to  have  any  of 
these  national  officers'  records  read  as  samples  at  this  time  or  not? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  that  are  of  particular  interest? 

Mr.  Matthews.  They  are  rather  bulky.  These  are  on  each  of  the 
individuals,  one  set  of  cards  for  each  individual. 

Mr.  Starnes,  That  deals,  of  course,  with,  their  affiliations  in  Com- 
munist front  organizations? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Or  with  the  Connimnist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  sir;  this  is  the  record  of  Langston  Hughes,  a 
member  of  the  national  council  of  the  American  Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  seem  to  be  quite  bulky,  so  it  will  probably  serve 
the  purpose  by  having  them  inserted  in  the  record  along  with  their 
names. 

Mr.  Mati'hews.  A  number  of  these  individuals  are  members  of  the 
Communist  Party  of  public  record.  Langston  HugheS;  for  example, 
has  run  for  office  on  the  Communist  Party  ticket. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  others  that  have  public  records  of  being 
Communists  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Donald  Henderson  is  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  of  public  record.  His  reports  to  the  central  committee  of  the 
Communist  Party  are  published  in  the  press  of  the  Communist  Party 
itself. 

I  have  here  a  copy  of  Soviet  Russia  Today  for  August  1936,  which 
contains  an  interview  by  Ben  Davis  with  Paul  Robeson,  in  which 
Robeson  while  he  does  not  declare  that  he  is  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party,  states  that  he  has  made  his  choice  for  communism. 
Robeson  is  one  of  the  vice  chairmen  of  the  American  Peace  Mobiliza- 
tion, and  I  ask  that  this  copy  of  the  Soviet  Russia  Today,  with  this 
interview,  be  made  a  part  of  the  record. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  magazine,  Soviet  Russia  Today,  was  marked  "Matthews 
Exhibit  2,  May  22, 1941.") 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  many  are  on  the  executive  committee;  do  you 
know? 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  national  executive  committee  is  a  list  of  about 
60. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8475 

Mr.  Starxes.  Will  you  cluH-k  and  furinsh  us  tlip  pr()])ortionate 
number  of  Avho  are  actual  C'onnnunist  members  and  those  who  are  in 
front  orjxanizations  so  that  we  may  have  that  in  succinct  form? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes.  sir. 

Mr.  Staknes.  All  rio:ht;  is  there  anything  else  at  this  point? 

Mr.  Matthews.  We  have  a  collection  of  the  literature  that  was  dis- 
tributed at  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  meeting  in  New  York. 
The  sionificance  of  this,  if  I  may  take  the  liberty  of  interpreting  it, 
is  that  every  piece  of  literature  which  these  investigators  were  able  to 
obtain  at  the  meeting,  is  literature  which  comes  from  an  organization 
which  has  been  designated  by  this  committee  as  a  Communist  front 
organization,  or  by  rather  voluminous  evidence  in  the  records  of  the 
oonniiittee,  showing  a  rather  complete  interlocking  of  the  various 
front  organizations  of  the  Communist  Party,  including  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  don't  mean  that  they  all  come  from  one  organi- 
zation, do  you?  AVhat  I  mean  is,  they  came  from  a  number  of  differ- 
ent organizations? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  of  which  have  some  connection  with  the  Com- 
munist front  organizations  or  party? 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  would  appear  from  the  literature  that  was  dis- 
tributed at  the  American  Peace  Molulization  and  brought  to  the  com- 
mittee by  these  two  investigators,  that  no  organization  which  is  not 
connected  with  the  Communist  Party  took  the  occasion  to  distribute 
its  literature  at  that  meeting. 

Mr.  Staknes.  I  wan  to  bi'ing  that  point  out :  There  was  no  other 
type  of  literature  being  distributed  there? 

Mr.  Matthews.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Either  free  or  being  sold  there  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Other  than  that  sponsored  by  the  Communist  Party 
or  its  front  organizations;  is  that  correct? 

Miss  Huffman.  That  is  correct,  Mr.  Starnes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  W"as  that  correct  insofar  as  you  found,  ISIiss  Spargo  ? 

Miss  Spargo.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  will  ask  the  investigators  to  identify  the  litera- 
ture as  being  collected  at  the  meetings. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  prepared  this  collection  of  literature  yourself; 
did  you  not? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir;  every  bit  of  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  collection  of  literature  you  did  prepare;  is 
that  correct? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  is  this  literature  which  was  distributed  at  the 
meeting  ? 

Miss  Huffmax-.  Distributed  or  sold. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Distributed  or  sold  at  the  meeting  of  the  American 
Peace  Mobilization  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  New  York  ? 


8476  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Miss  Huffman,  Yes,  sir ;  not  all  at  the  Mecca  Temple  but  at  vari 
oils  American  Peace  Mobilization  meetings. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  receive  this  in  evidence? 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  material  referred  to  was  marked  "Huffman  Exhibits, Ma> 
22,  1941.") 

Mr.  Starnes.  Anything  else  now,  Dr.  Matthews  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  We  have  a  complete  collection  of  photographs 
taken  of  the  peace  vigil  in  front  of  the  White  House,  Mr.  Chairman, 
which  I  offer  in  evidence  as  exhibits. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  have  somebody  identity  any  particular 
parties  of  interest  there  who  have  any  connection  with  the  Commu- 
nist Party  or  any  other  subversive  group  ? 

Miss  HuTFMAN.  This  is  a  picture — the  party  on  the  right  hand 
side  is  Dr.  Walter  Scott  Neff. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  think  you  mea^i  on  the  left  of  the  picture. 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  on  the  left. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  the  National  Maritime 
Union  has  any  delegates  in  this  picket  line  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir.  Ye^sterday  I  came  by  the  picket  line  and 
one  of  the  delegates  from  the  National  Maritime  Union  was  one  of 
the  delegates  who  had  been  at  the  Mecca  Temple  meeting  and  who 
was  later  up  at  Randall's  Island,  and  at  Randall's  Island  he  was, 
besides  having  the  cap  that  they  wore  with  the  sign  on  and  the  pin  on, 
was  over  at  the  Abraham  Lincoln  Brigade 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  any  delegates  from  the 
American  Communications  Association  is  in  the  picket  line? 

Miss  Huffman.  I  did  not  see  her  in  the  picket  line  but  Josephine 
Timms,  who  was  a  speaker  at  the  mother's  meeting  on  the  Monday 
following  Mother's  Day,  had  stated  from  the  platform  that  she  was 
going  and  she  was  taking  a  number  of  people  with  her  to  go  down 
on  the  picket  line. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  T-i-m-m-s  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  She  is  secretary  of  the  American  Communications 
Association  ? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir ;  she  is  also  an  officer 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  Walter  Scott  Neff,  who  was  identified  in  this 
picture,  was  identified  yesterday  as  one  of  the  professors  at  the  City 
College  of  New  York  who  was  recently  ousted  as  a  result  of  the 
investigation  of  the  Coiidre  committee? 

Miss  Huffman.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Those  photographs  having  been  identified,  Dr.  Mat- 
thews, may  be  attached  as  exhibits  for  the  record. 

(The  photographs,  43  in  number,  were  marked  "Huffman  Ex- 
hibit 4,  May  22, 1941.") 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  anything  further  at  this  time,  Dr.  Mat- 
thews ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Nothing  further  at  this  time ;  no,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  There  will  be  no  meeting  of  the  committee  this  after- 
noon. The  committee  will  adjourn  until  10  o'clock  Monday. 
When  we  convene  Monday  morning  we  will  hear  the  testimony  of 
Richard  Krebs,  but  this  phase  of  the  hearing  has  not  been  concluded. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8477 

The  committee  is  in  possession  of  nnmerous  docnments,  member- 
ship lists,  and  so  forth,  that  it  is  checking  in  a  careful  and  pains- 
takino-  manner.  These  are  records  and  docnments  which  have  been 
brouixht  to  the  connnittee  under  subpena. 

Tlie  Chairman,  and  I  assume  I  am  speakino-  for  the  members 
of  the  committee,  was  very  nnich  impressed  yesterday  by  a  state- 
ment made  by  an  investigator  of  this  committee  that  there  were 
Government  employees  who  are  terrified  at  the  prospect  of  being 
called  before  this  connnitte  as  witnesses  in  order  to  give  testimony 
to  any  subversive  activities  which  they  might  have  cognizance  of 
in  governmental  departments  and  agencies,  this  terror  or  fear  being 
based  upon  the  fact  that  it  might  endanger  their  positions. 

Of  course,  this  connnittee  has  no  power  to  guarantee  anyone's 
security  of  tenure  in  either  public  or  private  employment,  but  it 
seems  to  me  to  be  a  sad  connnentary  that  any  Government  employee 
of  the  United  States  of  America  shonld  at  any  time  have  any  fear 
of  ai)pearing  before  any  congressional  committee  to  give  testimony 
concerning  un-American  and  subversive  activities,  or  even  wrong- 
doing that  is  not  attached  to  nn-American  and  subversive  activi- 
ties, to  a  group  who  are  elected  as  representatives  of  the  people 
of  the  United  States.  That,  in  my  judgment,  is  a  very  sad  com- 
mentary on  existing  conditions  in  certain  agencies. 

Now,  there  has  been,  of  course,  a  great  deal  of  alarm  and  of  fear 
by  numbers  of  good  people  who  may  have  behmged  or  may  belong 
to  the  Washington  Bookshop  and  other  organizations,  whose  mem- 
bership lists  the  committee  now  has  in  its  possession.  These  people 
are  expressing  a  fear  that  they  may  be  tarred  with  the  Communist 
brush  simply  because  they  might  have  been  members  of  a  certain 
organization.  It  is  true  that  the  Communist  Party  has  secured 
positions  of  control  and  power  in  a  number  of  organizations  which 
were  wholly  worthy  in  their  inception  and  wholly  worth  wdiile  if 
properly  administered,  That  is  in  addition  to  the  fact,  of  course, 
that  they  have  set  up  a  number  of  organizations  with  beautifully 
camouflaged  names  which  camouflage  their  real  purpose  and  intent. 
Every  American  citizen  can  be  assured  that  this  subcommittee  will 
take  no  action  which  will  bring  discredit  or  will  tend  to  reflect  dis- 
credit upon  any  innocent  American  citizen.  We  do  feel  as  a  sub- 
committee, however,  it  is  important  that  intelligent  people  who  may 
be  what  they  term  themselves  as  "Progressive"  or  "Radicals"  or 
"Liberals,"  or  whatever  name  they  want  to  designate  themselves 
by%  we  do  think  that  the  time  is  here  and  the  time  is  overdue  when 
people  of  that  type  and  character,  who  are  genuinely  sincere,  should 
stop  permitting  themselves  to  be  made  dupes  of.  Certainly  some 
of  them  should  have  enough  intelligence  to  stay  out  of  these  organi- 
zations. AVe  don't  know  whether  there  are  any  repeated  oifenders 
in  this  particular  respect  or  not.  The  committee  is  not  passing  on 
that  matter  at  this  time  and  will  not  until  we  have  had  an  oppor- 
tunity to  carefully  check  these  lists.  Whatever  names  may  be  made 
public  in  the  future  with  reference  to  these  organizations,  the  coun- 
try and  the  people  and  the  innocent  people  who  may  be  members  of 
these  organizations  can  rest  assured  that  the  names  wull  be  made 
public  only  after  careful  checking  and  that  every  safeguard  will 
be  thrown  around  innocent  people,  but  at  the  same  time  this  sub- 


g478  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

committee  \A'ill  not  be  deterred  in  its  investigations  by  the  fact 
that  there  are  innocent  people  in  these  groups  and  where  we  find 
that  there  are  Communists  or  others — Xazis  or  Fascists  or  by  what- 
ever name  called — they  are  all  brothers  or  sisters  under  the  skin, 
because  they  have  a  common  intent  and  common  purpose  at  this 
time,  and  that  is  to  destroy  our  democratic  way  of  life. 

I  want  to  say  we  intend  to  expose  those  people  wherever  they 
are — we  don't  care  whether  it  is  in  some  private  organization  or  gov- 
ernmental agency.  The  people  of  the  United  States  should  know 
where  they  are  and  who  they  are. 

The  committee  will  stand  adjourned  until  Monday  at  10  o'clock. 

(Whereupon,  at  12:30  p.  m.,  the  committee  adjourned  until  10 
a.  m.,  Monday,  May  26,  1941.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


MONDAY,   MAY  26,    1941 

House  of  Representath'es, 

SUBCOINIMITTEE  OF  THE  SpECIAL  COMMITTEE 

To  IN^'ESTIGATE  TjN-AMERICAISr  AcTRlTIES, 

Washington^  D.  C. 

The  subcomniittee  met  at  10  a.  m.  in  the  caucus  room,  House 
Office  Building,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee) 
presiding. 

Present:  Messrs.  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee),  Voorhis, 
and  Mason. 

Also  present :  ISIr.  Eobert  E.  Stripling,  chief  investigator,  and  Dr. 
J.  B.  Matthews,  director  of  research. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  committee  will  resume  its  sessions.  Wliom  will 
you  have  this  morning,  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Richard  Krebs. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Come  around,  ]\Ir.  Krebs. 

TESTIMONY  OF  EICHARD  KREBS 

Mr.  Starnes.  Please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand.  Do  you 
solemnly  swear  the  testimony  you  are  going  to  give  in  this  investiga- 
tion will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so 
help  you  God? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  a  seat  and  you  may  proceed.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  your  full  name? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Richard  Julius  Krebs. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  born,  Mr.  Krebs? 

Mr.  Krebs.  In  Hessia,  Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When? 

Mr.  Krebs.  December  17,  1905. 

Mr.  MArrHEws.  Have  you  used  the  pen  name  "Jan  Valtin"? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AamX  vou  are  the  author  of  the  book  Out  of  the 
Night? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVhen  did  you  first  come  to  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  came  to  the  United  States  for  the  first  time  in  1921. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  how  many  trips  or  visits  did  you  make  to  the 
United  States  subsequently? 

8479 

62626— 41— vol.  14 21 


3480  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  have  been  in  and  out  of  the  TTnited  States  four  times, 
except  the  last  entry,  which  makes  it  five  times  that  I  entered  tliis 
country. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  when  did  you  last  enter  the  United  States  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  In  March  1938. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Krebs,  are  you  acquainted  in  "general  with  the 
newspaper  the  Daily  Worker? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  have  been  very  well  acquainted  with  it ;  not  in  recent 
years,  thouf;h. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  copy  of  the  Daily  Worker  for  March 
15,  1938.     Have  you  seen  this  particular  issue  of  the  Daily  Worker? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthew\s.  On  pa^e  1  of  this  issue  of  the  Daily  Worker  there 
is  a  photofiraph  reproduced  called  Passport  Photo  of  Richard  Krebs. 
Is  that  a  photofjraph  of  yourself? 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  was  an  old  picture  of  myself. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  state  what  tliat  picture  was,  where  it 
was  used,  or  what  its  significance  is  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  was  a  picture  used  on  a  document  of  the  German 
Gestapo  at  the  time  when  I  worked  inside  the  (lestapo  for  the  Com- 
munist International. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  this  is  a  bona  fide  reproduction  of 
a  part  of  your  Gestapo  credentials? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  I  understand  you  to  say  when  you  w^ere  work- 
mtr  for  the  Communist  International 

Mr.  Mason.  With  the  Gestapo? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Rijiht. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Go  ahead.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  liaA'e  read  the  article  which  accompanies  this 
photooraph,  have  you  not? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  article  in  the  Daily  Worker  is  there  any 
mention  of  your  ever  havinp;  been  in  the  Communist  International 
or  the  Comnujnist  movement? 

Mr.  Krebs.  No;  the  article  was  written  to  hide  that  fact. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  The  only  chai'o;e  made  in  the  article  is  the  one 
to  the  ett'ect  that  you  were  a  Gestapo  agent,  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir;  it  is  the  same  charge  made  against  prac- 
tically all  of  Lenin's  friends  who  have  since  been  shot  under  just 
that  accusation. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Mr.  Krebs,  I  show  you  some  recent  issues 
of  the  Daily  Worker,  one  for  January  21,  19-11.  On  page  7  of  this 
issue  of  the  Daily  Worker  there  is  a  colunni  ovei*  the  name  of  Sender 
Garlin.     I  wdll  ask  you  first  if  you  know  who  Sender  Garlin  is? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  Sender  Garlin  was  for  years  the  correspondent 
of  the  Daily  Worker  in  Moscow.  He  was  sent  especially  to  Moscow 
to  report  on  the  Stalin  purge  trials  through  the  American  press. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  particular  column,  Garlin  is  w^riting  a  re- 
view of  your  book.  Out  of  The  Night.     Have  you  read  that  review? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  have. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Can  you  state  briefly  the  purport  of  the  review 
in  this  issue  of  the  Daily  Worker? 


UN-A.MKKICAN  riiOrAUANDA  ACTIVITIES  8481 

Mr.  IvKF.ns.  The  i)uii)ort  of  this  review  is  an  effort  to  tell  Daily 
AVorker  readers  thai  T  don't  exist  at  all,  but  that  Out  of  The  Night 
has  been  written  eolUn-tively  by  Isaac  Don  Levine,  General  Krivitsky, 
F'reda  Utley",  and  so-  forth. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  review  contains  the  definite  statement  that 
there  was  no  such  person  an  Jan  Valtin  ^ 

Mr.  Kkebs.  It  contains  the  statement  that  Jan  Valtin  is  Isaac  Don 
Levine. 

Mr.  Matfuews.  Now  in  the  Daily  Worker  for  January  24,  1941, 
there  is  a  ccmtin nation  of  the  discussion  of  the  book.  Out  of  The 
Nio-ht,  also  by  Sender  Garlin.     Have  you  read  this  article? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  the  purport  of  this  article? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Reviews  of  the  book  written  by  Isaac  Don  Levine  are 
quoted  but  they  are  used  in  such  a  way  as  to  give  the  readers  of  this 
paper  the  false  imj^ression  that  Isaac  Don  Levine  had  written  the 
book,  and  repeat  the  statement  that  Valtin  did  not  exist,  in  order  to 
discredit  the  book. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  copy  of  the  Daily  Worker  for  Febru- 
ary 21,  1941,  which  has  another  article  by  Sender  Garlin,  beginning; 
on  the  first  page.     Have  you  read  that  article? 

Mr.  Krebs,  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  By  the  time  this  article  was  written,  had  the  Daily 
Worker  changed  its  position  from  that  of  your  nonexistence  to  a 
position  that  you  did  in  reality  exist  as  a  Gestapo  agent? 

Mr.  Kkebs.  It  is  one  of  their  usual  somersaults  in  policy  aild  tactics 
after  they  saw  that  the  book  could  not  be  silenced  to  death  and  re- 
ceived the  wide  circulation  that  it  did,  then  they  realized  that  he 
argument  "Valtin  did  not  exist"  was  not  believed  by  anyone,  so  they 
changed  their  tactics  and  now  state  that  Valtin  did  exist  but  that  he 
was  a  Nazi  agent. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  I  will  ask  you  this  question  :  Does  the  book 
Out  of  The  Night  contain  sufficient  detailed  information  or  facts  to 
identif}^  the  author  of  the  book  in  Conmiunist  circles,  even  though 
no  name  at  all  appeared  on  the  book? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  Many  American  Communists  of  prominence  are 
mentioned  in  the  book.  Some  of  them  were  guests  at  my  home  in 
Hamburg  and  the  book  contained  enough  material  for  instant  identi- 
fication by  those  Connnunist  functionaries  in  America. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  issue  of  the  Daily  Worker  in  March  1938 — 
March  15,  1938 — where  the  Daily  AVorker  through  Sender  Garlin  said 
tliat  it  had  obtained  your  Gestapo  credentials 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  Daily  Worker  said  this  photograph  was  brought 
to  them  by  German  seamen.  The  truth  is  that  this  photograph  has 
been,  since  the  spring  of  1937,  in  the  files  of  the  G.  P.  U.  in  Moscow. 

The  publication  of  this  picture  by  the  Daily  Worker  and  by  other 
Communist  papers  appearing  in  the  United  States,  shows  that  this 
material  was  sent  to  them  straight  from  Moscow.  It  appeared  3 
months  after  my  break  with  the  Communist  International. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  was  your  break  with  the  Connnunist  Inter- 
national ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  December  1937  and  beginning  of  January  1938. 


8482  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  So  in  1938  the  Daily  Worker  stated  that  it  got  its 
information  concerning  you  from  German  seamen  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Then  in  1941,  3  years  later,  where  did  the  Daily 
Worker  say  that  it  got  its  information  concerning  you  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  is  stated  here  they  got  the  information  from  Scan- 
dinavian seamen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  the  source  of  this  information  was 
German  seamen  in  1938  and  Scandinavian  seamen  in  1941? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  reason  for  that  is  the  Comintern's  attitude  toward 
Hitler  has  since  changed  and  it  would  not  do  to  give  German  anti- 
Fascists  as  the  source  since  they  had  actually  an  alliance  with  Ger- 
man Fascists. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  what  were  your  exact  relationships  with  the 
Gestapo — will  you  please  state  those  briefly  ? 

Mr,  Krebs.  I  first  same  in  contact  with  the  Gestapo  while  doing 
underground  work  against  Hitler  in  Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  About  what  year  was  that  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  was  sent  to  Germany  in  the  fall  of  1933,  the  year 
Hitler  came  to  power,  to  reorganize  the  seamen,  dock  workers,  and 
river  workers  against  Hitler.. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wlio  sent  you? 

Mr.  Krebs.  After  some  time  of  underground  work  I  was  betrayed 
into  the  hands  of  the  Gestapo  by  a  Nazi  spy  in  the  Communist 
organizations.  I  was  arrested  in  November  1933  and  after  8  or  9 
months  in  concentration  camps  I  was  sentenced  to  13  years  for  high 
treason  by  Nazi  courts. 

My  first  contact  with  the  Gestapo  came  about  during  weeks  of 
questioning  in  Gestapo  headquarters  in  Hambui^  and  Berlin. 

During  the  31/2  years  of  my  imprisonment  in  various  Nazi  prisons 
I  was  often  called  to  Gestapo  headquarters  for  further  questioning. 
Later,  at  the  end  of  1936,  I  received  througli  a  G.  P.  IT.  man  working 
in  the  Gestapo — his  name  was  Rudolph  Heitman,  the  order  that  the 
Communist  International  Bureau  in  Copenhagen  had  singled  me  out 
for  an  attempt  to  work  inside  the  Gestapo  in  favor  of  the  Com- 
munist Intei-national — that  is  the  Soviet  Government.  As  a  loyal 
comrade  I  accepted  this  order  and  did  my  best  to  cai-ry  it  out. 

I  began  with  asking  the  Nazi  guards  for  Nazi  literature.  I  asked 
for  the  book,  Mein  Kampf.  I  made  notations  on  the  margin  of 
Mein  Kampf,  knowing  that  these  would  be  read  later  by  Gestapo 
agents.  I  wrote  pro-Nazi  notes  and  dropped  them  as  if  by  mistake 
in  the  prison  yard.  The  guards  would  pick  them  up  and  read  them. 
I  did  everything  in  general  to  try  to  convince  the  Gestapo  that  I 
had  broken  with  communism  and  was  moving  toward  the  Hitler 
faith. 

All  this  was  in  line  with  Communist  policy  of  placing  its  own  men 
in  the  police  departments  of  non-Soviet  nations. 

After  4  or  5  months  of  such  maneuvering  I  was  called  again  to 
Gestapo  headquarters,  this  time  not  to  be  questioned  but  in  order 
to  be  tested.  The  Gestapo  wanted  to  find  how  far  my  break  with 
communism  and  my  drifting  toward  the  Nazi  movement  was  sin- 
cere. I  passed  a  great  number  of  their  tests.  Some  of  them  were 
quite  tricky.     I  convinced  them  finally  through  the  collaboration  of 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §483 

one  of  tlio  leadin<j;  men  in  Copenhagen — this  man's  name  was  Richard 
Jensen.  Richard  Jensen  was  the  leading  treasurer  of  the  Comintern 
headquarters  for  the  west  with  its  offices  in  Copenhagen.  He  knew 
of  my  assignment  to  worm  my  way  into  the  Getapo — in  the  head- 
quarters of  the  Gestapo  under  the  eyes  of  one  of  the  leaders  of  the 
Gestapo's  foreign  divisions. 

This  Gestapo  leader  was  an  inspector  wdiose  name  was  Paul  Kraus. 

I  wrote  a  letter  to  Jensen.  The  text  of  the  letter  made  it  seem 
that  1  had  betni  released  from  a  Nazi  prison  and  was  hiding  in  Ger- 
many and  I  asked  Jensen  to  send  money.  This  letter  was  sent  off  by 
the  Gestapo  while  I  was  still  kept  in  prison.  Jensen  knew  what  game 
was  being  played  and  he  promptly  sent  American  money,  several  hun- 
dred dollars,  to  a  fictitious  address  in  Germany.  The  fact  that  a 
simple  letter  from  me  could  draw  a  considerable  sum  of  money  from 
Connnunist  headquarters  convinced  the  Gestapo  that  my  contact  with 
the  Comintern  was  still  good  and  that  my  break  with  the  Comintern 
was  sincere. 

After  that  I  was  drawn  into  the  active  work  of  the  foreign  division 
of  the  Gestapo.  I  remained  there  for  about  a  total  of  5  months  doing 
all  I  could  to  find  out  secrets  and  the  working  methods  of  the  Gestapo 
in  order  to  surrender  this  information  to  the  Comintern  and  the 
G.  P.  U.,  which  at  that  time  were  still  fighting  the  Nazi  organizations. 

■Sir.  INIatthews.  During  these  months  of  your  imprisonment  in  Ger- 
many, how  frequently  were  you  in  the  Gestapo  headquarters  in  Berlin 
and  Hamburgh 

]\Ir.  Krebs.  During  the  first  6  or  7  months  of  my  imprisonment  I 
was  at  least  twice  and  sometimes  three  times  a  week  in  the  Gestapo 
offices  for  que^stioning.  In  the  following  31/2  years  my  calls  to  the 
Gestapo  office  slowed  down  to  about  one  a  month  or  so.  But  later 
on  in  1936  and  1937, 1  spent  weeks  in  the  headquarters  of  the  Gestapo's 
foreign  divisicm.  day  after  day  from  morning  until  evening. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  an  opportunity  to  learn  the  methods 
of  work  and  the  objectives  of  the  foreign  division  of  the  Gestapo  dur- 
ing these  periods  which  you  spent  there? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  had  that  opportunity,  yes;  particularly  since  I  entered 
the  Gestapo  offices  from  the  first  to  the  last  with  the  intention  of  col- 
lecting all  possible  information  in  order  to  make  it  available  for  the 
fight  against  Hitler  and  against  Hitler's  Gestapo. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  You  had  been  trained  for  years  to  make  ^iuch  ob- 
servations and  to  gather  such  information,  had  you  not? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  are  tlie  foreign  offices  of  the  Gestapo 
located  ? 

Mr.  Krkbs.  The  national  offices  were  located  at  Berlin  in  a  pahice 
called  the  Prinz  Albrecht,  located  on  a  short  street  in  Berlin's  Gov- 
ernment district,  known  as  the  Prinz  Albrecht  Strasse.  The  execu- 
'tive  offices,  that  is  the  action  offices  of  the  foreign  division  of  the 
Gestapo,  however,  were  located  in  Hamburg  in  a  building  known  as 
the  Stadthaus,  in  the  center  of  Hamburg. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Why  are  the  offices  of  the  Gestapo  located  in  Ham- 
burg? 

jSIr.  Krebs.  For  the  same  reason  which  aU  foreign  divisions  of 
Nazi  organizations  were  centei*ed  in  Hamburg;  namely,  because  Ham- 


3484  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

bui-g  was  tlie  largest  port  of  the  European  continent.  From  Ham- 
burg sailed  an  average  of  a  thousand  German  ships  each  month  to  all 
parts  of  the  world,  so  communications  to  other  countries  were  much 
easier,  much  more  direct  from  Hamburg  than  from  Berlin.  For  the 
same  reason  the  Communist  International  has  its  maritime  and  com- 
munication headquarteis  for  over  10  years  also  in  Hamburg. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVill  you  please  state  in  general  what  the  work  of 
the  foreign  division  of  the  Gestapo  is  as  carried  on  in  these  executive 
offices  in  Hamburg? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  foreign  division  of  the  Gestapo  is  that  part  which 
does  espionage  and  police  work  in  favor  of  the  German  Government 
of  the  German  frontiers.  It  cooperates  with  the  foreign  division 
of  a  great  number  of  official  Nazi  organizations — foreign  divisions 
of  the  Nazi  Party. 

It  cooperates  with  the  Military  Intelligence  of  the  German  High 
Command,  and  it  also  cooperates  with  the  political  police  systems 
in  Japan,  Italy,  and  General  Franco's  Spain. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  is  it  the  work  of  the  foreign  divi- 
sion of  the  Gestapo  to  compile  the  most  elaborate  information  con- 
cerning every  country  in  the  world? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  In  watching  the  officials  of  the  foreign  division 
at  work  in  the  Hamburg  offices,  I  learned  first,  that  the  aim  of  the 
Hitler  movement  was  really  world  domination  because  there  was 
not  a  single  country  on  the  map  which  did  not  interest  the  foreign 
division  of  the  Gestapo. 

The  Gestapo  charted  every  item  of  every  phase  of  life  of  eveiy 
country  in  the  world.     I  can  give  you  a  few  examples. 

There  was  one  large  room  solely  reserved  for  card  files  containing 
names  of  citizens  of  foreign  countries,  classified  as  "enemies," 
"friends,"  and  "residents,"  and  in  the  different  classes  each  card  con- 
tained the  personal  history  of  the  individual,  his  political  affiliations, 
his  prominence  in  certain  business  or  certain  organizations,  or  his 
prominence  in  cultural  life.  It  included  Government  officials,  police 
officials,  teachers,  newspapennen,  trade-union  men.  And  tlie  purpose 
of  these  card  files  was  to  have  a  constant  barometer  on  the  strength 
of  the  morale  in  other  nations,  and  of  weaknesses  among  the  popula- 
tion of  another  nation;  of  elements  which  could,  in  case  of  emergency, 
in  case  of  war  or  intense  political  campaigns  of  another  nature,  be 
brought  into  the  harness  for  the  Nazi  movement ;  and  a  list  of  those 
which  should  at  once  be  seized  by  the  Gestapo  and  interned  in  case 
of  a  Gennan  invasion. 

Mr.  MATTHEW^s.  Was  there  such  an  elaborate  card-file  system  on 
Americans  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir ;  there  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  these  offices  of  the  foreign  division  of  the 
Gestapo  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  there  was.  It  concentrated  on  the  American  citi- 
zens of  the  eastern  and  western  seaboard. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  in  a  document  obtained  by  this 
committee  from  the  personal  effects  of  G.  Wilhelm  Kunze,  which  has 
already  been  released  to  the  public,  there  appears  the  following  instruc- 
tions of  the  German-American  Bund  : 

Record  cards  containing  personal  information  about  friends,  enemies,  mer- 
chants,   politicians,    associations,    association    officers,    and    similar    information 


UN-AMKltlCAN   PKOl'AdANDA  ACTIVITIES  8485 

;ib<mt  those  wlu>in  we  sliouUl  kimw,  tn  he  iiindc  (uit  in  duiilicMlt'  cxiu-tly  as  those 
for  nioinbcrs,  patiniis.  and  youth  voniinandcr  nii'mticrs  and  suhniitlcd  nmntldy. 

One  eanl  is  to  be  retained  by  the  unit  or  braneli  directorate  and  the  other  is  to 
be  sent  to  the  national  exeeutive  eonannuttee. 

YeUdW  cards  Ix-arinji  the  h'tter  "F"  are  intended  for  enemies;  where  they  are 
(ieiman  a  ■"D"'  is  Ic  be  inserted  at  tlie  top.     Tliey  are  not  to  be  used  for  Jews. 

Lifjlit-blue  cards  bearinj;-  Ilic  letter  "'J"  are  for  Jews. 

Mr.  Kfobs,  was  it  jtist  such  a  cai'd-iiulex  systoiii  which  was  kept  by 
the  foieian  division  of  the  Gestapo  in  H.unburg^ 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  yon  know  of  the  existence  of  these  instructions 
to  the  Gernian-Anierican  Btiiid  before  yesterday  i' 

Mr.  Krebs.  No;  I  did  not;  but  1  knew  that  Nazi  organizations  in 
all  countries  are  harnessed  to  this  (jestapo  machine;  that  the  Gestapo 
utilizes  any  form  of  German  organization — German  business  houses, 
sieamshi})  lines,  air  lines,  and  so  forth — as  a  news-gathering  and 
espionage  auxiliary. 

Mr.  jVIatthews.  Could  there  be  any  doubt  in  your  mind  that  such 
information  compiled  b}^  the  German-American  Bund  in  the  United 
States  would  eventually  find  it  way  to  this  card  file  in  the  Gestapo 
headquarters  in  Hambm-g? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Xot  "eventually,"  but  immediately  as  it  is  gathered.  I 
should  add  there  is  a  special  list  kei)t  by  the  Gestapo's  foreign  division 
of  Americans  who  traveled  abroad,  particularly  Americans  traveling 
on  the  European  Continent^ 

Mr.  Starxes.  Was  there  any  particular  reason  for  that,  Mr.  Krebs? 

]\Ir.  Krebs.  The  compiling  of  names  of  Americans? 

]Mr.  Starxes.  Yes ;  traveling  abroad. 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  theory  is  that  a  large  percentage  or  large  propor- 
tion of  Americans  traveling  abroad  are  naturalized  citizens  of  America 
who  have  originally  come  from  Germany  or  some  of  the  countries 
bordering  on  Germany,  and  also  the  theory  is  that  these  people  on 
returning  to  the  Continent  as  tourists  for  vacations  will  logicall}^  look 
uj)  their  friends  and  relatives  in  the  old  country. 

The  Gestapo  also  compiles  a  complete  register  of  citizens  of  Euro- 
pean countries  who  have  contacts  in  America,  which  is  then  utilized 
for  the  sending  of  propaganda  to  this  countiT,  not  in  large  packages, 
but  in  millions  of  small  pieces  of  propaganda  which  is  to  be  passed 
fi'om  family  to  family  and  friend  to  friend. 

That  list  is  also  utilized  to  put,  if  necessary,  friends  and  rehitives 
of  naturtdized  Americans  under  duress  if  Germany  when  the  time 
comes  when  the  Nazis  and  the  Gestapo  will  try  to  force  these  Ameri- 
can citizens  to  do  something  in  Hitler's  favor,  and  also  will  prevent 
German-Americans  who  are  naturalized  American  citizens  in  doing 
active  work  against  Hitler  in  this  country,  since  it  is  always  brought 
to  their  memory,  "You  have  friends  and  relatives  in  Germany  so 
keep  C|uiet  or  work  with  us.'' 

Mr.  Starxes.  Might  not  those  names  and  those  contacts  also  be 
utilized  to  obtain  information  about  the  industrial  life  of  America, 
her  capacity  to  organize  and  to  produce  for  defense,  and  might  not 
also  those  contacts  be  used  as  a  form  of  es})ion!ige  in  that  connection 
in  order  to  check  upon  the  defense  efforts  of  America  and  the  defense 
secrets  of  America^ 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  There  is  a  special  subdepartment  in  the  foreign 
division  dealing  with  wjiat  is  called  in  Germany  "Industrial  Reports 


8486  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Department."  This  department  has  its  special  schools  and  concen- 
trates on  Germans  in  America  and  Americans  of  German  origin,  who 
are  trained  mechanics,  engineers,  draftsmen;  also  newspapermen  and 
teachers — that  is,  any  likely  person  working  in  one  of  the  vital  indus- 
trial or  cultural  establishments  in  tlie  United  States. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Mr.  Krebs,  I  show  you  a  photostatic  copy  of  a 
cablegram  which  was  dispatched  from  Berlin  to  the  Transocean  News 
in  the  United  States.  This  cablegram  is  in  German.  Will  you  please 
give  a  translation  of  that  cablegram  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  This  cablegram  from  Berlin  to  the  Nazi  news  agency 
in  this  country  has  the  following  text : 

Urgently  require  details  about  the  personality  of  Curran  and  the  role  played 
by  his  seamen's  union.     Please  verify. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  another  cablegram  from  Berlin  to 
Transocean  News  in  this  country,  which  text  is  also  in  German  and 
I  will  ask  you  to  translate  that. 

Mr.  Krebs.  "Urgently  require  details  on  Curran's  latest  declara- 
tion." 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  Dr.  Matthews,  were  those  cablegrams  among 
the  records  that  the  committee  obtained  possession  of  from  Trans- 
ocean News? 

Mr.  Matthews.  From  the  files  of  Transocean  News  itself. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  see.     You  might   identify  those  by   dates.  _ 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  are  identified  in  a  previous  publication  of 
the  committee  by  dates. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  would  like  to  ask  the  witness  if  such  organiza- 
tions having  headquarters  in  Germany,  such  organizations  as  the 
Transocean  News,  have  any  relationship  to  the  Gestapo. 

Mr,  Krebs.  Yes;  the  Transocean  News  was  formed  to  supply  the 
people  of  North,  Central,  and  South  America  with  the  Nazi  version 
of  the  world's  news.  In  other  words,  with  propaganda,  not  readily 
recognized  as  such,  which  is  the  sign  of  good  propaganda.  The  Trans- 
ocean News  was  enabled  to  compete  successfully  with  American  news 
services  by  the  simple  method  of  being  completely  subsidized  by  the 
Nazi  Government  and  supplying  the  news  free  of  charge  to  the  Amer- 
ican press. 

The  officers  of  the  Transocean  News  are  used  by  the  Gestapo  not  as 
a  Gestapo  organization  as  such,  but  in  a  manner  that  each  office,  as  in 
each  other  German  office  of  a  business,  of  a  consulate  or  German  or- 
ganization— there  are  at  least  one  or  two  Gestapo  men  on  the  job  seeing 
that  instructions  from  Berlin  are  carried  out  and  keeping  watch  on 
unreliable  elements  in  these  organizations. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  there  be  any  doubt  whatever  in  your  mind 
about  Transocean  News  being  a  front  for  the  Gestapo  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Absolutely  none. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  in  line  with  the  questions  which  the  chairman 
suggested,  is  that  true  of  all  other  organizations  which  have  their  head- 
quarters in  Germany  today  under  the  Nazi  regime  and  function 
abroad  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Any  organization  of  Germans  existing  abroad  which 
does  not  accept  complete  Nazi  Party  and  Gestapo  domination  is 
smashed. 


U:^-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8487 

Mr.  Stakxes.  Is  that  true  with  reference  to  German-owned  or  Ger- 
man-controlled air  lines? 

Mr.  Krers   That  is  true. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Reojardless  of  whatever  country  they  are  located  in? 

Mr.  Krers.  Yes,  sir. 

jNIr.  Starkes.  Or  operate  in  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  true.  Any  employee  sent  out  from  Germany  to 
take  a  position  in  any  German  business  house  or  transportation  system 
abroad,  must  pass  the  Gestapo  headquarters  and  have  the  okay  of  the 
Gestapo  before  he  is  allowed  to  take  that  position. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  that  would  apply  particularly  to  German-owned 
and  operated  air  lines  in  South  America? 

Mr.  Krers.  Exactly. 

Mr.  jNIatthews.  Isit  correct  to  say  that  when  Transocean  News  is 
required  to  send  information  to  Berlin  on  the  personality  of  Joe  Cur- 
ran  and  his  role  in  the  National  JMaritime  Union,  and  to  send  informa- 
tion on  a  speech  which  he  made,  that  such  information  is  desired  by  the 
Gestapo  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  significance  of  this  to  me  is  that  the  Gestapo  con- 
siders Joseph  Curran,  of  the  National  IMaritime  Union  of  America, 
as  a  A-aluable  instrument  in  its  campaign  to  obstruct  aid  to  Britain, 
and  also  in  the  campaign  to  spread  the  spirit  of  defeatism  in  this 
country. 

Mr.  MATTHE^vs.  Now,  Mr,  Krebs,  is  there  a  division  or  a  section 
in  the  foreign  office  of  the  Gestapo  which  has  the  task  of  carefully 
reading  foreign  publications? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir;  there  is  a  large  hall  on  the  sixth  floor  of  the 
foreign  division  building  in  Hamburg,  where  about  100  people,  who 
are  trained  in  languages,  Gestapo  agents,  do  nothing  but  scan  every 
page  and  every  item  in  every  important  foreign  newspaper.  And  I 
have  heard  it  said  by  important  officials  of  the  department,  including 
Inspector  Kraus,  that  much  valuable  information  about  conditions 
and  doings  in  foreign  nations,  which  Germany  or  Russia  would  guard 
as  military  secrets,  are  culled  by  the  Gestapo  right  from  the  Ameri- 
can press  in  regard  to  the  location  of  new  Army  training  camps,  the 
sailing  of  warships  for  maneuvers,  the  establishment  of  new  defense 
factories  or  the  transformation  of  factories  from  consumer  goods  to 
defense  products.  All  of  these  items  are  clipped  out  by  the  Gestapo 
press  information  bureau  and  pieced  together  and  forms  a  very  valu- 
able portion  of  the  sum  total  of  their  information  about  other  coun- 
tries. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When,  for  example,  a  magazine  of  a  scientific  or 
technical  character  in  the  United  States  publishes  elaborate  data  on 
military  equipment,  would  such  information  be  considered  of  great 
value  to  the  Gestapo? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Of  course  it  would  be  at  once  picked  up  by  one  of  the 
thousands  of  Gestapo  agents  in  this  country  and  either  sent  to  the 
nearest  German  Consulate  or  Embassy,  or  be  directly  sent  to  Ger- 
many by  some  communication  route. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Would  the  publication  of  such  military  informa- 
tion be  considered  treasonable  in  Germany? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Well,  for  example,  yesterday  in  the  New  York  Times 
I  saw  an  item  that  two  American  panzer  divisions  had  been  com- 


3488  UN-AMEKICAN  I'KOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

pletely  organized  and  equipped  and  that  these  new  panzer  divisions 
were  going  to  have  maneuvers  somewhere  in  Tennessee.  The  date 
was  given,  the  phice  of  the  maneuvers,  was  given,  the  numerical 
strength  of  these  new  panzer  divisions  was  given  right  on  the  front 
page  of  the  Times. 

I  believe  if  a  German  editor  did  this  his  head  would  be  off  within 
3  days  for  high  treason, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  that  point  I  am  getting  at  is,  one,  as  to  the 
usefulness  which  the  Gestapo  finds  in  the  freedom  of  the  press  of 
this  country.  Have  you  heard  remarks  among  Gestapo  people,  high 
executives  concerning  the  ease  with  which  they  obtain  such  infor- 
mation in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Krehs.  Yes.  Once  I  heard  the  remark  by  Inspector  Kraus 
in  German — I  will  translate  it :  ''The  lack  of  discipline  of  the  demo- 
cratic press  is  fodder  for  us" — free  food  for  us. 

I  might  mention  that  the  Gestapo  did  not  get  one-tenth  from 
British  newspapers  in  the  form  of  military  and  industrial  informa- 
tion as  they  could  get  from  American  newspapers. 

Mr.  Matthew^s,  And  is  that  also  true  of  American  magazines  as 
well  as  newspapers,  is  such  information  obtained  from  magazines? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  sir;  from  your  very  popular  magazines  such  as 
Life  Magazine,  as  Time  Magazine.  They  are  collected  in  complete 
files  at  Gestapo  headquarters. 

Every  photograph  of  a  new  Army  bomber,  of  a  new  warship,  of  a 
training  camp,  of  a  new  factory  is  carefully  analyzed.  The  Gestapo 
has  apparatus  where  they  have  a  full-page  photograph  in  Life  and 
they  will  cut  that  full  page  photograph  into  10  or  12  sections  and 
each  section  is  enlarged  to  twice  the  size  of  this  newspaper  and  then 
ihese  enlarged  sections  are  pieced  together  again  and  handed  over 
to  the  engineering  department  of  the  military  intelligence  or  of  the 
central  industrial  council  of  the  Nazi  Party,  to  be  checked  on  its  use- 
fulness for  any  of  the  German  services. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  stated  a  moment  ago  that  the  headquarters 
of  the  foreign  division  of  the  Gestapo  was  located  in  Hamburg, 
that  is  the  executive  offices,  because  that  was  a  port  out  of  which 
radiated ■ 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  The  agents  of  the  Gestapo? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr,  Matthews.  In  the  guise  of  German  seamen? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Now,  will  you  please  elaborate  on  that  statement? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Years  before  Hitler  actually  came  to  ])ower,  beginning 
in  1930  and  1931,  the  Nazi  Party  made  tremendous  efforts  at  the 
complete  Nazi  domination  of  the  crews  of  German  ships.  I  know 
this  phase  of  the  Nazi  fight  for  power  in  great  detail,  since  I  was  in 
the  leadership  of  the  Gommunist  organizations  in  shipping. 

By  1923  already,  practically  all  the  crews  of  the  large  German 
liners  were  organized  wnthin  the  Nazi  Party  and  the  Storm  Troops. 
They  organized  a  special  marine  section  of  the  Storm  Troops  organi- 
zation which  is  called  the  Marine  Storm. 

After  Hitler  came  to  power  any  German  seaman  who  had  the 
slightest  political  blemish  from  the  Nazi  point  of  view  on  his  record, 


UN-AM EKICAN  1'H01'A(;AN1)A  ACTHITIES  8489 

was  not  ]ioniiitt(Hl  to  <ro  to  soa  on  Ijoard  Gorman  ships.  The  men  per- 
mitted to  sail  on  (Jei-man  ships  had  to  be  100  percent  trnstworthy, 
and  even  amon<>-  these  100  percent  Nazi  crews  were  special  Nazi 
units  called  in  P^n<j:lish  "points  of  support,"  and  also  in  an  imier  or- 
ganization 01-  micleiis  of  ti'ained  Nazis  workinij  for  the  Gestapo  direct. 
By  UK]')  the  ft)reiyii  division  of  the  (irestapo,  that  is,  the  marine 
department  of  the  foreign  division  of  the  Gestapo,  moved  into  a 
large  building  of  its  own  which  is  called  the  Stellahaus,  right  on  the 
watei'front  of  Hamburg — a  modern  10-story  building  devoted  solely 
for  the  maritime — the  connnunications  end  of  the  foreign  division  of 
the  Gestapo. 

Mr.  Matthews.  May  I  iliterrupt  you  there  at  that  point? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Ah'.  Matthews.  "Was  the  seamen's  organization  at  that  time  taken 
out  from  under  the  control  of  the  Labor  Front  in  Germany  and  placed 
directly  under  the  control  of  the  (jestapo? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  right.  In  1935,  a  few  months  after  the  forma- 
tion of  the  foreign  division,  the  former  trade  union  of  German  sea- 
men, which  nuiintained  the  name  of  "trade  unicm,"  after  the  Nazis 
took  over  and  smashed  the  old  Socialist  trade  unions  in  Germany 
which  had  been  under  the  jurisdiction  of  Dr.  Robert  Ley  of  the  Ger- 
man Labor  Front,  in  Jul}'  or  August  of  1935,  this  wdiole  seamen's  sec- 
tion of  the  German  Labor  Front  was  taken  out  of  Dr.  Ley's  jurisdic- 
tion and  placed  under  the  direct  jurisdiction  of  the  Gestapo. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  would  you  say  that  ])rior  to  the  outbreak  of 
the  present  war  the  principal  contacts  of  the  Gestapo  with  the  United 
States  were  through  the  organized  German  seamen  under  the  direc- 
tion of  the  Gestapo^ 

Mr.  Krp:bs.  It  was  through  German  seamen  a  large  part  of  coastal 
espionage  was  carried  on  by  trained  Nazis  serving  on  German  ships. 

In  the  fall  of  1935  there  was  not  a  single  overseas  ship  in  the  Ger- 
man-American marine  which  did  not  have  in  its  crew  Nazi  photo- 
graphic specialists  whose  sole  task  was  to  carry  on  photographic 
surveys  of  the  coast  lines  of  foreign  nations,  photograph  harbor  en- 
trances, case  docks,  shore  fortifications,  shipyards  and  so  forth. 

There  was  a  si)ecial  department  of  the  Gestapo  devoted  to  the 
analysis  of  this  material.  The  results  were  astonishing.  There  was 
practically  no  port  in  the  whole  world  which;  was  not  in  the  Gestapo 
offices  in  the  form  of  cf)mplete  photographic  surveys  brought  in  by 
thousands  of  Nazi  seamen-photographers. 

Mr.  ]\L\rTiH:ws.  Did  the  Gestapo  attempt  to  place  Nazi  seamen  on 
non-German-owned  boats? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes ;  that  was  systematically  done  as  well  as  on  Ameri- 
can ships. 

Mr.  ^Iattiiews.  Do  5'ou  know  whether  that  attempt  was  successful 
in  any  measure  oi-  not  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  was  successful  in  some  measure,  particularly  where 
the  Nazis  detailed  to  this  work  succeeded  in  entering  this  countrv  as 
quota  inunigrants  and  obtained  first  citizenship  pai)ers,  and  wdiere 
they  were  then  in  a  ])osition  to  enter  one  of  the  American  dockers'  or 
seamen's  unions  and  become  crew  members  aboard  American  ships. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  some  Gestapo  agents 
were  sent  to  the  United  States  in  the  guise  of  political  refugees? 


8490  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  this  group  forms  a  veiy  large  group  of  people 
used  by  the  Gestapo.  Some  are  trained  Nazis  posing  as  political 
refugees,  but  many  are  actually  former  political  prisoners  from  Ger- 
many whose  families  are  kept  as  hostages  and  who  were  sent  out 
to  work  for  the  Gestapo  in  foreign  countries,  including  America, 
under  the  threat  that  they  write  monthly  reports  and  if  the  reports 
do  not  come  in,  "your  family  will  be  arrested ;  if  our  checking  shows 
that  your  reports  contain  misleading  information  your  family  will 
also  be  arrested." 

These  people,  who  being  in  some  measure  professional  anti-Nazis, 
find  it  particularly  easy  to  be  accepted  by  the  public  of  democratic 
countries,  since  they  have  really  an  anti-Nazi  record  and  act  not  as 
Nazis  but  out  of  deadly  fear  of  the  Nazis  throwing  their  wives  and 
children  into  concentration  camps  or  murdered. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words  the  German  Government,  acting  in 
conjunction  with  the  Gestapo,  sends  political  refugees,  so-called,  into 
the  various  countries  who'  have  something  of  an  anti-Nazi  record — 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Because  the  state  of  public  opinion  throughout  the 
world  generally,  is  against  Germany  and  they  feel  by  that  means  they 
will  get  favorable  entree  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  they  use  them  for  that  purpose  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  It  has  gone  so  far  that  to  my  experience  it  was 
impossible  for  anyone  to  be  released  from  a  Nazi  concentration  camp 
unless  he  signed  a  pledge  that  he  would  serve  the  Gestapo.  The  great 
majority  were  given  jobs  in  German  industries  to  spy  on  anti-Nazis 
in  (xerman  industries. 

They  had  to  write  weekly  reports,  but  anyone  who  had  any  sort  of 
experience  in  travel  or  had  a  family  or  friends  in  outside  nations,  he 
was  used  for  foreign  work  provided  he  had  a  family  or  some  sort  of 
financial  reserve  which  could  be  kept  in  Germany  as  a  guaranty  for 
his  loyalty. 

Mr.  Starnes.  As  a  usual  rule  no  one  was  let  out  of  a  concentration 
camp  or  out  of  prison  without  first  the  Nazis  obtaining  from  that  per- 
son a  pledge  that  he  would  serve  the  Gestapo  when  released  wherever 
sent? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Anyone  who  would  not  sign  the  pledge  had  no  chance 
of  being  released  at  all. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Had  you  yourself  spent  a  good  deal  of  your  early 
childhood  traveling  throughout  the  world? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  I  was  sent  by  the  Gestapo  to  Denmark  and  had 
contacts  with  Gestapo  couriers  in  Belgium  and  in  Holland. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  a  fact,  that  you  had  had  much  experience 
in  world  travel  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  I  traveled  much  before  and  the  Gestapo  knew  it 
and  I  was  a  seaman  by  profession. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  was  the  reason  you  were  then  permitted 
to  go  outside  of  Germany  for  the  work  that  you  did  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  but  they  had  my  wife  and  child  in  Germany  as 
hostages. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  German  sea- 
men's homes  in  the  United  States  in  such  cities  as  New  Orleans, 
Philadelphia,  San  Francisco,  and  New  York? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8491 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  There  were  from  Republican  times  in  Germany 
a  number  of  German  seamen's  homes  in  American  ports,  in  North 
American  ports  and  also  in  Latin  American  ports.  The  best  known 
were  in  New  York,  Philadelphia,  New  Orleans,  San  Francisco,  Monte- 
video, and  Buenos  Aires. 

These  German  seamen's  homes  served  as  shipping  centers  for  Ger- 
man seamen.  When  a  German  captain  needed  a  crew  he  went  to  the 
consul  and  the  consul  went  to  the  manager  of  the  German  sailor's 
home  and  lie  supplied  the  men.  The}'  were  usually  in  charge  of  a 
seamen's  chaplain — seamen  missionaries. 

After  Hitler  came  to  power  all  these  managers  of  German  seamen's 
homes  were  recalled  to  Germany  and  trained  Nazis  were  sent  out  to 
take  charge  of  these  seamen's  homes  and  were  in  control  of  the  ship- 
ping out  of  German  sailors  to  foreign  ports. 

The  result  was  that  anyone  who  was  known  as  an  anti-Nazi  or 
who  was  not  willing  to  work  with  the  Nazis  had  no  chance  of  obtain- 
ing a  berth  through  these  German  shipping  offices. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  Nazi  managers  took  care  that  trained  Nazis 
were  put  on  ships  which  were  regarded  to  be  on  strategic  runs — that 
is,  sailing  to  strategic  ports. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  many  German  citizens  sent  abroad  by  the 
Gestapo  and  particularly  to  the  United  States,  with  instructions  to 
obtain  their  first  papers  as  soon  as  possible  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  Whenever  the  Gestapo  could  find  someone  who 
showed  enthusiasm  for  this  sort  of  task,  they  usually  sent  him  out 
and  in  their  own  words  it  was  "kinderspeil" — it  was  child's  play  to 
get  Germans  who  came  to  America  as  quota  immigrants  to  take  out 
first  papers  and  then  they  were  eligible  for  work  m  any  of  the  key 
industries,  in  shipping,  and  also  could  easily  enter  the  United  States 
Army  as  volunteers,  could  enter  the  United  States  Coast  Guard  as  a 
means  of  obtaining  citizenship  in  3  years  instead  of  5  years,  which 
was  just  incidental,  but  important  work  aside  from  their  general 
work  for  the  Nazis  in  the  Gestapo. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  said  it  was  easy  for  them  to  do  that.  What  I 
want  to  know  is  whether  you  know  whether  or  not  they  were  sent 
here  with  instructions  to  do  that  ^ 

Mr.  Krebs.  Oh,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  heard  discussions  along  those  lines? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  was  personally  questioned  by  Gestapo  inspectors  on 
the  possibility  of  getting  men  into  the  Coast  Guard. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  that  a  German  coming  into  this  country, 
coming  over  here  and  taking  out  his  first  papers,  could  get  into  the 
United  States  Army  and  then  could  obtain  full  citizenship  in  3  years 
because  he  was  in  the  Army? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Instead  of  the  customary  5  years? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir;  that  was  the  custom. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  situation  w^as  utilized  by  the  Gestai)o? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir;  utilized  ever  since  1935. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  the  same  was  true  of  the  Coast  Guard:  is 
that  correct? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  same  relations  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 


8492  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

_  Mr.  Starnes.  How  did  these  seamen's  homes  operate  in  this  connec- 
tion where  unions  had  been  establislied  in  these  union  halls? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  Nazi  seamen  coming  to  this  country  ? 

Mr.  Starmes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Krebs.  They  usually  managed  to  become  crew  members  of  non- 
American  ships  sailing  from  American  ports,  particularly  the  Scan- 
dinavian merchant  fleets  were  well  penetrated.  Many  Dutch  ships 
had  Nazis  in  their  crews  and  some  Belgian  ships — some  of  the  largest 
Belgian  ships  were  manned  by,  oh,  I  would  say,  over  20  percent  by 
German  Nazis.    Many  of  them  joined  the  American  seamen's  union. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  the  National  Maritime  Union? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  the  National  Maritime  Union  and  also  the 
westrcoast  union,  but  the  easiest  mark  was  the  National  Maritime 
Union,  since  it  was  only  necessary  for  them  to  act  as  Communists  in 
order  to  be  readily  accepted.  And  the  policy  of  the  Gestapo 
in  labor  unions,  since  the  fact  exists  that  the  Gestapo,  the  Nazi 
itself  could  not  operate  as  a  Nazi  fraction  in  a  union,  is  that  the  Nazis 
in  the  American  labor  unions  will  propose  a  Communist  policy  as  long 
as  such  Communist  policy  concurs  with  the  policy  followed  by  the 
Nazi  propaganda  machine. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  Gestapo  agents  will  join  the  Communist  frac- 
tions of  such  a  union  instead  of  trying  to  set  up  a  Nazi  fraction  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  They  will  not  start  by  joining  a  Communist  fraction. 
They  will  enter  the  union  as  simple  seamen  and  by  talking  radically, 
by  taking  part  in  the  little,  partial  strikes  against  bad  food  or  for 
over-time  payment,  attract  the  attention  of  Communist  fraction 
scouts,  wdio  are  always  on  the  lookout  for  new  recruits,  and  any  young 
Nazi  that  obtains  a  berth  aboard  an  American  ship  under  the  pre- 
tension that  he  is  becoming  an  American  citizen,  and  talks  radically, 
will  sooner  or  later  be  approached  by  the  Communist  organizer. 

The  Gestapo  tactics  is  not  to  ask  to  be  admitted  but  to  act  in  a  way 
that  will  bring  the  other  fellow  to  come  and  ask  the  Gestapo  man, 
"Please  come  inside  and  help  us.' 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  know  of  your  own  personal  knowledge  that 
Gestapo  agents  have  joined  the  National  Maritime  Union  for  the 
purpose  of  obtaining  information  and  for  the  purpose  of  creating 
trouble  in  the  American  merchant  marine? 

^Ir.  Krebs.  I  know  of  two  who  were  sent  to  this  country  and  ac- 
tually did  this  work.  One  was  Kurt  Bailich.  Kurt  Bailich  was  a 
seaman,  German  seaman,  active  for  the  Gestapo  already  since  1933. 
He  was  sent  over  by  the  Gestapo  in  1935  to  join  the  East  Coast  Sea- 
men's Union,  I  believe — I  don't  know  if  the  National  Maritime  Union 
existed  at  that  time. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Anyway,  the  predecessor  of  the  National  Maritime 
Union  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  right.  It  was  the  union  before  that  that  he 
joined.  The  Gestapo  received  reports  from  him  as  late  as  1937. 
These  reports  were  shown  to  me  by  Gestapo  inspectors  to  show  me 
the  nature  of  the  work  that  they  expected  from  me. 

These  reports  were  sent  from  New  Orleans.  Another  man,  an- 
other Nazi  operating  from  American  ships,  was  a  man  named  August 
Kastner.  Kastner  was  a  former  Communist  who  turned  to  Gestaj^o 
work  soon  after  Hitler  came  to  power.  He  was  one  of  the  Gestapo 
couriers  aboard  the  German  liner  Westemland  to  New  York.     In 


r.\  AMERICAN  PUOI»AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8493 

VX\{j,  or  the  be<2;iiiinng'  of  1937,  he  left  the  shij)  in  New  York  to  con- 
centrate on  work  in  American  seamen's  organizations.  Usually  the 
Nazi  seamen  actino-  for  the  (iestapo  do  not  jump  at  once  with  both 
feet  into  the  American  trade-union  work  without  first  having  gone 
through  a  school  of  smaller  work,  serving  aboard  German  ships, 
serving  as  couriers,  serving  as  members  of  the  harbor-control  stations, 
and  so  forth. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  will  you  please  describe  what  the  nature  and 
duties  of  a  harbor  control  bureau  are? 

Mr.  Krehs.  The  harbor  control  bureaus  of  the  Gestapo  were  started 
during  the  Spanish  civil  war.  At  that  time  Germany  made  every 
ell'ort  to  prevent  the  shii)ment  of  food  and  war  materials  to  Loyalist 
Spain,  and  in  order  to  check  the  movement  of  such  shipments,  the 
Gestapo  organized  observation  groups  in  many  important  European 
ports,  particularly  in  the  Scandinavian  countries,  Belgium,  Holland, 
and  France.  • 

Nazi  seamen  were  sent  to  those  ports  under  the  guise  of  seamen, 
but  they  did  not  ship  out  but  remained  in  that  port  engaged  in 
nothing  else  but  to  check  on  ship  movements,  nature  of  ship  cargoes, 
and  so  forth. 

This  work  was  done  in  great  detail.  Each  harbor  control,  pos- 
sibly, had  a  couple  of  men  running  around  the  docks  photographing 
labels  and  the  inscriptions  on  packing  cases  to  determine  the  factories 
which  had  sent  out  these  goods. 

They  walked  aboard  ships  during  the  lunch  hour  in  the  guise  of 
jobless  seamen  coming  to  bum  a  meal,  and  in  conversation  with  the 
crew  tried  to  find  out  the  destination  of  the  ship,  the  composition  of 
the  crew;  and  wherever  possible,  attempts  were  made  to  contact  the 
wireless  operators  of  the  ship. 

All  this  information  was  forwarded  to  the  Gestapo,  and  the  Gestapo 
used  it  in  counteractions  to  prevent  such  shipment. 

This  mode  of  harbor  supervision  was  so  successful  during  the 
Spanish  civil  war  that  it  became  a  world-wide  feature  of  the  mari- 
time service  of  the  Gestapo,  particularly  where  the  press  of  the  coun- 
try does  not  rejiort  in  detail  on  ship  movements. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  particular  stress  laid  upon  making  contact 
with  the  radiomen  aboard  ships? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVhat  v  ould  be  the  usefulness  of  radiomen  aboard 
ships  to  the  Gestapo?      Will  you  describe  that? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Well,  froin  the  very  beginning  the  original  efforts 
to  conti-ol  the  radio  personnel  aboard  merchant  ships,  politically,  was 
made  by  the  Comnnniists.  They  did  that  with  some  success,  and 
the  Gestapo  became  interested  in  this  also  during  1935.  It  ail 
started  with  the  marching  of  the  German  Army  into  the  Rhine- 
land.  It  coincided  with  the  organization  of  the  foreign  division 
of  the  Gestapo. 

Gestapo  inspectors  singled  out  Communist  prisoners  in  German 
concentration  camps  who  liad  had  maritime  experience  and  questioned 
them  as  to  organization  methods,  lines  of  approach,  program  of  de- 
mand, and  so  forth,  for  radio  personnel  aboard  the  sihps  of  various 
nations. 

Aboard  the  German  merchant  marine  there  was  not  one  radio 
operator  who  was  not  a  member  of  the  Nazi  Party,  and  radio  opera- 


8494  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

tors  aboard  German  ships  were  used  to  relay  radio  messages  of 
confidential  material  gathered  in  a  foreign  country  by  Nazi  spies. 

For  example,  material  gathered  by  Gestapo  people  in  this  country 
in  New  York,  would  not  be  relayed  directly  by  short-wave  station 
from  American  territory  to  Germany, 

Before  the  war  broke  out  information  was  given  to  the  radio 
operators  of  Gei'man  ships,  and  that  information  was  radioed  to 
Germany  shortly  after  the  ship  left  port.  In  this  way  mobile 
communication  stations,  which  could  not  be  traced,  were  available 
for  that  work. 

Considerable  efforts  have  been  made  to  penetrate — to  harness — 
radio  operators  on  foreign  ships  to  the  Gestapo  apparatus,  with 
only  minor  success. 

Ml'.  Starnes.  Do  you  know^  where  the  foreign  offices  of  the  Gestapo 
were  located  in  some  of  the  countries  outside  of  Germany? 

Mr.  Keebs.  Well,  I  know  the  address  for  Denmark, 'and  I  know 
the  address  for  Belgium. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  know  those  two? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  did  not  know  it  for  Italy  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  Danish  interests 

Mr.  Starnes.  For  Italy — the  Gestapo  address  in  Italy? 

Mr.  Krebs.  No  ;  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Or  Spain? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  I^JiEBS.  Well,  they  need  no  direct  addresses  there,  because  there 
is  police  union,  political  police  union,  between  the  political  police 
of  Germany,  Italy,  and  Japan  and  the  members  of  the  original  Comin- 
tern pact.  They  interchange  officials.  Italian  officials  of  the  Italian 
Ovra  are  active  in  German  Gestapo  headquarters,  and  German  Gestapo 
officials  are  active  in  Italian  political  police  headquarters — the  same 
thing  with  Japan. 

I  have  known  of  cases  where  German  anti-Nazi  seamen  sailed  on 
British  ships,  and  these  British  ships  came  to  Italy  and  Gestapo  people 
came  aboard  to  take  these  German  anti-Nazis  off  who  were  later 
spirited  from  Italy  to  Germany,  which  show^ed  me  that  the  political 
police  of  Italy  and  Japan  and  Germany  keep  lists  of  people  wanted 
by  the  German  Gestapo,  and  checks  on  the  identity  of  people  coming 
in  on  Italian  or  foreign  ships  in  the  hope  of  finding  a  wanted  man 
once  in  awhile. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  any  such  working  relationship 
exists  now  between  Germany  and  Russia,  since  the  pact  of  1939  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  don't  know  if  such  a  corporation  exists  now,  but  I 
wouldn't  risk  going  aboard  a  ship  to  Vladivostok. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know,  Mr.  Krebs,  to  what  extent  the  courier 
system  of  communications  has  been  supplanted  by  this  short-wave 
radio  method  of  communications,  since  the  outbreak  of  the  war? 

Mr.  Krebs.  In  the  Gestapo  schools,  which  exist  in  every  large  Ger- 
man city,  a  special  course  is  devoted  to  the  training  of  future  Gestapo 
agents  in  methods  of  communication. 

The  usual  method  used  before  the  war  broke  out  was  the  courier 
method,  which  was  taken  over  by  the  Nazis  in  whole  from  the  Com- 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8495 

munists.     It  ^vas  the  placing  of  Nazis  on  German  or  foreign  ships 
as  crew  members  who,  in  foreign  ports,  received  their  materiah 

As  soon  as  the  ship  left  port  the  agent  who  had  given  them  the 
material  notified  by  a  short  message  the  home  port,  and  as  soon  as 
that  ship  entered  the  German  port,  a  man  from  the  Gestapo  office  was 
aboard  to  take  care  of  that  material  so  that  the  seamen  carrying  such 
illegal  material  would  not  have  a  chance  to  do  anything  wrong  with 
it  except  tlirow  it  overboard  on  the  high  seas. 

But  in  cases  where  information  is  very  urgent  and  cannot  wait  for 
courier  service,  or  where  courier  service  is  interrupted,  the  radio  way 
of  communication  is  used. 

One  important  item  in  the  communication  sources  is  a  warning 
to  Gestapo  agents  to  beware  of  using  fixed  short  wave  sending  sta- 
tions— not  to  establish  short-wave  senders  in  one  department,  in  one 
house,  and  leave  it  there,  but  to  make  everything  mobile  and  port- 
able— change  it  from  day  to  day. 

One  of  the  methods  advocated  for  seaport  cities  was  to  get  pos- 
session of  a  number  of  small  yachts,  motor  launches,  fishing  craft 
ostensibly  under  private  ownership  of  Germans  who  are  not  open 
Nazis,  and  that  such  short-wave  messages  are  best  sent,  not  from 
ashore  but  a  few  miles  out  from  shore  at  sea,  since  then  a  detection 
of  the  station  is  impossible,  since  the  boat  or  the  yacht  or  the  launch 
after  sending  the  message  comes  back  into  port. 

Mr.  Starnes.  By  the  way,  I  didn't  understand  you  thoroughly  a 
moment  ago  about  the  method  of  the  Gestapo  operating  in  this 
country  where  they  had  clearing  houses,  general  clearing  houses  of 
information,  and  so  forth  and  so  on.  What  city  or  cities  do  they 
operate  from  chiefly  here  in  the  United  States^ 

Mr.  Krebs.  Before  the  outbreak  of  the  war  it  was  New  York,  be- 
cause New  York  offered  the  best  communications  with  German3\ 

Mr.  Starnes.  More  contacts  with  the  German  Nation  were  made 
through  the  port  of  New  York  than  elsewhere  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  correct:  but  since  the  outbreak  of  the  war, 
since  the  disruption  of  the  North  Atlantic  communications  lines, 
there  is  every  indication  that  the  clearing  house  has  been  moved  to 
San  Francisco,  since  the  communications  mostly  go  over  Russia 
and  there  is  comparatively  no  disturbance  in  shipping  and  mails 
from  the  West. 

Mr.  Starnes.  From  the  West  to  Russia? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  when,  for  example,  I  read  or  heard  that  a  man 
like  Captain  Wiedemann  was  appointed  to  the  German  consul  general 
in  San  Francisco,  a  post  which  was  before  him  taken  in  by  a  very 
minor  Nazi  official,  and  San  Francisco  was  not  important  from  the 
point  of  view  of  the  German  Empire,  but  when  suddenly  AViede- 
mann,  one  of  the  best-trained  and  most-trusted  men  in  the  German 
diplomatic  service,  is  given  such  a  seemingly  small  post  as  consul 
in  San  Francisco,  it  means  something. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  it  your  experience  and  your  information,  based 
on  your  past  life  and  your  contacts  with  both  organizations,  and 
knowing  the  situation  as  you  do  here,  that  now,  since  the  war  has 
broken  out,  the  more  effective,  or  the  most  effective  part  of  their 
operations  have  been  along  the  west  coast? 

I  am  speaking  now  both  of  the  Nazi  and  Communist  Parties. 

62626 — 41— vol.  14 22 


8496  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  heard  in  the  foreign  division  of  the  Gestapo,  toward 
the  end  of  1937,  repeated  conversations  on  this  country.  It  started 
when  Hitler  mentioned  America — it  started  with  Hitler's  paragraphs 
on  America  in  the  book  Mein  Kampf. 

The  Gestapo  people  regarded  America  already  in  1937  as  a  hostile 
country  and  an  enemy  country. 

Mr.  'Starnes.  As  far  back  as  1937  they  referred  to  America  as 
being  a  hostile  country  or  an  enemy  country? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  right.  The  same  as  they  regarded  France, 
Belgium,  Poland,  Czechoslovakia  as  enemy  countries,  and  from  their 
conversations  that  I  heard  I  had  the  impression  that  in  the  Gestapo 
brains  the  idea  was  alive  that  in  case  of  a  war  it  would  be  less  a 
question  of  open  military  clash  between  America  and  Germany  but  it 
would  be  between  Japan  and  America  and  that,  therefore,  a  large 
part  of  the  Nazi  etfort  and  Gestapo  effort  in  this  country  would  be 
concentrated  on  the  west  coast;  also  because  the  largest  naval  bases 
are  there. 

The  bulk  of  the  Navy  is  kept  on  the  west  coast.  Particular  interest 
was  shown  by  the  foreign  division  for  the  Hawaiian  Islands,  partic- 
ularly Pearl  Harbor  and  Honolulu. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  was,  of  course,  because  they  regarded  Hawaii 
as  the  key  to  the  Pacific  Ocean  and  the  key  to  the  American  defense 
system  on  the  west  coast  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  It  was  felt  that  any  long-distance  operation  of 
the  American  Navy  would  not  start  out  from  San  Pedro  or  San 
Diego,  but  would  have  their  last  American  base  in  Hawaii  for  actiorx 
toward  Japan. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  Gestapo  or  Nazi  conception  of  war,  does 
the  war  begin  only  when  shots  are  fired  or  teiritory  is  actually 
invaded  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  No;  that  is  the  democratic  conception  of  war. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  their  conception? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  democratic  nations  define  war  as  a  war  which 
starts  when  soldiers  start  marching,  but  not  in  tlie  totalitarian  mind, 
and  particularly  the  Gestapo  mind.  With  them  the  war  starts  when 
they  send  their  first  agent  across  another  country's  frontier  with  a 
secret  mission. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Let  me  ask  you  this  question,  Mr.  Krebs:  Based  upon 
your  experience  and  your  contacts  with  the  Gestapo  and  Nazi 
regimes,  is  it  your  opinion  that  a  great  deal  of  their  work  is  carried 
on,  their  propaganda  work  and  their  subversive  work  is  carried  on 
through  the  consular  agencies  in  this  countrv? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  make  use  of  their  consular  agents  for  propa- 
ganda purposes  and  for  the  acquisition  and  accumulation  and  for- 
warding or  transmission  of  information  vital  to  the  Nazi  Gov- 
ernment ? 

Mr.  KRf:BS.  You  see,  the  Nazi  movement  is,  as  the  Communist 
movement,  divided  in  two,  I  would  say,  lines  of  progress.  One  is 
comparatively  open  and  legal  and  the  other  is  completely  under- 
ground and  illegal. 

The  distribution  of  propaganda  and  agitation,  anything  which 
tends  to  influence  public  opinion,  belongs  to  the  so-called  legal  por- 
tion of  their  work  and  is  carried  on  largely  through  the  consulates 


UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8497 

and  t]iroii*rli  siu-li  oi<>aiiizati()ns  as  Fritz  KiihiTs  biiiul  and  other 
German  orjjanizations,  which  also  have  their  headcjuarters  in  Ham- 
bur«r  and  specializes  in  Nazi  propa<ianda. 

The  nnder<>roiind  part  ()i)erates,  to  my  knowledge,  independent 
of  the  consuhites.  For  exami)le,  when  I  was  sent  to  Denmark  in 
1936,  the  Gestapo  thought  that  I  was  actually  carrying  out  their 
instructions.  T  was  warned  never  to  a[)proach  a  German  consulate. 
They  had  the  theory  that  German  consulates  are  being  watched 
by  members  of  eneniy  organizations  or  by  police  and  that  anyone 
entering  or  leaving  a  consulate  would  sooner  or  later  become  identified 
or  associated  with  the  Nazi  cause. 

Mr.  Starxes.  AVhile  that  may  be  true,  was  it  your  experience  that 
a  portion  of  the  tinancial  burden  of  carrying  on  this  campaign  of 
pro])aganda  came  through  the  consular  agents? 

ISIr.  Krebs.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starxes.  That  was  a  means  of  transmitting  money? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

^Ir.  Starxes.  From  Nazi  Germany? 

]\Ir.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

^Ir.  Starxes.  Even  to  the  undercover  agents  of  the  departments? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Wouldn't  this  be  true,  too,  that  in  each  one  of  these 
organizations  that  were  open  and  known  and  carrying  on  propa- 
ganda work,  there  Avould  be  placed  police  representatives  to  see  how 
things  were  going  within  that  organization? 

Ml'.  Krebs.  I  did  not  quite  get  the  question.  Mr.  Voorhis. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  say  there  are  two  things  conducted  entirely  dif- 
ferent from  each  other — two  divisions  of  the  work? 

Mr.  ICrebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  One  is  the  propaganda  work,  which  is  open? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  largely  legal  and  carried  on  by  organizations 
that  people  in  the  United  States  know  exist  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  the  other  is  an  underground  working  of  espio- 
nage and  secret  police  work  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  My  question  was  whether  the  organizations  that 
were  carrying  on  the  propaganda  work  didn't  always  have  placed 
in  them  people  from  the  secret  police? 

Mr.  Krebs.   (No  answer.) 

]Mr.  Voorhis.  So  as  to  watch  what  was  happening? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  wouldn't  it  also  be  true  that  each  consulate 
would  probably  have  such  a  man? 

Mr.  Krei5s.  Well,  the  organizations  carrying  on  propaganda  work 
usually  have  a  nuich  larger  membership  than  the  underground  oper- 
ations and  there  are  constantly  scouts  of  the  underground  apparatus 
in  the  open  or  half-oi)en  mass  organizatiims,  first,  to  control  the  lead- 
ershi))  of  these  organizations,  but  chiefly  to  look  for  new  material  for 
underground  work. 

Anyone  who  has  been  active  in  the  Communist  Party  or  in  Fascist 
organizations  will  have  the  experience  that  when  a  marked  new  talent 


8498  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

pops  up  in  some  lower  unit  in  the  mass  organization,  this  young  talent 
suddenly  disappears  from  the  scene.  No  one  sees  him  any  more.  That 
means  he  is  recruited  for  the  underground  section  and  has  completely 
severed  relations,  official  relations  with  the  propaganda  organization. 

The  agencies  of  the  North  German  Lloyd  Line,  the  Hamburg 
American  Line  in  New  York,  for  exami)le,  had  much  more  to  do  with 
the  underground  organizations  of  the  Gestapo,  in  my  opinion,  than 
the  German  Consulate  in  New  York. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  would  like  to  ask  this  question:  Can  you  be  any 
more  specific  about  such  success  as  may  be  achieved  by  tlie  Gestapo 
or  by  the  Nazis  of  any  kind,  or  by  the  Communists,  in  getting  person- 
nel into  positions  as  radio  operators  on  American  ships? 

You  said  the  attempt  was  made  and  the  committee  has  had  testi- 
mony to  that  effect  previously,  but  I  wonder  whether  you  have  any 
specific  knowledge  about  the  ttegree  of  the  success  of  such  efforts  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Well,  offhand  I  know  of  one — I  can  give  you  his  name. 
His  name  is  Aage  Moeller — M-o-e-l-l-e-r  with  a  Scandinavian  "o." 
He  is  third  officer  aboard  the  Standard  Oil  Co.  tanker,  the  Calliope. 
and  also  a  member  of  the  G.  P.  U.  for  some  years,  in  contact  with 
Jensen  and  another  G.  P.  U.  chief  who  is  in  New  York  now,  George 
Hegner. 

He  has  an  office  in  Whitehall  Street  and  his  number  is  in  the  tele- 
phone book. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Is  this  fellow  on  this  boat  now,  as  far  as  you  know — is 
he  on  the  Standard  Oil  tanker  still  as  far  as  you  know  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Well,  my  information  is  less  than  6  weeks  old  on  this 
man. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  would  you  estimate  has  been  the  degree  of 
success  in  getting  these  people  into  positions  as  radio  operators? 

Mr.  Krebs.  As  radio  operators  the  Nazis  will  have  very  great  diffi- 
culties. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  about  the  Communists?  Would  they  have  as 
much  difficulty  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  don't  think  so,  not  so  great.  If  the  N;t.zis  have  men 
among  the  radio  personnel  today  on  American  ships,  tlien  they  are 
usually  men  of  German  origin,  but  the  Communists  find  it  much 
easier  because  the  Nazis  have  a  more  or  less  straight  political  ap- 
proach and  appeal  to  pride  and  national  institutions,  but  the  Com- 
munists with  their  economic  approach  talk  of  better  living,  of  any- 
thing except  G.  P.  U.  and  world  revolutions. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  More  contacts? 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  the  sum  total  of  the  effect  at  the  present  time  is 
the  same — it  doesn't  make  any  difference  whether  it  is  a  Communist 
or  a  Nazi  aboard  the  ship,  the  information  and  the  assistance  is  given 
to  Hitler  and  Germany  just  the  same? 

Mr.  Krebs.  My  opinion  is  that  the  Communist  control  of  the  Na- 
tional Maritime  Union  plays  today  exactly  the  game  Hitler  and 
Goebbels  would  want  the  American  trade-unions  to  play  with  no  con- 
cessions. 

Mr.  Matthews.  With  no  "concessions,"  you  mean,  "with  no  quali- 
fications" ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  mean  100  percent.  Mr.  Goebbels  himself — if  Mr. 
Goebbels  himself  were  in  charge  of  the  National  Maritime  Union, 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §499 

Messrs.  Curran,  Ray,  and  so  forth,  could  not  act  differently  thaii 
they  act  now. 

Mr.  jMaithews.  In  that  connection  who  was  tlie  man  who  for 
many  years  headed  the  maritime  work  of  the  Communist  Interna- 
tional? 

Mr.  Kreks.  The  ^enertd  secretary  of  the  maritime  division  of  the 
Connnunist  International  was,  from  1923  to  the  end  of  1939,  Albert 
Walter. 

Mr.  Matthews.  W-a-1-t-e-r? 

]\[r.  Krebs.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVith  his  headquarters  in  Hamburg? 

Mr.  Krebs.  His  headquarters  were,  during  those  10  years,  in  Ham- 
burg at  the  address  on  Rothesood  Strasse,  No.  8. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  for  more  than  10  years  Albert  Walter  was 
the  head  of  the  work  of  the  International  among  the  seamen  of  the 
world ;  is  that  right  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Among  the  seamen  of  all  countries,  including  America. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  knoAv  Albert  Walter? 

Mr.  IvREBS.  I  knew  him  very  well. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  work  under  his  direction  or  in  his  ap- 
paratus ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  saw  him  for  many  years  almost  every — for  years  I 
was  in  his  office  most  every  day. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  page  from  Look  Magazine  for  May 
20,  1941,  which  has  a  photograph  reproduced.  Is  that  a  genuine 
photograph  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  it  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  the  occasion  on  which  that  photo- 
graph was  made? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  It  was  an  international  mass  meeting  in  Ham- 
burg, I  believe  in  1932,  made  on  the  occasion  when — on  the  occasion 
of  the  political  exploitation  of  the  Scottsboro  trial.  There  were 
two  Americans,  Mr.  Louis  Engdahl  and  Ada  Wright,  supposedly  the 
mother  of  one  of  the  condemned  Negroes  of  Scottsboro.  They  trav- 
eled all  over  Europe  and  when  there  was  a  congi-ess  or  a  mass  meet- 
ing of  Communist  leaders,  those  two  popped  up  to  make  their  speech. 
Tliis  was  a  meeting  of  seamen  of  various  nationalities  in  a  large 
hall. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  is  the  man  in  the  left  of  the  photograph,  the 
man  standing? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Albert  Walter,  the  head  of  the  maritime  division  of 
the  Comintern. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  who  is  the  person  seated  next  to  him  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Johnson,  a  Negro  Communist  from  America,  who 
served  as  an  American  delegate  in  Hamburg  for  a  while. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  And  wdio  is  the  person  in  the  middle  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  myself. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  who  is  on  your  right? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  another  American  Communist  who  was  in 
charge  of  work  on  American  ships  in  continental  ports,  particularly 
Hamburg.  His  party  name  was  Mike  Pell  and  his  real  name  is 
Morris  Appelman. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  who  is  the  man  on  the  end  ? 


8500  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  Gundelack,  head  of  the  German  section  of 
the 

Mr.  Matthews.  According  to  this  account  in  Look  Magazine,  who 
supplied  this  photograph  to  the  magazine? 

Mr,  Krebs.  AVell,  I  suppose  Mike  Pell  did,  who  was  present  at  the 
meeting. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Morris  Appelman  signs  the  statement  submitting 
the  photograph,  stating  his  party  name  was  Mike  Pell.  That  is  in- 
formation from  the  Communist  Party  itself  that  you  were  a  real 
person,  really  existent  and  at  least  had  some  association  with  Albert 
Walter? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

]\rr.  Matthews.  Xow,  I  show  you  a  book  entitled  ''The  S.  S.  Utah," 
by  Mike  Pell,  published  by  International  Publishers  in  1933.  Did 
you  know  anything  about  that  book  at  the  time  of  its  preparation? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  I  know  it  very  well.  Mike  Pell  wrote  it  while 
he  worked  under  my  direction  in  Hamburg  in  1932.  a  year  before  its 
publication. 

He  received  the  instructions  to — be  was  writing  a  book  trying  to 
show  how  an  American  ship  should  be  organized  in  the  Communist 
sense,  and  he  received  instructions  through  the  maritime  secretary 
out  of  the  Comintern,  through  Walter,  to  go  ahead.  He  received 
a  salary.  The  writing  was  financed  by  the  Comintern,  and  the  pur- 
pose of  the  book  was  to  bring  out  in  popular  fiction  form,  the  tech- 
nique and  theory  of  organizing  a  strike  and  mutiny  aboard  a  ship 
on  the  high  seas. 

It  is  the  story  of  a  lone  Communist  coming  aboard  a  ship  with  a 
non-Communist  crew  and  ends  with  the  whole  crew  becoming  Com- 
munists, putting  on  a  mutiny,  shooting  by  police  and  things  like  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  where  Albert  Walter  is  today  or 
has  been  in  recent  months? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Albert  Walter  is  one  of  the  prominent  advisers  of 
the  Gestapo  in  maritime  matters.  He  works  for  the  foreign  division 
in  Hamburg. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  He  is  one  of  what  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Albert  Walter  is  one  of  the  chief  advisers  of  the  for- 
eign division  of  the  Gestapo  in  maritime  matters  today. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  In  other  words,  this  man,  who  for  years  you  worked 
with  when  he  was  the  head  of  the  international  Communist  organiza- 
tion of  seamen,  is  now,  you  say,  the  principal  adviser  of  the  Gestapo? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  On  maritime  matters? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  it  happened  in  very  many  cases. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  How  do  you  know  that? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  met  him  since  he  became  an  adviser  to 
the  Gestapo? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  Have  you  had  personal  conversations  with  him? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  us  the  details? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  can  give  a  short  history  of  his  turn-over.  Walter  was 
arrested  shortly  after  I  was  in  1933  and  was  kept  10  or  11  months 
in  the  Hamburg  concentration  camp,  and  after  10  months  he  made  a 


r\-A.MEKi(\\x  rrvOPAr.Axr>A  acttvitiks  8501 

deal  with  the  Gestapo  in  order  to  save  his  mother.  He  was  very 
devoted  to  his  mother,  a  woman  over  70  years  okl,  and  the  Gestapo 
knowino;  that  Walter  knew  all  the  secrets  without  exeei)tion  of  Com- 
munist ()r<ianizalions  in  the  merchant  marine  fleet  and  navies  of  tlie 
world,  threatened  that  they  would  imprison  or  kill  his  mother  if  he 
wouldn't  come  to  their  side. 

That  hroke  him  completely  :ind  lie  came  to  the  side  of  the  Nazis 
very  early  in  1934. 

AVhen  I  was  released  in  1937  from  a  Xazi  prison,  Inspector  Kraus 
of  the  Gestapo,  gave  me  Walter's  address  and  asked  me  to  <jo  to 
Walter  and  have  a  talk  with  him  and  report  on  the  imj)ression  Walter 
had  made  on  me.  He  wanted  to  use  me  to  test  Walter's  loyalty  as 
a  Xazi. 

I  went  to  AValter's  apartment  and  it  was  one  of  the  <rreatest  shocks 
of  my  life  when  the  man  who  had  been  my  boss  in  the  Communist 
International  for  many  years,  tried  for  2  hours  to  convince  me  of  the 
correctness  of  the  Nazi  policy,  and  from  that  I  gathered,  that  is  from 
his  own  talk,  that  he  was  well  paid  by  the  Gestapo  but  that  he  was 
inside  himself  a  beaten  man,  but  that  he  served  him  with  his  wide 
knowledge  of  maritime  matters,  and  I  accept  it  that  he  still  does  so 
today.     He  is  the  best  man  they  have  in  maritime  questions. 

Walter  knows  America  well.'  He  has  been  in  this  country  during 
the  World  War  as  a  German  war  prisoner  and  it  was  he  who  first 
organized  Lenin's  circles  in  prison  camps  among  the  German  war 
prisoners  here  and  after  his  release  went  directly  to  Russia  where 
Lenin  ai)pointed  him  as  the  maritime  chief  of  the  Comintern. 

Mr.  ^Iattiiews.  Would  you  say  that  the  case  oi  Walter's  conversion 
to  nazi-ism,  under  duress,  as  you  have  described  it,  is  a  typical  instance 
of  the  use  of  former  anti-Nazis  by  the  Gestapo? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  it  is  a  typical  instance,  but  most  of  them  are  not 
as  important  as  Walter  to  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  was  interested  particularly  about  your  reference  to 
that  picture.  You  say  that  was  at  a  time  when  they  were  making  a 
political  exploitaticm  of  the  Scoffi^horo  cam? 

Mr.  Krehs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  that  a  subject  of  debate  and  exploitation  and  of 
wide  use  throughout  the  Communist  circles  in  Eui-ope? 

Mr.  Kkebs.  Yes;  in  every  country  in  Europe  the  Scoftf<horo  ensr 
was  used  by  the  Communist  International  to  stir  up  general  hatred 
among  the  European  workers  against  the  economic  and  political 
system  of  America,  by  inciting  the  German  workers,  the  French 
workers,  the  Swedish  workers,  to  terrible  hatreds  against  American 
conditions,  by  telling  them;  "See,  that  is  the  way  proletarians  are 
treated  in  America." 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words,  they  were  using  that  as  an  example 
of  how  the  capitalistic  system  in  America  exploited  the  proletariat, 
or  the  peasants,  or  the  working  classes? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Well,  the  exploitation  of  the  ScotUhoro  case  was  that 
"Eight  Negroes  had  been  condenmed  to  death  under  fi'amed  charges 
because  they  were  simply  woi-kers  who  rode  on  a  freight  train.'' 

Mr.  Starnes.  My  interest  in  it  is  somewhat  personal  because  I  was 
called  out  of  a  moving  picture  show  on  a  ]\Iai-ch  evening  in  1931  to 


8502  UN  AMERICAN  TROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

take  charge  of  troops  going  to  the  scene  of  action  and  was  pr&sent 
throughout  the  first  trial  of  the  case. 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  was  just  through  such  campaigns  that  they  gained 
thousands  of  new  members. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  was  my  first  experience  in  riot  or  mob  duty  from  a 
military  standpoint,  therefore,  I  have  some  personal  interest. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Did  you  say  one  of  the  American  speakers  at  that 
mass  meeting  was  J.  Louis  Engdahl  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir ;  that  is  right,  from  Chicago. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  was  head  of  the 
International  Labor  Defense  at  the  time  he  made  this  tour  in  Europe? 

Mr.  Krebs.  He  was  nominally  the  head.  The  real  head  was  a  Kus- 
sian,  but  Engdahl  was  nominally  the  leader  of  the  International  be- 
cause that  would  carry  a  stronger  appeal  for  the  workers  than  to  have 
someone  with  a  Russian  name  on  the  list. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  who  the  actual  head  of  the  Interna- 
tional Labor  Defense  was? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes ;  the  first  general  secretary  of  the  maritime  division, 
a  man  named  Atchkanov. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  they  intervened  in  this  first  trial  by  sending 
telegrams  of  a  very  threatening  nature  to  the  presiding  judge  at  the 
Scottsboro  trial? 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  was  organized  all  over  the  world. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Those  telegrams  were  delivered  personally  by  me 
to  the  presiding  judge  at  the  time  and  they  were  very  threatening  in 
their  nature. 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  have  been  in  Communist  cell  meetings  in  Geraiany 
where  each  member  of  the  cell  was  given  10  or  15  Scottsboro  pam- 
phlets with  instructions  "Now  you  go  and  sell  them  for  10  pemiies 
and  with  the  proceeds  you  send  a  telegram  to  the  President  in 
America  or  the  judge  in  Scottsboro." 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Did  you  mean  by  your  reference  to  Ada  Wright, 
that  there  was  some  doubt  about  her  being  the  real  mother  of  some 
of  the  Scottsboro  defendants  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  No;  Communist  believed  she  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  party  circles ;  is  that  the  idea  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Well,  the  party  members  didn't  believe  she  was  the 
mother  of  one  of  the  Negroes.  She  was  some  Communist  woman 
taken  up  in  Moscow  in  some  way  and  carried  around  the  world  for 
that  purpose,  but  the  impression  given  out  to  the  audience  in  the 
mass  meetings  was  that  she  was  the  mother  of  one  of  the  condemned 
Negro  boys. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Krebs,  you  stated  a  moment  ago  that  in  the 
Nazi  concept  of  war,  hostilities  begin  when  the  first  "fifth  columnists" 
are  sent  across  the  border  into  a  non-Nazi  country  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  give  us  some  of  the  ways  in  which  the 
Gestapo,  working  for  the  Nazi  movement,  is  now  directing  its  attack 
upon  the  United  States?  What  are  some  of  the  methods  of  attack 
upon  America?  You  stated  that  Germany  today  considers  that  the 
United  States  is  an  enemy  country  and  has  been  since  1937? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  The  chief  Gestapo  attack  against  the  United 
States  today  is  only  in  part  directed  against  the  United  States.     A 


UN-AMBiaCAX  PROrACANDA  ACTIVITIES  8503 

larger  portion  of  (iestapo  work  to  mulenniiie  the  United  States 
strenirtli  at  the  present  time  is  directed  toward  Latin  America. 

The  Gestapo  leaders  of  the  forei<^n  division  regard  any  Gestapo 
thrust,  any  Gestapo  success  in  Latin  America  not  so  important  be- 
cause it  brings  nearer  the  domination  of  Latin  America,  but  it  is  a 
victory  in  the  struggle  to  create  bases  and  is  against  the  United 
States  on  the  theory  that  with  the  United  States  undermined  and 
torn  up  by  civil  strife,  distrust  between  nations,  the  wliole  of  America 
would  fail  under  their  economic  and  even  political  control. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  would  say,  then,  the  chief  method  of  penetra- 
tion and  the  chief  attack  directed  against  this  hemisphere  is  in  Latin 
America  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  In  Latin  America;  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Rather  than  directly  against  the  United  States  of 
America  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  right.  The  Gestapo  follows  the  policy  of  not 
openly  antagonizing  public  opinion  in  the  United  States,  but  the 
German-speaking  portions  of  the  population  of  some  South  Ameri- 
can countries — there  are  millions  of  them  living  in  German  towns  in 
Brazil,  Chile,  Argentina,  and  even  in  Guatemala,  with  German  schools, 
where  the  language  is  German  and  not  Spanish,  but  who  are  citizens 
of  that  Latin-American  country. 

That  is  ideal  recruiting  ground  for  them.  The  Germans  in  Amer- 
ica have  to  some  extent  been  assimilated  and  are  scattered,  but  the 
Germans  in  South  America  are  completely  separate.  Their  cultural 
life  and  their  traditions  are  completely  separate  from  the  Spanish 
culture  and  traditions,  and  also  the  resistance  with  which  Nazi  and 
Gestapo  campaigns  would  meet  in  Latin  America  would  be  much 
weaker  in  Latin  America — in  South  America  than  in  North  America, 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  the  Germans  appreciate  the  fact  that  following 
the  World  War  and  the  ascension  of  power  in  Germany  of  Hitler, 
that  no  movement  in  the  United  States  carried  on  under  a  German 
brand  would  be  very  popular?  Do  they  appreciate  that  fact?  Do 
they  realize  that  fact? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  it  is  very  extensively  used,  but  also  the  economic 
motive — I  have  seen  in  Hamburg  in  the  office  of  propaganda,  leaflets 
for  South  America.  The  text  in  a  nutshell  was  this — it  was  directed 
toward  Argentina : 

What  have  you  to  sell?  Your  economy  depends  on  the  sale  of  wheat  and  the 
sale  of  beef.  Does  America  buy  beef?  No;  it  exports  beef.  Does  America  buy 
wheat?  No;  it  exports  wheat.  Argentinians,  your  market  is  Europe  and  not 
America,  and  the  biggest  market  in  Europe  is  Germany.  Therefore,  it  is  logical 
for  you  to  work  with  us  instead  of  with  a  country  in  the  north  which  would 
like  to  sell  you  things,  but  will  not  buy  from  you. 

Such  arguments  are  used  very  extensively  in  conjunction  with  the 
idealistic  arguments  about  German  strength. 

Mr.  M.'VTTHEWs.  Of  what  value  are  German  business  houses  in  the 
United  States  to  the  Nazi  movement,  and  what  is  their  relationship 
to  the  Gestapo? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  Gestapo,  in  sending  agents  abroad,  sends  the  bulk 
of  its  agents  quite  legally  under  the  guise  of  employees  to  German 
business  firms  abroad. 

Any  German  firm  in  North  and  South  America  doing  business  with 
Germany,  being  run  by  Germans  or  being  in  some  Avay  dependent 


3504  u^'-A^[EUI('A^•  PRorAcjANDA  ACTivrnp:^ 

economically  in  its  public  relations  with  German  organizations  or  in 
its  public  relations  with  German  organizations  or  German  institu- 
tions, is  used  by  the  Gestapo  for  its  own  purposes. 

Mr.  Matthev/s.  And  what  would  those  purposes  include? 

Mr.  Krebs.  These  purposes  would  include,  first,  to  make  every 
German  business  firm  a  potential  fortress  in  future  campaions,  with 
German  business  firms  located  throughout  American  countries.  These 
firms  are  considered  as  ideal  concentration  i)oints  in  case  of  sndden 
emergencies,  in  case  of  sudden  Nazi  call  to  action.  Sec(md,  it  is 
usually  that  business  firms  have  a  very  large  range  of  contacts  with 
other  non-German  business  houses;  that  the  business  and  commercial 
contacts  of  German  firms  are  used  for  industrial  and  transport 
espionage ;  that  well-established  German  business  houses  are  used  for 
the  purpose  of  ]:)lacing  Gestapo  men  in  the  non-German  business 
houses  in  American  countries. 

They  are  sent  over  as  clerks,  as  acconntants,  as  ty])ists,  and  what 
not.  They  work,  and  wherever  it  is  possible  these  peo])le  are  recom- 
mended to  other  firms. 

German  businesses  which  take  the  form  of  air  lines  in  Latin 
America  are  of  first-rate  strategic  importance  in  connection  with 
espionage,  the  mapping  of  countries  from  the  air,  monopolizing  the 
pilot  staffs  of  that  country;  monopolizing  the  air  fields  and  landing 
bases  of  that  country. 

There  is  not  a  single  German  business  house  in  America  or  branch 
of  German  business  houses  in  America,  which  have  not  on  their 
staff  at  least  one  man  of  the  Gestapo.  It  is  this  world  of  business 
houses  which  form  the  strongest  points  of  the  Gestapo  as  the  trade- 
unions  form  the  strong  basis  for  Communist  and  G.  P.  U.  work. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  you  to  repeat  that.  The  German  or  Nazi 
Government  is  using  the  Gestapo  which  is  working  through  German 
business  concerns  in  this  country 

i\Ir.  Krehs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  To  obtain  information  about  our  security  program 
and  to  produce  choke  points  or  to  sabotage  our  efforts? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  as  the  Communists  are  using  the  trade-unions 
for  the  same  identical  purpose  in  sabotaging  strikes  and  slowing 
down  of  production? 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  is  a  Nazi  division  of  work.  The  Communists  could 
not  penetrate  business  if  they  tried. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  neither  could  the  Nazis  penetrate  the  trade- 
unions  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Neither  could  the  Nazis  penetrate  the  trade-unions  if 
they  tried  to. 

Mr.  Mason.  But  you  wouldn't  say  that  now  since  the  Communists 
and  the  Nazis  have  combined,  that  they  haven't  the  influence  of 
both  of  these  organizations — trade-unions  and  business  houses  and 
therefore  are  doubly  dangerous  from  our  standpoint  ? 

Mr.  Krei^s.  Yes,  sir;  doubly  dangerous,  especially  since  their  gen- 
eral policy  today  as  to  world  affairs  is  the  same. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  a  more  accurate  way  to  put  it  than  to  say 
they  are  in  one  organization.  In  other  words,  as  I  understand  you, 
your  statement  was  to  the  effect  that  you  didn't  know  of  specific 


UX-AMEKICAN   PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8505 

iiKstaiR-es  wIrmv  there  was  an  actual  iiiergino;  of  the  Connminist  and 
the  Nazi  organizations,  but  the  fact  is  that  their  policies  today 
are  the  same  policies  and  that  therefore  the  work  done  by  either 
one  ()!•  the  other  was  of  benefit  to  the  other,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  KuEHs.   Yes;  that  is  correct. 

Mr,  Staknes.  In  other  words,  they  have  merged  their  objectives 
and^ their  objectives  are  the  same? 

Air.  Ki!Eus.  Yes. 

Mr.  Staknes.  In  that  their  objective  is  to  destroy  a  democracy 
such  as  this  or  as  we  know  it — that  is,  to  destroy  democratic  gov- 
ernment and  substitute  for  it  some  form  of  state  socialism? 

Ml'.  Kkebs.  Tliat  has  been  the  common  aim  from  the  very  begin- 
ning but  under  different  methods. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Now,  they  find  by  using  their  different  methods 
tliey  are  approaching  the  same  objective? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.   VooRHis.  You  spoke   about   German   business  houses? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  wouhl  like  to  be  clear  what  we  mean  by  "German 
business  houses."  Do  you  mean  by  that  a  commercial  or  industrial 
organization  whose  ownership  is  in  Germany. 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Or  do  you  mean  a  business  in  America  that  is  run  by 
people  of  German  extraction  ?  Wliich  of  those  two  things  do  you 
mean  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Both.  At  first  this  line  of  action  was  started  with 
large  German  companies  based  in  Germany  but  with  branch  offices 
in  this  country. 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  Yes. 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  began  with  the  North  German  Lloyd  and  Hamburg- 
American  Lines,  particularly  with  the  North  German  Lloyd.  The 
Nazis  as  soon  as  they  came  to  power  forced  a  fusion  of  these  com- 
])anies  and  the  North  German  Lloyd  offices  in  New  York  were  con- 
sidered by  the  foreign  division  of  the  Gestapo  in  Hamburg,  as  their 
office,  as  a  Gestapo  office. 

Next  the  branch  offices  of  the  German  steel  and  dye  trusts,  and 
from  there  on  down  to  very  small  German-American  or  American- 
German  enterprises.  For  example,  before  my  book  was  published  and 
I  lived  in  New  York  for  about  'I  years  as  a  man — general  laborer — 
I  tried  at  various  times  for  jobs,  small  jobs,  such  as  elevator  man 
or  porter  in  hotels  and  apartment  houses.  I  was  astonished  to  find 
right  in  New  York  and  in  Brooklyn  in  modem  apartment  houses, 
maybe  owned  by  a  Jewish  firm  but  the  superintendent  is  a  German 
and  a  Nazi,  anil  the  whole  i)ersonnel  of  that  apartment  house  were 
Nazi  members — were  members  of  the  Nazi  Party,  yet  it  was  a  modern 
apartment  block  in  which  members  of  the  Nazi  Party  were  in  posses- 
sion of  passkeys  to  every  apartment. 

In  all  such  cases  I  refused  to  take  this  work,  but  particularly  among 
the  ai)artment  house  superintendents  in  New  York  City — and  I  know 
New  York  especially  because  I  worked  there,  there  is  a  very  large 
number  of  Nazi  Germans  even  in  such  districts  as  Washington 
Heights,  up  in  the  Bronx  and  Chelsea  and  so  forth. 


3506  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Wherever  a  Nazi  holds  the  position  even  of  a  minor  foreman  he  will 
employ  only  Nazis.  When  he  hears  of  another  job  being  opened  up 
somewhere  in  a  factory  or  in  an  ofSce,  wherever  it  may  be,  he  will  do 
his  utmost  to  place  a  Nazi  in  that  position. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Well,  one  thing  that  I  want  to  try  to  be  clear  and 
careful  about  is,  we  know  there  are  a  great  number  of  people  in  the 
United  States  have  German  names  or  are  of  German  descent  who  are 
thoroughly  loyal  to  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Now,  we  want  to  be  clear  that  just  because  the  name 
of  a  company  happens  to  be  a  German  name  that  that  doesn't  mean 
that  that  company  is  sympathetic  to  the  Nazis  necessarily,  does  it? 

Mr.  Krebs.  If  there  is  a  German  business  house — even  if  the  chiefs 
of  that  business  house  are  not  Nazis,  but  this  German  business  house 
has  some  sort  of  dealings  with  Germany  which  would  enable  the 
Gestapo  to  put  this  business  house  under  economic  pressure,  this  busi- 
ness house  would  be  utilized  by  the  Gestapo. 

Mr,  VooRHis,  Then  we  will  say  that  any  American  business  that 
has  extensive  dealings  in  Germany  is  likely  to  be  utilized  in  the  man- 
ner that  you  have  described,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  is  the  German  name  for  the  Dve  Trust  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  German  name? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Yes. 

Mr.  Krebs.  I.  G.  Farbenindustrie. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  relationship  of  the 
I,  G.  Farbenindustrie  in  Germany,  which  you  formerly  referred  to  as 
the  Dye  Trust;  do  you  know  whether  or  not  that  company  controls 
any  patents  for  the  manufacture  of  certain  important  metals  in  the 
United  States  as  well  as  elsewhere  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  I.  G.  Farbenindustrie,  I  know  from  first-hand  ex- 
perience, was  already  in  1934  completely  in  the  hands  of  the  Gestapo. 
They  went  so  far  as  to  have  their  own  Gestapo  prison  on  the  factory 
grounds  of  their  large  works  at  Leuna.  and  that  the  I.  G.  Farbenin- 
dustrie began,  particularly  after  Hitler's  ascent  to  power,  to  branch 
out  in  the  foreign  field  through  subsidiary  factories,  and  go  far  be- 
yond their  original  scope  of  production. 

I.  G.  Farbenindustrie  means  paints,  factory  production  of  aniline 
paints.  But  in  Germany  the  I.  G.  Farbenindustrie  includes  ex- 
plosives. It  is  the  gi^eastest  poison-gas  industry  of  the  world  concen- 
trated under  the  title  of  I.  G.  Farbenindustrie,  and  anything  con- 
nected with  the  chemical  side  of  warfare. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  They  control  patents  for  the  manufacture  of  magne- 
sium, do  they  not? 

Mr.  KjtEBS.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  they  control  the  patents 
for  any  particular  mechanical  devices  that  are  essential — like  jigs  and 
dies  and  that  sort  of  thing  that  are  used  in  ordnance  manufacture  and 
that  sort  of  thing?  The  sort  of  jigs  and  dies  we  have  used  here  on 
educational  orders  and  that  have  been  used  here  for  producing  certain 
pieces  of  ordnance?  Do  you  know  whether  they  have  control  over 
anything  like  that  or  patents  covering  such  tools? 


UX-AMEKICAN   rKOl'ACJANDA  ACTIVITIES  8507 

Mr.  IMattiikws.  I  don't  believe  Mr.  Krebs  understood  the  question. 
Mr.  Krebs.  I  understand. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Congressman  Starnes  Avants  to  know  if  the  I.  G. 
Farbenintkistrie  controls  patents  on  such  mechanical  devices? 

Mr.   Krebs.  Not  to  my  knowledge.     That  belongs  to  the   metal 

industry. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Any  further  questions,  gentlemen? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  all  for  today. 

Mr.  Starxes.  The  committee  will  stand  adjourned  until  10  tomor- 
row morning. 

(Whereupon,  at  12:15  p.  m.,  the  committee  adjourned  until  10 
a.  m.,  Tuesday,  May  27,  1941.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


TUESDAY,   MAY   27,    1941 

House  of  Representatives, 
Subcommittee  of  the  Special  Committee  to 

Investigate  Un-American  Activities, 

Wa-skhigfon,  D.  G. 

The  subcommittee  met  at  10  a.  m.  in  the  caucus  room,  House  Office 
Buildino:,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (cliairman  of  tlie  subcommittee)  presiding. 

Present:  Messrs.  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subconmiittee),  Voorhis, 
Thomas,  and  Mason. 

Also  present :  Mr.  Robert  E.  Stripling,  chief  investigator,  and  Dr. 
J.  B.  Matthews,  director  of  research. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  committee  will  resume  its  hearings. 

Whom  do  you  have.  Dr.  Matthews  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Richard  Krebs. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Come  around,  Mr.  Krebs. 

EICHARD  KREBS— Recalled 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Krebs,  were  you  ever  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes ;  I  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  the  dates  of  your  member- 
nhip  in  the  Conununist  Party  and  describe  briefly  the  periods  of  Com- 
munist Party  strategy  which  your  membership  covered  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  became  a  member  of  the  Conununist  Party  in  the 
spring  of  1988  and  remained  a  member  until  December  1937.  The 
period  of  membership  covered  first  the  period  defined  by  tlfe  Com- 
munists themselves  as  the  period  of  relative  stabilization.  That  is 
the  period  following  the  post-war  troubles,  which  is  also  the  period  of 
the  first  5-y('ar  plan,  ending  about  '88-"84. 

Following  that,  in  1937,  the  so-called  period  of  popular-front  policy 
of  the  Comintern,  a  period  which  is  also  described  as  the  people's 
front — known  as  the  jjeople's  front  and  also  the  Ti'ojan  horse  policy. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What,  exactly  were  your  functions  as  a  member  of 
the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  began  as  an  active  rank-and-file  member  of  the  Com- 
munist water-front  organizations  in  Hamburg  and  was  later  sent  as 
a  traveling  maritime  organizer  to  various  countries — Holland,  Bel- 
gium, United  States. 

In  1930  I  became  a  member  of  the  secretariat  of  the  maritime  divi- 
sion of  the  Comintern  in  the  function  of  international  political  in- 

8509 


3510  UN-AMERICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

structor,  traveling  as  such  in  Belgium,  Holland,  Great  Britain,  Nor- 
way, Sweden,  Denmark,  Switzerland,  France,  and  Germany. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Krebs,  I-  am  a  little  doubtful  as  to  what  you 
gave  as  the  period  of  joining  the  Communist  Party.  Did  you  say  1933 
or  1923? 

Mr.  Kbebs.  1923,  I  meant  to  say. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  name  all  of  the  countries  in  which  you  had 
assignments  in  the  list  which  you  just  now  gave? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes ;  all  the  countries ;  my  travels  to  the  countries  I  men- 
tioned were  following  orders  to  go  to  these  countries — orders  from  my 
superiors  in  the  movement. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  the  reason  for  the  special  attention  which 
the  Communists,  the  Comnuinist  International  and  the  Communist 
Party,  give  to  the  maritime  industry? 

Mr.  Krebs.  From  the  very  beginning  the  maritime  industry  was 
considered  by  Communist  leaders  as  the  most  strategic  of  all  indus- 
tries from  the  point  of  view  of  the  interests  and  safety  of  the  Soviet 
Union. 

The  underlying  theory  of  intense  Communist  efforts  to  control  the 
maritime  industry  of  other  countries  was,  first,  that  whoever  controls 
the  ports  and  the  shipping  of  a  nation  controls  also  that  nation's  ex- 
ports and  imports ;  that  is,  has  an  economic  strangle  hold  on  the  life 
of  that  nation. 

Second,  that  Comnumist  control  of  shipping  and  liarbors  would  en- 
able the  Soviet  Union  to  obstruct  eifectively  any  attempts  at  overseas 
war  campaigns  carried  on  by  some  country  without  the  assent  of  the 
Soviet  government. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  way  were  the  Communist  organizations 
in  the  United  States  shipping  industry  affiliated  with  or  directed  from 
Communist  centers  in  the  Soviet  Union  or  elsewhere? 

Mr.  Krebs.  As  early  as  1923  there  were  no  Communist  waterfront 
organizations  to  speak  of.  The  first  beginnings  of  Communist  ship- 
ping organizations  in  this  country  were  the  result  of  the  sending  over 
to  American  waters  of  a  number  of  scores  of  traveling  organizers, 
serving  as  members  in  ships'  crews,  coming  from  Europe  and  doing 
organizing  work  in  every  port  of  call. 

Originally  these  men  were  supplied  with  literature  and  propaganda 
material  and  instructions  and  a  small  amount  of  funds  from  the 
European  headquarters,  which  was,  from  the  very  beginning,  in 
Hamburg. 

Since  then  the  successive  Communist-controlled  maritime  organiza- 
tions in  this  country  have  never  acted  without  being  completed  in  ac- 
cord and  without  following  instructions  from  Comintern  maritime 
headquarters  abroad.  It  went  so  far  that  even  the  leaders  of  the 
Communist  maritime  organizations  in  this  country  had  to  be  O.  K.'d 
in  Moscow  and  Hamburg  before  they  were  permitted  to  assume  their 
jobs. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  year  did  this  Communist  drive  for  the  con- 
trol of  the  maritime  industry  in  other  countries  begin? 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  began  in  1923.  The  immediate  reason  for  this  in- 
ternational campaign  to  control  shipping  was  this :  Following  the 
World  War  the  Comintern,  then  under  Lenin  himself,  harbored  the 


rX-AMERICAN   rROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIP:S  8511 

illusion  that  the  world  revolution  was  coming.  There  were  revolu- 
tionary attempts  in  Hungary,  in  Finland,  in  the  Baltic  countries,  and 
elsewhere.  The  idea  was:  *'We  will  have  a  Soviet  P]urope  within  1 
or  2  years." 

But  as  one  after  another  of  these  revolutionary  movements  were 
beaten  dow  n  ami  defeated  in  Europe,  it  became  ap[)arent  to  the  Soviet 
government  that  the  conception  of  a  soviet  world  Avas  still  very  far 
away  from  its  realization. 

This  conclusion  they  arrived  at  toward  the  end  of  1923,  after  the 
decisive  defeat  of  an  attempt  at  an  armed  insurrection  in  Germany, 
They  saw  there  would  be  no  soviet  world  within  a  few  years.  They 
settled  down  for  a  long  and  hard  struggle  to  prepare  for  the  next 
revolutionary  crisis,  and  it  was  with  the  realization  of  a  long  struggle 
that  the  decision  was  made  to  make  every  attempt  to  control  the 
maritime  industries. 

]Mr.  Matthews.  You  are  referring  to  the  attempt  to  set  up  a  Ba- 
varian-Soviet republic  in  Germany  in  1923? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Xo;  not  in  Bavaria.  The  Bavarian  attempt  was  made 
in  1919.  But  in  1923,  during  the  peak  of  the  Gennan  inflation  and 
the  French  occupation  of  industrial  Ruhr  district,  there  was  prevalent 
among  the  German  masses  a  mass  despair,  and  from  Moscow  through 
Kadek  and  Zinoviev,  then  heading  the  Comintern,  the  diagnosis  that 
Germany  was  ripe  for  revolution. 

They  sent  hundreds  of  Red  Army  officers  to  Germany  to  organize 
militai-y  organizations  of  German  Communists.  A  large  amount  of 
Russian  rifles  and  anmiunition  was  smuggled  into  German  ports,  and 
the  date  of  the  armed  rising  of  the  Connnunists  was  set  repeatedly, 
but  always  canceled  until  Thaelmann,  who  later  became  the  chief  of 
the  Conmuuiist  Party  of  Germany,  in  a  rage,  gave  the  order  through 
the  couriers  to  start  out  and  give  the  signal  for  the  insurrection. 

An  order  from  Moscow  canceled  this,  but  to  Hamburg  the  order 
did  not  reach,  and  one  or  two  smaller  cities,  in  time.  There  was  an 
armed  insurrection  which  resulted  in  defeat.  Many  hundred  lives 
were  lost,  and  that  ended  the  attempt  at  German  revolution  and 
caused  the  Comintern  to  give  up  the  idea  of  immediate  world  revolu- 
tion, and  then  they  settled  down  for  the  long  campaign  of 

]Mr.  ^Matthews.  Who  was  named  by  Moscow  as  the  leader  of  the 
International  Propaganda  and  Action  Committee  for  the  marine 
workers  of  the  world  ? 

Mr.  Kkebs.  The  first  leader  appointed  by  Moscow  to  head  the  Inter- 
national Propaganda  and  Action  Committee  for  marine  workers — the 
Ipac  Transport,  was  a  Russian  named  Atchkanov.  a  friend  of  Lenin. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  were  the  successors  to  Atchkanov? 

Mr.  KuEHs.  After  2  or  3  years  of  Atchkanov's  leadership,  which 
did  not  bring  great  organizational  success,  Moscow  decided  to  move 
the  center  of  the  Ipac  Trans])ort  from  Moscow  to  some  European 
place  and  appoint  a  non-Russian  as  its  chief  in  order  to  make  the 
world  believe  that  the  international  revolutionary  seamen's  move- 
ment was  not  inspired  and  directed  from  Moscow  but  was  a  spon- 
taneous movement  coming  fi-om  Europe,  and  so  headquarters  were 
moved  from  Moscow  to  Hamburg  in  the  beginning  of  1923,  and  ap- 
pointed as  chief  was  the  German,  Albert  Walter,  who  had  a  British 
and  also  an  American  background. 

62620 — 41 — vol.  14 23 


8512  UN-AMEKICAN   I'KOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  IMattiifavs.  Were  there  any  Americans  in  the  leadership  of  the 
Ipac  or  the  International  Propa<2:anda  Action  Committee? 

Mr.  Krei5S.  Tliere  were  Americans  in  the  leadership  of  the  organi- 
zation which  was  a  successor  of  the  Ipac  Transport. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  was  the  name  of  that  successor  organ- 
ization ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Ipac  Transport  was  transformed  in  193U  into  an  in- 
dependent international  called  the  International  of  Seamen  and  Har- 
bor Workers,  or  the  I.  S.  H.  W. 

The  formation  of  this  organization,  at  an  international  congreSvS 
where  Americans  were  appointed  to  the  executive  committee  of  this 
maritime  division  of  the  Comintern. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  the  year  in  which  the  transforma- 
tion from  the  International  Propaganda  and  Action  Committee  to  the 
International  of  Seamen  and  Harbor  Workers  took  place? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  the  year  wzs  1930,  and  the  cause  was  the  forcing 
upon  the  Russians  of  the  first  5-year  plan  and  industrialization  pro- 
gram. 

Stalin  and  the  Soviet  Government  could  not  afford  outside  inter- 
vention; and  to  make  doubly  sure,  the  Ipac  Transport  was  trans- 
formed into  an  independent  international  of  Communuist-dominated 
trade-unions.     Americans  entered  this  central  committee  first  in  1932. 

The  Americans  named  were  the  Negro,  James  Ford,  who  repeat- 
edly was  a  candidate  for  vice  president  of  the  United  States;  a 
young  American,  who  at  that  time  came  from  San  Francisco,  whose 
name  was  Thomas  Kay. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Ford  and  Ray  or 
other  American  leaders  in  this  movement  of  the  Communist  Inter- 
national, were  present  at  the  conferences  in  tlie  Soviet  Union  or 
elsewhere  in  Europe?  You  mean  the  organizational  conference  in 
connection  with  the  formation  of  the  I.  S.  IT.  W.  ? 

INIr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  they  attend? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  In  1930  at  the  conference,  at  a  special  conference 
in  Moscow  where  the  organization  of  the  marine  international  was 
decided,  three  or  four  Americans  were  present,  but  the  leaders  of  the 
American  delegation  were  George  Mink  and  Tommy  Ray. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  photograph,  which  is  a  picture  of 
delegates  of  transport  workers  at  the  Red  International  Congress. 
Have  you  seen  this  photograph  before  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  the  year  in  which  that  congress  was 
held? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  was  an  advance  conference  which  took  place  in 
Moscow. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  year,  do  you  recall? 

Mr.  Krebs.  In  1930. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recognize  any  of  the  faces  in  that  picture? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  Way  on  the  right  "is  Waher,  Albert  Walter,  the 
chief  of  the  Comintern's  maritime  division. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  identified  Walters  yesterday  as  the  man 
who  had  been  converted  under  duress  to  a  position  in  tlie  Nazi  move- 
ment in  Germany,  did  you  not? 


rX-AMEKU'AN    rK()rA(;AXI)A  ACTIVITIES  8513 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  is  tlio  samo  niini  Avho  now  is  the  nmritime  adviser 
for  tho  Gestapo. 

On  Walter's  left  on  the  pictuie  is  A.  D.  Lozov.sky,  whose  real  name 
is  Abraham  Branovitch.  Lozovsky  is  the  <2:eneral  secretary  of  the 
Ked  International  L;iboi'  Unions  in  INIoscow,  known  as  the  Profin- 
teiii.  Next  to  Lozovsky  is  George  Mink,  then  chief  of  Commnnist 
water-front  operations  on  the  east  coast 

Mr.  ^NIaithkws.  On  the  east  coast  of  the  United  States? 

]Mi'.  K!n:i?s.  On  the  east  coast  of  the  Ignited  States.  And  next  to 
(ieoriie  Mink  is  Tonnny  Ray,  who  was  director  of  operations  on  the 
west  coast  of  the  United  States  at  that  time. 

Mr.  Ma'ithews.  Did  yon   know  Tommy  Ray  pers(mally? 

Mr.  Khebs.  Yes;  I  have  met  him  several  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  meet  George  Mink  j^ersonally? 

Mr.  Kkebs.  Whom? 

Mr.  Maithews.  Georoe  Mink? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  met  George  Mink  many  times  personally. 

Mr.  Maithews.  Did  you  ever  meet  James  Ford  personally? 

Mr.  Kkebs.  James  Ford  worked  under  my  direction  in  Hamburg 
ff)r  over  1  year. 

Mr.  ]\Iattitews.  Is  this  the  same  James  Ford  who  was  a  candidate 
for  the  Vice-Presidency  on  the  Comnumist  Party  ticket  in  the  United 
States  last  year? 

Mi-.  Kkebs.  That  is  right. 

]\lr.  Matthews.  In  how  many  countries  did  this  maritime  division 
of  tlie  Comintern  maintain  organizations? 

Ml-.  Kkebs.  By  193'2.  2  years  after  its  organization,  it  had  inde- 
]>endent  trade-unions  or  trade-union  operations  in  everj'  maritime 
country  of  Europe.  It  had  all  of  the  British  dominions;  a  very 
strong  union  in  China:  also  another  union  in  the  Dutch  East  Indies; 
some  Xegro  dockers"  unions  in  Cape  Town  and  Durban ;  another  one 
at  Dakar,  French  West  Africa :  an  East  India  seamen's  union  of 
]>ritish  India;  and  they  were  the  beginning  of  Comnumist-dominated 
trade-unions  in  Latin- American  countries,  particularly  the  Argentine 
and  L^ruguay. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  thev  first  gain  their  first  foothold  in 
the  United  States? 

^Ir.  Kkebs.  The  Comintern  got  its  first  foothold  in  the  United 
States  during  1925  and   1926.     Mink  began  work  in  1926. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  yon  say  the  Comintern  got  its  first  foothold 
in  the  United  States,  do  you  mean  the  marine  or  maritime  division 
of  the  Comintern? 

Mr.  Kkebs.  Maritime  division  of  the  Comintern. 

Mr.  Matthp:ws.  In  1925? 

Mr.  Kkebs.  In  1925  and  1926. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  was  George  Mink  the  Communist  leader  for 
llie  American  water  front  on  behalf  of  the  Comintern? 

Ml-.  Kkebs.  Yes;  George  Mink  began  work  in  1926  organizing  Com- 
munist groups  in  East  coast  ports.  He  attracted  Moscow's  atten- 
tion because  he  seemed  a  very  enthusiastic  worker  and  Mink  was  sub- 
seciuently  called  to  Moscow  in  1928,  together  with  James  Ford,  to 
attend  a  world  congress,  either  of  the  Comintern  or  the  Profintorn, 


8514  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

I  don't  know  which,  and  after  his  return  from  Moscow  in  1928  he  was 
the  absolute  chief  of  Communist  efforts  on  the  American  water  front. 

The  authority  given  him  personally  by  Lozovsky  in  Moscow  took 
him  out  of  the  jurisdiction  of  the  centi'al  committee  of  the  Communist 
Party  of  America.  Mink  operated  as  a  separate  leader.  Mink  was 
not  subjected  to  orders  from  the  American  Party  leaders.  He  had 
his  own  budget — that  is,  his  own  subsidy  from  Moscow  and  operated 
directly  under  Moscoav's  orders. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  George  Mink  was  a 
seaman  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  George  Mink  was  a  taxicab  driver  in  Philadelphia 
before  he  went  into  the  organizing  of  seamen.  I  don't  believe  George 
Mink  has  ever  gone  to  sea  except  for  his  trips  to  Moscow. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  not  very  frequently  known  as  "the  taxicab 
seaman?" 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  beg  your  pardon? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  not  freqently  known  as  "the  taxicab  seaman?" 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  don't  know.  As  far  as  I  know  the  water-front  people 
and  sailors  described  him  chiefly  as  "Mink  the  pink." 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  photograph  and  ask  you  if  you  can 
identify  that  as  a  picture  of  George  Mink  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  George  Mink. 

i\Ir.  Matthews.  And  while  you  are  making  the  identification  of 
Mink,  there  is  another  photograph  on  the  same  page? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  that  man  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  a  man  who  is  called  in  the  party  "Horse  Face." 
whose  real  name  is  Roy  Hudson,  an  organizer  for  the  Commiuiist 
maritime  workers  in  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Roy  Hudson  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes;  known  in  the  Communist  Party  as  "Horse 
Face." 

Who  appointed  George  Mink  to  this  very  responsible  position  which 
you  described? 

Mr.  Krebs.  George  Mink  was  appointed  directly  by  Lozovsky  first, 
and  his  leadership  was  substantiated  and  prolonged  at  orders  from 
Albert  Walter,  with  the  okay  of  Lozovsky  in  Moscow. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  have  identified  Lozovsky  as  the  head  of 
the  Red  International  unions? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  long  as  that  organization  was  in  existence? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  An  organization  known  as  the  Profintern? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  Lozovsky  is  Assistant  Com- 
missar of  Foreign  Affairs  in  the  Soviet  Union? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  sir.  Lozovsky,  because  of  his  knowledge  of  other 
people's  countries,  gained  while  being  head  of  the  Profintern,  was 
appointed  to  the  post  of  Assistant  Secretary  for  Foreign  Affairs  in 
the  Soviet  Government. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  will  you  describe  briefly  the  precise  task  of 
the  International  Seamen's  Clubs  in  American  harbors? 

Mr.  Krebs.  When  the  Comintern  first  began  its  maritime  efforts 
it  had  no  lai''ge  organizations  to  rely  on.      The  idea  was  advanced 


UX-AMKUICAN   I'KUl'ACJANDA  ACTIVITIES  8515 

by  Lozovsky  to  create  in  all  important  harbors  of  the  world  Com- 
nuinist  clubs  which  should  <>ive  movies,  dances,  and  entertainments 
to  attract  the  seamen,  and  once  the  seamen  were  there,  to  draw 
them  into  discussions,  to  supply  them  with  literature,  and  to  use 
these  International  Seamen's  Clubs  mainly  as  propa^janda  centers, 
with  the  idea  that  after  the  seamen's  clubs  had  attracted  a  number, 
a  lar<;e  number  of  seamen,  hundreds  or  thousands,  in  each  harbor 
or  in  each  large  country,  that  the  seamen's  clubs  should  proceed  to 
organize  on  that  basis  seamen's  unions. 

The  tirst  seamen's  clubs  in  the  United  States  were  started  in  the 
end  of  19:26  and  1927,  by  George  jNIink.  By  1931  there  were,  I 
think  there  were  a  dozen,  around  a  dozen  seamen's  clubs  in  the 
United  States  harbors,  and  another  40  International  Seamen's  Clubs 
scatteied  in  other  chief  harbors  of  the  world,  including  the  Soviet 
Union. 

All  these  clubs  were  financed  through  budgets  which  came  from 
Moscow  to  the  I.  S.  H.  W.  office  in  Hamburg,  and  were  then  dis- 
tributed as  subsidies  to  the  various  clubs  by  Albert  Walter. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  When  and  by  whom  was  the  Marine  Workers' 
Industrial  Union  organized  in  the  United  States^ 

]\Ir.  Thomas.  I  Avould  like  to  have  the  witness  develop,  if  you 
will  iiold  that  question  for  a  moment,  I  would  like  for  the  witness 
to  develop  where  the  most  active  and  largest  seamen's  clubs  are 
located  today  in  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  seamen's  clubs  existed  in  America — the  headquar- 
ters was  in  New  York,  140  Broad  Street. 

There  were  seamen's  clubs  in  Boston,  Philadelphia,  Baltimore, 
Xorfolk.  New  Orleans,  Houston,  Tex.,  Seattle,  San  Francisco,  San 
Pedro,  that  is  Los  Angeles  Harbor;  I  believe  Portland,  Oreg..  and 
some  smaller  clubs  scattered  over  smaller  ports.  These  seamen's 
clubs  were  officially  liquidated  in  1935,  when  the  Comintern  decided 
on  its  change  of  policy  from  the  revolutionary  policy  to  the  Trojan 
horse  policy,  when  oi'ders  were  given  for  the  seamen's  club  members 
and  the  seamen's  clubs  activities  were  to  join  the  established  trade 
unions. 

The  seamen's  clubs  were  by  that  time  held  to  have  fulfilled  their 
purpose — that  is  attract  thousands  of  seamen  through  their  propa- 
ganda activities,  and  now  the  forces  of  the  seamen's  clubs  were  told  to 
enter  the  trade-unions — ^to  conquer  these  trade-unions.  That  is  the 
transformation  in  the  words  of  Lozovsky,  from  propaganda  to  action. 

A  number  of  seamen's  clubs  remained  in  this  country  but  they 
were  only  there  for  work  among  non-Americans — foreign  seamen 
and  they  were  known  and  still  exist  under  the  name  "Scandinavian 
Seamen  s  Clubs,"  in  a  half  dozen  American  ports. 

ISIr.  Starxes.  But  that  group  of  clubs  was  officiallv  liquidated 
in  1935? 

iNIr.  Krebs.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  from  that  time  on  they  were  directed  to  use 
Troian  horse  tactics  and  to  join  existing  maritime  unions? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Ml-.  Starxes.  Were  they  directed  to  join  any  particular  imion  or 
do  you  know  what  particular  maritime  union  they  were  directed  to 
use  their  efforts  toward? 


*r< 


8516  UX-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes ;  they  were  ordered  at  that  time  to  join  the  Ameri- 
can Federation  of  Labor,  International  Seamen's  Union  of  the  west 
coast,  the  gnlf  coast  and  the  east  coast. 

There  was  also  a  firemen's  union.  Each  Communist  joined  a  union 
to  which  he — each  Communist  joined  the  union  to  whicli  he  belonged 
on  the  basis  of  the  work  he  was  doing  aboard  a  ship.  Seamen 
joined  the  seamen's  union,  the  firemen  joined  the  firemen's  union; 
the  east  coast  sailors  joined  the  east  coast  union,  and  the  west  coast 
sailors  joined  the  west  coast  union,  forming  Communist  fractions 
and  starting  immediately  in  these  unions  the  so-called  rank  and  file 
movement  with  the  objective  to  overthrow  every  union  leadership 
which  did  not  follow  the  party  line. 

On  the  east  coast  they  succeeded  in  taking  over  the  whole  union 
in  this  manner,  and  on  the  west  coast  they  did  not  succeed  and  are 
still  working  on  the  camouflaged  fraction  basis. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  say  the  seamen  did  not  succeed  on  the 
west  coast,  to  what  particular  union  do  you  have  reference  on  the 
w^est  coast — what  is  the  name  of  the  seamen's  union  on  the  west 
coast? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Well,  there  was  at  that  time — at  the  time  the  clubs 
were  liquidated,  there  was  only  the  International  Seamen's  Union. 
Today  it  is  the  union  directed  by  Harry  Lundberg,  and  on  the  east 
coast  it  is  the  National  Maritime  Union,  the  direct  successor  of  the 
old  Marine  Workers  League  and  the  International  Seamen's  Clubs. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  in  between  the  Marine  Workers  League  and 
the  National  Maritime  LTnion  there  came  the  Marine  Workers  Indus- 
trial Union. 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  right ;  Marine  Workers  Industrial  I^nion  was 
organized  in  1930  on  the  basis  of  the  International  Seamen's  Clubs. 
The  order  came  from  Lozovsky.  It  was  relayed  by  the  Hamburg- 
office  through  Walter  and  the  effect  of  the  order  was — the  order  was 
in  effect,  that  Communists  all  over  the  world  should  organize  inde- 
pendent Communist  waterfront  unions.  They  were  part  and  parcel 
of  the  set-up  to  which  also  the  International  Seamen's  belong. 

This  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Union,  an  outright  Communist 
Tuiion,  was  liquidated  in  1930  officially,  in  reality  (mly  transferred 
into  a  fraction  and  instructed  to  enter  other  unions  and  take  them 
over. 

The  Communists  felt  at  that  time  that  they  were  strong  enough 
to  do  this  and  take  over  older  unions. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  of  any  specific  instances  in  which 
money  was  transmitted  from  Moscow  or  from  the  Soviet  Union  to 
American  Communists  for  use  in  the  maritime  industry? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  I  know  of  several  instances. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  some  of  them  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  In  1930  the  sum  of  $40,000  was  relayed  through  the 
I.  S.  H.  W.  offices  in  Hamburg  to  George  Mink  in  New  York,  to  the  ad- 
dress 140  Broad  Street,  for  an  extension  of  the  network  of  Inter- 
national Seamen's  Clubs  and  also  for  an  enlargement  and  increase  of 
circulation  of  the  Communist  maritime  newspaper.  The  Marine 
Workers  Voice,  at  that  time. 

The  monev  was  shipped  in  cash  by  a  Communist  courier  serving 
aboard  the  Hamburg- American  Line,  Albert  Balin. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  of  any  other  instances  ? 


UX-A.MEiacA.\    I'KorAlJAXDA  ACTH  ITU.S  8517 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  in  19;^3  I  sent  over  a  sum  of  money  to  the  maii- 
tinie  hea(l{]uai"tei's  in  New  York.  The  money  then  w(>nt  lo  the  ad- 
dress of  Koy  Iluclson,  who  had  snceeeded  Mink  in  the  k^adersliip  of 
the  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Union — Mink  had  been  taken  over 
into  (t.  p.  V.  work  and  was  in  Europe  at  that  time — and  had  filled 
Mink's  place. 

Aoain  in  1937  a  sum  of  money  destined  for  these  Scandmavian  sea- 
men's clubs  and  for  the  publication  of  the  Communist-Scandinavian 
and  German  i)ai)ers  for  disti-ibution  in  this  country,  was  shipped 
from  Copenha<:,en  by  the  maritime  division  through  a  courier  aboard 
the  Amei'ican-Scandinavian  sliip  Scanyoik. 

Mr.  Matthfavs.  In  what  year? 

]\Ii'.  Mason.  May  I  ask  how  much  money  was  sent  ?  Did  you  send 
much  more  over  here? 

Mr.  KijEBs.  To  Roy  Hudson  was  sent  from  $300  to  $400  monthly. 
It  was  for  the  upkeep  of  the  Marine  Workers  Voice,  the  Communist 
newspaper  here,  but  the  sums  were  strictly  bud<>;eted,  not  in  America, 
but  were  budgeted  over  in  Copenhagen  and  in  Moscow. 

The  sums  were  not  sent  them — they  could  not  receive  the  whole 
sum.  The  budget  was  worked  out  so  much  for  the  ])aper  and  so 
much  for  the  clubs  and  so  much  for  traveling  organizers,  and  so  much 
for  wages,  and  in  order  to  make  protection,  each  subbudget  was 
shipped  separately  across. 

Mr.  IVLiTTHEWS.  In  what  year  did  George  Mink  relinquish  his  lead- 
ership of  the  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Union  and  enter  the 
G.  P.  U.  i 

Mr.  Krebs.  There  is  no  clear  demarcation  line.  George  was  the 
head  of  the  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Union  until  1932.  but  he  had 
entered  the  G.  P.  U.  service  already  in  1930.  but  was  taken  altogether 
out  of  the  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Union  in  1932  to  do  full  time 
G.  P.  U.  work. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  then  succeeded  by  Eoy  Hudson? 

!Mr.  Krebs.  He  was  succeeded  by  a  committee  of  three,  which  in- 
cluded Roy  Hudson,  Tonnny  Ray,  and  Harry  Hynes. 

Mr.  ]Mattiiews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Roy  Hudson  and 
Harry  Hynes  and  Tommy  Ray  now  occupy  positions  of  leadership 
in  the  National  Maritime  Union? 

Mr.  IvREBS.  Harry  Hynes  was  killed  in  Spain  during  the  civil  war. 
He  was  a  member  of  the  Abraham  Lincoln  Brigade ;  Tommy  Ray  has 
been  until  recently  the  real  power  in  the  National  Maritime  Union. 

Joseph  Cui-ran,  the  nominal  head  of  the  union,  is  in  reality  nothing 
but  a  marionette  for  Tommy  Ray,  who  is  the  actual  dictator  of  the 
union,  and  also  the  head  of  the  Communist  fraction,  donunating  frac- 
tion within  tlie  Marine  Workers  Union. 

Roy  Hudson  is  regarded  as  the  —  he  has  become  a  member  of  the 
central  committee  of  the  Connnunist  Party  of  America  and  is  re- 
garded as  the  representative  of  the  Comnuuiist  fraction  of  the  Marine 
Workers  Union  of  the  National  Maritime  Union  in  the  Central 
Conunittee  of  the  Communist  Party,  but  has  occupied  beyond  that 
high  trade  union  functions  for  other  industries,  including  indus- 
tries in  Detroit  and  the  middle  western  cities. 

Roy  Hudson  was  named  foi'  a  wliile  as  ])ossible  successor  of  Earl 
Browder  when  it  became  apparent  that  Browder  W(Mdd  go  to  prison. 
Tommy  Ray  some  months  after  the  otitbreak  of  the  present  war  was 


§518  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

sent  by  the  Comintern  to  the  West  Indies  for  special  work  there, 
especially  in  the  creation  of  Communist  bases  in  the  West  Indies. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  information  which  indicates  where 
Tommy  Ray  is  presently  active^ 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  understand  that  lonnnv  lia>  is  pn'bt'.ill}  active-  on 
the  West  Indian  islands  of  Jamaica  and  Haiti  and  Cuba,  and  so 
forth. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Has  he  been  active  in  Puerto  Rico  and  the  Virgin 
Islands,  so  far  as  you  know? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Well,  I  don't  know  the  exact  details.  I  know  that  he 
has  been  sent  to  the  West  Indies  for  a  certain  Communist  job. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  was  that  job? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  job  was  to  create  Comnuniist  waterfront  bases  in 
the  ports  of  the  West  Indies. 

I  found  it  of  special  interest  at  that  time  because  I  knew  that  Nazi 
organizers  at  the  same  time  were  very  active  in  making  bases  for 
themselves  in  the  ports  of  the  West  Indian  islands. 

Mr.  Thomas.  May  I  ask  a  question:  Has  Tommy  Ray  also  been 
active  down  on  the  Gulf  coast? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  he  has  been  active  on  the  Gulf  coast  and  west 
coast. 

Mr.  Thomas.  What  has  he  been  doing  on  the  Gulf  coast? 

Mr.  Krebs.  National  Maritime  Union  work,  Marine  Workers  In- 
dustrial work  and  organizing.  He  was  constantly  traveling,  making 
the  rounds,  calling  meetings  of  local  leaders,  pointing  out  faults,  lay- 
ing down  the  line  for  future  action,  and  so  forth. 

Each  of  these  groups  on  the  Gulf  and  west  coasts  were  duty  bound 
to  send  monthly  reports  to  Tommy  Ray,  and  Ray  and  Hudson  then 
combined  these  monthly  reports  and  sent  each  month  a  total  report 
to  the  maritime  division  over  in  Europe,  in  Copenhagen  and  Ham- 
burg. 

The  headquarters  were  in  Hamburg  until  Hitler  came  into  power 
and  after  Hitler  came  to  power  the  maritime  headquarters  for  the 
whole  International  were  moved  from  Hamburg  to  Copenhagen. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  after  Hitler  took  Copenhagen  do  you  know 
where  they  were  moved  to? 

Mr.  Krebs.  There  is  only  two  places  where  they  could  have  moved, 
one  is  Leningrad,  the  chief  port  of  Russia,  and  the  other  is  some 
port  in  the  United  States  either  San  Francisco  or  New  York. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  a  speech  made  by  Tommy  Ray  at 
an  international  gathering  in  which  the  line  of  the  Communist  In- 
lernational  was  laid  down  for  work  among  the  workers  of  the  mari- 
time industry  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  that  was  during  the  International  World  Con- 
gress of  Marine  Workers,  which  took  place  in  May  1932,  in  Ham- 
burg.    The  exact  date  is  May  20  until  May  25,  1932. 

Communist  marine  workers  delegations  from  20  to  30  countries 
took  part  at  this  congress.  There  was  a  strong  Americjin  delegation 
under  the  leadership  of  George  Mink,  and  Tommy  Ray  was  present 
and  Tonnny  Ray  was  sing'led  out  by  the  leaders  of  the  maritime 
division  to  deliver  to  this  congress  the  main  speech  on  the  task  of 
Communist  seamen  and  dockers  in  the  event  of  war. 


UX-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8519 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Ray  had  any  collab- 
orators in  the  preparation  of  this  speech  for  the  sabotage  of  war 
activities^ 

Mr.  KiJKivs.  Yes;  he  hail.  Before  the  congress  opened,  the  whole 
line  of  the  conoivss  and  the  j)hascs  of  the  speeches  were  let  down 
liy  a  connnittee  of  foui'  or  five,  which  included  Albert  Walter,  myself, 
(leoro-e  Miidv.  and  a  personal  dele<>;ate  of  Stalin,  whose  name  was 
Komissarenko.  Komissarenko  was  the  special  deleoate  of  the  Soviet 
(iovernment  at  the  headquarters  of  the  marine  division. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  able  at  this  time  to  give  a  brief  summary 
of  the  contents  of  that  speech  made  by  Tommy  Ray  and  on  wliich 
you  collaborated^ 

INIr.  Krebs.  Yes.  In  speaking  about  the  task  of  Communist  water- 
front workers  in  case  of  an  outbreak  of  war,  in  Communist  parlance 
"impei-ialist  war/'  Ray  outlined  the  stratei2:ic  importance  of  the  ship- 
ping industry  and  pointed  out  that  in  tJie  event  of  war  it  would  be 
the  prime  and  foremost  task  of  the  Communist  organizers,  first,  to 
obstruct  the  transport  of  war  materials  for  any  country  waging 
war  without  the  consent  of  the  Soviet  Government. 

War  materials  are  not  only  defined  as  munitions,  cannon,  tanks, 
and  so  forth;  but  oil  cargoes,  gasoline  cargoes,  wool  cargoes — wool 
for  the  making  of  uniforms,  food  shipments — everything  that  is  used 
for  the  maintenance  of  an  army  is  considered  by  the  Comintern  as 
war  material. 

The  methods  to  achieve  this  obstruction  were  first  and  foremost, 
the  method  of  strikes.  The  line  let  down  was  that  the  workers  should 
not  be  called  to  a  general  strike  in  the  maritime  industry  under  the 
slogan  '"Obstruct  war  traiisports,"  chiefly,  but  that  the  wn)rkers  should 
be  led  easily  into  such  an  action  under  economic  slogans  such  as 
higher  wages,  free  Sunday  in  port  for  every  day  spent  out  at  sea, 
and  so  forth,  and  that  only  after  physical  clashes  between  the  strik- 
ing masses  and  the  police  or  the  military  and  arrests,  not  until  then 
should  political  slogans  be  advanced — "Down  with  police  brutality, 
freedom  of  the  arrested,"  and  the  central  slogan  "'Down  with  war," 
and  "Prevent  the  transport  of  war  materials." 

The  congress  adopted  a  resolution  based  on  the  speech  delivered 
tliei'e  at  this  international  congress  by  Tommy  Ray. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Do  you  have  a  copy  of  that  resolution.  Mr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  We  don't  have  it  in  full.  We  have  a  report  of  the 
congress  and  of  the  resolution,  which  I  am  about  to  bring  to  the 
attention  of  the  witness. 

:\Ir.  Krebs.  this  is  an  issue  of  the  Daily  Worker  for  May  22,  1932. 
On  the  front  page  is  an  article  entitled  "International  Congress  of 
Seamen  and  Harbor  Workers  Cheers  Scottsboro  INIother,"  from  Ham- 
burg, Germany.     Have  you  seen  that  article? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  have  seen  much  longer  reports  on  the  congress.  This 
is  just  a  dispatch.     I  have  seen  it  some  time  ago,  it  seems. 

Mr.  IMatthews.  Will  you  note  that  the  Daily  Worker  itself  calls 
attention  to  the  presence  of  certain  Americans  at  this  congress?  Will 
Vou  read  what  it  has  to  say  about  these  Americans i'  This  is  the 
Daily  Worker  for  May  23  instead  of  May  22. 


§520  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Krebs  (reading)  : 

A  huge  banner  demanding  the  release  of  the  nine  framed-up  innocent  Scotts- 
boro  Negro  boys  hangs  over  the  entrance  of  the  large  hall,  which  is  the  scene 
of  the  First  World  Congress  of  the  International  Seamen  and  Harbor  Workers. 
The  congress  includes  139  delegates  representing  the  seamen  and  harbor  work- 
ers of  27  countries. 

Mrs.  Ada  Wright,  mother  of  two  of  the  Scottsboro  boys,  and  .T.  Louis  Engdahl 
are  seated  among  the  fractional  delegates.  A  Scottsboro  re.soluticm  calling  for 
the  organization  of  Scottsboro  defense  committees  on  all  ships  and  in  all  harbors 
1o  cooperate  with  the  International  Red  Aid  has  been  unanimously  adopted. 
It  was  gi-eeted  with  a  thunder  of  cheers  and  applause. 

George  Mink,  heading  the  American  delegation,  introduced  a  resolution  de- 
manding the  release  of  Tom  Mooney. 

Tommy  Ray  of  San  Francisco,  one  of  the  American  delegates,  made  the 
report  on  war.  The  American  delegate.  Loren/,,  of  New  Orleans,  and  Mink, 
of  New  York,  in  discussion  rai.sed  the  Scottsboro  and  Mooney  persecutions  as 
part  of  the  war  preparations  of  American  imperialism. 

W'alter,  secretary  of  the  International  Seamen  and  Harbor  Workei's,  reported 
and  by  presenting  concrete  facts  proved  that  the  critis  of  world  capitalism  is 
I'apidly  deepening,  with  worsening  conditions  for  the  seamen  and  harbor  work- 
ers and  the  whole  working  class.  He  showed  deepening  poverty  and  famine 
esiiecially  among  the  colonial  seamen  and  dockers.  He  presented  proof  showing 
a  decrease  of  40  percent  in  the  transport  trade,  with  14.000,000  tons  of  shipping 
laid  up,  and  24  percent  of  the  ships  sailing  with  cargoes.  He  showed  on  the 
other  hand  that  the  ship  tonnage  of  the  Soviet  Union  has  increased  100  percent 
over  1913— 

and  so  forth,  and  then  it  goes  on,  in  a  political  vein. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  copy  of  the  International  Trade 
Union  Press  Correspondence.  Was  that  a  publication  of  the  Com- 
munist International? 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  was  the  publication  of  Lozovsky  of  the  Comintern. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  describe  briefly  the  article  which 
appears  on  page  4  of  this  issue  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  It  contains  a  summary  of  the  antiwar  resolutions 
adopted  by  this  International  Maritime  Congress  after  the  speech  of 
Tommy  Ray. 

Mr.  Matthews.  CongTessman  Thomas,  this  is  as  near  a  complete 
account  of  the  resoloution  as  we  happen  to  have  in  our  possession. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  that  in? 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  from  the  International  Trade  Union  Press 
Correspondence,  which  the  witness  has  identified  as  the  organ  of  Lo- 
zovsky, who  was  head  of  the  Profintern  in  Moscow. 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  headline  is  "Appeal  of  the  World  Congress  of  Water 
Tran.sport  Workers  Against  Imperialist  War." 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  you  going  to  be  able  to  trace  this  movement  into 
its  various  ramifications  in  the  United  States  and  Latin  America? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Right  down  to  the  present  day. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  being  true,  the  committee  will  withhold  any 
ciuestions  and  let  you  develop  that  in  a  chronological  manner. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  may  proceed,  Mr.  Krebs. 

Mr.  Krebs  (reading)  : 

Remember  the  horrors  of  the  World  War  when  millions  of  workers  bled  to 
death  foi'  the  prf)fit-craving  capitalists.  Tens  of  thousands  of  seamen  went  down 
in  torpedoed,  bombed,  and  blown-up  ships  whilst  women  and  children  perished 
in  penuz-y  and  hiniger. 

The  same  fate  hovers  over  you  today.  Therefore,  don't  hesitate.  Watch 
carefully  at  every  harbor,  on  every  ship  and  river  vessel  that  is  being  loaded  and 
transported.  Should  arms  or  other  war  material  be  shipiied,  organize  the  im- 
mediate stoppage  of  loading,  unloading,  and  transporting  of  any  kind  of  war 
material. 


rX-A:\IKKI('AX   rUOTAlJANDA  A(   ri\  ITIES  8521 

Mr.  Matthews.  Xoav  yon  say  that  is  a  resohitimi  basod  upon  the 
speec'li  iiuide  by  Toininy  Kay  at  this  international  congress,  a  speech 
upon  wliich  j'on  coUaborated? 

Mr.  Kkkbs.  That  isrig^ht. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Kkebs.  That  is  ri<ihi. 

Mr.  IVLvtthews.  Do  you  know  whetlier  or  not  that  particular  line 
has  ever  been  changed? 

Mr.  Krers.  No;  it  has  never  been  changed. 

Mr.  ^\)()RIIIs.  AA'hen  was  that  given? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  was  in  May  of  1932. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  it  is  still  tlie  policy  of  the  Communist  Party 
to  watch  tlie  cargoes  tliat  ai'e  being  loaded  upon  shi})s  and  to  stop 
loading  of  arms  or  nuuiitions  or  anything  that  goes  into  the  defense 
of  a  nation? 

]Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  The  policy  still  stands.  It  is  not  for  all  trans- 
)K)rts.  but  for  just  those  transports  which  do  not  have  the  O.  K.  of 
the  Soviet  Government. 

Mr.  Starves.  In  other  words,  if  the  Soviet  Government  O.  K.'s  it, 
it  could  be  shipped  anywhere;  if  they  are  against  it  then  it  would 
be  the  j^olicy  of  the  National  Maritime  Union  or  any  other  union 
under  Connnunist  domination  to  stop  those  shipments  by  refusing 
to  load,  and  by  striking,  and  so  forth? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Refusing  to  load,  refusing  to  transport,  refusing  to 
handle  in  any  way  anything  which  has  to  do  with  war  materials. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  What  about  American  aid  to  England  going  out  of 
the  east  coast  ports?  What  about  American  goods  going  to  Eng- 
land— war  materials  leaving  east  coast  ports  or  any  other  ports,  for 
that  matter,  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Krebs.  For  England? 

Mr.  Voorhis,  Yes.  It  would  seem  logical  to  me  that  something 
would  be  done  by  this  group  to  prevent  that. 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  The  Comnuniist  organizations  even  today  make 
all  possible  efforts  to  obstruct  shipments  of  war  material  to  Britain. 
Uj)  to  the  present  time  such  shipments  have  been  carried  mainly 
aboai'd  British  bottoms  where  Communist  influence  is  very  weak, 
but  where  such  sliipments  have  been  carried  on  non-British  and  non- 
American  bottoms,  that  is,  on  ships  whose  crews  are  controlled  by 
the  now  existing  Scandinavian  Seamen's  Clubs,  which  do  not  limit 
theii-  activities  to  Scandinavians  but  embrace  Dutchmen  and  Belgians 
and  seamen  of  other  con({uered— other  nations  con([uered  by  Hitler, 
there  have  been  a  great  innnber  of  strikes  started  because  of  minor 
economic  demands  designed  to  delay  the  shipment  for  days  and  often 
weeks. 

The  issue  has  not  become  acute  for  American  ships  since  no 
American  ships  as  yet  have  been  used  to  carry  such  material,  but 
declarations  by  the  Connnunist  fraction  leaders  in  the  mai'itime 
unions,  and  Curran  himself,  stated  that  they  had  the  power  to  ob- 
stiuct  such  shi})ments  and  I  hey  would  use  it. 

Mr.  'J'homas.  In  other  words,  Russia  has  the  whip  hand  on  Amer- 
ican shi])ping  at  all  times? 

Ml-.  Krebs.  He  feels  that  he  has  the  whip  hand  because  he  knows 
there  is  not  a  single  American  ship  sailing  from  east  coast  ports 
which  does  not  have  aboard  among  its  crew  a  Communit  unit. 


g522  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  said  a  statement  had  been  made  by  Joseph 
Curran. 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes ;  Joseph  Curran  l\as  made  a  statement. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  When  and  Avhere? 

Mr.  Krebs.  In  a  speech  before  a  union  meeting  or  a  union  con- 
vention. It  has  been  generally  in  the  American  press  and  also  the 
National  Maritime  Union  has  issued  a  special  pamphlet  in  conjunc- 
tion with  the  AVest  Coast  Longshoremen's  Union,  under  the  title 
"The  Yanks  Are  Not  Coming,"  and  this  was  distributed  in  thousands 
of  copies  on  American  ships  and  in  American  harbors  to  create  a 
spirit  that :  "It  is  up  to  you  to  decide  whether  the  Yanks  are  coming 
or  whether  they  are  not  coming." 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  the  National  Mari- 
time Union  is  cooperating  with  the  American  Peace  Mobilization  in 
its  present-day  program? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  American  Peace  Mobilization  is  a  comparatively 
new  organization  and  I  know  practically  nothing  about  it,  but  if  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization  is  a  front  for  the  Communist  Party 
then  I  would  say  with  100-percent  surety  that  they  cooperate. 

Mr.  Starnes.  With  the  National  Maritime  Union? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Because  both  are  fronts  for  one  and  the  same  thing, 
both  are  directed  in  the  last  analysis  by  the  Central  Committee  of 
the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  the  National  Maritime  Union  the  successor  of 
the  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Union  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes,  it  is.  It  is  not  the  direct  successor.  The  Marine 
Workers  Industrial  Union  was  ordered  liquidated  by  Moscow  in  1935 
after  the  Seventh  World  Congress  of  the  Communist  International 
in  Moscow,  which  took  place  in  that  year.  They  decided  under 
orders  from  Georgi  Dimitrotf  to  change  the  policy  to  the  Trojan- 
horse  policy. 

The  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Union  was  dissolved.  The  mem- 
bers of  this  union  entered  the  American  Federation  of  Labor's  Inter- 
national Seamen's  Union  as  rank  and  file  members,  formed  the  frac- 
tions, grew  in  the  rank  and  file  movement,  and  particularly  since  the 
end  of  1934  this  rank  and  file  movement  grew,  assumed  more  and 
more  power  inside  of  the  existing  International  Seamen's  Union, 
until  by  the  end  of  1936  the  Conmiunist  rank  and  file  movement, 
that  is,  the  Communist  caucus,  the  Communist  block,  had  com])lete 
power  of  the  union. 

The  union  was  destroyed  and  a  new  union  was  created  by  the  same 
rank  and  file  movement  called  the  National  Maritime  Union  of 
America. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  it  customary  for  the  Communist  leadership  in 
such  unions  to  send  detailed  regular  and  frequent  reports  to  any 
international  headquarters  of  the  Comintern? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  as  long  as  I  was  active  in  Communist  organiza- 
tions, the  rule  w^as  it  was  mandatory  that  every  Communist  fraction, 
every  Communist  organization  operating  in  the  maritime  industry, 
also  every  Communist  Party  itself,  should  send  once  a  month  a  de- 
^tailed  report  on  the  past  month's  activities  and  results  obtained,  plus 
a  plan  for  the  next  month's  work,  to  international  headquarters. 


UX-AMKUK'AN   runi'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8523 

I  have  seen  myself,  a  miniber  of  such  reports  which  were  sent  iii 
by  Roy  Hudson  and  some  were  written  by  Tommy  Ray. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVas  it  a  part  of  your  work  as  an  agent  of  the 
G.  P.  U.  to  read  such  reports  from  time  to  time? 

Mr.  Kkebs.  All  reports  arriving  at  headquarters  were  analyzed 
fii-st  by  the  maritime  division  and  then  they  were  handed  over  to 
the  local  G.  P.  U.  office.  They  were  studied  there  and  then  the  reports 
vrere  given  to  the  couriers  sei'ving  as  seamen  aboard  a  Soviet  ship. 

It  must  be  noticed  that  wherever  a  Communist  headquartei*s  is 
located  it  is  always  a  harbor  which  has  regular  contact  with  Soviet 
shipping,  Russian  shipping.  These  ships  are  the  last  link  of  all 
material  which  comes  in  which  is  sifted  first  in  Copenhagen  and 
then  put  aboard  a  Soviet  ship  and  forvrarded  to  INIoscow. 

^Ir.  Mattheavs.  Is  it  your  testimony  that  even  though  you  yourself 
were  not  present  in  the  United  States  during  some  of  these  periods, 
that  you  did  read  the  reports  from  the  Communist  leaders  concern- 
ing tile  activities  and  developments  in  the  United  States? 

jNIr.  Krebs.  I  read  some  of  those  reports  in  1933  and  again  in 
1937  in  the  headquarters  of  the  maritime  division  in  Copenhagen. 
I  can  give  you  the  address  of  the  headquarters  at  that  time. 

Ml'.  Matthews.  What  is  the  address? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Vestr  Brogade.  That  is  the  name  of  the  street.  The 
name  of  the  building  in  Vesterport.  It  is  the  largest  and  most  modern 
office  building  in  the  Danish  capital,  and  the  maritime  division  and 
the  western  secretariat  of  the  Comintern  maintained  a  flight  of 
offices  there,  camouflaged  as  a  firm  of  architects.  The  sign  on  the 
door  reads  Selvo  &  Co.,  Architects.  It  was  to  these  offices  that  the 
reports  were  sent  out  where  I  read  some  of  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  your  practice  to  have  any  special  attention 
given  to  reports  that  dealt  with  strikes  in  the  maritime  industry? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  whenever  a  strike  took  place  a  conq^lete  and  de- 
tailed report  of  such  a  strike,  sometimes  where  reports  with  hundreds 
of  typewritten  pages  were  sent  in  to  headquarters. 

The  strike  report  was  checked  by  independent  reports  from  con- 
trolled people  placed  in  the  various  harbors  and  then  the  concurrent 
leports  were  analyzed,  the  facts  were  taken  together;  weakness  of 
strategy  and  tactics  were  pointed  out,  good  points  were  stressed  and 
the  lessons  from  each  strike  rei>ort  were  drawn  and  formulated  as 
lessons  for  tactical  measures  to  be  taken  in  the  strikes  of  the  future. 

Such  analyses  and  lessons  of  strikes  were  usually  published  in 
pam])hlet  form  or  in  mimeographed  bulletins  and  then  sent  to  Com- 
.munist  maritime  groups  all  over  the  world  for  study  purposes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  of  any  strike  which  was  considered  of 
such  an  outstanding  character  in  Communist  International  circles,  a 
strike  which  occurred  in  the  maritime  industry  of  the  United  States, 
thai  such  an  analysis  was  published  throughout  the  world? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  there  was  only  one  strike,  though,  in  the  maritime 
industry  of  the  United  States  which  was  considered  of  international 
significance  and  of  outstanding  importance  and  that  was  the  water- 
front strike  which  resulted  in  the  San  Francisco  general  strike  in 
1934. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  yourself  read  the  reports  of  Communist 
leaders  from  that  San  Francisco  strike? 


g524  rX-AMERICAX  PKOPAGAXDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes ;  I  read  tliein  years  later,  in  1937,  after  I  came  from 
Germany  and  read  over  a  large  number  of  such  reports  in  order  to 
familiarize  myself  in  what  had  happened  during  my  absence  from 
headquarters. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  were  the  authors  of  those  reports  sent  from 
this  country  to  Copenhagen,  dealing  with  the  San  Francisco  general 
strike  ?  Who  were  the  authors,  wdio  prepared  those  reports  in  this 
country? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  reports  came  from  various  sources.  The  ones  deal- 
ing with  the  Marine  Workers  Industrial  Unions  were  sent  by  Hudson 
and  Ray. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  In  reading  the  reports  that  had  to  do  with  the  gen- 
eral strike  in  San  Francisco,  of  what  significance  did  the  Communist 
International  derive  from  them? 

Mr.  Krebs.  They  pointed  out  in  their  analysis  of  the  Frisco  general 
strike  that  it  w'as  the  first  general  strike  which  had  ever  taken  j^lace 
in  the  United  States  under  clear  Comnuniist  leadership.  Second, 
they  pointed  out,  the  sequence  in  Comnuniist  strategy  in  using  the 
strikes  as  stepping  stones  toward  the  final  aim,  armed  insurrection. 
The  sequence  pointed  out  is  this :  From  the  partial  strike  in  one  indus- 
try to  the  mass  strike  in  one  industry,  a  higher  form  of  battle  from 
the  mass  strike  in  one  industry  to  mass  strikes  in  a  group  of  indus- 
tries, and  then  from  the  mass  strikes  in  the  group  of  industries 
through  an  intensive  propaganda  campaign  appealed  to  the  jiublic 
opinion,  that  is,  to  win  the  sympathy  of  the  population  for  the 
strikers,  particularly  by  provoking  clashes  in  which  a  few  strikers  are 
killed  by  police.  This  is  used  to  capitalize  in  order  to  win  the  favor 
of  the  population  and  this  is  considered  as  the  link  toward  the  gen- 
eral strike  from  the  mass  strike  to  the  general  strike. 

Now,  to  this  point  the  San  Francisco  strike  followed  the  pattern 
but  it  was  considered  particularly  significant  because,  as  is  taught  in 
the  Comintern  University  in  Moscow,  because  fi'om  the  general 
strike  in  (me  district  to  the  general  strike  all  over  the  country,  the 
next  set-up  is  general  strikes  with  mass  demonstrations  of  the 
workers.  The  next  step  is  general  strike  with  armed  mass  demonstra- 
tions of  the  workers  and  general  strikes  with  armed  mass  demonstra- 
tions supposed  to  lead  the  armed  and  marching  and  stiiking  masses 
into  open  battle  with  the  police  and  the  armed  forces  of  the  Govern- 
ment, and  then  comes  the  final  step  from  general  strike  with  armed 
demonstrations  to  armed  insurrection  and  seizure  of  power. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  these  reports  which  analyzed  the  San  Fran- 
cisco general  strike  of  1934,  was  the  name  of  Harry  Bridges  men- 
tioned ? 

J\Ir.  Krebs.  The  name  of  Bridges  was  mentioned  in  several  re- 
ports. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  there  any  significance  attached  to  the  name 
of  Harry  Bridges  in  these  reports? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  name  of  Harry  Bridges  was  mentioned  in  reports 
written  by  Roy  Hudson. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  what  Hudson  had  to  say  about  the 
significance  of  Bridges'  part  in  the  strike? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Roy  Hudson  spoke  of  Bridges  as  a  subordinate,  as  a 
man  taking  orders  from  Roy  Hudson. 


UX-AMKKRAN    rK()l'A(;AM)A  ALTIVITJES  8525 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  spoke  of  Harry  Brid<ies  as  his  own  siibordi- 
iinte? 

Mr.  Kkkbs.  Yes,  sir;  as  his  subordinate. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  takin*;  orders  from  him? 

Mr.  Krehs.  Yes. 

^Fi'.  Matthews.  "What  else  did  he  have  to  say  about  Bridges,  if 
auythiu<>:? 

Nir.  Kkebs.  Bridojes  was  mentioned  as  Hudson's  man  on  the  west 
coast,  just  as  Tonnny  Ray  was  Hudson's  man  on  the  east  coast. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  that  was  the  first 
(ime  that  Bridges  had  come  in  some  important  way  to  the  attention 
of  the  Comnumist  International? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  it  interested  me  })articularly  because  I  had  been 
several  times  in  the  United  States  and  I  came  to  the  conclusion  th.at 
the  name  of  Bridges  was  practically  unknown  in  Conmuuiist  circles 
before  19;U.  but  that  in  the  course  of  the  1934  strike  the  name  became 
prominent  and  was  regarded  by  the  maritime  division  of  the  Comin- 
tern as  a  very  good  name,  as  a  name  ranking  with  those  of  Ray  and 
Hudson. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Right  on  that  point,  Mr.  Matthews — I  would  lil^e  to 
liave  the  witness  develo])  what  he  means  by  "a  very  good  name."' 
AVill  you  bring  out  as  much  of  that  as  you  possibly  can? 

Mr.  Matthews.  "What  do  you  mean  when  you  say  the  Communist 
International   movement   considered  "Bridges   a   good  name''   after 


■? 

Mr.  Krers.  At  that  time  the  Communists  did  not  have  complete — 
did  not  dominate  completely  any  decisive  water-front  unions  in  this 
country,  except  their  own  union,  the  ]Marine  Workers  Industrial 
Union,  and  the  Conununist  argument  with  regard  to  the  trade-union 
movement,  particularly  during  strikes,  was  that  they  had  to  throw 
out  of  the  union  leaders  who  did  not  follow  the  party  lines  and  men 
following  the  party  line  be  put  in  power.  The  differentiation  is 
sharp.  In  every  strike  movement  you  will  find  sharp  attacks  on  one 
side  against  one  group  and  an  equally  sharp  and  thus  support  of  an- 
other group. 

]\Ir.  Thomas.  In  other  words,  Harry  Bridges  was  to  be  supported 
and  encouraged  by  the  Conmiunist  International? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  The  reports  stated  in  effect  that  Harry  Bridges 
is  "their  man."  In  the  resolution  distributed  to  the  various  mari- 
time groups,  Harry  Bridges  was  put  as  a  symbol  and  as  an  idol  of  a 
type  of  leader  of  revolutionary  water-front  organizations,  who  should 
be  emulated,  imitated  by  groups  and  Communist  water-front  leaders 
elsewhere. 

^Ir.  VooRHis.  Before  you  leave  this  line  I  want  to  ask  a  couple  of 
questions. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  want  to  show  you  an  article  by  Jack  Stachel  in 
the  magazine  the  Communist  for  November  1934,  an  article  entitled 
"Our  Trade-Union  Policy,"  which  was  a  report  to  the  political  bureau 
of  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party. 

This  article  contains  a  long  anal^'sis  of  the  San  Francisco  general 
strike  and  near  the  end  of  it.  it  reads  as  follows : 

What  will  happen  if  the  workers  elect  not  only  one  Bridges  but  hundreds  of 
Rridfres  in  the  section  and  district  leadership,  not  to  speak  of  national  leader- 
ship?    There  will  be  big  struggles.     The  workers  will  become  revolutionized. 


8526  UN-AMEaiCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Now  I  ask  yon,  Mr.  Krebs,  in  the  light  of  yoiii-  own  knowledge 
of  such  analysis  and  reports  of  strikes,  what  you  are  to  understand 
by  this  reference  to  Bridges'  leadership  in  the  general  strike? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes.  It  is  an  adaptation  of  the  Comintern  trade- 
union  policy  just  befoi'e  the  Seventh  World  Congress,  which  was 
sent  out  to  the  Communist  parties  in  all  countries,  in  56  countries 
where  Communist  parties  exist,  and  this  is,  in  my  judgment,  an 
adaptation,  an  American  adaptation  to  a  central  resolution. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A  central  resolution  of  the  Comintern? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Of  the  maritime  bureau  of  the  Comintern,  heading  the 
lessons  of  the  general  strike  in  San  Francisco. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Which  was  sent  throughout  the  world  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes;  throughout  the  world. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  this  you  consider  an  American  adaptation? 

Mr.  Krebs.   Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  that  central  resolution? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  haven't  read  it  through,  but  I  see  one  line.  This 
means  to  get  the  party  membership  fully  into  the  trade-unions.  "To 
strengthen  our  party  base  by  further  recruiting  A.  F.  of  L.  workers 
and  to  build  the  apparatus  to  lead  the  work  from  top  to  bottom." 
''Apparatus"  is  a  special  term  used  for  illegal  and  hidden  Communist 
leadershii),  and  this  conforms  exactly  with  the  trade-union  policy 
dictated  from  Copenhagen  and  Moscow  just  before  the  Seventh 
World  Cong:i'ess.     That  was  in  1934. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Now  returning  to  this  reference  to  Harry  Bridges, 
what  do  you  understand  by  Stachel's  statement  that  the  workers  will 
become  revolutionized  if  hundreds  of  Bridges  are  placed  in  the  leader- 
ship of  the  trade  unions? 

Mr.  Krebs.  It  has  to  the  Communist  functionary  but  one  meaning. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  that  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  The  meaning  is  that  Harry  Bridges  is  here  considered 
by  the  organization  chief  of  the  Communist  Party  as  one  of  those 
rare  functionaries  who  will  really  understand  how  to  lead  masses, 
also  non-Communist  masses  into  action,  into  that  sort  of  action  which 
conforms  to  the  Communist  ])rinciples  of  acceleration  of  action  from 
part  strikes  to  mass  strikes,  to  armed  demonstrations,  and  so  forth, 
wdiich  is  in  the  program  of  the  Comintern,  defined  as  the  process  of 
revolutionizing  the  masses;  and  wlien  the  report  of  Stachel  to  the 
Central  Committee  states  there  will  be  big  struggles,  the  desirability 
of  having  hundreds  of  Bridges  in  the  movement,  and  that  the  workers 
will  become  revolutionized,  it  is  a  compliment  to  Bridges  as  a  party 
functionary  by  the  highest  party  functionary  outside  of  Earl  Brow- 
der  in  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  Jack  Stachel  the  highest  party  functionary 
outside  of  Browder  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Jack  Stachel  was  the  organization  chief  and  as  such 
the  real  executive  of  the  party.  Earl  Browder  was  the  political  chief 
and  the  man  who  guided  policy. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  these  reports  on  the  San  Francisco  general 
strike,  which  you  read  in  Copenhagen,  leave  any  doubt  in  your  mind 
about  the  question  of  Harry  Bridges'  membership  in  the  Communist 
Party? 


UX-AMKKUAX    riUII'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8527 

Mr.  Krebs.  No;  absoliitel}'  not.  Harry  Bridges  was  regarded  in 
these  r(>p<)i'ts — mentioned  in  these  re})()rts  as  as  much  of  a  liolshevik 
at  Tonnny  Kay  and  Kt)y  Hudson. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  practice  of  out- 
standing Comnumist  leadei-s  hohling  Connnunist  Pai-ty  membership 
cards  ^  Do  functionaries  like  Browder  and  Ray  and  Hudson  hold 
membership  cards  ^ 

Mr.  Krebs.  No:  they  don't  hold  membership  cards.  Membershij) 
cards  of  the  Connnunist  Party  were  designed  to  be  carried  by  the 
dupes  in  the  rank  and  tile,  but  anyone  above  the  job  of  a  district  func- 
tionary, that  is,  the  leader  of  the  Conmiunist  organization  of  a  city 
district,  of  a  county  district,  who  would  be  caught  carrying  a  Com- 
munist membership  book,  would  be  expelled  from  the  party  for  en- 
dangering the  party  t>rganization  and  his  own  function  by  carrying- 
such  a  document  around  in  his  pocket. 

The  party  membership  book  is  designed,  is  used  today  simply  as  a 
means  of  control  for  the  payment  of  dues  of  the  large  rank  and 
file  mass  of  the  party,  but  anyone  engaged  in  leading  party  work  or 
in"  subleading  party  work  would  be  considered  an  irredeemable  fool, 
guilty  of  criminaf  neglect,  if  he  went  anywdiere  among  non-Com- 
munists with  a  party  membership  book  or  even  kept  a  party  member- 
ship book  in  his  home. 

I  know  that  during  15  years  of  membership  in  the  Communist 
Party  I  stopped  carrying  a  party  membership  book  as  early  as  1926. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "When  you  say  you  stopped  carrying  a  party  mem- 
bership book,  did  you  have  the  book  anywhere  else? 

Mr.  Krebs.  No  ;  I  didn't  keep  them  at  all. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  no  book  was  issued  to  you  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  received  my  pay  from  the  organization  and  auto- 
matically, when  the  pay  was  given,  I  had  to  give  10  or  20  percent  of 
that  pay  into  the  party  coffers  and  that  was  all. 

Mr.  ^Iatthews.  In  other  words,  do  you  mean  to  say  that  a  person 
of  ]u-ominence  may  be  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  without 
ever  having  had  a  party  book  issued  in  his  name  '. 

Mr.  Krebs.  He  will  have  a  party  membership  book  issued  in  his 
name  wlien  he  entered  the  party  and  was  a  small  comrade  of  the  rank 
and  file,  but  as  soon  as  he  was  trusted  with  confidential  work,  it  was 
his  jjarty  duty  not  to  carry  a  membership  book. 

Air.  AIattheavs.  Or  not  co  have  one  anywhere  else  ? 

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  Vooehis.  May  I  interrupt  for  a  moment?  I  want  to  ask  a  few 
questions  about  the  San  Francisco  strike. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  In  the  first  place,  do  you  believe  that  the  net  result 
of  the  San  Francisco  strike,  having  taken  place  and  of  the  experi- 
ences that  were  had  in  connection  with  it  by  that  connnunity  and  by 
solid  labor  oi-ganizations,  made  more  likely  or  less  likely  the  possi- 
l)ility  of  ])ulling  off  such  a  tiling  again? 

Mr.  Krei's.  The  San  Francisco  strike,  the  San  Francisco  general 
strike  is  regarded  by  the  Communist  Party  and  the  Comintern  as  a 
very  valuable  dress  rehearsal. 

♦52620— 41— vol.  14 24 


8528  UX-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA   ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  YooRHis.  I  am  not  talkino;  about  how  the  Comintern  regards 
it ;  I  am  talking-  about  how  the  rank  and  file  of  the  American  labor 
movement  were  affected  in  their  attitude  toward  the  possibility  of 
such  a  thing  occurring  again.  My  question  is  whether  you  think 
that  the  exi)eriences  tnat  were  had  in  that  strike  made  it  more  likely 
that  solid  American  labor  would  fall  into  such  a  train  of  circum- 
stances again  or  less  likely  that  they  would? 

Mr.  Krebs.  If  a  similar  condition  arises  in  any  other  place  or  again 
in  San  Francisco,  and  the  masses  of  the  workers  are  convinced, 
through  clever  propaganda,  that  they  are  justified  in  striking,  that 
they  have  every  chance  to  win  such  a  strike;  that  is,  obtain  the 
demands  forwarded  by  their  union  leadership  or  by  the  faction,  they 
would  fall  into  such  a  strike. 

A  strike  is  not,  as  it  is  said  in  the  organization,,  "whistled  on."  A 
strike  is  usually  started  in  a  small  department  and  grows. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  from  the  standpoint  of  the  labor  movement  gen- 
erally  

Mr.  Krebs.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  They  certainly  didn't  o^ain  anything  out  of  the  gen- 
eral strike  in  San  Francisco. 

Mr.  Krebs.  Well,  the  San  Francisco  strike  served  to  create  a  very 
strong  fundament  for  the  later  longshoremen's  organization  and  wa- 
ter-front organizations — the  C  I.  O.  controlled  organizations  on  the 
west  coast.  It  was  the  beginning  of  real  Connnunist  power  on  the 
west  coast. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Well,  I  don't  think  I  have  made  myself  clear  yet. 

INIr.  Mason.  What  Mr.  Voorhis  is  trying  to  clear  up  is  the  fact 
that  the  workers,  those  who  took  j^art  in  this  general  strike.,  gained 
nothing  for  themselves  but  that  the  Communist  Party  laid  the 
foundation  for  future  o])erations  because  of  the  general  strike. 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Mason.  And  they  used  the  workers  as  dupes  to  further  their 
program  and  not  the  welfare  of  the  workers.  Is  that  what  you  were 
trying  to  say? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  think  that  most  labor  that  was  drawn  into  that 
realizes  that  that  is  exactly  wdiat  happened. 

Mr.  Krebs.  I  understand  the  question. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  therefore  it  seems  to  me  that  the  net  result  of 
that  makes  such  a  recurrence  less  likely,  rather  than  more  so,  in  the 
future. 

jNIr.  Krebs.  Well,  the  Communist  strike  purpose  has  never  been, 
is  never  and  will  never  be  following  the  objectives  of  bettering  the 
living  conditions  of  the  workers  because  the  Communist  Party,  in 
striving  for  general  national  crises  and  revolutionary  situations, 
would  act  against  their  own  interests  if  they  worked  for  bettering 
labor  conditions. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Exactly. 

Mr.  Krebs.  Because  if  they  work  for  better  labor  conditions,  the 
proletariat,  in  their  own  words,  "would  be  satisfied  and  they  would 
be  interested  in  making  revolutionary  action."  But  the  Communist 
Party  considers  every  strike  as  a  political  battle,  but  if  they  told 
the  workers:  "This  is  a  political  battle  fought  for  the  benefit  of 
the  Communist  policy  and  Communist  organizations,"  they  would 


UX-AMEKRAN    rUOl'AdANDA   ACTIViriES  §529 

not   lure  one   worker  out   of  his  house   door   by   such   a   slogan,  so 
they  have  to  advance  economic  slogans. 

JNIr.  Stauxes.  They  do  do  that.  However,  the  Communist  Party 
ascends  to  power  iu  a  union  by  advancing  economic  programs  which 
makes  (liii)es  of  the  workers. 

Mr.  Khebs.  Makes  du[)es  of  the  rank  and  file.  The  rank  and  tile 
Avilj  reuiain  dupes  until  they  are  met  by  an  educational  drive  in 
the  counterdirection. 

At  present  the  Conununist  fractions  in  many  unions  have  free 
hands,  because  the  Connnunists  operate  with  a  well-trained,  dis- 
<'iplined.  well-financed  machine.  The  other  side  has  no  such  ma- 
chine. The  other  side  may  be  the  majority  but  it  has  no  machine, 
no  oiganization  at  its  disposal,  and  so  long  as  the  workers  are  not 
educated  to  the  real  phase  of  communism's  tactics  in  trade  unions 
and  in  strike  movements,  they  are  likely  to  become  dupes  again  at 
the  next  occasion. 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  Xow.  one  more  question  about  this  matter:  Isn't  it 
true  that  the  one  thing  that  Communist  strategists  hope  for  most 
earnestly  is  that  the  employer  on  his  part  will  be  unreasonable  or 
arbitrary,  or  that  there  will  be  bad  conditions  actually  in  existence 
iu  order  to  form  a  basis  for  an  appeal;  isn't  that  true^ 

Mr.  Krebs.  That  is  correct.  I  have  known  of  strikes  called  by 
organized — by  Communist:  fractions  and  by  Communist  Party  or- 
ganizations for  the  outright  purpose  of  strengthening  party  position. 

I  remember  a  shipping  strike  in  Germany.  The  Communist 
Party  forced  the  crew  members  of  some  200  ships  out  on  strike, 
and  while  the  rank  and  file  of  the  seamen  were  out  on  strike  the 
Conununist  Party  mobilized  several  hundred  Comnumists  who 
offered  themselves  as  strikebreakers,  and  then  the  Communist  Party 
said :  ''There  are  too  many  strikebreakers,  the  ships  ai-e  out,  let  us 
call  the  strike  off.'"  \Yhen  the  strike  was  called  off.  the  whole  result 
was  the  non-Comnumists  who  struck  found  themselves  jobless  and 
the  Commu.ni;-t  Party  had  increased  its  position  in  the  German  mer- 
chan.t  marine  fivefold  by  sending  its  members  in  as  strikebreakers. 

Xow.  there  are  many  small  aspects.  The  technique  of  strikes 
is  taught  in  Moscow  as  medical  science  is  taught  in  a  bona  fide  col- 
lege, and  every  small  item  that  may  crop  up  in  a  strike  is  con- 
sidered, weighed,  and  a  rule  of  conduct  laid  down.  That  is 
summed  up  in  a  word  by  Lozovsky  himself,  which  is  called  Strike 
Is  War,  and  forms  the  basis  of  lecture  series  at  the  Lenin  Uni- 
versity in  Moscow. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  Chair  wishes  to  make  an  announcement.  After 
conferring  with  Dr.  Matthews,  the  Chair  is  of  the  opinion  that  some 
of  the  testinu)ny  which  is  now  about  to  be  developed  has  certadn* 
national-defense  angles  that  ))robably  should  be  brought  to  the  atten- 
tion of  the  naval  and  military  intelligence  before  we  decide  to  make 
it  public. 

The  Chair  is  o-oing  to  call  the  committee  into  executive  session 
and  ask  the  witness  to  remain.  The  public  hearings  of  the  committee 
willbe  resumed  tomorrow  morning  at  10  o'clock. 

(Whereupon,  at  12 :  15  p.  m.,  the  committee  went  into  executive 
session.) 


INVESTIGATION  Oh   UN-AMERICAN  riiOrAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


THURSDAY,   MAY   29,    1941 

House  of  Representatives, 
Subcommittee  of  the  Special  Commtitee 

TO  Investigate  Un-American  Activities, 

Washmgfon,  D.  C. 

The  subcommittee  met  at  10  a.  m.  in  the  caucus  room.  House  Office 
Building,  Hon,  Joe  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee) 
presiding. 

Present:  Messrs.  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee),  Voorhis, 
and  Mason. 

Also  present :  Mr.  Robert  E.  Stripling,  chief  investigator,  and  Dr. 
J.  B.  Matthews,  director  of  research. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  conunittee  will  come  to  order. 

The  Chair  feels  a  statement  should  be  made  at  this  time  with  ref- 
erence to  an  investigation  which  has  been  conducted  by  the  committee, 
■of  the  background  of  the  signers  to  Communist  election  petitions  in 
the  city  of  Philadelphia. 

This  investigation  reveals  some  startling  facts  which  the  American 
people  are  entitled  to  have  knowledge  of.  The  committee  finds  on 
investigating  the  background  of  the  signers  to  these  C^ommunist  elec- 
tion petitions  in  Philadelphia,  83  signers  are  employed  in  the  Phila- 
<lelphia  Navy  Yard ;  40  in  the  Frankfort  Arsenal ;  157  in  other 
Government  positions,  and  425  miscellaneous  workers. 

The  committee  also  finds  that  114  signers  work  in  the  transportation 
system  in  the  city  of  Philadelphia  and  that  510  are  W.  P.  A.  workers. 

The  conunittee  further  finds  that  5  of  the  signers  work  in  an  electric 
■company  supplying  the  city  and  those  vital  installations  with  power, 
and  that  there  are  12  teachers  and  C  newspapermen.  This,  in  the  judg- 
ment of  the  committee,  reveals  to  an  unusual  degree  the  penetration 
of  the  Communist  Party  into  many  organizations  which  are  vital  and 
essential  to  the  function  of  this  democracy  of  ours. 

We  don't  know  how  many  signed  this  under  misapprehension  or  oy 
mistake.  Frankly.  iiUelligent  peo])le  would  (l()ul)t  that  any  voter 
would  sign  a  jietition  to  ])lace  a  l)arty  on  the  ballot  regardless  of  the 
name  of  the  party,  through  ignorance  or  mistake. 

This  morning  we  are  to  hear  testimony  of  witnesses  from  the  west 
coast.  The  committee  has  received  allegations  and  comj^laints  to  the 
effect  that  subversive  elements  have  sought  to  use  legitimate,  bona  fide 
trade  unions  for  political  purposes.  We  do  know  that  that  is  the  pro- 
gram of  the  Communist  Party,  the  avowed  program. 

8531 


8532  UX-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVrriES 

We  have  received  alleoations  or  complaints  to  the  effect  that  the 
Communist  Party  has  placed  its  members  in  key  positions  in  certain 
of  our  trade-unions,  and  that  these  Communist  members  or  sympa- 
tliizers  have  used  this  position  and  have  abused  this  position  of  trust 
and  power,  to  the  extent  that  they  have  sought  to  impede  production 
for  national-defense  purposes,  producing  strikes  and  stoppages  that 
in  some  instances  are  unwarranted. 

The  connnittee  feels  that  such  action  does  not  reflect  the  ripened 
judgment  of  the  working  men  and  women  of  America,  because  we 
know  they  are  the  most  loyal  and  patriotic  group  of  people  that  we 
have.  We  also  know  that  honest,  law-abiding  and  (jod-fearing  labor- 
ing men  and  women  in  this  country,  including  the  greater  part  of 
their  leadership,  as  well  as  the  rank  and  tile,  are  anxious  to  rid  the 
labor  movement  of  these  subversive  elements,  and  they  are  entitled  to 
the  support  of  the  country  in  that  effort. 

The  committee  knows  that  the  Connnunists  in  the  trade-unions  seek 
to  use  their  power  and  the  positions  which  they  may  hold  for  the  pur- 
pose of  discrediting  trade-unions  on  the  one  hand  and  for  destroying 
the  country  on  the  other. 

The  result  of  these  allegations  and  charges  of  Communist  infiltra- 
tion or  penetration  into  certain  of  our  trade-unions  has  produced  a 
r' umber  of  un warranted  and  unnecessary  strikes  in  the  country  and  it 
has  produced  trouble  in  the  industrial  centers,  all  to  the  detriment  of 
our  defense  program,  which  tlireatens  and  imperils  our  national  se- 
curity, is  the  reason  that  we  are  hearing  these  witnesses  this  morning. 

Dr.  Matthews,  whom  will  you  have  first? 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  first  witness  is  Hugh  Ben  Inzer. 

TESTIMONY    OF    HUGH    BEN    INZER.    CHAIRMAN,    VIGILANT 

AMERICAN  COMMITTEE 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand?  Do 
you  solenndy  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall  give  in  this  investi- 
gation will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so 
help  you,  God  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  a  seat,  Mr.  Inzer,  and  you  may  proceed.  Dr. 
Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  your  full  name  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Hugh  Ben  Inzer. 

Mr.  Matthews.  H-u-g-h  B-e-n  I-n-z-e-r? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  do  you  live,  Mr.  Inzer? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  live  at  10000  Alexander  Avenue,  South  Gate,  Calif. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  born  ? 

Mr.  In/.er.  I  was  ]x)rn  in  Alabama. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  When '. 

Mr.  Inzer.  In  1900,  September  4. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  served  in  the  armed  forces  of  the 
United  States? 


r  NAM  KIM  CAN    I'ltol-AGANDA   A(  "ri  \  111  I.S  8533 

Mr.  Lnzeh.  Yes,  sii-;  I  have  seiA'ed  8  yeai'b  in  the  rnilecl  States  Navy 
and  came  out  with  two  honorable  discharges  and  a  good-conduct 
inedal. 

Mr.  Stakxts.  (live  us  his  union  l^ackground. 

i\Ir.  Matthews.  Will  vou  please  fix  the  dates  of  your  service  in  the 
United  States  Navy  ^ 

Mr.  Tx/.ER.  I  went  into  the  T'nited  States  Navy  in  May  1921  and 
was  discharged  in  lJ)t29. 

Mr.  Mattiifa\s.  \A'hat  is  your  ]n-esent  occupation? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  work  at  the  General  Motors  assembly  ))lant.  2700 
Tweedie  T^oulevard,  South  Gate,  Calif. 

^Ir.  Maithews.  PTcnv  lono-  Imve  you  been  working  at  the  General 
Motors  plant  in  South  Gate,  Calif.'^ 

Mr.  Inzer.  Since  November  IC).  108G. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  been  employed  continuously  there  since 
then? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  a  member  of  any  labor  union  at  that 
plant? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  am  a  member  of  the  C.  I.  O.,  U.  A.  W..  Local  216. 

Ml-.  Matthews.  That  is  the  United  Automobile  Workers  of  Amer- 
ica ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  And  what    do  you  say  is  the  number  of  the  local? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Local  216. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVhen  did  you  join  Local  216  of  the  L^.  A.  W.? 

Mr.  Inzer.  1937. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Do  vou  believe  in  the  right  of  labor  to  organize 
and  bargain  collectively? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  certainly  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  any  qualifications  whatsoever  about 
that  belief? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well.  I  do,  because  I  feel  that  any 

Mr.  Matthews.  Let  me  restate  the  question :  Are  you  entirely 
without  any  qualifications  of  any  kind  in  favor  of  such  organization? 

Ml-.  Inzer.  I  am  entirely  in  favor  of  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  prompted  in  your  appearance  before  this 
committee  to  give  testimony  by  the  sole  consideration  of  labor's  own 
welfare? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right.     I  have  labor's  welfare  at  heart  only. 

Mr.  Maithews.  You  have  no  other  interest  in  appearing  before  this 
conunittee? 

Mr.  Inzer.  No.  sir; 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  3aju  ever  held  any  office  in  Local  216  of  the 
U.  A.  W.? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  have.     I  was  once 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  what  office  you  have  held 
in  the  union  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  was  elected  by  the  men  in  my  department  as  commit- 
teeman of  my  department,  and  the  duty  of  the  committeeman  was 
tf)  take  u))  the  grievances  of  the  men  in  that  department  with  the 
management. 


3534  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  were  you  elected  to  that  position  in  the 
union  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  served  as  committeeman  in  November  and  December 
of  1939. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  an  elective  position? 

Mr.  Inzer.  It  was:  by  the  men  in  my  o;roup. 

Mr.  Matthews.  By  the  men  where  ^ 

Tvlr.  Inzer.  In  my  department. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  you  were  on  the  negotiating  com- 
mittee of  the  union,  were  you? 

Mr.  In.5Er.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  held  any  other  ofRce  in  the  union? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  have.  In  January  1940  I  was  elected  to  the  executive 
board  of  Local  21G  and  served  until  April  of  1940,  and  at  that  time 
I  was  elected  as  president  of  Local  216  and  served  my  term  for  the 
year,  and  last  April  past  I  was  reelected  as  president  of  Local  216. 

Mr.  Mai-thews.  Were  you  at  that  time  elected  by  a  vote  of  the 
membership  of  the  union? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  was;  a  referendum  vote. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  was  the  date  again,  please,  that  you  were 
elected  president  of  Local  216? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  was  the  latter  part  of  March  1940  and  1941,  both, 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  were  elected  twice? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Twice. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  serve  continuously  from  the  latter  part 
of  March  1940  u])  until  recently  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  the  size  of  the  majority  vote  when  you 
were  first  elected  to  the  presidency  of  Local  216? 

Mr.  Inzer.  At  the  first  election  I  believe  there  were  around  800 
vo'  e.s  cast,  and  I  received  500  of  those  votes. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  When  was  your  second  election  to  the  presidency 
of  Local  216? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  was  in  March  1941. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  was  the  size  of  the  vote  in  that  election  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  it  so  happened  on  that  day  we  had  a  rainstorm 
in  California  and  the  men  didn't  turn  out  very  well.  There  were 
516  votes  cast,  and  I  received  316  votes  out  of  the  516. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  one  or  more  opponents  in  that 
election? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  had  one  opponent. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  he  received 

Mr.  Inzer-  Two  hundred  votes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  still  the  president  of  Local  216  of  the 
U.  A.  W.? 

Mr.  Inzer.  No,  sir;  I  am  not. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Just  a  minute.  What  was  the  reason  that  there  was 
a  smaller  vote  cast  on  the  second  election  than  there  was  at  the  first 
election? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  was  on  account  of  the  rain.  We  had  a  rainstorm 
that  day,  and  the  men  didn't  take  time  to  vote. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  In  other  words,  it  wasn't  because  of  a  reduction 
in  the  number  of  members  in  the  local,  or  anything  like  that? 


rX-AMBKICAN    PROPAGANDA   ACTIVITIES  8535 

Ml-.  Inzek.  Xo;  it  was  not.  It  just  so  happened  it  rained,  and  the 
men  didn't  ^o  out  to  vote. 

Mr.  Staknes.  They  do  have  rainstorms  in  California  sometimes. 

Mr.  l-Nziu.  That  is  classed  as  a  "'low  l'o<i".'' 

Ml'.  Mai'hikws.  You  say  you  are  not  now  the  president  of  Local 
21(),  even  thoii^li  \oii  were  elected  to  tlial  positiou  in  Marcli  of  mis 
year^ 

jMr.  IxzKK.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  did  you  resign  the  presidency  of  the  local? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes.  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  you  resign? 

Mr.  Inzeu.  I  resigned  the  3d  of  xVpril  1941. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  briefly  at  this  time  what 
prompted  your  resignation  from  the  presidency  of  the  locals 

Mr.  IxzER.  I  had  been  working  with  a  group  of  C.  I.  O.  men  on 
the  means  of  eliminating  the  subversive  and  racketeering  leadership 
of  the  C.  I.  O.  from  our  ranks  on  the  west  coast,  and  I  called  a 
special  meeting  to  explain  to  the  rank  and  tile  of  Local  216  that  I 
was  selected  to  head  this  committee. 

One  of  tlie  representatives  of  the  C.  I.  O.  on  the  west  coast  found 
out  about  the  meeting,  and  he  came  out  and  contacted  the  executive 
board  of  the  local  before  the  meeting  was  to  be   called   and  en- 
couraged them  not  to  allow  me  to  call  the  meeting^  as  it  would  be 
damaging  to  the  C.  I.  O. 

Mr.  Maithews.  Do  you  mean  that  you  resigned  the  presidency 
of  the  un.ion  because  you  felt  that  such  a  position  might  in  some 
way  conflict  with  your  desires  to  head  the  committee  which  had  been 
formed  for  the  purpose  of  eliminating  subversive  elements  from 
C.  I.  O.  leadership  i 

^Ir.  IxzER.  That  is  right.  I  felt  that  I  might  go  against  the 
wishes  of  some  of  the  men  in  my  local  if  I  were  to  head  this  com- 
mittee, being  president  of  the  local.  In  other  words,  I  would  be 
more  or  less  expressing  their  thoughts  as  well  as  mine,  so  I  resigned 
so  I  could  head  this  connnittee  as  a  rank-and-file  member  and  express 
my  own  views  with  the  committee. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  jour  resignation  due  entirely  to  your  own 
ijiitiative^ 

Mr.  Inzer.  It  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  was  no  demand  for  your  resignation  from 
the  membershi])  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  There  was  no  demand.  In  other  words,  the  rank  and 
file  objected  at  the  next  regular  meeting  when  I  presented  my  resig- 
nation; but  I  asked  tliem  to  accept  it,  as  I  was  heading  this  com- 
mittee. 

iMr.  Matthews.  Now,  is  this  committee,  of  which  you  are  now  the 
head,  composed  entirely  of  members  of  the  C.  I.  O.  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right ;  members  of  the  C.  I.  O. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  this  conmiittee  of  which  you  are  the  present 
head  supported  financially  or  otherwise  by  any  individuals,  groups, 
or  agencies  outside  of  the  ranks  of  the  C.  I.  O.  ^ 

^Slr.  Inzer.  Xo,  sir;  it  is  not. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Let  us  get  the  name  of  that  organization. 


8536  UX-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  am  coming  to  that  right  now.  Will  you  please 
give  the  name  of  the  committee  of  which  you  are  the  head  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  The  name  of  the  committee  is  the  Vigilant  American 
Committee. 

Mr.  VooiJiiis.  The  Vigilant  Americans  Committee? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Vigilant  American  Committee. 

Mr.  IMatthews.  Has  this  committee  received  any  financial  support 
from  any  individuals  or  organizations  connected  with  the  manage- 
ment of  industries  on  the  west  coast  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  No,  sir ;  it  has  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  the  committee  come  into  existence  entirely  on 
the  initiative  of  rank-and-file  members  of  the  C.  I.  O.  unions? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  California? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right ;  it  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  is  the  objective  of  the  committee  solely  to 
eliminate  subversive  and  racketeering  elements  from  the  unions  of 
which  its  members  are  members? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  what  unions  are  represented 
on  the  Vigilant  American  Committee? 

Mr.  Inzer.  We  have  quite  a  number  of  them.  I  don't  have  the  list 
with  me,  but  I  can  remember  most  of  them.  We  have  the  Auto 
W^orkers,  the  Longshoremen,  Electric  Workers,  Shipbuilders,  Con- 
struction Workers,  and  some  others  that  I  can't  remember  just  at 
the  present  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  your  committee  represents  a  rank 
and  file  movement  throughout  the  C.  I.  O.  and  is  not  limited  to  the 
United  Automobile  Workers? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Xow  shortly  after  your  first  election  to  the  presi- 
dency of  Local  216'  of  the  U.  A.  W.,  were  you  called  into  a  conference 
at  the  headquarters  of  your  union  in  Los  Angeles? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  was. 

Mr.  MATrHEws.  Who  asked  you  to  come  down  to  the  headquarters 
of  the  union  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  It  was  Lew  Michener,  the  regional  director  on  the  west 
coastof  theU.  A.  W. 

Mr.  jNIatthews.  Is  that  spelled  L-e-w  M-i-c-h-e-n-e-r? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Lew  Michener  invited  you  to  come  down  to  C.  I.  O. 
headquarters  for  a  conference? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right.  He  asked  me  to  take  a  couple  of  days 
otf  and  the  International  would  pay  my  expenses  while  I  was  off. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  recall  the  exact  date  of  this  conference 
which  vou  had  at  C.  I.  O.  headquarters? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  was  on  the  8th  of  May  1940. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  hoAv  you  are  able  to  recall 
the  exact  date  of  the  conference? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  was  the  next  day  after  the  primary  elections 
and  I  believe  they  were  on  the  7th  of  May  1940. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  there  others  besides  Lew  Michener  at  this 
conference  at  C.  I.  O.  headquarters? 


UN-A^fERICAN   l'K(  )rA<  ;aM)A  AfTIVITIES  8537 

Mr.  TxzF.R.  Yes,  sir:  there  was.  Tliere  were  a  imniber  of  otlier 
men  })reseiit. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  riaht.  what  did  you  do  when  you  first  went 
to  hea(l(iuarters  on  May  8,  1940^ 

Mr.  IxzKK.  Well,  the  first  thinji;  in  the  niornina-  I  was  taken  from 
office  to  odice  in  the  C  I.  O.  buildin.u-,  nieetina  different  ])eople, 
anil  as  I  would  *xo  around  and  meet  them,  the  International  repre- 
sentative. Lew  Michener,  would  tell  those  people  that  I  was  elected 
president  of  Local  216,  and  I  would  be  cooperating  with  them  in 
the  move  to  organize  the  unorganized. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Will  you  give  us  the  address  of  the  headquarters? 

]Mi".  Inzer.  I  don't  believe  I  can  give  that. 

Mr.  Matthew\s.  In  what  building  is  it  ^ 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  it  is  in  the  C.  I.  O.  Buihling — at  that  time  it 
was  the  Currier  Building,  down  on  Third  Street,  between  Spring 
and  Main. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  Third  Street  between  Spring  and  Main? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews,  You  don't  remember  the  exact  number,  but  it 
"v\as  the  Currier  Building? 

Mr.  Inzer.  It  was  tlie  Currier  Building;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  C-u-r-r-i-e-r  Building? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  spent  the  morning  going  from  office  to  office 
and  being  introduced  by  Michener  to  C  I.  O.  officials  and  office 
workers,  as  the  newly  elected  head  of  Local  216  of  the  U.  A.  W.  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right ;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  W^hat  did  you  do  in  the  afternoon? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  we  went  out  for  lunch — I  went  out  for  lunch 
with  Lew  Michener  and  I  believe  Slim  Connolly  and  Wyndham 
Mortimer.     After  we  came  back 

Mr.  Matthews.  Just  a  minute,  please.  You  went  out  to  lunch,  you 
say,  and  you  believe  it  was  with  Slim  Connolly? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  know"  it  was  Michener  and  I  know  Mortimer  was 
present  and  I  do  believe  that  Connolly  came  in  and  had  a  cup  of 
coffee  with  us. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  is  Mortimer?^ 

Mr.  Inzer.  Mortimer  is  the  organizer  on  the  west  coast.  He  has 
been  in  charge  of  the  organizational  drive  in  the  aircraft  industry. 

Mr.  ^Iatthews.  What  is  his  first  name? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Wvndliam  Mortimer. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  W-y-n-d-h-a-m  Mortimer? 

]\lr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  are  sure  he  joined  you  for  lunch  that  day? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes;  he  was  there  I  am  positive. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  Slim  Connolly  joined  you  for  part  of  the 
lunch? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes. 

Mr.  Maithews.  Do  you  know  what  Slim  Connolly's  first  name  is? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Philip  Connolly,  but  he  is  known  as  "Slim."  Every- 
body calls  him  "Slim." 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  Slim  Connolly's  position  in  the  C.  I.  O. 
organization  in  California? 


8538  U\-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  he  is  president  of  the  State  C.  I.  O.  and  he  is  also 
secretary  to  the  District  Council  of  Los  Angeles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now  after  lunch  did  you  go  back  to  the  offices  of 
Lew  Michener? 

Ml'.  Inzer.  Yes;  we  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  headquarters? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  went  back  what  happened? 

Mr.  Inzer.  When  I  went  back  we  went  into  the  regional  director's 
office,  who  is  Lew  Michener,  and  sat  down. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  there  other  individuals  there? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  there  were — Mortimer  went  in  with  us  and 
Connolly  waited  outside  for  a  while  and  then  he  came  in  with  two 
other  men. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  these  two  other  men  introduced  to  you? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes;  they  were. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  they  were  introduced  to  you,  did  you  hear 
their  names  distinctly? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes ;  I  understood  their  names. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  no  doubt  whatever  about  their  names 
as  they  were  introduced  to  you? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right;  I  have  checked  them  since  then. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  Avere  these  two  men  who  were  introduced  to 
you  on  the  afternoon  of  May  8  in  the  offices  of  Lew  Michener  at 
C.  I.  O.  headquarters  in  Los  Angeles? 

Mr.  Inzer.  One  of  them  was  introduced  to  me  as  Hans  Diebel  and 
the  other  was  introduced  to  me  as  Pettis  Perry. 

Mr.  Matthews.  H-a-n-s  D-i-e-b-e-1? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  P-e-t-t-i-s  P-e-r-r-y? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Do  you  have  a  date  for  that  conference  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  May  8,  1940. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  Dr.  Matthews,  are  you  going  to  show  who  these 
men  are? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes.  When  Hans  Diebel  and  Pettis  Perry  were 
introduced  to  you,  were  you  told  anything  about  their  connections? 

Mr.  Inzer.  No,  sir;  I  was  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  subsequently  make  any  investigations  on 
your  own  initiative  to  ascertain  who  these  men  were? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  did,  after  the  meeting;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now.  while  you  were  still  at  the  meeting,  what  part 
did  Hans  Diebel  jDlay  in  the  discussions  there  in  Lew  Michener's 
office  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  the  only  thing  he  did  was  to  listen  to  the  con- 
versation and  he  would  verify  different  statements  made  by  the  re- 
gional director  or  Slim  Connolly  or  AVyndham  Mortimer  by  "Yes"  or 
"No." 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  mean  to  say  that  Mortimer  and  Michener 
and  Connolly  from  time  to  time  turned  to  Diebel  and  asked  questions 
which  brought,  from  him  yes  or  no  answers  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthew\s.  Did  Michener  make  any  statement  there  at  your 
conference  or  in  your  discussion  about  Hans  DiebeFs  cooperation  ^ 


rX-AMEKICAX    I'ROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8539 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes:  he  did.  1  lun  sure  it  was  he  or  Slim  Conolly  that 
made  the  sttiteiiuMit  to  me  at  that  time  that  Hans  Diebel  was  the 
owner  of  a  book  store — in  other  Avords,  he  was  a  publisher  and  had  a 
set-up  foi-  a  news]ia]KM-  or  hand  bills  to  be  put  out — literature — and 
said  that  he  would  at  any  time  eoopei'ati'  with  the  C.  I.  ().  in  putting 
out  literature  to  be  distributed  to  the  different  C.  I.  O.  plants  in 
ease  we  wanted  to  call  a  coast-wide  strike  to  effect  the  ne^^otiations 
on  any  })lant  that  they  were  workino;  on  at  that  time;  and  he  also 
pointed  out  that  Hans  Diebel  had  cooperated  before  in  putting  out 
the  literature  for  the  C.  I.  O.  on  the  coast  of  "The  Yanks  Are  Not 
Comino."    He  brought  that  out  very  clearly. 

Mr.  Starxks.  Did  Hans  Diebel  agree  to  that  statement  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  sat  and  listened  in.    He  didn't  make  any  comment. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  either  Michener  or  Connolly  or  both,  in  the 
course  of  the  discussion  there,  stated  that  Diebel  had  cooperated  with 
them? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Had  cooperated  with  them  in  putting  out  the  litera- 
ture. The  Yanks  Are  Not  Coming. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  had  agreed  to  assist  them  in  putting  out  litera- 
ture and  distributing  it  to  bring  on  a  coast-wide  strike  and  to  cooper- 
Ate  in  the  program  of  the  The  Yanks  Are  Not  Coming^ 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  AVas  anything  said  to  3^ou  about  yonr  willingness 
or  unwillingness  to  cooperate  with  elements  who  were  temporarily  in 
agreement  with  the  program  of  the  C.  I.  O.  as  understood  by 
ISIichener  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  was  asked  that  question  and  at  the  time, 
not  knowing  exactly  who  these  men  were  and  not  hearing  enough 
conversation  to  become  suspicious  of  them  at  the  time  I  was  asked, 
I  agreed  that  I  would  be  glad  to  have  the  cooperation  and  work  with 
anyone  who  was  willing  to  help  us  out  on  our  organizational  drive. 

^Ir.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  which  one  of  the  men  asked  you 
that  question? 

Mr.  Inzer.   (No  response.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  Michener  or  Connolly  or  Mortimer? 

^Ir.  Inzer.  I  believe  it  was  ISIichener,  I  am  positive  it  was 
^Michener. 

]\Ir.  Matthews.  Was  Michener's  own  language  in  describing  these 
men:  "Elements  temporarily  in  agreement  with  us"? 

Mr.  Inzer.  No;  he  didn't  bring  it  out  so  I  would  understand  that 
it  was  any  phonies  or  any  foreign  elements  or  any  organizations  rep- 
resented or  representing  foreign  governments. 

Mr.  MATrHP:ws.  Well,  how,  exactly,  did  he  describe  it? 

Ml'.  Inzer.  Well,  the  only  way  he  described  that  was — as  I  stated, 
I  didn't  know  exactly  who  these  men  were.  It  hadn't  been  told  to 
me  that  they  were  officials  of  the  C.  I.  O.  or  who  they  were. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  want  to  know^  just  how  he  described  them  when 
he  asked  you  if  you  were  willing  to  cooperate — what  were  his  words? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  asked  me  if  I  was  willing  to  cooperate  with  any 
groups  who  were  willing  to  cooperate  with  us  in  organizing  the 
unorganized. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  use  the  words  "temporary  agreement"  or 
not? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes;  he  did. 


g540  UX-AMEIUCAN   PKOrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  If  you  are  not  sure,  we  want  you  to  sa}^  so. 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  did.     He  did  say  that — I  am  positive  of  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  you  be  able  to  recognize  a  photograph  of 
Hans  Diebel^ 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  believe  I  would.  I  have  seen  him  twice.  I  believe 
I  would  recognize  his  picture. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  photograph  and  ask  you  if  you  can 
identify  the  individual  in  that  photograph  ^ 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  Hans  Diebel  right  there.  I  can  recognize 
him  by  his  chin  and  glasses,  although  he  is  a  heavier  man  than  this 
picture  now. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  absolutely  positive  of  your  identification? 
Is  that  the  man  introduced  to  you  as  Hans  Diebel  by  Lew  Michener 
on  the  afternoon  of  May  8,  1940? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  the  man. 

Mr.  VooRHis,  You  said  you  had  seen  him  twice ;  when  was  the  otlier 
time  that  you  saw  him? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Tliat  was  the  time  we  went  to  the  book  store  to  investigate 
just  where  his  store  was  located  and  what  it  consisted  of. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  to  find  out  if  he  was  actually  the  same  man? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Did  somebody  else  go  with  you  on  that  occasion  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  they  did;  Mr.  Franklin  went  with  me. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  Mr.  Franklin  is  here  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  The  only  other  thing  I  would  like  to  get  clearly  in  my 
mind  is  exactly  who  was  present  at  this  meeting.  Maybe  we  have  that, 
but  would  you  just  name  the  people  that  were  there  again? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  will  name  the  people  who  were  active  in  the  meeting. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  The  ones  you  are  sure  of. 

Mr.  Inzer.  There  was  a  number  of  people  coming  in  and  out — the 
secretaries,  and  one  of  the  organizers  was  sitting  at  the  desk  for  a 
while,  but  the  men  actually  at  the  meeting  were  Slim  Connolly,  Lew 
Michener,  Wyndham  ]\Iortimer,  Hans  Diebel,  Pettis  Perry,  and  myself. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  At  that  time  what  office  did  you  hold? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  was  president  of  local  216. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  President  of  3^our  local  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right.    1  had  just  been  elected. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Do  you  know  whether  presidents  of  other  locals  were 
brought  in  for  similar  meetings? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  I  know  that  they  were  brought  in — in  other  wordsy 
we  were  taken  down  as  a  group,  all  of  the  presidents  of  different  locals 
of  the  LT.  A.  W.— we  were  taken  down  for  a  meeting  with  the  regional 
director,  but  at  no  other  time  can  I  say  that  these  other  two  men 
mentioned  were  there. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Was  your  local  one  of  the  more  important  locals? 

Mr.  Inzer.  My  local  at  that  time  was  the  largest  U.  A.  W.  local  on 
the  coast. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  It  was  the  largest  single  local  on  the  coast? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  get  the  size  of  the  membership  of  his 
local? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  That  is  pretty  well  indicated  in  the  election  that  was 

held. 


IN-AMKKICAN    I'lJOTAd  AM  >A    AC11\  IIIES  8541 

Mr.  Inzkh.  TIk'  size  ol'  I  he  local  is  1,800 — we  have  i,yU0  uieii  in  the 
j)huit. 

Mr.  \'(H)Kni.s.  And  you  still  have  that  number,  approximately? 

iNlr.  Inzkk.  Yes:  \ve  do. 

Mr.  Vooiuiis.  You  say  wliile  this  conference  was  <i()ino-  on  on  (lie 
afternoon  of  May  8  that  there  were  other  people  cominji'  into  the 
room  and  leaving  and  so  on  and  so  forth? 

Mr.  Inzkk.  Yes.  sir:  that  is  I'ioht. 

Mr.  \'o(>i;nis.  You  can't  name  any  of  those  peo])le  or  identify 
them  and  say  wlio  they  were? 

Mr.  IxzKij.  There  is  only  one  person  that  I  could  identify  and 
that  is  a  man  who  was  at  that  time  organizer  under  Lew  IMiehener, 
and  his  name  was  Dick  Coleman. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Dick  Coleman? 

Mr.  IxzER.  Dick  Coleman;  yes,  sir. 

ISIr.  VooKHis.  Where  is  he  now? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  is  in  Los  Angeles.  He  is  personnel  manager  for 
the  Willys-Overland  in  Los  Angeles. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Did  he  hear  any  of  this  conversation  ? 

Mi-.  Inzer.  I  presume  he  did.  He  came  in  the  office  while  we  were 
there.    I  wouldn't  say  that  he  did.    He  was  busy  with  his  work. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  would  like  to  bring  out  a  few  more  points  about 
the  photograph,  ]\lr.  Chairman.  This  particular  photograph  is  al- 
ready an  exhibit  in  the  record  of  this  committee,  having  been  intro- 
duced almost  3  vears  ago. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  properly  identified  as  being  a  photograph  of 
HansDiebel? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes;  of  Hans  Diebel. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  his  connection  with  any  subversive  moA'es 
in  this  count  IT.  Dr.  ]\Iatthews? 

]\lr.  MATriiEws.  I  am  going  to  ask  the  witness 

Mr.  Starnes.  Has  that  already  been  established  in  another  part 
of  the  record? 

Mr.  ALatthews.  That  has  been  established  by  numerous  references 
in  previous  hearings.  I  think  the  witness  also  made  an  investigation 
on  his  own  initiative  to  ascertain  Hans  DiebeFs  connections. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  riglit. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now.  you  say  you  were  told  that  Hans  Diebel 
Avas  the  owner  of  a  bookstore  in  Los  Angeles  and  had  some  publishing 
facilities  which  would  enable  him  to  cooperate  with  you  in  the 
bringing  out  of  literature;  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right;  yes.  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  make  inquiries  to  find  out  what  tlie  name 
of  the  bookstore  owned  by  Hans  Diebel  was? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  did.  I  had  the  name  of  the  bookstore,  but 
I  don't  have  the  name  with  me.     I  can  name  it  if  j^ou  tell  me. 

Mr.  M\tthews.  Was  it  the  Aryan  Book  Store? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  go  personally  to  the  Aryan  Book  Store 
to  see  if  you  could  identify  Hans  Diebel  as  the  man  you  met  at 
C.  I.  O.  headquarters? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  did;  but  before  I  went  there  I  told  Brother  Franklin 
what  had  hapjiened  and  he  told  me  wlio  these  men  were. 


8542  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr,  Matthews.  You  did  not  know  yourself? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  didn't  know  who  they  were  connected  with;  and  so 
at  that  time  he  and  I  went  to  locate  the  book  store  and  to  make  sure 
that  he  was  managing  the  book  store. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  learned  since  your  first  meeting  with 
Hans  Diebel  at  C.  I.  O.  headquarters  that  he  is  an  important  indi- 
vidual in  the  German-American  Bund  in  California? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  true. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  holds  any  official 
position  in  the  German-American  Bund? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes;  I  know  he  does.  I  believe  he  is  at  the  head  of 
the  German-American  Bund  right  at  this  time  in  Los  Angeles. 

Mr.  Maithews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Hans  Diebel  is  an 
American  citizen? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  is  not  an  American  citizen. 

INIr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  has  recently  made 
application  for  citizenship? 

^Ir.  Inzer.  He  made  application  and  he  was  turned  down  here  just 
recently. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A  few  weeks  ago  his  application  for  citizenship 
was  rejected;  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  courts  in  California? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

ISIr.  Matthews.  How  do  you  know  that? 

Mr.  Inzer.  It  was  stated  in  the  newspapers  and  I  have  also 
discussed  it  with  other  members  of  the  C.  I.  O.  and  they  verified  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  particular  photograph  Diebel  is  pictured  as 
in  charge  of  a  literature  table  of  the  German-American  Bund  at  a 
bund  camp  in  San  Diego,  Calif.,  and  he  is  pictured  in  his  German- 
American  Bund  uniform. 

Did  you  know  at  the  time  you  met  Pettis  Perry  who  he  was  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  No,  sir;  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  since  made  any  investigation  to  find  out 
who  Pettis  Perry  is? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  have. 

]\Ir.  Matthews.  And  what  did  you  learn  about  Pettis  Perry's 
connections  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  learned  that  he  was  one  of  the  important  people  in  the 
Comnuniist  Party  in  Los  Angeles  and  that  he  has  run  for  public 
office  on  the  Communist  ticket  in  California, 

INIr.  Matthews.  What  part  did  Pettis  Perry  play  in  the  discussions 
m  Michener's  office  on  the  afternoon  of  May  8,  1940? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  played  the  same  part  as  Diebel— just  sat  in  and  any 
point  tliat  was  brought  up  that  they  wanted  his  sanction  on,  they 
would  ask  him:  "Is  that  not  right?"  and  he  would  answer  "yes"'  or 
"no." 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Wasn't  Perry  a  candidate  for  office  in  the  last  elec- 
tion i 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  believe  he  was  on  the  Communist  ticket. 

Mr.  Starnes.  On  the  Communist  Party  ticket  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  On  the  Communist  Party  ticket;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  thought  he  ran  for  Congress. 


UN-AMERICAN   I'KOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8543 

Mr.  IxzER.  He  ran  for  Congress  either  the  hist  election  or  the  time 
before. 

Mr.  ^Iatthkws.  Yes,  Congressman;  the  records  of  the  connnittee 
show  that  Pettis  Perry  has  on  several  occasions  run  for  office  on  the 
Communist  Party  ticket  in  California. 

Mr.  VooRHis,  in  1940  I  understand  Perry  was  a  candidate  for  Con- 
gress from  the  Fourteenth  District  against  Congressman  Tom  Ford, 
on  the  Communist  Party  ticket. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  so  far  as  you  could  understand  the  situation. 
Perry  was  there  at  this  meeting  with  you  in  Michener's  office,  in  an 
advisory  capacity — that  is,  Michener  turned  to  him  and  asked  for  his 
advice,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Tliat  is  right ;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matitiews.  Can  you  recall  any  particular  question  that  was 
asked  by  Michener  or  Connolly  or  Mortimer  that  was  directed  to 
Periy  ? 

]\Ir.  Inzer.  Well,  one — I  am  sure  of  one  that  was  directed  to  Perry 
and  that  was  ^Michener  was  explaining  to  me  that  it  was  very  im- 
portant that  all  of  the  heads  of  the  U.  A.  W.  locals  in  California 
should  get  together  so  as  any  time  they  desired  to  call  a  strike  of  all 
phmts  to  effect  the  negotiations  of  any  such  plant,  that  it  was  very 
important  that  we  all  get  together  and  inform  our  rank  and  file 
members  as  to  what  was  taking  effect,  and  he  would  turn  to  Perry 


"-.TOO      " 


and  ask,  "Is  that  not  right  f  and  he  would  say  "yes 

Mr.  Maithews.  Did  you  learn  that  Pettis  Perry  is  head  of  the 
International  Labor  Defense  in  Los  Angeles? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  did ;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  you  give  a  brief  personal  description  of 
Pettis  Perry  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Pettis  Perry  is  a  colored  man  and  I  would  say  he  is 
about  the  age  of  40  and  weighs  close  to  200  pounds. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  your  reaction  to  the  situation  after  you 
learned  that  Hans  Diebel  was  prominent  in  the  affairs  of  the  German- 
American  Bund  and  Pettis  Perry  was  prominent  in  the  affairs  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well.  I  was  very  much  shocked  because  before  I  was 
elected  to  office  I  had  heard  the  regional  director  and  Slim  Connolly 
speak  at  different  meetings  and  state  that  the  C.  I.  O.  should  stay 
away  from  politics  or  any  group  that  was  not  for  organized  labor,  and 
I  was  really  shocked  to  learn  that  they  were  affiliating  themselves 
with  these  men,  as  they  were  members  of  the  Comnumist  Party  and  the 
German-American  Bund. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  stayed  in  your  position  as  president  of  the 
local.  Local  216.  after  you  had  learned  about  this  connection  with 
Diebel  and  Perry,  for  approximately  1  year,  did  you  not? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Did  your  ultimate  resigTiation  from  the  presidency 
have  anything  to  do  witli  what  you  had  learned  that  afternoon  in 
Michener's  office? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes ;  it  did.  That  afternoon  in  Michener's  office  started 
me  to  uncovering  all  of  the  evidence  that  I  could  against  these  people, 
and  I  worked  on  that  until  the  time  I  resigned  to  head  the  committee. 

Mr.  ALvtthews.  Did  you  stay  in  the  presidency  of  your  local  for 

62626 — 41— vol.  14 2.5 


8544  UN-AMERICAJs   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

the  reason  that  you  woukl  be  able  best  to  combat  subversive  influences 
from  an  official  position  in  the  union? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes;  I  did.  I  tried  to  inform  my  rank  and  file  members 
of  the  local  as  to  what  was  goino-  on  in  our  reoional  office  and  I  tried  to 
get  the  cooperation  of  the  other  locals  during  that  year,  to  eliminate 
these  people  with  their  ideas  and  connections. 

We  tried  to  do  that  without  couiing  out  in  the  open  with  it.  We 
tried  to  do  it  among  ourselves  but  it  seemed  to  be  an  impossible  task, 
so  that  led  up  to  my  resignation. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is,  you  eventually  came  to  believe  that  a  rank 
and  file  movement  of  an  unofficial  character  would  be  the  best  means 
of  combating  these  influences,  is  that  right,  in  the  C.  I.  O.  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right ;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  entirelv  committed  to  the  best  inteiests,  as 
you  understand  tliem,  of  the  C.  I.  6.  organizations? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  You  would  like  to  see  the  C.  I.  O.  become  a  more 
effective  instrument  of  collective  bargaining? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  right.  I  am  absolutely  for  organized 
labor  and  I  am  for  the  C.  I.  O.  I  believe  in  the  C.  1.  O.  100  percent, 
but  I  do  believe  that  it  should  be  controlled  by  American  leaders  and 
not  l^y  men  wdio  are  racketeers  and  members  of  subversive  groups. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  liave  a  couple  of  questions  that  fii  perfectly  at  this 
point,  if  I  may  ask  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Go  ahead. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Mr.  Inzer,  in  your  opinion,  what  happens  to  legiti- 
mate labor  grievances — I  mean  atteuipts  to  correct  things  that  are 
really  wrong  and  should  be  improved  and  corrected — what  happens 
to  attempts  to  make  such  corrections  in  legitimate  demands  when 
the  claim  can  be  made  by  the  employer  and  can  be  made  to  stick, 
"There  are  Connnunists  or  Nazis  representing  or  influencing  the 
union  that  is  making  the  demand"? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  that  is  very  damaging  to  the  organized  laboring 
group,  because  the  men  who  are  trying  to  negotiate  these  grievances, 
if  they  are  members  of  the  Communist  Party  or  the  German-Ameri- 
can Bund  or  any  other  group  that  is  not  American,  they  have  that 
fear  that  the  company  will  point  out  that  they  are  members,  so 
therefore  they  can't  force  the  negotiations  for  the  members  as  they 
could  if  they  were  American  people. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  And  suppose  the  company  does  point  out  that  fact, 
what  happens  to  the  cause  of  the  men  in  the  eye  of  the  public? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  when  that  is  pointed  out  it  is  very  injurious  to 
the  members  who  are  Americans  in  the  labor  movement,  and  it  also 
gives  them  a  black  eye  the  same  as  it  does  these  people  who  are 
members  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  In  other  words,  the  elimination  of  Communist  lead- 
ershi])  wdierever  it  exists,  would  put  the  men  in  a  much  better  posi- 
tion from  the  standpoint  of  receiving  consideration  for  their  legiti- 
mate demands,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  absolutely  correct. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Now,  on  the  other  hand,  suppose  the  organization 
IS  clean  of  any  such  leadership,  then  don't  you  have  a  better  chance 
of  getting  ahead? 


rx-A^rEuicAN  ru( >rA(;ANi)A  activities  8545 

Mr.  Tnzkh.  I  Avould  sny  wo  would  have  a  bettor  cliaiico,  because 
wlioii  llie  iK'opIo  iu'<i()tiatin<i-  for  the  union  would  <io  into  the  uuin- 
agement.  they  would  luive  nothiuj;  to  fear  as  to  what  the  niauage- 
inent  could  turn  around"  aiul  accuse  theui  of,  because  they  have  a  clean 
slate  and  the  ne<zotiatino;  with  the  nianaoenient  would  be  a  i)erfect 
set-up. 

Ml-.  VooRHis.  That  is  right.  Now  here  is  one  thing  that  will  be 
said  by  certain  people — they  will  say,  "Well,  charges  will  be  made 
against  any  union  anyway  by  the  merchants'  and  manufacturers' 
associations."  which  you  no  doubt  are  familiar  with — they  will  say 
that  they  will  make  charges  anyhow,  that  this  is  a  Communist  strike. 
Do  you  believe  that  it  makes  a  ditference  if  they  make  such  charges 
whether  the  charges  are  true  or  not? 

Mr.  Inzer.  It  certainly  does  make  a  ditference,  because  if  the 
charges  are  not  true — in  other  words,  if  I  am  accused  of  being  a 
Connnunist  when  I  am  not,  T  am  not  goin.g  to  sit  back  and  say, 
"Well,  that  is  the  merchants  and  manufacturers  or  that  is  the  Dies 
committee,  and  I  don't  believe  what  they  say."  If  they  accuse  me 
of  being  a  Comnmnist  I  am  going  to  have  them  prove  that  I  am  a 
Connnunist. 

Mr.  \\x)RHis.  In  other  words,  even  though  some  groups  that  rep- 
resent a  reactionary  industrial  interest  may  attempt  to  make  charges, 
but  the  real  question  is  whether  they  are  going  to  be  able  to  make 
them  stick,  and  if  they  are  not  going  to  be  able  to  make  them  stick, 
30U  are  in  a  lot  better  position  than  you  would  be  if  there  were  an}' 
truth  to  it. 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right.  If  charges  were  made  by  the  mer- 
chants and  manufacturers  or  any  other  organization  against  the 
leaders  of  the  C.  I.  O.  and  if  they  were  not  Comnnniists,  it  is  very 
easy  to  prove  to  the  public  that  they  are  not. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  all.  Dr.  ]Matthews. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  How  long  liave  you  known  Lew  Michener? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  have  known  Lew  ]Michoner  for  about  3  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  discussed  the  Communist  Party 
with  IMichener? 

Mv.  Inzer.  Yes:  I  have  many  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  lune  boon  the  nature  of  your  discussions  of 
the  Communist  Party  Avith  Michenor? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  since  this  meeting  and  other  occurrences,  there 
would  bo  times  that  he  would  come  into  my  local  and  make  inter- 
national reports,  but  before  he  got  through  he  would  be  attacking 
the  President  of  the  Linited  States  and  the  Dies  committee,  and  the 
F.  P.  I.  and  come  right  on  doAvn  to  myself. 

In  other  words,  before  he  got  out  of  the  building  he  would  be 
insulting  me,  and  that  was  for  no  other  reason  than  I  would  not 
cooperate  with  him  under  the  Communist  set-up,  and  I  would  go  to 
liim  and  accuse  him  of  being  a  member  of  the  Comminiist  Party  and 
ask  him  why  he  didn't  stay  away  from  it  and  organize  tlio  unorgan- 
ized into  the  C.  I.  O.  and  make  it  an  American  group  of  worker^. 
He  would  laugh  it  off  or  say:  "Oh.  don't  believe  the  Dies  commit- 
tee,"' or  "That  is  some  more  of  the  management's  proi)aganda.'" 

And  at  no  time  would  he  ever  state  that  he  was  not  a  member  of 
the  Comnumi.st  Party. 


8546  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  discuss  with  Michener  any  set-backs 
which  occurred  in  the  C.  I.  O.  organization  drives  as  a  result  of  the 
Communist  taint  upon  his  organization? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  With  reference  to  any  particular  plants  or  organ- 
ization drives? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  what  they  were? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  they  were  trying  to  organize  the  North  American 
Aircraft  in  Los  Angeles,  and  my  local  being  a  General  Motor  local 
and  North  American  being  connected  with  the  General  Motors  Cor- 
poration, they  called  on  the  executive  board  of  my  local  to  do  what 
they  could  to  help  out. 

We  would  go  out  every  evening  and  contact  the  men  as  they  were 
coming  in  and  going  onto  the  night  shift.  They  would  tell  myself 
and  the  rest  of  the  executive  board  of  Local  216  that  they  did  not 
want  to  join  the  C.  I.  O.  because  the  leaders  were  Communists. 
They  would  tell  us  that  the  leaders  of  the  C.  I.  O.  were  right  out 
there  trying  to  organize  them  and  they  were  Communists  themselves 
and  putting  out  Communist  literature  at  the  gates 

;Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  the  rank  and  file  of  the  workingmen  in 
the  plant  told  you  that,  when  you  were  going  to  them  and  asking 
them  to  join  the  C.  I.  O.  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  organize  so  you  could  better  your  conditions 
and  so  forth? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  they  would  give  you  that  reply? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  the  other  leaders  out  there  were  distributing 
Communist  literature  and  soliciting  memberships  in  the  Communist 
Party  at  the  same  time? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right ;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  j^ou  ever  raise  that  issue  on  the  floor  of  the 
sessions  of  the  Auto  Council  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  did  you  have  to  say  about  the  question 
on  the  floor  of  the  Auto  Council  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  After  the  first  Labor  Board  election  at  North  Ameri- 
can, the  majority  was  not  given  to  anyone.  In  other  words,  the  vote 
was  so  close  between  the  American  Federation  of  Labor  and  the 
C.  I.  O.  that  they  had  to  have  another  election.  Immediately  after 
that  first  election  the  regional  office  called  a  special  meeting  of  the 
Auto  Council  to  discuss  means  of  organizing  for  the  second  Labor 
Board  election,  and  at  that  time  one  of  the  members  of  the  U.  A.  W. 
got  up  on  the  floor  and  stated  that  he  met  a  man  down  in  Los  Angeles 
who  he  had  worked  with,  that  was  now  an  officer  of  the  American 
Federation  of  Labor,  and  he  asked  him  how  the  A.  F.  of  L.  caused 
them  from  getting  the  majority  of  the  votes.  This  man  told  the 
IT.  A.  W.-C.  I.  O.  workers  did  that  themselves  by  having  Communists 
out  there  trying  to  organize  the  North  American  workers  into  the 
C.  I.  O.,  and  he  said  that  he  would  like  to  have  a  statement  from  the 
regional  office  as  to  that  statement. 


UN-A.MEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8547 

Upon  that  Wyndhani  Mortimor  took  the  floor,  and  he  again  passed 
the  buck  by  sa^dng  ''that  is  some  more  of  your  company  stooges  and 
don't  pay  any  attention  to  what  the  Dies  committee  says;  the  Dies 
committee  doesn't  know  the  difference  between  unionism  and  rheu- 
matism,'' and  a  bunch  of  hooey  like  that,  and  set  down. 

Immediately  I  took  the  floor  and  told  Lew  JSIichener  and  Wyndham 
jMortimer  that  they  had  been  accused  of  belonging  to  the  Communist 
Party,  and  that  I  believed  they  were  members,  and  I  would  like  to  have 
a  statement  from  them  at  that  time  so  that  I  could  go  back  and  tell 
these  workers  that  had  told  me  they  were  Communists,  that  they  were 
not  Communists  or  members  of  the  party.  They  refused  to  make  a 
statement. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  a  California  law  firm 
by  the  name  of  Gallagher,  Wirin  &  Johnson  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  connection  has  there  been  between  the  law 
firm  of  Gallagher,  Wirin  &  Johnson  and  the  U.  A.  W.  locals  in 
California? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Most  of  the  U.  A.  W.  locals  in  California  are  affiliated 
with  that  law  firm.  In  other  words,  we  are  paying  them  so  much  per 
month  to  look  out  for  our  interests. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  say  that  most  locals  are? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir ;  there  are  one  or  two  of  the  U.  A.  W.  that  would 
not  affiliate  with  the  attorneys. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Which  ones? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Studebaker  for  one. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  don't  know  of  any  others? 

Mr.  Inzer.  No  ;  I  can't  say  any  others  right  now. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Why  didn't  they  hire  this  firm? 

Mr.  Inzer.  For  the  simple  reason  that  the  officers  of  the  Stude- 
baker local  knew  at  that  time  that  they  were  connected  with  and  one 
member  of  them  was  a  Communist,  and  they  would  not  affiliate  with 
them. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  There  is  a  witness  here  from  the  Studebaker  local 
who  will  testify  directly  on  that  point. 

Mr.  ISIatthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Leo  Gallagher,  the 
head  of  the  firm  of  Gallagher,  Wirin  &  Johnson,  has  run  for  public 
office  on  the  Communist  ticket  in  California? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  he  ran  on  the  Communist  ticket  for  State  secre- 
tary and  pulled  a  vote  of  about  150,000. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  anyone  in  the  C.  I.  O. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Just  a  moment ;  I  would  like  to  say  a  word  about  Cali- 
fornia at  that  point.  In  that  election  where  he  got  150,000  votes,  what 
other  candidates  were  in  the  field? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  couldn't  answer  that. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Well,  I  think  it  should  be  explained.  There  was  only 
one  other  candidate  who  had  won  both  the  Republican  and  Democratic 
nominations;  the  only  opportunity  a  person  had  if  they  wanted  to 
vote  against  that  man  who  had  both  major  party  nominations  was  to 
vote  for  Gallagher,  which  explains  to  some  degree  why  he  got  all  the 
votes  he  did. 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  know  all  the  votes  he  got  were  not  from  the  Communist 
Party — they  were  from  other  j^eople. 


8548  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  wonder  if  my  colleague  would  like  to  qualify  the 
question  about  California's  rainfall  ? 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  I  would  like  to  say  if  this  part  of  the  country  had  as 
much  rain  as  California  it  would  be  better  oif. 

IMr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  who  it  was  in  the  C.  I.  O.  organization 
that  recommended  the  locals  retain  the  firm  of  Gallagher,  Wirin,  and 
Johnson  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Each  U.  A.  W.  local  and  I  believe  all  C.  I.  O.  locals  were 
asked  to  affiliate — I  am  not  positive  of  that,  but  I  know  the  longshore- 
men are  in  it.  Each  local  received  a  communication  from  Lew  Mich- 
ener's  office  asking  us  to  affiliate  with  this  law  firm  and  telling  us  what 
protection  we  would  have,  and  after  that  Johnson  of  Gallagher,  Wirin, 
&  Johnson  came  out  to  our  executive-board  meeting  and  made  a  talk 
about  the  law  firm  and  what  protection  we  would  have  if  we  affiliated 
with  them  and  after  he  had  finished  I  took  the  flt)or  and  spoke  against 
the  affiliation,  pointing  out  to  the  executive  board  that  there  was  at 
least  one  member  of  this  firm  who  was  a  member  of  the  Connnunist 
Party. 

Mr.  Starnes.  When  you  speak  of  affiliation,  Mr.  Inzer,  you  mean, 
of  course,  that  the  unions  had  retained  this  firm  to  represent  them — 
that  is  what  you  mean  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir ;  that  is  what  I  mean. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  did  the  local  do  after  Johnson  made  his 
speech  and  you  made  your  speech? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  it  was  recommended  to  the  rank  and  file  of  our 
local  that  we  affiliate  with  this  law  firm  and  that  Johnson  be  at  the 
next  regular  meeting  to  explain  to  the  rank  and  file  just  what  protec- 
tion we  would  have.  He  was  there  and  at  that  time,  at  the  first  of  the 
meeting,  he  asked  for  a  $60  retainer  fee  and  there  was  quite  some  dis- 
turbance or  restlessness  among  the  members  so  he  cut  it  down  to  $50. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  $50  a  month  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Fifty  dollars  a  month,  and  at  that  time  the  rank  and  file 
voted  to  accept  these  attorneys  as  our  law  firm. 

Mr.  JVIatthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Gallagher  and  Lew 
Michener  are  closely  associated  with  each  other? 

Mr.  Inzer,  Yes,  sir ;  I  do  know  it. 

Mr,  Matthews.  What  are  the  facts,  of  your  own  knowledge,  on  that 
point? 

Mr,  Inzer.  Well,  the  first  point  is  that  they  have  a  law  office  right 
in  the  C.  I.  O.  Building  and  the  second  point,  that  any  social  gather- 
ing that  we  held  at  the  C.  I.  O.  Building  or  at  the  San  Diego  con- 
vention, you  would  see  Lew  Michener  and  Johnson  and  Al  Wirin. 
In  other  words,  they  were  very  closely  associated  and  hung  out 
together  at  these  gatherings. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Is  that  spelled  W-i-r-i-n  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  correct. 

Mr,  Matthews.  And  his  first  name  is  Abraham  Lincoln? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  is  known  as  ''Al,"  and  "A.  L."  stands  for  Abraham 
Lincoln;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  your  position  as  president  of  Local  216,  have 
you  ever  had  personal  contacts  with  Wyndham  Mortimer? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Frequently? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8549 

Mr.  Inzpir.  Well,  for  awhilo;  yes.  He  used  to  come  out  to  our 
meetin<is  and  we  would  have  an  issue  on  the  floor  thtit  was  pertainmg 
to  the  rank  and  file  of  the  local  only,  and  he  would,  if  he  saw  that 
it  was  some  issue  that  was  important  to  the  Comnumist  Party,  he 
would  ^ot  in  and  argue  for  it,  so  finally  he  came  out  and  wanted  to 
take  the  floor  on  some  point  that  was  brought  up  and  I  refused  to 
let  him  have  the  floor.  In  other  words,  I  barred  him  from  the  meet- 
iuiTs  and  we  passed  a  motion  that  before  anyone  other  than  the 
regional  director  could  come. out  to  the  meetings,  they  must  get  per- 
mission from  the  executive  board;  so  he  was  barred  from  the  meet- 
ings because  he  would  come  out  and  try  to  confuse  the  issue  and  put 
over  the  Communist  policy. 

]\Ir.  ^VIati'hews.  Did  you  ever  discuss  the  Communist  Party  with 
Mortimer  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes.  sir;  I  have  a  number  of  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  state  briefly  the  nature  of  those  conver- 
sations? 

Mr.  Inzer.  AVell,  I  would  tell  him  that,  after  some  meeting  where 
he  had  spoken  or  something,  I  would  tell  him  that  he  was  trying 
to  put  over  the  Connnunist  Party  policies  in  the  C.  I.  O.  movement, 
and  I  thought  he  should  refrain  from  that  and  stick  to  organizing 
the  C.  I.  O.  He  would  make  the  remark,  "Oh,  that  is  the  thoughts 
of  the  Dies  committee,"  or,  "the  management."  or  ''the  F.  B.  I.,"  and 
""don't  pay  any  attention  to  them,  they  will  use  all  those  means  to 
tear  down  the  ones  who  are  trying  to  get  you  good  working  condi- 
tions and  raises  in  pay  and  so  on."     He  would  just  pass  it  off. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  attend  the  annual  convention  of  the 
United  Automobile  Workers  in  St  Louis  in  1940? 

Mr  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  a  delegate? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matihews.  From  your  local  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Did  you  meet  Wyndham  Mortimer  at  that  con- 
vention ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Mortimer  showed  any 
tendencies  to  associate  witli  any  special  group  at  the  St.  Louis  con- 
vention of  the  United  Automobile  Workers? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes.  sir.  If  you  were  not  a  Communist  he  would  not 
speak  to  you ;  and  why  I  say  that  is,  there  was  a  man  from  Detroit  by 
the  name  of  John  Anderson,  who  got  up  on  the  floor  and  stated  he 
was  "a  comrade  and  proud  of  it,"  and  "if  the  United  States  had  the 
unions  that  they  have  in  Russia  the  workers  of  the  United  States 
would  i)e  much  better  off,"  and  he  and  Wyndham  Mortimer  were  to- 
gether at  all  times — sat  together  in  the  convention,  ate  together  in  the 
restaurant,  and  when  I  went  to  bed  at  night  they  were  still  together. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Anderson's  speech  on  the  floor  of  the  convention  in 
which  he  declared  he  was  a  Communist,  was  carried  in  the  press,  was 
it  not  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes.  sir;  it  was. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  the  same  Wyndham  Mortimer,  Dr.  Mat- 
thews, that  Earl  Browder  in  reply  to  questions  here,  2  years  ago,  pro- 


8550  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

pounded  by  members  of  this  committee,  stated  that  if  he  was  not  a 
Communist  that  "he  was  a  very  close  friend  of  the  Communists." 
That  is  the  same  Wyndham  Mortimer,  is  it  not? 

Mr.  JMatthews.  As  1  lecall  the  exact  hinguage.  Congressman 
Starnes,  3'ou  asked  Mr.  Browder  if  Wyndham  Mortimer  \A'as  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party  and  Earl  Browder  replied :  "I  don't  know 
that  he  is,  but  at  least  he  is  very  close  to  us." 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  would  like  to  ask  one  question :  Did  you  say  that 
Wvndham  Mortimer  was  denied  admission  to  a  meeting  of  your 
local? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  did  say  that,  by  action  of  the  local;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooKHis.  And  the  reason  they  took  that  action  was  they  be- 
lieved his  speeches  and  so  on  confused  the  issues  and  points  that  they 
were  trying  to  discuss  that  had  to  do  with  the  actual  problems  they 
faced,  is  that  true  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  am  not  sure  whether  he  was  denied  admission  to 
the  local  or  denied  the  right  to  the  floor. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Which  was  it  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  It  means  the  same  thing.  In  other  words,  if  he  were  to 
come  to  the  meeting  without  first  asking  permission  of  the  executive 
board,  if  he  came  to  the  meeting  he  would  be  allowed  to  sit  in,  yes,  sir; 
but  not  allowed  to  have  a  voice,  but  he  wouldn't  come  out  unless  he 
could  have  a  voice. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Mr.  Inzer,  were  you  a  member  of  the  District 
Council  No.  5  of  the  United  Automobile  Workers  during  the  year 
1940? 

Mr.  Inzer,  Yes,  sir ;  I  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  also  a  member  of  the  Los  Angeles  In- 
dustrial Union  Council  in  1940? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  the  Los  Angeles  Industrial  Union  Council  the 
body  which  brings  together  or  federates  all  of  the  C.  I.  O.  locals  in  all 
unions  in  Los  Angles? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr,  Matthews.  In  other  words,  it  is  the  central  labor  bodv  of  the 
C.  I.  O.  unions? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  your  experience  after  attending  the  meetings 
of  District  Council  No.  5  of  the  U.  A.  W.  and  the  Los  Angeles  Indus- 
trial Union  Council  in  1940,  that  those  bodies  were  controlled  by 
the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir ;  that  is  true. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  will  you  please  give  some  evidence  for  your 
answer  ? 

Mr,  Inzer.  The  reason  I  say  that  is  because 

Mr.  Matthews.  Why  did  you  gain  that  impression  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  The  reason  I  gained  that  impi-ession  is  this:  Every 
known  Communist  or  everyone  in  the  U.  A.  W.  or  C.  I.  O.  that  has 
been  pointed  out  as  a  Communist  on  the  west  coast  or  in  California 
always  manages  to  get  themselves  on  as  delegates  to  these  councils, 
and  they  aie  always  present — they  never  miss  a  meeting — they  are 
always  right  there. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8551 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  ever  nominated  for  a  position  in  the 
auto  council  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir ;  I  was  nominated  for  the  chairmanship  of  the 
auto  council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  what  territory  does  the  auto  council — is 
that  district  No.  5? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  district  No.  5.  That  was  the  auto  workers  in 
and  around  Los  Ani^eles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Those  members  in  and  around  Los  Angeles? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

]VIr.  Matthews.  You  were  nominated  by  whom? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  was  nominated  by  Noah  Taucher. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Taucher,  as  he  is 
called,  is  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  don't  believe  he  is  a  member;  I  believe  he  is  just  a 
fellow-traveler. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  nominated  you  for  the  office  of  president  of 
the  C.  I.  O.-LT.  A.  W.  Council,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now.  will  you  please  tell  what  happened  after  he 
had  nominated  you  for  the  presidency? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  we  had  the  meetings  there  once  a  month  and  at 
that  meeting  where  I  was  nominated,  the  nominations  were  open  for 
officers  of  the  council,  and  Taucher  nominated  me. 

Immediately  after  the  meeting — the  nominations  were  left  open 
until  the  next  meeting  and  then  they  would  have  more  nominations 
and  the  elections.  After  I  was  nominated  and  after  the  meeting 
adjourned,  he  and  Lew  Michener  both  came  to  me  and  asked  me 
if  I  would  not  accept  the  nomination  because,  he  pointed  out,  that  he 
had  so  much  to  do  that  he  couldn't  possibly  accept  it  another  term 
and  they  felt  that  I  was  the  man  for  the  job  because  they  needed  my 
cooperation  and  so  on.     I  promised  I  would  accept  it. 

Mv.  Maithews.  Were  you  head  of  the  largest  local  of  the  U.  A.  W. 
at  that  time? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right.  I  was  president  of  the  largest  local  on 
the  coast. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  AYlien  did  that  take  place? 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  was  just  going  to  ask  that. 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  took  place  right  after  the  meeting  I  had  with  the 
regional  director  in  May,  around  the  10th  of  May. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  1940? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right.     It  was  next  Sunday  after  the  8(h. 

^Ir.  Matthews.  They  both  asked  you  to  take  this  position  and  you 
agreed  to  take  it.     Then  what  happened? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  at  the  next  meeting  there  was  a  resolution  sent 
in  by  my  local — I  forget  just  what  it  was  now,  but  it  had  something 
to  do  with  the  Communist  movement  in  the  C.  I.  O.,  and  before  the 
nominations  were  oj^ened  this  came  on  the  floor  and  I  got  up  and 
spoke  on  it.  In  other  words,  I  spoke  against  the  movement  to  bring 
the  Communists  into  the  council  and  my  doing  so  caused  Noah 
Taucher  to  be  nominated  for  the  presidency  of  the  council  and  after 
we  recessed  for  the  election — ^lie  accepted  and  I  accej)ted,  and  after 
the  recess  for  the  election  and  we  went  back  in  he  was  elected  by — 
he  got  65  votes  and  I  believe  I  got  16. 


3552  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ArTIVITIES 

He  was  put  back  in  office  the  second  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  an  hour  or  so  before  you  had 
spoken  against  the  Communists  on  the  floor  of  the  council 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Your  presidency  was  acceptable  to  Taucher  and 
Michener  '* 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  after  you  had  spoken  they  opposed  you? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right;  but  I  would  like  to  say  something.  That 
shows  there  was  a  little  dirty  work  there.  The  Chair  at  that  time — 
Taucher  did  not  take  the  chair,  so  they  elected  a  temporary  chair- 
man and  I  was  nominated  and  there  were  three  or  four  more  nomi- 
nated and  it  was  brought  down  to  myself  and  one  other  man,  and 
they  sent  us  out  of  the  room  to  take  a  vote  on  which  one  would  be 
the  chairman.  We  tied.  In  other  words,  between  the — I  will  say 
75  people  there  or  whatever  it  was,  I  got  half  and  the  other  fellow 
got  half  for  the  temporary  chairmanship,  so  we  tossed  a  coin  to  see 
who  would  take  the  chair  and  the  other  man  took  the  chair,  and  at 
that  time  I  will  say  I  received  about  45  votes  and  one  hour  later 
after  I  had  opposed  this  group  I  got  16  votes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Slim  Connolly  is 
connected  with  the  Auto  Council? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  is  not  connected  with  the  Auto  Council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  he  connected  with  the  C.  I.  O.  council? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  he  is  connected  with  the  C.  I.  O.  council — 
district  council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  his  position  in  the  C.  I.  O.  council  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  is  ])resident  of  the  C.  I.  O.  council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  he  preside  at  the  meetings  of  the  council? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  now,  the  council  that  I  attended  is  district  council 
and  of  the  district  council  he  is  the  secretary  to  the  council  and  he  does 
not  take  the  chair  there.  He  is  the  secretary,  but  whoever  has  the 
chair  ttikes  their  orders  from  Slim  Connolly.  If  he  doesn't  want  a  man 
to  have  the  floor  he  will  nudge  the  chairman  and  the  chairman  will 
ignore  the  man  that  has  his  hand  up. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Slim  Connolly  or  Philip  M.  Con- 
nolly which,  I  believe,  is  his  correct  name? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  that  he  is  one  of  the  national  officers 
of  the  American  Peace  Mol)ilization? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  he  is  one  of  the  officers  of  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  come  in  contact  with  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization  in  California? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  see  their  literature  and  see  them  working  around  the 
C.  I.  O.  building  but  I  have  never  come  directly  in  contact  with  them 
in  my  local.    We  don't  allow  them  out  there. 

Mr.  Matthev/s.  Is  your  committee,  the  Vigilant  American  Commit- 
tee, aware  of  any  ])articular  connections  with  the  American  Peace 
Mobilization — liave  you  taken  any  position  on  that  organization? 

Mr.  Inzer.  AVell,  we  know  that  the  American  Peace  INIobilization  is 
a  Communist  Party  outfit  and  we  know  that  they  are  working  through 
the  C.  I.  O.  building  and  we  know  that  Connolly  and  Michener  and 


rX-A.MKUlCAN    I'intI'A(;AM)A  ACTIVITIES  8553 

IVIortiinei'  aiul  t\\v  wliolc  bmicli  of  officers  there  are  connected  with  this 
conunittee. 

]\lr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  heard  Connolly  discuss  the  national- 
defense  pro<>Tam  in  council  nieetinos? 

Mr.  Tx/.KR.  Yes,  sir;  I  have. 

Mr.  ^lATTiiinvs.  And  what  have  you  heard  him  say  at  council 
nieetiniis? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  have  heard  him  state  that  the  President,  tlie  Conp-ess, 
the  F.  B.  1..  the  Dies  committee,  and  all  of  the  officials  in  Washin<2:t(>n 
were  usino-  the  national-defense  program  to  tear  down  organized 
labor. 

Ml-.  VooRHis.  Did  he  include  President  Roosevelt? 

Mi\  Tn/.kk.  Yes.  sir:   absolutely. 

Ml'.  Maithews.  Did  you  ever  hear  him  discuss  the  question  of 
strikes  i 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes.  sir;  I  haA'e.  At  one  particular  meeting  I  went  to 
of  the  council,  lie  was  giving  his  report  and  in  that  report  he  stated 
that  "we  now  have  12  strikes."  I  believe  it  was,  "in  the  Los  Angeles 
area  and  as  soon  as  these  strikes  are  settled  we  must  get  down  to 
the  fine  point  of  organizing  and  get  ready  for  bigger  and  better 
strikes." 

]Mr.  Matthews.  He  stated  that  at  the  meeting  of  the  council? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  MATTm:ws.  "WHiat  did  you  understand  him  to  mean  l^y  that — 
that  they  would  pull  a  general  strike  after  they  had  had  strikes  in 
the  individual  plants — pull  a  general  strike,  have  a  "bigger  and  bet- 
ter strike"  that  way? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  what  I  gathered  from  that  was  this:  That  the 
Communist  Party  in  the  C.  I.  O.  is  using  this  strike  clause  to  dis- 
turb  the  workers  and  poison  the  minds  of  the  workers  against  the 
officials  in  "Washington  and  against  the  management,  and  by  doing 
so  then  at  any  time  they  want  to  call  a  Nation-wide  or  a  coast-wide 
they  will  have  the  men  all  set  to  pull  a  strike,  by  trying  to  organize 
or  negotiate  with  some  management  of  a  plant  where  the  demands 
would  be  so  strenuous  or  so  great  that  the  company  couldn't  possibly 
accept  them  and,  therefore,  pull  that  plant  out  and  through  a  syni- 
{)athy  strike  they  would  ask  all  tlie  other  locals  to  go  out. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  further  understand  that  was  for  the  pur- 
pose of  slowing  down  the  national-defense  effort  and  to  prevent  this 
Xation  from  arnniig  for  security's  sake? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  exactly  the  way  I  understand  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  gathered  that  from  his  continued  conver- 
sations, his  speeches,  and  the  attitude  of  this  man  and  other  Com- 
muni.sts  who  have  positions  of  power  in  the  labor  movement  on  the 
west  coast    ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  connect.  I  liave  never  heard  one  of  the  offi- 
cials mentioned  yet.  get  u])  and  make  a  speecli  but  what  they,  in  that 
speech,  brought  in  the  President  of  the  United  States  and  CongTess 
and  the  Dies  committee  and  the  F.  B.  I.  They  bring  tliem  in  every 
tiirte  the}'  take  the  floor.  They  bring  them  in  to  try  to  poison  the 
minds  of  the  workers  against  our  President  and  Government. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  d(j  they  say  they  are  against  the  foreign  policy 
of  the  Government  and  that  the  Nation  should  not  arm  for  defense  ? 


8554  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Inzer.  They  do,  arid  they  say  that  if  they  should  arm  they 
should  keep  everything  that  is  made  for  defense  here  in  the  United 
States. 

Mr.  Starxes.  They  are  opposed,  in  other  words,  to  sending  any  aid 
to  Britain  or  the  embattled  democracies  elsewhere? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Absolutely. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  is  it  your  considered  judgment,  in  view  of  your 
long  connections  with  the  labor  movement  there  on  the  west  coast  and 
your  official  position  and  your  contacts,  that  that  is  the  ])urpose  of 
Michener  and  Mortimer  and  Pettis  Perry  and  Hans  Diebel  and  others 
who  are  active  out  there  in  these  strikes  and  who  are  in  positions  of 
prominence  and  in  positions  where  they  can  do  injury,  both  to  labor 
and  to  our  Government? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir ;  I  do.  I  believe  it  is  their  aim  to  do  everything 
possible  to  prevent  us  from  sending  aid  to  Britain  or  any  other  place. 
In  other  words,  they  don't  want  any  aid  to  go  out — they  want  to  try 
to  stop  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  they  have  expressed  no  real  interest  to  rearm 
our  own  Nation  for  defense? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  know  it  to  be  a  fact  they  don't  have  any  interest  along 
those  lines. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Have  you  heard  anybody  say  that  ?  I  mean  have  you 
heard  anybody  in  a  meeting  make  a  speech  in  which  he  opposed  the 
defense  of  the  United  States  as  such? 

Mr.  Inzer.  They  have  spoken;  yes,  sir;  and  put  literature  out  as 
to  the  preparation  for  war  and,  in  other  words,  they  state  through 
their  literature  and  everything  that  they  do  not  want  to  send  any  aid 
to  Britain  or  any  other  country. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  will  ask  you  this,  Mr.  Inzer :  Don't  they  refer  to  our 
national  effort  today  as  "a  preparation  for  an  imperialist  war,"  and 
"they  are  opposed  to  an  imperialist  war"? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Isn't  that  their  attitude? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Exactly. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  isn't  it  a  fact  they  have  fought  step  by  step  the 
efforts  of  the  President  of  the  United  States  and  the  Congress  and 
the  people  of  the  United  States,  to  provide  security  for  this  Nation,  on 
the  ground  that  it  was  merely  preparing  the  Nation  to  enter  "an 
imperialist  war"? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  proceed.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  have  s])oken  about  this  Communist  influ- 
ence or  control  in  the  C.  I.  O.  Council  in  Los  Angeles.  Do  you  know 
whether  or  not  the  council  has  coo])erated  from  time  to  time  with 
various  front  organizations  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir ;  I  know  that  they  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  With,  for  example,  the  National  Negro  Congress? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  International  Workers  Order? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  International  Labor  Defense? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  Workers  Alliance? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8555 

]SIr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matoiews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  organization  of 
Labors'  Non-Partisan  League  in  Los  Angeles? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  do. 

]Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  your  judgment  about  the  control  of  that 
organization? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  I  know  for  a  fact  that  that  is  controlled  by  the 
Connnunist  Party  because  the  president  of  Labors'  Non-Partisan 
League  is  a  known  Communist.    His  name  is  Lou  Goldblatt. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  spelled  L-o-u  G-o-l-d-b-l-a-t-t? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  JNIatthews.  And  he  is  president  of  Labors'  Non-Partisan 
League  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  and  he  is  also  the  secretary  to  the  State  C.  I.  O. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  he  is  a  known  Communist  Party  membei-? 

Mv.  Inzer.  Yes.  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  was  formerly  on 
the  State  ceaitral  committee  of  the  Communist  Party,  as  a  matter  of 
public  record? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  is  a  close  associate  of  Harry  Bridges,  is  he  not? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  is  one  of  his  right-hand  men. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  to  ask  you  this  general  question — of  course, 
I  know  it  is  true  but  I  want  this  expression  from  you:  Don't  you 
find  it  a  fact  that  the  great  rank  and  file  of  your  C.  I.  O.  out  there 
on  the  west  coast,  as  well  as  all  the  working  men  and  women,  that  is, 
the  great  majority  of  them,  don't  you  find  that  they  believe  in  ade- 
quate defense  and  that  they  are  willing  to  cooperate  with  the  Presi- 
dent and  the  Congress  of  the  United  States  in  providing  absolute 
security  for  this  Nation  against  attack  from  any  source  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Absolutely.  I  certainly  do,  because,  as  I  say,  we  have 
1,800  men  in  my  local  and  our  local  endorsed  President  Roosevelt 
unanimously  and  they  are  absolutely  in  accord  with  national  de- 
fense ;  and  I  will  say  that  99  percent  of  the  C.  I.  O.  members  are  in 
accord  with  national  defense. 

Mr.  vStarnes.  Don't  you  feel  that  labor  really  has  a  greater  stake 
in  retaining  democracy  in  this  country  than  most  any  other  group? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  certainly  do. 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  As  a  matter  of  "fact,  isn't  it  true  that  the  sentiment 
you  just  described  as  being  the  opinion  of  the  rank  and  file  of  the 
workers  in  the  C.  I.  O.,  that  that  sentiment  was  so  strong  that  it  pre- 
vented the  passage  of  certain  types  of  resolutions  during  the  time 
of  tlie  last  national  election,  which  this  other  group  wanted  to  get 
through  and  that  they  were  never  able  to  get  them  through;  isn't 
that  true? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir ;  that  is  true. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  There  was  a  long  battle  there  in  their  effort  to  put 
such  resolutions  over? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  M.^tthews.  Now,  after  you  resigned  from  the  presidency  of 
Local  216  this  year,  did  you  have  any  further  contacts  with  Lew 
Michener  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir ;  I  did. 


8556  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  call  on  you  at  your  home  on  April  7,  1941  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  he  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  describe  what  happened  at  the 
time  of  Michener's  visit  to  your  home  on  April  7,  1941  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  On  April  7,  1941,  that  was  a  Monday  and  we  always 
hold  our  executive  board  meetings  on  Monday,  so  about — I  will  say 
8 :  15,  my  door  bell  rang  and  I  went  to  the  door  and  it  was  Lew 
Michener  and  he  asked  me  if  I  was  alone.  I  told  him  ''No,"  that  I 
had  company.  He  wanted  to  know  if  he  could  come  in.  I  told  him 
"Yes,"'  to  come  in.    So  he  did. 

Well,  this  was  in  the  presence  of  two  other  men.  One  man's  name 
was  Brother  Franklin,  who  is  here,  and  the  other  man  I  don't  care 
to  mention  his  name  because  since  that  occurrence  his  wife  has  been 
threatened,  as  well  as  himself,  and  he  does  not  care  to  have  his  name 
exposed. 

But  these  two  men  were  present  and  Lew  Michener  came  in  and  he 
wanted  to  know  if  I  was  going  to  the  executive  board  meeting.  I 
told  him  "No,"  that  I  would  not  go  as  I  was  no  longer  chairman. 
He  wanted  to  know  when  I  was  going  ''to  forget  about  this  Vigilant 
American  Committee  and  come  back  and  help  them  organize  the 
unorganized." 

I  told  him  that  as  soon  as  he  could  prove  to  me  that  none  of  the 
lenders  down  there  were  members  of  the  Communist  Party  or  working 
with  the  Conununist  Party  that  I  would  "forget  about  the  commit- 
tee and  come  back  and  work  with  them." 

So  he  went  ahead  to  point  out  that  it  was  very  urgent  that  I  should 
come  back  because  I  was  well  qualified  to  help  organize  the  unor- 
ganized and  they  needed  me;  and  he  went  on  and  on  and  so  he  also 
also  spoke  to  Brother  Franklin  and  told  him  that  if  he  would  come 
back  and  "forget  about  the  committee,"  that  he  would  see  he  went 
back  to  work  in  San  Pedro  as  a  longslioreman  and  "the  trouble  he  had 
had  down  there  with  the  labor  officials  would  be  forgotten,  the  record 
would  be  clean;"  and  they  wanted  us  to  come  back  and  he  said  he 
would  assure  us,  if  we  would  come  back,  that  Franklin  and  myself 
both  woidd  be  given  a  good  job  with  the  International. 

I  told  him  at  that  time  that  I  was  not  interested  because  I  would 
not  be  able  to  go  back  in  and  work  with  people  who  were  teaching 
the  workers  the  policies  of  the  Communist  Party.  So  at  that  point 
he  got  up  and  started  to  leave  my  house  and  he  got  kind  of  sarcastic 
and  he  said  :  "Well,  I  know  what  you  are  out  for."  He  said,  "You  are 
c>ut  for  the  money,"  and  he  say,  "If  that  is  what  you  want,"  he  says, 
"I  will  get  you  $500  and  I  will  get  Franklin  $500  right  now,"  so  at 
that  point  I  became  quite  angry  and  I  attempted  to  smash  him,  but 
there  was  a  coffee  table  in  the  way  and  he  fell  over  that  and  Brother 
Franklin  took  him  out  the  door  and  the  other  gentleman  that  was 
there  got  between  me  and  the  door,  and  he  left  at  that  point. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Roy  Donnelly? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  is  he? 

Mr.  Inzer.  He  is  a  longshoreman ;  he  is  a  member  of  Local  113  in 
San  Pedro. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  discussed  a  Nation-wide  strike  with 
Donnelly? 


UN-AMEUICAX  I'ROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8557 

Mr.  Inzkk.  I  have  not  myself,  but  a  I'rieiid  of  niiiio  cliHcussetl  it  with 
liim,  or  they  were  talking;  of  a  Nation-wide  strike  or  coast-wide  strike 
and  at  tliat  time  this  same  friend  that  was  present  at  my  house  that 
T  can't  mention  the  name,  told  Koy  Donnelly  that  if  such  a  strike  was 
calleil  that  the  Navy  would  be  c;dled  out  to  take  charj>;e  and  Roy 
Donnelly  made  the  statement  at  that  time  that  if  the  Navy  were 
called  out  that  they  would  never  leave  San  Pedro — that  the  long- 
shoremen would  take  care  of  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  think  perhaps  I  may  say  at  this 
point  that  the  perscm  whose  name  the  witness  is  not  mentioning,  had 
intended  to  come  here  and  be  present  today  but  had  received  threats, 
his  wife  had  received  threats  and  he  preferred  not  to  come  as  a 
witness. 

Mr.  Staknes.  You  mean  after  he  had  been  subpenaed  as  a  witness 
to  ai)pear  before  the  connnittee 

Mr.  Matthews.  These  witnesses  are  voluntary  witnesses — they  were 
not  subpenaed,  as  I  understand  the  situation. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  it  your  opinion  based  upon  your  o\vn  union  mem- 
bership, your  own  experience  as  a  union  official  and  with  your  con- 
tacts with  labor  men  and  officials  in  the  coast  area  generally,  the 
west-coast  area,  that  the  Connnunists  who  are,  unfortunately,  within 
the  labor  movement  are  acting  in  concert  to  sabotage  our  defense 
efforts,  to  slow  down  our  tlefense  efforts  by  promoting  unrest,  discord, 
and  dissatisfaction  wherever  they  can  do  so,  and  furthermore  that 
they  are  willing  to  work  and  are  working  at  the  present  time  with 
Hans  Diebel  and  any  other  bundist  or  German  sympathizer  toward 
the  same  end.  namely,  to  pi-oduce  dissatisfaction  and  unrest;  promote 
strikes  and  discord  in  an  effort  to  slow  down  our  defense  program 
or  to  sabotage  our  defense  program. 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  would  say  that  the  German-American  bundmen,  the 
Conmmnist  Party,  the  Trotsky ites  and  all  of  them  at  this  time  are 
working  hand  in  hand. 

Mr.  Starnes.  On  the  west  coast? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  right ;  they  are  working  hand  in  hand  at  this 
time,  working  right  together. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  i  would  like  to  ask  a  couple  of  questions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you  completed  with  Mr,  Inzer,  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Matthew\s.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  proceed,  Mr.  Voorhis. 

Mr,  VooRHis.  I  want  to  ask  the  witness  about  Labors'  Non-Partisan 
League.  How  long  has  it  been  organized  out  there  in  Los  Angeles 
County? 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  belive  that  was  organized  in  1938,  but  I  am  not 
positive  about  that.     I  believe  it  was  organized  in  1938. 

Mr.  Vtxmiiis.  Well,  at  first  what  was  your  opinion  on  it — what 
w^as  you  oi)ini()n  of  it  in  the  beginning? 

Mr.  Inzer.  When  it  was  first  organized  I  was  for  it.  I  really 
thought  it  was  a  good  thing  and  I  think  yet  Labors'  Non-Partisan 
I^eague  is  a  good  set-up  if  it  run  by  the  right  people.  In  other 
words,  if  they  kept  the  subversive  groups  out  of  it. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  was  for  it  too  in  the  beginning.  I  mean  I  tried 
to  help  it  out.  When  do  you  think  that  this  other  control,  the  Com- 
munist control  that  you  mentioned,  took  it  over? 


g558  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Inzer.  I  would  say  so  far  back  as  1939 — the  first  part  of  1940 
anyway. 

Mr.  VooEHis.  I  think  yoii  are  probably  right.  But  isn't  this  an- 
other instance  where  there  was  an  agency  that  could  have  been  a 
bona  fide  attempt  to  try  to  represent  on  a  political  front  the  legiti- 
mate interests  of  rank  and  file  people  but  now  that  the  chance  of 
doing  that  has  been  pretty  well  wrecked  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  That  is  absolutely  true.  I  have  known  of  delegates 
from  the  Labors'  Non-Partisan  League  to  go  to  Sacramento  to  try 
to  interview  the  Governor  on  different  points  and  he  would  refuse 
to  see  them  because  he  knew  those  men  out  there  waiting  for  him 
Avere  members  of  the  Communist  Party  down  there  pretending  to 
be  there  protecting  the  interests  of  labor. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  the  Governor  of  California  a  reactionary? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Well,  I  wouldn't  say  so. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Isn't  the  Governor  a  pretty  progressive  sort  of 
man  ? 

Mr.  Inzer.  Yes,  sir;  he  is  that. 

]\Ir.  VooRHis.  The  reason  I  ask  that  question  is  because  I  think 
the  Governor  has  a  pretty  consistent  progressive  and  prolabor  record, 
and  I  think  for  him  to  take  that  attitude  is  all  the  more  significant 
for  that  reason. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Any  more  questions,  Mr.  Voorhis? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  No  ;  I  think  that  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Mason? 

Mr.  Mason.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  If  there  are  no  further  questions,  the  committee 
will  stand  adjourned  until  1  o'clock. 

(Whereupon,  at  11:50  o'clock  the  committee  adjourned  until  1 
p.  m.,  the  same  day.) 

afternoon  session 

The  committee  met  at  1  p.  m.,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (chairman)  pre- 
siding. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  committee  will  resume  its  hearings. 
Whom  will  you  have.  Dr.  Matthews? 
Mr.  Matthews.  Richard  K.  Franklin. 

TESTIMONY   OF  KICHARD    K.   FRANKLIN,   LOS   ANGELES,   CALIF. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand,  Mr. 
Franklin  ?  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  will  give 
before  this  investigation  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and 
nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  be  seated,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  give  your  full  name? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Richard  Kenneth  Franklin. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  do  you  live,  Mr.  Franklin  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Los  Angeles,  1108  South  New  Hampshire  Avenue. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  born? 

Mr.  Franklin.  In  Los  Angeles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When? 


UN-AMEKICAN  rROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8559 

Mr.  Frankon.  1012,  July  11. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  give  a  brief  outline  of  the  jobs  or  posi- 
tions which  you  have  held? 

Mr.  Franklix.  "Well,  I  haven't  held  overly  many  jobs.  The  first 
job  as  a  wage  earner  I  had  was  with  the  Sterling  Meat  Co.  I  -svent 
to  work  there  about  1935  and  we  had  an  A.  F.  of  L.  union  and  we 
became  embroiled  in  some  difficulties  and  we  went  out  on  strike  and 
we  lost  our  jobs  and  then  I  went  to  Mork  at  the  Globe  Milling  Co. 
and  worked 

^Ir.  Matthews.  You  say  you  lost  your  job  at  the  Sterling  Meat  Co. 
because  you  went  out  on  strike? 

]Mr.  Fraxklix.  A  great  many  of  us  did. 

Mr.  ^Iatthews.  Then  you  went  to  work  for  the  Globe  Milling  Co.  ? 

Mr.  Fraxklix.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  how  long  did  you  work  there? 

Mr.  Fraxklix.  I  worked  off  and  on  until  1940. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Have  you  ever  worked  as  a  longshoreman? 

Mr.  Frax'klix.  Yes.  "\Ye  belonged  to  the  liiternational  Long- 
shoremen and  Warehousemen's  Union.  Milling  work  is  seasonal  and 
such  times  when  we  were  off  we  worked  out  of  the  hiring  hall — we 
worked  out  of  the  hiring  hall  either  in  San  Pedro,  W^ilmington,  or 
Los  Angeles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  join  the  union  at  the  Globe  Milling  Co.? 

Mr.  Fraxklix.  Yes,  sir;  I  joined  first  the  Teamsters  Union  and 
then  we  switched  to  the  I.  L.  W.  U.  because  we  believed  it  afforded 
better  benefits  to  the  workers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  at  the  present  time  a  member  of  the 
International  Longshoremen  and  Warehousemen's  Union? 

Mr.  Fraxklix.  Xo  ;  I  am  not. 

Mr.  ^Latthews.  Why  are  you  not  ? 

Mr.  Fraxklix.  Because  I  was  suspended  and  later  expelled. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AYhat  were  the  charges  against  you  I 

Mr.  Fraxklix.  Well,  'T  was  engaging  in  activities  detrimental  to  the 
welfare  of  the  union."  That  was  the  particular  charge.  I  was  sus- 
pended without  a  hearing  at  a  general  membership  meeting.  The  con- 
stitution of  the  I.  L.  W.  U.  on  the  Pacific  coast  now  provides  that  a 
member  can  be  suspended  and  expelled  without  a  public  hearing  if  he 
speaks  in  any  manner  against  any  official  or  officer  of  the  union. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  And  what  were  your  activities  in  which  you  were 
actually  engaged? 

Mr.  Fraxklix.  Anticommunistic  activities  solely. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  a  member  of  the  Vigilant  American 
Committee? 

]Mr.  Frax'klin.  Yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  which  Mr.  Inzer  is  the  chairman  ? 

Mr.  Fraxklix^  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  hear  Mr.  Inzer's  testimony  this  morning? 

INIr.  Fraxklix.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  any  facts  which  to  your  own  personal 
knowledge  are  in  conflict  with  the  testimony  of  Mr.  Inzer? 

Mr.  Fraxklix".  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  So  far  as  you  know  the  subject  matter  about  which 
he  testified  you  can  state  that" Mr.  Inzer's  testimony  was  correct  ? 

62626— 41— vol.  14 26 


8560  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Franklin.  I  can  go  further  than  that  on  almost  everything 
that  he  testified.  I  can  verify  it  personally  because  I  took  the  trouble 
to  verify  it  personally,  and  we  have  coordinated  our  ell'orts  to  a  great 
extent — a  certain  group  of  us  in  which  he  is  included. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  ]H-esent  at  the  home  of  Mr.  Inzer  on  April 
7  of  this  year  at  the  time  that  Mr.  Lew  Michener  visited  him? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  heard  Mr.  Inzer's  description  of  that  occasion  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  his  testimony  correct? 

Mr.  Franklin.  In  every  detail. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  anything  to  add  to  his  testimony  about 
that  occasion  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  No  ;  I  don't,  except  to  say  I  admired  Mr.  Inzer  very 
much  for  being  willing  to  get  up  and  tell  these  things  because  of  the 
policy  of  these  people  to  direct  threats  at  everyone  who  is  engaged  in 
any  activity  against  them,  which  has  caused  reluctance  on  the  part  of 
a  great  many  of  our  members  to  testify  against  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Lew  Michenei-  offer  you  and  Mr.  Inzer  sums 
of  money  if  you  would  drop  your  anti-Communist  work? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  said  that  he  could  get  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  said  he  could  get  sums  of  money  for  you? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes.  he  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  much  did  he  say  he  could  get  for  you  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  $500,  specifically. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  after  he  made  that  offer  there  was  an  alter- 
cation between  him  and  Mr.  Inzer? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  and  Mr.  Inzer  became  embroiled  in  an  argu- 
ment and  Mr.  Inzer  struck  him  and  knocked  him  over  the  coffee  table 
and  I  restrained  him  and  took  Michener  to  the  door  and  put  him  out. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  And  what  did  you  say  to  Mr.  Michener  when  he 
left  there? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Well,  I  don't  remember,  but  it  wasn't  very  compli- 
mentary. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  getting  back  to  the  activities  in  which  you 
have  been  engaged  and  for  which  you  say  you  were  suspended  and 
expelled  from  the  International  Longshoremen  and  Warehouse- 
men's Union.  Have  you  written  any  pamphlets  on  the  subject  of  the 
subversive  activities  in  trade  unions? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes;  I  wrote  a  pamphlet  called  "The  Fifth  Column 
Is  Here." 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  can  you  state  briefly  or  elaborate  upon  the 
theme  of  that  pamphlet? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Well,  that  pamphlet  revealed  just  who  was  behind 
the  subversive  activities  in  southern  California,  just  who  were  the 
men  who  were  interferring  with  the  labor  union ;  it  names  specifically 
Phil  Connolly  and  Congressman  Lee  Geyer  here  as  a  foi-mer  mem- 
ber of  the  Communist  Party,  and  Don  Healy  and  other  people  whom 
we  have  proof  are  Communists,  and  I  have  detailed  all  these  things. 

There  were  four  suits  filed  against  us  because  of  that  pamphlet  but 
none  of  the  suits  were  ever  pressed  in  spite  of  the  fact  we  wished  them 
pressed. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  these  pamphlets  circulated  in  the  harbor 
district  ? 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §561 

Mr.  Franklix.  CojMes  of  the  pamphlet  were  sold  at  cost  to  every 
union  that  watitecl  them.  The  C.  I.  O.  unions  were  not  permitted 
to  take  them,  hut  the  teamsters  in  the  San  Pedro  district  circulated 
them  anyway.  They  bought  8,000  copies  and  circulated  them  through 
the  harbor  local. 

Mr.  MA-rrHEWs.  "Were  yuu  subjected  to  verbal  attacks  after  the  cir- 
culation of  this  pamphlet? 

Mr.  P^RANKLix.  Oh,  unmercifully,  I  should  say;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "Were  there  any  i)ersons  in  particular  who  en- 
gaged in  these  verbal  attacks  upon  you? 

Mr.  FRANitLix.  Well,  within  the  union  there  was  Ralph  Dawson  and 
Lloyd  Seeliger.  who  are  both  organizers  for  the  International  Long- 
shoremen and  "Warehousemen's  Union. 

Mr.  ^L\TinEws.  "Will  you  spell  the  names,  please? 

Mr.  Franklin.  S-e-e-1-i-g-e-r;  Lloyd  Seeliger  and  Ralph  Dawson — 
D-a-w-s-o-n. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  Ralph  Dawson,  Mr.  Franklin? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  vou  know  him  to  be  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

Mr.  Franklin.  I  have  never  seen  his  book  or  anything,  but  I  know 
he  is — I  am  Avell  aware  of  it. 

Mr.  "V^oorhis.  How  do  you  know  that  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  If  you  see  a  Methodist  going  to  the  Methodist  Church 
and  consorting  with  Methodists,  you  can  take  it  for  granted  he  is  a 
Methodist;  if  he  contributes  money  to  build  up  the  Methodist  Church 
you  have  a  fair  idea  that  he  is  a  IVIethodist.  That  is  the  only  way  you 
■can  judge  the  rank  and  file  Communists.  If  they  contribute  to  build- 
ing up  the  Communist  Party  and  advocate  the  purchase  of  Commu- 
nist literature;  if  he  urges  a  imion  to  support  the  Communist  cause  and 
support  Communist  measures  that  come  on  the  floor  of  a  union  you  can 
do  nothing  else  but  assume  he  is  a  Communist. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Then  my  question  would  be :  When  did  you  see  Ralph 
Dawson  do  those  things? 

Mr.  Franklix.  I  have  never  seen  Ralph  Dawson  do  anything  else. 
He  advocated  the  sale  of  the  People's  World,  the  sale  of  the  New 
Masses — every  Communist  publication  that  came  before  the  union,  he 
advocated  the  sale  of  it. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Now.  just  a  minute;  were  you  in  the  union  meet- 
ing when  he  did  that? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wluit  union?  Was  it  the  Longshoremen  and  Ware- 
housemen's Union  ? 

Mr.  Franklix.  Longshoremen  and  Warehousemen's  Union,  Local 
126.  At  a  meeting  of  the  local  a  committee  was  set  up  to  further  the 
sale  of  the  People's  World,  and  Charles  Pfeifer  was  the  chairman  and 
was  an  organizer  of  the  union — a  jjaid  organizer,  and  Ralph  Dawson 
was  one  of  the  members. 

I  might  add  it  is  very  seldom  any  member  of  a  union  who  is  not  a 
paid  oflicial  engages  in  the  activities  such  as  that.  It  seems  to  be  pres- 
sure. There  is  pressure  brought  on  them  who  are  paid  to  do  these 
things,  but  the  rank  and  file  membership  are  not  active  at  all  and  are 
not  interested  in  the  furtherance  of  any  communistic  cause  in  the 
Longshoremen  as  well  as  anv  other  C.  I.  O.  union. 


8562  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Just  a  minute.  I  want  to  be  clear  on  this.  Your  tes- 
timony is  that  in  meetings  of  the  Longshoremen's  local — that  is  the 
Longshoremen's  local  of  San  Pedro,  Calif. ;  is  that  right  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Both  the  locals.  I  belonged  to  both  of  them  at 
different  times — 113  and  126. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  in  meetings  of  those  locals  that  Ralph  Dawson 
was  a  member  of  a  committee  to  promote  subscriptions  to  the  People's 
World? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Is  that  right  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir. 

IVIr.  VooRHis.  And  you  heai'd  him  make  speeches,  did  you 

Mr.  Franklin.  In  favor  of  the  People's  World,  yes — oh,  innumer- 
able times — at  almost  every  meeting  there  was  someone  who  would  get 
up  and  invariably  it  was  Ralph  Dawson  or  Charlie  Pfeifer,  and  urged 
the  rank  and  file  members  to  give  a  day's  pay  to  the  People's  World — 
to  the  support  of  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words  he  doesn't  conceal  the  fact  that  he  is 
a  sympathizer  and  supporter  of  the  Communist  Party  program — in 
fact  he  proclaims  it? 

Mr.  Franklin.  I  have  heard  him  and  Seeliger  both  say  to  me  that 
the  Communist  Party  "is  the  most  progressive  in  California,"  when 
you  might  say  I  baited  them  about  calling  themselves  progressive  on 
the  floor  of  the  union.  They  will  say  the  Communist  Party,  in  their 
estimation,  is  the  most  progressive  in  California. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  Dawson's  position  at  the  present  time  in 
tlie  C.  I.  O.  organization  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  is  an  organizer  for  the  Longshoremen  and 
Warehousemen  of  the  Pacific  coast. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Has  he  been  chairman  of  the  Los  Angeles  Indus- 
trial Union  Council  recently? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  was  until  recently.  Eugene  Judd  is  now — just 
elected. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  during  the  past  year  Dawson  has  been 
the  president  of  the  Los  Angeles  Industrial  Council  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  at  present  he  is  an  organizer  for  the  Inter- 
national Longshoremen  and  Warehousemen's  Union? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  was  an  appointee 
of  Harry  Bridges  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  was  originally  appointed  by  Harry  Bridges  and 
then  elected  to  his  position  in  the  local. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  we  have  the  police  record  of  Ralph 
Dawson  from  the  authorities  in  California;  would  you  like  to  have 
that  in  the  record  at  this  point  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  the  same  Ralph  Dawson  that  took  an  active 
part  in  the  Harvill  Die  Casting  strike? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Which  threatened  to  tie  up  the  aviation  industry  on 
the  Pacific  coast  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  the  same  Ralph  Dawson  and  the 
same  Ralph  Dawson  who  was  in  the  Salinas  fruit  pickers  strike. 


UN-AMKRICAN  rilOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8563 

The  record  reads  as  follows,  and  I  would  like  to  ask  the  witness  if 
lie  can  testify  as  to  certain  points  that  are  contained  in  tliis  record: 

F.  B.  I.  No.  729,803  file  dated  July  26,  1939.  First  entry,  arrested  San  Fran- 
cisco May  8,  1933,  for  violating  ordinance  S33,  used  alias  Ralph  E.  Olney. 
Second  entry,  arrested  Visalia  November  S,  1933,  strike  agitation  and  escaped 
from  peace  officer.  Sentenced  to  San  Quentin  for  3  years,  sentence  suspended 
on  condition  leave  State.  Used  alias  Kalpli  E.  Austin.  Third  entry,  arrested 
Los  Angeles  July  12,  1939,  assault  with  deadly  weapon.  Used  present  name  of 
Ralph  Dawson. 

Last  arrest  occurred  in  connection  with  California  Milling  Co.  case  on  Los 
Angeles  at  whicli  violence  occurred.  According  to  Russell  Parsons,  former 
assistant  district  attorney,  subject  is  Harry  Bridges'  right-hand  man.  He  has 
been  organizer  at  Seattle  for  the  C.  I.  O.  Druggist  Union  which  is  under 
Bridges'  domination  and  during  1939  was  organizer  for  the  International 
Longshoremen  and  Warehousemeii's  Associatlion.  Parsons  stated  that  on 
Bridges'  instructions  Communist  attorneys  Gallagher,  Wirin,  and  Johnson,  who 
represented  Dawson  on  last  arrest  iigreed  to  plead  all  other  defendants  guilty 
provided  indictment  against  Dawson  would  be  dropped.  Have  reviewed  file  in 
district  attorney's  office  on  subject. 

Regarding  arrest  in  Visalia  complaint  was  filed  charging  criminal  syndicalism, 
<'0unt  one,  alleged  Ralph  Au.stin  (Daw-son)  in  custody  of  ofiicers  J.  E.  Hill, 
deputy  sheriff  of  Tulare  County,  and  Constable  D.  O.  Howard,  did  willfully  and 
unlawfully  escape  custody  of  said  ofl5cers. 

Count  two  alleges  Ralph  Austin  (Daw\son)  on  or  about  October  10  did 
willfully  and  unlawfully  by  spoken  and  written  words  and  personal  conduct. 
Justify,  attempt  to  justify,  advocate,  teach,  and  aid  and  abet  criminal  syndical- 
ism and  the  duty,  necessity,  and  ijropriety  of  committing  crime,  sabotage,  vio- 
lence, and  unlawful  methods  of  terrorism  as  a  means  of  changing  industrial 
ownership  and  control  and  seeking  a  political  change.  Strike  at  Visalia  was  led 
hy  Pat  Chambers,  Lillian  Monroe,  and  Caroline  Decker,  all  well-known  Com- 
munists. 

Riot  was  precipitated  wherein  two  i^ersons  were  killed  when  subject  tried 
to  get  Communist  companions  to  come  and  take  him  away  from  the  policemen 
who  liad  arrested  him.  Austin  (Dawson)  pleaded  guilty  to  escape  and  applied 
for  probation.  Probation  was  granted,  sentence  suspended  for  3  years  under 
conditions  that  defendant  go  to  State  of  Washington  with  his  parents  to  reside 
during  period  of  probation  and  not  to  return  to  California  during  probation. 

Probation  Officer  C.  T.  Pools'  report  stated  Ralph  Olney  Austin  (Dawson) 
born  November  30,  1912,  Spokane,  Wash.,  parents  Ralph  ().  and  Elizabeth  Austin, 
7740  Thirty-third  Avenue  NW.,  Seattle.  Wash.  Came  to  San  Francisco  Septem- 
ber 1932,  studied  at  Shaeffer  Art  School  until  January  1933,  expelled  from  school 
because  of  Communist  ideas  after  being  warned.  Report  of  San  Francisco  pro- 
batiiMi  officer  states  Austin  (Dawson)  was  arrested  in  San  Francisco  for  preach- 
ing doctrine  of  communism  on  street  corners.     Fingerprints  and  picture  available. 

jNIr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Franklin,  do  you  know  Elmer  J.  Freitag? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes.  sir. 

Mr,  Starnks.  Who  is  Elmer  J.  Freitag? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  is  the  president  of  the  North  American  Air- 
craft, C.  I.  O. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Was  he  among  the  group  who  came  to  the  committee 
table  here  and  addressed  Congressman  Voorhis  after  the  committee 
had  recessed  the  morning  session  today? 

]Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  was  present  and  participated  in  a  demonstration, 
if  I  might  use  that  term  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes.  I  might  say  that  this  committee  opposed  his 
committee  at  North  American  and  did  everything  we  could  to  defeat 
him  without  disrupting  the  local  out  there.  We  couldn't  afford  to 
tear  the  whole  thing  apart,  but  we  did  everything  we  could  to  defeat 
him. 


3564  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Staenes.  Did  you  know  the  otliers  who  participated  in  this 
demonstration  this  morning-  ? 

Mr.  Fkanklin.  Just  Lew  Michener ;  I  didn't  know  the  young  fellow. 

Mr.  Starni  s.  Freitag  and  Lew  Michener  you  knew  '^ 

jNIr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  S.TARNES.  And  they  are  here  in  Washington  now? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  ])olitical  background 
or  record  of  Elmer  J.  Freitag* 

Mr.  Franklin.  When  he  said  he  w^ished  we  would  stop  the  gen- 
eralities and  get  down  to  ])ertinent  things  we  can  do  that  very  easily, 
because  Mr.  Freitag  is  a  former  registered  Communist  and  is  still  a 
party  member  and  it  is  common  knowledge  among  certain  groups 
in  the  North  American  Aircraft  plant  that  he  is,  and  that  he  refused 
to  allow  that  to  be  publicized  in  the  newspapers  because  that  would 
hurt  them  in  their  negotiations  with  the  management.  Otherwise 
Mr.  Freitag  would  be  exposed  and  would  not  be  in  the  position  as 
president  of  the  organization. 

Mv.  Starnes.  I  want  to  state  for  the  record  in  view  of  the  demon- 
stration that  he  made  and  his  conduct  during  the  recess  that  the 
committee  has  in  its  possession  a  telegram  from  Mr.  Stedman,  the 
investigator  on  the  Pacific  coast.  I  will  read  the  pertinent  portion 
of  it  with  reference  to  Mr.  Freitag.     It  says : 

Further  investigations  in  re  Elmer  J.  Freitag,  member  of  strike  committee  at 
Nortli  American  and  now  in  Wasliingtou  on  North  American  negotiations,  the 
committee's  further  investigation  reveals  that  according  to  record  of  W.  M.. 
Kerr,  registrar  of  voters,  Los  Angeles  County,  Freitag  registered  as  a  Communist 
voter  on  January  8,  1!)3S. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  that  discussion  which  took  place  after  the  ad- 
journment of  the  morning's  hearing,  did  you  hear  Congressman  Voor- 
his  ask  Freitag  if  he  had  ever  been  a  registered  Conmuinist  voter? 

Mr.  Frj\nklin.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  hear  his  reply  ? 

Mr,  Franklin.  Well,  he  said  something  about  "You  have  me,"  or 
something  like  that.  I  couldn't  recall  exactty  what  it  was — there  was 
so  much  milling  around  here,  and  I  was  being  shoved. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  hear  him  admit  it? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  didn't  deny  it. 

I  think  it  should  be  brought  out  in  regard  to  the  North  American 
situation  that  Mr.  Michener  and  other  people  like  him  back  there  do 
not  care  if  they  get  their  wage  increases.  In  fact,  they  would  rather 
not ;  and  the  other  fellow  who  was  saying  he  was  "a  good  American'* 
probably  is,  but  they  wnll  go  back  without  these  wage  increases  and 
there  will  be  dissatisfaction  at  the  North  American  Aircraft  plant 
which  wnll  further  the  work  of  the  Communists  in  recruiting  members ; 
it  will  make  bitterness  among  the  great  body  of  workers,  and  their 
purpose  will  be  accomplished.  So,  actually,  so  far  as  Mr.  Michener 
is  concerned,  it  is  a  gain  to  them,  and  every  situation  like  that  is  a 
gain  to  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  mean  that  is  the  considered  policy  of  the  Commu- 
nists in  the  labor  movement,  that  they  obtain  positions  of  power  and 
authority  in  certain  of  our  luiions  and  as  members  of  negotiating  com- 
mittees that  they  will  make  demands  and  take  positions  impossible  to 
meet  ? 


rX-A.MKKKAN    I'l{(  tTAvlANDA  ACTIVITIKS  8565 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starxes.  And  then  <2;o  back  to  create  further  dissatisfaction 
and  unrest  amon<r  the  workers  in  order  to  further  the  program  of  the 
party  in  recruitino-  members  for  the  Communist  Party  in  the  various 

unions  ( 

Mr.  Franklin.  Well,  a  study  of  negotiations  in  which  they  are  en- 
gaged will  reveal  them  invariably  doing  that.  They  bait  the  em- 
ployer into  an  unreasonable  attitude  if  everything  else  fails,  or  they 
tryto  make  some  demand  wliich  they  don't  think  will  be  met. 

'jNIr.  ^'o(,)RIIIs.  What  do  you  think" of  the  attitude  of  the  North  Amer- 
ican Aircraft  ? 

ISIr.  Franklin.  You  mean  in  regard  to  their  wages  and  things? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Yes. 

Mr.  Franklin.  I  think  their  demands  are  just.  I  think  they  should 
be  granted  it.  but  I  doubt  that  Mr.  Michener  wishes  them  to  be  granted. 
That  is  what  I  am  saying  to  you.  He  would  like  to  every  way 
hamper  the  negotiations  and  go  back  and  capitalize  on  the  dissatis- 
faction that  will  be  created  by  the  fact  they  are  not  granted. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Certainly;  and  the  fact  that  there  is  representation 
like  that  makes  it  more  difficult? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes.  naturally. 

]VIr.  VooRHis.  Makes  it  more  difficult  for  an  adjustment  to  be  made 
that  might  be  favorable  to  the  men,  isn't  that  true? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir.  That  is  an  example  of  their  psychology. 
That  little  fellow  there  will  probably  go  back  and  will  be  more  amen- 
able to  suggestions  that  he  cooperate  more  closely  with  the  Com- 
munists than  he  was  when  he  left  Los  Angeles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Allien  did  you  lirst  become  aware  of  the  problem 
of  communism  in  the  C.  I.  O.? 

Mr.  Franklin.  AVell,  I  was  engaged  in  a  political  campaign  in 
Los  Angeles.     I  was  manager 

Mr.  Matthews.  AYliat  year  was  that  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  1939.  I  was  managing  the  councilmanic  campaign 
of  a  candidate  and  I  was  contacted  by  a  man  who  said  he  was  Al 
Bryan.  He  said  he  was  the  director  of  the  educational — director,  I 
believe  it  was — educational  director  of  the  Communist  Party.  He 
otfei-ed  me  a  bunch  of  material  on  Evan  Lewis.  Evan  Lewis  had 
taken  an  antislum  clearing  stand  in  the  council  and  they  gave  me 
the  information  that  Evan  Lewis  owned  a  house  on  East  Twenty-fifth 
Street  which  rented  for  $15  a  month,  which  was  three  rooms  with  an 
earthen  floor — no  floor  at  all  in  one  room  and  no  running  water  and 
the  windows  were  patched  and  boarded  up.  He  collected  $15  a 
month  rent  for  this.     I  used  that  material  in  the  campaign. 

Another  fellow  came  out  named  George  Willet,  who  was  a  worker 
for  the  International  Labor  Defense. 

They  held  a  meeting  at  which  they  secured 

Mr.  ^r attiikws.  Did  Al  Bryan  tell  you  he  was  educational  director 
for  the  Conmumist  Party? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  And  then  vou  were  assigned  the  assistance  of 
George  Willet? 

]\Ii'.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  there  any  other  individuals  whom  you 
learned  to  be  Communists  who  were  engaged  in  that  campaign? 


3566  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Franklin.  Well,  tliey  held  a  meeting  at  Mrs.  Hendrika 
Beeks'  house.  She  is  a  Communist  Party  member.  Her  place  is  at 
145  East  Seventy-first  Street, 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  do  you  spell  Beeks? 

Mr.  Franklin.  B-e-e-k-s — Hendrika  Beeks. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  meeting  was  held  at  her  house  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  say  she  is  a  Communist  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  do  you  know  she  is  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Franklin.  She  is  a  registered  Communist — makes  no  secret 
of  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  the  meeting  at  Mrs.  Beeks'  house,  were  you  in 
attendance? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  meet  William  L.  Elconin  at  her  home  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes;  he  was  an  organizer  for  the  State,  County,  and 
Municipal  Workers  of  America,  and  said  that  he  could  obtain  the  en- 
dorsement of  that  organization  for  this  candidate. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  related  to  Mrs.  Beeks  in  any  way? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  was  her  son-in-law. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  meet  Betty  Martin  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthewis.  On  that  occasion  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  who  is  Betty  Martin  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  She  was  a  woman  who  was  sent  out  here  from 
Detroit,  she  said,  "to  unite  the  progressive  forces  under  the  leadership 
of  the  Communist  Party,"  I  believe  the  expression  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  meet  Don  Healy  ? 

Mr,  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  is  Don  Healy? 

Mr.  Franklin.  At  that  time  he  was  a  Los  Angeles  head  of  Labors' 
Non-Partisan  League.     He  is  now  head  of  the  Construction  Workers, 

C.  I.  o. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  meet  Adele  Young? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes.  She  is  a  colored  woman  working  for  the 
National  Negro  Congress. 

Mr.  jNIatthews.  Did  you  meet  Hans  Hansen? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Hans'  Hansen?  Yes;  he  is  the  financial  secretary 
for  Local  1500.  He  is  still  the  A.  F.  of  L.  Carpenters'  Union 
secretary. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  meet  Pereboon? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes ;  but  he  is  not  a  Communist. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  is  not  a  Communist  ? 

Mr.  Franklin,  No  ;  he  was  there  with  me. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Where  did  these  people  meet  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  It  was  at  a  meeting  where  they  guaranteed  they 
would  get  the  various  union  endorsements  for  the  candidate. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  candidate? 

Mr.  Franklin.  The  councilmanic  campaign — I  was  managing  a 
candidate  for  the  council — his  name  was  Robert  Hyde. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  with  the  exception  of  Pereboon,  whom  you 
say  was  not  a  Communist • 


UN-AMERICAN  PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8567 

Mr.  Franklin.  No;  he  was  there  with  me. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  the  other  persons  named — Bryan,  Willet, 
Beeks,  Elconin,  Martin,  Healy,  Young,  and  Hansen  identified  by  you 
as  Comnuuiists'^ 

Mr.  Fk AN  KLIN.  I  was  given  to  understand  that  they  were  by  George 

Willet. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now.  was  this  your  first  discovery  in  an  emphatic 
way  of  the  problem  of  Communist  penetration 

Air.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  JNIatthews.  Into  the  trade-union  picture  in  California  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes;  it  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  elaborate  why  it  was  that  you  gained  that 
impression  at  that  particular  time? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Well,  through  their  conversation  and  through  the 
fact  that  George  Willet  detailed  to  me  that  himself — he  told  me  that 
those  people  were  Communist  members  along  with  others.  He  at  that 
time  was  explaining  to  me  the  power  and  influence  of  the  Communist 
Party  and  how  they  were  gaining  ground  on  all  fronts. 

He  was  working  for  the  International  Labor  Defense  and  was  fur- 
thering the  other  interests  of  the  party. 

]\Ir.  aIattiiews.  Have  you  ever  discussed  the  Communist  Party  with 
AVilliam  Elconin? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  Elconin's  position  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  is  an  organizer  for  the  United  Electrical,  Radio, 
and  Machine  Workers  of  America. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  at  the  present 
time  engaged  in  any  strike  activities  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  was  lately,  but  the  strike  is  settled.  It  was  at 
the  Columbia  recording  plant. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  connection  with  your  discussions  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  with  Mr.  Elconin,  what  did  he  tell  you  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  told  me  when  he  was  editor  of  the  school  paper 
at  the  California  Institute  of  Technology,  that  he  joined  the  Com- 
munist Party  because  he  believes  in  their  objectives,  or  something  to 
t  hat  effect,  t  don't  recall  the  exact  words.  It  was  quite  a  conversation ; 
but  he  did  admit  to  me  that  he  was  a  Communist. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  been  at  any  Communist  Party  meet- 
ings with  Slim  Connolly  or  where  he  was  present? 

Mr.  Franklin.  I  was  not  at  a  Communist  Party  meeting  but  I  was 
at  a  meeting  held  under  the  auspices  of  the  Communist  Party,  which 
was  by  invitation.  They  called  it — they  sent  out  cards  and  incidentally 
I  have  one  of  the  cards — at  which  he  spoke  and  he  spoke  as  a  repre- 
sentative of  the  News  Guild,  I  believe,  the  Los  Angeles  News  Guild. 

Mr.  Matthews.  American  Newspaper  Guild  of  Los  Angeles  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  was  that  meeting? 

Mr.  Franklin.  That  was  shortly  after  this  election  in  1939 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  April  of  1939? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  did  Connolly  have  to  say  at  that  meeting,  do 
you  recall? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes;  he  just  discussed  the  necessity  for  lining 
up  wliat  he  termed  "the  reactionary  advertising  sheets  of  the  dis- 


8568  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

trict"  and  to  the  Xews  Guild  problems  that  confronted  the  union  in 
its  org-jinizing  activities. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  the  persons  Avho  were  in  charge 
of  the  meeting^ 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes:  there  were  several  of  them  in  charge  of  the 
meeting.  Betty  Martin  was  the  chairman  and  there  were  the  usual 
group  of  Communists  in  the  south  end  of  Los  Angeles  who  were 
present. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  George  Willet  is  a  paid 
woi'ker  for  the  International  Labor  Defense? 

^Ir.  Franklin.  He  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  did  he  tell  you  that  he  was  a  registered 
Communist  for  a  number  of  years? 

Mr.  Franklin.  He  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  what  position  Adele  Young  holds 
in  the  Comnuuiist  Party,  if  any? 

Mr.  Franklin.  I  know  that  she  is  a  registered  Comnmnist.  I 
don't  know  what  position  she  holds.  The  last  that  I  heard  she  was 
in  the  book  store — this  was  about  3  months  ago,  somewhere  down 
on  Spring  Street.  She  was  working  in  the  book  store.  They  had 
a  picture  of  her  in  the  People's  World. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  Betty  Martin  introduced  Slim  Connolly 
at  the  meeting,  do  you  recall  how  she  introduced  him? 

Mr.  Franklin.  She  introduced  him  as  a  member  of  the  News 
Guild. 

Mr.  ]VL\TTHEws.  Were  you  asked  to  join  the  Communist  Party  at 
that  meeting? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  anybody  with  you  when  you  were  asked  to 
join  the  Connnunist  Party? 

Mr.  Franklin.  My  wife  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  was  it  asked  you  to  join? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Willet,  George  Willet. 

Mr.  Matthews.  George  Willet  asked  you  to  join? 

Mr,  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  your  wife  asked  to  join  also? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  the  names  of  any  other  persons  who 
were  present  at  the  meeting? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Well,  they  would  be  almost  too  numerous  to  men- 
tion.    They  were  the  usual  group  of  Communists  who  were  there. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Where  was  this  meeting  held  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  On  East  AYashington  Boulevard  at  the  home  of 
Adele  Young,  She  had  a  big  room  in  the  back  there  rigged  out 
kind  of  like  a  liall.  It  was  not  a  regular  Communist  Party  meet- 
ing, you  understand.  They  termed  it  "an  educational  meeting  under 
the  ausj)ices  of  the  Communist  Party  of  Los  Angeles."  It  was  some- 
thing like  that.     I  have  the  card  but  neglected  to  bring  it. 

Mr,  VooRHis.  How  did  you  happen  to  go? 

Mr.  Franklin.  They  invited  me.  There  were  several  people  there 
who  were  not  Communists.  At  that  time  it  was  their  practice — they 
were  "constructing  a  united  front"  with  which  you  are  no  doubt  well 
familiar  because  they  considered  you  one  of  their  leading  spirits  in 


rX-AMEKICAN   I'lUHWOANDA  AC'lIVlllES  8569 

that  "united  l"i-(»iit."'  ami  roiiiully  coiuU'iiined  you  as  a  traitor  to  the 
cause  when  you  joined  tliis  committee  and  failed  to  save  their  skins, 
so  to  speak. 

Mr.  VdOKiiis.  Yes;  I  know. 

Mr.  ^Iatthkws.  What  was  your  reaction  to  the  invitation  to  join 
the  Connnunist  Party? 

Mr.  FitANKLiN.  "Well,  I  had  no  intention  of  joining  the  Communist 
Pariy.  I  merely  went  to  the  meeting-  to  sort  of  get  accjuainted  and 
see  what  I  could  see  and  I  was  cni-ious. 

At  that  time  I  held  a  dilferent  outlook  altogether  concerning  the 
])urposes  of  the  Connnunist  Party  than  I  ch)  now.  I  didn't  think 
that  they  were  as  harmful  as  they  are,  as  I  think,  now.  I  didn't  con- 
sider them  any  meance.  I  merely  considered  them  as,  w'ell,  you  might 
say  "crackpots,"  that  is  all. 

Mr.  IMa'itiiews.  Did  the  party  members  consider  you  friendly 
toward  them  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Fkaxklix.  Well,  I  believe  that  they  must  have  or  they  wouldn't 
liave  invited  me  to  their  meeting. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  What  prom})ts  you  to  appear  before  this  committee 
voluntaril}^  and  offer  testimony  concerning  Conmmnist  penetration 
into  the  labor  movement  in  California  ? 

Mr.  Franklin.  Well,  the  fact  that  I  think  that  if  it  wasn't  for  the 
present  international  situation  I  believe  that  the  Commtmists,  because 
of  their  zeal  and  their  capabilities — that  is  their  leaders,  w^ould  have 
gained  complete  control  of  the  United  States  through  their  labor 
organizations. 

That  sounds  rather  far-fetched  but  their  progress  is  amazing  within 
the  labor  unions  and  the  way  they  are  winning  the  goodvvill  of  thv^ 
working  people  and  winning  the  cooperation  of  the  indifferent  people, 
people  who  are  indifferent  to  all  causes,  is  amazing,  but  the  interna- 
tional situation  has  brought  a  surge  of  patriotism  to  the  average 
working  person  and  now  is  an  excellent  opportunity  to  rid  the  labor 
movement  of  all  of  those  influences  which  are  detrimental  to  its  wel- 
fare, and  that  includes  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  have  no  more  questions,  Mr,  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Voorhis? 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  Xo;  I  don't  believe  I  have  any  questions, 

Mr.  Starxes.  Mr,  Mason  ? 

Mr.  Masox.  Xo  C{uestions. 

Mr,  Starxes.  Thank  you  very  much,  Mr.  Franklin. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  witness  is  Mr.  Bailey. 

TESTIMONY  OF    FRED  E.  BAILEY,  LOS  ANGELES,  CALIF. 

Mr.  Starxes.  W\\[  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand,  Mr. 
Bailey?  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall  give 
before  this  couunittee  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing 
but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

]\rr.  Bailey.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Bailey,  will  you  please  give  .your  full  name? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Fred  E.  Bailey. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Where  do  you  live? 

Mr.  Bailey.  At  20-26  East  Fourth  Street,  Los  Angeles,  Calif. 


3570  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews,  Are  you  an  American  citizen  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVliere  were  yon  born? 

Mr.  Baii^y.  Chester,  Pa. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When? 

Mr.  Bailey.  November  6,  1898. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  served  in  the  armed  forces  of  the 
United  States? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  have ;  from  1917  to  1920. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  in  the  World  War  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  division  of  the  service? 

Mr.  Bailey.  In  tlie  Twenty-eio;hth  Division. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  your  present  occupation  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  At  present  I  am  workinji  in  San  Diejro  as  an  inspector 
for  Government  housinc;  for  the  McNeal-Zoss  Construction  Co. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  been  a  member  of  the  United  Auto- 
mobile Workers  of  America? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  have.  I  still  am  a  member.  I  have  been  on  strike 
at  the  Ford  plant  for  3  years.  I  still  carry  a  card  in  the  United  Auto- 
mobile Workers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Which  Ford  plant  is  that? 

Mr.  Bailey.  In  Long  Beach. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Long  Beach,  Calif.? 

Mr.  Bailey.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  have  been  on  strike  there  for  3  years? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Over  3  years.     It  was  3  years  last  April. 

Mr.  Matthews.  During  the  Ford  strike  did  you  meet  Lew  Michener  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  Communist  Party 
meetings  that  were  held  in  conjunction  with  that  strike  at  the  Ford 
plant  in  Long  Beach  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes,  sir;  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  detail  what  you  know  about  them  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Well,  the  latter  part  of  1938  I  was  invited  to  threee 
of  those  meetings.  These  meetings  were  to  be  held  to  discuss  a  re- 
lief set-up  of  all  the  unions  on  the  west  coast.  It  was  to  grow  until 
it  included  the  entire  west  coast  and  was  to  be  started  with  the 
United  Automobile  Workers  in  Los  Angeles  County. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  were  you  notified  to  attend  these  meetings? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  was  notified  through  the  secretary,  the  recording 
secretary  of  my  local. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  was  he  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Paul  Harvey. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  how  did  you  know  these  were  Communist 
meetings  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Well,  I  knew  after  I  got  there  when  I  saw  who  the 
leaders  were,  that  it  was  a  Communist  meeting. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Was  there  any  Communist  literature  sold  or  dis- 
tributed ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes ;  it  was  sold  and  given  away  to  strikers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  to  be  vouched  for  before  you  were 
permitted  to  enter  the  meeting? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes. 


UX-AMEUICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8571 

Mr.  jMattiiews.  Do  you  recall  who  vouched  for  you  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Well,  those  who  brought  guests  along  vouched  for 

them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  acted  as  chairman  of  the  meeting? 

Mr.  llMLEY.  Bill  Lyons. 

]Mr.  ^Iatthews.  L-y-o-n-s? 

Mr,  Bailey.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  ]^Iatthews.  Do  you  know  who  Lyons  is? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Lyons  is  an  organizer  for  the  Communist  Party  in 
Los  Angeles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  that  time  what  was  he? 

Mr.  Bailey.  At  that  time  he  was  a  member  of  a  local  in  Los 
Angeles.  I  just  don't  recall  the  number  of  that  local  but  I  think  it 
was  188. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  at  any  of  these  meetings — you  say  there  were 
three  of  them  that  you  attended,  I  believe? 

]Mr.  Bailey.  Yes;  I  attended  three  of  them. 

3klr.  ]VL\TTnEWS.  At  any  of  these  meetings  was  Lew  Michener 
present  ? 

Jklr.  Badley.  Yes;  he  was  present  at  the  one  we  had  in  Bell.  I 
don't  know  just  where  it  was  held  in  Bell  or  at  whose  home  it  was 
held  but  it  was  held  at  the  home  of  a  Communist. 

Mr.  Matthews.  '\Yliat  part  did  Michener  take  in  the  meeting? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Michener  took  the  part  of  organizing  this  relief  set- 
up. The  purpose  was  to  influence  the  State  relief  in  such  a  way 
as  to  bring  enough  pressure  up  on  them  that  benefits  could  be  gotten 
by  strikers  without  all  that  red  tape  that  you  have  to  go  through. 
In  other  words,  if  there  was  a  strike,  a  big  strike,  proper  relief  would 
be  given  to  strikers  so  that  they  wouldn't  have  to  go  out  and  look 
for  other  jobs — ^they  could  put  more  time  on  a  demonstration. 

Mr.  ]Matthews.  Do  you  know  Scotty  Orr? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  do. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  Was  Scotty  Orr  at  any  of  these  meetings? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes;  he  was  there  too. 

Mr.  IVLvtthews.  Will  you  please  identify  Scotty  Orr? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Scotty  Orr  is  a  Scotchman  with  black  hair,  about  5 
feet  1  or  2  inches,  and  weighs  about  170  pounds. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  does  he  do? 

Mr.  Bailey.  He  is  an  organizer  for  the  aircraft  industi'y  around 
Los  Angeles. 

Mr.  ISL^TTHEws.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  Communist? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Xo;  I  don't  know  for  sure.  I  heard  one  time — I 
inquired  about  it  antl  they  said  that  ''he  was  too  hot"  and  that  the 
Communist  Party  didn't  want  him.  That  was  in  1938.  They  didn't 
want  him  on  account  of  his  Masonic  affiliations.  They  were  afraid 
of  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  did  he  participate  in  any  of  these  meetings? 

]Mr.  Bailey.  How  is  that? 

Mr.  ]\Latthews.  Did  he  participate  in  any  of  these  meetings? 

Mr.  Bailey,  Yes;  he  did.  He  talked  on  the  organization  of  the 
aircraft  industry.  The  aircraft  industry  was  discussed  very  much  at 
that  time. 

ISIr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Ralph  Reed? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes;  I  do. 


3572  UN-AMERICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  do  yoii  know  about  him  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Ralph  Reed  is  a  member  of  my  local  and  he  was  one 
of  those  that  was  invited ;  but  they  never  invited  him  anymore  because 
he  talked  too  much. 

Mr.  jNIatthews.  Do  you  know  Dell  Compton? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes,  sir;  I  know  Dell  Compton.  He  admits  that  he 
is  a  Communist. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  present  at  any  of  these  meetino;s? 

Mr.  Bailey.  He  was  present,  him  and  his  wife  both.  His  wife  is 
very  active  among  the  women  of  the  auxiliaries  in  the  United  Auto- 
mobile Workers. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Just  a  minute.  We  are  talking  about  these  meet- 
ings— just  exactly  what  were  these  meetings? 

Mr.  Bailey.  These  meetings  were  invitational  affairs. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Yes. 

Mr.  Bailey.  And  you  were  invited  to  attend  these  meetings? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  By  whom? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Well,  I  was  always  invited  by  m}?^  secretary. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  By  "your  secretary"? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes;  the  secretary  of  my  local. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Paul  Harvey? 

Mr.  Bailey.  They  tried  very  hard  to  alw^ays  get  a  foot  in  these 
locals. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Bv  getting  the  recordino-  secretary?  That  is  the 
policy  of  the  Communist  Party — if  they  can  get  a  hold  of  the  record- 
ing secretary,  they  have  got  an  entry. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  But  how  did  they  happen  to  invite  you  to  the  meeting? 

Mr.  Bailey.  They  wanted  me  to  attend  those  meetings  and  to  take 
over  the  relief  set-up  that  they  were  going  to  set  up. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Were  you  an  official  of  the  union  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes,  sir;  I  was.  I  was  secretary — chairman  of  the 
relief  committee. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  You  were  chairman  of  the  relief  committee  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes;  chairman  of  the  relief  committee,  and  I  had  very 
good  success  Avith  the  relief  organization  in  Los  Angeles  County, 'in 
getting  relief  for  the  strikers  of  my  own  union;  and  because  of  that 
Michener  wanted  me  to  take  over  the  whole  relief  committee  of  all  the 
locals  in  Los  Angeles  County  and  later  on  to  take  over  the  west  coast. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  sav  it  was  Michener  who  wanted  you  to  do 
that? 

Mr.  Bailey.  That  is  right.  Michener  talked  to  me  that  night  about 
it,  and  he  talked  to  me  about  it  in  the  office. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  Sam  Miller  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes;  I  am  not  so  well  acquainted  with  him,  but  I  know 
who  he  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  is  Sam  Miller? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Sam  Miller  was  secretary  of  the  Willys-Overland  local. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  at  these  meetings? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes;  he  was  at  that  one  in  Bell. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  one  at  Bell— B-e-1-1? 

Mr.  Bailey.  That  is  the  one.  The  other  two  meetings  were  not  so 
important.    I  only  stayed  about  a  half  hour  and  then  we  were  told  to 


UX-AAIEUK'A.N    rU()rA(;AM>A  ACTIVITIES  8573 

«r()  and  those  that  were  invited  there  left  and  the  meeting  continued 
■\vitlu)Ul  us. 

Mr.  Ma'itiiews.  Now,  was  the  Workers  Alliance  brought  into  the 
discussion  at  any  of  these  meetings? 

Mr.  H.Mi.KY.  The  Workers  Alliance  was  always  brought  in  wherever 
the  relief  situation  was  discussed. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  say  that  you  w^ere  successful  in  obtaining  re- 
lief for  men  on  strike.  Would  you  obtain  that  relief  through  the 
Workers  Alliance? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  did  at  first;  yes.  I  gained  a  lot  of  information  from 
the  Workei-s  Alliance — a  complete  picture  of  the  relief  set-up  in 
southein  California.  I  knew  who  I  could  go  to  see  in  each  one  of  these 
distiicts.  The  Workers  Alliance  had  employees  working  for  the  State 
i-elief  administration  that  helped  the  AVorkers  Alliance  to  get  relief 
for  their  members,  and  I  took  advantage  of  that  to  the  extent  that  I  had 
the  same  success  in  getting  them  on. 

Mr.  VooRiris.  What  employees  of  the  State  relief  administration 
were  doing  that  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  The  Workers'  Alliance  had  members  working  in  the 
State  relief  administration — in  the  offices. 

Mr.  Starxes.  When  was  that  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  In  1938  and  1939. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Do  you  know  who  was  personal  manager  of  the  State 
relief  administration  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Bailey.  No  ;  I  don't. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Do  you  know  whether  it  is  the  same  person  that  is 
manager  of  it  now? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  don't  know  who  it  is. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  think,  Mr.  Chairman,  it  is  only  fair  to  state  that  at 
that  time  there  was  a  very  different  regime  in  the  State  relief  admin- 
istration than  there  is  today, 

Mr.  Bailey.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  VnoRHis.   You  say  that  w\as  in  the  beginning  of  1938  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  The  latter  part  of  1938. 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  That  is  right,  the  latter  part  of  1938.  I  am  quite  cer- 
tain that  William  Plunkett  was  personnel  director  of  the  State  relief 
administration  at  that  time.  He  was  later  dismissed  by  the  Governor, 
and  I  don't  think  you  will  find  any  such  situation  existing  there  now. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  your  contacts  with  the  State  office  or  with  the 
Los  Angeles  office  or  other  local  offices? 

Mr.  Bailey.  My  contact  was  made  with  Mr.  Heckt  in  the  State  relief 
administration  at  Los  Angeles. 

Mi-.  Matthews.  How  do  you  spell  that  ? 

:Mr.  Bailey.  H-e-c-k-t.     But  I  never  got  very  far  with  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  was  it  your  understanding  that  because  you 
were  chairman  f)f  the  relief  committee  in  the  striking  local  of  the  U.  A. 
W..  and  because  you  had  had  some  success  in  obtaining  relief  for 
strdvei-s.  that  the  Communists  wished  to  use  you  in  a  general  relief  or- 
ganization which  they  were  going  to  set  up? 

Mr.  Bailey.  That  is  right— that  is  what  Mr.  Michener  told  me. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  Did  he  tell  you  that  the  Communists  were  involved 
in  this  in  any  way? 


3574  UX-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Bailey.  Oh,  no ;  not  the  Communists,  no ;  but  he  told  me  through 
my  acquaintance  with  the  relief  set-up  and  what  I  had  done  for  my 
local  that  he  wanted  to  place  me  in  that  position. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  are  you  acquainted  with  the  way  in  which  the 
Communists  functioned  in  the  strike  at  your  local  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes ;  I  am, 

Mr.  Matfhews.  Will  you  describe  that  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  As  far  as  my  local  is  concerned  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

Mr.  Bailey.  When  we  went  on  strike  we  went  on  strike  on  a 
Friday  and  the  following  Monday  we  had  a  representative  from  the 
harbor  district  of  the  Communist  Party,  Loretta  Adams,  and  Mrs. 
Adams  offered  us  all  available  assistance  that  we  needed.  They 
provided  an  ambulance  to  carry  away  strikers  that  were — that  should 
happen  to  get  hurt  in  any  fights,  and  we  had  a  representative  of  the 
I.  L.  D.  who  called  there  and  gave  us  cards  as  to  what  to  do  in  case 
of  arrest — in  case  we  got  caught  working  somebody  over  or  over- 
turning a  car  or  something  like  that — the  things  that  go  with  a 
strike. 

This  card  gave  us  information  as  to  what  to  do, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  of  any  other  way  in  which  the  Com- 
munists functioned  in  your  strike? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes;  they  helped  us  to  set  up  a  restaurant  to  feed  the 
strikers  that  worked  on  the  picket  line;  they  sponsored  a  couple  of 
dances  to  provide  funds  for  the  strikers 

Mr.  Staenes.  Can  you  give  us  information  or  can  you  confirm  the 
information  given  to  us  under  oath  by  Mr.  Inzer  and  by  Mr.  Franklin, 
to  the  effect  that  at  the  present  time  the  Communists  are  quite  active 
in  the  coast  area  out  there  in  an  effort  to  promote  discord  and  strife 
and  dissatisfaction;  produce  slow-downs  and  stoppages  of  construc- 
tion work  in  the  airplane  industry,  because  of  its  effect  on  the  na- 
tional-defense program  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  No  ;  I  can't,  I  ceased  my  activities  with  my  own  local 
in  November  of  1939.    I  went  broke  and  I  had  to  go  to  work. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Where  have  you  worked  since  then? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  have  been  working  on  the  W.  P.  A.  for  awhile  and  in 
the  latter  part  of  1940  I  went  to  work  with  the  McNeal  Construction 
Co.,  at  Long  Beach,  and  then  I  went  to  San  Diego  on  a  big  job  there; 
but  I  haven't  attended  any  meetings  of  my  local. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  would  like  to  ask  a  couple  of  questions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Certainly. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Is  that  local  still  on  strike  at  the  Ford  plant  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Still  out  on  strike ;  yes,  sir, 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  the  plant  is  operating,  is  it  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  Yes,  sir ;  it  is. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  In  other  words,  in  practical  effect  the  strike  has  been 
lost? 

Mr.  Bailey.  I  wouldn't  say  that  that  strike  is  lost — ^that  strike  is 
not  lost. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  You  don't  think  it  is  ? 

Mr.  Bailey.  No;  because  we  have  a  decision  handed  down  by  the 
Labor  Board  and  upheld  by  the  appellate  court.  He  has  been  ordered 
to  reinstate  all  the  strikers  and  pay  them  back  wages. 


UX-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8575 

yiv.  VooKHis.  But  he  hasn't  done  it? 

Mr.  Bailey.  No. 

Mr.  Vooinns.  How  hnifj  afjo  was  ho  ordered  to  do  that? 

Mr.  Bailey.  We  irot  tlie  first  order  about  2  years  a<>o  and  then  just 
about  6  months  atro  it  was  uphekl  by  the  higher  court. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Do  you  think  conchict  like  that  plays  into  tlie  hands  of 
the  Conununists  in  the  labor  movement? 

Mr.  Bailey.  It  certainly  does. 

Mr.  VooRHTS.  I  mean  action  like  that  on  the  part  of  an  employer. 

Mr.  Bailey.  It  certainly  helps  the  Connnunist  movement  a  lot  be- 
cause they  just  seem  to  <2;et  in  when  you  are  at  your  lowest. 

yiv.  VooRHis.  I  think  so,  too. 

Mr.  Bailey.  That  is  why  they  center  so  mnch  of  their  activity  on 
the  Workers  Alliance.  They  use  that  very,  very  mnch  because  they 
jret  in  and  g:et  a  hold  of  a  man  when  he  is  down — he  is  hunory  and  he 
can't  <2:et  a  job.  Then  is  when  they  breed  the  connnunistic  idea  into 
his  head  and  that  is  why  they  wanted  me  on  this  relief  committee, 
because  I  knew  what  those  fellows  were  up  against. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Thank  you  very  much,  Mr.  Bailey. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  witness  is  Mr.  Crozier. 

TESTIMONY  OF  OSCAR  C.  CROZIER,  SAN  GABRIEL,  CALIF. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Mr.  Crozier.  will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your 
right  hand  ?  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall  give 
before  this  committee  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing 
but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  give  us  your  full  name? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Oscar  C.  Crozier. 

Mr.  Matfhews.  Wliere  do  you  live  ? 

]Mr.  Crozier.  San  Gabriel. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  an  American  citizen  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A^Hiere  were  you  born? 

Mr.  Crozier.  In  Logansport,  Ind. 

Mr.  Matthews.  WTien? 

Mr.  Crozier.  In  December  1895. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  have  you  lived  in  California? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Been  in  California  since  1930. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Have  you  been  a  member  of  any  trade  union  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  your  background  in  the  trade 
imion  movement? 

Mr.  Crozier.  In  1937,  in  March,  they  started  to  organize  the  Stude- 
baker  Pacific  Corporation,  an  assembly  plant  for  automobiles,  in 
which  plant  I  was  employed  and  in  that  plant  I  was  instrumental  in 
organizing  the  U.  A.  W.-C.  I.  O.,  and  was  elected  the  first  temporary 
chairman. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  belong  to  any  union  before  that  time? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes;  I  had  belonged  to  the  International  Theatrical, 
Stage  Employees  and  Moving  Picture  Operators. 

026:i6 — 11— voL  14 27 


g576  UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  working  at  the  time  you  belonged 
to  that  union  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  was  working  in  a  theater  in  Logansport,  Ind. 

Mr.  Mati'hews.  Have  you  ever  worked  for  the  Pennsylvania  Rail- 
road Co.? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  For  the  Humes  Refining  Co.  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  now  you  are  employed  at  the  Studebaker 
Pacific  Corporation? 

Mr.  Crozier.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  California? 

Mr.  Crozier.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  the  Studebaker  Pacific  Corporation? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Studebaker  Pacific  Corporation;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  kind  of  work  do  you  do  there? 

Mr.  Crozier.  They  are  engaged  in  the  assembly  of  Studebaker 
automobiles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  are  a  member  of  the  IT.  A.  W.  local  at 
that  plant? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  the  number  of  the  local  at  that  plant? 

]yir.  Crozier.  Local  255. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  have  you  been  a  member  of  that  union  ? 

ISIr.  Crozier.  Since  March  of  1937. 

Mr.  jMatthews.  Did  you  organize  that  local? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  was  instrumental  in  organizing  it,  and  practically 
organized  it  alone  by  myself. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Bill  Lyons  have  anything  to  do  with  that 
local  at  the  time  of  its  inception? 

Mr.  Crozifj?.  Yes,  sir;  Bill  Lyons  conducted  the  meetings  which 
were  called — the  mass  meetings  which  were  called  for  the  organiza- 
tional drive  in  that  ])lant. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  do  you  know  about  Bill  Lyons  and  his  con- 
nections, if  anything? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Will  you  repeat  that  question? 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  do  you  know  about  Bill  Lyons  and  his  con- 
nections, if  anytliing? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Connections  with  what? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Any  organizations. 

Mr.  Crozier.  He  was  at  that  time  acting  in  the  capacity  of  an 
organizer  for  the  IT.  A.  W.  due  to  the  fact  that  they  were  short  of 
paid  organizers.  He  was  not  a  paid  organizer  but  he  was  always 
an  active  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  how  do  you  know  he  was  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Because  he  has  stated  to  me  that  he  was  a  member  of 
the  Connnunist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  hold  any  position  in  Local  255  after  its 
organization  in  1937? 

]Mr.  Crozier.  I  did.  I  was  elected  the  first  temporary  chairman 
and  the  first  ]:)ermanent  chairman  and  the  second  chief  shop  steward, 
and  then  again  elected  ])resident. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8577 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Have  you  been  in  effect  president  of  the  local  three 
times  ? 

Mr.  Ckozier.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  any  official  position  in  the  local  at 
the  ])resent  time? 

Mr.  CnoziEK.  Xone  whatsoever. 

!Mr.  MA'rrHEws.  Durino;  the  period  when  you  were  an  official  of 
Local  255.  were  you  a  delei>-ate  to  the  Los  Angeles  Industrial  Union 
Council  ^ 

Mr.  Crozier.  At  various,  different  times. 

ISfr.  Matthews,  Did  you  ever  discuss  the  question  of  Communist 
activities  on  the  floor  of  the  Los  Anjxeles  Industrial  Trade  Uniuii 
Council  ? 

Mr.  Crozter,  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  take  any  particular  position  with  reference 
to  the  affiliation  of  your  own  local  with  the  Los  Angeles  Industrial 
Union  Council 't 

]SIr.  Crozier.  Yes,  sir;  I  did.  In  1938  I  recommended  to  my  local 
union  that  they  withdraw  from  the  council  due  to  the  fact  that  we 
were  not  receiving  any  interest  or  any  goodwill  out  of  the  council 
and  that  it  was.  in  my  opinion,  communistically  controlled. 

Mv.  ]NL\TTHEWS.  What  action  did  your  local  take  on  your  proposal  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  They  withdrew  from  the  council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Your  own  Local  255  withdrew  from  the  Los  Angeles 
Industrial  Union  Council? 

Mr.  Crozier.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  the  ground  that  you  were  deriving  no  particular 
benefit  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  And  that  you  considered  the  Los  Angeles  Indus- 
trial Union  Council  Communist  controlled? 

Mr.  Crozier.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Local  255  is  at  present 
affiliated  with  the  Los  Angeles  Industrial  Union  Council? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes;  we  reaffilialod  with  the  council. 

^Ir.  Matthews.  When  was  that? 

Mr.  Crozier.  That  was  about  6  montlis  ago,  now. 

Mr.  Matthews.  About  6  months  ago  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes. 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  At  the  time  you  withdrew  didn't  a  good  many  of  the 
unions  withdraM"  from  it  also? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Well.  I  can't  say  as  to  that.  There  were  some  with- 
drawals from  it,  yes. 

^Ir.  ]\Iatthews.  Now,  while  you  were  president  of  Local  255,  did 
you  come  in  contact  with  Lew  Michener? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes. 

Mr.  ISIatthews.  What  position  did  he  hold  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Crozier.  He  wna  the  regional  director. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  meet  with  him  frequently  with  I'egard  to 
union  matters? 

^Ir.  Crozier.  Well.  I  might  say  I  possibly  should  have  met  vvith  him 
more  than  I  did  in  regaixl  to  union  matters,  but  due  to  his  affiliations 
and  liis  bedfellows,  my  local  and  myself  stayed  away  from  him. 


8578  UN-A]\IERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  do  you  mean  by  "bedfellows" '? 

Mr.  Ceozier.  Well,  members  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Mattpiews,  What  do  you  know  about  his  associations  with 
members  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Well,  I  might  say  this,  "birds  of  a  feather  flock  to 
gethei","  and  that  is  where  I  got  my  opinion  of  Lew  Michener  and 
the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  think  it  would  be  best  for  you  to  be  more  specific 
about  that.  You  just  say,  "birds  of  a  feather  flock  together,"  and 
that  is  why  you  think  it.     Now,  I  think  you  should  explain  that. 

Mr.  Crozier.  Well,  I  might  explain  it  in  this  way,  which  I  think 
further  down  in  the  testimony  it  will  be  brought  out  definitely,  as 
to  why  I  connect  Lew  Michener  with  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  All  right,  I  will  wait  until  that  testimony  comes  in. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  at  any  time  find  Lew  Michener  in 
company  with  Sam  Miller,  Bill  Lyons,  and  Nick  Ripan? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes;  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  First,  will  you  state  what  you  know  about  Sam 
Miller  and  Bill  Lyons  and  Nick  Ripan  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Bill  Lyons  definitely  told  me  he  was  a  member  of 
the  Conmiunist  Party  and  he  was  a  known  organizer  for  the  Com- 
munist Party.  Sam  Miller,  who  is  a  member  of  Local  215,  is  or  was 
an  instructor  for  the  Communist  Party  in  Highland  Park. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  he  taught  in  a  Communist  Party  work- 
ers' school? 

Mr.  Crozier.  No  ;  I  have  to  say  it  this  way :  That  they  stayed 
completely  away  from  me  due  to  the  fact  that  way  back  in  1938  I 
took  the  stand  definitely  against  them  and  we  have  been  very  for- 
tunate to  keep  the  Communists  out  of  Local  255. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  do  you  know  about  Nick  Ripan? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Nick  Ripan.  or  Bill  Ripan,  definitely  resigned  as  a 
board  member  of  the  Disti-ict  Auto  Council  due  to  the  fact  that  he 
had  to  devote  his  time  to  Communist  organizing. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  now,  will  you  describe  the  incident  where 
you  found  Michener  in  the  company  of  Miller,  Lyons,  and  Ripan  ? 

^Ir.  Crozier.  Yes.  It  was  in  the  Currier  Building,  212  AVest  Third 
Street.  I  was  called  to  a  conference  in  room  409  of  that  building. 
When  I  got  off  the  elevator  you  have  to  go  past  the  regional  office 
and  in  the  corner  outside  of  the  office  or  in  the  hall,  with  his  back 
up  against  the  wall,  stood  Lew  Michener  and  gathered  around  him, 
closely,  was  Bill  Lyons  and  Sam  Miller  and  Ripan. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  hap])ened  after  you  saw  these  men  together? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Well,  Lew  Michener  kind  of  ducked  down  so  pos- 
sibly, he  thought,  I  wouldn't  see  him,  and  after  our  conference  in 
room  409  he  came  to  me  and  said :  "Buddy,  I  believe  I  owe  you  an 
apology." 

I  said :  "Well,  Lew,  if  it  was  concerning  the  coincident  of  which  I 
witnessed  when  I  came  in  I  don't  think  you  do  owe  me  an  apolog}'." 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  did  he  say  about  that? 

Mr.  Crozier.  He  more  or  less  tried  very  hard  to  a^pologize  and  I 
wouldn't  accept  no  apology  whatsoever  from  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  attend  the  convention  of  the  United  Auto- 
mobile Workers  in  St.  Louis  last  year? 


rX-AMEHK  AN   I'UOPAOxANDA  ACTIVITIES  8579 

Mr.  Crozikij.  T  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Just  when  was  tlial  convention? 

Mr.  CRoziFji.  Tliat  convention  was  held — lonvencd  on  July  29  and 
extended  into  Auo;ust. 

Mr.  Matthkws.  Did  vou  ao  as  a  delegate  from  the  Studebaker 
local.  Local  No.  255? 

Mr.  CnoziER.  I  did. 

Mr.  jSlArriiKws.  Did  yon  j^articipate  in  the  election  of  a  regional 
director  for  California  at  that  convention? 

Mr.  Cik)zu:r.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthfavs.  Will  you  please  tell  what  part  you  had  in  that 
election? 

Mr.  Crozi'.R.  Well,  when  we  were  gathered  in  our  caucus  room  and, 
naturally.  I  think  as  the  previous  witness.  Brother  Inzer,  has  stated, 
when  the  nominations  were  opened  and  Lew  Michener  was  nominated 
and  myself  was  nominated,  I  told  Lew  ^lichener  definitely  that  if  he 
didn't  take  the  regional  office  out  of  the  home  of  the  Communist 
Party,  of  which  we  considered  the  Currier  Building,  and  that  was 
where  the  regional  office  was  then  located,  we  were  going  to  come 
up  thei-e  and  throw  him  and  the  furniture  all  out  the  window. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  did  he  have  to  say  about  that? 

Mr.  Crozif.r.  He  definitely  said  they  were  going  to  move  the  home 
of  the  regional  office  and  that  they  did  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  the  People's  World  one  of  the  institutions 
that  was  housed  in  the  Currier  Building? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  would  not  say  definitely  that  they  were.  However, 
I  recall  back  iji  early  1938  going  up  there  and  we  got  some  literature 
and  definitely  I  wouldn't  say  that  they  were  housed  or  that  the 
Peo])le"s  World  was  edited  in  that  building. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now.  at  the  St.  Louis  convention,  where  you  were 
a  candidate  for  regional  director  and  Michener  was  a  candidate,  you 
said  there  was  a  third  candidate? 

Mr.  Crozier.  No;  just  the  two  of  us. 

Mr.  ]\L\tthews.  Who  was  elected? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Lew  Michener. 

Mr.  Maithews.  Do  you  recall  the  general  size  of  the  vote? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes;  it  was  tremendous  on  his  side. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  disgruntled  because  you  failed  of  elec- 
tion ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Well,  I  would  have  liked  to  have  been  the  regional 
director  for  just  about  30  days  down  there,  to  clean  that  place  out. 
That  is  really  what  was  my  incentive  for  being  the  regional  director, 
for  the  benefit  of  the  labor  movement  in  that  district. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  notice  anything  of  particular  significance 
about  Michener's  associates  at  the  St.  Louis  convention? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes,  sir;  very  definitely.  Of  course,  Wyndham  Mor- 
timer, who  is  one  of  Michener's  oi-ganizers  and  works  directly  under 
Michener.  he  was  associating  with  John  Anderson,  of  Local  155 
of  Detroit,  who  is  a  known  Comnnmist  and  who  defended  the 
Soviet  Union  on  the  floor  of  our  convention. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Michener  voted 
on  the  resolutions  that  were  brought  before  the  St.  Louis  conven- 
tion ? 


8580  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Crozier.  Michener  was  very  clever  about  siicli  things  as  that. 
He  usually  got  out  when  it  was  about  time  to  vote  on  anything. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  the  St.  Louis  convention  of  the  United  Auto- 
mobile Workers  adopt  a  resolution  endorsing  the  third  term  can- 
didacy of  the  President  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  They  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  did  the  Auto  Council  or  the  C.  I.  O.  or- 
ganization in  California  do  subsequent  to  this  endorsement  at  St. 
Louis  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Well,  I  don't  quite  understand  what  you  are  referring 
to  there.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Did  Michener  in  California  after  the  convention, 
back  the  resolution  which  had  been  adopted  at  St.  Louis? 

Mr.  Crozier.  No;  he  did  not.  They  were  opposed  to  Franklin 
Koosevelt  for  a  third  term  and  the  New  Deal.  However,  I  was 
not  a  delegate  to  the  State  convention,  which  was  held  in  San  Diego, 
of  which  I  think  the  affair  you  are  referring  to  took  place;  but  Lew 
Michener,  as  an  international  executive  board  member  of  the  United 
Automobile  Workers  of  America,  C.  I.  O.,  in  the  international  ex- 
ecutive board  meeting  prior,  6  weeks  prior  to  the  convention  called 
in  St.  Louis,  at  that  meeting  the  board  approved  Franklin  D.  Roose- 
velt for  the  third  term  and  Lew  Michener  at  that  board  meeting 
fought  that  down,  but  he  was  whipped  into  line  back  at  that  time 
and  he  definitely  knew  when  he  went  into  the  convention  that  his 
own  board  went  for  the  third  term  for  Roosevelt. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  the  relevancy  of  this? 

Ml-.  Matthews.  At  the  St.  Louis  convention  where  the  so-called 
Connnunist  faction  failed  to  exert  any  very  great  influence  in  the 
resolutions,  they  went  back  to  California  and  in  the  organizations 
there  succeeded  in  overriding  what  had  been  done  at  St.  Louis.  In 
other  words,  they  lost  on  the  Communist  Party  line  in  St.  Louis 
and  succeeded  on  the  Connnunist  Party  line  in  Los  Angeles. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  lost  on  the  broader  front  and  went  back  and 
renewed  their  efforts  on  a  smaller  front  on  the  coast  and  won  out, 
is  that  wiiat  you  are  bringing  out? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  my  understanding  of  the  situation.  I 
will  ask  the  witness  to  state  if  that  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Let  me  get  this  straight :  These  leaders  who  went 
to  California  to  renew  the  drive  of  the  Communist  Party,  they,  to- 
gether with  other  Connnunist  leaders,  centralized  their  efforts  there, 
is  that  right? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wyndham  Mortimer  is  not  a  native  of  California? 

Mr.  Crozier.  No,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  know  whether  Lew  Michener  is  or  not? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  wouldn't  state — no;  I  don't  know  whether  he  is  or 
not. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Could  I  ask  a  question  here,  Mr.  Chairman? 

Mr,  Starnes.  Yes;  Mr.  Voorhis. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Mr.  Crozier,  there  has  been  considerable  testimony 
today  about  the  C.  I.  O.  in  southern  California,  i  want  to  ask  you 
how  many  members  this  organization  has  that  is  headed  by  Mr.  Inzer, 
and  to  which  I  understand  you  also  belong — about  how  many  mem- 
bers do  you  have? 


UN-AMERICAN  PUOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8581 

Mr.  Croziek.  Woll,  Conai-essnian  Voorhis,  I  am  not  a  menibor  of 
the  \'i<^ilaiit  Coniinittee,  and  I  would  like  a  little  later  on  to  elabo- 
rate on  that  as  to  why  I  am  not  a  member,  due  to  the  f  act^  of  the 
committee  we  have  set  up  within  our  own  local  union.  We  have 
endorsed  l^rother  Inzer's  connnittee  100  percent  and  will  cooperate 
with  them  at  all  times  and  do. 

Mr.  Stahnes.  But  you  have  your  own  organization  fight? 

]\Ir.  Crozier.  Yes. 

Mr.  \\)ORHis.  I^t  me  ask  you  this:  Among  the  rank  and  file  of 
the  C.  I.  O.  generally  in  southern  California,  what  percentage  of 
the  men  do  you  reckon  are  opposed  to  Communist  domination  where- 
ever  it  might  exist  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  AVell,  I  would  say  the  overwhelming  majority  of  the 
C.  I.  O.  in  general,  throughout  the  United  States,  is  opposed  to  the 
Connnunist  Party. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  so  would  I. 

Mr.  Crozier.  And  to  any  other  subversive  groups. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  And  the  same  would  be  true  in  southern  California? 

Mr.  Crozier.  That  is  true;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Are  there  international  unions  that  are  affiliated  with 
the  C.  I.  O.  in  southern  California  which,  in  your  opinion  are  clean 
of  Communist  influence? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Which  ones? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Well,  I  can  say  Local  255  for  one,  and  of  course  you 
are  speaking  relative  to  international  unions? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Yes;  at  the  moment. 

Mr,  Crozier.  Well,  I  don't  think — I  am  sorry  to  say  and  to  make 
this  report  from  California,  I  don't  think  I  could  report  that  there 
is  one  international  that  hasn't  got  some  Communist  activities  with- 
in it. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Well,  of  course  you  can't,  because  they  are  going  to 
try  to  have  activities  in  every  organization  there  is,  but  I  am  asking 
you  about  international  organizations  where  they  do  not  have  any 
controlling  influence  and  where  the  movement  of  opposing  men  has 
been  strong  enough  to  prevent  their  holding  any  offices  or  gaining 
any  control  or  any  influence  to  speak  of. 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  say  definitely  I  don't  know  of  any  out  there  that 
is  not. 

Mr.  A^oorhis.  What  about  the  rubber  workers? 

]\Ir.  Crozier.  Well,  I  will  have  to  say  that  Bob  Roberts,  of  the 
rubber  workers,  has  kept  the  rubber  workers  very  clean.  I  don't 
believe  they  are  completely  controlled  by  it.  but  there  is  Communist 
influence,  in  my  opinion,  in  the  rubber  workers. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  There  are  certain  locals  where  I  could  vouch  myself 
tli(M-e  isn't  a  bit. 

Mr.  (Crozier.  Oh,  yes:  certain  individual  locals:  yes,  sir;  as  T  stated 
about  mine,  but  I  thought  vou  were  referrino;  to  internationals. 

All 

Mr.  VooKHis.  You  know  wdiat  is  in  the  constitution  of  the  Rubber 
Workers"  International? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes;  I  know  what  is  in  our  local  union  constitutioii, 
too. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  What  I  am  trying  to  get  at  is,  and  I  think  it  is  im- 
portant for  the  general  picture  to  be  as  clear  as  we  can,  and  I  don't 


8582  UN-AJNIERICA^'  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

want  the  comniittee  to  let  the  impression  go  out  that  this  is  a  universal 
proposition — I  think  it  is  important  for  some  of  the  men  that  are  fight- 
ing the  front  line  battle  on  this  thing  to  get  credit  for  it  and  usually 
they  don't. 

All  I  want  to  make  clear  is  that  there  are  locals  and  larger  organiza- 
tions, too 


Mr.  Crozier.  I  heartily  agree  with  you. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  AVhere  the  fight  to  keep  the  Communists  crom  any 
controlling  influence  has  been  successful. 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  heartily  agree  with  you,  that  there  are  locals  even 
beyond  and  in  addition  to  the  rubber  workers  that  are  attempting  to 
do  that  very  thing  that  you  are  trying  to  bring  out,  but  not  the 
internationals. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  didn't  mean  everyone;  I  just  meant  generally. 
What  other  locals  would  you  mention,  if  you  can  think  of  any  others, 
where  you  think  the  same  general  situation  occurs  as  in  your  local  ? 

Mr.  Crozeer.  Well,  I  should  say  Local  21G  has  fought  diligently  and 
hard  and  opposed  the  subversive  groups,  and  Local  43  of  the  rubber 
workers.  Local  44  also,  and  my  own.  And,  in  fact,  I  would  have  to 
say  all  of  them  have  fought  against  it. 

Mr.  VooRHis,  Local  44  of  the  rubber  workers  is  the  one  Herb  Wil- 
son is  the  president  of? 

Mr,  Crozier.  Yes ;  that  is  correct. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  about  the  Amalgamated  Clothing  Workers? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Well.  I  am  not  so  familiar  with  them.  However.  I 
do  know  that  the}^  battle  heartily  against  them  also.  I  have  not  at- 
tended, but  as  you  brought  out  the  point — our  local  union  rents  our 
hall  from  the  rubber  workers  which  is  located  on  Atlantic  Boulevard 
and  that  is  how  I  happen  to  know  definitely  about  them, 

Mr,  Mason,  Just  this  one  thing:  You  men  have  come  here  volun- 
tarily as  witnesses  because  of  your  interest  in  trying  to  clean  up 
the  labor  unions  of  the  west  coast  that  you  represent,  and  get  rid  of 
subversive  elements  and  also  influences  in  those  unions. 

Would  you  say  that  it  would  be  safe  to  say  you  are  representing 
at  least  95  or  98  percent  of  the  membership  of  the  C.  I.  O,  unions 
on  the  west  coast  in  your  efl'orts  to  do  that  very  thing? 

Mr,  Crozier.  I  would  say  yes. 

Mr.  Mason.  That  is  all.     That  is  the  picture  as  I  get  it, 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  copy  of  the  bylaws  of  Studebaker 
Local  255,  and  ask  you  if  you  can  identify  that  as  a  correct  copy  of 
the  bylaws  of  the  organization? 

Mr,  Crozier.  Yes.  sir ;  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Has  this  been  adopted  in  its  entirety  by  the  Stude- 
balver  Local  255? 

Mr.  Crozier.  It  has. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  was  it  so  adopted? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  would  say  about  three  and  a  half  months  ago. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  page  16  there  is  an  article  numbered  article 
19,  entitled.  "Installation  Cei-emony."  Will  you  please  read  that 
article — section  1? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes;  section  1,  entitled  "Installation  Ceremony." 
Then — 

The  provisions  and  procedures  outlined  in  article  36  of  the  constitution  of 
the    International    Union,    the    United    Automobile    Workers    of    America,    are 


rX-A.MKHirAN   I'KOI'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8583 

luM-eby  addptod  for  the  iiLstallalion  ceri'inniiit's  for  this  local,  provided,  liowever, 
that  there  sliall  be  added  to  the  oath  in  said  article  3H,  set  forth  beginning 
after  the  last  line  of  the  said  constitutional  oath,  the  following: 

"To  support  and  comply  with  the  laws  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United 
States  of  Ainciica  and  the  constitution  and  laws  of  the  State  of  California 
and  to  do  everything  in  my  power  to  preserve  and  defend  the  form  of  govern- 
ment established  in  the  United  States  of  America,  and  to  oppose  the  establish- 
ment of  any  Nazi.  Fascist,  or  communistic  government  party  within  the  United 
States  of  America." 

Mr.  Matthews.  Xow,  your  local  adopted  that  section  of  your 
bylaws^ 

Mr.  Crozier.  They  did,  without  a  dissentin"^  vote. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  your  bylaws  have  to  go  before  any  other  body 
for  approval? 

Mr.  Crozh^r.  They  do.  They  must  be  ratified  according  to  our 
international  constitution  of  the  United  Automobile  Workers  of 
America,  by  our  international  executive  board. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Has  this  installation  ceremony  been  approved? 

Mr.  Crozier.  That  has  not.  We  were  notified  that  they  rejected 
that  part  as  it  was  unconstitutional  according  to  our  constitution. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words  the  international  executive  board 
rejected  that  installation  ceremony  as  your  local  had  adopted  it? 

Mr.  Crozier.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  YooRHis.  On  what  ground  did  they  reject  it  ? 

]\Ir.  Crozier.  They  rejected  it  on  the  ground  that  it  was  uncon- 
stitutional. 

^fr.  Voor.His.  Why? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Due  to  the  fact  of  our  international  constitution,  of 
which  I  have  a  copy  over  there  in  my  brief  case. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Was  it  because  of  the  fact  that  you  are  an  inter- 
national union  with  membership  in  Canada? 

Mr.  Crozier.  No.  I  wcnild  like  to  if  you  care — I  can  quote  from 
the  international  constitution  on  the  grounds  why — T  don't  like  to  do 
it  without  quoting  from  the  constitution — I  don't  want  to  get  off 
the  track. 

]\Ir.  Matthews.  I  think  perhaps  the  witness  can  explain  where  the 
conflict  lies. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  can  set  that  section  out  in  the  record  and  let 
him  explain  it  in  his  own  words. 

Mr.  AIatthews.  What  is  the  conflict? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Well,  definitely,  because  the  C.  I.  O.  has  taken  the 
policy  that  they  shall  accept  for  membership  within  the  C.  I.  O.  all 
races,  creeds,  and  it  is  not  prejudiced  to  anyone.  That  is  a  very 
broad  and  long  thing  thsit  came  about  back  in  the  early  days  of  it 
when  that  was  adopted  and  when  I  don't  think  they  felt  the  Com- 
munists were  going  to  come  in  or  that  the  present  crisis  was  going 
to  be  here,  and  I  look  and  hope,  sincerely  hope,  that  at  our  con- 
vention in  Buffalo  this  year  that  we  can  in  some  sort  of  way  or  other 
amend  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  been  present  at  any  gathering  where  a 
communication  was  received  relative  to  the  purchase  of  defense 
bonds  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes;  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wliat  gathering  was  that? 


3584  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIAaTIES 

Mr.  Croziek.  That  was  the  regular  meeting  of  the  Los  Angeles 
Industrial  Union  Council. 

jNIr.  Matthews.  And  did  this  communication  urge  upon  union 
members  the  purchase  of  defense  bonds  of  the  United  States  Gov- 
ernment ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  It  did ;  and  the  communication  was  from  our  C.  I.  O. 
national  headquarters. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  reception  did  that  communication  have  in 
the  Los  Angeles  Industrial  Union  Council? 

]\Ir,  Crozier.  Slim  Connolly,  the  secretary  of  the  council,  read  the 
communication,  and  it  asked  us  to  buy  defense  bonds  and  stamps, 
explaining  what  a  good  investment  it  was,  and  when  he  got  to  the 
part  of  the  "good  investment,"  why,  Slim  Connolly  merely  laughed, 
and  it  was  a  "ha  ha,"  and  he  stated  in  some  sort  of  words  like  this : 
"Yes,  it  is  a  good  investment,"  and  with  that  an  indignant  laugh. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  a  sarcastic  laugh? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes;  a  scarcastic  laugh. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  the  communication  received  with  favor  by 
any  vote? 

Mr.  Crozier.  No;  it  was  moved  and  seconded  and  carried  to  file 
the  communication. 

JNIr.  Matthews.  Was  any  further  action  taken  on  it? 

Mr.  Crozier.  No;  none. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Immediately  after  that  communication  was  read 
did  the  subject  of  a  testimonial  dinner  in  honor  of  Leo  Gallagher 
come  before  the  council  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes,  sir;  it  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  this  a  copy  of  the  announcement  of  the  testi- 
monial dinner  in  honor  of  Leo  Gallagher? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes,  sir ;  it  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  action  was  taken  by  the  council  on  this 
subject  and  in  what  mood,  if  you  are  able  to  describe  it? 

Mr.  Crozier,  The  communication  was  read  by  Slim  Connolly  and 
definitely  there  was  a  motion  made  to  concur  in  the  communica- 
tion and  endorse  the  testimonial  dinner  and  urge  the  council  to 
send  invitations  to  all  delegates. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  the  matter  greeted  with  any  enthusiasm  on 
the  part  of  the  council  ? 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes ;  I  would  say  it  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Leo  Gallagher  has 
been  a  candidate  for  public  office  on  the  Communist  Party  ticket  in 
California  ?  , 

Mr.  Crozier.  Yes ;  I  do.  / 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  offer  this  for  inclusion  in  the 
record  at  this  point,  as  a  list  of  sponsors,  beginning  on  page  3  of 
the  announcement  of  this  testimonial  dinner  in  honor  of  Leo  Gal- 
lagher. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered.  Is  there  anything  else,  Dr.  Mat- 
thews? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  all. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Crozier  Exhibit  No.  1, 
May  29,  1941.") 


UX-AMEHICAX   1'U(H'A(;AM)A  ACTlVniKS  8585 

(The  list  of  sponsors  mentioned  above  is  as  follows:) 

Joseph  W.  AidU'ii.  Curl  J.  Allen',  Mrs.  Fay  E.  Allen,  Gcor.iiP  Anderson, 
Spencer  Austrian.  William  Axelrod,  Selnni  Micliels  Baehelis,  Vicki  Dauni.  Jolui 
Jieardsiey,  Louise  Bennett,  Herbert  Biberman,  Leo  Biiielnian,  Warren  K.  Bill- 
iiijis.  George  E.  Bodie,  Louis  P..  F-olanos.  Jim  Burfoi'd,  J.  Vernon  Burke,  Nor- 
man T.  Byrne.  Iln.uli  J.  Campbell,  liobert  Clark,  Dorothy  Connelly.  Bert  Corona, 
Floyd  Covinstou.  Tom  Cullen.  Kobert  O.  Curran.  Janus  L.  Daufjlitery.  Ernest 
Dawson.  R.  M.  Deitz.  Bill  Eiconin,  A.  P.  Entenza,  vSluiji  Fnjii.  Osrar  IL  Fuss, 
IMiil  Gardner.  Wilbur  Gilbert.  Howard  Goddard.  Louis  Goldl)latt,  Augustus 
K.  Hawkins.  Don  R.  Heah'y,  Marshall  Ho'o,  J.  E.  Jeffrey.  (4rover  Johnson, 
Chester  II.  Jordan.  Frederic  A.  Kane,  A.  Kerauan,  Frank  S.  Lopez,  Jr.,  Hugh 
E.  MacBeth.  Ernest  Marsh,  James  S.  Martin.  A.  Maymudes,  La  Rue  Mc- 
cormick, Les:er  A.  McMillan,  Carey  McWilliams,  Ed  Means,  Lew  Michener, 
J.  Miller.  Stanley  Moffatt,  Tom  Mooney,  Mary  Moore,  Ernest  P.  Morgan, 
Leonard  Oechsii.' Sam  Ornitz,  Peter  J.  Padovan,  Charles  A.  Page,  Eugene 
Pal  ton,  James  Penn.  Cy  Perkins.  Pettis  Perry.  Herbert  Resner,  Paul  Richie, 
liobert  S.  Robinson.  Herbert  K.  Sorrell,  Don  Ogden  Srewart,  Clinton  J.  Taft, 
Mrs.  Jessie  Terry,  Clore  AVarne. 

Mr.  Maithews.  Just  a  moment,  ]\Ir.  Chairman.  The  witness 
would  like  to  make  a  statement  re<zarding  his  own  organization, 
which  is  somewhat  parallel  to  the  Vigilant  American  Committee. 

What  is  the  name  of  the  organization  which  you  set  up  in  the 
Studebake  Local  255? 

Mr.  Crozier.  The  American  Way  Committee. 

Mr.  MATrHE\vs.  Now,  will  you  please  state  the  objectives  of  this 
committee  i 

Mr.  Crozier.  Mr.  Chairman,  may  I  have  permission  to  read  it? 
I  don't  want  to  leave  out  anything  and  I  don't  want  to  get  anything 
in  there  becau.^e  I  am  not  here,  naturally,  in  behalf  of  this  committee. 
1  am  liere  in  behalf  of  the  connnittee  but  they  didn't  send  me  here 
and  naturally  I  want  to  get  it  as  we  have  it  as  a  matter  of  record. 

Mr.  Starves.  You  may  proceed. 

Mr.  Maso2^.  You  say  you  are  not  here  in  behalf  of  the  committee  ? 
You  are  here  in  cooperation  with  and  in  sympathy  with  the  purposes 
of  this  committee?  You  are  here  in  behalf  of  your  local  w^hich  you 
want  to  clear  of  any  such  things? 

Mr.  Crozier.  I  am  sorry.  I  thought  I  made  that  very  clear  by 
stating  tliat  1  wasn't  authorized  by  the  connnittee  to  be  here. 

^Ir.  IMatthews.  He  means  the  American  Way  Committee. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  see. 

Mr.  Crozier.  Because  there  is  a  large  movement  under  way  to 
dis.solve  that  committee. 

The  American  W^ay  Connnittee  has  adopted  for  their  true  aims, 
to  purge  from  our  local  union  and  the  C.  I.  O.  in  general  and  the 
United  States  of  America,  any  members  who  are  members  or  sym- 
jyalhizers  of  the  Communists,  Nazi,  or  Facist  Parties,  or  any  any 
other  un-American  groups  whose  activities  are  opposed  to  the  best 
interests  of  the  kind  of  a  labor  movement  that  the  free  peoples  of 
the  United  States  of  America  would  be  proud  of,  such  antilabor 
groups  as  the  IVL  and  M.,  the  Southern  Californians,  Inc.,  the  Neu- 
tral Thousands,  and  so  on. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  all. 

IMr.  VooRHis.  These  groups  that  you  mentioned  at  the  end  of  your 
statement,  it  is  your  opinion  that  their  activities  in  the  way  of  extreme 


§586  UX-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

aiitilabor  activities  play  into  the  hands  of  the  Communists  in  the 
iabor  movement? 

Mr.  Ckozier.  Well,  the  American  Way  Committee  definitely  con- 
siders the  antilabor  group  tactics  as  nn- American  and  from  that 
standpoint  that  is  why  we  adopted  those  along-  with  the  others. 

I  also  should  like  to  add  if  it  is  permissible,  that  we  even  feel, 
as  far  as  the  committee  is  concerned,  that  some  of  those  groups  have 
a  greater  advantage  over  us  than  even  the  Communists  themselves 
because  they  have  contacts  with  some  of  the  employers  which  they 
parallel  themselves  with  and  which  we  thiidv  destroys  the  labor 
movement, 

Mr.  Starnes.  Next  witness. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Boiling. 

TESTIMONY  OF  JAY  EDWARD  BOILING,  LOS  ANGELES,  CALIF. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Boiling,  will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your 
right  hand?  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall 
give  before  this  committee  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and 
nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Please  give  your  full  name  for  the  record. 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Jay  Edward  Boiling. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  do  you  live? 

Mr.  BoLLiXG.  In  Los  Angeles,  Calif. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  born? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Hellier,  Ky. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  July  20,  1892. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  have  you  been  living  in  California? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Since  about  April  19,  1919. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  served  in  the  armed  forces  of  the 
United  States? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  capacity? 

Mr.  BoLLixG.  I  w^as  in  the  Artillery. 

Mr.  Matthews.  During  the  World  War? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Yes ;  during  the  World  War. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  briefly  the  jobs  or  positions 
which  you  have  held  during  your  adulthood? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  will  sketch  over  a  few  of  them.  I  don't  think  I 
could  tell  you  all  of  them  since  I  came  to  California.  I  first  got 
replacement  training  as  a  disabled  soldier  at  the  University  of  Cali- 
fornia at  Los  Angeles,  and  took  up  architectural  engineering  and 
drawing.  After  finishing  the  4-year  course  there  I  went  to  work 
with  an  architectural  firm  called  Truesdale,  Perrington  &  Newton, 
architects  and  engineers  of  Los  Angeles,  as  supervisor  of  construc- 
tion. I  was  with  them  something  over  a  year.  I  am  not  sure.  That 
has  been  some  time  ago. 

After  that  I  worked  at  the  carpenter  trade  for  awhile — a  few  years 
at  different  places  around  Los  Angeles  County. 


rX-AMERICAN  PROrAfJANDA  ACTIVITIES  8587 

Tlieii  I  worked  with  the  Airway  Electrical  Appliance  Corporation 
as  a  salesman  (liirin<r  the  depression. 

I  think  it  w  as  alH)iit  the  1st  of  November  1934  that  I  went  to  work 
for  the  Ford  Motor  Co.,  in  Lon<^-  Beach.  I  worked  with  the  Ford 
Motor  Co.  in  Long  Beach  until  April  15,  1938,  at  which  time  the 
local  went  on  strike. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  yon  ^ro  on  strike  with  the  local  ? 
Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  did. 

Mr.  Ma'ithews.  Were  yon  a  member  of  the  local  at  the  time? 
Mi-.  Bollino.  Yes;  I  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  Local  406  of  the  U.  A.  W.  ? 
Mr.  Bolling.  That  is  ritrlit. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  that  local  is  still  out  on  strike? 
Mr.  Bolling.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  the  local  Avhich  a  previous  witness  has  re- 
ferred to  wlien  he  said  that  an  order  for  reinstatement  was  granted 
about  2  years  ago? 

Mr.  Bolling.  That  is  correct. 

IVIr.  ^Matthews.  Where  have  you  been  employed  since  you  went  on 
strike  at  the  Long  Beach  Ford  plant  in  1938? 

Mr.  Bolling.  In  March  1939, 1  think  it  was  either  the  28th  or  29th, 
I  Avent  to  work  for  the  Studebaker  Pacific  Corporation.  I  remember 
it  was  only  17  days,  lacked  17  days  of  being  1  year  I  was  out  on 
strike  without  any  work  whatever. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  still  employed  at  the  Studebaker  Pacific 
Corporation  ? 

Mr.  Bolling.  I  am. 
Ml'.  Matthews.  In  what  capacity? 

Mr.  Bolling.  I  am  in  the  trim  department,  which  is  called  depart- 
ment 210. 

Mr.  Matthe"ws.  Have  you  been  working  there  continuously  since 
1939? 

Mr.  Bolling.  Practically  speaking;  yes.  There  have  been  a  few 
months  that  I  have  been  off. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Now,  did  you  take  an  active  part  in  the  Ford 
strike  at  Long  Beach? 

Mr.  Bolling.  I  consider  I  did. 

Mr.  ^L^tthews.  Will  you  please  state  briefly  what  it  was? 
Mr.  Bolling.  I  was  a  member  of  the  executive  board.  I  was  trus- 
tee at  the  time  and  I  was  elected  as  a  member  of  the  finance  com- 
mittee to  finance  the  strike,  and  shortly  afterwards  I  was  sent  north 
by  tlie  local,  visiting  the  different  cities  such  as  Baker's  Field  and 
in  tlie  Bay  area  and  on  up  north  into  Oregon  and  Washington,  speak- 
ing at  different  locals,  asking  for  funds  to  carry  on  the  strike. 

!Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  a  member  of  Local  255  at  the  Studebaker 
Pacific  Corporation  plant  ? 
Mr.  Bolling.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  Local  255  of  the  United  Automobile  Work- 
ers of  America  ? 

Mr.  Bolling.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  had  any  conmiittee  position  assigned  to 
3'ou  in  that  local? 


8588  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  am  a  member  of  the  bylaws  committee  which  wrote 
up  the  bylaws  that  were  in  question  a  few  minutes  ago;  I  am  chair- 
man of  the  educational  committee,  a  delegate  to  the  Auto  Council 
and  also  to  the  Los  Angeles  Industrial  Union  Council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  hold  all  of  those  positions  at  the  present  time  ? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matihews.  And  you  are  a  delegate  to  the  Los  Angeles  Indus- 
trial Union  Council? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matihews.  And  also  a  delegate  to  the  Auto  Council? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Mati^hews.  What  territor}'  is  included  in  that  Auto  Council? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  am  not  so  sure  at  the  present  time,  but  my  under- 
standing is  that  it  includes  district  6  or,  in  other  words,  the  same 
area  that  is  included  in  the  regional  area — that  is,  included  in  the 
area  which  Michener  has  jurisdiction  over. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  through  several  States? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  understand  it  includes  the  Auto  Workers  in  the 
western  part  of  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  been  president  of  the  Auto  Coun- 
cil? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Yes,  sir;  I  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  In  1038. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  in  your  experience  as  president  of  the  Atito 
Council,  also  in  the  Ford  strike,  and  recently  your  experience  as  a 
member  of  the  Los  Angeles  Industrial  Union  Council,  have  you  come 
in  contact  with  Lew  Michener? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  Lew  Michener's  position? 

Mr.  BoLLTNG.  At  the  present  time  he  is  regional  director  of  the 
Los  Angeles  and  west  coast  area. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  the  U.  A.  W.  ? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Michener  personally? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  is  a  member  of 
the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Michener's  wife  told  me  that  he  was  a  member  of 
the  Conjmimist  Party. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  Have  you  ever  confronted  Michener  himself  with 
the  question  of  his  membership  in  the  Comminiist  Party? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  have  accused  him,  I  think,  on  the  floor,  of  being  a 
Communist. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  has  been  his  reply  ? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  He  denied  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  all  he  has  done? 

Mr.  BoLLTNG.  Well,  he  did 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  In  what  terms.  I  mean,  did  he  deny  it,  if  any? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  He  told  me  the  last  time  that  I  made  that  asser- 
tion, when  I  got  close  to  him  after  the  meeting,  that  he  was  not  a 
Communist  and  that  he  would  get  me  for  that  and  threatened  to 
strike  me  and  I  pulled  off  my  glasses  and  handed  them  to  a  man 


UX-AMI-:KI(A\   I'UOl'ACJANDA  ACTIVJTIKS  8589 

near  me  and  I  told  him  to  j^o  aliead,  and  by  that  time  they  jumped 
between  lis  and  they  took  Micliener  out. 

Ml'.  Mattiif.ws.  You  sav  Mrs.  Michoncr  tokl  you  that  Michener  was 
a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ( 

^fr.  BoLLiXG.  She  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  she  ever  say  anything  about  Communist  Party 
meetings  hehl  at  their  home? 

^Ir.  BoLLiNG.  She  said  that  the  Communist  Party  met  there — 
parties  Avere  hehl  in  their  apartment  and  after  she  and  Michener  had 
a  falling  out  or  had — rather,  wasn't  getting  along  so  very  well,  that 
they  wouldn't  let  her  be  present  any  more  and  finally  moved — 
woulihi't  have  them  in  the  apartment  any  longer. 

She  also  told  me  that  ^Nlichener  would  go  to  Hollywood  and  some- 
times she  would  be  along  and  he  v\-ould  get  sums  of  money  from 
people — she  didn't  know  who  they  were.  They  would  stop  in  front 
of  some  place  and  he  would  go  in  and  get  money  and  come  back 
and  distribute  it  in  Los  Angeles  to  individuals — drive  up  and  get  out 
and  go  in,  and  in  cases  where  she  could  hear  he  would  say :  "Here  is 
this  money,"  and  "you  know  what  to  do  with  it." 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  did  she  ever  name  any  other  parties  who  had 
attended  these  Communist  Party  meetings  in  her  apartment? 

]Mr.  Jk)LLiXG.  She  did.  I  can't  remember  very  many  of  them  but 
I  know  she  mentioned  Bill  Lyons,  Sam  Miller,  and"  Nick  Ripan. 
And  she  mentioned  Slim  Connolly  but  I  am  not  sure  whether  she 
said  Slim  Connolly  was  at  the  meetings  or  not,  but  she  did  say  he 
was  a  Communist. 

Mr.  Matthews.  She  told  you  that  Slim  Comiolly  was  a  Commu- 
nist ? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  She  did.  She  also  told  me  that  Michener  told  her 
that  it  would  be  only  a  short  time  until  the  Communists  would  take 
the  Government  of  the  United  States  over;  that  they  had  Commu- 
nists api)ointed  in  every  defense  industry,  in  every  munitions  and 
arms  factory  in  the  United  States  and  could  take  them  over  at  any 
time — it  was  only  a  short  time  until  they  made  the  strike  then  they 
would  handle  things  their  way. 

I\[r.  Starnes.  a  short  time  until  they  did  what? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Take  over  the  Government. 

Mr.  Starnes.  AVhat  was  it  you  said  about  "a  short  time  until  they 
pulled  a  general  strike?" 

Mr.  BoELiNG.  No.  no.  As  I  understood  it  from  her,  until  they 
started  a  revolution  to  take  over  the  Government  but  she  didn't  put 
it  just  that  way. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  think  he  also  stated  that  Mrs.  Michener  stated 
that  the  Communists  had  persons  in  all  of  the  defense  industries, 
arms  plants,  and  so  forth, 

Mr.  Voorhis.  How  did  she  happen  to  tell  you  these  things? 

^Ir.  BoLLiNG.  I  went  to  her  son's-in-law  place — I  didn't  know  that 
he  was  Mr.  IMichener's  son-indaw  or  that  Mrs.  Michener  was  there. 
I  went  to  him  in  regard  to  this  split  in  the  U.  A.  W.  more  than  2 
years  ago  and  I  went  to  talk  to  her  son-in-law — I  think  his  name  is 
Henry  Knoblock.  He  was  a  member  of  Local  400  and  I  was  still  a 
member  of  Local  406  at  that  time.  I  went  to  him  to  talk  to  him  in 
regard  to  this  point.     He  didn't  happen  to  be  at  home  and  Mrs. 


3590  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Michener  was  there  and  her  daiiohter.  She  asked  me  in  and  I  went 
in  and  she  asked  me  if  there  was  anythin^r  she  could  do,  and  1  told 
her  I  was  in  a  little  bit  of  an  embarrassino;  position  and  told  her  the 
circumstances — that  I  was  there  in  favor  of  Martin  and  I  under- 
stood that  her  husband  was  against  him,  and  then  she  told  me  that 
1  needn't  be  embarrassed  to  say  anything  or  speak  my  mind  because 
she  and  Michener  had  separated  and  she  did  not  intend  to  go  back 
with  him  again. 

She  also  stated  that  she  would  be  willing  to  testify  before  this  com- 
mittee if  some  protection  was  accorded  her,  because  she  would  be 
afraid  to  testify  for  fear  of  bodily  harm  unless  she  was  protected  in 
some  way. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Jack  Orr? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  Jack  Orr's  position? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Jack  Orr,  at  the  present  time,  I  don't  know,  but  as 
I  understand  it  and  I  think  according  to  the  paper,  he  was  editor  of 
the  Aircraft  Organizer. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  the  official  publication  of  the  aircraft  divi- 
sion of  the  U.  A.  W.  ? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Jack  Orr  ever  tell  you  that  he  was  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Comnumist  Party? 

Mr.  BoLLixG.  He  did. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Do  you  know  where  it  was  that  he  told  you  that? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  Berkeley,  Calif. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  were  the  circumstances  under  which  he 
told  you  that? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  He  told  me  in  a  way — this  is  the  way  I  got  it — it 
W'as  in  conversations  with  myself  as  well  as  other  students  of  the 
labor  school  in  northern  California,  in  Berkeley.  They  were  talking 
of  political  parties  and  he  spoke  of  the  Communist  Party  as  '"we" — 
"we  don't  think  this,"  or  "we  believe  this,"  or  "we  don't  believe  that," 
and  he  did  not  deny  it  and  I  took  it  from  that  that  was  an  admission 
that  he  was  a  Communist. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Was  anyone  else  present  when  he  told  you  that? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  There  were,  but  they  were  students  and  it  has  been — 
it  was  in  July  of  1938  and  I  couldn't  name  the  ones  that  were  present 
because  it  was  kind  of  a  general  discussion.  I  just  happened  up 
during  the  time  the  discussion  was  going  on. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Ealph  Dawson? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  1  know^  Ralph  Dawson;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  official  position  does  he  hold? 

Mr.  BoLi.iNG.  Rali^h  Dawson  at  the  present  time  is  chief  organizer 
of  the  C.  I.  O.  in  the  Los  Angeles  area. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Has  he  until  recently  been  the  president  of  the 
Los  Angeles  Industrial  Union  Council? 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  He  became  president  a  few  months  ago  when  the 
president  of  the  council  resigned  to  take  up  a  job  with  the  O.  P.  M. 
That  man  was  a  member  of  the  Oil  Workers'  Union.  I  can't  re- 
member his  name  at  the  present  time,  but  anyway  he  was  president 
and  Dawson  was  vice  president.  He  resigned  and  Dawson  took  his 
place  and  was  president  up  to  a  short  time  ago  when  they  had  the 
election — the  election  was  a  short  time  ago,  a  month  or  so  ago. 


rX-A.MEUICAN    rUOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8591 

Mr.  Ma'ithews.  Did  you  hoar  the  report  from  the  California  au- 
thorities on  the  reoortl  of  Kaiph  Dawson  read  here  this  afternoon^ 

Mr.  BoLUNG.  1  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anythin<;  that  is  in  conflict  with  any 
of  tlie  statements  made  in  that  report^ 

Mr.  Rolling.  I  do  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  it  your  ju(l<rment,  based  upon  your  knowledge  of 
Dawson's  activities  and  views,  that  he  follows  the  Connnunist  Party 
line? 

Mr.  Rolling.  Without  a  doubt  to  my  mind. 

^fr.  VooRHis.  What  do  you  base  that  statement  on? 

Mr.  Rolling.  From  his  nction  in  the  council,  his  actino;  as  chair- 
man of  the  council,  on  giving-  the  floor  to  certain  individuals  who 
seem  to  have  something  in  common  with  him  and  others  that  he 
would  refuse  the  floor  that  had  something  on  their  mind  that  wasn't 
in  common  with  them. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Who  were  the  ones  that  he  gave  the  floor  to  and 
what  did  they  say? 

Mr.  Rolling.  That  is  just  one  of  the  details — that  is  just  one  of 
the  things;  it  was  because  of  his  talks  and  what  he  did,  and  what  has 
been  stated  here  today  by  other  witnesses,  his  attitude  in  that  area 
toward  organizing  the  U.  A.  W.  and  his  associates. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Did  you  attend  the  sessions  of  the  Los  Angeles 
Industrial  Union  Council  recently  wdien  the  matter  of  the  testi- 
monial dinner  in  honor  of  Leo  Gallagher  came  up? 

Mr.  Rolling.  I  did. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Were  you  personally  present? 

Mr.  RoLLiN(;.  I  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  would  be  your  description  of  the  reception 
of  the  announcement  of  this  testimonial  dinner? 

Mr.  RoixiNG.  Very  enthusiastically  received — well  supported. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well  supported  and  received  with  enthusiasm  by 
the  council? 

Mr.  Rolling.  That  is  correct. 

Ml-.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  that  Leo  Gallagher  has  been  a  candi- 
date for  public  office  on  the  Communist  Party  ticket  in  California? 

Mr.  Rolling.  I  certainly  do;  I  voted  in  that  election. 

Mr.  ]\Latthews.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Voorhis,  do  you  have  any  questions? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Yes.  .Vre  you  a  member  now  of  the  Los  Angeles 
Lidustrial  Union  Council? 

Mr.  Rolling.  I  am  a  delegate  to  the  Los  Angeles  Union  Council. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Do  you  remember  the  question  I  asked  the  former 
witness  about  the  Ford  strike? 

Mr.  Rolling.  That  is  right. 

^fr.  Voorhis.  Would  you  agree  Avith  what  he  had  to  say  about  the 
orders  that  had  been  handed  down  from  the  National  Labor  Kela- 
tions  Roard  and  upheld  by  the  apjiellate  court  to  the  Ford  Motor 
Co.? 

Mr.  Rolling.  Rv  all  means  I  agree. 

Mr.  VciORiiis.  Would  you  agree  with  what  he  said  to  the  effect  that 
tactics  of  that  kind  on  the  part  of  industrialists  has  made  your  ta.sk 
more  difficult? 

62626 — 41— vol.  IJ. 2S 


3592  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  That  is  correct — I  believe  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  ISIr.  Boiling,  did  Studebaker  hire  you  although  they 
knew  you  were  on  strike  at  the  Ford  plant? 

Mr.  Bulling.  Yes;  they  knew  I  was  on  strike  and  they  told  the 
employment  department,  C.  L.  Cosby,  that  I  was  listed  on  the  South- 
ern California  Incorporation  blacklist.  Cosby  told  me  that  he  didn't 
care  whose  blacklist  I  was  on,  that  they,  the  Studebaker  Pacific  Cor- 
poration, did  not  recognize  blacklists. 

I  don't  want  to  miss  this  opportunity  to  say  that  they  are  the 
finest  organization  I  have  ever  had  the  privilege  to  work  for,  an 
organization  which  recognizes  the  rights  of  labor  to  organize  and 
tries  to  get  along  with  the  union. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  prompted  here  as  a  voluntary  witness 
by  what  you  conceive  to  be  the  best  interests  of  the  C.  I.  O.? 

Mr.  Boiling.  I  am,  by  all  means. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  convinced  that  communism  and  nazi- 
ism  constitutes  a  very  grave  menace  to  the  C.  I.  O.  organization 
generally  ? 

Mr.  Bolling.  I  certainly  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  specifically  to  the  organization  with  which 
you  have  had  personal  connection? 

Mr.  Bolling.  That  is  right;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Based  upon  your  membership  in  a  trade  union,  plus 
your  experience,  your  observations,  and  your  contacts  with  union 
men  on  the  west  coast  and  elsewhere,  you  consider  the  great  rank 
and  file  of  them  to  be  loyal  and  patriotic  to  this  country? 

Mr.  Bolling.  I  do,  the  majority  of  them. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Eegardless  of  whether  thev  are  in  the  C.  I.  O.  or 
A.  F.  ofL.? 

Mr.  Bolling.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  that  goes  for  most  of  the  leaders  also? 

Mr.  Bolling.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  to  ask  you  if  on  the  other  hand,  however, 
based  upon  that  same  knowledge,  experience,  and  personal  contact 
with  them  daily,  if  it  has  not  been,  in  your  judgment,  the  purpose 
of  the  Communist  Party  through  what  influence  they  can  wield  in 
trade  unionism,  to  sabotage  our  defense  program,  to  slow  down 
production  of  defense  material  for  security  purposes,  on  the  excuse, 
fii-st,  that  the}^  are  trying  to  improve  the  lot  of  labor  and,  secondly, 
because  they  are  opposed  to  this  country  embarking  on  an  "im- 
perialist war"? 

ISIr.  Bolling.  That  is  much  better  than  I  can  describe  it.  I  sub- 
scribe absolutely  to  that  view. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  would  be  an  accurate  statement  as  to  the  at- 
titude of  the  Communists  who  are  in  trade  unions  on  the  west  coast 
and  elsewhere? 

Mr.  Bolling.  That  is  absolutely  true. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  they  constantly  sought  to  bring  about  discord, 
dissatisfaction,  and  disruption  among  trade  unions  and  in  industry 
jilong  the  west  coast,  which  would  have  the  effect  of  slowing  down 
production  and  of  impeding  the  effort  of  the  American  people  to 
provide  security  for  themselves? 


un-a:mkkican  propaganda  activities  8593 

Ml'.  HoLLiNG.  Tlmt  is  my  personal  opinion  and  my  view  exactly 
und  moreover,  they  seem  to  have  the  policy  that  if  they  can't  rule 
or  get  control  oi"  the  union  the  next  step  is  to  break  it  up,  rule  or 
ruin  seems  to  be  the  policy  and  there  is  no  doubt  in  my  mind  about 
that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Any  other  questions,  Mr.  Voorhis  or  Mr.  Mason  ?  Any 
questions,  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  BoixiXG.  I  have  a  couple  of  statements  here  I  would  like  to 
make  to  clarify  a  situation.  One  of  them  is  concerning  Ralph  Reed, 
of  Los  .Vngeles,  who  was  mentioned  by  a  former  witness. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  BoLLiNG.  I  know  Ralpli  Reed  very  well,  and  I  know  the  circum- 
stances under  which  he  visited  this  meeting  that  was  spoken  of.  They 
told  him  that  they  were  going  to  organize — this  is  his  stoi*y  to  me,  and 
1  know  he  is  very  anticommunistic — they  told  him  they  were  going  to 
organize  dairy  workers  and  wanted  him  to  go  along,  and  they  got  him 
in  the  car  and  took  him  to  a  private  home  to  this  meeting. 

He  stayed  for  a  while  to  see  what  it  was  all  aboiut,  and  he  began  to 
realize  what  it  was  about.  They  sent  around  a  book  for  him  to  sign  to 
get  his  signature,  and  he  refused  to  sign  it;  and  they  told  him,  "Oh,  it 
is  only  a  guest  book."  He  said :  "Well,  I  don't  care  what  it  is ;  I  am  not 
going  to  sign  my  name  to  it,"  and  he  was  very  indignant  because  they 
got  him  to  that  meeting.  He  didn't  make  any  secret  about  his  disap- 
proval. 

I  just  want  to  make  it  clear  that  Ralph  Reed  is  certainly  not  in  any 
sense  of  the  word  a  Communist,  nor  is  he  sympathetic  to  the  Commu- 
nist Party. 

There  is  only  one  other  thing  that  I  would  like  to  say  a  word  on,  and 
that  is  regarding  the  strike  at  the  Ford  Motor  Co. 

When  we  first  went  out,  I  don't  think  we  had  been  out  but  a  few  hours 
until  v.e  had  a  representative  from  the  I.  W.  O. — the  International 
Workers  Order,  who  told  Mr.  Carson  in  my  presence  and  others  whom 
I  don't  remember — asked  us  if  we  needed  an  ambulance  and  a  nurse 
and  a  doctor  over  there.  We  were  a  little  bit  surprised  and  asked  him 
where  he  was  from,  and  he  told  us;  and  we  wanted  to  know  why  we 
should  need  an  ambulance,  nurse,  and  doctor,  and  he  said  :  "Oh,  you  are 
going  to  have  trouble ;  I  can  see  that  now."  He  said :  "We  will  keep  a 
nurse  and  ambulance  and  doctor  here  all  the  time." 

We  told  him  we  couldn't  do  it,  and  he  said  :  "It  won't  cost  anything." 
He  said  it  would  be  a  courtesy  of  the  organization  to  furnish  those 
things. 

]Mr.  Starxes.  Anything  further? 

Mr.  BoLLixG.  That  is  all. 

^Ir.  Starnes.  Thank  you,  Mr.  Boiling. 

Now.  Dr.  Matthews,  do  you  have  anything  else  you  want  to  present 
at  tliis  time? 

]Mr.  Matthews.  No,  sir ;  I  haven't  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  There  are  a  number  of  questions  which  have  been 
raised  by  the  testimony  today.  The  Chair  is  impressed,  as  I  think 
the  committee  is,  with  the  evident  sincerity  of  the  members  of  the 
trade  unions  to  rid  their  unions  of  any  influence  which  is  subversive 
in  its  character,  and  which  tends  not  only  to  discredit  trade  unions 
themselves,  but  in  this  critical  period  of  the  country  to  disturb  our 
national  unity  and  disrupt  production  for  security. 


g594  UN-AMEKICAX  PKOl'AGANUA  ACTIVITIES? 

At  a  later  meeting  or  session  of  this  subcommittee,  the  committee 
expects  to  call  before  it,  if  they  are  not  willing  to  appear  voluntarily, 
some  of  those  whose  names  which  were  mentioned  in  the  testimony 
today,  to  ascertain  their  attitude  toward  this  Government  of  ours 
and  toward  the  questions  raised. 

There  is  one  question  that  I  would  like  to  ask  one  person  if  he 
is  present  at  this  time.  I  would  like  to  ask  Mr.  Elmer  J.  Freitag  a 
question.     Is  Mr.  Freitag  present  ? 

Mr.  Freitag.  That  is  me ;  right  here. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Are  you  Mr.  Freitag? 

Mr.  Freffag.  That  is  rio;ht. 

Mr,  Starnes.  Do  you  mmd  answering  a  question  ? 

Mr.  Freitag.  No. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ELMER  J.  FEEITAG,  PRESIDENT,  LOCAL  683,  UNITED 
AUTOMOBILE  WORKERS,  CONGRESS  OF  INDUSTRIAL  ORGANIZA- 
TIONS, INGLEWOOD,  CALIF. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand? 
Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall  give  before  the 
committee,  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Freitag.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  a  seat.     Mr.  Freitag,  where  is  your  home? 

Mr.  Freitag.  Inglewood,  Calif. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  are  an  American  citizen? 

Mr.  Freitag.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  were  born  in  California? 

Mr.  Freitag.  That  is  right.  I  was  born  here  and  both  of  my 
parents  were  born  here — not  in  California — did  you  say  in  Califor- 
nia? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Where  were  you  born? 

Mr.  Freitag.  Chicago,  111. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  the  month,  da}',  and  year  of  your  birth? 

Mr.  Freitag.  The  da}'  and  year? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Freitag.  The  date  is  March  2,  1907. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  are  a  member  of  the  C.  I.  O.  ? 

Mr.  Freitag.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  local? 

Mr.  Freitag.  Local  683. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  are  a  member  of  Local  683  ? 

Mr.  Freitag.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  what  plant  and  in  what  affiliate  ? 

Mr.  Freitag.  I  am  at  North  American  Aviation,  Inc.,  of  Ingle- 
wood, Calif. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  what  union  are  you  affiliated  with?  What  is 
your  union  ?     Is  it  the  Automobile  Workers  ? 

Mr.  Freitag.  Aircraft  division  of  the  United  Automobile  Workers 
of  America. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  long  have  you  been  a  member  of  that  organiza- 
tion ? 

Mr.  Freitag.  How  long? 


UN-AMEIUCAN  PROPArxANDA  ACTIVITIES  8595 

^Ir.  Stahnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Freitag.  I  would  say,  o;enerally  speakinji,  about  3  years. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  lonji'  have  you  lived  in  California? 

Mr.  Freitac.  I  have  lived  in  Califoi-nia  about  5  or  G  years. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  lon<>:  have  you  been  entra<i;ed  in  some  sort  of 
profession — I  mean  by  that  how  lonfj  have  you  been  engaged  as  either 
a  worker  in  an  automobile  industry  or  aircraft  industry,  and  so 
forth? 

INIr.  Freitag.  How  long  have  I  followed  the  aircraft  profession;  is 
that  your  question? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Ml-.  Freitag.  Ever  since  I  came  out  of  high  school  and  spent  some 
3'ears  in  college. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  go  to  college? 

IVIr.  Freitag.  Yes ;  I  went  to  college. 

]Mr.  Starnes.  "Where  did  you  go? 

]Mr.  Freitag.  I  went  to  Crane  Junior  College  and  Armour  Institute 
of  Technology,  both  in  Chicago,  111. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  hold  any  official  position  in  your  local? 

Mr.  Freitag.  Yes ;  I  am  president  of  Local  683. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  hold  any  position  in  addition  to  that — do 
you  hold  any  district  or  international  office,  or  can  you  hold  an  inter- 
national office  and  a  local  office  also? 

Mr.  Freitag.  No:  I  am  just  a  worker  in  the  plant  and  president  of 
the  union,  that  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  will  ask  you  if  on  the  8th  Jay  of  January  1938, 
jou  registered  in  Los  Angeles  County  as  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  there? 

Mr.  Freitag.  I  would  say  that  I  am  not  a  member  of  the  party. 

Mr.  Starnes.  At  the  present  time? 

]Mr.  Freitag.  Or  have  ever  been  a  member  of  the  party. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  register  though  and  does  it  appear  there  in 
the  records  of  the  Honorable  W.  M.  Kerr,  registrar  of  voters,  Los 
Angeles  County,  as  a  Communist  voter  on  January  8,  1938? 

Mr.  Freitag.  Yes:  I  registered.  After  about  2  months  I  changed 
my  affiliation  to  the — before  I  could  even  vote,  to  the  Progressive 
Party :  that  is  correct. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  that  is  all. 

Any  questions,  ^Ir.  Voorhis? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  No:  I  don't  think  so. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Xow,  is  Mr.  Lew  Michener  present  ? 

Mr.  Michener.  Yes. 

TESTIMONY  OF  LEW  MICHENER 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  j)lease  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand?  Do 
you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall  give  before  this  com- 
mittee, will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth, 
so  hel|)  you  God? 

Mr.  INIlCHENER.    I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Michener,  the  committee  is  anxious  to  hear  you  at 
a  subsequent  hearing  and  I  would  like  to  know,  for  your  convenience 
as  well  as  that  of  the  connnittee,  will  you  be  in  the  city  for  several  days? 

Ml-.  Michener.  At  this  time  I  am  unable  to  state  definitely  on  that, 
but  I  imaiiine  I  will  be  here  at  least  over  the  week  end.  Congressman. 


3596  UN-AMERICAJ!^  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Could  you  arrange  or  can  we  arrange  with  you  for  a 
hearing  at  your  convenience  1  day  next  week  ? 

Mr.  MicHENER.  I  will  be  only  too  happy  to  appear  before  your  com- 
mittee.   My  address  is  the  Hamilton  Hotel. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  committee  is  going  into  executive  session  now 
and  as  soon  as  we  determine  when  the  committee  can  again  be  present 
for  a  hearing,  we  will  get  in  touch  with  you  to  arrange  for  your  appear- 
ance. 

Mr.  MicHENER.  As  a  patriotic  citizen  I  want  to  contribute  my  testi- 
mony. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Thank  you  very  much. 

The  committee  will  stand  adjourned  until  further  notice. 

( Whereupon,  the  committee  at  3 :  15  p.  m.,  adjourned  without  date.) 


INYESTKiATlON  OF  TN-AMERICAN  PROPAdANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


THURSDAY,   JUNE   10,    1941 

House  of  Representatives, 
Subcommittee  of  the  Special  Committee 

TO   IN^^ESTIGATE   Un-AmERICAN    ACTIVITIES, 

Washington,  D.  C 

The  subcommittee  met  at  2 :  30  p.  m.,  in  the  Banking  and  CiiiTency 
Committee  room,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee) 
presiding. 

Present :  Messrs.  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee)  and 
Voorhis. 

Also  present :  Mr.  Robert  E.  Stripling,  chief  investigator,  and  Dr. 
J.  B.  Matthews,  director  of  research. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  committee  will  come  to  order. 

The  committee  is  holding  a  session  this  afternoon  for  the  purpose 
of  hearing  the  testimony  of  Mr.  Balint.  Dr.  Matthews,  you  may 
proceed  with  the  examination. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ALEX  BALINT,  REGIONAL  DIRECTOR,  NATIONAL 

DIE  CASTERS  ASSOCIATION 

(Mr.  Balint  was  accompanied  by  his  attorney,  Edward  Lamb.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand? 
Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall  give  will  be 
the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you 
God? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  your  name? 

Mr.  Balint.  Alex  Balint. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  do  you  live? 

Mr.  Balint.  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  born,  Mr.  Balint? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  was  born  in  Hungary. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVhen? 

Mr.  Balint.  April  12,  1912. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  have  vou  been  in  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Balint.  Since  1920. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  a  citizen  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Balint,  Well,  I  have  just  been  informed  through  the  news- 
papers that  my  citizenship  has  been  held  up — final  papers. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  On  what  ground  was  your  citizenshij^  held  up, 
do  you  know? 

8597 


8598  rx-A:s[ERirAx  propaganda  activities! 

Mr.  Balint.  I  take  it  that  the  o:ronnds  were  because  I  was  active 
on  behalf  of  the  hiboring  people  of  this  country. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  received  any  notice  of  any  grounds? 

Mr.  Bai.int.  I  have  received  no  notice  whatsoever. 

Mr.  i\lATTHEWs.  You  don't  know  whether  or  not  your  application 
has  been  held  up  ^ 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  received  word  throuoh  the  newspapers  and 
it  seems  peculiar  that  they  should  be  held  u])  at  a  time  of  a  threat- 
ened aluminum  strike — at  the  time  the  strike  had  not  been  called 
and  I  fail — I  mean,  I  want  to  know  what  the  connection  between 
holding  up  my  final  citizenship  papers  is  and  my  activities  on  behalf 
of  the  workers  of  the  Aluminum  Co, 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  court  did  you  make  application  for  citi- 
zenship '^ 

Mr.  Balint.  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Mr.  JMatthews.  Before  what  judge? 

Mr.  Balint.  AVell,  it  wasn't  before  a  judge;  it  was  before  the 
naturalization  office  there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  had  any  hearings  on  your  citizenship 
papers? 

Mi-.  Balint.  I  have  passed  all  examinations,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  was  your  application  first  made? 

Mr.  Balint.  Apjilication  was  first  made  in  1938. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  gone  under  any  other  name  than  the 
name  of  Alex  Balint  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  never  used  any  other  name. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  a  middle  name? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  no  middle  name. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  never  gone  under  any  other  name  than  the 
name  of  Balint;  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Balint.  No  other  name  except  that. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  arrived  in  this  country  in  1920  you  were 
about  8  years  old ;  is  that  right? 

Mr.  Balint.  Six  or  8. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  did  you  obtain  your  first  employment  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Well,  I  have  worked  ever  since  I  was  12  years  old. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  did  you  first  go  to  work  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  first  started  when  I  was  12  years  old  to  picking  beans 
out  in  the  country  to  help  support  the  family. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  State  was  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  In  Indiana. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  after  that  when  was  your  next  employment  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  When  I  was  15  years  old.  I  left  school  to  get  a  job  in 
a  steel  foundry. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  was  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  In  Indiana. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  town? 

Mr.  Balint.  Indianapolis. 

Mr.  Mattllews.  In  what  steel  mill? 

Mr.  Balint.  Federal  Foundry. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  how  long  did  you  work  there? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  worked  there  approximately  2  years. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Do  you  remember  the  years  of  that  employment? 


UN-AMERICAN   PKUl'ACJANDA  ACTIVITIES  8599 

Mr.  Balint.  No;  I  don't.     It  would  be  very  hard  to  recall. 

Mr.  Matthews.  After  you  left  the  foundry  in  Indianapolis,  where 
did  you  have  your  next  employment  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Well,  for  a  time  I  was  on  C.  W.  A.,  I  think  they  called 
it  at  that  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  was  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  That  was  in  Cleveland. 

Mr.  Matthews,  How  lon*^  have  you  lived  in  Cleveland  ? 

]\Ir.  Balint.  Oh.  I  have  lived  in  Cleveland  now  otf  and  on  for 
approximately  12  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  After  you  left  your  employment  with  the  C.  W.  A., 
where  did  you  work? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  ^loi  employment  at  the  Republic  Steel  Corporation. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  year  was  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  Approximately  the  latter  part,  I  believe,  of  1934  or 
1933,  1934  and  1935  I  worked  there.  The  years  mioht  not  be  right 
but  it  is  right  in  that  period. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  at  Republic  Steel,  in  CleA'eland? 

Mr.  Balint.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  vou  dismissed  from  Republic — from  Republic 
Steel? 

Mr.  Baunt.  Yes;  I  was  discharged  because  I  was  president  of  an 
A.  F.  of  L.  labor  union  there  at  the  time. 

Mr.  ]\r\TTHEWs.  When  did  you  have  your  next  employment  after 
leaving  Re])ublic  Steel? 

Mr.  Balint.  My  next  employment  after  I  was  discharged,  I  pro- 
ceeded to  organize  workers  into  the  unions  of  the  C.  I.  O. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  unions? 

Mr.  Balint.  The  Steel  Workers'  Organizing  Conmiittee. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVhere  did  you  work  for  the  Steel  Workers'  Organ- 
izing Committee  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  In  Cleveland.  Ohio. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long? 

Mr.  Balint.  Approximately  2  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  organize  for  any  other  unions  than  the 
Steel  AVorkers'  Organizing  Committee? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  organized  for  the  Cleveland  Industrial  Union 
Council.    That  is  the  central  labor  body  of  the  C.  I.  O.  in  Cleveland. 

Mr.  ^Iatthews.  What  particular  field  of  workers  were  you  organiz- 
ing among  them? 

Mr.  Balint.  Well,  it  was  pretty  general. 

^Ir.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  been  arrested  ? 

Mr.  B\lint.  Yes;  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When? 

Ml'.  B  slint.  I  was  arrested  when  I  was  16  years  old. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AVere  you  convicted  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  AAliat  was  the  charge? 

Mr.  l^ALTNT.  AVell.  the  charge  was  that  a  friend  and  I  went  to  Chi- 
cago on  a  vacation 

Mr.  Matthews.  AAVll.  you  weren't  charged  with  going  to  Chicago 
on  a  vacation ;  you  were  charged  with  stealing  an  automobile,  weren't 
vou  ? 


8QQ0  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Ealint.  No;  I  wasn't  charoed  with  stealing  any  automobile. 

Mr,  Matthews.  What  was  the  charge  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  If  you  will  just  let  me  explain  I  will  tell  you  the  charge. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  you  weren't  charged  with  going  to  Chicago 
on  a  vacation  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  am  proceeding  to  explain  fully  if  you  will  just  allow 
me,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  right,  go  ahead. 

Mr.  Balint.  I  went  to  Chicago  on  a  vacation  with  a  friend  of  mine 
and  two  people  that  we  went  to  see  there  had  an  automobile  and 
wanted  to  know  if  we  would  go  riding  with  them,  and  we  did.  It 
turned  out  to  be  a  stolen  automobile.  The  friend  that  I  was  with,  his 
father  intervened  for  him  and  he  was  let  off,  while  I  didn't  have  no 
one  to  intervene  for  me  and  I  was  convicted. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A¥hat  was  the  charge? 

Mr.  Balint.  The  charge  was,  as  I  recall  it,  auto  theft. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  that  is  what  I  asked  you  and  you  said  "No." 

Mr.  Balint.  Well,  as  I  said,  I  didn't  steal  the  automobile;  I  was 
merely  riding  in  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  All  right;  did  you  serve  a  term? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  did. 

Mv.  Matthews.  Where  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  In  the  reformatory. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  Pontiac? 

Mr.  Balint.  That  is  light. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Illinois? 

Mr.  Balint.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  a  term  did  you  serve  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Ap])roximately  11  months. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  you  join  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Lamb.  Oh,  just  a  second.  You  don't  have  to  answer  that.  Do 
you  want  to  discuss  that  ?  I  mean  you  don't  have  to  attempt  to  answer 
that.     It  is  a  loaded  question. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  the  attorney  says  the  witness  does 
not  have  to  answer  such  a  question. 

Mr.  Lamb.  I  insist  he  doesn't  have  to  answer  the  question.  I  assume 
we  are  going  to  conduct  a  legitimate  hearing  here. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Certainly,  we  don't  conduct  any  other  kind. 

Mr.  Lamb.  I  am  sure  we  won't  today. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  a  ])erfectly  legitimate  question. 

Mr.  Lamb.  Well,  it  isn't  a  proper  question,  and  Mr.  Matthews  should 
be  the  first  one  to  know  it.  Now,  I  think  this  witness  should  be 
advised  by  the  committee  what  his  rights  are. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Let  us  ask  the  question  whether  he  did  join  the 
Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Balint.  Will  you  advise  me  of  my  rights? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Answer  the  question  whether  you  did  join  the 
Communist  Party. 

Mv.  Balint.  I  never  joined  the  Communist  Party  or  any  other 
political  organization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  have  never  been  affiliated  with  the  Com- 
munist Party  in  any  sha])e,  form,  or  fashion? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  luive  never  been  affiliated  with  any  political 
organization. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8601 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  been  affiliated  witli  tlie  Cnrnmunisl; 
Party? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  never  been  affiliated  with  the  Communist  Party 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Earl  Browder  personally? 

Mr.  Balint.  No:  I  do  not. 

]Mr.  Ma'ithkws.  You  have  never  met  him? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  never  met  him. 

Mr.  ^[atitiews.  Did  you  ever  ur,ire  attendance  upon  any  of  Brow- 
der's  meetin<>s  or  upon"  anv  Browder  meeting,  in  the  city  of  Cleve- 
land? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  want  to  say  now  for  the  record  that  I  am  not  inter- 
ested in  connuunism  or  any  other  foreign  "isms,"  and  I  resent  being 
questioned  on  communism  because  I  don't  know  anything  about  it. 

Mr.  IMatthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  for  the  witness  to 
answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Answer  the  question. 

Mr.  La?,ib.  Tell  him  this  is  nothing  but  an  attempt  to  smear  our 
organization. 

Mr.  Balint.  This  is  nothing  but  an  attempt  to  smear  our  organiza- 
tion and  to  smear  the  purpose  for  wliicli  we  are  striking  for. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  are  being  asked,  Mr.  Witness,  perfectly  legiti- 
mate and  pertinent  ci[uestions.  You  were  asked  whether  you  were  a 
member  of  the  Communist  Party  and  you  can  answer  that  ei<:her 
"Yes"'  or  ""No."  You  have  been  asked  whether  you  associated  with 
Earl  Browder  in  any  particular  activities  along  any  particular  en- 
deavor, and  that  is  a  perfectly  legitimate  question,  because  everybody 
in  the  country  knows  that  Earl  Browder  has  been  for  many  years 
the  head  of  that  party  in  this  counry  and  that  is  the  reason  you  are 
asked  that  question. 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  testified,  sir,  I  do  not  know  Earl  Browder. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  will  repeat  the  question :  Have  you  ever  urged 
attendance  u])on  any  meeting  addressed  by  Earl  Browder  in  the  city 
of  Cleveland? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  testified  that  I  am  not  interested  in  communism, 
therefore  I  would  not  be  urging  anyone  to  attend  any  Connnunist 
meetings. 

Mr.  ^Iatthews.  Have  you  ever  done  so  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  never  done  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  acquainted  with  a  lady  named  Vera 
Apergis  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Vera  Apergis? 

Mr.  Maitiiews.  Apergis — A-p-e-r-g-i-s? 

Mr.  Balint.   (No  response.) 

Mr,  Matthews.  Do  you  know  her? 

Mr.  Balint.  Yes;  I  believe  I  do,  if  it  is  the  one  we  are  thinking  of. 

Mr.  Ma'ithews.  Under  what  circumstances  did  you  know  Mrs. 
Apergis  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  was  organizing  for  the  C.  I.  O.,  helping  to  clear 
up  a  situation  there  in  the  W.  P.  A.  organization  at  the  time,  for 
the  Industrial  Union  Council,  and  I  believe  that  she  was  one  of  the 
disrupters  that  was  thrown  out  of  the  organization. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  And  where  was  that;  in  Cleveland? 

Mr.  Balint.  In  Cleveland. 


3g02  UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr,  Matthews.  When  you  say  ''disrupter,''  what  do  you  mean  by 
that? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  mean  a  person  who  attempts  to  break  up  hibor 
organizations. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  What  was  her  position  in  the  organization? 

Mr.  Balint.  For  a  time  she  was  the  president  of  it, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  appointed  you  to  your  position? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  The  president  of  what? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Of  the  union,  I  understood  him  to  say, 

Mr,  Balint,  She  was  president  of  one  of  the  sewing  clubs  there- 
sewing  union, 

Mr.  Matthews,  Of  the  C.  I.  O.  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  she  was  trying  to  break  it  up  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Yes. 

Mr,  Matthews.  This  was  a  C.  I.  O.  union? 

Mr.  Balint.  It  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Industrial  Sewing  Union? 

Mr.  Balint.  It  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  a  hand  in  having  her  thrown  out 
of  the  union? 

Mr.  Balint.  No  organizer  of  any  C.  I.  O.  union  has  a  hand  in 
throwing  out  anyone — anyone  out  of  any  union.  If  the  membership 
feels  that  they  want  to  vote  out  someone  that  is  their  privilege,  and 
in  this  case  they  exercised  that  privilege  and  voted  her  out  of  office. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  appointed  you  to  your  position  in  this  union 
where  you  were  associated  with  Mrs.  Apergis? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  was  not — never  associated  with  Mrs.  Apergis  and 
would  not  care  to  be  linked  up  in  any  association  whatsoever  with 
her. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Why  did  it  take  you  several  seconds,  to  put  it 
mildly,  to  tell  the  committee  whether  or  not  you  ever  knew  Mrs. 
Apergis  ? 

j\fr.  L\MB.  I  think  the  witness  certainly  should  be  given  the  benefit 
of  the  Chair's  advice  as  to  the  propriety  of  such  type  of  examina- 
tion, as  to  why  he  took  several  seconds  to  answer  a  question,  when 
he  didn't  even  know  who  the  questioner  was  talking  about, 

Mr,  Matthews.  I  would  like  to  point  out  that  it  took  a  very  long 
while  for  him,  to  refresh  his  memory  but  now  he  seems  to  know  a 
great  deal  about  Mrs.  Apergis. 

Mr.  Lamb.  Tell  him  you  didn't  know  who  he  was  talking  about. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Just  in  case  the  record  doesn't  show  the  length 
of  time  it  took  him  to  answer  the  question 

Mr.  Balint.  I  merely  wanted  to  make  sure  that  it  was  the  person 
I  had  in  mind.    I  haven't  seen  or  heard  of  her  for  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  year  was  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  And  in  my  work  I  meet  a  lot  of  i)eople — thousands 
of  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  in  what  year  was  that  that  vou  last  knew 
her? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  believe  that  was  in  1938. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  was  in  1939,  wasn't  it,  Mr.  Balint  ? 


UX-AMElilCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8603 

Mr.  Balint.  "Well.  T  am  not  going  to  argue  about  a  couple  of 
months. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  aren't  you  sure? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  don't  recall  offhand.  It  is  somewhere  in  that 
period. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  say  that  was  "years  ago"? 

Mr,  Balint.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Two  years,  to  be  exact? 

Mr.  Balint.  Two  or  three  years  ago. 

IVIr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  show  your  Communist  Party  mem- 
bership book  to  Mrs.  Apergis? 

Ml'.  Balint.  That  is  a  downright  lie.  I  never  had  any  Com- 
munist Pai-ty  membership  book,  nor  have  I  ever  been  affiliated  in  any 
way,  shape,  or  form  with  any  connnunistic  organizations. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  don't  know  what  the  witness 
refers  to  when  he  says  "it  is  a  downright  lie.''  I  asked  him  a  ques- 
tion and  I  would  like  to  have  him  answer  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Your  answer  is  that  3^ou  did  not  show  her  your 
Comnumist  Party  membership  book? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  would  have  no  book  to  show  her.  I  testified  that  I 
was  not  a  member  and  therefore  I  would  notJiave  a  book  to  show  her. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  reply  to  Dr.  Matthews,  your  answer  is  that  you 
■did  not  show  her  any  Communist  Party  membership  book? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  didn't  have  any  Communist  Party  membership 
book.  My  answer  was  that  I  was  not  in  any  way  affiliated  with 
any  communistic  organizations,  and  therefore  I  would  not  have 
any  Communist  book  to  show  her, 

Mr,  Starnes.  I  am  asking  you  the  direct  question :  Have  you  ever 
had  a  Communist  Party  memlDership  book  ? 

Mr,  Balint.  I  never  did  have. 

Mr.  Starnes,  And  you  never  did  show  her  a  Communist  Party 
membership  book? 

Mr.  Balint.  If  I  never  had  any,  I  couldn't  show  any. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Therefore  you  didn't  show  one? 

Mr.  Balint.   (Xo  response.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Let  us  not  beg  the  question;  say  "No"  if  you  didn't 
or  "Yes"  if  you  did.     It  is  not  difficult  for  you  to  say  that,  is  it? 

Mr.  Baltnt.  I  would  not  have  any  book  to  show  and  therefore  I 
didn't  show  any. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Go  ahead.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  vou  ever  work  in  the  South? 

Mr.  Balint.  In  the  South? 

IVIr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

Mr.  Balint.   (No  response.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  any  southern  State? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  never  worked  nor  have  I  ever  been  in  any 
Southern  States.     I  lieard  the  South  is  very  bad  for  labor  organizers. 

i\Ir.  MA'niiEws.  Do  vou  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  Andrew 
Balunek? 

Mr.  Balint.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "Will  you  do  youi'  best  to  refresh  your  recollection, 
if  you  wish  to? 


8Q()4  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  B  \LiNT.  Go  aliead,  help  me  along,  maybe  I  can  remember  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Then  answer  whether  or  not  you  know  Andrew 
Baliinek^ 

Mr.  Lamb.  I  think  the  witness  already  answered  that  he  didn't 
know  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  would  like  for  the  witness  to  have  an  oppor- 
tunity to  refresh  his  recollection  and  if  he  cares  to,  to  change  his 
answer. 

Mr.  Balint.  Offhand  I  would  say  that  from  the  name — the  name 
does  not  sound  familiar  to  me.  Perhaps  if  you  can  acquaint  me  with 
the  things  that  happened  or  something,  I  can  remember  him. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews,  how  long  will  it  take  you  to  conclude 
your  examination  of  this  witness?  We  better  let  the  record  show 
who  is  appearing  for  the  witness  as  attorney. 

Mr.  Lamb.  My  name  is  Edward  Lamb,  attornej',  Toledo,  Ohio.  I 
am  also  general  counsel  for  the  National  Association  of  Die  Casting 
Workers,  affiliated  with  the  C.  I.  O.,  which  is  involved  in  the  nego- 
tiations with  the  Ahniiinum  Co.,  which  are  now  taking  place  before 
the  Mediation  Board. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  would  like  to  ask  a  question :  Do  you  know  Ken- 
neth Eggert? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  read  about  Kenneth  Eggert. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  vou  know  him?  You  can  answer  my  question 
^'Yes^'  or  "No." 

Mr.  Balint.  I  do  not  know  Kenneth  Eggert. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  all  I  want  to  know, 

Mr.  Balint.  1  have  read  about  Kenneth  Eggert. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  meet  him? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  never  met  Kenneth  Eggert. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  go  ahead.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  he  works  for  the 
same  union  you  do? 

Mr.  Balint.  It  is  my  information  that  he  does. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  where  he  works  for  tlie  same  union? 

Mr.  Balint.  The  last  I  recall,  it  was  somewhere  iii  Kansas  City  or 
somewhere  west. 

Mr.  IVIatthews.  How  long  ago  was  that  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Oh,  that  was  several  weeks  ago. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  your  position  with  the  National  Die  Casters 
Association  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  My  position  is— I  am  the  regional  director  in  the 
Cleveland  area. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  how  long  have  you  held  that  position  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Approximately  2  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  an  elective  position  or  appointive  posi- 
tion ? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  was  elected  by  the  national  board  of  the  organization. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Who  is  the  national  president  of  the  union? 

Mr.  Balint.  The  national  president  is  George  Peacock. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Who  is  tlie  national  secretary-treasurer? 

My.  Balint.  Edward  Cheyfitz  is  executive  secretary. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Edward  Cheyfitz  is  executive  secretary? 

Mr.  Balint.  Yes. 


UN-AMERICAN    I'UOrAGANDA   A(  "ll\  i  il  KS  8605 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Balint,  do  yini  believe  that  the  Coiunmiiiyt 
Party  is  a  menace  to  organized  labor? 

Mr.  Balint.  1  don't  know  the  program  nor  the  policies  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  and  tlieivfoi-e  I  woidd  not  be  in  a  position  to  answer  a 
question  of  that  kind.  If  you  would  acquaint  me  with  what  they  do, 
perhaps  on  the  various  thin«>;s  that  you  bring  out  I  would  answer. 

Mr.  Matphews.  Have  you  ever  encountered  any  Communists  in  your 
woi'k  as  an  oroanizer? 

Mr.  Balint.  Not  that  I  recall.  It  is  not  my  purpose  going  around 
asking  members  of  our  organization  what  their  political  opinions  are 
or  affiliations  might  be. 

iNlr.  Matthews.  You  believe  the  Connnunists  have  the  same  right  to 
a  place  and  activity  in  a  labor  organization  as  any  other  political 
group  ? 

]Mr.  Balint.  I  might  say  that  in  our  oi-ganization  we  pursue  a  policy 
that  where  an  employer  hires  a  grou])  of  workers  to  work  for  liini  we — 
all  those  workers  working  in  a  particular  plant  are  eligible  for  mem- 
bership in  our  union. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Do  you  believe  that  Communists  or  Communist 
Party  members  properly  should  be  officers  of  a  labor  organization^ 

Mr.  Balint.  I  don't  know  any,  therefore,  I  wouldn't  know.  I  would 
say  that  the  workers  in  our  union  have  a  free  choice  by  secret  ballot  to 
elect  their  own  officers  and  they  exercise  that  right. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthi:ws.  In  other  words  you  decline  to  say  that  you  do  n(jt 
believe  that  Communists  have  no  place  in  official  positions  in  a  union  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  don't  know,  sir,  of  any  Communists  in  our  union. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  your  o]^inion  as  a  labor  man,  do  you  think  they 
should  have  such  positions? 

]SIr.  Balint.  I  have  said  that  our  constitution  provides  who  is  and 
who  is  not  eligible  for  membership  in  our  organization,  and  it  states 
that  any  worker  working  in  a  given  plant  is  eligible  for  membership 
in  the  organization,  provided,  of  course,  that  he  is  not  of  a  super- 
visory capacity. 

ISIr.  Starnes.  That  does  not  answer  the  question.  You  don't  care 
whether  he  is  a  Democrat  or  a  Ile])ublican  or  Communist  or  a  Nazi 
or  anything  else? 

Mr.  Balint.  We  make  it  a  practice 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  know,  but  without  making  a  speech,  I  am  asking 
you  the  question  whether  or  not  it  makes  any  difference  whether  your 
union  leaders  are  Republicans,  Democrats,  Communists,  Nazis,  or 
anything  else? 

Mi-.  Balint.  I  am  not  making  a  speech  or  at  least  I  am  trying  to  be 
brief  as  possible. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  can  be  brief  by  just  saying  ''Yes"  or  "No."  In 
other  words  it  is  your  philosophy  that  it  doesn't  make  any  difference, 
insofar  as  you  are  concerned,  whether  the  officers  of  your  unions  are 
members  of  tlie  Democratic  Party,  the  Republican  Party,  the  Com- 
munist Party,  the  Nazi  Party,  or  any  other  party;  it  ctoesn't  make 
any  difference? 

IVIr.  La^fb.  Tell  him  that  you  will  make  your  own  answers, 

Mr.  Balint.  If  you  will  ])ermit  me.  I  will  make  my  own  answer,  sir. 

IMr.  Lamb.  Tell  him  your  constitution  provides  for  the  eligibility  of 
members. 


33()g  UX-AMEUirAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVrTIP:S 

Mr.  Balint.  The  answer  is  our  constitution  provides  as  to  who  is 
eligible  and  who  is  not  eligible  for  membership  in  our  organization 
and  you  nor 

Mr.  Starnes.  Just  a  moment.  Does  your  constitution  prohibit  a 
man  from  being  an  officer  of  your  union  if  he  is  a  Democrat? 

Mr.  Balint.  Our  constitution,  as  I  stated,  doesn't 

Mr.  Starxes.  Answer  that  question  and  then  you  can  go  ahead  and 
explain  your  answer.  Answer  my  question  first  and  then  you  can 
make  any  explanation  you  want  to. 

Mr.  Lamb.  I  think,  Mr.  Chairman 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Attorney,  he  can  answer  the  question  and  then  if 
he  wants  to  qualify  his  answers  in  any  way  he  may  do  so. 

Mr.  Lamb.  But  I  am  afraid  you  are  not  giving  him  an  opportunity 
to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Does  your  constitution  ]3rohibit  a  Democrat  from  be- 
ing a  member  of  your  organization  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Our  constitution 

Mr.  Starnes.  Answer  ''Yes"  or  "No"  to  that  and  then  you  can 
make  your  explanation. 

Mr.  Balint.  Our  constitution 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  wait  a  minute,  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Balint.  It  does  not. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  make  any  statement  you  want  to. 

Mr.  Balint.  The  constitution  of  our  organization  provides  that  any 
worker  working  in  our  particular  industry  or  any  worker  working 
in  any  plant  related  to  the  industry,  is  eligible  for  membership  in 
our  organization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right.  Now,  that  being  true  it  does  not  make  any 
diiference  if  he  is  a  Republican;  does  it? 

Mr.  Lamb.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Balint.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  it  doesn't  make  any  difference  if  he  is  a  Commu- 
nist; does  it? 

Mr.  Balint.  We  never  ask  people  what  their  political  opinions  are. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Therefore  it  doesn't  make  any  difference  to  you 
w^hether  he  is  a  Communist  or  not  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  Like  all  other  unions,  we  take  in  everybody. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  answered  very  courteously,  it  does  not  make  any 
difference  if  he  was  a  Democrat  and  it  did  not  make  any  difference  if 
he  was  a  Republican,  and  then  you  made  your  statement.  Now,  an- 
swer my  question.  If  you  want  to  say  anything  further,  all  right,  but 
does  it  make  any  difference  to  you  if  he  is  a  Communist  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  If  an  employer  hires  a  man  in  a  particular  plant 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  made  that  statement. 

Mr.  Balint.  He  is  eligible  for  membership  in  our  union. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  I  want  you  to  answer  my  question.  You  have 
made  that  statement  already.  Does  it  make  any  difference  to  you 
whether  or  not  he  belongs  to  the  Communist  Party  so  far  as  the  union 
is  concerned  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  So  far  as  the  union  is  concerned,  I  can  only  say  that  as 
a  responsible  officer  of  my  union  I  follow  out  the  program  and  policies 
that  our  conventions  democratically  set  forth  in  the  constitution. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8607 

Mr.  Starnf.s.  And  in  reply  to  questions  whicli  have  been  put  to  you 
in  a  courteous  numner  time  and  time  again  here,  you  fail  and  refuse  to 
state  whether  or  not  it  makes  any  difference  whether  your  members 
are  members  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Balint.   (No  response.) 

Mr.  Lamb.  Tell  him  you  want  to  give  a  complete  answer  to  every 
question  that  he  asks  you,  and  that  you  want  to  explain  the  constitution 
of  your  union. 

Mr.  8TAENES.  You  are  not  prepared  to  answer  that  question,  then, 
unequivocally? 

Mr.  Lamb.  He  is  fully  prepared  if  you  will  just  give  him  an  oppor- 
tunity to  answer  the  question. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Attorney,  he  answered  similar  questions,  identi- 
cal questions,  with  reference  to  whether  or  not  it  made  any  difference 
whether  members  of  his  union  belonged  to  the  Democratic  or  Republi- 
can Part}',  but  the  moment  we  ask  about  the  Communist  Party  he  is 
unable,  ai^parently,  to  give  a  direct  answer  to  the  question. 

Mr.  Balint.  That,  sir,  is,  well 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  better  be  sure  what  you  are  going  to  say. 

Mr.  Balint.  I  thought  I  had  answered  the  question. 

Mr.  Starne's.  No;  you  did  not. 

Mr.  Lamb.  Yes;  he  did. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  asked  you  frankly  to  answer  my  question  as  you 
answered  questions  propounded  to  you  as  to  whetlier  or  not  it  made 
any  ditf'erence  whether  a  member  or  officer  of  your  union  was  a 
Democrat  or  Rej^ublican,  both  of  which  questions  you  answered  that 
it  made  no  difference. 

Now,  you  don't  have  anything  to  say  as  to  Communist  Party  mem- 
i)ers  who  might  be  officials  or  members  of  your  union? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  said,  sir,  that  I  as  an  individual  am  not  authorized 
to  say  wlio  is  eligible  and  who  is  not  eligible  to  join  this  organization. 

Mr.  Starnes.  AVell,  is  a  Conmiunist  eligible  to  join? 

Mr.  Balint.  If  he  is  working  in  a  given  plant — any  group  of 
workers — anvbodv  is  eligible  to  join  the  membership  just  like  you 
do  in  the  A.  F.  of  L.  or  C.  I.  O. 

A[r.  Starnes.  Now,  we  are  getting  somewhere.  Could  a  member 
of  the  Gei-man-American  Bund  join  your  organization?  Do  you 
welcome  them  into  your  membership? 

Ml'.  Balint.  How  do  I  know  who  is  a  member  of  the  German- 
xVmerican  Bund  { 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  accept  members  of  the  National  Socialist 
Party,  the  Nazi  Partv.  and  members  of  the  German-American  Bund 
int(k  a  union  if  they  are  working  in  the  plant?  Are  they  eligible  for 
membership? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  have  no  infornuition  on  that,  as  to  any  Communists 
cf  Nazis  or  anybody  else. 

Mr.  A'ooRiiis.  Let  us  put  it  this  way:  I  tliink  I  understand  about 
youi-  constitution  and  the  fact  that  you  feel  that  anyone  who  is 
working  in  a  ])lant  should  be  a  member  of  the  union,  but  let  me  ask 
you  this:  Do  you  believe  that  it  would  be  a  l)ad  thing  foi-  your 
union  if  it  happened  that  a  person  who  was  a  Communist  oi'  a  mem- 
ber of  the  German-American   Bund,  were  elected  to  a  position  or 

02626 11— vol.  14 29 


8608  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITTES 

chosen  in  some  maimer  to  a  position  of  leadership  and  influence, 
wliere  he  could  affect  what  happened  to  the  union  in  its  negotiations 
and  in  its  work? 

Mr.  Balint.  My  answer  to  that  would  be  that  if  the  next  national 
convention  of  our  union  wants  to  define  or  eliminate  any  group  of 
people  being  members  of  the  union,  they  have  that  right.  I  haven't 
got  that  right. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  did  not  ask  you  if  you  had  tliat  right  nor  do  I 
expect  you  to  exercise  a  right  that  you  haven't  got.  I  simply  asked 
you  whetlier  you  believed  or  didn't  believe  that  it  would  be  a  bad 
thing  for  the  union  if  a  person  who  was  a  Communist  or  a  member 
of  the  German- American  Bund  should  happen  to  be  elected  or  ap- 
pointed to  a  position  of  ofRcial  trust  in  the  union? 

Mr.  Balint.   ( No  response. ) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews,  do  you  have  anything  fuither  of  this 
witness  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  have  two  questions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Go  ahead. 

Mr.  Lamb.  Wait  a  second;  I  think  Mr.  Voorhis  is  entitled  to  an 
answer  to  his  question. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  woukl  like  to  have  an  answer.  What  would  you  say 
to  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  Will  you  repeat  your  question? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  Understanding  the  constitution  of  the  union,  I  asked 
you  whether  you  believed  that  it  would  be  a  bad  thing  for  your  or- 
ganization and  harmful  to  it,  if  a  person  that  was  a  Communist  or 
a  member  of  the  German-American  Bund  should  be  elected  or  ap- 
pointed to  a  position  of  official  trust  where  he  could  represent  the 
union  and  carry  on  its  activities  and  make  decisions? 

Mr.  Balint.  Just  1  minute  and  I  will  answer  that  question. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Let  the  record  show  the  witness  is  conferring  with 
his  attorney  before  he  answers  the  question.  He  must  have  legal 
advice  before  he  can  answer  such  a  question  as  that. 

Mr.  Lamb.  In  that  particular  subject,  Mr.  Starnes,  I  appreciate 
your  suggestion  that  it  should  show  of  record  if  a  witness  consults 
with  his  attorney.  I  am  personally  not  ashamed  of  advising  the 
witness  as  counsel  before  this  committee  or  any  other  place. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  quite  all  right,  but  let  the  witness  answer  the 
question. 

Mr.  Lamb.  May  I  make  a  statement  for  tlie  record  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  No:  it  is  not  necessary.  There  was  simply  a  delay 
in  the  proceedings  here  and  I  merely  said  let  the  record  show  that 
the  witness  is  conferring  with  his  attorney. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  think  my  question  is  plain  enough,  isn't  it? 

Mr.  Baijnt.  I  Avoukl  say,  relative  to  your  question,  that  the  policy 
of  our  organization,  and  I  have  nothing  to  say  as  to  that  policy  in  the 
fonnulation  of  it,  is  set  by  convention. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  did  not  ask  you  about  the  policy.  I  understand  the 
policy.  I  just  asked  you  how  you  would  feel  about  a  situation  like 
that.' 

Mr.  Balint.  Well,  how  I  feel  doesn't  particularly  matter. 

Mr.  Voorhis.  But  it  might  matter 


rX-A.MKUirAX   1'ROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8609 

Mr.  Ballnt.  I  am  an  oilict'i  of  a  labor  organization  and  I  must 
necessarily  follow  out  their  policy  and  program  as  they  decide  by 
tlemocratic  convention. 

Mr.  Vo(^iniis.  As  a  member  of  the  organization  though,  you  have 
a  I'ight  to  the  floor  and  you  have  a  right  to  take  a  position. 

Mr.  Balint.  1  take  ])ositions.  I  can  assure  j^ou. 

Ml-.  V(iORHis.  If  you  knew  that  a  man  was  a  Communist  or  a 
meriiber  of  the  German-American  Bund  would  you  oppose  his  elec- 
tion to  an  office^ 

Mr.  Balixt.  Well,  it  is  very  ditlit-uli,  sir,  to  answer  "if"  questions. 
It  is  always  on  some  supposition.  If  you  would  give  me  a  specific 
px:imi)le  as  to  something  that  an  individual  did  I  would  tell  you 
whether  I  woidd  opi)ose  him  on  the  floor  or  not. 

Mr.  L.v.MB.  Ask  him  for  a  3  cents  an  hour  raise. 

Mr.  Balint.  We  are  asking  for  a  -tVo-cent  general  wage  increase 
from  the  Aluminum  Co.  That  company  has  been  tied  with  the 
Nazi-Fascist  industries  in  Germany  and  we  are  called  Communists 
for  that  reason. 

Mr.  Vooi{iiis.  I  hold  no  brief  for  the  Aluminum  Co. 

Ml-.  Balixt.  And  I  call  on  this  committee  now  to  investigate  the 
Aluminum  Co.  and  its  Nazi  tie-ups  to  deteniiine  why  they  provoked 
this  strike  out  in  Cleveland,  after  we  had  worked  for  2  days  to  ask 
tliat  tlie  men  not  strike,  but  that  they  couldn't — but  that  they  con- 
tinue working  while  we  mediate  the  strike. 

^Ir.  VooKHis.  You  mean  the  company  refused  to  have  them  con- 
tinue working?  : 

Mr.  Balixt.  I  said  that  someone  provoked  that  strike.  We  havei 
settled  all  of  that  back  home  but  when  we  came  here  there  is  a 
sudden  walk-out  and  our  negotiating  committee  maintains  that  this 
w;ilk-out  was  provoked  by  company  agents. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Will  y(»u  give  the  committee  the  names  of  any  Nazi 
agents  connected  ^\"ith  the  company? 

Mr.  La.^ih.  Several  of  them  are  under  indictment. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Mr.  Balint. 

Mr.  Balixt.  I  Avould  say.  sii-.  tliat  you  can  get  all  that  information' 
fi'om  the 

Mr.  VooRiiis.  Department  of  Justice? 

Air.  B.MJXT.  That  is  right,  in  their  suit  against  the  company. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Have  you  got  any  information  that  you  can  give 
us  with  i-eferen(-e  to  the  work  of  Nazi  agents  in  the  company? 

.Mr.  Balixt.  1  have  no  such  information  but  I  do  have  informa- 
tion of  sabotage  ronnnitted  in  the  |)]ants  of  the  American  Aluminum 
Co.  of  Amei-ica.  and  we  have  witnesses  who  saw  this  sabotage.  We 
have  called  it  to  the  attention  of  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation 
ainl  thus  far.  as  we  know,  no  investigation  has  been  made  as  to 
tliis  |»articular  act  of  sabotage  tliat  took  place. 

Mr.  Starxes.  You  mean  to  tell  nie  that  the  F.  B.  I.  refused  to 
investigate  a  nuitter  of  sal)otage  reported  to  them  in  a  plant  on 
ilefense  ordei-s^ 

Mr.  Il\L!Nr.  I  said  as  far  as  our  information  is  no  action  has  yet 
been  taken. 

Mr.  St.xrxes.  AVill  vou  furnish  the  secretarv  of  this  committee 
the  names  of  those  people? 


3510  UN-AMERICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Balint.  I  will  furnish  it  here  to  you  publicly,  the  exact  act  that 
took  place. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  to  know  the  names  of  the  people. 

Mr.  Balint.  I  will  tell  you  the  names  here  publicly. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Please  do  that. 

Mr.  Lamb.  Go  ahead;  tell  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  would  like  to  have  the  names  of  those  people  who 
are  Nazi  sympathizei's  and  who  conmiitted  acts  of  sabotage  in  the 
plant;  and  another  thing.  Mi.  Balint,  if  you  know  of  any  tie-up  of 
Communists  on  the  one  hand  and  the  Nazis  on  the  other  to  stop  pro- 
duction in  the  plant,  we  would  like  to  know  about  that. 

Mr,  Balint.  To  proceed,  then? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes. 

Mr.  Balint.  Approximately  a  month  and  a  half  or  so  ago,  a  work 
stoppage  took  place  in  the  American  Magnesium  Corporation,  a  plant 
that  is  wholly  owned  now  by  the  Aluminum  Co.  of  America,  in  Cleve- 
land, known  as  the  X  plant.  This  work  stoppage  took  place  on  a  Fri- 
day and,  of  course,  there  was  no  work  on  Saturday  and  all  the  men 
went  home  protesting  against  some  actions  thexe  of  the  foremen  on 
wage  rates  and  other  bad  working  conditions.  After  that  work  stop- 
page took  place,  we  have  witnesses  who  saw  Haskell,  the  general  man- 
ager of  that  plant,  come  in  on  Saturday  morning,  and  he  proceeded  to 
M'reck  and  break  molds  that  had  already  been  made  by  these  workers; 
and  he  brought  with  him  a  photogi-apher  and.  after  he  had  wrecked 
these  molds,  he  would  take  this  photographer — this  photographer 
would  take  pictures  of  it. 

Then  they  proceeded  to  go  into  the  men's  washroom  and  throw  the 
seats  off  of  there,  throw  paper  all  around  and  take  pictures  of  the  mess 
that  they  had  created  there.  Further  than  that,  they  went  and  broke 
windows  in  the  plant  and  took  pictures  of  that. 

Now,  there  is  something  as  to  the  purpose — there  is  a  real  act  of 
sabotage  of  breaking  molds. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  charge  that  Mr.  Haskell,  the  manager  of  the 
plant,  did  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  How  do  you  spell  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  H-a-s-k-e-1-1. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  vou  report  that  to  the  F.  B.  I.? 

Mr.  Balint.  We  reported  that  to  the  F.  B.  I.? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  give  the  F.  B.  I.  the  names  of  the  witnesses 
who  saw  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  turned  all  the  information  over  to  our  attorney  for 
disposition.  We  talked  to  the  agents  of  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investi- 
gation on  that,  and  we  asked  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation  to 
investigate  as  to  how  a  company  that  was  so  swamped  with  vital  work 
for  the  Government,  that  one  of  its  general  managers  can  go  inside  of 
a  plant  and  proceed  to  wreck  molds  that  are  necessary  for  the  produc- 
tion of  aircraft  engines ;  and,  as  far  as  we  know,  no  investigation  has 
been  made. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  see  that  with  your  own  eyes  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  We  have  talked  to  the  witnesses  who  saw  it  with  their 
eyes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  know ;  but  did  you  not  see  it  yourself? 


U\-A.MEHICAN  PROPAGAJ^DA  ACTIVITIES  ggH 

Ml'.  Balint.  I  ilid  liot  see  it. 

Mr.  Staknp:s.  So  you  are  givinjv  us  what  is  hearsay  testimony,  but 
you  can  gWe  us  the  names  of  tlie  witnesses  who  did  see  these  acts? 

Mr.  Balint.  Our  legal  department,  sir,  has  all  the  information. 

Mr.  ^NIajtiiews.  When  did  you  come  to  Washington,  Mr.  Balint? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  came  to  Washington  Thursday  morning  about  1 
o'clock. 

Mr.  jNlAmiEWs.  And  this  sabotage  took  place  on  Saturday  after  you 
came  to  Wasliington? 

Mr.  Balint.  Xo;  this  sabotage  took  place,  as  I  said,  approximately 
a  montli  and  a  half  ago. 

Mr,  VooRiiis.  I  would  like  to  ask  one  question :  Did  I  understand  you 
to  say  awhile  ago  that  the  walk-out  that  had  taken  place  in  Cleveland 
was  an  unauthorized  strike  from  the  union  standpoint? 

Mr.  Balint.  No;  I  did  not  say  that. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Well.  I  am  not  trying  to  put  words  in  your  mouth,  but 
that  is  what  I  understood  you  to  say. 

Mr,  Starnes.  And  so  did  I. 

Mr.  Balint.  To  make  it  clear,  we  came  to  Washington,  D,  C.,  after 
■we  had  been  informed  by  the  Mediation  Board  to  come  here  and  medi- 
ate the  issues  involved  in  our  dispute.  We  had  a  strike  set  for  last 
Wednesday.  W^e  appeared  before  the  policy  committee  of  our  organi- 
zation and  pleaded  that  there  be  no  work  stoppage  pending  mediation. 
We  had  a  veiy  hard  time.  The  men  insisted  on  walking  out,  and  we 
asked  them  to  remain  at  work  until  after  we  got  to  Washington,  We 
finally  got  them  to  agree  not  to  stop  work  until  we  mediate,  and  we 
went  away ;  and  the  men  had  the  understanding  that  we  would  appeal 
to  the  Mediation  Board  to  put  our  hearing  a  few  days  ahead  of  sched- 
ule, in  view  of  the  militant  mood  of  the  men,  because  here  was  a  group 
of  six  or  seven  thousand  men  wdio  have  been  stepped  on  by  this  Nazi 
corporation,  for  a  j^eriod  of  20  years,  denied  the  right  to  organize; 
fired  when  they  tried  to  organize;  and,  for  the  first  time,  these  workers 
felt  that  they  had  a  union  and  they  wanted  to  protect  every  gain  that 
they  liatl  made,  and  they  felt  that  the  company  was  stalling. 

They  further  felt  that  the  Mediation  Board  was  stalling,  and  when 
we  left  we  told  them  that  we  would  attempt  to  convince  the  Mediation 
Board  to  set  our  hearing  date  ahead  in  order  that  it  be — all  the  dis- 
putes or  all  tlie  issues  involved  be  eliminated  in  a  hurry. 

Well,  when  we  came  to  Washington  we  were  not  succesful  in  get- 
ting the  Mediation  Board  to  set  up  our  hearing  a  few  days  and  it 
took  place  Mond.iy.  We  learned  that  the  policy  committee  had  au- 
thorized the  calling  of  the  strike  while  we  were  in  W^ashington,  D,  C, 
and  I  believe  from  there  on  it  is  a  matter  of  record. 

Our  national  secretai-y,  Mr.  Cheyfitz,  issued  a  statement  that  in 
view  of  the  fact  that  the  walkout  had  taken  place  that  he  stood  four- 
square behind  the  men. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right.     Now,  who  is  the  policy  committee? 

Mr.  Balint.  The  policy  connnittee  consists  of  300  conmiitteemen, 
representatives  from  every  single  department  in  that  plant.  It  is  a 
very  democratic  organization. 

Mr,  Starnes.  Will  you  give  us  the  names  of  some  of  them? 

Mr.  Balint.  Just  a  moment. 

(Conferring  with  Attorney  Lamb.) 


8612  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  record  will  now  show,  of  course,  that  ther3  is 
some  time  elapsing. 

Mr.  Balint.  Theie  is  approximately  300  committeemen  there. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Don't  you  know  the  name  of  a  single  one? 

Mr.  Balint.  Well,  I  know  them  all  by  their  first  names — Tony, 
Jack,  or  anything  like  that. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Give  us  some  of  them  and  then  you  can  furnish  the 
rest  of  them  for  the  record. 

Mr.  Balint.  Well,  there  is  Al. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Al  who? 

Mr.  Balint.  That  is  it ;  I  don't  know  their  last  names. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  Haskell's  first  name,  whom  you  spoke  about? 

Mr.  Balint.  Well.  I  didn't  speak  of  it.  I  said  his  name  was 
Haskell. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  man  Haskell  that  you  spoke  of,  what  is  his  first 
name  ? 

Mr.  Balint.  He  is  the  plant  superintendent;  I  don't  know  his  first 
name — I  don't  know  him,  consequently  I  wouldn't  know  liis  name. 

Mr,  Starnes.  Do  you  know  the  last  name,  or  the  full  name  of  a 
single  one  of  these  300  committee  members  of  yours  that  belong  to  this 
great  democratic  organization  ? 

Mr,  Balint.  Yes;  I  guess  I  can  think  of  some  if  you  will  just  gi\'e 
me  a  minute. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  Balint.  There  is  John — there  is  Jolm  Bozich. 

Mr,  Starnes,  All  right,  that  is  one. 

Mr,  Balint.  (No  response,) 

Mr.  Starnes.  Very  well,  if  you  don't  remember  any  of  the  i-est  of 
them  I  will  not  ask  you  further. 

Do  you  have  something  else.  Dr.  Matthews  ? 

Mr,  Matthews.  Yes;  I  would  like  to  ask  the  witness  if  he  owns 
an  automobile.     Do  you  own  an  automobile? 

Mr.  Balint.  Yes. 

Mr,  Matthews.  What  is  the  license  number  ? 

Mr.  Lamb.  Just  a  second.  May  I  inquire — I  have  already  advised 
the.  committee  that  a  representative  of  the  committee  has  rifled  all 
the  personal  effects  of  the  negotiating  conmiittee  here  before  the  Na- 
tional Defense  Board,  and  it  is  the  purpose  of 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wait  a  minute.  I  want  to  put  you  under  oath. 
Will  you  hold  up  your  hand  and  be  sworn  ? 

TESTIMONY  OF  EDWARD  LAMB,  GENEEAL  COUNSEL,  NATIONAL 
ASSOCIATION  OF  DIE  CASTING  WOEKERS 

Mr.  Starnes.  D^o  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall 
give  before  this  committee  will  be  the  truth,  the  wliole  truth,  and 
nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  ? 

Mr,  Lamb.  I  certainly  do;  yes,  sir;  indeed. 

Mr,  Starnes.  You  are  making  a  statement  here  that  some  com- 
mittee investigator  rifled  the  personal  effects  of  Mr.  Balint.  Wlio 
was  the  investigator? 

Mr.  La  1MB.  I  will  tell  the  committee  more  fully  what  I  attempted  to 
say  before  when  I  was  interrupted. 


rX-AMKKK  AN    I'lK  )1'A(  JAXDA   ACTIVmES  8613 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  to  know  the  name  of  the  invest i£:ator.  You 
are  ^joing  to  answer  my  question  or  you  are  going  to  sit  down. 

Mr.  Lamp..  Which  do  you  want^ 

Mr.  Starxes.  And  if  you  don't  want  to  do  that  we  have  means  of 
enforcmg  the  rules  of  this  committee. 

Mr.  Lamb.  Wliich  do  you  want  ^ 

Ml-.  8tai;nes.  1  jusL  want  you  to  answer  this  question — you  are  an 
intelligent  man 


Mr.  Lamu.  1  think  so;  I  have  been  intelligent  enough  to  appear 
before  several  of  these  committee  hearings. 

Mr.  Starnks.  Then  just  tell  me,  give  this  committee  the  name  of 
the  investigator  tliat  you  know  rifled  the  personal  effects,  as  you 
expressed  it. 

Mr.  Lamb.  As  we  left 

Mr.  Starnes.  1  want  to  know  his  name  and  then  you  can  make  your 
statement. 

Mr.  Lamb.  I  woidd  like  to  know  it  myself. 

]Mr.  Starnes.  Were  you  present  when  he  rifled  those  personal 
effects  ? 

Mr.  Lamb.  I  was  before  the  Mediation  Board  when  your  repre- 
sentative came  over. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Have  you — have  a  seat;  you  don't  know  anything 
about  it. 

Mr.  Lamb.  AVe  would  be  glad  to  have  you  reveal  this  information 
to  us. 

Mr.  Staknes.  AYe  would  like  to  have  it  from  you  if  you  had  any, 
but  we  are  not  going  to  let  you  pull  a  demonstration  here. 

Mr.  YooRHis.  Do  you  mean  to  say  under  oath  that  a  committee 
investigator  rifled  tlie  effects  of  these  men  that  came  here  to  the 
^Mediation  Board? 

Mr.  Lamb.  ]\Ir.  Yoorhis,  I  didn't  ask  an  awful  lot  as  attorney  for 
the  witness,  but  as  a  witness  for  myself  I  do  appreciate  the  courtesy 
of  at  least  being  afforded  tlie  chance  to  finish  my  answer. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Xow,  j\[r.  Lamb,  let  us  be  fair.  You  are  an  at- 
torney  

Mr.  Lamb.  That  is  what  I  want  to  be. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  are  accustomed  to  representing  a  number 
of  people  before  different  committees  in  different  places. 

Mr.  Lamb.  That  is  I'ight. 

Mr,  Starnes.  And  you  are  a  very  intelligent  man. 

Mr.  Lamb.  Thank  you. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  are  xevy  clevei-  and  adept,  and  you  also  know 
how  to  weave  in  a  story  very  adeptly  into  the  record. 

Mr.  L\MB.  I  have  never  been  complimented  so  much  in  my  life 
but  I  appreciate  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  We  understand  that.  We  ask  you  the  direct  ques- 
tion and  instead  of  making  a  direct  answer  jou  make  some  sort  of 
broad  accusation.  If  you  have  some  evidence  against  a  committee 
investigator  the  committee  wants  to  know  about  it ;  if  you  want  to 
make  a  speech  and  recite  general  statements  you  can  make  that  kind 
of  statement  on  the  outside.  We  don't  want  the  record  cluttered 
up  with  generalities. 


3614  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

If  you  know  the  names  of  any  investigators  who  did  such  a  thing, 
I  would  like  to  know  those  names.  I  am  like  Mr.  Voorhis;  if  you 
know  it  was  a  committee  investigator  we  want  to  know  about  it. 
We  don't  want  a  general  speech  or  indictment.  We  understand  each 
other  all  right. 

Mr.  Lamb.  I  wonder  if  Mr.  Voorhis  feels  with  you  that  I  should 
not  be  afforded  an  opportunity  to  answer  the  question  completely? 

Mr.  Voorhis.  I  think  you  should  answer  it. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  think  you  should  be  specific  and  not  attempt  to 
make  a  beautiful  speech  or  stage  a  demonstration  before  this  com- 
mittee. 

Mr.  Lamb.  Would  an  answer  of  three  sentences  not  be  too  cumber- 
some for  the  record? 

Mr,  Starnes.  Not  at  all ;  300  if  they  are  pertinent. 

Mr.  Lamb.  Thank  you.  As  we  left  the  National  Defense  Media- 
tion Board  hearing  today  we  were  advised 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  you  are  going  to  hearsay  now. 

Mr.  Lamb.  But  I  haven't  finished  even  one  sentence,  have  I? 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  go  along. 

Mr.  Lamb.  That  as  the  committee  representatives  came  to  the  place 
where  our  union  negotiating  committee  is  residing  in  Washington, 
that  an  investigator  of  the  Dies  committee  appeared  there  and  stated 
that  he  was  looking  for  certain  records — he  was  looking  for  certain 
persons,  and  thereujjon  he  went  into  the  house  and  examined  the  per- 
sonal effects  of  the  men  who  are  on  our  negotiating  committee  while 
they  were  before  the  National  Defense  Mediation  Board. 

Now,  I  am  giving  you  the  information  that  was  given  to  our  com- 
mittee as  we  left  that  National  Defense  Mediation  Board  to  come 
here.  I  have  given  you  the  information  I  have  frankly  and  in  fact 
I  think  I  did  it  in  one  sentence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  you  will  be  seated.  Everything  you  have, 
said  is  hearsay.  You  made  a  nice  little  speech  for  the  record  in  which 
you  attempted  to  cast  aspersions  on  an  investigator  of  this  committee. 
It  is  all  hearsay.  You  say  you  have  been  advised  that  that  was  done, 
but  you  have  no  direct  information  or  no  testimony  that  you  can  swear 
to  yourself? 

Mr.  Lamb.  That  is  right.     We  came  directly  over  here. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  go  ahead,  Dr.  Matthews. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ALEX  BALINT— Resumed 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  asked  the  witness  for  the  number  of  liis  automobile 
license. 

Mr.  Lamb,  May  I  ask  the  committee  members,  the  Chairman, 
whether  that  is  the  policy,  knowing  what  has  ha]i]3ened  to  the  com- 
mittee members,  whether  the  license  number  of  the  car  of  this  witness 
should  be  given  to  the  committee  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Testimony  of  this  type,  Mr.  Lamb,  has  been  given  to 
us  by  scores  of  witnesses,  gladly  and  willingly,  who  appeared  before 
us  in  New  Jersey  and  New  York  and  other  places. 

Mr,  Lamb.  If  you  order  the  witness  to  answer  the  question  I  will 
advise  him  to  answer  it,  with  the  reservation  that  anything  that  hap- 
pens to  his  car  you  are  the  gentleman  who  started  at  least  the  course 
of  conduct  that  we  hope  will  not  take  place. 


rX-AMF.HK  AN   I'KOPAGrVNDA  ACTIVITIES  8615 

IVfr.  Staknes.  All  rioht,  ^'ive  him  the  number  of  the  car;  I  will  give 
you  mine. 

Mr.  Hamnt.  XB-377,  Ohio  license. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mv.  Bulint,  diil  you  ever  speak  for  the  American 
Leaaue  for  Peace  and  Dcniocracy? 

\[i'.  Bam  NT.  I  do  not  recall  that  1  have  ever  spoken  for  any  orj^an- 
ization  of  that  kind. 

^fr.  Maithews.  Would  you  testify  that  you  did  not  speak  for  the 
Anierican  Leacue  for  Peace  and  Democracy? 

Mr.  Bali  NT.  Yes,  sir;  I  would  testify  that  I  did  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  believe  that  it  is  appropriate  at  this  time 
of  national  emer^rency.  for  labor  loaders,  occupying  positions  as  impor- 
tant  as  yours,  to  denounce  communism? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  believe  that  all  labor  leaders  at  this  time  should 
especially  urge  the  preservation  of  democracy  heren(  in  defense  of  civil 
liberties,  in  maintenance  of  the  right  to  strike,  in  maintenance  of  all 
the  civil  liberties  that  we  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  answer  is  not  responsive  to  the  question. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  have  any  questions  that  are  pertinent?  I 
don't  want  any  more  si^eeches. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  want  to  know  how  the  witness  stands  with  ref- 
erence to  the  policies  of  the  C.  I.  O. 

Mr.  Starnes.  He  is  not  going  to  give  you  a  direct  answer  on  it 
and  I  think,  Dr.  Matthews,  any  further  questions  along  this  line  is 
a  waste  of  the  committee's  time. 

Mr.  Balint.  Let  me  say — you  asked  me  a  question  relative  to  the 
C.  I.  O.  I  stand  foursquare  behind  the  program  and  policies  of  the 
C.  I.  O.  as  was  adopted  at  the  last  convention. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Then  why  hesitate  to  say  that  it  is  appropriate 
for  labor  leaders  to  denounce  communism? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  am.  I  stand  on  that  program  anytime  and  any 
place.     It  is  a  program  that  millions  of  American  workers  are  proud 

of. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Well,  you  are  aw^are  of  the  fact  that  the  Atlantic 
City  convention  of  the  C.'  I.  ().  last  year,  adopted  a  resolution  unani- 
mously denouncing  communism,  aren't  you? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  am. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  And  yet  you  would  decline  to  say  that  you  agree 
with  that? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  will  say  that  I  will  follow  out  that  policy  all  the 
way. 

Mr.  ^Iatphews.  You  will  denounce  communism? 

Mr.  Balint.  I  will  say  that  I  will  follow  out  the  decisions  of  that 
convention. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  denounce  communism   along  with  the 

C.  I.  o.? 

Mr.  Baijnt.  The  convention's  decisions. 
Mr.  Matt'hews.  Mr.  Chairman,  that  is  sufficient. 
Mr.  Starnes.  You   may  be  excused.     Do  j^ou   have  any   further 
need  for  this  man  ? 
Mr.  Maithews.  No. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  are  excused  from  any  of  our  processes. 
Mr.  Matthews.  Vera  Apergis. 


8616  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

TESTIMONY  OF  MES.  VERA  APEKGIS 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand; 
Do  vou  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are  about  to  give 
before  the  committee,  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing 
but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God'^ 

Mrs.  Apergis.  I  do.  / 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  your  full  name  ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Vera  Apergis. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A-p-e-r-g-i-s? 

Mrs.  Apekgis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  born? 

Mrs.  x^pergis.  Buffalo,  N.  Y. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  your  present  occupation? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Senior  clerk  on  W.  P.  A. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  Alex  Balint  in  connection  with  your 
work  on  the  W.  P.  A.  at  one  time? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  He  was  a  director. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  Alex  Balint? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  your  position  at  the  time  you  knew 
Alex  Balint? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  I  was  president  of  the  W.  P.  A.  industrial  organization 
of  the  C.  I.  O. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  was  his  position? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  He  w^as  appointed  as  a  director  over  me  from  the 
C.  I.  O.,  over  the  W.  P.  A. — over  the  men's  division  and  the  women's 
division. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  year  was  that? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  1939. 

Mr.  Matthews.  About  what  month? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Well,  I  believe  he  was  oppointed  sometime  in  Febru- 
ary, by  Mr.  Stevenson. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  frequent  discussions  with  Alex  Balint  ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Almost  every  day. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Alex  Balint  ever  show  you  his  Communist 
Party  membership  book? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes;  one  Saturday  afternoon. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  ever  discuss  communism  with  you  ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  tell  you  that  he  was  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir ;  since  he  was  14  years  old. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  told  you  that  he  joined  the  Communist  Party 
when  he  was  14? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Mat'ihews.  Did  he  tell  you  more  than  once  that  he  was  a  member 
of  the  Communist  Party? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Quite  a  few  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  urge  you  to  join  the  Communist  Party? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir ;  he  said  if  I  wanted  to  be  a  good  organizer 
and  belong  to  a  labor  party  I  will  never  know  what  an  organizer  means 
until  I  belong  to  the  Communist  Partj^ 


UN-AJ\IEiaCAN  PROPAGA.XDA  ACTIVITIES  8617 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  ho  toll  you  you  wouldn't  get  anywhere  unless 
you  joined  the  Conmiunist  Party  ? 
Mrs.  ArERGis.  Yes. 
Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  do  you  Avant  to  ask  the  witness  some 

questions? 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  have  no  questions. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  worked  with  Mr.  Balint,  did  you  occujjy 
the  same  office? 

Mrs.  ArEiiGis.  Yes.  sir. 

Mr.  Ma'ithi.ws.  AVhen  he  came  into  that  office  was  there  an  Ameri- 
can flag  on  his  side  of  the  room  ? 

Mrs.  Ai'EKGis.  Yes,  sir;  directly  in  front  of  us.  both  of  us. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  did  he  do  with  the  American  flag  ? 

Mrs.  ApEKGis.  The  American  flag  was  removed  to  the  w^omen's  side 
and  his  side  was  for  Communist  literature  for  every  Communist  that 
run  on  the  ticket  and  Yetta  Lamb. 

^fr.  Starnes.  Lamb — L-a-m-b? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  She  run  for  Mayoi- — Lang,  I  think  it  is — L-a-n-g,  if 
I  am  not  mistaken. 

Mr.  ]Matthews.  And  did  you  yourself  see  the  Communist  litera- 
ture which  Alex  Balint  ke})t  in  your  office  ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Oh,  yes;  because  the  office  wasn't  divided;  we  had 
the  office  combined.  He  had  a  desk  on  one  side  and  I  had  a  desk 
on  the  other  side. 

Mr.  VoGRHis.  What  was  this  an  office  of? 

Mr.  Matthews.  C.  I.  O.  union  for  workers  on  the  sewing  project, 
on  W.  P.  A.    Mr.  Balint  testified  what  the  union  was. 

Xow.  Mrs.  Apergis.  are  you  absolutely  positive  that  what  Mr. 
Balint  showed  you  was  his  Communist  Party  membership  book? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  no  doubt  about  that? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Oh,  no;  because  he  wanted  to  show  mo  what  good 
standing  he  was  in.  We  had  a  party  on  Thursday  night  and  we  had 
a  bottle  of  whisky  left  over  and  after  the  tailors*  meeting,  which  I 
held  every  Saturday  afternoon,  the  tailors,  after  the  meeting,  dis- 
banded and  Mr.  Balint  and  one  of  these  young  men  stayed  and  they 
had  this  bottle  of  whisky  staudhig  on  the  desk  and  they  were  dis- 
cussing the  Communists.  The  man  was  very  much  against  them  and 
Mr.  Balint  tried  to  explain  to  him  and  to  me  what  a  real  Com- 
munist meant. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Alex  Balint  call  you  by  telephone  one  night 
and  urge  you  to  bring  the  members  of  your  organization  to  a  mass 
meeting  which  was  to  be  addressed  by  Earl  Browder? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  We  had  a  meeting  on  Tuesday  night  and  there  was  a 
meeting  at  the  auditorium  and  I  was  directed  to  bring  all  the  mem- 
bers down  to  the  auditorium. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "\'\1io  was  speaking  at  the  auditorium  that  night? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Well,  Earl  Browder  was. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  AMio  directed  you  to  bring  the  members  of  your 
organization  there? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Mr.  Balint. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  call  you  bv  telephone  or  tell  you  person- 
ally? 


8618  UX-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mrs,  Apergis.  Telephone. 

Mr.  Matthews.  He  called  you  by  telephone? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  instructed  you  to  bring  the  women  from  your 
meeting  to  the  auditorium  where  Browder  was  speaking? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  go  ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes;  we  did.  When  we  seen  what  was  going  on  we 
left  and,  besides  that,  we  didn't  have  25  cents  to  pay.  Some  went 
in  to  see  what  was  going  on,  but  we  left. 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  was  a  25-cent  admission  charge  which  kept 
some  from  going  in;  is  that  right? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Are  you  still  president  of  this  w^omen's  organiza- 
tion? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  No,  sir.  Mr.  Balint  and  his  Communist  organiza- 
tion, some  of  the  Communist  leaders  got  the  best  of  me  and  I  had 
to  resign. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  trying  to  destroy  the  union  of  which 
you  were  president? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  I  did  destroy  it.  I  instructed  everyone  not  to  pay 
a  cent  of  dues.  I  turned  the  minutes  and  all  the  records  over  to  the 
W.  P.  A.  investigation. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Why  did  you  do  that? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Because  I  wanted  to  see  that  the  W.  P.  A.  was 
cleared  of  all  the  Communists. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  convinced  that  this  union,  after  Balint 
came  in,  had  come  completely  under  the  control  of  the  Communists? 

Mrs.  Apekgis.  Well,  I  would  say  30  percent  of  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  mean  30  percent  of  the  membership  was 
Communist  ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  about  the  control  at  the  top  ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  It  was  controlled  by  me  and  my  people  but  then 
they  just  couldn't  stand  it,  to  think  that  our  regional  director  was 
a  Communist  and  little  by  little  they  wouldn't  pay  dues. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Whom  do  you  refer  to  when  you  say  "regional 
director" ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Well,  I  meant  Mr.  Balint. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  organize  this  union? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir;  I  did,  with  14  members. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  was  the  strength  of  it  when  Mr.  Balint  came 
into  the  organization? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  We  nmst  have  had  around  eight  or  nine  hundred 
members. 

Mr.  Starnes.  At  that  time? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  was  your  answer? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is,  you  built  it  from  14  to  eight  or  nine 
hundred  ? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  Yes,  sir. 


rX-AMKUICAN   I'ROPAGA^'DA  ACTIVITIES  8619 

Mr.  Matthews.  Then  Mr.  Balint  came  in  and  took  charge? 

Mrs.  Apekgis.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  he  appointed  by  Mr.  Stevenson? 

Mrs.  Apergis.  He  was  ap])oinled  by  Mr.  Stevenson. 

Mr.  ISIatthews.  Who  is  Mr.  Stevenson? 

Mrs.  ApmiGis.  He  is  secrotaiy  of  the  CleveUnid  Industrial  Council. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  all,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Staknes.  All  ri<iht,  the  next  witness. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  witness  is  Mr.  Balunek. 

TESTIMONY  OF  ANDREW  BALUNEK 

Mr.  8TAKNES.  Will  3'ou  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand. 
Do  you  solenmly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall  give  before  the 
conmiittee  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  JNIatthews.  What  is  your  name? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Andrew  Balunek. 

Mr.  Matthews.  B-a-1-u-n-e-k? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  born,  Mr.  Balunek  ? 

Mr.  Baluxek.  Born  in  Pennsylvania. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When? 

Mr.  Balunek.  August  8,  1902. 

Mr.  Matthews.  After  your  birth  did  you  spend  most  of  your  youth 
in  Europe  ( 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  were  born  in  this  country  and  spent  your 
youth  in  Europe? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  you  come  back  to  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Balunek.  I  came  back  February  18,  1923. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Alex  Balint? 

Mr.  Balunek.  I  know  him  since  1931. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  did  you  meet  him? 

Mr.  Balunek.  I  met  him  down  at  Seventy-ninth  Street  in  the 
Communist  hall  and  I  see  him  often  when  he  organize  the  people 
at  the  corner  at  Seventy-ninth  and  the  hall. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  Hungarian  district  of  Cleveland? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthetws.  And  vou  have  seen  him  there  in  the  Communist 
hall  ? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Hundreds  of  times,  and  we  go  together  downtown 
many  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  it  at  Seventy-ninth  and  Buckeye  Road? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Seventy-ninth  Sti'eet  and  Buckeye  Road  are  differ- 
ent. They  cross.  It  is  Seventy-ninth  and  Bucke3^e  Road.  It  is  cross- 
town.    It  is  cross-town  in  the  city  of  Cleveland. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  You  have  seen  him  there? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Many  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  Connnunist  meetings? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 


8620  UN-x\MEHICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  know  him  personally? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  work  with  him  at  Republic  Steel? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  year  was  that? 

Mr.  Balunek.  1934,  '35,  and  '36. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  ever  talked  with  Balint  about  com- 
munism ? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Every  day,  because  I  ride  with  him  down  to  the 
mill  every  day.     He  takes  us  down  to  work  and  home. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  rode  to  and  from  work  at  Republic  Steel 
with  Balint? 

Mr.  Balunek.  With  Balint;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  For  a  period  of  months? 

Mr.  Balvnek.  Oh,  maybe  1  year. 

Mr.  Matthews.  For  a  j^ear  ? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Maybe  more. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  did  he  discuss  communism  with  you? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Oh,  yes;  communism  and  ClOism.  First,  com- 
munism. He  says  he  is  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  and  many 
times  he  asked  me,  he  says:  "Wliy  don't  you  join?  If  you  do  you 
are  ^oinc:  to  get  a  job  like  I  do.  and  if  you  work  at  Republic  Steel 
and  you  are  a  Communist,  don't  worry  al^out  it,  you  are  going  to  get 
the  position." 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  tell  you  that  he  was  a  member  of  the  Com- 
munist Party? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir ;  he  told  me  that  many  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  urge  you  to  join  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  tell  you  you  would  get  a  good  job  if  you 
joined  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  tell  you  that  more  than  once? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Oh,  a  dozen  times. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  a  member  of  the  union  at  the  present 
time  ? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A^Hiat  imion? 

Mr.  Balunek.  C.  I.  O. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  is  the  name  of  the  union  ? 

Mr.  Balunek.  C.  I.  O.  organization — steel  workers  organization. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Steel  Workers  Organizing  Committee? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Mati'hews.  Do  you  work  in  the  aluminum  plant  which  is  now 
on  strike  in  Cleveland? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir;  I  went  to  work  and  2  o'clock  the  strike 
started  and  I. went  home. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  do  work  at  the  plant  which  is  now  struck? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  why  I  am  not  working  now. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  are  emj)loycd  there? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  are  you  a  member  of  the  union? 


UX-AMEKICAN   TKOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8621 

Mr.  Balunek.  I  joined  the  union  1  month  ago  because  I  am 
scared  from  the  Comnumist  racketeers,  because  I  lost  my  job  down 
in  the  Republic  Steel — that  is  the  wny  I  lost  my  job. 

Mr.  MA'rrHEws.  You  mean  tlie  C'onununists  maneuvered  to  get  you 
fired? 

Mr.  Baluxek.  Fired  out  for  poor  work.  They  put  that  dirty 
spot  on  me  '"poor  chi[)per"  and  I  had  5  or  6  years"  experience  in 
chi}){)er  work.     Alex  Balint  do  the  job  the  same  thing  with  me. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Could  1  ask  a  couple  of  questions:  Do  you  believe 
that  the  workers  in  those  plants  need  a  union  to  protect  them? 

Mr.  Balt'Xek.  Yes.  sir:  I  believe  that  a  good  union  is  good  any 
time.  I  believe  the  union  but  not  the  communism  and  they  force 
the  men  to  join  the  union.  That  is  against  the  law  like  they  use 
it  down  in  the  United  States  Aluminum.  They  talk  to  the  men: 
"You  guys  join  tlie  union,  if  not  you  are  going  to  pay  $25  or  $50 
admission."" 

Mr.  Mai^hews.  You  mean  they  threatened  the  men  with  fines 
after  the  strike  was  won? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes.  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  If  they  didn't  join  the  union  they  would  be  fined 
after  the  strike  was  won?     That  is  what  you  mean  to  say? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Yes;  have  to  pay  $25  or  $50  admission.  That  is 
wh}-  a  lot  of  the  people  are  scared  and  they  signed  the  union  just 
the  same  as  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  reason  you  joined  the  union? 

Mr.  Balunek.  Certainly. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Anything  further,  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  all. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  Chair  wishes  to  announce  that  additional  testi- 
mony will  be  taken  on  this  phase  of  the  investigation  on  Thursday 
morning. 

The  committee  will  stand  adjourned  until  that  time. 

(Whereupon,  at  4: 10  p.  m.,  the  committee  adjourned  until  10  a.  m., 
Thursday,  June  12,  1941.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


THURSDAY,   JUNE   13,    1941 

House  of  Representatives, 
Subco:mmittee  of  the  Special.  Committee 
To  Investigate  Un-American  Activities, 

Washington^  D.  C. 

The  subcommittee  met  at  4 :  30  p.  m.,  in  the  Banking  and  Currency 
Committee  room,  Hon.  Joe  Stariies  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee) 
presiding. 

Present:  Messrs.  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subcommittee),  and 
Voorhis. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  subcommittee  will  resume  its  hearings.  This 
is  a  resumption  of  the  hearings  which  were  conducted  on  Tuesday 
afternoon,  June  10,  at  which  JNIr.  Vo<,)rhis  and  the  chairman  were 
present.  Today  the  cliairman  is  sitting  as  a  subcommittee  of  the 
subcommittee,  with  the  consent  of  the  subcommittee,  to  hear  this 
testimony. 

Dr.  Matthews,  whom  will  j^ou  have? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  C.  B.  Cowan. 

TESTIMONY  OF  C.  B.  COWAN,  FOEMER  MEMBEE,  COMMUNIST 

PAETY 

Mr.  Starnes.  Come  around,  Mr.  Cowan.  Will  you  please  raise 
your  right  hand  and  be  sworn?  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the 
testimony  you  shall  give  before  this  committee  will  be  the  truth, 
the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right,  Dr.  Matthews. 

IMr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  j^our  full  name  for  the 
record  ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Claire  Biglow  Cowan. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  were  you  born? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Williams,  Oreg. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When? 

Mr.  Cowan.  In  February  1902. 

Mr.  Matthews.  ^Vliere  do  you  reside  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  ever  a  member  of  the  Connnunist  Party'? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  was. 

Mr.  ^NFatthews.  When  did  vou  join  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  1929. 

t5262«— 41— vol.  1-1 30  8623 


8624  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  AOTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where? 

Mr,  Cowan.  At  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Mr.  Mati^hews.  At  the  time  you  joined  the  Conmninist  Party, 
what  was  your  occupation? 

Mr.  CowAN.  Punch  press  operator  in  the  Fisher  Body  plant. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  were  you  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Seven  years;  a])pi-oximately  7  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  you  quit  the  Connnunist  Party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  didn't  quit  the  Comnnmist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  did  you  terminate  your  relationship  witli 
the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  was  expelled  from  the  party  in  March  of  1936  by 
action  of  the  control  commission — national  control  commission  of 
the  party. 

Mr,  Mattfiews.  Did  you  at  the  time  of  your  expulsion  from  ihe 
Communist  Party  make  any  public  statements  with  reference  to  your 
reasons  for  tlie  conflict  between  yourself  and  the  party? 

Mr,  Cowan,  I  did. 

Mr,  Matthews,  Can  you  state  briefly,  if  you  wish  to,  for  the  benefit 
of  the  committee,  what  that  public  statement  consisted  of? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  issued  a  public  statement  immediately  upon  the 
publication  in  March  of  1936  by  the  Daily  Worker  as  to  my  expulsion 
and  those  statements  or  excerpts  therefrom  were  published  in  the 
three  Cleveland  dailies  to  tlie  effect  that  I  had  been  consistently  op- 
posing inside  of  the  Connnunist  Party  the  growth  of  a  foreign  bu- 
reaucracy that  was  takiiiir  control  of  the  Amei'ican  Connnunist  Party 
in  tlie  interests  of  a  government — a  foreign  government — and  that  I 
could  have  no  part  of  any  such  organization  or  group  that  was  Avork- 
ing  against  the  interest  of  the  American  working  class. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  were  tried  by  the  central  control  com- 
mission of  tlie  Connnunist  Party  of  the  United  States,  who  was  in 
charge  of  the  centi'al  conti'ol  commission  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Mr.  Dirba,  of  the  central  control  comnnssion,  was  the 
chairman  of  that  committee. 

Mr,  Matthews.  Is  that  Charles  Dirba  ? 

Mr,  Cowan,  That  is  correct, 

Mr,  Matthews.  Do  you  happen  to  know  whether  or  not  Mi',  Dirba 
has  ever  used  the  alias  of  Lapin? 

Mr,  Cowan,  On  that  I  am  not  informed, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  Mr.  Dirba's  back- 
ground ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Nothing  {positive.  It  was  ^aid  among  the  inner  circles 
of  the  Connnunist  Party  to  me  ])ersonally  that  Sir.  Dirba  was  a 
representative  here  in  the  United  States,  in  the  American  Party--of 
the  American  Commission  of  Connnimist  International — this  is 
merely  statements  made  by  other  members  of  the  Comnnaiist  Party 
Central  Connnittee. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Rut  you  do  know  })ersonally  that  he  had  charge  of 
Ihe  procedings  which  resulted  in  your  expulsion  from  the  party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Correct. 

Ml'.  Matthews.  And  your  expulsion  was  not  a  local  mailer  but 
a  niatlcr  of  the  national  control  commission;  is  that  correct; 


r.X-AMKUK'AN   I'UOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8625 

Mr.  Cowan.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  MA-rriiEWs.  Can  you  uivc  u  biief  <lescriptit)U  of  Charles  Dirba? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Charles' Dirba  is  a  man  who  at  first  <«lance  ^ives  the 
impression  of  beinf;  very  tall — approximately  6  foot  1,  or  6  foot  2. 
In  reality  he  is  shorter  because  he  is  very  lean,  emaciated,  slightly 
stooped;  hollow  chieked  and  is  about,  I  would  say,  TO  or  rJ  years 
of  age. 

Mr.  Matiheavs.  At  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes:  at  the  i)resent  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Whal  organizations  affiliated  with  or  undc;-  tiie 
control  of  the  Communist  Party  were  you  assigned  to  work  in  dniing 
your  membership  in  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Various  organizations,  principally  among  which  were 
the  unemployed  organizations  in  district  6.  That  is  Ohio,  east  Indi- 
ana. Kentucky,  and  southwestern  Pennsylvania;  and  hiter  in  the 
national  fraction  of  the  Unem])loyed  Council  of  the  I^.  vS.  A. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Before  you  leave  tlie  National  Unemi)loyment 
Council,  U.  S.  A..  I  show  you  a  photostatic  co])y  of  a  letter  on  the 
letterhead  of  the  National  Unemployment  Council,  U.  S.  A.  Have  you 
ever  seen  that  letterhead  <^)r  a  similar  letterhead  ? 

(Handing  j^hotostat  to  the  witness.) 

Air.  Cowan.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  can  identify  that  as  the  letterhead  of  the 
organization  as  you  knew  it? 

Air.  Cowan.  Not  as  I  knew  it.  This  letterhead  was  printed  at  the 
lime  I  liad  been  transferred  from  the  uneni)jloyed  organization,  in  an 
active  capacity,  to  the  Workers  Ex-Service  Men's  League. 

My  position  in  the  organization  had  been  taken  by  Andrew  Onchi. 
whose  name  is  on  this  letterhead. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  this  letterhead  is  the  name  of  "Andrew  Onda.'' 
national  chairman.     Are  you  acquainted  with  Andrew  Onda? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  where  he  is  located  at  the  present 
lime? 

Mr.  Cowan.  He  recently  was  transferred  from  Cleveland,  a  matter 
of  some  90  days  or  4  months  ago,  as  I  understand  it,  to  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  him  as  a  member  of  the  Communist 
}\arty? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  recruited  him  into  the  Communist  Party  and  trained 
him  in  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  About  what  vear  was  that? 

Mr.  Cowan.  In  1932. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  acquainted  with  Israel  Amter? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Israel  Amter  I  know  personally  and  I  have  known 
him  for  many  years. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  this  letterhead  Israel  Amter  signs  the  lettei'  as. 
''National  Secretary  of  the  Nati(^nal  Unemployment  Coinicil.  U.  S.  A."' 
Can  y(ju  say  whether  or  not  Israel  Amter  is  one  of  the  to])  function- 
aries of  the  Connnunist  Party  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Israel  Amter  is  a  member  of  the  central  control  com- 
mittee of  the  Connnimist  Party  of  the  United  States  of  America,  and 
also  a  member  of  its  [)olitical  bureau. 


8626  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVrTIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  letter  is  addressed  to  Harold  Hickerson,  under 
date  of  June  1924,  and  reads  as  follows : 

Harold  Hickerson, 

Washington,  D.  O. 

Dear  Comrade:  I  met  Comrade  Cowan  in  Cleveland  and  gave  liim  the  address. 

It  might  be  well  if  you  got  in  touch  with  him  directly.  From  what  I  gathered, 
this  organization  is  made  up  greatly  of  veterans  who  used  to  he  in  the  hospital  in 
Dayton. 

Would  you  say  that  reference  is  to  yourself? 

Mr.  Cowan.  It  is. 

Mr.  JMatthews.  In  what  connection  are  you  referred  to  in  this  letter 
from  Amter  to  Hickerson  ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  was  at  that  time  the  national  fraction  secretary  of  the 
Workers  Ex- Service  Men's  League,  an  organization  set  up  by  the 
Connnunist  Party  for  the  purpose  of  mobilizing  and  conducting  the 
bonus  march  and  later  the  rank-and-file  veterans'  encampment  at  Fort 
Hunt,  Va.,  in  1932, 1933,  and  1934. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  should  have  asked  you  at  the  outset,  Mr.  Cowan, 
but  I  ask  you  now,  if  you  have  ever  served  in  tlie  armed  forces  of  the 
United  States? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  what  your  service  record  is, 
Mr.  Cowan? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  joined  the  United  States  Marines  in  Cleveland,  Ohio, 
and  was  sent  from  there  to  Parris  Island,  where  I  took  my  final  oath  in 
the  United  States  Marines  on  July  25,  1918.  I  served  until  the  6th  of 
September  1919  at  the  Navy  Yard  in  Philadelphia. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  it  because  you  had  served  in  the  Marines  that 
you  became  one  of  the  national  leaders  of  the  Workers  Ex-Service 
Men's  League? 

Mr.  Cowan.  We,  in  the  party,  considered  it  good  policy  to  put  in  the 
leadership  of  such  an  organization  one  who  had  had  a  service  record ; 
yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Who  were  some  of  the  other  national  leaders  of  the 
Workers  Ex-Service  Men's  League? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Harold  Hickerson,  Walter  Trumball,  Emanuel  Levine, 
Peter  Cacchione. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  C-a-c-c-h-i-o-n-e,  is  it  not? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes.  These  made  up  mainly  the  national  leadership 
insofar  as  the  party  forces  in  that  organization  were  concerned. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  in  March  of  1934,  a  call  was  sent  out  to  all 
posts  of  the  Workers  Ex-Service  Men's  League  for  a  bonus  conven- 
tion to  be  held  in  Washington  on  May  10  of  that  year.  Do  you 
recall  whether  or  not  you.  Emanuel  Levine  and  Harold  Hickerson, 
were  the  signers  of  that  call  ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  We  were.  We  were  the  national  leadership  of  the 
combined  veterans'  organizations  then  assisting  in  the  fight  for  tlie 
bonus,  known  as  the  National  Veterans  Rank  and  File,  and  it  was 
after  a  meeting  of  the  party  faction  assigned  to  veteran's  works  that 
this  letter  was  sent  out  and  went  to  all  posts  of  the  organization  in 
the  United  States. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  have  mentioned  two  organizations  with 
which  you  were  identified  during  your  membership  in  the  Communist 
Party — the  Workers  Ex-Service  Men's  League  and  the  U)iemploy- 


IN-AMKltlCAN    runr.MiANDA  ACTIVITIES  8627 

ment  Councils.  Were  there  any  others  of  particular  importance, 
so  far  as  your  activities  were  concerned? 

IVIr.  Cowan.  I  was  also  insofar  as  district  activities  were  concerned, 
assigned  to  district  agitation  and  propaganda  as  director  and  also 
during  the  absence  of  a  responsible  central  connnittee  representative, 
to  the  trade-union  fraction  of  the  district  of  Ohio,  district  6. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  work  in  the  Trade  Union  Unity 
League? 

Mr.  (\nvAN.  I  did.  At  one  time  T  was  the  district  6  secretary  for 
a  short  period  and  for  a  considerable  time  a  member  of  the  district 
fraction. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  state  whether  or  not,  in  your  own  per- 
sonal knowdedge,  the  Unemployment  Councils  were  set  up  by,  con- 
trolled by,  and  eventually  liquidated  by  the  Communist  Party  of 
the  United  States? 

Mr.  CowAx.  I  can  definitely  state  to  my  own  personal  knowledge, 
having  taken  a  part  in  the  decisions  prior  to  March  6,  1930,  and 
working  through  them  until — through  and  in  them  until  they  were 
liquidated  into  the  Workers  Alliance  at  Washington — at  a  confer- 
ence at  Washington,  that  this  organization  definitely  was  conceived 
in  the  minds  of  the  party  leadership  here  and  internationally. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  you  s|)eak  of  March  6,  1930,  I  presume 
you  refer  to  the  very  large-scale  demonstrations  which  resulted  in 
rioting  all  over  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Cowman.  I  would  hardly  say  that  the  calling  of  those  demon- 
strations resulted  in  rioting.  I  refer  to  them  as  the  demonstrations 
of  the  unemployed  and  hungry  people  of  that  period  wdio  responded 
in  answer  to  the  call  sent  out  in  the  form  of  leaflets  by  the  party 
activities  at  that  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  On  that  date  there  were  large-scale  demonstrations 
througliout  the  United  States? 

Mr.  CowAx.  On  that  date  there  were  large-scale  demonstrations 
throughout  the  United  States,  definitely. 

Mr.  Matthew's.  And  attendant  on  those  demonstrations  there  was 
a  good  deal  of  rioting  in  some  cities,  was  there  not? 

Mr.  CowAx.  Some  people  may  call  it  rioting.  I  think  it  was 
the  protection  of  these  people  from  unprovoked  assaults  by  police 
in  various  parts  of  the  country  to  disburse  the  gatherings. 

Mr.  Mattiie^vs.  Do  j'ou  happen  to  know  whether  William  Z. 
Foster,  and  other  top  party  leaders  in  New  York,  were  arrested  and 
coiwicted  and  served  terms  as  a  result  of  what,  for  convenience,  I 
will  call  rioting  in  New  York  on  March  6,  1930? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  do  know  that  these  men  that  you  mentioned  were 
ai-rested,  so  tried  and  convicted. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Now,  do  you  know  a  paper  called  the  Hunger 
Fighter,  which  was  published  by  the  Unemployment  Councils?  Did 
you  ever  see  copies  of  that  publication? 

Mr.  CoWAX.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  A\rite  for  that  publication? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Occasionally. 

Mr.  Matthews.  If  it  will  refresh  your  recollection,  Mr.  Cowan, 
I  think-  von  wrote  an  article  for  the  Hunger  Fighter  in  February 
of  1933?" 


8628  UN-ASfERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes. 

^Ir.  Matthews.  The  February  issue  of  1933? 

Mr.  CoAVAN.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  the  editor  of  tlie  Hung'er  Fighter  carried  on 
the  masthead  of  the  organization,  was  Franivlin  Folsom.  Did  you 
happen  to  know  Franklin  Folsom? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  never  met  Franklin  Folsom.  The  Hunger  Fighter 
was  managed  as  a  sort  of  independent  printing  establishment,  sep- 
arate and  apart  from  the  actual  organizational  stiiicture  of  the 
Unemployment  Councils,  and  certain  individuals  were  put  in  charge 
there  who  were  more  or  less  interested  in  the  financial  aspects  of 
the  paper  than  they  were  in  the  campaigns  that  it  ostensibly  was 
created  to  chronicle. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  masthead,  howt^ver,  carries  the  statement  that 
it  is  published  fortnightly  by  the  Unemployment  Councils.  In  some 
respects  it  was  the  official  publication  of  the  organization,  was  it  not? 

Mr.  Cowan.  The  Unemployment  Councils  had  no  publishing  organ- 
ization. This  stuff  was  done  outside  for  us.  The  entire  content  of 
the  paper,  however,  was  under  the  control  of  our  national  fraction 
and  nothing  appeared  therein  that  was  not  first  approved  by  us. 

Mr.  Maithews.  Have  you  ever  heard  of  Michael  Davidow? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  You  know  that  he  is  a  Communist  Party  member? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  see  that  he  is  one  of  the  contributors 
to  this  paper? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Richard  Sullivan,  another  contribu- 
tor? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  don't  know  Sullivan. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  knew  of  him? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  knew  him  as  a  party  member  in  New  York? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  knoAv  Ann  Livingston,  who  was  a  col- 
umnist for  the  Daily  Worker? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  know  the  name. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  know  her  name? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes ;  I  know  her  name. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  knew  her  as  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes:  I  knew  her  as  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Apart  from  whatever  technical  relationship  there 
was  between  this  publication  and  the  Unemj^hwment  Councils,  would 
_you  say  that  the  Hunger  Fighter  was  definitefy  a  Communist  publi- 
cation ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  No:  I  couldn't  say  that  the  Hunger  Fighter  definitely 
was  a  Communist  publication,  because  there  was  permitted  in  the 
Hunger  Fighter,  through  our  national  committee,  material  that  defi- 
nitely did  not  follow  the  party  line,  as  a  concession  to  those  forces 
that  were  following  what  we  considered  a  progressive  line  in  the 
unemployed  field. 


UN-AMEUK  AN    l'K()rA<;A.\i  )A   ACTIVITIES  8629 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  aren't  concessions  sometimes  a  ]y<\v\  of  I  lie 
party  line  ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  In  this  instance  we  had  no  choice. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  party  line  made  the  concessions,  is  that  cor- 
rect ? 

Mr.  CowAX.  The  concessions  that  are  found  in  this  publication 
were  dictated  by  the  growin<y  majority  of  those  who  were  not  mem- 
bers of  the  partj^  in  the  various  districts  throughout  the  country,  and 
the  excessive  amount  of  contriV)uted  material  that  came  in.  and  the 
protest  from  nonparty  forces  wlio  contributed  but  their  maleiial 
was  not  iniblished. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  of  Franklin  Folsom  being  a  member 
of  the  Comnuuiist  Party '^ 

Mr.  Cowan.  Xo. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  You  do  not  know  that  ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  No. 

Mr.  Ma'ithews.  During  your  membership  in  the  Conununist  Pai-ty 
did  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  Alex  Balint? 

Ml'.  Cowan.  During  my  membership  in  the  Communist  Party  I 
know  no  such  man. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  never  knew  of  a  party  member  whose  name 
was  Alex  Balint  or  Al  Balint? 

Mr.  Cowan.  During  my  time  in  the  Connnunist  Party  I  never 
knew  anyone  who  had  the  name  Alex  Balint,  who  was  a  party  mem- 
ber, nor  the  name  Alex  Balint  appearing  on  the  party  records 
to  which  I  had  access  at  the  time. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  have  access  to  party  records  ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  A<  a  member  of  the  district  bureau  I  had  constant 
access  to  the  district's  membership — just  the  district's  membership 
records. 

Mr.  Mati'hews-  Now,  I  show  you  a  photograph  which  appeared 
in  the  AVashii^igton  Post  and  ask  you  if  you  know  the  man  whose 
picture  appears  on  the  right.     Do  you  know  that  man  by  any  name? 

Mr.  Cowan.    Yes;  I  know  that  man. 

Mr.  Matthi':ws.  Are  you  positive  that  you  know  the  man? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Very  positive. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Under  what  name  did  you  know  him? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  knew  him  under  the  name  of  Al  Barry. 

Mr.  Mai  THEWS.  Would  you  please  spell  the  name? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Barry — B-a-r-r-j'^,  Al  Barry. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Al  Barry  ^ 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes. 

Mr.  M.vrTHEWs.  Mr.  Chairman,  tlie  witness  lias  identified  a  photo- 
graph of  Alex  Balint,  wliose  pliotogra})h  a})pears  with  Andrew 
Balunek  on  the  first  page  of  the  Washington  Post  for  June  11,  1941. 

Did  you  know  Al  Barry  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  did. 

Mr.  MArniEws.  Are  you  positive  of  that? 

Mr,  OowAN,  Very  positive. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  have  personal  association  with  Al 
Barry  as  a  member  of  the  Connnunist  Party  ^ 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  called  him  to  Dartv  meetings  as  a  member  of  the 
party  to  discuss  with  him  and  outline  to  him  various  of  the  party 
campai<rns  in  that  period. 


gg30  UN-AMERICAN  PROl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  state  approximately  what  year  it  was 
that  you  first  knew  Al  Barry  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  'i 

Mr.  Cowan.  The  latter  part — not  as  a  member  of  the  Communist 
Party  in  the  beginning.  The  man  I  knew  as  Al  Barry  was  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Young  Communist  League.  That  was  in  the  hitter  part 
of  1930,  and  that  status  of  Al  Barry  continued  until  approximately 
1933,  in  the  spring,  when  the  party  in  the  district — we  decided  to 
transfer  him  to  tlie  party  but  to  send  him  back  to  do  industrial  trade 
union  work  in  the  Young  Connnunist  League  as  his  party  assignment. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  an  issue  of  the  Y.  C.  L.  Builder — 
the  Young  Communist  League  Builder  for  September  1933.  In  your 
experience  in  the  Communist  Party  did  you  ever  see  this  ])u])lication^ 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  have.  I  have  often  read  this  and  seen  it  sold  as 
a  booklet  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  On  page  10  of  this  issue  there  appears  an  article 
entitled  "Winning  the  Youth  for  the  Y.  C.  L.  Through  Struggle." 
The  article  is  signed  by  Al  Barry,  Cleveland,  and  Mary  Johnson. 

You  knew  Mary  Johnson  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party, 
did  you,  or  the  Young  Communist  League  ? 

Mr.  CowAN.  I  knew  Mary  Johnson  as  a  member  of  the  Young 
Communist  League. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  say  it  was  al)out  1933  that  Al  Barry 
was  taken  into  the  Communist  Party  from  the  Young  Communist 
League  and  then  reassigned  to  work  in  the  Young  Commnnist  League 
in  industrial  work,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  CowAN.  In  the  early  part  of  1933  or  the  latter  part  of  1932 — 
it  was  that  winter,  anyhow,  he  was  assigned  to  remain — he  was  given 
party  membership  status  from  the  league  and  graduated  into  the 
party  from  the  league  and  assigned  to  remain  therein,  but  to  add 
to  his  usual  youth  activities  certain  youth  trade  union  industrial 
work. 

]Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Cowan,  I  show  you  a  copy  of  the  Daily 
Worker  for  Monday,  April  16,  1934.  On  page  2  thereof  there  is  a 
signed  article  entitled  "Five  Thousand  Workers  in  Otis  Steel  Keacly 
To  Act."  The  date  line  is  Cleveland,  April  15,  and  the  author  of  the 
article  is  Al  Barry. 

Is  that,  in  your  judgTnent,  the  same  man  whom  you  have  identified 
from  the  photograph  which  I  showed  you  a  few  moments  ago? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes,  sir:  because  at  that  particular  time  a  question 
had  arisen  as  to  policy  in  the  steel  mills  and  we  instructed  Al  Barry 
at  that  time  to  investigate  and  report  on  the  situation  in  the  Otis, 
Corigan,  Kenney  Steel,  Republic  plants,  and  Newberg  plant  of  the 
American  Steel  &  Wire  Co.,  and  to  write  these  up  for  the  party  press, 
and  this  is  definitely  one  of  those  articles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  happen  to  know  whether  Al  Barry  was  a 
citizen  of  the  LTnited  States? 

Mr.  Cowan.  On  that  point  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  do  know  that  Al  Barry  was  assigned  by  the 
party  to  make  reports  on  the  progress  of  organization  in  the  Otis 
Steel  Co.  around  this  date 

Mr.  Cowan.  Not  on  organization,  on  general  conditions  among  the 
workers. 


UN-AMEiacAN  i'U()PA(;anda  activities  8631 

Mr.  Matthews.  Oh  ovneral  coiulitions  among  the  workers  and  that 
this  article  in  the  Daily  Woiker  is  one  of  the  reports  arising  from 
tliat  assiiinment^ 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  IMr.  Chairman,  the  committee  has  come  into  pos- 
session of  certain  portions  of  the  tiles  of  the  secretary  of  the  Com- 
nuinirit  I'artv  in  the  State  of  Ohio.  Herbert  Goldfrank,  which  is  in 
the  handwriting  of  Herbert  Goldfrank.  There  is  a  sheet  which 
seems  to  refer  to  the  American  League  membership  and  there  is  a 
notation  on  this  sheet  "Al  Barry  contacts."  1  wonder  if  you  can 
advise  us  as  to  the  best  way  to  make  that  a  part  of  the  record? 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews,  if  we  could  have  someone  who  can 
identify  the  handwriting  of  Goldfrank,  it  may  be  accepted.  Do  you 
liave  anvone  who  can  do  that  ? 

]\Ir.  Matthews.  The  staff  of  the  committee  has  no  doubt  about  where 
the  document  came  from.  Apart  from  the  question  of  the  handwriting 
it  did  come  from  the  brief  case  of  Goldfrank  in  the  State  of  Ohio. 
Also,  in  the  brief  case  of  the  secretary  of  the  Communist  Party  of 
Ohio  there  were  certain  letters.  One  letter  is  addressed  to  "Dear  Com- 
rade Goldfrank."  The  letter  is  signed  "Comradely,  G.  Ellison."  It 
is  dated  "Cleveland,  Ohio,  September  22,  1938." 

The  subject  matter  of  this  letter  has  to  do  with  a  Communist  Party 
member  who  was  being  investigated  by  Charles  Dirba  of  the  central 
control  commission  and  the  correspondent  is  writing  to  Comrade  Gold- 
frank and  states  that  he  or  she  has  referred  the  matter  for  a  follow-up 
to  "Al  Balint." 

There  is  a  series  of  letters  that  came  from  Charles  Dirba,  whom  the 
witness  has  identified  as  the  Communist  International  representative 
on  the  central  control  commission  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the 
United  States,  and  from  the  correspondence  it  appears  that  Dirba, 
through  his  local  office  in  Cleveland,  is  checking  up  on  another  Com- 
munist Party  member  through  Al  Balint. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Well,  if  you  have  the  information  which  you  state  you 
have,  and  I  am  informed  by  the  secretary  of  the  committee  that  this 
information  was  obtained  by  the  committee  investigator  Randall  in  the 
year  1939  in  Cleveland,  Ohio,  and  that  it  can  be  identified  positively 
as  having  been  in  the  possession  of  this  man  Goldfrank,  under  such 
circumstances  you  ma}'  insert  any  or  all  of  the  correspondence  in  the 
record. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  should  like  to  call  your  attention  to  the  fact  that 
this  appears  to  be  indisputably  documentary  evidence  making  Al 
Balint,  who  appeared  here  as  a  witness  and  who  has  now  been  identified 
by  this  witness  as  "Al  Barry,"  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party, 
trusted  by  the  highest  authority  in  the  Communist  Party,  Charles 
Dirba,  of  "the  central  control  commission. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Under  the  facts  as  recited  to  me  by  the  secretary  of 
the  committee  as  to  the  source  of  this  material,  it  may  be  inserted  in 
the  record. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  would  like  to  suggest,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  this 
correspondence  be  not  marked  as  an  exhibit  but  copied  in  full  in  the 
record. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 


8632  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

(The  documents  referred  to  are  as  follows:) 

Life  History  of  Kenneth  Orrville  Gemmill,  Sitbmitted  January  3,  1938 

My  iiame  is  Kenneth  Orrville  Gemmill.  Born  December  20,  1904,  in  Orrville, 
Ohio.  Mother  born  June  1885  in,  I  believe,  Dunkirk,  Ohio.  Father  born  1878 
in  Reading,  Pa.,  I  believe. 

Father  i^  dead.  He  was  32  years  old  when  he  died.  He  was  an  electrical 
engineer.  Mother  is  living  and  is  52  years  old.  She  is  working  part  time  for 
the  Kellogg  Korset  Co.,  branch  store  in  Cleveland.  After  my  father's  death, 
my  mother  worked  for  the  National  Carbon  C<>.,  1910  to  1925. 

My  mother  was  born  of  middle-class  parents,  her  father  was  an  insurance 
broker  until  he  had  an  accident  which  affected  him  physically  and  mentally. 
He  then  became  an  evangelical  preacher  whereupon  my  grandmother  divorced 
him  and  went  to  work  to  support  her  family. 

Economic  status  of  family :  After  my  father's  death,  my  mother  had  to  woi'k 
in  order  to  supply  myself  and  my  sister.  By  living  frugally  she  was  able  to 
save  a  little  money.  The  family  had  no  other  income  until  I  went  to  work. 
My  home  environment  has  always  been  pleasant.  My  mother  has  always  en- 
couraged me  to  read  and  develop  my  own  ideas.  There  were  only  two  children, 
myself  and  my  sister.  I  have  never  had  any  religious  training.  I  have  never 
had  any  religious  affiliation.  ]My  parents  never  belonged  to  any  political  party 
that  I  know  of. 

I  began  to  work  in  I^ecember  1919  for  the  Big  Four  Railroad.  Mechanic  and 
apprentice.  Remained  with  the  Big  Four  until  December  1923.  excepting  the 
time  out  during  the  big  railroad  strike  in  1922. 

(The  following  i:)]aces  and  time  only  approximate:)  After  leaving  the  rail- 
road I  worked  for  the  Standard  Oil  Co.  as  station  attendant  in  1923;  during 
the  latter  part  of  1923  I  worked  for  the  Glidden  I'aint  Co.  in  Cleveland.  In 
1924  I  worked  as  a  salesman  for  the  Vance  Motors  Company,  Smart  Silk 
Hosiery  Mills  and  for  several  months  in  1924-1925  I  was  insurance  agent  for 
the  National  Life  and  Accident  of  Nashville.  Tennessee,  located  in  Cleveland. 
March  1927  to  March  1929,  I  was  with  the  S.  8.  Kresge  5-and-lO-cent  stores  as 
stockman  and  lioorman,  located  in  Cleveland;  Canton,  Ohio;  and  Gary,  Ind. 
After  coming  back  to  Cleveland  from  Gary,  I  took  a  course  in  mechanical 
dentistry  which  I  practiced  from  1929  to  1935,  owning  my  own  laboratory. 
From  April  1936  to  January  1937  I  was  employed  at  the  Vv'inton  Engine  Co., 
in  Cleveland,  as  a  mechanic.  Since  January  1937  I  have  been  employed  full 
time  in  party  work. 

I  have  never  had  an  income  other  than  my  wages  or  profit  from  my  work 
in  my  laboratory. 

I  have  never  had  any  military  service  (except  military  training  in  .school). 
During  the  World  War  I  was  in  school.     I  am  not  married. 

I  have  one  sister  living.  Married.  Her  husband  (Dr.  Karl  Reischauer  was 
killed  in  Shanghai  bombing  August  13,  1937).  Since  that  time  she  has  enrolled 
in  Columbia  University  and  is  now  in  the  graduate  class.  Economic  condition 
fair.     She  has  no  children. 

I  have  no  children.  My  mother  is  quite  sympathetic  to  our  party.  My 
mother  reads  the  Daily  Worker,  Sunday  Worker,  sometimes  the  Communist 
and  voted  the  Party  ticket  last  national  election.  I  have  no  relatives  that  I 
know  of  that  ever  worked  for  the  Government.  I  have  never  traveled  outside 
of  the  U.  S.  A. 

I  entered  school  in  1909.  Finished  grammar  school  and  quit  high  school  in 
my  second  year  to  go  to  work.  I  attended  school  for  10  years.  I  had  two 
courses  in  political  economy,  one  in  Marxism-Leiniuism  (Party  education). 

I  am  attending  district  training  school  now.  I  have  read  innmuerable  party 
pamphlets  and  Fuerbach,  Anti-Duhring,  Housing  Question,  Capital,  vol.  1,  parts 
of  vol.  2,  selected  works  of  Lenin,  and  so  forth ;  read  the  Communist  C.  I.,  im- 
precor,  party  organizer.  Daily  Worker  .also  Leninism  by  Stalin.  Of  the  above 
I  studied  (in  party  classes)  Capital,  Foundations  of  Leninism.  Strategy  and 
Tactics.  The  dictatorship  of  the  Proletariat.  Also  Origins  of  Myths,  and  am 
writing  a  paper  on  the  effect  of  the  Art  of  Pottery  on  Mosaic  Creation  Myth. 

Familiar  with  English  only,  though  studied  French  and  Latin  in  high  school. 

Joined  the  C.  P.  in  May  1936  in  Cleveland.  After  joining  recruited  six  to 
seven   friends   immediately,   all   of   whom   are   continually   active   in   branches. 


UX-AMEKICAN   I'HOl'AOANDA  ACTIVITIES  8633 

Was  mombor  of  unit  bureau,  elected  niemliersbip  directoi-  of  branch.  In  Decem- 
ber 1986  was  pbu'od  in  charge  of  arranging  aftairs  for  the  party  by  the  secretary 
of  county  comniittee.  at  the  same  time  I  was  trying  to  reorganize  tlie  Daily 
Worlver  and  literature  departments.  Alanli  1937  I  was  placed  in  charge  of 
D.  W.  Department  for  county.     I  am  branch  organizer  at  the  present  time. 

Have  never  belonged  to  any  political  party  other  than  the  C.  P.  I  came  into 
the  party  through  my  contacts  with  party  members  in  the  A.  L.  A.  W.  &  F. 
Comrade  Williamson  was  the  district  organizer.  Was  recommended  for  party 
by  Comrade*  Harry  Rogers,  who  was  at  the  time  branch  organizer.  Was  associ- 
ated with  league  in  Lakewood  and  Youth  League.  I  have  never  been  out  of 
party.  Have  attended  county  convention — 1936;  Ohio  State  convention — 1937; 
Mid-West  Daily  conference  in  Chicago. 

Have  recruited  14  members,  and  through  written  promise  from  Comrade 
Biebel  of  West  Lafayette,  Indiana,  to  join  the  Party  an  entire  brancli  on  the 
campus  of  Purdue  L'niversity  (9  members)  of  which  Comrade  Biebel  is  organizer. 

I  have  never  been  associated  with  an  opposition  group. 

During  the  time  I  was  employed  by  the  Big  4,  I  was  member  of  the 
I.  A  of  M.  Joined  in  1919  in  Cleveland.  Remained  in  iintil  1923.  Never  held 
office  in  any  union.  Joined  Auto-C.  I.  O.  union  and  was  partially  respiuisible  for 
the  .strong  organization  of  the  Winton  Engine  Co.  when  they  were  organized 
by  the  auto  workers.  After  giving  up  my  job  at  Winton  Engine  to  do  party 
work  I  have  been  dropped  from  union.  Do  not  belong  to  any  other  organizations. 
I  have  never  participated  in  any  government  bodies. 

I  took  part  in  the  R.  R.  strike  in  1922.  actively  taking  part  in  the  picketing 
of  the  Linndale,  Ohio,  .shops.    I  have  never  been  arrested. 

Comrade  Carl  Winters  can  substantiate  most  of  the  data  given  since  I  joined 
the  party.  Also  Paul  Guszits,  member  of  Lakewood  Branch,  2068  West  One 
Hundred  and  Third  Street. 

(The  second  document  is  as  follows:) 

Cleveland,  Ohio,  September  22,  193S. 

De-vr  Comrade  Gou>frank  :  I  am  enclosing  the  life  history  of  Gemill,  as  well 
as  the  history  of  the  case  of  Harry  Howard. 

The  suspect,  Harry  Howard,  was  first  reported  to  Carl  by  Gemill.  I  went  out 
to  Gemill's  home  and  interviewed  the  source  from  where  he  received  the 
information  (Paul  Guszits).  By  the  way,  the.se  two  members  are  very  clo.se 
friends,  are  always  in  each  other's  company. 

I  sent  incptiries  for  a  follow-up  to  Al  Balint,  A.  S.  &  W.  Branch,  and  to  Com- 
rade Winters,  but  never  received  replies  from  any  of  these. 

Please  return  all  this  material  for  my  files. 

Regarding  Gemill's  history : 

1.  According  to  birth  date,  he  went  to  work  for  the  R.  R.  at  15  years  of  age 
(that  might  be  possible),  but  he  joined  the  I.  A.  of  M.  also  in  1919  in  Cleveland, 
and  I  don't  think  they  accept  members  15  years  of  age,  even  as  apprentices. 

2.  No  statement  of  where  he  worked  between  1925  to  March  1927 ;  then  for  2 
years  (March  1927  to  March  1929)  he  worked  for  Kresge  5-10-cent  stores  in 
three  different  cities:  Cleveland,  Canton,  and  Gary,  Ind.  (The  state  he  says 
that  this  Howard  took  a  detective  course.)  He  worked  as  a  floorman  and  stock- 
man in  the  5-10-cent  store,  but  does  not  state  if  the  company  sent  him  to  the 
three  different  cities  to  work,  and  why.  Couldn't  they  get  employees  there  to 
do  the  work,  or  was  he  a  .sipecial  employee? 

3.  Tlien  he  took  a  cour.se  in  mechanical  dentistry  (where?)  which  he  prac- 
ticed until  1935  (6  years  in  his  own  laboratory)-  (He  started  in  1029,  during 
the  depression,  last  through  the  worst  part  of  it,  and  when  things  began  to 
pick  up,  he  went  out  of  business.) 

After  whicli  he  secured  a  job  at  Winton  Motor  (through  whom,  an<l  how  was 
he  qualified  to  go  from  dentistry  ro  atito  mechanics?) 

he  worked  there  8  months  (started  in  April  1936,  joined  the  party  1  month 
later),  then  quit  his  good  job,  to  take  a  full-time  party  job  as  D.  W.  agent 
6  months  after. 

Why  did  he  quit  a  good  paying  job  when  he  only  became  acquainted  with  the 
party  tlirough  some  contact  (  ?)  in  the  A.  L.  A.  W.  &  F.? 

What  was  he  doing  politically  during  the  time  he  was  in  business? 

Where  was  he  located  while  in  business;  who  were  some  of  his  clients;  what 
wholesale  houses  did  he  do  business  with? 


8534  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

What  connections  has  he  with  Comrade  Biebel,  of  West  LaFayette,  lud.  ? 
I  tliiuk  you  will  have  to  work  out  a  questionnaire,  based  upon  his  answers 
to  his  life's  history,  and  inquiries  to  Indiana  party.     I  have  emphasized  certain 
paragraphs  in  red  pencil. 
Comradely, 

G.  Ellison. 

(The  third  document  was  in  an  o))ened  envelope  with  the  word 
'^Personal"  in  the  upper  left-hand  corner;  in  the  center  of  the  envelope 
the  name  "Goldfrank."    The  document  reads  as  follows :) 

New  York  City,  N.  Y.,  Septewber  2t,  193S. 

Dear  Comrade  Goldfeank:  Wg  have  just  finished  going  through  the  many 
biographies  we  received  some  time  ago  and  will  need,  as  I  told  you  previously, 
considerable  information  more  on  a  large  ninnber  of  comrades.  This  time  we 
would  like  to  get  further  information  to  complete  the  biography  of  Kenneth 
Orville  Gemnull.  Please  see  that  we  get  the  following  information  promptly  and 
inform  the  comrades  that  as  many  pages  should  be  written  out  as  necessary  to 
give  a  full  picture  for  our  records.  If  this  is  done  this  time  and  in  all  other 
cases,  we  will  have  a  minimum  amount  of  requests  to  make. 

We  notice  that  it  is  stated  that  he  worked  with  >S.  H.  Kresge  ('o.  as  a  stock- 
man and  floorman  in  Gary,  Ind.,  Canton,  Ohio,  and  Cleveland,  Ohio.  We  are 
interested  in  knowing  how  he  got  the  job  with  this  company,  where  he  was 
lured,  exactly  the  location  of  the  •■■stores  he  worked  in,  and  the  exact  month  and 
dates  if  possible  when  he  worked  in  each  store.  We  are  interested  in  knowing 
where  he  took  his  course  in  mechanical  dentistry,  since  he  practiced  and  oper- 
ated as  a  mechanical  dentist  from  1929  to  1935,  in  his  own  laboratory.  Where 
was  this  laboratory  located,  and  just  incidentally  to  complete  the  records  on 
this  point  we  would  like  some  of  the  people  he  bought  supplies  from  as  well  as 
names  and  addresses  of  the  companies  and  names  of  one-half  dozen  of  some  of 
his  clients. 

Comrade  Gemmill  seems  to  be  quite  a  competent  person  and  we  are  wondering 
what  the  connection  is  between  work  as  a  dental  miH^'hanic  and  how  he  got  his 
job  and  was  competent  to  work  at  the  Winton  Motor  Co.  If  possible,  we  would  like 
to  know  through  whom  he  got  the  job  at  Winton. 

I  want  you  to  be  certain,  Comrade  Goldfrank,  to  realize  that  out  of  the  one- 
hundred-odd  questionnaires  which  we  received  from  you  in  Ohio  of  all  leading 
comrades,  that  his  is,  I  believe,  the  18th  that  we  have  completed  going  through, 
and  had  to  ask  further  questions  about  and  if  the  rest  are  inadequately  completed 
biographies,  we  will  ask  for  further  questions  as  we  come  to  it.  I  am  sorry  that 
you  didn't  do  a  better  job  in  getting  a  full  biography  in  the  first  place.  Because 
you  know  our  records  mean  nothing  unless  they  are  completed.  Awaiting  your 
immediate  reply  after  you  have  gotten  Comrade  Gemmill's  full  reixirt. 
Comradely  yours. 

(The  fourth  document  is  as  follows:) 

New  York  City,  October  7, 1938. 
Dear  Goldfrank  :  I  have  been  working  on  the  biographies  that  I  received  from 
you  some  time  ago,  and  would  like  to  get  some  furthei-  information  on  Kenneth 
Orville  Gemmill. 

As  you  know,  the  questionnaire  has  a  point  as  to  when  one  began  to  work, 
what  kind  of  work,  and  what  was  the  complete  history  of  various  jobs  held, 
length  of  time  in  each  job,  name  of  company,  where  located,  why  changed  jobs,  if 
fired  from  jobs,  for  what  reason,  and  so  forth. 

On  this  point,  the  biography  of  Gemmill  is  very  fragmentary.    We  suggest  that 
you  see  Gemmill  and  get  a  complete  history  on  the  point  of  various  occupations 
and  jobs  held  by  him. 
Yours, 

Charles. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  acquainted  from  first-hand  knowledge  with 
any  other  assignments  which  Al  Barry  received  from  the  Communist 
Party,  Mr.  Cowan? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Not  any  other  general  assignments.  The  other  assign- 
ments, that  is  his  other  work  would  be  but  the  execution  of  the  general 
assignment  given  to  him  by  the  party. 


UX-AMEUICA.N    i'UUrA(iANDA  ACTIVITIES  8635 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  acquiiiuted  with  A.  E.  Stevenson,  the  chair- 
nian  of  the  Industrial  Union  Council  of  the  C.  I.  O.  in  Cleveland  ^ 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  A.  E.  Stevenson  is 
a  member  of  the  Connnunist  Party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  1  do  not  [positively  know  that  Stevenson  is  a  member 
of  the  Connnunist  Party.  It  has  been  reported  to  me  by  certain 
persons  that  Stevenson  'i  years  a^o  joined  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  MA-rrnEWS.  But  you  don't  know  that  of  your  own  knowledge? 

Mr.  CowAx.  I  don't  know  that  he  was  definitely  not  a  member  of 
the  Connnunist  Party  when  I  was  in  the  party. 

Mr.  IMattiiews.  Are  you  satisfied  from  your  own  investigation  of 
the  matter  that  Stevenson  has  followed  the  Comnnmist  Party  line 
in  his  activities  generally  of  late? 

Mr.  Cowan.  1  have  personally  witnessed  A.  E.  Stevenson  attend 
fraction  meetings  of  the  Cleveland  Industrial  Union  Council,  which 
fraction  meetings  are  composed  exclusively  of  party  members.  These 
meetings  have  taken  place  in  Cleveland,  (3hio,  on  the  west  side. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  acquainted  with  Ben  Gray? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  do  you  know  about  Ben  Gray  and  his  con- 
nection with  the  Communist  Party,  if  any? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Ben  Gray  was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party 
when  I  became  a  member  and  when  I  left  the  party  he  was  still  a 
member,  and  I  have  positive  knowledge  in  my  conflicts  with  him  in 
his  work  in  the  Workers  Alliance  in  1936  and  1937,  in  Cleveland, 
Ohio,  that  he  is  still  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  ever  sent  by  the  Communist  Party  to 
the  west  coast  for  any  special  mission? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  was  sent  by  the  Communist  Party's  National  Trade 
Union  in  New  York  to  the  west  coast  in  June  of  1934,  and  remained 
there  during  July  of  1934  to  work  under  the  cover  of  the  Workers 
Ex-Service  Men's  League  during  the  coast-wide  seamen's  and  long- 
shoremen's strike. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  you  say  you  were  sent  by  the  party  to  work 
under  the  cover  of  the  Workers  Ex-Service  Men's  League.  Do  you 
mean  by  that  that  fundamentally  you  were  sent  there  to  do  Com- 
munist Party  work? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  was  sent  there  to  do  party  work;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthf:ws.  But  the  auspices  publicly  were  the  auspices  of 
the  Workers  Ex-Service  iVIen's  League? 

Mr.  Cowan.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  told  whom  you  should  make  contact 
with  when  you  reached  San  Francisco? 

^[r.  Cowan.  I  had  my  own  list  of  contacts  for  my  own  office,  of 
the  various  officers  of  the  posts  of  the  Workers  Ex-Service  Men's 
I^eague  in  the  coastwise  cities,  from  Seattle  into  Mexico  and  up  into 
Canada,  and  these  names  of  the  officers  of  the  various  posts  were 
divided  in  my  list  into  party  and  nonparty  members. 

This  list  was  used  by  me  for  the  purpose  of  building  uj)  inass 
meetings  of  veterans  under  a  difficult  situation  in  the  coastwise  cities. 

I  had  been  given  an  addition:d  list  of  party  members  in  lending 
positions  on  the  west  coast,  attached  to  the  strike  situation,  and  told 


8Q36  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

definitely  to  get  in  touch  with  them  and  worlv  with  them  in  any  ac- 
tivities that  I  might  carry  out  through  the  fraction  method. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  instructed  to  get  in  touch  with  any 
individual  in  particular  before  you  begun  your  work  in  the  S;)n 
Francisco  area? 

Mr.  Cowan.  These,  of  course,  were  individuals,  individual  members 
of  the  jjiarty — leaders  of  the  party  there. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  instructed  t(^  get  iii  touch  with  Harry 
Bridges  when  j'ou  went  to  San  Francisco  before  you  undertook  your 
work? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  was  instructed  to  get  in  toucli  with  Harry  Bridges 
only  insofar  as  my  woik  concerned  the  San  Francisco  Bay  urea,  but 
I  was  warned  at  that  time  to  be  very  careful  in  my  contacrs  with  him 
because  insofar  as  the  party  trade  union  apparatus  was  concerned, 
he  was  then  considered  to  be  more  or  less  unreliable  as  to  tbe  p;irty 
line.  But,  nevertheless,  to  work  with  him  as  he  would  attend  the 
meetings  of  the  party  in  that  area  and  give  I'cports  on  which  we 
could  base  our  own  plans  for  activities  in  that  region. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  tlie  a^iivitie^  of 
Henry  Schmidt  on  the  west  coast  at  that  time. 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  only  know  that  at  that  time  we  were  informed  when 
we  went  to  the  west  coast,  that  all  of  the  orders  that  would  come 
to  us  through  the  highest  party  committees,  would  reach  us  throvigh 
Schmidt  and  that  we  were  not  to  question  his  authority  nor  to  expose 
his  whereabouts. 

Mr.  Ma^tthews.  Did  you  understand  tliat  Schmidt  was  su]>erior  to 
the  local  party  oi-ganization. 

Mr.  CoAVAN.  W^e  were  so  definitely  told. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  learn  of  the  activities  or  anythiiig  about 
the  activities  of  George  Maurer  on  the  west  coast  at  that  time? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Not  anything  particularly.  Arrests  took  place  in 
Sacramento  at  the  time  that  I  was  supposed  to  meet  Maurer,  that 
required  me  to  go  into  southern  Oregon  for  a  time  into  hiding,  and 
the  contact  with  Maurer  was  interru}>ted  by  the  Sacramento  arrests 
and  were  never  completed. 

He  did  not  figure  to  any  great  extent  in  the  work  tliut  I  did  ihere 
nor  had  I  met  him  previously  in  any  conferences  or  conventions.  His 
name  did  not  appear  on  the  party  list  tliat  Avas  gi^'en  co  me  in  New 
York. 

Mr.  Matohews.  Was  George  Maurer  active  according  to  the  in- 
formation Avhich  you  received,  in  the  pai'ty  fractions  of  the  trade 
unions  on  the  west  coast  ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  That  I  do  not  know, 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  was  the  significance  of  Ids  name  being  given 
to  you  ? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  can  only  assume  that  since  all  such  names  given 
to  me  were  names  of  individuals  situated  in  strategic  positions  in 
the  various  unions,  that  he  was  one  of  those  working  for  the  parly 
strategically  in  some  of  the  unions  or  some  of  the  activities  surround- 
ing the  strike. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Did  I  understand  vou  to  sav  that  George  Maurer 
Avas  Avorking  more  or  less  under  coa  er  at  that  time  on  the  coast  ? 


UN-AMERICAN   PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8637 

Mr.  CoAVAx.  As  I  stated  before,  it  was  interrupted  and  lio  luid 
to  ^o  into  hiding  and  so  did  1,  because  of  the  status — his  status 
there  of  beiii<>-  ordered  to  keep  under  cover. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  should  like  to  call  your  attten- 
tion  to  the  fact  that  the  coniniittee  has  in  its  j:)Ossessi()n  bank  records 
Avhicli  show  that  George  .Maurer.  about  whom  the  witness  is  now 
testifvino-.  Jms  in  recent  months  received  a  sum  of  money  approxi- 
matiuii-  $r>.(H)()  from  the  Soviet  (joverinnent. 

Did  you  know  AV'ilHam  Z.  Foster^ 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  knew  William  Z.  Foster;  yes. 

M)'.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Earl  Browder? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  knew  Earl  Browder. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Do  you  know  Robert  Minor? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  know  Robert  Minor. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  ever  go  to  Moscow  ? 

Mr.  CowAx.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  "Were  you  evei'  urged  to  go  to  Moscow? 

Mr.  CoAVAX.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  By  Avhom? 

Mr.  Coavan.  First  in  1931  by  the  district  committee  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  in  Cleveland,  Ohio.  Later,  on  three  different  occa- 
sions, in  1934  and  1935,  bj'  the  central  control  commission  of  the 
party  in  New  York  City. 

Ml'.  Mattheavs.  Was  that  Dirba  Avho  suggested  that  you  go  to 
MoscoAv  ^ 

Mr.  CoAVAN.  Dirba  Avas  the  representatiA-e  of  the  control  commis- 
sion who  made  this,  well,  shall  I  say  request.  In  fact  is  was  an 
order. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Do  you  know  EdAvard  Cheyfitz? 

Mr.  CowAx.  I  know  EdAvard  Cheyfitz. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  EdAvard  Cheyfitz  is 
a  member  of  the  Comnmnist  Party? 

Mr.  CoAVAX.  I  do. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  AVas  he  a  member  of  the  party  sometime  ago? 

Mr.  Coavax.  He  Avas  a  member  of  the  party  in  district  6,  Ohio, 
in  its  Toledo  section,  shortly  before  I  Avas  expelled  from  the  part  v. 

Mr.  Stakxes.  AVho  is  this  Cheyfitz  you  are  talking  about.  Dr. 
MattheAvs? 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Cheyfitz  has  been  identified  here,  Mr.  Chairman, 
as  the  national  executiA^e  secretary  of  the  National  Association  of 
Die  Casters. 

Mr.  Stakxes.  Is  that  the  same  Cheyfitz,  Mr.  Cowan  ? 

Mr.  Coavax.  That  is  the  same  Cheyfitz. 

]Mr.  Stakxes.  And  you  knoAv  him  positivelv  as  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  kneAv  him  then  in  the  Toledo  section  and  up  until 
1935  as  a  member  of  the  Conimunist  Party  in  tlie  Toledo  section. 

Mr.  Stakxes.  Did  you  attend  Conmnmist  Partv  meetinjzs  Avith 
him?  .  ^ 

Mi-.  Coavax.  I  did. 

^Iv.  Stakxes.  Did  you  engage  in  Communist  Partv  Avork  Avith 
him  ? 


§538  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Cowan.  No;  I  did  not.  The  only  work  that  I  had  was  this: 
I  was  sent  from  the  center  in  Clevehmd,  Ohio,  the  district  center, 
to  various  sections  of  the  party,  from  time  to  time  in  our  district, 
as  the  district  representative,  to  speak  to  the  i)arty  membership  on 
the  internal  affairs  and  to  lay  down  the  line  of  the  party  to  the 
section  membership. 

Cheyfitz  attended  those  meetings  in  Toledo  on  two  occasions  that 
I  was  sent  there  as  a  district  representative  for  the  section  prior 
to  1935. 

Mr.  Staenes,  In  that  connection  I  think  the  Chair  should  call 
attention  to  the  fact  that  Mr.  Cheyfitz  sent  a  telegram  to  the  Presi- 
dent of  the  United  States  in  March  of  this  year.  I  will  now  read  it 
into  the  record.  It  was  carried  in  all  of  the  daily  newspapers  of 
this  country.  The  telegram  which  Mr.  Cheyfitz  made  public,  which 
he  sent  to  the  President,  who  was  at  that  time  vacationing  in  Florida 
waters,  and  this  was  in  connection  with  the  strike  in  the  Harvill 
Die  Casting  Union  on  the  Pacific  coast.  The  telegram  was  as 
follows : 

In  the  interests  of  the  Nation's  welfare,  I  urge  that  the  United  States  Gov- 
ernment take  immediate  possession  of  the  Harvill  Airci-aft  Die  Casting  Cor- 
poration. 

That  is  what  Cheyfitz  in  his  telegram  to  the  President  said;  and 
I  further  quote: 

Henry  Harvill,  president  of  the  c'ompany,  has  deliherately  flouted  your  repre- 
sentatives by  refusing  to  sit  down  and  negotiate  settlement  of  the  strike.  In 
the  name  of  the  Harvill  employees  and  the  National  Association  of  Die  Casters, 
I  now  request  you  to  exei'cise  your  Executive  authority  vested  in  you  and 
take  over  this  plant. 

The  same  press  carries  a  denial  of  that  statement  by  the  two 
mediators  which  Mr.  Hillman  sent  to  the  west  coast  to  mediate  the 
difficulty.  The  Chair  thinks  it  is  highly  important  that  this  be  made 
a  part  of  the  record  at  this  time  in  connection  with  the  testimony 
now  being  given  by  Mr.  Cowan. 

Mr.  Matthews.  IVIr.  Cowan,  do  you  know  Fay  Stevenson? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  from  press  accoinits 
that  Fay  Stevenson  has  been  active  in  recent  strike  activities  in  the 
Alumiimm  plant  in  Cleveland? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  know  these  tilings  generally  from  observing  certain 
parades  of  the  trade-union  movement,  and  the  general  press  accounts, 
and  other  such  sources  of  information. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Fay  Stevenson  is  or 
was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Paity? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  know  that  Fay  Stevenson  was,  while  I  was  a  mem- 
ber, a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  and  I  have  positive  knowl- 
edge that  she  still  is. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Can  you  further  identify  Fay  Stevenson? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes;  I  am  going  to  ask  the  witness  if  he  knows 
what  relationship  Fay  Stevenson  bears  to  Edward  Cheyfitz. 

Mr.  Cowan.  She  is  his  mother. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Fay  Stevenson  is  Edward  Cheyfitz's  mother? 

Mr.  Cowan.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  lier  former  husband  a  Mr.  Chevfitz? 


UN-AMEKK'A.N   I'KOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8639 

Ml-.  Cov.  AN.   Mr.  Clicvfitz,  yes.  of  Toledo,  Oliio. 

Mr.  Matihews.  Do  you  know  Paul  Martin? 

Mr,  Cowan.  I  do  not  personally  know  Paul  Martin.  I  liave  seen 
him  in  certain  activities,  but  never  met  tlie  man. 

Mr.  ^Iattiikws.  Hut  you  know  from  the  situation  in  Cleveland  tliat 
he  is  the  })iesident  of  the  local  that  was  on  strike  recently,  do  you  not? 

Mr.  Cowan.  I  know  that  generally,  from  general  sources. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews,  will  you  be  able  a  little  later  to  give 
further  information  about  Paul  Martin  by  another  witness? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  INIr.  Chairman.    That  is  all  of  this  witness. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  will  be  all,  Mr.  Cowan,  and  thank  you. 

AA'ho  will  be  your  next  witness.  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  witness  is  Mr.  Mosberger. 

TESTIMONY   OF   JOHN  M.   MOSBERGER.   FORMER  MEMBER.    COM- 
MUNIST PARTY 

Mr.  Staknes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand,  Mr. 
Mosberger?  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall  give 
before  this  connnittee  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing 
but  the  truth,  so  help  you  God  { 

Mr.  Mosberger.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  proceed.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  ])lease  give  your  full  name? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  My  full  name  is  John  M.  Mosberger. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  yon  si)ell  your  last  name? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  M-o-s-b-e-r-g-e-r. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  Avere  you  born? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  ? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  November  2.  1908. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Where  do  you  reside  at  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Were  you  ever  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  Yes;  I  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  did  you  join  the  Conmnmist  Party? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  I  joined  in  1938. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  you  now  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  MosBERfiER.  Xo ;  I  am  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  When  and  why  did  you  (piit  the  Connnunist  Party? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  T  didn't  quit.  I  resigned  from  the  Connnunist 
Party  because  of  a  disagreement  over  parliamentary  procedure. 

Mr.  Ma'ithews.  When  was  that  ? 

Mj-.  Mosbkr(;er.  That  was  in  1940. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  remembei-  the  month? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  Xo:  I  couldn't  tell  you  ])ositively.  It  was  in  be- 
tween Ahu-ch.  Ai)ril,  and  May. 

Mr.  Mattih:ws.  JU'tween  March  and  May  of  last  year? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  Yes. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  Did  you  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  know 
a  man  by  the  name  of  Radden  ? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  Yes.  sir;  I  do  Ivtiow  Edward  Radden. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Edward  Radden — how  do  you  spell  his  name  ? 
i;L'n2n— 41 — vol.  14 :^] 


8640  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  MosBERGER.  R-a-d-d-e-ii. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  know  him  to  be  a  member  of  the  Conmiivmst 
Party  ? 

Mr.  MosBERGER.  Yes ;  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  did  you  know  that  he  was  a  member  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  MosBERGER.  Because  I  went  to  his  home  every  Wednesday  night 
to  take  him  to  the  meetings.  He  was  very  hard  to  get  to  the  meetings, 
so  I  went  for  him  all  the  time.     Also,  I  gave  liini  instructions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Wio  is  this  Radden  ?     Can  you  identify  him  for  me  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes.  Edward  Radden  was  one  of  the  men  who 
came  to  Washington  last  week  to  negotiate  the  aluminum  strike  with 
the  Defense  Mediation  Board. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  correct,  Mr.  Witness  ?     Is  he  the  same  Radden  ? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  The  same  Radden ;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  What  position  did  you  hold  in  your  unit  of  the 
Communist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  I  was  branch  educational  director. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  branch  educational  director  of  j^our  unit  of  the 
Communist  Party,  did  you  have  any  supervisory  relationship  to 
Edward  Radden  ? 

Mr.  Mosberger.   (No  response.) 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  vou  instj-uct  him  or  delegate  him  to  do 
anything  ? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  No;  I  did  not.  I  merely  gave  him  assignments 
for  speaking. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  gave  him  assignments  for  speaking? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  he  carry  out  those  assignments? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  Yes ;  he  did. 

Mr.  Mattiieavs.  W^ere  those  assignments  for  the  Conmninist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Mosberger.  Absolutely. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  absolutely  no  doubt  then  that  Edward 
Radden — — 

Mr.  Mosberger.  No  question  about  it  at  all. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party  at  least 
up  until  the  strike  of  1940? 

Mr.  Mosberger;  No  doubt  about  it  at  all  up  to  the  time  I  resigned. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  all.  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Thank  you,  Mr.  Mosberger. 

Who  will  be  your  next  witness? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Robert  B.  Barker. 

TESTIMOIJY  OF  EGBERT  B.  BARKEE,  INVESTIGATOR  FOR  THE 
SPECIAL  COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Barker,  will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your 
right  hand?  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall 
give  will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth, 
so  help  you  God? 

Mr.  Barker.  I  do. 

Mv.  Starnes.  Mr.  Barker,  have  you  this  date  been  in  touch  with 
the  office  of  the  clerk  of  the  Criminal  Court  of  Cuyahoga  County, 
Ohio? 


UN-A3IERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8641 

Mr.  Bakker.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.    Staknes.  On    instructions   from   the   chairman   of   the   com- 
mittee i 
'>«Mr.  Barker.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Did  you  obtain  from  that  office  a  report  on  the 
criminal  record  of  one  Paul  Martin? 

Mr.  Barker.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  state  for  the  benefit  of  the  record  what 
that  report  is^ 

Mr.  Baukei;.  Yes.  sir;  Paul  Martin,  alias,  is  the  local  president — 
he  is  the  president  of  Local  55,  C.  I.  O.,  Die  Casters  Union  at  the 
Aluminum  Co.  of  America  in  their  plant  in  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

H(>  has  had  six  convictions  for  felonies,  including  three  for  auto- 
mobile theft.  The  last  conviction  was  for  robbery  with  firearms 
for  which  he  received  a  sentence  of  1  to  25  years.  He  served  7  years 
and  came  out  of  the  penitentiary  and  assumed  the  alias  of  "Paul 
Martin."  and  the  Ohio  State  Parole  Board  at  Columbus  has  re- 
voked his  parole  and  has  sent  a  warrant  to  the  sheriff  of  Cuyahoga 
County,  Ohio,  for  this  man's  arrest  and  return  lo  the  State  peni- 
tentiary at  Columbus  to  serve  the  remaining  17  years  of  his  sentence. 

Mr.  Chairman,  I  was  also  advised  that  a  warrant  has  been  issued 
for  Alex  Balint  for  false  statements  made  in  his  alien  registration 
statement,  by  the  United  States  Commission  at  Cleveland,  Ohio. 
That  news  just  came  in  a  few  minutes  ago. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Thank  you.  In  view  of  the  present  critical  situation 
with  reference  to  international  affairs,  and  the  extraordinary  efforts 
that  our  own  Government  is  making  to  place  its  house  in  order,  and 
to  pro\4de  security  for  the  people  of  this  Nation,  the  Chair  invites 
attention  to  a  statement  contained  in  the  committee's  report  which 
was  written  in  the  jeiw  1938.     I  quote : 

American  labor  has  Ixirne  the  brunt  of  the  Communist  efforts  to  imrsue  the 
policy  of  iM'iirratidii  of  mass  organizations  in  tlie  past  4  years  and,  to  the  degree 
that  that  effort  has  l)eeu  successful.  American  labor  1ms  a  task  of  great  seriou^i- 
ness  and  imiiortanee  on  its  hands.  The  serious  factor  in  the  situation,  from 
the  .stai'.diioint  of  the  Nation  as  a  whole,  lies  not  so  much  in  tlie  purely  economic 
views  which  the  members  of  labor  organizations  may  liold.  as  in  the  foreign 
control  over  Connnunist  Party  members,  which  miglit  in  time  <;f  stress  lead 
to  sabotage  and  to  espionage,  and  in  rlie  Communist  rule-or-ruiu  policy  so  dis- 
ruptive to  the  labor  organizations  themselves. 

The  ('(mnnittee  believes  that  the  Americiui  labor  movement  must,  and  will,  as 
speedily  as  possible,  free  itself  of  Communist  leadership  and  control  wherever 
it  exists. 

The  committee  is  emphatic  in  its  belief  that  a  strong  and  vigorous  l.ilwr  move- 
ment is  an  element  of  strength  in  the  life  of  our  democracy.  But  the  committee 
must  a.ssert  that  the  Communist  Party  is  interested  in  tr.-Mle-unions  iirimarily 
for  the  purp.ose  of  attempting  to  utilize  those  labor  organizations  for  the  benefit 
of  the  Russian  dictatorship  and  its  foreign  policies. 

The  Chair  feels  that  the  statement  of  the  committee  made  more 
than  a  year  and  a  half  ago,  which  seemed  to  be  so  strong  at  that  time, 
in  the  light  of  subsequent  events  is  an  understatement  of  the  present 
situation.  The  events  which  have  transpired  in  this  coimtry  in  the 
past  12  niottths  have  been  so  startling  that  they  shock  the  conscience 
of  this  Nation.  No  longer  are  we  a  self-com))lacent  Nation  and  no 
longer  do  we  laugh  and  scoff  at  the  threat  which  Comnnmist  pene- 
tration into  the  American  labor  movement  holds  for  the  safety  and 
security  of  130.000.000  American  people:  no  longer  is  the  committee 


8642  UN-AMEKICAX  I'ROl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

charged  with  being  "red  baiters,"  "witch  hunters,"  nor  an  agency  set 
up  to  destroy  the  rights  of  American  labor. 

Responsible  labor  leaders  themselves  now  recognize  the  gravity  of 
the  situation  and  belatedly  they  are  moving  to  cleanse  their  household 
of  these  subversive  elements. 

During  the  past  2  weeks  the  Nation  has  witnessed  the  spectacle  of 
a  rank-and-file  movement  in  one  of  our  great  laboi'  organizations  in 
an  endeavor  to  rid  itself  of  subversive  leadership  which  has  the  effect 
of  sabotaging  our  defense  program.  Let  us  look  for  a  moment  at 
the  phase  of  investigation  before  the  committee  during  the  past  2 
weeks.     Aviation  constitutes  one  of  our  bottlenecks. 

We  find  the  North  American  plant  closed  and  the  President  of  the 
United  States  having  to  use  the  Army  of  the  United  States  to  open 
that  plant  so  that  it  may  produce  foi'  our  security.  We  have  sworn 
testimony  of  the  president  of  the  striking  local  out  there  that  he  regis- 
tered as  a  Communist  in  1938;  we  have  additional  testimony  that  other 
Communists  were  prominent  leaders  in  that  strike  movement.  Dur- 
ing the  past  week  we  have  the  spectacle  of  a  strike  in  the  ahimiiium 
industry  in  the  city  of  Cleveland,  closing  down  a  plant  out  there  vital 
and  essential  to  our  national  defense. 

Kenneth  Eggert,  a  leader  in  the  Harvill  Ali-craft  Co.  strike  in 
March  of  this  year,  a  student  in  the  school  of  Lenin  at  Moscow,  an 
expert  in  sabotage  and  labor  organization,  pulled  a  strike  in  tliat  j^lant 
and  Mr.  Cheyfitz,  who  has  been  identified  today  by  competent  wit- 
nesses as  a  Communist  Party  member,  telegi'aphed  the  President  of 
the  United  States  urging  him  to  take  over  the  Hai'vill  Aircraft  Co. 
plant  in  the  name  of  the  Govermnent  of  the  United  States  and  oper- 
ate it.  That  strike  was  led  by  Connnunists;  the  North  American 
strike  was  led  by  Conmuniists. 

The  Attorney"  General  of  the  United  States  says  that  the  Vidtee 
Aircraft  strike  was  led  by  Connnunists,  and  here  we  find  the  strike  at 
the  Aluminum  Co.  of  America  at  Cleveland  led  by  Connnunists. 

Alex  Balint,  identified  here  by  competent  witnesses  who  have  no 
interest  to  serve  other  than  the  best  interests  of  their  country,  as 
l)eing  a  Communist,  regional  director  in  that  area  of  the  Die  Casters 
Union;  Mr.  Cheyfitz  again  a])i)ears  on  the  scene  in  this  particular 
strike  and  we  have  the  unusual  spectacle  of  the  regional  director  of 
this  union  in  the  Cleveland  area  being  not  only  a  Connnunist  but 
being  an  alien  and  admitting  here  under  oath  that  he  had  served 
in  a  penal  institution  in  the  State  of  Illinois  for  the  theft  of  an  auto- 
mobile. 

The  chairman  is  informed  by  the  conmiittee's  investigator  in  the 
Cleveland  area,  Mr.  ,Tackson,  that  Paul  Martin,  who  was  identified 
here  this  afternoon  as  a  Communist,  is  the  president  of  the  local 
union  which  went  on  strike  out  there,  and  that  Mr.  IVIaitin  has  a 
record  of  being  six  times  convicted  and  having  served  7  years  of  a 
sentence  for  armed  robbery  in  the  State  of  Ohio.  This  is  an  unusual 
s])ectacle.  It  is  a  spectacle  that  does  no  credit  to  the  American  labor 
movement  and  it  does  no  credit  to  the  United  States  of  America. 

It  is  a  sad  commentary  when  alien  Communists  and  Communists 
with  long  prison  records  lead  local  unions  on  a  strike  at  this  critical 
hour  against  their  Government.  These  strikes  are  directed  at  the 
most  vital  bottlenecks  in  our  defense  program. 


rX-A.MKUICAN   TKOFAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8643 

The  cliairinaii  feels  tlini  lespdiisible  labor  leaders  in  America  and 
the  rank  and  file  of  the  labor  movement  in  America  shonld  move 
heaven  and  earth  to  rid  themselves  of  these  barnacles.  Tf  they  do  not 
thev  will  surely  deserve  the  public  tlisfavor  and  the  iniblic  contempt 
which  they  would  so  richly  deserve  by  failure  to  act. 

The  Chair  also  feels  it  is  incumbent  on  every  agencj^  of  the  Fed- 
eral (iovermnent  to  coo])erate  witli  this  ccmimittee  in  an  effort  to 
expose  the  activities  of  hibor  leaders  who  are  agents  of  foreign  gov- 
ernments and  who  are  slowing  down  and  sabotaging  our  defense  pro- 
gram to  the  end  that  there  will  be  a  cession  of  such  activities  and 
to  the  end  that  America  may  have  the  security  which  her  citizenship 
wants  and  to  which  she  is  entitled. 

I  might  say  that  it  is  also  a  sad  commentary  on  current  events  when 
ex-convicts,  aliens,  Conmnniists.  and  agents  of  foreign  governments 
are  permitted  to  come  to  the  capital  of  this  Nation  to  negotiate  labor 
disputes  with  American  business  management  before  the  United 
States  Conciliation  Service  and  the  National  Defense  Mediation 
Board. 

The  conmiittee  will  stand  adjourned. 

(Whereupon,  at  5:40  p.  m.,  the  committee  adjourned  w^ithout 
date.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


MONDAY,   AUGUST    11,    1941 

House  of  Representatives, 
Subcommittee  of  the  Special  Committee, 

TO  Investigate  Un-American  Activities, 

Washington.,  D.  C. 

The  subcommittee  met  at  10  a.  m.,  in  the  Caucus  Room,  House  Office 
Building,  Hon.  Joe  Starnes  (chairman  of  the  subconnnittee),  pre- 
sidin<x. 

Present:  Messrs.  Starnes  (cliairnian  of  the  subcommittee),  Voorhis, 
and  Mason. 

Also  present:  Mr.  Robert  E.  Striplino;,  chief  investigator,  and  Dr. 
J.  B.  Matthews,  director  of  research. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Tlie  committee  will  come  to  order. 

The  subcommittee  is  meeting  this  morning  for  the  purpose  of  hear- 
ing testimony  regarding  Nancy  Reed  and  others. 

It  a])pears  from  information  which  has  come  to  the  chairman 
and  to  the  subconnnittee,  that  Nancy  Reed  is  evading  an  appearance 
before  this  committee. 

A  subpena  has  been  served  and  proper  notice  has  been  given  of 
the  hearing,  but  she  fails  to  appear,  therefore,  it  will  be  necessary 
to  use  the  testimony  of  the  connnittee  investigators  concerned  in  this 
investigation,  plus  the  documentary  evidence  that  is  in  possession  of 
the  committee,  in  order  to  proceed  with  this  particular  hearing. 

Now,  if  it  is  agreeable  with  the  subcommittee,  we  will  establish  the 
fact  for  the  record  that  the  sul)penas  were  issued. 

Mr.  Stripling,  will  you  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand  and  be 
sworn. 

TESTIMONY    OF    ROBEET    E.    STRIPLING,    CHIEF   INVESTIGATOR, 
SPECIAL  COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  shall 
give  shall  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so 
help  you  God  ? 

Mr.  Stripling.  I  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  As  secretary  of  the  connnittee,  did  you  cause  a  sub- 
pena to  be  issued  for  Nancy  Reed  to  appear  before  this  subconnnittee? 

Mr.  Stripling.  Yes. sir;  on  June  18. 

:Mi-.  Starnes.  That  is  June  18, 1941  ? 

Mr.  Stripling.  1941 ;  yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  did  you  do  with  the  subpena  ? 

8645 


gg46  UN-AMERICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Stripling.  It  was  sent  to  Investigator  Stephen  Birmingham, 
who  served  the  siibpena. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Sent  to  Investigator  Birmingham  in  New  York  City? 

Mr.  Stripung.  Yes,  sir ;  who  served  the  subpena. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Does  the  snbpena  shoAv  it  has  been  served  ? 

Mr.  Stripling.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  happened  after  the  service  of  the  subpena, 
did  Miss  Reed  get  in  touch  with  the  connnittee  in  any  way  by  her 
attorney  or  personally  ? 

Mr.  Stripling.  The  subpena  was  a  forthwith  sul)pena  and  Mr. 
Nathan  Witt  of  the  law  firm  of  Witt  &  Lighter  called  me  in  Wash- 
ington and  stated  that  he  would  like  to  get  a  continuance. 

I  conferred  with  the  members  of  the  committee  and  it  was  agreed 
that  Mrs.  Reed  could  a})pear  at  a  future  date  providing  she  was  given 
48  hours'  notice  by  the  committee. 

Last  Friday  I  was  instructed  by  the  chairman  of  the  subconunittee, 
Mr.  Starnes,  to  notify  Miss  Reed  and  also  Mr.  Witt  to  appear  here 
today. 

For  the  record  I  would  like  to  put  these  telegrams  in  evidence.  The 
telegram  to  Nancy  Reed  was  addressed :  "36  LTnion  Square,  New  York 
City." 

lu  response  to  the  subpena  served  on  you,  you  are  hereby  directed  to  appear 
before  the  Special  Committee  on  Uu-American  Activities  in  Room  531,  Old  House 
Office  Building,  Washington,  D.  C,  at  10  a.  m.,  on  Monday,  August  11,  1941. 

That  is  signed :  '^Robert  E.  Stripling." 

A  similar  telegram  was  sent  to  Nathan  Witt  at  9  East  Fortieth  Street, 
New  York  City,  N.  Y.,  which  read : 

You  are  hereby  directed  to  notify  your  client,  Miss  Nancy  Reed,  that  in  response 
to  a  subpena  served  on  her,  she  is  to  appear  before  the  Special  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities  in  Room  531,  Old  House  Office  Building,  Washington, 
D.  C.  at  10  a.  m.,  Monday,  August  11,  1941. 

Mr.  Chairman,  this  morning  when  neither  Mr.  Witt  nor  Miss  Reed 
appeared  I  called  Mr.  Witt's  office  in  New  York  City  and  was  told  that 
he  was  in  Corning,  N.  Y.  I  asked  to  speak  to  Mr.  Lighter.  I  was  told 
that  Mr.  Lighter  was  not  in,  but  a  gentleman  in  the  office  told  me  that 
he  would  have  Mr.  Lighter  call  me. 

Mr.  Lighter  did  not  call.  However,  the  gentleman  in  the  office  called 
and  said  that  he  had  contacted  Mr.  Lighter  and  that  Mr.  Lighter  said 
that  they  were  making  every  effort  to  locate  Miss  Reed.  I  reminded 
him  of  the  agreement  of  the  committee  of  the  48  hours'  notice,  and  so 
forth,  and  told  him  I  would  submit  that  information  to  the  com- 
mittee. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  telegrams  were  delivered  so  far  as  you  know? 

Mr.  Stripling.  They  were  delivered ;  yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Any  questions,  Mr.  Mason? 

Mr.  Mason.  No  questions. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  Mason.  I  would  suggest  we  proceed  with  the  hearing  based  on 
the  evidence  that  we  have  present  and  the  testimony  of  our  investigator. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Whom  will  you  have  Dr.  Matthews  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Mr.  Birmingham,  will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your 
right  hand. 


UN-A>rKUI(AN   TKOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8647 

TESTIMONY  OF  STEPHEN  W.    BIRMINGHAM.  INVESTIGATOR, 
SPECIAL  COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  solcnuily  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are 
about  to  ffivo  will  be  the  trutb,  tiie  whole  truth,  and  notliiuir  but  the 
truth,  so  help  you  God  i 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Staknes.  Will  you  i)lease  state  your  full  name? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Stephen  W.  Birminfrham. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  vou  aie  an  investigator  for  the  cxmmiittee,  Mr. 
Birmingham? 

iVfr.  Birmingham.  I  am. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  you  have  been  connected  with  the  committee  since 
1938? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Did  you  serve  a  subpena  on  Nancy  Reed  at  any  time, 
to  appear  before  this  committee? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did,  at  30  Lafayette  Street,  New  York  City. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  will  you  please  state  briefly  your 
experience  in  investigative  and  detective  work? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  From  1910  to  1920  I  was  first-grade  detective  in 
the  New  York  Police  Department  in  the  safe  and  loft  squad.  In  1917 
I  w^as  a  special  agent  in  the  military  intelligence  in  the  War  College  in 
Washington  in  charge  of  the  field  agents— German  propaganda  and 
spy  activities  in  the  District  of  Columbia,  Maryland,  and  Virginia. 

I  was  with  the  McCormick  committee  as  the  chief  investigator  in 
1934.  with  the  lobby  probe  m  1936,  and  with  the  Dies  committee  from 
1938  to  1941. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  in  the  course  of  your  work  as  an 
investigator  for  this  committee,  did  you  come  into  possession  of  numer- 
ous documents  which  pertained  to  the  activities  of  one  Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did. 

Mr.  MattheW'S.  Did  you  obtain  these  docmnents  by  properly  drawn 
subpenas? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  state  where  you  obtained  these  doc- 
uments— that  is,  give  a  general  geographical  account  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  In  December  1940  I  received  some  information 
from  a  confidential  source  that  a  ring  of  agents  of  the  Commtmist 
Party  was  operating  in  the  United  States  and  Europe.  I  was  in- 
formed that  in  the  vicinity  of  Seventieth  Street,  buried  in  a  cellar 
were  some  records.  I  contacted  some  people  and  took  those  records  by 
serving  a  subpena  on  the  person  in  whose  custody  they  were. 

I  received  some  additional  information  and  cm  February  19,  1941, 
accomi)anied  by  George  Hurley.  I  went  to  Sandwich,  Conn.,  looking 
for  seven  boxes  of  records  in  wooden  boxes.  After  digging  under  a 
house  under  the  dirt  and  a  lot  of  canvas  we  uncovered  three  out  of  the 
seven  boxes,  which  are  some  of  these  records  that  Dr.  iSIatthews  has. 

Mr,  MATTH^3^vs.  Were  there  physical  evidences  that  four  or  more 
other  boxes  had  been  buried  there? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  There  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  same  vicinity? 


8648  UN-AJ\IERICAN  PROPAG.^^DA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Birmingham.  There  were  imprints  in  the  dirt  showing  other 
boxes  had  been  there  and  had  been  removed. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  have  you  familiarized  your- 
self with  the  documents  obtained  in  the  mannei-  which  you  have  just 
described  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Would  you  be  able  to  identify  those  documents 
one  by  one? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  would.  I  read  them  and  liad  tb.em  photo- 
stated in  my  New  York  olHce — every  one  of  them. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  vou  spent  a  period  of  months  examining 
them  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  And  I  have  cataloged  them. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Have  you  spent  a  period  of  months  examining 
these  documents  i 

Mr.  Birmin(jham.  For  the  ])ast  4  months. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Wc^dd  you  say,  Mr.  Birmingham,  that  others  be- 
side Nancy  Reed  are  prominently  involved  in  these  documents? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  They  are. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews,  when  one  of  the  committee  aides 
brings  the  original  documents  into  the  committee  room,  have  them 
identified  by  Mr.  Birmingham,  and  then  you  can  use  the  photostats 
for  the  record. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  will  you  ])lease  come  over  here 
to  tlie  table  and  look  at  this  collection  of  folders  and  state  whether 
or  not  these  are  folders  prepared  by  you  and  contain  the  documenrs 
to  which  reference  has  been  made  in  your  testimony? 

Mr.  BiRMiNOiiAiM.  They  are  and  they  were  all  prepared  by  me 
and  put  in  the  folders. 

Mr.  Matthew\s.  Are  these  the  original  documents  obtained? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes;  at  Cape  Cod  and  in  the  seventies  in  New 
York  City. 

Mr.  Matt'hews.  Did  you  serve  a  subpena  on  the  caretaker  of  the 
property  at  Sandwich,  Cape  Cod,  when  you  obtained  the  documents 
there  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did;  she  was  a  Miss  K.  Ellis. 

Mr.  Matthews.  K-a-y? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  No;  the  initial  "K"  Ellis. 

Mr.  Starnes.  She  was  the  custodian  of  the  property  at  the  time? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes,  sir.  It  was  a  summei-  resort  up  there. 
There  was  nobody  there  when  I  went  up. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Now,  from  time  to  time.  Dr.  Matthews,  in  referring 
to  these  it  is  all  right  to  use  the  photostats? 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  any  time  the  committee  desires  it  will  be  a 
simple  matter  to  produce  the  original  for  the  photostats,  which  will 
be  offered  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right.  But  before  we  go  any  further,  are  you 
going  to  show  by  Mr.  Birmingham  or  by  Mr.  Hurley  or  by  your 
own  testimony  who  Nancy  Reed  is? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  correct.  Mr.  Birmingham,  have  you,  in 
the  course  of  your  inquiry  ascertained  something  of  the  background 
of  Nancy  Reecl? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  have. 


UN-A.MKK1CAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8649 

Mr.  Ma'ithews.  Can  yoii  tell  Iho  coinniitiee  ^vh()  Nancy  Reed's 
mother  is? 

]\fr.  ]^iRMTNGiiA:Nr.  }\vv  motliei-  is  ISIrs.  Fernanda  Reed  of  Cam- 
bri(l«2:e.  Mass..  oriuinally,  and  one  of  the  third  owners  of  the  New 
York  Daily  Worker. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  Fernanda — F-e-r-n-a-n-d-a  W.  Reed — 
R-e-e-d? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Right. 

Mr.  Ma'ithfws.  She  with  tAvo  otiier  persons  are  the  ow^ners  of  the 
Daily  AVorker? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  api)roximately  how  long  Fernanda 
Reed  has  been  one  of  the  owners  of  the  Daily  Worker? 

i\Ir.  BiRiMiKGHAM.  Positively  I  couldn't  tell  you — about  a  year  and 
a  half,  but  these  records  will  show  when  she  took  that  position. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  did  you  discover  from  these  documents  that 
Nancy  Reed  has  a  sister  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthfavs.  And  who  is  the  sister  of  Nancy  Reed  ? 

Ml-.  B  RMiNGHAM.  Maiy  Reed. 

Mr.  IMatthews.  Where  does  Mary  Reed  reside  at  present? 

Mr.  Birminghajni.  Her  married  name  is  Mai-^y^  Copeland.  She 
lives  at  ]H'esent  in  Leningrad,  Russia. 

Mr.  MATTHEW'S.  Is  Mary  Reed  Copeland  prominently  involved  in 
these  documents  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  is. 

Mr.  jSIatthew^s.  Is  Fernanda  Reed,  the  mother  of  Nancy  and  Mary 
Reed,  prominently  involved  in  these  documents? 

]\Tr.  Birmingham.  She  is. 

Mr.  Matthew\s.  Did  you  ascertain  whether  or  not  Fernanda  Reed 
has  a  son? 

INIr.  Birmingham.  She  has. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  what  is  the  son's  name? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Willard  Reed,  Jr. 

IVIr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  where  Willard  Reed,  Jr.,  has  been 
employed  recently  ? 

JNIr.  B:RMiNGHA:\r.  With  the  American  Airlines. 

Mr.  MattheW' s.  Do  you  have  any  information  that  he  has  severed 
his  connection  with  the  American  Airlines? 

Mr.  Btrmingha]m.  I  have  some  information  which  I  haven't 
checked. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  a  report  that  he  is  now  residing  outside 
of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  where  does  that  report  indicate  that  he  is 
at  |)resent  employed  ? 

Mr.  BiRAriNGHA:sr.  Su]iposed  to  be  in  New  Zealand. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  What  is  ho  doing  in  New  Zealand? 

Mr.  BiRAiiNGHAM.  Training  airplane  flyers — that  is  the  story. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  does  the  informaticm  involved  in  these  sev- 
eral bundled  documents  show  conclusively  in  your  opinion,  Mr.  Bir- 
mingham, that  Fernanda  Reed,  the  mother;  Nancy  Reed,  the 
daughter;  Mary  Reed,  the  daughter;  and  Willard  Reed,  Jr.,  the  son, 
have  all  been  Communists? 


8650  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  does. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  it  show  that  they  have  been  actual  members 
of  the  Communist  Party? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  does. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  it  show  they  have  been  extraordinarily  active 
as  members  of  the  Comnnuiist  Party? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  does. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Referring  particularly  to  Nancy  Eeed,  have  you 
ascertained  whei'e  Nancy  Reed  is  presently  employed  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  In  the  State  Welfare  Department,  New  York 
City. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  a  division  of  the  Department  of  Labor  of 
theStateof  New  York? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  do  you  know  the  exact  title  of  her  position? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  is  a  senior  investigator  of  handicapped 
people,  is  my  understanding. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  she  in  the  division  of  placement  and  unemploy- 
ment insurance  of  the  department  of  labor  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  where  she  is  in  charge  of  handicapped 
persons. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know,  Mr.  Birmingham,  whether  or  not 
charges  have  been  brought  against  Miss  Nancy  Reed  in  the  Depart- 
ment of  Labor  of  the  State  of  New  York  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  believe  they  have  by  Connnissioner  Godfrey 
Schmidt. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  it  your  information  that  a  hearing  has  been 
held  at  which  a  Nancy  Reed  testified  in  a  proceeding  under  oath  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  There  have  been  several  hearings  befcfi'e  Com- 
missioner Schmidt. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  identify  this  document  as  the  transcript 
of  the  hearing  to  which  you  i-ef er  ? 

[Handing  manuscript  to  the  witness.] 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  can.  That  is  a  copy  of  her  testimony  at  the 
hearing. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  that  this  entire  document  be 
received  in  evidence  in  the  matter  pertaining  to  Nancy  Reed. 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  the  document.  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  document  is  a  transcript  of  the  hearing  before 
Deputy  Commissioner  Godfrey  Schmidt  of  the  Department  of  Labor 
of  the  State  of  New  York,  at  which  Nancy  Reed  was  a  witness  under 
oath. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Does  it  have  any  pertinency  to  the  inquiry  that  we 
have  under  way  at  the  present  time,  and  will  you  offer  documentary 
pi^oof  and  oral  testimony  here  wliich  would  be  in  conflict  with  that 
or  contradictory  of  some  of  her  statements? 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  relevance  of  this  document  is  that  Miss  Reed 
under  oath  made  numei-ous  statements  before  the  Deputy  Commis- 
sioner of  the  Department  of  Labor  for  the  State  of  New  York, 
which  are  in  conflict  with  the  document;n\v  evidence  which  is  in  this 
committee's  possession. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Does  that  deal  with  or  would  it  have  an}^  relevancy 
with  un-American  and  subversive  activities  ? 


rX-AMKUirAN   rROrA(JANDA   ACTrVITIES  8651 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  lieai-in<!;  before  the  deputy  commissioner  of  the 
(le.i)artineiit  of  hibor  dealt,  I  should  say,  exclusively  with  the  question 
of  Miss  Reed's  coiuiections  with  the  Communist  Party  and  her  activi- 
ties in  the  Connnunist  Party. 

Mr.  Stakxes.  It  will  be  received  and  the  reporter  will  incorporate 
it  in  the  record. 

(The  transcript  of  testimony  above  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

Minutes  ok  Inkoumal  Hf.aring  Hklh  tn  the  Office  of  the  DtrrpARTMENx  of  Labor 
BEa'T)KE  Deputy  Comaiissionek  GoDFKi':Y  P.  Schmidt,  Room  4.57,  SO  Centre  Street, 
New  York  City,  on  June  3,  1941,  at  3  p.  m. 

Present:  Mr.  Jacob  H.  Mason,  Division  of  Placement  and  Unemployment  Insur- 
ance, 342  Madison  Avenue,  New  Yorlv  City ;  Mr.  A.  Victor  Hansen,  Division  of 
Placement  and  Unemployment  Insurance,  Alliany,  N.  Y. ;  Miss  Nancy  Reed,  Divi- 
sion of  Placement  and  Unemployment  Insurance,  80  Lafayette  Street,  New  York. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt  : 

Q.  I  suppose.  Miss  Reed,  tliat  you  have  read  these  various  newspaper  clippings 
about  your  alleged  affiliation  with  the  Communist  Party  [handing  clippings  to 
Miss  Reed]? — A.   (After  examining  clippings.)   Haven't  seen  this  one  [indicating]. 

Q.  Haven't  you? — A.  What  is  the  newspaper? 

Q.  I  really  don't  know  the  name.  Is  that  one  of  the  Long  Island  papers?— A.  It 
doesn't  say  at  the  top.  Before  I  go  any  further,  may  I  ask  a  little  more  about 
this  inquiry? 

Q.  Surely ;  you  may  ask  any  questions  you  want. — A.  What  it  is  about,  and 
what  it  is  for? 

Q.  Yes.  In  the  first  jjlace,  there  is  no  charge  against  you,  and  the  only  reason 
for  the  inquiry  is  to  ascertain  facts  beyond  the  basis  of  these  newspaper  rumors, 
and  since  you  were  the  one  directly  mentioned  in  the  newspapers,  I  felt  that  it 
woiUd  bo  ouly  fair  to  give  you  a  fair  opportunity  to  acknowledge  them  or  to 
deny  them  or  to  make  any  statement  in  reply  to  them  that  you  felt  called  upon 
to  make,  because  you  can  appi'eciate  that  there  is  a  law  that — ^the  Devaney  law — 
that  in  effect  forbids  Communists  from  being  in  the  employ  of  the  State,  or  at 
least  in  express  language  forbids  the  State  from  employing  persons  who  advo- 
cate the  overthrow  of  tin;  Government  by  illegal  or  violent  means.  Now,  I  want 
you  to  unilerstand  that  so  far  as  I  am  concerned,  and  I  am  the  one  who  is  con- 
ducting the  hearing.  I  conduct  it  without  any  prejudice  whatever,  and  without 
any  presumptions  for  or  against  you.  Frankly,  I  want  to  get  the  facts,  and  I 
know  that  since  you  are  an  employee  there  is  every  reason  to  suppose  that  you 
are  willing  to  cooperate  in  giving  me  all  the  facts.  Now,  does  that  satisfy  you 
as  to  the  purpose  of  the  hearing?  As  I  say,  it  has  nothing  whatever  to  do  with 
any  charges  against  you  at  the  moment.  Obviously,  if  you  were  for  example  to 
acknowledge  membership  in  the  C<jmmunist  Party  or  acknowledge  advocacy  of 
the  doctrines  prescribed  by  the  Devaney  law,  then  we  would  have  to  consider, 
po.ssibly.  ihe  insiitntion  of  cliarges  against  you,  but  as  of  the  present  moment,  my 
purpose  is  purely  fact-hnding.  and  1  ask  your  cooperation. — -A.  Is  it  for  the  press 
at  all?     I  mean,  is  it  fiu-  the  ailministralion  to  give  to  the  press? 

Q.  This  is  entirely  for  the  administration. — A.  You  see,  I  didn't  know.  1 
didn't  know  Mr.  Hansen's  name,  and  the  request  came  to  me  without  going 
througli  Mr.  Davis  (phonetic),  and  I  really  was  at  a  loss  to  know  quite  what  ii 
was  about. 

Q.  M;iyb«!  that  was  really  my  fiinlt,  bur  I  don't  think  we  have  ever  met  before, 
and  therefore — you  understand  that  I  am  Deputy  Industrial  Commissioner,  and 
I  have  just  given  you  my  card.  Now,  have  you  any  other  question  to  ask  before 
we  proceed  to  the  investigation? — A.  No.     I  would  like  to  answer  any  questions. 

Q.  Now,  I  have  just  shown  you  a  slieaf  of  newspaper  clippings. — A.  I  have  seen 
this  one  [indicating]. 

Q.  I  asked  whether  you  had  seen  any  of  tliem  before? — A.  I  have  seen  this  one. 
from  the  New  York  World  Telegram,  on  Tuesday  [indicating].  I  haven't  .seen 
this  one  [indicating]. 

Q.  Wotdd  you  mind  reading  that? — A.  Surel.y.      (Witness  reads  clipping.) 

Q.  Now.  are  there  any  misstatements  of  fact  in  those  articles  that  you  just 
lead? — A.  Yes;  tiie  finst  one. 


gQ52  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Q.  Would  yon  mind  identifying  for  us  tlie  mistatement?  Just  read  it  into  the 
record  we  are  mailing? — A.  That  'her  sister  is  now  employed  by  the  Comintern." 

Q.  Do  you  have  a  sister,  Miss  Reed? — A.  I  have  a  sister.  She  lives  in  the 
Soviet  Union  now,  but  she  is  not  employed  by  them. 

Q.  She  is  not  emplo.ved  by  whom? — A.  By  them. 

Mr.  Hansen.  But  she  is  living  there? 

Miss  Rked.  She  has  lived  there  for  years. 

Mr.  Mason.  Has  she  ever  been  employed  by  them? 

Miss  Reed.  Yes. 

Mr.  Mason.  When  did  she  cease  her  affiliations? 

Miss  Reed.  About  6  years  ago. 

Q.  What  is  your  sister's  name? — A.  Maiy. 

Q.  Mary  Reed?— A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now,  is  there  any  other  statement  in  there  that's  not  ac-curale? — A.  Well,  a 
good  deal  of  the  union  material  I  would  criticize.  I  didn't  know  whether  you 
meant  just  what  affects  me  personally. 

Q.  You  can  criticize  any  part  that  you  feel  is  in.-u-curate. — A.  I  never  remember 
at  all  hearing  sinyone  on  the  executive  board  say  that  Mr.  Rosenfeld  was  a  union 
buster,  and  that,  "We  haven't  got  the  goods  on  you  yet,  and  we  will  keep  you  under 
surveillance."  I  know  of  no  committee  whatsoever  that  was  ever  appointed  to 
do  any  such  work  of  that  sort.     It  is  pretty  hard  to  pick  out  these  things. 

Mr.  Mason.  How  many  members  are  on  the  i^xe<'utive  ciiuniiittee? 

Miss  Reed.  Seventeen. 

Q.  Well,  of  course,  one  of  the  statements  in  one  of  those  elippiugs  says  that 
you  are  a  Communist,  is  that  true? — A.  It  doesn't  say  that  here.  It  says  that 
I  was  asked  over  the  telephone,  and  to  whicii  I  refused  an  answer. 

Q.  Well,  let's  go  into  that.  Frederick  WoKman.  (»f  the  World  Telegram,  said 
he  telephoned  your  office,  and  asked  you  whetlier  you  were  a  Communist,  and 
I  believe  he  said  you  refused  to  answer'/ — A.  Right. 

Q.  Well,  are  you  a  Comnuniist? — A.  No. 

Q.  Were  you  ever  a  Conmumist? — A.  No. 

Q.  That  is  to  say,  you  never  were,  and  are  not  now  a  member  of  the  Connuuuist 
Party,  and  never  belonged  to  any  fraction  of  the  ConununiHt  Pait.v'r — A.  If  you 
belong  to  a  cell  or  fraction  you  would  automatically  belong  to  th:^  Communist 
Party. 

Q.  May  I  ask  why.  Miss  Reed,  you  refused  to  tell  Woltman  rhat? — A.  Well, 
really,  when  he  asked  me  about  the  union  business,  it  was  not  my  business  to 
answer  him,  and  I  referi'ed  :ill  such  questions  to  .lames  King,  who  is  our  local 
president,  and  as  far  as  giving  any  newspaper  reporter  any  statement  on  my 
political  attiliations  or  personal  life  in  any  way,  I  saw  no  reason  to  make  any 
answer  to  him  at  all.  He  just  slid  that  in  as  fast  as  he  could  after  he  asked  me 
the  first  question  about  the  executive  board. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  write  any  articles  for  the  New  Mjisses? — A.  No;  I  haven't. 

Q.  For  the  Comnuniist  Monthly'.^ — A.  No. 

Q.  For  the  Third  International,  the  quarterly *!' — A.  NO;  I  am  nol   a  writer. 

Q.  Or,  for  the  Daily  Worker'? — A.  No;  I  haven't. 

Q.  You  see,  the  fact  that  you  are  not  a  writer  doesn't  necessarily  mean  th<it 
you  didn't  write,  because  as  you  probably  know,  there  are  a  lot  of  people  writing 
today  who  are  not  writers.  Is  that  statement  true,  to  the  effect  that  your  mother 
is  Mrs.  Fernando  Reed,  and  she  is  part  owner  of  the  Daily  Worker"/ — A.  She  is 
one  of  the  three  old  ladies  who  took  over — The  Freedom  of  the  Press  is  the  name 
of  the  organization. 

Q.  Is  that  a  corporation.  The  Freedom  of  the  Press'? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  And  who  are  the  other  two? — A.  Mrs.  Woodruff,  Susan  Woodriilf  (phonetic), 
and  a  Mrs.  or  Miss — I  don't  know  which — Pennypacker. 

Q.  Pennypacker'/ — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Is  your  mother  president  of  that  corporation'/ — A.  No:  I  think  it  is  jointly 
owned  by  those  three. 

Q.  You  don't  think  it  is  a  coriioi-ation'/ — A.  Well,  isn't  that  a  coriioration? 

Q.  No;  joint  ownership  isn't  necessarily  a  corjioration,  it  may  be  a  partner- 
ship.— A.  I  don't  know  the  term.  I  know  the  three  of  them  took  it  over,  the 
ownership,  last  summer. 

Q.  They  bought  it  from  the  faction  of  the  Third  Internationale,  known  as  the 
Conununist  Party  of  the  United  States'/ — A.  T  really  don't  know  the  transaction 
that  went  on.     I  really  don't. 

Q.  Are  you  an  officer  of  The  Freedom  of  the  Press? — A.  No ;  not  at  all. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8653 

Q.  You  live  where?     I  forgot  to  put  that  down.— A.  I  live  at  101  East  Sixteenth 

Street. 

Q.  And  you  live  there  witli  your  mother? — A.  No;   luy  mother  doesn't  live 

with  me. 

Q.  Are  you  married? — A.  Not  now. 

Q.  Now'  do  you  helieve  in  the  "dictatorship  of  the  proletariat,"  or  do  you 
know  what  that  means? — A.  Well,  I  don't  know  if — I  don't  know  if  it  is  necessary 
to  discuss  that  at  this  point.  I  mean,  to  do  so,  it  really  needs  my  general  philoso- 
phy of  life.     It  really  comes  into  that. 

Q.  Well,  I  think  it  does  for  this  reason,  that  after  all  you  and  I  know  that  in 
this  world  of  ours  nien  do  luviiuile  themselves,  and  women  too,  with  naiiie-calling, 
tags,  slogans.  Now,  I  am  not  so  nnich  concerned  with  a  tag  or  a  slogan,  because 
very  frankly  I  have  been  calbnl  a  dangerous  radical  by  some  people,  and  1  have 
been  called  a  Fascist  by  some  people,  and  I  think  that  any  person  who  Is  honest 
and  outspoken  about  his  views  on  certain  matters  will  at  one  time  or  another  get, 
without  deserving  maybe,  a  tag  or  a  name.  Now,  beyond  the  name  and  the  tag 
there  is  a  reality,  a  belief,  an  advocacy  that  should  really  be  the  proper  fcmnda- 
tion  for  the  name  or  tag  and  often  isn't,  and  therefore.  I  am  not  interested  so 
much  in  whether  you  say.  "No;  1  am  not  a  Communist,"  or.  "Yes;  1  am  a  Com- 
munist," because  even  if  you  said.  "Yes ;  I  am  a  Communist,"  I  wouldn't  be  satis- 
fied with  rh:it.  because  that  is  a  word  that  has  been  used  ambiguously  and  vaguely 
by  very  many  people,  and  so  for  that  reason  I  would  like  to  go  into  some  of  the 
questions  th.-it  to  me  reflect  the  reality  rather  than  the  mere  names.  You  under- 
stand my  purpose? — A.  Yes.  Well,  I  think  perhaps  we  ought  to  be  clear,  first, 
that  we  mean  the  same  thing  about  dictatorship. 

Q.  I  appreciate  that  very  much.  You  mean  when  we  talk  about  the  very  name 
"Conuuunist"?— A.  No:  "dictatorship  of  the  proletariat,"  the  first  question  you 
asked  me.  because  you  might  have  (pute  a  different  conception  of  it  from  what 
I  hiive.  All  I  know  really  is  that  1  believe  in  a  much  better  world  for  all  of  us 
to  live  in. 

Q.  Than  th<'  (me  we  are  living  in  today? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Well.  I  think  all  of  us  can  s;iy  that.— A.  It  is  not  quite  easy  to  agree  to. 

Q.  If  we  didn't  tliere  wonld  perhaps  be  something  wrong  with  us;  but  to  get 
back  to  my  (luestion,  you  find  difficulty  about  understanding  what  I  mean  al50Ut 
"dictatorsinp  of  the  proletariat."  You  appreciate  that  in  history  of  a  current 
logic,  or  history  as  we  know  it  today,  the  words  "'dictatorship  of  the  proletariat" 
have  a  technical  significance  in  some  circles,  or  do  you  appreciate  that? — A.  In 
some  circles  ;  yes. 

Q.  You  and  I  have  read  about  Connnunists ;  we  have  read  about  the  Soviets, 
and  so  forth,  and  we  know  that  they,  par  excellence,  used  the  expression  "dic- 
ta torsliip  of  the  proletariat."  Maybe  in  other  forms  men  like  Kautsky  used  it. 
but  Kautsky  would  be  reprobated  by  Stalin  today  hi  the  use,  and  those  who 
particip;ile  in  tlie  Fourth  Internationale,  as  distinguished  from  the  Third  Inter- 
nationale, tlu-y.  loo.  ndght  use  the  words  "dictatorship  of  the  proletaruit,"  but 
I  am  now  talking  about  the  meaning  of  the  words  "dictatorship  of  the  proletariat" 
in  the  Third  Internationale.  Are  you  familiar  with  the  meaning  of  those  words 
in  the  Third  Inreriiationale":' — A.  Not  as  excepted  from  any  other.  Perhaps  I 
have  ;i  very  lay  person's  iiiterpi(>tatioii  of  it. 

Q.  Wliat  is  your  inierpretation  (.f  the  "dictatorship  of  the  proletariat"  as  you 
have  read  aliout  it'.' — A.  As  a  government  wlierel\v  the  proletarian  composition 
of  the  i»opiilation  does  have  control  ov(^r  the  government. 

Q.  As  exeniitlified  in  Soviet  Russia  today'.' — A.  Yes;  I  would  say  so.  I  mean, 
that  at  least  is  their  objective. 

Q.  Well.  iiuw.  liave  you  anything  else  to  add  about  your  understanding  of  the 
term  "dict.-itorsliip  of  llie  pi'oletariat'".' — A.  No:  but  your  question  was  whether 
I  believed  in  "(iiclalorship  of  the  jiroletariat."  Well,  now.  that  might — lirstly, 
we  might  have  dilTerent  conceptions  of  it,  and,  secondly,  do  you  mean  here  or 
do  you  mean  llieie.  or  dn  you  mean  for  the  world,  or  just  as  a  general  philosophy, 
or  whafr 

Q.  Well,  as  you  know,  tlie  words  "dictatorship  (if  the  proletariat"  as  used,  for 
example,  iiy  Lenin  and  Stalin,  had  a  primary  significance  for  Soviet  Russia,  but 
thro'igh  the  Third  Int«'rnationale  had  a  world-wide  significance,  too,  so  that  we 
can  take  botli.  and  we  will  Itegin  witli  the  world-wide  sijiiiificance.  Do  you 
believe  in  tlie  world-wide  mission  of  the  "dictatorship  of  the  proletariat'":' — A.  You 
know,  rbat's  still   ambiguous. 


g(354  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Q.  Well,  I  want  you  to  be  perfectly  frank,  ami  tell  me A.     (Interrupting.) 

The  world-wide  mission — mii-siou  would  involve  a  revolutionary  approach  to  it, 
doesn't  it,  from  what  you  say? 

Q.  Well,  I  don't  think  that  mission  necessarily  means  or  involves  a  revolu- 
tionary approach. — A.  Is  this  necessarily  a  discussion  of  what  I  would  like  to 
see,  my  philosophy,  or  is  it  just  to  be  of  this  union  business? 

Q.  It  would  be  a  discussion  of  what  you  believe  in  your  philosophy.  You  see, 
I  am  asking  it  of  you  for  the  same  reason  that  I  asked  your  cooperation  before, 
because  I  have  been  asked  to  make  this  investigation,  because  of  the  rumors  in 
the  papers,  and  so  forth,  and  we  are  living  in  a  particularly  fevered  time,  as  you 
know. — A.  Yes. 

Q.  And,  there  is  public  pressure  to  get  this  thing  iroiu'd  out.  Now,  it  is  to  your 
advantage  as  well  as  to  mine  that  we  go  into  it  as  thoroughly  as  possible,  so-  that 
if  there  is  no  justillcatiou  for  some  of  these  rtmiors,  we  can  lay  the  rumors  once 
and  for  all. — A.  You  mean  you  nmst  answer,  fo-r  instance,  to  what  my  philoso- 
phies about  the  "dictatorship  of  the  proletariat"  are?  I  mean,  is  that  really  going 
to  come  tip?  I  really  think  I  would  like  to  discuss  it  with  you  at  length.  I  am 
nc;t  trying  not  to  cooperate.  Please  don't  misunderstand,  but  I  think  it  is  rather  far- 
fetched because  it  is — if  you  are  going  to  be  asked  to  give  an  answer  to  somebody 
on  just  that  point,  then  it  perhaps  is  worth  going  into  all  this,  but  it  is  a  big  ques- 
tion, and  I  would  modify  it,  and  I  would — I  would  say  that  perhaps  eventtially 
there  may  be  a  happy  ending,  but  I  can't  say  for  today,  and  I  can  t  say  that  I  am 
for  stirring  up  any  revolutionary  war  all  over  the  world  to  prodtice  it,  so  I  think 
it  has  to  be  carefully  analyzed  befoi'e  answering  it.    Don't  you? 

Q.  1  certainly  do,  and  if  you  prefer  that  I  ask  yoti  no  tpiestions  and  that  you 
jtist  give  me  extemporaneously,  and  without  any  interruptions  from  me,  your  owti 
slant  on  these  things,  that's  all  right  with  me,  but  my  purix)se  in  asking  that  detail 
is  prec-isely  in  order  to  go  into  it  careftilly,  as  you  suggested,  becatise  I  don't  think 
myself  that  yc-ti  can  go  into  this  question  carefully  and  thoroughly  unless  you  hit 
all  of  those  basic  ideas  which  are  right  behind,  nnd  which  are  the  reality  behind 
communism,  dictatorship  of  the  pr(jletariat,  revolutionary  class  warfare,  and  so 
on,  yoti  see? — A.  Y'es ;  but  since  I  am  not  so  well  versed  in  this  thing,  not  being  a 
meml>er,  I  don't  have  such  a  lot  of  po'litical  information  at  my  linger  tips  to  go 
into  a  long  di.scussion  with  you  about  it. 

Q.  Well,  if  you  don't  know  the  answer.  Miss  Reed,  yon  just  tell  me. — A.  I  am 
quite  a  lay  person  in  this  matter  of  wanting  to  have  a  better  world  than  what  we 
have.  As  I  said  before,  I  feel  that  unions  are  a  must,  and  I  have  always  been 
active,  and 

Q.  (Interposing.)  May  I  interrtipt.  Miss  Reed,  before  you  go  on?  I  don't  want 
you  to  give  me  an  answer  that  yoti  don't  know.  If  I  ask  yo-u  a  question  you  don't 
know,  you  just  frankly  tell  me.  (Jn  the  other  hand.  I  don't  want  you  to  take  it  that 
1  will  believe  or  anybody  has  a  right  to-  believe  that  sinqjly  becatise  someone  is 
informed  about  the  general  line  of  Soviet  philosophy,  for  example,  tliat  therefore 
they  are  Communists,  because  just  taking  my  own  case  as  another  instance.  I  have 
studied  something  of  Soviet  philoso-phy  for  some  little  time  now,  and  I  feel  that  I 
am  rather  more  informed  about  it  than  a  lot  of  people,  but  that  doesn't  make  of 
me  a  Comnnmist.    Do  you  see? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  When  I  ask  these  questions  about  the  ide(,-logical  panoply  of  communism  of 
the  world  today,  I  am  asking  it  simply  in  order  that  I  might  find  out  basically 
from  you  in  your  own  words  whether  there  is  anything  to  this  rumor.  No.  1  that 
you  are  a  Co-mmunist,  No.  2  that  will  keeping  you  on  the  pay  roll  amount  to  a  viola- 
tion of  the  Devaney  law.  Now,  we  can  start  with  that  right  at  the  beginning  and 
say.  Do  you  believe  in  the  overthrow  of  the  Governmenr  of  this  country  I)y  violent 
means? — A.  No. 

Q.  I»o  you  believe  in  the  (yverthrow  of  the  Government  of  this  county  by  illegal 
means? — A.  No;  I  don't. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  distributed  literature  that  advocated  the  overthrow  of  this 
Government  by  either  violent  or  illegal  means? — A.  No:  I  haven't. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  belonged  to  an  organization  that  liad  for  one  of  its  purposes, 
at  least,  the  use  of  violent  or  illegal  means  to  obtain  political  objectives? — A.  No; 
I  don't  believe  in  it. 

Q.  Remember.  I  haven't  put  you  under  oath. — A.  I  know.  This  is  the  Devaney 
law. 

Q.  Yes;  that's  right,  and  I  haven't  put  you  under  oath  for  the  very  good  reason 
tliat  I  take  it  that  you  are  going  to  tell  me  the  truth  without  the  nece.ssity  of  being 
put  under  oath,  at  the  moment,  and  I  want  this  to  be  a  free  and  untrammeled 
investigation,  and  I  don't  want  you  to  have  any  hesitancy  about  anythiTig  you  say, 
and  therefore  I  haven't  attempted  to  put  you  under  oath,  and  you  have  never 


UN-AMEUK'AN   PUOFAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8655 

prliiU'd.  published,  edited  any  bodlc.  paper,  oi-  docnmenr  that  advocated  the  attaiu- 
nieiit  of  pelitieal  objectives  by  violent  or  ilU>f;al  means'? — A.  No  ;  I  haven't. 

Q.  Yon  will  luive  to  si)eak  up,  or  ii  won't  be  on  the  record. — A.  I  am  sorry. 
No ;  I  haven't. 

Q.  And  you  have  never  orjianized,  or  helped  to  organize,  any  society  or  group 
of  persons  which  desired  or  advocated  the  overthrow  of  this  Covernment  by  violent 
or  Illegal  means? — A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  know  whether  there  are  any  romnuinists  at  the  office  in  which  you 
work'."" — A.  That  I  don't  feel  I  should — I  have  no  delinite  knowledge.  I  have 
never — I  had  people  called  "red."  and  pointed  out  to  me,  but  I  wouldn't  vouch  for 
}.t  because  I  have  never  had  any  proof. 

Q.  In  other  words,  there  have  been  eases  when  persons  in  your  office  have  been 
pointed  out  to  you? — A.  Jjabeled  "red,"  just  as  I  have  been,  but  I  wouldn't  take 
any  stand,  or  vouch  for  it,  because  I  have  no  proof  of  it. 

Q.  Has  any  fellow  worker  in  the  Division  of  Placement  and  Unemployment 
Insurance  ever  admitted  to  you  that  he  or  she  ever  was  a  Communist'.' — A.  No. 

Q.  At  no  time? — A.  No;  I  can  say  so. 

Q.  Now,  would  you  care  to  give  the  names  of  the  persons  who  have  been  pointed 
out  to  you  as  Connnunists,  even  though  you  have  no  particular  reason  for  relying 
upon  that  information '.■' — A.  No;  I  don't  think  that's  quite  fair. 

Q.  In  other  words,  you  don't  want  to  give  that'? — A.  No. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  observed  any  conduct  or  listened  to  any  conversation  by 
employees  of  the  Division  of  Placement  and  Unemployment  Insurance  that  would 
give  you  the  basis  for  susjiecting  or  believing  that  there  were  Communists  in  the 
Division  of  Placement  and  Unemployment  Insui-ance? — A.  Well,  as  I  say,  I  have 
heard  many  people  labeled  as  I  have  been,  and  I  have  tried  to  feel  toward  them  as 
I  felt  about  this  whole  name-calling  episode  down  there.  I  felt  that  sticks  and 
stones  can  break  one's  bones,  so  to  speak.  I  don't  like  to  indulge  in  it  myself,  -ind 
I  don't  like  to  have  it  practiced  on  me. 

Q.  Well,  tell  me.  Miss  Reed,  do  you  suspect  there  is  any  particular  nefarious 
reason  or  scheme  behind  the  name  calling  that  affects  you?  Have  you  reason  to 
su.spect  tliat  there  is  .some  malicious  thoughts,  take  these  newspapers,  for  instance? 
I  would  very  much  appreciate  to  have  your  views  on  that? — A.  Oidy  insofar  as  it 
is  an  attempt  to  break  the  union  we  have  fought  so  hard  to  build  up.  I  think  that 
when  this  group  was  not  given,  in  their  estimation,  enough  of  the  floor,  and  enough 
chance  to  express  their  minority  opinion  that  they  resorted  to  this  low  form  of 
"red  hairing,"  even  to  the  extent  of  going  to  newspapers  which  they  knew  in 
advance  would  seriously  affect  the  union's  growth  and  ability  to  do  its  job,  and 
al.so  hurt  the  administration,  which  was  entirely  uncalled  for,  and  when  Mr. 
Rosenfeld  came  to  me  after  the  meeting  and  said  he  was  sorry  that  my  name  had 
appeared,  that  he  had  nothing  to  do  with  it,  I  answered  him  that  if  he  was  inter- 
ested in  building  a  union  he  would  certainly  not  And  this  way  of  going  to  the 
papers  and  getting  one  member  exiwsed  as  a  "red,"  because  he  knows  what  conse- 
quences that  can  have. 

It  indicates  to  me  just  one  thing,  and  that  is  that  he  is  not  genuinely  interested 
in  helping  this  union  grow,  and  I  might  say  one  thing  here  that  sounds  a  little 
boastful,  perhaps,  but  I  want  it  to  go  in  the  record.  That  part  of  the  business — 
part  of  the  meeting  that  we  had  last  week,  just  after  this  article  had  appeared  was 
given  to  business  reports,  and  I  am  the  chairman  of  the  committee,  the  social 
committee,  and  I  stood  up  to  make  my  report,  took  the  floor,  and  suddenly  a  burst 
of  applause  came  from  the  union,  without  any  instigation  on  my  part  or  any  of  my 
friends.  I  assure  you  it  was  simply  an  acknowledgment  of  the  rank  and  tile 
membership  that  what  1  had  done  for  the  union  and  meant  to  the  union  stood  out 
far  and  away  above  any  name-calling.  The  executive  board  hasn't  made  any 
attempt  to  dignify  this  sort  of  thing  with  an  answer.  We  are  going  right  along 
doing  our  job.  as  I  am  in  my  own  office  as  b(>st  I  know  how,  and  disregarding  this 
.sort  of  name-culling,  and  that's  all  I  think  it  deserves. 

Q.  You  spoke  of  "this  group."  I  think  that  was  the  phrase  you  used.  Who  are 
the  persons  comprising  "this  group"? — A.  The  names  are  UUman  Rosenfeld.  He 
is  the  editor  of  the  group's  paper.  They  call  the  paper  "We  Pay  Dues,  Too,"  and  I 
know  four  other  names  of  that  group.  They,  I  think,  'wvre  mentioned  in  one  of 
the  papers.  At  least,  they  had  all  their  names  on  the  editorial  board  on  this  sheet. 
I  haven't  got  a  sheet  with  me. 

Q.  Can  you  get  us  one'? — A.  Yes:  I  think  I  can,  surely. 

Q.  Is  that  the  group'? — A.  Yes.  Those  are  the  leaders  of  the  group.  I  don't 
know  all  of  the  names.  I  don't  know  who  they  are.  I  guess  I  got  off  the  trail 
there. 

(■>L'()2(! — 41 — vol.  14 :!2 


8-356  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Q.  That's  all  right.     Dirt  you  have  anything  else  at  the  moment? — A.  No. 

i).  A  moment  ago  you  said  that  yon  were — you  were  asked,  and  I  think  in  fact 
th;it  you  I'efused  to  give  tlie  names  of  i:)eisons  jiointed  out  to  you  as  Communists. 
Would  yiiu  give  us  the  name  of  the  person  who  pointed  out  these  persons  as  Com- 
munists?— A.  Well,  you  see,  it  has  been  over  some  time,  and  perhaps  it  has  been 
many,  not  by  one.  There  has  been  name-calling  by  one,  and  name-calling  by 
another.     It  hasn't  been  any  one  special  person. 

Q.  Yoii  mean  there  have  been  several  persons  that  have  pointed  out  other  people 
to  you  as  Communists? — A.  You  know  as  I  do  that  in  an  active  grcmp  in  a  union 
there  are  always  people  bi'aiided  as  Connnunists,  and  if  a  rumor  goes  around  that 
so  and  so  is,  why  I  don't  remember.  I  couldn't  remember  offhand  to  tell  you  who 
had  told  me  one  thing  and  who  had  told  me  another,  about  the  thing.  It  is  just 
generally  conceded  that  there  are  Connnunists  in  the  active  leadership  of  imions, 
becinise  they  are  very  h;ird  workers  for  whatever  they  believe  in,  and  they  very 
often  are  the  most  self-sacrilicing.  and  I  have  never  known  a  union  yet  that  hadn't 
been  called  names.     Beyond  that,  I  can't  say. 

Q.  In  other  words,  you  don't  remember  the  names  of  any  of  the  informants  on 
this  point? — A.  No. 

Q.  Well,  now,  have  you  reflected  in  this  connection  that  if  these  rumors  are 
bandit'd  about  the  persons  who  ai'e  the  sub.iect  of  those  rnmoi's  are  exposed  to  a 
kind  of  martyrdom  that  they  don't  deserve  if  they  are  not  Communists,  and  that 
therefore  if  we  conduct  a  real  investigation  we  might  be  able  to  put  an  end  to 
that  rumor  mongerlngV — A.  I  don't  think  you  ever  will,  because  of  just  such 
people  that  find  this  "red-baiting"  as  the  most  effective  and  the  most  dramatic  way 
to  get  recognition  of  their  points  of  view.  I  have  seen  it  happen  .mi  many  tin:es,  I 
really  don't  have  any  interest  in  it.  The  sooner  "red-baiting"  wears  itself  out 
and  we  get  down  to  business,  the  better  off  I  feel,  and  I  am  sure  tlie  union  feels 
the  same  way  about  it. 

Q.  Precisely.  I  feel  myself  tliat  unwarranted  rumors  should  subside  and 
should  be  made  to  .^^ettle  as  quickl.v  as  possible,  and  .iust  becau.se  of  it.  I  feel 
that  you  would  be  doing  those  perscms  a  service  if  you  gave  us  those  names  so 
that  we  could  settle  the  question  one  way  or  the  other,  because  it  is  not  "red 
baiting"  if  these  people  are  veritable  Ccmununists.  It  is  "red  baiting". if  they 
are  not.  One  way  or  the  other,  we  ought  to  kn.ow  the  truth  so  that  when  these 
rumors  are  bandied  abou.t  in  the  newspapei's  (»r  given  to  us  b.v  word  of  mouth, 
we  can  give  a  very  definite  answer.  We  can  say  to  the  person  who  pulilishes  these 
things  or  to  the  persons  that  write  us  letters — after  all,  you  know  we  are 
presumabl.v  going  to  receive  a  letter  from  somebody,  and  we  haven't  received 
it  yet,  although  the  papers  have  carried  an  account  of  it  yesterday.  Now,  I  feel, 
briefly,  that  I  would  be  in  a  very  strong  position  if  when  somebody  made 
charges  I  could  say  first  of  all,  "Don.'t  be  vague  and  general.  (live  us  the  names", 
and  then  if  they  gave  us  the  names  of  these  jiersons  to  whom  labels  had  been 
improperly  attached,  we  could  say,  "Sorry:  we  investigated  that  and  found  it  is 
not  true."  Or,  if  we  found  it  is  true,  then  we  have  certain  duties  mider  the  law. 
Now,  don't  you  think  from  that  angle  you  would  be  doing  yourself,  the  other 
people,  and  us  all  a  good  turn  by  giving  us  those  names? — A.  Mr.  Schmidt,  you 
said  yourself  that  you  had  also  been  branded  as  a  dangerous  radical.  How, 
may  I  ask,  did  you  liandle  that?  Did  yon  .give  it  the  dignity  of  an  answer,  or 
did  you  simply  ignore  it  and  go  ahead  about  your  work? 

Q.  On  one  occasion,  when  I  couldn't  find  out  who  it  was  that  gave  me  the 
title,  I  didn't  acknowledge  it.  On  another,  I  did.  In  fact,  on  two  occasions  I 
did  acknowledge  it.  I  went  right  to  the  person. — A.  Well,  I  have  gone  to  Mr. 
Rosenfeld,  who  is  responsible  tor  this  information  being  put  into  the  papers, 
and  I  told  him  what  T  think,  and  1  would  lots  ratlier  let  it  go  at  that. 

Q.  Well,  I  don't  want  to  bring  you  in  it.  naturally,  in  the  future,  and  I  won't 
disclose  the  fact  that  you  gave  the  information,  if  that's  what  you  are  worrying 
about,  but  I  .iust  want  to  be  in  a  position — —A.  (Interrupting.)  I  positively 
couldn't  tell  who.  I  know  in  a  general  way  that  there  are  rumors  that  go 
around  in  aii.v  iniion  that  so-and-so  nnist — because  they  believe  in  peace — that 
so-and-so  must  be  a  member  of  the  Conununist  Party,  l)ecause  the  Communist 
Party  believes  in  ]ieace,  and  that  sort  of  talk  is  so  loose  that  I  don't  believe  in 
listening  to  it,  and  I  try  to  go  right  about  my  business.  Now,  you  try  and  re- 
memlser  who  said  that  about  so-and-so — I  am  not  prepared  to  say. 

Q.  In  other  words,  .vou  are  unable  to  remember  the  names  of  the  persons  that 
were  pointed  out  to  you  as  possibly  being  a  Connnunisr  :  is  that  it? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now.  let's  get  back  to  the  Comimuiist  ideology,  if  you  iilea.^e.  You  have 
referred  to  class  warfare? — A.  Yes. 


UX-AMKKKWN    I'UOl'A*;  \NI»A  ACTIVITIES  8G57 

Q.  You  ujult'i-stiiml  the  ti'ihnical  signiiicanoe  of  ihosc  words  in  more  or  less 
romnuiiiist  circles V — A.  Well,  I  cau  interiiret  it  by  my  own 

Q.  Well,  can  you  tell  me  what  yon  uiuierstancl  by  it,  if  you  don't  mind? — A. 
There  are  two  classes  of  people  in  the  class  struggle. 

Q.  In  ofhi'v  words,  do  yon  bt'li(>ve  that  tlu-re  is  a  class  strtigsln  today? — A.  Yes; 
I  think  that's  quite  acccptalde. 

Q.  And  yon  think  that  there  are  two  antagonists  in  rhai  class  struggle? — A. 
You  mean  all  over  the  world? 

Q.  Well,  I  don't  care  where. — A.  Or  do  yon  mean  some  place  special? 

Q.   All  over  tlie  world,  we  will  ])nt  if.' — A.  I  would  .say  all  over  the  world. 

Q.  And.  that  wouM  mean  in  America,  too'.' — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now.  would  you  i<ientify  the  antagonists  a;;  the  prclelarians,  on  tlie  one 
hand,  and  the  capitalists,  on  the  other? — A.  Not  wholesale;  no. 

Q.  Not  wholesale?  Well,  how  would  you  identify  the  antagonists  of  this 
world-wide  class  struggle  tl'.at  you  speak  of? — A.  I  would  say  that  those  who 
are  interested  in  some  form  of  socialism  where  the  wealtii  of  tiie — the  pro- 
duction, the  means  of  production,  are  owned  by  people  wh.o  make  the  things,  and 
then  the  other  people  who  do  not  want  to  have  it  distributed,  but  who  prefer 
to  make  profit  from  them.     That  is  as  simple  as  A  B  C. 

Q.  Do  you  believe  in  the  institution  of  private  property? — A.  Oh,  my  good- 
ne.-s  ;   this  is 

Q.  Well,  I  asked  you  to  be  pationt  willi  me.  because  I  told  yon  before  that 
I  think  the  only  right  way  to  go  abmit  it  is  to  go  about  it  thoroughly,  and  I 
think  you  see  the  logic  of' that  yourself.  Do  you  believe  in  the  institution  of 
private  property? — A.  Today  or 

C.  (Interi-upting. »  To(iay'? — A.  You  see  I  heslt:^ite  because  perliaps  I  haven't 
thought  these  answers  (mt  sufficiently  and  intelligently,  and  if  1  say  something 
I  would  hate  to  .see  it  in  print  that  i  would  regret  afterward,  because  it  really 
might  not  be  exactly  what  I  meant  to  say. 

Q.  Well,  you  can  iiualify  what  you  s;iy  in  any  way  you  see  fit. — A.  Private 
jiroperty  is  one  person  owning  something — iust  v.-hat   do  you  mean,  really? 

Q.  Well,  there  are  two  kinds  r.f  property  basically,  aren't  there?  There  is 
capital  jiroperty  and  consumers'  property.  I  m.ean,  the  property  like  butter 
and  clothes  that  are  consumed  in  th"  use;  and  capital  property,  which  is  the 
property  that  is  m<)re  permanent.  It  is  used  in  the  making,  usually,  of  con- 
sumers' articles.  Now.  I  want  to  know,  do  you  believe  that  there  is  a  place 
for  the  right  of  private  ownershi>)'i' — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Do  you  believe  that  the  Goveriunent  should  control  all  of  the  means  of 
production  or  should  own  all  of  the  means  of  production? — A.  \^'ell,  I  think 
it  woidd  be  worth  trying.  I  mean — I  am  not  a  Marxist.  I  don't  know  if 
that's  what  you  are  getting  at,  to  get  me  to  '"omniii  myself  to  ;i  philosophy 
that   I   am  not   jtrepared  t(». 

(}.  No;  I  don't  want  you  to  commit  yourself  to  anything  except  the  truth. 
Miss  Reed.  I  am  just  asking  questions  tliat  in  my  opinion  go  beyond  tags. — 
A.  But  there  are  some  very,  very  deep  questions  tl'.at  can  have  ,i  g;;od  deal 
of  discussion  (me  w:iy  or  another. 

Q.  That's  right.  Now,  maybe  it  might  be  tliat  yovi  haven't  ever  discussed 
th«>m  or  talked  about  them.  If  you  haven't,  and  you  "lon't  have  any  opinion 
on  them  one  way  or  another,  .say  so. — A.  I  had  better  say  that  it  is  over  my 
depth  on  that  one. 

Q.  I  suppose  you  have  heard  that  in  the  Communist  scheme  of  things  the 
state  is  the  instrument  of  tlie  exploiter.s.  Do  you  believe  that's  so  today? 
Have  you  ever  lieard  of  that? — A.  No. 

Q.  Have  you  evei-  heard  of  the  doctrine  of  the  wasting  away  of  the  state".' — 
A.  Yes;  I  have  heard  that  expression. 

Q.  Do  you  know  wiiat  it  means? — A.  Only  what  I  can  imagine  what  it 
would   mean. 

Q.  Well,  what  do  you  imagine  il  would  mean? — A.  That  is  where  the  state 
set-up  will  eveinually  he — well,  it  won't  be  called  a  state;  it  would  be  called 
something  else:  that  is.  it  would  he  a  .system  of  .v-ociety  that  won't  have  a 
state  set-up.  It  would  be  more  of  a  communal  set-up.  I  am  not  very  good  at 
this. 

Q.  That's  all  right.  I  don't  know  whether  you  answered  the  question  I 
first  asked,  about  the  "dictatorship  of  the  proletariat" — if  it  is  the  best  poli- 
tical and  economic  and  social  arrangement  for  the  attainmi-nt  of  the  classless 
state? — A.  1  don't  know  about  that,  Mr.  Srhmidt ;  I  don't  believe  in  any  die. 
tatorship. 


8558  UN-.'UIEKICAN   PKOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Q.  You  have  heard  of  the  classless  state  of  Karl  Marx,  for  example? — A.  Well, 
I  have  heard  of  it,  and  it  all  .seemed  pretty  nehnlous  to  me. 

Q.  You  have  heard  of  the  Thinl  Inlernatioual,  I  believe V — A.  Yes. 

Q.  You  know  what  the  Third  International  isV — A.  I  know  it  is  not  the  fourth, 
and  I  know  it  is  not  the  second,  and  I  don't  know  where  it  conies  in. 

Q.  Well,  did  you  know  that  the  Communist  Party  in  the  United  States  was  at 
least  once  a  section  of  the  Third  International? — A.  Yes;  I  think  I  can  tie  it  up 
as  part  of  it — yes ;  I  would  say  so. 

Q.  And,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  the  Daily  Worker  of  some  years  ago  used  to  carry 
in  its  masthead  the  legend  to  the  effect  that  •'I'ublishcd  by  the  Communist  Party 
of  the  United  States,  a  section  of  the  Third  International."  Isn't  that  so? — A. 
I  don't  remember. 

Q.  Well,  is  the  Daily  Worker  published  by  Communists  today? — A.  When  you 
say  "published,''  do  you  mean  written — do  you  have  to  be  a  member  to  be  on  the 
staff,  do  you  mean? 

Q.  No.  I  mean,  so  far  as  the  ownership  of  that  publishing  outlet  is  concerned,  is 
that  Communist? — A.  I  haven't  any  idea  of  the  constituency  of  the  persons  run- 
ning it.  I  know  only  that  they  would  be  apt  to  be,  scnne  of  them.  I  dou't  know 
who  they  are. 

Q.  Well,  is  your  mother  a  member  of  the  Comnnuiist  Party? — A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  read  the  Daily  Worker? — A.  Yes;  I  did. 

Q.  Wouldn't  you  say  that  most  of  the  writers  in  it  are  members  fif  the  Com- 
munist I'arty? — A.  I  would  say  it  is  the  mouthpiece  and  the  paper  of  those  of 
Conununist  leanings,  but  I  have  no  official  knowledge  of  how  it  is  worked,  and 
that  part  is  my  mother's  business.     I  don't  really  know  the  technical  end  at  all. 

Q.  Plave  you  ever  read  the  monthly  called  the  Communist? — A.  I  know  there 
is  such  a  thing,  but  I  don't  remember  reading  it. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  read  the  quarterly  called  the  Third  International? — A.  No; 
I  haven't. 

Q.  Have  you  seen  it? — A.  I  don't  remember  ever  seeing  it.     A  quarterly? 

Q.  Yes.  Published  in  several  different  languages  by  the  Comintern? — A.  I 
may  have  seen  it,  but  I  don't  remember  it. 

Q.  Have  you  read  some  or  all  of  the  bonks  in  the  Little  Lenin  Library? — A. 
No  ;  I  have  not. 

Q.  Would  you  be  willing  to  sign  a  statement  repudiating  comnumism?- — A.  Re- 
pudiating communism?     For  who.  for  what?     I  mean,  when  you 

Q.  (Interrupting.)  For  me? — A.  You  see  that  I  am  not  very  well  informed 
You  mean  as  a  theory,  as  a  basis? 

Q.  As  a  basis  for  political  and  social  action? — A.  Well,  1  don't  think  I  know 
enough  to  say  that,  Mr.  Schmidt.  I  mean,  because  my  mother  is  suddenly  a 
1-year-old.  and  goes  off  on  a  tangent  as  she  has,  and  undertakes  to  do  a  job,  and 
offhand  I  am  not  as  well  informed  about  those  things  nearly  as  she  is,  and 

Q.  (Interrupting.)  Do  you  believe  in  the  political  genei'al  strike?  You  know 
what  a  general  strike  is? — A.  Yes;  I  have  heard  of  it.     We  have  had  some. 

Q.  What's  that? — A.  They  have  had  some  in  certain  sections  of  the  country. 

Q.  You  don't  know  what  the  political  genei'al  strike  is? — A.  No ;  I  don't  know 
that  term. 

Q.  Do  you  advocate  for  political  and  social  action  the  use  of  revolutionary 
mass  movements? — A.   I  will  have  to  say  that  I  don't  know  on  that  one. 

Q.  Well,  you  mean  you  don't  know  what  I  mean? — A.  You  are  using  a  good 
many  terms  that  are  prett.y — sound  like  as  if  they  had  a  lot  of  meaning  to  them, 
and  I  am  not  prepared  to  understand  offhand  what  those  terms  mean. 

Q.  AVell,  they  do  have  a  pretty  settled  meaning  in  some  circles. — A.  Well,  I 
don't  feel  that  I  can  answer  that,  when  I  don't  understand  all  the  significance  of 
an  answer. 

Q.  Well,  now,  you  feel  that  you  would  hesitate  about  signing  a  statement  re- 
pudiating communism  because  you  don't  know  enotigh  about  communism  to 
repudiate  it;  is  that  it? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Well,  suppose  instead  of  asking  you  to  repudiate  communism  as  a  tag,  I 
set  down  on  a  piece  of  paper  certain  of  the  basic  dogmas  of  communism  and  ask 
.von  to  repudiate  them.  Would  you  sign  that  kind  of  a  statement? — A.  It  depends 
on  what  they  are,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  That's  right,  but  I  said  the  dogmas  of  communism? — A.  Well,  when  I  see 
what  the.v  are,  I  will  know  whether  I  would  sign  such  a  thing,  but  I  don't  know 
again  what  your  purpose  is.  Is  it  to  be  able  to  answer  the  press  by  saying  tliat 
I  have  been  uji  to  this  office  and  made  a  flat  statement,  and  then  you  will  feel 
that  everything  is  all  right?     Is  that  the  purpose  of  this? 


rx-A.MEuu'AN  i'kofa(;am)a  activities  8659 

Q  Wi-11,  luiw.  wo  are  not  so  tiaiiu'lUd  h.v  llu'  i)ross  tliat  we  fei'l  we  owe  them 
a  duty  to  divulge  to  thmn  what  you  are  vsayinji;.  We  feel  that  we  have  a  certain 
responsihility  of  section  J2-A  of  tlie  civil-service  law. — A.  Yes. 

Q.  (hue  we  have  satisfied  ourselves  that  we  have  (iischarjied  that  duty  properly, 
then  it  doesn't  matter  particularly  to  us  what  rumors  lloat  about,  so  long  as  they 
don't  spoil  puhlic  relations  or  corrupt  personnel  morale. — A.  Riuht. 

Q.  And,  wherever  we  think  it  is  necessary  to  use  any  information  you  give  us 
to  prtwcnt  the  deterioration  of  the  puhlic  relations  or  of  intei'nal  morale.  yo\i 
can  undersrand  we  would  feel  free  to  use  it.  Now.  does  that  answer  your  ques- 
ti<ni  to  me? — A.  Yes:  I  wondered  if  you  have  felt  any  repercussiou  from  this  inci- 
dent that  you  felt  would  interfere  with  your  public  relations  or  any  internal 
)Morale'r 

Q.  Well,  you  are  what,  an  employment  investigator? 

Mr.  Ma.sqn.   Senior  employment  investigator. 

Q.  You  have  some  knowledge  of  the  actualities  of  today's  conditions  from  the 
I)lacement  angle? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now,  I  ask  you  as  a  senior  employment  investigator,  do  you  think  it  helps 
relations  or  hurts  them,  these  newspaper  articles? — A.  It  is  not  good,  Mr, 
Schmidt. 

Q.  You  indicated  it  before  when  you  .said  before  that  you  thought  the  under- 
lying motive  was  to  damage  the  administration? — A.  No;  I  said  to  Mr.  Rosen- 
feld  that  this  might  hurt  the  administration. 

Q.  Oh,  I  am  sorry. — A.  And.  I  didn't  indicate  that  that  was  his  motive,  but  T 
felt  it  was  his  motive  to  damage  the  union,  but^ — I  have  forgotten  what  I  was 
going  to  say. 

Q.  Do  you  approve  of  the  dominant  economic  system  called  finance  capitalism 
or  the  capitalistic  system? — A.  The  capitalistic  system,  as  I  understand  it,  has 
outlived  itself,  and  certainly  the  world  is  calling  for  something  better  than  that, 

Q.  Well,  do  ycu  think  that  the  only  way  of  getting  rid  of  it,  or  one  of  the 
available  ways  of  getting  rid  of  the  capitalist  system  is  direct  struggle  or  the 
general  strike,  or  class  warfare?— A.  It  lias  been  proposed,  but  I  don't  agree  with 
any  form  of  force  and  violence,  if  that's  what  .vou  mean.     Is  it? 

Q.  Yes.  If  you  have  any  doubt  about  the  meaning  of  any  question.  I  will 
rephrase  it  in  another  way. — A.  Yes.     Wouhl  you  say  it  again. 

Q.  Surely.  Did  y<Hi  ever  hear  of  the  expre.ssion  "dialectic  materialism"? — 
A.  Yes;  I  have  heard  of  it. 

Q.  You  know  what  it  means? — A,  No ;  I  never  did  find  out. 

Mr.  Mason.  You  are  not  a  stranger  to  dialectics,  however,  I  take  it? 

Miss  Rekd.  You  are  better  than  I  am,  because  I  don't  know  what  it  means. 

Q.  Well,  for  your  information,  and  in  order  thiit  you  might  understand  future 
questi<ms,  I  will  tell  you  that  in  the  general  line  of  Communist  philosophy,  the 
ba.sic  concept  was  a  materialist  conception,  let's  say  an  evolutionary  materialist 
conception,  a  conception  that  denied  spiritual  functions,  the  primacy  of  the 
si>ii-itual,  and  a  conception  of  history  based  somewhat  on  Hegel,  who  held  that 
history  unfolds  itself  according  to  certain  patterns.  There  was  a  time  when  the 
highest  development  of  that  evolutionism  was  feudalism.  Then,  there  might  have 
come  capitalism  that  we  know  today,  and  in  the  future  the  "dictatorship  of  the 
proletariat,"  and  the  termination,  the  end.  the  goal  of  that  ceaseless  development 
of  history  was  called  the  classless  state.  Now,  these  Communist  theoreticians 
held  that  nothing  men  could  do  would  interfere  with  that  process.  We  lived  in 
a  deterministic  world,  a  world  that  was  not  influenced  basically  by  free  will,  but 
we  were  swept  forward  on  the  surge  of  history.  They  qualified  that  at  least  to 
this  extent,  by  saying  that  there  was  a  dialectic  that  could  be  used  to  speed  up 
that  evolutionary  process,  and  that  dialectic  they  held  was  class  warfare,  so 
that  everything  that  ministered  to  the  bad  feelings  of  the  two  antagonistic  classes 
was  helpful  in  the  long  run  for  revolutionary  impacts,  was  helpful  in  the  long 
i-un  because  they  simply  sped  the  day  of  the  coming  first  of  the  "dictatorship  of 
the  proletariat,"  and  iiltimately  of  the  classless  society.  Now,  that  is  a  rough 
and  ready  approximation  that  I  suppose  some  Communist  theoreticians  might  find 
fault  with. — A.  I  am  glad  to  have  you  explain  it. 

Q.  I  wondered  now  whether  you  believ(>d  in  the  usefulness  of  the  class 
struggle  to  speed  the  day  of  ascent  of  a  better  political  and  social  system? — 
A.  That  would  assume  that  I  really  knew  what-  I  was  talking  about,  and  had 
thought  out  what  you  have  explained  beforehand,  and  I  haven't, 

Q.  Therefore,  you  have  no  intelligent  opinion  on  it? — A.  I  have  no  intel- 
ligent opinion  on  it. 


8560  UN-AMERICAN  PKOl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Q.  Have  you  any  knowledge  of  what  is  the  hasic  oriterion  of  Commimist 
ethics? — A.  No. 

Q.  I  know  in  some  Communist  circles  that  would  seem  ignorant,  to  use  that 
phraseology,  but  I  use  it  advisedly,  because  away  back  in  the  early  lG20"s, 
Letiin.  in  addressinji'  a  group,  a^sfMied  that  there  was  a  deliiiite  Communist 
ethic.  ;ind  that  it  consisted  of  this,  that  everything  wnich  advanced,  or  helped, 
or  favored,  or  facilitated  th^  "dictatorship  of  the  proletariat''  was  good,  and 
everyrhing  that  hindered,  delayed,  or  hurt  the  prospects  of  that  dictatorship 
was  bad.  Would  you  agree  with  that  as  a  standard  of  what  is  good  and  what 
is  bad? — A.  Offhand,  no:  but  I  really  am  faced  with  a  lot  of  cpiestions  that 
you  assume  I  know  a  lot  about,  and  I  can't  answer  th'nu  intelligently,  Mr. 
Schmidt. 

ij.  What  (piestions.  for  example? — A.  Well,  I  mean  as  far  as  it  .sounds  likt' 
a  very  deep  question,  and  it  Involves  a  lot  of  thinking,  and  I  haven't  done  it, 
and  I  don't  know  how  to  answer  it.  You  can't  answer  those  things  offhand. 
I  go  back  to  my  first  statement  about  thinking  that  this  situation  we  are  in 
today  is  not  good,  and  could  be  better,  and  I  am  doing  my  job  as  well  as  I 
know  how,  and  have  always  loved  mj"  job,  and  consider  myself  as  having  done 
a  good  job  on  it,  because  I  believe  in  the  State  employment  service  and  working 
in  my  union  that  I  think  is  a  necessary  job  to  be  done  through  the  workers 
that  are  members  of  the  union,  and  I  haven't  gone  into  these  things  that  you 
bri)ig  out  in  these  deeper  questions,  ami  J — if  I  answered  them  yes  or  nov 
I  would  tiierehy  be  telling  you  that  I  really  knew  what  I  was  talking  about, 
if  1  answered  them,  and  I  dfiu't. 

Q.  Well,  do  you  believe  that  one  of  the  advisable  methods  for  social  better- 
ment in  the  future  for  the  attainment  of  a  better  world  that  you  spoke  of 
befoi-e  would  be  ;in  intensification  of  the  revolutionary  crises  in  various  couu- 
ti'ies,  in  our  own  particularly? — A.  No;  I  wouldn't  say  ott'hand.  That  implies 
that  1  want  revolutioji  in  various  countries,  and  think  that  that's  going  to  solve 
things?    No;  I  would  say  no. 

Q.  Are  there  any  conditions  under  which  you  would  advocate  revolutionary 
action  in  the  sense  of  unlawful  and  violent  action? — A.  No;  I  say  again  that 
I  do  not  stand  for  vicjlence  or  illegal  means. 

Q.  Why'/ — A.  Because  I  don't  believe  that  that  is  the  way  of  handling  any 
situation.  I  don't  believe  in  lighting  when  you  get  mad.  If  you  can't  use 
your  head  and  discuss  the  thing  out,  well  then,  you  had  better  not  get  into  it. 

Q.  Do  you  believe  that  it  is  advisable  to  develop  in  the  proletarian  a  class 
consciousness".' — A.  T  think  the  workers  should  know  their  rights  and  b«^  aware 
of  them,  surely,  if  that's  what  you  mean. 

i}.  No;  I  don't  mean  that  exactly.  By  class  consciousness  I  mean  a  sense  of 
solidarity  against  a  common  enemy  which  is  the  antagonist  class,  which  is 
variously  known  as  bourgeoisie,  or  capitalist,  or  exploiters? — A.  Well,  I  believe 
in  unions,  and  unions  are  an  example  of  solidarity  for  getting  their  workers 
rights,  and  I  believe  in  that ;  yes. 

Q.  Well,  do  you  believe  that  an  enmity  should  exist  between  the  unions  or 
any  proletarian  group  and  the  antagonist  class? — A.  I  don't  think  enmity  does 
any  good  anywhere. 

Q.  I  suppose  you  would  concede  that  Stalin  and  Lenin  are  Communists? — 
A.  Lenin  was,  I  guess. 

Q.  That's  a  correction  that  I  deserved.  Lenin  was  a  Communist,  and 
Stalin  is?— A.  Yes. 

Q.  Well,  here  is  a  statement  that  Lenin  made  about  the  "dictatorship  of  the 
proletariat."  I  quote :  "The  'dictatorship  of  the  proletariat'  is  the  most  deter- 
mined and  most  ruthless  war  waged  by  the  new  class  against  the  more  powerful 
enemy,  against  the  bourgeoisie."  Then,  he  says,  again  I  quote  :  "The  'dictatorship 
of  the  proletariat'  is  a  persistent  struggle,  sanguinary  and  bloodless,  violent  and 
passive,  military  and  economic,  educational  and  administrative,  against  the 
forces  and  traditions  of  the  old  society."  Would  you  agree  with  that  statement 
or  repudiate  it? — A.  I  can't  absorb  a  thing  as  deep  as  that  and  say  yes  or  no  to 
it  right  away. 

Q.  Shall  I  read  it  again? — A.  No:  I  think  that  I  might  agree  with  some  of  it, 
and  not  all  of  it.  I  can't  say  yes  or  no.  I  really  don't  think  it  is  quite  fair  to 
ask  me  a  "yes"  or  "no"  answer  on  a  thing  like  that.  I  mean,  all  of  it  assumes 
a  great  deal  of  reading  and  philosophical  study  on  this  matter. 

Q.  Well,  I  don't  know  whether  that  is  altogether  so.  I  am  picking  out  state- 
ments that  T  tlioughr  were  pretty  elementary,  so  that  when  a  person  heard  them  he 
would   understand   their  significance.     May   I  quote  another  one  to  you?     This 


UN-AMERICAN  PKOrAGANDA   ACll\ HIES  8661 

liiiiL'  i  (luutr  troiu  KStuliu  in  liis  bookirt  eallcd  ■TnuiMlalions  of  Leninism."'  "To 
luit  it  briefly,  the  'dictatorship  of  the  proletariat'  is  the  domination  of  the 
proletariat  over  the  boiujieoisie  untrammelled  by  law  and  based  on  violence  and 
enjnyinji  the  sympathy  and  support  of  the  toiling  and  exiiloited  masses."  I  will 
read"  it  once  moro  so  that  you  can  thinlv  about  it. — A.  May  1  ask  what  answer 
you  would  expect  for  that,  whether  I  agree  to  itV 

Q.  Yes;  that's  right,  or  whether  you  would  repudiate  it.  I  will  read  it  once 
more  to  you.  "The  'dictatorship  of  the  proletariat'  is  the  domination  of  the 
proletariat  over  the  bimrgeoisie  untrammelled  by  law  and  based  on  violence  and 
enjoying  the  sympathy  and  support  of  the  toiling  and  exploited  masses."  Now, 
my  question  in  relation  to  that  is.  if  that  is  the  definition  of  "dictatorship  of  the 
proletariat" V — A.  Does  it  inchide  statements  on  force  and  violence? 

Q.  It  says,  "domination  of  the  proletariat  over  the  bourgeoisie  untrammelled 
by  law  and  based  on  violence  and  enjoying  the  sympathy  and  support  of  the 
lulling  masses."— A.  Well,  that's  not  my  conception  of  what  the  "dictatorship  of 
the  priileiariat"  is. 

<}.  AVeil.  in  other  words,  you  would  not  agree  with  thatV — A.  It  doesn't  seem 
to  coincide  with  my  ideas  of  force  and  violence.  If  there  is  anything  that  I 
don't — offhand  I  wouldn't  say  that  I  agree  with  it;  no. 

Q.  Well,  if  you  don't  agree  with  it,  are  you  just  neutral  about  it,  or  do  you 
repudiate  if.'  In  otlier  words,  I  want  to  tiud  out  are  you  passive  about  it,  or  do 
you  actively  repudiate  it V — A.  As  I  understand  it  now,  I  would  repudiate  it,  if 
that's  what  you  call  it :  but  it  is  because  these  things  are  meaty,  and  they  might 
have  a  wealth  of  meaning  there  that  I  don't  get  at  first,  and  I  might  agree  with 
some  of  it  or  not  all  of  it.  As  it  stands  now,  I  wouldn't  agree  with  it.  That's  not 
my  interprotation  of  what  I  have  ever  heard  of  the  "dictatorship  of  the 
proletariat." 

Q.  Where  have   you  heard  about    the   dictatorship A.   [Interrupting.]  Mr. 

Schmidt,  I  feel  that  I  am  blocking  you,  and  I  don  t  want  to,  but  you  are  asking 
nui  a  great  many  deep,  deep  questions  on  theory  that  I  cannot  answer,  and 
since  I  caiuiot  answer,  and  since  I  cannot  answer  them,  you  ask  me,  am  I 
passive  or  do  I  repudiate  them?  Now,  I  don't  do  either.  I  am  not  informed. 
I  don't  want  to  answer  a  question  as  deep  as  that.  Tlnit  is  worth  a  lot  of 
study.  I  imagine,  and  I  have  not  done  it. 

Q.  Weil,  now  look;  remember  before  wlien  I  aslied  about  repudiating  com- 
munism as  a  tag.  that  I  would  be  glad  to  get  some  of  the  dogmas  of  communism 
and  ask  you  to  repudiate  them.  Now.  obviously.  I  meant  I  would  get  them 
together  on  a  written  paper,  and  I  would  assume  that  St:>.lin  and  Ivnin  knew 
what  communism  was,  just  as  well  as  I  assume  tliat  tiie  Pope  kuiw  what 
catJiolicism  was,  and  on  the  basis  of  what  they  say  comuuinism  is,  1  would 
ask  you  to  sign  a  statement  repudiating  communism  as  ro^presented  by  the 
dogmas  that  I  will  have  quoted  to  yoii.  You  can  take  those  dogmas  and  con- 
sider them  very  carefully  and  study  them,  if  you  .say  they  are  very  meaty,  and 
distil!  from  them  whatever  is  right  in  your  opinion,  and  wrong,  and  you  can 
qualify  your  answer  as  you  deem  proper.  Now,  that  might  lie  one  Way  of 
doing  it. — A.  It  would  have  to  be  the  only  way,  because  I  think  it  is  quite  a 
stiff  lest  to  put  me  to. 

Q.  Tliis  is  not  an  examination  pap«'r  in  political  economy,  or  anything  likn 
that. — A.  It  sounds  lil<e  an  oral  one. 

Q.  It  is  not  an  oral  examiuatiou  for  tlie  very  reason  tiiat  you  are  not  being 
rated,  for  one  thing,  and  for  the  other  thing,  I  told  yini  all  you  would  have 
to  say  is  "No,"  and  I  wouldn't  press  it. — A.  Well,  may  I  say  "no"  to  that,  then*:' 

Q.  All  right,  whatever  you  want.  However,  you  said  that  this  iext  thai  1 
read  from  the  P'oundatiiai  of  Lemnisni  and  which  is  nothing  but  n  paraphriising 
of  a  text  found  in  Lenin's  work  The  Stiit(>  and  Revolution,  did  not  ac<-ord  with 
your  understanding  of  the  "dictatorship  of  the  proletariat,"  is  that  right? — 
A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now,  what  is  your  understanding  of  the  "dicta torshii)  of  the  proletariat" 
and  where  did  yon  get  that  understanding?  Tliat's  two  (piestions. — A.  YVs : 
that's  two.  \\'ell.  I  think  it  is  rather  a  cbildisb  picture  I'eally.  The  word 
"dictatorship"  means  control,  neces.sarily,  and  control  by  the  proletarians,  b.v  the 
jiroletarian  people  in  the  Cfminuinity.  Now,  if  tliey  control  everything,  then 
they  ai'e  their  own  employers  and  bosses,  and  then  there  is  no  class  that  can 
exploit  them,  and  can  operate  against  them,  and  all  peo])le  who  work  shall 
share,  and  the  whole  thing  ouglit  to  be  a  lovely  little  pattern  of  pcoi)le  getting 
what  they  deserve  in  this  world.  I  think  that  that's  a  good,  thing  to  have 
because  I   think  that  there  are  such  evils  created  b.v  people  exploiting  other 


86J52  UN-AMERTCAN  I'ROPAGANDA   ACTIVITIES 

people  aud  working  against  them,  aud  tlie  things  that  are  exposed  all  the  time 
as  happening,  it  is  because  there  is  an  under  dog  that  is  being  trodden  and 
downtrodden,  and  that  sort  of  thing  would  be  over.  I  would  like  to  see  a 
world  where  that  is  all  over.  Now,  that's  very  simple  and  childlike,  and  I  feel 
that  there  are  three — I  used  to  think  of  three  sides  to  a  triangle  that  I  feel 
should  be,  and  they  are  better  health  in  the  world,  and  I  feel  there  should  be 
free  education,  and  I  feel  there  should  be  a  chance  to  work  at  whatever  they 
wanted  to  work  at.     I  thought  that  would  be  the  principles  of  a  millennium. 

Q.  Of  course,  it  wouldn't  be  a  millennium  unless  we  know  what  was  the 
content  of  that  education.  Isn't  that  significant  there?  For  example,  if  you 
had  a  lot  of  Nazi  propaganda  as  the  content  of  that  education,  you  wouldn't 
consider  we  had  reached  the  niilUenium,  would  you? — A.  At  least,  I  think  all 
education  should  be  free.     I  wouldn't  go  into  it  any  further  than  that. 

Q.  "Well,  suppose  the  education  consisted  of  an  explanation  of  the  "dictator- 
ship of  the  proletariat"  by  Marx  and  Lenin  and  Stalin,  would  you  consider 
that  as  the  millenivun? — A.  Well,  that's  assuming  that  I  know  what  their 
interpretation  is,  and  I  have  not  studied  it  and  I  don't  know. 

Q.  I  see — A.  I  mean,  that  is  my  childhood  picture  and  it  is  what  I  have 
been  working  toward  and  when  I  couldn't  be  a  nurse  as  I  wanted  to,  and  didn't 
want  to  be  a  teacher,  I  chose  employment  work,  and  I  have  been  in  it  ever 
since. 

Q.  Well,  to  get  to  the  second  question  that  was  included  in  my  compound 
question  before,  what  is  the  source  of  your  knowledge  of  the  "dictatorship  of 
the  proletariat"? — A.  Well,  as  you  know,  my  mother  is  part  owner  of  the  Daily 
Woiker,  so  that  I  have  seen  that  paper,  and,  as  it  states  in  here,  I  went  to  the 
Soviet  Union  uiyself  and  I  have  visited  there  and  visited  mv  sister,  and  I  have 
thought  a  good  deal  about  it  as  an  experiment  that  I  think  is  very,  very  fine, 
the  things  that  I  have  seen  done.  My  mother  has  traveled  there  and  told  me 
many  things,  and  I  have  read  some  of  the  literature,  the  radical  literature. 

Q.  Well,  what  have  you  read  in  the  field? — A.  I  have  read  the  Daily  Worker. 

Q.  The  New  Masses'? — A.  Sometimes  I  see  that. 

Q.  Any  books  on  the  subject? — A.  I  have  read  autobiographies.  I  haven't 
read   Lenin's  works,  though. 

Q.  What  autobiographies? — A.  W>11.  I  read  Foster's  hook  on  his  life.  I  have 
forgotten  the  name  of  it.     I  am  not  a  very  well  read  person,  actually. 

Q.  Did  you  read  Lyons'  book"? — A.  Eugene  Lyons'  book?  No:  I  didn't  read 
that. 

Q.  Did  you  read  any  of  the  b.isic  Communist  documents,  like  Kapitov 
[phonetic]  ? — A.  No. 

Q.  Or  Legotha's  Statement  [phonetic]? — ^A.  No. 

Q.  Strachey? — A.  I  think  I  remember  one  ijamphlet  or  something  of  his. 

Q.  Howard  Lasky? — A.  No;  I  haven't  read  his  articles. 

Q.  You  don't  remember  any  books  devoted  to  communism  tiiat  you  have  read 
which  might  be  the  source  of  your  concept  of  the  "dictator.ship  of  the  prole- 
tariat"?— A.  I  think  it  is  because  I  have  been  around  among  people  vrho  were 
interested  in  the  labor  movement  and  left-wing  things  for  a  long  time ;  and  if  I 
see  my  mother,  when  I  do  see  her 

Q.  (Interrupting.)  Would  you  consider  yourself  a  left-winger,  if  that  has  any 
connection? — A.  I  presume  being  in  the  C.  I.  O.  is  so  labeled  a  left-winger, 
hut  I  don't  know  what  I  wijuld  call  myself.  I  know  what  I  am  but  I  don't  think 
it  is  the  label — I  don't  like  the  label  myself,  because  everybody  has  so  many 
interpretations  of  labels.  I  am  a  strong  union  person  and  always  have  been. 
I  believe  in  unions. 

Q.  You  have  kept  informed  about  the  experiment  in  Russia,  as  you  called 
it?— A.  Yes. 

Q.  You  know  something  about  its  constitution  and  its  government,  do  you? — 
A.  I  did  read  its  constitution  once ;  yes. 

Q.  Would  you  agree  with  the  principles  of  the  constitution  of  the  Soviet 
Union? — A.  I  remember  particularly  that  it  gives  everybody  the  right  to  work, 
and  mv  whole  angle  being  on  that  slant,  I  was  interested  in  that  particularly. 

Q.  Well,  was  that  actually  being  carried  out  according  to  your  observation 
of  Russia  in  your  visits  there ".•' — Yes.  I  tried  to  find  an  employment  oftice  to 
see  if  there  was  a  problem  in  employment,  and  if  there  was  one,  and  I  was 
allowed  to  visit  as  a  tourist,  and  it  didn't  seem  to  be  a  problem  of  employ- 
ment, it  was  a  problem  of  finding  the  workers  and  not  the  v/orkers  finding 
the  jobs. 

Q.  Would  you  consider  Soviet  Russia,  according  to  the  pattern  that  you 
studied,  a  democracy? — A.  In  what  sense  of  the  word? 


UN-AMKKICAN    I  la  H'ACA.NDA  ArTi\  ITIKS  8663 

Q.  It  isn't  ;i  (Iriiuu-racv  in  i»nr  si'nst"  of  tli**  word,  hccinisc  it  is  not  ;i  capitalist 
deiuocrac.v,  is  ilV— A.  No;  but  tlion  you  liavc  to  intcrpnM  what  you  moan  by 
(h'niocracv.     It   isn't  our  type  of  (U-uiocracy  hvn\ 

Q.  Hut'you  <lo  consider  it  a  (Icniocracy.  and  not  a  dictatorship? — A.  As  far 
as  I  could  SCO  it  is ;  yes.  .   „      . 

Q.  So  that  you  would  say  that  Stalin  is  not  a  dictator  even  if  Hitler  is?— A. 
Yes;  I  would  say  that. 

Q.  Why  do  you  say  that? — A.  Well,  I  know  that  tlie  elections  are  very— the 
basis  for  election  is  from  the  very  smallest  unit  in  a  factory- 

Q.  That's  a  cell,  isn't  if?— A.  No. 

Q.  The  smallest  nnil?— A.  No.  When  1  say  that.  I  mean  the  smallest  jjroup 
of  workers  in  any  factory,  and  it  goes  up  and  up  to  a  supreme  court  that 
is  tiie  basis  of  their  government.     So.   1  think  that's  very  democratic. 

Q.  In  other  wiu-ds.  yon  think  that  Stalin's  government  and  the  Supreme 
r'rt'sidiuni  in  Russia   is  responsible  to  the  people? — A.  I  would  say  so. 

Q.  And  that  the  people  of  (Jermany  do  not  enjoy  that  responsiveness  in 
Hit'ler?  You  see.  1  am  asking  you  how  you  distinguish  Hitler  from  Stalin? — A. 
Well,  you  see.  I  don't  know  the  (ierman  situation  and  I  don't  know  how — my 
interpretation  of  what  Hitler  does  is  very,  very  different  from  that,  because 
I  don't  think  the  set-up  is  like  that,  from  the  shops  and  factories. 

Q.  You  think  it  was  any  response  to  public  opinion  there  that  Stalin  permitted 
Ids  soldiers  to  g(>bble  up  Finland,  or  Kstonia,  or  Lithuania,  or  part  of  Poland? — 
A.  I  don't  know.  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  What  is  that? — A.  I  don't  kn(nv  that. 

Q.  When  you  say  you  don't  know,  you  mean  you  don't  know  enough  about 
the  facts  to  say  whether  or  not  Stalin  w^as  justified  in  taking A.  (Interrupt- 
ing.) Well.  I  don't  know  what  measures  he  took.  You  are  asking  a  military 
question.     I   haven't  any  idea. 

Q.  Well,  did  you  disapprove  of  his  conduct  in  resorting  to  military  measures 
to  take  over  part  of  Finland,  for  example? — A.  I  don't  think  I  can  answer  that. 
I  mean,  whether  I  approve  of  what  he  did  or  not  is  beyond  me.  I  wouldn't 
presume  to — he  must  have  had  some  reason  that  I  have  never 

Q.  Well,  would  you  presume  to  disapprove  of  Hitler's  action  invading  Hol- 
land?— A.  I  hate  war.  I  hate  war  of  any  kind,  and  I  wouldn't  approve.  I 
don't  know  anything  about  militai'y  tac-tics,  and  I  don't  know  this  whole 
game  of  checkerboard,  aiul  killing  each  other  off  and  fighting  each  other.  It 
is  horrible  to  me.     I  don't  presume  to  approve  one's  military  step. 

Q.  r>ut  the  killing  and  the  horror  of  struggle  is  just  as  near  and  actual  where 
the  fight  is  between  the  Finns  and  the  Soviets  as  it  is  between  any  other  groups 
of  combatants'/ — A.  Well,  I  don't  know.  I  don't  take  any  brief  for  Hitler  or  war 
in  any  capacity.  I  am  not  sticking  uj)  for  one  bit  of  military  strategy  against 
another. 

•     Q.  So  that  you  hate  war  even  when  the  warrior  is  StJilin"? — A.  That  assumes 
that  I  think  the  warrior  is  Stalin.     I  don't  know.     I  hate  war. 

Q.  Here  is  a  statement  I  would  like  to  read  to  you  from  one  of  the  Communist 
texts,  "Democracy  under  the  capitalist  system  is  capitalist  democracy,  the  democ- 
racy of  an  exploiting  min<n-ity  based  on  the  restriction  of  the  rights  of  the  ex- 
ploited majority,  and  directed  against  this  majority."  l>o  you  believe  that  that 
is  a  correct  statement  of  democracy  in  this  connti'yV  Shall  I  read  it  again'.' — A. 
Would  you  mind,  please? 

Q.  'Democracy  under  the  capitalist  system  is  capitalist  democracy,  the  democ- 
racy of  an  exploiting  minority  based  on  the  restriction  of  the  rights  of  the  ex- 
ploited majoi-ity.  and  directed  against  this  majority." — A.  Exploited  m;ijority? 

Q.  That's  right,  and  it  goes  on.  I  will  read  further.  "Only  luider  the  'd'cta- 
torship  of  the  proletariat'  is  real  freedom  for  the  exploited  and  real  participation 
in  the  administration  of  the  country  by  the  proletai'ians  and  pea.sants  possible. 
Under  the  'dictatorship  of  the  proletariat",  democracy  is  proletarian  democracy, 
the  democracy  of  the  exploited  majority  based  uiion  the  restriction  of  the  rights 
of  the  exploiting  minority,  and  directed  against  this  minority."  You  see,  that 
juxtaposes  two  democracies,  one  called  capitalist  democracy,  and  the  other  called 
proletarian  democracy,  and  it  obviously  st>ts  forth  the  proletarian  democracy  as 
the  desirable  and  preferable  kind.  Is  that  your  opinion,  or  do  you  have  a  third 
alternative  in  between  these  two?  Would  you  like  to  see  the  thing  in  front  of 
you? — A.   I  can  see  that  I  will  have  to  study  it  to  know  all  the  implications. 

Q.  It  is  marked  right  here.  [Handing  book  to  witness.]— A.  |  Witness  examines 
book.] 

(Discussion  off  the  record.) 


3Q54  UN-AJVIERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

By  Mr.  Hanson  : 

Q.  Miss  Reed,  did  you  ever  make  a  contribution  of  any  kind  to  the  Communist 
Party?— A.  Well,  I-^ 

Q.  Money  contributions? — A.  Not  under  any  name.  If  I  put  in  some  money  iu 
a  collection,  it  is  the  most  I  ever  did. 

Q.  Well,  have  you  put  money  in  collection  plates? — A.  Well,  for  many  causes! 

Q.  Where? — A.  I  think  at  Madison  Square  Garden. 

Q.  When  they  were  having  a  Conuniuiist  rally? — A.  Mass  meetings  of  different 
kinds  I  have  put  in  the  plate. 

Q.  But,  I  am  speaking  of  contributions  to  the  Communist  Party? — A.  No. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  made  a  contribution  that  yoti  knew  would  find  its  way  to  the 
Conununist  Party? — A.  Well,  if  that  part  of  the  contribution  went  to  the  Com- 
munist Party 

Q.  Well,  you  speak  of  a  rally  at  Madison  Square  Garden,  what  kind  of  a  rally 
was  it,  who  fostered  it? — A.  A.  P.  M.  I  went  to  one  under  the  auspices  of  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization.  I  am  trying  to  think  of  more.  The  last  one  I  went 
to  was  the  transportation  workers.  I  have  nt)t  put  in  any  money  that  was  ear- 
marked for  the  Comnuinist  Party;  no. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Have  you  ever  signed  a  petition  for  the  Communist  Party? 

Miss  Reed.  No  :  I  have  been  very  careful  not  to  do  so. 

Q.  Now,  did  you  ever  take  part  in  a  rally,  or  a  meeting,  or  a  gathering  where 
Communists  predominated,  known  to  yott  to  have  predominated? — A.  I  have 
sometimes  gone  to  Madison  Sqtiare  Garden  to  meetings  called  for  various  big 
rallies.     I  haven't  done  it  very  much.     I  have  done  it  occasionally. 

Q.  What  are  those  variotts  things  that  you  would  go  to? — A.  I  think  the  Soviet 
Union  recognition.  Now  that  was  a  long  time  ago,  bttt  such  big  public  mass  rallies, 
I  have  attended,  sometimes. 

Q.  And,  they  were  mostly  of  (•ommunistie  tendencies,  let's  say? — A.  As  far  as 
the  content  of  the  public  there,  you  mean,  of  the  audience? 

Q.  Either  that  or  fostered  by  members  of  the  Communist  Party? — A.  That 
may  have  been.  That  may  have  been.  I  have  been  to  big  rallies  at  Madison 
Square  Garden  of  a  general  nature. 

Q.  Didn't  you  say  vou  lived  down  on  Twenty-sixth  Street? — A.  No;  On 
Si.xteenth  Street. 

Q.  Sixteenth  Street?— A.  That's  right. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  have  known  Communists  visit  you  down  there  at  small 
meetings? — A.  Well,  through  my  mother's  work;  I  know  she  has  friends  among 
them,  and  she  has  invited  them  to  our  hotise. 

Q.  But  your  mother  doesn't  live  there? — A.  Not  now,  but  she  has  been  living 
there  at  times.  When  she  took  over  the  paper  she  stayed  with  me  for  a 
short  time. 

Q.  I  see,  and  those  men  were  there  at  whose  invitation,  yours  or  your 
mother's? — A.  My  mother's. 

Q.  Never  at  yotirs? — A.  I  would  say  not. 

Q.  Did  yott  ever  entertain  iu  yottr  residence  down  there,  some  of  the  "left 
wing"  members  of  the  Maritime  Union? — A.  Left  wing  members  of  the  Maritime 
Union? 

Q.  Well,  let's  say  known  Communists  iu  the  Maritime  Union.  Did  you 
ever  entertain  them  down  there  at  your  residence?  I  mean,  at  small  meet- 
ings?— ^A.  Well,  I  know  members  of  the  Maritime  Union,  of  the  National  Mari- 
time Union. 

Q.  Do  you  know  them  to  be  Communists? — A.  I  know  them  to  be  left  wingers, 
strong  tinion  men. 

Q.  Do  you  know  them  to  be  Communists? — A.  I  have  never  heard  proof 
that  they  were.     I  have  heard  them  called,  but  as  I  have  been  called. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  satisfy  yourself  in  your  own  mind  as  to  whether  or  not 
they  wereCommunists.  or  didn't  it  make  any  difference  to  yott? — A.  It  didn't 
make  any  differencci. 

Q.  You  would  .lust  as  soon  entertain  Communists  in  your  home  as  you 
would  union  members? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  I  can  understand  your  activities  iu  coiniection  with  the  union  that  you  are 
a  member  of,  but  what  were  your  activities  in  connection  with  the  Maritime 
Union? — A.  My  activities  in  connection  with  thenfi? 

Q.  Yes. — A.  Well,  that's  a  bit  personal.  I  was  very  much  in  love  with  some- 
body in  the  Maritime  Union. 

Q.  Is  that  the  reason  meetings  were  held  at  your  home  for  the  Maritime 
Union  members? — A.  Well,  I  know  that  sometimes  they  ask  me  if  they  could 
go  there. 


UN-AMERICAN  T'UOrACANDA  ACTIVITIES  8665 

Q.  Ami.  do  yon  participate  in  these  meetings?— A.  No;  not  at  all.  It  was 
always  when  I  was  away. 

Q.  Always  when  yon  were  away? — A.  Yes. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  I  have  no  fnrther  qnestions  today,  because  I  think  yon  have 
had  enough  questions  for  the  time  being. 

Mr.  H.\NSON.  Well,  these  are  not  quite  as  di-ep  as  yours.  These  do  not 
require  as  much  thought.     I  thought  it  would  be  refreshing. 

Miss  liKEi).  l>iil  yon  learn  something  too? 

Mr.  Ma.nson.   I  ielt  as  if  I  had  taken  a  postgradnate  course. 

Q  Coming  back  to  the  question  Mr.  Schmidt  asked  about  some  of  your  co- 
workers down  there,  it  was  clear  that  you  didn't  want  to  give  the  names  of  those 
that  had  been  branded,  but  without  telling  me  the  names  of  those  persons,  can't 
you  tell  me  the  names  of  those  among  your  coworkers  that  you  definitely  know 
that  are  Conunuuists?— A.  Not  in  my  office.  I  have  no  proof  of  anyone  in  my 
organization. 

Mr.  ScHMiuT.  Will  you  just  keep  your  voice  up  a  little,  because  we  have  some 
competition. 

Miss  Reeu.  Yes. 

Mr.  ScHMU)T.  Thank  yon. 

Mr.  Hanson.  All  right,  that's  all  I  wanted  to  ask. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Well,  thank  yon  very  much.  Miss  Reed,  and  I  know  that  it  is 
kind  of  putting  you  at  a  disadvantage  and  on  the  spot  to  have  you  come  here 
without  forewarning  and  ask  you  a  lot  of  questions  that  you  perhaps  didn't 
anticipate  were  going  to  be  asked,  but  you  appreciate  that  my  job  is  to  get  at  the 
facts,  and  you  have  nothing  whatever  to  worry  about  if  I  get  the  facts. 

State  of  New    Yohk,   Department  of    Labor.    Investigatory   Hearing  of   the 

Industrial  Commissioner 

Nancy  Reed,  witness. 

Hearing  held  at  8(1  Centre  Street,  New  York  City,  June  23,  1941,  before  Godfrey 
P.  Schmidt.  Deputy  Industrial  Commissioner. 

Witnesses:  Thomas  R.  Owens,  A.  Victor  Hansen.  J.  Henry  Waldman.  .lacob 
Mason. 

.James  .1.  Denike.  senior  hearing  stenographer. 

Mr.  Schmujt.  In  the  first  place.  Miss  Reed.  I  understand  there  was  some  sug- 
gestion that  you  niighr  be  deprived  of  your  vacation  because  of  my  questioning. 

Miss  Reed.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Now,  will  you  explain  that  to  me?  I  want  to  try  to  straighten 
that  nut.  because  1  don't  see  any  reason  why,  because  of  my  questioning,  you 
shonld  lose  any  of  your  vacation. 

Miss  Reeo.  My  vacation  was  scheduled  to  start  on  Friday  at  5  oclock,  and  when 
I  was  served  with  a  subpena  from  the  Dies  committee  as  of  Thursday  afternoon 
I  explained  that  this  schedule  had  been  worked  out  very  carefully,  and  that  since 
the  subpena  said  "forthwith"  I  would  like  to  be  tible  to  arrange  my  schedule 
according  to  the  Department's  convenience,  that  way.  So  Mr.  Birmingham,  I 
tliink  his  name  was.  said  he  would  call  you  up  and  straighten  it  out.  Now.  what 
he  meant  by  tlnit  I  thiidi  was  a  little  confusing,  because  when  I  called  him  the 
following  day  he  said.  "It's  quite  all  right.  You  can  take  it  later,"  and  I  said, 
"Well,  that  isn't  really  what  I  mean." 

Mr.  Schmidt.  What  is  that  date?  Friday,  .June  :iO?  Is  that  the  day  you  were 
.suppo.sed  to  start  yacatif)n? 

Miss  Reh>.  Last  Friday,  yes;  the  20th. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  How  long  were  you  to  go? 

Miss  Reiid.  Three  weeks. 

Mr.  Sciimiut.  And  with  wliom  do  you  make  those  vacation  arrangements? 

JMiss  Rem).  My  local  office.  You  see,  I'm  Jiead  of  the  department,  and  I  have  to 
arrange  for  someone  else  to  take  my  supervisory  work.  That  means  dovetailing 
with  just  one  person,  and  there  was  a  good  deal  of  confusion  in  my  office  .suddenly 
becau.><e  Mr.  Davis  was  suddenly  called  to  handle  the  B  and  C  department,  and 
that  through  the  deputy  managers  mixed  their  vacations  all  up.  and  the  person 
that  I  was  dovetailing  with  was  going  to  pincli  hit  for  them.  So  it  was  most 
important  that  I  take  it  as  scheduled  and  there  had  been  a  great  deal  of  confusion 
ail  week,  so  that's  why  I  .asked  i)articularly. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  You  didn't  answer  my  question.  With  whom  do  you  arrange  to 
take  your  vacation?    What  is  the  name  of  the  iKirson  you 

Miss  Reed.   Mr.  Davis,  the  manager. 

Mr.  Schmidt.   And  you  arrange  with  Mr.  Davis? 

Miss  Reed.  Yes,  sir. 


SQQQ  UN-AMEHICAN   PROPAGANDA  A(  TIVITIKS 

Mr.  Schmidt.  And  you  file  a  schedule,  is  that  it? 

Miss  Reed.  Yes ;  a  month  in  advance,  and  it  had  to  be  juggled  somewhat. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  You  had  to  file  your  schedule  a  month  in  advance?  With  whom 
did  you  file  it? 

Miss  Reed.  I  turn  it  in  to  the  manfiger.  He  in  turn  sends  it  to  the  district 
superintendent. 

Mr.  Schmidt.    Who  is  that? 

Miss  Reed.  Miss  Kennedy.  And,  I  thought  it  went  from  there  to  Albany,  but 
I'm  not  sure. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Well,  I  can  tell  you.  Miss  Reed,  that  I'll  see  to  it  personally 
that  you  don't  lose  any  vacation  on  the  score  of  my  questioning.  Of  course,  I 
want  to  explain  that  I  had  no  knowledge  of  the  Dies  committee  preparation 
of  a  subpena.  I  difin't  have  anything  to  do  with  that.  nu(\  I  take  it  that  the 
Dies  committee  acted  because  of  the  newsjjaper  publicity. 

Miss  Reed.  Yes ;  that's  right. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  So  that 

Miss  Reed.  I  simply  told  them  to  phone  you,  because  they  asked  who  would 
have  authority  to  arrange  it.  and  I  said.  "Well.  Mr.  Schmidt  knows  the  case  very 
well." 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Yes.  Well,  just  ease  your  mind  about  that.  I'll  tell  you  that 
I  guarantee  you  won't  lose  any  vacation  just  on  the  score  of  uiy  asking  you  a 
series  of  (luestions. 

Miss  Reed.  Well,  it's  a  matter  of  being  there  at  a  certain  schedule,  you 
understand.  What's  bothering  me,  because — now  we  have  no  way  of  dove- 
tailing it. 

i\lr.  Schmidt.  Well,  if  necessary,  I'll  see  to  it  they  import  somebody  with 
similar  qualificatiiais  into  youi"  local  office,  and  I  think  that  will  take  care 
of  it. 

Miss  Reed.  Yes ;  one  isn't  so  indispensable. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  That's  right.  And  now.  Miss  Reed,  if  you'll  raise  your  right 
hand,  I'll  swear  you  in. 

Nancy  Reed,  having  been  duly  sworn,  testified  as  follows: 

By  Mr.  Schmidt  : 

Q.  Now,  first  I'll  ask  the  formal  questions  under  oath  i-egardiug  the  Devaney 
Act. — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  at  any  time,  by  word  of  mouth,  willfully  and  deliberately 
advocate,  advise,  or  teach  the  doctrine  that  the  (iovernmenr  of  the  United  States 
or  of  any  State,  or  of  any  political  subdivision  thereof,  should  be  overthrown 
by  force,  violence,  or  any  imlawful  means? — A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  willfully  and  deliberately  advocate,  or  advise,  or  teach,  in 
writing,  that  doctrine? — A.  No. 

Q.  You  understand  what  I  mean? — A.  Yes;  1  have  l)een  reading  this  over 
very  cai-efully. 

Q.  In  other  words,  it  will  make  it  short  if  I  sa.v — that  doctrine,  if  you  under- 
stand mv  referring  back  to  the  doctrine  as  described  in  the  Devaney  Act? — 
A.  Yes. 

Q.  Did  you.  ever  print,  publish,  edit,  issue,  or  sell  any  book,  paper,  document, 
or  written  or  printed  matter,  in  any  form,  containing  or  advocating,  advising  or 
teaching  the  doctrine  that  the  Government  of  the  United  States  or  any  State, 
or  any  political  sul>division  thereof  should  be  overthrown  by  force,  violence, 
or  any  unlawful  means? — A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  advctcate,  advise,  teach,  or  embrace  the  duty  necessary,  or 
the  propriety  of  adfipting  such  a  doctrine  of  unlawful  means,  of  violence? — 
A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  organize  or  help  to  organize,  or  become  a  member  of  any 
society  or  group  of  [lersons.  which  teaches  or  advocates  that  the  Government 
of  the  United  States  or  any  State  or  any  political  subdivision  thereof,  should 
be  overthrown  by  force,  violence,  or  by  any  unlawful  means? — A.  No. 

Q.  Are  you  now  a  member  of  the  Communist  I'arty? — A.  No;  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  Were  you  ever  a  member  of  it? — A.  No,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  participate  in  any  meeting  of  a  fraction  or  nucleus  of  the 
Communist  Party? — A.  No,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  You  were  never  arrested  in  your  life? — A.  No.  WoiUd  you  call  an  auto- 
mobile casualty,  where  I  was  brought  into  the  police  station  and  immediately 
released,  or  something  like  that? 

Q.  No,  no.     Did  you  ever  assume  any  alias? — A.  No. 


rX-A.MKKIl  A.N    I'KOl'AilANDA  AOTIVITIES  8667 

Q.  Or  jtt'U  name,  nr  otlu'i-  kind  of  nanio? — A.  No. 

Q.  Were  you  ever  known  to  the  Conununists,  to  your  knowledKe,  l)y  any 
other  name  than  the  name  of  Nancy  ReedV — A.  Nancy  Reed  only. 

Q.  Do  yon  belong  to  the  Tra(h'  I'nion  Kdncatinnal  League V — A.  Tliat  dot-sn't 
exist  any  more. 

Q.  Did  you  belong  to  itV — A.  Well.  1  had — I  think  in  1921)  tiiere  was  an  othce 
worker's  local  that  I  had  a  card  in  for  about  a  month  or  two,  as  I  recall.  It 
was  just  before  I  went  to  the  Soviet  Union. 

Q.  That  was  a  Comnnuust  organization,  wasn't  it?— A.  1  don't  know.  Not  to 
my  knowledge — the  Trade  I'nion — there  w;is  no  requirement  in  any  way  iM)liti- 
cal  about  it.     Just  a  straight  union. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  belong  to  the  Internati«mal  Lal)or  Defense? — A.  I  have  con- 
tributed sometimes  to  it.  and  I  think  a  little  drive  they  had  I  remember  a 
dollar,  giving  me  a  card.  I  kept  it  for  awhile.  I  have  never — I  don't  know 
whether  lli.-it  was  considered  menibershiii,  but  I  contributeil  to  it. 

Q.  Well,  when  did  you  contrilmte  to  that? — A.  I  tiiiidv  that  time  I  gave  a 
dollar  was  in  19X4.  as  I  remember. 

Q.  In  1984? — A.   It  was  a  long  time  ago. 

Q.  Would  y<ni  be  good  enough  to  write  yoni-  name  three  times  on  that  sheet 
of  paper": — A.  Ye.s.  sir. 

Mr.  ScHMinx.   I'll  introduce  this  into  the  record  as  exhibit  A,  as  of  this  date. 

Q.  At  the  time  that  yon  contributed  to  the  I.  L.  D.  did  you  know  it  was  a 
Communist  organization? — A.  No.     I  still  don't  know  it  is. 

Q.  You  don't  think  it  is  a  t'omnumist  organization  today,  or  was  at  that 
time? — A.  No.  no. 

Q.  Were  yon  born  in  this  country? — A.  Yes:  I  was. 

Q.  In  what  city  were  you  born"/ — A.  Dunstable. 

Q.  Is  that  in  Massachu.setts'.'' — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Were  you  a  member  of  the  league  Against  War  and  Fascism  at  the  time 
when  it  existed  mider  that  name? — A.    (No  response.) 

Q.  Do  yon  recall? — A.  In  my  memory,  it's  the  same  situation  as  the  I.  L.  D.. 
that  I  contributed.  I  certainly  didn't  keep  a  card  as  a  member.  I'm  not  sure 
whether  I  was  or  not.  but  1  would  have  been  if  I — if  I  understood  its  principles 
correctly. 

Q.  That  is  the  same  organization  which  was  later  known  as  the  League  For 
Peace  and  Democracy,  if  yon  recall? — A.  Yes:  but  I  never  was  active  in  it,  so  I 
don't  remember  whether  my  contributions  were  considered  as  member.ship. 

Q.  I  believe  you  said,  in  answer  to  my  questions  based  on  the  Devaney  Act, 
that  you  did  not  believe  in  the  use  of  force,  violence,  or  unlawful  means  for  the 
attainment  of  soci.-il  or  j)olitical  ends? — A.  Are  you  referring  to  the  United  States, 
or  anywhere  else? 

Q.   Yes:  in  the  I'liited  States. — A.   No. 

Q.  In  other  words,  in  no  case  would  it  be  justified  in  the  United  States? — -A.  (No 
response.) 

Q.  Were  you  ever  known  by  the  name  of  Anne  McLonghlin.  to  your  knowl- 
edge?— A.  No. 

Q.  Are  you  sure  <if  that': — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Woidd  you  write  Anne  McLonghlin  on  that  pajn'r,  three  times,  please? — A. 
Yes.     How  do  you  spell  the  "Anne"? 

Q.  We'll  spell  it  A-n-n-e. 

Mr.  ScHMiBT.  I'll  introdiue  into  the  record  of  this  proceeding  specimens  of 
Miss  Reed's  h:uid writing  of  the  name  of  Anne  McLoughlin,  as  repeated  three 
times  on  tliis  docuinent. 

(Received  in  evidence  and  marked  "Exhibit  B"  as  of  this  date — June  23.) 

Q.  Does  that  name  mean  anything  to  you  at  all,  the  name  Anne  McLoughlin? — 
A.  I  have  heard  it. 

Q.  I  mean,  does  it  mean  anything  i>articnlarly  to  yoti? — A.  No. 

Mr.  H-ANSON.   In  what  connection  have  you  heard  it.  Miss  Reed? 

Miss  Rekd.   I  thiidi  it's  a  very  common  name. 

Mr.  H.\NsoN.  Do  you  know  any  person  that  went  by  that  name? 

Miss  Ru:d.  N(»t  offhand  :  no. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  you  know  any  person  that  used  that  name? 

Miss  RhEi).   No. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 

Q.  Do  you  believe  the  Communist  Party  is  the  organized  vanguard  of  the 
working  classes,  composed  of  the  self-sacrificing  section  of  the  proletariat? 


8668  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

A.  I  remember  in  my  last  testimony,  spealviny  about  self-sacrifi.e  and,  that 
is — that  is — I  think  that  could  be  said  of  tliem.     I  thiuli  it  could  be  modilled, 

too,  so  I  don't 

Q.  Well,  for  your  information,  I'll  tell  you  that  in  ease  you  don't  know  it, 
tlie  Conununist  Party,  of  course,  in  this  country,  as  is  true  of  the  Corhmunist 
Party  all  over  the  world,  all  the  sections  of  the  Third  International,  claim  that 
they  are  the  organized  vanguard  of  the  proletariat,  and  I  wondered  whether 
that  agreed  witli  your  view. 

Mr.  Owens.  You  couldn't  answer  that  question  "Yes"  or  "No"  could  you, 
Miss  Reed? 

Miss  Reed.  I  think  it's  a  matter  of  opiniou. 

Mr.  Owens.  You- 

Miss  Reed.  And  belief. 

Mr.  Owens.  Couldn't  answer  it  "Yes''  or  "No''? 
Miss  Reed.  No. 

Q.  Would  you  be  willing  to  deny  that  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United 
States  of  America  is  a  leader  and  organizer  of  the  proletariat,  leading  the 
working  class  in  the  tight  for  revolutionary  overthrow  of  capitalism,  and  for 
the  establishment  of  the  dictatoi-sliip  of  the  proletariat,  and  for  the  estiiblish- 
ment  of  the  Socialist  Soviet  Republic  in  the  United  States*? — A.  No. 

Q.  Y'ou  would  not  be? — A.  Excuse  me.     When  you  said   that — I'm  sorry,   I 

didn't  hear  the  first  part  of  it.    Would  you- 

Q.  I'll  withdraw  that  question  and  answer,  and  I'll  start  fresh. — A.  Mr. 
Schmidt,  may  I  ask  one  thing,  too? 

Q.  Certainly. — A.  Is  this  to  be  a  continuation  of  my  beliefs  and  my  philosor 
phiesV  Is  this  to  be  a  test  of  the  Devany  Act.  or — I  feel,  really,  that  I 
went  through  a  good  deal  the  last  time,  that  I  was  very  willing  to  cooperate 
in  what  you  wanted  to  find  out,  and  I  think  I  did  it  to  the  best  of  my  ability. 
And  I'd  like  to  make  a  statement  or  two  on  my  own,  since  you  did  all  the 
questioning  before. 

Q.  Go  aliead,  I'll  welcome  any  statement  you  want  to  make. — A.  And,  I 
should  have  aslvcd  before  this  thing  began,  just  what  was  the  pni'x^ose  of 
having  me  testify  again,  as  I  did  before,  since  we  had  gone  into  great  detail 
at  that  time.     The  statement  I'd  like  to  make  is  to  the  effect  that  if  I  have 

been  coloi-ed.  red  or  pink,  by  my  mother's  activities who  is  not  a  member 

of  the  Conununist  Party,  but  is  considered  (ioe  by  the  avei-age  tliiuking  person — 
and  because  my  sister  did  once  work  for  the  C<unintern  as  I  stated  before, 
I  certainly  could  be  colored  lily-white  by  the  other  half  of  my  family — my 
father  being  a  minister  of  the  Gospel,  headmaster  of  a  school  previously, 
my  brother  being  an  executive  in  a  conservative  organization,  and  every  one 
of  us  living  in  different  parts  of  the  world,  and  having  very  different  ideas 
on  life,  and  wune  of  us  being  able  to  live  together  more  than  24  liours  at  a 
time,  I)ecause  of  our  individual  beliefs,  perliaps.  So.  this  thing  seems  to  liave 
stennned  from  the  fact  that  the  article  appeared  in  the  paper  about  my 
mother,  winch  was  common  knowledge  a  year  or  so  before.  Tlie  fact  that 
I  went  to  the  Soviet  Union  five  times  total,  and  worked  there  a  year  was 
very  well  known  by  the  admin.istration  of  the  State  department  of  labor 
before  I  was  takfn  on  as  a  worker  (>  years  ago.  I  came  in  on  a  civil-service 
list  as  No.  5  on  the  list,  and  I  stand  on  my  woi-k  record  from  that  point  on. 
I  never  let  my  outside  interests  interfere  with  my  work.  When  it  comes  to 
questioning  to  this  extent,  as  a  result  of  a  newspaper  article,  and  I  under- 
stand from  Frieda  Miller's  letter  to  us  in  the  union  that  an  investigation  was 
already  in  process  before. 

Q.  Well,  if  you  understand  tliat,  then  you'll  understand  it  wasn't  the  result 
of  newspaper  publicity  solely. — A.  Well,  when  I  came  in  the  last  time  you 
presented  me  with  the  new^spaper  article  and  asked  me  if  I  had  read  it  and 
if  the  statement  were  true.  I  know  what  sort  of  thing  the  foul  Hearst  Press, 
and  e(juall.v  foul  World  Telegram  are  apt  to  do  to  an  incident  of  that  sort. 
You  seem  to  have  come  to  a  conclusion  in  youi'  minds  just  after  tliat  time, 
and  you  took  the  thread  of  my  mother's  interest  in  the  Daily  Worker  to  call 
me  in  and  question  me. 

Q.  You  make  a  mistake  when  you  say  we  have  come  to  a  conclusion.  If 
we  had  cctme  to  a  conclusion  you  wouldn't  hie  here  now  in  the  cour.se  of  an 
investigatory  liearing. — A.  Well,  then  I'll  take  it  Itack  about  the  conclusion. 
I  mean  you  did  go  into  this  matter  as  a  result  of  this  newspaper  statement. 
At   least,    it    was    timed   apparently   so.     And,   in   regard    to    the    union,   I   have 


UN-AMERICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8669 

lu'c-n  uiifoiMunnti'ly  connccicd  \\\)  with  Iliis  t'ljisodc  in  tin-  uiiiim  Just  Ix'causi' 
(il  tliis  iiici(h>iit  of  my  iiictiicr  ;i  year  aijn.  aiid  I  tliiiik  that  it's  coiuitlcicly 
covert'd  in  my  past  remarks. 

Q.  Wfll,  sdiiit'  thiniis  miulit  not  be  c-ovt'rcd  in  youi-  past  remarks,  l»ut  for 
Olio  tliinir.  since  I  didn't  put  you  under  oath  at  tha;  time,  1  felt  that  when 
I  did  put  you  under  oaih  I'd  hiive  to  lepeat  some  of  the  past  stajies  of  tlie 
invest ijiat  ion. — A.  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  For  the  other  thing,  1  miglit  say  tliat  in  deierminin,t>:  the  seope  of  my 
examination,  and  therefore  the  seope  of  the  (luestions  which  1  propose  to  you,  I 
am  .tiuided  by  my  interpretation  not  oidy  of  the  Devany  Act,  wliicli  is  an  important 
asiK'ct  of  tile  wliole  pnihlcm,  hut  also  ip.v  interpretation  of  the  ;idmiiiistra  ive 
order,  and  so  forth,  tliat  affect  you.  Now,  let's  consider  for  a  moment,  the  Devany 
Act.  Your  counsel,  Mr.  Leider,  came  in  here  and  suggested  to  me  that  I  might 
possibly  be  mistaken  in  my  interpretation  of  that  act.  I  told  him  that  I  disagreed 
Willi  his  interpretation,  and  I  thought  that  he  was  mistaken.  But  this  much  I'll 
tell  you,  of  what  I  told  him.  I  don't  feel  that  I  am  bound  only  by  direct  questions 
that  pertain  to  the  Devany  Act.  1  feel  that  infereiiiial  and  circumstantial  evi- 
dence can  be  used.  Obviously,  they  must  be  used  with  caution,  and  I  propose  to 
use  that  necessary  caution.  I'm  not  going  to  victimize  anybody  just  because  of 
beliefs.  It  is  not  my  purpose  at  all.  But,  in  testing  the  statement  of  whether 
someone  is  a  member  of  the  Conununist  I'arty,  it  seems  to  me  that  I  can  go  beyond 
that  and  test  the  ideology,  because  after  all  what  is  the  C.  P.  except  a  system  of 
ideologies".' — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Do  you  see? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now.  that's  the  point  of  departure  of  my  questions,  and A.  IMay  I  ask 

one  thing,  if  you  will? 

Q.  Surely.— A.  The  statement  that  appeared  in  the  foul  Journal  American  last 
Thursday 

Q.  I  have  that  here,  somewhere.— A.  It  had  a  quote  from  me  that  I  had  by  my 
own  admission  worked  in  the  Soviet  Union  as  a  labor  investigator.  Now,  that, 
of  course,  is  not  my  words  at  all,  and  I'd  like  to  know  how  they  got  so  much 
Information. 

Q.  Thai's  the  very  question  I'd  like  to  know.  Did  you  speak  to  anyone? — A.  I 
certainly  did  not. 

Q.  Well.  I  know  they  didn't  get  it  from  me.  They  didn't  get  it  from  me.— 
A.  Well,  I  don't  answer  any  newspaper  reporters. 

Q.  I  i-ecall  very  well  when  Woltman  called  you  he  repeated  in  his  column  that 
you  didn't  answer  him.  and  I  might  put  this  on  the  record  now — Do  you  recall 
you  were  telephoned  by  Frederic  Woltman  of  the  World  Telegram  ^sometime 
ago? — A.  I  do. 

Q.  And  he  addressed  you  certain  questions,  first  about  the  union,  isn't  that 
right?— A.  Right. 

Q.  And,  after  that,  he  asked  you  a  question  that  you  considered  personal  to 
yourself?— A.  Right. 

Q.  \na  that  question  was,  in  efl'ect- 1  don't  remember  the  words  used. 
In  tact.  I  know  that  the  words  used  were.  He  asked  vou  whether  you  were 
a  Communist  at  that  time? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Is  that  right? — A.  Yes,   sir. 

Q.  And  what  was  your  answer  to  him?— A.  I  don't  answer  questions  at  all 

Q.  \ou  did  not  deny  at  that  time  that  you  were  a  Communist?— A.  Well,  I 
certainly  didn't,  because  I  don't  give  any  newspapers  any  information,  except 
with  or  (jn  advice  of  counsel.     That's  reasonable,  I'm  sure. 

Q.  And  that  is  the  reason  you  gave  me  when  I  questioned  vou  heretofore, 
on  that  point'/- A.  Right. 

Q.  Now.  wi're  there  any  othei-  statements  you  wanted  to  make,  Miss  Reed, 
before  we  went  on'/- A.  Well,  perhaps  you'll  let  me  interject  them  as  thev— 
as  I  think  of  them? 

Q.  Certainly.  Feel  free  to  do  that  throughout.  Now,  you  have  already  said 
you  never  registered  as  a  memlier  of  the  Conununist  Party;  is  that  right'? — A. 
When  you  say  "registered"  you  use  that  wovd  in  relation  to-^ 

Q.  To  the  Conununist  Party  records? — A.  Yes. 

(.).  H:!ve  you  ever  registered  as  a  member  of  the  Conununist  Partv?  In  vot- 
ing'.'— A.  No. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  participated  in  the  meetings  of  any  shop  unit,  street  unit, 
or  town  unit,  or  branch  of  the  Communist  P.-irty,  to  .vour  kiinwledge"? — A.  Well, 
I  have  been  to  an  awful  lot  of  meetings  in  my  life. 

Q.  You  don't  remember A.  P:specially  in  the  last  10  year.s. 


8(j70  un-amekk'an  pkopacanda  activities 

Q.  YoTi  don't  remember  whether  any  were  branches  of  the  Communist  Party? — 
A.  I  may  have  come,  as  an  invited  gnest,  to  some  of  those. 

Q.  You  say  you  may  have.  Do  you  recall  whether  you  did  attend  a  branch 
meeting? — A.  I  don't  recall,  offhand. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  attend  a  section  convention  of  the  Communist  Party? — A.  No. 
Q.  Not  to  your  knowledge? — A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  attend  a  meeting  of  the  section  committee  of  the  Communist 
Party?— A.  Nb. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  attend  a  meeting  of  the  section  bureau  of  flie  Communist 
Party? — A.  No,  no. 

Q  Did  you  ever  attend  a  meeting  of  the  unit  l>ureau  of  the  Communist  Party? — 
A.  No. 

Q.  ()t  the  branch  bureau? — A.  No. 

Q.  Did  yo'U  ever  attend  a  district  conventi(m  of  the  Communist  Party '?^A.  No. 
Q.  Did  yoiT  ever  attend  a  meeting  of  the  district  committee  of  the  Communist 
Party? — A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  attend  a  uarional  conventidii  of  the  Ci.mmunisf  Party? — A.  I 
think  there  was  a  mass  meeting  in  ^Madison  Square  Garden,  as  part  of  that,  I  did 
go  to  it. 

Q.  When  was  that? — A.  I  think  it  was  in  June,  because  it  was  very  hot,  but  I 
don't  remember  exactly  what  year.  AjJiii'oximarely  4  years  ago,  but  I'*!  like  to  say 
here  that  wlit^ii  ;\h'.  Hanson  (juestioned  me  the  last  time  about  attending  (V/m- 
munist<-ontrolled  meetings  1  believe  he  said — and  Madison  Square  Garden,  I 
didn't  remember  that  one,  and  I  do  now  remember  it. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  attend  a  meeting  of  th^  central  conunittee  of  the  Communist 
Party?— A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  attend  a  meeting  of  the  lu/litical  bureau  of  flie  Communist 
I'arty  of  the  I'nited  States? — A.  No. 

Q.  Were  you  ever  invited  to  attend  any  meetings  such  as  rlie  ones  I  have  indi- 
cated, that  is  to  say,  meetings  of  groups,  meetings  of  the  branches,  of  the  sections, 
of  the  section  committee  meetings,  of  the  naticaial  conventions,  of  the  central  i-om- 
mittee,  any  of  those'.' — A.  No.    As  I  said  befoie.  if  I  was  invited  as  a  guest  to  some 

of  those  small  group.s 

Q.  Was  it  a  shop  unit? — A.  I  don't  know.    I  don't  remember. 
Q    Where  was  the  meeting  held?    Do  you  remember  that? — A.  No. 
Q.  What  kind  of  workers  were  there?    Do  you  remember  that'? — A.  No;  I  don't, 
frankly. 

Q.  Who  was  the  section  organizer  who  invited  you? — A.  I  don't  remember  the 
name  either.    It  was  a  long  time  ago.  if  it  happened,  and  I'm  saying,  because  it's 

vague  in  my  mind,  and  if  I  went  to-  those  as 

Q.  Would  it  be  a  section,  I  mean  a  unit  organizer,  who  invited  you,  or  the  "ad — 
prop"  director'? — A.  I  don"t  know.  Mr.  Schmidt. 
Q.  You  don't  know  that"? — A.  (No  response.) 
Q.  Yen  don't  know?— A.  No. 

Q.  When  you  went  to  Russia,  did  you  attend,  or  were  you  invited  to  attend  the 
World  Congress  of  the  C.  I.,  the  Communist  International? — A.  No;  I  was  not. 

Q.  Did  you  attend,  or  were  you  invited  to  attend,  the  enlarged  plenim  of  the 
C.  C.  I.,  that  is  the  Executive  Committee  of  the  Communist  International? — A. 
No.  May  I  say  something  here  that  I  thought  of  in  regard  to  that  newspaper 
article? 

Q.  Yes. — A.  It  has  in  italics,  that  is,  the  one  I  saw  did. 

Q.  Yes ;  this  has  the  italics. — A.  "Tliat  only  trusted  members  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  are  allowed  to  work  in  tlie  Soviet  Union".     Is  that  right? 

Q.  So  it  says  here.  Is  that  cor'recf? — A.  Well,  I  think  you  know  as  well  as 
I  do  that  that  is  absolutely  incorrect.  You  know  the  job  I  did  there  in  the 
Commissariat  of  Labor? 

Q.  No;  I  don't  know,  exactly.— A.  I  thought  I  mentioned  it  the  last  time. 
Well,  I  interviewed  all  the  foreigners  coining  there  applying  for  jobs. 

Q'.  You  worked,  then,  in  the  Commissariat  of  Labor,  rather  than  in  the 
Coo]terative  Pulilishing  Society  of  Foreign  AVorkers? — A.  I  worked  there  for 
about  2  or  3  months  before  this  other  job  was  organized,  and  it  was  necessary, 
and  then  they  transferred  me  from  that  job. 

Q.  I  don't  quite  follow  that.     You  worked A.  At  the  Cooperative  Publish- 
ing Society  of  Foreign  Workers  in  U.S.S.R. 
Q.  Before  you  worked  in  the  Commissariat  of  Labor? — A.  That's  right. 
Q.  Now,  was  it  necessary  for  you  to  be  a   Communist  Party  member,  or  a 
sympathizer  of  communism,  with  the  Communist  doctrine,  to  work  in  the  Coop- 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8671 

erative  Publishing  Society  of  Foreign  Workers  in  the  U.  S.  S.  R. ? — A.  No;  it 
was  not.  I  was  never  asked.  I  was  never  asked  before  they  hired  me,  whether 
I  was  or  not. 

Q.  Was  it  necessary  for  yt)u  to  sliow  credentials  that  yon  wore  a  party  mem- 
ber, or  to  adopt  the  party  line,  or  the  line  of  the  Communist  International,  for 
you  to  obtain  and  hold  a  position  in  the  Commissariat  of  Labor  in  Soviet  Rus- 
sia?—A.  No. 

Q.  What  was  that? — A.  No;  I  say.  No  credentials  whatsoever.  I  was  not 
asked  that  question. 

Q.  Your  sister,  Mary,  did  work  for  the  Cooperative  Publishing  Society  of 
Foreign  Workers  in  the  U.S.S.R.,  is  that  right? — A.  No.  She  worked  for  the 
Comintern. 

Q.  I'm  sorry.     Just  what  was  her  position  in  the  Comintern? — A.  Translator. 

Q.  And  when  was  that? — A.  She  has  been  there  since  1927,  I  believe.  Still 
there.  Sbe's  not  working  for  them,  as  I  said  before.  For  the  last  5  or  6 
years,  I  think.  I  think  it  was  1935.  She  has  been  ill  with  heart  trouble.  She 
is  doing  a  little  free-lance  writing  for  the  publishing — for  the  State  Publishing 
House. 

Q.  Which  is  the  same  as  the  Cooperative? — A.  No. 

Q.  What  is  the  State  Publishing  House?— A.  Well,  I  think  it's  the  State— I 
really  don't  know.  I  know  they  have  one  big  central  publishing  house  in  Lenin- 
grad and  one  in  Moscow. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  at  any  time  conduct  propaganda  or  agitation  to  induce  people 
to  correspond  with  the  programs  and  the  decisions  of  the  Third  International? — 
A.  No,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  Was  your  sister  known  by  any  other  name,  except  Mary  Reed? — A.  No. 

Q.  She  has  no  alias,  to  your  knowledge? — A.  No. 

Q.  Would  you  reject  the  Commuiust  doctrine  and  program  if  it  is  the  Com- 
munist doctrine  and  program  which  is  embodied  in  the  following  language?: 
"The  class  struggle  in  almost  all  of  the  countries  of  Europe  and  America  is 
entering  the  phase  of  civil  war.  Under  such  conditions  the  Communists  can 
have  no  confidence  in  bourgoisie  law.  They  must  everyone  create  a  parallel 
illegal  apparatus  which,  at  the  decisive  moment  could  assist  the  party  in  per- 
forming its  duty  to  the  revolution.  In  all  countries  where,  in  consequence  of 
martial  law  or  exceptional  laws  the  Com.munists  are  unable  to  carry  on  their 
work  legally,  a  combination  of  legal  and  illegal  work  is  absolutely  necessary." 

Miss  Reed.  INIay  I  ask  first,  who  is  this  gentleman  here? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  This  is  Mr.  Waldman,  Mr.  Hanson's  assistant. 

A.  You  say — "if  this  is  the  Communist  doctrine."  Now,  thei'e  are  things 
about  the  Communist  philosophy  that  I  agree  with  very  heartily.  There  are 
also  things  that  I  don't.  I  have  not  read  this  my.self.  I  would  want  to  study 
it  before  I'd  say  yes  or  no  to  that.     And  I  can't  say  offhand,  so  I  won't. 

Q.  Well,  can  you  say,  if  I  show  it  to  you,  to  read? 

A.  I'd  rather  not.  It's  very  meaty  thinking,  as  most  of  those  things  are,  and 
it  can  require  modification  or  elaboration. 

Q.  Well,  the  meat  of  it  is  very  simple,  if  you  read  the  English;  it  simply 
means  that  in  furtherance  of  the  revolution  Communists  must  be  prepared  to 
combine  legal  and  illegal  work. 

A.  I'd  rather  not  answer  that,  because  I'm  not — I  don't  feel  qualified.  I  have 
said  before,  there  are  parts  of  their  philosophy  that  I  agree  with. 

Q.  Do  you  acknowledge  any  duty  to  revolution?     That  was  the  phrase  here. 

A.  No.     All  of  this  is  assuming  a  good  deal,  Mr.  Schmidt,  and  I  don't. 

Q.  All  right.  That's  the  answer,  then.  And,  of  course,  if  you  don't  acknowl- 
edge a  duty,  a  revolutionary  duty,  then  you  can't  consider  yourself  guilty,  as 
Communists  have  considered  other  guilty,  of  a  betrayel  of  revolutionary  duty? 

Mr.  OwKNS.  I'm  not  sure  that  IMiss  Keed  clearly  understands  that  question. 
Do  you  understand  that  question,  Miss  Reed? 

Miss  Reed.  That  last  one — it  is  very  confusing. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  I'll  withdraw  that  question.     I'll  put  it  in  again. 

Q.  Since  you  say  you  acknowledge  no  duty  to  revolution,  it  would  follow,  I 
take  it,  that  for  ymi  at  least,  there  is  no  such  thing  as  a  betrayal  of  revolutionary 
duty,  even  if  the  Communists  talk  about  such  a  betrayal? — A.  I  think  that  is 
still  involved,  Mr.  Schmidt,  and  I  think  it  isn't  answerable  by  "yes"  or  "no." 
And  I  think  I  cannot  go  into  the  whole  breadth  of  the  philosophy  and  beliefs 
and  discuss  with  you  just  which  part  of  it  I  support  in  my  own  mind  and  those 
that  I  don't. 

62626 — 41— vol.  14 33 


8672  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Q.  Do  you  believe  that  without  revohitionary  overthrow  of  capitalism,  no 
democratic  I'eorganizatiou  will  save  mankind  from  imperialist  war? 

A.  No,  I  don't  believe  that.  I  really  think,  to  pick  out — as  you  have  aU 
through  these  documents — little  pieces  that  you  think  would  analyze  just  what 
I  agree  with  and  what  I  don't  agree  with,  is  a  mistake.  I,  perhaps,  can  pick 
out  for  you  some  that  I  do  agree  with  and  some  that  I  don't  and  do  it  better 
than 

Q.  Well,  the  only  reason  why A.  This  is  a  long  process  of  picking  out  parts, 

all  of  which  are  related  to  the  whole  article,  and  which  in  themselves  don't 
really  substantiate  anything.     I  think  it's  a  mistake  to  continue  this,  really  I  do. 

Q.  I'm  going  to  ask  you  to  be  patient  with  my  method  of  procedure.  I  have 
a  special  reason  for  quoting  language,  rather  than  using  my  own.  I  could 
easily  use  my  own  language. — A.  I  think  it  would  be  a  lot  simpler  for  me  to 
understand,  Mr.  Schmidt,  that  those,  some  of  those  passages,  all  of  which  are 
tied  in  together  with  the  whole  thesis.  I"m  sure  a  great  many  people  who  have 
been  to  the  Soviet  Union  would  agree  with  a  lot  of  those  things  in  there,  and 
not  with  everything,  and  it  seems  to  be  your  point  is  to  prove  either  tliat  I 
believe  in  everything  or  not. 

Q.  Oh,  no.  I'm  not  a  bit  impressed  with  that  as  my  point.  As  a  matter  of 
fact,  I'll  be  frank  to  say  there  are  some  things  in  the  Communist  doctrine  that 
I  myself  believe. — A.  Well,  I  think  that  is  vei'y  creditable.  I  know  a  lot  of 
people  who  have  been  there  and  come  back  the  way  I  feel  about  it — interested 
in  the  thing — and  I  think  this  whole  war  situation  puts  a  very  different  slant 
on  things  too. 

Q.  I  have  no  doubt  it  puts  a  very  different  slant  on  things — it  makes  patriots 

(Hit  of  the  Daily  Worker  and A.  I  don't  believe  that.     I  mean,  when  I  heard 

John  Steele  speak  jesterday  over  the  radio  from  London,  he  praised  the  Soviet 
Union  for  many  things,  he  even  praised  Stalin.  He  said  he  was  no  fool,  and 
said  other  thing's  equally  complimentary.  And  he  said  "Now  I  suppose  I'll  be 
called  a  Bolshevik,  and  I'm  not."  And  that's  the  thing  that  I  have  been  called 
for  so  long  that  I'm  practically  immune  to  it,  because  I  have  been  interested 
in  the  Soviet  Union  for  10  or  12  years  and  I  have  helped  on  that  Committee 
for  Recognition  at  the  time  before  we  recognized  them,  and  I  have  consistently 
seen  things  that  I  value  very  highly  in  the  Soviet  Union.  Now,  the  trend  of 
events  and  the  whole  war  hysteria,  and  this  accusation  about  my  being  my 
mother's  daughter,  and  she  being  connected  with  the  Daily  Worker,  all  puts  a 
very  black  light  on  me  at  present.  And  there  are  people  who  know  me  for 
years  and  years  as  a  good  worker.    And  I  have  not — — 

Q.  Have  I  given  any  evidence  that  I  have  thought  the  less  of  you  because  you 
are  your  mother's  daughter? — A.  Well,  it  certainly  has  been  brought  in.  and  my 
sister  has  been  brought  in. 

Q.  Well,  that A.  I'd  like  to  bring  in  something  about  my  father,  if  you  are 

interested  in  that,  I  mean. 

Q.  Certainly,  go  ahead. — A.  In  all  my  family— — 

Q.  I  have  no  objections  to  your  bringing  in  something  about  your  father. 
That's  perfectly  agreeable  to  me. — A.  Well,  I  mean,  it's  all  part  of  the  picture, 
and  you  want  to  get  a  whole  picture.  Perhaps  I'm  suffering  a  little  bit,  not 
having  had  a  vacation,  but  I  seem  to  be  going  over  this  ground  so  many  times. 
I  frankly  don't  see — and  I  thought  after  last  time,  we  went  over  all  this,  and 
that  this  business  of  picking  spots  out  of  all  these  periodicals  and  things — 
really,  didn't  tell  very  nmch,  did  it?  I  mean,  when  I  tell  you  definitely  that  I 
believe  in  some  of  it  and  I  don't  believe  in  other  parts  of  it,  and  I'm  not  a 
Conununist,  and  I — and  that  I'm  my  mother's  daughter,  etc..  etc. 

Q.  Well,  I  think,  Miss  Reed,  that  statement  of  yours  is  the  very  basis  why  I 
would  continue  this  line.  You  say  that  you  believe  in  some  of  it  and  don't 
believe  in  other  parts  of  it.  That's  precisely  what  I  understood  up  to  now,  and 
because  I  wanted  to  isolate  what  you  believe  in  from  what  you  don't  believe  in. 
I  felt  the  only  way  I  could  do  it  is  to  give  you  excerpts  from  acknowledged 
Communist  sources,  and  ask  you  whether  you  did  believe  or  did  not  believe  in 
them. — A.  Well,  excerpts  which  are  part  of  a  whole,  documents  which  in  them- 
selves as  picked  out  cannot  be  good  proof  of  anything  at  all.  I  can  read  these 
things  through  and  believe  in  part  of  it  and  not  in  another  part  of  it. 

Q.  That's  right.  That's  right.  And  I  just  want  to  find  out  what  you  believe 
in.  That's  why  I'm  asking  you. — A.  Well,  I  stick  to  the  Devaney  law.  I  know 
it  practically  by  heart,  and  that  seems  to  be  involved  in  all  these  questions 
that  you  are  asking  me. 


UN-AMEUICAN   I'lK  H'Ad  AM  >A    A( '  11  \- 1  IIKS  8673 

Q.  That  is  involved,  bnt  that  is  not  the  only  thing  I'm  considering. — A.  That, 
I  understood,  was  what  you  told  me  in  the  very  beginning  was  the  reason  for 
your  questioning,  wlien  I  first  came  in. 

Q.  It  was,  at  that  time;  yes.  Here,  let  me  ask  a  general  question  before  I 
again  address  myself  to  these  articles.  Do  you  know  enough  about  the  Com- 
munist doctrine,  the  Communist  line  in  this  country  to  be  able  to  tell  me 
whether  or  not  Communists  advocate  revolutionary  means,  means  of  violence 
and  lawlessness  if  the  dictatorship  of  the  pi-oletariat  can  be  advanced  by  those 
means? — A.  I  don't  think  I  know  that  question ;  no. 

Q.  To  put  it  more  simply,  does  the  Communist  Party  line  and  the  Com- 
miuiist  program,  and  the  decisions  of  the  Comintern,  do  all  of  those  sources 
repudiate  the  doctrine  that  the  end  justifies  the  means,  in  all  cases? — ^A.  (No 
response.) 

Q.  The  end.  of  course,  being  the  dictatorship  of  the  proletariat,  or  socialism, 
or  communism,  depending  upon  what  stage  of  advantagement  you  pick. — A.  I 
don't  know  that. 

Q.  You  don't  know  that,  either? — ^A.  No. 

Q.  Well,  you  will  concede,  won't  you,  that  Stalin  knows  as  well  as  any  man 
living  what  the  Communist  program  and  the  Communist  line  entails? — A.  I 
should  judge  so ;  yes. 

Q.  In  an  article  in  the  Communist  of  February  1935,  volume  14,  No.  2,  the 
article  being  called  the  Socialist  Revolution  in  the  United  States,  Stalin  is 
quoted  as  having  said :  "Is  an  upheaval  of  this  kind,  is  a  radical  transforma- 
tion of  the  old  bourgeois  system,  possible  without  a  forcible  revolution?  Is 
it  possible  without  establishing  the  dictatorship  of  the  proletariat?  Obviously 
not.  To  think  that  such  a  revolution  can  be  carried  out  peacefully  within  the 
framework  of  bourgeois  democracy,  within  the  framework  of  the  system  that 
is  adapted  to  maintain  bourgeois  rule,  means  one  of  two  things ;  it  either  means 
madness,  an  inability  to  understand  the  ordinary  significance  of  words,  or  else 
it  means  a  cynical  repudiation  of  the  proletarian  revolution."  That's  one  quota- 
tion, and  it  refei's  in  this  quotation  to  a  previous  part  of  the  article,  where  it 
.said  :  "The  fundamental  task  of  the  bourgeois  revolution  is  to  seize  power,  and  to 
adapt  that  power  to  the  already  existing  bourgeois  economy.  The  fundamental 
task  of  the  proletariat  revolution  is,  on  seizing  power,  to  construct  a  new 
socialist  economy."  [The  publication  is  handed  to  the  witness.] — A.  Will  you 
let  me  see  that? 

Q.  Surely. — A.  I  am — I  never  have  taken  to  politics  in  any  way  easily.  It 
is  very  ditiicnlt  for  nie.  Right  now.  I  have — I  think  you  can  appreciate  the 
week  end  heat — and  I  would  have  to  study  very  very  long  and  arduously  before 
I  could  answer,  Mr.  Schmidt.  I'm  not  in  any  mental  state,  with  all  this  thing 
I  have  been  through,  to  go  and  put  my  mind  on  answering  these  very  de<?p 
theoretics"!  questions. 

Q.  Well,  I  brought  that  quotation  f)Ut  because  you  had  admitted  a  moment 
ago  you  didn't  know  that  the  Communist  Party  and  the  Communist  Party 
program,  the  world  over,  stood  for  revolutionary  means,  force  and  violence,  and 
illegal  means,  when  they  were  deemed  necessary  by  the  vangiiard  to  establish 
the  dictatorship  of  the  proletariat. — A.  I  understood  you  to  explain  last  that 
the  Conunuuist  Party  of  America  was  sepanite  from  the  International.  Now, 
I'm  nor  prepared  to  go  into  this  theory.  I  have  told  you  befoi-e  what  I  stand  for 
and  what  I  believe.  You're  much  bettei-  at  this  sort  of  stuff  than  I  am. 
I — read  this  first 

Q.  Do  yon  believe  that  the  Commiun'sr  Party  is  out  to  carry  on  a  i^ystematic 
and  persistent  connnunislic  work  in  trade-unions,  and  W()rkers'  industrial 
councils,  and  cooperative  societies,  and  in  mass  organizations? 

A.  That  all  depends  on  how  it's  done.     I  don't  believe  in  it  offhand. 

Q.  You  acknowledge  no  duty  on  your  own  part  to  devote  your  entire  activity 
to  the  interest  of  really  revolutionary  propaganda  and  agitation,  along  the 
Conununist  line? — ^A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  acknowledge  any  duty  to  give  all  possible  snijport  to  the  Soviet 
Republic  piihlicMtions? — A.  No.  None,  other  than  what  Chuichill  has  just  is- 
sued— Out  to  Fight  the  Nazi  System. 

Q.  When  you  were  here  the  last  time  you  took  the  position  1  think  that  you 
were  opposed  to  all  war. — A.  I  hate  war. 

Q.  You  still  are  opposed  to  all  war? — A.  I  still  hate  war.  Mr.  Schmidt.  I 
said  rhat  rather  glibly  abctut  Churchill's  statement,  that  we  don't  question  who 
our  neighbor  is.  as  long  as  they  are  fighting  a  common  foe,  and  when  you  said 


8674  UN-AMERICAN  PROPA(JANDA  ACTIVITIES 

all  aid  toward  Soviet,  I  meaut  in  this  respect— not  less  than  any  military  aid 
at  all. 

Q.  Do  you  believe  that  the  Communist  Party  in  the  United  States  has  become 
the  trusted  vanguard  of  the  working  classes? 

A.  No;  I  don't  think  I  can  say  that. 

Q.  Do  you  think  the  working  class  ought  to  regard  it  as  their  trusted  van- 
guard and  beloved  organizer?— A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  believe  that  the  proletarian  dictatorship  is  the  way  out  of  social, 
political,  and  economic  ills  today? — A.  Where? 

Q.  In  America. — A.  No ;  I  think  they  have  done  it  in  the  Soviet  Union.  That 
is  their  business  and  entirely  apart  fi'om  this  country. 

Q.  Do  you  think  it  is  the  historic  mission  of  the  working  classes  to  effect  a 
revolutionary  overthrow  of  the  capitalist  system  in  this  country? — A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  think  the  Communist  Party  is  the  only  party  that  fights  uncom- 
promisingly for  the  interest  of  the  workers  in  this  country? — A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  acknowledge  any  obligation  to  fulfill  the  decisions  of  the  World 
Congress  and  the  committees  of  the  Communist  International — A.  No. 

Q.  Have  you  read  the  program  of  the  Communist  International — A.  I  remen>- 
ber  starting  it  once,  but  I  certainly  never  got  through  it. 

Q.  Do  you  acknowledge  that  program  as  an  outline  of  your  duty  in  handling 
political  or  social  or  economic  problems? — A.  No,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  Where  did  you  receive  your  high-school  education?— A.  Cambridge. 

Q.  England? — A.  Massachusetts.  I  had  so  many  schools.  That  was  the  only 
actual  high  school  that  I  went  to.    I  went  to  other  schools. 

Q.  You  went  to  high  school  in  England,  too,  didn't  you? — A.  Well,  it  was 
called  Oxford  High  School  for  Girls,  but  I  don't  think  it  was  the  same  as  our 
high  school  here. 

Q.  I  see.    You  went  to  Smith  College,  then,  for  a  while? — A.  I  did. 

Q.  And  Radcliffe?— A.  Right. 

Q.  And  Simmons? — A.  Right. 

Q.  After  that,  where  did  you  go'? — A.  I  went  to  work. 

Q.  You  worked  first  for  wliom? — A.  William  Filene  &  Sons. 

Q.  After  that,  for  whom  did  you  woi'k? — A.  The  Brooklyn  Bureau  of  Charities 
was  my  next  big  job.     I  may  have  had  quite  a  few  little  ones  in  between  there. 

Q.  And  after  that? — A.  Then  I  worked  for  Miss  Odenkrantz  in  the  employ- 
ment center  for  handicapped,  approximately  4Vj  years. 

Q.  And  vou  stopped  that  around  1931? — A.  No;  it  was  before  that.  I  think — 
yes ;  1931,  that's  right. 

Q.  And  after  that,  where  did  you  work? — A.  I  went  to  the  Soviet  Union  for 
that  year ;  that  was  the  winter  of  1931  and  1932. 

Q.  And  that  was  the  time  when  you  worked  at  first  for  the  Cooperative 
Publishing  House? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  And  later  for  the  Commissariat  of  Labor  in  Russia? — A.  That's  right. 

Q.  What,  exactly,  were  your  duties  in  working  first  for  the  Cooperative  Pub- 
lishing House  and  then  for  the  Commissiariat  of  Labor? — A.  A  very  minor  job. 
I  did  some  typing  and  proofreading  for  the  publishing  house. 

Q.  In  English?— A.  Yes. 

Q.  Do  you  speak  Russian? — A.  No.  Then  I  was  asked  to  be  transferred  to 
this  Commissariat  of  Labor  job,  because  they  needed  someone  to  interview 
incoming  foreigner  workers  and  I  had  had  employment  service  and  they  were 
very  anxious  to  have  me  do  that,  so  I  was  transferred  to  that  job. 

Q.  And  you  did  interview  American  worker.s? — A.  American  engineers  and 
workers  of  all  kinds.  I  had  a  job  for  1,200  Canadian  coal  miners  1  day  and  I 
sent  to  Miss  Odenkrantz,  to  put  into  clearance. 

Q.  And  that  was  the  brunt  of  your  work  for  the  Commissariat  of  Labor? — 
A.  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  Placing  experienced  technical  people? — A.  I  really  didn't  place  them.  I 
sent  them  with  an  interpreter,  after  I  registered  them,  with  an  interpreter  to  the 
Trust  itself,  which  is  the  way  the  thing  is  set  up  there,  and  they  in  turn 
selected  them  and  sent  them  to  jobs. 

Q.  Were  you  guided  by  an  employer  specifications  in  making  those  selections? — 
A.  No.  They  were  so  hard  up  for  people  at  that  time  they — they,  as  I  say — I 
Bent  6  Canadians  to  this  coal  trust,  and  got  an  order  back  for  1,200  more  just 
like  them. 

Q.  Weren't  they  careful  at  least  to  try  to  keep  out  Fascists  or  Gestapo? — 
A.  No ;  not  at  that  time.  The  people  could  come  in  as  tourists  and  change  over 
to  a  worker's  visa  very  easily. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8675 

Q.  All  right.  Then  after  you  came  back  from  Russia  you  worked  where? — 
A.   (No  response.) 

Q.  In  November  ll>32  you  came  back,  didn't  you,  or  thereabouts? — A.  Along 
in  there ;  yes.  I  worked  for  the  New  York  State  Employment  Service,  on  their 
temporary  pay  roll,  in  the  Brooklyn  ottice  for  about  6  months.  I  think  it  was 
May  when  tiiey  were  through  at  that  particular  job. 

Q.  And,  after  May,  did  you  go  bark  to  Russia  for  awhile? — A.  No;  I  was  out 
of  work  for  about  5  months,  until  the  fall  again.  Then  I  worked — I  had  picked 
up  jobs,  but  the  next  big  job  was  with  the  Federal  Interviewer  Transient 
Bureau  and  that  was  until  about  a  year — I  think  it  was. 

Q.  Was  it  September  of  1934  that  you  worked  as  a  placement  interviewer? — 
A.  Yes ;  in  the  Home  Relief  Bureau,  until  my  appointment  to  the  State. 

Q.  And  after  your  appointment  to  the  State,  in  the  division  of  placement,  did 
you  go  to  Russia  again? — A.  I  went  on  one  more  trip,  I  think  it  was  in  1937, 
my  last  trip,  or  was  it — I  know  I  went  in  1937  for  my  vacation,  I  made  five 
altogether— 1929,  1930,  1931,  and  in  1935  I  believe  I  went  for  2  weeks— I  was 
there  and  then  1937.     Yes ;  that's  right,  that's  right. 

Q.  When  you  went  in  1935 A.  It  was  before  I  took  the  State  job,  that's 

right. 

Q.  Just  Immediately  before  you  took  the  State  job? — A.  Yes;  I  had  a  month's 
vacation,  and  I  went  over  and  back. 

Q.  You  didn't  work  in  Russia  at  that  time? — A.  No;  I  went  there  for  a 
vacation. 

Q.  Well,  when  you  made  out  your  application  for  civil-service  employment  you 
didn't  fsiet  forth  your  employment  in  Soviet  Russia,  did  you? 

A.  I  don't  remember  that — whether  I  did  or  not.  But  it  was — mainly  be- 
cause I  left  the  job  with  Miss  Odenkrantz  to  be  married,  and  I  left  that  year  out. 

Q.  I  don't  understand  what  your  marriage  has  to  do  with  your  employment 
record. — A.  Well,  I  left  Miss  Odenkrantz  to  be  married. 

Q.  Is  that  the  time  you  went  to  Russia? — A.  In  19.31,  or — yes;  I  went  in  1931. 
Then  my  plans  changed  and  I  got  a  job  over  there,  and  I  stayed  there  for  a 
year. 

Q.  But,  you  see,  you  made  your  application  out  for  civil-service  employment 
in  1935  or  1936,  as  I  recall  it.— A.  That's  right. 

Q.  Now,  at  that  time  you  did  not  insert  the  record  of  your  employment  in 
Soviet  Russia? — ^A.  Well,  if  I  didn't,  it  was,  perhaps,  because  I  felt  it  had  no 
bearing  on  my  personnel  work,  and  I  still  don't  see  that  it  was  required.  I 
don't  remember  at  all  my  reason  for  it.  I  just  know  that  I  have  made  out  a 
good  many  of  those  blanks  and  just  put  down  at  that  time  which  was  true,  the 
reason  for  leaving.     That's  what  it  was  there. 

Q.  You  don't  know  of  any  other  reason  why  you  omitted  it  except  what  you 
have  just  given? — A.  No;  I  don't,  because  it  was  common  knowledge,  everybody 
knew  it — when  I  came  back — that  I  had  worked  there. 

Q.  You  suggested  that  you  didn't  think  that  your  employment  in  Russia  had 
anything  to  do  with  your  job.  the  job  you  were  looking  for. — A.  Well,  I  don't 
think  to  this  day  that  it  would  have  any  particular  bearing.  If  you're  indicating 
that  I  left  it  out  for  a  reason,  that  it  would  be  misunderstood — I  don't  have  any 
recollection  of  doing  that — doing  it  for  that  reason. 

Q.  I'm  not  indicating  anything.  I  just  want  to  know. — A.  Well,  I  don't  really 
know  why  I  did  it.     Maybe  there  wasn't  room  on  the  page.     I  have  so  many 

Mr.  Hanson.  But  the  work  you  did  in  Russia  was  the  same  type  of  work  that 
you  were  trying  to  locate  here. 

Mi.ss  Reed.  Yes ;  that  is  true,  but  certainly  not  according  to  the  American 
system. 

Q.  I  don't  understand  your  suggestion  that  it  had  no  bearing.  Since  it  was 
personnel  work,  it  would  have  a  direct  bearing,  wouldn't  it? — A.  Well — think 
what  you  like  about  that  omission.  But  I  really  don't  know  why  I  did  it,  and  I 
see  no  reason  to  have  omitted  it  for  any  other  reason  than  I  left  to  be  married, 
and  I  gave  that  as  a  reason  for  leaving  my  other  job,  and  I  have  nothing  to  hide 
about  that  experience.  I  don't  know  that  I  put  it  in.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  it  was 
about  3  months'  work      I  did  a  short-time  job,  and  so 

Q.  Well,  you  worked  for  the  Soviet  Union  for  a  year? — A.  I  was  there  a  year. 
I  began  to  work  in — in  October,  and  I  know  I  had  514  months'  employment  on  the 
publi.shing  house,  becau.se  I  was  eligible  for  a  vacation  and  it  was  while  I  was 
on  the  vacation  that  I  .started  to  work  in  the  Commissariat  of  Labor.  Now,  the 
Commissariat  of  Labor  job  stopped  because  the  war  situation  grew  very  severe 


3(376  UN-AMEUrCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

aud  they  did  uot  allow  people  any  longer  to  come  in  as  easily  as  they  had  heeu, 
and  my  job  was  completed,  and  because  I  had  been  taken  from  one  job  to  an- 
other, my  employer  was  required  to — Borodin — to  find  another  niche  for  me 
where  he  was  working  on  the  Moscow  News  and  I  worked  there  about  a  month 
I  think  before  I  went  ou  my  vacation,  and  after  which  I  returned  to  Ameiica. 

Q.  Is  that  the  Borodin  tliat  subsequently  was  physically  liquidated? — A.  I 
don't  think  so.  I  think  he  is  still  managing  editor  of  the  Moscow  News,  I'm  not 
sure. 

Q.  You  said  you  were  married  in  1931? — A.  I  left  to  be  married,  Mr.  Schmidt, 
and  my  ijlans  changed. 

Q.  You  didn't  get  married? — A.  No. 

Q.  Now,  did  you  at  any  time  ever  maintain  in  your  office  a  list  of  Communist 
comrades,  for  placement? — A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  tell  anybody  that  you  had  such  a  list  in  your  desk? — ^A.  No. 

Q.  And  that  you  were  using  that  list  to  help  place  "comrades"  in  positions? — 
A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  know  Grace  Hutchins  ? — A.  Yes ;  I  know  Grace  Hutchins. 

Q.  'Who  is  Grace  Hutchins ";' — A.  She  works  in  the  Labor  Research  Association. 

Q.  Is  the  Labor  Research  Association  a  Communist  organ? — A.  Not  to  my 
knowledge.     I  don't  know. 

Q.  Who  else  works  there? — A    I  know  Bob  Dunn,  or  Bill. 

Q.  Is  he  a  Communist? — A.  No ;  I  don't  think  so. 

Q.  Well,  aren't  you  familiar  with  the  fact  that  he  has  written  in  the  Party 
Organizer,  and  other  Communist  organs? — A.  No;  but  I  don't  think  that's  the 
requirement  to  be  a  Communist,  to  write  in  tliose  journals.  I  don't^ — I  think  he  is 
another  one  that  has  always  been  branded  as  a  "red,"  because  he  has  been  asso- 
ciated with  the  left-wing  radical  movement  all  the  time.  I  know  he  works  there. 
I  know  him  sligiitly. 

Q.  Is  Grace  Hutchins  a  Communist? — A.  I  think  she  was  on  a  public  office  as 
a  Communist. 

Q.  Didn't  she  once  run  for  comptroller  of  the  State  on  the  Communist  ticket? — 
A.  Yes. 

(}.  That  would  make  her  a  Communist? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Did  she  ever  send  names  to  you,  or  refer  to  you  comrades  for  employment 
in  the  State  service? — A.  I  don't  know  if  they  were  comrades.  She  has  some- 
times sent  me  people  with  research  experience  to  see  if  I  could  steer  them  to 
the  right  department  for  jobs.  This,  I  want  you  to  know,  has  been  done  by  so 
many  organizations,  and  I  think  I  am  particularly  susceptible  to  being  asked  by 
organizations,  clinics,  and  ho.spitals,  particularly  because  I  have  worked  in  handi- 
cap work  for  so  long  that  I  have  become  what  is  known  as  an  information 
bureau  for  a  good  deal  of  the  State  jobs  for  handicapped  people. 

Q.  When  you  went  to  Russia  the  last  time — I  believe  you  said  it  was  1937 
or  1938?— A.  Yes. 

Q.  You  met  Dorothy  Rehm  in  Russia,  didn't  you? — A.  No;  I  think  we  just 
missed  each  other.  No ;  she  didn't  go  at  the  same  time  I  did.  I  know  she  was 
going  around  that  time. 

Q.  Well,  you  gave  her  a  letter  to  your  sister,  didn't  you? — A.  I  believe  so.  I 
very  often  did — use  my  sister  to  show  people  the  things  around  there.  She 
speaks  Russian  very  well. 

Q.  Didn't  you  and  Dorothy  Rehm  go  to  Russia  at  the  same  time,  although 
not  on  the  same  boat? — A.  No. 

Q.  Didn't  you  meet  Dorothy  Rehm  in  Russia?— A.  No. 

Q.  You  didn't? — A.  What  year  did  Dorothy  Rehm  go  to  Russia?  I  don't  re- 
member.   I  know  she  was  going,  but  I  didn't  think  she  went  at  the  same  time. 

Q.  Didn't  she  talk  with  you  before  she  went  ? — A.  Well,  I  knew  she  was  going. 
I  knew  she  wanted  to  know  about  the  price  of  tickets  and  what  not,  of  that 
sort,  prices,  and  tickets. 

Q.  Did  she  make  arrangements  and  booking  through  you? — A.  No. 

Q.  But  you're  sure  you  didn't  meet  her  in  Ru.ssia  at  that  time? — A.  No;  I  have 
no  recollection  of  it,  because  I  think  she  was — she  went  at  a  different  time.  I 
can't  remember,  but  I  don't  remember  seeing  her  there. 

INIr.  Hanson.  Did  you  meet  anybody  else  over  in  Russia  that  worked  with 
the  division  at  that  time,  or  is  still  working  with  the  division? 

Miss  Reed.  You  mean  Dorothy  Ryder,  maybe?  I  think  Dorothy  Ryder  came 
in  at  the  same  time  I  came  in. 

Q.  You  met  her  in  Russia  ? — A.  I  saw  her  one  day ;  yes.  We  were  in  the 
same  city ;  that's  right. 


U\-A.MKUK'AX   PKOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8677 

Q.  At  biviikfast  with  lier  and  your  sister? — A.  I  don't  tbiuk  so.  I  don't  re- 
jnember. 

(>.  Did  you  give  Dorothy  Ityder  a  hotter  to  your  sister? — A.  I  don't  remember. 
I  know,  she  knows  I  have  a  sister  there,  and  if  slie  could 

Q.  Do  you  know  Roy  Hudson? — A.  I  know  who  he  is. 

Q.  Do  you  know  him  personally? — A.  No. 

Q.  You've  never  met  him? — A.  I  have  talked  to  other  people  where  he  was 
around,  sliakiug-  hands  with  him 

Q.  Who  is  he? — A.  He  is  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Q.  On  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party,  isn't  he? — ^A.  I  don't 
linow. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  attend  any  fraction  of  the  Communist  Party  when  he  was 
present  ?^ — A.  No. 

Q.  Any  fraction  of  the  Communist  Party  in  the  N.  M.  U.? — A.  No. 

Q.  Were  you  active  in  the  N.  M.  U.? — A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  know  what  I  mean? — A  What  do  you  mean?  C.  I.  O.?  I  know 
that,  but  what  do  yovi  mean  by  being  active? 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  you  belong  to  the  women's  auxiliary? 

Miss  Hekd.  I  helped  them  in  their  organizing,  in  the  food  kitchen  particu- 
larly. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Would  your  helping  them  bring  you  to  frequent  the  union 
headquarters,  or  the  headquarters  at  230  Seventh  Avenue? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Were  you  ever  in  the  building? 

iliss  B.EED.  Not  to  my  knowledge.  I  have  been  in  a  number  of  offices,  I 
til  ink,  once  or  twice.    Whei'e  is  that?     On  Eleventh  Avenue? 

Mr.  Hanson.  But  you  have  never  been  at  230  Seventh  Avenue,  the  Com- 
munist headquarters  for  the  water  front? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Where  did  you  meet — the  women's  auxiliary? 

Miss  Reed.  I  didn't  meet  with  them.  I  was  much  too  l)usy  at  tliat  time.  Tliey 
used  to  invite  me  to  some  of  their  meetings,  and  I  could  never  go.  I  just  know 
that  if  I  could  help  them  at  all  in  organizing  food  kitchens,  I  helped,  and  raising 
money  for  food  supplies. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 

Q.  Do  you  know  Joe  Statchell?— A.  No. 

Q.  Know  who  he  is? — A.  I  have  heard  the  name  Statchell,  but  I  don't  think 
it's  "Joe.'' 

Q.  He's  a  member  of  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party  and  was 
at  one  time  chief  of  their  labor  policy  in  the  United  States. 

Did  you  ever  meet  Earl  Browder,  personally? — A.  No.  I  saw  him  once  at  a 
meeting  at  which  he  bowed  to  me  because  I  recognized  him,  and  that's  all  I  know 
of  him. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Miss  Reed,  did  you  ever  direct  the  activities  of  the  Young  Com- 
munist's League  on  the  water  front? 

Miss  B.KEJ).  No :   I   didn't. 

Mr.  W'aij)man.  Do  you  know  Blackie  Meyers? 

Miss  REf:D.  Yes. 

Mr.  Waldman.  How  well  do  you  know  him? 

Miss  Reed.  Not  very  well.     I  knew  him  in  the  strike. 

Q.  Winestone — do  you  know  him? — A.  No. 

Q.  Kedacht? — A.  No.  These  names  are  all  familiar  to  me,  but  I  don't  know 
them  personally. 

]Mr.  Wai.dman.  How  well  do  you  know  Beth  MacHenry? 

Miss  Rked.  Oh.  I  have  known  her  for — she  was  a  writer — I  know  her. 

Q.  On  the  Daily  Worker  staff?— A.  Yes. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Is  she  a  known  Communist? 

Miss  RET.a>.  Well,  I  don't  know  whether  you  have  to  be  a  Communist  to  be  a 
writer  on  the  Daily  Worker. 

Mr.  Waldman.  "That  wasn't  the  question  I  asked. 

Miss  Rekd.  When  you  say  "known  Connnunist,"  are  you  assuming  that  everyone 
who  is  working  on  the  Daily  Worker  is  a  Conmiunist? 

Mr.  Han.son.  No.     He  is  asking  whether  you  believe  her  to  be  a  Communist. 

Miss  Reed.  No;  I  have — it's  commonly  assumed  that  she  is. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Well,  you  know  now  what  he  wants. 

Mi.ss  Reed.  She  probably  is.  Everyone — that  is  not  my  understanding,  but — • 
everyone  who  works  on  the  Daily  Worker  is  assumed 


g(J78  UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mi\  Hanson.  But  you  share  the  general  assumption  that  she  is  a  Communist? 
Miss  Reed.  I  would ;  yes.     I  share  it,  but  I  have  no  way  of  knowing. 
Mr.  Wai-dman.  Do  you  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  Goldwater? 
Miss  Rb:ed.  No. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt  : 

Q.  Do  you  recall  working  with  him  in  Russia  ? — ^A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  know  George  Mink? — A.  No  ;  I  don't  know  him. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  get  an  invitation,  from  him  or  anyone  else,  to  attend  a  meet- 
ing in  Detroit  or  Chicago? — A.  No;  to  my  knowledge,  I  didn't —  at  all. 

Q.  Did  you  have  a  summer  home  in  Massachusetts? — A.  No;  I  haven't. 

Q.  Did  you  have  one?— A.  I  don't  own  any  property. 

Q.  Did  you  have? — A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  have  some  friend,  or  some  relative  of  yours  there?- -A.  Yes;  I  come 
from  Massachusetts. 

Q.  Where  did  you  live  in  Massachusetts,  besides  Dunstable? — A.  I  was  brought 
up  in  Cambridge,  Mass. 

Q.  What  was  the  address? — A.  Lived  on  Walker  Street,  most  of  the  time. 

Q.  What  was  the  address  at  Dunstable? — A.  There  wasn't  any.  I  don't  even 
remember  the  house  where  I  was  born — just  a  little  house. 

Q.  Any  other  address  in  Massachusetts  that  you  lived  at? — A.  Why,  I  guess 
I  have  lived  a  good  many  places  in  Massachusetts. 

Q.  What  were  some  of  those  addresses,  if  you  recall? — A.  I  visited  Springfield ; 
my  mother  has  a  house. 

Q.  Where  is  your  mother's  house? — A.  At  Sandwich,  Cape  Cod. 

Q.  Sandwich,  on  Cape  Cod?— A.  That's  right. 

Q.  While  you  lived  there,  were — to  your  knowledge — any  records  of  the  Com- 
munist Party  found  hidden  on  the  premises  of  any  of  those  houses? — A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  know  Tommy  Ray? — A.  I  have  heard  of  him ;  his  name  is  familiar. 

Q.  You  don't  remember  where  you  met  him? — A.  No;  I  don't. 

Q.  Do  you  know  Arthur  Thomas? — A.  No;  I  think  his  name  is  connected 
with,  or  was,  with  the  N.  M.  U.  at  one  time. 

Q.  Did  you  meet  him? — A.  I — probably  in  strike  situations — I  did. 

Q.  You  don't  remember  the  situations  under  which  you  met  him? — A.  No; 
I  don't. 

Q.  Do  you  know  Bella  Dodd? — A.  No;  I  have  never  had  the  pleasure  of  meet- 
ing her. 

Q.  Ferdinand  Smith?— A.  I  know  he's  secretary  of  the  National  Maritime 
Union. 

Q.  Have  you  met  him  ? — A.  Yes ;  I  have  met  him  personally  ;  yes. 

Q.  Is  he  a  Conununist,  to  your  knowledge? — A.  I  have  no  knowledge  of  it. 
It's  the  same  as  the  other  people — they  are  labeled. 

Q.  Do  you  know  Howard  Mackenzie? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Where  did  you  meet  him? — A.  During  the  strike.  I  couldn't  tell  you  the 
day,  or  the  time,  or  the  place,  at  all. 

Q.  Is  he  a  Communist,  to  your  knowledge? — A.  Not  to  my  knowledge. 

Q.  William  Howe? — A.  Never  heard  of  him. 

Q.  He  was  also  known  by  the  name  of  Jamieson. — A.  No. 

Q.  Never  heard  of  that/^ — A.  No. 

Q.  You  don't  recall  receiving  any  invitation  from  Mink  or  from  anyone  else 

in  the  Communist  Party,  in  the  spring  of  this  year,  to  attend A.  Of  this 

year? 

Q.  (Continuing.)  To  attend  a  meeting  at  Detroit?— A.  I  certainly  didn't.  I 
would  know  that.     It's  very  recent. 

Q.  In  any  other  year,  or  at  any  other  time? — A.  No. 

Q.  You  would  be  sure  about  that,  too? — A.  The  name  IMink  is  only  a  name 
to  me.  I  surely  would  know  if  he  had  written  me  a  letter,  and  I  haven't 
received  any. 

Q.  Who  is  Mink?  Do  you  know? — A.  No,  I  don't.  I  know  he  is  connected 
with  the  seamen  in  some  way— I  don't  know  anything  more. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  you  know  Rose  Waters? 
Miss  Reed.  I  know  the  name. 
Mr.  Hanson.  Do  you  know  her? 
Miss  Reed.  No. 

Q.  You  understand  that  she  is  a  Communist?— A.  I  understand  that  she  worked 
for  the  Communist  Party. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8679 

Q.  She  is  a  member  of  the  Central  Committee,  isn't  she? — A.  I  don't  know. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  yon  know  Andrew  Overgaard"? 

Miss  Retj).  No.     I  have  heard  the  name.  l)nt  I  don't  know  him. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  yon  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  Joe  Zack? 

Miss  Uked.  No.     I  saw  his  name  in  some  paper,  bnt  I  don't  know  him. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  you  remember  the  occasion"/ 

Miss   Uked.  No. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  yon  know  Thomas  Ray? 

Mr.    Schmidt.  I   asked  her  that. 

:^Ir.  Hanson.  Oh,  I'm  sorry.  You  say  your  mother  had  a  summer  home  in 
Sandwich,  Cape  Cod? 

Miss  Keed.  That's  right. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Did  you  visit  tliere? 

Miss  Rb:ed.  I  have ;  yes. 

Mr.  Hanson.  At  any  time  that  you  visited  there,  did  you  ever  see  Earle 
Browder  there? 

Miss  Rexd.  No. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  you  know,  of  your  own  knowledge,  whether  or  not  Earle 
Browder  was  ever  there? 

Miss  Refj).  To  my  knowledge,  he  never  has  been. 

Mr.  Hanson.  And  you  met  Earle  Browder  only  once? 

Miss  Reed.  I  didn't— I  wasn't  even  introduced  to  him.  I  remember  recognizing 
him,  because  of  seeing  his  pictures,  and  bowing  to  him  and  he  bowed  back  to 
me.     Now,  if  that's  knowing  a  person,  I  don't  know — I  don't  agree  with  It. 

Mr.  Hanson.  But  that's  the  extent  of  your  acquaintance  with  Earle  Browder? 

Miss  Reed.  That's  right. 

Mr.  Waldman.  May  I  ask  a  question?    Are  you  married  now? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Mr.  Waldman.  How  weU  do  you  know  Ted  Lewis,  or,  his  regular  name  is 
Albert  Edward  Lewis? 

Miss  Reed.  I  really  think  this  is  getting  personal.  I  should  like  to  consult 
counsel  before  I  make  any  statements  about  my  very  personal  life. 

Mr.  Waldman.  I'm  not  interested  in  your  personal  life,  Miss  Reed. 

Miss  Reed.  Well,  but  you're  a.sking 

Mr.  Hanson.  We  ask  that  in  the  same  connection  we  ask  all  these  other 
people  here.  It  might  be  personal  to  ask  you  whether  you  know  these  other 
people  here. 

Miss  Reed.  He  said  "how  well,"  not  if  I  know  him.     I  do  know  Mm. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Well,  we'll  change  that. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Do  you  know  Ted  Lewis? 

Miss  Reed.  Yes ;  I  know  him. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Have  you  heard  from  him  lately? 

Miss.  Reed.  No.  I  really  don't  think  that  tliat  ought  to  be  asked,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  I'm  in  control  of  the  meeting,  and  if  you  give  me  a  good  reason 
why  it  shouldn't  be  asked  I'll  witlidraw  the  question.     Why  are  you  so 

Miss  Refd.  I'm  a  little  emotional  about  that  because  the  last  I  know  his  ship 
was  torpedoed,  and  I  feel  very  keenly  about  it  and  I'd  rather  not  go  into  it. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Don't  you  hear  from  him  through  somebody  in  Halifax? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Mr.  Waldman.  You  don't? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Well,  I  don't  understand  the  source  of  this  emotion  you  speak  of. 

Miss  Reed.  I  mean — after  all,  that  is  getting  pretty  personal. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  I  can't  know  it's  personal  any  more  than  I  would 

Miss  Rked.  You  know,  by  the  way  I  react,  that  it's  a  little,  a  little  difficult 
for  me  to  be  quite  unemotional. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  You  see.  Miss  Reed,  if  I  conducted  an  investigation,  and  every 
time  somebody  said  "I  get  emotional  about  that  question"  and  I  withdrew 
that  question,  then,  of  course,  I'd  have  to  stop  my  investigation. 

Miss  Reed.  Well,  of  course,  my  being  emotional  about  it — after  all,  it's  about 
2  hours  I  have  tried  to  hold  my  temper,  and  I'm  very,  very  tired.  And  you 
hit  a  subject  that  is  very  close  to  my  heart. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  All  right.  If  you  mean  by  that  that  you  have  a  special  place 
in  your  affections  for  him,  then  I  won't  press  my  questions  about  Mr.  I.,ewis. 

Mr.  Wau)Man.  Except  one  question,  please.  Do  you  know  of  him  being  a 
Communist? 


8680  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Miss  Reed.  He  has  been  called  that,  just  like  everybody  else,  but  I  don't  know. 
Mr.  Waldman.  To  your  knowledge,  he  was  lost  on  that  shipV 
Miss  Reed.  Yes. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  I  don't  think  it's  necessary  to  go  into  that. 

Mr.  Owens.  Miss  Reed,  are  you  familiar  with  the  21  pctints  of  the  Communists 
International? 

Miss  Reed.  No  ;  I'm  not. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 

Q.  Are  you  familiar  with  O.  Piatnipsky's  manual  on  thatV — A.  Is  that  what 
you  have  been  reading  all  this  fromV 

Q.  That's  one  of  the  things.— A.  Then  I  am  familiar  with  it  to  that  extent. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  know  a  man  by  the  name  of  MacQuistonV — A.  Yes. 

Q.  What  do  you  know  about  himV— A.  It's  almost  difficult  for  me  to  say  what 
I  think  of  him.  I  met  him — during  the  strike,  as  I  met  so  many  of  those  National 
Maritime  Union  people.  The  strike  was  in  1936  and  1937.  I  haven't  seen  him 
since  and  I  never  want  to  see  him  again  as  long  as  I  live.  You  know  as  well  as 
I  do  what  his  i-ecord  has  been. 

Q.  No ;  I  don't  know  as  well  as  you  do,  apparently. — A.  Well,  he  has  been  fired 
from  his  own  union  for  90  years. 

Mr.  Hanson.  That's  a  long  time. 

Miss  Reed.  It  isn't  long  enough. 

A.  (Contiiuiing.)  He  has  been  proven  to  have  been  one  who  actually  had  a 
part  in  the  slaying  of  one  of  the  best  union  men  in  New  Orleans,  or — I  don't 
remember  the  southern  Gulf  port. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  You  made  a  statement  there,  under  oath,  that  I  would  just  advise 
you  as  an  attorney  might  subject  you  to — if  it  ever  got  out 

Miss  Reed.  I  beg  your  pardon. 

Mr.  Schmidt  (continuing).  To  penalty,  as  slander.  If  it's  true,  I'm  interested, 
but  I  want  you  to  be  very 

Miss  Reed.  No :  I'm 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Strike  it  out,  then. 

Miss  Reei>.  Yes;  I  want  to  start  again.  That  he  has  been  accused  publicly, 
because  I  know  he  has  had  a  trial. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Was  he  acquitted? 

Miss  Re:ed.  He  was  in  jail  as  a  result  of  it. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Well,  he  could  be  in  jail  awaiting  trial,  you  see.  I'm  won- 
dering  

Miss  Reed.  No ;  it  was  after  the  trial.  I'd  better  not  be  getting  into  this  thing, 
because  I'm  not  cle.ir  enough  of  the  facts. 

Q.  You're  quite  sure? — A.  No. 

Q.  Well,  it  would  be  easy  enough  to  check. — A.  I  know  he  has  appeared  before 
the  Dies  committee  many  times,  and  I  think — I  don't  know,  if  he's  around  New 
York.     I  heard  recently  that  he  was,  and  that  its  how  he  makes  his  living. 

Q.  How? — A.  By  working  for  the  Dies  committee. 

Q.  You  said  you  heard  recently  he  was  in  New  York.  From  whom  did  you 
hear  that? — A.  I  don't  remember  that.     I'm  sure  I  heard  his  name  mentioned. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  you  know  Conrad  Jones? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Mr.  Hanson.  You  don't  know  Conrad 

Miss  Reei>.  I  know  a  Jones  that  was  in  the  strike,  but  I  don't  know  his  first 
name.    It  might  have  been  that  one. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Would  it  refresh  your  memory  if  I  told  you  he  handled  all  of  the 
relief  cases  for  the  N.  M.  U.? 

Miss  Reed.  No  ;  I  didn't  know  him  as  that. 

Mr.  Hanson.  From  1937  to  1939? 

Miss  Reed.  I  didn't  know  him  as  that.  A  Jones  I  remember  in  the  strike  case, 
that's  all. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Didn't  he  send  people  down  to  you? 

Miss  Reed.  No  ;  he  didn't. 

Mr.  Hanson.  When  you  were  on  the  relief  bureau,  or  whatever  you  call  it? 

Miss  Reed.  No.  I  was  with  the  relief  bureau  for  6  months  in  1934,  before  the 
strike,  before  even  N.  M.  U. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 
Q.  I'm  going  to  refer  you  to  this  article  that  was  the  latest  reference  to  you  in 
the  newspapers,  to  my  knowledge.     There  might  have  been  others  that  I  didn't 


rX-AMEKIlAN   I'KOl'AtiANDA  ACJlMliKS  8681 

follow  fhat  apiioarcd  in  tho  Now  York  Journal  on  the  date  indii-atod  tliere.  What 
date  is  that?— A.  Yos ;  this  is  the  one. 

Q.  What's  that  date?— A.  Juno  1!>. 

Q.  That  makes  certain  reference  to  you.  I'd  like  to  lind  out  from  you  whether 
those  rc^ferences  are  true,  insofar  as  they  affect  you,  and  what  would  have  been 
the  source  of  this,  accordins:  to  your  knowhKlge  or  opinion? — A.  I  wish  I  knew  the 
source.  I'll  admit.  Mr.  Scinnidt.  that  1  couldn't  figure  out  how  this  labor  inves- 
tig-.itor's  statement  came  out  other  than  (hroufjh  my  testimony  here.  In  the  first 
place,  I  never  called  myself  a  labor  investigator,  and  it  isn't  the  Kremlin  State 
rubUshing  H  mse  either!  and  I  don't  know  at  all  how  this  got  here. 

Q.  Weli,  if  y<iu  recall,  your  record  before  me  the  last  time,  you  did  not  go  into 
the  nature  of  the  work  you  did  in  Soviet  Russia. — A.  I  remember  saying  to  you 
that  I  worked  in  the  Conmiissariat  of  Labor. 

Q.  Did  you?    I  didn't  know  anything  about  the  type  of  work. — A.  Okay,  okay. 

Q.  Nowl  is  there  any  source  that  you  have  an  opinion  about  that  we  might 
investigate?— A.  No;  if's  not  labeled  with  anyone's  writing— civil-service  employee 
since  "26,  which  is  incorrect — it  should  be  '36.  Lives  at  16  Union  Square,  which 
also  is  not  correct.  Senior  interviewer,  and  so  forth.  50  Lafayette  Street — already 
has  been  called  by  the  Labor  Department  as  a  witness.  I  wish  I  knew  where  it 
came  from,  Mr.  Schmidt.  I  haven't  any  idea.  I  certainly  tried  to  keep  it  as  quiet 
as  I  coukl  that  1  have  been  called  here. 

Q.  You  wern't  interviewed  by  anyone? — A.  No;  I  was  not,  and  I  would  not  be. 
I  considered  this  private  and  I  want  to  keep  it  so. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Have  you  stated  for  our  record  where  you  live? 

Miss  Reed.  It's  two  addresses,  to  be  exact.  It's  101  East  Sixteenth  Street, 
because  it's  on  Sixteenth  Street.  It  also  has  an  address  36  Union  Square  because 
it  faces  that  way,  too. 

Mr.  Wai.dman.   You  still  live  there  now? 

:Miss  Reei>.  I  have  lived  there  5  years. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Still  living  there  now? 

Miss  Reed.  Yes. 

By  Mr.  Hanson  : 

Q.  Miss  Reed,  did  you  ever  at  any  time  try  to  bring  back  into  the  fold  of  the 
Communist  Party  any  ex-Communists  V 

A.  Now.  Mr.  Hanson 

Q.  That's  simple. — A.  To  bring  back  assumes  that  you  are  there. 

Q.  Well,  you  take  an  ex-Communist.  That  means  he  is  thrown  out  of  the 
party.  Now,  did  you  ever  persuade  anybody  to  change  their  mind  and  go  back 
to  the  party? — A.  I  don't  know.  I  don't  remember  doing  anything  like  that. 
I  should  say  "no."  oftTiand. 

Q.  Would  you  ever  find  yourself  in  a  position A.  Who  are  you  referring 

to? 

Q.  Just  generally,  anyone  at  all. — A.  No ;  no. 

Q.  You  never  tried  to  induce  some  party  that  had  been  expelled,  or  had 
left   the  party — the  Communist  Party — to  return   to   the  party? — A.  No. 

Mr.  Owens.  Miss  Reed,  is  it  possible  for  a  Communist  to  leave  the  party? 

Miss  Rled.  Oh,  I  believe  so,  of  course.  I  have  heard  of  plenty.  MacQuiston, 
for  one. 

Mr.  Owens,  lie  was  expelled? 

Miss  RI':ed.  Yes. 

Q.  I'm  talking  about  anybody  that  has  either  been  exjielled  or  that  left  the 
party. — A.  I  know  Granville  Hicks  left  voluntarily.  He  disagreed  with  some- 
thing, and  there  have  been  plenty  of  people  like  that. 

Q.  You  haven't  asked  him  at  any  time  to  return  to  the  party,  or  you  haven't 
asked  anybody  else,  that  you  know  of,  to  return  to  the  party — A.  No ;  no. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 

Q.  Did  you  ever  ask  anyone  who  wasn't  a  member  of  the  party  to  i)ecome 
a  member? — A.  Well,  I  might  have  said  that  I  believed  in  certain  things  that 
I  believe  in,  that  I  have  admitted  to  you  I  believe  in,  and  asked  them  to 
believe  in  it,  too. 

Mr.  Han.son.  That  would  be  believing  in  the  party,  wouldn't  it? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Q.  You  couldn't  just  ask  them  to  believe  in  certain  excerpts  of  this  doctrine? — 
A.  No. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Off  the  record. 


8682  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Waldman.  May  I  ask  just  one  question? 
Mr.  Schmidt.  Yes.     For  the  record. 

By  Mr.  Waldman  : 

Q.  Do  you  know  David  Mapes — M-a-p-e-s? — A.  No;  I  don't  know  any  David 
Mapes. 

Q.  Do  you  know  any  "Mapes"  at  all?— A.  There  is  a  Mapes  that  works 
up  in  the  Bureau. 

Q.  Where  does  he  work?— A.  At  342. 

Q.  That's  342  Madison?— A.  But  it  isn't  David. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 

Q.  This  is  your  picture? — A.  Yes;  it  is.     May  I  ask  where  you  got  it? 

Q.  Mr.  Hanson  got  that.  Ifs  an  enlargement  of  a  picture? — A.  I  know  the 
original  very  well. 

Q.  Yes?    But  that's  you,  isn't  it?— A.  Well,  what  do  you  think? 

Q.  I  know.     I'm  asking  you. — A.   (No  response.) 

Q.  It's  you? — A.  Why  certainly  it's  me. 

Q.  All  right. 

Miss  Reed.  May  I  ask  where  you  got  it? 

Mr.  Hanson.  I  wouldn't  know. 

Miss  Reed.  May  I  ask  this  question,  too?  Do  they  go  to  people's  homes  with 
a  badge  and  say  they  are  an  investigator  for  the  Department  of  Labor? 

Mr.  Hanson.  "They  have  done  that  a  number  of  times. 

Miss  Reed.  They  have  badges ;  I  mean,  to  warrant  that? 

Mr.  Hanson.  All  inspectors  have  badges,  in  the  Labor  Department. 

Miss  Reed.  On  this  sort  of  a  private  hearing  case,  you  have  investigators 
with  badges  going  around  investigating?     Is  that  so? 

Mr.  Hanson.  That's  true.  Naturally,  we've  got  to  have  some  means  of  identi- 
fication, but  they  also  know  the  proper  use  of  a  badge.  They  are  all  instructed 
in  the  proper  use  of  a  badge.     They  don't  just  use  the  badge  for  any 

Miss  Reed.  I  was  interested  because  a  friend  of  mine  was  approached  and 
when  he  asked  the  man's  name  he  said  Waldman,  and  I  associated  it  right 
away. 

Mr.  Hanson.  No  ;  I'm  sure,  we  can  account  for  all  our  men  and  our  badges. 

Miss  Reed.  I  think  if  he  has,  you'd  better  investigate  it. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Well,  I'm  sure 

Miss  Reed.  Is  Woltman  one  of  your  investigators? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  He  has  been  the  man  on  the  World-Telegram. 

Miss  Reed.  I  know,  that's  why  I  thought 

Mr.  Hanson.  We  don't  have  him. 

Miss  Reed  (continuing).  I  thought  you  ought  to  know  something  about  him 
assuming  that  role. 

Mr.  Hanson.  We  can  account  for  all  the  badges.  Miss  Reed. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Would  that  person  be  willing  to  testify  against  this  fellow? 

Miss  Reed.  Sure. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  What's  the  person's  name? 

Miss  Reed.  The  name  is  John  Davis. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  I'd  very  much  like  to  go  to  the  bottom  of  this,  because,  if 
anybody  from  the  World-Telegram  is  passing  himself  off  as  an  investigator 

Mr.  Hanson.  Miss  Reed  says  he  has  a  badge  and  gave  his  name  as  John 
Davis. 

Miss  Reed.  No  ;  excuse  me.     He  gave  the  name  as  Waldman. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Well,  what  about  John  Davis?     What's  his  address? 

Miss  Reed.  It's  One  Hundred  and  Second  Street.  He's  on  the  old-age  pension. 
He's  a  handicapped  man. 

Mr.  Hanson.  I  see. 

Miss  Reed.  Do  you  know  if  he  was  approached,  Mr.  Hanson? 

Mr.  Hanson.  That.  I  don't  know.     I  have  a  sheath  of  names  here,  Miss  Reed. 

Miss  Reed.  I  imagine.     I  have  been  around  New  York  a  long  time. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 

Q.  Miss  Reed,  if  we  sent  somebody  to  see  this  Davis,  might  we  use  your  name, 
or  is  it  better  not  to? — A.  Oh,  certainly.  He  was  the  one  that  told  me  that 
this  thing  had  happened;  did  I  know  anybody  named  Waldman,  and  I  said, 
"Well,  if  it's  Waldman,  he's  misusing  his  authority." 

Q.  Do  you  think  he'd  recognize  the  person? — A.  Oh,  I'm  sure ;  yes. 

Q.  Because  I  have  met  Woltman  already. — A.  I  haven't. 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8683 

Q.  1  met  him  some  mouths  ago,  whou  Miss  Miller  was  appointed. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Excuse  me,  just  a  moment.  I  asked  if  you  knew  Conrad  Jones. 
He  was  then  liaison  officer  of  the  N.  M.  U.,  handling  relief  cases.  Now,  do  you 
know  a  man  by  the  name  of  Kelly,  who  fulfills  a  similar  position? 

Miss  Rkkd.  jS'o  ;  I  don't  know  him.  I  know  when  the  matter  of  getting  jobs 
for  the  seamen,  when  they  didn't  have  any  unemployment  insurance  and  the 
fight  went  on  in  Washington  about  it.  I  know  the  State  Department  set  up 
some  kind  of  arrangement  to  get  them  jobs,  but  I  don't  know — I  know  Kelly 
was  working  in  one  of  our  offices,  there  was  a  picture  of  him  in  the  papers 
as  working  in  the  State  employment  office  as  a  representative  of  the  seamen. 
Wasn't  that  right? 

Mr.  Hanson.  I  didn't  understand  him  to  be  in  the  employ  of  the  department. 

Miss  Reed.  Well,  he  was  just  working  as  their  representative. 

Mr.  Hanson.  As  the  Union's? 

Miss  Reed.  Yes ;  but  seated  in  the  offices  of  the  State  employment,  I  think  at 
79  Madison.     I'm  not  siu'e. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt  : 

Q.  Do  you  know  Robert  Meers? — A.  No. 
Q.  Or  Marty  Gamier? — A.  No.     Are  we  going  to  continue? 
Mr.  Waldmvn.  One  more  name.     Do  you  know  A.  I.  Van  Dyne? 
Miss  Reed.  I  have  seen  the  name  in  print,  too ;  I  know  the  name. 
Mr.  WAiJ)iiAN.  You  don't  know  her  personally? 
Miss  Reed.  No. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  All  right.  We'll  recess  now  for  lunch.  We'll  resume  at  about 
2  o'clock. 

(At  12: 15  o'clock  Deputy  Commissioner  Schmidt  declared  a  recess  for  lunch.) 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 

Q.  Miss  Reed,  I  show  you  a  copy  of  a  publication  called  the  Active  File,  and  I 
a.sk  you  whether  you  have  ever  seen  that  or  similar  copies  before? — A.  I  remember 
seeing  copies  of  the  Active  File  when  it  came  out.  I  don't  happen  to  remember 
this  particular  cover. 

Q.  I'll  show  you  another  copy  of  the  Active  File  and  ask  you  whether  you  have 
ever  seen  that  issue,  or  similar  issues,  of  the  Active  File  before? — A.  Well,  as  I 
said  before,  I  i-emember  seeing  them  as  they  came  out.  I  don't  know  if  I  saw 
them  all  or  just  a  few  of  them,  but  I  think  I  saw  them — everybody  that  I  know 
received  them  in  the  mail. 

Q.  You  received  your  copies  in  the  mail,  did  you? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Did  you  have  anything  to  do  with  preparing  any  part  of  that A.  No. 

Q.   (Continuing).  Active  Pile? — A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  know  who  were  the  authors  and  editors  of  the  Active  File  at  auv 
time?— A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  know  how  the  Active  File  was  distributed  in  general? — A.  Only 
through  the  mail,  I  believe,  and  I  think  in  some  offices  they  put  it  on  the  desks, 
but  I  don't  remember  exactly. 

Q.  And  do  you  have  any  idea  how  the  mailing  list  was  obtained  or  prepared? — 
A.  No  :  I  don't,  definitely. 

Q.  Did  you  know  a  man  named  Homer  Brooks?  Homer  Brooks? — A.  That 
name  is  not  familiar. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  visit  Soviet  Russia  in  company  with  your  mother,  Mrs.  Fer- 
nanda Reed? — A.  No. 

Q.  Dn  you  know  David  Wahl — W-a-h-1? — A.  Yes,  I  know  him. 

Q.  Who  is  David  Wahl? — A.  Well.  I  used  to  know  him — I  haven't  seen  him 
for  a  long  time.    He's  a  library  worker. 

Q.  A  library  worker? — A.  He  worked  in  the  Public  Library. 

Q.  Where  did  he  work? — A.  In  the  Public  Library  in  New  York. 

Q.  Do  you  know  whether  he  was  a  Communist? — A.  No. 

Q.  You  don't  know?— A.  No. 

By  Mr.  Hanson  : 

Q.  What's  the  name  of  that  man  you  were  so  bitter  about  this  morning — 
MacQuiston? — A.  You  mentioned  MacQui.ston  this  morning. 

Q.  That's  the  man  you  were  so  bitter  al>out? — A.  Well,  if  you  call  it  that. 

Q.  I  mean,  that's  the  man  you  said,  aside  from  all  the  others,  that  you  didn't 
like,  that  you  never  wanted  to  see  him  again ;  is  that  right? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  How  did  you  get  to  know  that  man? — A.  I  told  you  before,  I  met  him  in 
the  strike,  during  the  strike  season,  which  went  on  for  about  4  or  5  months. 


85§4  un-amp:rican  propaganda  activities 

I  don't  recal]  where  I  first  met  him.  I  know  him  as  a  name,  as  part  of  that 
group  that  I  met  at  tliat  time  in  the  strike  situation. 

Q.  I  mean,  in  what  way  were  you  so  closely  associated  with  him  that  you 
could  become  so  bitter? — A.  I  became  bitter  l)ecause  I  know  the  circumstances 
around  which  he  was  fired  from  his  own  union,  and  for  that  reason — it's  nothing 
personal  about  me,  at  all. 

Q.  Was  he  a  known  Communist? — A.  I  know  he  had  once  been  called  a 
Communist,  and  been  expelled  from  the  Communist  Party,  but  I  don't  know  his 
status  as  of  any  date  or  other,  and  I  don't  know  what  he  is  today. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt  : 

Q.  When  you  say  "his  status''  what  are  you  referring  to? — A.  I  know  it 
was 

Q.  (Contintiing.)  His  registration  with  the  party  as  a  member,  with  dues 
paid,  and  so  forth? — A.  No,  no.  I  know  he  was  called  a  Communist  and  his 
being  suspended  from  the  union  was  public  information.  More  than  that  I  don't 
know. 

Q.  Well,  of  course,  you  know A.  And,  I  know  he  was  expelled  from  the 

union. 

Q.  (Continuing.)  The  Communist  Party,  as  you  know,  has  a  constitution  and 
bylaws,  and  article  3,  section  2  defines  a  party  member  as  "One  who  accepts  the 
party  program,  attends  the  regular  meetings  of  the  membership  branch  of  his 
place  of  work,  or  his  territory  or  trade,  who  pays  dues  regularly,  and  is  active  in 
party  work."  Now,  according  to  that  definition,  you  have,  I  believe,  denied  that 
you  were  a  party  member? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  And  you  say  you  were  never  at  any  time  in  your  life  a  party  member,  accord- 
ing to  that  definition;  isn't  that  right? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now,  when  you  deny  knowing  much  about  whether  so-and-so  was  a  party 
member — for  example,  MacQuistion — is  that  what  you  have  in  mind? — A.  No; 
it  isn't.  I  remember  hearing  that  he  was  expelled  from  the  Communist  Party, 
and  that  I  believe  it  was  for  drinking.  I'm  not  absolutely  sure.  Then,  the  things 
that  he  did  in  his  union  which  warranted  his  being  expelled  for  99  years 

By  Mr.  Hanson: 

Q.  What  union  was  that? — A.  The  National  Maritime. 

Q.  And  what  was  your  interest  in  the  National  Maritime  Union? — A.  Well 

Q.  I  mean  that  you  shotild  grow  so  embittered  over  something  he  did  to  the 
union? — A.  Well,  he  has  proved  himself,  as  I  have  told  you — before — this  morn- 
ing— as  I  told  you,  I  didn't  know  the  circumstances  about  the — slaying  in  New 
Orleans,  but  he  was  accused  of  that.  And,  to  my  knowledge,  was  convicted  of 
the  slaying  of  a  young  organizer. 

Q.  Organizer  of  what? — A.  The  National  Maritime  Union;  and  then  he  gave 
up  all  kinds  of  information  to  the  Dies  committee,  I  believe. 

Q.  On  what? — A.  Yott  know,  they  had  a  great  deal  of  trouble  in  that  union. 

Q.  But  the  thing  I  can  understand A.  He  was  very  much  involved  with 

them,  and  I  don't  know  the  circumstances,  but  I  know  he  has  a  very  bad  name, 
and  was  expelled  from  the  union  for  99  years,  after  a  membership  trial. 

Q.  But  what  interest  is  there,  Miss  Reed,  that  makes  you  so  embittered,  because 
he  was  expelled  from  a  ttnion  that  you  have  no  interest  in,  or  at  least — —A.  No ; 
I  never  said  I  had  no  interest  in  the  National  Maritime. 

Q.  Then,  do  you  have  an  interest  in  the  National  Maritime  Union? — A.  I  do 
have. 

Q.  And  to  what  extent  is  that  interest? — A.  I  think  it's  a  very  good  union. 
I  have  helped  in  the  strike  struggle,  and  so  I  have  known  a  lot  about  it  from 
its  birth,  and  naturally  I'm  interested  in  it  as  a  labor  union — as  my  own 
union,  as  any  union  that  has  done  a  good  job  of  organizing  the  unorganized 
workers  in  the  trade. 

Mr.  Owens.  Is  that  a  C.  I.  O.  union? 

Miss  Reed.  Yes;  it  is  C.  I.  O. 

Q.  Is  it  also  true  then,  because  of  Ted  Lewis  being  associated  with  that 
union — isn't  that  a  possible  reason  why  you  took  so  much  of  an  interest  in 
that  particular  union?  I  mean  you  can't  go  around  fostering  all  tmions,  be- 
cause they  do  a  good  job. — A.  No;  but  I  happened  to  he  very  much  interested 
in  this.  I  knew  people  personally  in  it  and  believed  in  theiii  and  I  think  it'.- 
quite  plain  that  I  have  always  been  interested  in  it  since  it  was  born.  I 
still  am. 


UN-AMEUICAX  rUOrAGANDA  ACT1VHIES  8685 

By  Mr.  St  hmidt  : 

Q.  Have  yoii  at  any  time  attended  the  workers'  schools,  any  of  their  schools 
in  the  United    States? — A.   No. 

Q.  None  of  these  schools  conducted  in  the  United  States  under  the  auspices  of 
the  Communist  Party? — A.  I  think  I  took  a  course  in  Russian,  just  before  I  went 
to  Russia  in  VXM  there. 

Q.  \Vh«Me  did  you  take  that  course,  at  Thirteenth  Street? — A.  Yes,  sir. 

Q.  Did  you  take  any  worker's  courses  in  the  Lenin  Institute  or  any  other 
school  in  Russia? — A.  No. 

Q.  Nt»t  even  in  the  evenings? — A.  No. 

Q.  Did  you  ever  explain  or  teach  the  ma.'fs  policies  of  the  party,  or  policies 
of  socialism  to  any  persons  or  groups? — A.  No ;  never  had  classes. 

Q.  Did  you  accept  the  party  program  in  its  entirety? — A.  No. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  at  any  time  been  active  in  the  party  work? — A.  You 
mean ■ 

Q.  (Continuing.)  Even  though  yoii  were  not  a  member  of  the  party?  Have 
you  at  any  time? — A.  You  asked  me  this  morning  if  I  was  a  member  of  the 
I.  L.  D..  and  of  the  League  Against  War  and  Fascism.  If  I  have  been  inter- 
ested in  left-wing  organizations,  and  been  in  a  small  way  a  part  of  them, 
I  have  always  given  most  of  my  time  and  energy  to  my  union. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  signed  any  pledges  to  remain  true  to  the  principles  of  the 
Ccmuininist  Party,  to  maintain  its  unity  of  purpose,  and  action,  and  to  work 
to  the  best  of  your  ability  to  fulfill  its  program? — A.  No. 

Q.  At  no  time?— A.  No. 

Q.  Under  the  name  of  Nancy  Reed?     Or  any  other  name? — A.  No. 

Q.  Do  you  belong  to  the  I.  W.  O.  ? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Just  the  mortuary A.  I  have  the  sickness,  the  doctor — medical  service 

aloTig  with  it. 

Q.  When  did  you  join  the  I.  W.  O.? — A.  I  think  it's  about  5  years  that  I  have 
been  a  member. 

Mr.  "Waidman.  Do  you  know  anyone  in  the  Workmen's  Circle? 

Miss  Ree3>.  No. 

Mr.  AValdman.  Nothing  about  the  Workmen's  Circle? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Mr.  Waxdman.  It's  similar  to  the  International  Worker's  Order,  except  that 
it's  fostered  by  the  right-wingers,  as  compared  to  the  I.  W.  O.,  which  is  fostered 
by  the  left-wingers,  and  is  a  Communist  front. 

Q.  You  have  at  no  time  ever  attempted  to  establish  a  branch  or  fraction  in 
the  N.  M.  U.?  I  don't  remember  whether  I  asked  you  that. — A.  You  didn't 
ask  me.  but  I  have  not. 

Q.  You  were  never  used  as  a  delegate  to  a  State  convention  of  the  Communist 
Party'?— A.  No. 

Q.  When  you  visited  Russia,  did  you  take  with  you  a  transfer  card,  signed 
by  any  (fffit-ial  of  rhe  Communist  Party,  to  your  knowledge? — A.  No,  Mr.  Schmidt. 
I  wasn't  a  memlter.     W^hy  should  I  take  a  transfer  card? 

Q.  Well,  is  a  transfer  card  necessarily  given  only  to  a  member? — A.  I  don't 
know.  I'm  sure. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Could  anybody  get  a  job?  If  I  had  gone  there,  would  they 
have  given  me  a  job? 

Miss  lit'sii).  If  you  qualified,  yes;  Mr.  Waldman. 

Mr.  Waldman.  They  would,  if  I  was  qualified? 

Miss  Reed.  Yes. 

Mr.  Owens.  You  mean  independent  of  whether  you  are  a  Communist? 

Miss  Rkkd.  This  came  up  this  morning;  I  think  you  weren't  here.  That  story 
in  the  .Tournal  simply  isn't  true. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt  : 

Q.  I'm  going  to  read  to  you  a  ([uestion  that  Stalin  put  to  the  American  delega- 
tion of  the  Communist  Party  on  May  14,  1920.  which  I'll  ask  you  to  answer  to  the 
b<\st  of  your  ability  :  "Can  you  picture  a  Connnunist,  not  a  paper  Communist  but  a 
real  Communist,  avowing  loyalty  to  the  Comintern,  and  at  the  same  time  refusing 
to  accei)t  ros])onsil)ility  for  carrying  out  tlie  decisions  of  the  Comintern?" 
Do  you  know  enough  about  conmiunism  to  essay  an  answer  to  that  question? — 
A.  Would  you  mind  repeating  it? 

Q.  Here  it  is,  it's  written  there,  underlined  in  red — Stalin's  speeches. 

(At  this  point  the  subject  piece  was  handed  to  the  witness  for  perusaL) 


8686  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

A.  How  did  you  phrase  your  question,  Mr.  Schmidt? 

Q.  I  said  I  was  going  to  put  to  you  the  question  which  Stalin  asks  there,  and 
ask  you  to  answer  it  to  the  best  of  your  ability. — ^A.  No. 

Q.  This  pamphlet  [indicating],  published  by  the  International  Publishers,  on 
the  subject  of  political  education,  entitled  "The  Communist  Party,"  says,  on  page 
26 :  "The  Communist  Party  must  put  the  conquest  of  the  proletarian  dictatorship 
as  their  first  and  most  immediate  task."  Now,  would  you  put  the  conquest  of  the 
proletarian  dictatorship  as  one  of  your  first  and  most  immediate  aims,  in  political 
or  social  action?— A.  No,  Mr.  Schmidt.    May  I  ask  a  question? 

Q.  Yes. — A.  Is  it  permissible  to  have  a  copy  of  that  written  statement? 
Q.  Well,  I'll  think  about  it.  It  might  be  permissible  in  the  end.— A.  All  right. 
Q.  "When  I  spoke  to  you  on  June  3  in  my  oflice  you  said  to  me,  among  other 
things,  if  you  belonged  to  a  cell  or  a  fraction  you  would  automatically  belong  to 
the  Communist  Party.  I  asked  you  this  question,  that  is  to  say,  you  never  were — 
you  are  not  now  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party,  and  you  never  belonged  to 
any  fraction  of  the  Communist  Party?— A.  Yes. 

Q.  And  your  answer  was  that  if  you  belonged  to  a  cell  or  fraction  you  would 
automatically  belong  to  the  Communist  Party.  Is  that  the  correct  answer?— 
A.  I  (Miss  Reed  is  handed  a  copy  of  the  transcription  of  her  testimony  of  June  3 
to  read)— that  should  be  modified,  I  should  say,  to  mean- though  you  are  referring, 
of  course,  to  the  Communist  Party — that  if  you  belong  to  a  cell  or  a  fraction 
thereof  as  a  member,  as  a  duly  authorized  member,  I  suppose  you'd  understand 
that;  yes.    Is  there  anything  contradictory  there,  now? 

Q.  No;  you  didn't  say  anything  contradictory.  I  just  wanted  to  find  out 
whether  that  was  the  correct  statement,  according  to  your  view,  and  then  1 
wanted  to  ask  you  how  you  knew  that  was  true?— A.  Well,  you  forget  that 
I  have  been  around  the  left-wing  movement— as  I  said  before — for  several 
years,  and  have  a  sister  who  worked  in  the  Comintern,  and  have  a  mother 
who  has  been  interested  in  all  these  things,  and  what  information  1  have  about 
the  left-wing  movement  has  been  absorbed  over  a  long  period  of  time,  in 
that  way.  I  have  known  Communists,  people  who  are  called  Communists, 
associated  with  left-wingers,  as  well  as  a  very  great  variety  of  opinions. 

Q.  In  the  course  of  picking  up  that  kind  of  information  about  the  organ- 
ization of  the  Communist  Party,  didn't  you  also  pick  up  from  Communists  and 
from  left-wingers  some  of  the  more  basic  doctrines  of  the  Communist  Party,  and 
of  the  Comintern? — A.  Some  of  the  beliefs  of  the  Communist  Party  action 
I  have  certainly  learned  through  my  association,  and  as  I  have  told  you  before, 
I  do  agree  very  heartily  wnth  some  of  them,  Mi-.  Schmidt.  I  don't  accept 
them  all. 

Q.  Well,  take  for  example  the  basic  one  on  the  dictatorship  of  the  prole- 
tariat. Do  you  have  some  notion  of  what  that  means? — A.  Yes;  I  have  a 
notion  of  what  that  means. 

Q.  You  know  what  it  means,  I  mean,  in  Communist  circles? — A.  What  it 
means,  you  mean,  in  the  Soviet  Union? 

Q.  That's  right. — A.  Well,  when  you  work  there  and  hear  about  it,  you 
absorb  a  certain  amount  of  information,  but  it  isn't  first — I  mean,  it  isn't — 
it  isn't  definite.  I'm  not,  as  I  told  you  once  before,  a  well-read  Marxist  by 
any  means,  and  my  interpretation  of  it  sounds  very  much  like  a  lay  person's 
point  of  view.  That's  what  it  is.  I  know  we  went  into  some  discussion  about 
it  before,  and  I  didn't  have  really  half  as  well-grounded  information  about  it 
as  you  apparently  did,  and  I  wasn't  prepared  to  go  into  a  long  discussion  of  it. 
Q.  Well,  look.  In  the  course  of  your  peregrinations  with  Communists  or 
Sovet  Russia,  didn't  you  have  pointed  out  to  you  the  place  which  revolutionai'y 
tactics  have  in  the  establishment  of  the  dictatorship  of  the  proletariat"? — 
A.  No ;   my  job  was  not  of  any  political  nature  at   all,   you  know. 

Q.  I  understand  that.  But,  I'm  now  talking  about  the  things  you  might 
have  picked  up,  by  osmosis,  from  your  surroundings.  Didn't  yott  have  it  pointed 
out  to  you,  for  example,  that  there  was  a  vast  difference  between  the  Social 
Democrats  and  the  Reformists  on  the  one  hand,  and  the  Leuin-Marxists  on 
the  other? — A.  No;  I  did  not  have  that  pointed  out. 

Q.  Have    you    ever    heard    the    phrase    "Social    Democracy"    or    "Social 

A.  Yes. 
Q.  What  does  that  mean? — A.  Not  very  much. 

Q.  Well,  doesn't  it  mean,  in  Communist  circles,  that  group  which  relies  on 
parliamentarism  as  a  means  to  achieve  the  preliminary  stage  of  communism, 
which  is  socialism? — A.  I  can't  say — I  don't  know,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  Ha.sn't  it  been  pointed  out  to  you  that  that  is  the  point  on  which  the 
Marx-Leninists  differ  from   the   Social   Democrats,   precisely    that?     That   the 


UN-AMBKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8687 

Maix-Loninists  talk  about  the  inevitaliility  and  the  necessity  for  the  use  of 
force  and  unhiwful  means  for  the  initial  achievement  of  the  dictatorship  of 
the  proiotarlat,  as  a  prelude  to  the — to  both  socialism  and  communism? — A. 
No ;  it  hasn't. 

Q.  You  have  heard  of  the  Trotzkyites? — ^A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now,  you  know  enough  about  communism  and  about  Soviet  Russia  to 
know  that  the  Trotzkyites  were  never — certainly  not  in  recent  years — regarded 
with  high  favor  by  the  present  regime  in  Russia,  or  by  the  Communist  Party 
in  the  United  States?     Isn't  that  so'/— A.  I  believe  so. 

Q.  Do  you  know  what  was  the  basis  of  the  difference? — A.  I  think  we  went 
into  it  a  little  the  last  time. 

Q.  I  don't  think  so,  not  on  Trotzky. — A.  Well,  perhaps  it  was  in  my  conver- 
sation with  Mis.s  P.uchanan.  I  know  oidy  there  is  a  difference  on  the  basis 
of  world  revolution,  or  revolution  in  one  country  or  another.  That  was  my 
understanding. 

Q.  Well,  that's  precisely  what  I'm  getting  at.  In  other  words,  you  indicated, 
did  you  not,  th.it  revolution  is  necessary  for  both,  only  for  the  Trotzkyites 
world  rev(»lution  was  the  prerequisite,  whereas  to  the  Marx-Leninists  of  the 
Sralin  .school,  it  was  revolutit)n  only  as  indicated  by  the  zigzag  course  of  the 
weake.st  link? — A.  Well,  this  is  your  interpretation,  and  I  told  you  all  I  know 
about  it,  and  if  you  interpret  it  that  way  that  should  stand  as  your  interpreta- 
tion, not  mine,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  I  wanted  to  know  what  your  interpretation  of  the  revolution  was. — 
A.  I  don't  know. 

Q.  You  used   it  a   a  moment  ago,  when  you  said A.   I  know  the  theory 

l>etween  the  Trotzkyism  and  the  other  ism  is  ba.sed  on  the  difference  between 
world  revolution,  all  over  the  place,  and  revolution  in  one  country.  That's  as 
far  as  my   understanding  goes  of  the   difference  between   the  two. 

Q.  Now,  what's  your  understanding  of  revolution,  as  used  in  either  or  both 
of  those  theories"/ — A.  Well,  again  it  goes  into  a  long  discussion,  doesn't  it? 

Q.  I  don't  think  it's  too  long,  necessarily.  You  can  make  it  short. — A.  Well, 
I'm  afraid  I  can't  make  it  short. 

Q.  Well,  then,  make  it  long — A.  Well,  is  it — I  mean  I'm — rather,  I've  taken 
this  information  out  of — from  hearsay,  and  it  means  to  rue — activity  of  a 
revolutionary  nature  in  one  counti-y  at  a  time,  versus  revolutionary  activity 
all  over  the  world  at  the  same  time.     Now,  more  than  that  I  don't  know. 

Q.  Have  you  ever  heard  Communists  talk  about  the  type  of  revolution  that 
would  convert  the  so-called  imperialist  war  into  a  civil  war? — A.  No ;  I  don't 
believe  I  have.  Isn't  it  perfectly  possible  for  a  person  to  have  heard — It 
imzzled  me  for  a  long  time  about  what  the  Trotskyites  wanted — I  asked,  and 
that  was  my — the  explanation.  I  don't  remember  who  I  asked,  but  that  was  as 
far  as  it  went  in  my  own  thinking,  and  that  was  what  I  carried  in  my  mind. 

Q.  Make  no  mistake,  I'm  not  blaming  you  for  knowing  that,  or  I  should 
have  t()  blame  myself  too.  I  have  no  blame  for  anybody  wanting  to  study  these 
matters.  I'm  oft"  that  subject  for  a  moment. — A.  I'm  not  worried  about  know- 
ing it — it's  what  I  have  come  to  understand  as  what  it  means.  But  you  asked, 
now,  what's  my  idea  of  revolution.  That  goes  on  and  on  and  on.  I'm  not 
prepared  to  discuss  it  because  I  don't  know. 

Q.  Well,  have  you  heard  the  phrase  "imperialist  war"  discussed  among  Com- 
munists. Do  you  have  any  understanding  what  the  Communists  mean  by  the 
s(j-called  iniperialist  war"/ — A.  I  have  heard  the  phrase,  Mr.  Schmidt,  but  I 
can't  go  into  an  explanation  of  it. 

Q.  Would  the  war  that  Russia  is  fighting  to  keep  the  Nazis  out  of  Russia  be 
considered — in  your  opinion — an  imperialist  war  by  the  Soviets".'' — A.  I  don't  know. 

Q.  If  the  Comintern  asked  the  comrades  in  the  United  States  and  other 
places  in  the  world  to  ilo  everything  they  could  to  attempt  to  convert  any 
capitalist  war  into  a  civil  war,  would  you  consider  that  illegal? — A.  Illegal  for 
them  to — since  they  are  not 

Q.  To  convert  a  capitalist  war  into  a  civil  war? — A.  Your  question  was  if 
they  asked  them?  Would  it  bt> — would  it  be  illegal  for  them  to  ask?  For  them 
to  do  it,  when  you  yourself  say  that,  or  have  said,  there  isn't  a  connection  any 
longer  between  the  Russian  Communists  and  the  American  Communists? 

Q.  When  did  I  say  that? — A.  I  understood  you  to  say  that  in  the  last  meet- 
ing we  had. 

Q.  I  don't  think  I'd  say  that,  but  if  I  did  I  certainly  didn't  mean  to,  because 
from  my  own  point  of  view — if  you  want  it — I  think  there  is  a  very  definite 
vlistinction —  I  mean  connection — between  the  Communists,  between  Communism 

62626 il — vol.  14 H4 


g588  UN-AMEUICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

all  over  the  world,  whether  it's  the  C.  P.,  U.  S.  A.,  or  C.  P.,  U.  S.  S.  R.,  that  is  to 
say,  communism  in  Russia  or  communism  here,  and  the  link  that  connects  them 
is  the  Third  International. — A.  Well,  I  thought  you  told  me  yourself,  and  I'd 
like  to  go  back  to  perhaps  find  it — that  you  said,  "You  know,  don't  you,  that 
the  Third  International  is  now  separated  from  the  Communist  Party  of  Amer- 
ica"?    Isn't  that  right? 

Q.  Oh,  I  think  you're  referring  to  the  change  in  the  masthead  of  the  Daily 
Worker,  for  example? — A.  No;  I  thought  it  was  just  a  statement  you  made. 

Q.  No.  Originally,  of  course,  the  constitution  of  the  Third  International,  the 
program  of  the  Third  International  required  that  they  be  identified  as  the 
Communist  Party  of  the  United  States,  a  section  of  the  Third  Counuunist  Inter- 
national. That  was  a  requirement  under  the  program  and  under  the  formal 
get-up.— A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now,  of  course,  afterwards  they  were  less  outspoken  about  that  connection. 
No  question  about  it.     That  is  to  say,  they  were  less  outspoken  in  the  sense 
that  they  didn't  advertise  that  it  was  a  section  of  the  Third  InternationaL— 
A.  Are  you  informed  that  it  is?     I  don't  know. 

Q.  Certainly. — A.  I  don't  know. 

Q.  The  reason  I'm  asking  you  that  is  because  you  indicated  tliat  I  had  saic* 
something. — A.  Then  that,  perhaps,  is  what  I'm  referring  to. 

Q.  You  are  informed,  are  you  that  thei'e  is  a  real  distinction  between  the  Soviet 
Party  in  Russia  and  the  Communist  International'/ — A.  Tliat  was  my  under- 
standing. 

Q.  Well,  of  course,  there  is  this  much  of  a  distinction.  That  the  Soviet  Party 
is  the  particular  party  t)f  Soviet  Russia,  dealing  in  many  cases  with  peculiarly 
Russian  problems,  whereas  the  Third  International  is  the  party  that  is  the  organ- 
ization that  combines  into  one  unity  of  a  world  congress  all  of  the  various  sections 

or  Comnuinist  Parties  in  the  whole  world.     And,  of  course,  that A.  I  thought 

that  the  discussion  we  had  the  last  time  that  it  was  stated  they  had  severed 
connections.     Now 

Q.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  isn't  Joseph  Stalin  today  the  head  of  the  Political  Secre- 
tariat of  the  Third  International?  That's  his  position.— A.  Is  it?  Well,  I 
don't 

Q.  And  the  political  secretariat  is  the  governing  body  of  the  presidium,  which 
is,  in  turn,  the  governing  body  of  the  E.  C.  C.  I. — the  Executive  Council  cf  the 
Communist  International — and  that  body  is  responsible  directly  to  the  world 
congress.     However,  it  is  not  necessary  to  go  into  that  any  further. 

Mr.  Owens.  Are  these  meetings  of  fractions  of  the  Communist  Party — can 
visitors  attend  these  meetings?     That  is,  uoumembers? 

Miss  Reied.  Yes ;  I  believe  they  can. 

Q.  On  invitation? — A.  On  invitation;  yes. 

Q.  That  would  be  on  the  invitation  of  the  leading  member  in  the  fraction? — 
A.  I  don't  know.     I  think  it  would  be — friends  that  they  wanted  to  interest. 

Q.  You  did  say  before,  I  think,  that  you  might  have,  altlu»ugh  you  weren't 
sure,  you  were  invited  to  attend  a  branch  meeting  or  a  fraction  meeting?  You 
don't  remember  where  that  was,  whether  it  was  a  branch  or  fraction? — A.  No; 
I  don't.     I  was  trying  to  think  after  that,  where  it  was  held. 

Q.  You  don't  remember  how  long  ago  that  was? — A.  No ;  it  wiis  a  long  time 
ago,  though. 

Mr.  Owens.  Any  of  these  meetings  you  did  attend,  you  attended  as  an  invited 
guest  and  not  as  a  member  of  the  Communist  Party? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Q.  It  wasn't  a  fraction  of  the  Communist  Party  in  the  N.  M.  U.,  was  it? — 
A.  No ;  is  wasn't,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  You're  sure  of  that  much? — A.   (No  response.) 

Mr.  Hanson.  Did  your  interest  in  the  N.  i\I.  U.  extend  to  the  point  of  going 
down  to  the  water  front  and  distributing  circulars? 

INIiss  Reed.  I  never  did,  Mr.  Hanson.  I  was  mostly  interested  in  the  food 
kitchen  they  had  to  organize  for  feeding  the  strikers. 

Mr.  Owens.  You  said  that  there  were  certain  teachings  of  the  Communist 
Party  that  you  opposed.  Now,  are  you  in  a  position  to  tell  lis  what  some  of 
those  teachings  are,  that  you  are  opposed  to? 

Miss  Reed.  I'd  perhaps  be  able  to  think  them  up  at  home  and  write  them 
for  you. 

Q.  One  of  them  would  be  the  use  of  unlawful  means,  wouldn't  it? — A.  Right. 

Q.  Another  would  be  the  use  of  force  or  violence  to  attain  political  and 
.social  ends? — A.  Right. 


UN-AMERICAN  I'KOl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8689 

Q.  Thorofore,  you  would  reject  the  Commuuist  ideologies,  ;uul  (Joinnuiuist 
(ioctrincs,  and  decisions,  and  thesis,  and  programs  insofar  as  tiiey  relied  upon 
the  use  of  uidawful  means,  or  the  use  of  force  or  violence V — A.  That's  right, 
Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  Do  you  know  Lincoln  Rothschild? — A.  Lincoln  Rothschild V  The  name  I 
don't  know — the  first  name.     I  know  a  Mr.  Rothschild. 

Mr.  W.\Li)M.\N.  Diirothy  Rehm's  husband. 

Mi.ss  Rked.  Oh.  I  have  met  him. 

C^  l>o  you  know  if  he  is  a  Comnumist? — A.  No;  I  have  .iust  met  him  once. 
I  lion't  know. 

Q.  I'.efore  you  raised  a  (piestion  about   a  certain  name.   Mapes — is  itV 

Mr.  Waldman.  David  Mapes,  M-a-p-e-s. 

Q.  Or  Spencer  Mapes? — A.  I  don't  know  David  Mapes. 

Q.  Do  you  know  a  Spencer? — A.  He  works  in  the  division. 

Q.  Is  he  a  Communist? — A.  Not  to  my  knowledge.  I've  never  even  heard 
him  called  one. 

By  Mr.  Hanson  : 

Q.  I  questioned  you  this  morning.  Miss  Reed,  witli  respect  to  the  name  of 
Anne  McLoughlin.  Did  you  know  anybody  that  went  by  that  name? — A.  I 
think  I  did  know  a  girl,  way  back;  yes.     I  mean  the  name  was  familiar  to  me. 

Q.  Who  was  she?  I  tliought  if  you  had  time  to  refresh  your  memory — — A. 
I  remember.  That  was. a  girl  who  received  mail  sometimes  at  my  house,  because 
her  husband  was  following  her  and  she  didn't  want  him  to  find  it  out  and  I 
think  that  was  the  mime.  It's  a  long  time  ago,  and  it  lasted  only  for  a  very 
short  time.  And,  as  far  as  knowing  her  or  where  she  is  now,  or  anything  like 
that — - 

Q.  About  how  loug  ago  was  that? — A.  I  think  it  was  G  years  ago,  at  least. 

Q.  Did  slie  work  with  the  division?— A.  No. 

Q.  Was  she  a  Communist? — A.  I  don't  know.  I  never  asked.  It  was  a 
matter  of  domestic  difficulty. 

Q.  You  must  have  known  something  about  her  background,  because  you 
dou't  just  take  anybody  into  your  house. — A.  I  met  her  through  somebody. 
1  remember  the  iucideut.  I'll  have  to  check  and  see  if  it  was  that  exact  uame. 
I  don't  remember. 

Q.  How  did  she  spell  it?  Did  she  si>elL  it  A-n-n,  or  A-n-n-e? — A.  I  don't 
know.     I  don't  even  know  that. 

Q.  You  never  heard  of  her  in  connection  with  the  conmuuiistic  activities? — A. 
No. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt  : 

Q.  The  Daily  Worker  expresses  the  authentic  Commuuist  view  of  the  Central 
Committee,  doesn't  it? — A.  That's  a  question,  I  think,  you  asked  me  before. 

Q.  Not  that  question  exactly;  no. — A.  No?  Well,  you  mean  under  the  new 
reorganization? 

Q.  Both  before  and  aftei-  the  new  reorganization. — A.  I  think  it  did  before. 
But  now  I'm  not  prepared  to  state.  It's — it's  a  new  organization,  and  they  have 
a  new  board. 

Q.  Have  you  often  personally  differed  with  the  party  line  that  was  reflected 
by  the  Daily  Worker? — A.  Well,  I  certainly  haven't  agreed  with  anything  and 
everything  I  have  ever  seen  in  it.  definitely.     But  again,  whether  it  was  the 

Q.  I  mean  editorially? — A.  I  don't  always  get  to  read  those,  either.  I  cer- 
tainly know  I  have  seen  things  in  it  that  I  don't  agree  with,  at  all. 

Q.  Do  you  know  through  what  outfit  Dorothy  Ryder  made  her  arrangeenmts 
to  go  to  Europe?  Was  it  Amtorg? — A.  I  don't  think  Amtorg  arranged  trips, 
did  they?    I  don't  think  they  ever  did. 

Q.  What  outfit  did  you  make  your  own  arrangements  thntugh? — A.  I  went 
rlirough  the  World  Tourist. 

Q.  What's  that?— A.  The  World  Tourist. 

Q.  Is  that  the  same  as  Intourist? — A.  No;  I  think  it  was  just  a  travel  bureau 
called  the  World  Tourist.  I  think.  Intourist  doesn't  handle — I  don't  know 
whether  it  handled  actual  trips  there  or  not. 

Q.  Well,  v.iiat's  the  address  of  World  Tourist?— A.  I  think  it's  out  of  business 
now,  Mr.  Scihniidt.    It  used  to  be  in  the  Flatiron  Building. 

Q.  In  the  F'latiron  Building?  And  you  made  all  of  your  trips  through  the 
World  ToTirist?— A.  Well,  I  made  five,  and  I  can't  recjill  if  I  made  all  .)f  them 
through  there,  but  I  know  some  of  them  were. 


3590  un-a:merican  propaganda  activities 

Q.  Do  you  remember  whether  you  made  the  last  two  through  World  Tourist? — 
A.  I  think  one — the  one  in  1935.  I'm  sure  I  did,  because  I  remember  the  trans- 
action.   I  don't  remember  about  1937. 

Q.  And  the  one  before  that,  the  one  before  1935? — A.  Offhand,  I'd  have  to 
look  it  up. 

Q.  Do  you  have  records  of  the  outfits  through  whom? — A.  I  have  my  passports, 
that  still  might  have  that  on  them. 

Q.  Do  you  still  have  your  passport  for  each  of  those  trips? — A.  Yes.  Well, 
I  have  never  thrown  away  a  passport,  so  I  imagine  it  covers  them. 

Q.  And,  in  each  case,  the  application  through  World  Tourist  or  other  travel 
agency  was  made  by  you  under  the  name  of  Nancy  Reed? — A.  Right. 

Q.  And  the  passport  was  issued  to  you  under  the  name  of  Nancy  Reed? — 
A.  Right. 

Q.  And,  Dorothy  Ryder?  Do  you  know  whether  she  made  her  arrangements 
through  World  Tourist? — A.  No,  I  don't  remember,  Mr.  Schmidt. 

Q.  Do  you  know  whether  she  made  her  application  under  the  name  of  Dorothy 
Ryder,  or  not?    — A.  I  don't  know,  but  I  believe  so. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  I  don't  have  anything  else. 
By  Mr.  Owens  : 

Q.  In  connection  with  your  position  with  the  division  of  placement  and 
unemployment  insurance.  Miss  Reed,  are  you  in  a  position  to  place  applicants 
for  employment  in  defense  industries? — A.  Well,  hardly,  Mr.  Owens.  I  have 
been  in  the  service  of  the  division  placing  handicapped  applicants  ever  since 
I  first  joined  the  service  in  June  of  1935.  until  this  last  December,  when  I  have 
been  working  in  the  women's  industrial  Division — jobs  with  packers  of  cloth- 
ing— and  peanuts — packing  and  the  needle  trade — the  operations  are,  primarily. 

Q.  You  wouldn't  say  you  are  in  a  position  to  place  any  applicants  in  defense 
industries? — A.  No  ;  not  by  any  stretch  of  the  imagination. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Did  you  ever  have  any  meetings  at  your  home,  of  Communist 
groups? 

Miss  Reed.  No. 

Mr.  Waldman.  At  your  home,  at  Sixteenth  Street? 

Miss  Reed.  No.  I  have  had  a  good  many  social  parties  there,  because  I 
happen  to  have  a  very  large  open  apartment,  and  I  have  had  socials  there. 

Mr.  Waldman.  Solely  for  your  friends? 

Miss  Reed.  Particularly  for  raising  money  for  the  food  kitchens,  etc.,  etc. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 

Q.  Miss  Reed,  on  the  whole,  your  knowledge  of  communism  as  to  its  tactics, 
is  too  limited  to  enable  you  to  say  with  certainty  whether  a  Communist  favors 
subversive  means — is  that  the  position  you  take? — A.  Yes. 

Q.  So  that  if  j'ou — if  a  person,  certain  persons  presented  themselves  to  you, 
whether  as  Communists  or  as  others,  for  placement,  you  wouldn't  have  any 
method  of  eliminating  them  on  the  basis  of  subversive  activity. — A.  No ;  I  don't 
believe  in  it,  Mr.  Schmidt.  I  have  placed  hundreds  of  people  in  my  life,  in 
my  work,  and  I  have  not  gone  into  that  question  at  all.  I  have  really  estab- 
lished— I  hope  it's  somewhere  in  my  record — professional  standards,  placing 
people  according  to  their  qualifications  for  the  job  only. 

Q.  Does  the  address  141  East  Twenty-ninth  Street  mean  anything  to  you?— 
A.  Well,  I  think  that  used  to  be  the  Communist  Party  headquarters.  It  doesn't 
any  more.  I  just  happened  to  know  there  was  a  bookshop  there  that  I  went 
to  visit  about  some  books  recently,  and  that's  what  it  is. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Do  you  know  who  compiles  that  paper  [indicating  a  copy  of  the 
Active  File]  ? 

Miss  Reed.  No,  I  don't,  Mr.  Hanson. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Did  you  ever  contribute  anything  to  it? 

Miss  Reed.  No,  I  didn't. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt  : 

Q.  Did  you,  by  any  chance,  attend  the  twentieth  anniversary  of  the  Com- 
munist International,  and  the  fifteenth  anniversary  of  the  Daily  Worker,  that  is 
advertised  there. — ^A.  At  Madison  Square  Garden?  Well,  as  I  told  you  this 
morning,  I  remembered  going  to  a  big  mass  meeting,  that  was  colorful,  and  I 
think  it  was  part  of  the  national  convention  of  the  Communist  Party  in  Madison 
Square  Garden.  I  have  no  recollection  of  this  one  at  all  [copy  of  the  Active  File 
has  been  handed  to  the  witness].     That  was  what  year?     1939,  I  don't  recall  it. 


UN-AMERICAN  PKOL'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8691 

Mr.  Waldman.  Are  you  doing  any  active  work  in  this  T.  W.  U.  tlireatened 
strike? 

Miss  llr.iD.  No.  Mr.  Waldman. 

Q.  That's  the  answer. — A.  May  I  ask  you  what  you  mean  hy  "active  work"? 

Q.  The  same  kind  of  work  you  were  doing  with  the  National  Maritime 
Union. — A.  No,  I'm  not. 

Q.  This  is  the  application.  I  believe,  that  you  signed  for  your  civil  service — 
or  this  is  at  least  a  copy  of  it. 

Mr.  Waldman.  That's  a  copy. 

(The  document  is  handed  to  the  witne.ss). 

Q.  (Continuing.)  Is  there  any  error,  that  you  know  of,  on  that  application? — 
A.  This  is  apparently  when  I  applied  for  the  employment  manager's  examina- 
tion, because  it  says'  "'Exact  title  and  number  of  examination  desired." 

Q.  That's  right.  ' 

A.  Examination  for  employment  manager.  I  did  take  an  examination  for  that 
at  one  time. 

Mr.  Hanson.  Isn't  that  a  copy  of  your  original  application? 

Miss  Kkkd.  No;  this  isn't  a  copy  of  my  application.  This  is  for  a  promo- 
tional examinaticm.     It  says  here  "for  employment  manager." 

Mr.  Owens.  I  imagine  the  experience  is  on  the  other  side. 

Mr.  Waldman.  On  the  other  side. 

(The  witness  is  handed  the  document,  which  she  examines.) 

Miss  Reed.  Yes. 

Mr.  Owens.  Is  there  a  question  there — "Give  your  experience  for  the  past 
3  years,"  or  something  like  that?  Here's  the  question,  here.  Describe  under 
the  headings  given  below  any  employment  or  occupation  you  have  ever  had 
which  in  your  opinion  tends  to  qualify  you  for  the  position  sought,  and  as  far 
as  possible,  any  other  employment  or  occupation  you  have  had,  including  war 
service.  Give  Information  requested  under  each  heading,  being  careful  to  show 
definitely  whether  or  not  your  training  and  experience  meet  the  requirements 
for  the  position  for  which  you  are  making  application.  Qualifications  stated 
by  candidates  are  subject  to  verification.  Use  additional  sheets  of  paper  and 
attach  them  as  directed  at  the  end  of  this  if  needed  to  complete  your  experi- 
ence record — That  is,  give  the  positions  that  are  similar  to  the  one  for  which 
you  are  applying,  and  as  far  as  possible,  every  other  employment  or  occupation 
you  have  had.  I  assume  this  is  being  introduced  in  connection  with  your 
statement  this  morning  that  there  was  some  work  Miss  Reed  did  while  in 
Russia  that  she  did  not  account  for  in  this  application  blank. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt  : 

Q.  You  have  nothing  to  add  to  what  you  said  before  on  that? — A.  Yes.  I 
might  add  that  I  spent  a  year  in  California  once,  before  even  I  started  employ- 
ment work,  and  I  had  17  different  jobs  there. 

Q.  Seventeen? — A.  Yes.  I  worked  in  a  garage,  as  a  truck  driver.  I  worked 
on  cow  farms  as  milk  hand.  I  can't  quite  enumerate  all  the  different  kinds 
that  I  have  had,  and  when  I  did  the  work  in  Soviet  Russia,  for  0V2  months, 
as  I  said  this  morning,  I  was  doing  a  little  typing  and  proofreading  stuff.  I'm 
trying  to  think  of  how  long,  exactly,  I  was  in  the  Commissariat  of  Labor,  but 
I  know  I  went  there  about  February,  and  before  the  1st  of  May  the  job 
was  completed,  so  it  was,  we'll  say,  2  months  at  the  very  most.  And  entirely 
different  standards  and  all  of  work.  And  then  I  went  to  a  little  newspaper 
business,  of  editing  for  1  mouth — or  cheeking  over  correspondence  it  really  was, 
and  I  certainly  don't  see  that,  that  scraps  of  a  little  here  and  a  little  there 
would  indicate  that  I'm  better  qualified  for  an  employment  manager,  and,  as 
I  say,  there  wasn't  very  much  room  on  the  sheet,  except  for  the  things  that 
really  led  up  to  my  job,  and  I  didn't  put  it  in  there,  and  I  think  if  I  had  it 
to  do  over  again  I'd  eliminate  it  also,  because  I  don't  think  it  has  any  relative 
weight. 

Q.  To  get  back.  Miss  Reed,  to  this  statement  in  the  Journal  of  June  19.  1941, 
I  particularly  resented  it  when  I  saw  it,  because  I  wanted  it  understood  that 
this  was  a  private  hearing,  and  I  was  not  handing  anything  to  the  newspapers, 
and  this  certainly  looked  as  if  somebody  in  the  department  had  handed  some- 
thing to  the  newspapers. — A.  Yes. 

Q.  Now,  I  know  that  is  not  so.  Is  there  any  person  that  might  have  handed 
this  out,  that  you  know  of,  might  give  us  a  lead  on  investigating? — A.  No. 
It's   not  signed.     I   have   no   other   way   of  knowing   who   did    it,   other    than 


8692  UN-AMERICAN  PROrAOANDA  ACTIVITIES 

possibly  Howard  Rnshmore.  He's  assigned  to  this  sort  of  tiling  in  New  York 
City.     I  have  seen  his  name. 

Q.  Is  he  a  reporter  on  this  paper? — A.  Yes;  he  is. 

Q.  And  he  is  the  one,  as  I  recall  it,  who  wrote  the  article  in  the  Daily  Worker, 
on  Gone  With  the  Wind?— A.  Yes. 

Q.  And  he  got  into  some  scrape  with  the  control  commission  on  that,  or 
something? — A.  Well,  I  don't  know  the  story. 

Q.  I  don't  know  the  details,  but  he  is  an  ex-Communist? — A.  I  met  him  at 
a  party  once  and  I  knew  he  came  to  my  office,  before  he  was  laid  off  from  this 
paper,  and  apparently  wanted  some  more  free-lance  work.  He  walked  in  my 
office,  sat  down  and'  waited— I  had  to  keep  him  waiting  approximately  an 
hour — and  asked  me  if  I  could  help  him  get  a  newspaper  job  and  I  said  I 
don't  handle  newspaper  jobs,  the  place  to  apply  is  here,  and  here's  the  address. 
Now,  he  called  my  office  about  February — he  didn't  do  it,  a  man  that  works 
with  him  called  up  Miss  Kennedy  and  asked  what  date  I  was  appointed,  and 
then  calle<l  me  on  the  'phone  in  the  office  and  said.  "Is  it  true  your  mother  is 
a  part  owner  of  the  Daily  Worker?" — and  I  said,  "I'm  very  busy  on  my  job 
and  I'm  not  answering  any  questions."  He  told  me  he  was  from  the  Hearst 
Press— "and  I'm  not  answering  questions  of  that  nature,"  and  he  said,  "Well, 
here's  my  'phone  number,  and  call  me  back" — and  gave  his  name  as,  I  think, 
Bennett  or  something  like  that,  and  said  "if  I'm  out  ask  for  Rushmore."     Then 

I  recollected  that  Howard  Rushmore  had  been  in  some  disrepnte  with  the 
Daily  Worker,  and  I  flgure<l  that  that  is,  perhaps,  one  of  his  doings.  Now, 
on  tiie  other  hand,  I  know  of  no  other  way  by  which  any  reports  on  that  foul 
sheet — I  don't  know  any  other  way  it  could  have  gotten  there,  except  that  I 
think  he  and  Woltman  know  each  other  personally. 

Q.  I  think  that  explains  it. 

Mr.  Owens.  How  long  did  you  say  you  worked  in  Russia? 

Miss  Reed.  I  worked  totally  from  September  or  October  to  about — the  begin- 
ning of  October  until  the  summer,  when  I  went  on  vacation.  I  had  the  longest 
one  with  the  publishing  house  as  a  typist  or  proof i-eader.  and  about  2  months, 
approximately  in  this  Commissariat  of  Labor,  and  tdiout  a  month  for  the 

Mr.  Owens.  You  only  had  2  months  there  which  in  any  way  had  to  do 
with  this  application? 

Miss  Reed.  Yes ;  only  2  months. 

Mr.  Owens.  All  the  services  on  this  application  blank  refer  to,  or  cover, 
pretty  substantial  periods.  The  first  one  covers  2  years,  the  next  one  TVi 
months,  the  next  one  11  months,  the  next  6V2  months,  the  next  is  3  years  and 

II  months,  and  the  next  one  is  a  year  and  7  months. 
Mr.  Schmidt.  Yes. 

By  Mr.  Schmidt: 

Q.  Well,  have  you  any  other  statement  to  make?— A.  I'd  like  to  say  that  I 
regret  this  whole  thing  exceedingly,  Mr.  Schmidt,  and  I  feel  as  if  I  have  been 
pulled  through  a  knothole.  Maybe  it's  because  I  do  need  a  vacation  very  badly. 
I  have  been  doing  a  lot  of  doubling  up  work  in  my  office.  It's  been  a  very 
strenuous  few  months  for  me,  and  I  like  my  job  exceedingly,  and  I  have  no 
conscious  about  having  misused  my  job  or  gone  contrary  to  the  Devahey  law, 
which  I  understand  I  was  originally  called  in  about. 

Q.  Well,  Miss  Reed,  I'm  sorry  if  you  feel  that  you've  been  pulled  through 
a  knothole.  I  certainly  didn't  feel  that  I  pulled  you  through  a  knothole.  As 
I  have  told  you  before,"  I'm  sorry  that  I  had  to  get  this  kind  of  an  assignment, 
just  as  sorry  as  you  are  to  have  to  go  through  with  that  kind  of  an  assignment, 
but  I'm  sure  that  if  you  have  told  us  all  the  truth  there  is  absolutely  nothing 
for  you  to  worry  about.     So,  that's  all  I  can  say. — A.  All  right. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Thank  you.  Miss  Reed.     Good  afternoon. 

Certified  to  be  a  true  and  correct  copy  of  the  transcript  of  minutes. 

(Signed)     Jane  J.   Denikb, 
Senior  Hearing  Stenographer. 

Transcribed  July  3,  1941. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmiiicrham,  did  you  find  in  your  examina- 
tion of  these  documents  that  Miss  Reed  had  very  close  connections 
with  scores  of  prominent  Communists,  particularly  in  the  United 
States  but  also  in  other  countries  ? 


UX-A.MEKICAX   rROPACfANDA  ACTH  iriES  8693 

Mr.  Birmingham.  1  did. 

Mr.  Maithews.  Did  you  find  that  Nancj^  Roed  li:ul  been  engaged 
in  Coinnmnist  activities  in  the  United  States  outside  of  the  city  of 
New  York  I 

Mr.  BnmTNOH.\:\r.  I  did. 

Mr.  Ma'ithp:ws.  For  exani2)]e.  in  North  Carolina? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Oklahoma  ? 

Mr.  Bir:\iingham.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Colorado? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Are  there  among  tliese  documents 

Mr.  Birmingham.  And  Habana,  Cuba,  you  might  add. 

iSIr.  Matthews.  And  Habana,  Cuba? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  don't  want  to  interrupt  you  because  I  want  you  to 
develop  this  chronologically,  which  you  are  doing,  but  will  you  be 
able  to  identify  some  of  the  activities  engaged  in  by  Nancy  Reed? 
That  is,  specify  what  the  activities  were  and  who  she  was  working 
with,  so  we  may  have  a  clearer  picture. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  j:)urpose  at  the  present  time  is  to  give  a  gen- 
eral summary  of  what  the  documents,  one  by  one,  will  reveal. 

Mr.  Starnes.  All  right. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  Did  you  find  in  your  examination  of  these  docu- 
ments, Mr.  Birmingham,  that  Miss  Nancy  Reed  had  been  receiving 
reports  concerning  activities  of  a  Communist  nature  from  parts  of 
the  United  States  far  removed  from  New  Yoi-k  City? 

Mr.  Birmingha:h.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Reports  such  as  would  reasonably  be  presumed 
to  be  sent  to  a  very  high  and  important  functionary  of  the  Com- 
munist Party? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  true. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  .you  know  whether  or  not  Nancy  Reed  is  or 
has  been  married,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  could  never  prove  it,  but  it  has  been  stated 
that  she  was.    There  is  some  correspondence  there  to  that  effect. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  find  among  these  documents  a  passport 
or  passports  which  Nancy  Reed  had  had  made  out  to  herself? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did. 

Mr.  Ma'ithews.  Do  those  passports  reveal  that  Nancy  Reed  was 
born  at  Dunstable,  Mass.,  on  May  5,  1899? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  these  passports  show  that  Nancy  Reed  visited 
the  Soviet  T^nion  five  times? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  They  do. 

Mr.  Starnes.  During  what  period  of  time? 

Mr.  Bir:mingha:vi.  From  1931  to  1933. 

jVIr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  the  passports  wliich  we  will  pro- 
duce in  evidence  are  the  originals.  The  passports  show  the  first  visit 
by  Miss  Reed  under  the  name  of  Nancy  Reed  to  the  Soviet  Union 
in  1929.  The  second  visit  in  1930,  the  third  visit,  lasting  more  than 
a  year,  in  1931  and  1932.  The  fourth  visit  in  the  year  1935  and  the 
fifth  visit  in  1937. 


8694  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Did  5^ou  find,  Mr.  Birmingham,  that  Nancy  Reed  had  been  em- 
ployed by  the  Soviet  Govermnent  in  the  Soviet  Union  in  1931  and 
1932  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did ;  and  there  are  records  to  show  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Have  you  read  the  testimony  which  Miss  Reed 
gave  before  the  Deputy  Commissioner  of  the  Department  of  Labor 
for  New  York  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  No;  not  completely,  I  haven't. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Miss  Reed  testified 
that  she  omitted  from  her  application  blank  for  employment  in  New 
York  the  fact  that  she  had  been  employed  in  the  Soviet  Union  for  a 
period  of  almost  a  year  ? 

Mr.  BiRMiNGHAar.  I  believe  she  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is,  she  omitted  that  information  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  Miss  Reed  write  certain  articles  concerning 
her  visit  to  the  Soviet  Union  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  photostatic  copy  of  a  document,  the 
original  of  which  is  in  the  committee's  possession,  which  is  entitled 
"My  Year  in  Russia,  1932."  Can  you  identify  that  as  one  of  the 
documents  which  3^011  obtained  from  the  eifects  of  Miss  Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  that  is  in  the  hand- 
writing of  Nancy  Reed  as  you  have  had  occasion  to  check  her  hand- 
writing on  her  passports  and  other  documents  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  looks  the  same. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  poem  entitled  ''My  Year  in  Russia,  1932." 
It  reads  as  follows : 

I  lived  and  I  loved  and  I  suffered ;  I  made  some  mistakes  that  were  bad,  but 
I  learned  the  proportion  of  my  life  to  that  of  the  mass  and  I  am  glad  for  I  now 
feel  that  I  can  be  useful  in  the  fight  for  the  rule  that  is  coming  to  pass,  and 
that  then  some  day  I  may  be  a  leader  in  the  struggle  of  class  against  class. 

I  ask  that  that  be  received  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Without  objection,  it  is  so  ordered. 

(The  photostat  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  1.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham.  I  show  you  a  photostatic  copy 
of  a  letter  and  ask  you  if  you  can  identify  that  as  one  of  the  docu- 
ments, the  original  of  which  is  in  the  possession  of  the  committee  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  is  a  letter  dated  October  29, 
1937,  from  the  son  of  Mary  Reed,  Mary  Reed  being  the  sister  of 
Nancy  Reed  and  residing  in  the  Soviet  Union  with  her  son  John, 
George  Copeland,  former  husband  of  Maiy  Reed,  was  the  father  of 
John,  therefore,  his  name  would  ordinarily  be  John  Copeland.  This 
letter  to  his  father  reads  as  follows : 

Dear  Dad:  Please  don't  send  me  letters  for  ".Tohn  Copeland"  because  in  this 
school  people  know  me  as  "Reed."  I  just  got  this  letter  because  nobody  knew 
John  Copeland,  but  that's  all  right,  I  got  the  letter. 

I  don't  know  much  about  going  to  U.  S.  A. 

I  am  learning  to  type. 

I  play  football,  the  English  kind.  I  like  to  play  Chess  very  much,  and  I  play 
it  good. 

I  don't  want  the  funnies.  I  want  Popular  Science  and  the  New  Pioneer  that 
Nan — 


UN-AMEUICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8695 

which  is  a  very  frequent  reference  to  Nanc}^  Reed  in  these  docu- 
ments— 

will  give  you  to  send  together  to  this  school ;  and  if  you  can,  you  can  send  me 
Popular  Mechanics. 

I  can't  use  American  money.  I  have  no  more  time.  Lots  of  love,  Your  son 
John. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  ask  that  be  received  in  evidence. 

Mr.  St.\rnes.  Without  objection,  it  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  2.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  is  this  a  photostatic  copy  of  part 
of  one  of  the  passports  of  Nancy  Reed  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  a  copy  of  the  original. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  ask  this  be  marked  as  an  exhibit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  passport  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  3.") 

Mr.  Matihews.  And  is  this  a  photostat  of  another  passport  of 
Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  This  is  a  photostat  of  the  original. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  I  ask  this  be  received  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received  as  an  exhibit. 

(The  passport  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  4.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Referring  again  to  John  Copeland,  who  wrote  his 
father  that  he  ay  anted  to  be  known  as  John  Reed  in  the  Soviet  Union, 
I  show  you  a  letter  from  Mary  Reed  to  her  sister,  Nancy.  Can  you 
identify  that  as  one  of  the  documents  which  you  obtained  in  this 
collection? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  can. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  letter  from  the  mother  of  John  Reed  to  his 
aimt,  or  her  sister,  there  is  this  reference  to  John : 

Am  enclosing  a  letter  from  John  and  may  even  send  a  wire,  but  I  really  don't 
want  you  to  put  off  your  trip  on,  account  of  that!  I  tried  to  make  John  change 
his  plans,  but  his  heart  is  so  set  on  visiting  his  friend  in  the  Ukraine  that 
nothing  will  move  him. 

I  ask  that  that  be  received  in  evidence  as  one  of  the  documents. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  letter  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  5.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  some  photostatic  copies  of  an  envelope 
and  ask  you  if  you  can  identify  that  as  a  photostat  of  the  originals 
in  the  committee's  possession. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  an  envelope  which  indicates  that  Nancy 
Reed  was  in  Leningrad  in  the  IJ.  S.  S.  R.  and  was  addressed  in  care 
of  "Intourist"  in  1937,  and  ask  that  be  received  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  photostat  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  6.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  I 

Mr.  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews,  do  you  have  any  documentary  proof 
or  oral  testimony  that  you  will  offer  showing  what  Nancy  Reed's 
purpose  was  in  visiting  the  Soviet  Union  so  many  times? 


8(596  UN-AMERICAN  PROl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  Mr.  Chairman.  I  show  you  a  photostatic  copy 
of  a  letter  dated  November  15,  1937,  addressed  to  "Nan,  darling,"  and 
ask  yon  if  you  can  identify  that  as  one  of  the  documents  which  you 
obtained  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  letter  addressed  to  "Nan"  says,  in  part: 

I  would  be  wori'iefl  stiff  about  you — not  hearing  from  you  for  so  long — if 
Mother  B.  had  not  had  news  of  you  through  Herta. 

Other  documents  in  the  collection,  Mr.  Chairman,  indicate  that 
"Mother  B."  in  tliis  r^ference  is  Mother  Bloor,  an  outstanding  Com- 
munist woman  in  the  United  States,  and  that  the  "Herta"  to  whom 
reference  is  made  here  is  Herta  Ware,  who  is  a  daughter  of  Mother 
Bloor  through  a  former  marriage  to  Ware. 

The  records  indicate  that  Mother  Bloor  was  once  married  to  a  cer- 
tain Ware  and  had  three  children  whose  names  were  Ware — Herta 
Ware;  Hamilton  Ware,  who  is  now  employed  in  Washington  in  the 
Federal  Government — I  believe  the  secretary  of  the  committee  can 
give  you  the  details  on  that;  and  Hal  Ware,  who  was  employed  in 
the  Department  of  Agriculture  until  1935,  when  he  was  killed  by  a 
streetcar  in  Washington. 

So  we  have  here  one  of  the  numerous  indications  that  Mother  Bloor, 
an  outstanding  Communist  woman  in  the  United  States,  and  her 
daughter  are  in  contact  with  Nancy  Reed  and  able  to  transmit  infor- 
mation to  Mary  Reed  in  Moscow  concerning  the  welfare  of  Nancy 
Reed  in  the  United  States. 

I  ask  that  that  he  received  as  an  exhibit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Without  objection,  it  is  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 

No.  7.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  we  have  here  a  collection  of  docu- 
ments, all  of  which  pertain  to  the  visits  of  Nancy  Reed  to  the  Soviet 
Union.  The  first  of  these  is  a  document  entitled  "A  Soviet  Vacation," 
which  is  a  typewritten  article  with  numerous  interlineations,  by  pen, 
written  by  Nan  Reed,  according  to  a  notation  made  in  the  handwriting 
of  Nancy  Reed. 

Mr.  Birmingham,  can  you  identify  that  as  one  of  the  documents 
which  you  received  or  obtained  in  this  collection  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  particular  article  about  which  we  have  no 
information  as  to  whether  it  was  ever  published  or  not,  Nancy  Reed 
describes  a  visit  which  she  made  to  one  of  the  rest  homes  in  the  Soviet 
Union  during  her  period  of  approximately  a  year's  employment  in 
that  country.  Some  of  the  passages  which  give  an  indication  a«  to 
Miss  Reed's  viewi)oint  belong,  I  think,  in  the  record  at  this  point : 

I  was  spellbound,  thinking  it  is  because  I  am  a  worker  in  the  Soviet  Union 
that  all  these  beauties  are  my  privilege  to  live  among  and  to  enjoy.  I  recalled  my 
enthusiastic  first  impressions  of  southern  California  twelve  years  ago,  and  realized 
that  in  spite  of  similar  beauty,  the  thrill  of  what  I  now  felt  had  been  totally 
lacking  then.  And  this  was  only  my  first  hour.  I  have  not  yet  met  the  250 
Soviet  students  that  made  up  the  population  of  this  workers'  vacation  paradise. 

I  wondered  how  I  was  going  to  communicate  with  them  when  my  knowledge  of 
their  language  was  so  scant,  but,  luckily  for  me,  the  Russians  are  possessed  of 


UX-AMEKICAN   I'llOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8697 

groat  imaginations:  when  words  failed  nio,  wli(>n  even  my  evcr-prosent  little 
dictionary  did  not  disclose  my  meanint;.  then  my  liand  motions  plus  their  quick 
response,' and  always  a  lot  of  lauyliter,  would  somehow  hridjie  the  gap  toward 
understanding.     This  is  the  quickest,  happiest  way  of  learning  Russian. 

A  thorough  physical  examination  was  required  on  arival  and  advice  given  as 
to  how  many  pounds  one  should  gain  or  lose  hy  the  time  one  was  ready  for 
another  examination  before  going  homo.  The  free  medical  department  had  two 
iloetors,  two  nurses,  and  a  dentist  on  duty  all  the  time,  and  every  ache  or  pain 
was  tended  with  a  care  that  seemed  to  me  should  make  any  orphan  there  feel 
he  had  parents  again.  There  was  even  a  barber  shop  on  the  premises  as  well  as 
a  post,  telegraph,  and  banking  service  for  two  hours  every  day.  I  wondered  to 
myself  what  more  security  a  workei-  would  want  than  to  liave  his  meals,  living, 
recreation,  and  health  all' taken  care  of.  But  this  security  in  the  Soviet  Union 
means  more  than  just  material  security,  it  gives  courage  to  grasp  life  firmly  with 
both  hands  and  face  its  problems  fearlessly. 

Our  daily  regime,  for  there  are  no  Sundays,  was  a  choice  of  sports  in  the 
mornings— swimming,  rowing,  sun  bathing— a  beach  for  the  women  and  a  beach 
for  the  men,  adjoining  with  no  drawn  line  of  demarcation — tennis  with  a  variety 
of  good  rackets  for  the  experienced  and  not  so  good  for  the  beginners;  volley 
hall,  the  great  national  game;  reading  in  the  library  or  walks  to  the  village  for 
a  newspaper  or  grapes,  since  it  was  the  grape  season  in  one  of  the  best  grape 
regions  of  the  country. 

Dinner  was  at  one  o'clock  and  consisted  of  cabbage  soup  with  meat,  croquettes  or 
-sometimes  chicken,  two  vegetables,  and  dessert.  Immediately  after  dinner  we  had 
to  go  to  our  dormitories  to  lie  down.  Reading  was  allowed,  but  sleep  was  urged. 
Occasionally  the  head  doctor  came  around  to  count  noses,  but  since  we  never 
knew  when  he  was  coming  it  was  a  very  effective  method  of  seeing  that  each  got 
his  i)roper  amotint  of  daily  rest. 

The  tea  gong  soiuided  at  4  o'clock  and  huns  or  sweetened  bread  were  an  added 
Incentive  to  answer  this  call.  From  teatime  until  supper  and  also  after  supper 
one  could  again  do  what  he  liked.  For  supper  at  7  we  usually  had  hot,  white 
kasha,  very  much  like  our  farina,  fish  or  meat,  vegetables,  black  bread,  and 
tea.  I  never  got  up  from  the  table  hungry.  Together  with  the  first  breakfast  at 
S  o'clock  of  milk,  coffee,  and  black  bread,  and  the  second  breakfast  at  9  o'clock 
of  bread  and  butter,  eggs,  and  tea.  we  actually  consumed  five  meals  a  day,  and 
since  we  had  to  be  in  bed  at  11  o'clock,  we  got  at  least  ten  hours  of  sleep  out  of 
every  twenty-four. 

Never  have  I  known  more  immaculate  cleanliness  nor  more  clocklike  smooth- 
ness in  the  running  of  an  organization,  but  what  was  still  more  impressive  and 
still  remains  refreshing  in  my  mind  was  the  un.iversal  spirit  of  wholesome,  happy 
fun.  Never  once  did  any  of  these  Soviet  students,  young  men  and  women  entirely 
unchaperoned,  have  to  resort  to  any  artificial  stimulation  in  the  form  of  drink, 
although  wine  shops  were  only  ten  minutes  away,  but  always  in  the  evenings 
did  their  happy  voices  ring  across  the  moonlit  waters  with  the  triumphant  songs 
of  their  proletarian  world. 

Tliat  is  the  general  tenor  of  the  article.  It  compares  conditions  and 
affairs  in  the  Soviet  Union  with  conditions  in  the  United  States. 

Is  that  a  correct  account  of  this  article,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr,  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  ask  the  article  be  received. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Without  objection,  it  is  so  ordered. 

(The  article  referred  to  is  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  8.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  document  is  a  certificate  made  out  to  Nancy 
Reed  admitting  her  to  the  rest  home  whicli  she  describes  in  the  article 
from  which  an  excerpt  has  been  read. 

I  ask  this  be  received  in  evidence. 

Air.  Starnes.  Without  objection  it  is  so  ordei-ed. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  9.") 


3598  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  document  dated  June  12,  1932,  ad- 
dressed to  "Comrade  Borodin,"  and  ask  you  if  you  can  identify  that 
as  one  of  the  documents  which  you  obtained  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  10.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  two-page  typewritten  document  sent  by 
Nancy  Keed  to  Comrade  Borodin,  in  which  Miss  Reed  makes  numerous 
suggestions  concerning  the  office  in  which  she  was  working  in  the 
Soviet  Union. 

The  "Comrade  Borodin"  to  whom  reference  is  made  here  first 
achieved  international  notoriety  as  the  representative  of  Stalin  in 
China  in  1927,  when  Borodin  was  sent  to  that  country  to  head  the 
Communist  revolution  which  took  place  at  that  time  and  in  which 
enterprise  Earl  Browder,  according  to  testimony  befc-re  this  com- 
mittee, was  closely  associated  with  Comrade  Borodin. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  this  about  the  period  of  time  that  Earl  Browder 
testified  before  this  committee  here  in  this  room  that  he  visited  China 
on  a  special  mission  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  sir ;  and  Michael  Borodin  was  associated  with 
Browder  in  that  enterprise;  and  James  Dolson,  another  witness  before 
this  committee,  a  witness  from  Pittsburgh,  was  also  in. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  that  the  one  cited  for  contempt  before  the  com- 
mittee ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  correct.  He  was  also  m  China  working 
under  Michael  Borodin  at  that  time. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Was  that  the  same  James  Dolson,  who  was  employed 
on  the  W.  P.  A.  as  a  teacher? 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  That  is  correct.  You  may  recall  when  Mr.  Dolson 
was  asked  if  he  had  conferred  at  any  length  with  Borodin  his  first 
reply  was  that  he  didn't  speak  Russian  well  enough  to  confer  with 
Borodin  and  then  Mr.  Wolson  was  reminded  that  Mr.  Borodin  was 
born  and  grew  up  in  Chicago  and  spoke  Englisli  fluently,  and  then  he 
admitted  he  had  conversations  with  him. 

The  particular  criticism  which  Miss  Reed  makes  to  Borodin  in  this 
document  and  to  Comrade  Melnichanski  in  another  document  which  I 
ask  Mr.  Birmingham  to  identify 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  these  Russian  leaders  should  take  more  care 
to  impress  favorably  foreign  visitors  so  that  when  they  return  to  their 
respective  countries  they  will  be  better  propaganda  for  the  Soviet 
Union. 

Is  that  a  correct  statement  of  the  point  involved  in  these  communi- 
cations, Mr,  Birmingham  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Mattews.  I  ask  the  letter  to  Comrade  Melnichanski  be  marked. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  11.") 

Mr.  Starnes.  These  last  two  exhibits  are  important  documents  and 
the  Reporter  will  incori3orate  them  in  the  record. 


UN-AMERICAN  I'llOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8699 

(Birmingham  Exhibit  No.  10  is  as  follows:) 

Ckiticisms  of  Oub  Office  Roiitine  and  Suggestions  for  Tiitaii  iMPBovEMEirr 

June  12,  1932. 

To  COMBAPE  BOKODIN  : 

I.    LACK  OF  OKGA.MZhU  SYSTEM 

Because  of  the  total  absence  of  any  meetings  of  our  staff,  the  functions  of  eacti 
member  have  never  been  clearly  defined,  and  problems  that  required  discussion  by 
the  staff  as  they  arose  have  remained  unsolved. 

a.  We  should  have  regular  weekly  staff  meetings. 

b.  We  should  have  a  definite  idea  of  the  kind  of  information  that  you,  AOMS 
and  the  Intourist  need  for  reference,  in  order  to  properly  and  permanently  or- 
ganize our  system  of  taking  applications. 

n.    I-\CK  OF  REOirLAR  SERVICE 

Our  work  has  suffered  very  much  from  the  irregularity  of  the  Intourist  guides. 
During  May  when  the  Visa  Bureau  sent  word  to  us  to  proceed  in  getting  people 
jobs,  we  were  continually  stranded  for  guides,  and,  when  they  did  come,  they  were 
not  qualified  to  do  any  telephoning  to  the  trusts  before  taking  the  people  to  the 
job,  because  this  job  of  telephoning  requires  some  one — 

(1)  With  a  good  understanding  of  employment  (terms  and  so  forth). 

(2)  With  a  knowledge  of  the  needs  of  the  trusts. 

(3)  With  a  knowledge  of  how  to  get  in  touch  with  the  right  people,  for  hiring 
applicants. 

(4)  With  a  good  knowledge  of  the  three  languages,  Russian,  English,  German. 

a.  We  need  one  permanent  n-orker  irith  above  qnaliflcations.  Such  a  person 
might  combine  the  duties  of  making  the  contacts  with  the  trusts  and  the  duties 
of  technical  secretary.  If  well  organized  the  work  of  the  English  and  German 
secretaries  could  be  dovetailed  with  those  of  the  technical  secretary  so  as  to  give 
the  former  time  to  make  frequent  statistical  lists  and  reports  from  the  data  which 
they  have  at  hand,  and  possibly  take  over  some  of  the  correspondence  from  appli- 
cants abroad. 

b.  We  need  office  equipment  such  as  another  telephone,  an  up-to-date  telephone 
book.  (We  have  had  to  use  one  that  is  2  years'  old  and  belongs  to  another  depart- 
ment which  claims  it  whenever  it  needs  it — better  paper  supply  (sometimes  we  get 
only  three  sheets  at  a  time)  files — desks  repaired. 

c.  We  need  to  work  out  a  standard  voeabular^  of  employment  terms. 

in.    WITHHOLDING  OF  INFORMATION 

Information  from  such  organizations  as  the  AOMS  and  the  Dvoretz  Truda 
should  be  given  to  the  Secretaries  immediately  on  receipt  so  as  not  to  hold  up  the 
work  unnecessarily  and  so  that  the  secretaries  can  coordinate  their  activities 
instead  of  working  as  they  do  now,  in  a  haphazard  way. 

a.  Any  meetings  that  deal  with  the  work  of  the  bureau  should  include  the  secre- 
taries of  the  two  sections  and  should  be  interpreted  to  them  so  that  they  may 
know  of  the  work  that  is  being  planned. 

rv.   DAMAGING  POLITICAL  EFFECTS 

Because  the  work  of  our  office  has  been  so  disoi'ganized,  and  because  of  the  lack 
of  regular  service,  it  has  naturally  resulted  in  a  poor  impression  on  the  people 
coming  to  the  office,  and  when  this  impression  is  not  overcome  it  gives  rise  to  very 
bad  propaganda  against  the  U.  S.  S.  R. 

a.  Fifty  Germans  and  fourteen  Americans  have  already  gone  back  to  their  own 
countries,  and  it  has  been  reported  that  the  Germans  made  an  unfavorable  report 
of  things  here. 


8700  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

(Birmingham  Exhibit  11  is  as  follows:) 

Moscow,  July  25,  1932. 

Deur  Comrade  Mklisichanski:  I  have  been  working  in  employment  manage- 
ment for  the  last  five  years  and  I  want  to  make  my  experience  useful  to  the 
Soviet  Union. 

While  people  coming  as  tourists  were  being  allowed  to  stay  as  workers  I 
was  in  Charge  of  the  English-speaking  section  of  the  Foreign  Bureau  under 
Comrade  Borodin,  but  when  this  department  was  closed  as  a  result  of  the 
new  regulation  1  was  transferred  by  Comrade  Borodin  to  the  Moscow  Daily 
News. 

The  workers  who  came  to  Moscow  while  I  was  on  that  job  were  up  against 
a  very  diflBcult  problem.  A  decision  which  affected  their  whole  lives  was 
changed  about  twenty  times  in  one  month,  and  workers  who  had  come  here 
enthusiastically,  eager  to  give  all  they  had  to  the  building  of  socialism,  found 
themselves  stranded  and  in  many  cases  were  treated  by  oui*  office  with  such 
indifference  and  such  failure  to  understand  their  predicament  that  they  left 
with  a  very  bitter  feeling  against  the  Soviet  Union,  which  through  its  tourist 
offices  in  various  countries  had  encotiraged  them  to  stay  and  now  drove  them 
back  to  the  poverty  and  persectition  of  their  own  countries  without  so  nuuli 
as  an  explanation. 

Such  treatment  affects  the  whole  attitude  of  a  worker.  His  political  uut- 
look  when  he  returns  home  depends  to  a  great  extent  on  the  honest  courtesy 
with  which  he  has  treated  here.  Consequently,  I  look  tipou  the  hiring  of 
foreign  workers  for  the  Soviet  Union  not  only  as  a  convenience  for  the  fac- 
tories here,  but  also  from  the  political  standpoint  of  their  attitude  towards  u?;. 

I  must  say  that  the  failure  of  some  comrades  in  Moscow  to  tinderstand 
the  psychology  of  foreign  workers  who  are  sympathetic  to  us  has  caused  much 
needless  hostility.  I  have  counteracted  this  as  far  as  it  has  been  in  my  power 
to  do  so,  and  hope  that  the  opportunity  will  again  come  to  me  for  the  personal 
contact  in  employment  for  which  I  am  trained  and  for  which  I  am  naturally 
fitted. 

Therefore,  I  am  extremely  interested  in  the  ftitttre  of  emi)loyment  work  in 
connection  with  Soviet  factories.  If  there  is  any  possibility  of  the  develop- 
ment of  organized  selection  f)f  workers  abroad  f<)r  jobs  here,  I  want  to  know 
how  how  I  can  best  eijuip  myself  for  such  work  and  get  the  experience  in 
Soviet  industry  and  political  life  which  would  tit  me  for  carrying  on  employ- 
ment work  abroad.  My  knowledge  of  French  and  German  is  a  help,  and  I 
expect  to  know  Rtissian  soon. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  is  a  document  in  Russian  which  I  ask 
Mr.  Birmingham  to  identify.     Did  you  obtain  that  document? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  certificate  of  credentials  showing-  th'^t 
Nancy  Reed  is  a  fellow-laborer  editing  the  newspaper,  Moscow 
Daily  News,  published  in  Moscow  in  the  American  language.  Trans- 
lated it  is  as  follows : 

To  whom  it  may  concern: 

Comrade  Nancy  Reed  is  a  fellow-laborer  editing  the  newspaper  Moscow 
Daily  News,  published  in  Moscow  in  the  American  laiigtiage.  Comrade  Reed 
is  traveling  to  the  Caticuses  in  order  to  gather  material  for  our  paper- 

We  ask  all  Soviet  and  professional  unions  to  cooperate  with  her  in  her  work, 
as  well  as  to  assist  her  in  obtaining  all  necessary  tickets  for  her  travels. 

It  is  signed,  "Stolar,  Secretary  in  Charge." 

I  ask  this  be  marked  as  an  exhibit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  12.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham.  I  show  you  another  document 
and  ask  you  to  describe  it. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is  an  identification  card  for  professional 
printers  and  billfolders. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  a  certificate  or  niembershi])  card? 


UX-AMEKICAN   I'KOrACJANnA  ACTIVITIES  8701 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  an  identification  card  issued  to  the  mem- 
bers of  the  union  and  shows  Nancy  Keed's  membership  as  a  ma- 
chinist. 

Mr.  Matphews.  Was  this  made  out  to  Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Nancy  Reed,  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  document  indicates  that  Nancy  Reed  was  a 
member  of  the  Professional  Printers  and  Billfolders  Union  in  the 
Soviet  Union,  and  her  occupation  is  listed  as  a  "machinist"  on  her 
membersliip  card. 

I  oli'er  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman, 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  13.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  can  you  identity  that  document 
and  give  its  significance  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  This  is  made  from  Nanc}'  Reed's  phone  book 
while  she  was  in  the  Soviet,  of  telephone  numbers  of  persons  and  the 
names  of  collectives  and  trade  unions  and  names  of  persons  connected 
with  the  same,  with  Moscow  telephone  numbers. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  have  the  entire  telephone  book  used  by 
Miss  Reed  in  the  Soviet  Union? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  MATTHEW'S.  I  offer  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Ml".  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  14.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  One  more  document.  Did  you  obtain  that  docu- 
ment in  this  collection  of  material  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  There  are  four  of  notes  in  the  handwriting  of  Nancy 
Reed  and  two  tyi^ewritten  pages  which  apparently  deal  with  the 
personnel  work  in  which  Miss  Reed  was  engaged  while  she  was  em- 
])loye(l  by  the  Soviet,  a  type  of  work  similar  to  that  which  she  had  been 
doing  for  the  Department  of  Labor  in  the  State  of  New  York  during 
the  past  several  years. 

As  a  matter  of  fact,  the  documents  disclose,  do  they  not,  Mr.  Bir- 
mingham, that  Miss  Nanc}'  Reed  stated  to  the  authorities  in  tlie  Soviet 
Union  that  one  of  the  purposes  of  her  obtaining  employment  in  the 
Soviet  Union  was  connected  with  the  fact  that  she  was  doing  similar 
work  in  the  Ignited  States? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthew's.  I  offer  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  St.\i;nks.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  15.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  the  work  of  personnel  placement? 

Ml-.  BiimiNGHAM.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  Mr.  Birmingham,  when  Nancy  Reed  returned 
from  the  Soviet  Union  was  she  active  at  all  in  propaganda  work  on 
])ehalf  of  the  Soviet  Union  ? 

^fr.  Bii::mingiiam.  Very  much  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  she  make  speeches  in  this  country  giving  her 
impression  of  the  Soviet  Union  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  On  many  occasions. 


8702  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  document  and  ask  you  to  identify  that. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  can. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  is  a  photostatic  copy  of  a  letter 
addressed  to  Miss  Reed  from  Margaret  Thorp,  who  signed  herself 
as  Mrs.  Willard  Thorp,  who  I  think  was  one  of  the  prominent  officials 
in  the  N.  R.  A.  a  few  years  ago. 

Margaret  Thorp  writes  to  Miss  Reed  saying : 

It  is  very  pleasant  to  hear  from  you  and  I  am,  of  course,  delighted  to  do 
anything  I  can  for  the  Cause,  though,  since  I  am  a  very  new  member  of  the 
present  day  club  and  have  a  bad  memory  for  faces,  I  shall  not  be  as  useful  as  I 
should  like  to  be. 

Your  nice  elderly  lady,  I  am  sure,  was  Mrs.  William  R.  Hall,  11  Cleveland 
Lane,  who  is  a  great  believer  in  recognition. 

The  person  who  introduced  you  was,  I  think,  Mrs.  Thomas  C.  Roberts,  32 
Hodge  Road — anyway  I  believe  she  would  be  worth  trying.     Also  these,  though 

I  may  make  some  horrid  slips: 

Miss  Edith  Roberts,  Miss  Helen  Roberts,  46  Bayard  Lane  ;  Mrs.  Walter  Roberts, 
155  Hodge  Road;  Mrs.  Richard  V.  Lindabury,  34  Cleveland  Lane;  Mrs.  George 
Batten,  Rosedale  Road ;  Mrs.  Burnham  Dell,  Meadow  Garden,  Kingston  Road ; 
Mrs.  William  Koren,  105  Fitz-Raudolph  Road;  Mrs.  Allen  G.  Shenstone,  111 
Mercer  Street. 

My  mother,  who  was  with  me  that  afternoon,  is  not  a  member  of  the  Club  but 
was  much  interested  in  your  talk  and  might,  I  think,  be  worth  writing  to;  Mrs. 
Wilson  Farrand,  157  Ralston  Avenue,  South  Orange,  N.  .T. 

Two  members  of  the  club  who  were  not  present  but  are  much  interested  in 
Russia  are : 

Mrs.  Luther  P.  Eisenhart,  The  Dean's  House,  Princeton  University,  and 

Mrs.  Roger  Parrott,  17  Ivy  Lane. 

Use  my  name,  if  you  care  to,  in  writing  to  either  of  them. 

I  hope  this  may  be  of  some  use.  Probably  Nancy  Baldwin  Smith  can  do  more 
for  you.  I  think  your  talk  did  real  good,  for  not  only  did  it  excite  those  in- 
numerable questions,  but  the  attempts  made  to  explain  away  your  agreeable 
picture  by  those  who  can  believe  no  good  of  the  country  are  very  amusing. 
Their  chief  bulwark  is  tliat  the  Russian  Government  probably  imported  you 
there  and  treated  you  in  the  princely  manner  you  described  so  that  you  might 
go  back  to  America  and  spread  propaganda.  I  hope  much  that  we  may  meet 
again  .soon.     Sincerely  yoiir.s,  Margaret  Thorp.     (Mrs.  Willard  Thorp.) 

I  offer  that  in  evidence.  Mr.  Chairman. 
Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  just  referred  to  and  read  was  marked  "Bir- 
mingham Exhibit  No.  16.") 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Mr.  Birmingham,  can  you  identify  this  as  a  docu' 
ment  which  you  obtained? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  letter  addressed  to  Miss  Nancy  Reed  from 
Evans  Clark,  director  of  tlie  Twentietli  Century  Fund,  Incorporated, 

II  West  Forty-second  Street,  New  York  City. 
Mr.  Clark  says : 

Dear  Miss  Reed:  I  have  your  letter  of  June  5th  asking  for  a  contribution 
for  the  Independent  Committee  for  the  Recognition  of  Soviet  Russia.  I  might 
possibly  make  a  very  small  donation,  but  would  like  to  know  a  little  more  about 
what  the  Committee  has  done  and  plans  to  do,  with  some  idea  of  the  financing. 

This  letter  indicates  that  Nancy  Reed  was  to  some  extent  active  on 
behalf  of  tliis  committee  in  soliciting  funds  for  the  work  of  the  com- 
mittee to  obtain  the  recognition  of  the  Soviet  Union. 

In  ink  on  the  letter,  in  the  handwriting  of  Nancy  Reed,  is  the  name 
of  Ira  S.  Kotins. 

I  offer  this  in  evidence.  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 


UX-AMKKICAN   I'UOrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8703 

(The  letter  just  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  17.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  document  is  a  list  of  individuals  who  were 
apparently  a  part  of  a  solicitation  list  in  the  possession  of  Nancy  Reed, 
and  used  by  her  in  coiniecfion  with  this  campaign  for  the  recognition 
of  the  Soviet  Union. 

Can  5'ou  identify  those  docmnents  as  a  part  of  the  collection  which 
you  obtained.  ]Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  BiRMiX(aiAM.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  first  name  visible  on  this  list  is  that  of  Charles 
Reclit,  lawyer.  Forty-second  Street. 

Mr.  Recht  will  be  recalled  as  a  witness  who  appeared  before  this 
conunittee.  a  lawyer,  whose  principal  client,  if  not  only  client,  is  the 
Soviet  Union. 

Other  names  appearing  on  this  list  are  Theodore  Dreiser,  Fanny 
Hurst.  Alice  Wit  hero  w,  Stewart  Chase,  Hey  wood  Broun,  Mrs.  Frank 
Vanderlip,  Floyd  Veil,  Norman  Hapgood,  Evans  Clark,  and  a  host  of 
others.  The  collection  also  includes  a  letter  addressed  to  Mrs.  Lamont, 
on  the  letterhead  of  this  Independent  Committee  for  the  Recognition 
of  the  Soviet  Union,  which  shows  that  Margaret  Lamont,  the  wife 
of  Corliss  Lamont,  was  the  executive  secretary  of  the  organization. 

Nancy  Reed's  name  does  not  appear  on  the  letterhead,  but  the  corre- 
spondent does  indicate  that  she  was  active  in  behalf  of  the  committee 
despite  the  fact  that  she  did  not  ajiparentl}^  hold  an  official  position. 

I  ofiVr  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received, 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  18.") 

Mi-.  M-ATrHEWs.  JSIr.  Chairman,  we  have  four  more  documents  which 
apparently  are  articles  which  Miss  Reed  either  published  or  intended 
to  piiblislu  all  of  which  have  to  do  with  her  impressions  of  the  Soviet 
T'nion  or  her  attitude  toward  certain  social  questions  in  the  United 
States. 

The  first  of  these  documents  is  entitled  "Tramway  Etiquette  in 
Moscow."    Can  you  identify  that,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  this  is,  as  Mrs.  Thorp  said,  an  agreeable  pic- 
ture which  was  presented  by  Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  offer  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  19.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  document  is  entitled  "Functions  of 
Money—"  that  is  in  the  dollar  sign,  "In  the  U.  S.  S.  R." 

Can  you  identify  that  document,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  These  are  penciled  notes  in  the  handwriting  of 
Nancy  Reed  and  among  her  comments  in  her  own  handwriting  under 
point  7 : 

The  seizure  of  all  banks  and  of  the  whole  financial  machinery  is  necessary  for 
the  subsequent  control  of  production  and  distribution  under  the  workers,  but  it 
will  not  be  the  delicate  or  complicated  machine  that  it  is  under  capitalism. 

62626— 41— vol.  14- 35 


3704  UX-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

These  were  apparently  notes  for  a  speech  or  an  article  prepared  in 
the  handwriting  of  Miss  Reed. 

I  offer  this  in  evidence,  Mr,  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  20.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  docnment  is  a  lengthy  one  dealing  with 
the  conditions  generally  in  the  Soviet  Union,  bnt  particularly  bearing 
upon  the  position  of  women  in  the  Soviet  Union.  It  is  a  typewritten 
document  with  interlineations  in  the  handwriting  of  Miss  Reed.  Is 
that  correct,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  again  the  numerous  comparisons  of  the  posi- 
tion of  women  in  the  United  States  and  the  Soviet  Union  show  that 
Miss  Reed  was  presenting  an  agreeable  picture  of  the  Soviet  Union  as 
contrasted  with  the  disagreeable  picture  of  the  United  States? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  offer  that  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  21.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  document  will  you  identify  as  one  ob- 
tained with  the  others  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  typewritten  document  also  with  inter- 
lineations in  the  handwriting  of  Miss  Reed. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  typewritten  document  in  possession  of  the 
committee  is  a  letter  to  Mrs.  Roosevelt,  apparently  intended  for  publi- 
cation. It  is  not  signed  by  Miss  Reed  but  signed  "Ima  Worker."  It 
is  a  sharp  rebuke  of  Mrs.  Roosevelt  on  account  of  an  article  which 
Mrs.  Dahl,  the  daughter  of  Mrs.  Roosevelt,  had  published  in  Liberty 
Magazine  giving  some  indication  for  menus  on  vacation  and  in  the 
course  of  that  article  again  Miss  Reed  presents  a  rather  disagreeable 
picture  of  the  United  States  as  contrasted  with  the  sort  of  economy 
which  she  apparently  would  like  to  see  supplant  what  is  in  this  country. 

I  ask  that  this  be  received  in  evidence  as  one  of  the  documents. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  22.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  can  you  identify  this  photostatic 
document  as  a  copy  of  a  part  of  a  letter  from  Mary  Reed  in  the  Soviet 
Union,  to  her  sister,  Nancy  Reed,  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  A  portion  of  this  letter  reads  as  follows : 

I'm  puffing  my  chest  out  about  your  church  and  work  for  the  President.  Boy, 
you  are  a  "man  of  action"  all  right.  You've  got  the  guts,  kid,  and  can  go  through 
the  world  chin  up,  and  it  is  me  that  knows  how  that's  not  always  so  easy. 

If  Miss  Reed  had  appeared  before  the  committee  this  morning  I  am 
sure  the  connnittee  would  be  glad  to  have  her  explain  what  these 
references  mean. 

It  is  sometimes  true,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  a  word  like  "church''  is 
a  code  for  the  party  and  "work  for  the  President"  could  very  easily 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8705 

bo  work  for  somebody  who  is  designated  "]*resident."  I  think  you 
recall  Mr.  Dolson  had  a  membership  card  made  out  in  the  name  of 
the  l*resident. 

I  ask  this  be  marked  as  an  exhibit. 

Ml'.  Stai^nes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  23.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  will  you  identify  this  document 
as  one  that  you  obtained^ 

Mr.  BiRMixGHAM.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  This  is  a  letter  addressed  to  "Nancy  dear."  It 
is  dated  June  3,  1939,  and  signed  by  "Charles."  Charles  explains  in 
the  first  i^aragraph  that  he  is  compelled  to  break  a  date,  and  at  the 
close  of  his  letter  he  tells  Nancy  that  if  she  pursues  a  certain  course 
of  action,  "you'd  be  so  happy  and  a  million  times  better  Communist 
for  it.  too."'  We  don't  know  or  do  you  have  any  idea  who  "Charles" 
might  be  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Couldn't  identify  him. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Charles  is  unidentified  but  he  is  apparently  a  per- 
son who  assumes  in  his  correspondence  that  Miss  Reed  is  a  Communist. 

I  ask  this  be  marked  as  an  exhibit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  24.") 

Mr.  Matihews.  Can  you  identify  this  photograph  as  one  you  ob- 
tained in  this  collection  of  documents,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  photograph,  apparently,  of  a  passport 
photograph  which  may  be  deduced  from  the  fact  that  the  signature  is 
at  the  bottom  of  the  photograph  and  the  signature  is  "Grover  J. 
Shoholm." 

Mr.  Birmingham,  is  there  a  rather  extensive  correspondence  from 
Grover  Shoholm  in  this  collection  of  documents  which  w^ere  obtained 
from  the  effects  of  Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  There  is. 

Mr.  Matihews.  Does  that  correspondence  go  back  approximately 
20  years? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  does. 

Mr.  Matihews.  Does  it  go  back  to  the  days  of  Harvard  during  the 
World  War? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  does. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  Grover  Shoholm  apparently  a  student  at 
HarViU'd  University? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  He  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  offer  this  in  evidence. 

Ml*.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  photograph  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  25.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  anything  about  the  subsequent  em- 
ployment of  Gi'over  Sholiolm  as  revealed  in  these  numerous  docu- 
ments ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  don't  know  his  present  whereabouts.  Up  to 
1933  he  was  on  one  of  the  United  States  Shipping  Board  boats. 


8706  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  this  a  picture  of  Grover  Sholiolin  in  uniform 
on  a  United  States  liner  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  ask  this  be  received  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  photograph  referred  to  is  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  26.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  ask  these  exhibits  be  received  one 
by  one.  The  first  is  from  Grover  J.  Shohohii,  addressed  to  "Dear 
N.  E." 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  27.") 

Mr.  Starnes.  What  is  the  purport  of  the  correspondence?  To 
show  that  Grover  Shoholm  was  a  member  of  the  party  and  interested 
in  party  activities  and  that  he  was  employed  on  a  United  States 
merchant  ship  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  correct;  and  certain  official  documents 
which  were,  for  some  reason  or  other,  in  the  possession  of  Nancy 
Reed  which  show  that  Grover  Shoholm  was  an  employee  of  the 
Soviet  Union,  and  vested  with  absolute  autocratic  powers  in  various 
parts  of  the  Soviet  Union,  I  believe,  includin<r  Vladivostok.  His 
official  credentials  were  for  some  reason  or  other  in  the  possession 
of  Nancy  Reed. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  After  the  revolution. 
Mr.  VooRHis.  You  have  the  originals? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes,  sir.  The  first  is  a  letter  to  show  you  how 
extensive  this  correspondence  is.  It  dates  from  August  11,  1917. 
This  one  is  dated,  as  I  say,  August  11,  1917,  and  addressed  to  "Dear 
N.R." 

The  next  is  a  letter  with  the  envelope  accompanying  it,  addressed 
to  "Miss  Nancy  Reed,"  dated  May  2,  1938 ;  is  that  correct  ? 
Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

]VIr.  Matthews.  From  Grover  Shoholm  showing  that  from  the 
period  of  1917  until  1938  there  was  a  more  or  less  regular  corre- 
spondence between  Grover  Shoholm  and  Nancy  Reed.  In  this  letter 
of  April  30,  postmarked  May  2,  1938,  Grover  Shoholm  states: 

However,  I  spoke  with  Mother  Bloor  wheii  she  was  here,  perhaps  a  month 
or  a  little  more  ago,  to  make  sure  that  she  had  not  gotten  into  some  political 
trouble  there.  Mrs.  Bloor's  eyes  glowed  when  she  spoke  of  Mary,  she  knew 
her,  she  said  when  she  lived  in  Springfield,  and  she  was  emphatic  when  she 
said  that  she  knew  that  Mary  was  "all  right."  She  also  mentioned  you,  that 
you  had  just  returned  and  that  you  were  active  in  New  York. 

Now,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  think  it  is  a  reasonable  deduction  if  Mother 
Bloor  reports  to  some  one  who  is  a  known  Communist  abroad  that 
Nancy  Reed  is  "active  in  New  York,"  that  that  doesn't  mean  just 
generally  active  in  a  social  nature,  but  active  in  the  Communist 
Party.  However,  that  interpretation  may  be  taken  for  what  it  is 
worth. 

This  letter  has  an  interesting  closing.  First  Shoholm  has  asked 
about  the  conversion  of  rubles  into  dollars  or  dollars  into  rubles 
at  some  rate  other  than  the  official  rate  of  exchange  and  he  asks 


UN-AMERICAN'  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8707 

about  whether  it  is  a  serious  offense  to  smuggle  currency  into  the 
Soviet  Union.  American  currency  into  the  Soviet  Union. 

In  other  words  he  wants  to  send  some  money  to  Mary  in  the 
Soviet  Unioii,  accordin<r  to  the  letter,  and  he  is  seeking  advice  of 
Nancy  about  what  he  should  do  in  the  matter.     Then  he  says: 

If  you  could  scout  around  and  find  out  about  these  two  points,  you  being 
in  New  York,  the  center  of  things,  and  also  a  Party  member,  and  let  me  know 
at  once,  we  ought  to  be  able  to  help. 

Now,  apparently  Grover  Shoholm  categorically  identifies  Nancy 
Keed  as  a  member  of  the  Conununist  Party,  which  is  in  direct  con- 
tradiction to  her  testimony  before  the  deputy  commissioner  of  the 
De})artment  of  Labor  of  'New  York.  In  her  testimony  there  she 
denied  being  a  Conununist  or  ever  having  been  one, 

I  offer  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  28.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  letter  is  one  addressed  to  "Dear  Mary,"  a 
letter  which  was  also  in  the  possession  of  Nancy  Reed.  It  is  dated 
November  11.  1918.  In  this  letter  Shoholm  states  that  Porter  Sargent 
and  Everts  "are  the  conspirators  of  the  Harvard  Liberal  Club,  to 
which  I  belong."  Despite  the  date  on  the  letter,  there  is  no  reference 
in  the  connnunication  that  that  was  Armistice  Day. 

I  offer  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  29.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  letter  is  signed  "Grover  J.  Shoholm, 
LT.  S.  S.  Sturgeon  BayP    What  type  of  vessel  was  the  Sturgeon  Bayf 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  belonged  to  the  merchant  marine,  a  freighter. 
I  understand  it  is  still  in  service. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  still  in  service? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  one  time  Grover  Shoholm  was  apparently  em- 
ployed on  that  vessel. 

Mr.  jNIattheavs.  I  offer  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  30.") 

]\Ir.  Matthews.  And  I  show  vou  this  document.  Can  you  identify 
that  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes;  it  is  a  letter  addressed  to  Mary  and  signed 
b}'  Grover  J.  Shoholm,  U.  S.  S.  Sturgeon  Bay. 

Mr.  Matthe^vs.  I  offer  that  in  evidence, 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  31.") 

Mr.  Mati-hews.  And  do  you  identify  this  document? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes.  It  is  a  letter  signed  with  the  initials  G.  J.  S., 
dated  September  17,  1918. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  offer  it  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 


3708  UN-AMERICAN  PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 

No.  32.")  .,       . 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  have  three  similar  documents 
signed  by  Grover  Shohohn,  which  I  offer  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  will  be  received. 

(The  three  documents  referred  to  were  marked  "Birmingham 
Exhibits  33,  34,  and  35.")  .       . 

Mr.  Matthews.  Here  is  a  photostatic  copy  of  official  credentials  m 
Kiissian,  which,  translated,  read  as  follows : 

Certificate  dated  October  i,  1920 : 

Issued  by  National  Secretariat  for  Foreign  Affairs  attesting  to  the  fact  that 
Comrade  Slioholm  is  designated  Controller  of  the  Radio  Telegraph  of  the  Na- 
tional Commissariat  for  Foreign  Affairs — 

and  bears  the  stamp  of  the  National  Commissariat  for  Foreign  Affairs. 

That  is  one  of  the  credentials,  the  original  of  which  was  in  the  pos- 
session of  Nancy  Reed  and  which  the  committee  now  has. 

I  offer  that  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  is  a  certificate  stamped  "R.  S.  F.  S.  R." 
which  means  the  Russian  Socialist  Federal  Soviet  Republic,  National 
Commissariat  for  Foreign  Trade,  and  dated  November  4,  1920,  at 
Moscow.    It  states : 

Issued  by  National  Committee  for  Foreign  Trade  to  Comrade  Shoholm,  Grover 
Ivan  or  Ivanov,  to  serve  in  capacity  of  Correspondent  Translator  for  the  National 
Commissariat  for  Foreign  Trade  in  Vladivostok  in  the  Dolnevostok  Republic. 

All  civilian  and  military  groups,  the  R.  S.  F.  S.  R.,  and  the  Dolnevostok  Repub- 
lic are  ordered  to  obey  Comrade  Shoholm  to  the  full  during  his  tenure  in  the  City 
of  Vladivostok,  as  well  as  in  the  execution  of  his  service  in  this  official  commission. 

It  is  signed :  "National  Committee  for  Foreign  Trade." 

I  offer  that  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  received.  i^-u-^ 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 

No.  37.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  next  one  of  the  credentials  is  a  certificate  issued 
to  one  Comrade  Grover  Ivanov  Shocholm  or  Shokolm,  Minister  of  Pro- 
visions and  Trade,  to  act  as  director  of  management  of  the  authorized 
commission  in  Vladivostok,  to  work  as  correspondent-translator : 

All  native  and  military  groups  of  the  D.  V.  R.  are  to  report  to  Shoholm  for 
directions  in  the  city  of  Vladivostok. 

It  is  signed  by  the  Minister  of  Provisions  and  Trade,  D.  V.  R.,  and 
Director  of  Affairs,  January  2, 1921.    I  offer  that  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered.  , 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 

No.  38.")  ^  ..•  u  •   J-    .    .1,  ^ 

Mr.  Matthews.  There  are  several  documents  which  indicate  that 

Grover  Shoholm  has  been  in  correspondence,  not  only  over  a  long 

period  of  time  with  Mary  and  Nancy  Reed  but  also  from  many  parts 

of  the  world.  __.,.,. 

Here  is  a  letter  from  Malmo,  Sweden ;  an  envelope  from  Helsinki, 
Finland;  one  from  Bochkareyo,  Siberia;  and  one  from  Vladivostok; 
and  so  on.    I  offer  them  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  will  be  received. 


UX-A.\rERICAN   PHOPAGAXDA  ACTIVITIES  8709 

(The  documents  referred  to  were  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  39.") 

^Ir.  Staknes.  The  purport  of  all  those  official  docnnients  is  to  show 
that  Shoholm  was  a  high  functiojiaiy  in  the  Coinnuinist  Party? 

Mr,  Matthews.  Yes;  and  in  one  of  his  letters  to  Nancy  Reed  he 
says: 

You  being  a  Party  member  would  be  able  to  supply  me  witb  certain  attitudes. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  this  man  has  been  an  employee  of  various  ship- 
ping concerns  in  this  country? 

Mr.  BiKMiNGHAM.  Tluit  is  correct.  He  has  been  in  the  Merchant 
Marine. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  there  any  indication  he  ever  held  any  govern- 
mental position  in  this  country  or  was  employed  by  the  Government  in 
anv  capacity  in  this  country  ? 

Mr.  BiKMiNGHAivr.  Yes. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  In  this  letter  which  has  already  been  introduced  in 
evidence,  Grover  Shoholm  wrote  to  Nancy  Reed : 

I  probably  told  you  tbat  I  worked  for  about  two  years  iu  the  State  Chemical 
Laboratory  on  water  analysis,  and  about  nine  months  in  the  Soils  Laboratory 
of  the  United  States  Engineers  and  took  some  courses  at  Brown. 

In  this  particular  letter  Shoholm  mentions  other  Conununists  who 
are  publicly  identified  as  such,  as  being  in  touch  with  Nancy  Reed. 
He  says  (Birmingham  Exhibit  No.  35)  : 

On  the  question  of  books,  "revolutionary  novels,"  suppose  you  consult  with 
Myra  Page.  She  knew  me  when  I  was  in  the  Party  and  will  remember  me. 
I  always  liked  her  way  of  writing. 

Myra  Page  is  one  of  the  writers  on  the  Daily  Worker's  staff  and 
has  been  for  approximately  20  years.  Myra  Page  is  at  the  present 
time  also  the  director  of  a  school  for  writers  conducted  under  the 
auspices  of  the  League  of  American  Writers. 

Again  Shoholm  says: 

If  you  can  see  Fanny  Rudd — there  is  a  good  comrade,  and  she  will  help. 
About  me  just  say  that  I  am  trying  to  be  a  chemist  but  meeting  with  no  great 
success. 

Can  you  identify  this  as  a  photostatic  copy  of  part  of  a  letter  sent 
by  Mary  Reed  to  Nancy — Mary  Reed  Copeland  to  Nancy  Reed  ? 
iMr,  Birmingham.  Yes. 
Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  in  this  particular  letter  that  Mary  Reed  says : 

But  M.  B.  will  give  you  an  inkling.  Also,  I  sent  a  telegram  for  the  books  and 
busy  as  you  are  I  know  you'll  get  Joe  Freeman  and  Michael  Gold  and  others  on 
the  job,  and  Esther  promised  to  help,  too. 

Mr.  Birmingham,  have  j'^ou  been  able  to  identify  the  "Esther" 
referred  to  in  this  correspondencse  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  have  not. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  the  "Joseph  Freeman"  and  "Michael  Gold" 
referred  to  have  been  prominently  identified  in  the  public  mind  as 
Communists? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  They  have, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Michael  Gold  being  one  of  the  columnists  on  the 
Daily  Worker  and  Joseph  Freeman  for  a  number  of  years  one  of  the 
editors  of  New  Masses? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr,  Matthews.  I  offer  this  photostat  in  evidence,  Mr,  Chairman. 


3710  UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  i-eceived. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  40.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  identify  this  as  part  of  another  letter 
sent  by  Mary  Reed  Copeland  to  her  sister  Nancy  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  can. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  letter  Mary  Reed  Copeland  asks  her  sister 
Nancy : 

And  why  V.  I.  Jerome  did  not  answer  my  letter. 

The  assumption  here  is  that  Mary  Reed,  that  is  that  Nancy  Reed,  is 
in  contact  with  these  prominent  Communists  in  New  York  City  and 
will  be  able  to  answer  such  questions  for  her  sister  Mary.  I.  V. 
Jerome,  for  example,  was  for  a  number  of  years  the  editor  in  chief 
of  the  Communist,  the  monthly  publication  of  the  Communist  Party. 
She  says : 

Include  his  answer  in  your  wire  even  if  you  have  to  take  it  out  of  my  dollars 
and  take  the  books  out,  too,  if  you  can't  get  them  otherwise.  Ask  Joe  or  someone 
about  the  author,  too. 

And  on  the  assumption  derived  from  previous  correspondence  that 
is  apparently  Joe  Freeman. 

I  offer  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  41.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  can  you  identify  that  as  one  of 
the  documents  you  obtained  in  this  collection  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  can. 

Mr.  IMatthews.  This  is  a  letter  addressed  "Dear  Nancy"  and  signed 
"Herta." 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  Herta  Ware? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Herta  Ware;  is  that  correct,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  letter  Herta  Ware,  the  daughter  of  Mother 
Bloor,  says  to  Nancy : 

Hope  we  can  have  another  get-together  next  week.  Carl  and  Anne  are  down 
here  in  a  little  shack  with  the  baby  and  a  colored  girl. 

The  reference  there,  Mr.  Chairman  is  apparently  to  Carl  and  Anne 
Reeve.     Carl  Reeve  is  a  son  of  Mother  Bloor  by  another  marriage, 

I  offer  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  42.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  identify  that  letter,  Mr.  Birmingham, 
please? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  letter  signed  Len ;  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  letter  is  addressed  "Dear  Nan."  The  letter  is 
from  Glasgow,  Scotland.     In  the  course  of  this  letter  Len  writes : 

About  yourself  now.  I  see  that  you  are  busy  with  meetings,  and  so  forth,  and 
also  that  you  very  often  meet  Rose  Baron.  Exactly  twelve  months  ago  today  I 
was  flliing  in  a  form  in  the  M.  O.  P.  R.  offices  under  the  personal  supervision  of 
Rose.     She  will  remember  that 


UX-AMEKICAX   rUOI'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8711 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  is  "M.  O.  P.  R."? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  the  Russian  headquarters  of  the  Interna- 
tional Labor  Defense.  There  lias  been  a  <z"ood  deal  of  testimony  in 
the  conuuittee  whieh  makes  that  connection,  Concrressman.  I  don't 
know  the  Russian  words  for  M.  O.  P.  R.,  but  the  Rose  Baron  has  been 
identified  in  testimony  before  this  committee  as  the  office  secretary  of 
the  International  Labor  Defense  in  New  York  and  here  apparently 
she  was  working-  for  a  period  in  the  International  Labor  Defense 
headquarters  in  Moscow,  and  the  Len  of  this  letter  met  Rose  Baron 
in  Moscow  and  writes  to  Nancy  Reed  that :  "You  very  often  meet 
Rose  Baron."' 

Len  says: 

I  am  pleased  to  hear  you  have  found  a  job.  Don't  get  making  Red  speeches 
from  your  office  desk  and  find  yourself  fired  into  the  street. 

Another  part  of  the  letter  states : 

Sometime  ago  I  sent  a  copy  over  *^o  the  States  and  tliey  wrote  back  asking 
for  ijermission  to  publish  it. 

That  is  a  copy  of  his  pamphlet — 

but  1  have  heard  nothing  since  and  have  also  forgotten  the  address  of  the 
people  who  wrote  except  that  I  remember  it  was  from  Belle  Taub  whom  I 
met  in  Amsterdam  at  the  Anti-War  Congress. 

The  xVnti-War  Congress  referred  to  here  is  the  one  held  in  Am- 
sterdam. 

Mr.  Starnes.  From  which  came 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  sunuuer  of  1932,  from  which  came  the 
American  League  for  Peace  and  Democracy,  and  the  "Belle  Taub"  re- 
ferred to  here  is  the  wife  of  the  attorney  who  appeared  before  this 
committee  or  tried  to  appear  before  this  committee  recently. 

;Mr.  VooRHis.  What  attorne}'  was  that? 

Mr.  ]\Iatthews.  Allen  Taub.  The  chairman  will  recollect  the  ap- 
pearance of  Allen  Taub. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Yes,  I  remember  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Len  under  his  signature  savs: 


*&' 


The  addre.^s  I  have  will  always  find  me,  but  I  would   remind  you  it  is  the 
C.  P.  district  office. 

Now,  Len  writing  from  Glasgow  states  the  address  to  which  he  is 
to  receive  his  letters  is  the  Communist  Party  district  office. 

Mr.  Birmingham,  do  you  have  any  idea  who  "Len"  in  this  letter  is? 

Mr.  Bikmi^(;ham.  Later  on  he  is  identified. 

Mr.  ^L^tthews.  How  is  he  identified  in  subsequent  correspondence? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  On  the  envelope  of  the  original  letter  is  the  re- 
turn address.     It  is  on  the  original  and  is  not  photostated, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  make  an  identification  of  Len? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  No,  but  I  have  seen  the  letter. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  offer  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  letter  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  43.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  the  effects  of  Nancy  Reed,  which  came  into  your 
possession  through  service  of  these  subpenas,  did  you  find  an  al- 
ternate's badge  for  the  New  York  State  cf)nvention  of  the  Communist 
Party  in  May  of  1938  ? 


3712  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  we  have  no  way  of  knowing 
whether  or  not  this  was  the  alternate's  badge  of  Nancy  Reed.  If 
she  had  appeared  before  the  committee,  of  course,  she  would  have 
been  asked  that  question,  but  at  least  the  badge  was  in  her  personal 
eft'ects. 

I  offer  it  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  44.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  in  the  material  which  you  ob- 
tained on  Cape  Cod  and  which  was  dug  up  from  the  ground  there, 
were  there  reports  of  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party 
and  other  confidential  reports  of  the  Communist  Party  and 

Mr.  Birmingham.  There  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Can  you  identify  these  reports  as  being  among 
those  documents  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  can. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  these  were  documents  which  you  have  in- 
formation were  buried  at  Sandwich  on  Cape  Cod,  either  personally, 
or  under  the  supervision  of  Nancy  Reed ;  is  that  correct  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  your  information  state  whether  or  not  Nancy 
Reed  herself  was  present  when  these  documents  were  buried  in  the 
ground  there? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  She  was  present  when  the  documents  were  buried 
and  supervised  their  burial? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  did. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  evidence  do  we  have  to  that  effect  ? 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  confidential  information. 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  how  the  documents  were  obtained.  The 
person  who  assisted  in  the  burial  took  the  committee  investigator 
right  to  the  spot  as  they  dug  them  up. 

Mr.  VooRHis,  And  that  person  testified  that  Nancy  Reed  was  there  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  made  a  statement  to  me — she  didn't  testify. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  this  was  on  the  property  of  the  Reeds  in 
Sandwich,  Mass.,  and  the  material  obtained  is  a  part  of  this  material 
which  is  apparently  the  personal  effects  of  Nancy  Reed. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  asked  Mr.  Birmingham  whether 

Mr.  Matthews.  Whether  his  information  had  it  that  Nancy  Reed 
was  present? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes,  she  was  present;  that  is  correct. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  I  was  wondering  what  that  information  was,  but  I 
understand  now. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  drew  a  map  showing  exactly  where  the 
material  was  under  a  house  and  told  me  beforehand,  a  month  before 
I  went  up  there,  exactly  where  it  was  buried  and  who  supervised  the 
burying  of  it  and  how  it  was  covered  with  canvas  and  leaves.  I 
went  right  to  the  spot  with  a  rake  and  hoe  and  dug  up  the  material 


rX-AMKHICAX   riiOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8713 

as  she  stated,  except  for  four  boxes  that  were  missing.  I  got  three 
out  of  seven. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  the  party  who  gave  you  the  information  is  the 
same  party  who  stated  that  she  assisted  Nancy  Reed  in  hiding  the 
docunuMits  at  that  place? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  there  you  liave  approximately  10  convention 
rej)orts  of  the  Communist  Party ■ 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Of  the  central  committee  of  the  Communist 
Party. 

Mr.  Matthews.  These  are  the  originals,  are  they  not? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes;  they  are  the  originals. 

Mv.  Matthews.  And  not  photostats? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  No;  not  photostats. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  these  minutes  of  the  Central  Committee  of  the 
Communist  Party  furnish  the  committee  pertinent  information  with 
reference  to  the  activities  of  the  party  in  this  country? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Thev  cover  a  wide  range  of  activities. 

Mr.  Starnes.  A  wide  range  of  activities  and  over  a  number  of 
years  ? 

Mr.  jNIatthews.  That  is  correct,  but  particularly  with  reference  to 
recent  activities  of  the  Communist  Party — around  the  tenth  con- 
vention which  was  held  3  years  ago,  1938. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  do  they  divulge  the  names  of  some  of  the  active 
workers  and  leaders  in  the  party  and  their  roles? 

Mr.  IMatthews.  No  ;  names  are  not  divulged  in  the  reports. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Different  subjects  like  Communists  in  Spanish 
activities,  the  Workers  School,  and  the  other  different  activities, 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  would  like  to  know  if  you  can  summarize  further 
on  that  line,  just  what  the  reports  deal  with.  Do  they  have  any 
reference,  Mr.  Birmingham,  to  the  front  organizations  of  the  party — 
are  they  mentioned  in  there? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Not  by  name  but  how  they  should  work.  If 
you  look  at  them  I  think  you  can  understand  what  they  mean — how 
many  were  dismissed  from  being  drunk  and  so  forth  and  so  on.  It 
is  all  headed  there  at  the  top. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  Chair  thinks  these  documents  are  so  important 
that  they  should  be  incorporated  in  the  record,  because  this  is  the 
first  time  insofar  as  we  have  been  able  to  ascertain,  the  committee 
has  come  into  possession  of  such  reports.  They  give  information  as 
to  organizations,  the  number,  the  growth,  and  the  composition  of 
the  party  by  years;  naming  the  affiliate  industrial  units,  neighbor- 
hood branches,  Negroes,  women,  housewives,  working  women,  and 
then  it  gives  the  number  here  who  were  members  of  the  A.  F.  of  L., 
C.  I.  O.,  the  Workers  Alliance,  the  employed,  unemployed;  native 
and  foreign  born — those  in  the  party  for  a  year  and  those  for  more 
than  a  year,  less  than  a  year,  and  also  gives  them  by  national  gTOups, 
social  and  industrial  composition,  and  the  Negroes  in  the  party  by 
districts. 


8714 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


The  Chair  believes  it  is  of  such  importance  that  it  should  be  copied 
into  the  record. 

(The  material  referred  to  is  as  follows:) 

May  1938. 
Rb3H>rt  on  Organization 

material  for  the  organization  commission  loth  party  convention 

We  are  coming  to  the  10th  Party  Convention  with  an  approximate  member- 
fehip  of  75,000  (although  the  registration  figures  and  the  1938  recruiting  thus 
far  account  for  only  !j3.940  and  12,000,  or  66,000).  This  figure  is  calculated 
on  the  basis  of  the  members  registered  January  1st,  plus  the  number  recruited 
up  to  May  1st.  It  shows  that  our  Party  has  doubled  its  membership  since 
January  1936.  This  growth  is  due  especially  to  the  successful  recruiting  drive 
that  culminated  in  the  Party  Builders  Congress. 

The  statistics  gathered  for  the  Convention  on  the  basis  of  the  registrations 
of  1936,  1937,  and  1938,  indicate  clearly  both  the  strong  and  weak  points  in 
the  Party  organization.  They  enable  us  to  draw  conclusions  regarding  the 
further  building  of  the  Party  quantitatively  and  qualitatively.  They  indicate 
in  which  direction  we  must  improve  the  functioning  of  the  Party,  upon  which 
depends  to  a  great  extent  the  increasing  role  of  the  Party  as  a  political  factor 
in  the  life  of  the  country. 

The  Groicth  and  Composition,  of  the  Party 


Registration 

Shop  Units 

Industrial  Units 

Neighborhood  Branches _ _ 

Members  in  shop  units ^ 

"  "  industrial  units 

"         "  branches 

Negroes 

AVomcn 

Housewives 

Working  women 

Male 

Employed  in  shops  of  500  workers... 
Employed  in  shops  of  1,000  workers. 

Members  AFL 

Members  CIO  (Independent) 

Members  Workers  Alliance 

Employed 

Unemployed 

Native 

Foreign  born 

One  year  or  less  in  Party 

Two  years  in  Party 


January  1936 


30, 836 
600 


5,000 


3,000 
8,047 
3,352 
3,802 
22,  783 
7,700 
2,000 
8,000 
4,000 


14,  743 
16, 093 


January  1937 


37, 682 

517 

336 

1,226 

6, 120 

5,667 

19,  470 
2,  627 

10,  990 
3,355 
6,888 

26, 103 

12, 905 
4,  383 

14,  226 


4,210 
22.  485 

15,  167 
19,  853 
17,  S29 

16,  852 
5,312 


January  1938 


.54, 012 
555 
582 

1,391 

7,478 
10,  585 
33,116 

4,940 
16, 898 

6.014 
11,094 
36, 051 
28.  596 

5,670 

8,987 
16. 509 

5. 929 
30,  665 
19, 929 
30, 165 
23, 847 
26, 806 

7,061 


Negroes  in  Party  by  Districts 


Dist. 

Jan.  1937 

Registration 

Jan.  1938 

Registration 

New  York                                         

863 

188 

137 

342 

180 

90 

70 

42 

12 

104 

16, 796 

1,933 

1,730 

2,714 

250 

280 

236 

364 

114 

3,  391 

1,405 
247 
264 
703 
448 
192 
123 
145 
129 
194 

22,060 

Philadelphia.        .      .      

2,539 

Ohio                                                  

2,677 

Illinois    .      .        

4,662 

Alabama                                      .    

581 

Missouri     . .. 

484 

Florida                                             . 

389 

Maryland 

8.59 

Oklahoma                                   -      

341 

California _ ._  ._ 

4,739 

UN-AMEUICAN   rUUl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES 
National  Groups 


8715 


Jan.  1936 

Jan.  1937 

Jan.  19.38 

Italian         .            ..    

1,040 
710 

906 
902 
831 
557 
424 
427 
361 
196 
74 

1,372 

Polish      

1,193 

Spiinish         .      .  .  .  

533 

Ilun^^ariiin                                                   .      _  .  - - 

642 

Lithuanian                            

700 

(lerman   .   , 

Jugoslav                            - 

637 

590 
862 

Czcflioslovak        .  ..  

273 

Ukrainian          , 

210 

Social  and  Induatrial  Composition 


Jan.  1936 

Jan.  1937 

Jan.  1938 

Steel                       -      

584 
844 
446 

646 

732 

242 

919 

422 

239 

266 

21 

41 

83 

.'■.37 

1,959 

2.  735 

1.581 

264 

870 

2.630 

770 

1.717 

1,212 

Mining        

1.037 

Marine 

289 

Longshore          ._  

1,034 

Auto 

291 
259 
282 

001 

Railroad       -    ..  

285 

Te.Mile 

479 

Rubber                    -..        -. 

133 

Oil 

I'aeking                                        .    ..-_.---- 

Mftal            

683 

Buikline  trades  (inel.  bricklayers,  laborers,  carpenters, 
painters)                     _  .  -  -      .  -  

2,929 

Needle  trades  ._. 

3,050 

Food                                -                            ... 

2,214 

Agriculture      .  - .-.  

513 

Farmers 

939 

Office  Workers  ...        ...  .  ..     .. 

1,788 
480 
941 

4,073 

Social  Workers . 

934 

Teachers 

2,097 

1937  regis- 
tration 

Party  schooling 

Jan. 1937 

Jan.  1938 

Professionals _ 

Students  

6.822 
743 
296 

Section  Training  Sch  .  _ . 
District       "           "  -_. 
National      "          "  

3,267 

1,304 

276 

3.889 
1.424 

Storekeepers 

282 

CONCLUSION 

(1)  From  tlip  fignre.s  we  see  thaf  the  nuinbei-  of  shop  units  between  1936  and 
193.S  remained  practically  static.  We  notice,  however,  that  since  1936,  582 
industrial  nnits  were  built,  so  that  today  we  have  altogether  almost  18,000 
members  organized  in  units  which  are  directly  involved  in  work  in  the  indus- 
tries and  in  unions  (shop  and  industrial  units).  Compared  with  1936-37,  we 
find  an  increase  of  about  ll.*,OUO  members  belonging:  to  units  of  both  types. 

(2)  The  neighborhood  branches  show  only  a  very  slight  increase  in  the  numeri- 
cal growth  between  1936-38.  The  uumber  of  members  in  this  form  of  organiza- 
tion aic,  however,  14,000  more  today  than  1  year  ago.  This  shows  that  the  size 
of  the  i)ranches  has  grown  considerably,  due  especially  to  the  latest  successful 
recruiting  drive.  The  growth  of  the  branches  in  membership  gives  us  the  possi- 
bility today  of  establishing  working  groups  in  tlie  election  districts  and  precincts 
in  the  big  cities.  This  will  enable  us  to  establish  the  individual  members  of  the 
Party  as  citizens  of  the  conununity,  and  thereby  enable  the  Party  to  participate 
more  successfully  in  the  iwlitical  life  of  the  Assembly  Disti'icts,  Wards,  or 
I>recincts. 

(3)  Negroes:  The  figure  of  Negro  members  in  rhe  Party  shows  that  between 
1936-37  there  was  a  slight  decline.     It  is  only  in  January  1938,  through   the 


8716  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

special  efforts  made  during  the  recruiting  drive  that  we  brought  this  number 
to  ahnost  5,000.  While  numerically  we  can  record  this  increase,  yet  the  per- 
centage of  Negro  members  in  relation  to  the  total  Party  membership  remains 
practically  the  same.  From  now  on  greater  efforts  and  systematic  work  and 
attention  will  have  to  be  paid  to  the  Negro  neighborhoods  and  Negro  organiza- 
tions, not  only  for  the  purpose  of  increasing  their  number  in  the  Party,  but 
also  to  cut  down  the  fluctuation  which  among  Negroes  is  much  higher  than  the 
average  fluctuation  in  the  Party. 

(4)  Women:  The  increased  number  of  women  in  the  Party  is  very  satis- 
factory. Between  1936  and  1937,  it  has  been  more  than  doubled.  What  is 
more  encouraging,  is  the  fact  that  the  number  of  working  women  between 
1936  and  193S  has  been  practically  tripled.  These  figures  prove  not  only  that 
with  the  trade-union  drives  the  working  women  are  becoming  more  politically 
conscious,  but  also  that  the  proper  efforts  made  by  the  Party  organization  to 
draw  the  most  militant  women  into  the  ranks  of  our  Party  has  seen  results. 
This  pace  must  be  kept  up.  There  are  possibilities  of  swelling  our  ranks  with 
tens  of  thousands  of  \^orking  women. 

(5)  The  figures  of  the  employed  in  shops  show  that  since  1936  we  tripled 
the  number  of  employed  in  the  light  industries,  and  increased  substantially 
also  the  number  of  Party  members  working  in  the  basic  industries.  We  are 
far  behind  our  aim,  however,  in  deeply  rooting  the  Party  in  the  basic  indus- 
tries of  the  country.  This  is  shown  not  only  by  the  smaller  proportion  of  those 
recruited  from  basic  industries  compared  with  the  light  industries,  but  esi>ecially 
by  the  small  increase  in  some  of  the  basic  industries.  Where  a  real  effort 
has  been  made,  as  for  example  in  steel,  the  results  are  obvious  in  comparison 
to  mining,  railroad,  textile,  longshore,  and  others.  One  main  task  remains: 
Concentration  on  the  basic  industries  for  the  purpose  of  building  new  shop 
nuclei,  strengthening  the  existing  ones  with  intensified  recruiting.  This  calls 
for  special  well-planned  drives  in  the  concentration  districts  in  the  mining  and 
textle  territories,  in  the  most  important  ports,  etc. 

(6)  Figures  giving  the  length  of  time  in  the  Party  show  that  we  have  over 
20,000  members  who  have  been  in  the  Party  over  two  years,  as  against  nearly 
34,000  who  have  been  in  the  Party  less  than  two  years.  Adding  to  the  27,000 
members  that  are  in  the  Party  for  one  year  or  less,  the  12,000  that  have  joined 
the  Party  since  .January,  we  find  that  out  of  a  total  of  65  to  66  thousand  active 
members  on  record  today,  40,000  are  in  the  Party  less  than  one  year. 

This  shows  immediately  that  we  have  not  only  to  combat  fluctuation  in 
general,  but  we  must  pay  special  attention  to  prevent  the  dropping  of  the  older 
Party  members.  At  the  same  time  it  is  necessary  to  intensify  the  education 
to  the  utmost,  for  the  purpose  of  maintaining  and  developing  the  large  numbers 
of  new  Party  members. 

(7)  In  1936,  at  the  time  we  conducted  a  drive  to  get  all  eligible  Party 
members  into  the  trade  unions,  we  had  on  record  8,000  in  the  A.  F.  L.  and 
4,000  in  Independent  Unions;  in  January,  1937,  we  find  14,226  Party  members 
active  in  A.  F.  L.  unions.  In  January  1938,  8.987,  in  A.  F.  E..  16,509  C.  I.  O. 
unions,  and  1,0<J0  in  Independent  and  other  unions. 

From  12.(X)0  Party  members  active  in  the  trade  unions  in  1936,  we  have 
reached  in  January  the  number  of  27.000.  This  is  a  real  advance  the  Party 
has  made  in  the  trade  union  field,  especially  in  the  industrial  unions.  Adding 
to  the  27,000  the  number  of  Party  members  organized  in  the  Workers  Alliance, 
we  find  today  50  percent  of  the  membership  active  in  trade  unions  and  unem- 
ployed organizations.  This  figure,  beside  its  positive  side  which  cannot  be 
underestimated,  shows,  at  the  same  time,  that  there  are  still  thousands  of 
members  eligible  for  membership  not  only  in  trade  unions  but  also  in  the 
Workers  Alliance. 

(8)  The  figures  on  native-  and  foreign-born  in  the  Party  are  very  Indicative 
of  the  growing  attraction  of  the  Party  among  the  native  masses.  In  1936 
the  foreign-born  comprised  .53-.54%  of  the  Party  membership.  In  1987,  and 
especially  in  1938,  we  see  a  change  in  the  picture.  Today,  the  majority — 
30,165  as  against  23,846 — are  native-born.  (Figures  from  January  registration. 
Today  the  percentage  of  native-born  is  still  higher,  considering  the  high  per- 
centage of  native  among  the  newly  recruited  since  Janiiary.) 

Among  the  national  grovips  we  find  a  slight  increase  among  Italians,  Poles, 
and  a  few  others,  which  is  not  in  step,  however,  with  the  possibilities  and 
needs  to  counteract  the  forces  of  fascism  and  reaction   among  these  masses. 

It  is  natural  that  having  reached  its  present  size,  the  Party  will  attract 
increasingly  more  native  and  young  elements.     One  of  our  main   tasks  is  to 


L'N-A.MEKICA-N   rUOl'Ali A.NDA  ACTIVITIES  8717 

coiu'eiitrnlc  in  this  diriK'tiuii.  Ilecause  of  the  strong  ties  whieh  our  Party  has 
established  for  years  with  the  masses  of  the  various  national  groups,  the  role 
these  masses  play  in  the  basic  industries  and  political  life  of  the  country, 
and  their  close  relation  to  the  new  generations,  it  is  necessary  however,  to 
take  special  measures  to  strengthen  the  Party  among  these  masses,  and 
especially  among  the  millions  of  Jewish,  Italian,  German,  Polish,  and  Spanish 
speaking  people. 

(9)  The  Party  attracts  also  more  and  more  young  elements.  There  are  in  the 
Party  7.560  below  25  years  of  age,  18.617  under  the  age  of  35,  making  a  total 
of  over  2H,00U  under  35  years  of  age.  The  doors  of  the  Party  must  remain 
open  to  all  who  agree  with  our  program  and  are  prepared  to  be  active  in  the 
Party's  work.  Special  concentration  on  young  elements  must  continue  with 
undinilnished  intensity. 

(10)  The  social  composition  .shows  that  in  the  last  period  the  Party  has  made 
real  headway  in  recruiting  thousands  of  professionals  and  white-collar  workers. 
The  Party  will  have  to  keep  up  the  tempo  of  work  among  this  stratum  of  the 
population.  .\t  the  same  time,  however,  we  must  emphasize,  and  take  the 
proper  measures  for  building  more  intensively  the  Party  among  the  industrial 
workers.  While  we  cannot  neglect  recruiting  among  the  professionals,  the 
work  of  the  Party  organization  must  be  concentrated  mainly  on  the  industrial 
workers.  We  must  strive  to  get  a  much  higher  proportion  of  industrial  workers 
in  our  ranks.     (This  is  mainly  the  problem  of  the  New  York  City  Organization.) 

(11)  The  tigure  on  Party  schooling  shows  the  real  effort  the  Party  has  made 
to  concentrate  in  the  direction  of  training  forces  for  leadership.  In  the  years 
1936  and  1937.  7,000  members  went  through  section  training  schools,  nearly  !a 
thousand  through  district  training  schools,  and  over  450  through  the  National 
Training  School.  To  this  we  must  add  other  thousands  of  Party  members  enlisted 
in  evening  courses  and  workers  schools. 

These  results  must  be  view^^d  only  as  a  healthy  beginning,  considering  the 
tens  of  thousands  of  new  members  that  need  education,  the  growing  tasks  of  the 
Party,  the  establishing  of  new  schools  on  a  state,  county,  section  scales,  of  evening 
cour.ses.  of  a  greater  utilization  of  the  Workers  Schools,  must  be  regarded  as  the 
most  important  task  for  building  and  further  consolidating  the  Party  organization. 

RECRUITING  AND  FLUCTTTATION 

Between  January  1936  and  January  1937,  2."i.l48  men  and  women  signed  mem- 
bership applications.  Between  January  1937  and  January  1938,  the  figure  rose  to 
30.272.  Adding  the  initiations  of  1937  to  the  registered  members  January  1936, 
which  was  30,836,  would  have  given  us  by  January  1937  a  membership  of  50,000. 
In  January  1937,  liowever.  the  registration  was  37.682  members.  It  means  that 
during  1937,  18,302  members  have  dropped  out,  which  means  a  32%  loss  of  the 
total  membership.  However,  if  we  consider  the  total  recruits  as  compared  with 
the  lost  membership,  we  have  a  turnover  of  72%  this  year.  (W(^  must  consider, 
however,  that  the  figures  of  25,148  that  appeared  as  recruited,  in  reality  expressed 
the  tigure  of  initiations,  which  do  not  correspond  to  the  lumiber  of  as.sigued 
members  to  the  units.) 

During  the  year  1938  the  fluctuation  dropped  considerably.  Adding  to  the 
37.682  registered  members  January  1937,  30.272  initiations,  we  should  have  had  a 
total  membership  of  68,000  by  January  1st.  Considering  that  the  registration 
January  1938  gives  us  a  figure  of  54.012,  we  see  an  approximate  loss  of  14,000 
during  the  year.  This  shows,  in  comparison  with  the  previous  year,  that  the  loss 
has  been  lowered  to  20  percent  and  less.  However,  if  we  consider  the  total  re- 
cruits as  compared  with  the  lost  membership,  we  have  a  turnover  of  46  percent 
this  .vear  (with  the  exception  of  New  York  and  a  few  other  stat(>  organizations 
who  have  registered  as  recruited  only  those  that  are  assigned  to  units.  Most  of 
the  state  organizations  still  consider  the  nuinl)er  of  initiations  as  recruited.)  At 
this  point  it  is  necessary  to  state  that  from  now  on  we  shall  adopt  the  system  of 
considering  as  new  recntits  only  those  who  have  signed  applications  and  actually 
assigned  to  units. 

If  we  add  the  recruited  up  to  date  to  the  54,012  registered  Januai-y  1938,  we 
have  today  a  niember.ship  of  about  75,000. 

The  above  figures  prove  two  outstanding  things : 

(1)  A  steady  increase  in  recruiting. 

(2)  A  steady  decline  in  fluctuation. 

This  achievement  is  due  not  only  to  the  more  intensive  political  life  of  the 
Parry,  but  to  the  organizational  measures  put  into  effect  since  the  9th  Conven- 


3718  UN-AMERICAN  PKOrAGANDA  AGTIVtTiES 

tioii,  aud  especially  duriug  1937  for  the  nid'oilizatuni  of  the  Pai'ty  in  regard  to 
the  iutensificatiou  of  recruiting  aud  cutting  of  iluctuatiou.  The  setting  ay  oi 
recruiting  committees  and  the  establishment  of  membership  commissions  and 
membership  directors  in  the  Party  organizations  for  the  purpose  of  checking  on 
the  attendance,  on  dues  payents,  etc.,  has  helped  a  great  deal.  Briefly,  to  the 
extent  that  the  leading  comuuttees  paid  more  attention  t(t  this  problem,  the  Party 
was  able  not  only  to  strengthen  its  rank.s,  but  keep  the  new  members. 

This  conclusions  shows  that  to  speed  up  the  tempo  in  building  the  Party,  it  is 
necessary  to  strengthen  its  political  life  and  education,  and  at  the  same  time, 
improve  the  organizational  apparatus  which  must  insure  continuous  intensified 
recruiting,  a  better  attendance  at  Party  meetings,  further  improvement  in  the 
system  of  collection  of  dues,  etc.  These  are  essential  measures  to  equip  the 
Party  in  carrying  out  its  political  activities. 

Essential  trrohlvms  of  organization. 

To  concretize  the  resolution  on  organization  before  the  Convention,  to  cope 
with  the  new  political  needs,  it  is  necessary  to  evaluate  all  the  experiences  gained 
in  the  last  two  years,  and  see  to  wliat  extent  the  decisions  of  the  9th  Party  Con- 
vention were  fruitful,  to  see  in  which  direction  our  efforts  shall  be  concentrated 
today  to  further  improve  the  structure  and  functioning  of  the  Party  apparatus 
and  the  lower  organizations.  We  must  see  to  what  extent  the  changes  in  the 
lower  organizations  have  fulfilled  our  expectations,  and  whether  some  readjust- 
ments are  necessary.  It  is  only  through  mass  recruiting,  through  building  a 
mass  circulation  of  our  Party  press,  through  intensifying  the  activities  of  Party 
members  among  the  organized  masses,  thrijugh  paying  the  utmost  attention  to 
the  functioning  of  the  Party  apparatus  and  of  the  Party  organization  proper 
and  intensifying  education,  that  we  will  "solve  the  problem  of  the  political 
and  organizational  consolidation  and  the  strengthening  of  the  Party  as  an  organic 
and  key  part  of  the  task  of  forging  the  anti-fascist  democratic  front." 

As  the  figures  show,  since  the  9th  Party  Convention,  our  Party  has  grown 
in  quantity  and  quality ;  has  grown  in  influence.  It  was  from  the  9th  Conven- 
tion on  primarily,  that  we  laid  the  basis  for  building  a  mass  Party.  During 
this  period  one  of  the  most  important  problems  before  us  was  how  best  to 
adapt  the  structure  of  the  Party  organization  to  the  new  political  needs  of 
the  Party  and  the  working  class ;  how  to  improve  the  existing  forms  of  organi- 
zation, develop  new  ones,  to  enable  the  Party  to  connect  itself  strongly  with 
fhe  organized  masses  of  the  shops,  trade  unions,  the  masses  in  the  neighborhoods 
and  with  their  communal  life. 

Since  1936,  the  Party  has  grown  in  size,  the  apparatus  has  been  strengthened 
so  that  today  there  are  state  organizations  in  all  important  states  of  the  union. 
Instead  of  27  districts  which  we  had  two  years  ago,  there  are  today  40  state 
organizations  functioning,  aud  there  are  Party  units  in  all  48  states.  State 
organizations  as  F'lorida.  Oklahoma,  Texas,  and  others,  which  two  years  ago 
had  only  a  few  hundred  members,  have  grown  into  organizations  of  500  Party 
member's  and  more.  The  Party  has  grown  numerically  and  in  quality  not  only 
in  the  most  industrial  states,  but  it  has  taken  root  and  gained  in  influence 
throughout  the  entire  country. 

The  organizational  readjustments  decided  at  the  time  of  the  9th  Convention 
made  possible  such  successful  mobilization  of  the  Party  as  in  the  case  of 
the  election  campaign,  of  the  trade-union  drives,  in  the  campaign  for  the  defense 
of  the  Spanish  and  Chinese  peoples,  etc.  They  have  helped  in  making  the 
Party  react  more  quickly  to  the  various  political  problems  that  have  arisen  on 
a  national,  state,  and  local  scale. 

The  organizational  measures  decided  at  the  9th  Party  Convention  as  regards 
meetings,  dues  payments,  improvements  of  the  inner  life  of  the  branches  and 
units,  the  development  of  greater  initiative  and  inner  Party  democracy,  combined 
with  new  methods  of  work  suited  to  the  traditions  of  the  American  workers,  have 
strengthened  the  power  of  attraction  of  our  Party  so  that  thousands  upon  thou- 
sands of  trade  unionists,  workers  from  the  basic  industries,  from  the  light 
industries  and  thousands  of  professionals  have  joined  our  ranks. 

Past  Forms  of  Party  Organization. 

The  results  obtained  since  the  9th  Convention  were  made  jwssible  because  the 
organizational  changes  were  combined  with  increased  political  activities,  more 
intensive  education,  and  the  development  of  hundreds,  thousands  of  new  leading 
forces  in  all  tyi>es  of  Party  schools. 


UX-AMEUICAN   PUOl'AGAM  )A   ACTIVITIES  8719 

In  a  short  time  we  were  able  to  pass  from  tlie  street  unit  form  of  organization 
to  the  branches,  built  on  (he  basis  of  the  imlitical  divisions  of  the  cities  (on  an 
assembly  or  ward  scale).  The  old  sections  adapted  themselves  to  the  new  political 
needs,  becoming  the  Party  organization  on  a  county  or  assembly  district  scale,  etc. 
Today  the  state  organizations  are  divided  into  counties,  assembly  districts, 
wards,  etc.  To  the  extent  that  Party  influence  has  grown  in  the  shops  and 
trade  unions,  not  only  the  shop  luiclei  have  gained  new  forces,  but  582  industrial 
units,  with  a  total  membership  of  10,58.")  have  come  into  life.  Industrial  units 
launched  at  the  time  of  tlie  J)th  Party  Convention  helped  not  only  the  growth 
of  the  Party,  but  were  effective  instruments  in  the  trade-union  drives. 

Our  Organizational  Forms  in  Accord  with  the  Neir  Political  Needs. 

Since  the  9th  Party  Convention,  profound  changes  have  taken  place  in  the 
country  which  raised  the  political  consciousness  of  the  toiling  people.  The 
establishment  of  the  C.  I.  O.  as  a  powerful  organization,  the  growth  of  a  progres- 
sive movement  inside  of  the  A.  F.  L.  unions,  the  development  of  political  organiza- 
tions as  the  American  Labor  Party,  the  Commonwealth  Federation,  Labor's 
Xon-Partisan  League,  etc..  under  tlie  influence  of  progressive  forces,  are  playing 
a  great  role  in  raising  the  political  level  of  labor  on  a  national,  state,  and  local 
scale.  Considering  that  the  progressive  political  movements  are  not  merely 
organized  on  a  trade-union  basis,  but  are  developing  on  ii  territorial  political 
basis  as  well,  we  see  at  once  how  such  changes  require  an  improvement  in  the 
Party  organization  and  Party  activities  to  make  the  Party  a  more  vital  instni- 
ment  towards  the  development  of  progressive  political  movements  of  the  broad 
masses  and  moving  the  great  mass  of  the  toiling  people  into  the  stream  of  the 
anti-fascist  democratic  front. 

This  convention  reaffirms  the  decision  made  at  the  9th  Party  Convention,  and 
emphasizes : 

(1)  That  we  must  maintain  and  improve  the  structure  of  the  Party  on  a 
State,  County,  Assembly  District,  Precinct.  Ward  basis:  that  we  must  main- 
tain and  improve  the  activities  of  the  three  forms  of  organization — shop  units, 
industrial  units,  and  branches. 

(2)  That  we  must  concentrate  on  strengthening  the  .shop  units  and  build  new 
ones  in  the  basic  industries.  Shop  nuclei  shall  not  be  organized  artificially. 
They  must  be  established  there  where  they  can  and  must  become  mass  organi- 
zations in  the  larger  shops. 

(3)  We  must  abolish  the  idea  that  the  branches,  the  Party  organizations  that 
act  on  a  neighborhood  scale,  are  today  a  set'oudary  form  of  organization  or 
just  a  temporary  one.  They  must  become  decisive  permanent  organizations  in 
tlie  neighborhoods  that  tie  the  Party  with  the  political  life  and  problems  of  the 
conununities. 

(4)  The  industrial  units,  whethcn-  based  on  trade-unions  or  industry,  in 
some  cases  as  a  temporary  and  in  other  cases  as  permanent  organizations,  must 
be  applied  flexibly.  This  organization  must  be  maintained  or  built  whei-e  it 
serves  a  real  purpose.  It  should  be  abolished  wherever  there  is  a  basis  for 
building  shop  nuclei  in  its  place,  or  where  it  no  longer  .serves  the  ptirpose  for 
which  it  was  built. 

Shop  Units. 

To  achieve  the  above-stated  aim.  it  is  neces.sary  to  raise  the  role  of  this 
organization  in  its  full  Leninist  light.  We  must  combat  opportunistic  tenden- 
cies that  have  reduced  some  of  the  shop  units  to  mere  fractions,  or  have 
transformed  some  of  the  shop  units  into  industrial  units,  thus  limiting  their 
political  role. 

In  view  of  the  thou.sands  of  new  Party  members  in  our  I'anks.  it  is  highly 
impoi-tant  to  promote  a  thorough  discus.sion  of  the  role  of  the  shop  units,  as 
the  organization  of  the  most  advanced  workers  in  the  shops,  which  raise  the 
daily  problems  of  tlie  workers  in  a  political  light,  and  connect  this  with  the 
position  of  the  Party  on  the  political  issues  on  a  state,  national,  and  international 
scale. 

In  the  classes  for  new  members,  in  the  evening  courses,  in  the  discussions  on 
organizational  problems,  this  question  must  be  raised.  Furthermore,  we  must 
create  guarantees  that  these  important  organizations  receive  c-ontinuous  guid- 
ance and  help,  so  as  to  enable  them  to  speak  to  the  masses  regularly  through 
their  .'jhop  papers  and  daily  contacts  with  the  workers,  as  the  only  way  of 
establishing  this  organization  as  the  Party  in  the  shop,  mills,  and  mines. 

62626 — 41 — vol.  14 36 


3720  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Industrial  Units. 

In  regard  to  industrial  units,  the  9th  Party  Convention  correctly  conceived 
this  organization  as  a  transitional  form,  for  the  purpose  of  building  shop 
units  and  becoming  a  positive  force  in  helping  to  build  and  consolidate  the 
trade-unions.  Today  a  number  of  industrial  units  have  fulfilled  their  purpose. 
Others,  because  of  lack  of  guidance,  have  not  orientated  toward  transforma- 
tion into  shop  units;  others  again  for  the  same  reason,  have  been  reduced  to 
fractions  and  are  not  involved  in  the  development  of  the  broad  movements  in 
the  communities.  Professional  units  have  sprung  up  and  developed  without 
control,  separating  the  professionals  in  our  ranks  from  the  proletarian  elements, 
resisting  a  transformation  into  units  on  the  basis  of  institutions.  To  solve  the 
problem  of  industrial  units,  it  is  necessary,  as  stated  above,  to  review  them 
one  by  one,  under  the  direct  guidance  of  the  leading  committees,  to  determine 
which  of  them  shall  be  strengthened  and  how  they  shall  be  strengthened ; 
which  are  ready  to  be  transformed  into  shop  units,  and  which  shall  be  dissolved 
and  their  members  assigned  to  branches.  Above  all,  we  must  strive  to  improve 
this  leadership,  which  is  a  decisive  factor  in  the  well  functioning  of  the 
organization. 

Those  industrial  units  based  on  large  unions  shall  not  only  remain  in  exist- 
ence, but  must  be  strengthened.  In  the  larger  industrial  centers  they  can  be 
built  by  taking  into  consideration,  not  only  the  problem  of  the  union,  but  the 
political  needs  of  the  Party  on  a  geographical  basis. 

Taking  for  granted  that  there  is  an  industrial  unit  of  200  members  in  a 
union  of  20,000  workers,  why  can't  such  an  industrial  unit  be  split  into  two  or 
three  industrial  units  on  the  basis  of  the  territory  where  the  Party  members 
live?  Such  industrial  units — their  work  coordinated  by  a  joint  buro — will  not 
only  be  able  to  carry  on  their  political  task  in  the  union,  but  will  become  a 
vital  Party  organization  in  the  communal  life  of  the  territory  where  it  will 
meet,  where  the  members  live,  and  where  they  can  join  in  the  activities  of  the 
Party,  as  the  most  advanced  force  of  a  strong  luiion. 

The  members  of  the  industrial  units  built  in  all  kinds  of  very  small  unions 
or  small  craft  locals  can  be  assigned  to  strengthen  the  branches.  In  such  type 
of  unions  or  locals,  only  a  few  Party  members  are  needed  to  carry  on.  By 
strengthening  the  most  important  industrial  imits,  by  involving  them  in  terri- 
torial work,  it  will  also  be  possilile  here  and  there,  as  the  situation  demands  and 
under  the  strict  control  of  the  leading  committees,  to  transfer  a  certain  number 
of  Party  members  from  industrial  units  to  strengthen  the  political  life  of  the 
branches. 

Strengthen  the  Brmuhes  in  the  Covun unities. 

As  stated  above,  the  branches  have  proved  themselves  to  be  one  of  the  main 
instruments  of  our  Party  through  which  we  spread  oi^r  agitatiftn  and  In-ing  the 
Party  in  close  contact  with  the  political  life  of  the  masses  in  the  neighborhoods; 
are  the  main  vehicle  of  the  Party  in  carrying  on  political  campaigns  and  also 
one  of  the  main  electoral  instruments  of  our  Party.  To  make  them-  a  better 
Party  organization  which  links  itself  with  the  problems,  with  the  life  of  the 
community  in  which  tliey  are  active,  we  must  keep  in  mind  at  all  times: 

(1)  To  strengthen,  to  develop  their  leadership. 

(2)  To  limit  their  size  to  a  number  not  exceeding  50  (as  decided  in  previous 
resolutions  of  the  C.  C.) 

(M)  To  improve,  wherever  necessary,  their  composition  by  drawing  in  indus- 
trial workers. 

( 4 )   To  get  the  branches  to  issue  neighborhood  papers. 

(o)  To  establish,  in  the  larger  centers,  the  group  system  on  a  precinct  or 
ward  basis,  which  will  help  to  activize  the  individual  members  of  the  branches. 

In  building  the  groups  we  must  be  on  giiard  against  the  conception  that  the 
groups  are  independent  units,  and  warned  against  mechanical  organization. 
The  groups  shall,  as  a  general  rule,  be  built  where  they  are  necessary,  but  only 
when  there  are  guarantees  that  within  the  group  there  are  a  few  comrades  with 
initiative  who  will  know  exactly  how  to  carry  out  the  decisions  of  the  branch, 
how  to  stimulate  the  activities  of  the  rest  of  the  membership. 

The  building  of  the  group  system  must  be  viewed  as  a  process  of  development. 
The  groups  based  on  a  precinct  Election  District  basis  or  other  political  sub- 
divisions, should  be  led  by  a  captain  whose  task  shall  be,  not  only  to  guide  the 
group  in  its  activities,  but  to  keep  in  contact  with  all  Party  members  living  in 
the  territory  of  the  precinct,  etc.,  irrespective  of  the  Party  organization  to  which 
they  belong. 


UN-AMERICAN   I'IUH'A(4AN1)A  ACTIVITIES  8721 

At  the  same  time,  we  must  keep  in  mind  that  it  is  the  bram-h  that  shapes 
Party  policies,  discusses  the  political  problems ;  that  the  branch  is  the  main 
place  for  the  education  of  the  members,  while  the  jiroup  is  an  active  body 
carryiui,'  out  the  policies  of  the  branch  in  a  Riven  territory. 

Membership  meetings  on  an  assembly  or  ward  scale,  of  all  Tarty  members 
living  in  the  territory,  must  be  introduced  as  a  regular  feature  of  Party  life. 
This  will  help  a  great  deal  in  stimulating  the  activities  of  all  Party  organiza- 
tions and  individual  Party  members  living  in  the  territory,  and  will  make  them 
conscious  of  their  political  role  and  tasks. 

Cotwlusion. 

The  improvement  of  the  political  life  and  function  of  the  I'arty  organization 
must  be  accompanied  by  an  improvement  in  the  system  of  collection  of  dues  and 
of  attendance.  This  calls  for  careful  selection  of  membership  directors,  financial 
secretaries,  and  the  establishment  of  well-functioning  commissions  on  a  State, 
county,  assembly,  or  section  scale. 

The  carrying  out  of  the  above  decisions,  accompanied  by  intensified  education 
and  political  discussion  in  all  the  organizations,  by  intensified  political  activity 
in  the  shops,  trade-unions,  mass  organizations,  and  the  communities,  will  enable 
us  to  go  forward  with  the  circulation  drives  of  the  three  Party  dailies,  to  extend 
our  agitation  among  the  broad  masses,  and  to  carry  through  intensive  recruiting. 

Onward  in  building  the  Party,  to  make  of  it  the  dynamic  force  moving  the 
masses  toward  achieving  a  powerful  antifascist  democratic  front ! 

0  *  m  *  *  *  * 

Report  on  the  Training  of  Cadres  Between  the  9th  and  IUth  Conventions 

OF  THE  Party 

This  report  covers  the  activities  of  the  School  Commission  between  the  9th  and 
10th  Conventions,  and  deals  with  the  work  of  the  districts. 

Only  13  districts  sent  in  reports,  some  only  partial  reports.  The  School  Com- 
mission can  report  to  the  Central  Committee  marked  progress  in  its  work. 

During  this  period  2  National  Training  Schools  of  6  months'  duration  each 
were  held.  One  hundred  twenty  comrades  studied  in  these  schools.  (See  at- 
tached report  of  Comrade  Siskind.)  To  supplement  the  National  Training 
School,  3  regional  schools  were  organized :  1  for  Minnesota  and  adjacent  States 
(19  students),  1  for  the  South  (15  students),  and  1  by  the  Illinois  State  Organiza- 
tion and  adjacent  States  (see  appended  reports). 

A  special  school  for  the  training  of  forces  to  work  among  the  Negro  people  was 
organized.  This  was  a  10-week  school,  with  24  comrades  attending.  A  school 
was  contemplated  to  train  forces  for  work  among  the  National  Groups;  it  was 
planned  but  did  not  materialize  due  to  lack  of  funds.  The  New  York  State 
organization  held  a  3-week  school  for  Spanish  comrades,  and  a  similar  school  was 
just  completed  hy  the  Texas  organization.  More  attention  to  Ihis  phase  of  work 
must  be  paid  in  the  future,  and  the  National  Groups  mobilized  for  this  purpose. 

Besides  the  above-mentioned  schools,  the  School  Commission,  jointly  with 
the  New  York  State  organization,  held  during  the  summers  of  1936  and  1V)37 
5-week,  full-time  schools  for  professionals  aud  industrial  workers,  to  train 
teachers.  P'or  the  summer  of  1938.  3  such  schools  are  being  organized  with 
about  150  students— 2  in  New  York  for  the  Eastern  Section  of  the  country  and 
1  in  Chicago  for  the  Midwestern  States.  A  number  of  excellent  forces  for 
educational  and  other  activities  came  forward  as  a  result  of  these  schools. 

Another  item  of  importance  in  this  connection  is  the  following:  Last  sum- 
mer. Comrade  Stachel  recommended  that  we  mobilize  some  professionals  and 
send  them,  during  their  vacation,  to  teach  classes  in  the  smaller  cities  and 
factory  towns.  "While  last  summer  only  5  comrades  were  sent  out,  this  sum- 
mer, as  a  result  of  these  schools,  we  will  be  able  to  send  out  about  30  comrades. 
The.se  comrad(»s  pay  their  own  expenses.  The  larger  state  organizations  should 
take  the  initiative  to  organize  their  own  summer  schools  for  comrades,  and 
thus  make  a  valuable  addition  to  their  educational  forces. 

Another  type  of  school  that  the  School  Commission  will  concentrate  on  this 
summer  and  help  develop  in  the  districts,  is  the  full-time.  9-day  or  2-week 
school,  especially  for  trade-union  functionaries.  These  comrades  take  vacations 
and  in  most  cases  can  pay  the  expenses  incurred.  They  can  discuss  funda- 
mentally, on  a  broad  theoretical  basis,  the  problems  facing  the  Party,  and  as 
a  result  become  more  politically  alert  to  their  tasks. 


g722  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

STATES    A^D    DISTRICTS 

During  this  period  we  can  note  not  only  a  remarkable  growth  in  the  number 
of  schools  and  classes,  but  also  the  development  of  new  types  and  forms. 
In  New  York,  besides  the  full-time  day  schools,  conducted  by  the  State  and 
County  Committees  (New  York),  the  full-time  evening  school,  3  to  5  evenings 
a  week,  is  organized  on  a  section  and  county  scale.  This  form  is  well  suited 
to  the  training  of  comrades  for  leadership  in  units,  branches,  and  in  mass 
organizations:  but  for  the  general  training  of  the  membership,  this  is  insuflB- 
cient.  For  this,  additional  and  more  elastic  forms  should  be  developed.  Analy- 
sis of  the  composition  of  these  evening  (full  time)  schools,  shows  that  the 
average  worker  cannot  attend  school  5  evenings  a  week,  in  the  first  place.  In 
the  second  place,  there  are  not  as  yet  enough  trained  forces  to  man  these 
schools. 

In  Ohio  and  California,  1-  to  2-day  week-end  classes  were  organized,  with 
great  success.  Factory  workers,  especially  in  heavy  industry,  attend  this  type 
of  class  more  readily.  California  and  Massachusetts  have  also  adopted  the 
circuit  school  method,  where  a  comrade  travels  and  teaches  classes  in  dif- 
ferent towns.  Illinois  succeeded  in  organizing  classes  also  for  Non-Party 
workers,  members  of  trade-unions.  Good  progress  was  made  by  New  York, 
California,  Ohio,  Illinois,  and  Philadelphia,  in  these  schools. 

Before  the  9th  Convention  of  the  Party  the  2-  to  6- week  full-time  schools  were 
the  predominant  tyiies.  After  the  9th  Convention,  especially  in  1937-38,  full-time 
schools  of  12  weeks'  duration  were  organized  (New  York).  The  reports  indicated 
that  there  were  held : 

21  schools  from  2  to  12  weeks 425  students. 

10  schools  from  1  to  2  week.s 247  students. 

22  week-end  schools 385  students. 

Numerous  classes — 3  to  5  evenings — in  which  Branch  and  Unit  functionaries 
were  trained  were  conducted  during  this  period. 

Notwithstanding  the  general  advance  made  by  a  number  of  districts,  some  im- 
portant disti-icts  lag  sadly  behind,  when  we  consider  the  problems  facing  them. 
This  is  due  not  wholly  to  the  absence  of  forces,  but  rather  to  the  failure  to  con- 
centrate on  this  problem  and  find  a  solution.  Proof  that  most  districts  can  at 
least  partially  solve  the  problem  of  training  their  own  forces  is  Minneaiwlis, 
where  Comrade  Darcy  paid  special  attention  to  the  training  of  personnel  and 
promoted  this  phase  of  work,  and  Ohio,  where  Comrades  Williamson  and  Winters 
made  a  special  concentration  on  the  training  of  cadres. 

THE  SOUTH 

Texas  and  Florida  are  doing  some  good  work  in  this  field.  Alabama  is  coming 
along,  but  most  states  cannot  develop  this  work  with  their  own  forces  at  present. 
Help  must  be  given  to  them,  and  the  best  foini  foi"  the  present  would  be  circuit 
schools.  A  suitable  comrade  should  be  assigned  to  the  South  to  this  task  by  the 
Central  Committee. 

The  School  Commission  imid  special  attention  to  the  training  of  Southern  com- 
rades by  organizing  the  Southern  Regional  School  in  Philadelphia.  Students 
came  from  Philadelphia,  Virginia,  West  Virginia,  Tennessee,  Washington,  D.  C, 
Florida,  Alabama,  Louisiana,  Missouri,  and  Arkansas.  The  entire  orientation  of 
the  school  was  toward  the  problems  of  the  South.  In  addition  to  the  curriculum 
which  was  planned  by  the  School  Commission,  there  were  special  lectures  by 
leading  district  and  national  comrades  on  s(mie  outstanding  current  developments. 
Supplementary  to,  and  as  part  of  their  theoretical  training,  the  students  attended 
a  number  of  meetings  of  Party  organizations  in  Philadelphia.  This  type  of  activity 
proved  very  valuable  in  that  it  gave  the  students  a  picture  of  the  various  activities 
in  which  the  Party  is  engaged.  The  composition  of  the  student  body  showed  that 
greater  attention  must  be  paid  by  the  districts  to  the  problem  of  selection.  All  the 
comrades  made  considerable  progress,  and  the  school  helped  to  develop  a  number 
of  good  forces  for  work  in  the  South. 

EDUCATION  FOR  WORK  AMONG  THE  NEGRO  PEOPLE 

All  schools  had  a  fair  representation  of  Negro  comrades,  but  continued  concen- 
tration on  this  phase  of  the  work  must  be  exerted.  Progress  was  made  through 
the  organization  of  the  James  W.  Ford  Training  School  for  work  among  the  Negro 
people. 


UX-AMEKICAN   l'UUl'A(iA.\J)A  ACTlViTlES  8723 

StudcMits  wtnv  presoMit  from  the  following  states:  Coiiiiccticnt,  New  York,  l\nin- 
sylvania,  Ohio.  Mit-liisan,  Illinois,  Missouri,  Arkansas,  Texas,  Louisiana,  Alabama, 
Virgiuin,  and  Maryland.  Tho  core  of  the  curriculum  w.is  History  of  the  Net^ro 
people,  the  Problems  of  the  Negro  people  lu  the  United  States,  and  the  solution 
of  these  pi-oblems.  The  National  Negro  Congress,  and  the  devilopment  of  the 
United  Negro  I'eople's  Front  generally,  received  special  attention.  All  other 
subjects  were  built  around  this  central  core.  The  comrades  at  all  times  showed 
great  interest  in  current  struggles  and  discussed  the  problems  before  the  Party 
continually.  This  showed  itself  especially  in  their  study  of  the  material  on  the 
trial  of  the  Kight-Trotskyite  bloc  of  assassins,  and  in  the  discussion  of  the  draft 
resoluiions  of  the  Tenth  Party  Convention. 

The  main  aim  of  the  Centr.-il  Connnittce  in  establishing  this  school  was  accom- 
plished, and  a  number  of  important  forces  for  work  in  the  South  and  among  the 
Negro  people  generally  were  given  a  political  foundation.  The  Southern  Re- 
gional School,  with  a  composition  of  about  509^  Negro  comrades,  also  contributed 
to  this  work. 

THE  AGKICUL'nTR.VI.  AHEAS 

In  the  present  situation,  it  is  very  important  to  train  forces  for  work  in  the 
countryside  as  rapidly  as  possible.  We  must  admit  that  not  nmch  was  done  in 
this  field.  The  state  organizations  have  not  as  yet  undertaken  to  solve  this 
problem  in  a  serious  manner.  The  next  task  of  the  School  Commission,  with 
the  cooperation  of  the  Agricultural  Connnission,  must  be  to  find  ways  and  means 
to  develop  this  work.  The  districts  must,  nevertheles.s,  them.selves  start  some 
activities,  and  this  concerns  all  districts  of  the  Party. 

WOMKN 

The  number  of  women  in  our  schools  and  classes  has  increased.  But  me  must 
admit  that  not  enongh  is  being  done  to  train  women  in  the  trade-unions,  auxil- 
iaries, ma.ss  organizations,  domestics,  and  hou.sewives.  Very  often  it  is  advisable 
to  organize  special  classes  for  women  to  discuss  the  problems  that  interest  them 
especially. 

YOUTH 

Some  help  was  given  to  the  youth,  and  all  schools  had  a  fair  proportion  of 
comrades  active  in  Y.  C.  L.  work.  The  educational  work  in  the  Y.  C.  L.  has  been 
extended ;  nevertheless,  not  enough  schools  were  organized  by  the  Y.  C.  L.  to 
train  leaders  for  the  American  youth.  No  .special  help  was  given  by  the  districts 
to  the  Y.  C.  L.  The  entire  Party  must  help  the  Y.  C.  L.  establish  full-time 
schools  for  the  training  of  forces.  A  national  .school  for  30  conn'ades  to  last  two 
months  is  planned  for  this  Fall. 

QtJANTITY    AND   (iUALiri' 

The  leap  the  Party  made  in  the  m;mber  of  schools  and  classes  during  the 
last  year  did  not  always  result  in  tlie  proportional  increase  in  the  quality  of  our 
work.  To  improve  the  quality  of  our  work,  persistent  and  conscious  efforts  must 
be  made.     It  is  necessary  to  pay  particular  attention  to: 

(ff)  Selection. — The  selection  of  comrades  to  the  National  Training  School 
improved,  but  the  same  cannot  be  said  about  the  comrades  sent  to  the  other 
.schools.  The  instructions  of  Comrade  Browder  in  regard  to  selection  are  not 
lived  up  to  in  many  cases.  Sending  a  comrade  to  a  full-time  school  is  a  real 
promotion,  and  the  decision  of  our  Conventions  and  the  policy  of  the  Central 
Committee  as  to  the  promotion  of  cadres  must  be  adhered  to. 

(b)  Planninff. — We  can  state  that  all  schools  organized  by  the  Central  Com- 
mittee are  well  planned  as  to  physical  arrangements,  program,  and  per.sonnel. 
The  same  cannot  be  said  for  all  State  and  District  schools.  There  as  yet  is  too 
much  left  to  chance.  (In  most  cases,  this  is  due  to  the  absence  of  ((ualified 
teachers  and  organizers.)  Schools,  in  the  words  of  Comrade  Browder,  j)roduce 
our  means  of  production.  As  in  all  Socialist  production,  two  things  are  essential, 
good  material  and  skill.  We  must  produce  that  skill.  It  can  be  produced  in 
two  ways:  (1)  assign  the  most  experienced  comrades  to  organize  and  lead  the 
school  work;  and  (2)  "educate  the  educators." 

(c)  Method. — The  main  pi-olilem  in  Conununist  education  is  concreteness,  the 
unity  of  theory  and  practice,  the  integration  of  our  main  aim  with  the  problems 
facing  the  Party  at  the  present  historical  moment,  and  the  connection  of  daily 


8724  UN-AMERICAN  PROI'AGANDA  ACTIViTIES 

tasks  with  those  problems.     Otherwise,  the  whole  thing  becomes  abstract.     Spe- 
cial attention  to  this  problem  is  now  urgent  in  all  the  school  work. 

(d)  Curricull  of  our  schools  must  be  worked  out  in  detail.  It  must  take  into 
consideration  not  only  the  general  Party  program,  but  also  the  peculiar  problems 
and  historical  background  of  that  section  of  the  population  to  which  the  comrade 
will  carry  the  message  of  the  Party.  The  political  development  of  the  comrades, 
their  background,  and  the  specific  situation,  as  well  as  the  problems  confronting 
that  part  of  the  country,  plus  the  time  available  for  these  schools,  must  be  the 
basis  for  the  organization  of  the  curriculi.  In  the  National  School  for  special 
training  in  Negro  work,  for  instance,  material  on  the  history  of  the  Negro  people 
in  the  United  States,  their  problems  and  the  solution  of  these  problems  by  the 
Party,  and  the  developing  movements  among  the  Negro  people  were  made  the 
core  of  the  curriculum.  Other  sub.ieets  were  made  to  fit  in  this  scheme.  In  this 
manner,  the  course  was  made  interesting,  alive,  and  concrete. 

(e)  Reading  Material. — Special  attention  should  be  devoted  to  the  careful  selec- 
tion and  preparation  of  suitable  material  for  our  course,  integrating  the  basic 
teachings  of  Marx,  Engels,  Lenin,  and  Stalin,  with  the  problems  confronting  the 
Party.  Together  with  this,  comrades  in  all  Party  schools  should  be  taught  to 
understand  the  decisions  of  the  Party  and  recognize  that  speeches  of  Comrade 
Browder  and  other  leading  members  of  the  Central  Committee  are  directives  to 
follow ;  that  the  "Daily  Worker"  and  the  "Communist"  are  the  mobilizing  instru- 
ments of  the  Party  for  the  carrying  out  into  life  of  the  tasks  facing  us. 

(f)  Apparatus. — A  factor  that  tends  to  hinder  the  constant  political  quality  of 
the  work  of  the  schools  is  the  tendency  to  transfer  comrades  who  are  making 
good  in  this  field  of  work  to  other  activity,  on  the  one  hand.  On  the  other  hand, 
comrades  who  continue  in  educational  activities  and  especially  in  school  work  are 
seldom  drawn  into  participation  in  the  leading  bodies  of  the  Section,  County,  or 
State.  This  by  itself  tends  to  make  those  comrades  less  sensitive  to  the  problems 
facing  the  Party.  In  too  many  cases,  educational  activity  is  considered  of 
secondary  importance  and  comrades  accept  it  with  reluctance.  We  must  see  to 
it  that  in  all  cases  the  comrades  put  in  charge  of  this  work  must  be  members  of 
leading  bodies  of  the  Party.  In  this  way  they  can  help  the  other  comrades 
orientate  in  the  problems,  tasks,  and  tactical  line  of  the  Party ;  otherwise,  the 
schools  will  not  always  enable  the  Party  to  produce  "politically  trained  and 
technically  skilled  leading  people"   (Browder). 

The  tasks  ahead  are : 

(1)  To  extend  our  activities  not  only  to  the  large  cities,  but  also  to  the  smaller 
cities  and  towns.     More  evening  classes,  week-end  and  full-time  schools  must  be 
organized.     The  existing  Workers'  Schools  must  be  strengthened  and  new  ones 
opened.     Circuit  schools  must  be  established  where  permanent  classes  cannot  be 
organized. 

(2)  To  improve  the  quality  of  our  w<irk,  text  books  and  study  material  must 
be  produced.  The  publication  and  distribution  of  Marxist-Leninist  literature  by 
our  Party  has  grown  enormously.  Nevertheless,  the  production  of  study  material 
still  lags.  This  problem  was  repeatedly  discussed  and  some  steps  taken  to  remedy 
the  situation,  but  we  must  admit  that  we  have  not  as  yet  succeeded.  We  must 
have  I'eading  material,  ttxt  books,  and  up-to-date  outlines  for  all  schools  and 
classes.  They  must  be  individualized  and  adapted  to  the  section  of  the  country, 
industry,  or  particular  section  of  the  population  from  which  the  comrades  come 
and  in  which  they  will  be  active.  To  carry  out  this  task,  the  School  Commission 
must  establish  a  special  department  with  a  qualified  comrade  in  charge. 

(3)  To  train  teachers  and  organizers  for  school  w(U'k.  Comrades  who  were 
graduated  from  the  National  Training  School  and  other  important  schools,  should 
help  in  this  work. 

(4)  There  is  a  demand  for  a  Marxist-Leninist  Correspondence  Institute  or  Uni- 
versity. Units  and  individual  comrades  away  from  the  central  points,  sympa- 
thizers, militant  workers  and  farmers,  professionals,  etc..  seek  clarification  on 
the  Party  program  and  help  in  the  understanding  (tf  Mnrxism-Leninism,  as  well  as 
answers  to  ever-more  complex  problems.  We  must  reach  them  and  give  them  that 
heljj.  This  can  be  accomplished  through  an  established  correspondence  institute. 
Many  colleges  and  univei-sities  conduct  courses  in  this  manner.  The  American 
people  are  used  to  this  method  of  study.  We  do  not  have  to  follow  the  capitalist 
methods,  but  we  can  adapt  them  to  our  needs.  The  forces  are  here.  They  may 
need  some  training.     But  on  the  whole,  it  is  high  time  to  organize  such  courses. 

Recognizing  these  problems,  the  Central  Committee  has  at  present  assigned 
some  valuable  additional  forces  to  the  School  Commission.     With  the  close  coop- 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8725 

eration  of  the  State  and  District  Committer's,  we  can  extend  our  worli,  imiirove 
its  quality,  and  be  of  real  help  in  transforming  our  Party  into  a  real  Bolshevik, 
mass  Party. 

Comradely  submitted. 

ScHooi-  Commission  Central  Committee. 

UOPWA 

Cio-16 


Lessons  of  the  Primary  Campaign 

The  fact  that  the  slate  of  Thomas  Kennedy  for  govei'nor  polled  over  half  a  mil- 
lion voti's  in  the  Democratic  primaries  in  iNIay  was  a  victory  for  labor.  The  large 
vote  for  Lieutenant  Governor  Kennedy,  secretary-treasurer  of  the  United  Mine 
Workers  Union,  was  a  signal  to  the  democratic  chieftains  that  labor  must  be 
reckoned  with  in  the  councils  of  the  Party.  The  large  Kennedy  vote  checked 
those  reactionaries  within  the  Democratic  Party  who  wanted  to  ignore  labor  in 
formulating  the  program  and  in  the  key  positions  of  the  Party.  Primarily,  the 
half  million  votes  represented  the  great  strength  of  labor  in  the  State  of  Pennsyl- 
vania. The  great  United  Mine  Workers  and  the  Steel  Workers  Organizing  Com- 
mittee of  the  C.  I.  O..  together  with  other  powerful  C.  I.  O.  unions  in  the  basic 
industries  of  Pennsylvania,  such  as  hosiery,  and  textile,  radio,  and  other  indus- 
tries, had  succeeded  in  becoming  powerful  factors  in  the  political  life  of  the  state, 
together  with  the  progressives  in  the  A.  F.  of  L.  and  the  Railroad  brotherhoods. 
The  Kennedy  slate  was  also  successful  in  the  farm  counties,  carrying  most  of  the 
counties  of  the  state  and  losing  out  mainly  in  Pittsburgh  and  Philadelphia,  where 
they  also  polled  substantial  votes  in  spite  of  strong  machines  against  them. 

The  half  million  votes  for  Kennedy  was  a  victory  for  the  New  Deal.  The  com- 
bined Democratic  vote  totalled  1,300,000,  for  the  three  slates  running.  All  thi-ee 
of  these  slates  professed  their  acceptance  of  the  New  Deal  and  of  Roosevelt  as 
their  leader.  The  New  Deal  was  not  the  main  issue.  The  issue  was  whether 
labor  was  to  play  a  role  in  the  councils  of  the  Democratic  Party.  The  outcome 
was  that  labor,  by  polling  a  half  million  votes  from  labor — both  C.  I.  O.  and  A.  F. 
of  L.- — from  farmers  and  middle  class  professionals,  became  a  commanding  factor 
in  the  state  political  set-up. 

The  Democratic  Party,  however,  emerged  from  the  primaries  with  some 
difficulties  that  must  be  overcome  to  insure  victory  against  reaction.  First, 
all  progressive  forces  in  the  state  must  be  activized,  especially  the  decisive 
labor  forces  and  the  most  progressive  elements  supporting  the  Kennedy  ticket. 
Old  sores  which  in  some  cases  linger  must  be  healed  up  by  the  bringing 
forward  of  labor  to  its  i-ightful  place  in  the  Democratic  ranks. 

The  CtJmmunist  Partj-,  in  putting  up  its  own  ticket,  makes  its  main  aim 
the  victory  of  democracy  over  reaction.  At  this  time  the  achievement  of 
.socialism  is  not  possible.  The  main  issue  of  this  compaign  is  not  socialism 
versus  capitalism.  The  main  issue  of  the  campaign  is  progress,  democracy, 
and  securty,  against  reaction,  union  smashing,  and  fascism.  It  is  this  realiza- 
tion that  prompts  the  Communist  Party  to  make  as  its  main  aim,  not  the 
rolling  up  of  a  record  vote  for  its  own  ticket,  but  by  the  independent  cam- 
paign conducted  by  the  Communist  Party,  to  insure  to  the  defeat  of  Reaction- 
ary Republicanism. 

The  Communist  Party  puts  up  its  own  candidates  in  the  present  elections 
(Mother  Bloor  for  Governor,  Pat  Toohey  for  United  States  Senator,  and 
Benjamin  Caeruthers  for  Lieutenant  Governor,  in  order  to  facilitate  the  work 
of  the  party  in  organizing  the  democratic  front  of  all  progressives  in  the 
state  to  defeat  reaction.  The  Communist  Party,  in  putting  up  its  own 
ticket,  points  out  the  shortcomings  in  the  program  of  the  Democratic  Party. 
We  put  forward  our  own  program  and  platform  in  the  present  elections,  the 
platform  adopted  at  the  10th  National  Convention  of  the  Party  and  adapted 
to  the  needs  of  the  state.  We  point  out  the  need,  in  order  to  insure  victory, 
for  the  denifK-rats  to  rai.se  relief  standards,  to  champion  the  demands  of 
the  Negro  people,  the  fanners,  the  youth,  the  middle  class  in  the  cities.  We 
bring  before  tlie  people  the  need  for  an  aggressive  campaign  to  back  Presi- 
dent Roosevelt's  program  for  quarantining  the  aggres.sor  nations  who  are  now 
trying  to  spread  war  throughout  the  world.  We  organize  the  people  to  defend 
democratic  Spain  and  China.  We  bring  before  the  people  an  exposure  of 
the   reactionary   character   of  red-baiting.     We   educate   the  people   as   to   the 


8726  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIYITIES 

need  for  socialism  if  poverty,  war,  and  unemployment  are  finally  to  be  abolished 
and  jioint  to  the  shining  example  of  the  Soviet  Union  which  has  created  a  new 
socialist    society.     We    stimulate    all    progressive    forces    into    activity. 

If  the  election  campaign  is  to  be  won  for  progress  and  democracy,  labor  must 
be  brought  forward  as  an  outstanding  part  of  the  leadership  of  the  Democratic 
Party.  The  independent  organizations  of  the  workers,  Labor's  Non-Partisan 
League,  Progressive  Voters  Leagues  and  othei-  independent  organizations  of 
labor  must  be  brought  forward  and  galvanized  into  action  as  one  of  the  main 
forces  for  again  manifested  by  the  statement  of  William  Green  endorsing  the 
reactionary  Davis.  The  fact  that  James  McDevitt,  head  of  the  Pennsylvania 
State  Federation  of  Labor,  has  denounced  Green's  strike-breaking  and  splitting 
statement  and  that  other  state  leaders  of  the  A.  F.  of  L.  are  preparing  to  follow 
suit,  and  .loin  with  McDevitt  in  endorsment  of  the  Jones-Earle  slate,  shows  that 
Green  is  having  a  harder  and  harder  time  to  prevent  trade  uruon  unity  in 
Pennsylvania.  Trade  Union  unity  of  the  C.  I.  O.,  together  with  the  member- 
ship of  the  A.  F.  of  L.  is  necessary  on  an  increasing  scale  if  reaction  is  to  be 
defeated. 

In  order  to  insure  victory  over  reaction,  the  Democratic  Party  must  draw  the 
necessary  lessons  from  the  primaries  and  vigorously  champion  the  rights  of  the 
Negro  people  and  the  demands  of  the  farmers.  <^nly  by  bringing  forward  the 
needs  of  these  large  sections  of  the  population  can  the  Democratic  Party  hope 
to  defeat  reaction. 


Rbpgiit  of  Centrat.  Co.ntrol  Commission  C.  P.  V.  S.  X.  to  the  Tenth  Nation.ax 

Convention,  End  of  May  1938 

The  work  of  the  C.  C.  C.  during  the  past  two  years,  since  the  9th  Convention 
of  the  Party,  has,  in  the  miiin.  followed  the  same  general  lines  that  prevailed 
during  the  preceding  two  years  (betwen  the  8th  and  9th  Conventions),  and  the 
results,  shortcomings  and  lessons  of  this  work  are  also  practically  the  same. 

In  the  matter  of  getting  proper  and  prompt  reports  on  all  disciplinary  cases 
arising  in  the  various  districts,  sections,  and  units  of  the  Party,  the  C.  C.  C. 
has  obtained  slightly  better  results  than  previously,  but  there  are  still  a  few 
districts  which  continue  to  neglect  this  necessary  routine. 

In  the  handling  of  appeals,  in  the  passing  upon  public  exposures,  and  in 
dealing  directly  with  cases  involving  national  functionaries  or  otherwise  re- 
quiring C.  C.  C.  attention,  it  merits  recording  that,  without  a  single  exception 
the  proceedings  and  (lecisions  of  the  C.  C.  C.  have  always  met  with  unqualilied 
approval  of  the  Polburo  and  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Party. 

The  shortcoming  of  not  having  given  sufficiently  wide  publicity  to  lessons  that 
can  be  drawn  from  certain  individual  cases,  or  from  certain  categories  of  cases, 
still  remains;  although  by  correspondence  and  by  circulars  sent  out  for  dis- 
tribution to  all  sections  and  isolated  units,  the  C.  C.  C.  has  drawn  attention  to 
them,  has  repeatedly  called  for  greater  vigilance  against  class  enemies,  and. 
as  pointed  out  in  C.  C.  C.  report  to  the  Ninth  Convention,  has  urged  action 
directed  toward  "preventing,  precluding  and  obviating  violations  of  Party  poli- 
cies and  discipline,  various  deviations  from  the  Party  line,  factionalism,  bu- 
reanciacy,  financial  irresponsibility,  and  lack  of  care  in  the  selection  of  func- 
tionaries and  of  candidates." 

FINANCIAJ.   CONTROL 

In  agreement  with  the  Central  Committee  of  the  Party,  the  C.  C.  C.  has  taken 
upon  itself,  since  the  middle  of  1987,  the  additional  task  of  sui^ervising  the 
audits  of  the  financial  books  and  records  of  the  Central  Committee  and  of  its 
enterprises. 

The  C.  C.  C.  is,  therefore,  in  a  position  to  certify  that  such  audits  have  been 
pi-operly  made,  and  that  the  financial  reports  submitted  to  this  Convention  are 
correct. 

In  October  1937.  the  C.  C.  C.  issued  to  all  Party  managers,  treasurers,  ac- 
countants and  auditors  a  set  of  rules  and  guiding  points  on  accounting  and 
auditing  applicable  to  larger  enterprises.  The  necessity  for  proper  budgeting, 
for  keeping  books  up-to-date,  for  internal  check-up  and  strict  managerial  c(mtrol, 
and  for  pi'oper  audits  cannot  be  overemphasized.  Strict  attention  must  be  paid 
to  financial  questions  and  to  auditing  arrangements  on  the  ijart  of  comrades 
holding  responsible  posts  in  mass  organizations,  especially  trade  unions. 


UX-AMEIUCAN   PKOIWCANDA   AniViriKS  8727 

GENI':RAL   STA'ITJS   OF  niSCIPLlNK 

Oil  the  basis  of  statistics  of  (lisciplinary  cast's  for  VM(i  and  1!):^,  as  comyarod 
with  previous  years,  it  can  l)e  deliiiitely  stated  that  the  j^eiicral  status  of  discipline 
in  tlie  Party  has  continued  to  improve  very  substantially. 

While  the  average  number  of  expulsions  per  year  during  11)33,  1934,  and  193") 
was  343,  the  average  for  1936  and  1937  is  only  188.  Yet  the  Party  membership 
has  at  the  same  time  more  than  doubled,  so  that  the  rate  of  expulsions  has  fallen 
from  an  average  of  1:M%  for  1933-34-35,  to  only  0.4%  for  193t>-37. 

A  detailed  schedule  of  disciplinary  cases  for  1936  (analyzed  by  districts  and  by 
causes)  was  sulimitted  to  the  June  1937  Plenum  of  tlie  Central  Connnittee. 

The  detailed  schedule  for  1937.  submitted  herewith,  show.s  that  the  highest  rate 
of  expulsions  (for  1937)  obtained  in  Nebraska:  namely,  over  l&%,  half  of  which 
(5  cases)  was  for  Trotskyism.  Next,  in  order,  come — Utah  with  1.18%  and  Iowa 
with  1.109r.  Among  the  larger  districts  (wliere  percentages  begin  really  to 
mean  something),  Distr.  6  (Cleveland)  leads  with  .93%;  then  comes  D.  12 
(Seattle)  with  .67%  ;  then  D.  13  (Calif.)  with  .57%  :  and  then  D.  2  (New  York) 
with  .47%. 

As  to  causes,  the  greatest  number  of  1937  expulsions  fall  into  the  category  of 
general  irre.sponsibility  (drunkenness,  moral  loo.sene.ss,  etc.),  namely,  42  cases  (or 
approx.  17%  of  the  total).  Next,  in  order,  come — 37  cases  of  general  unreliabil- 
ity (politically  untrustworthy,  spy  suspects,  etc.)  ;  then  36  cases  of  Trotskyism  (or 
approx.  15%),  21  of  general  disruption.  15  of  financial  dislionesty  (thieves  and 
.swindlers),  15  spies,  11  financially  irresp<insible,  10  careerists  and  turn-coats, 
8  Lovestonoites,  etc. 

The  number  of  inner  disciplinary  actions  (censures,  removals,  warnings)  has 
also  decreased  from  197  cases  in  1935  to  an  average  of  104  in  1936  and  1937  (96 
cases  in  1936  and  112  in  1937).  The  largest  single  category  of  the  latter,  as  far 
as  causes  are  concerned,  was  under  the  head  of  general  ii'responsibility  ;  namely,  22 
cases  (or  about  20%).  Financial  irresponsibility  (irregularities  and  looseness) 
accounted  for  12  cases  (or  about  10%). 

Of  readmissions  into  the  Party  of  previously  expelled  persons,  there  were  31  in 
19a"i,  18  in  1936,  and  40  in  1937. 

It  is  noteworthy  that  there  were  32  expulsions  of  Trotskyites  in  1935,  12  in  1936, 
iind  36  in  1037.  For  Lovestoneites.  the  corresponding  figures  were  :  2  in  1935,  none 
in  1936,  and  8  in  1937.  These  figures  do  not  include  expulsions  from  the  YCL.  It 
must  be  recognized  that  there  is  now  hardly  any  difference  between  the  Trotskyites 
and  Lovestoneites,  and  that  the  Party  must  be  especially  on  guard  against  these 
unscrupulous  cheats  and  disrupters,  who,  on  every  burning  issue  of  the  day, 
actually  serve  as  agents  of  fascism  and  reaction,  while  mouthing  "left"  phrases 
luirelated  to  these  issues. 

With  the  growth  of  the  Party  and  the  still  gi-eater  growth  of  its  influence, 
increased  vigilance  is  needed  also  against  spies,  swindlers,  and  careerists,  who, 
similarly  to  Trot.skyites  and  Lovestoneites,  ti-y  to  sneak  into  the  ranks  of  the 
Party  under  false  pretenses.  The  important  provision  of  the  proposed  Party 
Constitution,  that  only  those  are  eligible  for  membership  in  the  Party  "whose 
loyalty  to  the  working  class  is  uncpiestioned."  must,  therefore,  be  given  serious 
attention  during  the  process  of  recruiting  new  members,  especially  of  those  whose 
applications  are  secured  in  open  meetings.  If  no  endorser  for  an  ay)plication  can 
be  found,  who  would  be  satisfied  on  this  point,  then  a  discreet  check-up  can  still 
be  made  within  a  short  time  after  the  technical  acceptance  of  the  apulicntion.  and 
the  acceptance  can  be  voided  if  the  check-up  should  result  in  negative  findings. 

The  same  precautions  should  be  taken  toward  guarding  against  morally  or 
politically  untrustworthy  pei-sons  (drunkards,  degenerates,  generally  irresponsi- 
Itle  and  Tuireliable)  who  are  apt  to  bring  discredit  to  the  Party. 


FUTURE  TASKS  OF  THE  C.  C.  C. 


As  reiterated  in  the  proposed  amended  Constitution  of  th(>  Party  (Art.  IX 
and  X,  which  provide  also  for  changing  the  name  to  "National  Control  Com- 
mission"), the  C.  C.  C.  will  have,  in  the  main,  the  same  general  tasks  as  durmg 
the  latter  part  of  the  period  proceeding  this  Convention:  1)  To  act  as  the 
central  disciplinary  body  of  the  Party:  2)  To  supervise  auditing;  3)  In  general, 
to  inculcate  throughr.ut  the  Party  the  necessary  vigilance  against  alien  and 
hostile  elements. 

As  far  as  supervision  of  auditing  is  concerned,  the  Constitution  clearly  places 
the  financial  books  and  records  of  the  National  Committee  of  the  Party  and  its 


8728  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

enterprises  under  these  supervisions.  It  stands  to  reason  tliat  it  may  be  ex- 
tended to  cover  auditing  rules  in  general  and  auditing  vpork  in  various  sub- 
divisions of  the  Party  in  particular. 

The  duty  to  see  that  Party  unity  and  discipline  are  properly  maintained  and 
strengthened  will  involve  responsibility  for  the  functioning  of  the  state  or 
district  disciplinary  committees  according  to  certain  general  rules,  including 
the  matter  of  getting  prompt  reports  from  lower  subdivisions  of  the  Party  and 
of  transmitting  these  reports  and  reports  on  their  own  actions  to  the  C.  C.  C. 
It  will  involve  making  investigations  and  decisions  on  appeals  and  on  such  cases 
as  are  referred  to  the  C.  C.  C.  by  the  Central  Committee,  etc.,  as  provided  in  the 
Constitution. 

The  C.  C.  C.  will  have  to  pay  special  attention  also  to  what  might  be  termed 
"preventive  work."  Ways  and  means  will  have  to  be  found  for  spreading 
throughout  the  Party  certain  concrete  lessons  on  guarding  against  alien  and 
hostile  elements,  against  agents  of  the  class  enemy,  and  on  exercising  the  neces- 
sary vigilance  in  recruiting  woi'k  and  in  the  selection  and  promotion  of  leading 
personnel  and  public  representatives  of  the  Party. 

Especially  will  this  be  necessary  in  view  of  the  rapid  growth  of  the  Party  and 
the  great  increase  of  its  influence  among  the  widest  masses  of  American 
people. 

Schedtile  of  expulsions  for  the  year  1937 

Abbrev. —  (1)  Lovestoneites ;  (2)  Trotskyites :  (3)  White  Chauvinists;  (4)  Petty- 
bourgpois  Right  Opportunists;  (5)  Careerists  and  turncoats;  (6)  Unprincipled  factional- 
ist.s  ;  (7)  Generally  Disruptive;  (8)  Gen.  Irresponsible  (drunkards,  etc.)  ;  (9)  Financially 
irresponsible;  (10)  Fin.  Dishonest  (thieves  and  swindlers);  (11)  Gen.  Unreliable  (spy 
suspects,  scabs,  etc.)  ;  (12)  Spies  and  provocateurs. 


UN-AMERICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


8729 


;s* 

lOl  t^>o 

■^OOOCS^       •       'COW       1  ♦-<  .-H  C^  T-H  rH       1       1       t       1       1       1 

§  :  : 

CC  OJ  CO 

-^  cc  -^ 

i 

1 1— » 

!co  i  |(N--<rt  i^_,„^rt  1  1  1  1  ;  I  ;  1  1  ;  ;  j^ 

iO  Wj  OS 
CO  r-lCO 

N 

• 
1 

ItOM     ■ 

!  (N  oi    '    '    1    '    i    i    1    !    ■    i    i    '    '    •    '  — 1    '    ! 

:2;:s 

,-lO-H^eO^        <   .-i  M  ■^  ;£)  ^  1-1         1         1         1   ,-1   rH   r-l         1         .         1         iW         .         i         1  1-(         1 

1                  III          I  1  1  1     1  1  1     1 

CO  ^co 

d 
£.2 

^ooca    !lN     '     ! 

«<»-('       1       t       '       1       1 »H       <       1       1       ' 

lO  r-l  (O 

OS 

I  o 

C   f^          1          1 

'li,-ll!ii!i<>r,-|!lilic^' 

n<»s 

00 

,-H   O  '^         '  »0         1         1 

NCOol^lwiir-tliiillllll' 

(Mcoas 

,  (©  ^     1  ^     .     1 

Ilooiiiieolrtlllillirtlll 

(Nil  CO 

C9 

o 

■  rH       i      1  1?)       1  N  — 1       1       1       1       i       '  -H       '       '       i       1       'i       i       1       1       1       !       c       '. 

1—1 

r-.COC»        1        I         1         1 

' '        ' f-H 

•    ••■••Ill .     1     t     •     1     > 

1     t    1     1     I     I     I     1     I     1     1     >>     1         

O-H        1 

!o* 

i"    i    i    i    i    i    i    i    i    '    i    i    i    '    i    i    i    i    i    i 

ot,g 

d 

i-c«0 

c 
pi 

„-«  i-  ;  i 

u3iec<i>i>l><il!ii>i<<-i> 

m  iieo 

> 

o 

|oo 

i  i  i  i  i  i  i  i  i  i  i  i  i  ;  i  i  i  i  i  i  i 

00      ilN 

1 

0 

i-ii  ■  = 

=.^a    -c    -^r"  25^- ^-cs^-^^^  12-2 

"3  1  ; 
o   ;   ; 
E-   ;   ; 

-^  !MC 

•>r  -^  t^  »  o: 

22;«2:S2^22S53SS?;St3SS?2SS? 

3:  o> 

3730  un-amp:rican  propaganda  activities 

Inner  DiscipUnary  Actions,  19S7 


Fin. 
Irresp. 
&  Loose 

Gen. 
irresp. 

Viola  P. 
Line 

Disrup- 
tive 

Miscl. 

Tot. 

1936 
Tot. 

2.  N.  Y     

3 

9 
6 

4 
2 

3 
3 

36 
6 

55 
17 
3 
2 
7 
3 
14 
3 
1 
1 
1 
1 
2 
2 

66 

3.  Phila 

1 

6    Ohio 

3 

3 

7.  Mich 

1 

1 

1 

8.  Ill 

1 

4 
3 
2. 

2 
2 

3 

12.  Wash 

13.  Calif -..      .     -.-. 

2 
1 

1 

4 

18 

14.  N.  J 

1 

18    Wise 

19.  Colo 

1 
1 

20   Te\ 

23.  Kv 

1 

1 
2 

25.  Fla 

1 

""     " 

2 

34.  Md 

1.     N.  E 

1 

Total: 

12 

7 

22 
14 

7 
11 

15 
10 

56 
54 

112 
96 

96 

1936 

Readmissions,  1937 


Lov-ites. 

Trot- 
ites. 

Oppor- 
tun. 

Irresp. 

Miscl. 

Tot. 

1936 
Total 

2.  N.  Y 

1 

14 
2 
1 

14 

1 

29 
3 
1 
1 
1 
1 
3 

12 

6.  Ohio 

7.  Mich 

8.  Ill 

1 

1 

10.  Nebr 

1 

1 

12.  Wash    

1 

13.  Cal 

3 

19.  Colo 

1 

20.  Tex 

1 

1 

2 

26.  S.  D 

1 

May  1938. 


ReS'OKT  OiN   P^ARM    WORK  AND  OUR  TASKS 


MATERIAL  FOR  THE  FARM   COMMISSION,  TENTH  PARTY  CONVENTION 

Review. — The  Ninth  Party  Convention  and  the  snbsequent  Central  Committee 
meetings  have  stressed  the  importance  of  uniting  the  progressive  farm  movement, 
of  building  the  farmer-labor  alliance,  and  of  organizing  tlie  unorganized  farmers 
to  defeat  reaction  in  rural  districts.  There  have  been  definite  advances  in  the 
direction  of  these  objectives. 

Unity. — In  the  Mid-West  the  Farm  Holiday  Association  and  in  the  South  Share 
C'roppers  Union  united  with  the  National  Farmers  Union  last  year.  Independent 
groups  in  New  York,  Louisiana,  and  California  are  being  urged  to  unite  with 
the  Farmers  Unit)ii. 

Cniit/hlinite  Influence. — Two  years  ago  the  Coughlinites  were  choking  every- 
thing progressive  in  the  Farmers  Union.  Last  year  the  Coughlinites  were  elimi- 
nated from  leadership  in  the  Alabama  Farmers'  Union  and  they  suffered  defeats 
in  Ohio  and  Pennsylvania.  In  the  last  National  Convention  of  the  Union,  the 
last  of  the  Coughlinites  were  eliminated  from  national  leadership.  The  progres- 
sive leaders  have  revoked  the  ('ouglilinite-controUed  charters  in  Minnesota  and 
Michigan  with  the  aim  of  restoring  them  to  active  progressive  elements  at  the 
next  convention.  Coughlinites  remain  in  control  of  "vest  pocket"  State  unions  in 
Illinois  and  Indiana  and  maintain  influence  in  the  Iowa  Union.  A  more  vigorous 
campaign  against  Coughlinite  elements  is  needed  to  stop  them  from  splitting  the 
Union,  to  remove  tliein  from  leadership  completely  in  all  Farmers  Union  States, 
and  to  check  their  efforts  to  block  progressive  action  in  the  Union. 

F(urmer-Lnhor  Alliance. — The  chartering  of  the  United  Cannery,  Agricultural, 
Packing,  and  Allied  Workers  of  America  by  the  C.  I.  O.  last  year  gave  birth  to  a 
rapid  organizing  drive  among  farm  and  cannery  workers.     The  Union  has  grown 


UN-AMEKICAN   l'H(H'A(L\2<DA  ACTIVITIKS  8731 

to  IIS.OOO  nu'inlun-s.  Witli  its  policy  of  c-oopoiiition  with  small  faiiiiois.  it  is  the 
most  imiiortant  sinuU^  factor  in  the  development  of  a  farmer-labor  alliance. 

While  in  several  States  the  Fanners  (luion  was  actively  cooperatin.L'  with  labor, 
the  last  national  convention  authorized  the  National  Hoard  to  work  out  forms  of 
cooperation  with  labor  on  a  permanent  basis.  This  was  done  last  December  when 
the  Farmers  Union  sijjned  a  leKislativo  pact  with  Labor's  Nou-1'artisan  League 
and  the  C.  I.  O.,  and,  hiter,  when  this  agreement  was  extended  to  include  efforts 
to  have  consumer  cooperatives  deal  directly  with  the  farmers.  Other  farm  organ- 
izations in  New  York.  California,  and  Louisiana  are  cooperating  with  hibor. 
While  good  begiimings  have  been  made  to  develop  farmer-labor  political  confer- 
ences and  other  forms  of  cooperation  in  every  rural  area. 

Organization. — The  Farmers  Union  has  appointed  Southern  and  Eastern  Organ- 
izing Committees  which  can  serve  as  a  springboard  for  mass  organizing  drives. 
The  possibilities  of  uniting  all  progressive  farm  leaders,  with  the  cooperation  of 
labor,  for  a  national  organizing  drive  among  small  farmers  are  very  good  and 
every  effort  should  be  made  to  crystiiUize  this  movement  as  soon  as  possible. 
Ohio  and  Massachusetts  have  made  small  beginnings  in  this  work.  In  Minnesota 
a  real  organizing  drive  is  under  way. 

Rracliouniii  MorenirtUx. — The  pro-fascist  Associated  Farmers  on  the  We.st 
Coast  have  already  spread  into  seven  Rocky  Mountain  states  with  the  immediate 
objective  of  crushing  organization  of  agricultural  and  other  Uibor.  Here  it  is  very 
important  to  organize  small  farmers  in  alliance  with  labor  as  quickly  as  possible 
to  defeat  this  movement.  The  Corn  Belt  Liberty  League  has  sprung  up  in  the  hist 
month  to  corral  farm  support  to  defeat  the  New  Deal  in  the  elections.  Here  it  is 
important  to  expand  the  Farmers  Union  and  other  pro-New  Deal  farm  groups  to 
aefeat  this  movement. 

Party  Btiildinff. — In  Alabama  seventy,  and  in  Minnesota  and  Wisconsin  sixty, 
farmers  were  recruited  during  the  Party  Building  Drive.  It  was  in  these  states 
that  the  best  advances  were  made  in  mass  f.irm  work.  Some  of  the  larger  districts 
either  failed  to  recruit  farmers  or  recruited  very  few,  so  the  percentage  of  farmers 
in  the  Party  has  declined  nationally.  While  some  Districts  are  recognizing  this 
weakness,  especially  in  the  elections,  the  Party  as  a  whole  must  lose  no  time  in 
recruiting  large  luimbers  of  farmers. 

The  ground  work  for  much  greater  progress  in  the  future  has  thus  been  laid, 
and  with  full  cooperation  of  the  Districts,  the  movement  among  farmers  should 
grow  much  faster. 

Economic  SlitiKition. — The  developing  economic  crisis  is  bringing  even  greater 
destitution  to  small  farmers.  The  ratio  of  farm  to  non-farm  prices  dropped  from 
101  in  January  1937  to  81  in  January  1938.  or  20%.  Its  significance  is  better 
understood  by  comparison  with  the  same  index  from  August  1929  to  August  1930. 
when  the  drop  was  18.2%. 

National  farm  income  dropped  from  $10.5  billion  in  1929  to  .$4..")  billion  in  1932. 
and  last  year  it  had  increased  to  only  $8.3  billion  (including  AAA  subsidies). 
while  farm  population  has  increased  by  1.500.000.  In  1937  the  average  per  capita 
cash  farm  income  was  still  19%  less  than  1929.  Considering  that  in  1929  fifty  per- 
cent of  the  fanners  marketed  only  11%  of  the  cash  crops,  the  per  capita  income 
for  these  families  was  oidy  $74.  Now.  the  bottom  half  of  the  farmers  is  getting 
even  less.  About  a  million  farmers  have  been  receiving  some  form  of  relief  from 
the  government. 

The  niimber  of  3  to  9  acre  (subsistence)  farms  increased  by  70%,  as  compared 
to  an  8%  increase  for  all  farms  between  1930-35.  Farm  tenancy  increased  7.5% 
iji  the  same  period.  Concentration  of  land  ownership  in  the  1935  Census  report 
by  the  fact  that  18.6%  (»f  all  farms  (those  175  acres  and  over)  had  ()(16%  of  all 
land  in  farms. 

While  total  mortgage  indebtediK'ss  declined  from  $9  billions  to  $7.5  billion 
between  1930-35.  this  was  accomplished  by  foreclosures  on  over  1,300.000  farms. 
Today  there  are  more  than  l.tiOD.OtU^  owner-operated  farms  under  mortgage  and 
the  averiig(>  size  of  mortgages  have  increased  fi'om  40  to  50%  of  the  farm  value. 

TTnpaid  family  labor  on  farms  increased  2Vi  times  between  1930  and  1935.  Total 
agricultural  wages  dropped  from  $1  billion  to  half  this  figure  in  the  same  period. 
In  1934  over  280,000  farmers  reported  off-the-farm  earning  as  farm  wage  hands. 
In  1929  only  7.S75  farms,  each  producing  about  ,$30,000  in  crops,  accounted  for 
11%  of  the  total  wages  of  farm  labor.  Eastern,  Rocky  Mountain,  and  Pacific  Coast 
states  accounted  for  the  highest  expenditures  for  fiirm  labor.  An  increase  in  the 
use  of  farm  machinery  on  large  farms  is  also  significant  of  the  last  5  years. 

It  is  evident  that  agriculture  had  not  recovered  from  the  last  crisis  and  that 
the  vast  majority  of  small  farmers  (owners  and  tenants)   are  in  a  much  worse 


3732  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

condition  at  the  beginning  of  the  present  crisis.  The  capitalist  development  on 
large  farms  is  proceeding.  Small  farmers  are  being  driven  into  greater  poverty, 
tliousands  of  them  off  the  land,  and  many  more  thousands  out  of  commercial  pro- 
duction. Mass  struggles  of  farmers  for  existence  on  the  land  will  increase  as  the 
effects  of  the  crisis  get  sharper. 

Democratic  front. — The  largest  farm  organizations  (the  National  Grange, 
with  800,000  members,  the  Farm  Bureau  Federation,  with  410,000  members, 
and  most  of  the  cooperatives,  with  a  total  of  3,280,000  members),  suffer  from 
conservative,  bureaucratic  leadership  that  lines  up  with  reaction  against  the 
New  Deal.  However,  these  organizations  have  supported  all  New  Deal  farm 
measures  (with  occasional  reservations),  and  most  of  their  programs  oppose 
fascism  but  support  isolationist  peace  policies.  The  bulk  of  the  members  are 
small  and  middle-sized  farmers  who  traditionally  hate  Wall  Street.  The  con- 
servative leaders  are  being  forced  into  the  position  of  having  their  members 
demanding  better  farm  legislation  and  more  farm  aid,  while  they  still  support 
reactionary  Republicans  who  advocate  "hands  off  the  farmer"'.  Tlie  possibility 
of  progressive  New  Deal  and  labor  forces  drawing  these  organizations  into  a 
broad  democratic  front  movement  against  the  trusts  and  to  improve  the  farm- 
ei's'  welfare  should  be  explored  everywhere. 

The  American  Youth  Congress  made  a  beginning  in  work  among  rural  and 
farm  youth.  As  a  result,  progressive  farm  youth  leaders,  in  cooperation  with 
the  AYC,  are  planning  for  a  Rural  Youth  Congress.  The  4-H  C'lubs,  Future 
Farmers  of  America,  Farmers  Union  Juniors,  Junior  divisicms  of  the  Grange 
and  Farm  Bureau,  the  American  Country  Life  Association,  and  so  on,  are  being 
involved  in  this  movement.  Every  possibility  of  furthering  a  Rural  Youtli 
Congress  and  the  election  of  progressive  youth  leaders  should  be  encouraged, 
and  similarly,  support  for  the  World  Youth  Congress  in  August,  with  special 
emphasis  on  convincing  young  people  of  a  collective  security  peace  program. 

The  progressive  movement  should  initiate  Farmer-labor  conferences  every- 
where possible,  on  the  basis  of  the  Farmers  Union-LNPL  agreement,  to  further 
develop  tlie  democratic  front  movement  and  influence  the  members  of  the 
larger  farm  organizations.  In  every  election  campaign,  the  progressive  forces 
should  put  forward  a  clear  program  for  farmers  and  secure  full  participation 
of  farm  groups  in  the  campaigns. 

While  the  New  Deal  has  tackled  a  few  of  the  major  farm  problems,  the 
results  are  far  from  satisfactory,  with  a  strong  tendency  to  benefit  only  the 
middle  and  large  farmers. 

The  Agricultural  Adhustmcnt  Act  has  raised  prices  of  the  major  crops 
through  curtailment  of  production.  The  prices  are  far  below  cost  of  pi'oduction 
and  amendments  to  raise  prices  to  approach  cost  of  production  should  be 
proposed.  Also,  protection  for  small  farmers  by  establishing  the  average 
production  on  a  family-sized  farm  as  the  minimum  marketing  quota  should  be 
proposed.     Soil  conservation  work  under  the  AAA  should  be     increased. 

The  Farm  Tenant  Act  was  passed  after  a  five-year  struggle  for  a  land 
program.  It  is  supposed  to  provide  loans  to  reliabilitate  tenants  and  share- 
croppers, to  refinance  heavily  mortgaged  farmers  and  for  purchase  of  farms 
by  landless  farmers.  Reactionaries  in  Congress  sabotaged  this  program  through 
limitation  of  funds.  One  of  our  chief  demands  should  be  for  large  increases  in 
the  appropriations  for  the  Farm  Security  Administration. 

The  Agricultural  Marketing  Agreements  Act  empowers  the  Department  of 
Agriculture  to  work  out  agreements  between  farmers  and  dealers  to  regulate 
marketing  and  establisli  minimum  prices  for  milk,  fruits,  and  vegetables.  This 
Act  should  be  revised  to  insure  adequate  protection  for  the  farmers,  and 
guard  against  Trust  control. 

A  Production  Loan,  Appropriation  of  $50  million  has  been  autliorized  by  ('on- 
gress  each  year  since  1931  to  provide  credit  for  farmers.  Tlie  size  of  this  appro- 
priation should  be  enlarged  and  administration  transferred  from  the  conservative 
Farm  Credit  Administration  to  the  Farm  Security  Administration. 

A  key  demand  for  each  of  these  measures  is  More  Democracy. — In  every  case 
these  measures  should  be  amended  to  insure  control  by  small  farmers.  The 
struggle  for  democratic  control  in  the  county  and  state  administrative  committees 
will  sharpen  the  conflict  between  farmers  and  the  bankers  and  landlords  and 
guarantee  all  possible  benefits  from  legislation  to  the  farmers. 

The  Federal  Land  Banks,  which  hold  40%  of  the  farm  mortgage  debt  and  own 
about  10%  of  the  farm  land  outright,  are  in  danger  of  being  taken  over  by  the 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


8733 


Wall  Street  bankers.  The  progressive  movement  should  demand  ccinthmed 
government  control  plus  thorough  changes  in  policg  to  democratize  them  and  make 
them  serve  the  interests  of  the  small  farmers  instead  of  bailing  out  the  insurance 
companies. 

Around  the  larger  towns  and  cities,  labor  and  farmers  should  cooperate  to 
establish  either  farmer  or  municipal  control  of  marketing  to  reach  the  consumer 
by  the  shortest  route  and  eliminate  racketeers  and  middlemen.  This  direct  form 
of  farmer-labor  cooperation  can  win  the  support  of  independent  grocers  and 
consumers.  Fanners  should  be  encouraged  to  place  a  Union  Label  on  their 
dairy  products,  fruits  and  vegetables. 

State  and  national  programs  should  include  demands  for  mortgage  moratoriums, 
increased  relief,  protection  and  financial  aid  for  cooperatives,  cairbing  of  the 
trusts  and  monopolies,  rural  electrification,  homestead  tax  exemption  up  to 
^lO.OCX)  and  the  graduated  land  tax.  liberal  production  credit,  and  so  forth. 

In  all  cases,  the  fanners  must  be  urged  to  support  a  collective  security  peace 
policy.     So  far,  the  strongest  isolationist  tendencies  exist  among  rural  people. 

Through  exploring  and  using  all  avenues  of  contact  with  farmers  and  farm 
leaders,  through  development  of  a  broad  farmer-labor  alliance,  and  through  a 
real  party  building  drive  among  farmers,  it  will  be  possible  to  build  a  strong 
democratic  front  iuvolving  the  masses  of  farmers  for  security,  peace,  and 
democracy. 

Principle  Farm  Organization  Memberships  by  States 


state 

Total 
Farmers 

Grange 

Farm 
Bureau 

Farmers 
Union 

All  Co-ops 

Inde- 
pendent 

New  England             

158. 240 
177,000 
191, 284 
255, 146 
196,  500 
200, 835 
231, 312 
203,  302 
199, 890 
221, 986 
884.  606 
83,  303 

278. 454 
174,  590 
133,600 
213,312 
501,000 
150,  360 

64, 826 

84,381 

170,216 

311,683 

273. 455 
273,  783 
253,  013 
250,544 
466, 470 
197, 632 
278,298 

140. 000 

135, 000 

68, 000 

80, 000 

25,  000 

10, 430 

39,  000 

500 

19, 000 

8,  500 
29, 300 
64, 100 
28,350 

1,500 
38, 090 

100 

New  York 

124, 200 

12, 000 

Pennsylvania                              -      

2,500 
3,000 
3.000 
1,000 
1,000 
3,000 
3,000 
3.000 
15, 000 
8,000 
1,000 
4,000 
16, 000 
20,000 
1,000 
1,000 
1,000 
1,000 
1,000 
200 
3,000 

Ohio                        

167, 600 
129,  600 
160, 100 
269,  630 
332, 100 
192,  500 
259.  480 
87,  630 

Michigan - 

Indiana                    --      -  

Illinois    -.  -  - 

Minnesota                              -    - 

Wisconsin 

Iowa                                  -  -    --  



North  Dakota ,._ 

South  Dakota          .      .  _  .  . 

Missouri    -.  .     ..  

5,895 

16, 227 

8,130 

174, 150 

Kansas 

15, 000 

Nebraska      .         

150, 770 

Oklahoma 

Texas       .              ..    . 

14,  350 

24, 150 

350 

1.000 

5,780 

9,090 

19,  610 
7,900 

14,  565 

California _.. 

22, 000 
22,  000 
35, 000 

77, 380 

1,000 

Oregon 

Washington 

Louisiana 

10,000 

Mississippi 

Alabama 

Tennessee.   

Arkansas     ...        ..           ..        .._ 

1,000 
200 

Georgia    

Carolinas 

7,900 

4,427 

12.600 

Virginia     .  .. 

Kentucky - 

200 

United  States.. 

6, 812, 350 

800,000 

410, 000 

110,000 

3,280,000 

Large 

Cooperatives  by  commodities 


Commodity 

Number 

Members 

Business 

Dairy  Products ... 

2,300 
3, 125 
1,197 
1.082 
164 
926 
1,906 

750,  OfK) 
580,  000 
410,  0(K) 
158,  000 
85,000 
507,000 
790,000 

$440,  000,  000 

Grain...  

315,  OfK),  oon 

Livestock 

175.  (KK\0(K1 

Fniit  <t  Vegetables _    .. 

200.  000,  0(K) 

Poultry       

53,  000. 000 

Miscellaneous .                                       

160,  000,  0110 

Purchasing 

187,  000,  0(K) 

United  States 

10,700 

3, 280, 000 

1, 530, 000, 000 

Note. — Grange,  Co-op,  and  Independent  Unions  membership  figures  by  states  are  not  complete. 


^734  UN-AMEKICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

May  1938. 
Information  MEMOBANDrM  on  thk  People's  He^vlth   Issue 

The  question  of  the  people's  health  is  a  major  political  issue.  The  toiling 
masses  are  suffering  from  appallingly  bad  health  conditions  caused  hy  their 
poverty  and  lack  of  medical  care,  and  these  must  be  remedied  by  political  action. 
These  conditions  are  becoming  increasingly  more  acute,  especially  in  the  slum 
and  poor  rural  districts,  because  of  lowered  standards  of  living  produced  by  the 
industrial  crisis.  The  U.  S.  Public  Health  Service  has  completed  a  survey  of 
three-quarters  of  a  million  families  which  shows  the  devastating  results  of'  the 
last  crisis.  The  shocking  i-ates  of  sickness  and  premature  death  revealed  in  this 
report  are  growing  rapidly  worse  as  the  present  crisis  develops.  The  U.  S. 
Surgeon  General,  Dr.  Thomas  J.  Parran,  has  stated,  in  testifying  before  the 
Special  Committee  on  Unemployment  and  Relief,  on  March  16,  1938,  that: 

"The  great  majority  of  the  unemployed  are  unable  to  buy  food,  clothing,  and 
shelter.  PraeticaHy  all  of  them  are  unable  to  buy  medical  care  on  any  basis. 
None  of  them  can  bear  the  cost  of  catastrophic  serious  illness.  The  excess  of 
illness  among  the  unemployed  results  from  lowered  standards  of  living  which 
they  experience.  Among  i-elief  families,  there  is  more  than  12  times  the  amount 
of  ix'rmarent  disablement  of  the  family  head  than  among  those  in  comfortable 
circumstances." 

The. National  Health  Survey  revealed  that  every  year,  40,000  young  people 
between  the  ages  of  15i-45  die  from  the  ravages  of  tuberculosis.  Proper  care 
would  cut  the  death  rate  by  507'-.  Every  year,  75,000  infants  are  still-born  and 
more  than  60,000  more  die  during  the  first  month  of  life.  With  proper  care, 
these  rates  could  be  cut  in  half.  IH.OOO  women  die  in  child-birth  every  year  in 
the  U.  S.  More  women  have  died  in  child-birth  in  this  country,  most  of  them 
needlessly,  during  the  jjast  20  years  than  there  were  casualties  of  American 
soldiers  on  the  battlefields  dui'ing  the  World  War.  757r  of  the  materual  deaths 
are  preventable.  Among  the  Negro  people,  statistics  of  infant  and  maternal 
deaths  are  nearly  twice  as  great  as  amcnig  whites.  The  devastating  diseases, 
silicosis,  which  destroys  the  lungs  of  workers,  is  one  of  the  worst  occupational 
diseases. 

In  niatters  of  public  health,  this  country  stands  today  where  it  was  in  relation 
to  public  education  during  the  middle  of  the  last  century.  Then,  poor  iteople 
could  not  send  their  children  to  private  elementary  schools  run  for  profit.  Poor 
people  today  are  without  adequate  medical  care,  though  this  is  a  necessity  of 
life.  Throughout  the  country,  many  health  movements  are  on  foot,  initiated  by 
public  as  well  as  private  agencies.  A  welter  of  legislative  bills  are  pending  in 
many  state  legislatures  and  in  Congress  dealing  with  some  angle  or  other  of 
the  people's  health  question.  Among  the  doct(U'S,  the  430  insurgents,  who  de- 
clared that  the  health  of  people  is  "a  direct  ccnicern  of  the  governnu'ut,''  are 
ripe  for  action  in  support  of  a  people's  health  movement.  This  open  opposition 
movement  among  the  physicians  in  the  American  Medical  Association  has  now 
increased  to  nearly  1,0(10  members.  Tliere  is  a  strong  movement  for  a  Federal 
health  program,  in  which  the  Roosevelt  Administration  is  displaying  interest. 
The  Committee  on  Econcimic  Security,  in  its  report  to  President  Roosevelt,  de- 
clared in  favor  of  a  "nation-wide  Public  Health  Program,  financially  and  tech- 
nically aided  by  the  Federal  Government."  Similarly,  the  C.  I.  O..  the  A.  F.  of  L., 
the  A.  L.  P.,  and  many  other  mass  organizations,  including  the  I.  W.  O.  and 
Workers  Alliance,  have  taken  a  stand  on  this  issue.  The  masses  are  increasingly 
demanding  the  right  to  health,  with  their  other  demands  for  social  security. 

It  is  of  the  utmost  Importance  that  we  participate  in  all  of  these  movements. 
It  is  necessary  that  our  forces  participate  in  all  health  issues  alTecting  the 
people  and  that  our  forces  shall  attach  themselves  to  the  existing  health  agencies 
in  all  communities  to  give  support  and  leadership  on  so  imijortant  a  political 
issue.  In  every  State  Connnittee,  a  Party  Health  Connnission  should  be  set 
up  to  take  the  initiative  in  developing  the  fight  for  the  health  needs  of  the  people. 

A  partial  solution  to  the  question  of  bringing  adequate  medical  care  to  the 
masses  is  through  a  compuUory  national  hvalth-ivxurauce  plan,  to  be  i)aid  for  by 
taxation  upon  the  rich.  This  should  include  full  medical,  diagnostic,  preventive, 
and  curative  care,  with  periodic  medical  examinations  included  as  a  preventive 
measure.  The  demand  should  be  raised  for  pcojAe'n  health  eenter><  in  every  com- 
munity, with  the  people  represented  in  the  administration  to  air  their  grievances 
and  adjust  complaints.  An  important  means  to  finance  such  centers  would  be 
through  W.   P.   A.   health   projects   to   supplement  local   and   state  funds.     The 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8735 

W.  P.  A.  has  already  built  99  new  hospitals  and  repaired  934  others,  while 
W.  P.  A.  medical  and  dental  clinics  have  performed  services  in  9,0IK>,(t(X)  instances. 

We  might  liiiht  to  extend  the  Social  Security  legislation  to  provide  health 
protection,  adcipiate  medical  care,  hcjilth  insurance,  maternity  insurance,  safe- 
guards against  occupational  hazards,  lil)eral  Workmen's  Compensation  Laws,  and 
special  provisions  to  protect  women  and  young  workers  in  industry,  as  a  necessity 
of  life. 

"Our  Citizens."  sa.vs  the  T".  S.  Surgeon  General,  Dr.  Thomas  .1.  Parran,  Jr., 
"should  have  an  ecpial  opportunity  for  health  as  an  inherent  right,  coocpial  with 
the  right  to  lih(>rty  and  the  pursuit  of  haiipine.ss." 

The  American  people,  the  progressive  memliers  of  the  medical  profession  who 
now  constitute  a  powerful  opposition  movement  over  the  heads  of  the  reac- 
tionary hierarchy  in  the  A.  M.  A.,  the  trade  unions,  A.  L.  P.  and  Farmer-Labor 
Parties,  will  rally  to  the  struggle.  The  broadest  possible  united  front  can  and 
should  be  built  around  the  issue  to  amend  the  Social  Security  Law.  This  move- 
ment to  meet  the  critical  health  needs  of  the  masses  opens  up  new  channels  for 
strengthening  the  democratic  front. 


May  1938. 
Repori  on  Negro  Work 

material  for  the  negro  commission,  loth  party  con\'ention 

The  main  slogan  before  the  people  of  the  coimtry  is  unity.  We  have  the  task 
of  achieving  unity  in  the  trade-union  movement,  unity  of  the  nation,  and  we  have 
as  the  main  instrument  the  democratic  front  as  the  immediate  expression  of  this 
unity.  The  line  of  the  Party  to  pay  special  attention  to  the  problems  of  the 
Negroes  and  to  begin  a  more  intensified  struggle  around  Negro  rights. 

When  National  Negro  Unity  was  on  the  agenda  in  1866-70,  it  was  at  that 
point  a  struggle  for  the  rights  of  the  Negroes  and  against  the  oppressors.  Fol- 
lowing this  unit.v  the  reactionaries  gained  ascendancy  and  thus  we  see  the 
basis  of  the  unity  of  the  people  flows  out  of  the  slave  days.  This  unity  can  be 
achieved  only  on  the  basis  of  overcoming  the  reactionaries.  This  means  struggle 
against  discrimination  and  also  overcoming  the  contradiction  that  we  are  con- 
fronted with  in  the  struggle  for  the  Negroes.  The  only  way  to  overcome  it  is  by 
doing  away  with  the  special  form  of  oppression  that  they  face.  The  Negroes 
must  not  wait  for  the  whites  to  take  on  the  burden  and  we  must  overcome  the 
resistance  of  the  whites  to  do  nothing  about  it.  We  must  see  the  necessity  of 
impressing  on  the  Negroes  that  the.v  must  fight  in  their  own  interest  and  that 
the  main  instrument  is  the  National  Negro  Congress.  We  must  break  down 
the  resistance  among  the  white  people  to  achieve  the  unity  which  is  so  necessary. 

The  main  link  now  to  be  -seized  is  that  link  around  employment  discrimination 
or  limitation  in  employment  opportunities.  We  have  here  not  onl.v  the  need  to 
unify  the  Negroes  and  fight  in  the  interests  of  the  Negroes  but  many  related 
problem.s.  We  must  take  a  stand  against  monopolies  and  the  fascist  organiza- 
tions. The  more  we  develop  this  campaign  the  easier  will  be  the  development 
of  the  democratic  movement. 

Now  we  have  a  few  lessons  to  draw  from  this  because  of  the  situation  con- 
fronting the  Negroes.  There  is  a  tendency  in  Harlem  to  incite  against  the  Jews, 
against  the  small  store  keeper  and  not  again.st  the  big  corporations,  the  big 
monopolies.  In  these  there  are  very  few  Jews  among  the  Board  of  Directors. 
They  are  usually  aryan.  The  reactionary  forces  in  the  Negro  neighborhood  seize 
upon  the  fact  that  the  Jews  are  small  businessmen  and  say  that  they  are  the 
main  enemy.  There  is  a  lesson  insofar  as  unity  is  concerned,  unit.v  between 
Negroes  and  whites,  unity  in  the  trade  unions.  The  key  to  the  whole  question 
is  an  energetic  fight  both  to  organize  the  Negroes  and  to  force  through  conces- 
sions. Certain  concessions  have  been  gained  from  the  monoiwlies ;  Negroes  have 
been  placed  in  jobs.  With  the  aid  of  the  Transport  Workers"  Union  we  hope  to 
have  Negro  bus  drivers  in  1938. 

Now  to  move  to  the  next  point  which  was  the  discussion  how  to  work  among 
the  Negro  people.  We  must  find  that  main  mass  organization  where  the  people 
are  and  we  must  recognize  that  to  be  the  church.  A  lot  has  been  said  on  how 
to  get  into  the  church.  The  best  way  is  to  join  it  or  one  of  the  many  auxiliaries 
in  the  church.  Every  one  of  us  can  join  one  of  the  organiztitions  in  the  church 
and  there  become  leaders  in  the  biggest  mass  organization  among  the  Negroes. 
They  constitute  S.OOO.OfX)  out  of  the  13.()0<),0n0  in  the  United  States.  Another 
thing  in  connection  with  the  church  is  the  Negro  youth.     The  Negro  youth  to- 

62626 — 41 — vol.  14 37 


§736  UX-AMERICAN   l'K0PAf4ANDA  ACTIVITIES 

clay,  because  of  imemployinent  faces  demoralization.  They  face  certain  prob- 
lems which  make  them  snbject  to  propaganda  of  the  fascists.  They  speak 
favorably  of  Hitler  and  Mussolini  and  say  that  we  need  such  people  for  this 
country.  They  speak  against  discussion  on  political  questions,  but  when  it 
comes  to  singing  they  sing  and  can  teach  others  to  sing.  They  come  to  branch 
meetings  only  once  a  week  and  they  do  not  utilize  them. 

We  must  get  these  comrades  who  can  sing  to  open  our  meetings  with  songs. 
They  can  also  create  songs,  new  songs  in  the  interest  of  the  people.  Then  we 
have  the  actors  in  the  Party.  We  have  a  movement  of  Negro  actors  and  now 
we  have  learned  how  to  use  little  skits  to  get  over  a  point.  Tliey  don't  have  to  be 
able  to  read  to  understand  statements.  We  can  utilize  these  people  to  put  over 
our  political  points  and  propaganda  and  education  work  of  our  sections  and 
districts. 

For  more  than  fifty  years  the  A.  F.  of  L.  did  almost  nothing  to  organize 
Negro  labor.  As  a  matter  of  fact  it  barred  them  through  constitutional  meas- 
ures.    The  top  leaders  said,  "You  can't  organize  Negroes." 

The  Committee  for  Industrial  Organization  has  organized  more  than  a  quarter 
million  in  less  than  two  years. 

Why  could  the  C.  I.  O.  do  it,  and  not  the  A.  F.  of  L?  Fir.st  of  all,  the  policy  of 
the  C.  I.  O.  is  a  correct  one.  It  is  a  policy  that  states  clearly,  that  all  workers  re- 
gardless of  race,  creed,  or  color  must  be  organized.  Secondly,  its  correct  policy 
of  industrial  organization  gives  greater  confidence  to  workers.  The  great  mass 
of  workers  are  learning  that  their  best  interest  can  only  be  protected  by  such  a 
policy. 

For  many  years  the  Executive  Council  of  the  A.  F.  of  L.  refused  to  grant  the 
Pullman  Porters  an  International  Charter,  thus  hampering  the  growth  of  this 
labor  organization.  Under  the  leadership  of  A.  Phillip  Randolph,  an  Inter- 
natidual  Charter  was  finally  won.  Today  tlie  Brotherhood  of  Sleeping  Car 
Porters  is  a  serious  factor  in  the  ranks  of  Negro  labor. 

Wherever  Negro  labor,  under  the  A.  F.  of  L.  attempted  to  organize  and  pro- 
tect itself  agiiinst  the  employers,  the  discouraging  hand  of  the  Executive  Council 
of  the  A.  F.  of  L.  could  be  felt.  The  usual  method  of  hamstringing  Negro  labor, 
by  the  officialdom  of  the  A.  F.  of  L.  was  through  "Federal"  charters  which  tied 
them  to  the  apron  strings  of  reactionaries  like  Green,  Woll,  and  Hutchinson. 

These  people  tried  to  place  the  blame  for  lack  of  Trade-Union  Organization 
amongst  Negroes,  not  where  it  rightly  belonged — upon  their  own  shoulders. 
They  blamed  the  Negro  workers. 

The  whole  world  knows  that  Negroes  are  loyal  fighters  when  given  half  a 
chance. 

Until  the  C.  I.  O.  was  born,  what  little  trade-union  organization  there  was. 
among  Negroes,  that  is,  the  ones  that  joined  the  A.  F.  of  L.  joined  in  the 
face  of  great  difficulties.  They  joined  in  spite  of  the  barriers  erected  by  the 
leadership  of  the  American  Federation  of  Labor. 

We  must  state,  however,  that  there  were  many  white  trade-unions  who  car- 
ried on  a  rentless  struggle  against  the  destructive  policy  of  the  top  ofiicialdom 
of  the  A.  F.  of  L.  Men  who  saw  many  years  ago,  that  only  a  policy  of  indus- 
trial organization,  a  policy  free  of  all  forms  of  discrimination  because  of  race, 
creel,  or  color,  would  serve  the  best  interest  of  the  American  working  class. 
Outstanding  among  these  was  Wm.  Z.  Foster. 

Foster,  and  many  other  real  builders  of  the  American  Labor  movement,  were 
expelled  from  the  American  Federation  of  Labor  by  the  same  reactionary  ele- 
ments that  are  now  in  control  of  the  Executive  Council.  The  clique  that  is 
leading  the  fight  against  C.  I.  O.  This  clique  nuist  be  halted  in  its  attack 
on  the  labor  movement.  The  labor  movement  must  be  united.  The  American 
working  class  must  be  united  into  one  powerful  organization  based  upon  the 
principle  of  industrial  unionism.  The  Committee  for  Industrial  Organization 
has  shown  the  way. 

Insofar  as  the  Negro  worker  is  concernetl,  the  C.  I.  O.  has  proven — if  proof 
were  needed — that  Negroes  are  ready,  and  eager  to  join  the  ranks  of  organized 
labor.  Not  only  are  the  Negro  workers  eager  to  join  unions,  Init,  they  have 
demonstrated  their  willingness  to  go  the  limit  in  defense  of  the  cause  of 
organized  labor. 

It  is  no  accident  that  the  C.  I.  O.  has  been  able  to  organize  over  250,(X)0 
Negroes  in  the  short  space  of  2  years.  While  the  A.  F.  of  L.  during  57  years 
of  its  existence   reluctantly  enrolled  40  to  50,01)0,  and  this  under  pressure. 

The  task  coiifnmting  oi;r  entire  party  on  the  question  of  trade-union  unity, 
is   the  one   of  bringing  new   thousands  of  Negroes  into   the  imions,   especiall.v 


rNT-AMEUlCAN    TKoPACANDA   ACTIVITIES  8737 

C  I.  O.  uiiious.  Ilowevor,  we  nmst  imt  lU'fil^'ft  tor  a  siiijjlc  iiKinu'iit  those 
Ne.sro  workers,  who,  under  the  impetus  of  the  C.  I.  O.  drive  joined  the  A.  F. 
of   L.     They    nuis(    be   enlisted    in   the   struggle  for   trade-union   unity. 

Our  trade-union  ('(unniissions  must  liave  as  one  of  its  chief  taslvS,  the 
winning  over  of  tlie  great  mass  of  Xegro  labor  into  the  organized  labor  move- 
ment— into  the  unions.  This  means  among  other  things,  the  training  of  our 
whole  party  membership  to  be  conscious,  elert,  and  vigilant  in  fighting  for  job 
security,  and  ecjual  opportunity  in  advancement  for  Negroes. 

Systematic  and  planned  enliglitment  work  must  be  carried  on  amongst  the 
white  workers,  winning  them  to  struggle  against  all  jim-crow  barriers  erected 
against  Xegro  Labor. 

It  is  only  by  rallying  the  white  workers  in  defense  of  Negro  labor,  against 
all  forms  of  Negro  discrimination,  and  for  equal  rights,  will  we  be  able  to  build 
the  powerful  labor  movement  that  will  stop  reaction  in  its  tracks.  It  is  thus 
we  will  build  the  Democratic  Front,  the  Peoples  Front,  and  lay  the  base  for 
Socialism. 

As  the  menace  of  fascist  reaction  threatens  the  Negro  people  with  double 
ferocity,  there  exists  the  greatest  desire  for  unity  among  them,  United  action, 
greater  community  cooperation  is  the  foremost  need  that  face  the  Negro  people 
today. 

The  struggle  of  the  Negro  people  for  their  own  freedom  and  the  struggle  of 
the  forces  of  progress  and  democracy  meet  on  a  common  ground  against  their 
common  enemy,  against  fascist  reaction. 

The  National  Negro  Congress  has  come  forward  as  the  Herculean  helmsman 
in  building  the  unity  of  action  among  the  Negro  popidation,  of  welding  unity 
of  all  sections  of  the  Negroes  in  the  direction  of  improving  their  general  lot 
as  well  as  towards  a  serious  consideration  of  their  problems  in  the  international 
arena. 

The  struggle  around  the  antilynching  bill  which  was  sponsored  by  the  N.  A.  A. 
C.  P.  occupied  a  central  place  in  the  development  of  the  whole  progi-essive 
movement  in  tb.e  country.  The  National  Negro  Congress  was  a  foremost  sup- 
porter of  this  struggle  and  helped  to  raised  the  struggle  to  new  high  levels.  It 
was  the  foremost  Negro  Peoples'  united  front  organization  which  carried  this 
struggle  into  the  deep  South  and  strengthened  the  direct  offensive  against  en- 
trenched landlord  and  manufacturing  class,  who  are  afraid  growing  progressive 
movement  in  the  country,  and  particularly  in  the  south,  who  are  afraid  of  the 
rising  strength  of  labor  and  who  are  terrorized  at  the  increasing  unity  of  Negro 
and  v.hite  in  the  trade-unions  because  they  know  that  this  is  a  prelude  to  unity 
in  poi:tical  action. 

The  Second  National  Negro  Congress  which  met  in  Philadelphia  in  October 
1937  was  attended  by  1.200  delegates  as  compared  with  912  delegates  who  at- 
tended tlie  First  Congre.ss  which  met  in  Chicago  in  1936.  The  Secc  nd  Congress 
was  a  remarkalile  .success  over  the  first.  However,  the  increase  in  the  Con- 
gress's numerical  strength  as  indicated  by  the  manner  of  delegates  at  the  Second 
Congre.ss  does  not  at  all  fully  indicate  the  actual  strength  and  influence  which 
the  Congres  enjoys  among  the  masses.  Its  prestige  is  more  far-reaching  than 
is  indicated  by  its  numerical  growth. 

The  f'acr  that  the  second  National  Negi-o  Congress  was  greeted  by  President 
Roosevelt,  Farmer-Lab^r  Governor  Elmer  P)enson,  of  Miimesota,  John  L.  Lewns, 
and  Mayor  LaGuardia,  of  New  York,  is  a  striking  manifestation  of  the  growing 
prestige  which  it  has  placed  upon  the  recognition  of  outstanding  progressive 
leaders  of  the  movement  for  progress  and  democracy  in  the  country. 

The  program  and  aims  of  the  National  Negro  Congress  nuist  be  made  known  to 
the  greatest  number  of  people.  Our  task  is  to  solicit  and  secure  the  active 
supjjort  of  every  local  and  national  oi'ganization  of  the  Negro  people  in  the 
country  and  all  mixed  and  white  organizations  that  are  willing  to  join  in  the 
fight  for  econonuc  and  social  justice  for  Negroes,  sucli  as  trade-unions,  civic, 
fraternal,  church,  business,  and  professional  organizations  to  heli)  build  the 
Congress  and  nnd<e  it  a  greater  success. 

As  a  result  of  the  successful  work  done  by  the  Congress  and  l)ccause  of  the 
important  place  which  it  occupies  in  the  American  progressive  movement,  there 
has  ari'^en  a  greater  desire  among  ndllions  of  Negro  peo]  le  and  many  progressive 
white  people  to  establish  closer  relationship  with  the  National  Negro  Congi'ess. 

There  are  millions  of  individual  inem')ers  of  organizations  who  are  anxious  to 
support  and  cooperate  with  the  Congress,  but  l)ecausp  their  re.'^pective  oi'gan'za- 
fion  or  trade-union  may  be  unaffiliated  with  the  Congress,  a  clo.sei"  contact 
through  which  they  can  fully  participate  has  been  insufficiently  realized. 


8738  UN-AMERTCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Existing  in  the  midst  of  the  rapid  growth  of  the  democratic  and  progressive 
movement  in  the  country,  and  the  necessity  of  rallying  the  great  masses  of  the 
Negro  people  around  and  to  this  movement  raises  an  important  task  for  the 
National  Negro  Congress.  That  is  the  task  of  providing  for  the  greatest  and 
fullest  participation  of  millions  of  individual  progressives  in  the  work  of  the 
Congress. 

The  task  then,  therefore,  is  to  bring  the  National  Negro  Congress  more  effec- 
tively and  more  closer  to  the  Negro  population  in  the  country  and  to  provide 
greater  opportunities  for  the  fullest  cooperation  and  participation  of  all  pro- 
gressives in  building  the  Congress. 

The  National  Negro  Congress  has  inaugurated  a  campaign  to  secure  Sponsors 
in  the  various  progressive  organizations,  trade-unions,  clubs,  and  in  the 
neighborhoods.  Individual  members  of  organizations  can  become  official  Spon- 
sors of  the  Congress  in  their  respective  organizations  or  union  and  among 
their  friends  in  their  communities  by  contributing  a  fee  of  fifty  (50)  centa 
for  which  they  will  receive  National  Negro  Congress  Sponsors  Buttons. 

Thousands  of  individuals  can  be  approached  to  become  Sponsors  of  the 
Congress.  Every  effort  should  be  put  forth  to  develop  the  campaign  for 
sponsors.  Individual  members  of  organizations,  clubs,  and  trade  unions  who 
are  sponsors  of  the  Congress  can  play  a  significant  role  in  bringing  the 
Congress  into  their  organization  and  help  to  draw  the  organization  into  the 
work  of  the  Congress  and  prepare  the  basis  for  their  organization's  affiliation 
to  the  National  Negro  Congress. 

In  the  negihborhoods  where  several  Sponsors  have  been  secured  in  an 
assembly  district  or  a  ward,  these  people  should  be  brought  together  to  form 
a  Sponsors  Club  on  the  A.  D.  or  ward  basis.  These  sponsors  Clubs  will 
function  under  the  supervision  of  the  central  body  of  the  Congress  in  a  partic- 
ular borough,  county,  town,  or  city. 

The  question  of  securing  National  Negro  Congress  Sponsors  should  be  one  of 
the  central  points  of  preconvention  discussion  in  every  Party  branch,  vuiit,  and 
fraction.  Party  organizations  and  committees  should  develop  discussions  around 
the  Negro  I'eoples'  Front,  building  the  National  Negro  Congress,  the  history 
of  the  Negro  people  and  building  the  Communist  Party  as  the  Party  of  the 
Negroes.  In  addition  to  the  material  in  the  preconvention  discussion  bulletin, 
every  Party  member  should  read :  Earl  Browder's  Lincoln  and  the  Connnunists, 
The  Peoples'  Front,  and  James  W.  Ford's  speeches  at  the  First  and  Second 
Congresses  of  the  National  Negro  Congress. 

Columnists  in  the  trade  unions  should  consult  the  educational  committee 
of  their  unions  and  arrange  to  include  in  their  educational  jjrogram  discussions 
on  the  National  Negro  Congress  and  the  trade-unions,  etc.  Trade-union  meet- 
ings should  be  covered  by  people  with  folders,  leaflets.  Sponsor  buttons,  and 
who  should  ask  for  the  floor  to  give  five-minute  speeches  on  the  Congress  and 
appeal  for  fifty  cents  Sponsors. 

We  Communists  have  always  stood  as  the  vanguard  in  the  ranks  of  the 
fighters  for  Progress  and  Democracy.  The  Communist  Party  strives  to  further 
develop  the  National  Negro  Congress,  the  United  Negro  Peoples'  Front  as  an 
inseparable  part  of  the  People's  Front  for  democracy,  peace,  and  equal  status 
for  the  Negro  people. 

We  must  develop  further  the  role  of  the  Communist  Party  as  the  vanguard 
in  the  struggle  for  Negro  rights,  in  the  liberation  struggle  of  the  Negro  people, 
and  its  role  in  continuing  the  revolutionary  traditions  of  our  country.  Our 
Party  continues  the  role  of  Marx  and  Engels  in  the  struggle  for  democracy  in 
the  United  States  who  rallied  the  British  workers  to  the  side  of  our  democracy 
in  the  United  States  against  the  British  Tories  and  prevented  their  intervention 
on  the  side  of  the  slave  owners  of  the  South.  Our  Party  personifies  Lenin, 
who  aided  the  American  working  class  in  their  struggle  to  unity  and  organ- 
ization. His  Letter  to  the  American  Working  Class  and  his  contribution  toward 
the  solution  of  the  Agricultural  Question  in  the  United  States  exemplifies 
Lenin's  role  in  America  which  must  be  brought  home  to  the  Negro  people. 
The  role  of  Stalin  can  and  must  be  brought  to  the  Negroes  in  all  our  work. 
On  the  basis  of  Stalin's  contribution  to  the  solution  of  the  National  Question, 
our  Party  has  been  able  to  work  out  its  correct  analy.sis  and  approach  to  the 
Negro  people  in  the  United  States  out  of  which  the  existence  of  the  National 
Negro  Congress  is  an  outstanding  result. 

In  building  the  National  Negro  Congress,  we  must  strive  to  advance  the  struggle 
for  Negro  I'ights  and  the  unity  of  Negro  and  white  toilei-s.  We  must  dramatize 
all  the  democratic  demands  of  the  Negro  people  as  inseparable  from  the  struggle 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8739 

of  the  progressive  white  people  for  deiiKx -nicy  .iiul  peace.  The  National  Negro 
Congress  is  a  meeting  ground  of  the  Xi'gro  peoph'  in  the  United  S'tates  to  join  in 
the  biiikling  of  tlioir  own  united  front  against  i-eacti(/n.  for  tlieir  freedom,  peace, 
progress,  and  uhimate  liberation.  In  the  struggle  for  the  democratic  front  of 
which  the  National  Negro  Congress  is  an  integral  part,  the  Negro  people  will  learn 
still  more  the  need  for  building  the  Peoples'  Front  in  America,  through  which 
struggle  they  will,  together  with  the  revolutionary  Negro  and  white  proletariat, 
under  the  leadership  of  the  Conumniist  Party  will  advance  to  complete  liberation, 
to  Socialism. 

Green,  Woll,  and  Hutchinson  tried  t(/  place  the  blame  for  lack  of  trade-union 
organization  amongst  Negroes,  not  where  it  rightly  belongs,  upon  their  own 
shoulders.  They  blamed  the  Negro  workers.  The  whole  world  knows  that 
Negroes  are  hifyal  fighters  when  given  half  a  chance. 

I'ntii  the  C.  I.  O.  was  born,  what  little  trade-union  organization  there  was 
among  Negroes,  that  is,  the  ones  that  joined  the  A.  F.  of  L.  joined  in  the  face  of 
the  greatest  dilHculties.  They  joined  in  spite  of  the  bari-iers  erected  by  the 
leadership  of  the  American  Federation  of  Labor. 

We  must  state,  however,  that  there  were  many  white  trade-unionists  who  car- 
ried on  a  relentless  struggle  against  the  destructive  policy  of  the  top  ofhcialdom 
of  the  A.  F.  of  L.  Men  who  saw  many  years  ago  that  only  a  policy  of  industrial 
organization,  a  policy  free  of  all  forms  of  discrimination  because  of  race,  creed, 
or  color,  w(^uld  serve  the  best  interest  of  the  American  wo'rking  class.  Outstand- 
ing among  these  was  Wm.  Z.  Foster. 

Foster,  and  many  tither  real  builders  of  the  American  Labor  movement,  were 
expelled  from  the  American  Federation  of  Labor  by  the  same  reactionary  elements 
that  are  now  in  control  of  the  Executive  Council.  The  clique  that  is  leading  the 
fight  against  the  C.  I.  O.  This  clique  must  be  halted  in  its  attack  on  the  labor 
movement.  The  labor  movement  must  be  united.  The  American  working  class 
must  be  miited  into  one  ixnverful  organization  based  upon  the  principle  of  indus- 
trial unionism.    The  Committee  for  Industrial  Organization  has  sho-wn  the  way. 

Insofar  as  the  Negro  worker  is  concerned,  the  C.  I.  O.  has  proven,  if  proof  is 
needed,  that  Negroes  are  ready,  and  eager  to  join  the  ranks  of  organized  labor. 
Not  only  are  the  Negro  workers  eager  to  join  unions,  but  they  have  demonstrated 
their  willingness  to  go  the  limit  in  defense  of  the  cause  of  organized  labor. 

It  is  no  accident  that  the  C.  I.  O.  has  been  able  to  organize  over  2.")0,COO  Negroes 
in  the  short  space  of  two  years.  While  the  A.  F.  of  L.  during  57  years  of  its 
existence  reluctantly  enrolled  40-50,(X)0  and  this  under  pressure. 

The  task  confronting  our  entire  party  on  the  question  of  trade-iuiion  unity,  is 
the  one  of  bringing  new  thousands  of  Negroes  into  the  unions,  especially  C.  I.  O. 
unions.  However,  we  must  not  neglect  for  a  single  moment  those  Negro  workers, 
who,  under  the  imi>etus  of  the  C.  I.  O.  drive  joined  the  A.  F.  of  L.  They  must 
be  enlisted  in  the  struggle  for  trade-union  unity. 

Our  trade-iuiion  Commissions  must  have  as  one  of  its  chief  tasks,  the  winning 
over  of  the  great  mass  of  Negro  labor  into  the  organized  labor  movement — into 
the  unions.  This  means  among  other  things,  the  training  of  our  whole  Party 
membership  to  be  conscious,  alert,  and  vigilant  in  fighting  for  job  security,  and 
equal  opportunity  in  advancement  for  Negroes. 

Systematic,  and  ])lanned  enlightenment  work  must  be  carried  on  amongst  the 
white  workers,  winning  them  to  struggle  against  all  jim-crow  barriers  erected 
against  Negro  labor. 

MAY,  1938. 
Report  on  Women's  Work 

M.^TERIAL  for  THE  WOMEN'S  COMMISSION.   TENTH  PARTY  CONVENTION 

Women  passed  through  a  harsh  experience  in  1029-34.  They  have  seen  the 
rise  of  fascism  in  European  countries  which  destroyed  all  the  gains  women  made. 
In  our  own  country,  women  see  reactionary  monoijolies  attempting  to  destroy 
democratic  rights  of  the  people.  By  their  increased  activities  in  193(3-38,  women 
in  the  United  States  have  indicated  that  they  are  aware  of  the  need  to  fight 
for  democracy,  that  they  are  organizing  against  the  inequalities  of  women  exist- 
ing in  nearly  all  phases  of  life;  these  inequalities  which  in  themselves  are  a 
violation  of  democracy;  they  are  organizing  against  the  callous  indifference 
to  the  iKisition  of  woman  and  her  problems. 

In  1936-38  large  numbers  of  women  took  part  in  strikes  for  the  recognition  of 
the  industrial  union;  many  joined  the  luiions ;  there  were  outstanding  women's 
demonstrations  for  jobs  on  W.  P.  A.  projects;  Negro  and  white  women  united 


8740  U?s-AMEKICA>    PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

on  picket  lines,  demanding  jobs  for  Negro  women ;  in  a  number  of  cities,  large 
numbers  of  Negro  women,  through  their  organizations  have  become  part  of  a 
united  movement  for  jobs  for  Negro  young  women ;  housewives  sent  brigades 
to  Washington,  demanding  increased  budgets  for  the  unemployed ;  the  activities 
of  the  wives  of  auto  and  steel  workers  in  support  of  trade  unions  is  known 
nationally.  The  new  trade-union  auxiliaries  are  a  result  of  this  mass  activity. 
The  demonstrations  and  the  picketing  of  housewives  against  increased  prices  for 
meat,  milk,  bread,  rents,  aijd  increased  gas  rates  is  outstanding.  The  League 
of  Women  Shoppers,  a  middle-class  women's  organization,  has  increased  its 
organization  in  20  cities  as  a  result  of  its  active  support  of  the  labor  movement, 
and  its  monthly  magazine. 

These  activities  of  the  women  are  all  part  of  the  developing  progressive  move- 
ment today. 

Other  manifestations  of  women's  part  in  the  developing  progressive  movement, 
are  the  women's  anti-silk  peace  parades ;  their  ever-widening  activities  in  the 
boycott  of  Japanese  goods ;  mother's  peace-day  parades  and  peace  mass  meetings, 
which  in  1938  have  taken  on  a  mass  character,  making  the  communities  peace 
conscious  and  arousing  the  community  to  the  necessity  for  aid  to  mother  and 
child;  the  united  people's  conferences  against  the  high  cost  of  living,  the  united 
movement  taking  in  nearly  the  whole  comnmnity  (in  Paterson,  N.  J.)  around 
issues  of  interest  to  working  mothers ;  the  broad  women's  movements  for  women's 
«ind  children's  all-day  clinics;  the  women's  activities  in  support  of  democratic 
Spain — the  mass  women's  delegation  to  Washington  demanding  the  lifting  of  the 
embargo  and  the  many  sided  women's  activity  in  support  of  the  O'Connell  peace 
bill,  the  day  of  fasting  in  support  of  Loyalist  Spain  by  the  women  delegates  to 
the  Y.  W.  C.  A.  convention. 

A  series  of  national  conventions  of  mass  women's  org'anizations  held  in  1938 
made  keynote  speeches  against  fascism  and  for  democracy.  The  Y.  W.  C.  A. 
convention  stressed  that  Christians  nmst  block  fascism  in  the  U.  S.  A. ;  that 
Nazism  in  Germany  cotild  have  been  avoided  by  tinity  of  the  people ;  the  League 
of  Women  Voters  Convention  stressed  the  need  to  preserve  democracy.  Conven- 
tion speeches  were  publicized  attacking  the  reactionary  Supreme  Court  and  sup- 
porting the  Reorganization  Bill.  The  convention  of  the  General  Federatiou  of 
Women's  Clubs,  representing  nearly  two  million  members,  decided  to  conduct 
community  welware  work  around  health  and  other  such  issues,  as  part  of  the 
human  democratic  rights  of  the  people.  The  Jewish  women's  organizations  con- 
vention stressed  that  not  Communism,  but  fascism,  is  the  danger  today.  Over 
30  women's  org'anizations  in  13  southern  states,  some  representing  the  entire 
South,  and  entire  States  in  the  South,  adopted  resolutions  against  lynchings.  An 
antifascist  note  was  heard  even  in  the  D.  A.  R.  convention,  when  President  Roose- 
velt reminded  the  delegates  that  our  forefathers  threw  off  a  fascist  yoke.  Even 
here,  there  is  a  growing  sentiment  against  fascism,  so  much  so  that  the  leaders 
had  to  veil  their  reactionary  proposals  with  antifascist  phrases.  The  Cause 
and  Cure  of  War  conference  representing  11  women's  mass  organizations  with  a 
membership  of  14  million  'adopted  a  collective  security  policy  for  peace.  They 
are  sending  a  large  delegation  of  women  to  Europe  this  sunjmer  on  a  peace  mis- 
sion. Millions  of  these  women  belong  to  many  church  organizations.  The  large 
number  of  women  delegates  to  the  Congress  of  the  American  League  for  Peace 
and  Democracy  and  its  enthusiastic  women's  session,  indicates  how  active  women 
are  in  the  peace  movement.  The  composition  of  the  ;mdiences  with  its  many  first- 
comers  at  the  Mother  Bloor  mass  meetings  in  celebration  of  International  Women's 
Day  is  also  an  indication  of  the  growing  eagerness  on  the  part  of  masses  of  women 
to  fight  against  war  and  against  reaction  and  for  democracy. 

The  basic  organized  masses  of  women  in  the  U.  S.  A.  have  demonstrated  in 
1986-38  that  they  are  on  the  side  of  progressive  forces.  The  form  in  which  this 
progressive  position  presents  itself  is  mo.'^tly  arotmd  f/cnrral  isfniei^  involving 
peace  and  democracy,  in  the  general  people's  movements,  and  in  the  separate 
women's  organizations.  Separate  women's  organizations  here  and  there  do  carry 
on  some  work  for  special  legislation  to  improve  economic  conditions  for  women. 
But  a  united  women's  movement  for  e(iual  rights  for  women  does  not  yet  exist. 
The  Women's  Charter  movement  aroused  much  discussion  about  the  necessity  for 
such  a  movement.  For  the  first  time,  a  stir  has  been  created  in  women's  organiza- 
tions on  this  subject.  For  the  first  time,  some  conventions;  of  women's  organi- 
zations are  discussing  this  subject.  However,  organizationally  only  the  first  steps 
have  been  taken  to  build  the  united  women's  movement  for  women's  equal  rights. 
However,  we  can  say  that  whereas  inaor  to  l!)3(i  there  dir^  not  exist  even  talk 
about  a  united  women's  movement,  today  there  is  beginning  to  be  signs  of  an 


UX-AMEKK'AN    rilOPAGANDA   ACTIVITIKS  8741 

orit'iitat  inn  in  thai  dii'iH-t  ion.  The  nnited  activities  of  a  number  of  organizations 
(It'niandini;-  jobs  for  wonion,  the  loniiiorary  c•onferen^v^s  to  limit  hours  of  work 
for  (loniosiic  workers,  tlie  beji'innin.ns  of  united  front  conferences  to  ai<l  mother 
and  child.  Hie  small  ,i;roui>s  tliat  are  beinji  developed  around  the  Women's  Charter, 
the  Mother's  Day  united  peace  i;ommittees,  tlie  attempt  to  unite  the  opposition 
to  the  "Equal  Rights"  amendment — all  is  an  indication  in  this  direction. 

The  Women's  Charter  Group  which  came  out  of  Wa.<liington  has  now  been 
reorganized  into  the  Joint  Connnilti'e  for  Women'.s  Work,  with  the  resolution 
adopted  at  the  International  Labor  Conference  in  Geneva  as  the  basis  for  its 
work.  This  resolution  was  presented  in  Geneva  by  the  United  States  Govern- 
ment delegation.  This  resohition  is  a  good  guiding  document  for  the  building  of 
the  imited  women's  movement  for  e(puil  rights.  It  contains  the  principle  that 
should  be  embodied  into  an  act  to  be  presented  to  Congress  by  the  progressive 
moment,  to  abolish  the  legal  discrimination  that  exists  against  women  and  to 
safeguard  the  principle  of  special  legislation  that  fits  the  special  needs  of 
women.  Such  congressional  action  would  substitute  the  Utopian  •'Equal  Rights" 
amendment  sponsored  by  the  Women's  I'ai'ty. 

Organizationally,  the  united  women's  movement  is  not  a  finished  movement. 
Organizationally,  it  is  less  advanced  than  other  progressive  united  movements. 
Nevertheless,  it  is  a  decisive  section  of  the  democratic  front.  We  must  under- 
stand its  form  of  development  to  help  it  mature  and  strengthen  itself.  That  is 
of  especial  importance  to  the  progressive  movement  as  a  whole.  Its  main  weak- 
ness comes  from  the  fact  that  women  in  trade-unions  are  active  only  to  a  limited 
degree  in  the  women's  equal  rights  movement.  The  main  task  in  the  building 
of  the  united  women's  equal  rights  movement  is  for  the  trade-unions  to  hold 
special  meetings  of  its  women  members  to  work  out  legislative  programs  for  women 
of  their  particular  industry.  Of  the  22  States  having  miniminn-wage  laws  for 
women,  which  employ  two-thirds  of  all  working  women  and  7( K v  of  all  women 
in  manufacturing,  very  few  have  the  necessary  government  machinery  to  apply 
that  law.  The  cotton  industry,  which  employs  the  largest  number  of  women, 
is  concentrated  in  States  still  without  any  minimum  wage  provisions.  Increased 
activities  of  women  in  the  trade-unions  around  a  legislative  program  for  women 
will  bring  into  the  trade-unions  many  unorganized  women. 

The  fulfillment  of  this  main  task  will  strengthen  the  work  of  the  women's  mass 
organizations  to  improve  woman's  social  position.  It  will  help  convince  many 
leaders  of  mass  women's  organizations  aboiit  the  need  for  a  united  women's 
movement  around  equal  rights  for  women.  Certain  of  the  women's  organizations 
have  bad  experience  in  united  women's  activities  around  the  peace  issue  as  the 
Cause  and  Cure  of  War  Committee,  representing  11  mass  women's  organizations; 
also  the  Women's  Joint  Congressional  Committee  which  is  made  up  of  22  of  the 
most  repre-sentative  national  women's  organizations  (it  does  legislative  work). 
As  part  of  this  main  ta.sk,  it  is  necessary  to  hel])  activize  the  rank  and  file  mem- 
bers in  the  mass  women's  organizations  around  the  progressive  policies  adopted 
in  their  national  conventions,  to  help  them  l)ecome  active  in  support  of  democratic 
Spain,  to  aid  the  babies  of  Spain,  to  support  the  O'Connell  Peace  Bill,  to  lift 
the  embargo  against  Spain,  and  to  exterid  the  boycott  of  Jaijanese  goods  move- 
ment ;  to  make  Mother's  Day  a  mass  day  for  peace  and  aid  to  mother  and  child; 
to  work  for  women's  conference  against  lynching  and  in  support  of  the  anti- 
lynch  bill.  This  work  should  inclnde  the  building  up  of  the  membership  in  the 
American  League  for  Peace  and  Democracy. 

Women  are  nearly  half  the  voting  population.  In  some  States,  as  Illinois, 
women  are  51 9r  of  the  voters.  The  reactionaries  have  already  opened  their 
election  campaign  to  win  the  votes  of  the  women  in  the  198S  elections.  Hoover 
already  made  his  appeal  to  the  women  of  the  nation  against  Roosevelt's  budget 
for  .jobs  and  relief  under  the  slogan  of  fisjht  the  "Moral  Recession"  in  govern- 
ment. This  sjieech  was  immediately  followed  up  by  the  call  of  the  Women's 
National  Republican  Club  calling  upon  women  to  unite  to  defeat  the  New  Deal 
with  its  "spending"  budget.  It  blames  the  Roosevelt  administration  for  the 
wor.«ened  condition  of  th(>  family,  and  openly  asks  the  women  to  vote  for  tlie 
candidates  of  r(>action  in  the  lll^S  elections:  because,  it  says  that  success  in  10,38 
(for  reaction)  will  point  toward  a  Reimblican  President  in  1040.  In  the  speech 
of  H  >over  in  the  call  of  the  Women's  National  Republican  Cbib,  in  the  statements 
of  the  Women's  Rebellion  committee  organized  by  the  fascist  elemp>nts  in  N'^w 
York  who  are  cann\Ticning  against  all  nrogressive  measures — tlipre  is  a  common 
plank — defeat  the  Roosevelt  plan  for  iobs  and  relief,  cut  the  federal  bud.cet  for 
relief  and  nublic  works,  and  save  the  billions  of  the  monopolies:  shift  the  burden 
for  the  relief  of  the  unemployed  to  the  comnuuiities — meaning  to  the  people. 


3742  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Tlie  reactionaries  are  already  trying  to  exploit  the  sentiments  against 
fascism  as  expressed  in  the  women's  conventions.  They  are  operating  under 
the  deraogogic  slogan  of  no  dictatorship  in  government. 

Much  support  is  extended  to  the  reactionaries  by  the  isolationist  polices 
of  the  Women's  Internatonal  League  for  Peace  and  Freedom.  Ths  organiza- 
tion until  recently  was  considered  a  progressive  one.  Not  knowing  alxjut  its 
present  reactionary  policies,  women  can  be  misled.  It  blames  the  Roosevelt 
administration  for  continuing  the  depi'essiou  as  a  way  to  war.  This  detracts 
from  the  guilt  of  the  real  culprits  who  are  responsible  for  the  miseries  of  the 
people — the  reactionary  monopolies. 

The  women  isolationists  are  finding  themselves  in  the  same  camp  with  the 
renegade  Lovestonites.  They,  together  with  the  would-be  women  liberals 
in  the  United  States  who  attack  the  Soviet  Union,  who  side  with  the  Trotskyite 
agents  of  fascism,  do  not  represent  the  masses  of  women  in  the  United  States. 
Blinded  by  their  isolationist  polices,  and  the  fascist  propaganda  of  the  Trot- 
skyites,  they  do  not  see  the  great  and  active  support  that  the  millions  of 
women  in  the  Soviet  Union  are  giving  to  the  leaders  of  their  government,  to 
Stalin,  for  the  elimination  of  the  traitors  who  plotted  to  open  the  Soviet 
frontiers  for  faslism  to  come  in.  The  masses  of  women  fighting  war  and 
fascism  in  the  United  States  will  pass  such  would-be  leaders  by. 

But  with  such  great  effort  on  the  part  of  reactionaries  of  all  shades  to  win 
the  women,  it  is  not  so  certain  that  many  women's  votes  will  not  be  given 
to  reactionary  candidates,  that  women  may  be  temporarily  swayed  away  from 
their  progressive  position  if  the  progressive  political  organizations  do  not  speed 
up  their  efforts  to  win  the  women. 

In  preparation  for  the  1938  elections,  progressive  political  organizations 
should  request  their  Congressmen  and  Senators  to : 

1.  Include  a  clause  in  the  Hours-and-Wages  Bill  providing  equal  applica- 
tion of  the  benefits  in  that  Bill  to  women. 

2.  To  amend  the  National  Security  Act,  title  V,  Section  502,  authorizing  an 
adequate  sum  to  be  appropriated  annually  to  the  States  for  maternal  and 
child  health  services. 

3.  Support  the  Child  Labor  Amendment. 

Progressive  political  state  conferences  and  progressive  election  campaign 
committees  should  include  the  following  in  their  platform: 

1.  Full  opportunity  for  women  to  work. 

2.  Safeguarding  of  women's  health  in  employment. 

3.  Full  opportunity  for  education  for  women. 

4.  State  and  W.  P.  A.  aid  to  mother  and  child. 

5.  Dowry  subsidy  for  women  on  W.  P.  A.  and  relief. 

6.  All-day  women's  and  children's  clinics  in  hospitals  or  medical  centers. 

7.  Equal  rights  for  Negro  women. 

Progressive  political  State  conferences  and  organizations  should  initiate  and 
support  state  measures  to  abolish  legal  discriminations  against  women  that 
exist  in  their  States.  A  model  state  law  for  this  is  the  Wisconsin  State  Law, 
guaranteeing  civil  and  political  rights  to  women  and  at  the  same  time  recog- 
nizing the  need  for  special  laws  to  improve  the  iwsition  of  women. 

The  women  in  the  trade-unions,  together  with  women's  organizations  in  the 
city  and  state,  with  the  support  of  the  progressive  political  organizations,  in- 
cluding the  progressive  women's  clubs  of  the  Democratic  and  Republican  parties, 
should  initiate  city  and  state  women's  conferences,  for  the  realization  of  this 
program. 

Such  conferences  will  promote  the  welding  together  of  women  in  the  trade- 
unions  with  various  women's  organizations  for  the  building  of  a  broad  national 
united  women's  movement  as  part  of  the  democratic  front  movement  to  block 
the  road  to  fascism  and  war. 

WOMEN  IN   TRADE-UNIONS 

Each  local  trade-union,  separately  or  jointly  with  unions  in  other  industries, 
should  create  a  women's  joint  committee  to  work  on  a  project  as  to  what 
should  constitute  a  living  wage  for  women  in  the  state  for  various  industries, 
the  findings  of  this  project  committee  to  be  proposed  to  the  State  Minimum  Wage 
Board.  Similar  project  committees  can  work  for  improvement  of  women's 
health  in  employment.  The  project  committee,  through  trade-unions  and  women's 
organizations,  nia.v  rally  to  get  their  proposal  adopted.  A  state  bill  limiting  the 
hours  of  work  for  domestic  workers  should  be  initiated  through  the  trade-unions 


UN-AMERICAN  PROl^AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8743 

or  the  y.  W.  C.  A.  whose  reciMit  conventiou  decided  to  work  for  the  organ- 
ization of  tlio  domestic  worl<ors.  Tlirouuli  the  W.  P.  A.  Women's  Division  and 
the  Workers  Alliance,  the  women  slionld  he  organized  to  work  for  maintenance 
and  extension  of  W.  P.  A.  projects  for  women. 

COMMUNITY  ACTIVITY 

Women's  trade-union  auxiliaries,  Parents  and  Teachers  Associations,  Women's 
political  chihs,  women's  committees  of  progressive  political  organizations,  may 
hand  together  in  the  comnumity  to  set  up  a  Women's  Community  Welfare 
Committee.  This  to  include :  W.  P.  A.  and  Municipal  Aid  to  mother  and  child, 
particularly  maternal  assistance,  with  special  attention  to  the  need  of  Negro 
mothers :  the  improvement  and  extension  of  health  centers  with  women's  and 
children's  clinics,  including  hirth  control  information  service;  day  nurseries  for 
working  mothers;  better  .schools;  recreational  centers  for  the  children  and  the 
youth.  These  community  committees  may  he  joined  together  on  a  city-wide 
basis  and  trade  unions  and  city  women's  organizations  support  .sought  to  work 
for  state  maternity  insurance  and  amendment  of  the  National  Social  Security 
Act  f<»r  adequate  funds  to  states  for  mother  and  child  health  services. 

WORK  AGAINST  THE  H.  O.  L. 

Efforts  to  get  affiliations  of  Consumers  organizations  and  luiited  front  con- 
ferences against  high  prices  to  the  National  Consumers  Federation  should  be 
stressed.  This  organization  is  a  clearing  for  experiences  in  consumers  work  and 
helps  to  unite  the  City  Consumers  with  the  .small  farmers. 

Support  for  the  investigation  of  the  food  monopolies  by  the  Federal  Government 
should  be  connected  with  the  1938  election  campaign.  Neighborhood  women's 
organizations,  trade-union  auxiliaries,  are  very  effective  in  bringing  the  work 
against  the  H.  C.  L.  into  the  neighborhoods. 

The  Party  has  more  than  doubled  its  women  membership  since  the  9th  Party 
convention,  aiul  has  tripled  the  number  of  working  women  in  the  Party.  We 
set  as  our  task  that  by  International  Women's  Day,  March  r.)39,  we  shall 
improve  more  considerably,  the  number  of  working  women  in  our  Party — by 
then,  to  build  permanent  state,  district  Party  commissions  for  women's  work. 

To  improve  the  composition  of  these  commissions  by  the  inclusion  of  a  larger 
number  of  working  women.  The  commissions  to  set  up  the  necessary  com- 
mittees for  work  among  women  in  the  193.S  Congressional  campaign.  That 
larger  numbers  of  women  students  be  included  in  the  general  Party  Training 
Schools.  That  special  Party  women's  study  circles  be  organizfd.  The  Party 
shall  improve  its  work  among  the  masses  of  women  of  the  nationalities,  espe- 
cially Italian  and  Jewish,  and  among  the  Catholic  women.  To  get  support  for 
the  antifascist  Italian  women's  paper.  Our  Party  press  shall  carry  more  mate- 
rial on  the  life  conditions,  the  problems  and  the  activities  of  women.  To  make 
'•Women  on  the  March"  a  iiermanent  publication.  Systematic  publication  of 
literature  on  the  Party's  position  on  the  family,  or  religion  in  relation  to  women, 
on  the  life  and  work  of  the  women  in  the  Soviet  Union  and  on  activities  of 
women  against  war  and  fascism  in  other  countries,  shall  be  published.  More 
literature  on  the  Comnuuiist  position  on  the  woman  question  shall  be  published. 


Women's  Work  of  the  Nation .\t.  Bure.\us 

Compiled  by  Cl.\r.\  Bodian 

May  1938 

Women's  Commission  C.  C. 

In  interviewing  the  various  leaders  of  the  Leaguage  organizations  I  was 
much  impressed  with  their  interest  and  enthusiasm  at  our  effort  to  gather  this 
information.  They  were  very  cooi)erative  and  indicated  that  the  I.  W.  O.  has 
organized  a  women's  section  in  their  national  organization.  As  a  residt  of 
this,  they  have  high  exijectations  of  the  attention  to  be  paid  on  women's 
problems. 

Onlv  three  of  the  women's  language  bureaus,  namely,  the  Flimish,  Hungarian, 
and  Italian  have  their  own  periodicals.  The  others  get  special  columns  in  the 
regular  press.  None  have  a  planned  educational  program.  All  expressed  the 
need  for  such  a  program  to  raise  the  political  level  of  their  membership.     All 


3744  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

carry  on  united-front  activity  in  one  way  or  another,  fitted  in  tlie  general  work 
of  tfie  national  bureau. 

Some  are  doing  splendid  work  around  Spain  and  China  by  raising  funds  and 
developing  campaigns  for  lifting  of  the  embargo  on  Spain.  All  are  making 
strenuous  efforts  to  work  with  other  language  groups.  Very  few  however,  have 
developed  campaigns  on  day-to-day  issues  concerning  their  innuediate  pioblems. 

The  Jewish  bureau  which  undoubtedly  influences  thousands  of  women  in 
various  organizations,  was  able  to  give  me  the  least  information,  because  of 
their  lack  of  coordination  among  Jewish  organizations.  The  Bureau  head  made 
the  point  that  a  tremendous  campaign  can  be  developed  around  Anti-Semitism 
among  the  conservative  organizations,  such  as  the  Women's  division  of  the 
American  Jewish  Congress,  etc. 

Because  of  the  International  situation  as  a  whole,  the  field  is  fertile  for  co- 
ordhiated  woi'k  for  Peace  and  against  Fascism. 

Every  language  group  has  a  certain  percentage  of  women  in  various  indus- 
tries. Finnish  women  in  the  East  are  primarily  in  the  textile  industry,  also 
in  the  needle  trades.  In  the  Midwest  they  are  engaged  on  the  farms  and  in 
auto  and  on  the  West  Coast  are  in  canning  and  agricultural  industries.  Many 
of  them  are  mariied  women,  who  are  housewives  as  well  as  industrial  women. 

The  national  work  includes  tlie  teaching  of  language  to  children  in  special 
organized  schools  to  reach  larger  numbers  of  the  parents  in  this  way. 

The  National  mass  organizations  have  comparatively  small  women  mem- 
bership, but  they  wield  tremendous  influence  among  thousands  of  women,  both 
organized  and  unorganized.  Then  can  play  a  definite  role  in  the  coming  1938 
elections,  since  the  program  of  the  Democratic  Front  effects  every  one  of  those 
language  women.  The  La  Follette  group  has  great  influence  over  the  progres- 
sive language  groups,  especially  in  the  farm  regions  and  in  civil-rights  issues. 
The  major  task  for  the  language  department  and  the  national  women's  com- 
mission is  the  formation  of  phins  of  work  and  simple  methods  of  approach. 

It  is  important  that  women  in  the  language  mass  organizations  be  recruited 
into  the  party.     Many  of  them  are  ready  and  ripe  for  the  Party. 

It  is  of  utmost  importance  that  we  work  out  a  plan  to  correctly  approach 
the  religious  groups  and  how  best  to  raise  the  religious  question  as  a  whole. 

We  should  concentrate  particularly  among  Italian,  German,  Spanish,  and 
Jewish  women's  organizations,  also  to  urge  groups  to  link  up  their  work  with 
issues  in  the  United  States,  support  of  Spain  and  China,  also  support  of  politi- 
cal prisoners  in  the  countries  they  come  from,  particularly  in  the  reactionary 
and  fascist  countries. 


Women's  Commission,  C.  C, 

Maij  1938. 

The  following  is  a  partial  list  of  women's  organizations  which  adopted  reso- 
lutions   condemning   lynching. 

It  is  suggested  that  immediate  attention  be  given  to  the  organization  of 
wumen's  conferences  against  hjnchbHj,  to  push  the  anti-Lynch  Bill,  especially 
in  those  states  as  listed  here,  where  women's  organizations  have  already  de- 
clared themselves  against  lynchings. 

1.  Women's  Auxiliary  to  the  National   Council   of  the  General   Convention   of 

the    Protestant    Episcopal    Chnrcli    in    the    diocese    of:    Alabama,    Georgia, 
Florida,  Kentucky,  and  Mississippi. 

2.  Women's  Missionary  Society  of:  Kentucky,  Florida,  Georgia. 

3.  The   Women's   Advisory   Committee   of   the   Pre.sbyterian    Church,    U.    S.,    of 

Georgia  and  Virginia. 
■:!.  The  Women's  Missionary  Council  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church,  South, 
embracing  Alabama,  Central  and  West  Texas,  Florida,  Kentucky,  Ar- 
kansas, Louisiana,  Mississippi,  North  and  South  Georgia,  N.  Carolina, 
North  Mississippi,  Oklahoma,  S.  Carolina,  Tennessee,  Upper  S.  Carolina, 
Virginia. 

5.  The  Women's  Missionary  Union  of  the  Southern  Baptist  Convention. 

6.  The    Southwestern    Regional    Conference    rep.    the    National    Federation    of 

Business    and    Professional    Women's    Clul)S,     tlie    Arkansas    Democratic 
Women's    Club,    the    Georgia    Council    of    Federated    Church    Women,    the 
Georgia    Woman's   Christian   Temperance   Union,    the   Louisiana   Assn.    of 
Peace  Officers,  the  Mississippi  Women's  Christian  Temperance  Union. 

7.  The   Association   of   Southern   Women   for   the   Prevention   of   Lynching    has 

been  active  against  lynching  for  many  years. 


rX-A.MEKICAN    I'K()1'A(  J  AM  )A   ACTIVITIES  8745 

MASS    WOMI'N'S  OUCAMZATIONS 

Women's  Trade  Union  League.  Women's  Tr:ule  Union   Anxiliarios. 

Parents  and  Tcac-hers  Ass'us.  Progressive  Women's  Councils. 

Young  Women's  Christian  Ass'us.  Cause  and  Cure  of  War  Committee. 

Language  Women's  organizations.  Federation  of  Negro  Women's  Clubs. 

National  Colored  Women's  Council.  Catliolie  Women's  Cour.cil. 

Jewish   Women's   Council.  League   of  Women    Shoppers. 

Federation  of  Women's  Clubs.  Farm  women's  organizations. 

F.  L.  P.  Women's  clubs.  Progressive  political  women's  clubs. 

League  of  Women  "Voters.  Auxiliaries  American  Legion. 

Connnunity  organizations.  Auxiliaries  Vets,  of  Foreign  Wars. 

GENERAL  ORGANIZATIONS 

International  Workers  Order.  American   League   for    Peace   and    De- 
National  Negro  Congress.  mocracy. 
Workers  Alliance. 


Report  of  National  Training  School,  1936-1937,  1937-1938 

A  decision  to  establish  a  six-month  full-time  National  Training  School, 
accommodating  about  60  students  per  term,  was  made  toward  the  end  of  1935. 
This  decision  was  prompted  by  the  following  considerations: 

(1)  The  resurgence  of  the  labor  movement,  and  the  awakening  of  broad 

masses  to  a  conscious  political  life; 

(2)  The  growth  of  the  influence  of  the  Party  and  its  rapid  maturity  to 

the  position  of  a  potent  factor  in  the  political  life  of  the  country, 
and  as  a  driving  force  and  integral  part  of  every  progressive  move- 
ment directed  against  reaction  and  for  the  defense  of  democracy; 

(3)  The  growing  complexity  of  the  problems  of  the  Democratic  and  People's 

Front,  of  trade  union  unity,  and  consequently  the  need  everywhere 
of  trained  forces  intimately  connected  with  every  movement,  with 
every  development,  providing  direction,  giving  answers  to  the  po- 
litically awakening  masses  and  showing  the  way  at  each  turn : 

(4)  The  decisiveness  of  the  task  for  understanding  how  to  independently 

bring  forward  the  vanguard  role  of  the  Party  in  each  situation,  in 
each  crystallization  of  the  movement  of  the  people  against  reaction, 
and  on  this  basis  of  building  the  Party  and  the  Party  press ; 

(5)  The  relatively  low  theoretical   level  of  the  membership  and  the  still 

existing  gulf  between  the  brilliant  line  and  directives  of  the  Party 
leadership  and  their  application  by  the  lower  organs  down  below 
among  the  masses ;  and 

(6)  The  political  task  in  this  situation  of  undertaking  along  broad  lines 

the  systematic  internationalist  Socialist  education  of  the  masses  on 
the  basis  of  their  fundamental  experiences  and  growing  political 
consciousness. 

All  of  these  made  it  necessary  to  place  the  question  of  I'arty  education,  of 
Marxist-Leninist  training  of  Party  personnel,  as  a  decisive  question  of  the  hour. 
The  establishment  of  the  new  six-month  National  Training  School  was  an 
important  step  in  meeting  this  need. 

Since  the  decision,  two  such  National  Training  Schools  have  been  held. 
Let  us  briefly  examine  the  work  of  these  tw^o  schools  in  an  attempt  to  deter- 
mine to  what  extent  they  have  answered  the  main  need  of  the  Party,  to  what 
extent  they  have  fulfilled  their  main  tasks. 

CUKRICULUM 

The  experiences  of  the  two  6-nionlli  schools  already  concluded  establish  the 
fact  that,  in  the  main,  the  curriculum  was  adapted  to  the  jiolitical  requirements 
of  training  personnel.  The  main  courses  consisted  of  the  History  of  the  United 
States  (history  of  the  people,  of  the  labor  and  revolutionary  movements), 
Political  Economy  (the  main  laws  of  capitalist  development,  the  development 
of  classes  and  class  relations).  History  of  the  Communist  Party,  of  the  Soviet 
L'nion,  Leninism,  and  Organization.  Besides  these  central  courses,  the  subjects 
History  of  the  First  International,  Struggle  against  Trotskyism  and  Lovestone- 
ism.  Public  Speaking,  Shop  I'aper  and  Leaflet  Technique,  as  well  as  a  series  of 
lectures  on  special  organizational  problems  and  lectures  on  most  important 
current  developments  constituted  an  integral  part  of  the  curriculum. 


8746 


UX-AMEIUCAX  PUOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


In  the  second  school  (1937-1938),  an  additional  course  deveh)ped  for  the  first 
time — the  course  on  the  History  of  our  Party — whicli  was  an  important  political 
addition  to  the  curriculum,  and  a  significant  element  in  Party  training. 

In  general,  the  results  of  the  two  schools  established  the  correctness  of  the 
general  line  of  the  curriculum  which  succeeded  in  providing  a  rounded  training 
in  the  fundamentals  of  Marxist-Leninist  theory  and  its  application  to  the  current 
political  and  organization  tasks  of  the  Party. 

It  can  also  be  registered  that  the  methods  of  administration,  of  instruction 
and  organization,  were  in  the  main  proven  successful  by  the  intensity  and  quality 
of  work  of  the  students  and  the  high  poUtical  morale  that  marked  both  schools. 
However,  there  is  need  for  a  still  greater  degree  of  coordination  of  the  various 
courses,  for  a  more  marked  and  clearer  correlation  of  theory  and  practice  in 
every  subject,  and  still  greater  attention  to  the  development  of  technical  courses. 

An  important  factor  in  making  the  two  schools  generally  successful,  was  the 
participation  of  leading  members  of  the  Polburo  and  Central  Committee  on  the 
teaching  staff.  This  brought  to  the  school  comrades  in  the  leadership  of  definite 
phases  of  the  work  of  the  Party  with  first-hand  knowledge,  and  equipped  to 
provide  the  comrades  with  a  sound  basis  for  the  solution  of  the  main  problems 
of  the  day. 

The  physical  accommodations  ])iovided  by  the  Central  Connnittee  had  a  very 
important  bearing  on  the  fulfillment  of  the  political  tasks  of  the  school,  by 
providing  excellent  material  conditions  which  freed  the  comrades  of  all  obliga- 
tions except  concentration  on  their  studies. 

COMPOSITION 

Even  a  cursory  examination  of  the  composition  of  a  Party  school  will  establish 
beyond  doubt  that  the  selection  of  students  determines  to  a  great  degree  the 
results  and  effectiveness  of  the  school.  The  Central  Committee  has  carried  on 
a  consistent  struggle  ovei-  a  period,  to  politically  convince  the  leading  comrades 
in  the  districts  of  the  need  for  a  serious  political  attitude  toward  the  selection 
of  students  for  Party  training  schools.  This  struggle  has  not  been  without  suc- 
cess, especially  the  very  clear  reference  of  Comrade  Browder  at  the  June  (1937) 
Plenum  of  the  Central  Committee  to  the  need  for  selecting  "comrades  who  can- 
not be  spared,"  as  students  to  Party  schools.  That  this  emphasis  brought 
results,  is  evident  from  the  improved  composition  of  the  I'arty  schools  held 
since.  If  we  compare  the  two  National  Training  Schools,  1936-1937  and  1937- 
1938,  we  see  a  definite  improvement  in  composition. 


General  Analysis: 

Sent  by  Districts 

Polburo  Quota 

Y.  C.  L.  Quota 

Total  Number  in  School. _-_ 

Party  Functions: 

National  functionaries  (Party,  Y.  C.  L.  and  mass  organizations) 

District  functionaries 

State  Comm  ittee  Members 

County  and  Section  Organizers 

Trade-Union  Organizers.. _ 

Trade-Union  Afflliation percent 

Industrial  Composition: 

%  of  industrial  workers do.. 

Number  from  basic  industries .- 

Women percent 

Negroes do.. 

Negro  Women _  _ - 

Nationality:  Native  born percent 

Average  Age.   years 

Length  of  time  in  the  Party: 

5  years  and  over - - 

1  year  to  5  years... 

Under  1  year - 

Previous  Party  schooling: 

Reffional  and  District  Schools percent 

Section  Schools -do.. 

Y.  C.  L.  Schools... - do.. 

Workers'  Schools - do.. 


1936-1937 

1937-1938 

(out  of  59) 

(out  of  65) 

39 

43 

13 

13 

/ 

9 

59 

65 

0 

6 

8 

6 

11 

13 

10 

14 

0 

10 

27 

55H 

60 

e^A 

7 

12 

mi 

2VA 

12 

14 

1 

2 

83 

87 

28.2 

*28.6 

12 

23 

41 

37 

6 

5 

15 

19 

5 

15 

8 

15}^ 

8 

]5H 

•4  students  over  40  years  of  age  brought  up  the  average  age. 


UN-AMEHICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8747 

While  rliis  f;(MU'r:il  iinpi'ovomont  in  composition  reflects  a  better  political  orienta- 
tion in  the  districis  toward  tlie  (piestion  of  I'arty  education,  still  it  must  be  regis- 
tered that  till"  improved  composition  in  the  last  year  did  not  result  sufticiently 
from  the  initiative  of  the  districts.  It  still  required  several  months  of  pressure 
on  the  part  of  the  School  Commission,  and  in  some  cases  even  the  direct  inter- 
vention of  Comrade  Browder  to  secure  comrades  for  the  School. 

We  call  attention  especially  to  the  following  districts  for  selecting  leading 
comrades  for  the  school :  The  Chicago  district,  which  selected  a  Sub-District 
organizer,  the  organizer  of  the  most  important  County  organization,  as  well  as  a 
leading  Negro  comrade;  the  Pittsburgh  district,  which  sent  to  the  school  three 
members  of  the  District  Buro.  as  well  as  three  C.  I.  O.  organizers;  the  New  York 
district,  which  selected  a  district  functionary,  a  city-wide  leader  of  the  Workers' 
Alliance,  as  well  as  some  of  the  most  important  section  organizers;  New  Jersey, 
whicii  selected  two  members  of  the  District  Buro,  the  organizers  of  the  most  im- 
portant counties.  The  Florida  and  Oklahoma  districts  both  sent  their  District 
Organization  Secretaries  as  students,  etc. 

The  Y.  C.  L.  should  be  highly  commended  for  its  choice  of  a  group  of  eleven  able, 
promising,  and  leading  Y.  C.  L.  functionaries,  three  of  whom  are  members  of  the 
National  Conunittee  of  the  Y.  C.  L.  We  wish  to  stress  particularly  the  splendid 
comix)sition  of  the  Negro  comrades,  all  capable,  developed,  and  promising  leaders 
of  the  Negro  people,  and  of  the  large  number  of  able  and  effective  women  comrades, 
showing  an  improved  orientation  in  the  Party  generally  to  the  question  of  the 
training  of  women  cadres. 

Weaknesses  in  composition,  however,  that  apply  to  both  National  Training 
Schools,  which  we  must  call  sharply  to  the  attention  of  the  districts,  are  the 
following : 

1.  We  still  find  too  many  cases  of  comrades  sent  to  the  highest  Party  educational 
institution  without  any  previous  training  or  experience.  This  situation  neces- 
sarily tends  to  lower  the  political  quality  of  the  entire  school,  tends  to  discourage 
the  comrades  wlio  are  in  no  position  to  keep  average  pace  in  their  studies,  and 
places  special  burdens  upon  the  Administration  and  teachers,  which  necessarily 
hinders  the  fullest  development  of  the  entire  school.  In  the  future,  candidates 
for  the  National  Training  School  should  be  systematically  prepared  for  the  school 
by  the  districts  in  advance.  The  selection  should  not  be  more  or  le.ss  haphazard, 
but  purposeful.  Comrades  should  be  chosen  with  definite  functions  in  mind, 
should  be  selected  for  specific  training  to  fi!!  definite  needs  for  personnel.  These 
comrades  should  go  thi'ough  previous  training  and  receive  consistent  attention 
from  the  districts  with  a  view  of  preparing  them  for  the  highest  Party  school. 

2.  The  lack  of  attention  in  the  districts  to  the  physical  condition  of  the  com- 
rades sent  to  school  has  been  a  serious  problem,  especially  in  the  last  National 
Training  School,  when  5  students  were  sent  home,  too  ill  to  study.  The  National 
Training  School  does  not  exactly  offer  a  vacation  to  sick  comrades.  We  urge  the 
most  serious  attention  on  the  part  of  the  districts  to  physical  examinations  of 
candidates,  and  to  preparing  the  comrades  in  advance  to  make  themselves  phys- 
ically fit. 

A  political  problem  of  great  importance,  particularly  in  the  National  Training 
School,  due  to  its  duration,  is  the  problem  of  overcoming  to  the  fullest  extent 
po.ssible  the  isolation  of  the  students  from  the  mass  struggles  and  their  Party 
organizations.  Even  the  few  simple  steps  we  urged  upon  the  districts  were  insuffi- 
ciently carried  out  by  most  of  the  districts.  We  urged,  for  instance,  that  the 
districts  pi-ovide  their  students  with  their  local  papers,  at  least  their  trade-union 
organ,  and  (»ne  bourgeois  pajier.  We  appealed  time  and  again  for  the  districts  to 
maintain  regular  correspondence  with  their  students,  sending  them  periodically 
material,  reports  on  local  developments,  on  Party  campaigns,  etc.  But  this  appeal 
did  not  meet  with  the  response  that  should  have  been  expected.  We  urge  again 
tliat  the  districts  in  the  future  carry  out  these  simple  obligations  as  their  respon- 
sibility to  th(nr  students. 

For  any  real  evaluation  of  the  extent  to  which  Party  training  schools  fulfill 
their  main  tasks,  it  is  essential  that  records  be  kept  on  the  work  of  the  graduates 
for  some  period  after  their  training.  From  the  general  information  available  to 
us,  the  biggest  ma.iority  of  the  graduates  of  the  1936-1037  school  are  active,  lead- 
ing Party  workers,  in  different  fields  of  activity.  We  have  asked  for  reports  from 
the  district  organizations  on  the  utilization  of  the  students  from  the  1937-1938 
National  Training  School.  We  wish  to  stress  the  importance  of  receiving  such 
reports,  let  us  say.  two  or  three  times  a  year. 

In  our  opinion,  the  general  method  of  selecting  students  more  or  less  in  a 
hurry  by  the  District  Organizations,  as  a  result  of  all  kinds  of  communications 


8748  UN-AMERICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

and  pressure  from  the  Center,  must  l)e  entirely  ehanged.  A  real  Party  personnel 
policy  requires  that  selections  for  I'arty  schools  be  carried  out  as  a  system,  all 
year  around,  in  the  day  to  day  mass  work  of  the  Party.  The  District  leadership 
should  at  all  times  keep  a  careful,  political  personal  watch  over  the  Ite^^t  capital 
the  Party  possesses,  our  human  material.  Comrades  active  in  mass  work,  who 
prove  thf^mselves  in  the  trade-union  movement,  in  the  struggles  of  the  luiemployed, 
in  the  United  Front  and  political  progressive  movements,  comrades  who  show 
ability,  who  are  stable,  who  build  the  Party  in  the  course  of  the  struggle,  espe- 
cially comrades  from  the  basic  industries  and  important  plants,  should  be  sys- 
tematically watched  for  training.  The  districts  should  prepare  their  list  of  can- 
didates for  students  on  the  liasis  of  their  daily  contact  with  the  above  types  of 
comrades,  insicad  of  waiting  for  the  tinal  telegram  from  the  School  Commission 
at  the  last  minute  to  begin  to  worry  about  students  for  the  scliool. 

With  the  serious  attention  the  School  Commission  of  tlie  Central  Committee  is 
devoting  to  the  central  political  problems,  of  the  ciuTiculum  and  teaching  staff, 
and  with  a  more  serious  political  approach  to  the  problem  of  selection  of  students, 
there  is  no  doubt  that  our  schools  in  the  future  will  have  even  greater  achieve- 
ments to  record. 

Fraternally  submitted. 

National  Training  School, 
Geokgb  Siskind,  Director. 

UOPWA 

cio— 16 


MKMOr.ANDUi[    ON    THE   WORKERs'    ScHOOLS    FOR   THB   ICKTH    CONVENTION    OF   THE 

C.  p.  U.  S.  A. 

At  the  9th  National  Convention  of  the  Party,  the  need  for  building  Workers' 
Sc-hools  and  strengthening  those  which  already  existed  had  been  strongly  empha- 
sized in  the  report  of  the  Commission  and  in  the  general  resolution.  We  regret 
to  state  that  very  little  progress  can  be  recorded  in  that  field  since  the  9th 
Convention. 

Definite  progress  can  be  recorded  by  the  schools  in  Philadelphia  and  Pittsburgh. 
In  Philadelphia  the  school  has  increased  the  number  of  students,  reporting  a 
total  registration  of  1,200  for  the  year  1936-1937.  The  task  in  connection  with 
the  school  is  to  establish  a  firmer  base  ond  concentrate  on  the  improvement  of 
the  quality  of  the  work.  In  Pittsburgh  the  school  ceased  to  function  in  1935. 
It  was  reestablished  in  the  winter  of  1938  and  is  functioning  well.  The  school 
repoi'ts  a  registration  for  the  first  term  of  235,  and  for  the  second.  Spring  term, 
of  120  .students.  These  schools  are  now  functioning  to  a  great  extent  because  of 
the  cooperation  of  the  District  leadership. 

CHICAGO 

The  Workers'  School  shows  sustained  activity.  In  addition  to  the  work  in  the 
central  school,  extension  courses  have  been  successfully  conducted  in  various 
parts  of  the  city. 

BOSTON 

Since  the  9th  Convention,  the  old  Workers'  School  of  P>oston  has  been  function- 
ing as  the  PROGRESSIVE  LABOR  SCHOOL  OF  BOSTON.  The  registration  of 
the  school  is  very  small  and  does  not  show  any  growth ;  on  the  contrary,  it  shows 
a  decrease  as  compared  with  former  years,  despite  the  expectation  of  the  com- 
rades that  the  change  of  name  would  expand  tlie  scliool. 

BALTIMORE 

The  report  for  1937  shows  a  registration  of  248  for  the  three  terms  of  1937. 

SAN  FRANCISCO 

Since  the  General  Strike  when  the  Workers'  School  was  smashed  by  the  vigi- 
lantes, the  Party  was  unable  to  reestablish  the  institution  on  a  working  basis. 
The  CHimrades  there  are  of  the  opinion  that  they  should  concentrate  on  inner-Party 
education. 


rX-A.MEUICAN   ruol'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8749 

LOS    ANGEI.ES 

The  sohoul  in  Tais  Angoles  is  not  fvinclionins  at  present  as  a  centrally  located 
school,  but  the  work  is  concentrated  on  neijihhorhood  classes.  The  plan  is  to 
reestablish  the  school  as  soon  as  new  and  suitable  quarters  are  obtained. 

CLEVELAND 

Cleveland  reports  a  .sharp  decline  in  the  work  of  the  Work«>rs'  School  during 
the  first  term  of  1937-19:^8.  After  a  serious  discussion  on  the  question  was  held 
by  the  comrades  of  the  school  with  the  Party  committee,  the  decline  was  checked 
and  the  Spring-  term  shows  a  registration  of  '2^A)  with  a  fairly  large  proportion  of 
industrial  workers. 

DETROIT 

An  incomplete  report  from  Detroit  shows  that  educational  work  has  been  con- 
ducted in  the  form  of  various  classes  during  the  Fall  and  Winter  of  this  year. 

No  reports  were  received  from  Denver,  Minneapolis,  and  a  number  of  other 
places  where  schools  formerly  functioned. 

NEW   YORK 

Tlie  Workers"  School  in  New  York  has  maintained  its  scope  of  activity  and 
has  m:  de  substantial  progress  in  several  phases  of  the  work.  IMost  important 
achievements  have  been  in  the  improvement  of  the  quality  of  the  work.  This 
expressed  itself  in  the  higher  theoretical  and  political  level  of  the  teaching  per- 
sonnel. The  School  Bt>ard  and  the  Administration,  through  a  systematic  cheek-up 
of  the  work  of  the  teachers,  have  been  able  to  correct  a  number  of  weak  points 
and  replace  several  of  the  instructors  who  failed  to  satisfy  the  necessary  recpiire- 
ments.  Systematic  discussions  with  the  instructors  through  conferences  and  indi- 
vidual consultation  helped  to  rai.se  their  theoretical  level. 

Improved  quality  can  also  be  observed  in  the  material  xised  and  in  the  teaching 
methods.  Outlines  for  the  various  courses  are  often  revised  with  a  view  to 
further  improvements  and  bringing  them  up  to  date.  The  aim  is  to  attune  the 
outlines  and  other  material  to  the  political  problems  of  the  specific  period. 

The  steps  t;iken  can  be  considered  only  as  a  partial  improvement;  more 
will  have  to  be  done. 

Successful  steps  have  been  taken  in  the  direction  of  broadening  the  school 
by  the  introduction  of  cultural  subjec's  and  suttjects  dealing  with  problems 
of  interest  to  the  labor  movement  generally,  especially  the  trade  unions. 
Such  courses  as  labor  law  and  industrial  relations  attracted  more  than  200 
in  three  classes.  A  substantial  ntnnlier  of  active  trade  miionists  took  the 
course.  Also  a  large  number  of  the  memlters  of  the  legal  profession  regis- 
tered for  the  course.  In  line  with  the  whole  jjolitical  situation  and  tasks  of 
the  Party,  the  Workers'  School  has  paid  special  attention  to  the  courses  in 
American  History. 

growth  of  the  wokki:rs'  school  in  new  york 

The  peak  of  the  growth  of  the  scliool  was  reached  in  1935-36  when  the 
total  registra:ion  amounted  to  9,707  students.  The  following  year  the  regis- 
tration driipi)cd  to  8,3t)4,  and  this  yc^ir,  1937-3S,  shows  a  registration  of  7,136, 
not  including  the  summer  term.  Taking  an  average  summer  registration  of 
about  5(0.  we  will  get  !d)out  7,600  students  this  year.  This  downward  trend 
is  due  to  a  number  of  factors : 

(1)  The  large  educational  program  introduced  by  the  W.  P.  A.,  which  caused 
a   considei";iI)le   reduction   in    the   Lang\iage  Department   of   our    School; 

(2)  The  extensive  inner-Party  education  program  organized  in  the  New 
York  sections  and  counties  of  the  Party.  This  tended  to  take  away  a  num- 
ber of  members  who  formerly  came  to  the  Workers'  School ; 

(3)  The  introduction  of  educational  work  in  a  nund)er  of  trade  unions 
which  also  affected  the  registi-at  ion. 

During  the  period  of  the  dro])  in  registration,  the  number  of  Party  mem- 
bers increased  as  compared  with  iion-I'arty  students.  While  the  registration 
of  a  large  number  of  I'arty  members  is  surely  a  positive  feature,  still  it  is 
necessary  at  the  same  time  to  carry  on  a  broad  campaign  to  increase  the 
ninnber  of  non-Partv  members. 


3750  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

The  School  has  now  a  very  important  task :  to  increase  the  registration 
and  continue  further  in  the  imiirovement  of  the  quality  of  the  worli.  At  all 
times,  the  School  maintained  its  Marxist-Leninist  character  and  is  today,  as 
it  has  been  during  the  last  ten  years,  tlie  largest  Marxist-Leninist  educational 
institution  in  the  country. 

SUMMER   DAY    SCHOOL 

The  Workers'  School  in  New  York  is  offering  for  the  coming  Sunmier  a 
full-time  six-week  day  school.  The  curriculum  consists  of  Political  Economy 
I  and  II,  Marxism-Leninism  I  and  II,  and  a  survey  of  American  History 
from  colonial  times  to  the  present.  Sessions  will  be  held  daily  from  9  A.  M. 
to  1  P.  M.,  with  special  discussions  on  political  problems  on  Friday  morning. 
The  term  for  the  Summer  Day  School  is  from  July  5th  to  August  12th.  Tlie 
active,  early,  response  from  many  cities  to  this  type  of  school,  already  in- 
dicates that  it  will  be  successful.  The  school  is  open  to  Party  and  non- 
party people  and  offers  an  opportunity  for  comrades  to  receive  an  intensive, 
systematic,  theoretical  training. 

TASKS 

The  main  task  emphasized  at  the  9tli  Convention  still  remains  to  l)e  ful- 
filled. Workers'  Schools  for  tlie  teaching  of  Marxism-Leninism  must  be  built 
and  the  existing  ones  strengthened.  The  State  and  local  leadership  must 
pay  special  attention  to  this  phase  of  the  work.  A  well-functioning  Workers'^ 
School  will  aid  in  the  development  of  Party  education  generally  and  will 
also  stimulate  education  within   trade  unions  and  other  mass   organizations. 

A  tendency  to  replace  our  Workers'  Schools  with  so-called  non-partisan  labor 
colleges  must  be  combatted.  Labor  colleges  organized  by  trade  unions,  the 
C.  I.  O.  and  others,  have  an  important  role  to  play,  but  we  as  a  Connnunist  Party 
must  have  an  instrument  for  the  dissemination  of  the  teachings  of  Marx,  Engels, 
Lenin  and  Stalin,  precisely  at  this  time  when  our  Party  is  becoming  more  and 
more  a  decisive  factor  in  the  progressive  movement. 

Another  task  which  is  particularly  important  to  the  New  York  school  is  the 
Integration  of  the  school  with  the  State  organization  of  the  Party.  The  school 
functions  in  New  York  and  must  become  a  part  of  the  organization  of  the  Party. 
It  must  be  integrated  with  the  school  work  and  general  educational  work  of  the 
sections,  counties,  etc.  The  plan  of  work  must  include  the  utilization  of  the 
Workers'  School  as  one  of  the  most  important  instruments  for  the  education  of 
the  broad  Party  membership,  and  the  dissemination  of  Marxism-Leninism  among 
the  masses. 

TRAINING  OF  INSTRUCTORS 

Initial  steps  have  been  taken  to  train  qualified  instructors  for  the  Party  and 
mass  education.  Two  courses  for  training  teachers  were  carried  through.  The 
experiences  of  these  two  schools  have  proven  that  the  Workers'  School  is  equipped 
for  this  task,  which  now  should  be  established  as  a  definite  phase  of  the  worlTof 
the  school.  The  task  must  be  to  train  teaching  personnel  not  only  for  New  York, 
but  for  places  outside  of  New  York. 
Comradely  submitted. 

A.  Markoff. 
UOPWA 
cio-lG 


Report  on  the  Midwestern  Schools,  10th  Convention,  C.  P.  U.  S.  A. 

An  important  extension  of  work  of  the  School  Commission  of  the  Central 
Committee  was  the  organization  of  the  Midwestern  Regional  School  (Minnesota) 
and  the  District  Schools  in  Missouri  and  Indiana.  In  the  case  of  Missouri  and 
Indiana,  this  was  the  first  time  that  any  Party  training  schools  were  conducted. 
The  schools  in  the  main  were  highly  successful,  and  provided  85  people  with  a 
training  in  the  fundamentals  of  Marxism-Leninism.  The  schools  provided  forces 
for  the  mass  work  of  the  Party  in  those  territories  where  the  problem  of  forces 
is  particularly  acute.  Especially  with  regard  to  the  Missouri  School,  It  can  be 
said  that  the  people  trained  provide  the  basis  for  the  District  leadership. 

The  Minnei^nfa  Rcf/innnl  School  consisted  of  19  students  from  7  states  (Minne- 
sota, Wi.sconsin,  North  Dakota,  Nebraska,  Oklahoma,  Utah,  and  New  Mexico). 
The  composition  in  general  was  good.     Although  6  of  the  students  were  farmers. 


UN-AMEKICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


8751 


still,  coii.><idoring  that  tho  obloct  of  the  Central  Committee  was  to  make  this 
school  a  special  ctniceiitratioii  for  the  training  of  forces  for  the  conntryside.  we 
must  say  (hat  tlie  school  did  not  entirely  jicconiplish  this  i)nrpos(>.  This  was  due 
mainly  to  the  fact  (hat  the  distriets  did  not  take  advantage  of  this  special  school 
(SH)uth  Dakota.  Iowa.  Northern  Michigan,  etc.). 

The  Missouri  School  was  conduct(Ml  on  a  part-time  basis  for  a  period  of  four 
weeks  for  three  different  groups.  One  school  was  organized  for  steel  workers 
which  consisted  of  IS  students:  ant)ther  for  electrical  workers  and  miscellaneous 
trade  unionist,  consisting  of  20  students,  and  a  speeial  class  for  wt)men  consisting 
of  12  students,  making  a  total  of  fiO  students  for  all  three  groups.  Upon  the 
conclusion  of  these  three  schools — 12  students  were  chosen  from  the  various 
classes  for  a  one-week  full  time  school. 

The  T)i(1i(iii<i  School  was  for  a  period  of  ten  days,  full  time,  and  consisted  of 
12  students.  The  Indiana  school  supplied  a  number  of  forces  for  the  counties 
and  branches.  However,  the  outstanding  weakness  was  that  the  concentration 
industry,  auto,  was  very  poorly  represented  (1  student) — not  a  single  student 
from  South  Bend,  the  main  auto  center  of  the  state.  Preparations  are  being 
made  for  another  school  this  summer  which  will  consist  mainly  of  the  workers 
from  the  basic  industries  of  the  state. 

One  thing  very  positive  must  be  recorded  in  regard  to  all  these  schools,  and 
that  is.  that  they  served  to  stimulate  a  great  deal  of  interest  in  Marxist-Leninist 
training.  This  must  be  utilized  by  the  districts  to  continue  and  expand  this 
phase  of  Party  training. 

Comradely  submitted. 

Jack  Perixla. 


USE   THESE   FACTS 

tRcsearch  Bulletin  of  the  CoramuniFt  Party,  12th  A.  D.,  141  E.  29th  Street,  New  York  City,  Vol.  2,  #3, 

Feb.  8,  19371 

FIN.\L  RESULTS  OF  THE  ELKCTION  CAMPAIGN 

IFrom  the  annual  report  of  the  Board  of  Elections,  1936] 
Begistrafion  of  voters  in  the  12  A.  D. 


Democratic -  - 

Republican 

Socialist 

Communist 

Blank,  defect.,  and  missing. 

Total 


Males 


1.5,664 

2,  994 

109 

120 


20,155 


Females 


11,014 

3,721 

111 

64 


16,036 


Total 


26.  678 

6.  715 

223 

184 

2,391 


36, 191 


VOTE  FOR  PRESIDENT  AND 
VICE  PRESIDENT 


N.  y.  C. 

12th  A.  D. 

Total  Vote 

2, 823, 191 

34,  740 

Roosevelt  &  O   -. 

Landon  &  Knox        

1,802,502 

665.951 

38.  520 

31,952 

238,845 

22,  261 

9,559 

Thomas  &  Nelson 

Browder  &  Ford  

563 
594 

Amer.  L.  P _-. 

1,287 

VOTE  FOR  GOVERNOR 


Lehman 

Bleakley... 

Laidler 

1,572.315 

874. 087 

47.  051 

36, 264 

231,114 

19.3.53 

12.0.52 

728 

Minor 

6,80 

A.L.P 

1.174 

62626 — 41— vol.  14- 


-38 


VOTE    FOR   LIEUTENANT   GOVERNOR 


Bray,  Demo 

RobertPon,  Rep. 

Hahn,  Soc 

Sawyer,  Com... 


1, 866,  774 

634,  642 

52.  654 

61. 094 


22, 169 

9,044 

610 

884 


VOTE  FOR  STATE  COMPTROLLER 


Tremaine,  Demo. 

May,  Rep 

Cheney,  Soc 

Hutchins,  Com.. 


,  S8S, 

276 

599, 

266 

53,088  1 

62 

555 

22,  320 

8,601 

696 

905 


VOTE  FOR  ATTORNEY-GENERAL 


Bennett,  Dem. 
Perlman,  Rep.. 
Marks,  Soc... 
Briehl,  Com... 


1,869,108 

644, 363 

53,117 

62,160 


22,  525 

8,601 

589 

901 


8752 


U  X- A  .ME  H I  ( ;  AX   PR  ( )  PA  (J  A  X  DA  A<.'T  I  ^■  1 T I E  S 


Registration  of  voters  in  the  12  A.  D. — Continued 


VOTE  FOR  REPRESENTATIVE  AT 
LARGE 

VOTE  FOR  JUSTC.  OF  SUPREME  CT.  FIRST 
.IUDICI.4L  DISTRICT 

Blue,  Soc 

Crosswaith,  Com        _.  .- 

56, 043 
,55,  332 
64,  121 
63,  903 

601 
.587 
907 
904 

LipsiJT,  Soc 

Severn,  Soc       

25,  455 
24,621 
3.5.  192 
35,  293 

604 
580 

Hudson,  Com 

Gcrson,  Com 

Wortis,  Com 

Sternberg,  Com 

906 
902 

VOTE   FOR  PRES.   OF  BOARD  OF  ALDM. 

VOTE  FOR  JUDGES  OF  CT.  OF  GEN.  SES 

Brunner,  Dem 

1,6S9,765 

797, 469 

55,  698 

64,  436 

20, 343 

lU,  501 

.587 

918 

Bobriek,  Soc     . 

14. 166 

14,  146 

14,  324 

4,701 

4,658 

711 

Morris,  Rep 

Baron,  Soc 

ITaas,  Soc 

BrauD,  Soc 

703 
729 

Amter,  Com.._^ 

Brickman,  All  Peop 

Under,  All  Peopl 

164 
168 

VOTE   FOR   ASSOC.  JUDGE,  CT.   OF  APLS. 

VOTE  FOR  JUSTICES  OF  CITY  COURT 

N.  y.  c. 

12th  A.  D. 

Dolson,  Soc 

Shapiro,  Soc 

Sugar,  Soc 

Cannes,  Com 

Trachtenberg,  Com 

Ingram,  Com 

13, 980 
13,  329 
12.443 

15,  939 

16,  005 
15,923 

725 

Rippey,  Demo 

Hil,  Repub 

Mrserolc,  Soc 

Schwab,  Com 

1,  852, 6.56 

605, 380 

57, 477 

64, 882 

21.996 

8,738 

630 

928 

644 
605 
920 
918 
908 

VOTE  FOR  CONGRESSMAN,  SIXTEENTH  CONGRESSIONAL  DISTRICT 


6  A.  D. 

8  A.  D. 

10  A.  D. 

12  A.  D. 

14  A.  D. 

15  A.  D. 

Total 

Total  Votes  Reed 

3,339 

1,328 

7,539 

34,  599 

9,  540 

2,912 

59,  248 

O'Connor,  Dem 

2, 334 

535 

57 

65 

64 

773 

281 

33 

98 

19 

2,989 

3,580 

151 

268 

104 

20.  709 

8.929 

586 

801 

1,285 

5,  298 

2, 930 

173 

no 

294 

979 

1,577 

44 

36 

45 

33.  082 

Cudmore,  Rep 

Trager,  Soc  

Teichman,  Com 

Hastings,  Loyal 

17.  832 
1.044 
1.378 
1,811 

VOTE  FOR  STATE  SENATORS,  SIXTEENTH  SENATORIAL  DISTRICT 


12th  A.  D. 

14th  A.  D. 

Total 

Total  Votes  Reed 

34,  599 

31,821 

66,  420 

M cNaboe,  Dem 

Bruke,  Rep    ._  _. _ 

20,  617 

9,827 

647 

816 

19.933 

8.359 
527 
411 

40,  550 
18, 186 

Pushkofl,  Soc                                                     -             --     -  -- 

1,174 

Bauni,  Com ___  _.     __     .     .  ___        .__  

1,227 

STATE  VOTE  FOR  GOVERNOR 

Lehman,  Dem 2,970,595 

(Lehman,  A.  L.  P.) 262,192 

Bleaklev,  Rep 2,450,104 

Laidler,  Soc 96.208 

Minor,  Com 40,406 

STATE  VOTE   FOR  LIEUT.  GOVERNOR 

Bray,  Democratic 3,028,191 

Robertson,  Rep 2,136,506 

Hahn,  Soc 100, 151 

Sawyer,  Com 66, 132 


VOTE     FOR     ASSEMBLYMAN— TWELFTH 
ASSEMBLY  DISTRICT 

Edmund  J.  Delany  (Dem.) 21,576 

.Joseph  H.  Williams  (Rep.) 8,890 

Rose  Pearlman  (Soc.) 671 

Chapman  T.  Smith  (Com.) 818 

Absentee  ballots  voted 141 

Unrecorded 2,  785 

Total 34,740 


FINAL  NAT.  &  STATE  VOTE  FOR  PRES. 


Roosevelt,  Dem 
Landon,  Rep___ 

Thomas,  Soc 

Browder,  Com_ 


United 
States 


27,  752,  309 

16,  682.  342 

187,  342 

80,  096 


New  York 
State 


3,  293,  222 

2,' 180,' 670 

86,  897 

35,  609 


Lemke,  Union 

Colvin,  l'rohib-._ 
Aiken,  Soc., Labor 


United 
States 


892,  793 
37.  609 
12,  793 


New  York 
State 


rX-A.MKKK  AN    rU(trA(;AM)A   AC'in  ITIES  8753 

Daily  Worker  Nkws 
[12th  A.  D.      Feb.  2S.      Daily  Worker  Dept.] 

1.  Well^did  you  read  liow  the  Pjirty  Builders  did  it  in  Wed.,  February  23rd's 
Daily — Here  is  soiiieniie  that  signed  up  33  railroad  workers,  all  Negroes- — said 
"I  simply  eonceiii rated  my  elTorts  and  came  ivgularly  with  the  Daily  Worker 
on  that  bridge.  Wilhout  the  Party  press  I  could  not  approach  these  workers." 
James  Woolnvan,  Salt  Lake  City,  who  is  61  and  recruited  2H  sjiid :  "I  followed 
the  Daily  Worker  Route.  You  can  generally  count  on  the  Daily  Worker  readers 
to  sign  up." 

2.  The  route  is  coining  along  swell,  how  about  these  corner  orders  coming 
in  from  the  Branches. 

3.  What  are  you  doing  to  check  up  on  carrying  out  our  slogan  of  2  Dailies, 
per  day.  per  conu-ade. 

4.  How  about  some  real  Socialist  competition  among  the  units — Whose's  chal- 
lenging who — let  us  know — 

5.  Are  you  using  the  Daily  as  source  material  for  your  educational  discus- 
sions.    Let  us  help  you,  we  have  tlie  material. 

G.  Are  you  using  "'The  Daily  Worker  ^Marches  On."  it  is  swell  stuff  if  used 
right.     How  about  getting  up  a  Daih/  Worker  Quiz. 

T.  Why  not  have  a  display  of  articles  appearing  in  the  Daily  on  the  subject 
of  your  educational  discussion — e.  x..  religion — put  up  all  articles  on  religion 
api^earing  in  the  Daily  in  the  last  2  weeks. 

Signing  until  next  week — getting  dry — bring  in  suggestions  quick. 

READ  America's  most  exciting  newspapeh^ — the  daily  worker 


New  York  State  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party 

Dec.  5,  1936. 

the    fight    for'  spanish    democracy how    the    soviet    union    helps    spain — 

oue.  tasks 

Guide  for  Members  of  Educational  Corps  in  leading  Unit  Discussions: 
General  note :  The  discussion  leader  should  not  try  to  repeat  to  the  unit  in  a 
■direct  formal  speech  the  entire  content  of  the  presentation  made  at  the  eiluca- 
tional  corps  meeting.  This  tends  to  make  the  talk  of  the  comrade  mechanical 
and  do(S  not  get  the  maximum  discussion  and  participation  by  the  Unit  members. 
An  introductory  talk  of  about  30  minutes,  designed  to  stimulate  further  discus- 
.sion  is  best.  The  leader  of  the  discussion,  through  participating  in  the  general 
discussion  and  summary  can  present  the  necessary  content.  Application  of  the 
ta.sks  must  then  be  made  ly  the  unit,  in  the  territory,  shop,  union  and  mass 
organization  in  which  the  comrades  are  active.  A  planned  campaign  of  agita- 
tion and  practical  assistance  to  Spanish  democracy  will  result  not  only  in  real 
help  for  the  Spanish  fighters  but  also  result  in  Party  recruiting  and  building  the 
Party  press. 

Reference  Reading : 

1.  S]iecific  features  of  Spanish  Revolution — by  Comrade  Ercoli  in  the  Dec.  '36 
■Communist. 

2.  Pamphlet,  "How  the  Soviet  Union  helps  Spain,"  by  Comrade  Cannes. 

3.  Close  study  of  the  Daily  Worker  for  day  to  day  events  and  party  policy 
in  regard  to  them. 

SUGGESTIONS   FOR  INTRODUCTORY   TALK 

I.  Tlie  H'njniflcnncc  of  the  /?/)(7»/.s7i  Reroliifio)). — A  focal  point  in  the  struggle 
of  all  anti-fascists  for  democracy  and  world  peace.  Victory  against  fascism 
will  lead  to  more  rapid  develoimient  towards  socialism. 

II.  Ii(t(kf/roun(l  of  SixDiish  Rrrohitioti. — The  conditions  in  the  country — the 
status  of  agriculture  and  industry.  The  cultural  backwardness  of  the  mass  (see 
data  inclosed). 

III.  The  huUtJhifi  of  the  Peoples  Front. — The  role  of  the  C.  P.  of  Spain  in 
pressing  for  the  broader  united  front  of  all  anti-fascists.  The  present  partici- 
pation in  the  Peoples  Front.  The  hope  of  Trotskyites  to  split  the  Peoples 
-Front.     (See  December  Communist.) 


8754  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

IV.  Some  special  feattires  in  the  Spanish  Revolution. 

A.  Carrying   through   democratic   bourgeois   revolution    in    the   midst   of 

armed  struggle. 

B.  The  present  civil  war  is,  in  a  sense,  a  national  revolutionary  war. 

C.  The  influence  of  the  Anarchists. 

D.  The  participation  of  the  various  nationalist  forces  and  large  sections 

of  the  petty  bourgeoisie  and  even  some  sections  of  the  bigger 
bourgeoisie. 

E.  Why  do  we  not  po.s;e  the  question  of  Socialism  versus  Fascism.     The 

effect  this  would  have  inside  and  outside  Spain.  Show  how  posing 
this  question  this  way  would  make  certain  elements  necessary  in 
the  struggle  desert  the  Peoples  Front.  This  would  be  objective  help 
to  the  Fascists. 

V.  The  U.  S.  S.  R.  and  "Non-Intervention". — Point  out  the  responsibility  of 
Leon  Blum  and  the  C.  P.  of  France.  The  C.  P.  of  France  fought  against  this 
"non-intervention"  pact  from  the  beginning.  The  action  of  Blum  and  the 
swinging  of  the  leaders  of  the  labor  movement  of  France  and  Great  Britain 
behind  this  pact  placed  the  Soviet  Union  in  a  difficult  position.  The  Soviet 
Union  joined  the  pact  to  hinder  the  shipment  of  arms  to  the  fascists  while 
aiding  in  every  possible  icay  the  Madrid  Government.  In  any  race  for  arms 
to  Spain,  Italy,  and  Germany  are  in  a  far  more  favorable  position  than  the 
U.  S.  S.  R.  (If  possible  get  a  map  of  Europe  and  show  that  "Soviet  Union's 
only  two  routes  to  Spain  are  controlled  by  Germany  in  the  North  and  Italy 
in  the  South" — Gannes'  pamphlet.) 

Show  how,  through  the  exposure  made  by  the  Soviet  Union  in  the  London 
Connnittee  of  the  fascist  help  to  Spanish  reaction,  the  leaders  of  the  Second 
International,  the  British  Trade  Unions,  and  the  Amsterdam  International 
were  forced  to  change  their  original  stand  of  support  to  the  Non-interven- 
tion. 

The  masses  in  all  countries  must  aid  the  Soviet  Union  in  breaking  down 
all  obstacles  in  the  shipment  of  arms,  ammunition,  to  legal  government  of 
Spain. 

VI.  Indieate  the  role  and  yroicth  of  the  C.  P.  of  France. — How  is  it  fight- 
ing for  democracy.  The  Peoples  Front  is  in  the  present  situation,  a  powerful 
united  front  of  all  forces  fighting  for  democracy  and  peace,  which  will  lead 
toward  higher  stages  of  struggle,  to  the  emancipation  of  the  working  class,  to 
Socialism. 

VII.  Our  tasks. — To  arouse  the  American  people  as  to  the  significance  of  the 
struggle  for  democracy  and  peace  as  "the  cause  of  all  progressive  mankind." 
Plan  actual  steps  in  the  unit  to  mobilize  for  concrete  help  for  Spanish  democ- 
racy. Building  the  Farmer  Labor  Party  in  America  so  that  "It  Can't  Hapijen 
Here."     Building  the  Party  and  Party  press. 

SUPPLEMENTARY    MATERIAL 

I.  Background  of  the  Civil  War. 

1.  Spain   is   a    backward   agrarian   coimtry    with    strong   feudal    oppression 
heavily  falling  upon  the  toiling  population. 

a.  57%  of  the  population  work  on  land  and  forests. 

b.  2%  of  the  landowners  possess  67%  of  the  land. 

c.  1,173,000  peasants  own  6  million  hectares  while  103,000  big  land- 

loi'ds  possess  12  million  hectares.  5  million — peasants  and  land- 
workers — own  nothing.  40%  of  the  land  actually  in  use.  50,000 
large  landowners  in  a  population  of  24  million.  3  million  agri- 
cultural workers  earning  50  cents  to  75  cents  a  day. 

d.  The  Catholic  church  is  the  largest  landlord  in  the  country,  living 

on  ground  rent.  There  is  one  priest  for  every  9O0  inhabitants. 
There  are  100,734  persons  in  the  clergy. 


UN-AMEUICAN  rUOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §755 

II.  StatK.s  uf  Indiistrii. 

1.  Homo  market  limited  due  to  small  luucha.sing  power  of  poverty-stricken 

masses. 

2.  Unable  to  compete  in  international  market  due  to  technical  backwardness. 

3.  Semi-feudal  cliai-acter  of  agriculture  hinders  industrial  development. 

a.  Modern  industry  is  mostly  in  the  hands  of  foreigners.     Chemicals 

controlled  by  the  German  and  French,  pneumatic  tire  and  elec- 
tro-technical", by  the  French  and  Americans.  The  railroads  con- 
trolled by  French  and  English  capital. 

b.  There   are   in    Spain    today   about   2    million    industrial    workers, 

miners,  railwaymen,  dockers,  etc.,  plus  300,00')  domestic  workers. 

4.  The  worlving  class  is  c-ourageous,  inclined  to  talve  revolutionary  action,  hut 

has  lacked,  in  the  past,  coordination  between  the  struggles  of  the  work- 
ers and  peasants. 

III.  Cnlttinil  Dci-r1oi)iiicnt. — Spain  is  culturally  backward. 

1.  4r>9f   of  the  population  is  illitei'ate. 

2.  The  Catholic  churdi  has  4,804  cultural  institutions  with  601,950  students. 

27,000  in  secondary  schools.     17,103  in  professional  institutions. 

3.  Great  struggles  have  taken  place  in  the  past  against  feudalism  and  the 

church  hierarchy  resulting  in  the  expulsion  of  the  Jesuits  in  1767,  1808, 
1836,  and  1852. 

IV.  TJtr  Strufff/lc  for  n  Doiiocratir  Republic. — Development  of  the  United  Front 
and  the  Peoples  Front. 

1.  The  Republic  of  1031  did  not  change  any  of  the  fundamental  evils  in  Spain. 

2.  The  Monarchist  and  feudal  elements  controlled  the  State  apparatus  and 

the  huge  wealth  of  Spain,  hindering  the  application  of  the  Dec.  1931 
constitution. 

3.  The  Constitution   (1931)  provided  for— 

a.  A  democratic  republic  of  "workers  of  all  classes". 

b.  Separation  of  State  and  Church. 

c.  Abolition  of  religious  orders  hostile  to  the  Republic. 

d.  Civil  rights,  right  of  free  speech,  press,  and  assembly. 

e.  Pi-otection  of  the  workers,  social  legislation. 

f.  Equal  rights  for  both  sexes. 

g.  An  agrarian  reform  law  (pas.sed  in  1932). 

4.  Land  only  to  10,(i();»  peasants  since  1931  to  the  amount  of  about  100,000 

acres.  It  is  estimated  that  if  this  rate  of  land  distribution  would  con- 
tinue it  would  require  5,000  years  to  complete  the  so-called  agrarian 
reform. 

5.  All   provisions  of  the  December  Constitution  were  disregarded   since  it 

was  enacted. 

6.  From  1931  the  textile  industry  decreased  40%;  coal  mining  suffered  a 

surplus  reserve  of  300,000  tons. 

7.  Strike  struggles,  peasants  unrest  were  spreading  as  a  result  of  the  sup- 

pression of  the  rights  of  workers,  land  hunger,  and  lack  of  civil  rights. 
S.  The  Gil-Robles-Lerroux  dictatorship  attempted  to  take  away  the  vestiges 
of  rights  won  in  the  struggle  for  democratic  freedom.  It  provoked  the 
uprising  in  October  1934.  The  C.  E.  D.  A.  deliberately  attempted  to 
put  their  men  in  the  Lerroux  cabinet.  This  incident  gave  rise  to  the 
revolt. 

a.  The  working  population  of  Asturias  held  power  for  15  days, 

b.  .5,000  killed  and  30,000  imprisoned  throughout  Spain. 

c.  Reign  of  terror  was  installed. 

S.  The  causes  for  the  failure  of  the  October  19,34  uprising  were: 

a.  No  working  chiss  unity  and  cohesion  of  the  revolutionary  parties. 

b.  Neutrality  of  the  Anarchists. 

c.  Middle  classes  neglected. 

d.  Peasantry  not  won  over. 


8756  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

V.  The  Peoples  Front. 

1.  In  January,  1936,  a  pact  was  signed  between   the   Socialist  Party,   the 

Communist  Party,  Left  Republicans,   the  Republican   Union,  and  the 
Catelo  Left  Party. 

2.  The  pact  contained  the  following  main  points : 

Amnesty. 

Reform  of  the  Courts. 

Reduction  of  taxes  and  excessive  rents  of  the  peasants. 
Protection  of  small  industry. 
Public  works  for  the  unemployed. 
Regulation  of  priA^ate  banking. 
Labor  legislature,  etc. 

New  Schools  and  higher  education  for  workers,  students. 
International  policy  according  to  the  principles  and  methods  of  the 
League  of  Nations. 

3.  The  February  15,  1936,   elections  was  an  overwhelming  victory  for  the 

Peoples  Front.     Of  the  total  473  deputies  elected,  268  were  of  the  Left 
and  205  of  the  Right  and  Center.     C.  P.  elected  15  deputies. 

4.  A  Victory  despite  the  terror. 

VI.  Some  accomplishments  of  the  Azana  Republic  from  March  to  July  1036 : 

1.  Reinstatement  of  discharged  worker  and  employees  for  political  activities 

and  6-month  compensation  wages. 

2.  General  amnesty. 

3.  35,000  peasants  and  their  families,  totalling  87,000  peasants,  were  provided 

with  land. 

4.  Restoration  of  social  legislation. 

5.  Disbandment  of  the  smaller  fascist  groups. 

6.  Some  of  the  police  force  purged  of  fascists. 

7.  A  commission  to  fix  the  blame  of  the  October  murderers. 

8.  Semiautonomous  status  of  Catalonia  and  Biscay. 

VII.  The  Conununist  Party  of  Spain  has  repeatedly  called  for  a  series  of  strong 
measures  to  curb  the  fascists.  The  Government  was  weak  and  vacillating  against 
the  enemy. 

1.  The  United  Front  between  the  Socialists  and  Comnmnists  made  further 
advances. 

a.  The  trade-union  unification  in  one  C.  G.  T.,^  which  at  the  outbreak 

of  the  fascist  rebellion  had  one  million. 

b.  The  C.  N.  T."  not  unified  with  the  C.  G.  T.  and  has  700,000  members. 

c.  The  Socialist  and  Communist  youth  organically  united  into  140,000 

members   (Previous  to  unification  the  Socialist  youth  had  65.000 
members  and  the  YCL  50,000). 

VIII.  The  fascist  rebellion  of  July  JS,  ID.%. — International  fascists  help  Counter- 
revolution. 

1.  A  series  of  provocations  preceded  the  planned  rebellion  of  the  fascists. 

a.  90%  of  the  strikes  turned  into  lockouts. 

b.  closing  of  the  factories. 

c.  Fascists  carry  out  nnirders  and  burning  of  Churches. 

d.  5  million  pesetas  smuggled  out  of  Spain. 

e.  Smuggling  of  arms  and  ammunition  into  Spain. 

f.  The  Millionaire  Juan  March  finances  the  preparations. 

g.  Snajurjo  spent  a  few  months  in  Germany  preparing  the  revolt. 

2.  It  is  a  recognized  fact  that  since  the  rebellion.  German  and  Italian  fascism 

have  supplied  weapons  of  destruction.  The  Foreign  Minister  of  the 
Mulrid  government  made  a  full  report  on  the  question  at  the  League  of 
Nations. 

3.  75%  of  the  standing  army  of  105,000  went  over  to  the  fascists.     About  half 

of  the  Civil  Guard  and  the  Assault  Guard  sided  with  democracy. 


iC.   G.  T. — General  Confederation   of  Labor,  luuler  combined  influence  of  Socialist  and 
Communist.  ,  ,.     ,.   ,    .   „ 

2  C.  N.  T. — National  Confederation  of  Labor— under  anarcho-syndicalist  influence. 


UN-A.ME1U('AN    I'UorACiAXDA  ACTIVH'IKS  8757 

Nkw  Yokk  State  Committkk  ok  the  Commvxist  Party 

Decembek  11,  193G. 
EDUCATIONAL  SUPPLEMENT 

THE   seamen's   strike 

References: 

1.  Labor  Notes,  November  lOofi. 

2.  Daily  Worker — News  and  Editorials  on  strike  note  especially  editorial 

of  Dec.  10th,  1936  as  aid  in  explaining  to  trade  unions. 

(a)  The  "outlaw"  charge  against  the  East  Coast  Maritime  Strike. 

(b)  Who  is  David  C4ranceV 

(c)  Unions  officially  in  strike. 

Srrike  of  39.<'0n  maritime  workers  on  the  West  Coast,  October  30,  paralyzed 
shipping  industry.  Basic  demands  are  for  continuation  of  hiring  halls,  pref- 
erential employment  for  licensed  men,  and  six-hour  day  for  longshoremen. 
Unions  willing  to  arbitrate  other  demands  including  wage  increases.  Strike 
spread  also  to  eastern  and  Gulf  ports  Report  on  November  3rd  indicated  total 
of  278  ships  involved  and  80.000  men  affected  (including  non-marine  workers). 
New  York  World  Tclajram  11-13-30. 

Conditions  of  Scamoi. — Revealed  in  New  Government  Report  Federal  Co- 
ordinator of  Transportation  has  recently  published  a  report  by  the  sections  of 
Research  and  Labor  Relations  on  "Hours,  Wages,  and  Working  Conditions  in 
Domestic  Water  Transportation".  Owing  to  complexity  of  this  industry  and 
the  great  detail  of  the  data  presented,  we  can  cite  only  a  few  of  the  significant 
facts  brought  out.  The  survey  on  which  the  report  is  based  was  made  during 
1933. 

"An  accurate  census  of  number  of  employees  engaged  in  domestic  water 
transportation,"  states  the  report,  "is  not  available."  Leaving  out  employment 
that  is  exclusively  intrastate,  it  is  estimated  that  in  193-t  there  were  about 
293,000  employees' in  both  domestic  and  foreign  trade.  Of  these,  about  114,000 
were  employed  on  vessels,  about  110,000  were  stevedores  and  longshoremen,  and 
about  69.000  were  other  shore  workers.  The  following  facts  from  the  report 
deal  largely  with  conditions  of  seamen  : 

Hours:  A  basic  eight-hour  day  prevailed  in  June  1933  for  the  majority  of 
seamen.  But  on  common-carrier  vessels  in  the  Atlantic-Gulf  Coastwise  trade, 
a  third  of  the  deck  crew  and  '>'>Vc  of  the  workers  in  the  steward's  department 
were  reported  working  on  a  12-hour  schedule.  On  common-carrier  vessels  in 
the  Intercoastal  trade,  28%  of  the  deck  crew  were  reported  on  a  12-hour 
schedule  and  34%  in  steward's  department  were  scheduled  for  8  to  12-hour  day. 
On  (Jreat  Lakes  common-carrier  vessels,  all  officers,  12%  of  the  engine-room 
personnel,  3.")%  of  the  deck  crew,  and  33%  of  the  steward's  department  were 
reported  as  scheduled  for  12  hours  a  day. 

While  ve.s.sel  employees  of  contract  and  private  carriers  on  both  the  Atlantic- 
Gulf  Coastwise  and  Pacific  Coastwise  service  reported  an  8-hour  day,  on  the 
Great  Lakes  nearly  75%>  of  the  licensed  officers  and  more  than  50%  of 
unlicensed  personnel  were  scheduled  for  12  hours  a  day. 

On  Atlantic  and  Pacific  Inland  common  carriers  and  those  on  Mississppi 
River  and  its  tributaries,  a  12-hour  day  was  found  to  be  almost  universal. 

Wages :  Lowest  wage  rates  paid  in  June  1933  to  unlicensed  workers  on 
common  carriers  engaged  in  offshore  trade,  were  reported  by  Intercoastal  ships, 
the  next  lowest  by  Atlantic-Gulf  Coastwise  ships.  Seventy  percent  of  the 
unlicensed  personnel  in  the  former  trade  and  59%  of  that  in  the  latter  received 
$50  per  month  or  less,  as  compared  with  42%  in  Atlantic  Coastwise  service, 
37%  in  Pacific  Coastwise  service,  43%  in  Pacific-Alaska  service,  and  39%  on 
the  Great  Lakes. 

Ninety-thiee  percent  of  luilicensed  workers  on  common-carrier  vessels  in  the 
Atlantic  Iidand  trade  received  ."i;75  pei-  month  or  less;  4%  received  between  $70  and 
$10(»  per  month,  as  compared  with  48%  and  43%  respectively  for  similar  em- 
ployees in  the  Pacific  Inland  ser^ice. 

In  barge-line  operations  on  the  Missis.sippi  River  and  its  tributaries,  about 
55%  of  the  workers  other  than  officers  received  between  $26  and  $50  per  month. 

Overtime:  On  Pacific  Coast,  unlicensed  personnel  in  the  offshore  trades  are  paid 
at  the  rate  of  60c  pt^r  hour,  except  foi-  members  of  the  steward's  department  below 


8758  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

the  rank  of  cook,  whose  overtime  rate  is  50e' :  and  in  Pacific  Steam  Schooner  and 
Pacific-Alaska  services  at  the  rate  of  70(:'.  Atlantic  agreement  did  not  provide  for 
overtime  payment  to  unlicensed  personnel  until  after  September  26,  1936,  when 
provision  was  made  to  pay  overtime,  but  under  conditions  different  from  those 
in  effect  on  Pacific  Coast, 

Living  conditions :  "No  general  survey  of  living  conditions  on  board  ships  was 
undertaken,"  states  the  report,  but  statements  made  at  public  hearings  and 
references  to  living  conditions  in  union  agreements  indicate  that  "quarters  of 
unlicensed  personnel,  however,  are  unusually  overcrowded,  ill-venti'ated  and 
unsanitary.  While  food  allowances  are  adequate,  there  have  been  many  com- 
plaints that  food  is  often  poorly  cooked  and  badly  served  *  *  *.  It  is  evident 
that  too  little  attention  has  been  paid  by  ship  architects  and  ship  operators  to  the 
importance  of  living  conditions." 

Training  and  hiring:  There  has  been  little  attempt  to  establish  training  pro- 
cedures for  able  and  ordinary  seamen.  "Lack  of  adequate  training  for  certificated 
lifeboat  men  is  particularly  noticeable." 

"Where  unions  have  obtained  suflicient  strength  to  establish  hiring  halls,  some- 
•what  more  orderly  hiring  procedures  have  been  established." 


New  York  State  Committee 

Communist  Party 

eduoationax  department 

March  29,  1937. 
mat  day  discussion  outline 

I.  May  Dai/  an  American  Institution. 

A.  1886. — The  American  Federation  of  Trades  and  Labor  Unions  called  a 

one-day  general  strike  in  the  struggle  for  an  8-hour  day. 

B.  300,000  took  part  in  the  first  May  Day  demonstration;  the  8-hour  day 

was  won,  but  not  without  bloodshed,  at  the  McCormack  Factory  "riot" 
and  the  Haymarket  "riot."  Eight  labor  leaders  were  framed  and  hung 
as  a  result  of  the  Haymarket  bomb  explosion. 

II.  Maif  Dai/.  19S6  to  Maij  Day,  1937,  AlarKs  Oiif.'^tan(1iiif/  ccononuc  gains  for  the 
Workiny  Class  and  unity  in  titruyylc  of  Ncyro  and  n-liitc. 

The  great  task  of  organizing  the  unorganized  and  is  going  forward,  under  the 
impetus  of  the  C.  I.  O.,  which  has  taken  up  the  long-time  party  slogan  of  industrial 
organization. 

1.  Marine  Strike. 

West  Coast :  40.000  men  strike  for  98  days. 

Atlantic  Coast  and  Gulf  Coast  .ioined  and  struck  for  85  days.  Laid 
foundation  for  National  Maritime  Federation  as  step  toward  industrial 
union  in  marine.  Large  increase  in  union  membership  and  improvement 
of  working  conditions.  Inten.sified  succe.ssful  fight  on  "fink  books." 
Strengthened  labor  nationally. 

2.  General  Motors  and  Chrysler  strikes. 

C.  I.  O.  makes  first  drive  in  giant  open-shop  mass-production  industry 
and  uses  new  weapon — SIT-DOWN.  Mass  sit-downs  in  key  plants 
affected  200.000  workers.  Using  industrial  union,  class  struggle  tactics 
proves  successful. 

Capitalist  bosses  let  loose  all  their  forces.  Capitalist  press  with  dis- 
torted news.  Vicious  news  reels.  Lying  broadcasts.  Vigilantes.  State 
militia.  Injunctions.  Class-collaborating  AFL  leaders  like  Frey  and 
Green. 

Middle  class  generally  sympathetic  to  strikers  in  strike  area.  Women 
and  youth  actively  participated  in  struggle. 

Government  administration. 

Murphy  responded  to  mass  pressure,  the  strike  ended  without  the 
threatened  force  eviction  of  the  strikers. 

Working  class  solidarity  tremendous  in  strike  areas ;  the  whole  pro- 
gressive labor  movement  and  the  leadership  of  the  C.  I.  O.  actively  behind 
the  strike.    The  Flat  Glass  Workers,  for  example,  settled  a  10-week-old 


UN-AMERICAN   PU0rA(4ANDA  ACTTVITIES  8759 

strike  in  order  to  bring  pressure  to  bear  on  GM  by  selling  glass  to  GM's 
competitors.  Ford  and  Chrysler.  In  this  way  labor  used  a  class  strategy, 
concentrating  all  its  forces  on  one  point. 

The  Vivtory. 

Recognition  of  U.  A.  W.  as  sole  bargaining  ayeut  for  workers  in  20 
plants  for  6  months ;  and  recognition  as  agent  for  its  membership  in  49 

plants. 

No  discriminations  against  union  members  or  strikes.  Negotiations 
for  conditions.  $2r>.00<l.(i<l<)  wage  increases.  Injunction  quashed.  Mem- 
bership in  union  multiplied.  Open  shop  rule  broken  through.  Other 
companies  in  automobile,  etc.,  give  wage  increases.  Strengthened  pro- 
gressive labor  forces  in  the  struggle  in  steel. 

3.  Sti'ii. 

Successful  organization  drive  (unity  of  Negro  and  white)  victory  in 
auto,  forces  the  Carnegie-lHinois  Steel  Corporation,  the  one  that  had 
smashed  the  Homestead  strike  in  1887,  to  settle  with  the  C.  I.  O.  in  1937. 
An  agreement  was  signed  affecting  120,000  men.  Union  recognition,  the 
40-hour  week  and  wage  increases  were  gained.  The  example  of  Carnegie- 
Illinois  was  followed  by  otlier  steel  mills. 

4.  Pending  struggles  in  mass  productioti  industries. 

General  Electric,  textile,  coal,  rubber,  cement,  hosiery,  etc.,  etc. 

III.  The  Struggle  Against  Reaetion:  Tmairds  a  Fanner  Lahor  Party. 

The  Party's  tactic  of  defeating  reaction  and  building  the  forces  of  independent 
political  action  was  successful  and  proved  to  be  a  factor  in  clarifying  the  issues 
(contrast  Socialist  Party  sectarianism).  Hearst,  the  Liberty  League,  Coughlin, 
and  the  camp  of  reaction  were  overwhelmingly  repudiated.  The  peojile  voted  for 
a  progressive  legislative  program  and  for  a  better  life.  Labor  made  strategic 
gains,  which  it  began  to  cash  in  on  in  the  strike  wave  after  election,  using  pressure 
on  Roosevelt  and  Murphy  to  help  win  in  their  demands. 

In  Congress  there  was  formed  an  organized  progressire  hloe,  which  actually 
put  forward  its  own  nominee  for  Speaker  and  asked  for  Committee  appointments 
in  its  own  name.  The  bloc  consists  of  Farmer  Laborites,  Wisconsin  Progressive, 
and  Progressive  Democrats ;  it  now  numbers  17  to  20  representatives.  It  has 
taken  progressive,  determined  positions  on  "neutrality,"  relief,  W.  P.  A.,  sit- 
down  strikes,  and  the  Supreme  Court. 

Labor's  Non-Partisan  League,  at  its  national  conference,  determined  to  coop- 
erate with  Farmer  and  other  groups  (National  Negro  Congress)  and  to  form  state 
organizations. 

Supreme  Court. 

In  an  attempt  to  cheat  the  workers  of  their  election  victory,  of  their  hard-won 
industrial  victories,  and  to  prevent  progressive  legislation,  the  camp  of  reaction 
has  swung  all  its  power  behind  the  drive  to  defeat  the  President's  Supreme  Court 
proposals.  The  reactionaries  have  skillfully  been  able  to  split  awa.v  some  pro- 
gressives like  Wheeler  and  Nye,  who  raise  the  false  issue  of  action  by  the  slow 
process  of  constitutional  amendment,  as  an  alternative  to  the  President's 
proposals. 

Labor  and  all  progressive  forces  must  fall  behind  the  President's  proposals  and 
not  allow  the  issue  to  be  confused.  The  question  of  amending  the  constitution  is 
a  supphunentary  issue.  The  C.  P.  favors  after  the  passage  of  the  present  pro- 
posals the  passing  of  an  amendment  to  deprive  the  Supreme  Court  of  its  usurped 
power  to  review  legislation. 

IV.  International  Solidarity. 

1.  The  foremost  battlefront  of  the  entire  world — the  anti-fascist  movement — now 
lies  in  Spain.  There  the  iniity  of  the  people's  front  is  gathering  sufficient  strength 
toi>assover  to  the  oftensive  ngjiinst  the  interiiati<in:il  fascist  invasion.  All  jwssi- 
ble  support  must  be  given  to  Spain,  especially  to  kill  the  "neutrality"  legislation. 
The  fascist  rape  of  Etliiopia  and  the  invasion  of  Si)ain,  and  the  threats  against 
France,  Czechoslovakia,  and  all  democratic  countries,  especially  the  Soviet  Union, 
the  only  proletarian  democracy,  marks  the  imminence  of  world  war.  May  Day 
this  year  must  symbolize  the  struggle  against  fascism  for  peace  and  support  of 
the  peace  policies  of  the  Soviet  Union. 

2.  The  action  of  the  Soviet  Union's  courts  in  ferreting  out  the  counter-revolu- 
tionary Ti-otskyites  and  exposing  their  connection  with  the  war  plans  of  1937  of 


M'->. 


8760  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Hitler  and  Japan  constitutes  a  great  service  to  the  peace  forces  of  the  world. 
The  peace  policy  of  the  Soviet  Union  thus  scored  another  triumph  for  the  people 
of  the  world. 

3.  The  New  Soviet  Constitution,  the  greatest,  most  progressive  document  of  its 
kind  in  world  history,  was  a  further  blow  against  world  reaction  and  forms  a 
rallying  ground  in  the  struggle  against  fascism.^ 

V.  May  Day  and  the  Communist  Party. 

In  all  of  the  struggles  recounted  above,  the  Party  has  played  a  large,  and  at 
some  times,  a  leading  part.  It  is  necessary  to  use  the  preparations  of  MAY  DAY 
to  BUILD  THE  PARTY.  When  you  review  the  work  and  show  non-Party  masses 
what  has  been  accomplished  in  the  last  year  and  what  must  be  accomplished  in 
the  next,  it  should  be  possible  to  make  thousands  join  the  Party. 

The  Daily  Worker  must  be  strengthened  in  the  May  Day  campaign.     Trade  ' 
unionists  and  others  who  are  preparing  for  ]\Iay  Day  can  be  made  to  understand 
the  role  of  the  Daily  and  Sunday  Workers  in  these  preparations. 

In  all  agitation  and  propaganda,  the  role  of  the  Party  in  these  struggles  can 
be  brought  forward  to  strengthen  our  work  and  build  the  Party. 

VI.  The  Ultimate  Aim— TOWARDS  SOCIALISM. 

The  struggles  of  the  past  j^ear  form  a  step  forward  in  the  struggle  for  social- 
ism. The  movement  towards  mass  industrial  unionism,  towards  a  National 
Earmer  Labor  Party  i.s-  at  the  same  time  a  struggle  for  Socialism,  it  is  a  realistic 
struggle  which  takes  into  account  the  present  conditions  of  the  masses.  Let 
lis  raise  vigorovasly  the  slogan,  through  democracy  to  socialism. 

VII.  Organizational  proposals. 

(a)  If  possible,  organize  local  neighborhood  meetings;  (b)  issue  section  and 
unit  leatlets  and  shop  papers;  (c)  special  preparations  to  sell  the  special  pre- 
May  Day  issue  of  the  daily  worker  for  April  14th;  (d)  special  mobilizations  to 
■canvass  with  May  Day  edition  of  rhe  Daily  Worker;  (e)  intensihcation  of  neigh- 
borhood struggles  for  relief,  housing,  etc.;  (f)  stimulate  trade-union  organization 
in  your  locality. 

VIII.  Slogans. 

Organize  the  Unorganized  !  Every  Town  a  Union  Town  !  For  a  Powerful 
AND  United  Lakor  Movement  ! 

Abolish  thp:  Usurped  Powers  of  thei  Supremei  Court!  Support  Every  Meas- 
ui  E  Which  Curhs  the  Autocratic  Rule  of  the  Judiciary  !  Preser\'e  and  Ex- 
tend Democratic  Rights  !  Build  the  Amek,ican  Peoples  Front  Against  Red- 
action, Fascism,  and  War  I  Build  the  Farmer  Labor  Party,  the  Party  of  the 
People  Against  Wall  Street  ! 

Support  the  Heroic  Struggle  of  the  Spanish  People  Against  the  Fascist 
Invasion  of  Hitler  and  Mitssolini  !  End  the  Embargo  Against  the  Demo- 
cratic AND  Friendly  Government  of  Spain  !  Support  the  Peace  Policies  of 
the  Soviet  Union — the  Bulwark  of  Peace  and  Democracy  !  Keep  America 
Out  of  War  by  Keeping  War  Out  of  the  World  !  Build  a  Mighty  Peace  Move- 
ment of  Labor  Farmers  and  All  Progressives  ! 

Reading  Sii(>gesfions. 

"The  Connnunist"  for  March  and  April. 

Browder — Plenum  report  on  the  Election  Results. 

I\Iay  Day  Pamphlets. 

the  daily  worker. 


New  Y^ork  State  Committee  of  the  Communist  Party 

April  6,  1937. 
remindp:rs  on  procedure  in  disciplinary  cases 

To  Be  Read  at  All  Unit  Meetings  : 

Dear  Comrades : 

(1)  Every  accused  member  has  the  right  to  a  hearing  and  must  be  given 
an  opportunity  to  present  his  side  before  disciplinary  action  is  taken 
against  him.  Notes  or  minutes  should  be  taken  at  such  hearings.  These 
hearings,  however,  do  not  have  to  be  legalistic  aifairs.  Sometimes  written 
statements  in  reply  to  charges  are  sufficient. 


IX-A.MKKUAN    rUorAlJA.NDA  ACTIVITIES  8761 

(2)  Every  iiccusod  nunnhcr  lias  tho  riiiht  to  appeal  the  decision  to  a 
liijiliei'  I'ai'ty  coniinittee.  Such  appeals  should  be  made  in  writing  and  ex- 
plain on  what  grounds  appeal  is  made. 

(3)  -1//  disciplinary  actions  must  be  immediately  reported  by  units  to 
section,  by  section  to  counties;  and  by  counties  to  the  State  Committee. 
Fractions  in  organizations  nntst  iiiimciliatchj  report  all  cases  to  the  counties 
in  which  they  are  functioning. 

(4)  In  reporting  cases  the  lollowing  information  »u/.v/  be  given:  (a)  name 
of  accused;  (b)  home  address;  (c)  his  or  her  unit,  section,  county;  (d) 
when  joined  Party;  (e)  any  interruptions;  (f)  former  and  present  func- 
tions in  Party:  (g)  occupation;  (li)  which  mass  organization  belongs  to; 
<i)  exposure  of  spies  and  swindlers  should  be  accompanied  with  (in  addi- 
ti(ni  to.  above  information)  good  personal  description,  and,  if  possible,  with 
photos. 

(5)  The  following  are  the  disciplinary  actions  that  may  be  taken  against 
the  accused  member,  in  order  of  their  severity ; 

(a)  Criticism  or  severe  criticism. 

(b)  Censure  or  severe  censure. 

(c)  Either  of  above  with  warning. 

(d)  Removal  from  office. 

(e)  Dropping  from  rolls. 

(f)  Expulsions. 

(6)  All  charges  against  section  or  higher  functionaries  must  be  reported 
to  the  District  as  soon  as  they  are  received,  followed  up  later  with  findings 
and  decisions. 

All   removals   from   office   require   the   approval   of   the   next   higher 
committee. 

All  Expvlsio.xs   and  IIeadmissions   of   Previously   Expelled  Mem- 
bers Need  Appuoxal  of  the  State  Bukeau  or  State  CoifMiTTEE. 

State    Disciplinary    Com. 

KEEP  THIS  ON  FILE  FOR  FUTURE  REFERENCE 


Educational  Department.  ~  March  1,  1938. 

New  York  State  Committee, 
Discussion  Outline. 

Women  and  the  People's   Front 

(International   Women's   Day,    March    8) 

Earl  Browder.  The  People's  Front  (p.  46,  Report  to  the  9th  Convention  of  the 
C.  P.)  :  "There  are  hundreds  of  thousands  of  women  in  the  trade  unions,  there 
are  multiplied  numbers  in  industry  still  unorganized,  there  are  millions  of 
women  in  mass  organizations  of  varied  sorts.  Their  problems  are  growing 
more  difficult,  they  are  searching  for  answers,  for  a  new  way  out,  just  as  we 
have  seen  among  the  youth.  All  the  possibilities  exist  for  a  women's  move- 
ment on  the  same  scale  as  the  youth  movement.  It  is  the  task  of  our  Party 
to  find  and  develop  those  women  with  the  capacity  of  creating  and  leading 
such  a  movement." 

I.  Introduction. 

The  growing  struggle  for  democracy,  security,  jobs,  and  peace  has  brought 
more,  and  more  women  into  social  and  political  life.  The  celebration  of  In- 
ternational Women's  Day  should  therefore  serve  to  rally  the  Party  to  intensify 
its  efforts  to  involve  women  in  activity  and  to  guide  their  struggles  into  the 
channels  of  organization  of  a  democratic  front  to  defeat  the  reactionaries  iu 
the  1938  Congressional  elections. 

II.  Historical  Background. 

Just  like  May  Day,  International  Women's  Day  is  of  American  origin. 

The  designation  of  a  special  day  devoted  to  propaganda  among  women  was 
first  made  hi/  the  Socitilixt  Parti/  i)i  the  U.  8.  A.  in  1!)0S,  The  day  was  con- 
ceived to  be  for  the  purpose  of  advocating  woman  suffi-age  which  was  then 
agitating  the  middle-class  women  and  for  general  agitation  among  working 
women.     It  was  designated  on  the  last  Sunday  in  February. 


8762  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Clara  Zetkin,  at  an  International  Conference  of  Socialist  women  in  Copen- 
hagen in  1!)10  proposed  that  this  day  become  International.  Comrade  Zetkin 
then  put  this  resolution  into  action  in  Germany  and  for  the  first  time  it  was 
celebrated  in  1911  in  that  country.  During  the  campaign  under  Comrade 
Zetkin's  leadership  the  fact  that  the  struggle  for  equal  rights  for  women  was 
only  part  of  the  struggle  for  the  emancipation  of  the  workers  from  capitalism 
and  called  upon  the  women  to  mobilize  and  struggle  for  their  special  needs  as 
well  as  for  the  improvements  of  the  conditions  of  the  toilers  as  a  whole.  The 
demonstrations  in  Germany  were  highly  successful  and  in  Berlin  there  were 
collisif)ns  with  the  police. 

In  1914  Rosa  Luxemburg  in  Germany  rallied  the  women  for  the  struggle 
against  impending  war  and  was  arrested  for  her  activity.  On  International 
Women's  Day  the  women  of  Germany  demonstrated  against  the  anrest  of  Red 
Rosa  and  against  war.  Huge  demonstrations  against  war  were  held  in  many 
countries  under  the  leadership  of  the  Socialist  movement. 

On  March  8,  1917,  the  women  of  tsarist  Russia,  defying  the  brutal  terror  of 
the  police,  left  factories  and  marched  into  the  streets  demanding  "bread  and 
an  end  to  the  capitalist  war."  Their  action  was  thus  the  forerunner  of  the 
great  October  revolution  and  through  the  bitter  years  of  intervention  and 
famine  the  women  fought  valiantly  along  with  the  men  to  maintain  the  Soviet 
power.  In  1918  and  1919  International  Women's  Day  in  the  Soviet  Union 
became  the  rallying  cry  for  increased  defense  and  against  the  international 
imperialist  invaders.  Today  they  enjoy  the  fruits  of  their  struggle — equal  with 
men  in  the  building  of  Socialism.  While  the  October  Revolution  freed  the 
women,  the  new  Soviet  Constitution  guarantees  full  security — complete  civil 
and  economic  rights. 

On  March  8,  1930,  International  Women's  Day  in  Spain  was  celebrated  b> 
80,CM)0  demonstrators  marching  through  Madrid  under  the  slogans  of  liberation 
of  women  of  Spain  from  capitalist  exploitation  and  the  menace  of  war  and, 
fascism.  A.  Pasionaria,  the  most  popular  and  beloved  woman  in  Spain,  in-* 
spired  these  demonstrators. 

III.  Militant  Tr.\ditions  of  Women. 

(a)  Women  began  their  struggle  for  equality  during  the  Revolutionary  War 
of  1776  and  the  struggle  to  enact  the  Constitution  when  they  tried  to  have  their 
rights  recognized  and  guaranteed  in  the  Constitution. 

(b)  In  1834,  there  was  organized  the  first  working  women's  association,  in 
Lowell,  Mass.  After  a  great  textile  strike  there,  about  2.o00  women  organized 
the  Factory  Girls'  Association.  In  1835,  in  New  York,  a  Female  Union  Associa- 
tion was  formed,  to  be  followed  by  similar  groups  in  Baltimore,  Philadelphia, 
Lynn,  etc. 

(c)  In  1848,  right  in  New  York  State  (Seneca  Falls),  there  began  the 
organized  struggle  of  women  for  equality  at  the  Women's  Rights  Convention 
which  drafted  the  Women's  Rights  Declaration  calling  for  the  right  to  vote,  to 
hold  political  office,  to  own  proijerty,  to  make  contracts,  to  testify  in  court,  etc. 

This  was  the  beginning  of  what  came  to  be  known  as  the  Suffragette  Move- 
ment. It  produced  such  outstanding  women  leaders  as  Frances  Wright,  Eliza- 
beth C.  Stanton,  Susan  B.  Anthony. 

(d)  Abolitionism  al.so  found  its  women  advocates  and  leaders.  In  Phila- 
delphia, the  Female  Anti-Slavery  Society  supported  abolition  and  memoralized 
Congress  to  free  the  slaves,  and  also  organized  lectures  at  which  Negro  and 
white  mingled  in  the  audience.  The  Negro  people,  however,  developed  their 
own  great  woman  leader,  Harkiet  Tubman,  friend  of  .Tohn  Brown,  and  called 
Moses  by  her  people  because  she  led  more  than  300  of  them  to  escape  from 
slavery  through  the  "Underground  Railway."  From  New  York  she  returned 
to  the  South  19  times  (when  there  were  rewards  amounting  to  $40,000  being 
offered  for  her  capture)  to  help  Negroes  escape!  During  the  Civil  War  she 
was  a  valuable  aid  to  the  Northern  armies,  for  whom  she  served  as  scout, 
guide,  nurse,  and  spy.  She  died  in  Auburn,  New  York,  in  1913,  respected  by  all 
friends  of  progress. 

In  contemporary  times,  women  have  been  active  and  militant  in  the  great 
labor  struggles  in  textile,  mining,  transport,  and  steel.  They  have  developed 
living  leaders  like  Lucy  Parsons,  Ella  May  Wigging,  Elizabeth  Gurley  Flynn, 
Ann  Burlak,  Maude  Mae  White,  Negro  woman  leader  of  Ohio,  our  great  and 
famous  Mother  Ella  Reeve  Bloor. 


UN-AMERICAN   l^KOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8763 

IV.  The  Strigcie  jvr  Eqt'ality. 

Wliat  itiotiraniV    •"Equal  liighls"  Amendment  of  the  Woman's  Charter? 

(a)  The  Equal  Rif/hta  Aiueiiffnicut. 

Although  it  takes  up  the  line  oUl  slogan  of  the  suffrage  movement  for  equal 
rights,  this  proposed  amendment  to  the  U.  S.  Constitution  is  a  demagogic  threat 
to  all  women.  Ir  was  formulated  in  1!122  hy  the  Woman's  Party,  which  lias  in  re- 
cent years  hecome  a  close  ally  of  the  Repuhlican  Party.  The  essence  of  tlie  dan- 
ger in  this  movement  lies  in  the  fact  that  if  the  Amendment  were  passed,  it  would 
wipe  out  all  the  valuahle,  necessary,  and  socially  useful  Protective  legislation 
that  has  heen  passed  to  safeguard  women  and  mothers  from  douhle  exploitation 
hy  the  Big  Business  interests.  Thus  all  niininunn-ware  legislation  f(u-  women 
would  he  declared  unconstitutional ;  all  special  health  regulations  would  he  abol- 
ished. The  amendment  would  actually  perpetuate  the  existing  inequality  that 
rises  from  the  fact  that  the  capitalists  take  advantage  of  women  to  give  them  less 
pay  for  the  same  work,  to  discharge  them  during  pregnancy,  etc.  Anatole  France 
pointed  to  the  hollowness  of  bourgeois  political  democracy  without  economic  de- 
mocracy in  his  famous  saying:  '"Under  the  law  the  rich  and  the  poor  are  both 
prevented  from  sleeping  under  the  bridges  at  night."  So  we  might  point  to  the 
falseness  of  the  Equal  Rights  Amendment  by  saying:  "Under  tliis  law,  men  and 
women  would  both  have  the  right  to  bear  children."  The  real  way  to  wipe  out 
existing  inequalities  is  to  pass  special  protective  legislation  for  women  to  protect 
them  from  double  exploitation. 

(b)  The  Women's  Charter. 

This  cliarter  provides  for  real  equality.  The  movement  for  it  began  in  Decem- 
ber 193S3,  and  has  gained  great  momentum.  Recently  the  International  Labor  Con- 
ference in  Geneva  passed  resolutions  presented  by  the  American  delegation  en- 
dorsing the  principles  of  the  Charter.  These  principles  are  simply  and  clearly  pre- 
sented in  the  full  text,  which  reads  as  follows: 

"Women  shall  have  full  political  and  civil  rights ;  full  opportunity  for  educa- 
tion ;  full  opi)ortunity  for  work  according  to  their  individual  abilities,  with  safe- 
guards against  physically  harmful  conditions  of  employment  and  economic  ex- 
ploitation ;  they  shall  receive  compensation,  without  discrimination  because  of 
sex.  They  shall  be  assured  security  of  livelihood,  including  tlie  safeguarding  of 
motherhood.  The  provisions  necessary  for  the  establishment  of  these  standards 
shall  be  guaranteed  by  government,  which  shall  insure  also  the  right  of  united 
action  toward  the  attainment  of  these  aims. 

"Whei"e  sjiecial  exploitation  of  women  workers  exists,  such  as  low  wages  which 
provide  less  tlian  the  livin  ■■  standards  attainable,  unhealthful  working  conditions, 
or  long  hours  of  work  which  result  in  physical  exhaustion  and  denial  of  the  right 
to  leisure,  such  conditions  shall  be  con-ected  through  social  and  labor  legislation 
which  the  world's  experience  shows  to  be  necessary." 

V.  Women  Under  Socialism. 

The  great  Stalinist  Constitution  (Article  122)  guarantees  women  full  equality 
plus  all  the  necessary  protection:  ' Wtmien  in  the  U.  S.  S.  R.  ai'e  accorded  equal 
rights  with  men  in  all  .spheres  of  economic,  state,  cultural,  .social,  and  political  life. 
The  possibility  of  exercising  these  rights  of  women  is  insured  by  affording  women 
equally  with  men  the  Tight  to  work,  payment  for  work,  rest  and  leisure,  social 
insurance,  and  education,  and  by  state  protection  of  the  interests  of  mother  and 
child,  maternity  leave  with  pay,  and  the  provision  of  a  wide  network  of  maternity 
hoine.s,   nurseries,  and   kindergartens." 

VI.  Women  Under  Fasci  -m. 

Unheard  of  misery  and  war  is  the  lot  of  women.  Wherever  possible  they  are 
driven  from  their  .jobs,  restricted  to  the  home,  and  turned  into  breeders  of 
cannon  fodder.  They  are  ruled  out  of  the  professions  and  industry  and  forced 
into  domestic  service.  Their  political  rights  are  destroyed.  Their  wages  are 
reduced.  The  Cost  of  Living  .Ti'mps,  providing  additional  burdens  for  the 
housewife.  The  future  for  the  children  is  dark  and  a  source  of  constant  worry 
and  fear  on  the  part  of  the  mother. 

VII.  The  Role  of  Women  in  the  People's  Front  Movement. 
(a)    Working  Wotnen. 

Their  gre;it  need  is  for  trade  unions,  and  hundreds  of  thousands  of 
them   are   joining   the  C.    I.    O.    unions   in    the   present   drive   to  organize    the 


3764  UN-AMERICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

unorganized     (textile,    laundry,    office,    department-store,    white-collar    unions, 
etc.  I.     Their     *     *     * 

(The  remainder  of  this  report  was  missing.) 


New  York  County  Committee 

Communist  Party,  March  1,  1938. 

Education  Department.  Discussion  Outline. 

Spain  and  the  People's  Front 

Sections  I  and  II  are  introductory.  The  hulk  of  the  emphasis  should  be  placed 
on  Sections  III,  IV,  and  V.  The  comrade  leading  the  discussion  should,  with  the 
aid  of  the  unit  bureau,  supply  the  items  for  V-F. 

The  growing  seriousness  of  the  present  world  situation,  with  Hitler  and  tlie 
fascist  triple  alliance  driving  ever  faster  and  more  openly  toward  world  war, 
makes  the  struggle  for  collective  security  and  for  the  defense  of  Spain  and  China 
of  prime  importance.  Particularly  the  capitulation  of  Chamberlain  to  Italy, 
with  the  almost  certain  recognition  of  the  Ethiopian  contpiest  and  the  probable 
acceptance  of  fuller  Italian  intervention  in  Spain,  places  the  struggle  for  the 
maintenance  of  Spanish  democracy  in  the  forefront  of  the  tasks  of  the  world 
proletariat. 

"Tlie  aggression  of  which  we  are  the  victims  is  directed  not  only  against  Spain, 
all  the  free  and  independent  peoples  of  Europe  are  the  objects  of  this  aggression. 
And  the  tragedy  is  that  these  peoples,  deceived  or  else  misled  by  their  govern- 
ments, have  not  yet  been  able  thoroughly  to  understand  this  truth."  Jose  Diaz, 
General  Secretary  of  the  Communist  Pai'ty  of  Spain. 

I.  The  advances  of  the  People's  Fi-ont  government  in  the  last  nine  months 
indicate  cimclnsively  that,  bari'ing  open  and  complete  intervention  by  Italy  and 
Germany,  the  Spanish  people  can  defeat  fascism. 

a.  Establishment  of  powerful,  well-functioning  military  machine : 

1.  Completion  of  the  building  of  a  regular  army,  with  ti-ained  reserves. 

2.  Setting  up  a  single,  unified  con)mand. 

3.  Strengthening  of  civilian  support. 

4.  Compulsory  militai'y  training. 

^^.  Elimination  of  untrustworthy  and  incompetent  officers. 
(\.  Placing  of  industry  on  war  footing. 

b.  Institution  of  military  offensive — with  i)rilliant  results: 

1.  Brunete. 

2.  Capture  of  Quinto  and  P.elchite. 

3.  Teruel. 

4.  Fascists  resort  to  barbarous  murder  of  women   and  children  as 

only  way  of  retaTation  : 

a.  Bombing  of  Valencia,  Barcelona,  Madrid. 

c.  Liquidation  of  Trotskyists  and  the  P.  O.  U.  M. 

d.  Pleroic   su])i)ort   of   international  proletariat,   despite   tlie   vacillation   and 

treachery  of  democratic  governments. 

"Our  people  will  be  forever  thankful  to  the  Communist  International  and  to  its 
glorious  helmsman.  Comrade  DiniitrotT,  who  has  carried  on  an  untiring  struggle 
and  is  now  engaged  in  the  struggle  to  secxu'e  tliat  all  the  forces  of  the  inter- 
national proletariat  unite  and  act  jointly  in  aid  of  Spain."     Jose  Diaz. 

a.  Achievements  of  the  International  Battalion  : 

1.  Madrid. 

2.  Guadalajara. 

3.  Jaraina. 

4.  Teruel. 

b.  Formation  of  People's  Front  organiz  itions  for — 

1.  Financial  support. 

2.  Medical  aid,  food,  clothing. 

3.  Moral  support. 

c.  Support  from  the  U.  S.  S.  R. 


UX-AMERICAN    I'lJOl'ACANDA   ACTIVITIKS  8765 

"Only  the  Soviet  Union  lias  diuMily  defended  ns  at  all  inrcniational  conferences, 
airainst  the  foul  intrifjiies  of  the  a.iii;ressors.  and  ajiainst  the  hlind  and  eriniiiial 
weakness  of  the  diploniaey  of  the  hourgeois-deniocratie  countries."     Jose  Uiaz. 

1.  Arms  and  technicians  to  counterbalance  armed  fascist  intervention. 

2.  Food  and  money. 

3.  In  international  diplomacy  : 

X.  Leajiue  of  Nations. 

y.  Xoninterveution  Connnittee. 

z.  Xyon  Conference  on  piracy  in  Mediterranean. 

4.  Moral  support. 

II.  Tli(>  I'eopl(>'s  Front  .government,  despite  all  obstacles,  has  brought  abi)ut 
tremendous    internal    improvemenis  : 

a.  Agriculture : 

1.  Expropriation   of   land   belonging   to   Luulowners   participating  in 

revolt  ( bulk  of  land ) . 

2.  Institution  of  centers  for  aiding  and  educating  peasants,   which 

resulted  in  a  technical  revolution. 

3.  Development  of  cooperative.s  as  agency  of  agrarian  revolution. 

4.  Encouragement  of  voluntary  collectives  where  feasible. 

b.  Industry : 

1.  Large  industries  owned  by  State. 

2.  Big  capitalists  eliminated. 

3.  Small  shopkeepers  and  businessmen  protected. 
0.  Trade  Union  Unity : 

1.  Under  the  People's  Front  Government  the  U.  G.  T.  (Socialist)  and 

C.  N.  T.  (Anarchist)  have  been  brought  closer  together: 
a.  Unity  negotiations  now  under  way. 

2.  C.  N.  T.  opposed  to  political  action  on  principle,  has  supported  the 

Popular  Front  throughout. 
d.  Culture  and  education  : 

1.  Considerable  steps  to  liquidate  illiteracy: 

a.  Organization  of  women  and  girls  into  shock  brigades  against 
illiteracy. 

2.  Education  of  talented  children. 

2.  Establishment  of  workers'  institutes,  with  salaries  for  needy  stu- 
dents, short-term  collese  cour.'-es,  technical   comses.  etc. 

4.  Education  among  the  s(  Idiers. 

5.  Collaboration  with  agricultural  ministry. 

6.  Responsibility  for  art  treasures. 

III.  Role  of  the  Communi.st  Party  in  building  the  People's  Front : 

a.  C.  P.  originally  responsible  for  the  united  front  with  Socialists  and  for 

the  formation  of  the  People's  Front. 

b.  Military  achievements : 

1.  Fifth  regiment,  outstanding  front  line  fighters  despite  heavy  losses 

due  to  bad  organization  of  Caballero  government. 

2.  Had  political  commissariat  established  as  link  to  ijeople. 

3.  Fought  for  unified  command : 

a.  Elimination   of  untrustworthy   officers  and   elevation   of 

civilian  officers. 

b.  Institution  of  regular  discipline  and  conscription. 

c.  C.  P.  worked  most  earnestly,  faithfully,  and  vigilantly  for  the  unity  of 

Spain  and  the  success  of  the  People's  Front  government : 
1.  Headed  off  hasty,  premature  actions: 

a.  Stopped  general  strike,  1936. 

b.  Checked  immediate  or  forced  collectivization  of  farms. 

X.  Lack  of  material  prerequisities  for  collectivization^ 

power,  machinery,  technique,  etc. 
y.  Peasants  not  yet  prepared  to  accept  collectivization. 


8766  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

2.  Called  for  unity — The  People's  Front  at  all  costs : 

a.  Worked  for  unity  of  Socialists  and  Communists. 

b.  Stopped  quarrels  between  parties. 

c.  Checked  personal  rivalries,  e.  g.,  Caballero  and  Prieto  for 

premiership. 

d.  Worked  for  unity  in  the  trade-union  movement. 

e.  Resistance  to  antireligious  pressiu'e  of  anarchists. 

3.  Fearlessly  exposed  Caballero  when  he  proved  himself  inadequate 

as  premier : 

a.  Failure  to  cleanse  State  Apparatus  and  army  of  fascists, 

spies,  and  traitors. 

b.  Failure  to  form  a  regular  army  with  a  unified  command. 

c.  Failure  to  estimate  correctly  the  extent  of  the  war. 

d.  Failure  to  organize  industry  on  a  war  basis. 

e.  Failure  to  react  strongly  to  fascist-Trotskyist — P.  O.  U.  M. 

uprising  in  Barcelona. 

f.  Considerable  responsil)ility   for  fascist   successes  up   to  the 

gates  of  INIadrid.  for  inactivity  on  the  Aragon  fi-ont,  for 
the  loss  of  Malaga,  for  tlie  defeat  of  the  P>:isques.  etc. 

g.  Tendency  to  attack  critics  (especially  C.  P.)  as  traitors. 
h.  Stubbornness,   lack   of   responsiveness   to   masses,   political 

vanity. 

IV.  Spain  is  the  living  proof  of  the  revolutionary  character  of  the  People's 
Front  tactic,  showing  bow  the  People's  Front  leads  toward  a  higher  form  of 
democracy  and  indicating  "the  possibility  for  the  peaceful  development  to 
Socialism :" 

a.  Popular  revolution : 

1.  Government  representative  of  and  responsible  to  the  people. 

2.  Central  authority  established  on  popular  basis. 

3.  Church  eliminated  as  political  or  economic  force. 

4.  Progress  in  popular  culture. 

5.  Technical  progress  in  agriculture  and  industry. 

6.  People's  Army. 

7.  Emancipated  womanhood  and  youth. 

b.  Special  character  differing  from  ordinary  bourgeois  democracy: 

1.  Change  in  conception  of  democracy: 

a.  Unparalleled  mass  participation  in  public  life. 

b.  More  direct  mass  influence  on  government. 

2.  Change  in  content : 

a.  People  armed. 

b.  No  large  landowners  ;  land  distributed. 

c.  Large  industries  owned  by  State,  Unions: 

X.  Run  by  workers. 

y.  Big  capitalists  eliminated. 

d.  No  large  private  bankers  : 

X.  In  hands  of  State. 
y.  In  hands  of  workers. 

V.  Tasks  in  U.  S.  A. 

"I  am  distrustful.  I  only  believe  what  I  see.  I  have  been  deeply  moved  by 
the  demonstrations  of  solidarity,  but  I  would  prefer  more  tangible  things.  If  I 
would  see  more  clothes,  more  food  arriving — that  is,  if  the  concrete  aid  became 
moi-e  effective — then  I  would  believe  that  the  solidarity  had  grown.  I  have 
beard  many  words,  many  promises,  during  the  last  year.  I  would  now  like  to 
see  them  followed  by  appropriate  deeds."  General  Miaja,  Commander  in  Chief 
of  the  Spanish  Army. 

a.  Increases  support  of  Spanish  Loyalists 

1.  Support  of  the  International  Brigade 

2.  Material  needs,  money,  food,  clothing,  medical  supplies,  support 

of   refugee   children 

3.  Intensive  campaign  for  membership  in  the  Friends  of  the  Abra- 

ham Lincoln  Brigade 


UN-A.MKRirAX  PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8767 

b.  Pressure  to  change  policy  of  isolation  to  one  of  collective  action  to  guar- 

antee the  ;iss:i"essor 

1.  ImplenuMit  I'les.  Roosevelt's  Chicago  address  of  October  5th 

a.  Piissnge  of  O'Connell  Peace  Act  to  embargo  aggressors  and 
open  our  markets  to  victimized  nations 

2.  Support  of  the  American  I^eague  for  Peace  and  Democracy 

3.  Boycott  .7a])aii.  as  a  blow  at  international  fascism 

c.  Exposure  of  the  sabotage  of  the  Trotskyists.  Lovestoneites  and  Socialists 

1.  Their  defense  of  betrayals  and  counter-revolutionary  activities  in 

Spain 

2.  The  lying  reports  of  Sam  Baron 

3.  The  isolationist  attitude  of  Norman  Thomas 

4.  Their  support  of  Ludlow  Amendment 

5.  Their  slamlerons  attacks  on  the  U.  S.  S.  R.'s  policy  toward  Spain 

d.  Clarificjition  of  the  role  of  the   U.   S.  S.   R.  and  C.  P.  in  building  the 

People's  Front 

e.  The  performance  of  these  tasks  will 

1.  Strengthen  the  Spanish  People's  Front  and  hasten  its  movement 

in  the  direction  of  »Socialism 

2.  Help  to  crystallize  the  People's  Front  in  the  U.  S.  A.  and  on  a 

world  wide  scale 

f.  Tasks  of  our  unit 

SUGGESTED  READINGS 

"Rally  closer  the  Ranks  of  the  People's  Front" — Jose  Dias  (Communist  Inter- 
national, January  1938) 

"The  Change  in  Spain" — Robert  Minor  (The  Communist,  August  1937) 

Heroic  Spain — Marty 

"The  Victory  of  the  Spanish  I'eople" — Diaz  (Communist  International,  May 
1937) 

The  Spanish  Revolution — Ercoli 

Spain  in  Revolt — Gaimes  and  Repard 

Spain  and  the  People's  l>ont — Dimitroff 

Next  Steps  to  Win  the  War  in  Spain — Browder  and  Lawrence 

How  the  Soviet  Union  Helps  Spain — Cannes 

Life  and  Death  of  a  Spanish  Town— Paul 

International  Press  Correspondence — Vol.  17,  Nos.  30.  42,  45,  49,  50,  53,  56; 
Vol.  IS,  No.  1. 

OuB  Election  Campaign  and  Its  Relation  to  the  American  Labor  Party 

Communist  Party,  New  York  District,  August  26,  1936. 
Method  of  Presentation  to  Units. — This  material  is  not  to  be  repeated  to  the 
Cfmirades  in  a  speech.  Questions  in  writing  or  orally  should  be  noted.  Answers 
are  to  be  given  by  comrades  in  general  discussion.  The  leader  of  the  discus- 
sion to  use  outlines  as  guide  in  meeting  correctly  the  problems  raised  by  the 
comrades.  Where  sharp  differences  develop,  make  careful  notation  of  the 
questions  and  the  answers,  consult  the  section  committee  and  bring  back  the 
opinion  given,  not  as  "orders,"  but  as  a  guide  for  further  discussion  and 
acceptance  by  the  unit. 

I.  Parties,  issues  in  the  election  campaign. 

(a)  The  chief  enemy  of  the  peace,  freedom,  and  prosperity  of  the  American 
people  is  the  Republican  Party  and  its  reactionary  allies.  Defeat  the  Landon- 
Hearst-Liberty  League-Wall  Street  alliance. 

(b)  Roosevelt  and  his  administi'ation  are  retreating  before  the  attacks  of 
reaction  and  surrendering  position  after  position  to  the  main  enemy.  Stop  the 
surrender  of  our  rights  and  interests  in  Washington. 

(c)  The  Socialist  Party,  alter  breaking  loose  from  its  reactionary  Old  Guard, 
is  moving  into  the  baclcwater  of  doctrinaii-e  sectarianism,  drifting  out  of  the 
mass  currents  of  American  life.  Win  the  Socialists  for  the  people's  united  fi-ont, 
for  the  Farmer  Labor  Party. 

(d)  The  Farmer  Labor  Party  is  rapidly  growing  in  states  and  localities,  it  is 
organizing  itself  on  a  national  scale.  Support  the  program  and  platform  of  the 
Chicago  Farmer  Labor  Party  conference,  build  the  Farmer  Labor  Party. 

62626 — 41— vol.  14 39 


3768  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIPIS 

(e)  The  Communist  presidential  ticket  is  tlie  only  banner  in  the  national  elec- 
tions rallying  and  organizing  all  the  forces  of  the  people  ag'ainst  reaction,  fascism, 
and  war,  building  the  j^eople's  front  in  the  United  States.  Vote  the  Communist 
presidential  ticket. 

II.  Applying  the  general  line  of  our  party  in  New  York  City. 

Every  community  in  the  state  must  analyze  the  concrete  situation  and  adopt  a 
policy  following  the  general  line  of  the  Party  and  based  on  actual  conditions  in 
the  community. 

(a)  Nationally  our  main  attack  is  against  the  Republican  Party  as  the  out- 
standing carrier  of  fascist  trends,  as  the  representative  of  the  Hearst-Liberty 
League  set-up.  In  New  York  City  it  is  Taminany  that  is  tied  np  witli  the  Liberty 
Leayuc  through  Al  Smith  and  others.  In  New  York  City  Tammany  is  that  extreme 
reactionary  force  that  we  brand  Hearst.  Tammany  controls  the  head  and  high 
officials  of  the  Police  Department;  the  Board  of  Aldermen  and  the  Board  of 
Estimate.  It  has  used  this  control  in  the  same  manner  as  the  arch  reactionary 
forces  throughout  the  country.  Brutality  of  police  officials  in  the  labor  struggles, 
tho  I'ole  of  the  police  in  Harlem,  the  series  uf  measures  attacking  foreign  born 
workers,  free  speech  and  ijress,  finger  printing,  etc.  Many  other  instances  can 
be  given  to  substantiate  our  estimate  of  Tammany  as  the  arch  reactionary  force 
in  our  city.     In  New  York  City  our  main  fire  must  be  direeted  against  Tammany. 

III.  Our  form  of  criticism,  and  attack  against  La  Giiardio. 

LaGuardia  is  not  fighting  Tammany  sufficiently.  He  does  not  struggle  against 
the  Tammany  controlled  city  legislative  bodies  even  for  those  mild  reforms  that 
he  is  proposing.  LaGuardia  accepts  defeat  in  the  Board  of  Alderman.  He  does 
not,  as  chief  executive  of  the  city,  raise  these  issues  beffire  the  masses  in  order 
to  get  their  support  for  an  attack  by  the  people  against  Tammany  Hall. 

IV.  Labor's  T^on-Partisan  League  in  New  York  City  and  State — The  American 

Labor  Party. 

Nationally  we  estimated  Labor's  Non-Partisan  League  as  a  weak,  a  vacillating 
but  nevertheless  a  beginning  towards  labor's  independent  political  action,  with 
possibilities  of  developing  along  the  lines  Ave  hoped  for  that  development. 

In  New  York  City  and  State  Labor's  Non-Partisan  League  Jias  had  to  go  further 
organizationally  than  it  has  done  nationally.  They  have  set  up  an  organization, 
independent  from  the  Democratic  Party,  in  order  to  attract  the  tens  of  thousands 
of  radical,  independent  voters. 

V.  The  trends  irithin  the  Americnn  Labor  Party. 

Some  within  it  agreed  to  this  independent  course  only  in  order  to  get  the  maxi- 
mum number  of  votes  for  Roosevelt.  Others  believe  in  some  sort  of  realigning  of 
political  parties  (as  expressed  in  the  recent  national  conference  of  the  League), 
as,  for  instancfj,  the  breaking  away  of  the  lil)erals  fi'om  the  Republican  Party, 
the  extreme  conservatives  from  the  Democratic  Party,  and  a  realigning  of  forces 
within  the  present  capitalist  parties  around  the  so-called  liberalism  of  Roosevelt. 

On  the  other  hand  there  are  forces  within  it  that  really  ai'c  striving  for  a  labor 
party  as  a  permanent  organization.  They  stand  for  a  Labor  Party  in  principle. 
They  are  quite  a  factor  in  New  York  City. 

VI.  Common  ground  hetioeen  us  and  the  American  Labor  Party. 

(a)  On  the  issue  of  defeating  Landon  and  arch  reaction  at  all  costs  we  agree. 

(1))  On  the  trend  in  the  organization  for  a  permanent  Labor  Party  and  labor's 
independent  political  action — we  agree. 

(c)  On  their  intention  to  run  local  candidates  as  candidates  of  the  American 
Labor  Party — this  is  a  good  step  forward  as  far  as  policy  is  concerned. 

These  po.sitive  aspects  of  the  American  Labor  Party  are  of  the  greatest  impor- 
tance to  us.  Properly  developed  it  gives  us  a  means  of  carrying  through  the 
major  political  tasks  now  facing  us — the  forging  of  a  united  people's  front  against 
reaction  and  war,  and  the  defeat  of  the  Landon-Liberty  League  forces.  This  we 
can  achieve  by  being  within  the  American  Labor  Party,  infiuencing  its  program 
and  activities  and  strengthening  those  other  forces  within  the  American  Labor 
I'arty  moving  in  the  direction  of  a  completely  independent  and  permanently  estab- 
lished labor  party. 

They,  of  course,  make  as  a  condition  for  affiliation  or  support  to  the  American 
Labor  Party  the  acceptance  of  their  complete  program  which  is  in  the  first 
instance  the  support  of  Roosevelt  and  Lehman.  We  do  not  agree  with  this  part 
of  their  progi-am.     Our  position  has  not  changed  since  the  national  convention. 


UN-AMERICAN  rKOrAGA>DA  ACTIVITIIiIS  8769 

VII.  Our  attitude  toicard  the  American  Labor  I'artti. 

We  realize  that  we  are  not  able  to  deternilne  the  exact,  pure  course  for  the 
(lovi'loinnenl  of  a  Labor  Party  in  America,  but  that  there  will  be  all  kinds  of 
developments  in  different  localities.  Since  wo  have  here  in  New  York,  in  the 
American  Labor  Party  a  movement  representing  about  one  quarter  million  or- 
ganized trade-union  workers  moviiifi  towards  independent  political  action,  we 
cannot  remain  neutral  or  in  opposition,  but  have  to  work  with  it  and  become 
part  of  it.  This  we  can  do  by  urging  every  trade-union  that  we  can  influence  to 
afliliate  to  the  American  Labor  Party  ou  their  conditions.  By  being  inside  this 
movement  we  will : 

(a)  Strengthen  those  forces  that  are  closest  to  our  position  as  regards  defeating 
Landon  at  all  costs. 

(It)  Strengthen  the  tendency  within  the  American  Labor  Party  making  for  a 
permanent  I^abor  I'arty — independent  workers'  political  action. 

(c)  Influence  as  much  as  we  can  the  number  of  local  candidates  to  be  selected, 
their  programs  and  the  types  of  candidate  to  be  selected. 

It  is  with  this  in  mind  that  our  fractions  in  the  Trade  Union  Committee  for  a 
Labor  Paity  and  in  the  Peoiile's  Committee  for  a  Labor  Party  were  instructed 
to  influence  these  organizatitms  to  negotiate  for  afliliation  to  the  American  Labor 
Party. 

Several  prominent  progressive  trade-union  leaders  of  the  Trade  Union  Com- 
mittee for  a  Labor  Party,  whose  organization,  upon  advice  of  the  Committee,  have 
affiliated  with  the  American  Labor  Party,  have  already  been  granted  places  on 
the  city  executive  committee  of  the  American  Labor  Party.  So  also  with  leaders 
of  several  left-wing  unions.  The  American  Labor  Party  has  already  granted 
alTiliation  to  several  Labor  Party  Clubs  of  the  People's  Committee  and  several 
leaders  of  the  People's  Committee  have  been  placed  on  the  State  Executive 
Committee  of  the  American  Labor  Party. 

VIII.  Pomtioti  of  Communists  i>i  trade  unions  affiliated  to  the  American  Labor 
Party. 

Every  individual  member  of  a  trade-union  or  other  organization  is  not  bound 
to  its  full  program  by  affiliation  to  the  American  Labor  Party.  Outstanding 
Comnumist  leaders  and  members  can,  while  urging  affiliation  to  the  American 
Labor  I'arty.  state  the  positive  aspects  of  the  American  Labor  Party  and  that 
he,  as  a  Communist,  does  not  agree  with  the  support  of  the  candidacy  of 
Roosevelt  and  Lehman  and  will  vote  for  Browder  and  Ford. 

IX.  The  position  of  the  Socialist  Party  in  regard  to  the  American  Labor  Parly. 
The  Socialist  Party  opposes  the  American  Labor  Party.     It  declares  that  it 

is  not  a  "pure"  Labor  Party,  that  it  endorses  capitalist  candidates,  that  it  admits 
iiorilabor  elements.  They  insist  that  the  Labor  Party  in  America  be  born  pure 
and  in  a  mold  exactly  to  its  liking.  This  sectarian  policy  has  led  to  its  greater 
and  greater  isolation.  Hillman,  Dubinsky,  and  Potofsky  have  openly  attacked 
the  Socialist  Party.  Whereas  the  Socialist  Party  used  to  say,  "Well,  a  united 
front  with  you  (the  C.  P.)  will  jeopardize  our  relationship  with  the  trade- 
unions."  today,  because  of  our  greater  strength  in  the  trade-unions  and  because 
of  their  infaiitile  sectarian  policy,  this  question  is  reversed.  We  are  trying  in 
every  way  possible  to  convince  them  of  the  incorrectness  of  tbeir  position.  While 
our  argiunents  have  not  had  much  effect,  great  pressure  is  being  brought  to 
liear  tipon  them  in  the  trade-miions,  especially  by  leaders,  not  only  of  the  Amer- 
ican Libor  Party  issue,  but  also  on  the  method  u.sed  in  the  selection  of  Hochman, 
Thomas'  letter  to  Landon,  and  Thomas'  sijeech  to  the  Townsendites,  and  other 
i.ssues.  We'  will  have  to  fight  with  and  lick  them  in  the  trade-unions  on  the 
issue  (tf  the  American  Labor  Party.  (We  have  succeeded  in  doing  this  in  every 
instance  in  the  many  trade-unions  that  have  already  acted  on  this  matter.) 

X.  77(6  positiwi  of  the  Lovestoneites. 

They  have  made  a  complete  about-face  on  the  Labor  Party  issue  and  to  prevent 
isolation  arc  now  supiiorting  our  policy  as  I'egards  the  American  Labor  Party. 

XI.  The  position  of  the  Old  Gimrd. 

The  Old  Guard  accepts  the  whole  program  of  the  American  Labor  Party,  includ- 
ing Roosevelt.  Due  to  the  influence  of  the  Forward,  their  influence  in  the  Jewish 
ti'a(l(>-unions  as  well  as  over  a  substantial  portion  of  the  radical  voters,  very  seri- 
ous consideration   had  to  be  given  them  by  Hillman  and  others.     Since  the  Old 


8770 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


Guard  have  this  influence  and  is  not  considered  a  political  party  in  the  sense  that 
the  Socialist  and  Communist  Parties  are,  they  have  been  accepted  as  an  afliliate. 

The  Communist  Party  is  not  within  the  American  Labor  Party  as  a  party,  since 
the  American  Labor  Party  would  not  accept  party  affiliation  nor  would  the  Party 
affiliate  under  their  conditio-ns.  However,  this  question  has  never  been  taken  up 
by  them  and  the  American  Labor  Party  has  not  taken  an  official  position  in  this 
regard. 

XII.  Full  speed  ahead  with  our  Communist  election  campaign. 

In  order  to  continue  being  a  factor  and  to  strengthen  our  position  in  the  Amer- 
ican Labor  Party  we  must  show  real  strength  as  an  independent  force — a  Mrge 
KJommunitst  Party  vote.  There  is  the  danger  that  while  trying  to  get  all  of  the 
left  and  progressive  organizations  to  become  part  of  the  American  Labor  Party 
that  we  will  slacken  our  Communist  Party  election  campaign.  We  are  not  with- 
drawing Browder  and  Ford,  nor  our  state  ctindidates  headed  by  Comrade  Minor. 
We  must  get  much  more  than  the  fifty  thousand  votes  for  our  gubernatorial  can- 
didates, needed  to  keep  our  party  on  the  ballot.  A  strong  independent  Communist 
Party  election  apparatus  must  be  set  up  especially  in  those  places  where  we  sup- 
port local  united  front  or  Labor  Party  candidates. 

We  must  coordinate  our  Communist  Party  election  campaign  with  our  cam- 
paign for  the  building  of  the  American  Labor  Party  and  supiwrt  of  American 
Labor  Party  or  local  united  front  tickets.  In  unions  and  other  organizations 
whether  these  are  affiliated  with  the  American  Labor  Party  or  not — Browder- 
Ford  clubs  should  be  established  wherever  possible.  The  Communist  Party  elec- 
tion apparatus  must  be  strengthened  everywhere,  bringing  our  platform  and  candi- 
dates to  the  masses. 

Recruiting  into  our  Party,  the  Daily  and  Sunday  Worker,  the  sale  of  Com- 
munist Party  literature,  collecting  for  the  election  fund,  must  go  hand  in  hand 
with  a  powerful  Communist  Party  election  campaign. 

Exhibit  "A" 

Balance  sheet  as  of  December  31, 1937 

ASSETS 

Cash  on  Hand $1,403.86 

Loans  Receivable 68,  715.90 

Furniture  &  Fixtures 8,556.33 

Deferred  Assets 151.  T2 

Total  Assets 78, 827.  81 

liabilitib:s 
Loans  and  Accounts  Payable 10,429.88 

Surplus 68, 397. 93 

Exhibit  "B" 

Ca.'ih  statement 


1937 

1936 

Paid 

Received 

Paid 

Received 

Dues  - - 

$77,116.67 

4,  427.  97 

5,  599.  84 
67,  829.  29 
59, 379.  59 
35, 538.  54 

$69, 446.  75 
3  271  81 

Initiations 

Or?.  Supplies  &  Buttons  - 

3  511  39 

Donations — Organizations 

59.617.83 

Donations — Individuals    

56,  753  42 

International  Solidarity  (Sche.  1) 

$35,083.61 

$33,  645.  27 
17,869.59 
20, 035. 00 

7,  270.  74 
14,  456. 12 

4,  734.  76 

34  159  03 

9th  Convention _     .._  __ 

21, 353. 01 

Wages.    _ 

20,  106.  95 

9.  722.  47 

19,  .345. 88 

11,876.84 

Organization  Expense    _ 

Labor  Struggles  Supported  (Sche.  2) 

Traveling-.. 

UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


Crt .s7i  sfa tcmcn  t — Continued 


8771 


1937 

1936 

Paid 

Received 

Paid 

Received 

Tolosraiih,  Cables  Communication        

$8,  076.  33 

2,  34,5. 48 

2,041.08 

4,  549.  70 

4.  800.  00 

10,  237.  34 

.5.101.11 

1,  775. 94 

.5211.  23 

?.56.  61 

550. 00 

.501.59 

1,  756. 54 

289. 95 

1,008.22 

31.  979. 92 

34, 900. 83 

3, 240.  80 

21,. 506.  64 

24,  750.  72 

$7,  582.  79 
2,028.15 

2,  201.  46 
4,  686.  86 
4.  800.  00 

10,  6.50. 42 

3,  284. 32 

Teloi)hone                           .        

Postaco  &  Express 

Ptationerv  &  Supplies        -      -      -         

Rent      .-- 

Agitprop 

Ploiiiim';             

Recruitin'.z  Drive 

Oricoiifcrenco                            -            -         - 

Taxes 

Editorial  Expenses 

Trjiveliiiff  \uditor 

Paint  iiie  <fc  Repairs 

1936  f'loc.  Campaign 

152,017.91 

1.690  04 

25,548.14 

30,915.98 

3,081.81 

25, 059.  28 

17,  370.  72 

3, 500. 00 

1,024.30 

$146,156.80 

Misccllimeous 

Subsidies — Districts  (Sehe.  3) 

Sub';idies — Organizations       .-  -.  

Subsidies — Individuals 

Partv  nress 

Loans  Pavable 

$8, 424.  72 

1, 302. 03 

TOTAL  RECEIVED 

258,  316. 62 

394,  270. 04 

TOTAL  PAID 

257,  729. 81 

393, 453.  66 
817.65' 

817.05 

67 

Balance  12/31 

1, 403. 86 

259,133.67 

259, 133.  67 

394, 270. 71 

394, 270. 71 

Schedule  1 
International  solidarity 


Paid 

1937 

1936 

Paid 

1937 

1936 

Anti-Nazi  

$238. 08 
1, 482.  69 

India 

$130  45 

Brazil 

$70.  00 

400.  00 

364.  26 

5,  769.  45 

93.  25 

100. 00 

380.  00 

5.94 

62.50 

8, 195. 00 

1,  200. 00 

Italy 

655. 00 

Bulgaria 

Mexico -  

$6, 825. 15 

200. 00 

2,  225. 96 

1, 0.54. 10 

6.00 

8, 132. 00 

2, 033. 87 

Canada -.. 

3,  358.  81 
4,210.00 

Nicaragua 

Cuba 

Chile 

Philippines 

Porto  Rico .._ 

Portuguese 

3, 868.  56 
1  115  25 

China     

Costa  Rics> 

100.00 
457.66 

Delegations  &   Commu- 
nications 

Caribbean 

7. 150  00 

Ethiopian  Aid 

Germany _ 

Ireland 

Total 

"""'7,"645'00 
1,  200.  00 

35, 083.  61 

33, 645.  27 

SCHE3)ULE  2 

Labor  struggles  supported 


1937 

1936 

1937 

1936 

steel 

$5, 600. 22 
4, 094.  10 
2,  786. 61 
1,907.75 
1, 858.  75 
1, 085. 00 
205.00 

$3,  593.  54 

1,01.3.44 

781.00 

1, 2.50.  00 

2, 998.  55 

95.00 

Rubber 

$85. 00 
490. 00 
13.5. 00 
120.00 
978. 45 

$200  00 

Auto. - 

Oil 

18  00 

Textile 

Mining 

District  No.  17 

Miscellaneous 

675  00 

Railroad-. 

462  54 

Marine 

1, 986.  82 

Total 

Metal.. 

19, 345. 88 

13, 073.  89 

8772 


UN-AMERICAN  PKOPAGANT)A  ACTIVITIES 
Schedule  3 
Subsidies 


District 

1937 

1936 

District 

1937 

1936 

1 

$485.00 

$484. 00 

20 

$1,  257. 09 

1, 307. 00 

749. 00 

840.  25 

1, 398. 80 

1, 675. 94 

372.  72 

830. 00 

720.00 

1,404.91 

1,349.03 

809. 90 

623. 00 

1, 024.  60 

93.75 

245. 00 

$842  43 

2 

21 

1,  772. 38 

3 

f.21.00 

G25. 00 

2,  910.  no 

1,  510. 00 

3fi4.  00 

1,  210.  00 

1,  30.=>.  fill 

87S.  00 

299.94 

115.75 

143.  25 

30.  00 

1,001.85 

221.81 

2,  473.  89 

1, 0.53.  50 

116.00 

123.  00 

8.94 

941.02 

99.55 

60.  19 

1,501.31 

317.  00 

22 .        

734.50 

4 

23 

853. 89 

r, 

24                                   

1,115.51 

6 _-_ 

25  

1,101.42 

7  .   

26 

5.00 

8 - ._ 

27 

683. 00 

9 

28 

367  95 

10 

29 

1,  600. 05 

11.. 

30            -       .                 

435. 00 

12 

31 

32 

326  39 

13. _ 

419. 57 

14... 

33 

15 

34 

35 

16 

3, 05G.  ni 

3. 057.  64 

443. 43 

323.  65 

1,  581.  42 

3.  854.  22 

589. 79 

803.  34 

17 

Total 

18  .. 

31, 979. 92 

25  548  14 

19 - 

Financial  Statement,  Communist  Party  of  the  U.  S.  A.,  January  1,  1938,  to 

March  31,  1940 

Statement  of  income  and  expenses'^  for  the  21-month  period  January  1,  1938, 

to  March  31,  19^0 


Dues 

Initiation 

Supplies  and  Buttons 

Mass  Meetings  and  Affairs, 
Collections  and  Donations-. 

Defense  Assessment 

International  Solidarity 

Schools 

Tenth    Nr  tl  mal    Conven- 
tion (N  t)  

Natl.    Ndninating    Conv. 

(Uth). 

Wages. 

Rent.- 

Telegraph _ 

Telephone 

Postage  &  Expressage 

Stationery  &  Supplies 

Traveling 

National  Committee  Meet- 
ings. 


Party  Building  Congress, ._ 
Education  Department  & 
Literature--. 


Expenses 


$14, 950. 40 

110, 196.  72 

5,  665. 40 


300.  00 

82,  259. 88 
10, 800. 00 

4,  712.  55 
5, 972. 87 
6,  027.  26 

5,  718.  42 
29, 164. 19 

9, 696. 17 
2,  926. 10 

8,  943.  35 


Income 


5197, 176.  09 

6,  340. 47 

7,  797.  23 
89, 326.  43 
81,777.41 
15,869.98 

110,  623.  89 
5,  506. 90 

7,  352. 07 


Legislative  Department 

Industrial  Department 

Organization  Department-. 

Other  Departments 

Party  News  Bulletin 

Publicity  &  Press  Service.. 

20th  Aimiversary 

Auditing  

Social  Security  Taxes 

Unemployment    Insur. 

Taxes 

Repairs 

Miscellaneous  Expenses 

Subsidies  to  Districts 

Contributions 


Total  Received 

Total  Paid 

Total  General  Income 

Less  Reserves  for  Defense 

Fund  and  I.  S 

Net  Income  for  the 
Period 


E.xpenses 


$5, 486. 42 

21,401,21 

18,  967. 65 

42, 235. 99 

1, 954.  68 

7,591.07 

5, 934.  66 

460. 00 

1,  797.  50 

2, 434.  54 

752.  51 

4, 172. 51 

90,  233.  06 

8,  000.  00 


508,  756.  23 


Income 


$521,771.36 

508,  756.  23 

13, 015. 13 

1, 346.  75 

11,668.38 


•  We  are  advised  that  this  financial  report  is  merely  a  cover-up,  and  that  the  Communist  Party  of  the 
U.  8.  A.  actually  had  60%  more  fmids  that  they  did  not  account  for. 

Balance  sheet  as  of  March  31,  1940 

ASSETS 

Cash  on  Hand  and  in  Bank $11,471.64 

Loans  Receivable 65,  995.  36 

Furniture  &   Fixtures 9,259.95 

Total    Assets 86',  726.  95 

liabilities 

Loans  Payable 2,  883.  56 

Accts.    Payable 2,  430.  33 


.    UX-AMEHICAN   IMiurAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8773 

Balance  sheet  as  of  March  31,  lO.'fO — Continued 

RESERVES 

Defense    Fund $1)19.  58 

Intei-uatiuual    Solidarity 427. 17 

$1,  346.  75 

Total    Liabilities 6,  660.  6i 

SURPLUS 

Jan.  1,  1938 $68,397.93 

Net    Income 11,  668.  38 

80,  066.  31 


Total 86,  726.  95 

CERTIFICATION 

To  the  National  Committee,  Commnnist  Party,  U.  8.  A. 

I  have  examined  the  Balance  Sheet  of  the  Communist  Party,  U.  S.  A.,  as  of 
March  31,  1940,  and  the  Statement  of  Income  and  Expenses  for  the  27  months 
ended  that  date.  In  connection  therewith,  I  examined  or  tested  accounting 
records  of  the  Communist  Party,  U.  S.  A.,  and  other  supporting  evidence,  and 
have  reviewed  the  system  of  internal  control  and  the  accounting  procedure  of 
your  organization  by  methods  and  in  the  extent  I  deemed  appropriate. 

In  my  opinion  the  accompanying  Balance  Sheet  and  related  Statement  of 
Income  and  Expenses  fairly  present  the  financial  position  of  the  Communist 
Party,  U.  S.  A.,  at  March  30,  1940,  and  the  results  of  their  financial  transactions 
for  the  27  mouths"  iieriod  ended  that  date. 

Morris  A.  Greenbaum, 
Certified  Puhlic  Accountant. 

The  Communist  Party  of  Germany  is  being  aided  in  its  fight  against  the  Hitler 
regime  in  Germany  by  the  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States  through  a 
contribution  of  $18,000.  Five  thf)usand  dollars  were  contributed  during  the 
past  six  month.s. 

This  was  revealed  in  the  voluntary  financial  statement,  certified  by  a  public 
accountant,  covering  the  period  since  the  I'arty's  last  convention  in  1938,  made 
in  a  report  to  the  National  Nominating  Convention  of  the  Communist  Party 
of  the  United  States  in  session  at  the  Royal  Windsor,  89  W.  06th  Street,  New 
York.     The  report  was  made  in  accordance  with  previous  convention  procedure. 

The  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States,  according  to  attached  financial 
report,  had  a  total  income  of  $."321,771.36  for  the  27  months  ended  March  31, 
1940.  Assets  of  the  Party  as  of  tliat  date  were  $86,726.95.  Of  this,  .$11,471.64 
was  in  cash  in  hand  and  in  bank ;  $6.j,99."'>.36  in  loans  receivable  and  $9,259.95  in 
furniture  and  fixtures.    Debts  were  $6,660.54. 

The  statement  disclosed  that  17  percent  of  the  Party's  income  came  from 
mass  meetings  and  affnir.s,  and  $197,176.09  from  dues. 

Among  the  expenses  of  the  Party  was  $29,164.19  for  traveling.  On  that 
basis  of  an  allowance  of  two  cents  a  mile,  this  figure  revealed  that  leading 
Party  members  traveled  1,458,200  miles  since  the  last  convention  in  1938. 

The  Communist  Party  of  the  United  States  contributed  a  total  of  $110,623.89 
to  Communist  Parties  of  other  countries,  of  which  $18,000  went  to  the  Com- 
munist Party  of  Germany  since  May  1938. 

The  Convention  voted  to  raise  a  fund  of  $140,000  to  contribute  to  the  Party's 
national  caniijaign,  and  $110,000  to  aid  the  Daily  Worker,  official  paper  of  the 
Communist  Party. 

Workers   School — Laboring   Power 

(From  "Value,  Price,  and  Profit"  in  "Essentials  of  Marx,"  Chapter  7) 

Having  now,  as  far  as  it  could  be  done  in  such  a  cursoi-y  manner,  analyzed 
the  nature  of  value,  of  the  value  of  any  commodity  whatever,  we  must  turn  our 
attention  to  the  .specific  Value  of  Labor.  And  here,  again,  I  must  startle  you  by 
a  seeming  paradox.  All  of  you  feel  sure  that  what  they  daily  sell  is  their 
labor ;  that,  therefore,  labor  has  a  price,  and  that  the  price  of  a  commodity 


3774  UN-AMEKICAN  I'ROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

being  only  the  monetary  expression  of  its  value,  there  must  certainly  exist  such 
a  thing  as  the  value  of  labor  in  the  common  acceptance  of  the  word.  We  have 
seen  that  the  amount  of  necessary  hibor  crystallized  in  a  commodity  con- 
stitutes its  value.  Now,  applying  this  notion  of  value,  how  could  we  define, 
say,  the  value  of  a  ten-hour  working  dayV  How  much  labor  is  contained  in 
that  day?  Ten  hours'  labor.  To  say  that  the  value  of  a  ten-hour  woi"kiug 
day  is  equal  to  ten  hours'  labor,  or  the  qunntity  of  labor  contained  in  it, 
would  be  a  tautological  and,  moreover,  a  nonsensical  expression.  Of  course, 
having  once  found  out  the  true  but  hidden  sense  of  the  expression  "value  of 
labor, "  we  shall  be  able  to  interpret  this  ir-rational,  and  seemingly  Impossible 
application  of  value,  in  the  same  way  that,  having  once  made  sure  of  the  real 
movement  of  the  celestial  bodies,  we  shall  be  able  to  explain  their  apparent 
or  merely  phenomenal  movements. 

What  the  working  man  sells  is  not  directly  his  Lahor,  but  liis  Laboi'itig  Power, 
the  temporary  disposal  of  which  he  makes  over  to  the  capitalist.  This  is  so 
much  the  case  that  I  do  not  know  whether  by  the  English  laws,  but  certainly  by 
some  Continental  laws,  the  maximum  time  is  fixed  for  which  a  man  is  allowed 
to  sell  his  laboring  power.  If  allowed  to  do  so  for  any  indefinite  period  whatever, 
slavery  would  be  immediately  restored.  Such  a  sale,  if  it  comprised  his  lifetime, 
tor  example,  would  make  him  at  once  the  lifelong  slave  of  his  employer. 

One  of  the  oldest  economists  and  most  original  philosophers  of  England — 
Thomas  Hobbes — has  already,  in  his  Leviathan,  instinctively  hit  upon  this  iK)int 
overlooked  by  all  his  successors.  He  says :  "The  value  or  worth  of  a  man  is,  as 
in  all  other  things,  his  price:  that  is  so  much  as  would  be  given  for  the  Use  of 
his  Power." 

Proceeding  from  this  basis,  we  shall  be  able  to  determine  the  value  of  labor 
as  that  of  all  other  commodities. 

But  before  doing  so,  we  might  ask,  how  does  this  sti'ange  phenomenon  arise, 
that  we  find  on  the  market  a  set  of  buyers,  possessed  of  land,  machinery,  raw 
material,  and  tihe  means  of  subsistent-e,  all  of  them,  save  laud  in  its  crude  state, 
the  products  of  labor,  and  on  the  otlier  hand,  a  set  of  sellers  who  have  nothing 
to  sell  except  their  laboring  power,  their  working  arms  and  brains?  That  the 
one  set  buys  continually  in  order  to  make  a  profit  and  enrich  themselves,  while 
the  other  set  continually  sells  in  order  to  earn  their  livelihood?  The  inquiry 
into  this  question  would  be  an  inquiry  into  what  the  economists  call  "Previous 
or  Original  Accumulation,"  but  which  ought  to  be  called  "Original  Expropria- 
tion." We  should  find  that  this  so-called  original  accumulation  means  nothing 
but  a  series  of  historical  processes,  resulting  in  a  decomposition  of  the  original 
union  existing  between  the  laboring  man  and  his  instruments  of  labor.  Such  an 
inquiry,  however,  lies  beyond  tlie  pale  of  my  present  subject.  The  separation 
between  the  man  of  labor  and  the  instmments  of  labor  once  established,  such 
a  state  of  things  will  maintain  itself  and  reproduce  itself  upon  a  constantly 
increasing  scale,  until  a  new  and  fundamental  revolution  in  the  mode  of  produc- 
tion should  again  overtprn  it,  and  restore  the  original  union  in  a  new  historical 
form. 

What,  then,  is  the  Value  of  Laboring  Power? 

Like  that  of  every  other  commodity,  its  value  is  determined  by  the  quantity 
of  labor  necessary  to  produce  it.  The  laboring  power  of  a  man  exists  only  ju  his 
living  individuality.  A  certain  mass  of  necessaries  must  be  consumed  by  a  man 
to  grow  up  and  maintain  his  life.  But  the  man,  like  the  machine,  will  wear  out, 
and  must  be  replaced  by  another  man.  Beside  the  mass  of  necessaries  required 
for  his  own  maintenance,  he  wants  another  amount  of  necessaries  to  bring  up  a 
certain  quota  of  children  that  are  to  replace  him  on  the  labor  market  and  to 
perpetuate  the  race  of  laborers.  Moreover,  to  develop  his  laboring  power,  and 
acquire  a  given  skill,  another  amount  of  values  must  be  spent.  For  our  purpose 
it  suffices  to  consider  only  average  labor,  the  costs  of  whose  education  and 
development  are  vanishing  magnitudes.  Still  I  must  seize  upon  this  occa.sion  to 
state  that,  as  the  costs  of  producing  laboring  powers  of  different  quality  differ, 
so  must  differ  the  values  of  the  laboring  powers  employed  in  different  trades. 
The  cry  for  an  equality  of  wages  rests,  therefore,  upon  a  mistake,  is  an  insane 
wish  never  to  be  fulfilled.  It  is  an  offspring  of  that  false  and  superficial  radi- 
calism that  accepts  premises  and  tries  to  evade  conclusions.  Upon  the  basis  of 
the  wages  system  the  value  of  laboring  power  is  settled  like  that  of  every  other 
commodity ;  and  as  different  kinds  of  laboring  power  have  different  values,  or 
require  different  quantities  of  labor  for  their  production,  they  must  fetch  dif- 
ferent prices  in  the  labor  market.    To  clamor  for  equal  or  even  equitable  retribu- 


UN-AJNIEUICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8775 

tion  on  the  basis  of  the  wages  ^system  is  the  same  as  to  clamor  for  freedom  on 
the  basis  of  the  slavery  system.  What  you  think  just  or  equitable  is  out  of  the 
question.  The  question  is:  What  is  necessary  and  unavoidable  with  a  given 
svstem  of  production? 

"  After  what  has  been  said,  it  will  be  seen  that  the  valur  of  lahor'mg  poircr  is 
detcrmimd  by  the  value  of  the  neeexmries  required  to  i)roduce,  develop,  nuiintain, 
and  perpetuate  the  laboring  power. 


Workers  School — Production  of  Surplus  Value 
(Value,  Price  and  Profit,  Ch.  8,  Essentials  of  Marx) 

Now  suppose  that  the  average  amount  of  the  daily  necessaries  of  a  laboring 
man  require  six  hours  of  average  labor  for  their  production.  Suppose,  more- 
over, six  hours  of  average  labor  to  be  also  realized  in  a  quantity  of  gold  equal 
to  3s.  Then  3s.  would  be  the  price,  or  the  monetary  expression  of  the  daily 
value  of  that  man's  laboring  power.  If  he  worked  daily  six  hours  he  would 
daily  produce  a  value  sufficient  to  buy  the  average  amount  of  his  daily  neces- 
saries, or  to  maintain  himself  as  a  laboring  man. 

But  our  man  is  a  wages  laborer.  He  must,  therefore,  sell  his  laboring  power  to 
a  capitalist.  If  he  sells  it  at  3s.  daily,  or  18s.  weekly,  he  sells  it  at  its  value. 
Suppose  him  to  be  a  spinner.  If  he  works  six  hours  daily  he  will  add  to  the 
cotton  a  value  of  3s.  daily.  This  value,  daily  added  by  him,  would  be  an  exact 
equivalent  for  the  wages,  or  the  price  of  his  laboring  ijower,  received  daily.  But 
in  that  case  no  surplus  value  or  surplus  produce  whatever  would  go  to  the 
capitalist.     Here,  then,  we  come  to  the  rub. 

In  buying  the  laboring  power  of  the  workman,  and  paying  its  value,  the  capi- 
talist, like  every  other  purchaser,  has  acquired  the  right  to  consume  or  use  the 
commodity  bought.  You  consume  or  use  the  laboring  power  of  a  man  by  making 
him  work,  as  you  consume  or  use  a  machine  by  making  it  run.  By  buying  the 
daily  or  weekly  value  of  the  laboring  power  of  the  workman,  the  capitalist  has, 
therefore,  acquired  the  right  to  use  or  make  that  laboring  power  work  during 
the  whole  day  or  week.  The  working  day  or  the  working  week  has,  of  course, 
certain  limits,  but  those  we  shall  afterwards  look  more  closely  at. 

For  the  present  I  want  to  turn  your  attention  to  one  decisive  point. 

The  value  of  the  laboring  power  is  determined  by  the  quantity  of  labor  neces- 
sary to  maintain  or  reproduce  it,  but  the  use  of  that  laboring  power  is  only 
limited  by  the  active  energies  and  physical  strength  of  the  laborer.  The  daily 
or  weekly  value  of  the  laboring  power  is  quite  distinct  from  the  daily  or  weekly 
exercise  of  that  power,  the  same  as  the  food  a  horse  wants  and  the  time  it  can 
carry  the  horseman  are  quite  distinct.  The  quantity  of  labor  by  which  the 
value  of  the  workman's  laboring  power  is  limited  forms  by  no  means  a  limit  to 
the  quantity  of  labor  which  his  laboring  power  is  apt  to  perform.  Take  the 
example  of  our  spinner.  We  have  seen  that,  to  daily  reproduce  his  laboring 
power,  he  must  daily  reproduce  a  value  of  three  shillings,  which  he  will  do  by 
working  six  hours  daily.  But  this  does  not  disable  him  from  working  ten  or 
twelve  or  more  hours  a  day.  But  by  paying  the  daily  or  weekly  value  of  the 
spinner's  laboring  power  the  capitalist  has  accpiired  the  right  of  using  that  labor- 
ing power  during  the  whole  day  or  week.  He  will,  therefore,  make  him  work 
say,  daily,  twelve  hours.  Over  and  above  the  six  hours  required  to  replace  his 
wages,  or  the  value  of  his  laboring  power,  he  will,  therefore,  have  to  work  six 
other  hours,  which  I  shall  call  hours  of  surplus  labor,  which  surplus  labor  will 
realize  itself  in  a  surplus  value  and  a  surplus  produce.  If  our  spinner,  for  ex- 
ample, by  his  daily  labor  of  six  hours,  added  three  shillings,  value  to  the 
cotton,  a  value  forming  an  exact  equivalent  to  his  wages,  he  will,  in  twelve 
hours,  add  six  shillings'  value  to  the  cottcm,  a  value  forming  an  exact  equivalent 
to  his  wages,  he  will,  in  twelve  hours,  add  six  shillings'  worth  to  the  cotton,  and 
produce  a  proportional  surplus  of  yarn.  As  he  has  sold  his  laboring  power  to 
the  capitalist,  the  whole  value  or  produce  created  by  him  belongs  to  the  capital- 
ist, the  owner  pro  tem.  of  his  laboring  ix)wer. 

By  advancing  three  shillings,  the  capitalist  will,  therefore,  realize  a  value 
of  six  sliillings,  because  advancing  a  value  in  which  six  hours  of  labor  are 
crystallized,  he  will  receive  in  return  a  value  of  six  shillings,  because,  ad- 
vancing a  value  in  which  six  hours  of  labor  are  crystallized,  he  will  receive 


g776  UN-AMEKICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

in  return  a  value  in  which  twelve  liours  of  labor  are  crystallized.  By  repeat- 
ing this  same  process  daily,  the  capitalist  will  daily  advance  three  shillings  and 
daily  pocket  six  shillings,  one  half  of  which  will  go  to  pay  wages  anew,  and 
the  other  half  of  which  will  form  surplus  value,  for  which  the  capitalist  pays 
no  equivalent.  It  is  this  sort  of  exchange  between  capital  and  labor  upon 
which  capitalistic  production,  or  the  wages  system,  is  founded,  and  which  must 
constantly  result  in  reproducing  the  workingman  as  a  workingman  and  the 
capitalist  as  a  capitalist. 

The  rate  of  surplus  value,  all  other  circumstances  remaining  the  same,  will 
depend  on  the  proportion  between  that  part  of  the  working  day  necessary  to 
reproduce  the  value  of  the  laboring  power  and  the  surplus  time  or  surplus 
labor  performed  for  the  capitalist.  It  will,  therefore,  depend  on  the  ratio  in 
which  the  working  day  is  prolonged  over  and  above  that  extent,  by  working 
which  the  workingman  would  only  reproduce  the  value  of  his  laboring  power, 
or  replace  his  wages. 

Workers  Scihooi. — Value  ok  Laboe 
(Value,  Price,  and  Profit,  ch.  9,  Essentials  of  Marx) 

We  must  now  return  to  the  expression,  "Value,  or  Price  of  Labor." 

We  have  seen  that,  in  fact,  it  is  only  the  value  of  the  laboring  power,  meas- 
ured by  the  values  of  commodities  necessary  for  its  maintenance.  But  since 
the  workman  receives  his  wages  after  his  lal)or  is  pei-formed,  and  knows,  more- 
over, that  what  he  actually  gives  to  the  capitalist  is  his  labor,  the  value  or 
price  of  his  laboring  power  necessarily  appears  to  him  as  the  price  or  value 
of  his  labor  itself.  If  the  price  of  his  laboring  power  is  three  shillings,  in 
which  six  hours  of  labor  are  realized,  and  if  he  works  twelve  hours,  he  neces- 
sarily considers  these  three  shillings  as  the  value  or  price  of  twelve  hours  of 
labor,  although  these  twelve  hours  of  labor  realize  themselves  in  a  value  of 
six  shillings.     A  double  consequence  flows  from  this. 

Firstly,  the  value  or  price  of  the  laboring  power  takes  the  semblance  of 
the  price  or  value  of  labor  itself,  although,  strictly  speaking,  value  and  price 
of  labor  are  senseless  terms. 

Secondly,  although  one  part  only  of  the  workman's  daily  labor  is  paid, 
while  the  other  part  is  unpaid,  and  while  the  unpaid  or  surplus  labor  con- 
stitutes exactly  the  fund  out  of  which  surplus  value  or  profit  is  formed,  it 
seems  as  if  the  aggregate  labor  was  paid  labor. 

This  false  appearance  distinguishes  wages  labor  from  other  historical 
forms  of  labor.  On  the  basis  of  the  wages  system  even  the  unpaid  labor  seenis 
to  be  paid  labor.  With  the  slave,  on  the  contrary,  even  that  part  of  his  labor 
which  is  paid  appears  to  be  unpaid.  Of  course,  in  order  to  work,  the  slave 
must  live,  and  one  part  of  his  working  day  goes  to  replace  the  value  of  his 
own  maintenance.  But  since  no  bargain  is  struck  between  him  and  his  mas- 
ter, and  no  acts  of  selling  and  buying  are  going  on  between  the  two  parties, 
all  his  labor  seems  to  be  given  away  for  nothing. 

Take,  on  the  other  hand,  the  peasant  serf,  such  as  he,  I  might  say,  until  yester- 
day existed  in  the  whole  East  of  Europe.  This  peasant  worked,  for  example,  three 
days  for  himself  on  his  own  field  or  the  field  allotted  to  him,  and  the  three  subse- 
quent days  he  performed  compulsory  and  gratuitous  labor  on  the  estate  of  his 
lord.  Here,  then,  the  paid  and  unpaid  parts  of  labor  were  sensibly  separated, 
separated  in  time  and  space;  and  our  Liberals  overfiowed  with  moral  indignation 
at  the  preposterous  notion  of  making  a  man  work  for  nothing. 

In  point  of  fact,  however,  whether  a  man  works  three  days  of  the  week  for 
himself  on  his  own  field  and  three  days  for  nothing  on  the  estate  of  his  lord,  or 
whether  he  works  in  the  factory  or  the  workshop  six  hours  daily  for  himself  and 
six  for  his  employer  comes  to  the  same,  although  in  the  latter  case  the  paid  and 
unpaid  portions  of  the  labor  are  inseparably  mixed  up  with  each  other,  and  the 
nature  of  the  whole  transaction  is  completely  masked  by  the  intervention  of  a 
contract  and  the  pay  received  at  the  end  of  the  week.  The  gratuitous  labor 
appears  to  be  voluntarily  given  in  the  one  instance,  and  to  be  compulsory  in  the 
other.     That  makes  all  the  difference. 

In  using  the  word  "value  of  labor,"  I  shall  only  use  it  as  a  popular  slang  term 
for  "value  of  laboring  power." 


UN-AMKKICAN   PROl'.UJANJtA  ACTIVITIES  8777 

WoBKERS  School — Profit  Is  Madk  by  Sixlixg  a  Commodity  ai  Its  Valvk 
(Value,  Price  aiid  Profit,  Ch.  X,  Essentials  of  Marx) 

Suppose  an  average  liour  of  laboi-  to  l)e  realized  in  a  value  equal  to  >;ixpence,  or 
twelve  avera.t;L'  hours df  lalior  to  be  ivalized  in  six  sliillings.  Suppose,  further,  the 
value  of  labor  to  be  three  shillings  or  tlie  produce  of  six  hours'  lalior.  If,  then,  iu 
the  raw  material,  machinery,  and  so  forth,  used  up  in  a  commodity,  twenty-four 
hours  of  average  labor  were  realized,  its  value  would  amount  to  twelve  shillings. 
If.  moreover,  rhe  workman  employed  by  the  capitalist  added  twelve  hours  of  labor 
to  those  means  of  production,  these  twelve  hours  would  be  realized  in  an  additional 
value  of  six  shillings.  The  total  value  of  the  product  would,  therefore,  amount  to 
thirty-six  hours  of  realized  labor,  and  be  equal  to  eighteen  shillings.  But  as  the 
value  of  labor,  or  the  wages  paid  to  the  workman,  would  be  three  shillings  only, 
no  equivalent  would  have  been  paid  by  the  capitalist  for  the  six  hours  of  surplus 
labor  worked  by  the  workman,  and  realized  iu  the  value  of  the  commodity.  By 
selling  this  commodity  at  its  value  for  eighteen  shillings,  the  capitalist  would, 
therefore,  realize  a  value  of  three  shillings,  for  wl'iich  he  had  paid  no  equivalent. 
These  three  shillings  would  constitute  the  surplus  value  or  profit  pocketed  by  him. 
The  capitalist  would  consequently  realize  the  profit  of  three  shillings,  not  by 
selling  his  commodity  at  a  pi-ice  over  and  above  its  value,  but  by  selling  it  at  its 
real  value. 

The  value  of  a  commodity  is  determined  by  the  total  quantity  of  labor  con- 
tained in  it.  But  part  of  that  quantity  of  labor  is  realized  in  a  value,  for 
which  no  equivalent  has  been  paid.  Part  of  the  labor  contained  in  the  com- 
modity is  paid  labor;  part  is  unpaid  labor.  By  selling,  therefore,  the  com- 
modity at  its  value,  that  is,  as  the  crystallization  of  the  total  quantity  of  labor 
bestowed  upon  it,  the  capitalist  must  necessarily  sell  it  at  a  profit.  He  sells 
not  only  what  has  cost  him  an  equivalent,  but  he  sells  also  what  has  cost  him 
nothing',  although  it  has  cost  his  workman  labor.  The  cost  of  the  commodity 
to  the  capitalist  and  its  real  cost  are  different  things.  I  repeat,  therefore,  that 
normal  and  average  profits  are  made  by  selling  commodities  not  above,  but  at 
their  real  values. 

Workers  School — Political  Economy-A 
(Introductory  Lecture  by  Instructor  at  the  First  Session) 

WHAT  political  ECONOMY  IS  AND  WHAT  IT  TEACHES 

Before  we  go  into  a  detailed  study  of  the  problems  dealt  with  in  Political 
Economy  it  is  necessary  to  explain  what  the  scope  of  political  economy  is.  It 
is  self-evident  that  a  full  understanding  of  the  meaning  of  political  economy 
will  be  gotten  only  after  some  of  the  basic  problems  of  political  economy  have 
been  studied.     At  present  we  shall  deal  with  the  subject  only  in  a  general  way. 

PRODUCTIVE  FORCES   AND  PRODUCTIVE  RELATIONS  IN   SOCIETY 

The  basis  of  every  society  including  tlie  capitalist  society  is  the  production 
of  the  means  of  existence.     The  productive  process  is  a  social  process. 

"The  individual  and  isolated  hunter  and  fisher,  who  forms  the  starting  point 
with  Ricardo  and  Smith,  belongs  to  the  insipid  illusions  of  the  eighteenth  ceu- 
^j.y  *  *  *  Production  by  isolated  individuals  out.side  of  society — something 
which  might  happen  as  an  exception  to  a  civilized  man  who  by  accident  got 
into  the  wilderness  and  already  dynamically  possessed  within  himself  the  forces 
of  society — is  as  great  an  absurdity  as  the  idea  of  development  of  language 
without  individuals  living  together  and  talking  to  one  another." — Karl  Marx— 
"A  Ojntributi(m  to  the  Critique  of  Political  Economy,"  Introduction. 

Thus  Marx  emphasized  that  materi;il  production,  the  basis  in  every  historical 
epoch,  is  social  production.  It  constitutes  the  basis  for  human  existence  and  for 
social  life  in  all  epochs  of  history. 

However,  the  conditions  under  which  production  takes  place  are  not  the 
same  in  all  historical  epochs.  The  character  of  production  in  one  epoch  differs 
from  that  of  another  epoch. 


gyyg  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

"From  the  bow  and  arrow,  from  the  stone  knife  and  the  exceptional  and 
occasional  trading  intercourse  of  the  barbarian  to  the  steam  engine  with  its 
thousands  of  horse  power,  to  the  mechanical  weaving  machine,  to  the  railway 
and  the  Bank  of  England  is  a  tremendous  leap"— "Anti  Duehring"  D.  176). 

The  technique  in  the  particular  epoch  indicates  the  level  of  the  development 
of  those  means  and  instruments  of  production  with  which  man  consciously  acts 
upon  the  external  world.  The  economic  activities  of  men  in  every  epoch  are 
based  upon  the  specific  level  of  the  development  of  technique  and  culture,  i.  e., 
on  the  productive  forces  in  society.  The  productive  forces  include  the  means 
and  instruments  of  production  as  well  as  human  labor  power  in  a  given  society. 
The  level  of  the  development  of  productive  forces  reflects  the  degree  of  the 
development  reached  by  society  in  its  struggle  with  nature.  The  development 
of  the  productive  forces  in  society  constitutes  the  basis  of  the  develooment  of 
that  society. 

The  character  of  production  I'elations,  the  character  of  those  relations  among 
human  beings  which  are  formed  in  the  process  of  social  production,  depends  on 
the  level  of  development  of  the  productive  forces. 

"In  the  social  production  which  men  carry  on,"  says  Marx,  "they  enter  into 
definite  relations  that  are  indispensable  and  independent  of  their  will ;  these 
relations  of  production  correspond  to  a  definite  stage  of  development  of  their 
material  power  of  production.  The  sum  total  of  these  relations  of  production 
constitutes  the  economic  structure  of  society — the  real  foundation  on  which  rise 
legal  and  political  .superstructures  and  to  which  correspond  definite  forms  of 
social  consciousness." — Karl  Marx,  Critique  of  Political  Economy — Author's 
Preface. 

Hence,  the  productive  forces  do  not  represent  something  immutable,  frozen. 
Together  with  the  development  of  the  productive  forces  there  takes  place  a 
change  in  the  sum  total  of  the  production  relations,  or,  in  other  words,  in  the 
economic  structure  of  society. 

The  study  of  the  productive  forces  of  society,  the  study  of  how  human  labor, 
with  the  aid  of  various  means  of  production,  acts  on  the  external  world  in  order 
to  obtain  the  necessary  material  welfare  for  society,  belongs  to  the  domain  of 
technical  science.  The  subject  of  political  economy  is  not  the  technique  of  the 
economic  process  but  the  sum  total  of  all  the  production  relations  formed  among 
men  in  the  process  of  production. 

As  we  shall  see  later,  not  all  the  production  relations  are  the  subject  of  political 
economy,  but  production  relations  of  a  specific  type. 

All  economic  structures,  all  types  of  economy,  can  be  reduced  to  two  basic 
categories :  organized  and  unorganized. 

Of  the  organized  types  of  economy  we  have:  the  primitive  communal  tribe, 
the  feudal  manor,  and  also  the  future  communist  society. 

Of  the  unorganized  types  of  economy — we  have — the  exchange  economy  (simply 
commodity  and  the  capitalist  economy). 

In  the  following  paragraphs  we  shall  make  a  brief  observation  of  both  types 
of  economics. 

PRODUCTION   RELATIONS   IN   AN   ORGANIZED   TYPE  OF  ECONOMY 

If  we  take  the  primitive  commune  we  find  there  the  following  characteristic 
features :  First  of  all  there  is  the  common  ownership  of  the  means  of  production, 
the  production  and  distribution  of  products  in  common.  Social  production  and 
distribution  are  carried  on  according  to  a  conscious  definite  plan.  Here  we  have 
an  organized  human  group  on  a  collective  basis  where  the  functions  of  each 
member  are  definitely  regulated.  The  commune  under  the  leadership  of  the 
organizer  or  the  patriarch  determines  the  extent  of  its  production,  a.s  for 
example,  the  amount  of  food,  clothing,  implements,  etc.,  and  organizes  common 
labor  in  accordance  with  the  needs  of  the  commune.  Every  member  of  the 
commune  fulfills  a  certain  .social  function;  one  ploughs,  the  other  hunts,  the 
third  care  for  the  cattle,  etc.  In  such  society  exchange,  buying  and  selling  bias 
no  place.  Therefore  in  political  economy  such  type  of  society  is  known  as  a 
NATiTBAT.  economv.  If  exchange  of  certain  articles  takes  place  in  this  society,  it 
is  as  a  rule  accidental  and  occurs  not  within  the  commune  but  between  two 
separate  communes.  Only  later,  exchange  begins  to  penetrate  into  the  commune 
Itself,  when  the  forces  of  production  reach  a  higher  stage  of  development ;  this 
causes  disintegration  of  the  natural  character  of  the  economy  and  together  with 
it  the  breaking  up  of  the  commune  itself. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8779 

The  future  Coiumuuist  society  will  be  an  organized  economy  with  a  definite 
planned  production  and  distribution.  It  must  be  understood  that  there  will  be 
a  colossal  difference  between  the  future  Communist  society  and  the  primitive 
comnumes,  since  the  future  Communist  society  will  be  a  highly  organized,  com- 
plex structure  with  a  very  high  d(>gree  of  the  development  of  the  productive 
forces. 

Already  in  the  Soviet  Union  we  find  features  of  the  future  Communist  society. 
The  present  economy  in  the  Soviet  Union  is  a  transition  economy  between  cap- 
italism and  ciimnmnism.  In  the  Soviet  Union  private  ownership  and  control  of 
the  means  of  production  has  been  abolished  almost  completely.  The  prototypes 
of  tlie  fiiture  planning  organs  are  the  Covernment  Planning  Connnissiou,  the 
Central  Statistical  Bureau,  and  the  Supreme  Council  of  Economy.  With  the  aid 
of  these  institutions  the  working  class  in  the  Soviet  Union,  through  its  govern- 
ment, regulates  production  and  distribution,  takes  account  of  the  productive 
forces,  the  means  of  production  and  the  labor  power,  distributes  them  in  ac- 
cordance with  the  needs  of  the  basic  industries,  and  carries  on  its  economy  on  a 
definite  planned  basis  (First  and  Second  Five  Year  Plans). 

It  is  obvious  that  this  is  only  a  beginning;  that  it  is,  so  to  speak,  the  first 
phase  of  the  construction  of  conununism;  this  is  a  phase  where  there  are  still 
present  private  commodity  producers,  where  there  are  still  renuiants  of  even 
natural  economy,  where  all  elements  of  capitalist  economy  in. the  city  and  village 
have  not  been  destroyed,  where  there  is  still  a  sharp  struggle  going  on  between 
the  Socialist  forces  and  capitalist  elements.  Through  the  successful  completion 
of  the  First  Five  Year  Phiii  the  Socialist  forces  have  had  a  teremendous  victory 
over  the  capitalist  elements  and  thus  the  hegemony  of  the  working  class  and  its 
planned  economy  have  been  definitely  consolidated  in  the  Soviet  Union.  With 
the  introduction  of  the  Second  Five  Year  Plan  begins  the  stage  of  Socialism,  the 
period  of  a  classless  society. 

The  organized  types  of  economy  are  not  the  object  of  stiidy  in  political  econ- 
omy. The  production  relations  in  such  society  are  quite  clear  and  obvious  to 
everyone.  It  is,  luiwever,  entirely  different  with  the  unorganized  type  of  econ- 
omy. Here  production  relations  are  very  much  complicated ;  this  will  be  the 
object  of  our  study. 

JOSCHANGE  ECONOMY — SIMPLE   COMMODITY    AND    CAPTPAU.ST   ECONOMY 

Exchange  economy  includes  the  simple  connnodity  economy  as  well  as  the 
capitalist  economy.  In  order  to  clarify  the  basic  features  of  the  exchange  econ- 
omy we  shall  abstract  ourselves  from  the  special  features  typical  of  the  capitalist 
mod<>  of  production  (capitalist  exploitation,  wage  labor,  etc. )  and  concentrate  our 
attention,  for  the  time  being,  on  simple  commodity  production,  the  study  of 
which  will  aid  us  in  understanding  the  characteristics  of  the  more  developed, 
complex  commodity  economy — the  capitalist  economy. 

What  are  then  the  features  of  simple  connnodity  economy?  First,  in  simple 
connnodity  economy,  in  contradistinction  to  the  primitive  communes  and  the 
future  connnunist  society,  there  exists  private  individual  ownership  of  the  means 
of  production  and  of  the  products  of  labor.  Here  the  means  of  production  and 
laltor  iK)wer  are  not  yet  separated  one  from  the  other,  as  is  the  case  in  the 
cajiitalist  .society,  and  they  do  not  stand  in  opposition  to  each  other.  The  pro- 
ducer, flu?  owner  of  the  means  of  production,  produces  articles  not  for  his 
personal  u.se,  but  for  sale,  all  products  necessary  for  himself  he  obtains  on  the 
market,  where  he  purchases  them  from  other  producers. 

Secondly,  in  such  a  .society  there  exists  already  a  more  or  less  developed  social 
division  of  labor  between  the  individual  connnodity  producers.  In  the  organ- 
ized natural  economy  the  members  of  the  society  own  the  means  of  production 
in  connuon,  they  produce  and  distribute  the  products  of  their  labor  in  common; 
in  a  simple  commodity  economy  the  situation  is  entirely  different.  Each  pro- 
ducer ])ro(iuces  a  definite  kind  of  product. 

In  each  individual  enterprise,  in  a  shop  or  in  agricultural  economy,  where 
products  are  produced  for  the  market,  tliere  exists  organized  technical  divi- 
sion of  labor,  according  to  a  definite  plan.  But  a  general  economy  plan  in 
such  .society  does  not  exist;  there  is  absent  a  social  organ  which  could  con- 
sciously and  systematically  regulate  production  and  distribution.  Here  every 
commodity  producer  produces  on  his  own  risk.  In  such  society  none  of  the 
producers  knows  beforehand  what  the  market  requires,  how  much  of  one  or 
the  other  commodity  is  required,  what  quality,  in  what  manner,  etc. 


8780  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Consequeutly,  in  such  a  society  Anarchy  of  Production  dominates.  This 
anarchy  of  production  is  the  consequence  of  private  ownership  of  the  means 
of  production  and  of  the  unorganized,  spontaneous  social  division  of  laboi*. 

The  special  features  of  the  division  of  labor  in  an  organized  and  unorgan- 
ized economy  are  characterized  by  Marx  as  follows :  "In  the  primitive  Indian 
community  there  is  social  division  of  labor,  but  the  products  do  not  become 
commodities.  Or,  to  take  an  example  nearer  home,  in  every  factory  the  labor 
Is  divided  according  to  a  system,  but  this  division  is  not  brought  about  by 
the  operatives  mutually  exchanging  their  individual  products.  Only  such 
products  can  become  commodities  with  regard  to  each  other,  as  a  result  from 
different  kinds  of  labor,  each  kind  being  carried  on  independently  and  for 
the  account  of  private  individuals." — (Marx,  Capital,  Vol.  I,  page  49,  Kerr  ed.). 

In  an  organized  society  the  labor  activities  of  its  members  are  regulated 
in  a  conscious  planned  manner,  while  in  an  unorganized  society,  in  a  com- 
modity economy,  such  regulating  is  accomplished  by  exchange,  by  the  market. 
Here  each  producer  comes  into  contact  wnth  the  other  only  through  the  market, 
through  the  exchange  of  the  products  of  their  labor— through  the  commodities. 

Productive   relations   between   men   in   a   commodity    society    are   not   estab- 
lished directly,  as  is  the  case  in  an  organized  society  or  in  an  individual  plant 
(factory,    mill,    etc.)    they    are   formed    spontaneously,    indirectly    through    the 
medium  of  things,  commodities. 

"In  order  that  these  objects  may  enter  into  relation  with  each  other  as 
commodities,  the  guardians  of  the  commodities  must  enter  into  relation  one 
with  another  as  persons  whose  wills  reside  in  these  objects,  and  must  behave 
in  such  a  way  that  neither  appropriates  the  commodity  of  the  other,  nor 
parts  with  his  own,  except  by  means  of  an  act  performed  with  mutual  con- 
sent."—  (Marx,  Capital,  Vol.  I,  page  5^6,  Kerr  ed.) 

It  is  necessiiry  to  note  that  simple  commodity  economy  in  its  pure  form 
did  not  exist  historically.  It  existed  within  other  forms  of  society  (for 
example — feudalism).  Even  at  the  present  time  we  have  remnants  of  the 
precapitalist  elements  in  the  persons  of  the  artisans,  handicraftsmen  who  pro- 
duce articles  for  the  market  with  their  own  tools. 

It  is  understood  that  the  economic  role  they  play  in  society  is  very  much 
subordinated  to  the  capitalist  relations  in  a  capitalist  society  and  to  the  social- 
ist relations  in  the  Soviet  Union. 

Simple  commodity  economy,  i.  e.,  the  economy  of  simple  independent  com- 
modity producers,  appears  as  the  simplest  and  general  type  of  exchange  econ- 
omy. In  its  historical  development  it  disintegrates  the  relations  of  the  natural 
economy,  and  in  its  turn,  under  the  influence  of  the  development  of  the 
productive  forces,  becomes  gradually  more  complex  and  is  transformed  into 
capitalist  economy. 

At  one  pole  there  is  formed  a  comparatively  small  group  increasing  its  economic 
power,  concentrating  in  its  hands  more  and  more  of  the  instruments  and  means  of 
production,  thus  becoming  transformed  into  capitalists  using  wage  labor;  at  the 
other  pole  we  find  the  basic  mass  of  producers,  who  in  the  process  of  the  develop- 
ment of  exchange  become  gradually  ruined,  are  separated  from  the  basic  means  of 
production  and  are  transformed  into  wage  laborers,  who  own  nothing  but  their 
labor  power  which  they  sell  to  the  owners  of  the  means  of  production — to  the 
capitalists. 

The  owners  of  the  means  of  production  and  the  owners  of  the  labor  power  stand 
in  opposition  to  each  other  as  two  hostile  classes ;  the  capitalist  class  and  the  pro- 
letarian class.  The  exploitation  of  wage  labor  by  capital  is  the  most  outstanding 
characteristic  of  the  capitalist  society. 

Exploitation  of  labor  existed  also  in  the  precapitalist  epochs,  for  example  in 
feudalism  and  in  the  slave  system,  but  the  exploitation  was  clear  and  obvious  to 
everyone.  It  is  different  with  the  capitalist  exploitation.  Apparently,  it  seems 
(and  this  is  supported  by  bourgeois  economists),  that  wages  are  payment  for 
labor  and  not  for  labor  power  as  we  shall  see  later.  But  if  the  worker  receives 
payment  for  his  labor,  if  he  works,  let  us  say,  ten  hours  a  day  and  receives  a  pay- 
ment equivalent  to  the  value  created  by  his  labor,  the  possibility  tV)r  exploitation 
disappears.  On  the  surface  these  relations  between  the  capitalist  and  the  worker 
appear  as  the  movem(>nt  of  things,  as  the  exchange  of  the  commodity  labor  power 
for  a  definite  sum  of  money.  But  in  order  to  discover  the  real  relations  under  the 
external  wrapping,  it  is  necessary  to  arm  oneself  with  the  Marxian  theory. 


IX-A.MEKICAN   I'UOL'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8781 

PROOnCTIOX    DELATION   IN  CAPITALIST   SOCIETY  AS   THK  DIRECT  OBJECT  OF  STTJUY  OF 

POLITTCAL  ECONOMY 

As  we  stated  above,  in  a  commodity  economy  production  relations  are  not  estab- 
lislied  directly;  tliey  are  formed  Indirectly  through  the  medium  of  things — com- 
modities. The  individual  conmiodity  iirediicers^  are  not  connected  with  each  other 
directly.  Each  one  carries  on  production  independently,  at  his  own  risk.  The 
connecting  link  between  the  producers  is  established  in  the  process  of  exchange  of 
the  products  of  their  labor.  Thus,  the  production  relations  in  a  commodity  econ- 
omy are  hidden  behind  the  movement  of  the  commodities  on  the  market. 

The  prdbleni  of  pdlitical  economy  is  to  expose  the  production  relations,  to  clarify 
the  laws  governing  the  capitalist  economy.  We,  therefore,  can  dt  fiae  political 
economy  as  tlie  science  of  Production  Relations  in  the  Capitalist  Society. 

Bourgeois  political  economy  regards  the  capitalist  society  as  something  eternal 
and  immutable.  It  considers  the  commodity  form  of  the  product,  value,  money, 
etc.,  as  natural  qualities  of  the  thing  rather  than  the  result  and  expression  of 
sju'citic  social  relations  of  a  commodity  economy.  Capital,  for  example,  is  looked 
upon  not  as  a  social  relation  peculiar  to  a  definite  economic  form  of  society,  but  as 
something  which  is  independent  of  the  character  of  the  socio-economic  system. 
Thus,  bourgeois  political  economy  defines  capital  as  the  means  of  production.  But 
if  capital  is  nothing  else  but  the  means  of  production,  it  follows,  therefore,  that 
capital  (the  capitalist  system,  capitalist  exploitation)  was  and  will  be  forever, 
and  that  things  cannot  be  otherwise. 

Marxian  political  economy,  on  the  other  hand,  exposes  the  real  substance  of  the 
capitalist  system,  uncovers  its  inherent  contradictions  and  points  to  its  historically 
transitional  character.  In  imcovering  the  laws  of  the  origin,  development,  and 
the  downfall  of  capitalism,  political  economy  gives  to  the  working  class  a  mighty 
weapon  in  its  struggle  for  the  destruction  of  the  capitalist  system  of  society. 

CONTROL    QVESTIONS 

1.  What  are  the  distinguishing  characteristics  of  an  organized  economy?     How 

are  production  and  distribution  organized  in  such  a  society? 

2.  Why  does  political  economy  study  only  the  commodity-capitalist  economy? 

3.  Discuss    the   differences   between    the    simple   commodity    economy   and    the 

capitalist  economy. 

4.  What  are  the  characteristic  features  of  the  capitalist  economy? 

5.  Why    does    not    political    economy    study    the    production    relations    in    an 

organized  economy? 

6.  What  is  the  significance  of  political  economy  for  the  class  struggle  of  the 

Ijroletariat? 

7.  What  is  political  economy? 

Workers  School — Political  Economy  A 

FIRST    session — INTRODUCTORY COMMODITY 

1.  How  do  we  produce  the  things  we  live  on  (bread,  meat,  milk,  sugar, 
coffee,  clothing,  shoes,  light,  fuel,  rooms)? 

2.  Why  is  production  always  a  social  process? 

(Consider  production  by  primitive  tribes — under  slavery,  feudalism,  serf- 
dom— in  colonial  times,  at  present^for  colonial  times  use  attached  readings ; 
compare  production  of  pair  of  shoes  by  farmer's  family,  of  skins,  of  cattle, 
killed  and  tanned  by  themselves,  by  itinerant  journeyman,  neighborhood 
cobbler,  shoe  factory.) 

3.  What  are  Production  Forces — object  of  labor,  labor  power,  means  of  pro- 
duction? Explain  their  interdependence  and  nmtual  effect  of  changes  of  one 
upon  another.  Give  some  idea  of  pi-esent  productive  forces  of  the  United 
States;  U.  S.  S.  R.  Improved  land,  area  of  harvested  crops,  natural  resources, 
forest  reserves,  gainfully  employed  population,  number  of  wage  earners  in 
manufacture  and  mines,  number  of  farmers  and  farm  laborers,  mechanical 
horsex)ower,  electric  power  installations.  (Commerce  Yearbook,  1932,  V.  1,  pp. 
30,  31,  36,  37,  132,  214,  306,  325.)  (Economic  Handbook  of  the  Soviet  Union, 
pp.  11,  1-12,  145.) 

4.  What  are  production  relationships f 


3732  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

What  is  your  relationship  to  the  forces  of  production,  object  of  labor,  labor 
power,  means  of  production?  What  is  the  relationship  of  your  employer  to 
the  forces  of  production?    Is  there  any  difference? 

5.  Does  the  difference  in  the  relationship  (of  yourself,  your  employers,  etc.) 
to  the  forces  of  production  affect  the  way  and  the  share  you  get  of  the  things 
we  live  on?     (Discuss  the  census  of  Mfrs.  Commerce  Yearbook,  V.  1,  p.  41.) 

6.  Compare  production  relationship  under  present  capitalist  mode  of  pro- 
duction, in  primitive  tribe,  under  slavery,  serfdom,  etc. 

7.  What  is  Political  Economy? 

8.  Why  do  the  farmers  produce  more  agricultural  products  than  they  con- 
sume? What  value  has  that  surplus  to  them?  (Discuss  attached  table  on 
agricultural  and  farmers'  income  in  the  United  States.) 

9.  What  is  use  value,  and  what  is  exchange  value?  Is  there  any  exchange 
value  that  is  not  also  use  value?  Is  there  any  use  value  that  is  not  also 
exchange  value? 

10.  What  is  a  commodity? 

Discuss  contradictory  nature  of  commodity.  (Discuss  attached  readings  on 
conditions.) 

READINGS 

Marxist  Study  Course  in  Political  Economy,  Lesson  1,  p.  1&-32. 
Value  and  Labor,  material  mimeographed  by  Workers  School,  p.  1-15. 
Lenin,  The  Teaching.s  of  Karl  Marx,  p.  18-20.    Attached  readings. 


Workers'  School — Re^amngs  for  Political  Economy  A — Fikst  Session 

USE  VALUE  AND  EXCHANGE  VALUE  ;  FORMS  OF  VALUE;  RELATIVE  AND  EQUIVALENT  l-XyRM 
OF  VALUE ;  EXTENDED  FORM  OF  VALUE  ;  UNIVtiRSAL  FORM  OF  VALUE  ;  MONEY  FORM  OF 
VALUE 

Source:  Manufacture  for  Sale  1775 — by  the  author  of  American  Husbandry, 
Period  1775. 

"Nothing  is  more  diflScult  than  to  discover  the  amount  of  their  manufactures 
for  sale.     *     *     * 

"That  the  manufactures  for  sale  are  not  so  great  as  some  have  imagined,  may 
be  conceived  from  the  vast  number  of  inhabitants,  who  in  all  probability  work 
entirely  for  themselves,  in  a  country  where  the  minute  division  of  landed  property 
iy  so  great  as  in  the  most  populated  of  the  northern  colonies,  and  in  a  climate  that 
will  yield  little  valuable,  it  is  impossible  that  the  people  should  be  able  to  purchase 
manufactures;  poor  countrymen  in  England  do  it  because  all  their  income  is  paid 
tiiem  in  money,  whatever  may  be  their  work:  but  in  America  day  laborer.s  are 
rarely  to  be  found,  except  in  the  neighboi'hood  f)f  great  towns ;  on  the  contrary, 
the  man  who  in  England  would  be  a  laborer,  would  there  be  a  little  freeholder, 
who,  probably  raising  for  many  years  but  little  for  sale,  i^^  forced  to  work  up 
his  wool  in  his  family,  his  leather,  and  his  flax,  after  which,  the  rest  of  his 
consumption  is  scare  worth  mentioning.  The  number  of  people  in  the  northern 
colonies  who  come  under  this  denomination  is  very  great. 

"This  is  productive  of  distressing  incidents  to  small  farmers  who  supply  the 
markets  with  ijrovisions;  for  whatever  they  have  to  sell,  whether  trivial  or 
important,  they  receive  in  return  nothing  but  an  order  on  store  for  the  value  in 
goods;  and  as  the  wants  of  such  persons  are  few,  they  seldom  know  what  articles 
to  take.  The  storekeepers  turn  these  circumstances  to  advantage,  and  fre- 
quently force  on  the  customer  a  thing  f(n-  which  he  has  no  use ;  or  what  is  worse, 
when  the  order  is  trifling,  tell  him  to  sit  d()wn  at  the  door  and  drink  the  amount, 
if  he  chooses.  As  this  is  often  complied  with,  a  market  day  is  mostly  a  scene 
of  drunkenness  and  contention,  fraud,  cunning,  and  duplicity :  storekeepers  deny- 
ing the  possession  of  a  good  article  till  he  fails  in  imposing  a  bad  one.  I  have 
known  a  person  to  ask  for  a  pair  of  shoes  and  receive  for  answer  tliat  there  were 
no  shoes  in  the  store,  but  some  capital  gin  that  could  be  reconmiended  to  him. 
I  have  heard  another  ask  for  a  rifle  gun,  and  be  answered  that  there  were  no 
rifles  but  that  he  could  be  accommodated  with  the  best  Dut<'h  looking  glasses 
and  German  flutes  in  the  western  country.  Another  was  directed  l\v  his  wife  to 
bring  her  a  warming  pan,  smoothing  irons,  and  scrul)bing  brushes  ;  but  these  w(>re 
denietl.  and  a  wooden  cuckoo-clock  which  tlie  children  would  not  take  a  week 
to  demolish  was  sent  home  in  their  stead.     I  could  not  help  smiling  at  these 


UN-AMERICAN   PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8783 

Jibsiirclitit'S,  tlunisli  I  bt'liove  tlioy  deserve  the  name  of  imi)ositioiis,  till  an  ineideut 
reduced  me  to  the  condition  of  those  whom  I  have  just  describeil. 

"I  rode  an  excellent  horse  to  the  head  of  the  waters,  and  linding  him  of  no 
further  use  from  my  havinji  to  take  a  boat  there,  I  proposed  selling  him  to  the 
best  bidder.  I  was  offered  in  exchange  for  him  salt,  flour,  hogs,  land,  casi 
iron  salt  pans,  Indian  corn  whiskey,  in  short,  everything  but  what  I  wanted, 
which  was  money.  The  highest  offer  made  was  cast-iron  salt  pans  to  the  amount 
of  a  hundred  and  tliirty  dollars.  I  asked  the  proprietor  of  this  heavy  commodity 
how  much  cash  he  would  allow  me  instead  of  such  an  incumbrance;  his  answer 
was,  without  any  shame  or  hesitation,  forty  dollars  at  most.  I  preferred  the 
jmns,  though  they  are  to  be  exchanged  again  for  glass  bottles  at  Pittsburgh, 
tobacco  or  hemp  in  Kentucky,  and  dollars  in  New  Orleans.  These  various  com- 
}nercial  processes  may  occupy  twelve  months ;  nor  am  I  then  certain  of  the 
amount,  unless  I  give  30%  to  secure  it. 

"The  words  buy  and  .'^ell  are  nearly  unknown  here ;  in  business  nothing  is 
heard  but  the  word  trade.  Will  you  trade  your  watch,  your  gun,  pistols,  horses 
means,  'will  you  exchange  your  A\'atch,  gun  for  corn,  pigs,  cattle,  Indian  meal, 
etc.  But  you  must  anticipate  all  this  from  the  absence  of  money.'  "  Prepared  by 
Seminar  in  IVIarxian  Economics. 


Workers  School — Political  Economy  A — Rkadings  for  First  Session 

USE   VALUE  AND   EXCHANGE  VALUE.       COMMODITY.      FAMILY    (DOMESTIC)    PRODUCTION: 

FACTORY  OR  CAPITALIST  PRODUCTION 

Source:  Industrial  and  Commercial  Correspondence  of  Hamilton,  p.  3-7. 

Data  :  Letter  from  Col.  John  Chester,  re  Manufacturers  in  Connecticut.  Period 
1790. 

"The  manufactures  of  this  State  naturally  present  themselves  to  our  view 
under  the  following  heads :  Those  carried  on  in  families  merely  for  the  consump- 
tion of  those  families;  those  carried  on  in  like  manner  for  the  purpose  of  barter 
or  sale;  and  those  carried  on  by  tradesmen,  single  persons,  or  companies  for 
supplying  the  wants  of  others,  or  for  the  general  purposes  of  merchandise,  or 
commerce. 

"Those  which  come  under  the  first  description,  and  which  are  purely  domestic, 
are  the  most  exclusive  and  important,  there  being  scarcely  a  family  in  the 
state  either  so  rich  or  so  poor  as  not  to  be  concerned  therein.  These  domestic 
Manufacturers  are  of  Linen,  of  Cotton,  and  of  Wool,  in  their  various  modifications. 
Out  of  those  raw  materials  are  made  an  abundance  of  Linen,  Cotton,  Woolen, 
and  Worsted  Hose,  worn  by  all  ranks  of  people,  so  as  greatly  to  lessen  the 
Importation,  particularly  of  the  more  ordinary  kinds,  notwithstanding  our 
increased  population  and  wealth  has  greatly  increased  the  consumption  of  those 
articles.  Next  to  those  branches  may  be  reckoned  those  of  tow  cloth,  coarse  linens, 
linen  and  cotton  for  shirting  and  sheeting,  table  linen,  checked  and  striped  linens, 
and  bedticks;  also  coarse  fustians  and  jeans  for  men's  wear,  and  white  dimity 
of  the  women.  The  manufacture  of  Wool  is  of  various  kinds  of  cloth  for  servants 
and  the  ordinary  wear  of  the  whole  class  of  our  fanners  and  most  of  those 
who  follow  any  of  the  usual  trades  or  laborious  occupations    *    *    *_ 

"There  is  manufacturtd  also  large  parcels  of  almost  all  the  denominations 
aforerecited  for  the  purpose  of  barter,  or  sale  to  the  merchants,  who  export  them 
out  of  the  Stat(» — within  these  few  years  attempts  have  been  made  to  extend  our 
manufactures,  and  for  imv)roving  the  fabrics.  This  has  been  attempted  either 
by  single  persons  or  by  companies,  with  various  success.  Of  this  description  is 
the  Linen  manufacture  estalilislied  at  New  Ilavcn.  from  whence  large  parcels  of 
coarse  LiiKMis  have  been  shipp<'d  to  the  Southern  States  and  to  the  West  Indies. 
The  same  kind  of  manufacttire  has  more  recentl.v  been  established  at  Middletown 
and  New  I.,ondon.  the  Stock  at  all  those  places  b(Mng  raised  by  subscription,  and 
managed  by  an  agent  for  the  l)enetit  of  the  adventurers. 

"The  company  at  Hartford  (Woolen  .Manufacture-MN)  had  expended  so  much 
of  their  small  cajjital  in  Imildings,  implements,  etc.  that  they  found  themselves 
under  the  necessity  of  applying  to  Government  for  aid.  The  Legislature,  being 
sensible  of  the  imiK)rtance  of  encouraging  this  infant  establishment,  granted  them 
a  Lfjttery  to  raise  l.(X10.  io  enable  them  to  procure  a  more  complete  set  of  ma- 
chinery, and  for  extending  their  business.     This  Lottery  will  probably  net  them 

62626 — 41— vol.  14 40 


8784 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 


three  thousand  dollars  and  enable  them  to  make  a  further  trial  in  this  laudable 
attempt  to  establish  so  valuable  a  manufacture.  The  event  is  yet,  however,  very 
pr(;blematical.  Those  persons  concerned  in  setting  up  new  manufactures  have 
every  obstacle  to  surmount  which  can  arise  from  clashing  interests,  or  ancient 
prejudices,  as  well  as  from  the  smallness  of  our  capitals,  the  scarcity  of  materials 
and  workmen,  and  the  consequent  high  prices  of  both.  In  this  respect  the 
obstacles  which  are  opposed  to  the  woolen  manufacture  are  the  greatest.  *  *  * 
"In  addition  to  the  foregoing  list  should  be  sub.ioined  the  manufacture  in  wood, 
in  iron,  and  in  household  furniture  and  steel  carriages  of  all  kinds  are  made  in 
plenty  and  pretty  good  style — and  considerable  is  exported  to  the  Southern  States 
and  to  the  West  Indies.  The  manufactures  of  iron  are  various  and  extensive, 
and  exceed  our  demand  for  home  consumption,  except  Cutlery  and  some  part  of 
the  tools  used  by  tradesmen.  Our  manufactures  of  Leather  are  considerable,  so 
as  to  make  a  full  supply  of  shoes  and  boots,  saddles,  bridles,  horse  harness,  etc. 
even  for  exportation.  We  made  also  stuff  and  silk  shoes  nearly  sufficient  for 
the  consumption  of  the  State. 

LABOR  PRODUCTIVITY 

"As  to  the  quantum  of  all  these  manufactures,  either  those  used  amongst  our- 
selves, or  those  exported,  or  the  value  of  them  in  money,  I  dare  not  hazard  an 
opinion,  not  having  the  details  on  which  to  make  the  calculation,  or  ground  such 
an  opinion,  but  considering  the  number  of  our  laborious  and  active  citizens,  and 
our  modes  of  living,  it  cannot  otherways  than  be  considerable,  and  it  is  yearly 
increasing.  The  manufactures  carried  on  in  our  families  may  be  calculated  to 
increase  the  value  of  the  products,  beyond  that  of  the  raw  materials  as  three  to 
one — those  established  in  factories^such  as  the  woolen  manufacture  at  Hartford, 
not  less  than  four  to  one,  or  even  five  to  one." 

Prepared  by  Seminar  in  Marxian  Economics. 


WoRicERs  School — Political  Economy  A — Readings  for  First  Session 

Production  forces  and  production  relationship — Manufacturing  industries, 

United  States,  1919-29 


1919 

1929 

Percent  of 
increase 
(+)  or  de- 
crease (— ) 

Number  of  Establishments                       -      

214.383 
250,  571 

210. 959 
133.  210 

-1.6 

Persons  Engaged  in  Manufacturing  Industries: 
Proprietors  &  Firm  Members 

-46.8 

Salaried  Officers  &  Employees           .      .  -. 

1,438,219 
9,  000,  059 

«  1.  567.  138 
8, 838,  743 

Wage  Earners  (Average  per  year) 

-1.8 

Horse  Power  (Rated  Cap.  of  Power  Equipment) 

29,  327, 669 

42,931,061 

+46.4 

Wages                                                            -     .          

10,461.786,869 
2,  880, 808.  375 

11,620,97,3.254 
'■4,195,501,362 

+7.1 

Salaries''            

-45.6 

Total  Wages  and  Salaries 

13,  342, 655. 244 

'  15,  816,  474,  646 

+18.5 

Cost  of  Materials,  Containers,  Energy - 

37,  232,  702,  309 

'62,041,795.316 

24,  809. 092.  926 

38,  549.  579,  732 

'  70, 434, 863,  443 

31,885,283.711 

Value  of  Product  ..     . 

+13.5 

Value  added  to  Mfre                           . 

+28.5 

Appropriated  by  Proprietors- 
Value  added  minus  salaries  and  wages 

11.466.437.682 

16, 068, 809. 065 

+40.1 

Share  of  proprietors                                      .      -  - 

46.  2% 
42.  2% 
11.6% 

50. 4% 
36. 4% 
13.  2% 

+9.1 

Share  of  wage  earners 

-13.7 

Share  of  salaried  officers  and  employees          .  _  ,.  . 

+13.8 

(«)  Includes  208,303  employees  of  central  administrative  offices  who  were  included 
in  the  figures  in  1019. 

( 6)  Includes  6()0,437,3ol  of  salaries  of  employees  of  central  administrative  offices  that 
was  included  in  total  of  1919. 

(c)  Included  duplications  due  to  the  use  of  the  products  of  some  industries  and  ma- 
terials by  others. 

(d)  Salaries  include  a  great  deal  of  concealed  returns  of  proprietors  and  firm  members. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8785 

Workers  School — Political  Economy  A — Re^vdings  i'or  First  Sfcssion 

Important  items  on  the  position  of  agricuUure  in  the  United  States 

[Millions  of  dollars] 


Total 

value  of  all 

agricultural 

products 

Value  of 

products 

consumed 

at  home 

Value  of 

products 

for  the 

market 

Taxes 
paid 

Interest 

Rent 

Cash 
income 
after  all 
expenses 

1919    --- 

16. 935 

13,5()6 

8,927 

9,944 

11,041 

11,337 

11.9r.8 

11,480 

11,616 

11.741 

11,911 

9.347 

6,920 

5.240 

6.200 

2.  500E 

2,0OOE 

1,2()0E 

1,  500 E 

1,5,'^0 

1,697 

1,882 

1.822 

1.744 

1,742 

1,777 

1,523 

1,100 

800E 
l.OOOE 

14. 435 

11.566 
7.727 
8.444 
9.491 
9,640 

10, 086 
9.658 
9,872 
9.999 

10. 134 
7.824 
5.  820 
4;  440E 
5,200E 

380 

452 

633 

678 

718 

727 

729 

738 

754 

766 

777 

777 

700 

550E 

550E 

590 
672 

685 

700 

700 

712 

705 

699 

690 

684 

681 

671 

600 

550  E 

6OOE 

N.  A. 
N.  A. 
N.  A. 

N.  A. 
N.  A. 

927 
1,005 

999 
1.034 
1.068 
1.110 

911 

692 

600  E 

600E 

7,974 

1920 -- 

5.579 

1921 

3.204 

1922 

1923    

3,77s 
4,392 

1924 - 

4,  263 

1925        

4, 335 

1926 

4. 047 

1927            .     

4.276 

1928    

4.024 

1929            

4,  222 

1930        

2.  521 

1931  

1,591 

1932            

1,015E 

1933     

1,850E 

Source:  Bureau  of  Agricultural  Economics  of  U.  S.;  Crops  and  Markets,  Nov.  1932. 

Financial  result  for  average  farm  in  the  United  States  1930 

Total  receipts $1,  549 

Cash  outlay : 

Hired  labor •_ $304 

Livestock  bought 102 

Feed   bought 184 

Fertilizer 55 

Seed 34 

Machinery  and  tools G2 

Taxes  on  farm  property 1S3 

Interest    paid 196 

Miscellaneous    expenses 167 

1,287 

Profit $262 

Quantity  and  value  of  wheat  produced  during  two  periods 


Quantity  (millions  of  bushels)  _ 

Value  on  the  farm  (millions  of  dollars), 

Price  per  bushel  received  (cents  per  bushel) 


1931 


892 

$396 

$0.44 


Workers  School — Political  Economy  A 


LESSON   II 

USE— VALUE : 

A.  List  some  u.se-values. 

B.  How  are  these  produced  today? 

C.  How  were  use-values  produced  in  a  simple  commodity  economy? 

D.  Does   the   manufacturer   go   into   business   in   order    to   produce   things 

for  use? 

E.  Is  the  worker  interested  in  the  use-value  of  the  things  he  helps  produce? 

F.  What  is  the  aim  of  production  today? 


g786  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

EXCHANGE-VALUE : 

A.  What  is  the  relationship  of  the  owuer  of  a  use-value  to  this  use-value? 

B.  What   is   the   relationship   of  the  ovpner   of  an   exchange-value   to   this 

exchange  value? 

C.  What  results  from  the  latter  relationship? 

D.  Show  how  these  commoditj'  relationships  are  "economic  relations." 
USE-VALUE  AND  VALUE : 

A.  What  is  the  difference  between  a  pair  of  shoes  as  a  use-value  and  this 

pair  of  shoes  as  an  exchauge-value? 

B.  What  determines  this  difference? 

1.  What  makes  possible  the  exchange   of  a   certain    quantity   of  a 
commodity  for  a  certain  quantity  of  another  commodity? 
COMMODITY : 

A.  What  is  the  two-fold  nature  of  a  commodity  ? 
LABOR : 

A.  What  kind  of  labor  creates  value? 

B.  What  kind  of  labor  creates  use-value? 

C.  Can  these  two  kinds  of  labor  be  kept  mechanically  separated? 

D.  What  is  the  relationship  between  socially  necessary  labor,  production  of 

labor  and  value? 

1.  If  the  socially  necessary  labor  is  diminished  as  a  result  of  an 

increase  in  the  productivity  of  labor,  what  happens  to  value? 

Now  you  can  tell  why  the  boss  class  is  not  a  productive  force. 

Do  so. 
Show  from   the   above  analysis  the   importance   to  the  working 
class  of  a  study  of  political  economy. 


p.  2: 


Workers    School — Political   Economy'  A 

ASSIGNMENT  FOR  LESSON  III 

1.  What  are  the  characteristics  of  a  simple  commodity  economy? 

a.  productive  forces. 

b.  productive  relations. 

c.  nature  of  exchange. 

d.  diiRculties. 

2.  What  would  the  presence  of  money  have  accomplished? 
p.  3: 

1.  What  were  the  characteristics  of  the  economic  structure  of  the  U.  S.  in  1790? 

2.  What  are  the  characteristics  of  a  capitalist  commodity  economy? 

a.  productive  forces. 

b.  productive  relations. 

c.  nature  of  exchange. 

3.  What  conditions  are  necessary  for  the  development  of  capitalism? 
p.  6: 

1.  Contrast  production   for  exchange. 

a.  in  simple  commodity  economy. 

b.  in  cap.  commodity  economy. 


WoKKEBS  School — Political  Economy  A 

LESSON  IV. — FORMS  OF  VALUE 

Fall  Term  1933 
Questions  for  W.  W.  Martin's  Class: 

1.  What  is  meant  by  the  form  of  value? 

2.  What  form  of  value  is  found  in  the  first  historical  stage  of  commodity 

exchange? 

3.  Analysis  of  this  form  of  value : 

a.  What  is  the  relative  form  of  value? 

b.  What  is  the  equivalent  form  of  value? 

4.  What  is  the  total  or  extended  form  of  value? 

5.  Show  how  this  represents  a  higher  stage  of  historical  development. 

6.  What  is  the  general  or  univei-sal  form  of  value? 


UN-AMKRICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8787 

7.  Show  how  this  repipsents  a  still  higher  stage  of  historical  development. 

8.  What  is  the  money  form  of  value? 

9.  Show  how  this  is  the  highest  stage  of  historical  development  in  capitalism? 

10.  WJiy  is  money  a  connuodityV 

11.  Why  is  it  that  the  previous  metals  have  come  to  function  as  money? 

12.  What  are  the  functions  of  money? 

1  HE  FETISHISM  OP  COMMODITIES 

Jteview: 

1.  What  renders  all  human  products  exchangeable?     (abstract  labor). 

2.  Does  this  "element"  reside  in  the  commodities  as  a  physical  property 

of  the  commodities?     (No.) 

3.  Where  does  it  reside?     (In  the  activity  of  the  producers.) 

4.  Is    this    "element"    an    individual    possession    or    a    social    relationship? 

(latter) 
New  Lesson: 

1.  When  exchange  occurs,  what  seems  to  happen  between  commodities? 

2.  What  seems  to  be  the  character  of  commodities? 

3.  What  is  a  fetish?  (The  production  of  human  mind  in  concrete  shape.) 

4.  Is  there  any  similarity  between  a  commodity  as  it  seems  to  behave  and 

a  fetish? 

5.  What  is  meant  by  "fetishism  of  commodities"? 

6.  Show  how  this  is  not  true  for  the  period  of  Feudalism. 

a.  What  kind  of  relations  between  persons  exist  under  feudalism? 

b.  Contrast  feudal  relations  between  persons  and  capitalist  relations 
between  persons. 

7.  Why  do  bourgeois  economist  seek  to  uphold  the  notion  underlying  the 

fetishism  of  commodities? 

8.  What  is  the  significance  of  the  Marxist  exposure  of  this  notion? 

Workers  School — Political  Economy  A 

LESSON   VI — money    (CONTINUED) 

W.  W.  Martin's  Class 
Fall  Term,  1933 

1.  Explain  the  following: 

a.  measure  of  value 

b.  standard  of  price 

c.  means  of  circulation 

d.  hoarding 

e.  means  of  payment 

2.  What  is  meant  by  the  Gold  Standard? 
What  is  meant  by  going  off  the  G.  S.? 

3.  What  is  meant  by  Inflation? 

What  is  the  effect  of  Inflation  on  the  working  class? 

4.  Prove  that  the  Roosevelt  program  is  an  inflationary  one  causing  increas- 

ing misery  to  the  working  class. 

5.  What  are  the  functions  of  money  in  the  Soviet  Union? 

6.  Should  the  working  class  demand  in  its  struggle  against  inflation? 

7.  Bourgeois  Theories  of  Money : 

a.  Keynes;  Fisher 

b.  Social  Credit. 
Readings ; 

Lapi<lus :  pp.  48-63. 
Capital:  pp.  106-162. 

Workers  School — Political  Economy 

LESSON    vn CAPITAL 

W.  W.  Martin's  Class 
Fall  Term  1933 
Questions : 

1.  What  is  meant  by  the  circulation  of  commodities? 

2.  Show  how  the  circulation  of  commodities  contains  the  distinction  between 

money  as  money  and  money  as  capital. 


8788  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

3.  What  are  the  differences  betweeu  money  in  transaction  C-M-C  and  money 

in  transaction  M-C-M. 

4.  In  actuality,  however,  the  circulation  of  money  as  capital  completes  itself 

in  what  result? 

5.  What  is  capital? 
What  is  a  capitalist? 

6.  Show  how  the  bourgeois  concept  that  "surplus  value"  is  a  result  of  the 

process  of  circulation  is  wrong. 

7.  What  is  the  source  of  Surplus  Value? 

8.  What  conditions  are  necessary  and   fundamental   to  the   emergence   of 

capital  ? 

9.  Is  the  barbarian  owning  and  using  a  simple  instrument   a   capitalist? 

10.  Does  "capital"  as  defined  above  exist  in  the  U.  S.  S.  R.? 


Workers  School — Political  Economy  A 

LESSON    Vin — LuXBOR,    LABOR  POWER,    WAGES,   CAPITAL.    SURPLUS   VALUE 

W.  W.  Martin's  Class 
Fall  Term  1933 

1.  What  is  the  distinction  between  labor  and  labor  jwwer? 

2.  What  is  the  monetary  return  to  the  worker  called? 

3.  What  is  the  distinction  between  wages  and  the  value  created  by  the  workers? 

4.  Why  is  the  receipt  by  the  worker  of  the  value  created  by  him  an  impossi- 

bility under  capitalism? 

5.  What  is  the  bourgeois  view  of  wages? 

6.  Show  how  American  Federation  of  Labor  and  Socialist  support  of  the  N.  R. 

A.  is  support  of  the  bourgeois  view  of  wages  and  henc-e  of  capitalism. 

7.  Is  it  correct  to  say  that  "labor  is  the  source  of  all  wealth"?     (No.  2,  pp.  SO- 

BS, Critique  of  G.  Prog.,  sect.  1.) 

8.  What  is  the  twofold  result  of  the  twofold  character  of  labor  in  the  labor 

process? 

9.  What  is  meant  by — 

a.  Constant  capital. 

b.  Variable  capital. 

10.  Show  how  labor  power,  and  not  the  means  of  production,  is  the  source  of 

surplus  value. 

11.  Show  how  capital  is  a  bourgeois  social  relation  of  production. 

12.  What  is  meant  by  the  fetishism  of  capital? 

Readings: 

Marxist  Study  Course  in  Political  Economy — No.  2. 
Capital,  Vol.  I,  pp.  169-208  (Paul  Trans.). 


Workers  School- — Political  Economy  A 

LESSON  IX.  rath  OF  SURPLUS  VALUE 

W.  W.  Martin's  Class. 
Fall  Term,  1933. 

1.  What  is  the  value  of  the  product  at  the  end  of  the  labor  process? 

2.  What  is  the  source  of  "s"? 

3.  In  determining  rate  of  surplus  value,  why  do  we  determine  the  ratio 

8 

between  s  and  v  thus :  ^  ? 

Why  not  the  ratio  between  s  and  (c  plus  v)  ? 

4.  Why  is  it  correct  to  determine  the  rate  of  surplus  value  by  the  ratio 

between  surplus  labor  to  necessary  labor? 

5.  Why  is  the  rate  of  surplus  value  considered  as  the  degree  of  exploitation 

of  the  worker? 

6.  What  is  meant  by  the  surplus  product? 

7.  What  is  meant  by  the  working  day? 

8.  What  is  the  amount  of  surplus  value  equal  to? 

10.  What  is  the  result  of  an  increase  in  the  variable  capital? 


UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8789 

11.  When  Iddkod  npoii  from  the  iioint  of  view  of  tlie  labor  process,  what  is 

the   r«'latioii   between    iiistrmnents   of   pro(hietioii    and    worker   in    tlie 
process  of  prodiutionV 

12.  When  looked  npon  from  the  point  of  view  of  capital,  what  is  the  relation 

between  instruments  of  production  and  the  worker  in  the  pi'ocess  of 
production? 

13.  Wliat  is  meant  by  absolute  surplus  value? 

14.  What  is  meant  by  relative  surplus  value? 

15.  What  is  the  eff(x-t  on  relative  surplus  value  of  an  increase  in  the  pro- 

ductivity of  labor? 
10.  Why  is  tlie  capitalist  class  anxious  to  increase  the  productivity  of  labor? 
Eca  dings: 

No.  3  of  the  Marxist  Study  Course  in  Political  Economy. 


Workers  School — Value  and  Labor 
(Essentials  of  Marx.  Chap.  6) 

At  first  sight  it  would  seem  that  the  value  of  a  commodity  is  a  thing  quite  rela- 
tive and  not  to  be  settled  without  considering  one  commodity  in  its  relations  to 
all  other  commodities.  In  fact,  in  speaking  of  the  value,  the  value  in  exchange 
of  a  commodity,  we  mean  the  proportional  quantities  in  which  it  exchanges  with 
all  other  commodities.  But  then  arises  the  question :  How  are  the  proportions 
in  which  commodities  exchange  with  each  other  regulated? 

We  know  from  experience  that  these  proportions  vary  infinitely.  Taking  one 
single  commodity,  wheat,  for  instance,  we  shall  find  that  a  quarter  of  wheat 
exchanges  in  almost  countless  variations  of  proportion  with  different  commodi- 
ties. Yet,  its  value  remaining  always  the  same,  whether  expressed  in  silk,  gold, 
or  any  other  commodity,  it  must  be  something  distinct  from,  and  independent  of, 
these  different  rates  of  exchange  with  different  articles.  It  mu-^t  be  possible  to 
express  in  a  very  different  form  these  various  equations  with  various  commodities. 

Besides,  if  I  say  a  quarter  of  wheat  exchanges  with  iron  in  a  certain  proportion, 
or  the  value  of  a  quarter  of  wheat  is  expressed  in  a  certain  amount  of  iron,  I  say 
that  the  vulue  of  wheat  and  its  equivalent  in  iron  are  equal  to  some  third  thing, 
which  is  neither  wheat  nor  iron,  because  I  suppose  them  to  express  the  same 
magnitude  in  two  different  shapes.  Either  of  them,  the  wheat  or  the  iron,  mirst, 
therefore,  independently  of  the  other,  be  reducible  to  tliis  third  thing  which  is 
tlieir  common  measure. 

To  elucidate  this  point  I  .shall  recur  to  a  very  simple  geometrical  illustration. 
In  comparing  the  areas  of  triangles  of  all  possible  forms  and  magnitudes,  or  com- 
paring triangles  with  rectangles,  or  any  other  rectilinear  figure,  how  do  we  pro- 
ceed? We  reduce  the  area  of  any  triangle  whatever  to  an  expression  quite  differ- 
ent from  its  visible  form.  Having  found  from  the  nature  of  the  triangle  that  its 
area  is  equal  to  half  the  product  of  its  base  by  its  height,  we  can  then  compare 
the  different  values  of  all  sorts  of  triangles,  and  of  all  rectilinear  figures  whatever, 
because  all  of  them  may  be  resolved  into  a  certain  number  of  triangles. 

The  same  mode  of  procedure  must  obtain  with  the  values  of  commodities.  We 
must  be  able  to  reduce  all  of  them  to  an  expression  common  to  all,  distinguishing 
them  oidy  by  tlie  proportions  in  which  they  contain  that  identical  measure. 

As  the  exchangeable  values  of  commodities  are  only  social  functions  of  those 
things,  and  have  nothing  at  all  to  do  with  the  natural  qualities,  we  must  first  ask. 
What  is  the  common  social  substance  of  all  commodities?  It  is  labor.  To  produce 
a  commodity  a  certain  amount  of  labor  must  be  bestowed  upon  it  or  worked  up 
in  it.  And  I  say  not  only  labor  but  social  labor.  A  man  who  produces  an  article 
for  his  own  immediate  use,  to  consume  it  himself,  creates  a  product,  but  not  a 
commodity.  As  a  self-sustaining  producer  he  has  nothing  to  do  with  society.  But 
to  produce  a  commodity  a  man  must  not  only  produce  an  article  satisfying  some 
social  want  but  his  labor  itself  nmst  fcn-m  part  and  parcel  of  the  total  sum  of  labor 
expended  by  society.  It  must  l)(>  subordinate  to  the  Division  of  Labor  within 
Society.  It  is  nothing  witlnrnt  th(>  other  divisions  of  labor  and  on  its  part  is 
required  to  integrate  them. 

If  we  consider  commodities  as  values,  we  consider  tliem  exclusively  under  the 
single  aspect  of  realized,  fixed,  or,  if  you  like,  crystallized  social  labor.  In  this 
respect  they  can  differ  only  by  representing  greater  or  smaller  quantities  of  labor, 


§790  UN-AMERICAN  PROrAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

as,  for  example,  a  greater  amount  of  labor  may  be  worked  up  in  a  silken  handker- 
chief than  in  a  brick.    But  how  does  one  measure  quantities  of  labor? 

By  the  time  the  labor  lasts,  in  measuring  the  labor  by  the  hour,  the  day,  etc. 
Of  course,  to  apply  this  measure,  all  sorts  of  labor  are  reduced  to  average  or 
simple  labor  as  their  unit. 

We  arrive,  therefore,  at  this  conclusion.  A  commodity  has  a  value  because 
it  is  a  cviistallization  of  social  labor.  The  greatness  of  its  value,  or  its  relative 
value,  depends  upon  the  greater  or  less  amount  of  that  social  substance  contained 
in  it;  that  is  to  say,  on  the  relative  mass  of  labor  necessary  for  its  production. 
The  relative  values  of  commodities  are  therefore,  determined  by  the  respective 
quantities  or  amounts  of  labor,  worked  up,  realized,  fixed  in  them.  The  correla- 
tive quantities  of  commodities  which  can  be  produced  in  the  same  time  of  labor 
are  equal.  Or  the  value  of  one  commodity  is  to  the  value  of  another  commodity 
as  the  quantity  of  labor  fixed  in  tlie  one  is  to  the  quantity  of  labor  fixed  in  the 
other. 

I  suspect  that  many  of  you  will  ask,  does  then,  indeed,  there  exist  such  a 
vast,  or  any  difference  whatever,  between  determining  the  values  of  commodities 
by  wages,  and  determining  them  by  the  relative  quantities  of  labor  necessary  for 
their  production?  You  must,  however,  be  aware  that  the  reward  for  labor,  and 
quantity  of  labor,  are  quite  disparate  things.  Suppose,  for  example,. equal  quan- 
tities of  labor  to  be  fixed  in  one  quarter  of  wheat  and  one  ounce  of  gold.  I 
resort  to  the  example  because  it  was  used  by  Benjamin  Franklin  in  his  first  Essay 
pul)lished  in  1721,  and  entitled,  A  Modest  Enquiry  into  the  Nature  and  Necessity 
of  a  Paper  Currency,  where  he,  one  of  the  first,  hit  upon  the  true  nature  of  value. 
Well,  we  suppose  then,  that  one  quarter  of  wheat  and  one  ounce  of  gold  are 
equal  values  or  equivalents,  because  they  are  crystallizations  of  equal  amounts 
of  average  labor,  of  so  many  days'  or  so  many  weeks'  labor  respectively  fixed  in 
them.  In  thus  determining  the  relative  values  of  gold  and  corn,  do  we  refer  in 
any  way  whatever  to  the  wages  of  the  agricultural  laborer  and  the  miner?  Not 
a  bit.  We  leave  it  quite  indeterminate  how  their  day's  or  their  week's  labor  was 
paid  or  even  whether  wages  labor  was  employed  at  all.  If  it  was,  wages  may 
have  been  very  unequal. 

The  laborer  whose  labor  is  realized  in  the  quarter  of  wheat  may  receive  two 
bushels  only,  and  the  laborer  employed  in  mining  may  receive  one-half  of  the 
ounce  of  gold.  Or,  supposing  their  wages  to  be  equal,  they  may  deviate  in  all 
possible  proportions  from  the  values  of  the  commodities  produced  by  them.  They 
may  amount  to  one-half,  one-third,  one-fourth,  one-fifth,  or  any  other  proportional 
part  of  the  one-quarter  of  corn  or  the  one  ounce  of  gold.  Their  wages  can,  of 
course,  not  exceed,  not  be  more  than  the  values  of  the  commodities  they  pro- 
duced, but  they  can  be  less  in  every  possible  degree.  Their  wages  will  be  limited 
by  the  values  of  the  products,  but  the  values  of  their  products  will  not  be  limited 
by  the  wages.  And  above  all,  the  values,  the  relative  values  of  corn  and  gold, 
for  example,  will  have  been  settled  without  any  regard  whatever  to  the  value 
of  the  labor  employed,  that  is  to  say,  to  wages.  To  determine  the  values  of 
commodities  by  the  relative  quantities  of  labor  fixed  in  them,  is,  therefore,  a 
thing  quite  ditferent  from  the  tautological  method  of  determining  the  values  of 
commodities  by  the  value  of  labor,  or  by  wages.  This  point,  however,  will  be  fur- 
ther elucidated  in  the  progress  of  our  inquiry. 

In  calculating  the  exchangeable  value  of  a  commodity  we  must  add  to  the 
quantity  of  labor  last  employed  the  quantity  of  labor  previously  worked  up  in 
the  raw  material  of  the  commodity,  and  the  labor  bestowed  on  the  implements, 
tools,  machinery,  and  buildings,  with  which  such  labor  is  assisted.  For  example, 
the  value  of  a  certain  amount  of  cotton  yarn  is  the  crystallization  of  the  quan- 
tity of  labor  added  to  the  cotton  during  the  spinning  process,  the  quantity  of 
labor  previously  realized  in  the  cotton  itself,  the  quantity  of  labor  realized  in  the 
coal,  oil,  and  other  auxiliary  substances  used,  the  quantity  of  labor  fixed  in  the 
steam  engine,  the  spindles,  the  factory  building,  and  so  forth.  Instruments  of 
production  properly  so-called,  such  as  tools,  machinery,  buildings,  serve  again  and 
again  for  a  longer  or  shorter  period  during  repeated  processes  of  production.  If 
they  were  used  up  at  once,  like  the  raw  material,  their  whole  value  would  at  once 
be  transferred  to  the  commodities  they  assist  in  producing.  But  as  a  spindle,  for 
example,  is  but  gradually  used  up,  an  average  calculation  is  made,  based  upon 
the  average  time  it  lasts,  and  its  averge  waste  or  wear  and  tear  during  a  certain 
period,  say  a  day.  In  this  way  we  calculate  how  much  of  the  value  of  the  spindle 
is  transferred  to  the  yarn  daily  spun,  and  how  much  therefore,  of  the  total 
amount  of  labor  realized  in  a  pound  of  yarn,  for  example  is  due  to  the  quantity 


UN-AMEUICAN   l'K01'A(JANDA  ACTIVITIES  8791 

of  labor  previously  realized  in  the  spindle.  For  our  present  purpose  it  is  not 
necessary  to  dwell  any  longer  upon  tliis  point. 

It  might  seem  that  if  the  value  of  a  commodity  is  determined  by  the  quantity 
of  labor  bestowed  upon  its  production,  the  lazier  a  man,  or  the  clumsier  a  man, 
the  more  valuable  his  commodity,  because  the  greater  the  time  of  labor  required 
for  linishing  the  commodity.  This,  however,  would  be  a  sad  mistake.  You  will 
i-ecoliect  that  I  used  the  word  "social  labor,"  and  many  points  are  involved  in  this 
qualilicatiou  of  "social."  In  saying  that  the  value  of  a  commodity  is  determined 
by  the  quantity  of  hibor  worked  up  or  crystallized  in  it,  we  mvan  the  quantitij  of 
lahor  necessary  for  its  production  in  a  gincn  state  of  society,  under  certain  social 
avcraye  co)iditions  of  production,  irith  a  yiroi  social  arerayc  intensity,  and 
average  skill  of  the  labor  employed.  When,  in  England,  the  power  loom  came  to 
compete  with  tlie  hand  loom,  only  one-half  the  former  time  of  labor  was  wanted 
to  convert  a  given  amount  of  yarn  into  a  yard  of  cotton  or  cloth.  The  poor  hand 
loom  weaver  now  worked  seventeen  or  eighteen  hours  daily,  instead  of  the  nine  or 
ten  hours  he  had  worked  before.  Still  the  product  of  twenty  hours  of  his  labor 
represented  now  only  ten  social  hours  of  labor,  or  ten  hours  of  labor  socially 
necessary  for  the  conversion  of  a  certain  amount  of  yarn  into  textile  stuffs.  His 
product  of  twenty  hours  had,  therefore,  no  more  value  than  his  former  product  of 
ten  hours. 

If,  then,  the  quantity  of  socially  necessary  labor  realized  in  commodities  regu- 
lates their  exchangeable  values,  every  increase  in  the  quantity  of  labor  wanted 
for  the  production  of  a  commodity  must  augment  its  value,  as  every  diminution 
must  lower  it. 

If  the  respective  quantities  of  labor  necessary  for  the  production  of  the  respec- 
tive commodities  remained  constant,  their  relative  values  also  would  be  constant. 
But  such  is  not  the  case.  The  quantity  of  labor  necessary  for  the  production  of 
a  commodity  changes  continuously  with  the  changes  in  the  productive  powers  of 
the  labor  employed.  The  greater  the  productive  powers  of  labor,  the  more  produce 
is  finished  in  a  given  time  of  labor ;  and  the  smaller  the  productive  powers  of 
labor,  the  less  produce  is  finished  in  the  same  time.  If,  for  example,  in  the 
progress  of  population  it  should  become  necessary  to  cultivate  less  fertile  soils, 
the  same  amount  of  produce  would  be  only  attainable  by  a  greater  amount  of 
labor  spent,  and  the  value  of  agricultural  produce  would  consequently  rise.  On 
the  other  hand,  if,  with  the  modern  means  of  production,  a  single  spinner  converts 
into  yarn,  during  one  working  day,  many  thousand  times  the  amount  of  cotton 
which  he  could  have  spun  during  the  same  time  with  the  spinning  wheel,  it  is 
evident  that  every  single  pound  of  cotton  will  absorb  many  thousand  times  less 
of  spinning  labor  than  it  did  before,  and,  consequently,  the  value  added  by 
spinning  to  every  single  pound  of  cotton  will  be  a  thousand  times  less  than  before. 
The  value  of  yarn  will  sink  accordingly. 

Apart  from  the  different  natural  energies  and  acquired  working  abilities  of 
different  peoples,  the  productive  powers  of  labor  must  principally  depend : 

Firstly,  upon  the  natural  conditions  of  labor,  such  as  fertility  of  soil,  mines, 
and  so  forth. 

Secondly,  upon  the  progi-essive  improvement  of  the  social  powers  of  labor, 
such  as  are  derived  from  production  on  a  grand  scale,  concentration  of  capi- 
tal and  combination  of  labor,  snlidivision  of  labor,  machinery,  improved  meth- 
ods, appliance  of  chemical  and  other  natural  agencies,  shortening  of  time  and 
space  by  means  of  communication  and  tran.«port,  and  every  other  contrivance 
by  which  science  presses  natural  agencies  into  the  service  of  labor,  and  by 
which  the  social  or  cooperative  character  of  labor  is  developed.  The  greater 
the  productive  powers  of  laboi-,  the  less  labor  is  bestowed  upon  a  given 
amount  of  produce;  hence  the  smaller  the  value  of  the  produce.  The  smaller 
the  productive  powers  of  labor,  the  more  labor  is  bestowed  upon  the  same 
amount  of  produce;  hence  the  greater  its  value.  As  a  general  law  we  may, 
therefore,  set  it  down  that: 

The  values  of  eommodUies  are  directly  as  the  times  of  lahor  employed  in 
their  prodnetion,  and  are  inversely  as  the  productive  ponnrs  of  the  labor 
employed. 

Having  till  now  only  spoken  of  value,  I  shall  add  a  few  words  about  price, 
which  is  a  peculiar  form  assumed  by  value. 

Price,  taken  by  itself,  is  nothing  but  the  monetary  expression  of  value.  The 
values  of  all.  commodities  of  this  country,  for  example,  are  expressed  in  gold 
prices,  while  on  the  Continent  they  are  mainly  expressed  in  silver  prices.  The 
value  of  gold  or  silver,  like  that  of  all  other  commodities,  is  regulated  by  the 


3792  UN-AMEKICAN  PROl'AGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

quantity  of  labor  necessary  for  getting  them.  You  exchange  a  certain  amount 
of  your  national  products,  in  which  a  certain  amount  of  your  national  labor 
is  crystallized,  for  the  produce  of  the  gold  and  silver  producing  countries,  in 
M^hich  a  certain  quantity  of  their  labor  is  crystallized.  It  is  in  this  way,  in 
fact  by  barter,  that  you  learn  to  express  in  gold  and  silver  the  values  of  all 
conmiodities,  that  is  the  respective  quantities  of  labor  bestowed  upon  them. 
Looking  somewhat  closer  into  the  monetary  expression  of  value,  or  what  comes 
to  the  same,  the  conversion  of  value  into  price,  you  will  find  that  it  is  a 
commodities,  that  is,  the  respective  quantities  of  labor  bestowed  upon  them, 
homogeneous  form,  or  by  which  you  express  Ihera  as  quantities  of  equal 
social  labor.  So  far  as  it  is  but  the  monetary  expression  of  value,  price  lias 
been  called  natural  price  by  Adam  Smith,  prix  necessaire  by  the  French 
physiocrats. 

What  then  is  the  relation  between  vah;e  and  market  prices,  or  between  natural 
prices  and  market  prices?  You  all  know  that  the  market  price  is  the  same  for  all 
commodities  of  the  same  kind,  however,  the  conditions  of  production  may  differ 
for  the  individual  producers.  The  mai-ket  price  expresses  only  the  average  amount 
of  social  labor  necessary,  under  the  avei'age  conditions  of  production,  to  supply 
the  market  with  a  certain  mass  of  a  certain  article.  It  is  calculated  upon  the 
whole  lot  of  a  commodity  of  a  certain  description. 

So  far  the  market  price  of  a  commodity  coincides  with  its  A-'alue.  On  the  other 
hand,  the  oscillations  of  market  prices,  rising  now  over,  sinking  now  under  the 
value  or  natural  pi-ice,  depend  upon  the  fluctuations  of  supply  and  demand.  The 
deviations  of  mai'ket  prices  from  values  are  continual,  but  as  Adam  Smith  says: 
•'The  natural  price  is  the  central  price  to  which  the  prices  of  commodities  are 
continually  gravitating.  Different  accidents  may  sometimes  keep  them  suspended 
a  good  deal  aI)ove  it,  ixud  sometimes  force  them  down  even  somewliat  below  it. 
But  whatever  may  be  the  obstacles  which  hinder  them  from  settling,  in  this  center 
of  repose  and  continuance  they  are  constantly  tending  towards  it." 

I  cannot  now  sift  this  matter.  It  suffices  to  say  that  if  supply  and  demand 
equilibrate  each  other,  the  market  prices  of  commodities  will  correspond  with  their 
natural  prices,  that  is  to  say  with  their  values,  as  determined  by  the  respective 
quantities  of  labor  required  for  their  production.  But  supply  and  demand  must 
constantly  tend  to  etpulibrate  each  other,  although  they  do  so  only  by  compen- 
sating one  fluctuation  by  another,  a  rise  by  a  fall,  and  vice  versa.  If  instead  of 
considering  only  the  daily  fluctuation  you  analyze  the  movement  of  market  prices 
for  longer  periods,  as  Mr.  Tooke,  for  example,  has  done  in  liis  History  of  Prices, 
you  will  flnd  that  the  fluctuations  of  market  prices,  their  deviatitms  from  values, 
their  ups  and  downs,  paralyze  and  compensate  each  other;  so  that  apart  from 
the  effect  of  moncipolies  and  some  other  modifications  I  must  now  pass  by,  all 
de.scriptions  of  conmiodities  are,  on  the  average,  sold  at  their  respective  values  or 
natural  prices.  The  average  periods  during  which  the  fluctuation?:  of  market 
prices  compensate  e'ach  other  are  different  for  diffeivnt  kinds  of  commodities, 
because  with  one  kind  it  is  easier  to  adapt  supply  to  demand  than  with  the  other. 

If  then,  speaking  broadly,  and  embracing  somewhat  longer  periods,  all  descrip- 
tions of  commodities  sell  at  their  respective  values,  it  is  nonsense  to  suppose 
that  proHt,  not  in  individual  cases,  but  that  the  constant  and  usual  profits  of 
different  trades  spring  from  the  prices  of  commodities,  or  selling  them  at  a 
price  over  and  above  their  valiie.  Tlie  absurdity  of  this  notion  becomes  evident 
if  it  is  generalized.  What  a  man  could  constantly  win  as  a  seller  he  would  as 
constantly  lose  as  a  purchaser.  It  would  not  do  to  say  that  there  are  men  who 
are  buyers  without  being  sellers,  or  consumers  without  being  producers.  What 
these  people  pay  to  the  producers,  they  must  first  get  from  them  for  nothing. 
If  a  man  first  takes  your  money  and  afterwai'ds  retunis  that  money  in  buying 
your  commodities,  you  will  never  enrich  yourselves  by  selling  commodities  too 
dear  to  that  ssime  man.  This  sort  of  transaction  might  diminish  a  loss,  but 
would  never  help  in  realizing  a  profit. 

To  c.rplaiv.  therefore,  the  general  nature  of  profits,  you  must  start  from  the 
theorem,  that,  on  an  ai^erage,  commodities  are  sold  at  their  real  values,  and  that 
profits  are  derived  from  selling  them  at  their  values — that  is,  in  proportion  to  the 
quantity  of  labor  realized  in  them.  If  you  cannot  explain  profit  upon  this  sup- 
position, you  cannot  explain  it  at  all.  This  seems  paradox  and  contrary  to  every- 
day observation.  It  is  al.so  paradox  that  the  earth  moves  round  the  sun,  and 
that  water  consists  of  two  highly  inflammable  gases.  Scientific  truth  is  alwsiys 
paradox,  if  judged  by  every-day  experience,  which  catches  only  the  delusive 
appearance  of  things. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVFiTES  8793 

An  Outline  on  Countei{-Re\oi.ittionaby  Trotzkyism — For  Members  of 

Educational  Cokps 

Prepared  by  :  National  Education  Dept.  C.  C. 

Reference  Readings : 

1.  Olgin.  "Trotzkyism." 

2.  Vyshinsky,  "Trotzkyism  in  the  Service  of  Fascism." 

3.  Lang,  "Trotzkyism  and  Fascism." 

4.  Daily  Worker,  Nov.  'iS  i^  14.    Watcli  editorials  and  articles. 
What  ix  Trotzkyismf 

Trotzkyism  is  a  complex  of  anti-Marxist,  anti-Leninist  theories,  including: 

(1)  The  theory  of  i>ermanent  revolution. 

(2)  Tlie  theory  of  the  impossibility  of  building  Socialism  in  one  country. 
Organizationally,  Trotzkyism  meant: 

(1)  The  denial  of  the  necessity  of  iron  discipline  within  the  Party. 

(2)  Tlie  freedom  of  factional  groupings  within  the  Party. 
Practically,  Trotzkyism  meant : 

(1)  Unprincipled  formation  of  blocs  against  the  Party. 

(2)  Attacks  against  the  leadership  of  the  Party. 

(3)  Refusal  to  obey  decisions. 

(4)  Utilization  of  enemies  of  the  Proletariat  for  the  struggle  against 

the  Party  and  its  leadership. 

Tfw  theory  of  permanent  revolution. 

Trotzky's  theory  of  "permanent  revolution"  was  developed  in  1905  in  oppo- 
sition to  Lenin's  theory  of  the  growing  over  of  the  bourgeois-democratic  revolu- 
tion into  the  proletarian  revolution.  It  involved  the  character  of  the  relation- 
ship of  the  proletariat  and  peasantry  (petty-bourgeois  masses).  The  theory 
of  "permanent  revolution"  advanced  by  Trotzky  states : 

(1)  The  peasantry  as  a  whole  constitute  one  reactionary  mass. 

(2)  The  proletariat   will  have  to  fight   against   the  broad   masses  of   the 

peasantry. 
(.3)   This  fight  can  only  be  successful  if  the  victorious  proletariat  of  other 

countries  come  to  the  rescue. 
(4)   If  this  support  is  not  given,  the  rule  of  the  proletariat  in  one  country 

is  hopeless. 

This  theory  is  linked  up  with  Trotzky's. 
Theory  of  the  impossibility  of  building  socialism  in  one  country. 

This  theory  was  developed  in  opposition  to  Lenin's  formulation  in  1915  of 
the  possibility  of  Socialism  in  one  country  as  a  result  of  the  unevenness  of  de- 
velopment of  capitalism  in  the  epoch  of  imperialism. 

Trotzky's  theory  denies : 

(1)  The  law  of  the  uneven  development  of  imperialism  discovered  by  Lenin. 

(2)  That  the  proletariat  of  any  country,  even  in  a  highly  industrialized 

one,   cannot   maintain   its   rule   unless   the  victorious   proletariat   of 
Europe  comes  to  its  rescue. 

Trotzky's  theory  aflSrms : 

(1)  That  the  proletariat  of  one  country  can  seize  power  but  cannot  hold  it. 

(2)  That   the  pre-condition  for  building  Socialism  in  one  country   is  the 

.seizure  of  power  in  the  majority  of  countries. 

(3)  That  if  this  does  not  take  place,  the  capitalist  elements  within  one 

country  will  inevitably  defeat  all  attempts  to  establish  Socialism. 

(4)  That,  therefore,  withont  the  world  revolution  proletarian  rule  in  one 

country  must  perish. 

Basic  characteristics  of  these  theories. 

(1)  Over-estimation    of   the   strength    of   capitalism    and    under-estimatiou 

of  the  forces  of  revolution. 

(2)  Conceptions  of  the  development  of  the  proletarian  revolution  viewing: 

(a)  all  epochs  of  capllalism  as  identical. 

(b)  the  world  revolution  as  a  simultaneous  process. 

(c)  the  pea.santry  as  a  whole  as  a  capitalistic  class. 


3794  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVmES 

<3)   Denial  of  the  peasantry  as  an  ally  of  the  proletariat. 
(4)   Denial  tliat  the  proletariat  has  the  strength  to  lead  the  peasantry  onto 
the  path  of  Socialism. 

From  these  theories  flow : 

The  Trotzkyist  conception  of  the  dictatorship  of  the  proletariat. 
This  Consists  in : 

(1)  Viewing  the  dictatorship  of  the  proletariat  as  the  dictatorship  of  the 

Party  over  the  proletariat. 

(2)  "Viewing  the  dictatorship  of  the  proletariat  as  a  power  which  enters  •into 

hostile  collision  with  the  broad  masses  of  the  peasantry." 
This  means : 

(1)  Rejection  of  the  Marxist-Leninist  conception  that  "the  emancipation  of 

the  working  class  can  only  be  achieved  by  the  working  class  itself" 
and  the  bourgeois  substitution  of  the  idea  that  the  masses  do  not 
count — power  is  not  class  power,  but  the  power  of  leaders. 

(2)  Rejection  of  the  Leninist  conception  that  "the  supreme  principle  of  the 

dictatorship  is  the  preservation  of  the  alliance  between  the  proletariat 
and  the  peasantry  in  order  thta  the  proletariat  may  continue  to  retain 
the  leading  rule  and  state  power." 

The  practice  of  Trotzkyism> — a  survey  by  Lenin  in  1910. 

"Trotzky  represents  his  own  personal  vacillations,  and  nothing  more.  In  1903 
he  was  a  Menshevik ;  he  abandoned  Menshevism  in  1904,  returned  to  the  Menshe- 
viks  in  1905  and  merely  flaunted  ultra-revolutionary  phrases;  in  1906  he  left 
them  again ;  at  the  end  of  1906  he  advocated  electoral  agreements  with  the 
Cadets  (i.  e.,  was  virtually  once  more  with  the  Mensheviks)  ;  and  in  the  spring  of 
1907,  at  the  London  Congress,  he  said  he  differed  from  Rosa  Luxemburg  on  'indi- 
vidual shades  of  ideas  rather  than  on  political  tendencies.'  Trotzky  one  day 
plagiarizes  the  ideological  stock-in-trade  of  one  faction ;  the  next  day  he  plagiar- 
izes that  of  another,  and,  therefore,  declares  himself  to  be  standing  over  both 
factions. 

"Let  the  readers  now  judge  for  themselves  whether  Trotzky  represents  a  'gen- 
eral Party'  or  a  'general  anti-Party'  trend  in  Russian  Social-Democracy." — Lenin  : 
Selected  Works,  Volume  3,  pp.  517. 

This  quotation  shows  that  Lenin  condemns  Ti'otzky  for : 

(1)  Unprincipled  political  behavior. 

(2)  Phrase-mongering. 

(3)  Egotism. 

(4)  Deceit. 

Trotzkyism.  in  action  against  Leninism  to  1917. 

1905.  Against  Lenin's  slogan,  "Revolutionary  dictatorship  of  the  proletariat  and 
peasantry,"  Trotzky  advances  slogan.  "Down  with  the  Czar  and  up  with  a 
Workers'  government."  This  slogan  ignored  the  peasantry  and  meant  skipping 
an  important  stage  in  the  revolution.  If  it  had  been  carried  out  in  practice  it 
would  have  meant  throwing  the  peasantry  into  the  arms  of  the  counterrevolution. 

1910.  While  the  Bolsheviks  under  Lenin  were  endeavoring  to  maintain  Party 
discipline  and  to  carry  through  Its  tasks  which  were  opposed  by  the  petty-bourgeois 
currents  within  Russian  Social-Democracy,  Trotzky  wanted  to  conciliate  all  fac- 
tions on  the  basis,  not  of  Bolshevism,  but  of  Menshevism. 

Said  Lenin :  "Trotzky's  resolution  *  *  *  is  drafted  very  'cautiou.sly'  and 
lays  claim  to  'super-factional'  fairness.  But  what  is  its  meaning?  The  'Bolshevik 
leaders'  are  to  blame  for  everything  *  *  *  this  is  (its)  philosophy  of  his- 
tory."—Lenin  :  Selected  Works,  Vol.  4,  p.  3!). 

1911.  Trotzky  intrigues  with  various  factions  to  fight  Lenin  and  the  Party. 
"Trotzky  merely  revealed  the  plan  of  the  liquidators,  whom  he  faithfully 
serves  *  *  *  the  termination  of  the  struggle  (by  Lenin)  against  the  liqui- 
dators *  *  *  full  freedom  to  fight  the  Party." — Lenin  :  Selected  Wot'ks,  Vol.  4, 
p.  106. 

"Trotzky  has  been  deceiving  the  workers  in  the  most  imprincipled  manner  by 
assuring  them  that  the  obstacles  to  unity  were  principally  (if  not  wholly)  of  an 
organizational  nature  *  *  *  j^j  reality  *  *  *  in  the  forefront  now  is  the 
question  of  the  entire  program,  the  entire  tactics,  and  the  whole  character  of  the 
Party." — Lenin :  Selected  Works.  Vol.  4,  p.  95. 

1912.  Trotzky  forms  the  infamous  "August  Bloc."  A  direct  attack  on  the  prin- 
ciples of  Bolshevism.     All  the  groups  in  this  bloc  were  luiited  on  one  point — 


UN-A.MERICAN   PROPAGAiNDA  ACTIVITIES  §795 

destruction  ot  the  power  of  Lenin  and  the  Bolshevik  Party  In  the  Russian  labor 
movement. 

1913.  Trotzky  continues  liis  intrisues  contacting  everyone  who  might  be  of 
service  in  the  struggle  against  Leninism.  "The  whole  structure  of  Leninism  Is 
at  present  based  on  lies  and  falsilication.  and  harbors  the  poisonous  germs  of  its 
own  decomposition."— Trotzky  to  Cheidze,  April  1,  1913. 

1915-1917.  Lenin  advances  revolutionary  slogan — transforms  imperialist  war 
into  civil  war.  Trotzky  attacks  slogan,  saying  it  is  narrow  and  unsuited  for  mass 
propaganda. 

Loinn  advances  slogan — defeat  your  own  bourgeoise.  Trotzky  assails  Lenin, 
stating:  This  slogan  simply  amounts  to  an  inverted  nationalism,  or  nationalism 
with  a  minus  sign. 

Lenin  says :  "Break  with  the  waverers  and  the  conciliators."  Trotzky  :  Lenin's 
attitude  is  sectarian,  a  heritage  of  the  past. 

1917.  Trotzky  attacks  Lenin  as  a  dictator.  "You  do  not  know  Ilyitch's  (Lenin's) 
regime.  Illyitch  brooks  no  thiidiing  other  than  his  own." — Trotzky  to  Melnit- 
c?'anski — a  letter. 

Trotzkv  joins  the  Bolshevik  Party  with  reservations. 

"The  Bolsheviks  have  debolshevized  themselves,  and  I  cannot  call  myself  a 
Bolshevik.     *     *     *     The  aceptance  of  Bolshevism  cannot  be  demanded  of  us." 

Summary  of  Tn>t::kijist  action  up  1o  1917. 

(1)  Continual  attacks  upon  the  Bolsheviks 

(2)  Unprincipled  intrigue 

(3)  Attacks  against  the  leadership,  especially  Lenin,  who  was  accused  of 

being  "the  leader  of  the  reactionary  wing  of  our  Party,"  "a  party  dis- 
organizer,"  "a  professional  exploiter  of  every  backward  feature  in  the 
Russian  labor  movement."  Trotzky  also  called  Lenin  a  demagogue 
and  liar,  characterizing  Lenin's  Bolshevik  statements  as  "Those  hide- 
ous wantonly  demogogic  lies  of  Lenin." 

Trotzky  during  the  Civil  War. 

Conflict  with  C.  C.  on  plan  of  attack  against  Kolchak  in  summer  of  1917  Trotzky 
resigns.  C.  C.  accepts  resignation.  Autumn  1919.  Trotzky  summoned  from 
southern  front  to  attend  meeting  of  C.  C.  Central  Committee  recalls  Trotzky 
from  southern  front  on  demand  of  military  workers.  Operations  on  southern 
front  and  defeat  of  Denikin  take  place  without  the  participation  of  Trotzky. 
During  this  period  Trotzky  reveals  bureaucratic  handling  of  the  Red  Army. 

The  Brest-Litvosk  Treaty. 

Trotzky  becomes  panic-stricken  when  the  revolution  meets  with  difiiculties. 
Tries  to  sabotage  Lenin's  proposal  to  sign  the  Brest-Litovsk  Treaty  which 
would  give  the  revolution  a  breathing  spell  to  consolidate  its  forces.  Ad- 
vanced slogan :  "Neither  peace  nor  war."  Due  to  this  attitude  of  Trotzky 
the  treaty  when  finally  signed  contained  more  onerous  provisions  than  had 
originally  been  proposed  by  the  German  militarists. 

Trotzky  and  Trotskyism  during  the  liriuidnfion  of  war  communism,  1920-1921. 
Discussion  on  the  Trade  Union  question.  Trotzky  advocates  transforming 
trade  unions  into  state  organs,  naming  its  leaders  from  above.  This  idea  was 
later  realized  by  Hitler  and  Mussolini.  Lenin  condemned  Trotzky's  bureau- 
cratic standpoint,  pointing  out  that  trade  unions  must  be  democratically  con- 
trolled, and  that  the  relationship  of  the  Party  to  the  trade  unons  is  deter- 
mined by  persuasion  not  compulsion  as  advocated  by  Trotzky.  "Trotzky's 
mistake  consists  in  forgetting  Marxism,  in  a  theoretically  false  eclectric  defini- 
tion of  the  relation  of  politics  to  economics."  "Trade  unions  are  not  state 
organs;  they  are  schools  of  Commuinsm."    Lenin  1921. 

Trotzkyism  condemTied  hy  10th  Party  Congress. 

Leinn  demands  a  cessatifm  of  Trotzky's  attempts  to  build  a  faction.  Trotzky 
is  accused  of  an  anarcho-syndicalist  deviation  by  Lenin.  The  Congress  called 
for  the  immediate  liquidation  of  all  factionalism. 

Trotzkyism  in  1922. 

Trotzky  gathers  together  different  oppositional  groupings  for  an  attack  on 
the  Party  leadership  "which  has  brought  the  country  to  the  verge  of  ruin." 
Advocates  colonial  methods  of  exploitation  of  the  peasantry. 


3796  UN-AMERICAX  PKOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Trotzlcy  continues  factional  attacks  upon  the  leadership. 

The  13th  Party  Congress  condemus  Trotzkyism  as  a  social-rtemocratic  devia- 
tion from  Leninism. 

Trotzky's  desire  for  power  leads  Mm  to  attack  the  Party  openly  after  the  death 

of  Lenin — in  the  name  of  Leninism  and  Bolshevism: 

From  1924  to  1927  Trotzlcy  was  engaged  in  a  campaign  of  falsification  and 
slander  against  the  Party. 

(1)  He  tried  to  set  the  youth  against  "the  old  Bolsheviks."    "The  youth," 

he  said,  "is  the  barometer  of  the  Party." 

(2)  He  aecu.sed  the  Party  of  mining  the  country. 

(3)  He  accused  the  Party  of  being  agents  of  the  kulaks. 

(4)  He    systematically    falsified    the    history    of    the    October    revolution 

minimizing  the  role  of  Lenin  and  magnifying  his  own. 

(5)  He  violated  decisions  of  the  Party,  carrying  his  opposition  to  these 

decisions  to  non-Pa rty  masses. 

(6)  He   developed   the   tactic   of   double-dealing,    making   declarations   of 

willingness  to  carry  out  the  Party  line  and  simultaneously  organ- 
izing cliques  for  sabotaging  the  Parti-  linp 

(7)  He  tried  to  instill  a  spirit  of  pessimism  and  hopelessness  among  the 

masses  who  were  called  upon  to  proceed  with  the  construction  of 
Socialism. 

(8)  He  accused  Stalin  of  all  the  things  he  had  formerly  accused  Lenin 

of. 

(9)  He  developed  an   inordinate  hatred  of  Stalin  and  the  leadership  of 

the  Party  because  the  Party  membership  had  rejected  his  theories 
in  favor  of  Leninism  which  was  preserved  and  developed  by  Stalin. 

(10)  He  organized  secret  printing  presses  with   the  aid  of  elements  con- 

nected  with  White  Guardists. 

(11)  He  and  Dreitzer  (one  of  the  terrorists  executed  afrer  the  recent  trial) 

organized    a     counterrevolutionary    demonstration     against     Soviet 
Power  in  November  1927  together  with  Zinoviev. 

Trotzky  after  expulsion  from  the  Communist  Party. 
Main  aim :  to  destroy  the  Communist  International.     Tactics : 

(1)  to  spread  confusion  in  the  ranks  of  the  working  class; 

(2)  to  hinder  the  defense  of  the  Soviet  Union: 

(3)  to  supply  information  to  the  counter-revolurionai*y  bourgeoise ; 

(4)  to  oppose  everything  done  by  the  C.  I.  and  the  Soviet  Union; 

(5)  to  inspire  and   organize  hatred    of   Stalin   and   the  leadership  of  the 

Soviet  Union  ;  and,  from  1931  onwards,  to  organize  terrorist  groups 
for  the  purpose  of  murdering  the  leaders  of  the  proletariat ; 

(6)  to  use  for  this  purpose  white  guardists  and  the  Nazi  secret  police; 

(7)  to  boi-e  from  within  by  putting  his  agents  into  the  Party  by  double- 

dealing   tried    to    deceive    the   Party    aiid    to    prepare    for    terrorism 
against  its  leaders. 

Hotv  Trotzkyism  carried  on  its  attacks  in  print. 
On  the  first  Five-Year  Plan: 

"Industry  is  racing  toward  a  crisis  *  *  *  on  account  of  the  mon- 
strously bureaucratic  methods  used  in  the  construction  of  the  plan." — 
Trotzky,  Militant,  March  15,  1930. 

On  the  Second  Five-Year  Plan: 

"It  is  necessary  to  put  off  the  second  Five-Year  Plan." — Trotzky,  Militant, 
Jan.  7,  1933. 

"The  bureaucratic  leadership  *  *  *  which  has  been  blinded  by  the 
mirage  of  socialism  in  one  country  has  brought  national  economy  to  the 
brink  of  absolute  chaos." — Trotzky,  Militant,  March  13,  1933. 

On  Stalin: 

"Stalin's  autocratic  rule  has  erected  nepotism,  selfwill,  profligacy,  pillage, 
and  bribery  into  a  system  of  administration." — Trotzkv,  New  Militant, 
1936. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8797 

Oh  the  new  Sot'ict  ConKtitiifion: 

"To  suiotluT  the  protest  of  the  workers  nsiainst  the  growing  social  in- 
equality hy  the  weight  of  the  more  ha('l<war(l  masses  of  tlie  village — this  is 
tlie  chief  aim  of  the  new  constitution."— Trotsky,  New  Militamt,  1936. 

Pollution  of  i^ocia1i.'<t  Parfj/  bif  Trotzl-i/isni. 

Finding  it  inipossjlde  to  prevent  the  united  front  of  Socialist  and  Communist 
workei's,  Trut/kyites  enter  the  Socialist  Party  in  VSMy  in  order 

(1)  To  provide  themselves  with  machinery  for  anti-Communist  propaganda 

(2)  to  destroy   united   front  moves  on  the   part  of   Socialist   workers 

(3)  to    slander    tlu'    People's    Front   in    France    and    Spain    to   prevent    the 

formation  of  the  Farmer-Laiior  Party 

(4)  to  mislead  the  Socialist  youth  onto  the  road  of  counter-revolution 

(5)  to  .^lander  the  Soviet  Fnion  and  its  peace  policy 

(6)  to   indnence  workers   in   trade  unions  under  vSocialist  control  to  re.iect 

Communist  proposals  for  uTuty 

(7)  to   prevent   Socialist   workers  from   directing  their   main   blow  at   the 

liberty  League-IIearst-Landon  combination  as  the  main  forces  driving 
towards  fascism  in  the  U.  S.  A.  This  means  ob.lective  support  of 
fascism. 

Trotsky  justifies  terrorism  i)i  the   public  jiress. 

"Individual  terror  is  *  *  *  of  the  greatest  siimptoinatic  importance  be- 
cause it  characterizes  the  sharpness  of  the  antagonism  between  the  bureaucracy 
and  the  wide  masses  of  the  people,  especially  the  younger  people." 

"Marxists,  as  is  well  known,  have  irreconcilably  rejected  and  continue  to  reject 
individual  terror.  But  this  has  never  prevented  us  from  always  siding  with 
A\'illiam  1>11  and  not  with  the  Austrian  despot  Gessler. — Trotsky,  Neiv  Militant, 
Feb.  1,  1936. 

The  conclusion  of  Trot~kyisin — Fascist  assassination. 
Trotzky  to  Fritz  David  in  Copenhagen,  Nov.  1932: 

"There  is  now  no  way  out  other  than  the  violent  removal  of  Stalin  and 
his  followers.     Terror  against  Stalin — that  is  the  revolutionary  task." 
Trotzky  to  German-Ynrin  : 

"Stalin  must  be  physically  destroyed." 
Smirnov,  close  friend  of  Trotzky.  stated  at  the  trial: 

"I  admit  that  I  received  through  Gaven  the  directives  from  Trotzky  con- 
cerning terror.     *    *    *  '• 
Goebbels  to  the  press  in  Nazi  Germany  : 

"You  are  to  print  nothing  about  the  trial  in  ^Moscow  which  links  Ti'otzky 
to  the  Gestapo." 

Lessons  from  the  trial  of  the  Trotzkyist  assassins. 

Trotzkyism  always  contained  mechanistic  and  idealistic  elements,  revealed  in 
its  underestimation  of  new  material  conditions,  in  a  tendency  to  rely  upon  the 
impulses  of  the  will,  in  a  tendency  toward  adventurism.  As  Lenin  showed,  any 
deviation  from  dialectical  materialism  leads  to  reaction  and  darkness.  The 
idealogy  of  Trotzkyism  coincides  with  the  idealogy  of  fascism. 

Trotzkyism  in  the  course  of  its  degeneration  tr;iversed  all  forms  of  oppression 
to  Bolshevism,  always  adapting  itself  to  the  form  of  struggle  carried  on  by  the 
bourgeoisie  against  the  revolutionary  Party.  When  the  boui-geoisie  utilized  the 
liberals  in  Russia.  Trotzky  attacked  Bolshevism  from  the  liberal  stan<li)oint. 
When  the  l)ourgeoisie  used  social-democracy,  his  attack  was  based  on  the  stand- 
point of  the  latter.  And  finally,  when  the  bourgeoisie  began  to  i-esort  to  fascism, 
Trotzky  utilized  both  the  demogogy  and  the  terror  develojied  by  fascism. 

Trotzkyism  at  the  present  time  is  the  utilization  of  all  the  devices  castigated  by 
I^enin — cai-ried  to  its  lowest  point,  namely,  deceit,  hyprocrisy.  slander,  lies,  dis- 
ruption, double-dealing,  and  stool  pigeoning. 

Trotzkyism  means  MURDER  OF  COMMUNISTS  LEADERSHIP  AND  AID  TO 
THE  FASCIST  WAR  MAKERS  FOR  THE  PURPOSE  OF  DESTROYING  THE 
SOVIET  UNION  AND  DEFEATING  THE  PR(^LETARIAN  REVOLUTION 
EVERYWHERE. 


gygg  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

What  is  to  be  done? 

(1)  Proletarian  vigilance  against  all  attempts  to  smuggle  into  the  Party 

anti-Leninist  ideas. 

(2)  Proletarian  vigilance  against  any  attempt  to  weaken  the  discipline  of 

the  Party. 

(3)  Proletarian  vigilance  against  rumors,  gossip,  slander,  cynical  remarks 

calculated  to  weaken  the  Party  and  its  leadership. 

(4)  Proletarian   vigilance   against    those   who   try   to   weaken   the   Party's 

struggle  against  enemies  outside  the  Party  and  against  disguised 
enemies  who  worm  their  way  into  the  Party  for  the  purpose  of 
weakening  it. 

(5)  Every   member   of  the  Party  must   study  the  principles  of  Marxism- 

Leninism  in  order  to  be  equipped  to  fight  against  the  enemies  of 
Party. 

(6)  Every  Party  member  must  ask  himself  with  the  utmost  seriousness: 

Have  I  carried  out  the  tasks  assigned  me  in  the  spirit  of  Bolshevism? 
Have  I  done  all  in  my  power  to  strengthen  the  Party?  Have  I  been 
vigilant  enough  against  the  petty -bourgeois  tendency  towards  loosening 
of  Party  discipline? 

No.  3 
Tenth  National  Convention 

discussion  btjixetin 
Issued  by  the  Central  Conmiittee,  Communist  Party,  U.  S.  A. 
Our  Tasks  in  Developing  Party  Schooling 
By  Charles  Krumbein 

When  we  consider  the  situation  in  which  our  Party  is  operating,  we  can  see 
that  personnel  is  decisive:  On  the  world  scene,  the  opposing  poles  of  democracy 
and  fascism  are  in  a  life-and-death  struggle,  in  which  the  part  played  by  the 
United  States  can  be  decisive.  In  our  country  we  see  on  the  one  hand,  the  forces 
of  reaction  consolidating,  and  fighting  viciously  against  everything  progressive 
and  against  the  democratic  institutions  which  the  American  people  have  estab- 
lished through  struggle.  On  the  other  hand,  the  forces  of  progress  and  democ- 
racy are  rapidly  mobilizing  their  strength  to  give  combat  to  reaction  through  the 
Democratic  Front. 

We  can  say  without  any  boastfulness  that  our  Party  is  playing  an  active  role, 
varying  in  degree,  in  every  progressive  nK)vement  in  the  country.  Full  under- 
standing and  determined  application  of  our  mass  policies  in  these  forward  move- 
ments can  be  a  very  important  factor  in  the  tempo  of  their  advancement.  The 
struggle  to  win  more  and  more  millions  of  the  American  people  for  the  Demo- 
cratic and  People's  Front,  for  our  correct  peace  policy,  to  meet  the  needs  and 
aspirations  of  our  people,  confronts  us  with  more  complex  tasks  than  ever  before 
in  the  history  of  our  Party.  Hence,  not  only  is  there  greater  need  for  special 
training  of  leading  forces  to  meet  this  situation,  but  education  of  our  Party  mem- 
bers generally  is  one  of  our  most  important  and  serious  problems. 

Since  our  is^inth  Convention,  where  the  problem  of  personnel  was  made  a  cen- 
tral question,  some  advances  have  been  made  towards  its  solution.  Our  Party 
generally,  and  particularly  our  leading  comrades,  have  become  much  more  con- 
scious of  the  need  of  a  scientific  and  well-rounded  personnel  policy.  What  is 
more,  we  have  been  doing  something  about  it. 

party  schools 

In  this  article  we  want  to  deal  only  with  one  phase  of  this  problem— Party 
Schools.  With  regard  to  this  phase,  it  can  be  recorded  that  a  much  larger  pro- 
gram has  been  carried  through  than  ever  before.  In  the  last  year  alone,  the 
Central  Committee  has  organized  and  conducted  a  full-time  school  of  6  month.s' 
duration  with  GO  students;  a  school  to  train  comrades  in  Negro  problems,  of  10 
weeks'  duration  with  2o  students ;  two  regional  schools,  one  in  the  Northwest  and 
one  in  the  South,  of  8  and  6  weeks'  duration.  A  number  of  State  organizations 
have  given  real  serious  attention  to  this  phase  of  work,  especially  the  New  York, 
California,  Ohio.  Illinois,  and  Texas  State  organizations.  Other  States  have 
also  done  something  on  this  field  or  have  adopted  plans  for  Party  schools.  In 
quite  a  number  of  States  and  localities,  part-time  schools  were  organized  with 


UN-AIMERICAN  rUOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8799 

considerable  results.  These  achievements  mark  definite  progress,  but  they  are 
only  a  beginning,  since  tiie  needs  are  so  great. 

An  important  problem  in  connection  witli  training  of  personnel  that  has  yet 
to  be  solved,  is  schooling  of  those  comrades  who  arc  mass  leaders  and  are  unable 
to  find  time  for  study.  Our  Party  registration  of  January  1,  1938,  has  shown 
that  more  than  5,000  members  went  through  some  kind  of  Tarty  school,  but  these 
include  very  few  of  the  mass  leaders.  And  it  is  precisely  tlie.'^e  comrades  for 
whom  schooling  in  ^Marxism-Leninism  is  especially  important,  because  they  are 
in  contact  with  thousands  of  workers.  Since  tiiere  is  the  need,  we  can  tind  the 
way.  Some  methods  can  be  suggested  here.  Have  a  group  of  them  take  a  week 
off  and  organiz3  a  class  of  8  or  9  days'  duration,  from  Saturday  to  Sunday  of 
the  following  week.  Or  at  least  organize  a  group  in  the  important  centers  "that 
shall  meet  weekly  on  a  Saturday  or  Sunday  in  a  study  circle,  where  current  issues 
can  be  discussed  and  given  a  M.irxist-Leninist  interpretation.  Of  course,  wher- 
ever possible,  these  comrades  should  be  tirst  considerations  for  all  our  schools. 

Our  experiences  in  organizing  and  conducting  Party  schools  are  so  fruitful  and 
varied  that  it  is  now  possible  for  us  to  review  our  work  to  make  definite  improve- 
ments, and  thereby  extend  it  and  get  still  greater  results.  Some  conclusions  can 
be  drawn,  although  a  full  review  of  our  Party  school  work  of  the  past  two  years 
must  still  be  made. 

FOE  IMPKOVEU  METHODS 

First,  we  believe  it  will  be  necessary  to  revamp  drastically  the  curricula  of  all 
our  schools.  We  must  organize  our  curricula  so  that  there  is  much  greater  inte- 
gration of  the  theoretical  subjects  taught  with  the  tasks  and  immediate  political 
objectives  of  our  Party,  in  addition  to  integrating  a  number  of  the  subjects.  In 
most  of  our  schools  we  have  had  too  nuich  theory  in  the  abstract. 

A  few  illustrations  will  make  this  point  clear.  In  our  theoretical  study  of  the 
character  and  role  of  the  State,  it  is  necessary  at  the  same  time  to  bring  in  all  the 
lessons  of  American  traditions  and  to  interweave  our  whole  concept  of  the  Peo- 
ple's and  Democratic  Front.  Likewise  in  the  same  subject  must  be  brought  in 
the  role  of  the  women.  Negroes,  youth,  and  national  groups.  Or  again  when  we 
take  up  Marxian  economics  and  draw  the  lessons  of  the  class  forces  in  society,  we 
must  bring  in  the  role  and  program  of  monopoly  capital  in  America  which  is  the 
spearhead  of  reaction,  as  well  as  the  ipiestion  of  unemployment  and  how  to  meet 
the  problems  of  the  unemployed.  The  concept  of  a  theory  as  a  guide  to  action 
nuist  be  made  to  run  throngh  all  subji'cts  taught  in  our  schools  like  a  steel  rod. 

The  second  problem,  requiring  much  more  serious  attention,  is  the  selection  of 
students.  While  we  can  record  considerable  improvement  in  this  respect,  it  is 
still  far  from  satisfactory.  We  have  not  yet  fully  grasped  the  import  of  Comrade 
Browder's  demand  that  we  want  for  our  schools  precisely  those  comrades  "who 
cannot  be  spared." 

Too  often  students  are  selected  who  have  had  no  mass  experience,  with  the  result 
that  it  is  hard  for  them  to  relate  theory  to  practice.  Not  sufiicient  comrades  rep- 
resenting the  young  American  type  who  have  come  into  the  Party  through  mass 
struggle  ai-e  picked  for  the  schools.  All  of  us,  from  the  Central  Committee  down 
to  the  branch  leaders,  must  continuously  have  our  eyes  open  for  prospective  stu- 
dents, listing  them  for  schools  and  seeing  to  it  that  they  are  given  some  preliminary 
training,  that  is,  that  they  read  some  of  our  fundamental  literature.  If  the  com- 
rade is  picked,  then  he  is  already  somewhat  prepared.  If  not,  the  reading  he  has 
done  will  stand  him  in  good  stead.  This  will  stimulate  self-study,  so  necessary 
for  all  our  members. 

Last  but  not  least,  we  must  be  nnicli  more  careful  regarding  health  in  the  selec- 
tion of  students.  We  have  had  much  bad  experience  in  this  regard.  A  comrade 
in  bad  healtii  is  not  able  to  give  the  neces.sary  energy  to  his  studies  but  he  also 
has  an  adverse  eflfect  on  the  rest  of  the  student  body. 

Thirdly,  it  is  necessary,  especially  for  the  leading  comrades  and  the  leading 
committees  of  the  Party,  to  make  Party  scliooliiig  an  integral  part  of  all  Party 
work.  Every  Party  organization  sliotdd  plan  well  ahead.  National,  regional,  oV 
State  schools  should  not  be  considered  as  sufficient.  Tlie  need  is  so  great  that  all 
States,  counties,  sections,  and  large  branches  need  to  plan  for  and  organize  some 
form  of  school  or  study  class.  Fidl-timc^  schools,  even  though  a  short  duration, 
can  and  sliould  be  organized  Ity  every  State  organization  as  well  as  by  those 
counties,  cities,  and  sections  that  are  in  a  po.sition  to  do  so.  District  budgets 
should  provide  for  this  important  phase  of  work.  The  Center  is  in  a  position 
to  give  help  with  ciu-ricula.  bulletins,  etc.  A  careful  survey  of  our  Party  mem- 
bersliip  will  show  that  we  have  comrades  who,  with  a  little  preparation,  can 
teach  in  such  schools. 

62626 — 11— vol.  14 41 


3gQQ  UN-AMEKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVrXiES 

PABT-TIME   SCHOOLS 

Au  important  type  of  school  that  can  be  organized  wliever  there  is  50  or 
moi'e  Party  members,  is  tlie  part-time  scliool.  It  can  be  couducted  three  or  four 
evenings  and  Saturday  afternoon  or  Sunday  each  week  for  a  6-  or  8-week  period. 
Practically  no  expense  is  involved.  Workers  from  important  industries  and 
shops  who  cannot  get  away  for  full-time  schooling  can  go  to  these  schools.  The 
students,  however,  should  be  relieved  of  all  other  Party  tasks  for  the  di;ration 
of  the  school.  These  part-time  schools  may  be  of  a  general  nature  as  well  as 
on  an  industrial  basis,  or  devoted  to  comrades  in  specific  fields  of  work — branch 
oi'ganizers,  women's  work,  Negro  work,  educational  work,  literature,  finances,  etc. 

Lastly,  although  the  leading  comrades  and  committees  must  give  attention 
to  this  work,  to  guarantee  the  proper  planning  and  execution  of  the  plans,  it  is 
necessary  to  establish  a  special  apparatus  for  Party  schools.  Every  large  State 
organization  should  have  a  director  and  a  commission  for  this  work,  directly 
responsible  to  the  State  Committee.  Smaller  districts,  counties,  and  cities 
should  have  a  special  subcommission  as  part  of  the  Organizational-Educational 
Commission. 

All  the  above  is  put  forward  for  discussion.  Serious  consideration  should  be 
given  this  problem  at  all  coming  conventions.  We  feel  certain  that  as  a  result 
of  the  increased  consciousness  of  the  imix)rtauce  of  training  personnel,  and  with 
the  experiences  already  gained  we  will  be  able  to  make  further  advances  in  this 
important  task.  Great  help  can  be  given  by  all  who  are  especially  concerned 
witii  this  field  of  activity,  particularly  by  instructors  and  graduates  of  Party 
schools,  in  seeing  to  it  that  these  tasks  and  the  problems  connected  with  them, 
are  raised  and  pushed  wherever  they  find  themselves,  as  well  as  by  sending  to 
the  Center  all  suggestions  and  proposals  for  improvement. 

Draft  of  Amended  Constitution  of  the  Communist  Party,  U.  S.  A. 

The  draft  amended  Constitution  and  By-Laws  of  the  Communist  Party,  U.  S.  A., 
published  hrreirith,  is  svhiuittrd  lit/  the  Political  Burn,  for  discussion  hy  the 
Party  memhersh  ip. 

Final  action  on  this  draft,  and  on  all  anicudments  and  changes  to  he  sub- 
mitted, will  be  taken  by  the  coming  Tenth  Ccnvvention. 

All  Party  Units  should  devote  at  least  one  meeting  to  a  discussion  of  the 
Draft  Constitution  a'lid  By-Lairs. 

Units.  Party  Committees,  and  individual  Pitrty  members  have  the  right  to 
submit  amendments  or  additions,  either  through  their  elected  delegates  or 
directly  to  the  Central  Commitiee  prior  to  the  opening  of  the  Convention. 

ARXTCI.H  I 

The  name  of  this  organization  shall  be  tlie  COMMUNIST  PARTY  of  the 
UNITED  STATES  OF  A:MERICA. 

article  II 

Emblem 

The  emblem  of  tlu'  Party  shall  be  the  crossed  hammer  and  sickle,  with  a  cir- 
cular margin  having  at  the  top  'Tommunist  Party  of  the  U.  S.  A."  and  under- 
neath "Affiliated  to  the  Communist  International." 

article    III 

Mcmber.^hip 

Section  1.  Any  person,  IS  years  of  age  or  over,  regardless  of  race,  sex,  color, 
religious  belief,  or  nationality,  who  is  a  citizen  or  who  declares  his  intention  of 
becoming  a  citizen  of  the  I'nited  States  and  whose  loyalty  to  the  working  class 
is  unquestioned,  shall  be  eligible  for  membership. 

SEcrnoN.  2.  A  Party  member  is  one  who  accepts  the  Party  program,  attends 
the  regular  meetings  of  the  membership  branch  at  his  place  of  work  or  in  liis 
territory  or  trade,  who  pays  dues  regularly  and  is  active  in  Party  work. 

Section  3.  An  applicant  for  membership  shall  sign  an  application  card  which 
shall  be  endorsed  by  at  least  two  members  of  the  Communist  Party.  Applica- 
tions are  subject  to  discussion  and  decision  liy  the  basic  organization  of  the 
Party    (shop,   industrial,   neighborhood   branches).     After  the   applicant   is  ac- 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8801 

cepted  by  a  majority  vote  of  the  membership  of  the  organization,  he  shall  take 
the  Party  pledge,  as  follows: 

"I  pledge  firm  loyalty  to  the  best  interest  of  the  working  class  and  full  devo- 
tion to  all  progressive  movements  of  the  people.  I  pledge  to  work  actively  for 
the  preservation  and  extension  of  democracy  and  peace,  for  the  defeat  of  fascism 
and  all  forms  of  national  oppression,  and  for  the  establishment  of  Socialism. 
For  this  purpose,  I  solemnly  pledge  to  remain  true  to  the  principles  of  the 
Communist  Party,  to  maintain  its  units  of  purpose  and  action  and  to  work  to 
the  best  of  my  ability  to  fuUill  its  program.'' 

Section  4.  There  shall  be  no  mombers-at-large  without  special  permission  of 
the  National  or  State  Committee. 

Sectuin  5.  Party  members,  two  months  in  arrears  in  payment  of  dues,  cease 
to  be  members  of  the  Party  in  good  standing. 

Section  6.  Membei-s  who  are  four  months  in  arrears  shall  be  stricken  from 
the  Party  rolls.  Every  member,  three  months  in  arrears,  shall  be  officially  in- 
formed (^f  this  provision,  and  a  personal  effort  made  to  bring  such  member  into 
good  staudinj^. 

ABTICLK   IV 

Jiiitiafion  and  Dues 

Section  1.  The  initiation  fee  for  an  employed  person  shall  be  50^,  for  an 
unemployed  person,  lO^*. 

Section  2.  Dues  shall  be  paid  every  month  according  to  rates  fixed  by  action 
of  the  Party  Convention. 

Section  3.  The  income  from  dues  is  distributed  to  the  various  Party  organ- 
izations as  follows : 

a.  25  percent  to  the  Branch. 

b.  85  percent  to  the  National  Office. 

c.  The  remaining  40  percent  shall  be  distributed  between  the  respective  State, 
County,  City,  and  Section  organizations  in  accordance  with  decisions  of  the 
State  Conventions. 

article  v 

Internatlotml  Solidarity  and  Assessment 

Section  1.  Every  four  months,  all  members  of  the  Party  shall  pay  an  extra  as- 
sessment amounting  to  average  dues  payment  per  mouth  for  the  previous  four 
months,  for  an  International  Solidarity  Fund.  This  money  shall  be  used  by  the 
National  Committee  exclusively  to  aid  our  brother  Communist  Parties  in  other 
countries  sulleriiig  from  fascist  and  military  reaction. 

Section  2.  All  local  or  district  assessments,  or  collections,  are  prohibited,  except 
by  special  permission  of  the  Natio-nal  Committee.  Special  assessments  may  be 
levieu  by  the  National  Convention  or  the  National  Committee.  No  member  is 
considered  in  good  standing  unless  he  purchases  such  special  assessment  stamps. 

AETICLE  VI 
RIGHTS  ANO  DUTIES  OF  MEMBERS 

Section  1.  The  Communist  Party  of  (he  U.  S.  A.  upholds  the  democratic  achieve- 
ments of  the  American  people.  It  opposes  with  all  its  power  any  clique,  group, 
circle,  faction,  or  party,  which  conspires  or  acts  to  subvert,  undermine,  weaken, 
or  overthrow  any  or  all  institutions  of  American  democracy  whereby  the  ma- 
jority of  the  American  ijeople  have  obtained  power  to  determine  their  own  destiny 
in  any  degree.  The  Communist  Party  of  the  U.  S.  A.,  standing  unqualifiedly  for 
the  right  of  the  majority  to  direct  the  destinies  of  our  country,  will  fight  with  all  its 
strength  against  any  and  every  effort,  whether  it  comes  from  abroad  oa-  from 
within,  to  impose  upon  our  people  the  arbitrary  will  of  any  selfish  minority  group 
or  party  or  clique  or  conspiracy. 

Section  2.  Every  member  of  the  I'arly  who'  is  in  good  standing,  has  not  only  a 
right,  but  a  duty,  to  participate  in  making  (jf  the  policies  of  the  Party,  and  in  the 
election  of  its  leading  committees  in  a  manner  procided  for  in  the  Constitution. 

Section  3.  In  matters  of  state  or  local  nature,  the  Party  organizations  have 
the  right  to  exercise  full  initiative  and  to  make  decisions  within  the  limits  of  the 
general  policies  and  decisions  of  the  Party. 

Section  4.  After  thorough  discussion,  the  majority  vote  decides  the  policy  of 
the  Party,  and  the  minority  is  duty-bound  to  carry  out  the  decision. 


8802  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Section  5.  Party  members  disagreeing  with  any  decision  of  the  Party  organiza- 
tion or  Committee  have  the  right  to  appeal  that  decision  to  the  next  higher  body, 
and  may  carry  the  appeal  to  the  highest  bodies  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the 
U.  S.  A.,  its  National  Committee,  and  the  National  Co-nvention.  Decisions  of  the 
National  Convention  are  final.  While  the  appeal  is  pending,  the  decision  must 
nevertheless  be  carried  out  by  every  member  of  the  Party. 

Section  6.  In  pre-Convention  periods,  individual  I'arty  members  enjoy  unre- 
stricted rights  of  discussion  on  any  question  of  Party  policy  and  tactics,  and  the 
uork  and  future  composition  of  the  leading  committees. 

Section  7.  The  decisions  of  the  Convention  shall  be  final  and  every  Party  mem- 
ber and  Party  organization  shall  be  duty-bound  to  recognize  the  authority  of  the 
Convention  decisions  and  the  leadership  elected  by  it. 

Section  8.  All  Party  members  in  mass  organizations  (trade  unions,  farm  and 
fraternal  organizations,  etc.)  shall  work  jointly  in  a  comradely  manner  to  pro- 
mote and  strengthen  the  given  organization. 

Section  9.  It  shall  be  the  duty  of  Party  members,  within  the  democratic  pro- 
cedure of  the  organization  to  which  they  belong,  to  explain  tue  mass  policies  of 
the  Party  and  the  principles  of  Socialism,  to  endeavor  to  win  supijort  for  them, 
and  they  shall  abide  by  the  democratic  decisions  of  the  mass  organizations. 

Section  10.  All  Party  members  shall  be  required  to  belong  to  their  resi>ective 
trade  unions. 

Section  11.  All  offices  and  leading  committees  of  the  Party  from  the  Branch 
Executive  Committee  up  to  the  highest  committees,  are  elected  either  directly 
by  the  membership  or  through  their  elected  delegates.  Every  committee  must 
report  regularly  on  its  activities  to  its  Party  organization. 

Section  12.  All  Party  officers  may  be  removed  at  any  time  from  their  position 
by  a  majority  vote  of  the  body  which  elected  them. 

Section  13.  Requests  for  release  of  a  Party  member  from  responsible  posts 
can  be  granted  only  by  the  Party  organization  wliich  elected  him,  in  consultation 
with  the  next  higher  committee. 

Section  14.  No  Party  member  .shall  have  personal  or  political  relationship  with 
Trotskyites,  Lovestoneites,  or  other  known  enemies  of  the  Party  and  the  working 
class. 

ARTICLE    VII 

Structure  of  the  Parti/ 

Section  1.  The  basic  organization  of  the  Comnmnist  Party  of  the  U.  S.  A.  are 
the  shop,  industrial  and  territorial  branches. 

The  Executive  Committee  of  the  Branch  shall  be  elected  at  least  yearly  directly 
by  the  membership. 

Section  2.  The  Section  Organization  shall  comprise  all  Branches  in  a  given 
territory  of  the  city  of  State.  The  Section  territory  shall  be  defined  by  the 
higher  Party  committee  and  shall  cover  one  or  more  complete  political  divisions 
of  the  city  or  State. 

The  highest  body  of  the  Section  Organization  is  the  Convention,  or  special 
annual  Council  meeting,  called  for  the  election  of  officers,  which  shall  convene 
every  year.  The  Convention  or  special  Council  meeting  discusses  and  decides  on 
policy,  and  elects  delegates  to  the  higher  Convention. 

Between  Conventions,  the  highest  Party  body  is  the  Section  Council,  composed 
of  delegates  elected  proportionately  from  each  Branch  for  a  period  of  2  years. 
Where  Councils  do  not  exist,  the  highest  Party  body  is  the  Section  Conuuittee 
elected  by  a  majority  vote  of  the  Section  Convention,  which  also  elects  the  Section 
Organizer. 

The  Section  Council  or  Section  Committee  shall  elect  the  Section  Executive 
Committee  wiiich  is  responsible  to  the  body  that  elected  it.  Nonmembers  of  the 
Section  Council  can  be  elected  to  the  Executive  Committee  only  with  the  approval 
of  the  next  higher  committee. 

Section  3.  In  localities  where  there  is  fiiore  than  one  section  Organization  a 
City,  or  County,  Council  may  be  formed  in  accordance  with  the  I'y-Laws. 

Section  4.  The  State  Organization  shall  comprise  all  Party  organizations  in  one 
State. 

The  highest  body  of  the  State  Organization  is  the  State  Convention,  which  must 
convene  every  2  years,  and  shall  be  composed  of  delegates  elected  by  the  Con- 
ventions of  the  subdivisions  of  the  Party  or  Branches  in  the  State.  The  delegates 
are  elected  on  the  basis  of  numerical  strength. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8803 

A  Slate  Cvnumittee  of  rosulnr  aiul  altornato  nipmbevs  shall  he  elected  at  the 
State  Convention  with  full  [lower  to  earry  out  the  decisions  of  the  Convention 
and  coniiuct  the  activities  of  tlie  Party  Organization  until  the  next  Convention. 

The  State  Conimiftee  shall  elect  from  its  body  an  Executive  Committee,  which 
shall  he  responsible  to  the  State  Committee. 

Spe(  ial  State  Conventions  may  he  called  either  hy  a  majority  vote  of  the  State 
Conunittee,  or  the  written  reiiuests  of  the  branches  representing;;  one-third  of 
the  membership  of  the  State,  with  the  approval  of  the  National  Committee. 

SiXJiioN  5.  District  ()rj?anizatioiis  may  be  established  by  the  National  Com- 
mittee, covering  two  or  more  States.  In  such  cases  the  State  Committees  shall 
l)e  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  District  Committees,  elected  by  and  representing 
the  Party  oi'ganizations  of  the  States  composing  these  Districts.  The  rules  of 
convening  District  Conventions,  the  elections  of  leading  committees,  shall  be  the 
.same  as  that  provided  for  the  State  Organization. 

ARTICI-E  VIII 

XatiniKil  Orf/an ization 

Section  1.  The  supreme  authority  in  the  Communist  Party  of  the  U.  S.  A.  is 
the  National  Convention.  Regular  Conventions  shall  be  held  every  two  years. 
Only  such  a  National  Convention  is  authorized  to  make  political  and  organiza- 
tional decisions  binding  upon  the  entire  Party  and  its  membership. 

Sexttion  2.  The  National  Convention  shall  be  composed  of  delegates  elected  by 
the  State  and  District  Conventions.  The  delegates  are  elected  on  the  basis  of 
numerical  strength  of  the  State  Organizations.  The  basis  for  representation 
.shall  be  determined  by  the  National  Committee. 

Sfxtion  3.  For  two  months  prior  to  the  Convention,  discussions  shall  take 
place  in  all  Party  organizations  ou  the  main  resolutions  and  problems  coming 
before  the  Convention.  During  this  discussion  all  Party  organizations  have  the 
right  and  duty  to  adopt  resolutions  and  amendments  to  the  Draft  Resolution  of 
the  National  Committee  for  consideration  at  the  Convention. 

Sf:cnoN  4.  The  National  Convention  elects  the  National  Committee,  a  National 
Chairman  and  General  Secretary  by  majority  vote.  The  National  Committee 
shall  be  composed  of  regular  and  alternate  members.  The  alternate  members 
shall  have  voice  but  no  vote. 

Section  5.  The  size  of  the  National  Committee  shall  he  decided  upon  by  each 
National  Convention  of  the  Party.  Members  of  the  National  Committee  must 
have  been  active  members  of  the  Party  for  at  least  three  years. 

StX'TioN  6.  The  National  Committee  is  the  highest  authority  of  the  Party  be- 
tween Party  Conventions,  is  responsible  for  enforcing  the  Constitution,  for  se- 
curing the  execution  of  the  general  policies  adopted  by  the  democratically  elected 
delegates  in  the  National  Convention  asi^embled.  The  National  Committee  rep- 
resents the  Party  as  a  whole,  has  the  right  to  make  decisions  with  full  authority 
on  any  problem  facing  the  Party  between  Conventions.  It  organizes  and  super- 
vises the  various  departments  and  committees  of  the  National  Committee  of  the 
Party;  conducts  all  its  political  and  organizational  work;  appoints  or  removes 
the  editors  of  its  press,  who  work  r.nder  its  leadership  and  control ;  organizes 
and  guides  all  undertakings  of  importance  for  the  entire  Party;  distributes  the 
Party  forces  and  controls  the  central  treasury.  The  National  Committee,  by 
majority  vote  of  its  members,  may  call  si>ecial  State  or  National  Conventions. 
The  National  Committee  shall  submit  a  certified,  audited  financial  report  to  each 
National  ronvention. 

SiXTi  N  7.  The  National  Conunittee  elects  from  among  its  members  a  Political 
Bureau,  and  such  additional  secretaries  and  such  departments  and  committees 
as  may  be  considered  necessary  for  most  eflScieut  work.  The  Political  Bureau 
is  charged  with  the  responsibility  of  carrying  out  the  decisions  and  the  work  of 
the  National  Committee  between  its  fidl  sessions.  It  is  responsible  for  all  its 
decisions  to  the  National  Committee.  The  siz'^  of  the  Political  Bureau  shall  be 
decided  unon  by  majority  vote  of  the  National  Committee. 

Members  of  the  Political  Bureau  and  Editors  of  the  Central  Party  organs 
must  liave  been  active  members  of  the  Party  for  not  less  than  five  years. 

The  National  Committee  shall  ni<»et  at  least  once  in  four  months. 

The  Polhureau  of  the  National  Conmiittee  shall  meet  weekly. 

The  National  Committee  may,  when  it  deems  it  neces.sary,  call  Party  Con- 
frences.     The  National  Committee  shall  have  full  power  to  decide  on  the  basis 


8804  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

of  attendance  of  sucli  Conferences.     Such  Conferences  shall  be  consultative  bodies 
auxiliary  to  the  National  Committee. 

AKTICXE  IX 

National  Control  Commission 

Seotton  1.  For  tlie  purpose  of  maintaining  and  strengthening  Party  unity  and 
discipline,  and  of  supervising  the  audits  of  the  tinancial  books  and  records  of  the 
National  Committee  of  the  Party  and  its  enterprises,  the  National  Committee 
elects  a  National  Control  Commission,  consisting  of  the  most  exemplary  Party 
members,  each  of  whom  shall  have  been  au  active  Party  member  for  at  least 
five  years. 

The  size  of  the  National  Control  Conunission  shall  be  determined  by  the 
National  Committee. 

Section  2.  On  various  disciplinary  cases,  such  as  violations  of  Party  unity, 
discipline  and  ethics,  or  concerning  lack  of  class  vigilance  and  Communist  flrm- 
ness  in  facing  the  class  enemy,  or  of  spies,  swindlers,  double-dealers,  and  other 
agents  of  the  class  enemy — the  National  Control  Commission  shall  be  charged 
with  making  investigations  and  decisions,  either  on  appeals  against  the  decisions 
of  lower  Party  bodies,  or  on  cases  which  are  referred  to  it  l»y  the  National 
Committee,  or  which  the  National  Control  Committee  itself  deems  necessary 
to  take  up  directly. 

Section  3.  The  decisions  of  the  National  Control  Commission  shall  go  into 
effect  as  soon  as  their  acceptance  by  the  National  Committee  or  its  Political 
Bureau  is  assured. 

Section  4.  Members  of  the  National  Control  Commission  shall  have  the  right 
to  participate  in  the  sessions  of  the  National  Conmiittee  with  voice  but  no  vote. 

Section  5.  Meetings  of  the  National  Control  Commission  shall  take  place  at 
least  once  every  month. 

article  X 

Disciplinary  Procedure 

Section  1.  Breaches  of  Party  discipline  by  individual  mmebers,  financial 
irregularities  as  well  as  any  conduct  or  action  detrimental  to  the  Party's  pres- 
tige and  influence  among  the  working  masses  and  harmful  to  the  best  interests 
of  the  Party,  may  be  punished  by  censure,  public  censure,  removal  from  re- 
sponsible posts,  and  by  explusion  from  the  Party.  Breaches  of  discipline  by 
Party  Committees  may  be  punished  by  removal  of  the  Committee  by  the  next 
higlier  Party  Committee,  wliich  shall  then  conduct  new  elections. 

Section  2.  Charges  against  individual  members  may  be  made  by  any  person — 
Party  or  non-Par ty — in  writing,  to  the  Branches  of  the  Party  or  to  any  leading 
committee.  The  Party  Branch  shall  have  the  right  to  decide  on  any  disciplinary 
measiu'e,  including  exjilusion.  Such  action  is  subject  to  final  approval  by  the 
State  Committee. 

Section  3.  The  Section,  State,  National  Committee,  and  National  Control 
Commission  have  the  right  to  hear  and  take  disciplinary  action  against  any 
individual  member  or  organization  under  their  jurisdiction. 

Section  4.  AU  parties  concerned  shall  have  the  fullest  right  to  appear,  to 
bring  witnesses,  and  to  testify  before  the  Party  organization.  The  member 
punished  shall  have  the  right  to  appeal  any  disciplinary  decision  to  the 
higher  committees  up  to  the  National  Convention  of  the  Party. 

Section  5.  Party  members  found  to  be  strike-breakers,  degenerates,  habitual 
di'unkards,  betrayers  of  Party  confidence,  provocateurs,  advocates  of  terrorism 
and  violence  as  a  method  of  Party  procedure,  or  members  whose  actions  are 
detrimental  to  the  Party  and  the  working  class,  shall  be  summarily  dismissed 
from  positions  of  responsibility,  expelled  and  exposed  before  the  general  public. 

article    XI 

Affiliation 

Section  1.  The  Communist  Party  of  the  U.  S.  A.  is  affiliated  with  its  fra- 
ternal Communist  Parties  of  other  lands  through  the  Communist  International, 
participates  in  International  Congresses,  through  its  National  Committee. 
Resolutions  and  decisions  of  International  Congresses  shall  be  acted  upon  by 
the  supreme  authority  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  U.  S.  A.,  the  National 
Convention,  or  between  Conventions,  by  the  National  Committee. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8805 

ARTICLE   XII 

Amvnding  of  Constitution 

Section  1.  This  Constitution  can  be  amended  by  a  majority  vote  of  the 
delegates  of  the  National  Convention,  if  the  Aiuondnient  has  been  published 
in  the  Party  press  or  Discussion  Bulletins  of  the  National  Committee  at  least 
30  days  prior  to  the  Convention. 

ARTICLE  xni 

By-Latcs 

Section  1.  By-Laws  shall  be  adopted,  based  on  this  Constitution,  for  the  pur- 
pose of  establishing  uniform  rules  and  procedure  of  the  proper  functions  of 
the  Party  Or.uanizatious.  By-Laws  shall  be  adopted  or  changed  by  majority 
vote  of  the  National  Convention,  or  between  Conventions  by  majority  vote  of 
the  National  Committee. 

Section  2.  State  By-Laws  not  in  conflict  with  the  National  Constitution 
and  By-Laws,  may  be  adopted  or  changed  by  majority  vote  of  the  State  Con- 
ventions, or  between  conventions  by  majority  vote  of  the  State  Committee. 

article   XIV 

Charters 

Skction  1.  The  National  Coniniittee  shall  issue  Charters  to  State,  County, 
aiid  City  Oi'ganizations,  defining  the  territory  over  which  they  have  jurisdic- 
tion and  authority. 

Draft  of  Ruls:s  and  By-Laws,  C.  P.,  U.  S.  A. 

The  following  are  the  Rules  and  By-Laws  adopted  by  the  Communist  Party 
of  the  United  States  of  America,  in  accordance  with  its  Constitution,  for  the 
purpose  of  applying  the  Principles,  Rights,  and  Duties  as  established  in  the 
Constitution  in  a  uniform  manner  in  all  Party  Organizations. 

basic  organizations 

The  basic  organizations  of  the  Communist  Party  of  the  U.  S.  A.  are  the  shop, 
industrial,  and  territorial  branches.  A  shop  branch  consists  of  those  Party 
members  who  are  employed  in  one  place.  Shop  branches  shall  be  organized 
in  every  factory,  shop,  mine,  ship,  dock,  office,  etc.,  where  there  is  a  sufficient 
number  of  Party  members,  but  no  less  than  seven. 

Industrial  branches  shall  consist  of  Party  members  employed  in  the  same 
trade  or  industry ;  they  shall  be  composed  of  those  Party  members  who  are 
employed  in  places  where  shop  branches  have  not  yet  been  formed.  Industrial 
branches  shall  organize  shop  branches  wherever  possible. 

A  territorial  branch  consists  of  members  of  the  Party  living  in  the  same 
neighborhood  or  territory.  Territorial  branches  shall  be  organized  on  the  basis 
of  the  political  division  of  the  city  or  town  (assembly  district,  ward,  precinct, 
election  district,  town,  or  township,  etc.). 

Every  branch  of  the  Party  shall  elect  an  Executive  Committee,  which  shall 
consist  of  at  least  the  following  oflicers :  chairman,  treasurer,  educational 
director,  membership  director.  The  size  of  the  Executive  Committee  shall 
be  determined  by  the  size  of  the  branch,  but  shall  not  be  less  than  four. 

The  Executive  Committe  has  the  duty  of  preparing  the  agenda  and  pro- 
posals for  the  membership  meeting,  administering  and  executing  the  decisions 
of  the  membership  and  the  higher  Party  connuittee,  and  between  branch  meet- 
ings, to  make  decisions  concerning  matters  which  require  immediate  action. 
The  Executive  Committee  of  the  Branch  shall  report  regularly  of  its  work, 
which  shall  be  subject  to  review  and  action  of  the  meml)ership. 

Regular  election  of  branch  officei-s  shall  take  place  at  least  yearly,  but 
not  more  than  twice  a  year.  All  oflicers  shall  be  elected  by  majority  vote  of 
the  membership,  at  a  specially  notified  meeting.  Officers  may  be  replaced  by 
majority  vote  of  fhe  branch  membership  at  any  time,  with  the  approval  of  the 
higher  Party  committee. 

Financial  statements  shall  be  submitted  to  the  branch  by  the  Executive 
Committee  at  least  quarterly. 


8806  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

The  order  of  business  at  the  branch  meeting  shall  include  the  following:  (a) 
reading  of  minutes  of  previous  meeting;  (b)  dues  payments  and  initiation  of 
new  members;   (c)  report  of  Executive  Committee: 

1.  Check-up  on  decisions  (old  business)  ; 

2.  Assignments  and  tasks,  reports  on  communications,  literature  and  press 
(new  business)  : 

(d)   good   and  welfare;    (e)    regular  educational  discussion    (educational   dis- 
cussion can  be  moved  to  any  point  on  the  order  of  business). 

One-third  of  the  branch  membership  shall  constitute  a  quorum. 

Branches  shall  meet  at  least  once  in  every  two  weeks. 

SECTION    ORGANIZATIONS 

Delegates  to  the  Section  Convention  shall  be  elected  by  all  branches  in  pro- 
portion to  their  membership.  The  basis  of  representation  shall  be  decided  upon 
by  the  Section  Committee  in  consultation  with  the  higher  Party  Committee. 

Any  delegate  to  the  Section  Council  may  be  recalled  by  a  majority  vote  of 
his  branch.     The  Section  Council  meets  regularly  once  a  month. 

The  Section  Council  shall  m-ake  a  report  at  least  once  in  three  mouths 
to  the  general  membership  meeting  of  the  Section. 

The  Section  Council  shall  submit  financial  reports  to  tlie  branches  and  to 
the  higher  Party  Committee,  at  least  once  in  three  months. 

CITY  OR  COUNTY  ORGANIZATIONS 

In  cities  where  there  is  more  than  one  Section  Organization,  a  City  Council 
may  be  formed  by  the  election  of  delegates  either  from  the  Section  Councils  or 
directly  from  the  branches.  The  role  of  this  form  of  organization  is  to  coor- 
dinate and  guide  the  work  on  a  city-wide  scale,  and  shall  actively  participate 
in  or  .supervise  Party  activity  in  all  public  elections  and  civic  affairs  within  its 
territory. 

The  City  Council  elects  from  among  its  members  a  City  Executive  Committee 
with  the  same  rights  and  duties  as  the  Section  Executive  O^mimittee. 

The  State  Committee  has  the  right  to  form  County  Councils  with  the  same 
rights  and  duties  on  a  county  scale  as  the  City  Council  has  on  a  city  scale. 

The  structure  of  the  County  Organization  shall  be  the  same  as  the  City 
Council. 

STATE  OR  DISTRICT  ORGANIZATION 

For  two  months  prior  to  the  Convention,  discussion  shall  take  place  in  all 
Party  organizations  on  the  main  resolutions  and  problems  coming  before  the 
Convention.  During  this  discussion,  all  Party  organizations  have  the  right 
and  duties  to  adopt  resolutions  and  amendments  to  the  Draft  Resolutions  of  the 
State  Committee,  for  consideration  at  the  Convention. 

Only  members  who  are  at  least  two  years  in  the  Party  can  be  eligible  for 
election  to  the  State  Committee.  Exceptions  can  be  made  only  by  Conventions, 
The  size  of  the  State  Committee  shall  be  decided  upon  by  the  Convention,  in 
consultation  with  the  National  Committee. 

The  State  Committee  shall  meet  at  least  once  in  every  two  months.  It  shall 
elect  from  its  b(jdy  an  Executive  Committee  to  function  with  full  power,  and 
shall  be  responsible  to  the  State  Committee. 

The  State  Conunittee,  by  a  majority  vote  of  its  members,  may  replace  any 
regular  member  who  is  unable  to  serve  because  of  sickness  or  other  assign- 
ment, or  who  is  removed  from  office.  New  regular  members  shall  be  chosen 
from  among  the  alternate  members  of  the  State  Committee. 

An  auditing  conunittee,  elected  by  the  State  Committee,  shall  examine  the 
books  of  the  State  Financial  Secretary  every  month.  A  Certified  Public  Ac- 
countant shall  audit  these  books  at  least  once  a  year,  and  his  report  shall  be 
presented  to  the  State  Coniniittee  and  Conventions. 

Special  State  Conventions  may  be  called  by  a  majority  vote  of  the  State  Com- 
mittee, or  by  the  National  Committee. 

Upon  the  written  request  of  branches  representing  one-third  of  the  member- 
ship of  the  State  Organization,  the  State  Committee  shall  call  a  special  State 
Convention. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  §807 

The  call  for  a  Special  Convention  shall  be  subject  to  the  approval  of  the 
National  Committee. 

The  State  Committee  shall  have  the  power  to  establish  an  official  organ  with 
the  approval  of  the  National  Committee. 

The  State  Committee  shall  conduct  or  supervise  Party  activity  in  all  public 
elections  and  state-wide  public  affairs  within  the  State. 

The  State  Committee  shall,  if  it  deems  it  necessary,  appoint  a  Disciplinary 
Connnittee  with  the  task  of  hearing  disciplinary  cases,  and  report  their  findings 
and  reconnnendations  to  the  State  Committee. 

QUAOFICAIIONS    lOK    OIXEGATES    TO   CONVENTIONS 

Delegates  to  the  State  Convention  must  be  In  good  standing  and  have  been 
nienibt>rs  of  the  Party  for  at  least  one  year. 

Delegates  to  the  National  Convention  must  be  in  good  standing  and  have 
been  member.^:  of  the  Party  for  at  least  two  years. 

In  special  cases,  the  latter  qualitications  (length  of  time  in  Party)  may  be 
waived,  but  only  with  the  approval  of  the  leading  committee  involved  (Na- 
tional Connnittee  for  the  Natnmal  Convention,  State  Committee  for  the  State 
Convention). 

BATES    OF    DI^ES 

The  initiative  fee  for  an  employed  person  shall  be  500;  for  an  unemployed 
person  100. 

Dues  shall  be  paid  every  month  according  to  the  following  rates: 

a.  Housewives,    unemployed    and    all    membe|rs    earning    up    to    $47.00    a 

month — pay  lOc'  a  month. 

b.  All  members  earning  from  .$47.(i6  to  $112.00  inclusive,  per  month — ^pay 

500  a  month. 

c.  All  members  earning  from  $112.66  to  $160.00  inclusive,  per  month — pay 

$1.00  a  month. 

d.  Members  earning  $160.00  and  over  per  mouth,  pay.  besides  the  regular 

dues,  additional  dues  at  the  rate  of  500  for  each  $10.00  or  fraction 
thereof. 

Dues  are  receipted  for  by  dues  stamps  issued  by  the  National  Committee. 

TRANSFERS    AND   LEAVES    OF    ABSENCE 

Members  who  move  from  one  place  to  another,  and  have  to  go  from  one 
branch  to  another,  shall  obtain  transfers  from  their  branches.  No  member 
shall  be  accepted  by  the  new  branch  without  a  properly  fllled  out  transfer 
card.  Before  receiving  transfers,  members  shall  be  in  good  standing  and  pay 
up  all  other  financial  obligations  to  their  branches.  If  a  member  transfers 
from  one  section  or  city  organization  to  another,  a  duplicate  transfer  card 
shall  be  transmitted  through  the  State  or  District  Committee.  If  a  member 
transfers  from  one  state  or  district  to  another,  this  shall  be  recorded  in  the 
membership  book,  and  a  duplicate  transfer  card  shall  be  sent  through  the 
National  Committee. 

Menibei-s  of  the  Party  whfi  desire  to  leave  the  country,  and  to  go  to  another 
country,  mu.st  obtain  the  permission  of  the  National  Committee  of  the  Party. 

No  member  has  a  right  to  take  a  leave  of  absence  without  the  permission 
of  this  branch.  Leaves  of  absence  not  exceeding  one  month  may  be  granted 
by  the  branch.  An  extended  leave  of  ab.sence,  upon  the  recommendation  of 
the  branch,  is  acted  upon  by  the  next  higher  committee  of  the  Party.  Before 
a  leave  of  absence  is  given  the  member  shall  pay  dues,  and  settle  his  financial 
obligations  up  to  and  including  the  end  of  the  leave  of  absence  period. 

Discussion  BxnxETiN 
P.  O.  Box  87,  Station  D,  New  York,  N.  Y. 


gg08  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Workers  School 

35  E.  12th  St.,  N.  Y.  C.     Tel.:  Algonquin  4-1199 

A.  Markoff,  Director 

SCHOLARSHIP 

Date 

Tlie has  assigned 

(Name  of  organization) 

Name to  take 

the  following  courses  at  the  Workers  School : 

at  the  scholarship  rates  of  $2.50  for  each  political  course  and  .$3  for  English. 
Enclosed  find  $ covering  the  total  tuition  fee  for  the  above-mentioned 

courses. 

Signed 

Secretary 


Address 
The  total  tuition  fee  with  this  credential  must  be  presented  by  the  student  when 
he  comes  to  register.     All  blank  spaces  must  be  filled  in  by  the  secretary,  as 
indicated,   Scholarships  are   for  political  courses  only.     They  do  not  apply  to 
Russian  and  Spanish. 

(Union  label  224) 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  may  proceed  with  the  witness,  Dr.  Matthews, 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  I  show  you  a  collection  of  19  pages 
of  photostatic  copies  of  handwritten  notes.  Can  you  identify  those 
documents  as  among  the  material  which  you  obtained 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  case  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matihews.  I  offer  these  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  will  be  received. 

(The  19  pages  referred  to  above  were  marked  "Birmingham  Ex- 
hibit No.  46.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  it  is  my  personal  opinion  that  these 
documents  are  as  conclusive,  if  not  more  so,  than  any  other  material 
in  the  entire  collection.  It  has  been  verified  that  these  notes  are  in 
the  handwriting  of  Nancy  Reed.  I  will  read  you  some  of  the  matters 
from  the  first  page. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  Just  a  minute;  just  for  the  record,  how  has  it  been 
verified  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  By  checking  her  handwriting  on  her  i^assport  and 
other  documents,  which  are  undeniably  her  personal  documents  in  her 
own  handwriting. 

Mr.  VooKHis.  I  see. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  first  item  on  this  page  is  "Letter  from  Brown, 
congratulations,-'  the  fourth  item  is  "Workers'  School,"  the  fifth 
item  is  "New  Members,  8  P.  M."  In  parentheses  "8  Party  Mem- 
bers," I  would  assume  that  could  mean. 

"Dues;  Manifesto;  C.  P.  stand  on  Roosevelt;  Next  week  Spain," 
and  then  some  undecipherable  material. 

On  the  third  page  there  appears  "Party  affairs."  That  is  one 
of  the  items  listed.  "Daily  Worker  Quota"  is  another  of  the  items — 
"recruiting  on  Lenin  Day"  is  one  of  the  items  discussed.  "Frac- 
tion meeting,  books  for  next  discussion — Stalinism — the  Party,  shop 
papers." 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8809 

111  otluT  woid^,  Mr.  Chairman,  there  are  hundreds  of  references 
liere  to  matters  which  can  only  have  reference  to  the  Communist 
Party.  Tliese  are  apparently  minutes  of  some  kind  taken  in  the 
liandVritiuij:  of  Nancy  Reed.  It  AA'ould  be  my  own  interpretation 
of  the  material  that  this  was  a  fraction  meeting  of  the  union  to 
which  Miss  Reed  belonged  and  which  she  is  known  to  be  a  func- 
tionary— the  State,  Municipal,  and  County  Workers  Union.  In 
other  words,  this  is  a  meeting  of  the  members  of  the  Communist 
Party  who  were  also  in  the  local  union. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  there  isn't  anything  in  there  that  definitely 
says  that  that  is  what  it  is,  is  that  right? 

Mr.  MArriiEws.  The  deduction  which  I  base  that  statement  on 
is  that  there  are  these  numerous  references  to  Communist  Party 
matters  and  then  also  union  matters,  such  as  civil-service  status, 
which  would  be  a  subject  which  would  beFong  directly  in  the  field 
of  the  State,  Municipal,  and  County  Workers  Union,  and  since  we 
do  know  that  Miss  Reed  is  an  official,  in  fact,  the  vice  president  of 
her  local,  that  is  Local  28,  is  it  not,  Mr.  Birminghani? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Mati'hews.  Of  the  State,  Municipal,  and  County  Workers 
of  America,  it  would  appear  to  me  that  these  are  minutes,  at  least 
most  of  them  are  minutes,  which  she  made  of  the  Communist  Party 
fraction  of  that  particular  union.  But,  at  any  rate,  the  connection 
with  the  Comnumist  Party  is  unmistakable  and  certainly  not  acci- 
dental. 

Among  the  names  listed  frequently  in  these  minutes  is  the  name 
of  McLaughlin. 

In  the  effects  of  Nancy  Reed  which  the  committee  obtained,  there 
are  receipts  for  dues  for  Communist  Party  membership  made  out 
to  Ann  McLaughlin.  There  is  that  bit  of  evidence  and  other  evi- 
dence which  seems  to  show  that  Nancy  Reed's  party  name  is  "x^nn 
McLaughlin." 

Mr.  Birmingham,  you  have  examined  these  documents.  I  have 
just  made  the  statement  that  it  would  appear  from  various  pieces  of 
evidence  in  these  documents  that  the  Party  name  of  Nancy  Reed  is 
■'Ann  McLaughlin."  Would  that  be  your  judgment,  based  on  your 
knowledge  of  these  documents? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  had  information  and  was  told  that  that  was 
her  party  name  and  the  number  of  her  card. 

I\Ir.  Matthews.  And  in  addition  to  that  you  have  information 
which  includes  the  number  of  her  party  membership  book? 

Ml-.  Birmingham.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  that  information  obtained  by  a  person  who 
handled  the  party  membership  book  of  Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  was  in  her  possession. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Was  in  this  person's  possession  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  the  number  of  the  book  was  taken  down  and 
the  book  was  made  out  to  Ann  McLaughlin;  is  that  correct? 

]\Ir.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  ]VIatthews.  Will  you  please  read  that  into  the  record  ? 

Mr.  Birihingham.  The  book  was  made  out  to  Ann  McLaughlin, 
Communist  Party,  1940,  No.  5281,  branch  40-S,  signed  "Israel  Amter." 


8810  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  A-m-t-e-r  ? 

Mr.  BiR]MiNGHAM.  Yes ;  secretary,  assembly  district  12. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Before  you  get  away  from  these  minutes,  are  these  the 
original  minutes? 

Mr.  Matthews.  These  are  minutes  in  the  handwriting  of  Nancy 
Reed. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  documents  you  handed  me  before — these  are 
original  documents  of  which  you  have  no  photostatic  copies? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  They  are,  as  far  as  I  know. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  should  be  careful  of  those  documents,  because 
they  contain  information  that  will  get  us  somewhere.  It  is  the  first 
time  we  have  gotten  hold  of  documents  showing  membership  by  num- 
ber. I  notice  these  documents  deal  with  the  growth  and  composition 
of  the  Communist  Party  for  the  year  1936,  1937,  and  1938,  giving  the 
registered  number,  shop  units,  industrial  units,  neighborhood  branches ; 
number  of  Negroes  estimated  or  actually  are  given  here. 

Mr.  Mason.  Is  that  for  a  State  or  the  Nation  as  a  whole? 

Mr.  Starnes.  "The  tenth  party  convention."  That  must  mean  for 
the  Nation  as  a  whole.  It  does  deal  with  it  as  a  whole  because  it  gives 
here  the  number  in  the  A.  F.  of  L.  as  8,987  and  for  the  C.  I.  O.  16,509 ; 
members  in  the  AVorkers'  Alliance,  5,929. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  that  is  exactly  the  proportion  that 
Earl  Browder  testified  to.  He  said  there  were  about  twice  as  many 
Communist  members  in  the  C.  I.  O.  as  in  the  A.  F.  of  L. 

Mr.  Starnes.  "Native,  14,743  in  1936  and  in  1938.  30,165."  It  shows 
foreign  born,  23,847  in  1938.  It  shows  for  1938  in  the  party  for  1  year 
or  less,  26,806,  which  would  indicate  a  tremendous  growth  at  that  time. 
The  second  page  indicates  that  the  State  having  the  most  Negi-o  mem- 
bers was  New  York  State,  with  22,060,  and  California  second  with 
4,739,  while  the  State  of  Alabama  had  581. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  They  haven't  as  many  people  in  Alabama. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  want  to  ask  something  for  my  own  information. 
This  keeps  speaking  here  about  the  work  in  the  "foreign  field,"  and  it 
speaks  here  in  a  review  about  the  need  for  unity  and  says : 

la  the  Midwest  the  Farm  Holiday  Association  and  in  the  South  Sharecroppers 
Union  united  with  tlie  National  Farmers  Union  last  year. 

Where  I  said  "foreign"  it  should  be  "farmers."    It  continues : 

Independent  groups  in  New  York,  Louisiana,  and  California  are  being  urged  to 
unite  with  the  Farmers  Union. 

I  am  wondering  if  that  means  the  National  Farmers  Union,  that  has 
been  in  existence  for  many  years,  or  is  it  another  sort  of  farm  organi- 
zation bearing  that  name  which  the  Communist  Party  claims  to  control 
or  have  a  dominant  voice  in  ? 

Mr.  VooRHis.  If  I  could  interpose — this  is  1938,  which  is  the  first 
thing  to  be  remembered,  and  you  will  recall  ]\Ir.  Browder's  testimony 
and  a  number  of  other  people  whom  we  had  before  our  committee,  was 
to  the  effect  that  they  were  attempting  to  form  a  great  political  union 
with  all  sorts  of  organizations  and  kinds,  and  these  are  outfits,  I  take 
it,  that  they  are  attempting  to  make  use  of  in  such  a  way  as  they  can 
in  connection  with  that  sort  of  political  line,  and  I  also  believe  that  it 
is  true  that  there  is  an  organization  that  calls  itself  the  Farmers'  Union 
which  is  not  the  Farmers'  Educational  and  Cooperative  Union. 


UN-AMERICAN  PKOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8811 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  what  I  am  trying  to  get  straight. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  But  has  more  or  less  prostituted  tlvit  name. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Prostituted  the  name  and  calls  itself  the  National 
Farm  Union. 

j\Ir.  VooRHis.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  was  the  point  the  Chair  is  trying  to  get  straight 
in  his  mind. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  committee's  files  are  rather  full  on  that  subject, 
Mr.  Chairman,  and  I  think  you  will  find  this  is  the  situation:  About 
10  years  ago  the  Connnunist  Party,  through  two  of  its  leading  mem- 
bers, Hal  Ware,  one  of  the  sons  of  ]\Iother  Bloor,  who  had  spent  some 
years  in  the  Soviet  Union,  and  Lem  Harris,  set  up  an  organization 
which  they  called  just  the  Farmers'  Union. 

In  the  Daily  Worker  of  that  period,  for  example,  the  Farmers' 
Union  in  various  places,  and  I  would  assume  it  in  most  cases  didn't 
have  a  half  dozen  members,  would  nevertheless  make  a  public  endorse- 
ment of  the  Communist  Party  candidates  for  public  office.  In  other 
words  the  evidence  is  quite  clear  that  that  particular  Farmers'  Union 
was  set  up  by  the  Connnunist  Party  and  was  simply  a  front  for  the 
Communist  Party  in  view  of  these  endorsements  w^hich  it  made. 

Mr.  Starnes.  But  it  has  not  part  and  ])arcel  with  the  Farmers' 

Mr.  VooRHis.  The  right  name  for  the  thing  that  is  commonly  called 
the  Farmers'  Union  of  America  is  the  Farmers'  Educational  and  Co- 
operative Union  of  America. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Yes;  but  this  organization  was  known  officially  as 
the  Farmers'  Union  and  I  would  assume  was  the  oraauization  re- 
ferred to  in  these  minutes,  because  the  Sharecroppers'  Union  of  Ala- 
bama was  a  distinctly  Communist  Party  affair  as  contrasted  with  the 
Southern  Farmers'  Tenant  Union  which  was  organized  largely  by 
Socialists  and  which  was  not 

Mr.  YooRHis.  Which  was  not  Communist  ? 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  That  is  correct ;  which  was  not  Communist. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  notice  it  speaks  of  the  Coughlinites  were  eliminated 
from  leadership  in  the  Alabama  Farmers'  Union  and  that  they  suffered 
defeats  in  Ohio  and  Pennsylvania. 

^Nlr.  Matthews.  There  are  references  in  some  of  these  documents 
to  Father  Coughlin  which  shoAv  there  was  some  anxiety  on  the  part 
of  some  of  the  correspondents  of  Nancy  Reed  that  the  Coughlinite 
influence  was  growing  in  some  of  the  party  organizations,  which 
would  be  exactly  in  line  with  what  you  find  there. 

Mr.  VooRHis.  What  is  that  ? 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  That  the  Coughlinite  influence  was  growing  in 
party  organizations. 

Mr.  YooRHis.  That  is  too  much  for  me. 

^Iv.  Starnes.  It  is  i-eferred  to  in  this  document. 

Mr.  Matthews.  These  corres])ondents  wei-e  at  least  alleffinir  that 
the  Coughlinites  were  trying  to  bore  from  wnthin  the  Comnumist 
Party. 

Mr.  Starnes.  That  is  correct.  You  will  find  reference  to  that  in 
these  mimites  here  of  the  central  committee. 

We  will  recess  now  until  2  o'clock  this  afternoon. 

(Whereupon,  at  12:20  p.  m..  the  committee  recessed  until  2  p.  m., 
I  lie  same  day.) 


8812  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

AFTERNOON  SESSION 

(The  committee  met  at  2  p.  m.) 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  committee  will  resume  its  session. 

You  may  proceed,  Dr.  Matthews.  ] 

TESTIMONY  OF  STEPHEN  BIRMINGHAM— Resumed 

Mr.  Matitiews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  I  show  you  a  photostatic  cop^ 
oi  a  letter  and  ask  you  to  identify  that.  Was  that  among  the  papers 
that  you  obtained  by  subpena? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  letter  addressed :  "Nancy,  me  darlin',  how 
are  you?"  It  is  signed  "Anna,"  and,  Mr.  Chairman,  Anna  has  not 
been  i^lentified.  On  the  original  the  signature  is  in  a  red  pencil  and 
in  parentheses  after  the  signature  in  the  same  handwriting,  the 
author  of  the  letter  said,  "red  pencil  anyway."  The  letter  reads  as 
follows : 

Nancy,  me  darlin',  how  are  you?  Write  and  tell  me  what  you  are  doing,  and 
what  the  New  York  news  is.  I  was  working  for  the  capitalists  at  the  Guaranty 
Trust,  where  Jerry  worked,  but  this  job  is  so  much  better,  and  more  inter- 
esting. 

How  is  Johnny?  And  your  mother?  And  Mary? — but  mostly  yourself, 
Nancy?  You  lead  such  an  exciting  life  that  I  know  you  don't  have  much  time. 
But  in  between  causes,  drop  a  line  to  your  old  friend,  who,  though  on  the  other 
side  of  the  fence,  still  loves  you. 

Old  Prexy  Roosevelt  seems  to  have  shifted  over  to  your  side  from  mine, 
the  heretic!  And  people  say  Father  Coughlin  has  gone  red,  so  it's  all  mixed 
up!  I  don't  try  to  figure  it  out,  honestly!  I'll  let  you  go  .in  for  the  causes, 
and  let  me  know  what's  what. 

Do  you  come  to  dear  old  Beantown?  Don't  fail  to  call  me  up  or  I'll  be 
disappointed.  Parkway  4673-M,  and  the  address  is  91  Anawan  Avenue,  West 
Roxbury — you  know,  the  next  step  up  for  the  Irish  after  Dorchester. 

Write  soon,  will  you? 

Fond  regards, 

Signed  Anna  (red  pencil  anyway). 

Mr.  Chairman,  I  think  the  significance  of  that  letter  is  to  be  found 
in  several  places  in  this  material,  namely,  that  Nancy  Eeed's  friends 
have  known  for  years  that  she  was  connected  with  the  Communist 
movement. 

Mr.  Starnes.  In  other  words  you  think  the  purpose  of  the  letter 
would  disclose  the  fact  that  she  is  known  to  be  a  Communist  even 
by  those  who  are  not  Communists  and  this  is  a  link  in  the  cham  ? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes.     And  I  offer  that  letter  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  letter  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  47.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  we  have  here  a  collection  of 
documents;  can  you  identify  those? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  is  a  letter  from  Kit,  addressed 
"Dear  Nan,"  from  1136  Logan,  Denver,  Colo. 

Mr.  Birmingham,  have  you  been  able  to  identify  "Kit,"  the  author 
of  this  letter  as  Kit  Bowler? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  this  letter  Kit  Bowler,  writing  to  Nan  from 
Denver,  Colo.,  states  that  she  is  enclosing  with  the  letter  a  report 


UN- AMERICAN  PllOPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8813 

to  Nancy  on  the  Cono-ress  Ao-ainst  War  and  Fascism,  which  was  held 
in  Cliica<i().  And  this  is  a  nine-page  typewritten  report  which  was 
with  the  letter  you  obtained? 

Mr.  BnjMiNGHAM.  It  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes;  attached  to  it. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Now,  a  part  of  the  significance  of  these  two  docu- 
ments is  this,  IMr.  Chairman :  The  letter  is  addressed  "Dear  Nan"  and 
the  letter  itself  states  that  a  report  of  the  congress  is  being  sent  to 
Nan,  but  tile  report  itself  is  addressed  to  Ann  McLaughlin,  which 
would  be  further  evidence  that  Ann  McLaughlin  is  the  party  name  of 
Nancy  Reed. 

This  report  is  on  the  Congress  Against  War  and  Fascism,  which 
was  held  in  Chicago  in  September  and  October  1934. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Any  particular  significance  to  the  report? 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  report  is  a  very  detailed,  single-spaced,  type- 
written nine-page  report  on  that  congress  and  the  Communist  influence 
in  the  congress  to  Nancy  Reed,  That  is,  this  is  one  of  many  reports 
found  in  the  effects  of  Nancy  Reed  which  seem  to  indicate  that  she 
for  some  reason  or  other  was  the  recipient  officially  of  reports  on  Com- 
munist activities  in  various  parts  of  the  United  Srates. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Dr.  Matthews,  what  is  the  significance  of  that? 
Would  it  tend  to  show  that  Nancy  Reed  was  a  high  functionary  of 
the  Communist  Party  or  she  wouldn't  be  receiving  such  reports? 

iMr.  ^Matthews.  Air.  Chairman,  Mr.  Birmingham  testified  this 
morning  and  it  is  also  my  conclusion,  drawn  from  all  this  evidence, 
that  these  documents  show  conclusively  by  their  nature  and  contents 
that  Nancy  Reed  Avas  and  is  a  very  high  functionary  of  the  Com- 
munist Party,  and  particularly  when  you  couple  that  with  the  fact 
that  she  was  burying  these  documents  where  she  believed  they  would 
be  in  safe  keeping.  They  were  not  being  deposited  in  a  vault  of  a 
bank  but  were  being  buried  rather  unusually,  under  the  porch  of 
the  ancestral  home  in  Cape  Cod,  Mass. 

I  shall  read  one  or  two  sentences  from  the  letter: 

So,  I  enclose  my  report  on  the  really  marvelous  congress.  *  *  *  xhe  im- 
portant tiling  is  the  questionnaire  against  war  which  you  have  probably  received 
from  the  section  or  from  the  League  vs.  War  and  Fascism  direct. 

Now,  in  the  language  of  the  Communist  Party  that  must  refer  to 
the  section  of  the  party  which  was  in  charge  of  that  kind  of  a  front 
organization. 

The  roinnnmist  Party  ran  away  with  the  convention  as  far  as  hard  work, 
honor,  and  reward  went.  You  can  get  mimeographed  copies  of  many  of  the 
Sfieeches  from  the  league,  I  think. 

And  then  the  report  follows. 
The  end  of  the  letter  states : 

My  very  best,  if  rather  late,  regards  to  you  and  my  comrade  friends,  fraternally, 
Kit. 

I  offer  these  in  evidence,  if  the  chairman  please. 

Mr.  v'^tarxes.  They  will  be  received. 

(The  documents  referred  to  were  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  48.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  can  you  identify  these  two  docu- 
ments as  among  the  papers  which  you  obtained  ? 


8814  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  can;  yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Cliairman,  here  is  a  photostat  copy  of  a  receipt 
for  dues  paid  to  the  Communist  Party.  The  receipt  is  made  out 
"May  9,  1939,  to  Ann  McLaughlin."  It  is  marked  "S.  F.,"  which  in 
party  parhince  refers  to  tlie  solidarity  fund,  one  section  of  the  dues 
paid  by  members  of  the  Communist  Party  into  the  party  treasury. 

The'number  of  the  receipt  is  95653-A  and  is  for  $16.25.  Three  dol- 
lars of  it  is  allocated  to  the  solidarity  fund  and  $13.25  to  Spain. 

This  receipt  was  attached  to  a  letter,  was  it  not,  Mr.  Birming- 
ham ^ 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Signed  by  C.  Oumansky,  the  Soviet  Ambassador 
for  the  United  States,  and  addressed  to  Mrs.  Ferdinanda  W.  Reed, 
Sandwich,  Cape  Cod,  Mass. 

This  is  on  the  letterhead  of  the  Embassy  of  the  Soviet  Socialist 
Republics,  dated  June  27,  1939. 

I  think  Mr.  Birmingham  and  I  are  not  able  to  offer  any  reason- 
able explanation  as  to  why  the  Soviet  Ambassador  should  be  re- 
turning to  Ferdinanda  W.  Reed,  the  mother  of  Nancy  Reed,  a  Com- 
munist Party  receipt  made  out  to  Ann  McLaughlin,  but  nevertheless 
the  fact  is  that  that  was  done. 

Have  you  any  interpretation  of  that,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  No  ;  none  other  than  what  you  said. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  oifer  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  receipt  and  letter  referred  to  were  marked  "Birmingham 
Exhibit  No.  49.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  We  do  know,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  from  time  to 
time  the  party  members  use  their  dues  receipts  as  means  of  identi- 
fication and  it  would  be  possible  we  would  ask  Miss  Reed  that 
if  she  were  here,  whether  or  not  her  party  dues  receipt  was  sent 
to  the  Soviet  Ambassador  in  order  to  identify  her  as  a  member 
in  good  standing  of  the  Communist  l^irty  in  this  country  for  pur- 
poses of  going  to  the  Soviet  Union,  inasmuch  as  the  letter  of  the 
Ambassador  refers  to  a  trip  to  tlie  Soviet  LTnion.  That  is  among 
the  possibilities. 

Can  you  identify  that  document,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  i3iRMiNGHAM.  I  caii. 

Mr.  Matthews.  As  one  of  the  papers  you  obtained? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  is  a  letter  signed  "T.  H.  Wintringham''  and 
is  addressed  to  "Dear  Comrade  North." 

This  was  among  the  effects  of  Nancy  Reed.  The  "Comrade 
North"  referred  to  here,  is  Joseph  North,  as  revealed  in  a  large 
part  of  the  correspondence  which  you  obtained,  Mr.  Birmingham? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  just  why  Joseph  North's  correspondence,  in 
part  at  least,  was  in  the  possession  of  Nancy  Reed,  we  are  again 
able  to  guess  only  that  she  must  have  been  the  custodian  of  im- 
portant party  records. 

Joseph  North  has  been  an  editor  of  the  New  Masses  and  a  promi- 
nent Connnunist  Party  member,  publicly  avowed  as  such  for  a  long 
period  of  years. 


UN-AMKUICAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIKS  8815 

The  v.  H.  AA'intiin<>h;ini,  the  signer  of  the  letter,  was  a  high  Coni- 
niunist  Party  fiuictiouarv  in  Great  Britain,  j)i-ior  to  the  outbreak 
of  the  war  and  is  now  reported  to  be  in  the  United  States,  having 
taken  up  permanent  residence  here. 

At  the  time  of  the  writing  of  this  letter,  Wintringham  was  in 
Albacete,  Spain.  He  is  writing  to  Joseph  North  from  Spain.  He 
.says  in  part: 

You  are  the  only  member  of  tlie  C  P.  U.  S.  A.  with  wIkhh  I  have  corre- 
spoiuU'd  ;  that  is  why  I  write  to  yon  to  ask  your  lielp  in  ^t'tting  f(U"  my  fripud, 
Kitty  llciwlor.  ilie  letter  of  i-ecomuiendatioii  from  the  Party  Central  Com- 
mirtee  that  ^^he  needs. 

She  applied  to  join  the  Spanisli  C.  P.  in  January,  and  was  told  all  for- 
eigners aijplying  nuist  have  a  letter  from  their  home  party.  This  necessary 
formality  is  strictly  ol)served  here.  Letters  to  the  United  States  have  been 
misunderstood  and  I  hope  you  can  hiu'ry  up  the  O.  K.  which  must,  however, 
of  cc)urse,  be  sent  by  hand. 

Comrade  Bowli'r,  whom  1  have  known  since  September  of  last  year,  when  we 
met  in  Barcelona,  has  been  doing  excellent  work  here  as  a  .iournalist  and  in  other 
ways.  People  develop  (luickly  in  a  revolutionary  situation-  such  as  this  is  and 
show  their  qualities  clearly.  I  worked  closely  with  Kitty  when  myself  a  jouruiil- 
ist.  touring  the  Aragon  front  with  her  for  ten  days.  When  I  joined  the  Inter- 
national Brigade  (I  commanded  the  Anglo-Irish  Battalion  for  a  short  time  and 
am  now  being  nursed  by  Kitty  through  typhoid)  she  worked  for  the  Manchester 
(Juardian  in  Valencia,  and  I  have  had  good  rep(n'ts  of  her  woik. 

You  have  already  identified  Kitty  Bowler  as  the  author  of  this 
report  sent  from  Denver,  Colo.,  to  Xancy  Reed,  have  you  not,  Mr. 
Birmingham? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  So  next  we  find  Kitty  Bowler  in  Albaceta,  Spain, 
and  a  functionarj-  of  the  British  Conmumist  Party  writing  to  Joseph 
North  to  get  her  credentials  to  enter  the  Communist  Party  of  Spain, 
and  the  correspondence  is  in  the  hands  of  Nancy  Reed,  which  again, 
Mr.  Chairman,  is  an  indication  that  we  have  here  a  pattern  showing 
her  unquestioned  affiliation  with  the  Connnunist  Party. 

I  offer  this  in  evidence.  . 

]Mr.  Stahxes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  letter  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  50.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  can  you  identify  that  document  ? 

]Mr.  Birmingham.  I  can. 

Mr.  ]\Iatthew^s.  This  is  a  letter  addressed  to  "Dear  Nan."  and 
signed  with  the  single  letter  "B." 

Mr.  Birmingham,  have  you  been  able  from  other  letters  in  this  file 
to  identify  the  author  of  tliis  particular  letter? 

Mr.  BnjMiNGiiAM.  Yes;  that  is  Beth  McHenry. 

Mr.  jNIatthews.  And  who  is  Beth  McHenry  f 

Ml-.  BufMiNGHAM.  The  wife  of  Blackie  Meyers  of  the  Maritime 
Union. 

^Iv.  Matthews.  That  is  Frederick  N.  Meyers,  who  is  known  as 
Blackie  Meyers? 

Mr.  Bnj.AJiNGiiAM.  Yes.  sir. 

Mr.  MvnHEWs.  And  Beth  McHenrv  is  also  a  featm-e  writer  for  the 
Daily  Worker? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes,  sir, 

Mr.  Matt^hews.  And  has  been  such  for  a  period  of  years? 

JMr.  Birmingham.  Riffht. 

62626—41 — vol.  14 42 


8816  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Mr.  Matthews.  This  letter  from  Beth  McHenry,  addressed  to  "Dear 
Nan,"  reads :  "A  full  report  on  party  activities  in  Birmingham  and  the 
South" — It  appears  that  Beth  McHenry  is  on  a  tour  of  tlie  South  and 
is  reporting  to  Nancy  Reed.  The  letter  begins:  "Sunday  afternoon 
in  Birmingham." 

I  offer  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  letter  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  51.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  can  you  identify  that  as  another 
of  the  documents  which  you  obtained  in  this  collection  of  material? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  can. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  here  is  the  second  letter  which  has 
been  identified  for  the  record  from  the  same  party,  this  time  signed 
with  the  typewriter,  "BE.,"  and  addressed  to  "Dear  Nan,"  which  also 
deals  with  Birmingham. 

I  offer  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  letter  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  52.") 

]\fr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  collection  of  documents.  Can  you 
identify  these  as  a  part  of  the  material  which  you  obtained? 

Mr.  I3irmingham.  I  can. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  these  are  letters  from  High  Point, 
N.  C.  All  of  them  are  from  High  Point,  N.  C.,  and  addressed  to 
Nancy  Reed,  in  New  York,  and  most  of  them  are  signed  "Red,"  but 
some  of  them  are  signed  with  a  typewriter  "K.  Y.  Hendrix." 

We  know  from  previous  testimony  before  this  conmniittee,  particu- 
larly by  Fred  Beale,  that  K.  Y.  Hendrix  was  one  of  the  defendants  in 
the  Gastonia  murder  trial  some  3'ears  ago  and  that  he  was  known  as 
"Red  Hendrix." 

Presumably  the  letters  signed  "Red,"  from  High  Point,  N.  C,  are 
from  K.  Y.  Hendrix.  In  fact,  one  of  that  at  the  top  is  lieaded  "K.  Y. 
Hendrix.  Higli  Point,  N.  C,  Box  304,"  and  then  is  signed  "Red." 

These  letters  are  in  the  form  of  reports  on  strike  activities  in  North 
Carolina — strike  activities  of  recent  date. 

Hendrix  was  convicted  and  went  to  the  Soviet  Union  and  then  came 
back  and  served  a  part  of  his  term  in  the  penitentiary  in  North  Caro- 
lina and  was  paroled  and  is  now  again,  according  to  these  letters, 
engaged  in  Connnunist  Party  activities  at  High  Point,  and  is  making 
repoi'ts  to  Nancy  Reed,  in  New  York. 

This  letter  reads : 

My  dearest  friend :  Will  drop  yon  a  line  to  let  you  know  I  am  still  kicking. 
Weli,  how  is  all  the  comrades  in  the  sity.  Give  them  my  hest  regards.  What 
ahout  our  friend,  Beale.  Wasn't  he  a  rotten  skunk.  Well,  Nan,  I  have  quit 
drinking.  I  hav  not  taken  a  drink  in  a  long  time.  I  am  trying  to  do  sompthin 
worthwhile. 

We  have  a  very  good  branch  hear  we  have  a  office  hear  in  High  Point  and 
we  ar  trying  to  rase  some  money  to  git  started  off  with.  I  am  sending  you  a 
collection  list  and  will  you  bee  so  kind  as  to  try  to  git  us  some  help. 

Will  rite  you  again  just  as  soon  as  I  liear  from  you. 

Love,  forever.  Red. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8817 

In  the  second  letter  from  Red,  marked  "K.  Y.  Hendrix"  at  the  top  of 
the  letter,  is  addressed  : 

"Dear  Sweet  (iirl."  The  letter  thanks  Nancy  for,  or  at  least  the 
recipient  of  the  letter,  for  some  money  which  has  been  sent  down,  and 
this  statement  appears : 

You  git  ill  touch  with  Grnco  Hutclioii  and  make  her  help  you  rase  some  money 
for  this  district,  and  you  call  up  Sophey  Melvin  and  ask  her  to  donate  some  to 
this  district.  She  is  Si  Gerson's  wife  and  she  noes  how  hard  it  is  to  gitt  along 
down  hear. 

Mr.  Chairman,  (irace  Hutchon  has  been  identified  as  the  treasurer  of 
the  Communist  Party  in  New  York,  and  Sophey  Melvin  is  here  identi- 
fied in  the  letter  as  the  wife  of  Simon  Gerson. 

Another  letter  also  is  a  request  for  funds,  and  then  a  letter  says: 

Dear  Nan  :  Red  has  turned  over  to  our  committee  the  money  which  you  sent 
in  which  is  $500. 

This  is  signed  "Comradely  yours,  W.  S.  Helems,  secretary," 
"Red"  is  described  as  "Comrade  Red"  in  the  letter  and  it  would  ap- 
pear from  this  that  in  one  remittance  at  least  Nancy  Reed  had  sent 
$500  for  this  work  in  High  Point,  N.  C. 

Another  letter  from  Red  to  Nan  that  asks  her  for  money  that  was 
sent  down  to  save  the  hall  as  the  rent  was  due  the  day  the  money  ar- 
rived.    However,  Mr.  Hendrix  writes  in  this  letter : 

If  you  can  git  nie  a  job  I  will  come  to  the  city  to  stay.  The  rest  of  it  I  am 
gitting  tired  of  working  like  hell  all  the  time  and  never  having  a  dime  for 
nothing. 

Another  letter  from  Red  to  Nancy  reports  on  a  strike  at  one  of  the 
mills  in  High  Point,  and  still  another  letter  from  Red  to  Nancy,  dated 
January  9,  1939.  thanks  her  for  $10  that  she  sent  down  for  the  opening 
up  of  a  party  office  in  High  Point.  I  am  not  reading  these  letters  into 
the  record,  Mr.  Chairman, 

Here  is  another  letter  from  K.  Y.  Hendrix  to  "Dear  Nancy,"  which 
reports  on  the  .strike  at  the  Adams  &  Millas  Hosiery  Miir;  another 
letter  transmitting  a  clipping  from  a  newspaper  in  High  Point  to 
"Dear  Nan."     I  otfer  these  in  evidence. 

]Mr.  Starxes.  They  will  be  received. 

(The  letters  referred  to  were  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit  No. 
53.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  I  show  3'ou  some  documents  that 
relate  to  Cuba  and  Nancy  Reed's  activities  in  Cuba.  Can  you  identify 
those  as  among  the  documents  which  you  obtained  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  first  document  here  is  a  ])hotograph  of  a  parade 
in  Havana  and  in  the  center  of  the  parade  is  shown  Nancy  Reed 
marching. 

I  offer  that  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

yir.  St.mjxes.  It  will  l)e  received. 

(The  photograph  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  54.") 

Mr.  Matthew.s.  The  second  document  is  an  official  'lelegate's  cre- 
dentials is.sued  to  Nancy  Reed  as  the  representative  of  the  State, 


§g][g  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

County,  and  Municipal  Workers  of  America,  Local  28,  affiliated  with 
the  C.  I.  ().,  showing  Nancy  Reed,  to  be  an  accredited  delegate  to  the 
National  Congi-ess  of  Workers  meeting  in  Havana  on  January  23, 
1939. 

These  credentials  are  in  Spanish  and  the  translation  is  appended. 

I  offer  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  55.") 

INIr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  will  you  identify  this  document? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  whose  handwriting  is  that  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Nancy  Heed's. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  is  a  note  in  the  handwriting  of 
Nancy  Reed  on  the  letterhead  of  the  National  Congress  of  Workers,  to 
which  Miss  Reed  was  an  accredited  delegate  in  Havana,  and  her 
description  of  that  congress  is  as  follows : 

Oh,  how  I  wish  you  could  be  here,  here  In  this  hall  of  1,(XI0  delej;ates  of  workers 
from  all  over  the  Island  of  Cuba.  As  I  sit  here  on  the  platform  the  hall  is  seeth- 
ing with  honest  faces — all  colors  from  light-skinned  Spanish  to  dark  negro.  The 
air  is  warm,  the  sky  is  blue.  The  serious  atmosphere  of  attention  to  all  the  prob- 
lems of  so  many  industries,  principally  sugar,  tobacco,  and  shipping.  Just  now  a 
strong  clear  eyed  man  came  up  to  the  platform  and  the  microphone  announced 
him,  and  he  gave  the  clenched  fist  salute.  About  %  of  tlie  delegates  are  C.  P. 
and  are  openly  recognized  as  such. 

I  offer  that  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  56.") 

Mr.  ]\1atthews.  Another  document  also  on  the  stationery  of  the 
National  Congress  of  Workers  in  Havana  is  an  address  of  greeting  to 
the  congress.  That  may  have  been  a  memorandum  of  Miss  Reed's  own 
remarks  to  the  congress.     At  least  it  was  in  her  file. 

I  offer  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  57.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  can  you  identify  Eddie  Gordon? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  He  is  a  Communist  leader  of  the  Maritime  Work- 
ers Union  in  Havana,  Cuba. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Does  this  material  disclose  that  Nancy  Reed  and 
Eddie  Gordon  have  had  contact  with  each  other? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Quite  a  good  deal  of  it. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  Mr.  Birmingham,  I  show  you  a  memorandum  on 
Eddie  Gordon  and  ask  if  that  is  a  factual  statement  which  is  the  result 
of  your  investigation? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  again  a  document  entitled :  "Communist 
Party  Courier  and  Transmission  System"  and  ask  you  to  identify 
that  document? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  was  written  by  Eddie  Gordon. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Written  by  Eddie  Gordon  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 


I  X-AMEIUCAX  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8819 

Mr.  Mattiikws.  Mv.  Cliairnian,  T  ask  that  these  documents  be 
niarkod  for  identification  in  this  proceedino-. 

Mr.  Stakxf.s.  Without  objection  it  is  so  ordered. 

(The  documents  referred  to  are  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  58.") 

INIr.  Matthews.  Ecklie  (lordon  is  identified  as  a  prominent  Coni- 
numist  in  the  Cuban  Conununist  movement,  particuUirly  connected 
with  the  shippino;  industry. 

Mr.  BiKiMixc.iiAM.  INIaritime  industry  and  also  a  courier  of  the 
party,  deliverino-  messages  back  and  forth  between  the  United  States 
and  Cuba 

Mr.  Mati'hews.  And  in  close  touch  with  Nancy  Reed. 

INIr.  Birmingham.  Without  ])assports  or  anything  else. 

Mr.  JSIatthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  I  would  like  to  ask  you  at  this 
time  if  you  have  confidential  information  of  indisputable  character  to 
the  effect  that  Nancy  Eeed,  prior  to  the  outbreak  of  war  between 
Germany  and  Russia,  was  tipping  off  information  concerning  the 
.sailing  of  convoys  to  Great  Britain^ 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  have. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  think  that  is  perhaps  as  significant 
a  piece  of  information  as  you  could  have.  This  woman  whose  Com- 
munist connections  are  shown  to  have  covered  a  period  of  some  20 
years  is  known  to  have  been  engaged  in  very  definite  espionage  activi- 
ties within  the  past  few  weeks,  involving  the  sailing  of  convoys  from 
this  country  to  Great  Britain. 

In  that  connection,  Mr.  Birmingham,  do  you  know  whether  or  not 
certain  individuals  have  been  apprehended  by  the  British  Govern- 
ment and  taken  off  ships,  individuals  known  to  have  had  contact  with 
Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Bir^viingham,  That  is  my  understanding. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  have  been  so  informed  by  authoritative 
sources  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes;  reliable  sources. 

Mr,  Matthews.  We  have  a  letter  addressed  to  "Dear  Nancy"  from 
Havana,  Cuba,  and  signed  "Eddie,"  which  reads  as  follows : 

Received  .your  letter  and  hei'e  is  something  else  for  you.  Because  of  the  cool 
response  of  the  C.  I.  O.  Maritime  groups,  and  because  of  a  letter  received  here 
from  ftlathew  Woll  of  the  A.  F.  of  L.,  the  plionies  have  succeeded  in  convincing 
tlie  groups  to  nial<e  preparation  to  visit  the  states  and  see  Green  and  also  Ryan 
of  the  New  York  Longshoremen.  I  liave  been  afraid  of  this  all  along  and  now 
it's  come  out,  although  I've  been  asked  to  come  along  with  them  I  really  don't 
know  what  I  can  do.  Please  see  Al  Lannon  and  give  him  this  information. 
God  damnit,  after  all  our  work,  it  now  does  seem  like  sabotage  on  our  part, 
because  where  we  did  not  even  send  an  official  letter  wishing  them  success  the 
A.  F.  of  L.  did,  now  that  does  look  bad.     See  what  you  can  do. 

P.  S. :  If  you  get  back  before  my  report  gets  to  Lannon  tell  him  that  one  is 
on  its  way. 

It  is  signed  "Eddie." 

I  offer  this  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  59.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  AI  Lannon  has  been  identified  as  a  Comnmnist 
Party  member  openly,  having  been  a  candidate  for  the  Communist 


8820  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Party  ticket  in  New  York,  and  as  being  one  of  the  Connnunist  Party 
leaders  in  tlie  National  Maritime  Union. 

This  letter  in  the  handwriting  of  Eddie  Gordon  discloses  that  Nancy 
Reed  is  in  touch  with  Al  Lannon.  It  may  be  observed,  Mr.  Chairman, 
that  Al  Lannon's  fears  about  the  A.  F.  of  L.  taking  over  the  shipping 
union  were  unfounded.  The  National  Maritime  Union  did  succeed  in 
handling  the  situation  to  the  satisfaction  of  Eddie  Gordon  as  expressed 
in  this  letter. 

Another  letter  to  Nancy  Reed  from  Eddie  Gordon,  signed  in  his 
own  handwriting  reads  in  part  as  follows : 

I  would  appreciate  it  very  mucli  if  you  talk  to  Blackie  Myers  or  somebody  up 
there  and  really  explain  the  importance  of  maintaining  what  we  have  done 
down  here,  and  push  for  a  convention  of  all  labor  on  the  American  Continent, 
then  and  only  then  can  we  really  have  Continental  Solidarity  and  pan-American 
unity  capable  of  checking  world  reaction  against  the  workers  and  the  Democratic 
peoples  of  the  New  World. 

He  has  in  parentheses :  "This  sounds  good.     I'll  have  to  use  it  in  my 
next  speech." 
He  continues : 

Oh,  yes,  before  I  forget.  I  received  a  letter  from  Joe  Lewis  and  he  asked  me 
to  write  to  you  and  explain  the  why  and  wherefore  of  his  not  coming  up  to  see 
you. 

Can  you  identify  this  Joe  Lewis  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  don't  know  who  Joe  Lewis  is. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  not  "the"  Joe  Lewis  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  It  is  not  the  pugilist,  is  it  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  No. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  Joe  Lewis  here  has  not  been  identified. 

Gordon  continues: 

It  is  not  because  he  does  not  want  to.  He  tells  me  that  after  what  you  done 
for  him  he  would  rather  cut  off  his  right  arm  than  to  have  you  think  that  way, 
but  because  Teddy  thinks  that  he  has  an  ulterior  motive  is  the  reason  why  he  is 
staying  away. 

I  see,  Mr.  Chairman,  that  gets  into  a  personal  angle. 

I  offer  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  is  so  ordered. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  60.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  other  words,  there  are  two  Lewises  involved  in 
the  life  of  Miss  Reed  and  they  are  both  referred  to  in  this  particular 
section  of  the  letter. 

Mr.  Birmingham,  will  you  explain  these  two  documents? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  a  letter  from  the  Communist  leader  of 
the  Maritime  Union,  Juan  Arevelo. 

Mr.  Matthews.  These  two  documents,  these  two  j^hotostatic  copies 
of  penciled  notes  appear  to  be  from  Juan  Arevelo,  a  Communist 
leader  of  the  National  Maritime  Union  in  Cuba,  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  offer  these  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  They  will  be  received. 

(The  documents  referred  to  were  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  61.") 


UN-AMKKICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8821 

Mr.  Matthews.  jNIr.  Binnin<ihani,  do  you  have  reason  to  believe 
Miss  Reed  has  been  api)rehensive  lest  tlie  facts  which  these  docu- 
ments disclose  become  known — do  you  have  reason  to  believe  Miss 
Reed  has  been  fearful  this  information  was  goin*;  to  get  out  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  What  do  you  mean — at  this  time? 

Mr.  Matihev/s.  Yes. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  don't  think  she  had  any  idea  it  would  ever 
get  out  the  way  it  was  planted. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Well,  I  show  you  a  little  document  and  ask  you 
if  that  is  a  photostatic  copy  of  a  letter  which  had  been  torn  up? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

INIr.  Matthews.  And  which  came  from  the  effects  of  Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Not  of  these  documents.  This  refers  to  her 
troubles  in  the  State  Welfare  Department  and  with  William  R. 
Heai'st. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  this  letter  is  addressed  "Mother,*' 
and  is  dated  March  4,  1941.     It  is  signed  by  "N."    . 

Is  this  the  handwriting  of  Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.  Bir^iingham.  Yes;  and  it  was  in  her  effects. 

Mr.  Matthews  (reading:) 

The  time  has  come.  Dirty  W.  Hearst's  reporters  are  phoning  me  and  my 
office  to  know  if  you  are  my  mother !  I  haven't  met  with  them  yet,  but  am 
waiting  for  "good  advice"  right  now. 

It  cannot  be  helijed  and  what  will  be  will  he.  I  will  keep  you  informed ; 
but  I  wouldn't  be  your  daughter  if  I  were  afraid  of  the  futiu"e. 

Got  to  "Anise"  last  night,  but  she  had  no  news  of  Mary  at  all. 

It  is  signed :  "Love,  N." 

This  is  dated  IMarch  4,  1941. 

Mr.  Birmingham,  you  have  testified  that  Nancy  Reed  is  the  daugh- 
ter of  Ferdinanda  Reed,  one  of  the  owners  of  the  Daily  Worker? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Correct. 

jNIr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  whether  or  not  Ferdinanda  Reed 
disclosed  the  identity  of  her  children  to  the  press  at  the  time  she 
became  one  of  the  owners  of  the  Daily  Worker  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  didn't  disclose  Nancy.  She  did  her  daugh- 
ter Mary.     She  said  nothing  about  her  son  or  Nancy  Reed. 

Mr.  IVIatthews.  You  have  gone  into  the  press  reports  of  the  time 
and  find  when  the  reporters  asked  her  about  it,  she  stated  to  the  press 
that  she  had  a  child,  Mary,  in  Moscow,  but  said  nothing  about  Nancy 
or  her  sou  Williard.  Junior? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  right,  except  it  was  Leningrad  at  that 
time. 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  I  ofl'er  this  in  evidence. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received, 

(The  letter  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  62.") 

Mr.  ^Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  here  are  four  more  documents 
that  relate  to  Nancy  Reed's  visit  to  Cuba.  Can  you  identify  those  as 
documents  which  you  obtained? 

Mr.  Bir:mingha:m.  I  can. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  first  of  the  documents  is  a  memorandum  on  the 
Principal  American  Monopolist  Companies  and  Their  Investments 
in  Cuba;  the  second  is  a  report  addressed  to  the  secretary  of  the 
Syndicate  of  AVorkers  of  the  Cuban  Mining  Co. ;  the  next  is  a  letter 


8822  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

addressed  to  '"Dear  Nancy"  and  sit^ned :  "Domiiifro  J    Ziiniga,  409 
Menocal  Avenue,  Havana,  Cuba." 
The  letter  reads : 

You  will  excuse  me  because  I  didn't  answer  you  as  soou  as  you  wish.  I  were 
so  busy  not  only   working  for  myself  but  doing  some  working  for  the   Party. 

I  suppose  Dorothy  Rehm  are  seeing  you  already.  I  did  all  I  could  for  her 
down  here. 

When  Gordon  left  he  told  me  he  will  go  to  see  you.  I  recommended  him  tell 
you  send  with  him  a  good  fountain  pen  second  hand  or  new,  either ;  because 
you  know  here  are  to  expensive.  I  ask  you  that  like  comrade.  I  don't  use  to 
do  that.     In  case  you  want  an.ything  from  Havana  let  me  know  it. 

My  best  regards  for  yoiu-  dear  Ted  and  from  you  all  the  warm  from  my 
heart. 

That  is  signed :  "Sincerely  yours,  Domingo  J.  Zuniga,  409  Menocal 
Avenue.  Habana,  Cuba." 

Do  you  know  wliether  or  not  Dorothy  Kehm  has  been  identified, 
Mr.  Birmingham  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  She  is  an  employee  of  the  Division  of  Place- 
ment, Unemployment  Insurance,  New  York  State  Department  of 
Health. 

Mr.  JNIatthews.  I  offer  these  photostats  in  evidence,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Staknes.  They  will  be  received. 

(The  documents  referred  to  were  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  63.") 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  You  say  she  is  an  employee  of  the  State  Depart- 
ment of  Labor  for  the  State  of  New  York  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  from  this  letter  it  would  apj^ear  that  Dorothy 
Kehm  had  visited  Cuba  and  was  given  contact  with  the  author  of 
this  letter  by  Nancy  Reed  before  she  went  down  there? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  the  author  of  the  letter  informs  Nancy  he 
has  been  busy  working  for  the  party,  and  also  makes  a  reference  to 
Gordon,  the 'Eddie  Gordon  of  the  National  Maritime  Union,  "who 
is  on  his  way  to  New  York,"  and  asks  him  to  bring  him  back  a 
fountain  pen? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Mattheavs.  Mr.  Birmingham,  did  you  ascertain  that  Nancy 
Reed  is  vice  president  of  local  28  of  the  State,  County,  and  Municipal 
Workers  of  America  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  understand  that  that  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  I  show  you  a  letter  on  the  letterhead  of  the  union 
and  ask  if  that  was  among  the  documents  which  you  obtained  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  It  was. 

Mr.  Matthews.  We  have  a  number  of  documents  here,  Mr.  Chair- 
man, Avhich  relate  to  Nancy  Reed's  activities  in  this  particular  trade- 
union,  and  Mr.  Chairman, "this  is  one  of  the  unions  affiliated  with  the 
C.  I.  O.  which  has  been  identified  before  this  committee  on  numerous 
occasions,  as  having  a  large  element  of  Coimnunist  leadership  en- 
trenched in  it. 

Here  are  Iavo  publications.  One  is  called  "The  Employment 
Worker"  and  the  other  is  entitled,  "Active  File."  The  first  is  issued 
"by  Communist  Party  members  in  the  division  of  placement  and 
unemployment  insurance."  That  is  the  Department  of  Labor  of  the 
State  of  NeAv  York. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8823 

The  second  is  issued  by  tlie  Conimnnist  Party  members  in  the  di- 
vision of  ])hicement  and  unemployment  insurance  in  the  Department 
of  Labor,  New  York  State. 

Apparently  the  comrades  changed  the  name  of  the  publication  in 
between  issues. 

These  are  shop  papers  of  which  the  Communist  Party  publishes 
hundreds  and  they  all  follow  the  same  general  pattern. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Do  you  oif er  those  as  exhibits  ? 

INIr.  INIatthews.  Yes. 

Mv.  Starnes.  Without  objection  they  atIII  be  received. 

(The  documents  referred  to  were  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  64.") 

Mv.  Matthews.  Was  this  document  obtained  by  you  from  theelfects 
of  Nancy  Reed? 

Mr.   I^IRMINGHAIM.    It  WRS. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  here  is  a  document  wliich  is  a  tabu- 
lation of  names.  It  is  divided  into  four  columns.  The  first  column 
is  the  name  of  the  individual,  the  second  column  the  office  address, 
the  third  column  is  headed  "Function  U  &  P,"  and  the  fourth  column 
is  headed  "Remarks." 

I  might  say  that  the  column  headed  "Function  U  &  P"  means  their 
union  affiliation  and  party  affiliation. 

Among  these  individuals  we  find  the  name  of  Nancy  Reed  and  her 
office  address  is  given  here  as  79  ^Madison  Avenue. 

Under  "U"  it  is  stated  "vice  president"  and  we  know  that  she  is 
vice  president  of  this  union.  Under  "P"  or  party,  it  states  "ex-officio 
bureau." 

Mr.  Birmingham,  do  you  loiow  whether  or  not  all  or  most  of  these 
individuals  named  in  this  tabulation  are  emplo3'ees  of  the  Department 
of  Labor  of  the  State  of  New  York  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  haven't  checked  to  the  present  time  but  at  that 
time  they  were. 

Mr.  Matthews.  At  which  time? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  When  this  was  made  out  and  we  figured  that 
around  1938. 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  In  other  words,  you  ascertained  that  at  the  time 
this  document  was  drawn  up  the  persons  named  therein  were  em- 
ployees of  the  Department  of  Labor  of  the  State  of  New  York? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Correct. 

Mr.  INIatthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  we  had  a  large  collection  of  minutes 
in  the  handwriting  of  Nancy  Reed  this  morning  which  appeared  to 
be  minutes  of  the  fraction  meeting  within  the  trade-union  of  the  De- 
partment of  Labor  of  the  State  of  New  York.  This  would  seem  to 
be  a  tabulation  of  the  members  of  the  fraction  in  that  union.  Most 
of  the  individuals  whose  names  appear  here  are  indicated  as  having 
party  activities,  although  some  of  them  are  said  to  have  no  party 
activity. 

Their  names  are  Morris  linger,  William  Bernstein,  Dorothy  Rehm, 
Dorothy  Baskin,  Dorothy  Ryder,  Ed  Wilde,  Nancy  Reed,  Clara  Nezin, 
Raymond  Bunin.  Al  Kramer,  Janet  Wolfe,  Lillian  Ei)stein.  Gerald 
English,  Peter  Arthur.  Rachel  Gordon,  Eve  Ott,  Ralo  Chadwick,  Rose 
Bori.skin,  Frieda  Geller,  David  Kugler.  Mary  Dworkas,  Rose  Robbins, 
Archie  Shaw,  Sam  Risk,  Anne  Slobotkin,  Louise  Guriy,  Rosalyn  Bad- 
ner,  Stella  Eberlin,  Sylvia  Tauben,  Dorothy  Martin,  Henry  Levitan, 


8824  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Joe  Baiim,  Michael  Divornitski,  John  Davis,  Franklin  Folsom,  and 
Reva  Galatz. 

Mr,  Starnes.  Dr.  Matthews,  I  understand  Mr.  Schmidt,  deputy 
commissioner  of  labor  for  the  State  of  New  York,  is  present. 

Let  me  suggest  you  hand  him  that  list  of  names  and  let  him  study 
them  and  after  a  moment  we  can  use  him  as  a  witness. 

Mr.  Matthews.  First,  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  to  offer  this  as 
an  exhibit. 

Mr.  Starnes.  It  will  be  received. 

(The  document  referred  to  was  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  65.") 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  the  last  of  the  exhibits,  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  Matthews..  These  are  the  last,  Mr.  Chairman,  and  I  can  give 
you  a  brief  explanation  as  to  what  they  contain. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  suggest  we  have  Mr.  Birmingham  identify  them, 
and  then  you  can  give  us  a  brief  resume  and  have  them  attached  as 
exhibits. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Did  you  personally  make  these  photostats,  Mr. 
Birmingham  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  did. 

Mr.  Matthews.  You  made  these  photostats  from  the  originals  which 
are  in  the  committee's  possession  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Birmingham,  of  these  remaining  documents  we 
have  numerous  references  to  front  organizations  of  the  Communist 
Party,  such  as  the  Medical  Bureau  and  North  American  Committee 
to  Aid  Spanish  Democracy,  the  Norman  Tallentire  Celebration,  the 
American  Peace  Mobilization,  and  so  forth.  Are  you  familiar  with 
these  documents? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  I  am. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  do  they  disclose  the  fact  that  Nancy  Reed  did 
have  a  certain  measure  of  connection  with  these  front  organizations 
of  i  he  Comnumist  Party  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  An  absolute  connection. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  remaining  documents  from  No.  117  to  161, 
inclusive,  have  to  do  with  Ferdinanda  Reed's  ownership  of  the  Daily 
Worker,  together  with  a  voluminous  correspondence  of  an  early  post- 
war date  between  the  Reed  sisters  on  the  one  hand  and  high  Com- 
munist Party  functionaries  on  the  other  hand,  showing  that  as  far 
back  as  the  first  World  War  these  two  young  ladies,  who  were  then 
students  at  Radcliffe  College,  had  become  engaged  in  revolutionary 
activities. 

Mr.  Birmingham,  in  that  connection  can  you  state  that  the  au- 
thors, the  Reed  sisters,  are  in  close  touch  with  Louis  Fraina? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  One  of  those  letters  says  so. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Mr.  Chairman,  Louis  C.  Fraina  was  the  first  Ameri- 
can ever  appointed  to  the  Comnmnist  International  by  Lenin  per- 
sonally immediately  after  the  World  War.  Fraina  was  the  one  Ameri- 
can member  of  the  Communist  International  at  that  time.  He  was 
at  that  time,  while  traveling  considerably  abroad,  residing  in  Boston, 
and  this  correspondence  discloses  the  fact  that  the  Reed  sisters,  who 
must  have  been  rather  young  then,  and  who  were  students  of  Rad- 
cliffe College,  were  in  close  personal  touch  with  Fraina. 


UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  8825 

This  is  the  first  Communist  book  ever  published  in  the  United 
States  which  was  written  by  Louis  C.  Fraina.  That  book  was 
published  in  1918.  Fraina  was  the  first  editor  of  the  first  Com- 
munist magazine  in  the  United  States. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  it  appear  from  the  correspondence  and  the 
documents  on  file  that  the  Reed  sisters  had  intimate  contact  with 
leaders  of  the  party  in  this  country  from  1917  or  1918,  or  from 
their  college  days  on  down  to  the  present  time? 

Mr.  Matthew^s.  From  the  earliest  days,  and  this  correspondence, 
which  is  rather  voluminous  here,  Mr.  Chairman,  does  not  show  a 
merely  casual  connection  between  the  Reed  sisters  and  these  Com- 
munist Parry  functionaries,  but  a  veiy  close  working  relationship. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  The  young  ladies  had  committed  themselves  to 
various  strike  activities  led  by  the  Communists  in  Massachusetts  and 
pledged  themselves  in  their  letters  to  revolutionize  Radcliffe  Col- 
lege, and  various  other  sentiments  of  that  sort. 

Since  that  time,  as  we  know,  their  mother,  Ferdinanda  Reed  has 
become  one  of  the  owners  of  the  Daily  Worker. 

Mr.  Starnes,  And  one  of  the  daughters  resides  in  the  Soviet 
Union  ? 

Mr.  Matthews,  That  is  correct,  Mr.  Chairman,  and  one  of  the 
letters  from  Mary  Reed  in  the  Soviet  Union  to  Nancy  Reed  in  the 
United  States  has  to  do  with  an  intended  visit  of  Ferdinanda  Reed 
to  the  Soviet  Union,  and  Mary  advises  her  sister  to  be  sure  that 
their  mother  brings  with  her  to  the  Soviet  Union  credentials  showing 
that  she  is  a  charter  member  of  the  Communist  Party. 

Mr.  BiRMiNCxHAM.  Otherwise  she  wouldn't  see  anything. 

Mr,  Matthews.  In  other  words,  if  she  brings  these  credentials 
showing  she  is  a  charter  member  of  the  Communist  Party 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  this  correspondence  shows  without  a  shadow  of 
doubt,  and  the  other  documents  you  have  on  file,  that  Nancy  Reed 
and  Mary  Reed  are  sisters? 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Starnes.  And  are  the  daughters  of  Ferdinanda  Reed  ? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  There  is  no  question  about  that.  There  are 
letters  from  the  mother  to  each  of  them. 

Mr.  Matthews,  Now,  Mr,  Birmingham,  this  morning  I  asked  you 
about  the  signer  of  a  letter,  who  signed  himself  "Len,"  Was  his  last 
name  Wincott? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  you  have  reason  to  believe  that  Len  Wincott, 
who  is  a  Communist  Party  functionary  in  England 

Mr.  Birmingham.  Scotland. 

Mr.  Matthews,  Became  the  husband  of  Mary  Reed? 

Mr,  Birmingham,  On  August  17,  1933, 

]Mr,  Matthews.  On  August  17,  1933,  he  became  the  husband  of 
Mary  Reed  in  the  Soviet  Union;  is  that  correct? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  is  correct. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  this  letter  discloses  that  fact? 

Mr.  Birmingham.  That  shows  that;  yes,  sir, 

Mr.  ]\Iatthe\v8.  That  is  a  part  of  the  record  already. 


8826  UN-AMERICAN  PROPA<]!ANDA  ACTIVITIES 

That  is  all  with  this  witness,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Your  next  witness  is  Mr.  Schmidt? 

Mr.  Matthews.  Yes. 

TESTIMONY  OF  GODFREY  SCHMIDT,  DEPUTY  COMMISSIONER,  NEW 
YORK  STATE  DEPARTMENT  OF  LABOR 

Mr.  Starnes.  Will  you  please  stand  and  raise  your  right  hand. 
Do  you  solemnly  swear  that  the  testimony  you  are  about  to  give 
will  be  the  truth,  the  whole  truth,  and  nothing  but  the  truth,  so  help 
you  God? 

Mr.  Schmidt,  Yes. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Will  you  please  give  us  your  full  name  and 
address  ? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Godfrey  Schmidt.  I  live  at  3235  Grand  Concourse 
in  the  Bronx.  I  am  deputy  industrial  commissioner  in  the  State  de- 
partment of  labor,  concentrating  on  legal  problems  there.  I  am  a 
lawyer  by  profession. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  have  you  been  connected  with  the 
department? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  I  have  been  connected  with  the  department  some  3 
years  and  4  months.     I  have  been  deputy  about  2  years  and  4  months. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Do  you  know  Nancy  Keed  ? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Yes;  t  do. 

Mr.  Matthews.  Is  she  employed  by  the  State  department  of  labor? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Technically  she  is  still  employed.  Her  dismissal 
becomes  effective  on  August  15,  she  having  had  sent  to  her  a  notice 
of  dismissal  dated  July  11. 

Mr.  Matthews.  How  long  has  she  been  employed  by  the  State 
department  ? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  As  I  recall  it,  since  about  1936. 

Mr.  Matthews.  In  what  capacity? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  As  senior  employment  interviewer. 

Mr.  Matthews.  And  as  such,  of  course,  I  presume  as  a  matter  of 
fact  that  her  reports  and  recommendations  with  reference  to  those 
who  were  applying  for  positions  would  naturally  carry  weight? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Yes.  I  am  not  too  familiar  with  the  workers  of 
the  division  of  placement  and  unemployment  insurance  because  that 
division  is  equipped  with  its  own  legal  staff  and  it  is  quite  by  accident 
that  I  have  contact  with  it,  so  I  wouldn't  be  able  to  testify  as  to  the 
exact  work  of  her  department. 

Mr.  Matthews.  But  generally  speaking,  the  nature  of  it  is  such 
as  to  help  place  people  in  different  positions? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Yes,  sir;  that  is  right. 

Mr.  Starnes.  You  heard  the  list  of  names  read  a  moment  ago  which 
purposed  to  be  members  of  a  certain  union  or  a  Communist  Party 
fraction,  who  were  employees  or  were  alleged  to  be  employees  of  the 
State  department  of  labor.  Have  you  had  an  opportunity  to  check 
the  records  since  they  were  read  or  check  the  names  ? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  I  have  read  over  that  list  but  I  haven't  had  an  oppor- 
tunity to  check  that  list  with  our  personnel  list  because  I  don't  have 
such  a  list  with  me.     The  only  names  I  was  able  to  recognize  as 


UN-AMr]RICAN  Plid'ACANDA  ACTIVITIES  8827 

present  employees  of  the  division  of  ])lacement  are  Doi-othy  Rehm, 
Dorothy  Ilyder.  Nancy  Rood,  Janet  Wolfe,  and  Halo  Chadwick. 

Mr.  Staknes.  But  you  do  Avithout  havinij;  in  your  })ossession  at  the 
present  time  the  personnel  records,  recognize  those  names  and  parties 
as  beintr  emj^loyed  by  the  State  department? 

Mr.  ScHMun'.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Stakxes.  Are  there  any  proceedings  against  Nancy  Reed  now  by 
the  State  department  of  labor  in  New  York,  and  if  so,  what  are  they 
and  under  what  authority? 

Mr.  Schmidt.  There  are  proceedings  to  prove  that  she  is  ineligible 
under  section  12-A  of  the  New  York  State  civil-service  law,  which  is 
popidarly  known  as  the  Devaney  Act.  That  act,  as  you  probably  know, 
has  for  its  i^urpose  to  denominate  as  ineligible  for  civil  service,  persons 
who  spread  and  advocate  revolutionary  doctrines;  the  violence  or  forc- 
ible or  illegal  overthrow  of  our  form  of  government,  and  also  persons 
who  foster  membei'ship  in  or  Avho  become  members  of  a  revolutionary 
I)arty  having  sucli  revolutionary  aims. 

Mr.  Starxes.  Is  it  under  the  provisions  of  that  act  that  she  is  being 
suspended  or  discharged  from  the  department,  effective  August  15? 

]\Ir.  Schmidt.  Yes,  sir.  That  is  to  say  the  notice  to  her  dated  July 
11, 1941,  charged  her  with  ineligibility  under  section  12-A  of  the  civil- 
service  law  of  the  State  of  New  York. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Thank  you  very  much,  Mr.  Schmidt.  We  appreciate 
your  responding  to  the  subpena  and  we  want  to  say  to  you  that  if  the 
committee  can  be  of  assistance  to  you  and  the  State  department  of 
New  York,  the  department  of  labor  of  New  York,  in  furnishing  you 
evidence  from  our  files  which  will  enable  you  to  employ  only  those  who 
are  interested  in  })resei'ving  the  ty})e  of  government  that  we  have  at  the 
present  time,  and  to  oust  from  positions  of  official  responsibility  and 
power  those  who  do  not  believe  in  our  form  of  government,  we  are  oidy 
too  happy  to  do  so. 

Mr.  Schmidt.  Thank  you  very  much,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  I  only  wish  that  other  States  would  adopt  such  a  law. 

I  have  advocated  such  openly,  that  the  Federal  Government  and  the 
respective  States  take  such  action  and  enact  legislation  Avhich  would 
make  it  possible  for  only  American  citizens  who  believe  in  the  Ameri- 
can foi-m  of  government  to  occupy  and  hold  positions  of  responsibility 
in  the  administrative  or  executive  branches  of  the  Government. 

Mr.  Mason.  However,  Mr.  Chairman,  as  long  as  a  State  recognizes 
the  Communist  Party  as  a  i)o]itical  party  and  permits  them  to  place 
their  candidates  on  the  ballot,  it  seems  to  me  that  that  State  cannot 
very  well,  to  be  consistent,  bar  them  from  the  ballot  as  well  as  bar  them 
from  jol)s. 

Mr.  Starnes.  Is  that  all.  Dr.  Matthews? 

Mr.  _MAT^HE;^vs.  I  would  like  to  offer  this  collection  of  documents, 
identified  by  Mr.  Birmingham  as  an  exhibit. 

Mr.  Stai;xks.  They  will  be  received. 

(The  documents  referred  to  were  marked  "Birmingham  Exhibit 
No.  66.") 

Mr.  Matthews.  That  is  all,  Mr.  Chairman. 

Mr.  Starnes.  The  comniitlec  will  remain  in  executive  session  for  a 
moment,  but  the  hearing  is  adjourned. 

(Whereupon,  at  3:30  p.  m.,  the  hearing  was  concluded.) 


[For  release  4  p.  m.  eastern  standard  time,  Tuesday,  Soptcinber  10, 1940] 

Report  of  the  Full  Committee  of  the  Special  Committee  on 
Un-American  Activities,  Congressman  Joe  Starnes  Pre- 
siding, ON  THE  Carl  Byoir  Matter 

Oil  June  6  last  this  committee  initiated  an  investigation  with 
respect  to  allegations  of  un-American  activity  which  had  been  made 
against  Carl  Byoir,  president  of  Carl  Byoir  and  Associates,  by  Wright 
Patman,  a  Member  of  Congress,  on  the  floor  of  the  House  of 
Representatives. 

The  chairman  of  the  committee,  Mr.  Dies,  appointed  Mr.  Dempsey, 
of  New  Mexico;  Mr.  Casey,  of  Massachusetts,  and  Mr.  Mason,  of 
Illinois,  as  a  subcommittee  to  investigate  the  matter.  Competent 
investigators  of  this  committee  were  assigned  to  make  a  thorough 
investigation  of  all  of  the  charges.  At  the  same  time  the  Federal 
Bureau  of  Investigation  of  the  Department  of  Justice  undertook  a 
separate  and  independent  investigation.  On  July  16,  1940,  the 
Department  of  Justice  issued  the  following  statement: 

The  investigation  by  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation  concerning  allega- 
tions against  Carl  Byoir  disclosed  no  evidence  whatsoever  that  he  has  engaged 
in  any  un-American  activity.  No  basis  for  departmental  action  has  been  found, 
and  the  case  is  regarded  as  closed. 

The  subcommittee  also  had  for  consideration  all  of  the  evidence 
presented  before  the  McCormack  committee  with  respect  to  a  con- 
tract made  by  Mr.  Byoir  with  the  German  Federal  Railroads  for  the 
promotion  of  trade  and  travel  in  1933,  which  was  canceled  by  him 
in  1935.  The  committee  does  not  believe  that  it  is  within  its  province 
to  go  behind  the  findings  of  fact  nor  the  recommendations  of  the 
McCormack  committee  in  this  matter.  The  committee,  therefore, 
has  confined  itself  to  events  subsequent  thereto.  It  might  be  men- 
tioned in  this  connection  that  the  evidence  shows  that  the  contract 
was  entered  into  for  the  promotion  of  trade  and  travel  at  a  time  when 
our  Government  was  doing  everything  possible  to  promote  trade 
relations  with  Germany. 

On  July  15,  1940,  the  subcommittee,  after  a  study  of  all  of  the  evi- 
dence, unanimously  submitted  to  the  chairman  the  following  report: 

The  subcommittee  you  appointed  to  investigate  the  charges  of  un-American 
activities  made  against  Carl  Byoir  after  carefully  going  over  the  report  by  Mr. 
Stedman  and  also  after  consulting  the  files  of  FBI  in  the  case  find  nothing  to 
justify  the  cliargps  made,  nor  any  evidence  that  could  possibly  form  a  basis  for 
such  charges.  We  therefore  find  satisfaction  in  clearing  Mr.  Carl  Byoir  of  tlie 
charges  made  against  him  and  recommend  that  a  resolution  covering  a  complete 
exoneration  of  Mr.  Byoir  be  voted  by  the  full  committee  as  soon  as  possible,  such 
resolution  to  be  based  upon  the  subcommittee's  report.  We  also  believe  in  fairness 
to  Mr.  Byoir  immediate  publicity  should  be  given  to  the  subcommittee's  findings. 

8820 


8830  UN-AMERICAN  I'ROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Subsequently,  Mr.  Patman  registered  a  complaint  on  the  floor  of 
the  House  to  the  effect  that  he  had  not  been  heard  by  the  subcom- 
mittee, although  his  charges  had  been  set  forth  in  three  addresses  on 
the  floor  of  the  House,  all  available  to  the  subcommittee.  Accord- 
ingly, Mr.  Patman  was  given  an  opportunity  to  be  heard  before  a 
meeting  of  the  full  committee  held  on  Thursday,  August  29.  He 
made  a  complete  statement  of  his  position  in  this  matter.  Mr.  Pat- 
man presented  no  new  material  evidence.  Mr.  Byoir  appeared  and 
was  examined  concerning  the  charges  made  against  him. 

The  full  committee  adopts  the  report  of  its  subcommittee  fully 
exonerating  Mr.  Byoir  of  any  charges  reflecting  on  his  Americanism 
or  loyalty  to  the  Government  of  the  United  States. 


UN-AMEniCAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  ggg  J 

The  following  coiimiunicat ions  6f  denial  and  explanation  'haVe 
been  received  by  .th<J  tomniittee  and  ai'ie  included  in  the. recprdj^tt 
this  point.  ^ 

May  30,  1941. 
Spkcial  Committehj;  to  Investigate  Un-Ameirican  AcTivi'niEs, 
House  of  Representatives,  Washington,  D.  C. 
Gentlemkn  :  Although  I  have  repeatedly  requested  that  my  name  be  removed 
from  the  mailing  lists  of  certain  organizations  now  being  investigated  by  your 
Connnittee,  I  am  still  receiving  literature  from  some  of  them  and  my  name,  there- 
fore, may  be  on  some  mailing  list.     I  am  completely  in  accord  with  the  foreign 
policy  and  national  defense  program  of  this  country  and  I  am  not  a  member  of, 
nor  do  I  wish  to  be  in  any  way  associated  with,  any  organization  or  group  which 
advocates  a  contrary  position.     Therefore,  if  my  name  appears  on  any  list  ob- 
tained by  your  Committee,  of  persons  allegedly  associated  with  such  organiza- 
tions, I  request  that  it  be  stricken  therefrom. 

Moreover,  believing  that  an  isolationist  policy  is  neither  sound  nor  moral, 
I  have  given  money  for  Chinese,  Finnish,  Spanish,  Czechslovaliian,  British,  etc., 
relief  and  have  signed  petitions  to  the  Congress  urging  an  embargo  against  all 
aggressor  nations  and  the  rendering  of  all  pos.sible  aid  to  the  victims  of 
agression. 

Very  truly  yours, 

(Signed)     Luoy  L.  Kellet, 

Mrs.  Ogdeu  A.  Kelley, 
310  East-West  Highivaij,  Chevy  Chase,  Maryland. 
Copies  to : 

Hon.  Jerry  Voorhis. 
Mr.  Laurence  A.  Welch. 


May  31,  1941. 
The  Dies  CoirMiTXEE, 

Washhigton.  D.   C. 

Gentlemen  :  The  so-called  testimony  before  The  Dies  Committee,  as  reported 
in  the  newspapers,  stated  that  I,  an  employee  of  the  Navy  Yard,  was  an  active 
member  in  the  A.  P.  M.  This  is  absolutely  untrue  and  without  any  foundation 
whatsoever.  Anyone  making  any  such  statement  to  this  effect  is  a  cowardly  and 
malicious  liar. 

People  reading  this  implicating  lie  have  already  threatened  to  cause  me  to 
lose  my  job. 

This  letter  is  intended  for  your  records. 
Yours  very  truly. 

(Signed)     Chas.  T.  Gift. 
1227  Queens  Street  NE.,  Washington,  D.  C. 


Copyright  Office, 
The  Library  of  Congress, 
Washington,  D.  C,  April  7,  lOJfl. 
Honorable  Martin  Dies,  M.  C. 

Chairtnan  of  the  Committee  on  iin-American  Activities. 

House  of  Representatives,  Washington,  D.  C. 
Del\r  Mr.  Chairman  :  About  a  year  and  a  half  ago  your  Committee  released 
information  concerning  Government  employees  who  were  allegedly  members  of 
organizations  that  practiced  un-American  activities,  and  my  name  was  included 
therein. 

I  called  at  the  oflSce  of  your  Secretary,  as  a  result  of  advice  he  gave  a  friend 
of  mine,  but  I  was  unable  to  find  him  there. 

I  have  not  done  anything  more  about  this  matter;  but  recently  I  was  advised 
to  write  you  this  letter. 

I  have  not  at  any  time  during  my  whole  life  belonged  to  any  organization  what- 
ever, social,  political,  fraternal,  or  religious,  except  my  church,  and  I  have  not 
directly  or  indirectly  niadt-  any  financial  or  other  contribution  to  any  organiza- 
tion, other  than  my  church  ;  and.  strange  as  it  may  seem,  I  do  not  belong  to  any 
auxiliary  of  my  church. 

(;l'G26 — 41 — vol.  14 4.3 


8832  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES 

Moreover,  I  have  not  directly  or  indirectly  authorized  the  use  of  my  name  in 
connection  with  any  organization  whatever,  including  organizations  that  have 
for  their  purpose  the  promotion  of  American  or  un-American  activities. 

It  is  requested  that  this  communication  be  made  a  part  of  your  record  containing 
my  name. 

Sincerely  yours, 

(Signed)     Matthew  Lyons. 


X 


I 


Mt'H 


BOSTON  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  9999  05445  2154